Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance-Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance-Member Married to Member, 7683-7686 [2020-02673]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 28 / Tuesday, February 11, 2020 / Proposed Rules Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–6283, Carissa.Adams@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (section 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5))), notice is given that a food additive petition (FAP 2310) has been filed by LANXESS Corporation, 111 RIDC Park West Dr., Pittsburgh, PA 15275. The petition proposes to amend Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in part 573 (21 CFR part 573) Food Additives Permitted in Feed and Drinking Water of Animals to provide for the safe use of calcium formate as a feed acidifying agent, to lower the pH, in complete feeds for swine or poultry. The petitioner has claimed that this action is categorically excluded under 21 CFR 25.32(r) because it is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. In addition, the petitioner has stated that, to their knowledge, no extraordinary circumstances exist. If FDA determines a categorical exclusion applies, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. If FDA determines a categorical exclusion does not apply, we will request an environmental assessment and make it available for public inspection. Dated: February 5, 2020. Lowell J. Schiller, Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2020–02664 Filed 2–10–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 9 RIN 2900–AQ37 Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance—Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance—Member Married to Member Department of Veterans Affairs. Proposed rule. AGENCY: ACTION: VA proposes to clarify implementation of sec. 642 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13), which eliminated automatic enrollment in Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) for insurable dependents who are members of a uniformed service and are automatically covered under Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI). VA proposes that khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Feb 10, 2020 Jkt 250001 a SGLI-covered member who marries another SGLI-eligible member after January 1, 2013, the date on which the FY13 NDAA was enacted, or is married to a person who becomes eligible for SGLI after January 1, 2013, may only enroll or re-enroll in or increase FSGLIspousal coverage, upon applying for such coverage and providing proof of his or her spouse’s good health. Further, VA proposes not to require a SGLI covered member to apply or provide proof of good health for a member spouse or for a member dependent child to continue FSGLI coverage in force at the time the spouse or dependent child became a SGLI eligible member. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 13, 2020. ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https:// www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to: Director, Office of Regulation Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1064, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026. (This is not a toll-free telephone number.) Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AQ37— Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance—Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance Regulation Update—Member Married to Member.’’ Copies of comments received will be available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1064, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment. (This is not a toll-free telephone number.) In addition, during the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Weaver, Department of Veterans Affairs Insurance Center (310/290B), 5000 Wissahickon Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19144, (215) 842–2000, ext. 4404. (This is not a toll-free number.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Veterans’ Survivor Benefits Improvements Act of 2001 (‘‘2001 Act’’), Public Law 107–14, sec. 4, 115 Stat. 25, originally created FSGLI, which provides automatic coverage for spouses and dependent children of SGLIcovered members. The FSGLI automatic coverage provisions were created to simplify the process for obtaining FSGLI coverage during deployment. The 2001 Act provides for free, automatic dependent coverage for children in the amount of $10,000, which cannot be PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 7683 declined or reduced so long as the member carries SGLI. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(2), (a)(3)(A)(iii), (a)(3)(B); 1969(g)(1)(A). In addition, the 2001 Act prohibits requiring proof of good health for a child. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(c). FSGLI dependent child coverage is effective from the latest of the applicable dates enumerated under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(5)(A)–(D) and (F), which refers to the date a child becomes an insurable dependent, namely the date of birth, date of adoption, or the date of entrance into the member’s household, and this coverage remains effective for as long as the member maintains SGLI coverage or until the child no longer qualifies as an insurable dependent. In contrast, automatic FSGLI-spousal coverage requires payment of premiums and can be declined or reduced by the member to less than the $100,000 statutory maximum as long as the spousal coverage is equal to or less than the amount of SGLI coverage held by the member. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(2)(B), (a)(3). Once a member declines or reduces FSGLI-spousal coverage, or when a spouse eligible for FSGLI coverage is otherwise not insured under FSGLI, an application and proof of the spouse’s good health is required to elect, reinstate, or increase coverage. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(c). FSGLI-spousal coverage is effective from the latest of any of the applicable dates enumerated under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(5)(A)–(D) and (E), which refers to the date of marriage of the spouse to the member. However, the automatic coverage provisions of the 2001 Act caused the unintended consequence of creating debts for servicemembers when lags occurred in updating personnel records to reflect changed marital status, i.e., in the case of marriage. Such delays created premium debts requiring the member to pay back premiums for automatic FSGLI-spousal coverage in force prior to the branch of service receiving notification of the member’s marriage. In other words, a member was required to pay premiums for automatic spousal coverage, even if it meant paying retroactive premiums for a covered period during which the branch of service was unaware of the member’s marriage. In a case in which a member married another member, since each married member was responsible to pay any retroactive premiums associated with FSGLI-spousal coverage for the other, the impact on multiple-member families was magnified. The FY13 NDAA, sec. 642, 126 Stat. 1632, 1783, was signed into law on January 2, 2013, to address the problem of premium debts, at least in multiple- E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM 11FEP1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS 7684 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 28 / Tuesday, February 11, 2020 / Proposed Rules member families, by eliminating automatic FSGLI coverage for insurable dependents who are also members of a uniformed service. Section 642 eliminated automatic FSGLI enrollment for any insurable dependent covered under SGLI based on his or her own member status. The term ‘‘insurable dependent’’ includes a child as well as a spouse. See 38 U.S.C. 1965(10)(A) and (B). However, current law does not address certain issues, such as what happens to FSGLI coverage of a spouse or dependent child who later becomes a member, i.e., whether existing FSGLI coverage continues for a member’s spouse or dependent child who is insured under FSGLI at the time he or she becomes a member; whether a member can obtain or increase FSGLI coverage for a spouse or dependent child who becomes a member or when a member marries another member even though the coverage is not automatic; and what happens to FSGLI coverage when a spouse or dependent child leaves service. To promptly address the statutory gaps noted above, VA adopted an interim policy that (1) allows FSGLI coverage to continue for a spouse or dependent child who was covered by FSGLI prior to becoming a SGLI-covered member based on his or her own member status after January 1, 2013, and (2) permits a servicemember who marries another SGLI-eligible member after January 1, 2013, or is married to a person who becomes a SGLI-eligible member based on his or her own member status after January 1, 2013, to enroll or re-enroll in or increase FSGLIspousal coverage only upon applying for such coverage and providing proof of the spouse’s good health. In accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1967(c), this policy continues any FSGLI coverage in force, while requiring an application from the member and proof of the eligible spouse’s good health to enroll or reenroll an FSGLI-eligible spouse who is not so insured or to increase FSGLI coverage for the spouse. As such, this policy applies to member-spouses while they are in service as well as those member-spouses who separate from service. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(c). VA believes that this policy effectively addresses some of the issues arising from the FY13 NDAA that eliminated automatic FSGLI coverage for the limited class of dependents addressed by the law, and we now seek to codify this policy in regulations. VA proposes to implement regulatory guidance for the amended section 1967(a)(1) by adding a new paragraph (f) to 38 CFR 9.2, redesignating §§ 9.3 through 9.22 as §§ 9.4 through 9.23 and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Feb 10, 2020 Jkt 250001 adding a new § 9.3. New paragraph (f) of 38 CFR 9.2 would state that the effective date of coverage for an insurable spouse who qualifies for FSGLI under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1) but who was not so insured or was insured at a reduced rate will be the date the uniformed service receives an application and proof of the insurable spouse’s good health, subject to newly created 38 CFR 9.3. New 38 CFR 9.3 would clarify VA’s implementation of the amendments to 38 U.S.C. 1967(a) made by the FY13 NDAA that was enacted on January 2, 2013. VA therefore proposes to provide, in proposed § 9.3(a), that a SGLI-covered member who (1) marries another SGLIeligible member after January 1, 2013, or (2) is married to a person who becomes a SGLI-eligible member after January 1, 2013, may only enroll or re-enroll the member-spouse in or increase FSGLIspousal coverage upon applying for such coverage and providing proof of the member-spouse’s good health. As proposed in § 9.3(c), consistent with 38 U.S.C. 1967(c), the requirements for application and proof of the spouse’s good health also apply when a member seeks to enroll or re-enroll a memberspouse who is not insured in FSGLI, or seeks to increase FSGLI-spousal coverage, after the member-spouse separates from service. However, as provided in proposed § 9.3(b), if a member’s spouse was insured under FSGLI at the time the spouse became a member, the pre-service FSGLI-spousal coverage would continue without the need for the member to apply or provide proof of the spouse’s good health. Similarly, as provided in proposed § 9.3(c), if a member’s spouse was insured under FSGLI at the time the spouse separates from military service, the FSGLI-spousal coverage carried in service would continue post-separation without the need for the member to apply or provide proof of the spouse’s good health. For a member married to another member, VA has determined that requiring an application that asks for proof of good health to enroll or reenroll in or to increase spousal FSGLI strikes the appropriate balance between offering FSGLI coverage to the extent permitted by law and adhering to sound actuarial principles. By requiring an application that asks for proof of good health to enroll a member’s spouse for FSGLI-spousal coverage, the proposed rule would provide insureds the opportunity to meet their financial needs while mitigating the potentially negative impact of ‘‘adverse selection’’ in the program. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Adverse selection occurs when individuals use their superior knowledge of their insurability to minimize the period of time over which they are likely to pay premiums for coverage. Such a practice unfairly shifts the premium paying burden to other individuals paying premiums for coverage over a longer period of time, and potentially undermines the financial health of the program to the detriment of all insureds. Insurance programs rely on a pooling of risks, and premium rates are set according to the expected mortality of the insurance pool. If a disproportionate number of insureds in substandard health enter the program or carry higher coverage amounts than healthier individuals in the program, the increased mortality experience will exceed that upon which the premium rates are based and could impact the program negatively by driving up the cost of premiums for all program participants. As such, the proof of health requirement incorporated in the proposed rule would minimize the potential for adverse selection. Further, by initiating coverage