West Virginia Regulatory Program, 7475-7480 [2020-02570]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Amending the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface to within a 6.5-mile radius
(decreased from a 9.6-mile radius) of
Reedsburg Municipal Airport,
Reedsburg, WI; amending the extension
to the south of the airport to extend to
10.8 miles (increased from 10.5 miles);
adding an extension 2 miles each side
of the 330° bearing from TUSME
extending from the 6.5-mile radius of
Reedsburg Municipal Airport to 5.6
miles northwest of TUSME; and
updating the name and geographic
coordinates of Baraboo-Wisconsin Dells
Regional Airport (previously Baraboo
Wisconsin Dells Airport), Baraboo, WI,
to coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical
database;
And amending the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface to within a 6.7-mile radius
(increased from a 6.3-mile radius) of
Boscobel Airport, Boscobel, WI; adding
an extension 1 mile each side of the
247° bearing from the airport extending
from the 6.7-mile radius to 6.8 miles
southwest of the airport; and updating
the geographic coordinates of the airport
to coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical
database.
These actions are the result of
airspace reviews caused by the
decommissioning of the Lone Rock
VOR, which provided navigation
information for the instrument
procedures at these airports, as part of
the VOR MON Program.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019,
and effective September 15, 2019, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
an 8.7-mile radius of Portage Municipal
Airport.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL WI E5 Boscobel, WI [Amended]
Boscobel Airport, WI
(Lat. 43°09′39″ N, long. 90°40′25″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile
radius of the Boscobel Airport, and within 1
mile each side of the 247° bearing from the
airport extending from the 6.7-mile radius to
6.8 miles southwest of the airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February
3, 2020.
Marty Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020–02489 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
30 CFR Part 948
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AGL WI E5 Baraboo, WI [Amended]
Baraboo-Wisconsin Dells Regional Airport,
WI
(Lat. 43°31′19″ N, long. 89°46′17″ W)
Reedsburg Municipal Airport, WI
(Lat. 43°31′33″ N, long. 89°59′00″ W)
TUSME, WI
(Lat. 43°36′41″ N, long. 89°58′52″ W)
Portage Municipal Airport, WI
(Lat. 43°33′37″ N, long. 89°28′58″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 9.6-mile
radius of Baraboo-Wisconsin Dells Regional
Airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of
Reedsburg Municipal Airport, and within 2
miles each side of the 180° bearing from
Reedsburg Municipal Airport extending from
the 6.5-mile radius to 10.8 miles south of the
Reedsburg Municipal Airport, and within 2
miles each side of the 330° bearing from
TUSME extending from the 6.5-mile radius to
5.6 miles northwest of TUSME, and within
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7475
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
[WV–123–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–2016–0010
S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
201S180110; S2D2S SS08011000
SX064A000 20XS501520]
West Virginia Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendments.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are announcing receipt of
proposed amendments to the West
Virginia regulatory program (hereinafter,
the West Virginia program) under the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the
Act). Through these proposed
amendments, West Virginia seeks to
revise its program to amend its statutory
and regulatory provisions that involve
blasting and make organizational
changes within the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection
(WVDEP).
DATES: We will accept written
comments on these amendments until
4:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time (e.s.t.),
March 11, 2020. If requested, we will
hold a public hearing on the
amendments on March 6, 2020. We will
accept requests to speak at a hearing
until 4:00 p.m., e.s.t. on February 25,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified as SATS No. WV–123–FOR,
by any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
7476
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Ben
Owens, Field Office Director, Pittsburgh
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 3
Parkway Center South, 2nd Floor,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15220.
• Fax: (412) 937–2177.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: The
amendment has been assigned Docket
ID: OSM–2016–0010. If you would like
to submit comments go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Comment Procedures’’ below
under the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
review copies of the West Virginia
program, these amendments, a listing of
any scheduled public hearings, and all
written comments received in response
to this document, you must go to the
address listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendments by
contacting OSMRE’s Charleston Field
Office or the full text of the program
amendments are available for you to
read at www.regulations.gov.
Mr. Ben Owens, Pittsburgh Field Office
Director, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 3
Parkway Center South, 2nd Floor,
Pittsburgh, PA 15220, Telephone:
(412) 937–2827, Email: chfo@
osmre.gov
In addition, you may review a copy of
the amendment during regular business
hours at the following location:
West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, 601 57th
Street SE, Charleston, West Virginia
25304, Telephone: (304) 926–0490
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, Morgantown Area
Office, 604 Cheat Road, Suite 150,
Morgantown, WV 26508, Telephone:
(304) 291–4004 (By Appointment
only)
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, Beckley Area
Office, 313 Harper Park Drive, Suite 3,
Beckley, WV 25801, Telephone: (304)
255–5265.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ben Owens, Pittsburgh Field Office
Director. Telephone: (412) 937–2827.
Email: chfo@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the West Virginia Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the West Virginia
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its State program
includes, among other things, State laws
and regulations that govern surface coal
mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the Act and consistent
with the Federal regulations. See 30
U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the
Interior conditionally approved the
West Virginia program on January 21,
1981. You can find additional
background information on the West
Virginia program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
in the January 21, 1981, Federal
Register (46 FR 5915–5956). You can
also find later actions concerning West
Virginia’s program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 948.10, 948.12,
948.13, 948.15 and 948.16.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendments
On three occasions, April 4, 2016,
(Administrative Record No. 1607), May
3, 2017, (Administrative Record No.
1608), and May 2, 2018, (Administrative
Record No. 1613), West Virginia sent us
proposed revisions to its approved
program. These first two submissions
included, among other things, blasting
regulations and provisions that OSMRE
decided to incorporate with the third
submission so as not to cause confusion.
In the first submission, the State
proposes to eliminate the Office of
Explosives and Blasting and consolidate
the remaining duties and
responsibilities related to blasting under
the Division of Mining and Reclamation.
This submission also authorizes WVDEP
to promulgate its own blasting
regulations. The second submission
modifies the State’s pre-blast survey
statutory provisions. In the third
submission, the Division of Mining and
Reclamation (DMR) submitted its own
blasting regulations which relate to
blasting plans, public notices, blasting
procedures, blast records, pre-blast
surveys, certification of blasters,
blasting claims and arbitration, and
explosive material fee. By combining
these, the public will have an
opportunity to evaluate and comment
on both the State’s revised blasting law
and the newly promulgated blasting
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
regulations as set forth in these
submissions.
