Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance Genotyping Assay Using Next Generation Sequencing Technology, 7215-7218 [2020-01725]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
2020, DHS will further expand the list
of authorized airports to include DFW
and DTW. Arrival restrictions continue
until cancelled or modified by the
Secretary of DHS and notification is
published in the Federal Register of
such cancellation or modification.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alyce Modesto, Office of Field
Operations, 202–344–3788.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Background
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) is closely monitoring
an outbreak of respiratory illness caused
by a novel (new) coronavirus first
identified in Wuhan City, Hubei
Province, China. Coronaviruses are a
large family of viruses that are common
in many different species of animals,
including camels, cattle, cats, and bats.
Rarely, animal coronaviruses can infect
people and then spread between people
such as with Middle East Respiratory
Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).
The potential for widespread
transmission of this virus by infected
individuals seeking to enter the United
States threatens the security of our
transportation system and
infrastructure, and the national security.
In an abundance of caution and to assist
in preventing the introduction and
spread of this communicable disease in
the United States, DHS, in coordination
with the CDC and other Federal, state
and local agencies charged with
protecting the American public, is
implementing enhanced arrival
protocols to ensure that all travelers
with recent travel from the People’s
Republic of China are provided public
health services. Entry screening is part
of a layered approach used with other
public health measures already in place
to detect arriving travelers who are
exhibiting overt signs of illness,
reporting of ill travelers by air carriers
during travel, and referral of ill travelers
arriving at a U.S. port of entry by U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
appropriate public health officials to
slow and prevent the spread of
communicable disease into the United
States.
To ensure that travelers with recent
travel from the People’s Republic of
China are screened, DHS directs that all
flights to the United States carrying
persons who have recently traveled
from, or were otherwise present within,
the People’s Republic of China arrive at
airports where enhanced public health
services and protocols are being
implemented. While DHS anticipates
working with air carriers to identify
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
potential persons from the affected area
prior to boarding, air carriers shall
comply with the requirements of this
document.
On Friday, January 31, 2020, DHS
posted a document on the Federal
Register public inspection page,
announcing the DHS Secretary’s
decision that arrival restrictions would
go into effect at 5 p.m. EST on Sunday,
February 2, 2020 at seven airports. This
document adds four additional airports
to the list of airports where flights can
land and describes when the arrival
restrictions will include those airports.
DHS notes that implementation of the
arrival restrictions in this document and
in the January 31, 2020 document may
entail technical and logistical
difficulties for airlines. We are confident
that all airlines will make every effort to
comply. DHS is appreciative of good
faith attempts at compliance by airlines.
Notification of Arrival Restrictions
Applicable to All Flights Carrying
Persons Who Have Recently Traveled
From or Were Otherwise Present
Within the People’s Republic of China
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1433(c), 19 CFR
122.32, 49 U.S.C. 114, and 49 CFR
1544.305 and 1546.105, DHS has the
authority to limit the location where all
flights entering the U.S. from abroad
may land. Under this authority and
effective for flights departing after 5
p.m. EST on Sunday, February 2, 2020,
I hereby direct all operators of aircraft
to ensure that all flights carrying
persons who have recently traveled
from, or were otherwise present within,
the People’s Republic of China only
land at one of the following airports:
• John F. Kennedy International
Airport (JFK), New York;
• Chicago O’Hare International
Airport (ORD), Illinois;
• San Francisco International Airport
(SFO), California;
• Seattle-Tacoma International
Airport (SEA), Washington;
• Daniel K. Inouye International
Airport (HNL), Hawaii;
• Los Angeles International Airport,
(LAX), California;
• Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
International Airport (ATL), Georgia;
• Washington-Dulles International
Airport (IAD), Virginia;
Effective at 6:30 a.m. EST on Monday
February 3, this list of airports is
expanded to include:
• Newark Liberty International
Airport (EWR), New Jersey.