from the date the member submits an FSGLI application to enroll their SGLI-eligible spouse, the proposed rule would remain consistent with Congressional intent to prevent debts resulting from retroactive coverage during an extensive period when the member had not paid premiums. Moreover, VA has determined that maintaining existing coverage for dependent spouses enrolled in FSGLI prior to becoming a SGLI-eligible member, or enrolled in FSGLI at the time of separation from service, should continue because it is not the type of ‘‘automatic coverage’’ intended to be curtailed by the FY13 NDAA and would not invoke the concerns with overpayments sought to be remedied by the change in law. VA notes that SGLI-insurable dependent children, like a member married to another member (i.e., a member-spouse), are automatically enrolled in SGLI based on their status as members. Since passage of the 2013 NDAA, however, they are no longer automatically insured for FSGLI under their parent’s coverage. We propose to provide in 38 CFR 9.3(d) that, after January 1, 2013, an insurable child who is a member when a parent’s SGLI coverage commences is not eligible for automatic dependent coverage under the parent’s FSGLI. We further propose that dependent coverage in effect for an insurable child prior to the child becoming a member shall remain in effect so long as the child remains an insurable dependent. However, if an insurable child was not E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM 11FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 28 / Tuesday, February 11, 2020 / Proposed Rules khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS covered prior to becoming a member, the child could not be covered under a parent’s FSGLI after the child becomes a member. VA believes that this proposal would comply with the 2013 law change and allow FSGLI coverage to remain in place for those multiple-member families who (1) had been carrying FSGLI prior to a dependent child becoming a SGLIeligible member and (2) anticipate keeping FSGLI coverage for the duration of their member-child’s status as a dependent. Because current statute at 38 U.S.C. 1967(c) prohibits requiring proof of good health to enroll any dependent child in FSGLI, regardless of whether the child is also eligible for SGLI as a member, VA cannot allow enrollment in FSGLI for this limited class of dependent children upon application and providing proof of good health. The statutory bar to requiring proof of good health to enroll dependent children makes such a policy necessary. VA believes that allowing dependent children with automatic SGLI coverage to also enroll in FSGLI by simply submitting an application, without also requiring proof of good health, would run counter to sound actuarial principles by encouraging adverse selection. VA recognizes that dependent children who are also eligible for SGLI would only be eligible to retain FSGLI coverage in force prior to becoming a member, and unlike a member married to another member, they would not be able to enroll in new FSGLI coverage upon application and providing proof of good health. However, because VA is precluded by statute from requiring proof of good health to enroll any dependent in FSGLI, we cannot adopt such a policy as was done for a member married to another member. Unfunded Mandates The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector. Paperwork Reduction Act This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3521). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Feb 10, 2020 Jkt 250001 7685 Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 13771 approved this document on February 5, 2020, for publication. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. VA’s impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at https:// www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA’s website at https:// www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published.’’ This proposed rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this proposed rule is not significant under E.O. 12866. Luvenia Potts, Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the program affected by this document is 64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans. List of Subjects in Part 9 Life insurance, Military personnel, Veterans. Signing Authority The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Pamela Powers, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 For the reasons stated in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38 CFR part 9 as set forth below: PART 9—SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS’ GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965–1980A, unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 9.2 is amended by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows: ■ § 9.2 Effective date; applications. * * * * * (f) Except as provided in § 9.3: (1) For an insurable spouse who was eligible for coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) but was not so insured or was insured at a reduced rate and who became a member, and (2) For a member-spouse covered under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(i) and who was also eligible for coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) but who was not so insured or was insured at a reduced amount, the effective date of enrollment, re-enrollment, or an increase in coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1) shall be the date the uniformed service receives an application and proof of the insurable spouse’s good health. §§ 9.3 through 9.22 [Redesignated] 3. Redesignate §§ 9.3 through 9.22 as §§ 9.4 through 9.23. ■ 4. Add a new § 9.3 to read as follows: ■ § 9.3 Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance insurable dependents who become Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance eligible members, and Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance eligible members who marry Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance eligible members. (a) A Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance-covered member who— (1) Marries another Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance eligible member after January 1, 2013, or (2) Is married to a person who becomes a Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance eligible member after January 1, 2013, may only enroll or re-enroll the member-spouse in or increase Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance spousal coverage upon applying for such coverage and providing proof of the spouse’s good health. E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM 11FEP1 7686 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 28 / Tuesday, February 11, 2020 / Proposed Rules (b) A spouse shall remain eligible to be