Removal of Rule Designating Developing and Least-Developed Country Designations Under the Countervailing Duty Law, 7448-7449 [2020-02445]
Download as PDF
7448
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas
Designated as a Surface Area.
15 CFR Part 2013
*
RIN 0350–AA11
*
*
*
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
15:55 Feb 07, 2020
*
*
Somerset, KY [Amended]
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
Bowling Green, KY [Amended]
Bowling Green-Warren County Regional
Airport, KY
(Lat. 36°57′52″ N, long. 86°25′11″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile
radius of Bowling Green-Warren County
Regional Airport.
*
*
*
ASO KY E5
*
*
Somerset, KY [Amended]
Lake Cumberland Regional Airport, KY
(Lat. 37°03′13″ N, long. 84°36′56″ W)
Lake Cumberland Regional: RWY 05–LOC,
KY
(Lat. 37°03′38″ N, long. 84°36′28″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 6.5-mile
radius of the Lake Cumberland Regional
Airport, and within 8 miles south and 3.8
miles north of the 228° bearing from the Lake
Cumberland Regional: RWY 05–LOC
extending from the 6.5-mile radius of the
Lake Cumberland Regional Airport to 10
miles southwest of the Lake Cumberland
Regional: RWY 05–LOC.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February
3, 2020.
Marty Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020–02491 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am]
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
Lake Cumberland Regional Airport, KY
(Lat. 37°03′13″ N, long. 84°36′56″ W)
Within a 4-mile radius of Lake Cumberland
Regional Airport, and within 1 mile each side
of the 043° bearing from the airport extending
from the 4-mile radius to 4.8 miles northeast
of the airport.
ASO KY E5
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
*
Bowling Green, KY [Amended]
ASO KY E2
*
Adoption of the Amendment
*
Bowling Green-Warren County Regional
Airport, KY
(Lat. 36°57′52″ N, long. 86°25′11″ W)
Within a 4.2-mile radius of Bowling GreenWarren County Regional Airport, and within
1 mile each side of the 030° bearing from the
airport extending from the 4.2-mile radius to
4.5 miles north of the airport.
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 5–6.5.a. This airspace action
is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
*
ASO KY E2
Environmental Review
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
effective September 15, 2019, is
amended as follows:
Jkt 250001
Removal of Rule Designating
Developing and Least-Developed
Country Designations Under the
Countervailing Duty Law
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register, the U.S. Trade
Representative is publishing a notice
updating the designations of World
Trade Organization (WTO) Members
that are eligible for special de minimis
countervailable subsidy and negligible
import volume standards under the
countervailing duty (CVD) law. This
rule removes the regulations of the
Office of the United States Trade
Representative (USTR), that contain the
designations superseded by the notice.
DATES: The final rule will become
effective February 10, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Assistant General Counsel David P.
Lyons at 202–395–9446 or
David.P.Lyons@ustr.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
USTR last updated part 2013 in 1998.
See 63 FR 29945 (June 2, 1998). In order
to provide more timely updates, USTR
has determined that giving notice in the
Federal Register rather than through a
rulemaking is preferable. Accordingly,
USTR is removing part 2013 and,
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, is publishing a notice updating
the designations of WTO Members that
are eligible for special de minimis
countervailable subsidy and negligible
import volume standards under the CVD
law. Removal of part 2013 also is
consistent with the goals of Executive
Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Cost (January 30,
2017).
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
USTR has considered the impact of
the final rule and determined that it is
not likely to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
business entities because it is applicable
only to USTR’s internal operations and
legal obligations. See 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
III. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any
information collection requirement that
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM
10FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
requires the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 2013
Countervailing duties, Foreign trade,
Imports.
PART 2013—[REMOVED]
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, and under the authority of 19
U.S.C. 1677(36), the Office of the United
States Trade Representative removes
part 2013 of chapter XX of title 15 of the
Code of Federal Regulations.
Joseph Barloon,
General Counsel, Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative.
[FR Doc. 2020–02445 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290–F0–P
DATES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Air Plan Approval; Kentucky: CrossState Air Pollution Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving changes to
the Kentucky State Implementation Plan
(SIP) concerning the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR) submitted by
Kentucky on September 14, 2018, as
later clarified on December 18, 2018.
Under CSAPR, large electricity
generating units (EGUs) in Kentucky are
subject to Federal Implementation Plans
(FIPs) requiring the units to participate
in CSAPR’s federal trading program for
annual emissions of nitrogen oxides
(NOX), one of CSAPR’s two federal
trading programs for ozone season
emissions of NOX, and one of CSAPR’s
two federal trading programs for annual
emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2). This
action approves into the SIP the
Commonwealth’s regulations requiring
large Kentucky EGUs to participate in
CSAPR state trading programs for
annual NOX emissions and annual SO2
emissions integrated with the CSAPR
federal trading programs, replacing the
corresponding FIP requirements. EPA is
approving the portions of the SIP
revision concerning these CSAPR state
trading programs because the SIP
revision meets the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2019–0155. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Regulatory Management Section,
Air Planning and Implementation
Branch, Air and Radiation Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
[EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0155; FRL–10004–
69–Region 4]
15:55 Feb 07, 2020
This rule is effective March 11,
2020.