First Submission: House Bill (HB)
4726: By letter dated April 4, 2016,
WVDEP sent us an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.1201
et seq.) that included provisions enacted
by HB 4726. The bill was passed by the
West Virginia Legislature on March 11,
2016, and approved by the Governor on
April 1, 2016. HB 4726 terminated the
Office of Explosives and Blasting (OEB)
with the passage of W.Va. Code 22–3–
34 and transferred the duties and
responsibilities relating to blasting to
the Division of Mining and Reclamation
(DMR). The bill also provides that the
regulatory provisions of the State’s
Surface Mining Blasting Rule set forth in
the Code of State Regulations (CSR)
199–1 remain in effect until DMR
develops its own blasting rules. The bill
involves changes to West Virginia’s
statutory provisions relating to blasting,
pre-blast surveys, and the authority to
promulgate regulations. In addition, the
bill added new sections 22–3–35
through 22–3–38 to reflect
organizational changes; transfer of
functions; disciplinary procedures for
certified blasters; blasting damage
claims; rules, orders and permits to
remain in effect regarding blasting; and
the transfer of personnel and assets.
Second Submission: Senate Bill (SB)
687: By letter dated May 3, 2017,
WVDEP sent us an amendment to its
program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.1201
et seq.). SB 687 was passed by the West
Virginia Legislature on April 8, 2017,
and approved by the Governor on April
9, 2017. SB 687 modified the State’s preblast survey statutory requirements for
notifications to owners and occupants
regarding blasting associated with
construction and requests for new preblast surveys.
Third Submission: Senate Bill 163: By
letter dated May 2, 2018, WVDEP sent
us an amendment to its program under
SMCRA (30 U.S. C. 1201 et seq.) to
amend its regulations at CSR 38–2–1. SB
163 was passed by the West Virginia
Legislature on February 16, 2018, and
signed by the Governor on February 27,
2018. SB 163 authorized WVDEP to
promulgate legislative rules filed in the
State Register on July 27, 2017. SB 163
consolidated all State blasting
requirements under WVDEP’s Surface
Mining Reclamation Regulations. This
amendment modifies Section 6 relating
to blasting and creates new Sections 25
through 27 relating to certification of
blasters, blasting damage claim and
arbitration for blasting damage claims,
and the explosive material fee. It also
modifies the notification requirements
for pre-blast surveys to be consistent
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
with changes made at W.Va. Code 22–
3–13a.
consistent with the authority granted in
sections 34 through 39 of this article.
pre-blast surveys are included in this
section of the State’s submittal.
A. Proposed Statutory Revisions
Authorized by HB 4726 to W.Va. Code
22–1–7, 22–3–2, 4, 13a, 22a, 34, 35, 36,
37, and 38—Abolish Office of
Explosives and Blasting; Legislative
Findings and Purpose; Duties of
Secretary; Pre-Blast Survey
Requirements; Site-Specific Blasting
Design; Office of Explosives and
Blasting Terminated; Legislative
Blasting Rules; Disciplinary Procedures
for Certified Blasters; Claims Processing
for Blasting; Blasting Rules, Orders and
Permits to Remain in Effect; Proceedings
not Affected; and Transfer of Personnel
and Assets
HB 4726, which was passed by the
West Virginia Legislature, repealed
section 22–3A of the W.Va. Code and
added new sections designated 22–3–34
through 38 as a result of the elimination
of the OEB. This bill consolidates the
remaining duties and responsibilities
related to blasting into the DMR. It also
provides that the Blasting Rule, CSR
199–1, remains in effect until the DMR
develops its own rules for blasting.
Some changes, within the bill and
subsequent bills, are non-substantive
(i.e., changes in organizational structure,
prior effective dates, and designated
authorities) and will not be further
elaborated on within this proposed rule.
3. W.Va. Code 22–3–4—Duties and
Functions of Secretary
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by adding
subdivision (b)(6). Section 22–3–4(b)(6)
provides that the Secretary may, in
relation to blasting on all surface mining
operations and all surface blasting
activities related to underground mining
operations, regulate blasting on all
surface mining operations; implement
and oversee the pre-blast survey
process, as set forth in section 22–3–
13a; maintain and operate a system to
receive and address questions, concerns
and complaints relating to mining
operations; set the qualifications for
individuals and firms performing preblast surveys; educate, train, examine,
and certify blasters; and propose rules
for legislative approvals pursuant to
section 29a–3–15 for the
implementation of sections 34 through
39 of this article.
5. W.Va. Code 22–3–22a—Site-Specific
Blasting Design Requirement
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions at subsections (e)
and (f). Section 22–3–22a(e) provides
that blasting within 1,000 feet of a
protected structure must have a sitespecific blast design approved by the
DMR. In addition, section 22–3–22a(f)
provides that the operator must send
copies of all written waivers executed
pursuant to this subsection the DMR.
Written waivers executed and filed with
the DMR are valid during the life of the
permit or any renewal of the permit and
are enforceable against any subsequent
owners or occupants of the protected
structure.
1. W.Va. Code 22–1–7—Offices Within
the Department of Environmental
Protection
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by deleting
subsection 6. That subsection created
the OEB and charged it with
administering and enforcing the
provisions of article 3 of this chapter.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
7477
2. W.Va. Code 22–3–2—Legislative
Findings and Purpose
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by adding
subdivisions (a)(3) and (b)(9). Section
22–3–2(a)(3) provides that the West
Virginia Legislature finds that the
reasonable control of blasting associated
with surface mining within the State is
in the public interest and will promote
the protection of the citizens and their
property without sacrificing economic
development. In addition, it is the
policy of the State . . . to use
reasonable means and measures to
prevent harm from the effects of blasting
to its property and citizens. Section 22–
3–2(b)(9) provides in part that it is the
purpose of the article to vest in the
Secretary the authority to enforce all of
the laws, regulations, and rules
established to regulate blasting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
4. W.Va. Code 22–3–13a—Pre-Blast
Survey Requirements
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by modifying
subsection (c), subdivision (f)(7),
subsection (g), subsection (h), and
subsection (i). Section 22–3–13a(c)
provides that the DMR may not
determine the pre-blast survey to be
incomplete because it indicates that
access to a particular structure,
underground water supply or well was
refused, impossible or impractical. In
addition, the operator must send copies
of all written waivers and affidavits
executed pursuant to this subsection to
the DMR. Section 22–3–13a(f)(7)
provides that pre-blast survey must
include the date of the pre-blast survey
and the date it was mailed or delivered
to the DMR. Section 22–3–13a(g)
provides that the pre-blast survey must
be submitted to the DMR at least 15
days prior to the commencement of any
production blasting. The DMR must
review each pre-blast survey as to form
and completeness only and notify the
operator of any deficiencies: Provided,
that once all required surveys have been
reviewed and accepted by the DMR,
blasting may commence sooner than 15
days after submittal. In addition, the
DMR must provide a copy of the preblast survey to the owner or occupant.