covered by any existing Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance spousal coverage without the member applying for such coverage or providing proof of the spouse’s good health in a case where the spouse is enrolled in coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) prior to becoming a member married to another member. (c) A member’s spouse who was insured under Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance at the time the spouse separates from military service will continue to be covered under the spousal Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance carried while in service, and the member will not need to apply or provide evidence of the spouse’s good health post-separation. However, if a member seeks to enroll or re-enroll for coverage under Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance a spouse who did not have such spousal insurance coverage, or seeks to increase Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance coverage for such spouse, after the spouse separates from military service, the member will need to apply and provide proof of the spouse’s good health post-separation. (d) After January 1, 2013, an insurable child who is a member at the time a parent’s Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance coverage commences is not eligible for automatic dependent coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii). Dependent coverage in effect for an insurable child prior to becoming a member shall remain in effect so long as the child remains an insurable dependent. If an insurable child was not covered prior to becoming a member, the child cannot be covered under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) after the child becomes a member. [FR Doc. 2020–02673 Filed 2–10–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0294; FRL–10005– 10–Region 4] khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted through two letters dated June 25, 2008, VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:00 Feb 10, 2020 Jkt 250001 Comments must be received on or before March 12, 2020. DATES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2019–0294 at https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Air Plan Approval; Tennessee: Chattanooga NSR Reform SUMMARY: and September 12, 2018. The SIP revisions were submitted by the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) on behalf of the Chattanooga/Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Bureau and modify the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations in the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP to address changes to the federal new source review (NSR) regulations in recent years for the implementation of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Additionally, the SIP revisions include updates to Chattanooga’s regulations of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and other miscellaneous typographical and administrative updates. This action is being proposed pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). Andres Febres, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone number is (404) 562– 8966. Mr. Febres can also be reached via electronic mail at febresmartinez.andres@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 I. What action is EPA proposing? EPA is proposing to approve changes to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP regarding PSD permitting, as well as updates to the regulations of NOx and other miscellaneous typographical and administrative updates, submitted by TDEC on behalf of the Chattanooga/ Hamilton County Air Pollution Control Bureau (Bureau) through two letters dated June 25, 2008, and September 12, 2018.1 2 3 EPA is proposing to approve portions of these SIP revisions that make changes to the Chattanooga City Code, Part II, Chapter 4, Article II, Section 4–41. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve changes in Section 4–41, which include updates to Rule 2—Regulation of Nitrogen Oxides; Rule 9—Regulation of Visible Emissions from Internal Combustion Engines, and Rule 18—Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality.4 5 6 7 1 EPA notes that the Agency received the SIP revisions on July 8, 2008, and September 18, 2018, respectively. 2 The Bureau is comprised of Hamilton County and the municipalities of Chattanooga, Collegedale, East Ridge, Lakesite, Lookout Mountain, Red Bank, Ridgeside, Signal Mountain, Soddy Daisy, and Walden. The Bureau recommends regulatory revisions, which are subsequently adopted by the eleven jurisdictions. The Bureau then implements and enforces the regulations, as necessary, in each jurisdiction. 3 On January 16, 2020, TDEC submitted, on behalf of the Bureau, a letter dated January 15, 2020, providing supplemental information for the September 12, 2018, submittal. This letter is discussed in this proposed action and is available in the Docket. 4 The list of SIP-approved rules for Chattanooga/ Hamilton County, found at Table 4 of 40 CFR 52.2220(c), currently shows the title of Section 4–41, Rule 18 as ‘‘Prevention of Significant Air Quality Deterioration.’’ In this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), EPA is also proposing to approve a change to this title to instead show ‘‘Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality.’’ 5 The June 25, 2008, and September 12, 2018, SIP packages include other proposed changes to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP. Some of these revisions were only included for information and are not being requested for approval. EPA has taken separate action or will consider taking separate action to approve the remaining portions of these revisions. EPA will address only the aforementioned rules in this NPRM. 6 In this proposed action, EPA is also proposing to approve substantively identical changes from Chattanooga’s Section 4–41, Rule 18, in the following sections of the Air Pollution Control Regulations/Ordinances for the remaining jurisdictions within the Bureau, which were locally effective as of the relevant dates below: Hamilton County—Section 41, Rule 18 (9/6/17); City of Collegedale—Section 14–341, Rule 18 (10/16/17); City of East Ridge—Section 8–41, Rule 18 (10/12/ 17); City of Lakesite—Section 14–41, Rule 18 (10/ 17/17); City of Red Bank—Section 20–41, Rule 18 (11/21/17); City of Soddy-Daisy—Section 8–41, Rule 18 (10/5/17); City of Lookout Mountain— Section 41, Rule 18 (11/14/17); City of Ridgeside Section 41, Rule 18 (1/16/18); City of Signal Mountain Section 41, Rule 18 (10/20/17); and City E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM 11FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7683-7686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02673]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 9

