Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band, 6841-6856 [2020-02086]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
§ 501.8 Postage Evidencing System test
and approval.
(a) To receive Postal Service approval,
each Postage Evidencing System must
be submitted by the provider and
evaluated by the Postal Service in
accordance with the Intelligent Mail
Indicia Performance Criteria (IMIPC)
published by Commercial Payment.
Copies of the current IMIPC may be
requested via mail to the address in
§ 501.2(f). These procedures apply to all
proposed Postage Evidencing Systems
regardless of whether the provider is
currently authorized by the Postal
Service to distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems. All testing required by the
Postal Service will be an expense of the
provider.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 501.10.by revising
paragraph (a) introductory text and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 501.10 Postage Evidencing System
modifications.
(a) An authorized provider must
receive prior written approval from the
director, Commercial Payment, of any
and all changes made to a previously
approved Postage Evidencing System.
The notification must include a
summary of all changes made and the
provider’s assessment as to the impact
of those changes on the security of the
Postage Evidencing System and postage
funds. Upon receipt of the notification,
Commercial Payment will review the
summary of changes and make a
decision regarding the need for the
following:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Upon receipt and review of
additional documentation and/or test
results, Commercial Payment will issue
a written acknowledgement and/or
approval of the change to the provider.
■ 9. Amend § 501.14 by revising
paragraph (c) introductory text,
paragraph (c)(8), and paragraph (d)
introductory text to read as follows:
schedule listing the postage meters to be
destroyed, by serial number and model;
and the proposed time and place of
destruction to Commercial Payment for
approval prior to any meter destruction.
Providers must record and retain the
serial numbers of the meters to be
destroyed and provide a list of such
serial numbers in electronic form in
accordance with Postal Service
requirements for meter accounting and
tracking systems. Providers must give
sufficient advance notice of the
destruction to allow Commercial
Payment to schedule observation by its
designated representative who shall
verify that the destruction is performed
in accordance with a Postal Serviceapproved method or process. To the
extent that the Postal Service elects not
to observe a particular destruction, the
provider must submit a certification of
destruction, including the serial
number(s), to the Postal Service within
5 calendar days of destruction. These
requirements for meter destruction
apply to all postage meters, Postage
Evidencing Systems, and postal security
devices included as a component of a
Postage Evidencing System.
(d) If the provider uses a third party
to perform functions that may have an
impact upon a Postage Evidencing
System (especially its security),
including, but not limited to, business
relationships, repair, maintenance, and
disposal of Postage Evidencing Systems,
Commercial Payment must be advised
in advance of all aspects of the
relationship, as they relate to the
custody and control of Postage
Evidencing Systems and must
specifically authorize in writing the
proposed arrangement between the
parties.
*
*
*
*
*
Brittany M. Johnson,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–01120 Filed 2–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 501.14 Postage Evidencing System
inventory control processes.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) To ensure adequate control over
Postage Evidencing Systems, plans for
the following subjects must be
submitted for prior approval, in writing,
to the Office of Commercial Payment.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) Postage meter destruction—when
required, the postage meter must be
rendered completely inoperable by the
destruction process and associated
postage; printing dies and components
must be destroyed. Manufacturers or
distributors of meters must submit the
proposed destruction method; a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 2, 15, 90, and 95
[ET Docket No. 19–138; FCC 19–129; FRS
16447]
Use of the 5.850–5.925 GHz Band
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission’s proposal to amend its
rules for the 5.850–5.925 GHz (5.9 GHz)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6841
band. The proposal would permit
unlicensed devices to operate in the
lower 45-megahertz portion of the band
at 5.850–5.895 GHz under part 15 of the
Commission’s rules. It would also
permit Intelligent Transportation
System (ITS) operations in the upper 30megahertz portion of the band at 5.895–
5.925 GHz under parts 90 and 95 of the
Commission’s rules. ITS operations
would consist of Cellular Vehicle to
Everything (C–V2X) devices at 5.905–
5.925 GHz, and C–V2X and/or
Dedicated Short Range Communications
(DSRC) devices at 5.895–5.905 GHz. The
document also asks whether alternate
spectrum band approaches would better
achieve the goal of maximizing the
effective and efficient use of the 5.9 GHz
band, including whether differently
sized sub-bands or greater flexibility to
introduce additional vehicular safety
communications technologies into the
band would be warranted.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
March 9, 2020 and reply comments are
due on or before April 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ET Docket No. 19–138, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal Communications
Commission’s website: https://
www.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although the Commission continues to
experience delays in receiving U.S.
Postal Service mail). All filings must be
addressed to the Commission’s
Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
Commission to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Howard Griboff, Office of Engineering
and Technology, at (202) 418–0657,
Howard.Griboff@fcc.gov. For
information regarding the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) information
requirements contained in this
document, contact Cathy Williams,
Office of Managing Director, at (202)
418–2918 or Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
6842
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), ET
Docket No. 19–138, FCC 19–129,
adopted on December 12, 2019 and
released on December 17, 2019. The full
text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC
Reference Center (Room CY–A257), 445
12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554,
or by downloading the text from the
Commission’s website at https://
transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_
Business/2017/db0714/FCC-1794A1.pdf. Alternative formats are
available for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format) by sending an email to
fcc504@fcc.gov or calling the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
Comment Filing Procedures
Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS). See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings,
63 FR 24121 (1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/
ecfs/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messenger
delivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW, Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed
of before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW,
Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
Ex Parte Rules—Permit-But-Disclose
Pursuant to § 1.1200(a) of the
Commission’s rules, the proceeding this
NPRM initiates shall be treated as a
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with
§ 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
§ 1.49(f) or for which the Commission
has made available a method of
electronic filing, written ex parte
presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The NPRM contains proposed new or
modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (PRA). OMB, the general public, and
other federal agencies are invited to
comment on the proposed information
collection requirements contained in the
proceeding. In addition, pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4), the Commission seeks
specific comment on how it might
further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
Synopsis
I. Introduction and Background
1. The Commission has initiated this
NPRM to assess the 5.9 GHz band rules
and propose appropriate changes to
ensure that this 75 Megahertz of midband spectrum supports its most
effective and efficient use. This ‘‘fresh
look’’ approach proposes to repurpose
the lower 45-megahertz part of the band
for unlicensed operations, and to
continue to dedicate the upper 30
megahertz of the band for transportation
and vehicle safety-related purposes.
2. For the past two decades, the nonFederal Mobile Service allocation in the
5.9 GHz band has been reserved for use
by DSRC in the ITS service, with
specific rules and protocols designed to
enable transportation and vehicle safetyrelated communications. The
Commission specified a single
technological standard for DSRC based
on its expectation that doing so was
most likely to promote interoperability
between vehicles and infrastructure in
the United States, enable robust
automotive safety communications, and
accelerate the nationwide deployment
of DSRC-based applications while
reducing costs. Today, DSRC is being
used in certain specialized trafficrelated projects but has not been widely
deployed within the consumer
automobile market. Meanwhile,
numerous technologies have been or are
being developed and deployed in
spectrum outside of the 5.9 GHz band to
improve transportation safety and
efficiency and provide certain services
envisioned for DSRC.
3. C–V2X is a new technology that is
designed to provide transportation and
vehicle safety-related communications.
Its proponents want to use C–V2X to
provide ITS services in the 5.9 GHz
band. In November 2018, the 5G
Automotive Association (5GAA), as part
of its request for a waiver of the DSRC
rules to allow deployment of C–V2X at
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
5.905–5.925 GHz, asserted that C–V2X
represents a significant advancement in
technology to increase road safety and
maximize the benefits of connected
vehicles.
4. In the time since the 5.9 GHz band
was set aside for DSRC, unlicensed
device use in adjacent and nearby
spectrum has developed exponentially.
Most of the spectrum between 5.150
GHz to the lower edge of the 5.9 GHz
band at 5.850 GHz is available for
unlicensed operations under the rules
for Unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) devices. In 2013,
recognizing the increasing demand for
wireless broadband services, the
Commission began a proceeding to
examine the potential for allowing U–
NII devices to share the 5.9 GHz band
with DSRC. Coexistence evaluation
under a three-phase test plan was
ongoing at the time the NPRM was
released. The Commission has noted
that different parties have held different
opinions regarding how the 5.9 GHz
band should be used. These have
included continuing to allow for
exclusive use of the band for DSRC,
promoting the use of C–V2X in the
band, and making the band available for
unlicensed operations.
II. Discussion
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Dedicating Spectrum for Unlicensed
Operations and Vehicular Applications
5. Rather than further attempting to
resolve questions about co-existence
and sharing of spectrum by unlicensed
operations and DSRC, the Commission
proposes to repurpose the lower 45
megahertz of the 5.9 GHz band (5.850–
5.895 GHz) to allow unlicensed
operations, and retain use of the upper
30 megahertz of the band (5.895–5.925
GHz) for ITS purposes, either solely for
C–V2X or divided between C–V2X and
DSRC technologies. This 45/30
megahertz split for unlicensed
operations and ITS applications is
intended to optimize the use of
spectrum resources in the 5.9 GHz band
by providing spectrum to support
wideband unlicensed operations and
continuing to dedicate sufficient
spectrum to meet current and future
needs for ITS applications. The
Commission seeks comment on these
proposals and the potential benefits of
providing separate sub-bands in which
unlicensed operations and vehicularrelated systems would operate.
B. 5.850–5.895 GHz—45 Megahertz for
Unlicensed Operations
6. The U–NII bands span much of the
5 GHz band and play a crucial role in
accommodating the needs of businesses
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
and consumers for fixed and mobile
broadband communications, and
specifically, Wi-Fi. These bands provide
high data rate local area network
connections for business and home
users to interconnect with and access
the internet, and are often used for data
offloading by commercial wireless
networks to relieve congestion when
consumer demand is high. The
Commission believes that unlicensed
use of the 5.850–5.895 GHz portion of
the 5.9 GHz band is well suited for such
use and could help satisfy the
burgeoning demand for high-speed
wireless access.
7. The Commission proposes to
designate the 5.850–5.895 GHz sub-band
for unlicensed operations. The
Commission believes that the 5.850–
5.895 GHz sub-band (denoted as the U–
NII–4 band) could be combined with the
adjacent 5.725–5.850 GHz sub-band
(denoted as the U–NII–3 band) to
provide a large contiguous block of
unlicensed spectrum that could be used
to deliver more capacity and advanced
features to Wi-Fi users. The Commission
requests comment on its proposal to
designate the 45 megahertz of spectrum
at 5.850–5.895 MHz for unlicensed
operations.
8. The Commission suggests that
because the 5.850–5.895 GHz sub-band
is adjacent to the U–NII–3 band,
equipment manufacturers should be
able to readily and cost-effectively
manufacture devices to expand
operations into this sub-band. The
Commission seeks comment on how
easily existing U–NII equipment could
be modified to take advantage of the
additional 45 megahertz of spectrum
proposed for unlicensed operations.
C. 5.895–5.925 GHz—30 Megahertz for
ITS
9. With this NPRM, the Commission
revisits how best to make use of the 5.9
GHz band as part of a larger ecosystem
that includes a variety of spectrum
resources—including spectrum outside
of the 5.9 GHz band—that can improve
and enhance delivery of transportation
and vehicular safety-related
communications. The Commission
seeks comment on the state of DSRCbased deployment and the extent to
which existing licensees currently
operate on some or all of the existing
channels in the 5.9 GHz band. The
Commission also seeks comment on the
transportation and vehicular safetyrelated applications that are particularly
well-suited for the 5.9 GHz band as
compared to spectrum outside of the 5.9
GHz band, and how spectrum outside
the 5.9 GHz band can be used efficiently
and effectively to provide transportation
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6843
and vehicular safety-related
applications.
10. To ensure the most efficient and
effective use of the 5.9 GHz band, the
Commission proposes to continue
dedicating 30 megahertz of spectrum in
the upper portion of the 5.9 GHz band
at 5.895–5.925 GHz to support ITS
operations in the band. The Commission
proposes that designating 30 megahertz
of spectrum will be sufficient to support
ITS-related functions in the 5.9 GHz
band—public safety applications
involving safety of life and property—
which will be part of a larger wireless
ecosystem that advances national
transportation and vehicular safetyrelated goals. The Commission seeks
comment on these proposals.
Additionally, it seeks comment on
whether there are actions it should take,
or requirements that it should adopt, to
promote rapid and effective deployment
of ITS (e.g., establishing appropriate
benchmarks for infrastructure
deployment or in-vehicle installation).
11. C–V2X in the 5.905–5.925 GHz
band. The Commission proposes to
authorize C–V2X operations in the
upper 20 megahertz of the 5.9 GHz band
(5.905–5.925 GHz) as a means of
authorizing the ITS technology that is
most capable of ensuring the rapid
development and deployment of
continually improving transportation
and vehicular safety-related
applications now and into the future,
that is robust, secure, and spectrally
efficient, and that is able to integrate
spectrum resources from other bands as
part of its transportation and vehicular
safety-related system. The Commission
seeks specific and detailed comment on
this proposal and views.
12. The Commission seeks comment
on whether authorizing C–V2X in this
spectrum would be the best means for
promoting effective use of this spectrum
for ITS, both in terms of maximizing the
potential benefits of using 5.9 GHz
spectrum for vehicular-related systems
(including safety features) and
promoting rapid deployment of ITS in
the band. The Commission also seeks
comment on available technical studies
on C–V2X that could inform its
consideration of C–V2X, including any
recent studies that provide information
about how C–V2X would operate in the
5.9 GHz band. The Commission requests
that commenters provide detailed
information on precisely how C–V2X
communications would employ use of
5.9 GHz band frequencies, and how it
would integrate and make use of the
commercial mobile network
infrastructure as part of C–V2X.
13. The Commission also seeks
comment on how C–V2X would
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
6844
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
promote synergies with evolving
technologies that use other spectrum
resources and that will advance
vehicular safety and other intelligent
transportation capabilities of today and
those anticipated in the coming years.
The Commission requests comments
from motor vehicle manufacturers, the
associated automotive industry, and
communications companies regarding
authorization of C–V2X operations in
this spectrum, including the extent to
which their views on ITS development
deployment issues have evolved. If C–
V2X is best suited to achieve U.S. goals
for ITS, how can the Commission best
promote C–V2X use consistent with the
goals and objectives of ITS, including
safety and other vehicular ITS
applications, connectivity, rapid
development, and deployment?
14. C–V2X or DSRC in the 5.895–
5.905 GHz band. The Commission seeks
comment on whether the remaining 10
megahertz (5.895–5.905 GHz) of the 5.9
GHz band should also be designated for
C–V2X. The Commission seeks
comment on how to best optimize the
spectrum so that this portion of the 5.9
GHz band can effectively enable the
rapid and ongoing development and
deployment of transportation and
vehicular safety-related functionalities
and applications today and in the
future.
15. The Commission seeks comment
on whether making additional spectrum
available for C–V2X beyond 20
megahertz is necessary and appropriate
for enabling the development and
deployment of advanced C–V2X
applications in the band. What
additional C–V2X features potentially
would be enabled? Commenters that
support this approach should explain
how C–V2X would make use of the
entire 30 megahertz for ITS services and
applications, and the potential benefits
of this approach.
16. Alternatively, the Commission
seeks comment on whether it should
continue to set aside the 10 megahertz
of spectrum at 5.895- 5.905 GHz for
DSRC. The Commission requests
comment on the kinds of DSRC-based
services that would be possible using 10
megahertz of spectrum. What effect
would the Commission’s proposals have
on any applications delivered using
Channel 172 and Channel 184, the two
DSRC channels that the Commission
previously designated for safety of life
applications? Can any such services be
provided in the 10-megahertz at 5.895–
5.905 GHz? What would be necessary to
ensure that DSRC operations adjacent to
C–V2X would be compatible? Are there
any ITS services that DSRC would
provide that cannot effectively be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
provided using C–V2X? Is dividing the
30 megahertz of ITS spectrum between
C–V2X (20 megahertz) and DSRC (10
megahertz) useful and spectrally
efficient when it comes to making use
of the upper 30-megahertz portion of the
band at 5.895–5.925 GHz for ITS
services? The Commission asks that
commenters supporting DSRC in the 10
megahertz of spectrum at 5.895–5.905
GHz discuss the benefits and costs of
their preferred approach. The
Commission also seeks comment on
whether there is a more appropriate
division of the upper 30-megahertz
portion of the band at 5.895–5.925 GHz
between C–V2X and DSRC.
17. 5GAA indicates that in addition to
the 20-megahertz channel requested in
its waiver request, it also desires a 40megahertz channel (i.e., 60-megahertz
total) so that the technology it has
planned for the band can evolve to
include 5G systems and subsequent
wireless generations that will amplify
and expand upon the safety and other
driving applications. Given that the
Commission is already on the path to
make substantial mid-band spectrum
available for 5G in the 2.5 GHz and 3.5
GHz bands, and is proposing to do so in
the 3.7 GHz band, allocating a larger
spectrum designation in the 5.9 GHz as
a path to 5G appears unnecessary. The
Commission nonetheless seeks
comment on 5GAA’s assertions that 60
megahertz is needed for C–V2X so that
the technology planned for the band can
evolve to include 5G systems. Is it
necessary to plan for such systems in
the 5.9 GHz band? If so, can 20 or 30
megahertz of spectrum support 5G
automotive applications? What
advanced safety applications would be
offered on a future 5G system? The
Commission seeks comment on whether
other 5G spectrum the Commission has
made and is making available could be
used to support additional C–V2X
applications rather than the 5.9 GHz
band. Commenters should address how
5G systems might fit into the overall
connected vehicle ecosystem.
D. Transition of Existing DSRC
Operations
18. Incumbent DSRC operations in the
5.9 GHz band fall into two categories:
DSRC roadside units, which are
licensed on a non-exclusive, shared
basis pursuant to the Commission’s part
90 rules, and on-board units, which are
licensed-by-rule under part 95. Since
the proposals in the NPRM may require
DSRC incumbents to transition their
operations from currently-designated
frequencies, the Commission seeks
comment on possible transition paths.
To assess the potential effects of such a
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
transition, the Commission seeks up-todate information on actual DSRC
operations under existing licenses, as
well as the various uses of ITS that have
been implemented through DSRC
technology in this band. Do the
locations of roadside units registered in
the Commission’s licensing database
provide a complete and accurate
representation of the deployments
under these licenses? To what extent are
DSRC operations concentrated in certain
parts of the 5.9 GHz band, and how does
use of the band vary between on-board
and roadside units? Commenters are
invited to submit information about the
scope of deployment of such on-board
units including, if available, the number
of units deployed in consumer vehicles
versus the number deployed in state,
local, Tribal, or other governmental
vehicles.
19. To what extent are existing DSRC
deployments anticipated to be used on
a long-term (versus demonstration)
basis, and what is the lifespan of
existing DSRC pilot projects? To the
extent the Commission adopts the
proposals detailed in this NPRM, would
operators of existing DSRC deployments
be likely to pursue C–V2X-based
solutions, re-channelize to the
remaining DSRC channel (if it adopts
such a plan), or simply wind-down
operations? To the extent the
Commission grants new or renews
existing DSRC authorizations, should it
only prescribe such authorizations for a
relatively short period of time?
20. The Commission proposes to
modify existing DSRC licenses to allow
operation in only the 5.895–5.925 GHz
sub-band to the extent that licensees
want to operate a C–V2X system or only
in 5.895–5.905 GHz to the extent this
sub-band is retained for DSRC systems
and the licensees want to continue their
DSRC operations. The Commission
seeks comment on these proposals and
appropriate transition paths. How
would the proposed modifications affect
current licensees with operational sites?