Effective at 7:30 a.m. EST on Monday
February 3, this list of airports is
expanded to include:
• Dallas/Fort Worth International
Airport (DFW), Texas; and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7215
• Detroit Metropolitan Airport
(DTW), Michigan.
This direction considers a person to
have recently traveled from the People’s
Republic of China if that person
departed from, or was otherwise present
within, the People’s Republic of China
(excluding the special autonomous
regions of Hong Kong and Macau)
within 14 days of the date of the
person’s entry or attempted entry into
the United States. Also, for purposes of
this document, crew, and flights
carrying only cargo (i.e., no passengers
or non-crew), are excluded from the
measures herein. This direction is
subject to any changes to the airport
landing destination that may be
required for aircraft and/or airspace
safety as directed by the Federal
Aviation Administration.
This list of affected airports may be
modified by the Secretary of Homeland
Security in consultation with the
Secretary of Health and Human Services
and the Secretary of Transportation.
This list of affected airports may be
modified by an updated publication in
the Federal Register or by posting an
advisory to follow at www.cbp.gov. The
restrictions will remain in effect until
superseded, modified, or revoked by
publication in the Federal Register.
For purposes of this Federal Register
document, ‘‘United States’’ means the
States of the United States, the District
of Columbia, and territories and
possessions of the United States
(including Puerto Rico, the Virgin
Islands, American Samoa, the Northern
Mariana Islands, the Trust Territory of
the Pacific Islands, and Guam).
Chad F. Wolf,
Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2020–02413 Filed 2–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA–2019–N–5325]
Medical Devices; Immunology and
Microbiology Devices; Classification of
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug
Resistance Genotyping Assay Using
Next Generation Sequencing
Technology
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
Final amendment; final order.
07FER1
7216
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Upon request, FDA has classified the
HIV drug resistance genotyping assay
using NGS technology as class II
(special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. In
addition, we believe this action will
enhance patients’ access to beneficial
innovation, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens by placing the
device into a lower device class than the
automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976 (Pub. L. 94–295),
which amended the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order 1 finding a new
device to be substantially equivalent
under section 513(i) of the FD&C Act to
a predicate device that does not require
premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(i)). We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a
predicate by means of the procedures
for premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
1 In December 2019, FDA began adding the term
‘‘Final amendment’’ to the ‘‘ACTION’’ caption for
these documents, typically styled ‘‘Final order’’, to
indicate that they ‘‘amend’’ the Code of Federal
Regulations. This editorial change was made in
accordance with the Office of Federal Register’s
(OFR) interpretations of the Federal Register Act (44
U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing regulations (1
CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is classifying the human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug
resistance genotyping assay using next
generation sequencing (NGS) technology
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
HIV drug resistance genotyping assay
using NGS technology’s classification.
We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
We believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens.
DATES: This order is effective on
February 7, 2020. The classification was
applicable on November 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sana F. Hussain, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240–402–
7911.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
I. Background
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
device sponsors do not have to submit
a De Novo request or premarket
approval in order to market a
substantially equivalent device (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the 510(k) process, when necessary, to
market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On March 19, 2019, Vela Diagnostics
USA Inc. submitted a request for De
Novo classification of the SENTOSA SQ
HIV Genotyping Assay. FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the
device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on November 5, 2019, FDA
issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 866.3955. We
have named the generic type of device
‘‘Human immunodeficiency virus drug
resistance genotyping assay using next
generation sequencing technology,’’ and
it is identified as a prescription in vitro
diagnostic device intended for use in
detecting HIV genomic mutations that
confer resistance to specific
antiretroviral drugs. The device is
intended to be used as an aid in
monitoring and treating HIV infection.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
7217
TABLE 1—IN VITRO HIV DRUG RESISTANCE GENOTYPE ASSAY USING NGS TECHNOLOGY RISKS AND MITIGATION
MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Inaccurate detection of resistance
mutation(s).
Device description information, including performance characteristics, and performance studies in labeling.
Incorrect interpretation of test results.