RIN 2900-AQ37


Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance--Family Servicemembers' 
Group Life Insurance--Member Married to Member

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: VA proposes to clarify implementation of sec. 642 of the 
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2013 (FY13), 
which eliminated automatic enrollment in Family Servicemembers' Group 
Life Insurance (FSGLI) for insurable dependents who are members of a 
uniformed service and are automatically covered under Servicemembers' 
Group Life Insurance (SGLI). VA proposes that a SGLI-covered member who 
marries another SGLI-eligible member after January 1, 2013, the date on 
which the FY13 NDAA was enacted, or is married to a person who becomes 
eligible for SGLI after January 1, 2013, may only enroll or re-enroll 
in or increase FSGLI-spousal coverage, upon applying for such coverage 
and providing proof of his or her spouse's good health. Further, VA 
proposes not to require a SGLI covered member to apply or provide proof 
of good health for a member spouse or for a member dependent child to 
continue FSGLI coverage in force at the time the spouse or dependent 
child became a SGLI eligible member.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted through https://www.Regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to: Director, Office of 
Regulation Policy and Management (00REG), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room 1064, Washington, DC 20420; or by 
fax to (202) 273-9026. (This is not a toll-free telephone number.) 
Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 
2900-AQ37--Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance--Family Servicemembers' 
Group Life Insurance Regulation Update--Member Married to Member.'' 
Copies of comments received will be available for public inspection in 
the Office of Regulation Policy and Management, Room 1064, between the 
hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except 
holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for an appointment. (This is not 
a toll-free telephone number.) In addition, during the comment period, 
comments may be viewed online through the Federal Docket Management 
System (FDMS) at https://www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Weaver, Department of Veterans 
Affairs Insurance Center (310/290B), 5000 Wissahickon Avenue, 
Philadelphia, PA 19144, (215) 842-2000, ext. 4404. (This is not a toll-
free number.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Veterans' Survivor Benefits Improvements 
Act of 2001 (``2001 Act''), Public Law 107-14, sec. 4, 115 Stat. 25, 
originally created FSGLI, which provides automatic coverage for spouses 
and dependent children of SGLI-covered members. The FSGLI automatic 
coverage provisions were created to simplify the process for obtaining 
FSGLI coverage during deployment. The 2001 Act provides for free, 
automatic dependent coverage for children in the amount of $10,000, 
which cannot be declined or reduced so long as the member carries SGLI. 
See 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii), (a)(2), (a)(3)(A)(iii), (a)(3)(B); 
1969(g)(1)(A). In addition, the 2001 Act prohibits requiring proof of 
good health for a child. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(c). FSGLI dependent child 
coverage is effective from the latest of the applicable dates 
enumerated under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(5)(A)-(D) and (F), which refers to 
the date a child becomes an insurable dependent, namely the date of 
birth, date of adoption, or the date of entrance into the member's 
household, and this coverage remains effective for as long as the 
member maintains SGLI coverage or until the child no longer qualifies 
as an insurable dependent.
    In contrast, automatic FSGLI-spousal coverage requires payment of 
premiums and can be declined or reduced by the member to less than the 
$100,000 statutory maximum as long as the spousal coverage is equal to 
or less than the amount of SGLI coverage held by the member. See 38 
U.S.C. 1967(a)(2)(B), (a)(3). Once a member declines or reduces FSGLI-
spousal coverage, or when a spouse eligible for FSGLI coverage is 
otherwise not insured under FSGLI, an application and proof of the 
spouse's good health is required to elect, reinstate, or increase 
coverage. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(c). FSGLI-spousal coverage is effective 
from the latest of any of the applicable dates enumerated under 38 
U.S.C. 1967(a)(5)(A)-(D) and (E), which refers to the date of marriage 
of the spouse to the member.
    However, the automatic coverage provisions of the 2001 Act caused 
the unintended consequence of creating debts for servicemembers when 
lags occurred in updating personnel records to reflect changed marital 
status, i.e., in the case of marriage. Such delays created premium 
debts requiring the member to pay back premiums for automatic FSGLI-
spousal coverage in force prior to the branch of service receiving 
notification of the member's marriage. In other words, a member was 
required to pay premiums for automatic spousal coverage, even if it 
meant paying retroactive premiums for a covered period during which the 
branch of service was unaware of the member's marriage. In a case in 
which a member married another member, since each married member was 
responsible to pay any retroactive premiums associated with FSGLI-
spousal coverage for the other, the impact on multiple-member families 
was magnified.
    The FY13 NDAA, sec. 642, 126 Stat. 1632, 1783, was signed into law 
on January 2, 2013, to address the problem of premium debts, at least 
in multiple-