How might statutory limitations or
Commission policy inform the actions
that the Commission should take as part
of any transition plan? The Commission
notes that section 316 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, gives the Commission
authority to modify entire classes of
licenses by a rulemaking or
adjudication, though this authority has
been interpreted not to extend to any
‘‘fundamental change’’ to the terms of a
license. What obligations does section
316 of the Communications Act (or any
other provision of the Act) impose on
the Commission with respect to
incumbent DSRC operations if the
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Commission were to reallocate the band
under any of the proposals on which it
seeks comment in this NPRM?
21. Are there any transition
considerations for on-board units that
are different than considerations for
roadside units? Considering the
potential inability of DSRC on-board
units to communicate with non-DSRC
on-board units and infrastructure,
should the Commission take any actions
to remove them from service or require
other suitable modifications consistent
with any ultimately-adopted revisions
to the 5.9 GHz band? Would such units
remaining in vehicles impact
unlicensed operations assuming the
proposals in this NPRM are adopted? If
on-board units remain in vehicles and
DSRC licensees remain permitted to
operate only in the 5.895–5.905 GHz
sub-band, what effect, if any, would
unlicensed operations have on these
DSRC units?
22. Should the Commission allow
existing DSRC roadside infrastructure to
continue to operate under the licenses
they hold until the end of their license
term without renewal expectation? The
Commission seeks comment on whether
such an approach would adversely
affect the introduction of unlicensed
operations and C–V2X applications. In
addition, the Commission requests
comment on an appropriate transition
timeline for all DSRC operations under
any of the approaches it discusses
above. Finally, to the extent that the
Commission adopts revisions requiring
a transition of DSRC operations, the
Commission requests comment on any
other considerations or approaches that
it should take to effectuate an
appropriate transition.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Technical Rules
23. Unlicensed Operations in the
5.850–5.895 GHz Sub-band. Unlicensed
devices operate under the conditions of
not causing harmful interference and
accepting any interference from an
authorized radio station. The
Commission proposes that U–NII–4
device rules be placed in Part 15,
subpart E along with the existing U–NII
rules and be subject to all of the general
Part 15 operational principles, and seeks
comment on this proposal. Because the
proposed U–NII–4 band at 5.850–5.895
GHz is located immediately adjacent to
the existing U–NII–3 band at 5.725–
5.850 GHz, and the Commission expects
that manufacturers will design devices
that span the U–NII–3 and U–NII–4
bands to implement the widest channel
available under the standards—160
megahertz—the Commission proposes
that U–NII–4 devices be subject to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
similar technical and operational rules
that apply to the U–NII–3 band.
24. As an initial matter, the
Commission proposes that U–NII–4
devices be permitted to operate at the
same power levels as U–NII–3 devices,
as specified in section 15.407(a)(3) of
the Commission’s rules. The
Commission seeks comment on this
proposal or whether it should adopt
different power levels. The Commission
proposes that U–NII–4 devices, or
devices that operate across a single
channel that spans the U–NII–3 and U–
NII–4 bands, meet an out-of-band
emissions (OOBE) limit of -27 dBm/
MHz at or above 5.925 GHz, which is
the same limit required for U–NII–3
devices at this frequency. The
Commission notes that, for U–NII–3
devices, the -27 dBm/MHz limit
increases incrementally to a level of 27
dBm/MHz at the band edge, as shown
in section 15.407(b)(4) of the
Commission’s rules. Because the U–NII–
4 band is above the U–NII–3 band and
closer to adjacent services (e.g., ITS
services in the adjacent portion of the
5.9 GHz band (5.895–5.925 GHz) and 6
GHz fixed services), should the
Commission also establish a separate
limit at the upper U–NII–4 band edge
(i.e., at 5.895 GHz)? If so, what should
this limit be? U–NII–3 devices are only
required to meet an OOBE limit of -4.8
dBm/MHz at 5.895 GHz. Should the
slope of the OOBE from U–NII–4
devices at the upper edge of the band be
adjusted to match the OOBE limits from
U–NII–3 devices or should a different
limit be established? If the OOBE limits
from the U–NII–4 band are adjusted to
match the U–NII–3 band OOBE limits,
can unlicensed devices and ITS devices
operate directly adjacent to each other
as the emissions into the ITS band
would be identical from either U–NII–
3 or U–NII–4 devices? The Commission
seeks comment generally on the OOBE
limits it should apply at the upper end
of the U–NII–4 band and whether any
spectrum must be reserved to protect
ITS services, and if so, whether such
spectrum should be in the U–NII or ITS
segment of the 5.9 GHz band.
25. The Commission further proposes
that U–NII–4 devices, or devices that
operate across a single channel that
spans the U–NII–3 and U–NII–4 bands,
meet the same OOBE limits as U–NII–
3 devices at the lower edge of the
combined U–NII–3 and U–NII–4 band,
i.e., at 5.725 GHz. Because the
Commission expects devices designed
for the U–NII–3 and U–NII–4 bands to
be similar and therefore compatible
with each other, it does not believe it is
necessary to set a separate OOBE limit
for U–NII–4 devices at the U–NII–3/U–
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6845
NII–4 band edge. The Commission seeks
comment on these proposals as well as
comment on whether there are
alternative OOBE limits that it should
adopt.
26. The Commission’s proposals
support separate U–NII–3 and U–NII–4
bands to provide flexibility in designing
U–NII–3 equipment under the less
stringent OOBE rules at the upper edge
of the band. The Commission’s
proposals also provide flexibility for
devices to operate across the U–NII–3
and U–NII–4 bands using the widest
bandwidths permitted under the
Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers (IEEE) 802.11 standard.
Alternatively, the Commission could
expand the U–NII–3 band and
implement a single set of OOBE limits
for the combined 5.725–5.895 GHz band
using the OOBE limits proposed for U–
NII–4 band devices or devices that
operate across a single channel that
spans the U–NII–3 and U–NII–4 bands.
What advantages would a single band
under uniform rules provide? What
would be the drawbacks, especially
considering the effect on OOBE limits?
The Commission seeks comment on this
alternative. Under the Commission’s
proposal or this alternative, it also seeks
comment on any other rule changes that
are needed to support communications
across the combined U–NII–3 and U–
NII–4 bands. The Commission seeks
comment on how its proposals might
affect device design and cost.
27. Vehicular-Related
Communications in the 5.895–5.925
GHz Sub-band. The Commission
proposes to adopt rules for vehicularrelated communications in this subband that are similar to the
Commission’s approach when the rules
for DSRC operations were adopted. C–
V2X, which is based on the 3GPP LTE
family of standards (i.e., the 4G LTE-Pro
system in 3GPP Release 14, with
additional standard work currently
underway to develop a 5G C–V2X peerto-peer mode), is incompatible with
DSRC-based operations, which is based
on the IEEE 802.11 family of standards.
As such, the Commission proposes that
the technical rules for C–V2X be based
on the 3GPP LTE standard and seeks
comment on this proposal and any
alternatives that should be considered.
In addition, the Commission seeks
comment on whether the C–V2X
technical rules would be required for all
devices operating in the 5.905–5.925
GHz band, or alternatively in the 5.895–
5.925 GHz band, should the
Commission permit C–V2X operations
in the entire 30 megahertz.
28. The Commission’s current DSRC
rules incorporate by reference the
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
6846
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) EE2213–03ASTM
E223313–03 standard. However, that
standard has been superseded by a
different standard, the IEEE 802.11p. If
DSRC operations remain in the band,
the Commission seeks comment on
whether it should incorporate by
reference IEEE 802.11 standards for
DSRC operations. Similarly, the
Commission seeks comment on whether
3GPP standard(s) for C–V2X operations
should be incorporated by reference in
the Commission’s rules. What are the
trade-offs in terms of deployment speed,
safety and cost between mandating a
particular standard for devices and
leaving the choice of equipment to each
manufacturer or automotive company?
Commenters that advocate for
mandating a particular standard should
address how the Commission or
industry could ensure that devices
could be upgraded as the standard is
upgraded to incorporate new
capabilities and applications.
29. The Commission proposes that its
technical rules for C–V2X be based on
the 3GPP standard and discusses the
specific technical rules that have been
identified by 5GAA. These technical
specifications are shown in the
proposed rules. The Commission further
proposes that, if it permits C–V2X
operations across the entire 5.895–5.925
GHz band, it would extend these
proposed rules to encompass that entire
30 megahertz. The Commission seeks
comment on the specific language of
these proposed rules, including the
efficacy and technical feasibility of the
proposed technical rules.
30. The Commission proposes both
conducted and radiated OOBE limits for
C–V2X equipment and seeks comment
on these proposals. In that regard, the
Commission seeks comment on the
relative in-band versus out-of-band
efficiency of antennas in this frequency
range and whether both conducted and
radiated emissions limits are necessary.
The Commission also seeks comment on
whether devices should be required to
comply with both the conducted and
radiated emissions limits or only one of
the limits. Further, the Commission
seeks comment on the proper reference
for the OOBE limits, whether it should
be the channel edge or the band edge.
31. The Commission proposes that the
transmit power limit for C–V2X
operation be defined over its channel
bandwidth. The Commission seeks
comment on this proposal and asks
whether a different channel bandwidth
for compliance purposes would be more
appropriate. The Commission also seeks
comment on any alternative technical
rules to the existing DSRC regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
framework. Commenters should address
how any technical rules they support
ensures the ability of C–V2X operations
to deliver services while also ensuring
compatibility among different nearby
spectrum users (i.e., how the potential
for causing interference to other services
is minimized). Commenters should
specifically address any differences
between these proposals, especially
with respect to the OOBE limits, and the
existing DSRC rules.
32. Although the Commission
proposes specific rules consistent with
those suggested by 5GAA, the
Commission also seeks comment on
alternatives that are based on the
existing DSRC rules or some other
regulatory framework. Should the
Commission provide additional power
to C–V2X stations commensurate with
the Equivalent Isotropically Radiated
Power (EIRP) levels permitted under the
DSRC rules? Should additional power
be permitted only for certain
applications, such as vehicle-to-network
or roadside unit to network
communications? Should more power
be permitted for all licensees or limited
to only government entities as is the
case under the current DSRC rules? Or
would uniform power levels for all
users better serve the public and avoid
the potential for harmful interference?
Should antenna height be a factor in
how much power is permitted?
Commenters advocating for technical
limits similar to the existing DSRC rules
should address how their alternative
rules prevent harmful interference to
nearby services.
33. To the extent the Commission
retains provisions for DSRC operations
in the 5.895–5.905 GHz band, it
proposes to retain the existing part 90
and part 95 technical and coordination
rules that currently apply to DSRC
roadside unit and on-board unit
operations on that channel (currently
designated as DSRC Channel 180). This
includes a power limit of 23 dBm EIRP
and adherence to the current OOBE
limits. The Commission seeks comment
on this proposal. Should different
power and OOBE limits be permitted?
For example, should the Commission
permit 33 dBm EIRP levels, similar to
the power level proposed for C–V2X? If
so, what additional measures might
need to be imposed on DSRC operations
to ensure there is no increased
interference to DoD radars? Also, to the
extent the Commission retains
provisions for DSRC, it would be
adjacent to the C–V2X band. Are there
any additional technical rules the
Commission should adopt for DSRC
and/or C–V2X to facilitate their
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
respective operations under this
adjacent-channel arrangement?
34. Incumbent protection. In addition
to the non-Federal Mobile Service
allocation currently designated for
DSRC, the 5.9 GHz band contains
allocations for the Federal Radiolocation
Service and the non-Federal Fixed
Satellite Service (FSS) (Earth-to-space)
on a primary basis, and the Amateur
Service on a secondary basis for nonFederal use. The 5.850–5.875 GHz
segment of the 5.9 GHz band is
designated internationally for Industrial,
Scientific, and Medical (ISM)
applications.
35. The Department of Defense (DoD)
uses the Federal Radiolocation Service
to operate fixed and mobile radars for
surveillance (including airborne
surveillance), test range
instrumentation, airborne transponders,
and testing in support of the tracking
and control of airborne vehicles. The
existing DSRC rules for protection of the
primary 5.9 GHz band Federal
Radiolocation Service require that
roadside installations within 75
kilometers around 59 Federal radar
locations be coordinated with the
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA). The
Commission believes that requiring C–
V2X equipment to likewise coordinate
installations within 75-kilometer
coordination zones represents the most
straightforward approach for enabling
compatibility with federal operations.
The Commission seeks comment on this
proposal, and specifically on whether
C–V2X operations at the proposed
power levels would in any way alter the
previous assumptions for sharing with
DoD radars. In addition, the
Commission seeks comment on what
measures the Commission might
establish for C–V2X equipment to
ensure the radars are not subject to
harmful interference. Commenters
should address the potential impact
from both roadside and onboard units
and provide information as to how such
interference could be mitigated by
requiring technical or operational
constraints on the C–V2X operations in
the event harmful interference were to
occur.
36. The Commission also seeks
comment on whether there are alternate
methods to ensure that harmful
interference is not caused to federal
radars from C–V2X devices if it were to
adopt the proposals included in the
NPRM. Have there been any tests or
studies undertaken by C–V2X
proponents demonstrating that the C–
V2X protocol provides comparable or
greater protection to federal radars as
compared to DSRC devices?
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Alternatively, could dynamic or
location awareness methods be used by
C–V2X systems to automatically reduce
power when nearing any of the sites
designated for coordination, and could
such provisions be made applicable to
all C–V2X equipment? The
Commission’s consideration of on-board
units in this regard could become
relevant if it adopts final rules that
specify different maximum power limits
for C–V2X on-board units than those for
DSRC on-board units. Under such a
regime, how would systems be updated
if new DoD radar sites are added?
Proponents of any of these options
should provide details specifying how
the Commission could modify the
interference protection rules.
37. As to unlicensed devices in the
5.9 GHz band, the Commission notes
that unlicensed devices currently share
spectrum with D0D radar operations in
the adjacent U–NII–3 band (5.725–5.850
GHz) without implementing any
frequency use avoidance techniques,
and in general, sharing has been
successful. The Commission proposes to
adopt the same technical rules (e.g.,
radiated power, power spectral density,
etc.) for U–NII–4 unlicensed devices as
apply to U–NII–3 unlicensed devices.
The Commission will continue working
with NTIA and DoD to examine and
mitigate the potential for harmful
interference to DoD radars under these
proposed rules and may impose
additional technical or operational
constraints on U–NII–4 devices. The
Commission further seeks comment on
whether there are any mitigation
measures, such as technical or
operational conditions or constraints
that it should consider for U–NII–4
operations to protect DoD radars in the
5.9 GHz band.
38. The primary non-federal FSS
(Earth-to-space) operations at 5.9 GHz
band are part of the ‘‘extended C-band’’
and provide uplinks (Earth-to-space)
that are limited to international intercontinental systems and subject to caseby-case electromagnetic compatibility
analysis. The majority of these stations
are near the coastlines, though there are
some inland stations. To enable the
required international inter-continental
transmissions, these stations transmit to
satellites located at longitudes that are
not located over the U.S. The
Commission previously determined that
no coordination requirement is needed
to protect FSS uplink operations from
harmful interference due to DSRC
transmissions. Because C–V2X
operations are anticipated to be similar
to DSRC operations in their potential for
interference, the Commission proposes
that coordination with FSS stations is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
unnecessary to ensure protection from
harmful interference due to C–V2X
transmissions and seeks comment on
this assessment. The Commission
further proposes that to the extent DSRC
operations remain in the 5.9 GHz band,
such stations continue to operate under
the current rules; i.e., no coordination is
necessary with FSS stations. The
Commission seeks comment on this
proposal and asks commenters to
provide information on the types of FSS
uses this band supports and how much
this band actually is used (i.e., is it used
continuously or only as a back-up if
other links go down?). Should the
Commission codify coordination
procedures, or should they remain
under the purview of the interested
parties where they can be more easily
changed and updated as technology or
band usage changes? Although the
Commission observes that C–V2X and
FSS uplink operations can co-exist
without harmful interference, out of an
abundance of caution, it also seeks
comment on whether any testing or
studies have been conducted by
proponents of C–V2X that have
considered FSS uplink incumbents, and
how those results might inform the final
rules it adopts.
39. The Commission also proposes
not to adopt any restrictions on U–NII–
4 devices to account for the existing
non-federal users of the band. The
Commission believes that the expected
unlicensed device use cases, which
primarily involve delivery of Wi-Fi
signals along with the distance to FSS
satellites in geostationary orbit, should
protect FSS uplink operations from
harmful interference. The Commission
nevertheless seeks comment on whether
any targeted rules are needed to ensure
the protection of incumbent FSS uplink
operations. If so, what types of sharing
technology or techniques would be
appropriate and what are the cost
implications for manufacturers,
vendors, and consumers? The
Commission also believes that its
proposal to apply the existing U–NII–3
power rules to the 5.850–5.895 GHz
band will protect co-channel secondary
Amateur Service operations from
harmful interference. The Commission
seeks comment on this proposed
approach.
40. With regard to the secondary
Amateur Service operations in the 5.9
GHz band, the Commission reasons that
no additional rules are necessary to
accommodate co-channel C–V2X use
with the Amateur Service. The
Commission also concludes that its
proposal to apply the existing U–NII–3
power rules to the 5.850–5.895 GHz
band will protect co-channel Amateur
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6847
Service operations from harmful
interference. Similarly, the Commission
proposes that no additional rules are
necessary to protect C–V2X devices
from ISM operations permitted under
Part 18 of the rules in the 5.850–5.875
GHz portion of the band. The
Commission seeks comment on these
approaches.
41. Changes to the U.S. Table of
Frequency Allocations. In conjunction
with the Commission’s proposed use of
the 5.895–5.925 GHz sub-band for
vehicular-related systems, the
Commission proposes conforming
modifications to the U.S. Table.
Currently under Footnote NG160 in the
U.S. Table, use of the non-Federal
Mobile Service in the 5.850–5.925 GHz
band is limited to DSRC operating in the
ITS radio service. The Commission
proposes to modify Footnote NG160 to
remove the reference to DSRC, refer to
ITS generically, and limit ITS use of the
Mobile Service to only the 5.895–5.925
GHz band. The Commission seeks
comment on this proposal.
F. Vehicular Applications Outside of the
5.9 GHz Band
42. Vehicle-resident technologies are
widely deployed in millions of vehicles
today without using 5.9 GHz spectrum,
and other, more advanced vehicle safety
features are under development. The
Commission seeks comment on the
extent to which the needs for
transportation and vehicular safetyrelated communications and other ITS
applications originally identified for the
5.9 GHz band are already being met
through spectrum use outside of the 5.9
GHz band. Is the requirement in the
Intelligent Transportation Systems Act
of 1998 to consider designating
spectrum for ITS still relevant today?
Because the Commission’s general
policy has been to move away from
specific spectrum designations in favor
of more flexible use, is there still a need
to designate spectrum for ITS?
Commenters that advocate for a specific
designation should provide details
regarding the benefits of such a
designation including those to the
public as well as on equipment
designers and manufacturers.
43. Commenters also should consider
whether there are other spectrum bands
that might be better suited for
supporting ITS applications. If so,
which ones? What would be the benefit
of doing so, e.g., would this lead to more
rapid take-up of valuable automotive
safety applications? Commenters should
address the extent to which some of the
5.9 GHz band might remain critical to
the realization of ITS applications.