Section 22–3–13a(h) provides that the
pre-blast survey notice must be on a
form prescribed by the DMR. Finally,
section 22–3–13a(i) provides that all
authority to promulgate blasting rules is
transferred from the OEB to the DMR.
Other statutory provisions relating to
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6. W.Va. Code 22–3–34—Office of
Explosives and Blasting Terminated;
Transfer of Functions; Responsibilities
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by adding section
22–3–34, which states that the OEB will
be terminated.
7. W.Va. Code 22–3–35—Legislative
Rules on Surface Mining Blasting;
Disciplinary Procedures for Certified
Blasters
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by adding section
22–3–35, which provides that the DMR
will apply and enforce OEB’s rules at
199 CSR 1 until it adopts rules of its
own. DMR must promulgate rules for
legislative approval in accordance with
the provisions of section 29(a)–3–15 as
necessary to reflect the repeal of section
22–3a–7, as amended. This section
includes statutory provisions relating to
blasting and blaster certification as
submitted by West Virginia.
8. W.Va. Code 22–3–36—Claims Process
for Blasting
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by adding section
22–3–36, which establishes a blasting
claims process. WVDEP must establish
and manage the process for filing,
administering, and resolving claims
related to blasting. Other State statutory
provisions relating to the claims process
are presented in this section of the
submittal.
9. W.Va. Code 22–3–37—Rules, Orders,
and Permits To Remain in Effect
Regarding Blasting; Proceedings not
Affected
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by adding section
22–3–37. This section provides that all
orders, determinations, rules, permits,
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
7478
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
grants, contracts, certificates, licenses,
waivers, bonds, authorizations and
privileges that have been issued, made,
granted or allowed to become effective
prior to the enactment of this article will
remain in effect according to their terms
until modified, terminated, superseded,
set aside or revoked pursuant to this
article, by a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by operation of law. Any
proceedings, including notices of
proposed rulemaking, or any
application for any license, permit, or
certificate pending before the DMR are
not affected by the enactment of this
statute.
10. W.Va. Code 22–3–38—Transfer of
Personnel and Assets
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions by adding section
22–3–38, which provides that the
Secretary must transfer to the DMR any
personnel and assets presently used to
perform or used in the performance of
the duties and functions required by
sections 34 through 39.
B. Proposed Statutory Revisions
Authorized by SB 687 to W.Va. Code
22–3–13a—Pre-Blast Survey
Requirements
1. W.Va. Code 22–3–13a(a)(1), (2), (b)
and (f)—Pre-Blast Survey Requirements
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
West Virginia seeks to revise its
statutory provisions at section 22–3–
13a(1) for all surface mining operations
to send notifications of pre-blast surveys
to all owners and occupants of manmade dwellings or structures within one
half mile of the permitted area or areas.
Section 22–3–13a(2) provides that for
blasting associated with permitted
surface disturbance of underground
mines and blasting associated with
specified construction, including but
not limited to, haul roads, shafts, and/
or drainage structures, the operator may
send written request to the Secretary
asking that the required notifications be
limited to all owner and occupants of
man-made dwellings or structures
within one-half mile of the proposed
blasting area. Other pre-blast survey
requirements are included within this
section as submitted by the State.
C. Proposed Regulatory Changes
Authorized by SB 163 to CSR 38–2–6
Regarding Blasting; and CSR 38–2–25
Through 27 Relating to Certification of
Blasters; Blasting Damage Claim and
Arbitration for Blasting Damage Claims;
Explosive Material Fee
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its regulatory provisions
relating to blasting in general;
certification of blasters; blasting damage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
claims; arbitration for blasting damage
claims; and explosive material fee by
consolidating all blasting requirements
into its Surface Mining Reclamation
Regulations at CSR 38–2–6, 25, 26 and
27. Most of these requirements are being
transferred from the State’s Surface
Mining Blasting Rule at 199 CSR 1 due
to the proposed elimination of the OEB.
With the consolidation of its rules and
approval of these requirements by
OSMRE, 199 CSR 1 will be rescinded by
the State.
1. CSR 38–2–6.1—General Requirements
West Virginia seeks to revise its
blasting regulations by deleting existing
language at subsection 6.1 and adding
new language which provides that each
blaster will comply with all applicable
State and Federal laws in the use of
explosives, and each blaster that is
certified by the Secretary will be
responsible for all blasting operations in
accordance with the blasting plan.
2. CSR 38–2–6.2—Blasting Plans
West Virginia seeks to revise its
blasting regulations by deleting existing
language at subsection 6.2 and adding
new language which provides that all
surface mining operations that propose
blasting must include a blasting plan
that will include, at a minimum,
information setting forth the limitation
the operator will meet with regard to
ground vibration and air blast, the basis
for those limitation, and the methods to
be applied in preventing the adverse
effects of blasting operations. The
blasting plan will delineate the type of
explosives and detonation equipment,
the size, the timing and frequency of
blasts, and the effect of geologic and
topographic conditions on specific
blasts. Other regulatory provisions
relating to blasting plans are included
within this section.
3. CSR 38–2–6.3—Public Notice of
Blasting Operations
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that at least ten (10)
days but not more than thirty (30) days
prior to commencing any blasting
operations which detonate five (5)
pounds or more of explosives at any
given time, the operator must publish a
blasting schedule in a newspaper of
general circulation in all the counties of
the proposed permit area. Copies of the
schedule shall be distributed by
certified mail to local governments,
public utilities, and each resident
within one half mile of the blasting
sites. Unless blasting will occur on
drainage structures and roads, these
structures will be exempt for the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
purpose of measuring the notification
area. A list of residents, utilities and
owners of man-made structures within
the notification area will be made a part
of the blasting plan, and will be updated
on an annual basis. The operator must
republish and redistribute the schedule
at least every twelve (12) months in the
same manner above. The operator will
revise, republish, and redistribute the
schedule at least ten (10) days, but not
more than thirty (30) days prior to
blasting whenever the area covered by
the schedule changes or actual time
periods for blasting significantly differ
from that set forth in the prior schedule.
Proof of notification must be retained by
the permittee. Other specific
requirements relating to notifying the
public of all blasting operations are
included within this section.
