Removal of Rule Designating Developing and Least-Developed Country Designations Under the Countervailing Duty Law, 7448-7449 [2020-02445]

Download as PDF 7448 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is published yearly and effective on September 15. Regulatory Notices and Analyses The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as a Surface Area. 15 CFR Part 2013 * RIN 0350–AA11 * * * PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. § 71.1 [Amended] 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and 15:55 Feb 07, 2020 * * Somerset, KY [Amended] Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth. * * * * Bowling Green, KY [Amended] Bowling Green-Warren County Regional Airport, KY (Lat. 36°57′52″ N, long. 86°25′11″ W) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile radius of Bowling Green-Warren County Regional Airport. * * * ASO KY E5 * * Somerset, KY [Amended] Lake Cumberland Regional Airport, KY (Lat. 37°03′13″ N, long. 84°36′56″ W) Lake Cumberland Regional: RWY 05–LOC, KY (Lat. 37°03′38″ N, long. 84°36′28″ W) That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within an 6.5-mile radius of the Lake Cumberland Regional Airport, and within 8 miles south and 3.8 miles north of the 228° bearing from the Lake Cumberland Regional: RWY 05–LOC extending from the 6.5-mile radius of the Lake Cumberland Regional Airport to 10 miles southwest of the Lake Cumberland Regional: RWY 05–LOC. Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on February 3, 2020. Marty Skinner, Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center. [FR Doc. 2020–02491 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am] ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 * Lake Cumberland Regional Airport, KY (Lat. 37°03′13″ N, long. 84°36′56″ W) Within a 4-mile radius of Lake Cumberland Regional Airport, and within 1 mile each side of the 043° bearing from the airport extending from the 4-mile radius to 4.8 miles northeast of the airport. ASO KY E5 In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: * Bowling Green, KY [Amended] ASO KY E2 * Adoption of the Amendment * Bowling Green-Warren County Regional Airport, KY (Lat. 36°57′52″ N, long. 86°25′11″ W) Within a 4.2-mile radius of Bowling GreenWarren County Regional Airport, and within 1 mile each side of the 030° bearing from the airport extending from the 4.2-mile radius to 4.5 miles north of the airport. The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ paragraph 5–6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment. Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). * ASO KY E2 Environmental Review Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows: Jkt 250001 Removal of Rule Designating Developing and Least-Developed Country Designations Under the Countervailing Duty Law Office of the United States Trade Representative. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the U.S. Trade Representative is publishing a notice updating the designations of World Trade Organization (WTO) Members that are eligible for special de minimis countervailable subsidy and negligible import volume standards under the countervailing duty (CVD) law. This rule removes the regulations of the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), that contain the designations superseded by the notice. DATES: The final rule will become effective February 10, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assistant General Counsel David P. Lyons at 202–395–9446 or David.P.Lyons@ustr.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background USTR last updated part 2013 in 1998. See 63 FR 29945 (June 2, 1998). In order to provide more timely updates, USTR has determined that giving notice in the Federal Register rather than through a rulemaking is preferable. Accordingly, USTR is removing part 2013 and, elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, is publishing a notice updating the designations of WTO Members that are eligible for special de minimis countervailable subsidy and negligible import volume standards under the CVD law. Removal of part 2013 also is consistent with the goals of Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Cost (January 30, 2017). II. Regulatory Flexibility Act USTR has considered the impact of the final rule and determined that it is not likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities because it is applicable only to USTR’s internal operations and legal obligations. See 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P III. Paperwork Reduction Act The final rule does not contain any information collection requirement that PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM 10FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations requires the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 2013 Countervailing duties, Foreign trade, Imports. PART 2013—[REMOVED] For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of 19 U.S.C. 1677(36), the Office of the United States Trade Representative removes part 2013 of chapter XX of title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Joseph Barloon, General Counsel, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. [FR Doc. 2020–02445 Filed 2–7–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3290–F0–P DATES: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Air Plan Approval; Kentucky: CrossState Air Pollution Rule Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving changes to the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) submitted by Kentucky on September 14, 2018, as later clarified on December 18, 2018. Under CSAPR, large electricity generating units (EGUs) in Kentucky are subject to Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs) requiring the units to participate in CSAPR’s federal trading program for annual emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX), one of CSAPR’s two federal trading programs for ozone season emissions of NOX, and one of CSAPR’s two federal trading programs for annual emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2). This action approves into the SIP the Commonwealth’s regulations requiring large Kentucky EGUs to participate in CSAPR state trading programs for annual NOX emissions and annual SO2 emissions integrated with the CSAPR federal trading programs, replacing the corresponding FIP requirements. EPA is approving the portions of the SIP revision concerning these CSAPR state trading programs because the SIP revision meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s SUMMARY: jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 2019–0155. All documents in the docket are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. ADDRESSES: [EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0155; FRL–10004– 69–Region 4] 15:55 Feb 07, 2020 This rule is effective March 11, 2020. 40 CFR Part 52 VerDate Sep<11>2014 regulations for approval of a CSAPR full SIP revision replacing the requirements of a CSAPR FIP. Under the CSAPR regulations, approval of these portions of the SIP revision automatically eliminates Kentucky units’ obligations to participate in CSAPR’s federal trading programs for annual NOX emissions and annual SO2 emissions under the corresponding CSAPR FIPs addressing interstate transport requirements for the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and the 2006 24hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Approval of these portions of the SIP revision would also satisfy Kentucky’s good neighbor obligation under the CAA to prohibit emissions which will significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Jkt 250001 D. Brad Akers, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr. Akers can be reached by telephone at (404) 562–9089 or via electronic mail at akers.brad@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 7449 I. Background on CSAPR and CSAPRRelated SIP Revisions EPA issued CSAPR in July 2011 to address the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) concerning interstate transport of air pollution. As amended (including the 2016 CSAPR Update),1 CSAPR requires 27 Eastern states to limit their statewide emissions of SO2 and/or NOX in order to mitigate transported air pollution unlawfully impacting other states’ ability to attain or maintain four NAAQS: The 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS, the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS, the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The CSAPR emissions limitations are defined in terms of maximum statewide ‘‘budgets’’ for emissions of annual SO2, annual NOX, and/or ozone season NOX by each covered state’s large EGUs. The CSAPR state budgets are implemented in two phases of generally increasing stringency, with the Phase 1 budgets applying to emissions in 2015 and 2016 and the Phase 2 (and CSAPR Update) budgets applying to emissions in 2017 and later years. As a mechanism for achieving compliance with the emissions limitations, CSAPR establishes five federal emissions trading programs: A program for annual NOX emissions, two geographically separate programs for annual SO2 emissions, and two geographically separate programs for ozone-season NOX emissions. CSAPR also establishes FIP requirements applicable to the large EGUs in each covered state. Currently, the CSAPR FIP provisions require each state’s units to participate in up to three of the five CSAPR trading programs. CSAPR includes provisions under which states may submit and EPA will approve SIP revisions to modify or replace the CSAPR FIP requirements while allowing states to continue to meet their transport-related obligations using either CSAPR’s federal emissions 1 See 81 FR 74504 (October 26, 2016). The CSAPR Update was promulgated to address interstate pollution with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS and to address a judicial remand of certain original CSAPR ozone season NOX budgets promulgated with respect to the 1997 ozone NAAQS. See 81 FR at 74505. The CSAPR Update established new emission reduction requirements addressing the more recent NAAQS and coordinated them with the remaining emission reduction requirements addressing the older NAAQS, so that starting in 2017, CSAPR includes two geographically separate trading programs for ozone season NOX emissions covering EGUs in a total of 23 states. See 40 CFR 52.38(b)(1)–(2). EPA acknowledges that the D.C. Circuit issued decisions in Wisconsin v. EPA, 938 F.3d 303 (Sept. 13, 2019) and New York v. EPA, 781 Fed. Appx. 4 (Oct. 1, 2019) regarding the CSAPR Update; however, those decisions did not address the annual programs designed to fulfill the requirements of the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. E:\FR\FM\10FER1.SGM 10FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7448-7449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02445]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