[[Page 7684]]

member families, by eliminating automatic FSGLI coverage for insurable 
dependents who are also members of a uniformed service. Section 642 
eliminated automatic FSGLI enrollment for any insurable dependent 
covered under SGLI based on his or her own member status. The term 
``insurable dependent'' includes a child as well as a spouse. See 38 
U.S.C. 1965(10)(A) and (B). However, current law does not address 
certain issues, such as what happens to FSGLI coverage of a spouse or 
dependent child who later becomes a member, i.e., whether existing 
FSGLI coverage continues for a member's spouse or dependent child who 
is insured under FSGLI at the time he or she becomes a member; whether 
a member can obtain or increase FSGLI coverage for a spouse or 
dependent child who becomes a member or when a member marries another 
member even though the coverage is not automatic; and what happens to 
FSGLI coverage when a spouse or dependent child leaves service.
    To promptly address the statutory gaps noted above, VA adopted an 
interim policy that (1) allows FSGLI coverage to continue for a spouse 
or dependent child who was covered by FSGLI prior to becoming a SGLI-
covered member based on his or her own member status after January 1, 
2013, and (2) permits a servicemember who marries another SGLI-eligible 
member after January 1, 2013, or is married to a person who becomes a 
SGLI-eligible member based on his or her own member status after 
January 1, 2013, to enroll or re-enroll in or increase FSGLI-spousal 
coverage only upon applying for such coverage and providing proof of 
the spouse's good health. In accordance with 38 U.S.C. 1967(c), this 
policy continues any FSGLI coverage in force, while requiring an 
application from the member and proof of the eligible spouse's good 
health to enroll or re-enroll an FSGLI-eligible spouse who is not so 
insured or to increase FSGLI coverage for the spouse. As such, this 
policy applies to member-spouses while they are in service as well as 
those member-spouses who separate from service. See 38 U.S.C. 1967(c). 
VA believes that this policy effectively addresses some of the issues 
arising from the FY13 NDAA that eliminated automatic FSGLI coverage for 
the limited class of dependents addressed by the law, and we now seek 
to codify this policy in regulations.
    VA proposes to implement regulatory guidance for the amended 
section 1967(a)(1) by adding a new paragraph (f) to 38 CFR 9.2, 
redesignating Sec. Sec.  9.3 through 9.22 as Sec. Sec.  9.4 through 
9.23 and adding a new Sec.  9.3. New paragraph (f) of 38 CFR 9.2 would 
state that the effective date of coverage for an insurable spouse who 
qualifies for FSGLI under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1) but who was not so 
insured or was insured at a reduced rate will be the date the uniformed 
service receives an application and proof of the insurable spouse's 
good health, subject to newly created 38 CFR 9.3.
    New 38 CFR 9.3 would clarify VA's implementation of the amendments 
to 38 U.S.C. 1967(a) made by the FY13 NDAA that was enacted on January 
2, 2013. VA therefore proposes to provide, in proposed Sec.  9.3(a), 
that a SGLI-covered member who (1) marries another SGLI-eligible member 
after January 1, 2013, or (2) is married to a person who becomes a 
SGLI-eligible member after January 1, 2013, may only enroll or re-
enroll the member-spouse in or increase FSGLI-spousal coverage upon 
applying for such coverage and providing proof of the member-spouse's 
good health. As proposed in Sec.  9.3(c), consistent with 38 U.S.C. 
1967(c), the requirements for application and proof of the spouse's 
good health also apply when a member seeks to enroll or re-enroll a 
member-spouse who is not insured in FSGLI, or seeks to increase FSGLI-