Device description validation procedures and performance studies meeting acceptance criteria.
Device limitations in labeling for genetic mutation detection.
Device description information, performance characteristics, and performance studies in labeling.
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, HIV drug
resistance genotyping assays using NGS
technology are for prescription use only.
Prescription devices are exempt from
the requirement for adequate directions
for use for the layperson under section
502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR
801.5, as long as the conditions of 21
CFR 801.109 are met (referring to 21
U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
Section 510(m)(2) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) if,
after notice of our intent to exempt and
consideration of comments, we
determine by order that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We are not
announcing intent to exempt at this
time.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved FDA collections of
information. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 820,
regarding quality system regulation,
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0073; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0120, and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 866 is
amended as follows:
PART 866—IMMUNOLOGY AND
MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 866
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 866.3955 to subpart D to
read as follows:
■
§ 866.3955 Human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) drug resistance genotyping assay
using next generation sequencing
technology.
(a) Identification. The HIV drug
resistance genotyping assay using next
generation sequencing (NGS) technology
is a prescription in vitro diagnostic
device intended for use in detecting HIV
genomic mutations that confer
resistance to specific antiretroviral
drugs. The device is intended to be used
as an aid in monitoring and treating HIV
infection.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(1) The intended use of the device
must:
(i) Specify the analyte (RNA or DNA),
the genes in which mutations are
detected, the clinical indications
appropriate for test use, the sample
type, and the specific population(s) for
which the device in intended.
(ii) State that the device in not
intended for use as an aid in the
diagnosis of infection with HIV or to
confirm the presence of HIV infection,
or for screening donors of blood,
plasma, or human cells, tissues, and
cellular and tissue-based products.
(2) The labeling must include:
(i) A detailed device description,
including but not limited to, all
procedures from collection of the
patient sample to reporting the final
result, all device components, the
control elements incorporated into the
test procedure, instrument
requirements, and reagents required for
use but not provided as part of the
device.
(ii) Performance characteristics from
analytical studies and all intended
specimen types.
(iii) A list of specific mutations
detected.
(iv) The name and version of the
standardized database used for sequence
comparison and results derivation.
(v) A detailed explanation of the
interpretation of test results, including
acceptance criteria for evaluating the
validity of a test run.
(vi) A limitation statement that the
device is intended to be used in
conjunction with clinical history and
other laboratory findings. Results of this
test are intended to be interpreted by a
physician or equivalent.
(vii) A limitation statement that lack
of detection of drug resistance
mutations does not preclude the
possibility of genetic mutation.
(viii) A limitation statement
indicating the relevant genetic
mutations that are included in the
standardized database of HIV genomic
sequences used for comparison and
results derivation but that are not
detected by the test.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
7218
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 26 / Friday, February 7, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(ix) A limitation statement that
detection of a genomic drug resistance
mutation may not correlate with
phenotypic gene expression.
(x) A limitation statement that the test
does not detect all genetic mutations
associated with antiviral drugs.
(xi) A limitation statement listing the
HIV types for which the test is not
intended, if any.
(3) Device verification and validation
must include:
(i) Design of primer sequences and
rationale for sequence selection.
(ii) Computational path from collected
raw data to reported result.
(iii) Detailed documentation of
analytical studies including, but not
limited to, characterization of the cutoff,
analytical sensitivity, inclusivity,
reproducibility, interference, cross
reactivity, instrument and method
carryover/cross contamination, sample
stability, and handling for all genomic
mutations claimed in the intended use.
(iv) Precision studies that include all
genomic mutations claimed in the
intended use.
(v) Detailed documentation of a
multisite clinical study evaluating the
sensitivity and specificity of the device.
Clinical study subjects must represent
the intended use population and device
results for all targets claimed in the
intended use must be compared to
Sanger sequencing or other methods
found acceptable by FDA. Drug
resistance-associated mutations at or
above the 20 percent frequency level
must detect the mutations in greater
than 90 percent of at least 10 replicates,
for each of drug class evaluated.