4. CSR 38–2–6.4—Surface Blasting on
Underground Mines (Face-up Area,
Slopes and Shafts) and Construction
Blasting
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that construction
blasting means incidental blasting to
develop haul roads, mine access roads,
coal preparation plants and drainage
structures, and cannot include blasting
that removes the overburden to expose
underlying coal seams for the surface
extraction. Surface blasting activities
related to underground coal mining and
construction blasting are not subject to
the requirements of subdivision 6.3.a. of
this rule so long as all local
governments and residents and
workplaces or owners of dwellings or
structures located within one-half (1⁄2,)
mile of the blast site are notified in
writing by the operator of proposed
times and locations of the blasting
operation. Such notice of times that
blasting is to be conducted may be
announced weekly, but in no case less
than twenty-four (24) hours before the
blasting will occur.
Blasting activities for underground
coal mining and construction blasting
will be subject to this rule and regulated
as surface blasting and the operator
must submit a blast plan that considers
all aspects of blasting contained in this
section. For shafts and slopes related to
underground mining, the operator will
submit a blast plan for the initial
developmental blast of shafts and
slopes, which will consider all aspects
of surface coal mine blasting contained
in this section. The Secretary will then
only regulate and monitor for surface
effects from ground vibration and air
blast for the remainder of the shaft or
slope until it intersects the coal seam to
be mined.
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
5. CSR 38–2–6.5—Blast Record
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that a blasting log book
on forms formatted in a manner
prescribed by the Secretary will be kept
current daily and made available for
inspection at the site by the Secretary
and upon written request by the public.
Other provisions relating to what
information blasting records should
contain are included within this section.
6. CSR 38–2–6.6—Blasting Procedures
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that all blasting will be
conducted during daytime hours,
between sunrise and sunset; provided,
that the Secretary may specify more
restrictive time periods based on public
requests or other consideration,
including the proximity to residential
areas. No blasting will be conducted on
Sunday. Provided, however, the
Secretary may grant approval of a
request for Sunday blasting if the
operator demonstrates to the satisfaction
of the Secretary that the blasting is
necessary and there has been an
opportunity for a public hearing.
Blasting cannot be conducted at times
different from those announced in the
blasting schedule except in emergency
situations where rain, lightning, or other
atmospheric conditions or operator or
public safety requires unscheduled
detonations. Blasting will be conducted
in such a way so as to prevent injury to
persons, damage to public or private
property outside the permit area,
adverse impacts on any underground
mine, and change in the course,
channel, or availability of surface or
groundwater outside the permit area.
Other specific blasting and safety
provisions relating to air blast and
ground vibration limits are set forth
within this section.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
7. CSR 38–2–6.7—Blasting Control for
‘‘Other Structures’’
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that all ‘‘other
structures’’ in the vicinity of the blasting
area which are not defined as protected
structures must be protected from
damage by the limits specified in
paragraph 6.6.c.1 subdivisions 6.6.h.,
6.6.i. and 6.6j of this rule, unless waived
in total or in part by the owner of the
structure. The waiver of the protective
structures may be accomplished by the
establishment of a maximum allowable
limit on ground vibration or air blast
limits or both for the structure in the
written waiver agreement between the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
operator and the structure owner. The
waiver may be presented at the time of
application, in the blasting plan, or
provided at a later date and made
available for review and approval by the
Secretary. All waivers must be acquired
before any blasts may be conducted as
designed based on that waiver. The plan
submitted under this subsection cannot
reduce the level of protection for other
structures otherwise provided for in this
rule.
8. CSR 38–2–6.8—Pre-Blast Surveys
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that at least thirty days
prior to commencing blasting, an
operator’s designee must notify in
writing all owners and occupants of
manmade dwellings or structures with a
1⁄2 mile of the permit area or for those
that the meet the requirements of 6.4 of
this subsection within 1⁄2 mile of the
blast site that the operator or operator’s
designee will perform pre-blast surveys.
The operator must conduct the pre-blast
survey in a manner that will determine
the condition of the dwelling or
structure, to document any pre-blasting
damage and to document other physical
factors that could reasonably be affected
by the blasting. Assessments of the preblasting condition of structures such as
pipes, cables, transmission lines, wells,
and water systems must be based on the
exterior or ground surface conditions
and other available data. Attention must
be given to documenting and
establishing the pre-blasting condition
of wells and other water systems. The
pre-blast survey must include a
description of the water source and
water delivery system. When the water
supply is a well, the pre-blast survey
must include written documentation
about the type of well, and where
available, the well log and information
about the depth, age, depth and type of
casing, the static water level, flow and
data, the pump the name of the drilling
contractor and the source or sources of
the information. Other specific pre-blast
survey requirements are included
within this section.
9. CSR 38–2–25—Certification of
Blasters
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that in every surface
mine and surface area of an
underground mine when blasting
operations are being conducted, a
certified blaster must be responsible for
the storage, handling, transportation,
and use of explosives for each and every
blast, and for conducting the blasting
operations in accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7479
blasting plans approved in a permit
issued pursuant to W. Va. Code 22–3–
1 et seq., and the rules promulgated
under that article. Each person acting in
the capacity of a blaster and responsible
for the blasting operations must be
certified by the Secretary. Each certified
blaster must have proof of certification
either on his or her person or on file at
the permit area during blasting
operations. Other specific provisions
relating to the testing and certification
of blasters are included within this
section.
10. CSR 38–2–26—Blasting Damage
Claim and Arbitration for Blasting
Damage Claims
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that a claim of damage
to surface structures from blasting will
be the result of one or more of the
following:
• Fly rock damage is based on the
presence of debris from the blast site
and the presence of impact damage;
• Air blast damage is characterized by
broken or cracked window glass; and
• Blasting vibration damage is
investigated by experienced and
specially trained personnel to accurately
determine the presence of such damage.
Examples are explained in, but not
limited to, the American Insurance
Association publication, Blasting
Damage, A Guide for Adjusters and
Engineers.
It is the responsibility of the property
owner to notify the Secretary of the
alleged blasting damage. An
investigation will be conducted to
determine the initial merit of the
damage claim. Other specific provisions
pertaining to filing claims for blaster
damage and requests for arbitration
involving those claims are included
within this section.
11. CSR 38–2–27—Explosive Material
Fee
West Virginia seeks to add new
language to its blasting regulations
which provides that pursuant to W.Va.
Code 22–3A–7 and 5B–2a–2, there is
hereby assessed a fee of one-quarter cent
($.0025) per pound on explosive
material used for any purpose on
surface mining operations. Provided,
that the operators exempted from the
application of W. Va. Code 5B–B1–2A et
seq. must pay one-eighth ($.00125) cent
per pound on explosive material. Other
requirements regarding the payment,
collection and use of the material
handling fee are more fully described
within this section.