Commenters that support maintaining
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
6848
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
some 5.9 GHz band spectrum for ITS
applications should specify the specific
transportation and vehicular safetyrelated functions to be accommodated
in the band and how much bandwidth
in this particular band is necessary to
achieve those respective functional
capabilities. Are all of these
applications equally critical to ensure
automotive safety and improve the
vehicular transportation environment?
The Commission seeks comment on
how the Commission can ensure that
ITS is used for safety of life
applications. What are the trade-offs
associated with other options, such as
the use of different spectrum to provide
ITS services? Do the potential safety
benefits vary by band or service and, if
so, in what way?
44. Could the Commission modify its
rules to make it easier to provide for
automotive safety applications in other
bands or through other radio services?
What are the implications of retaining
spectrum for ITS in the 5.9 GHz band
relative to autonomous vehicles,
especially given that autonomous
vehicles are already being tested and
deployed using applications and
technologies other than DSRC for
vehicle-to-vehicle communications or
other transportation or vehicular-safety
related operations?
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
G. Benefits and Costs
45. The Commission’s goal in this
proceeding is to revise the current 5.9
GHz band plan to optimize the efficient
and effective use of the band by making
the band available both for unlicensed
use and ITS services. The Commission
seeks to evaluate the benefits and costs
of its proposed approach as well as
alternatives, and requests comment on
how to best calculate these benefits and
costs. To date, the band has been
underused for ITS services. Designating
the 5.850–5.895 GHz band for
unlicensed operations is likely to
generate quantifiable benefits for
consumers, stakeholders, and the
American economy. Similarly, the
Commission believes removing
uncertainty pertaining to the future of
ITS services in the band, including the
type(s) of technologies that are
authorized, would promote more rapid
and effective deployment of these
services in the band. At the same time,
the Commission recognizes that
reducing the spectrum available for ITS,
depending on the approach taken,
potentially could lead to social costs if
deployments of ITS would ever occur at
wide-scale. The Commission seeks
comment on how to best calculate these
benefits and costs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
46. The Commission believes that its
proposals have the potential to create
economic value by resolving uncertainty
concerning the future designation of the
5.9 GHz band for both unlicensed uses
and ITS services. Specifically, does the
economic value of removing this
uncertainty and providing a clear
direction for use of the band under the
proposed new band plan exceed the
benefits that might be achieved by
continuing on the path set out by the
Commission in 2013, when it sought to
explore sharing of the band between
unlicensed and DSRC devices (and the
extensive further testing that this would
entail)? Insofar as the Commission’s
proposal provides certainty that part of
the 5.9 GHz band would continue to be
reserved for ITS services, and would
have the effect of promoting
development and deployment of ITS
services that make use of this band, how
should the Commission evaluate the
benefits of such a determination today
and into the future?
47. The Commission seeks comment
on the benefits and costs of designating
a significant portion of this band for
unlicensed operations. The Commission
notes that other studies have sought to
quantify the benefits of unlicensed
spectrum, but most have focused on
existing allocations rather than on the
5.9 GHz band specifically. The
Commission requests comment on the
extent to which available studies may
provide an appropriate approach for
quantifying the benefits associated with
proposing to designate 45 megahertz at
5.850–5.895 GHz for unlicensed
operations. The Commission also seeks
comment on other potential benefits,
including benefits to other licensed or
unlicensed users (including ITS users)
that may be able to use unlicensed
devices in providing services.
48. The Commission also proposes to
measure the benefits and costs of
reserving 30 megahertz of spectrum in
the 5.9 GHz band for ITS and seeks
specific comment on how best to
evaluate these benefits and costs. In
proposing to reserve 30 megahertz of
spectrum in the 5.9 GHz band for ITS,
the Commission recognizes that many of
the technologies that will make use of
5.9 GHz band spectrum are evolving and
will continue to evolve in the future.
The Commission seeks comment on
how to evaluate the benefits and costs
of its proposal given the evolving nature
of transportation and vehicular safetyrelated technologies, both within and
outside of the 5.9 GHz band. The
Commission seeks comment on the
extent to which its proposals would
make ITS based technologies either
more or less effective. To what extent
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
are or will the types of ITS services that
would be available through use of the
5.9 GHz band going to be offered using
spectrum outside of the 5.9 GHz band?
How should the Commission evaluate
the benefits and costs of ITS services in
the 5.9 GHz band (whether for vehicular
safety or other transportation-related
applications) using 30 megahertz of
spectrum in the band as compared with
other amounts of spectrum in the band?
The Commission also asks that
commenters quantify how the vehicular
safety and transportation-related
benefits and costs may be affected based
on the authorization of C–V2X
technologies in the entire 5.895–5.925
GHz sub-band, or alternatively
authorizing C–V2X in the upper 20
megahertz and DSRC in the other 10
megahertz. Are there technologies
presently being or likely to be
developed outside of the 5.9 GHz band
that would substantially substitute for
benefits of ITS in the 5.9 GHz band?
49. The Commission is cognizant that
retaining 30 megahertz of spectrum for
ITS in the 5.9 GHz band may have other
economic benefits or costs that could be
affected by its proposal. For instance, in
addition to improving traffic safety, the
ITS service was envisioned as having
the potential to decrease traffic
congestion, facilitate the reduction of air
pollution, and help conserve vital fossil
fuels. To what extent would these
potential benefits be affected by the
Commission’s proposal? The
Commission asks commenters to
enumerate and quantify any such
alternative effects. Additionally, to the
extent that there are benefits and costs
associated with the Commission’s
proposal for unlicensed operations and
ITS services in the 5.9 GHz band, when
and over what time horizon would they
be realized?
H. Alternate Approaches
50. Are there spectrum band
approaches other than those discussed
above that may better maximize the
effective and efficient use of the 5.9 GHz
band? Would creating differently sized
sub-bands be a better approach than the
Commission’s proposed band plan? Are
there any additional emerging vehicle
safety technologies the Commission
should consider for the 5.9 GHz band?
Should the Commission provide
automakers and the transportation
industry with broad flexibility to
introduce additional vehicular safety
communications technologies into the
band, and permit any and all
technologies so long as they can coexist? This could include DSRC, C–V2X,
or future spectrum use protocols that
might be developed. If so, how should
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
the Commission define successful coexistence and interoperability, and are
there ways to ensure that a technologyneutral approach to any future such
developments would provide ready
access to the band and enable critical
safety services without causing harmful
interference to incumbent technologies?
51. Commenters should provide
detailed justification to support specific
band plan options, including the types
of services that could or could not be
delivered by unlicensed use or by
vehicular-related services under each
option. Likewise, in each case,
commenters should seek to quantify the
costs and benefits as well as the risks
and opportunities, of the discussed
alternatives relative to the Commission’s
proposed band plan.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis
52. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), the
Commission has prepared this present
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) concerning the possible
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities by
the policies and rules proposed in the
NPRM. Written public comments are
requested on this IRFA. Comments must
be identified as responses to the IRFA
and must be filed by the deadlines in
the NPRM for comments. The
Commission will send a copy of the
NPRM, including the IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel of Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA).
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
53. In this NPRM, the Commission
assesses the present 5.9 GHz band
(5.850–5.925 GHz band) rules and
proposes appropriate changes to ensure
the spectrum supports its highest and
best use. Recognizing the current state
of vehicular technology and
deployment, and the evolution of the
telecommunications market, the
Commission proposes to continue to
dedicate spectrum—the upper 30
megahertz portion of the band—for
transportation and vehicle safety
purposes and repurpose the lower 45
megahertz part of the band for
unlicensed operations to support highthroughput broadband applications.
54. For the past two decades, the 5.9
GHz band has been spectrum designated
for the operation of the Intelligent
Transportation System (ITS). The
Commission adopted licensing and
services rules for Dedicated Short Range
Communications (DSRC), and specified
a single technological standard based on
its expectation that, despite its general
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
preference for leaving the selection of
technologies to licensees, a single
standard in this band was most likely to
promote interoperability between
vehicles and infrastructure in the
United States, enable robust automotive
safety communications, and accelerate
the nationwide deployment of DSRCbased applications while reducing costs.
55. Since that time, the DSRC service
has evolved slowly and has not been
widely deployed within the consumer
automobile market (it has found use in
certain specialized, traffic-related
projects). Meanwhile, numerous
technologies have been or are being
developed and deployed to improve
transportation safety and efficiency and
provide the types of services envisioned
for DSRC in spectrum outside the 5.9
GHz band. A new technology, Cellular
Vehicle to Everything (C V2X), has been
gaining momentum as a means of
providing transportation and vehicle
safety-related communications, and its
proponents now seek to operate its
technology as an ITS service in the 5.9
GHz band. At the same time, unlicensed
device use has developed exponentially
elsewhere in the 5 GHz band to become
a vital component of the
communications landscape. As a result,
most of the spectrum between 5.150
GHz to the lower edge of the 5.9 GHz
band at 5.850 GHz is available for
unlicensed operations. As such, the
5.850–5.895 GHz sub-band in the 5.9
GHz band is especially well positioned
to deliver immediate and potentially
significant benefits when used by
unlicensed devices to meet the intense
demand.
56. This NPRM proposes to create
sub-bands within the 5.9 GHz band to
allow unlicensed operations to operate
in the lower 45 megahertz of the band
(5.850–5.895 GHz) and reserve the
upper 30 megahertz of the band (5.895–
5.925 GHz) for ITS, either solely C–V2X
or divided between C–V2X and DSRC
technologies. This 45/30 megahertz split
for unlicensed devices and ITS
applications is intended to optimize the
use of spectrum resources in the 5.9
GHz band by enabling valuable
additions and enhancements to the
unlicensed ecosystem and by
continuing to dedicate sufficient
spectrum to meet current and future ITS
needs within the vehicular-related
ecosystem. This proposal seeks to
provide the spectrum necessary for
unlicensed operations to implement the
widest, highest throughput channel
permitted by the standards, while
clarifying the technical rules and
eliminating uncertainty for the
development and deployment of ITS
applications.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6849
B. Legal Basis
57. The proposed action is taken
authority found in sections 1, 4(i), 301,
302, 303, 316, and 332 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 301,
302, 303, 316, and 332, and § 1.411 of
the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.411.
C. Description and Estimate of Number
of Small Entities to Which the Proposed
Rules Will Apply
58. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of, and where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that may be affected by
the proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA
generally defines the term ‘‘small
entity’’ as having the same meaning as
the terms ‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small
organization,’’ and ‘‘small governmental
jurisdiction.’’ In addition, the term
‘‘small business’’ has the same meaning
as the term ‘‘small business concern’’
under the Small Business Act. A ‘‘small
business concern’’ is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
59. Small Businesses, Small
Organizations, and Small Governmental
Jurisdictions. The Commission’s actions,
over time, may affect small entities that
are not easily categorized at present.
The Commission therefore describes
here, at the outset, three broad groups of
small entities that could be directly
affected herein. First, while there are
industry specific size standards for
small businesses that are used in the
regulatory flexibility analysis, according
to data from the SBA’s Office of
Advocacy, in general a small business is
an independent business having fewer
than 500 employees. These types of
small businesses represent 99.9% of all
businesses in the United States which
translates to 28.8 million businesses.
60. Next, the type of small entity
described as a ‘‘small organization’’ is
generally ‘‘any not-for-profit enterprise
which is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its
field.’’ Nationwide, as of August 2016,
there were approximately 356,494 small
organizations based on registration and
tax data filed by nonprofits with the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
61. Finally, the small entity described
as a ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’
is defined generally as ‘‘governments of
cities, counties, towns, townships,
villages, school districts, or special
districts, with a population of less than
fifty thousand.’’ U.S. Census Bureau
data from the 2012 Census of
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
6850
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Governments indicate that there were
90,056 local governmental jurisdictions
consisting of general purpose
governments and special purpose
governments in the United States. Of
this number there were 37,132 General
purpose governments (county,
municipal and town or township) with
populations of less than 50,000 and
12,184 Special purpose governments
(independent school districts and
special districts) with populations of
less than 50,000. The 2012 U.S. Census
Bureau data for most types of
governments in the local government
category show that the majority of these
governments have populations of less
than 50,000. Based on this data the
Commission estimates that at least
49,316 local government jurisdictions
fall in the category of ‘‘small
governmental jurisdictions.’’
62. Radio Frequency Equipment
Manufacturers (RF Manufacturers).
Neither the Commission nor the SBA
has developed a small business size
standard applicable to Radio Frequency
Equipment Manufacturers (RF
Manufacturers). There are several
analogous SBA small entity categories
applicable to RF Manufacturers—Fixed
Microwave Services, Other
Communications Equipment
Manufacturing, and Radio and
Television Broadcasting and Wireless
Communications Equipment
Manufacturing. A description of these
small entity categories and the small
business size standards under the SBA
rules are detailed below.
63. Fixed Microwave Services.
Microwave services include common
carrier, private-operational fixed, and
broadcast auxiliary radio services. They
also include the Upper Microwave
Flexible Use Service, Millimeter Wave
Service, Local Multipoint Distribution
Service (LMDS), the Digital Electronic
Message Service (DEMS), and the 24
GHz Service, where licensees can
choose between common carrier and
non-common carrier status. There are
approximately 66,680 common carrier
fixed licensees, 69,360 private and
public safety operational-fixed
licensees, 20,150 broadcast auxiliary
radio licensees, 411 LMDS licenses, 33
24 GHz DEMS licenses, 777 39 GHz
licenses, and five 24 GHz licenses, and
467 Millimeter Wave licenses in the
microwave services. The Commission
has not yet defined a small business
with respect to microwave services. The
closest applicable SBA category is
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except Satellite) and the appropriate
size standard for this category under
SBA rules is that such a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
For this industry, U.S. Census Bureau
data for 2012 show that there were 967
firms that operated for the entire year.
Of this total, 955 firms had employment
of 999 or fewer employees and 12 had
employment of 1000 employees or
more. Thus under this SBA category and
the associated size standard, the
Commission estimates that a majority of
fixed microwave service licensees can
be considered small.
64. Other Communications
Equipment Manufacturing. This
industry comprises establishments
primarily engaged in manufacturing
communications equipment (except
telephone apparatus, and radio and
television broadcast, and wireless
communications equipment). Examples
of such manufacturing include fire
detection and alarm systems
manufacturing, Intercom systems and
equipment manufacturing, and signals
(e.g., highway, pedestrian, railway,
traffic) manufacturing. The SBA has
established a size standard for this
industry as all such firms having 750 or
fewer employees. U.S. Census Bureau
data for 2012 shows that 383
establishments operated in that year. Of
that number, 379 operated with fewer
than 500 employees and 4 had 500 to
999 employees. Based on this data, the
Commission concludes that the majority
of Other Communications Equipment
Manufacturers are small.
65. Radio and Television
Broadcasting and Wireless
Communications Equipment
Manufacturing. This industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
manufacturing radio and television
broadcast and wireless communications
equipment. Examples of products made
by these establishments are:
transmitting and receiving antennas,
cable television equipment, GPS
equipment, pagers, cellular phones,
mobile communications equipment, and
radio and television studio and
broadcasting equipment. The SBA has
established a small business size
standard for this industry of 1,250 or
fewer employees. U.S. Census Bureau
data for 2012 show that 841
establishments operated in this industry
in that year. Of that number, 828
establishments operated with fewer than
1,000 employees, 7 establishments
operated with between 1,000 and 2,499
employees and 6 establishments
operated with 2,500 or more employees.
Based on this data, the Commission
concludes that a majority of
manufacturers in this industry are
small.
66. Automobile Manufacturing. This
U.S. industry comprises establishments
primarily engaged in (1) manufacturing
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
complete automobiles (i.e., body and
chassis or unibody) or (2) manufacturing
automobile chassis only. The SBA has
established a size standard for this
industry, which is 1,500 or fewer
employees. 2012 U.S. Census Bureau
data indicate that 185 establishments
operated in this industry that year. Of
this number, 162 establishments had
employment of fewer than 1,000
employees, and 11 establishments had
employment of 1,000 to 2,499
employees. Therefore, the Commission
estimates that the majority of
manufacturers in this industry are small
entities.
67. Internet Service Providers (NonBroadband). Internet access service
providers such as Dial-up internet
service providers, VoIP service
providers using client-supplied
telecommunications connections and
internet service providers using clientsupplied telecommunications
connections (e.g., dial-up ISPs) fall in
the category of All Other
Telecommunications. The SBA has
developed a small business size
standard for All Other
Telecommunications which consists of
all such firms with gross annual receipts
of $35 million or less. For this category,
U.S. Census Bureau data for 2012 show
that there were 1,442 firms that operated
for the entire year. Of these firms, a total
of 1,400 had gross annual receipts of
less than $25 million. Consequently,
under this size standard a majority of
firms in this industry firms can be
considered small.
68. Internet Service Providers
(Broadband). Broadband internet
service providers include wired (e.g.,
cable, DSL) and VoIP service providers
using their own operated wired
telecommunications infrastructure fall
in the category of Wired
Telecommunication Carriers. Wired
Telecommunications Carriers are
comprised of establishments primarily
engaged in operating and/or providing
access to transmission facilities and
infrastructure that they own and/or
lease for the transmission of voice, data,
text, sound, and video using wired
telecommunications networks.
Transmission facilities may be based on
a single technology or a combination of
technologies. The SBA size standard for
this category classifies a business as
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees.
U.S. Census Bureau data for 2012 show
that there were 3,117 firms that operated
that year. Of this total, 3,083 operated
with fewer than 1,000 employees.
Consequently, under this size standard,
the majority of firms in this industry can
be considered small.
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
69. Cable System Operators (Telecom
Act Standard). The Communications
Act of 1934, as amended also contains
a size standard for small cable system
operators, which is ‘‘a cable operator
that, directly or through an affiliate,
serves in the aggregate fewer than one
percent of all subscribers in the United
States and is not affiliated with any
entity or entities whose gross annual
revenues in the aggregate exceed
$250,000,000.’’ As of 2018, there were
approximately 50,504,624 cable video
subscribers in the United States.
Accordingly, an operator serving fewer
than 505,046 subscribers shall be
deemed a small operator if its annual
revenues, when combined with the total
annual revenues of all its affiliates, do
not exceed $250 million in the
aggregate. Based on available data, the
Commission finds that all but six
incumbent cable operators are small
entities under this size standard. The
Commission notes that it neither
requests nor collects information on
whether cable system operators are
affiliated with entities whose gross
annual revenues exceed $250 million.
Therefore, the Commission is unable at
this time to estimate with greater
precision the number of cable system
operators that would qualify as small
cable operators under the definition in
the Communications Act.
70. Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except Satellite). This industry
comprises establishments engaged in
operating and maintaining switching
and transmission facilities to provide
communications via the airwaves.
Establishments in this industry have
spectrum licenses and provide services
using that spectrum, such as cellular
services, paging services, wireless
internet access, and wireless video
services. The appropriate size standard
under SBA rules is that such a business
is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. For this industry, U.S.
Census Bureau data for 2012 show that
there were 967 firms that operated for
the entire year. Of this total, 955 firms
had employment of 999 or fewer
employees and 12 had employment of
1,000 employees or more. Thus, under
this category and the associated size
standard, the Commission estimates that
the majority of wireless
telecommunications carriers (except
satellite) are small entities.
D. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements for Small Entities
71. The NPRM proposes rules that
will affect reporting and other
compliance requirements. The NPRM
proposes to adopt rules reducing the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
amount of spectrum available for
vehicular-related communications, i.e.,
ITS, from 75 megahertz (5.850–5.925
GHz) to 30 megahertz (5.895–5.925 GHz)
and establish rules for the C–V2X
technology that largely follow the
Commission’s approach when the rules
for DSRC operations were adopted,
including those designed to protect
incumbent operations. The Commission
expects that manufacturers would be
required to redesign DSRC equipment to
reflect the revised band plan (if DSRC
remains a technical option in the band)
and design C–2X equipment to per the
Commission’s new rules. The
Commission also proposes that a
licensee of either technology must
register each of its roadside units in the
Universal Licensing System before
operating such roadside unit and delete
from the registration database any
roadside units that have been
discontinued.
72. The NPRM also proposes to allow
unlicensed operations in 45 megahertz
from 5.850–5.895 GHz (the U–NII–4
band) under the conditions of not
causing harmful interference and
accepting any interference from an
authorized radio station. The
Commission proposes that U–NII–4
devices be subject to similar technical
and operational rules that apply to the
U–NII–3 band, with regard to, e.g.,
power levels and out-of-band emissions
limits. Because the proposed U–NII–4
band at 5.850–5.895 GHz is located
immediately adjacent to the existing U–
NII–3 band at 5.725–5.850 GHz, the
Commission expects that manufacturers
will design devices that span the U–NII–
3 and U–NII–4 bands to implement the
widest channel available under the
standards, which will affect device
design and cost.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives
Considered
73. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6851
74. The proposals that would require
equipment modification or new
equipment manufacturing would have
an impact on equipment manufacturers,
some of which may be small entities.
Though the Commission believes that
its proposed technical rules for the ITS
equipment would provide appropriate
rules for this band, it seeks comment on
alternatives that are based on the
existing rules or some other regulatory
scheme, with regard to, e.g., power
limits and antenna height. The
Commission also seeks comment on
whether it should adopt different power
levels or alternative out-of-band
emissions limits for U–NII–4 equipment
as compared to other U–NII equipment.
75. In addition, the Commission also
seeks general comment on alternative
approaches to the spectrum band plan
than those discussed, such as creating
differently sized sub-bands for
unlicensed and ITS, and technology
neutral approaches to use of the ITS
band.
76. The regulatory burdens the
Commission has proposed are necessary
in order to ensure that the public
receives the benefits of innovative
services and technologies in a prompt
and efficient manner and apply equally
to large and small entities, thus without
differential impact. Comments with
proposed alternatives will assist in
reaching the best outcomes. The
Commission will continue to examine
alternatives in the future with the
objectives of eliminating unnecessary
regulations and minimizing any
significant impact on small entities.
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
77. None.
IV. Ordering Clauses
78. It is ordered that pursuant to the
authority found in sections 1, 4(i), 301,
302, 303, 316, and 332 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 301,
302, 303, 316, and 332, and § 1.411 of
the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.411,
that this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
is hereby adopted.
79. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
6852
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 2
Radio, Telecommunications.
47 CFR Part 15, 90, and 95
Communications equipment, Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
parts 2, 15, 90, and 95 as follows:
PART 2—FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS
AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS;
GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and
336, unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 2.106 is amended by
revising footnote ‘‘NG160’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 2.106
Table of Frequency Allocations.
*
*
*
*
*
NG160 In the band 5895–5925 MHz,
the use of the non-Federal mobile
service is limited to operations in the
Intelligent Transportation System radio
service.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 15—RADIO FREQUENCY
DEVICES
3. The authority citation for part 15
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, 304,
307, 336, 544a, and 549.
4. Section 15.401 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 15.401
Scope.
This subpart sets out the regulations
for unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) devices operating
in the 5.15–5.35 GHz and 5.47–5.895
GHz bands.
■ 5. Section 15.403 is amended by
revising paragraph (s) to read as follows:
§ 15.403
Definitions.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(s) U–NII devices. Intentional
radiators operating in the frequency
bands 5.15–5.35 GHz and 5.470–5.895
GHz that use wideband digital
modulation techniques and provide a
wide array of high data rate mobile and
fixed communications for individuals,
businesses, and institutions.
■ 6. Amend § 15.407 by:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(4) and
(5) as paragraphs (a)(5) and (6);
■ b. Adding new paragraph (a)(4);
■ c. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (a)(6);
■ d. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (b)(4);
■ e. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(5)
through (7) as paragraphs (b)(6) through
(8);
■ f. Adding new paragraph (b)(5); and
■ g. Revising paragraph (e).
The additions and revisions to read as
follows:
■
Jkt 250001
§ 15.407
General technical requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) For the band 5.85–5.895 GHz, the
maximum conducted output power over
the frequency band of operation shall
not exceed 1 W. In addition, the
maximum power spectral density shall
not exceed 30 dBm in any 500-kHz
band. If transmitting antennas of
directional gain greater than 6 dBi are
used, both the maximum conducted
output power and the maximum power
spectral density shall be reduced by the
amount in dB that the directional gain
of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi. However,
fixed point-to-point U–NII devices
operating in this band may employ
transmitting antennas with directional
gain greater than 6 dBi without any
corresponding reduction in transmitter
conducted power. Fixed, point-to-point
operations exclude the use of point-tomultipoint systems, omnidirectional
applications, and multiple collocated
transmitters transmitting the same
information. The operator of the U–NII
device, or if the equipment is
professionally installed, the installer, is
responsible for ensuring that systems
employing high gain directional
antennas are used exclusively for fixed,
point-to-point operations.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) The maximum power spectral
density is measured as a conducted
emission by direct connection of a
calibrated test instrument to the
equipment under test. If the device
cannot be connected directly,
alternative techniques acceptable to the
Commission may be used.
Measurements in the 5.725–5.895 GHz
band are made over a reference
bandwidth of 500 kHz or the 26 dB
emission bandwidth of the device,
whichever is less. Measurements in the
5.15–5.25 GHz, 5.25–5.35 GHz, and the
5.47–5.725 GHz bands are made over a
bandwidth of 1 MHz or the 26 dB
emission bandwidth of the device,
whichever is less. A narrower resolution
bandwidth can be used, provided that
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the measured power is integrated over
the full reference bandwidth.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) For transmitters operating solely in
the 5.725–5.850 GHz band:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) For transmitters operating solely in
the 5.850–5.895 GHz band or operating
on a channel that spans across 5.850
GHz:
(i) All emissions at or above 5.925
GHz shall not exceed an e.i.r.p. of ¥27
dBm/MHz.
(ii) All emissions below 5.725 GHz
shall be limited to a level of ¥27 dBm/
MHz at 5.65 GHz increasing linearly to
10 dBm/MHz at 5.7 GHz, and from 5.7
GHz increasing linearly to a level of 15.6
dBm/MHz at 5.72 GHz, and from 5.72
GHz increasing linearly to a level of 27
dBm/MHz at 5.725 GHz.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Within the 5.725-.5.850 GHz and
5.850–5.895 GHz bands, the minimum 6
dB bandwidth of U–NII devices shall be
at least 500 kHz.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 90—PRIVATE LAND MOBILE
RADIO SERVICES
7. The authority citation for part 90
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 303(g),
303(r), 332(c)(7), 1401–1473.
8. Section 90.7 is amended by adding
the definition of ‘‘Cellular Vehicle to
Everything (C–V2X) Communications
Services’’ in alphabetical order and
revising the definitions of ‘‘On-Board
unit (OBU),’’ ‘‘Roadside unit (RSU)’’ and
‘‘Roadway bed surface’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 90.7
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C–
V2X) Service. The use of cellular radio
techniques defined by the 3rd
Generation Partnership Program (3GPP)
to transfer data between roadside and
mobile units, between mobile units, and
between portable and mobile units to
perform operations related to the
improvement of traffic flow, traffic
safety, and other intelligent
transportation service applications in a
variety of environments. C–V2X Service
systems may also transmit status and
instructional messages related to the
units involved.
*
*
*
*
*
On-Board Unit (OBU). An On-Board
Unit is a DSRCS or C–V2X Service
transceiver that is normally mounted in
or on a vehicle, or which in some
instances may be a portable unit. An
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
6853
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
OBU can be operational while a vehicle
or person is either mobile or stationary.
The OBUs receive and transmit on one
or more radio frequency (RF) channels.
Except where specifically excluded,
OBU operation is permitted wherever
vehicle operation or human passage is
permitted. The OBUs mounted in
vehicles are licensed by rule under part
95 of this chapter and communicate
with Roadside Units (RSUs) and other
OBUs. Portable OBUs are also licensed
by rule under part 95 of this chapter.
Roadside Unit (RSU). A Roadside
Unit is a DSRCS or C–V2X Service
transceiver that is mounted along a road
or pedestrian passageway. An RSU may
also be mounted on a vehicle or is hand
carried, but it may only operate when
the vehicle or hand-carried unit is
stationary. Furthermore, an RSU
operating under this part is restricted to
the location where it is licensed to
operate. However, portable or hand-held
RSUs are permitted to operate where
they do not interfere with a site-licensed
operation. An RSU broadcasts data to or
exchanges data with OBUs.
Roadway bed surface. For DSRCS or
the C–V2X Service, the road surface at
ground level.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Section 90.149 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Applicable emission masks frequency band
(MHz)
*
5895–5925 4
*
4 DSRCS
§ 90.149
License term.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Non-exclusive geographic area
licenses for Roadside Units (RSUs)
under subpart M of this part in the
5895–5925 MHz band will be issued for
a term not to exceed ten years from the
date of original issuance or renewal. The
registration dates of individual RSUs
(see § 90.375) will not change the
overall renewal period of the single
license.
■ 10. Section 90.155 is amended by
revising paragraph (i) to read as follows:
§ 90.155 Time in which station must be
placed in operation.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Roadside Units (RSUs) under
subpart M of this part in the 5895–5925
MHz band must be placed in operation
within 12 months from the effective
date of registration (see § 90.375) or the
authority to operate the RSUs cancels
automatically (see § 1.955 of this
chapter). Such registration date(s) do
not change the overall renewal period of
the single license. Licensees must notify
the Commission in accordance with
§ 1.946 of this chapter when registered
units are placed in operation within
their construction period.
■ 11. Section 90.175 is amended by
revising paragraph (j)(16) to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(16) Applications for DSRCS and C–
V2X Service licenses (as well as
registrations for Roadside Units) under
subpart M of this part in the 5895–5925
GHz band.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Section 90.179 is amended by
revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 90.179
Shared use of radio stations.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Above 800 MHz, shared use on a
for-profit private carrier basis is
permitted only by SMR, Private Carrier
Paging, LMS, DSCRS, and C–V2X
Service licensees. See subparts M, P,
and S of this part.
■ 13. Section 90.205 is amended by
revising paragraph (q) to read as follows:
§ 90.205
Power and antenna height limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) 5895–5925 MHz. Power and height
limitations are specified in subpart M of
this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Section 90.210 is amended by
revising the entry of ‘‘5850–5925’’ in the
table and footnote 4 to read as follows:
§ 90.210
*
*
Emission masks.
*
*
*
Mask for equipment without audio low pass
filter
Mask for equipment with audio low pass filter
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
and C–V2X Service Roadside Units in the 5.895–5.925 GHz band is governed under Subpart M of this part.
stability for DSRCS and C–
V2X Service equipment in the 5895–5925
MHz band is specified in subpart M of this
part. For all other equipment, frequency
stability is to be specified in the station
authorization.
develop and implement the nation’s
intelligent transportation systems. It
includes the Location and Monitoring
Service (LMS), the Dedicated ShortRange Communications Service
(DSRCS), and the Cellular Vehicle to
Everything (C–V2X) Service. Rules as to
eligibility for licensing, frequencies
available, and any special requirements
for services in the Intelligent
Transportation Systems radio service
are set forth in this subpart.
16. Section 90.350 is revised to read
as follows:
Subpart M—[Amended]
§ 90.350
■
*
*
*
*
15. In § 90.213 amend paragraph (a)
by revising footnote 10 to the table to
read as follows:
■
Frequency stability.
(a) * * *
10 Frequency
■
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
§ 90.213
§ 90.175 Frequency coordinator
requirements.
Scope.
The Intelligent Transportation
Systems (ITS) radio service is for the
purpose of integrating radio-based
technologies into the nation’s
transportation infrastructure and to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
17. Amend Subpart M, consisting of
§§ 90.350 through 90.383, by revising
the undesignated heading after § 90.365
to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulations Governing the Licensing
and Use of Frequencies in the 5895–
5925 MHz Band for Dedicated ShortRange Communications Service
(DSRCS) and Cellular Vehicle to
Everything (C–V2X) Service
*
*
*
*
*
18. Section 90.370 is added to subpart
M to read as follows:
■
§ 90.370
Permitted frequencies.
(a) DSRCS Roadside Units (RSUs) are
permitted to operate in the 5895–5905
MHz band.
(b) C–V2X Service RSUs are permitted
to operate in the 5905–5925 MHz band.
(c) Channels are available on a shared
basis only for use in accordance with
the Commission’s rules. All licensees
shall cooperate in the selection and use
of channels in order to reduce
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
6854
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
interference. This includes monitoring
for communications in progress and any
other measures as may be necessary to
minimize interference. Licensees of
RSUs suffering or causing harmful
interference within a communications
zone as defined in § 90.375 of this part
are expected to cooperate and resolve
this problem by mutually satisfactory
arrangements. If the licensees are unable
to do so, the Commission may impose
restrictions including specifying the
transmitter power, antenna height and
direction, additional filtering, or area or
hours of operation of the stations
concerned. Further the use of any
channel at a given geographical location
may be denied when, in the judgment
of the Commission, its use at that
location is not in the public interest; use
of any such channel may be restricted
as to specified geographical areas,
maximum power, or such other
operating conditions, contained in this
part or in the station authorization.
(d) Frequencies in the 5895–5925
MHz band will not be assigned for the
exclusive use of any licensee.
■ 19. Section 90.371 is amended by
revising the section heading, removing
paragraph (a), redesignating paragraphs
(b) and (c) as paragraphs (a) and (b) and
revising the introductory text of newly
redesignated paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
DSRCS and C–V2X Service.
(a) DSRCS and C–V2X Service
Roadside Units (RSUs) operating in the
band 5895–5925 MHz shall not receive
protection from Government
Radiolocation services in operation
prior to the establishment of the RSU.
Operation of RSU stations within 75
kilometers of the locations listed in the
table below must be coordinated
through the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. Section 90.373 is amended by
revising the introductory text to read as
follows:
§ 90.373 Eligibility in the DSRCS and C–
V2X Service.
The following entities are eligible to
hold an authorization to operate
Roadside units in the DSRCS or C–V2X
Service:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. Section 90.375 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 90.375 License areas, communication
zones, and registrations.
(a) Roadside Units (RSUs) in the
5895–5925 MHz band are licensed on
the basis of non-exclusive geographic
areas. Governmental applicants will be
issued a geographic area license based
on the geo-political area encompassing
the legal jurisdiction of the entity. All
other applicants will be issued a
Maximum
output power
(dBm) 1
RSU
class
A
B
C
D
§ 90.371
geographic area license for their
proposed area of operation based on
county(s), state(s) or nationwide.
(b) Applicants who are approved in
accordance with FCC Form 601 will be
granted non-exclusive licenses for the
channel(s) corresponding to their
intended operations (see § 90.370). Such
licenses serve as a prerequisite of
registering individual RSUs located
within the licensed geographic area
described in paragraph (a) of this
section. Licensees must register each
RSU in the Universal Licensing System
(ULS) before operating such RSU. RSU
registrations are subject, inter alia, to the
requirements of § 1.923 of this chapter
as applicable (antenna structure
registration, environmental concerns,
international coordination, and quiet
zones). Additionally, RSUs at locations
subject to NTIA coordination (see
§ 90.371(a)) may not begin operation
until NTIA approval is received.
Registrations are not effective until the
Commission posts them on the ULS. It
is the licensee’s responsibility to delete
from the registration database any RSUs
that have been discontinued.
(c) Licensees must operate each RSU
in accordance with the Commission’s
rules and the registration data posted on
the ULS for such RSU. Licensees must
register each RSU for the smallest
communication zone needed for the
intelligent transportation systems
application using one of the following
four communication zones:
Communications zone
(meters)
............
............
............
............
0
10
20
28.8
15
100
400
1000
1 As described in the IEEE 802.11p-2010 and Standard and ATIS transposed standards of the 3GPP (incorporated by reference, see
§ 90.379).
22. Section 90.377 is revised to read
as follows:
■
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 90.377
height.
Maximum EIRP and antenna
(a) DSRCS and C–V2X Service
licensees shall transmit only the power
(EIRP) needed to communicate with an
On-Board Unit (OBU) within the
communications zone and must take
steps to limit the Roadside Unit (RSU)
signal within the zone to the maximum
extent practicable.
(b) DSRCS and C–V2X Service
licensees must limit RSU output power
to 20 dBm and equivalent isotopically
radiated power (EIRP) to 33 dBm. The
EIRP is measured as the maximum EIRP
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
toward the horizon or horizontal,
whichever is greater, of the gain
associated with the main or center of the
transmission beam.
(c) The radiation center of an RSU
antenna shall not exceed 8 meters above
the roadway bed surface, except that an
RSU may employ an antenna with a
height exceeding 8 meters but not
exceeding 15 meters provided the EIRP
specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
this section is reduced by a factor of 20
log(Ht/8) in dB where Ht is the height
of the radiation center of the antenna in
meters above the roadway bed surface.
The RSU antenna height shall not
exceed 15 meters above the roadway
bed surface.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23. Section 90.379 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 90.379
Units.
Technical standards for Roadside
(a) DSRCS Roadside Units (RSUs)
operating in the 5895–5905 MHz band
must comply with the technical
standard Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11p2010.
(b) C–V2X Service RSUs operating in
the 5905–5925 MHz band shall comply
with the V2X sidelink service for this
band as described in the ATIS
transposed standards of the 3GPP
specifications except where these rules
and regulations take precedence.
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(c) The standards required in this
section are incorporated by reference
into this section with the approval of
the Director of the Federal Register
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
All approved material is available for
inspection at the Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554 and
is available from the sources indicated
below. It is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or
go to www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibrlocations.html.
(1) 802.11p-2010, IEEE Standard for
Information technology—Local and
metropolitan area networks—Specific
requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN
Medium Access Control (MAC) and
Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications
Amendment 6: Wireless Access in
Vehicular Environments (2010). This
standard is available from the Institute
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(IEEE), 3025 Boardwalk Drive, Suite
220, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, 1–855–999–
9870, https://www.techstreet.com/ieee.
(2) 3GPP Release 14, 3rd Generation
Partnership Project Technical
Specification Group Services and
System Aspects (2018). This standard is
available from ATIS, 1200 G Street NW
Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005,
https://www.atis.org/docstore/
default.aspx.
■ 24. Section 90.381 is added to read as
follows:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 90.381
C–V2X Service emissions limits.
C–V2X Service Roadside Units (RSUs)
must comply with the following out-ofband emissions limits:
(a) Conducted limits measured at the
antenna input shall not exceed:
(1) ¥29 dBm/100 kHz at the band
edge (The band is defined in § 90.370 of
this part);
(2) ¥35 dBm/100 kHz ± 1 megahertz
from the band edge;
(3) ¥43 dBm/100 kHz ± 10 megahertz
from the band edge; and
(4) ¥53 dBm/100 kHz ± 20 megahertz
from the band edge.