(vi) Documentation that variant
calling is performed at a level of
coverage that supports positive
detection of all genomic mutations
claimed in the intended use.
(vii) Detailed documentation of limit
of detection (LoD) studies in which
device performance is evaluated by
testing a minimum of 100 HIV-positive
clinical samples including samples with
analyte concentrations near the clinical
decision points and near the LoD.
(A) The LoD for the device must be
determined using a minimum of 10
HIV–1 group M genotypes if applicable.
A detection rate at 1 × LoD greater than
or equal to 95 percent must be
demonstrated for mutations with a
frequency greater than 20 percent.
(B) The LoD of genetic mutations at
frequency levels less than 20 percent
must be established.
(viii) A predefined HIV genotyping
bioinformatics analysis pipeline (BAP).
The BAP must adequately describe the
bioinformatic analysis of the sequencing
data, including but not limited to read
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Feb 06, 2020
Jkt 250001
alignment, variant calling, assembly,
genotyping, quality control, and final
result reporting.
(ix) A clear description of the
selection and use of the standardized
database that is used for sequence
comparison and results derivation.
(4) Premarket notification
submissions must include the
information in paragraphs (b)(3)(i)
through (ix) of this section.
Dated: January 27, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020–01725 Filed 2–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
30 CFR Parts 550 and 553
[Docket ID: BOEM–2019–0079]
RIN 1010–AE05
2020 Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustments for Oil, Gas, and Sulfur
Operations in the Outer Continental
Shelf
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements
the 2020 inflation adjustments to the
maximum daily civil monetary penalties
contained in the Bureau of Ocean
Energy Management (BOEM) regulations
for violations of the Outer Continental
Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), pursuant
to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (FCPIA Improvements Act) and
relevant Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) guidance. The 2020
adjustment multiplier of 1.01764
accounts for one year of inflation from
October 2018 through October 2019.
DATES: This rule is effective on February
7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka, Chief, Office
of Policy, Regulation, and Analysis,
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, at
(202) 208–6352 or by email at
deanna.meyer-pietruszka@boem.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Legal Authority
II. Background
III. Calculation of 2020 Adjustments
IV. Procedural Requirements
A. Statutes
1. National Environmental Policy Act
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3. Paperwork Reduction Act
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
5. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
6. Congressional Review Act
B. Executive Orders (E.O.)
1. Governmental Actions and Interference
With Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights (E.O. 12630)
2. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866); Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review (E.O. 13563); and
Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs (E.O. 13771)
3. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
4. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
5. Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175)
6. Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (E.O. 13211)
I. Legal Authority
OCSLA authorizes the Secretary of the
Interior to impose a daily civil monetary
penalty for a violation of OCSLA or its
regulations, leases, permits, or orders
and directs the Secretary to adjust the
maximum penalty at least every three
years to reflect any inflation increase in
the Consumer Price Index. 43 U.S.C.
1350(b)(1). Similarly, OPA authorizes
civil monetary penalties for failure to
comply with OPA’s financial
responsibility provisions or its
implementing regulations. 33 U.S.C.
2716a(a). OPA does not include a
maximum daily civil penalty inflation
adjustment provision. Id.
The FCPIA Improvements Act 1
requires that Federal agencies publish
inflation adjustments to their civil
monetary penalties in the Federal
Register not later than January 15
annually.2 Public Law 114–74, sec.
701(b)(1). The purposes behind these
inflation adjustments are to maintain
the deterrent effect of civil penalties and
to further the policy goals of the
underlying statutes. Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990, Public Law 101–410, sec. 2
(codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note).
II. Background
BOEM implemented the 2019
inflation adjustment for its civil
monetary penalties through a final rule
published in the Federal Register on
March 26, 2019, which accounted for
1 The FCPIA Improvements Act amended the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990. Public Law 101–410 (codified at 28 U.S.C.
2461 note).