spousal coverage, after the member-spouse separates from service. 
However, as provided in proposed Sec.  9.3(b), if a member's spouse was 
insured under FSGLI at the time the spouse became a member, the pre-
service FSGLI-spousal coverage would continue without the need for the 
member to apply or provide proof of the spouse's good health. 
Similarly, as provided in proposed Sec.  9.3(c), if a member's spouse 
was insured under FSGLI at the time the spouse separates from military 
service, the FSGLI-spousal coverage carried in service would continue 
post-separation without the need for the member to apply or provide 
proof of the spouse's good health.
    For a member married to another member, VA has determined that 
requiring an application that asks for proof of good health to enroll 
or re-enroll in or to increase spousal FSGLI strikes the appropriate 
balance between offering FSGLI coverage to the extent permitted by law 
and adhering to sound actuarial principles. By requiring an application 
that asks for proof of good health to enroll a member's spouse for 
FSGLI-spousal coverage, the proposed rule would provide insureds the 
opportunity to meet their financial needs while mitigating the 
potentially negative impact of ``adverse selection'' in the program.
    Adverse selection occurs when individuals use their superior 
knowledge of their insurability to minimize the period of time over 
which they are likely to pay premiums for coverage. Such a practice 
unfairly shifts the premium paying burden to other individuals paying 
premiums for coverage over a longer period of time, and potentially 
undermines the financial health of the program to the detriment of all 
insureds. Insurance programs rely on a pooling of risks, and premium 
rates are set according to the expected mortality of the insurance 
pool. If a disproportionate number of insureds in substandard health 
enter the program or carry higher coverage amounts than healthier 
individuals in the program, the increased mortality experience will 
exceed that upon which the premium rates are based and could impact the 
program negatively by driving up the cost of premiums for all program 
participants. As such, the proof of health requirement incorporated in 
the proposed rule would minimize the potential for adverse selection.
    Further, by initiating coverage from the date the member submits an 
FSGLI application to enroll their SGLI-eligible spouse, the proposed 
rule would remain consistent with Congressional intent to prevent debts 
resulting from retroactive coverage during an extensive period when the 
member had not paid premiums. Moreover, VA has determined that 
maintaining existing coverage for dependent spouses enrolled in FSGLI 
prior to becoming a SGLI-eligible member, or enrolled in FSGLI at the 
time of separation from service, should continue because it is not the 
type of ``automatic coverage'' intended to be curtailed by the FY13 
NDAA and would not invoke the concerns with overpayments sought to be 
remedied by the change in law.
    VA notes that SGLI-insurable dependent children, like a member 
married to another member (i.e., a member-spouse), are automatically 
enrolled in SGLI based on their status as members. Since passage of the 
2013 NDAA, however, they are no longer automatically insured for FSGLI 
under their parent's coverage.
    We propose to provide in 38 CFR 9.3(d) that, after January 1, 2013, 
an insurable child who is a member when a parent's SGLI coverage 
commences is not eligible for automatic dependent coverage under the 
parent's FSGLI. We further propose that dependent coverage in effect 
for an insurable child prior to the child becoming a member shall 
remain in effect so long as the child remains an insurable dependent. 
However, if an insurable child was not