(b) Radiated limits: All C–V2X Service
RSUs must limit radiated emissions to
¥25 dBm/100 kHz EIRP or less outside
the band edges where the band is
defined in § 90.370 of this part.
■ 25. Section 90.383 is amended by
revising the introductory text and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 90.383 RSU sites near the U.S./Canada or
U.S./Mexico border.
Until such time as agreements
between the United States and Canada
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
or the United States and Mexico, as
applicable, become effective governing
border area use of the 5850–5925 MHz
band, authorizations to operate
Roadside Units (RSUs) are granted
subject to the following conditions:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Authority to operate RSUs is
subject to modifications and future
agreements between the United States
and Canada or the United States and
Mexico, as applicable.
§ 90.415
[AMENDED]
26. Section 90.415 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Render a communications
common carrier service, except for
stations in the Public Safety Pool
providing communications standby
facilities under § 90.20(a)(2)(xi) and
stations licensed under this part in the
SMR, private carrier paging, Industrial/
Business Pool, 220–222 MHz or the
DSRCS and C–V2X Service.
■ 27. Section 90.421 is revised by
adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 90.421 Operation of mobile station units
not under the control of the licensee.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) DSRCS and C–V2X Service OnBoard Units licensed by rule under part
95 of this chapter may communicate
with any roadside unit authorized under
this part or any licensed commercial
mobile radio service station as defined
in part 20 of this chapter.
■ 28. Section 90.425 is amended by
revising paragraph (d)(10) to read as
follows:
§ 90.425
Station identification.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(10) It is a Roadside Unit (RSU) in an
ITS system.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 95—PERSONAL RADIO
SERVICES
29. The authority citation for part 95
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, and 307.
Subpart L—[Amended].
30. Subpart L, consisting of §§ 95.3101
through 95.3189, is amended by revising
the subpart heading to read as follows:
■
Subpart L—DSRCS and C–V2X Service
On-Board Units
31. Section 95.3101 is revised to read
as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 95.3101
6855
Scope.
This subpart contains rules that apply
only to On-Board Units (OBUs)
transmitting in the 5895–5925 MHz
frequency band in the Dedicated ShortRange Communications Services
(DSRCS) and the Cellular Vehicle to
Everything (C–V2X) Service (see
§ 90.371 of this chapter).
■ 32. Section 95.3103 is amended by
adding the definition of ‘‘Cellular
Vehicle to Everything (C–V2X) Service’’
in alphabetical order and by revising the
definition of ‘‘On-Board Unit (OBU)’’ to
read as follows:
§ 95.3103
Definitions, OBUs.
Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C–
V2X) Service. A service providing for
data transfer between various mobile
and roadside transmitting units for the
purposes of improving traffic flow,
highway safety and performing other
intelligent transportation functions. See
§ 90.7 of this chapter for a more detailed
definition.
*
*
*
*
*
On-Board Units (OBUs). OBUs are
low-power devices on vehicles that
transfer data to roadside units or other
OBUs in the Dedicated Short-Range
Communications Service or the Cellular
Vehicle to Everything (C–V2X) Service
(see §§ 90.370–90.383 of this chapter), to
improve traffic flow and safety, and for
other intelligent transportation system
purposes. See § 90.7 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 33. Section 95.3131 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 95.3131
Permissible uses, OBUs.
On-Board Units (OBUs) may transmit
signals to other OBUs and to Roadside
Units (RSUs), which are authorized
under part 90 of this chapter or to
licensees as defined in part 20 of this
chapter.
§ 95.3159
[Removed].
34. Section 95.3159 is removed.
35. Section 95.3161 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
■
§ 95.3161
OBU transmitter certification.
(a) Each On-Board Unit (OBU) C–
V2XC–V2Xthat operates or is intended
to operate in the DSRCS or C–V2X
Service must be certified in accordance
with this subpart and subpart J of part
2 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 36. Section 95.3163 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 95.3163
OBU frequencies.
(a) DSRCS On-Board Units (OBUs) are
permitted to operate in the 5895–5905
MHz band.
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
6856
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 25 / Thursday, February 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(b) C–V2X Service OBUs are
permitted to operate in the 5905–5925
MHz band.
■ 37. Section 95.3167 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 95.3167
OBU transmit power limit.
(a) The maximum output power for
portable DSRCS On-Board Unit (OBU)
transmitter types is 1.0 mW.
(b) The maximum output power for
vehicular and portable C–V2X Service
OBU transmitter types is 20 dBm and
the maximum equivalent isotopically
radiated power (EIRP) is limited to 23
dBm.
(c) The power limits in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section may be referenced
to the antenna input, so that cable losses
are taken into account.
(d) For purposes of this section, a
portable unit is a transmitting device
designed to be used so that the radiating
structure(s) of the device is/are within
20 centimeters of the body of the user.
■ 38. Section 95.3179 is added to read
as follows:
§ 95.3179
Unwanted emissions limits.
(a) C–V2X Service Roadside Units
must comply with the following out-ofband emissions limits:
(1) Conducted limits measured at the
antenna input shall not exceed:
(i) ¥29 dBm/100 kHz at the band
edge (The band is defined in section
95.3163 of this part.);
(ii) ¥35 dBm/100 kHz ± 1 megahertz
from the band edge;
(iii) ¥43 dBm/100 kHz ± 10
megahertz from the band edge; and
(iv) ¥53 dBm/100 kHz ± 20
megahertz from the band edge.
(2) Radiated limits: All C–V2X Service
On-Board Units must limit radiated
emissions to -25 dBm/100 kHz EIRP or
less outside the band edges where the
band is defined in section 95.3163 of
this part.
(b) DSRCS out-of-band emissions
limits are specified in the IEEE 802.11p2010 standard (See section 95.3189 of
this part)
■ 39. Section 95.3189 is revised to read
as follows:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 95.3189
OBU technical standard.
(a) DSRCS On-Board Unit (OBU)
transmitter types operating in the 5895–
5905 MHz band must be designed to
comply with the technical standard
Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers (IEEE) 802.11p–2010.
(b) C–V2X Service OBU transmitter
types operating in the 5895–5925 MHz
band shall comply with the V2X
sidelink service for this band as
described in the ATIS transposed
standards of the 3GPP specifications
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:21 Feb 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
except where these rules and
regulations take precedence.
(c) The standards required in this
section are incorporated by reference
into this section with the approval of
the Director of the Federal Register
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
All approved material is available for
inspection at the Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554 and
is available from the sources indicated
below. It is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or
go to www.archives.gov/federal-register/
cfr/ibrlocations.html.
(1) 802.11p-2010, IEEE Standard for
Information technology—Local and
metropolitan area networks—Specific
requirements—Part 11: Wireless LAN
Medium Access Control (MAC) and
Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications
Amendment 6: Wireless Access in
Vehicular Environments (2010). This
standard is available from the Institute
of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(IEEE), 3025 Boardwalk Drive, Suite
220, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, 1–855–999–
9870, https://www.techstreet.com/ieee.
(2) 3GPP Release 14, 3rd Generation
Partnership Project Technical
Specification Group Services and
System Aspects (2018). This standard is
available from ATIS, 1200 G Street NW,
Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005,
https://www.atis.org/docstore/
default.aspx.
Appendix A to part 95 is amended by
removing the entry in the table for
‘‘95.1509—ASTM E2213–03 DSRC
Standard.’’.
[FR Doc. 2020–02086 Filed 2–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2018–0094;
4500090023]
RIN 1018–BD08
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Designation of Critical
Habitat for Yellow Lance
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
designate critical habitat for the yellow
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
lance (Elliptio lanceolata) under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act),
as amended. In total, approximately 319
river miles (mi) (514 kilometers (km)) in
North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland
fall within the boundaries of the
proposed critical habitat designation. If
we finalize this rule as proposed, it
would extend the Act’s protections to
this species’ critical habitat. We also
announce the availability of a draft
economic analysis of the proposed
designation.
DATES: We will accept comments on the
proposed rule and draft economic
analysis that are received or postmarked
on or before April 6, 2020. Comments
submitted electronically using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal (see
ADDRESSES, below) must be received by
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing
date. We must receive requests for
public hearings, in writing, at the
address shown in FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT by March 23,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Written comments: You may
submit comments on the proposed rule
or draft economic analysis by one of the
following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–R4–ES–2018–0094, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
Then, click on the Search button. On the
resulting page, in the Search panel on
the left side of the screen, under the
Document Type heading, click on the
Proposed Rule box to locate this
document. You may submit a comment
by clicking on ‘‘Comment Now!’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand-delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R4–ES–2018–
0094; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041–3803.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see
Information Requested, below, for more
information).
Document availability: The draft
economic analysis is available at https://
www.fws.gov/southeast, at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–R4–ES–2018–0094, and at the
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
The coordinates or plot points or both
from which the maps are generated are
included in the administrative record
for this proposed critical habitat
designation and are available at https://
E:\FR\FM\06FEP1.SGM
06FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6841-6856]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02086]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 2, 15, 90, and 95
[ET Docket No. 19-138; FCC 19-129; FRS 16447]
Use of the 5.850-5.925 GHz Band
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission's proposal to amend its rules
for the 5.850-5.925 GHz (5.9 GHz) band. The proposal would permit
unlicensed devices to operate in the lower 45-megahertz portion of the
band at 5.850-5.895 GHz under part 15 of the Commission's rules. It
would also permit Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) operations in
the upper 30-megahertz portion of the band at 5.895-5.925 GHz under
parts 90 and 95 of the Commission's rules. ITS operations would consist
of Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) devices at 5.905-5.925 GHz,
and C-V2X and/or Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) devices at
5.895-5.905 GHz. The document also asks whether alternate spectrum band
approaches would better achieve the goal of maximizing the effective
and efficient use of the 5.9 GHz band, including whether differently
sized sub-bands or greater flexibility to introduce additional
vehicular safety communications technologies into the band would be
warranted.
DATES: Comments are due on or before March 9, 2020 and reply comments
are due on or before April 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ET Docket No. 19-138,
by any of the following methods:
Federal Communications Commission's website: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery,
by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail (although the Commission continues to experience
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
People with Disabilities: Contact the Commission to
request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign
language interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: [email protected] or phone:
202-418-0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Griboff, Office of Engineering
and Technology, at (202) 418-0657, [email protected]. For
information regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) information
requirements contained in this document, contact Cathy Williams, Office
of Managing Director, at (202) 418-2918 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice
of
[[Page 6842]]
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), ET Docket No. 19-138, FCC 19-129, adopted
on December 12, 2019 and released on December 17, 2019. The full text
of this document is available for public inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445
12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554, or by downloading the text from
the Commission's website at https://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db0714/FCC-17-94A1.pdf. Alternative formats are
available for people with disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format) by sending an email to [email protected]
or calling the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at
(202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
Comment Filing Procedures
Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules,
47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and reply
comments on or before the dates indicated on the first page of this
document. Comments may be filed using the Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS). See Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket
or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th St. SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW, Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (tty).
Ex Parte Rules--Permit-But-Disclose
Pursuant to Sec. 1.1200(a) of the Commission's rules, the
proceeding this NPRM initiates shall be treated as a ``permit-but-
disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte
rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the presentation (unless a different
deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making
oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise
participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was
made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during
the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of
the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the
presenter's written comments, memoranda or other filings in the
proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings
(specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data
or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with Sec. 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
Sec. 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method
of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto,
must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available
for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
.doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding
should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The NPRM contains proposed new or modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
104-13 (PRA). OMB, the general public, and other federal agencies are
invited to comment on the proposed information collection requirements
contained in the proceeding. In addition, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the Commission seeks specific comment on how it
might further reduce the information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
Synopsis
I. Introduction and Background
1. The Commission has initiated this NPRM to assess the 5.9 GHz
band rules and propose appropriate changes to ensure that this 75
Megahertz of mid-band spectrum supports its most effective and
efficient use. This ``fresh look'' approach proposes to repurpose the
lower 45-megahertz part of the band for unlicensed operations, and to
continue to dedicate the upper 30 megahertz of the band for
transportation and vehicle safety-related purposes.
2. For the past two decades, the non-Federal Mobile Service
allocation in the 5.9 GHz band has been reserved for use by DSRC in the
ITS service, with specific rules and protocols designed to enable
transportation and vehicle safety-related communications. The
Commission specified a single technological standard for DSRC based on
its expectation that doing so was most likely to promote
interoperability between vehicles and infrastructure in the United
States, enable robust automotive safety communications, and accelerate
the nationwide deployment of DSRC-based applications while reducing
costs. Today, DSRC is being used in certain specialized traffic-related
projects but has not been widely deployed within the consumer
automobile market. Meanwhile, numerous technologies have been or are
being developed and deployed in spectrum outside of the 5.9 GHz band to
improve transportation safety and efficiency and provide certain
services envisioned for DSRC.
3. C-V2X is a new technology that is designed to provide
transportation and vehicle safety-related communications. Its
proponents want to use C-V2X to provide ITS services in the 5.9 GHz
band. In November 2018, the 5G Automotive Association (5GAA), as part
of its request for a waiver of the DSRC rules to allow deployment of C-
V2X at
[[Page 6843]]
5.905-5.925 GHz, asserted that C-V2X represents a significant
advancement in technology to increase road safety and maximize the
benefits of connected vehicles.
4. In the time since the 5.9 GHz band was set aside for DSRC,
unlicensed device use in adjacent and nearby spectrum has developed
exponentially. Most of the spectrum between 5.150 GHz to the lower edge
of the 5.9 GHz band at 5.850 GHz is available for unlicensed operations
under the rules for Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-
NII) devices. In 2013, recognizing the increasing demand for wireless
broadband services, the Commission began a proceeding to examine the
potential for allowing U-NII devices to share the 5.9 GHz band with
DSRC. Coexistence evaluation under a three-phase test plan was ongoing
at the time the NPRM was released. The Commission has noted that
different parties have held different opinions regarding how the 5.9
GHz band should be used. These have included continuing to allow for
exclusive use of the band for DSRC, promoting the use of C-V2X in the
band, and making the band available for unlicensed operations.
II. Discussion
A. Dedicating Spectrum for Unlicensed Operations and Vehicular
Applications
5. Rather than further attempting to resolve questions about co-
existence and sharing of spectrum by unlicensed operations and DSRC,
the Commission proposes to repurpose the lower 45 megahertz of the 5.9
GHz band (5.850-5.895 GHz) to allow unlicensed operations, and retain
use of the upper 30 megahertz of the band (5.895-5.925 GHz) for ITS
purposes, either solely for C-V2X or divided between C-V2X and DSRC
technologies. This 45/30 megahertz split for unlicensed operations and
ITS applications is intended to optimize the use of spectrum resources
in the 5.9 GHz band by providing spectrum to support wideband
unlicensed operations and continuing to dedicate sufficient spectrum to
meet current and future needs for ITS applications. The Commission
seeks comment on these proposals and the potential benefits of
providing separate sub-bands in which unlicensed operations and
vehicular-related systems would operate.
B. 5.850-5.895 GHz--45 Megahertz for Unlicensed Operations
6. The U-NII bands span much of the 5 GHz band and play a crucial
role in accommodating the needs of businesses and consumers for fixed
and mobile broadband communications, and specifically, Wi-Fi. These
bands provide high data rate local area network connections for
business and home users to interconnect with and access the internet,
and are often used for data offloading by commercial wireless networks
to relieve congestion when consumer demand is high. The Commission
believes that unlicensed use of the 5.850-5.895 GHz portion of the 5.9
GHz band is well suited for such use and could help satisfy the
burgeoning demand for high-speed wireless access.
7. The Commission proposes to designate the 5.850-5.895 GHz sub-
band for unlicensed operations. The Commission believes that the 5.850-
5.895 GHz sub-band (denoted as the U-NII-4 band) could be combined with
the adjacent 5.725-5.850 GHz sub-band (denoted as the U-NII-3 band) to
provide a large contiguous block of unlicensed spectrum that could be
used to deliver more capacity and advanced features to Wi-Fi users. The
Commission requests comment on its proposal to designate the 45
megahertz of spectrum at 5.850-5.895 MHz for unlicensed operations.
8. The Commission suggests that because the 5.850-5.895 GHz sub-
band is adjacent to the U-NII-3 band, equipment manufacturers should be
able to readily and cost-effectively manufacture devices to expand
operations into this sub-band. The Commission seeks comment on how
easily existing U-NII equipment could be modified to take advantage of
the additional 45 megahertz of spectrum proposed for unlicensed
operations.
C. 5.895-5.925 GHz--30 Megahertz for ITS
9. With this NPRM, the Commission revisits how best to make use of
the 5.9 GHz band as part of a larger ecosystem that includes a variety
of spectrum resources--including spectrum outside of the 5.9 GHz band--
that can improve and enhance delivery of transportation and vehicular
safety-related communications. The Commission seeks comment on the
state of DSRC-based deployment and the extent to which existing
licensees currently operate on some or all of the existing channels in
the 5.9 GHz band. The Commission also seeks comment on the
transportation and vehicular safety-related applications that are
particularly well-suited for the 5.9 GHz band as compared to spectrum
outside of the 5.9 GHz band, and how spectrum outside the 5.9 GHz band
can be used efficiently and effectively to provide transportation and
vehicular safety-related applications.
10. To ensure the most efficient and effective use of the 5.9 GHz
band, the Commission proposes to continue dedicating 30 megahertz of
spectrum in the upper portion of the 5.9 GHz band at 5.895-5.925 GHz to
support ITS operations in the band. The Commission proposes that
designating 30 megahertz of spectrum will be sufficient to support ITS-
related functions in the 5.9 GHz band--public safety applications
involving safety of life and property--which will be part of a larger
wireless ecosystem that advances national transportation and vehicular
safety-related goals. The Commission seeks comment on these proposals.
Additionally, it seeks comment on whether there are actions it should
take, or requirements that it should adopt, to promote rapid and
effective deployment of ITS (e.g., establishing appropriate benchmarks
for infrastructure deployment or in-vehicle installation).
11. C-V2X in the 5.905-5.925 GHz band. The Commission proposes to
authorize C-V2X operations in the upper 20 megahertz of the 5.9 GHz
band (5.905-5.925 GHz) as a means of authorizing the ITS technology
that is most capable of ensuring the rapid development and deployment
of continually improving transportation and vehicular safety-related
applications now and into the future, that is robust, secure, and
spectrally efficient, and that is able to integrate spectrum resources
from other bands as part of its transportation and vehicular safety-
related system. The Commission seeks specific and detailed comment on
this proposal and views.
12. The Commission seeks comment on whether authorizing C-V2X in
this spectrum would be the best means for promoting effective use of
this spectrum for ITS, both in terms of maximizing the potential
benefits of using 5.9 GHz spectrum for vehicular-related systems
(including safety features) and promoting rapid deployment of ITS in
the band. The Commission also seeks comment on available technical
studies on C-V2X that could inform its consideration of C-V2X,
including any recent studies that provide information about how C-V2X
would operate in the 5.9 GHz band. The Commission requests that
commenters provide detailed information on precisely how C-V2X
communications would employ use of 5.9 GHz band frequencies, and how it
would integrate and make use of the commercial mobile network
infrastructure as part of C-V2X.