2 Under the FCPIA Improvements Act, Federal
agencies were required to adjust their civil
monetary penalties for inflation with an initial
‘‘catch-up’’ adjustment through an interim final
rulemaking in 2016 and are required to make
subsequent inflation adjustments not later than
January 15 annually, beginning in 2017. Public Law
114–74, sec. 701(b)(1).
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 26 (Friday, February 7, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7215-7218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01725]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 866
[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-5325]
Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices;
Classification of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance
Genotyping Assay Using Next Generation Sequencing Technology
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final amendment; final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 7216]]
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is
classifying the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance
genotyping assay using next generation sequencing (NGS) technology into
class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the
device type are identified in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the HIV drug resistance genotyping assay using
NGS technology's classification. We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the device into class II (special
controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens.
DATES: This order is effective on February 7, 2020. The classification
was applicable on November 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sana F. Hussain, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-402-
7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the HIV drug resistance genotyping
assay using NGS technology as class II (special controls), which we
have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device class than
the automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (Pub. L. 94-295),
which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order \1\ finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act to a predicate device that does not
require premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)). We determine
whether a new device is substantially equivalent to a predicate by
means of the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k)
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In December 2019, FDA began adding the term ``Final
amendment'' to the ``ACTION'' caption for these documents, typically
styled ``Final order'', to indicate that they ``amend'' the Code of
Federal Regulations. This editorial change was made in accordance
with the Office of Federal Register's (OFR) interpretations of the
Federal Register Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 15), its implementing
regulations (1 CFR 5.9 and parts 21 and 22), and the Document
Drafting Handbook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically within
class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the initial
classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request
or premarket approval in order to market a substantially equivalent
device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial equivalence'').
Instead, sponsors can use the 510(k) process, when necessary, to market
their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On March 19, 2019, Vela Diagnostics USA Inc. submitted a request
for De Novo classification of the SENTOSA SQ HIV Genotyping Assay. FDA
reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria
for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on November 5, 2019, FDA issued an order to the
requester classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 866.3955. We have named
the generic type of device ``Human immunodeficiency virus drug
resistance genotyping assay using next generation sequencing
technology,'' and it is identified as a prescription in vitro
diagnostic device intended for use in detecting HIV genomic mutations
that confer resistance to specific antiretroviral drugs. The device is
intended to be used as an aid in monitoring and treating HIV infection.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
[[Page 7217]]
Table 1--In Vitro HIV Drug Resistance Genotype Assay Using NGS
Technology Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate detection of resistance Device description information,
mutation(s). including performance
characteristics, and performance
studies in labeling.
Device description validation
procedures and performance studies
meeting acceptance criteria.
Device limitations in labeling for
genetic mutation detection.
Incorrect interpretation of test Device description information,
results. performance characteristics, and
performance studies in labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act.
At the time of classification, HIV drug resistance genotyping
assays using NGS technology are for prescription use only. Prescription
devices are exempt from the requirement for adequate directions for use
for the layperson under section 502(f)(1) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR
801.5, as long as the conditions of 21 CFR 801.109 are met (referring
to 21 U.S.C. 352(f)(1)).
Section 510(m)(2) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a
class II device from the premarket notification requirements under
section 510(k) if, after notice of our intent to exempt and
consideration of comments, we determine by order that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide reasonable assurance of safety
and effectiveness of the device. We are not announcing intent to exempt
at this time.
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved FDA collections of information. These collections
of information are subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521). The collections of information in the guidance document ``De
Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III
Designation)'' have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844;
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 820, regarding quality
system regulation, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0073; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding
premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0120, and the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 866
Biologics, Laboratories, Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
866 is amended as follows:
PART 866--IMMUNOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 866 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. [thinsp]866.3955 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 866.3955 Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance
genotyping assay using next generation sequencing technology.