[[Page 7685]]

covered prior to becoming a member, the child could not be covered 
under a parent's FSGLI after the child becomes a member.
    VA believes that this proposal would comply with the 2013 law 
change and allow FSGLI coverage to remain in place for those multiple-
member families who (1) had been carrying FSGLI prior to a dependent 
child becoming a SGLI-eligible member and (2) anticipate keeping FSGLI 
coverage for the duration of their member-child's status as a 
dependent.
    Because current statute at 38 U.S.C. 1967(c) prohibits requiring 
proof of good health to enroll any dependent child in FSGLI, regardless 
of whether the child is also eligible for SGLI as a member, VA cannot 
allow enrollment in FSGLI for this limited class of dependent children 
upon application and providing proof of good health. The statutory bar 
to requiring proof of good health to enroll dependent children makes 
such a policy necessary. VA believes that allowing dependent children 
with automatic SGLI coverage to also enroll in FSGLI by simply 
submitting an application, without also requiring proof of good health, 
would run counter to sound actuarial principles by encouraging adverse 
selection. VA recognizes that dependent children who are also eligible 
for SGLI would only be eligible to retain FSGLI coverage in force prior 
to becoming a member, and unlike a member married to another member, 
they would not be able to enroll in new FSGLI coverage upon application 
and providing proof of good health. However, because VA is precluded by 
statute from requiring proof of good health to enroll any dependent in 
FSGLI, we cannot adopt such a policy as was done for a member married 
to another member.

Unfunded Mandates

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and 
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by 
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for 
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such 
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private 
sector.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection 
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
3501-3521).

Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 13771

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts; 
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory 
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. 
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that 
this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 
12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at 
https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the 
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the 
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website at 
https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations 
Published.''
    This proposed rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory 
action because this proposed rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
U.S.C. 601-612.
    Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final 
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do 
not apply.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance

    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the 
program affected by this document is 64.103, Life Insurance for 
Veterans.

List of Subjects in Part 9

    Life insurance, Military personnel, Veterans.

Signing Authority

    The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this 
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document 
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as 
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Pamela 
Powers, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this 
document on February 5, 2020, for publication.

Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy & 
Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38 CFR 
part 9 as set forth below:

PART 9--SERVICEMEMBERS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS' GROUP 
LIFE INSURANCE

0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965-1980A, unless otherwise noted.

0
2. Section 9.2 is amended by adding paragraph (f) to read as follows:


Sec.  9.2   Effective date; applications.

* * * * *
    (f) Except as provided in Sec.  9.3:
    (1) For an insurable spouse who was eligible for coverage under 38 
U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) but was not so insured or was insured at a 
reduced rate and who became a member, and
    (2) For a member-spouse covered under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(i) 
and who was also eligible for coverage under 38 U.S.C. 
1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) but who was not so insured or was insured at a 
reduced amount, the effective date of enrollment, re-enrollment, or an 
increase in coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1) shall be the date the 
uniformed service receives an application and proof of the insurable 
spouse's good health.


Sec. Sec.  9.3 through 9.22   [Redesignated]

0
3. Redesignate Sec. Sec.  9.3 through 9.22 as Sec. Sec.  9.4 through 
9.23.
0
4. Add a new Sec.  9.3 to read as follows:


Sec.  9.3   Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance insurable 
dependents who become Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance eligible 
members, and Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance eligible members who 
marry Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance eligible members.

    (a) A Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance-covered member who--
    (1) Marries another Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance eligible 
member after January 1, 2013, or
    (2) Is married to a person who becomes a Servicemembers' Group Life 
Insurance eligible member after January 1, 2013, may only enroll or re-
enroll the member-spouse in or increase Family Servicemembers' Group 
Life Insurance spousal coverage upon applying for such coverage and 
providing proof of the spouse's good health.

[[Page 7686]]

    (b) A spouse shall remain eligible to be covered by any existing 
Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance spousal coverage without 
the member applying for such coverage or providing proof of the 
spouse's good health in a case where the spouse is enrolled in coverage 
under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) prior to becoming a member married to 
another member.
    (c) A member's spouse who was insured under Family Servicemembers' 
Group Life Insurance at the time the spouse separates from military 
service will continue to be covered under the spousal Family 
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance carried while in service, and the 
member will not need to apply or provide evidence of the spouse's good 
health post-separation. However, if a member seeks to enroll or re-
enroll for coverage under Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance a 
spouse who did not have such spousal insurance coverage, or seeks to 
increase Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance coverage for such 
spouse, after the spouse separates from military service, the member 
will need to apply and provide proof of the spouse's good health post-
separation.
    (d) After January 1, 2013, an insurable child who is a member at 
the time a parent's Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance coverage 
commences is not eligible for automatic dependent coverage under 38 
U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii). Dependent coverage in effect for an insurable 
child prior to becoming a member shall remain in effect so long as the 
child remains an insurable dependent. If an insurable child was not 
covered prior to becoming a member, the child cannot be covered under 
38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) after the child becomes a member.

[FR Doc. 2020-02673 Filed 2-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.