13. The Commission also seeks comment on how C-V2X would
[[Page 6844]]
promote synergies with evolving technologies that use other spectrum
resources and that will advance vehicular safety and other intelligent
transportation capabilities of today and those anticipated in the
coming years. The Commission requests comments from motor vehicle
manufacturers, the associated automotive industry, and communications
companies regarding authorization of C-V2X operations in this spectrum,
including the extent to which their views on ITS development deployment
issues have evolved. If C-V2X is best suited to achieve U.S. goals for
ITS, how can the Commission best promote C-V2X use consistent with the
goals and objectives of ITS, including safety and other vehicular ITS
applications, connectivity, rapid development, and deployment?
14. C-V2X or DSRC in the 5.895-5.905 GHz band. The Commission seeks
comment on whether the remaining 10 megahertz (5.895-5.905 GHz) of the
5.9 GHz band should also be designated for C-V2X. The Commission seeks
comment on how to best optimize the spectrum so that this portion of
the 5.9 GHz band can effectively enable the rapid and ongoing
development and deployment of transportation and vehicular safety-
related functionalities and applications today and in the future.
15. The Commission seeks comment on whether making additional
spectrum available for C-V2X beyond 20 megahertz is necessary and
appropriate for enabling the development and deployment of advanced C-
V2X applications in the band. What additional C-V2X features
potentially would be enabled? Commenters that support this approach
should explain how C-V2X would make use of the entire 30 megahertz for
ITS services and applications, and the potential benefits of this
approach.
16. Alternatively, the Commission seeks comment on whether it
should continue to set aside the 10 megahertz of spectrum at 5.895-
5.905 GHz for DSRC. The Commission requests comment on the kinds of
DSRC-based services that would be possible using 10 megahertz of
spectrum. What effect would the Commission's proposals have on any
applications delivered using Channel 172 and Channel 184, the two DSRC
channels that the Commission previously designated for safety of life
applications? Can any such services be provided in the 10-megahertz at
5.895-5.905 GHz? What would be necessary to ensure that DSRC operations
adjacent to C-V2X would be compatible? Are there any ITS services that
DSRC would provide that cannot effectively be provided using C-V2X? Is
dividing the 30 megahertz of ITS spectrum between C-V2X (20 megahertz)
and DSRC (10 megahertz) useful and spectrally efficient when it comes
to making use of the upper 30-megahertz portion of the band at 5.895-
5.925 GHz for ITS services? The Commission asks that commenters
supporting DSRC in the 10 megahertz of spectrum at 5.895-5.905 GHz
discuss the benefits and costs of their preferred approach. The
Commission also seeks comment on whether there is a more appropriate
division of the upper 30-megahertz portion of the band at 5.895-5.925
GHz between C-V2X and DSRC.
17. 5GAA indicates that in addition to the 20-megahertz channel
requested in its waiver request, it also desires a 40-megahertz channel
(i.e., 60-megahertz total) so that the technology it has planned for
the band can evolve to include 5G systems and subsequent wireless
generations that will amplify and expand upon the safety and other
driving applications. Given that the Commission is already on the path
to make substantial mid-band spectrum available for 5G in the 2.5 GHz
and 3.5 GHz bands, and is proposing to do so in the 3.7 GHz band,
allocating a larger spectrum designation in the 5.9 GHz as a path to 5G
appears unnecessary. The Commission nonetheless seeks comment on 5GAA's
assertions that 60 megahertz is needed for C-V2X so that the technology
planned for the band can evolve to include 5G systems. Is it necessary
to plan for such systems in the 5.9 GHz band? If so, can 20 or 30
megahertz of spectrum support 5G automotive applications? What advanced
safety applications would be offered on a future 5G system? The
Commission seeks comment on whether other 5G spectrum the Commission
has made and is making available could be used to support additional C-
V2X applications rather than the 5.9 GHz band. Commenters should
address how 5G systems might fit into the overall connected vehicle
ecosystem.
D. Transition of Existing DSRC Operations
18. Incumbent DSRC operations in the 5.9 GHz band fall into two
categories: DSRC roadside units, which are licensed on a non-exclusive,
shared basis pursuant to the Commission's part 90 rules, and on-board
units, which are licensed-by-rule under part 95. Since the proposals in
the NPRM may require DSRC incumbents to transition their operations
from currently-designated frequencies, the Commission seeks comment on
possible transition paths. To assess the potential effects of such a
transition, the Commission seeks up-to-date information on actual DSRC
operations under existing licenses, as well as the various uses of ITS
that have been implemented through DSRC technology in this band. Do the
locations of roadside units registered in the Commission's licensing
database provide a complete and accurate representation of the
deployments under these licenses? To what extent are DSRC operations
concentrated in certain parts of the 5.9 GHz band, and how does use of
the band vary between on-board and roadside units? Commenters are
invited to submit information about the scope of deployment of such on-
board units including, if available, the number of units deployed in
consumer vehicles versus the number deployed in state, local, Tribal,
or other governmental vehicles.
19. To what extent are existing DSRC deployments anticipated to be
used on a long-term (versus demonstration) basis, and what is the
lifespan of existing DSRC pilot projects? To the extent the Commission
adopts the proposals detailed in this NPRM, would operators of existing
DSRC deployments be likely to pursue C-V2X-based solutions, re-
channelize to the remaining DSRC channel (if it adopts such a plan), or
simply wind-down operations? To the extent the Commission grants new or
renews existing DSRC authorizations, should it only prescribe such
authorizations for a relatively short period of time?
20. The Commission proposes to modify existing DSRC licenses to
allow operation in only the 5.895-5.925 GHz sub-band to the extent that
licensees want to operate a C-V2X system or only in 5.895-5.905 GHz to
the extent this sub-band is retained for DSRC systems and the licensees
want to continue their DSRC operations. The Commission seeks comment on
these proposals and appropriate transition paths. How would the
proposed modifications affect current licensees with operational sites?
How might statutory limitations or Commission policy inform the actions
that the Commission should take as part of any transition plan? The
Commission notes that section 316 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, gives the Commission authority to modify entire classes of
licenses by a rulemaking or adjudication, though this authority has
been interpreted not to extend to any ``fundamental change'' to the
terms of a license. What obligations does section 316 of the
Communications Act (or any other provision of the Act) impose on the
Commission with respect to incumbent DSRC operations if the
[[Page 6845]]
Commission were to reallocate the band under any of the proposals on
which it seeks comment in this NPRM?
21. Are there any transition considerations for on-board units that
are different than considerations for roadside units? Considering the
potential inability of DSRC on-board units to communicate with non-DSRC
on-board units and infrastructure, should the Commission take any
actions to remove them from service or require other suitable
modifications consistent with any ultimately-adopted revisions to the
5.9 GHz band? Would such units remaining in vehicles impact unlicensed
operations assuming the proposals in this NPRM are adopted? If on-board
units remain in vehicles and DSRC licensees remain permitted to operate
only in the 5.895-5.905 GHz sub-band, what effect, if any, would
unlicensed operations have on these DSRC units?
22. Should the Commission allow existing DSRC roadside
infrastructure to continue to operate under the licenses they hold
until the end of their license term without renewal expectation? The
Commission seeks comment on whether such an approach would adversely
affect the introduction of unlicensed operations and C-V2X
applications. In addition, the Commission requests comment on an
appropriate transition timeline for all DSRC operations under any of
the approaches it discusses above. Finally, to the extent that the
Commission adopts revisions requiring a transition of DSRC operations,
the Commission requests comment on any other considerations or
approaches that it should take to effectuate an appropriate transition.
E. Technical Rules
23. Unlicensed Operations in the 5.850-5.895 GHz Sub-band.
Unlicensed devices operate under the conditions of not causing harmful
interference and accepting any interference from an authorized radio
station. The Commission proposes that U-NII-4 device rules be placed in
Part 15, subpart E along with the existing U-NII rules and be subject
to all of the general Part 15 operational principles, and seeks comment
on this proposal. Because the proposed U-NII-4 band at 5.850-5.895 GHz
is located immediately adjacent to the existing U-NII-3 band at 5.725-
5.850 GHz, and the Commission expects that manufacturers will design
devices that span the U-NII-3 and U-NII-4 bands to implement the widest
channel available under the standards--160 megahertz--the Commission
proposes that U-NII-4 devices be subject to similar technical and
operational rules that apply to the U-NII-3 band.
24. As an initial matter, the Commission proposes that U-NII-4
devices be permitted to operate at the same power levels as U-NII-3
devices, as specified in section 15.407(a)(3) of the Commission's
rules. The Commission seeks comment on this proposal or whether it
should adopt different power levels. The Commission proposes that U-
NII-4 devices, or devices that operate across a single channel that
spans the U-NII-3 and U-NII-4 bands, meet an out-of-band emissions
(OOBE) limit of -27 dBm/MHz at or above 5.925 GHz, which is the same
limit required for U-NII-3 devices at this frequency. The Commission
notes that, for U-NII-3 devices, the -27 dBm/MHz limit increases
incrementally to a level of 27 dBm/MHz at the band edge, as shown in
section 15.407(b)(4) of the Commission's rules. Because the U-NII-4
band is above the U-NII-3 band and closer to adjacent services (e.g.,
ITS services in the adjacent portion of the 5.9 GHz band (5.895-5.925
GHz) and 6 GHz fixed services), should the Commission also establish a
separate limit at the upper U-NII-4 band edge (i.e., at 5.895 GHz)? If
so, what should this limit be? U-NII-3 devices are only required to
meet an OOBE limit of -4.8 dBm/MHz at 5.895 GHz. Should the slope of
the OOBE from U-NII-4 devices at the upper edge of the band be adjusted
to match the OOBE limits from U-NII-3 devices or should a different
limit be established? If the OOBE limits from the U-NII-4 band are
adjusted to match the U-NII-3 band OOBE limits, can unlicensed devices
and ITS devices operate directly adjacent to each other as the
emissions into the ITS band would be identical from either U-NII-3 or
U-NII-4 devices? The Commission seeks comment generally on the OOBE
limits it should apply at the upper end of the U-NII-4 band and whether
any spectrum must be reserved to protect ITS services, and if so,
whether such spectrum should be in the U-NII or ITS segment of the 5.9
GHz band.
25. The Commission further proposes that U-NII-4 devices, or
devices that operate across a single channel that spans the U-NII-3 and
U-NII-4 bands, meet the same OOBE limits as U-NII-3 devices at the
lower edge of the combined U-NII-3 and U-NII-4 band, i.e., at 5.725
GHz. Because the Commission expects devices designed for the U-NII-3
and U-NII-4 bands to be similar and therefore compatible with each
other, it does not believe it is necessary to set a separate OOBE limit
for U-NII-4 devices at the U-NII-3/U-NII-4 band edge. The Commission
seeks comment on these proposals as well as comment on whether there
are alternative OOBE limits that it should adopt.
26. The Commission's proposals support separate U-NII-3 and U-NII-4
bands to provide flexibility in designing U-NII-3 equipment under the
less stringent OOBE rules at the upper edge of the band. The
Commission's proposals also provide flexibility for devices to operate
across the U-NII-3 and U-NII-4 bands using the widest bandwidths
permitted under the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
(IEEE) 802.11 standard. Alternatively, the Commission could expand the
U-NII-3 band and implement a single set of OOBE limits for the combined
5.725-5.895 GHz band using the OOBE limits proposed for U-NII-4 band
devices or devices that operate across a single channel that spans the
U-NII-3 and U-NII-4 bands. What advantages would a single band under
uniform rules provide? What would be the drawbacks, especially
considering the effect on OOBE limits? The Commission seeks comment on
this alternative. Under the Commission's proposal or this alternative,
it also seeks comment on any other rule changes that are needed to
support communications across the combined U-NII-3 and U-NII-4 bands.
The Commission seeks comment on how its proposals might affect device
design and cost.
27. Vehicular-Related Communications in the 5.895-5.925 GHz Sub-
band. The Commission proposes to adopt rules for vehicular-related
communications in this sub-band that are similar to the Commission's
approach when the rules for DSRC operations were adopted. C-V2X, which
is based on the 3GPP LTE family of standards (i.e., the 4G LTE-Pro
system in 3GPP Release 14, with additional standard work currently
underway to develop a 5G C-V2X peer-to-peer mode), is incompatible with
DSRC-based operations, which is based on the IEEE 802.11 family of
standards. As such, the Commission proposes that the technical rules
for C-V2X be based on the 3GPP LTE standard and seeks comment on this
proposal and any alternatives that should be considered. In addition,
the Commission seeks comment on whether the C-V2X technical rules would
be required for all devices operating in the 5.905-5.925 GHz band, or
alternatively in the 5.895-5.925 GHz band, should the Commission permit
C-V2X operations in the entire 30 megahertz.
28. The Commission's current DSRC rules incorporate by reference
the
[[Page 6846]]
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) EE2213-03ASTM
E223313-03 standard. However, that standard has been superseded by a
different standard, the IEEE 802.11p. If DSRC operations remain in the
band, the Commission seeks comment on whether it should incorporate by
reference IEEE 802.11 standards for DSRC operations. Similarly, the
Commission seeks comment on whether 3GPP standard(s) for C-V2X
operations should be incorporated by reference in the Commission's
rules. What are the trade-offs in terms of deployment speed, safety and
cost between mandating a particular standard for devices and leaving
the choice of equipment to each manufacturer or automotive company?
Commenters that advocate for mandating a particular standard should
address how the Commission or industry could ensure that devices could
be upgraded as the standard is upgraded to incorporate new capabilities
and applications.
29. The Commission proposes that its technical rules for C-V2X be
based on the 3GPP standard and discusses the specific technical rules
that have been identified by 5GAA. These technical specifications are
shown in the proposed rules. The Commission further proposes that, if
it permits C-V2X operations across the entire 5.895-5.925 GHz band, it
would extend these proposed rules to encompass that entire 30
megahertz. The Commission seeks comment on the specific language of
these proposed rules, including the efficacy and technical feasibility
of the proposed technical rules.
30. The Commission proposes both conducted and radiated OOBE limits
for C-V2X equipment and seeks comment on these proposals. In that
regard, the Commission seeks comment on the relative in-band versus
out-of-band efficiency of antennas in this frequency range and whether
both conducted and radiated emissions limits are necessary. The
Commission also seeks comment on whether devices should be required to
comply with both the conducted and radiated emissions limits or only
one of the limits. Further, the Commission seeks comment on the proper
reference for the OOBE limits, whether it should be the channel edge or
the band edge.
31. The Commission proposes that the transmit power limit for C-V2X
operation be defined over its channel bandwidth. The Commission seeks
comment on this proposal and asks whether a different channel bandwidth
for compliance purposes would be more appropriate. The Commission also
seeks comment on any alternative technical rules to the existing DSRC
regulatory framework. Commenters should address how any technical rules
they support ensures the ability of C-V2X operations to deliver
services while also ensuring compatibility among different nearby
spectrum users (i.e., how the potential for causing interference to
other services is minimized). Commenters should specifically address
any differences between these proposals, especially with respect to the
OOBE limits, and the existing DSRC rules.
32. Although the Commission proposes specific rules consistent with
those suggested by 5GAA, the Commission also seeks comment on
alternatives that are based on the existing DSRC rules or some other
regulatory framework. Should the Commission provide additional power to
C-V2X stations commensurate with the Equivalent Isotropically Radiated
Power (EIRP) levels permitted under the DSRC rules? Should additional
power be permitted only for certain applications, such as vehicle-to-
network or roadside unit to network communications? Should more power
be permitted for all licensees or limited to only government entities
as is the case under the current DSRC rules? Or would uniform power
levels for all users better serve the public and avoid the potential
for harmful interference? Should antenna height be a factor in how much
power is permitted? Commenters advocating for technical limits similar
to the existing DSRC rules should address how their alternative rules
prevent harmful interference to nearby services.
33. To the extent the Commission retains provisions for DSRC
operations in the 5.895-5.905 GHz band, it proposes to retain the
existing part 90 and part 95 technical and coordination rules that
currently apply to DSRC roadside unit and on-board unit operations on
that channel (currently designated as DSRC Channel 180). This includes
a power limit of 23 dBm EIRP and adherence to the current OOBE limits.
The Commission seeks comment on this proposal. Should different power
and OOBE limits be permitted? For example, should the Commission permit
33 dBm EIRP levels, similar to the power level proposed for C-V2X? If
so, what additional measures might need to be imposed on DSRC
operations to ensure there is no increased interference to DoD radars?
Also, to the extent the Commission retains provisions for DSRC, it
would be adjacent to the C-V2X band. Are there any additional technical
rules the Commission should adopt for DSRC and/or C-V2X to facilitate
their respective operations under this adjacent-channel arrangement?
34. Incumbent protection. In addition to the non-Federal Mobile
Service allocation currently designated for DSRC, the 5.9 GHz band
contains allocations for the Federal Radiolocation Service and the non-
Federal Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) (Earth-to-space) on a primary
basis, and the Amateur Service on a secondary basis for non-Federal
use. The 5.850-5.875 GHz segment of the 5.9 GHz band is designated
internationally for Industrial, Scientific, and Medical (ISM)
applications.
35. The Department of Defense (DoD) uses the Federal Radiolocation
Service to operate fixed and mobile radars for surveillance (including
airborne surveillance), test range instrumentation, airborne
transponders, and testing in support of the tracking and control of
airborne vehicles. The existing DSRC rules for protection of the
primary 5.9 GHz band Federal Radiolocation Service require that
roadside installations within 75 kilometers around 59 Federal radar
locations be coordinated with the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA). The Commission believes that
requiring C-V2X equipment to likewise coordinate installations within
75-kilometer coordination zones represents the most straightforward
approach for enabling compatibility with federal operations. The
Commission seeks comment on this proposal, and specifically on whether
C-V2X operations at the proposed power levels would in any way alter
the previous assumptions for sharing with DoD radars. In addition, the
Commission seeks comment on what measures the Commission might
establish for C-V2X equipment to ensure the radars are not subject to
harmful interference. Commenters should address the potential impact
from both roadside and onboard units and provide information as to how
such interference could be mitigated by requiring technical or
operational constraints on the C-V2X operations in the event harmful
interference were to occur.
36. The Commission also seeks comment on whether there are
alternate methods to ensure that harmful interference is not caused to
federal radars from C-V2X devices if it were to adopt the proposals
included in the NPRM. Have there been any tests or studies undertaken
by C-V2X proponents demonstrating that the C-V2X protocol provides
comparable or greater protection to federal radars as compared to DSRC
devices?
[[Page 6847]]
Alternatively, could dynamic or location awareness methods be used by
C-V2X systems to automatically reduce power when nearing any of the
sites designated for coordination, and could such provisions be made
applicable to all C-V2X equipment? The Commission's consideration of
on-board units in this regard could become relevant if it adopts final
rules that specify different maximum power limits for C-V2X on-board
units than those for DSRC on-board units. Under such a regime, how
would systems be updated if new DoD radar sites are added? Proponents
of any of these options should provide details specifying how the
Commission could modify the interference protection rules.
37. As to unlicensed devices in the 5.9 GHz band, the Commission
notes that unlicensed devices currently share spectrum with D0D radar
operations in the adjacent U-NII-3 band (5.725-5.850 GHz) without
implementing any frequency use avoidance techniques, and in general,
sharing has been successful. The Commission proposes to adopt the same
technical rules (e.g., radiated power, power spectral density, etc.)
for U-NII-4 unlicensed devices as apply to U-NII-3 unlicensed devices.