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
7480
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Proposed Rules
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether these
amendments satisfy the applicable
program approval criteria of 30 CFR
732.15. If we approve the amendments,
they will become part of the State
program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written or electronic
comments on the proposed rule during
the 30-day comment period, they should
be specific, confined to issues pertinent
to the proposed regulations, and explain
the reason for any recommended
change(s). We appreciate any and all
comments, but those most useful and
likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either
involve personal experience or include
citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its
legislative history, its implementing
regulations, case law, other pertinent
State or Federal laws or regulations,
technical literature, or other relevant
publications.
We cannot ensure that comments
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) or sent to an address
other than those listed (see ADDRESSES)
will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by
4:00 p.m., e.s.t. on February 25, 2020. If
you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Feb 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak, and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563—Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) will review all significant
rules. Pursuant to OMB Guidance dated
October 12, 1993, the approval of State
program amendments is exempted from
OMB review under Executive Order
12866. Executive Order 13563, which
reaffirms and supplements Executive
Order 12866, retains this exemption.
Other Laws and Executive Orders
Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program
amendment to OSMRE for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require
us to publish a notice in the Federal
Register indicating receipt of the
proposed amendment, its text or a
summary of its terms, and an
opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed
amendment after the close of the public
comment period and determine whether
the amendment should be approved,
approved in part, or not approved. At
that time, we will also make the
determinations and certifications
required by the various laws and
executive orders governing the
rulemaking process and include them in
the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Dated: April 30, 2019.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic—
Appalachian Region.
Editorial Note: This document was
received at the Office of the Federal Register
on February 5, 2020.
[FR Doc. 2020–02570 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0008; FRL–10005–
27–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; FL; 2010 1-Hour
SO2 NAAQS Transport Infrastructure
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
Florida’s September 18, 2018, State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
pertaining to the ‘‘good neighbor’’
provision of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act) for the 2010 1-hour sulfur dioxide
(SO2) National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS). The good neighbor
provision requires each state’s
implementation plan to address the
interstate transport of air pollution in
amounts that contribute significantly to
nonattainment, or interfere with
maintenance, of a NAAQS in any other
state. In this action, EPA is proposing to
determine that Florida will not
contribute significantly to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS in any other state. Therefore,
EPA is proposing to approve the
September 18, 2018, SIP revision as
meeting the requirements of the good
neighbor provision for the 2010 1-hour
SO2 NAAQS.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before March 11, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2019–0008 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM
10FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7475-7480]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02570]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 948
[WV-123-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2016-0010 S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
201S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 20XS501520]
West Virginia Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are announcing receipt of proposed amendments to the West
Virginia regulatory program (hereinafter, the West Virginia program)
under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or
the Act). Through these proposed amendments, West Virginia seeks to
revise its program to amend its statutory and regulatory provisions
that involve blasting and make organizational changes within the West
Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP).
DATES: We will accept written comments on these amendments until 4:00
p.m., Eastern Standard Time (e.s.t.), March 11, 2020. If requested, we
will hold a public hearing on the amendments on March 6, 2020. We will
accept requests to speak at a hearing until 4:00 p.m., e.s.t. on
February 25, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified as SATS No. WV-123-FOR,
by any of the following methods:
[[Page 7476]]
Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Ben Owens, Field Office Director,
Pittsburgh Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 3 Parkway Center South, 2nd Floor, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania 15220.
Fax: (412) 937-2177.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: The amendment has been
assigned Docket ID: OSM-2016-0010. If you would like to submit comments
go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' below under the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to review copies of the West
Virginia program, these amendments, a listing of any scheduled public
hearings, and all written comments received in response to this
document, you must go to the address listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may
receive one free copy of the amendments by contacting OSMRE's
Charleston Field Office or the full text of the program amendments are
available for you to read at www.regulations.gov.
Mr. Ben Owens, Pittsburgh Field Office Director, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 3 Parkway Center South, 2nd Floor,
Pittsburgh, PA 15220, Telephone: (412) 937-2827, Email: [email protected]
In addition, you may review a copy of the amendment during regular
business hours at the following location:
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, 601 57th Street
SE, Charleston, West Virginia 25304, Telephone: (304) 926-0490
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Morgantown Area
Office, 604 Cheat Road, Suite 150, Morgantown, WV 26508, Telephone:
(304) 291-4004 (By Appointment only)
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Beckley Area
Office, 313 Harper Park Drive, Suite 3, Beckley, WV 25801, Telephone:
(304) 255-5265.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ben Owens, Pittsburgh Field Office
Director. Telephone: (412) 937-2827. Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the West Virginia Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendments
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the West Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, State laws and
regulations that govern surface coal mining and reclamation operations
in accordance with the Act and consistent with the Federal regulations.
See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these criteria, the
Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the West Virginia
program on January 21, 1981. You can find additional background
information on the West Virginia program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval in
the January 21, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 5915-5956). You can also
find later actions concerning West Virginia's program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 948.10, 948.12, 948.13, 948.15 and 948.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendments
On three occasions, April 4, 2016, (Administrative Record No.
1607), May 3, 2017, (Administrative Record No. 1608), and May 2, 2018,
(Administrative Record No. 1613), West Virginia sent us proposed
revisions to its approved program. These first two submissions
included, among other things, blasting regulations and provisions that
OSMRE decided to incorporate with the third submission so as not to
cause confusion. In the first submission, the State proposes to
eliminate the Office of Explosives and Blasting and consolidate the
remaining duties and responsibilities related to blasting under the
Division of Mining and Reclamation. This submission also authorizes
WVDEP to promulgate its own blasting regulations. The second submission
modifies the State's pre-blast survey statutory provisions. In the
third submission, the Division of Mining and Reclamation (DMR)
submitted its own blasting regulations which relate to blasting plans,
public notices, blasting procedures, blast records, pre-blast surveys,
certification of blasters, blasting claims and arbitration, and
explosive material fee. By combining these, the public will have an
opportunity to evaluate and comment on both the State's revised
blasting law and the newly promulgated blasting regulations as set
forth in these submissions.
First Submission: House Bill (HB) 4726: By letter dated April 4,
2016, WVDEP sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30
U.S.C.1201 et seq.) that included provisions enacted by HB 4726. The
bill was passed by the West Virginia Legislature on March 11, 2016, and
approved by the Governor on April 1, 2016. HB 4726 terminated the
Office of Explosives and Blasting (OEB) with the passage of W.Va. Code
22-3-34 and transferred the duties and responsibilities relating to
blasting to the Division of Mining and Reclamation (DMR). The bill also
provides that the regulatory provisions of the State's Surface Mining
Blasting Rule set forth in the Code of State Regulations (CSR) 199-1
remain in effect until DMR develops its own blasting rules. The bill
involves changes to West Virginia's statutory provisions relating to
blasting, pre-blast surveys, and the authority to promulgate
regulations. In addition, the bill added new sections 22-3-35 through
22-3-38 to reflect organizational changes; transfer of functions;
disciplinary procedures for certified blasters; blasting damage claims;
rules, orders and permits to remain in effect regarding blasting; and
the transfer of personnel and assets.