15 CFR Part 2013

RIN 0350-AA11


Removal of Rule Designating Developing and Least-Developed 
Country Designations Under the Countervailing Duty Law

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the U.S. 
Trade Representative is publishing a notice updating the designations 
of World Trade Organization (WTO) Members that are eligible for special 
de minimis countervailable subsidy and negligible import volume 
standards under the countervailing duty (CVD) law. This rule removes 
the regulations of the Office of the United States Trade Representative 
(USTR), that contain the designations superseded by the notice.

DATES: The final rule will become effective February 10, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assistant General Counsel David P. 
Lyons at 202-395-9446 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    USTR last updated part 2013 in 1998. See 63 FR 29945 (June 2, 
1998). In order to provide more timely updates, USTR has determined 
that giving notice in the Federal Register rather than through a 
rulemaking is preferable. Accordingly, USTR is removing part 2013 and, 
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, is publishing a notice 
updating the designations of WTO Members that are eligible for special 
de minimis countervailable subsidy and negligible import volume 
standards under the CVD law. Removal of part 2013 also is consistent 
with the goals of Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and 
Controlling Regulatory Cost (January 30, 2017).

II. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    USTR has considered the impact of the final rule and determined 
that it is not likely to have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small business entities because it is applicable 
only to USTR's internal operations and legal obligations. See 5 U.S.C. 
601 et seq.

III. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The final rule does not contain any information collection 
requirement that

[[Page 7449]]

requires the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 2013

    Countervailing duties, Foreign trade, Imports.

PART 2013--[REMOVED]

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, and under the authority of 
19 U.S.C. 1677(36), the Office of the United States Trade 
Representative removes part 2013 of chapter XX of title 15 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations.

Joseph Barloon,
General Counsel, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2020-02445 Filed 2-7-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3290-F0-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.