The Commission will continue working with NTIA and DoD to examine and
mitigate the potential for harmful interference to DoD radars under
these proposed rules and may impose additional technical or operational
constraints on U-NII-4 devices. The Commission further seeks comment on
whether there are any mitigation measures, such as technical or
operational conditions or constraints that it should consider for U-
NII-4 operations to protect DoD radars in the 5.9 GHz band.
38. The primary non-federal FSS (Earth-to-space) operations at 5.9
GHz band are part of the ``extended C-band'' and provide uplinks
(Earth-to-space) that are limited to international inter-continental
systems and subject to case-by-case electromagnetic compatibility
analysis. The majority of these stations are near the coastlines,
though there are some inland stations. To enable the required
international inter-continental transmissions, these stations transmit
to satellites located at longitudes that are not located over the U.S.
The Commission previously determined that no coordination requirement
is needed to protect FSS uplink operations from harmful interference
due to DSRC transmissions. Because C-V2X operations are anticipated to
be similar to DSRC operations in their potential for interference, the
Commission proposes that coordination with FSS stations is unnecessary
to ensure protection from harmful interference due to C-V2X
transmissions and seeks comment on this assessment. The Commission
further proposes that to the extent DSRC operations remain in the 5.9
GHz band, such stations continue to operate under the current rules;
i.e., no coordination is necessary with FSS stations. The Commission
seeks comment on this proposal and asks commenters to provide
information on the types of FSS uses this band supports and how much
this band actually is used (i.e., is it used continuously or only as a
back-up if other links go down?). Should the Commission codify
coordination procedures, or should they remain under the purview of the
interested parties where they can be more easily changed and updated as
technology or band usage changes? Although the Commission observes that
C-V2X and FSS uplink operations can co-exist without harmful
interference, out of an abundance of caution, it also seeks comment on
whether any testing or studies have been conducted by proponents of C-
V2X that have considered FSS uplink incumbents, and how those results
might inform the final rules it adopts.
39. The Commission also proposes not to adopt any restrictions on
U-NII-4 devices to account for the existing non-federal users of the
band. The Commission believes that the expected unlicensed device use
cases, which primarily involve delivery of Wi-Fi signals along with the
distance to FSS satellites in geostationary orbit, should protect FSS
uplink operations from harmful interference. The Commission
nevertheless seeks comment on whether any targeted rules are needed to
ensure the protection of incumbent FSS uplink operations. If so, what
types of sharing technology or techniques would be appropriate and what
are the cost implications for manufacturers, vendors, and consumers?
The Commission also believes that its proposal to apply the existing U-
NII-3 power rules to the 5.850-5.895 GHz band will protect co-channel
secondary Amateur Service operations from harmful interference. The
Commission seeks comment on this proposed approach.
40. With regard to the secondary Amateur Service operations in the
5.9 GHz band, the Commission reasons that no additional rules are
necessary to accommodate co-channel C-V2X use with the Amateur Service.
The Commission also concludes that its proposal to apply the existing
U-NII-3 power rules to the 5.850-5.895 GHz band will protect co-channel
Amateur Service operations from harmful interference. Similarly, the
Commission proposes that no additional rules are necessary to protect
C-V2X devices from ISM operations permitted under Part 18 of the rules
in the 5.850-5.875 GHz portion of the band. The Commission seeks
comment on these approaches.
41. Changes to the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations. In
conjunction with the Commission's proposed use of the 5.895-5.925 GHz
sub-band for vehicular-related systems, the Commission proposes
conforming modifications to the U.S. Table. Currently under Footnote
NG160 in the U.S. Table, use of the non-Federal Mobile Service in the
5.850-5.925 GHz band is limited to DSRC operating in the ITS radio
service. The Commission proposes to modify Footnote NG160 to remove the
reference to DSRC, refer to ITS generically, and limit ITS use of the
Mobile Service to only the 5.895-5.925 GHz band. The Commission seeks
comment on this proposal.
F. Vehicular Applications Outside of the 5.9 GHz Band
42. Vehicle-resident technologies are widely deployed in millions
of vehicles today without using 5.9 GHz spectrum, and other, more
advanced vehicle safety features are under development. The Commission
seeks comment on the extent to which the needs for transportation and
vehicular safety-related communications and other ITS applications
originally identified for the 5.9 GHz band are already being met
through spectrum use outside of the 5.9 GHz band. Is the requirement in
the Intelligent Transportation Systems Act of 1998 to consider
designating spectrum for ITS still relevant today? Because the
Commission's general policy has been to move away from specific
spectrum designations in favor of more flexible use, is there still a
need to designate spectrum for ITS? Commenters that advocate for a
specific designation should provide details regarding the benefits of
such a designation including those to the public as well as on
equipment designers and manufacturers.
43. Commenters also should consider whether there are other
spectrum bands that might be better suited for supporting ITS
applications. If so, which ones? What would be the benefit of doing so,
e.g., would this lead to more rapid take-up of valuable automotive
safety applications? Commenters should address the extent to which some
of the 5.9 GHz band might remain critical to the realization of ITS
applications. Commenters that support maintaining
[[Page 6848]]
some 5.9 GHz band spectrum for ITS applications should specify the
specific transportation and vehicular safety-related functions to be
accommodated in the band and how much bandwidth in this particular band
is necessary to achieve those respective functional capabilities. Are
all of these applications equally critical to ensure automotive safety
and improve the vehicular transportation environment? The Commission
seeks comment on how the Commission can ensure that ITS is used for
safety of life applications. What are the trade-offs associated with
other options, such as the use of different spectrum to provide ITS
services? Do the potential safety benefits vary by band or service and,
if so, in what way?
44. Could the Commission modify its rules to make it easier to
provide for automotive safety applications in other bands or through
other radio services? What are the implications of retaining spectrum
for ITS in the 5.9 GHz band relative to autonomous vehicles, especially
given that autonomous vehicles are already being tested and deployed
using applications and technologies other than DSRC for vehicle-to-
vehicle communications or other transportation or vehicular-safety
related operations?
G. Benefits and Costs
45. The Commission's goal in this proceeding is to revise the
current 5.9 GHz band plan to optimize the efficient and effective use
of the band by making the band available both for unlicensed use and
ITS services. The Commission seeks to evaluate the benefits and costs
of its proposed approach as well as alternatives, and requests comment
on how to best calculate these benefits and costs. To date, the band
has been underused for ITS services. Designating the 5.850-5.895 GHz
band for unlicensed operations is likely to generate quantifiable
benefits for consumers, stakeholders, and the American economy.
Similarly, the Commission believes removing uncertainty pertaining to
the future of ITS services in the band, including the type(s) of
technologies that are authorized, would promote more rapid and
effective deployment of these services in the band. At the same time,
the Commission recognizes that reducing the spectrum available for ITS,
depending on the approach taken, potentially could lead to social costs
if deployments of ITS would ever occur at wide-scale. The Commission
seeks comment on how to best calculate these benefits and costs.
46. The Commission believes that its proposals have the potential
to create economic value by resolving uncertainty concerning the future
designation of the 5.9 GHz band for both unlicensed uses and ITS
services. Specifically, does the economic value of removing this
uncertainty and providing a clear direction for use of the band under
the proposed new band plan exceed the benefits that might be achieved
by continuing on the path set out by the Commission in 2013, when it
sought to explore sharing of the band between unlicensed and DSRC
devices (and the extensive further testing that this would entail)?
Insofar as the Commission's proposal provides certainty that part of
the 5.9 GHz band would continue to be reserved for ITS services, and
would have the effect of promoting development and deployment of ITS
services that make use of this band, how should the Commission evaluate
the benefits of such a determination today and into the future?
47. The Commission seeks comment on the benefits and costs of
designating a significant portion of this band for unlicensed
operations. The Commission notes that other studies have sought to
quantify the benefits of unlicensed spectrum, but most have focused on
existing allocations rather than on the 5.9 GHz band specifically. The
Commission requests comment on the extent to which available studies
may provide an appropriate approach for quantifying the benefits
associated with proposing to designate 45 megahertz at 5.850-5.895 GHz
for unlicensed operations. The Commission also seeks comment on other
potential benefits, including benefits to other licensed or unlicensed
users (including ITS users) that may be able to use unlicensed devices
in providing services.
48. The Commission also proposes to measure the benefits and costs
of reserving 30 megahertz of spectrum in the 5.9 GHz band for ITS and
seeks specific comment on how best to evaluate these benefits and
costs. In proposing to reserve 30 megahertz of spectrum in the 5.9 GHz
band for ITS, the Commission recognizes that many of the technologies
that will make use of 5.9 GHz band spectrum are evolving and will
continue to evolve in the future. The Commission seeks comment on how
to evaluate the benefits and costs of its proposal given the evolving
nature of transportation and vehicular safety-related technologies,
both within and outside of the 5.9 GHz band. The Commission seeks
comment on the extent to which its proposals would make ITS based
technologies either more or less effective. To what extent are or will
the types of ITS services that would be available through use of the
5.9 GHz band going to be offered using spectrum outside of the 5.9 GHz
band? How should the Commission evaluate the benefits and costs of ITS
services in the 5.9 GHz band (whether for vehicular safety or other
transportation-related applications) using 30 megahertz of spectrum in
the band as compared with other amounts of spectrum in the band? The
Commission also asks that commenters quantify how the vehicular safety
and transportation-related benefits and costs may be affected based on
the authorization of C-V2X technologies in the entire 5.895-5.925 GHz
sub-band, or alternatively authorizing C-V2X in the upper 20 megahertz
and DSRC in the other 10 megahertz. Are there technologies presently
being or likely to be developed outside of the 5.9 GHz band that would
substantially substitute for benefits of ITS in the 5.9 GHz band?
49. The Commission is cognizant that retaining 30 megahertz of
spectrum for ITS in the 5.9 GHz band may have other economic benefits
or costs that could be affected by its proposal. For instance, in
addition to improving traffic safety, the ITS service was envisioned as
having the potential to decrease traffic congestion, facilitate the
reduction of air pollution, and help conserve vital fossil fuels. To
what extent would these potential benefits be affected by the
Commission's proposal? The Commission asks commenters to enumerate and
quantify any such alternative effects. Additionally, to the extent that
there are benefits and costs associated with the Commission's proposal
for unlicensed operations and ITS services in the 5.9 GHz band, when
and over what time horizon would they be realized?
H. Alternate Approaches
50. Are there spectrum band approaches other than those discussed
above that may better maximize the effective and efficient use of the
5.9 GHz band? Would creating differently sized sub-bands be a better
approach than the Commission's proposed band plan? Are there any
additional emerging vehicle safety technologies the Commission should
consider for the 5.9 GHz band? Should the Commission provide automakers
and the transportation industry with broad flexibility to introduce
additional vehicular safety communications technologies into the band,
and permit any and all technologies so long as they can co-exist? This
could include DSRC, C-V2X, or future spectrum use protocols that might
be developed. If so, how should
[[Page 6849]]
the Commission define successful co-existence and interoperability, and
are there ways to ensure that a technology-neutral approach to any
future such developments would provide ready access to the band and
enable critical safety services without causing harmful interference to
incumbent technologies?
51. Commenters should provide detailed justification to support
specific band plan options, including the types of services that could
or could not be delivered by unlicensed use or by vehicular-related
services under each option. Likewise, in each case, commenters should
seek to quantify the costs and benefits as well as the risks and
opportunities, of the discussed alternatives relative to the
Commission's proposed band plan.
III. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
52. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA),
the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) concerning the possible significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules
proposed in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested on this
IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be
filed by the deadlines in the NPRM for comments. The Commission will
send a copy of the NPRM, including the IRFA, to the Chief Counsel of
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA).
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
53. In this NPRM, the Commission assesses the present 5.9 GHz band
(5.850-5.925 GHz band) rules and proposes appropriate changes to ensure
the spectrum supports its highest and best use. Recognizing the current
state of vehicular technology and deployment, and the evolution of the
telecommunications market, the Commission proposes to continue to
dedicate spectrum--the upper 30 megahertz portion of the band--for
transportation and vehicle safety purposes and repurpose the lower 45
megahertz part of the band for unlicensed operations to support high-
throughput broadband applications.
54. For the past two decades, the 5.9 GHz band has been spectrum
designated for the operation of the Intelligent Transportation System
(ITS). The Commission adopted licensing and services rules for
Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC), and specified a single
technological standard based on its expectation that, despite its
general preference for leaving the selection of technologies to
licensees, a single standard in this band was most likely to promote
interoperability between vehicles and infrastructure in the United
States, enable robust automotive safety communications, and accelerate
the nationwide deployment of DSRC-based applications while reducing
costs.
55. Since that time, the DSRC service has evolved slowly and has
not been widely deployed within the consumer automobile market (it has
found use in certain specialized, traffic-related projects). Meanwhile,
numerous technologies have been or are being developed and deployed to
improve transportation safety and efficiency and provide the types of
services envisioned for DSRC in spectrum outside the 5.9 GHz band. A
new technology, Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C V2X), has been
gaining momentum as a means of providing transportation and vehicle
safety-related communications, and its proponents now seek to operate
its technology as an ITS service in the 5.9 GHz band. At the same time,
unlicensed device use has developed exponentially elsewhere in the 5
GHz band to become a vital component of the communications landscape.
As a result, most of the spectrum between 5.150 GHz to the lower edge
of the 5.9 GHz band at 5.850 GHz is available for unlicensed
operations. As such, the 5.850-5.895 GHz sub-band in the 5.9 GHz band
is especially well positioned to deliver immediate and potentially
significant benefits when used by unlicensed devices to meet the
intense demand.
56. This NPRM proposes to create sub-bands within the 5.9 GHz band
to allow unlicensed operations to operate in the lower 45 megahertz of
the band (5.850-5.895 GHz) and reserve the upper 30 megahertz of the
band (5.895-5.925 GHz) for ITS, either solely C-V2X or divided between
C-V2X and DSRC technologies. This 45/30 megahertz split for unlicensed
devices and ITS applications is intended to optimize the use of
spectrum resources in the 5.9 GHz band by enabling valuable additions
and enhancements to the unlicensed ecosystem and by continuing to
dedicate sufficient spectrum to meet current and future ITS needs
within the vehicular-related ecosystem. This proposal seeks to provide
the spectrum necessary for unlicensed operations to implement the
widest, highest throughput channel permitted by the standards, while
clarifying the technical rules and eliminating uncertainty for the
development and deployment of ITS applications.
B. Legal Basis
57. The proposed action is taken authority found in sections 1,
4(i), 301, 302, 303, 316, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 301, 302, 303, 316, and 332, and Sec.
1.411 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.411.
C. Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply
58. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules, if adopted. The RFA generally defines
the term ``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms
``small business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act. A ``small business concern'' is one which: (1) Is independently
owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and
(3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
59. Small Businesses, Small Organizations, and Small Governmental
Jurisdictions. The Commission's actions, over time, may affect small
entities that are not easily categorized at present. The Commission
therefore describes here, at the outset, three broad groups of small
entities that could be directly affected herein. First, while there are
industry specific size standards for small businesses that are used in
the regulatory flexibility analysis, according to data from the SBA's
Office of Advocacy, in general a small business is an independent
business having fewer than 500 employees. These types of small
businesses represent 99.9% of all businesses in the United States which
translates to 28.8 million businesses.
60. Next, the type of small entity described as a ``small
organization'' is generally ``any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.''
Nationwide, as of August 2016, there were approximately 356,494 small
organizations based on registration and tax data filed by nonprofits
with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
61. Finally, the small entity described as a ``small governmental
jurisdiction'' is defined generally as ``governments of cities,
counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special
districts, with a population of less than fifty thousand.'' U.S. Census
Bureau data from the 2012 Census of
[[Page 6850]]
Governments indicate that there were 90,056 local governmental
jurisdictions consisting of general purpose governments and special
purpose governments in the United States. Of this number there were
37,132 General purpose governments (county, municipal and town or
township) with populations of less than 50,000 and 12,184 Special
purpose governments (independent school districts and special
districts) with populations of less than 50,000. The 2012 U.S. Census
Bureau data for most types of governments in the local government
category show that the majority of these governments have populations
of less than 50,000. Based on this data the Commission estimates that
at least 49,316 local government jurisdictions fall in the category of
``small governmental jurisdictions.''
62. Radio Frequency Equipment Manufacturers (RF Manufacturers).
Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a small business size
standard applicable to Radio Frequency Equipment Manufacturers (RF
Manufacturers). There are several analogous SBA small entity categories
applicable to RF Manufacturers--Fixed Microwave Services, Other
Communications Equipment Manufacturing, and Radio and Television
Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing. A
description of these small entity categories and the small business
size standards under the SBA rules are detailed below.
63. Fixed Microwave Services. Microwave services include common
carrier, private-operational fixed, and broadcast auxiliary radio
services. They also include the Upper Microwave Flexible Use Service,
Millimeter Wave Service, Local Multipoint Distribution Service (LMDS),
the Digital Electronic Message Service (DEMS), and the 24 GHz Service,
where licensees can choose between common carrier and non-common
carrier status. There are approximately 66,680 common carrier fixed
licensees, 69,360 private and public safety operational-fixed
licensees, 20,150 broadcast auxiliary radio licensees, 411 LMDS
licenses, 33 24 GHz DEMS licenses, 777 39 GHz licenses, and five 24 GHz
licenses, and 467 Millimeter Wave licenses in the microwave services.
The Commission has not yet defined a small business with respect to
microwave services. The closest applicable SBA category is Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) and the appropriate size
standard for this category under SBA rules is that such a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For this industry, U.S.
Census Bureau data for 2012 show that there were 967 firms that
operated for the entire year. Of this total, 955 firms had employment
of 999 or fewer employees and 12 had employment of 1000 employees or
more. Thus under this SBA category and the associated size standard,
the Commission estimates that a majority of fixed microwave service
licensees can be considered small.
64. Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing. This industry
comprises establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing
communications equipment (except telephone apparatus, and radio and
television broadcast, and wireless communications equipment). Examples
of such manufacturing include fire detection and alarm systems
manufacturing, Intercom systems and equipment manufacturing, and
signals (e.g., highway, pedestrian, railway, traffic) manufacturing.
The SBA has established a size standard for this industry as all such
firms having 750 or fewer employees. U.S. Census Bureau data for 2012
shows that 383 establishments operated in that year. Of that number,
379 operated with fewer than 500 employees and 4 had 500 to 999
employees. Based on this data, the Commission concludes that the
majority of Other Communications Equipment Manufacturers are small.
65. Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications
Equipment Manufacturing. This industry comprises establishments
primarily engaged in manufacturing radio and television broadcast and
wireless communications equipment. Examples of products made by these
establishments are: transmitting and receiving antennas, cable
television equipment, GPS equipment, pagers, cellular phones, mobile
communications equipment, and radio and television studio and
broadcasting equipment. The SBA has established a small business size
standard for this industry of 1,250 or fewer employees. U.S. Census
Bureau data for 2012 show that 841 establishments operated in this
industry in that year. Of that number, 828 establishments operated with
fewer than 1,000 employees, 7 establishments operated with between
1,000 and 2,499 employees and 6 establishments operated with 2,500 or
more employees. Based on this data, the Commission concludes that a
majority of manufacturers in this industry are small.
66. Automobile Manufacturing. This U.S. industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in (1) manufacturing complete
automobiles (i.e., body and chassis or unibody) or (2) manufacturing
automobile chassis only. The SBA has established a size standard for
this industry, which is 1,500 or fewer employees. 2012 U.S. Census
Bureau data indicate that 185 establishments operated in this industry
that year. Of this number, 162 establishments had employment of fewer
than 1,000 employees, and 11 establishments had employment of 1,000 to
2,499 employees. Therefore, the Commission estimates that the majority
of manufacturers in this industry are small entities.