(a) Identification. The HIV drug resistance genotyping assay using
next generation sequencing (NGS) technology is a prescription in vitro
diagnostic device intended for use in detecting HIV genomic mutations
that confer resistance to specific antiretroviral drugs. The device is
intended to be used as an aid in monitoring and treating HIV infection.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The intended use of the device must:
(i) Specify the analyte (RNA or DNA), the genes in which mutations
are detected, the clinical indications appropriate for test use, the
sample type, and the specific population(s) for which the device in
intended.
(ii) State that the device in not intended for use as an aid in the
diagnosis of infection with HIV or to confirm the presence of HIV
infection, or for screening donors of blood, plasma, or human cells,
tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products.
(2) The labeling must include:
(i) A detailed device description, including but not limited to,
all procedures from collection of the patient sample to reporting the
final result, all device components, the control elements incorporated
into the test procedure, instrument requirements, and reagents required
for use but not provided as part of the device.
(ii) Performance characteristics from analytical studies and all
intended specimen types.
(iii) A list of specific mutations detected.
(iv) The name and version of the standardized database used for
sequence comparison and results derivation.
(v) A detailed explanation of the interpretation of test results,
including acceptance criteria for evaluating the validity of a test
run.
(vi) A limitation statement that the device is intended to be used
in conjunction with clinical history and other laboratory findings.
Results of this test are intended to be interpreted by a physician or
equivalent.
(vii) A limitation statement that lack of detection of drug
resistance mutations does not preclude the possibility of genetic
mutation.
(viii) A limitation statement indicating the relevant genetic
mutations that are included in the standardized database of HIV genomic
sequences used for comparison and results derivation but that are not
detected by the test.
[[Page 7218]]
(ix) A limitation statement that detection of a genomic drug
resistance mutation may not correlate with phenotypic gene expression.
(x) A limitation statement that the test does not detect all
genetic mutations associated with antiviral drugs.
(xi) A limitation statement listing the HIV types for which the
test is not intended, if any.
(3) Device verification and validation must include:
(i) Design of primer sequences and rationale for sequence
selection.
(ii) Computational path from collected raw data to reported result.
(iii) Detailed documentation of analytical studies including, but
not limited to, characterization of the cutoff, analytical sensitivity,
inclusivity, reproducibility, interference, cross reactivity,
instrument and method carryover/cross contamination, sample stability,
and handling for all genomic mutations claimed in the intended use.
(iv) Precision studies that include all genomic mutations claimed
in the intended use.
(v) Detailed documentation of a multisite clinical study evaluating
the sensitivity and specificity of the device. Clinical study subjects
must represent the intended use population and device results for all
targets claimed in the intended use must be compared to Sanger
sequencing or other methods found acceptable by FDA. Drug resistance-
associated mutations at or above the 20 percent frequency level must
detect the mutations in greater than 90 percent of at least 10
replicates, for each of drug class evaluated.
(vi) Documentation that variant calling is performed at a level of
coverage that supports positive detection of all genomic mutations
claimed in the intended use.
(vii) Detailed documentation of limit of detection (LoD) studies in
which device performance is evaluated by testing a minimum of 100 HIV-
positive clinical samples including samples with analyte concentrations
near the clinical decision points and near the LoD.
(A) The LoD for the device must be determined using a minimum of 10
HIV-1 group M genotypes if applicable. A detection rate at 1 x LoD
greater than or equal to 95 percent must be demonstrated for mutations
with a frequency greater than 20 percent.
(B) The LoD of genetic mutations at frequency levels less than 20
percent must be established.
(viii) A predefined HIV genotyping bioinformatics analysis pipeline
(BAP). The BAP must adequately describe the bioinformatic analysis of
the sequencing data, including but not limited to read alignment,
variant calling, assembly, genotyping, quality control, and final
result reporting.
(ix) A clear description of the selection and use of the
standardized database that is used for sequence comparison and results
derivation.
(4) Premarket notification submissions must include the information
in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (ix) of this section.
Dated: January 27, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-01725 Filed 2-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P