40 CFR Part 52
VerDate Sep<11>2014
regulations for approval of a CSAPR full
SIP revision replacing the requirements
of a CSAPR FIP. Under the CSAPR
regulations, approval of these portions
of the SIP revision automatically
eliminates Kentucky units’ obligations
to participate in CSAPR’s federal trading
programs for annual NOX emissions and
annual SO2 emissions under the
corresponding CSAPR FIPs addressing
interstate transport requirements for the
1997 annual fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) and the 2006 24hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Approval of these
portions of the SIP revision would also
satisfy Kentucky’s good neighbor
obligation under the CAA to prohibit
emissions which will significantly
contribute to nonattainment or interfere
with maintenance of the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS and 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS.
Jkt 250001
D.
Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management
Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
Mr. Akers can be reached by telephone
at (404) 562–9089 or via electronic mail
at akers.brad@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7449
I. Background on CSAPR and CSAPRRelated SIP Revisions
EPA issued CSAPR in July 2011 to
address the requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) concerning
interstate transport of air pollution. As
amended (including the 2016 CSAPR
Update),1 CSAPR requires 27 Eastern
states to limit their statewide emissions
of SO2 and/or NOX in order to mitigate
transported air pollution unlawfully
impacting other states’ ability to attain
or maintain four NAAQS: The 1997
annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS, the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, and the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. The CSAPR emissions
limitations are defined in terms of
maximum statewide ‘‘budgets’’ for
emissions of annual SO2, annual NOX,
and/or ozone season NOX by each
covered state’s large EGUs. The CSAPR
state budgets are implemented in two
phases of generally increasing
stringency, with the Phase 1 budgets
applying to emissions in 2015 and 2016
and the Phase 2 (and CSAPR Update)
budgets applying to emissions in 2017
and later years. As a mechanism for
achieving compliance with the
emissions limitations, CSAPR
establishes five federal emissions
trading programs: A program for annual
NOX emissions, two geographically
separate programs for annual SO2
emissions, and two geographically
separate programs for ozone-season NOX
emissions. CSAPR also establishes FIP
requirements applicable to the large
EGUs in each covered state. Currently,
the CSAPR FIP provisions require each
state’s units to participate in up to three
of the five CSAPR trading programs.
CSAPR includes provisions under
which states may submit and EPA will
approve SIP revisions to modify or
replace the CSAPR FIP requirements
while allowing states to continue to
meet their transport-related obligations
using either CSAPR’s federal emissions
1 See 81 FR 74504 (October 26, 2016). The CSAPR
Update was promulgated to address interstate
pollution with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS
and to address a judicial remand of certain original
CSAPR ozone season NOX budgets promulgated
with respect to the 1997 ozone NAAQS. See 81 FR
at 74505. The CSAPR Update established new
emission reduction requirements addressing the
more recent NAAQS and coordinated them with the
remaining emission reduction requirements
addressing the older NAAQS, so that starting in
2017, CSAPR includes two geographically separate
trading programs for ozone season NOX emissions
covering EGUs in a total of 23 states. See 40 CFR
52.38(b)(1)–(2). EPA acknowledges that the D.C.
Circuit issued decisions in Wisconsin v. EPA, 938
F.3d 303 (Sept. 13, 2019) and New York v. EPA, 781
Fed. Appx. 4 (Oct. 1, 2019) regarding the CSAPR
Update; however, those decisions did not address
the annual programs designed to fulfill the
requirements of the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS.
E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM
10FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7448-7449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02445]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
15 CFR Part 2013
RIN 0350-AA11
Removal of Rule Designating Developing and Least-Developed
Country Designations Under the Countervailing Duty Law
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the U.S.
Trade Representative is publishing a notice updating the designations
of World Trade Organization (WTO) Members that are eligible for special
de minimis countervailable subsidy and negligible import volume
standards under the countervailing duty (CVD) law. This rule removes
the regulations of the Office of the United States Trade Representative
(USTR), that contain the designations superseded by the notice.
DATES: The final rule will become effective February 10, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assistant General Counsel David P.
Lyons at 202-395-9446 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
USTR last updated part 2013 in 1998. See 63 FR 29945 (June 2,
1998). In order to provide more timely updates, USTR has determined
that giving notice in the Federal Register rather than through a
rulemaking is preferable. Accordingly, USTR is removing part 2013 and,
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, is publishing a notice
updating the designations of WTO Members that are eligible for special
de minimis countervailable subsidy and negligible import volume
standards under the CVD law. Removal of part 2013 also is consistent
with the goals of Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Cost (January 30, 2017).
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
USTR has considered the impact of the final rule and determined
that it is not likely to have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small business entities because it is applicable
only to USTR's internal operations and legal obligations. See 5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act
The final rule does not contain any information collection
requirement that
[[Page 7449]]
requires the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 2013
Countervailing duties, Foreign trade, Imports.
PART 2013--[REMOVED]
For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of
19 U.S.C. 1677(36), the Office of the United States Trade
Representative removes part 2013 of chapter XX of title 15 of the Code
of Federal Regulations.
Joseph Barloon,
General Counsel, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2020-02445 Filed 2-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290-F0-P