Second Submission: Senate Bill (SB) 687: By letter dated May 3,
2017, WVDEP sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30
U.S.C.1201 et seq.). SB 687 was passed by the West Virginia Legislature
on April 8, 2017, and approved by the Governor on April 9, 2017. SB 687
modified the State's pre-blast survey statutory requirements for
notifications to owners and occupants regarding blasting associated
with construction and requests for new pre-blast surveys.
Third Submission: Senate Bill 163: By letter dated May 2, 2018,
WVDEP sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S. C. 1201
et seq.) to amend its regulations at CSR 38-2-1. SB 163 was passed by
the West Virginia Legislature on February 16, 2018, and signed by the
Governor on February 27, 2018. SB 163 authorized WVDEP to promulgate
legislative rules filed in the State Register on July 27, 2017. SB 163
consolidated all State blasting requirements under WVDEP's Surface
Mining Reclamation Regulations. This amendment modifies Section 6
relating to blasting and creates new Sections 25 through 27 relating to
certification of blasters, blasting damage claim and arbitration for
blasting damage claims, and the explosive material fee. It also
modifies the notification requirements for pre-blast surveys to be
consistent
[[Page 7477]]
with changes made at W.Va. Code 22-3-13a.
A. Proposed Statutory Revisions Authorized by HB 4726 to W.Va. Code 22-
1-7, 22-3-2, 4, 13a, 22a, 34, 35, 36, 37, and 38--Abolish Office of
Explosives and Blasting; Legislative Findings and Purpose; Duties of
Secretary; Pre-Blast Survey Requirements; Site-Specific Blasting
Design; Office of Explosives and Blasting Terminated; Legislative
Blasting Rules; Disciplinary Procedures for Certified Blasters; Claims
Processing for Blasting; Blasting Rules, Orders and Permits to Remain
in Effect; Proceedings not Affected; and Transfer of Personnel and
Assets
HB 4726, which was passed by the West Virginia Legislature,
repealed section 22-3A of the W.Va. Code and added new sections
designated 22-3-34 through 38 as a result of the elimination of the
OEB. This bill consolidates the remaining duties and responsibilities
related to blasting into the DMR. It also provides that the Blasting
Rule, CSR 199-1, remains in effect until the DMR develops its own rules
for blasting. Some changes, within the bill and subsequent bills, are
non-substantive (i.e., changes in organizational structure, prior
effective dates, and designated authorities) and will not be further
elaborated on within this proposed rule.
1. W.Va. Code 22-1-7--Offices Within the Department of Environmental
Protection
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by deleting
subsection 6. That subsection created the OEB and charged it with
administering and enforcing the provisions of article 3 of this
chapter.
2. W.Va. Code 22-3-2--Legislative Findings and Purpose
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by adding
subdivisions (a)(3) and (b)(9). Section 22-3-2(a)(3) provides that the
West Virginia Legislature finds that the reasonable control of blasting
associated with surface mining within the State is in the public
interest and will promote the protection of the citizens and their
property without sacrificing economic development. In addition, it is
the policy of the State . . . to use reasonable means and measures to
prevent harm from the effects of blasting to its property and citizens.
Section 22-3-2(b)(9) provides in part that it is the purpose of the
article to vest in the Secretary the authority to enforce all of the
laws, regulations, and rules established to regulate blasting
consistent with the authority granted in sections 34 through 39 of this
article.
3. W.Va. Code 22-3-4--Duties and Functions of Secretary
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by adding
subdivision (b)(6). Section 22-3-4(b)(6) provides that the Secretary
may, in relation to blasting on all surface mining operations and all
surface blasting activities related to underground mining operations,
regulate blasting on all surface mining operations; implement and
oversee the pre-blast survey process, as set forth in section 22-3-13a;
maintain and operate a system to receive and address questions,
concerns and complaints relating to mining operations; set the
qualifications for individuals and firms performing pre-blast surveys;
educate, train, examine, and certify blasters; and propose rules for
legislative approvals pursuant to section 29a-3-15 for the
implementation of sections 34 through 39 of this article.
4. W.Va. Code 22-3-13a--Pre-Blast Survey Requirements
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by modifying
subsection (c), subdivision (f)(7), subsection (g), subsection (h), and
subsection (i). Section 22-3-13a(c) provides that the DMR may not
determine the pre-blast survey to be incomplete because it indicates
that access to a particular structure, underground water supply or well
was refused, impossible or impractical. In addition, the operator must
send copies of all written waivers and affidavits executed pursuant to
this subsection to the DMR. Section 22-3-13a(f)(7) provides that pre-
blast survey must include the date of the pre-blast survey and the date
it was mailed or delivered to the DMR. Section 22-3-13a(g) provides
that the pre-blast survey must be submitted to the DMR at least 15 days
prior to the commencement of any production blasting. The DMR must
review each pre-blast survey as to form and completeness only and
notify the operator of any deficiencies: Provided, that once all
required surveys have been reviewed and accepted by the DMR, blasting
may commence sooner than 15 days after submittal. In addition, the DMR
must provide a copy of the pre-blast survey to the owner or occupant.
Section 22-3-13a(h) provides that the pre-blast survey notice must be
on a form prescribed by the DMR. Finally, section 22-3-13a(i) provides
that all authority to promulgate blasting rules is transferred from the
OEB to the DMR. Other statutory provisions relating to pre-blast
surveys are included in this section of the State's submittal.
5. W.Va. Code 22-3-22a--Site-Specific Blasting Design Requirement
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions at
subsections (e) and (f). Section 22-3-22a(e) provides that blasting
within 1,000 feet of a protected structure must have a site-specific
blast design approved by the DMR. In addition, section 22-3-22a(f)
provides that the operator must send copies of all written waivers
executed pursuant to this subsection the DMR. Written waivers executed
and filed with the DMR are valid during the life of the permit or any
renewal of the permit and are enforceable against any subsequent owners
or occupants of the protected structure.
6. W.Va. Code 22-3-34--Office of Explosives and Blasting Terminated;
Transfer of Functions; Responsibilities
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by adding
section 22-3-34, which states that the OEB will be terminated.
7. W.Va. Code 22-3-35--Legislative Rules on Surface Mining Blasting;
Disciplinary Procedures for Certified Blasters
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by adding
section 22-3-35, which provides that the DMR will apply and enforce
OEB's rules at 199 CSR 1 until it adopts rules of its own. DMR must
promulgate rules for legislative approval in accordance with the
provisions of section 29(a)-3-15 as necessary to reflect the repeal of
section 22-3a-7, as amended. This section includes statutory provisions
relating to blasting and blaster certification as submitted by West
Virginia.
8. W.Va. Code 22-3-36--Claims Process for Blasting
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by adding
section 22-3-36, which establishes a blasting claims process. WVDEP
must establish and manage the process for filing, administering, and
resolving claims related to blasting. Other State statutory provisions
relating to the claims process are presented in this section of the
submittal.
9. W.Va. Code 22-3-37--Rules, Orders, and Permits To Remain in Effect
Regarding Blasting; Proceedings not Affected
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by adding
section 22-3-37. This section provides that all orders, determinations,
rules, permits,
[[Page 7478]]
grants, contracts, certificates, licenses, waivers, bonds,
authorizations and privileges that have been issued, made, granted or
allowed to become effective prior to the enactment of this article will
remain in effect according to their terms until modified, terminated,
superseded, set aside or revoked pursuant to this article, by a court
of competent jurisdiction, or by operation of law. Any proceedings,
including notices of proposed rulemaking, or any application for any
license, permit, or certificate pending before the DMR are not affected
by the enactment of this statute.
10. W.Va. Code 22-3-38--Transfer of Personnel and Assets
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions by adding
section 22-3-38, which provides that the Secretary must transfer to the
DMR any personnel and assets presently used to perform or used in the
performance of the duties and functions required by sections 34 through
39.
B. Proposed Statutory Revisions Authorized by SB 687 to W.Va. Code 22-
3-13a--Pre-Blast Survey Requirements
1. W.Va. Code 22-3-13a(a)(1), (2), (b) and (f)--Pre-Blast Survey
Requirements
West Virginia seeks to revise its statutory provisions at section
22-3-13a(1) for all surface mining operations to send notifications of
pre-blast surveys to all owners and occupants of man-made dwellings or
structures within one half mile of the permitted area or areas. Section
22-3-13a(2) provides that for blasting associated with permitted
surface disturbance of underground mines and blasting associated with
specified construction, including but not limited to, haul roads,
shafts, and/or drainage structures, the operator may send written
request to the Secretary asking that the required notifications be
limited to all owner and occupants of man-made dwellings or structures
within one-half mile of the proposed blasting area. Other pre-blast
survey requirements are included within this section as submitted by
the State.
C. Proposed Regulatory Changes Authorized by SB 163 to CSR 38-2-6
Regarding Blasting; and CSR 38-2-25 Through 27 Relating to
Certification of Blasters; Blasting Damage Claim and Arbitration for
Blasting Damage Claims; Explosive Material Fee
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its regulatory
provisions relating to blasting in general; certification of blasters;
blasting damage claims; arbitration for blasting damage claims; and
explosive material fee by consolidating all blasting requirements into
its Surface Mining Reclamation Regulations at CSR 38-2-6, 25, 26 and
27. Most of these requirements are being transferred from the State's
Surface Mining Blasting Rule at 199 CSR 1 due to the proposed
elimination of the OEB. With the consolidation of its rules and
approval of these requirements by OSMRE, 199 CSR 1 will be rescinded by
the State.
1. CSR 38-2-6.1--General Requirements
West Virginia seeks to revise its blasting regulations by deleting
existing language at subsection 6.1 and adding new language which
provides that each blaster will comply with all applicable State and
Federal laws in the use of explosives, and each blaster that is
certified by the Secretary will be responsible for all blasting
operations in accordance with the blasting plan.
2. CSR 38-2-6.2--Blasting Plans
West Virginia seeks to revise its blasting regulations by deleting
existing language at subsection 6.2 and adding new language which
provides that all surface mining operations that propose blasting must
include a blasting plan that will include, at a minimum, information
setting forth the limitation the operator will meet with regard to
ground vibration and air blast, the basis for those limitation, and the
methods to be applied in preventing the adverse effects of blasting
operations. The blasting plan will delineate the type of explosives and
detonation equipment, the size, the timing and frequency of blasts, and
the effect of geologic and topographic conditions on specific blasts.
Other regulatory provisions relating to blasting plans are included
within this section.
3. CSR 38-2-6.3--Public Notice of Blasting Operations
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that at least ten (10) days but not more than thirty
(30) days prior to commencing any blasting operations which detonate
five (5) pounds or more of explosives at any given time, the operator
must publish a blasting schedule in a newspaper of general circulation
in all the counties of the proposed permit area. Copies of the schedule
shall be distributed by certified mail to local governments, public
utilities, and each resident within one half mile of the blasting
sites. Unless blasting will occur on drainage structures and roads,
these structures will be exempt for the purpose of measuring the
notification area. A list of residents, utilities and owners of man-
made structures within the notification area will be made a part of the
blasting plan, and will be updated on an annual basis. The operator
must republish and redistribute the schedule at least every twelve (12)
months in the same manner above. The operator will revise, republish,
and redistribute the schedule at least ten (10) days, but not more than
thirty (30) days prior to blasting whenever the area covered by the
schedule changes or actual time periods for blasting significantly
differ from that set forth in the prior schedule. Proof of notification
must be retained by the permittee. Other specific requirements relating
to notifying the public of all blasting operations are included within
this section.
4. CSR 38-2-6.4--Surface Blasting on Underground Mines (Face-up Area,
Slopes and Shafts) and Construction Blasting
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that construction blasting means incidental blasting to
develop haul roads, mine access roads, coal preparation plants and
drainage structures, and cannot include blasting that removes the
overburden to expose underlying coal seams for the surface extraction.
Surface blasting activities related to underground coal mining and
construction blasting are not subject to the requirements of
subdivision 6.3.a. of this rule so long as all local governments and
residents and workplaces or owners of dwellings or structures located
within one-half (\1/2\,) mile of the blast site are notified in writing
by the operator of proposed times and locations of the blasting
operation. Such notice of times that blasting is to be conducted may be
announced weekly, but in no case less than twenty-four (24) hours
before the blasting will occur.
Blasting activities for underground coal mining and construction
blasting will be subject to this rule and regulated as surface blasting
and the operator must submit a blast plan that considers all aspects of
blasting contained in this section. For shafts and slopes related to
underground mining, the operator will submit a blast plan for the
initial developmental blast of shafts and slopes, which will consider
all aspects of surface coal mine blasting contained in this section.
The Secretary will then only regulate and monitor for surface effects
from ground vibration and air blast for the remainder of the shaft or
slope until it intersects the coal seam to be mined.
[[Page 7479]]
5. CSR 38-2-6.5--Blast Record
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that a blasting log book on forms formatted in a manner
prescribed by the Secretary will be kept current daily and made
available for inspection at the site by the Secretary and upon written
request by the public. Other provisions relating to what information
blasting records should contain are included within this section.
6. CSR 38-2-6.6--Blasting Procedures
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that all blasting will be conducted during daytime
hours, between sunrise and sunset; provided, that the Secretary may
specify more restrictive time periods based on public requests or other
consideration, including the proximity to residential areas. No
blasting will be conducted on Sunday. Provided, however, the Secretary
may grant approval of a request for Sunday blasting if the operator
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Secretary that the blasting is
necessary and there has been an opportunity for a public hearing.
Blasting cannot be conducted at times different from those announced in
the blasting schedule except in emergency situations where rain,
lightning, or other atmospheric conditions or operator or public safety
requires unscheduled detonations. Blasting will be conducted in such a
way so as to prevent injury to persons, damage to public or private
property outside the permit area, adverse impacts on any underground
mine, and change in the course, channel, or availability of surface or
groundwater outside the permit area. Other specific blasting and safety
provisions relating to air blast and ground vibration limits are set
forth within this section.
7. CSR 38-2-6.7--Blasting Control for ``Other Structures''
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that all ``other structures'' in the vicinity of the
blasting area which are not defined as protected structures must be
protected from damage by the limits specified in paragraph 6.6.c.1
subdivisions 6.6.h., 6.6.i. and 6.6j of this rule, unless waived in
total or in part by the owner of the structure. The waiver of the
protective structures may be accomplished by the establishment of a
maximum allowable limit on ground vibration or air blast limits or both
for the structure in the written waiver agreement between the operator
and the structure owner. The waiver may be presented at the time of
application, in the blasting plan, or provided at a later date and made
available for review and approval by the Secretary. All waivers must be
acquired before any blasts may be conducted as designed based on that
waiver. The plan submitted under this subsection cannot reduce the
level of protection for other structures otherwise provided for in this
rule.
8. CSR 38-2-6.8--Pre-Blast Surveys
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that at least thirty days prior to commencing blasting,
an operator's designee must notify in writing all owners and occupants
of manmade dwellings or structures with a \1/2\ mile of the permit area
or for those that the meet the requirements of 6.4 of this subsection
within \1/2\ mile of the blast site that the operator or operator's
designee will perform pre-blast surveys. The operator must conduct the
pre-blast survey in a manner that will determine the condition of the
dwelling or structure, to document any pre-blasting damage and to
document other physical factors that could reasonably be affected by
the blasting. Assessments of the pre-blasting condition of structures
such as pipes, cables, transmission lines, wells, and water systems
must be based on the exterior or ground surface conditions and other
available data. Attention must be given to documenting and establishing
the pre-blasting condition of wells and other water systems. The pre-
blast survey must include a description of the water source and water
delivery system. When the water supply is a well, the pre-blast survey
must include written documentation about the type of well, and where
available, the well log and information about the depth, age, depth and
type of casing, the static water level, flow and data, the pump the
name of the drilling contractor and the source or sources of the
information. Other specific pre-blast survey requirements are included
within this section.
9. CSR 38-2-25--Certification of Blasters
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that in every surface mine and surface area of an
underground mine when blasting operations are being conducted, a
certified blaster must be responsible for the storage, handling,
transportation, and use of explosives for each and every blast, and for
conducting the blasting operations in accordance with the blasting
plans approved in a permit issued pursuant to W. Va. Code 22-3-1 et
seq., and the rules promulgated under that article. Each person acting
in the capacity of a blaster and responsible for the blasting
operations must be certified by the Secretary. Each certified blaster
must have proof of certification either on his or her person or on file
at the permit area during blasting operations. Other specific
provisions relating to the testing and certification of blasters are
included within this section.
10. CSR 38-2-26--Blasting Damage Claim and Arbitration for Blasting
Damage Claims
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that a claim of damage to surface structures from
blasting will be the result of one or more of the following:
Fly rock damage is based on the presence of debris from
the blast site and the presence of impact damage;
Air blast damage is characterized by broken or cracked
window glass; and
Blasting vibration damage is investigated by experienced
and specially trained personnel to accurately determine the presence of
such damage. Examples are explained in, but not limited to, the
American Insurance Association publication, Blasting Damage, A Guide
for Adjusters and Engineers.
It is the responsibility of the property owner to notify the
Secretary of the alleged blasting damage. An investigation will be
conducted to determine the initial merit of the damage claim. Other
specific provisions pertaining to filing claims for blaster damage and
requests for arbitration involving those claims are included within
this section.
11. CSR 38-2-27--Explosive Material Fee
West Virginia seeks to add new language to its blasting regulations
which provides that pursuant to W.Va. Code 22-3A-7 and 5B-2a-2, there
is hereby assessed a fee of one-quarter cent ($.0025) per pound on
explosive material used for any purpose on surface mining operations.
Provided, that the operators exempted from the application of W. Va.
Code 5B-B1-2A et seq. must pay one-eighth ($.00125) cent per pound on
explosive material. Other requirements regarding the payment,
collection and use of the material handling fee are more fully
described within this section.
[[Page 7480]]
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether these amendments satisfy the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendments, they
will become part of the State program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written or electronic comments on the proposed rule
during the 30-day comment period, they should be specific, confined to
issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent State or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications.
We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the
comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than those
listed (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment including your personal identifying
information, may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4:00 p.m., e.s.t. on
February 25, 2020. If you are disabled and need reasonable
accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and
time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no
one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak, and others present
in the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563--Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. Pursuant to OMB Guidance dated October
12, 1993, the approval of State program amendments is exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13563, which
reaffirms and supplements Executive Order 12866, retains this
exemption.
Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking
When a State submits a program amendment to OSMRE for review, our
regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the
Federal Register indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text
or a summary of its terms, and an opportunity for public comment. We
conclude our review of the proposed amendment after the close of the
public comment period and determine whether the amendment should be
approved, approved in part, or not approved. At that time, we will also
make the determinations and certifications required by the various laws
and executive orders governing the rulemaking process and include them
in the final rule.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: April 30, 2019.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director, North Atlantic--Appalachian Region.
Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the
Federal Register on February 5, 2020.
[FR Doc. 2020-02570 Filed 2-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P