67. Internet Service Providers (Non-Broadband). Internet access
service providers such as Dial-up internet service providers, VoIP
service providers using client-supplied telecommunications connections
and internet service providers using client-supplied telecommunications
connections (e.g., dial-up ISPs) fall in the category of All Other
Telecommunications. The SBA has developed a small business size
standard for All Other Telecommunications which consists of all such
firms with gross annual receipts of $35 million or less. For this
category, U.S. Census Bureau data for 2012 show that there were 1,442
firms that operated for the entire year. Of these firms, a total of
1,400 had gross annual receipts of less than $25 million. Consequently,
under this size standard a majority of firms in this industry firms can
be considered small.
68. Internet Service Providers (Broadband). Broadband internet
service providers include wired (e.g., cable, DSL) and VoIP service
providers using their own operated wired telecommunications
infrastructure fall in the category of Wired Telecommunication
Carriers. Wired Telecommunications Carriers are comprised of
establishments primarily engaged in operating and/or providing access
to transmission facilities and infrastructure that they own and/or
lease for the transmission of voice, data, text, sound, and video using
wired telecommunications networks. Transmission facilities may be based
on a single technology or a combination of technologies. The SBA size
standard for this category classifies a business as small if it has
1,500 or fewer employees. U.S. Census Bureau data for 2012 show that
there were 3,117 firms that operated that year. Of this total, 3,083
operated with fewer than 1,000 employees. Consequently, under this size
standard, the majority of firms in this industry can be considered
small.
[[Page 6851]]
69. Cable System Operators (Telecom Act Standard). The
Communications Act of 1934, as amended also contains a size standard
for small cable system operators, which is ``a cable operator that,
directly or through an affiliate, serves in the aggregate fewer than
one percent of all subscribers in the United States and is not
affiliated with any entity or entities whose gross annual revenues in
the aggregate exceed $250,000,000.'' As of 2018, there were
approximately 50,504,624 cable video subscribers in the United States.
Accordingly, an operator serving fewer than 505,046 subscribers shall
be deemed a small operator if its annual revenues, when combined with
the total annual revenues of all its affiliates, do not exceed $250
million in the aggregate. Based on available data, the Commission finds
that all but six incumbent cable operators are small entities under
this size standard. The Commission notes that it neither requests nor
collects information on whether cable system operators are affiliated
with entities whose gross annual revenues exceed $250 million.
Therefore, the Commission is unable at this time to estimate with
greater precision the number of cable system operators that would
qualify as small cable operators under the definition in the
Communications Act.
70. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite). This
industry comprises establishments engaged in operating and maintaining
switching and transmission facilities to provide communications via the
airwaves. Establishments in this industry have spectrum licenses and
provide services using that spectrum, such as cellular services, paging
services, wireless internet access, and wireless video services. The
appropriate size standard under SBA rules is that such a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For this industry, U.S.
Census Bureau data for 2012 show that there were 967 firms that
operated for the entire year. Of this total, 955 firms had employment
of 999 or fewer employees and 12 had employment of 1,000 employees or
more. Thus, under this category and the associated size standard, the
Commission estimates that the majority of wireless telecommunications
carriers (except satellite) are small entities.
D. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small Entities
71. The NPRM proposes rules that will affect reporting and other
compliance requirements. The NPRM proposes to adopt rules reducing the
amount of spectrum available for vehicular-related communications,
i.e., ITS, from 75 megahertz (5.850-5.925 GHz) to 30 megahertz (5.895-
5.925 GHz) and establish rules for the C-V2X technology that largely
follow the Commission's approach when the rules for DSRC operations
were adopted, including those designed to protect incumbent operations.
The Commission expects that manufacturers would be required to redesign
DSRC equipment to reflect the revised band plan (if DSRC remains a
technical option in the band) and design C-2X equipment to per the
Commission's new rules. The Commission also proposes that a licensee of
either technology must register each of its roadside units in the
Universal Licensing System before operating such roadside unit and
delete from the registration database any roadside units that have been
discontinued.
72. The NPRM also proposes to allow unlicensed operations in 45
megahertz from 5.850-5.895 GHz (the U-NII-4 band) under the conditions
of not causing harmful interference and accepting any interference from
an authorized radio station. The Commission proposes that U-NII-4
devices be subject to similar technical and operational rules that
apply to the U-NII-3 band, with regard to, e.g., power levels and out-
of-band emissions limits. Because the proposed U-NII-4 band at 5.850-
5.895 GHz is located immediately adjacent to the existing U-NII-3 band
at 5.725-5.850 GHz, the Commission expects that manufacturers will
design devices that span the U-NII-3 and U-NII-4 bands to implement the
widest channel available under the standards, which will affect device
design and cost.
E. Steps Taken To Minimize the Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
73. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities.
74. The proposals that would require equipment modification or new
equipment manufacturing would have an impact on equipment
manufacturers, some of which may be small entities. Though the
Commission believes that its proposed technical rules for the ITS
equipment would provide appropriate rules for this band, it seeks
comment on alternatives that are based on the existing rules or some
other regulatory scheme, with regard to, e.g., power limits and antenna
height. The Commission also seeks comment on whether it should adopt
different power levels or alternative out-of-band emissions limits for
U-NII-4 equipment as compared to other U-NII equipment.
75. In addition, the Commission also seeks general comment on
alternative approaches to the spectrum band plan than those discussed,
such as creating differently sized sub-bands for unlicensed and ITS,
and technology neutral approaches to use of the ITS band.
76. The regulatory burdens the Commission has proposed are
necessary in order to ensure that the public receives the benefits of
innovative services and technologies in a prompt and efficient manner
and apply equally to large and small entities, thus without
differential impact. Comments with proposed alternatives will assist in
reaching the best outcomes. The Commission will continue to examine
alternatives in the future with the objectives of eliminating
unnecessary regulations and minimizing any significant impact on small
entities.
F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rules
77. None.
IV. Ordering Clauses
78. It is ordered that pursuant to the authority found in sections
1, 4(i), 301, 302, 303, 316, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 301, 302, 303, 316, and 332, and
Sec. 1.411 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.411, that this Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking is hereby adopted.
79. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration.
[[Page 6852]]
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 2
Radio, Telecommunications.
47 CFR Part 15, 90, and 95
Communications equipment, Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR parts 2, 15, 90, and
95 as follows:
PART 2--FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL
RULES AND REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise
noted.
0
2. Section 2.106 is amended by revising footnote ``NG160'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 2.106 Table of Frequency Allocations.
* * * * *
NG160 In the band 5895-5925 MHz, the use of the non-Federal mobile
service is limited to operations in the Intelligent Transportation
System radio service.
* * * * *
PART 15--RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES
0
3. The authority citation for part 15 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, 304, 307, 336, 544a, and
549.
0
4. Section 15.401 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 15.401 Scope.
This subpart sets out the regulations for unlicensed National
Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices operating in the 5.15-5.35
GHz and 5.47-5.895 GHz bands.
0
5. Section 15.403 is amended by revising paragraph (s) to read as
follows:
Sec. 15.403 Definitions.
* * * * *
(s) U-NII devices. Intentional radiators operating in the frequency
bands 5.15-5.35 GHz and 5.470-5.895 GHz that use wideband digital
modulation techniques and provide a wide array of high data rate mobile
and fixed communications for individuals, businesses, and institutions.
0
6. Amend Sec. 15.407 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(4) and (5) as paragraphs (a)(5) and
(6);
0
b. Adding new paragraph (a)(4);
0
c. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (a)(6);
0
d. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (b)(4);
0
e. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(5) through (7) as paragraphs (b)(6)
through (8);
0
f. Adding new paragraph (b)(5); and
0
g. Revising paragraph (e).
The additions and revisions to read as follows:
Sec. 15.407 General technical requirements.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) For the band 5.85-5.895 GHz, the maximum conducted output power
over the frequency band of operation shall not exceed 1 W. In addition,
the maximum power spectral density shall not exceed 30 dBm in any 500-
kHz band. If transmitting antennas of directional gain greater than 6
dBi are used, both the maximum conducted output power and the maximum
power spectral density shall be reduced by the amount in dB that the
directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi. However, fixed point-to-
point U-NII devices operating in this band may employ transmitting
antennas with directional gain greater than 6 dBi without any
corresponding reduction in transmitter conducted power. Fixed, point-
to-point operations exclude the use of point-to-multipoint systems,
omnidirectional applications, and multiple collocated transmitters
transmitting the same information. The operator of the U-NII device, or
if the equipment is professionally installed, the installer, is
responsible for ensuring that systems employing high gain directional
antennas are used exclusively for fixed, point-to-point operations.
* * * * *
(6) The maximum power spectral density is measured as a conducted
emission by direct connection of a calibrated test instrument to the
equipment under test. If the device cannot be connected directly,
alternative techniques acceptable to the Commission may be used.
Measurements in the 5.725-5.895 GHz band are made over a reference
bandwidth of 500 kHz or the 26 dB emission bandwidth of the device,
whichever is less. Measurements in the 5.15-5.25 GHz, 5.25-5.35 GHz,
and the 5.47-5.725 GHz bands are made over a bandwidth of 1 MHz or the
26 dB emission bandwidth of the device, whichever is less. A narrower
resolution bandwidth can be used, provided that the measured power is
integrated over the full reference bandwidth.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) For transmitters operating solely in the 5.725-5.850 GHz band:
* * * * *
(5) For transmitters operating solely in the 5.850-5.895 GHz band
or operating on a channel that spans across 5.850 GHz:
(i) All emissions at or above 5.925 GHz shall not exceed an
e.i.r.p. of -27 dBm/MHz.
(ii) All emissions below 5.725 GHz shall be limited to a level of -
27 dBm/MHz at 5.65 GHz increasing linearly to 10 dBm/MHz at 5.7 GHz,
and from 5.7 GHz increasing linearly to a level of 15.6 dBm/MHz at 5.72
GHz, and from 5.72 GHz increasing linearly to a level of 27 dBm/MHz at
5.725 GHz.
* * * * *
(e) Within the 5.725-.5.850 GHz and 5.850-5.895 GHz bands, the
minimum 6 dB bandwidth of U-NII devices shall be at least 500 kHz.
* * * * *
PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
0
7. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 303(g), 303(r), 332(c)(7),
1401-1473.
0
8. Section 90.7 is amended by adding the definition of ``Cellular
Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) Communications Services'' in alphabetical
order and revising the definitions of ``On-Board unit (OBU),''
``Roadside unit (RSU)'' and ``Roadway bed surface'' to read as follows:
Sec. 90.7 Definitions.
* * * * *
Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) Service. The use of cellular
radio techniques defined by the 3rd Generation Partnership Program
(3GPP) to transfer data between roadside and mobile units, between
mobile units, and between portable and mobile units to perform
operations related to the improvement of traffic flow, traffic safety,
and other intelligent transportation service applications in a variety
of environments. C-V2X Service systems may also transmit status and
instructional messages related to the units involved.
* * * * *
On-Board Unit (OBU). An On-Board Unit is a DSRCS or C-V2X Service
transceiver that is normally mounted in or on a vehicle, or which in
some instances may be a portable unit. An
[[Page 6853]]
OBU can be operational while a vehicle or person is either mobile or
stationary. The OBUs receive and transmit on one or more radio
frequency (RF) channels. Except where specifically excluded, OBU
operation is permitted wherever vehicle operation or human passage is
permitted. The OBUs mounted in vehicles are licensed by rule under part
95 of this chapter and communicate with Roadside Units (RSUs) and other
OBUs. Portable OBUs are also licensed by rule under part 95 of this
chapter.
Roadside Unit (RSU). A Roadside Unit is a DSRCS or C-V2X Service
transceiver that is mounted along a road or pedestrian passageway. An
RSU may also be mounted on a vehicle or is hand carried, but it may
only operate when the vehicle or hand-carried unit is stationary.
Furthermore, an RSU operating under this part is restricted to the
location where it is licensed to operate. However, portable or hand-
held RSUs are permitted to operate where they do not interfere with a
site-licensed operation. An RSU broadcasts data to or exchanges data
with OBUs.
Roadway bed surface. For DSRCS or the C-V2X Service, the road
surface at ground level.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 90.149 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.149 License term.
* * * * *
(b) Non-exclusive geographic area licenses for Roadside Units
(RSUs) under subpart M of this part in the 5895-5925 MHz band will be
issued for a term not to exceed ten years from the date of original
issuance or renewal. The registration dates of individual RSUs (see
Sec. 90.375) will not change the overall renewal period of the single
license.
0
10. Section 90.155 is amended by revising paragraph (i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.155 Time in which station must be placed in operation.
* * * * *
(i) Roadside Units (RSUs) under subpart M of this part in the 5895-
5925 MHz band must be placed in operation within 12 months from the
effective date of registration (see Sec. 90.375) or the authority to
operate the RSUs cancels automatically (see Sec. 1.955 of this
chapter). Such registration date(s) do not change the overall renewal
period of the single license. Licensees must notify the Commission in
accordance with Sec. 1.946 of this chapter when registered units are
placed in operation within their construction period.
0
11. Section 90.175 is amended by revising paragraph (j)(16) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.175 Frequency coordinator requirements.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(16) Applications for DSRCS and C-V2X Service licenses (as well as
registrations for Roadside Units) under subpart M of this part in the
5895-5925 GHz band.
* * * * *
0
12. Section 90.179 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.179 Shared use of radio stations.
* * * * *
(f) Above 800 MHz, shared use on a for-profit private carrier basis
is permitted only by SMR, Private Carrier Paging, LMS, DSCRS, and C-V2X
Service licensees. See subparts M, P, and S of this part.
0
13. Section 90.205 is amended by revising paragraph (q) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.205 Power and antenna height limits.
* * * * *
(q) 5895-5925 MHz. Power and height limitations are specified in
subpart M of this part.
* * * * *
0
14. Section 90.210 is amended by revising the entry of ``5850-5925'' in
the table and footnote 4 to read as follows:
Sec. 90.210 Emission masks.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mask for equipment Mask for equipment
Applicable emission masks with audio low pass without audio low
frequency band (MHz) filter pass filter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
5895-5925 \4\
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ DSRCS and C-V2X Service Roadside Units in the 5.895-5.925 GHz band
is governed under Subpart M of this part.
* * * * *
0
15. In Sec. 90.213 amend paragraph (a) by revising footnote 10 to the
table to read as follows:
Sec. 90.213 Frequency stability.
(a) * * *
\10\ Frequency stability for DSRCS and C-V2X Service equipment
in the 5895-5925 MHz band is specified in subpart M of this part.
For all other equipment, frequency stability is to be specified in
the station authorization.
0
16. Section 90.350 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 90.350 Scope.
The Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) radio service is for
the purpose of integrating radio-based technologies into the nation's
transportation infrastructure and to develop and implement the nation's
intelligent transportation systems. It includes the Location and
Monitoring Service (LMS), the Dedicated Short-Range Communications
Service (DSRCS), and the Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X)
Service. Rules as to eligibility for licensing, frequencies available,
and any special requirements for services in the Intelligent
Transportation Systems radio service are set forth in this subpart.
Subpart M--[Amended]
0
17. Amend Subpart M, consisting of Sec. Sec. 90.350 through 90.383, by
revising the undesignated heading after Sec. 90.365 to read as
follows:
* * * * *
Regulations Governing the Licensing and Use of Frequencies in the 5895-
5925 MHz Band for Dedicated Short-Range Communications Service (DSRCS)
and Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) Service
* * * * *
0
18. Section 90.370 is added to subpart M to read as follows:
Sec. 90.370 Permitted frequencies.
(a) DSRCS Roadside Units (RSUs) are permitted to operate in the
5895-5905 MHz band.
(b) C-V2X Service RSUs are permitted to operate in the 5905-5925
MHz band.
(c) Channels are available on a shared basis only for use in
accordance with the Commission's rules. All licensees shall cooperate
in the selection and use of channels in order to reduce
[[Page 6854]]
interference. This includes monitoring for communications in progress
and any other measures as may be necessary to minimize interference.
Licensees of RSUs suffering or causing harmful interference within a
communications zone as defined in Sec. 90.375 of this part are
expected to cooperate and resolve this problem by mutually satisfactory
arrangements. If the licensees are unable to do so, the Commission may
impose restrictions including specifying the transmitter power, antenna
height and direction, additional filtering, or area or hours of
operation of the stations concerned. Further the use of any channel at
a given geographical location may be denied when, in the judgment of
the Commission, its use at that location is not in the public interest;
use of any such channel may be restricted as to specified geographical
areas, maximum power, or such other operating conditions, contained in
this part or in the station authorization.
(d) Frequencies in the 5895-5925 MHz band will not be assigned for
the exclusive use of any licensee.
0
19. Section 90.371 is amended by revising the section heading, removing
paragraph (a), redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as paragraphs (a)
and (b) and revising the introductory text of newly redesignated
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 90.371 DSRCS and C-V2X Service.
(a) DSRCS and C-V2X Service Roadside Units (RSUs) operating in the
band 5895-5925 MHz shall not receive protection from Government
Radiolocation services in operation prior to the establishment of the
RSU. Operation of RSU stations within 75 kilometers of the locations
listed in the table below must be coordinated through the National
Telecommunications and Information Administration.
* * * * *
0
20. Section 90.373 is amended by revising the introductory text to read
as follows:
Sec. 90.373 Eligibility in the DSRCS and C-V2X Service.
The following entities are eligible to hold an authorization to
operate Roadside units in the DSRCS or C-V2X Service:
* * * * *
0
21. Section 90.375 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 90.375 License areas, communication zones, and registrations.
(a) Roadside Units (RSUs) in the 5895-5925 MHz band are licensed on
the basis of non-exclusive geographic areas. Governmental applicants
will be issued a geographic area license based on the geo-political
area encompassing the legal jurisdiction of the entity. All other
applicants will be issued a geographic area license for their proposed
area of operation based on county(s), state(s) or nationwide.
(b) Applicants who are approved in accordance with FCC Form 601
will be granted non-exclusive licenses for the channel(s) corresponding
to their intended operations (see Sec. 90.370). Such licenses serve as
a prerequisite of registering individual RSUs located within the
licensed geographic area described in paragraph (a) of this section.
Licensees must register each RSU in the Universal Licensing System
(ULS) before operating such RSU. RSU registrations are subject, inter
alia, to the requirements of Sec. 1.923 of this chapter as applicable
(antenna structure registration, environmental concerns, international
coordination, and quiet zones). Additionally, RSUs at locations subject
to NTIA coordination (see Sec. 90.371(a)) may not begin operation
until NTIA approval is received. Registrations are not effective until
the Commission posts them on the ULS. It is the licensee's
responsibility to delete from the registration database any RSUs that
have been discontinued.
(c) Licensees must operate each RSU in accordance with the
Commission's rules and the registration data posted on the ULS for such
RSU. Licensees must register each RSU for the smallest communication
zone needed for the intelligent transportation systems application
using one of the following four communication zones:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum output
RSU class power (dBm) Communications
\1\ zone (meters)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A..................................... 0 15
B..................................... 10 100
C..................................... 20 400
D..................................... 28.8 1000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As described in the IEEE 802.11p-2010 and Standard and ATIS
transposed standards of the 3GPP (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
90.379).
0
22. Section 90.377 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 90.377 Maximum EIRP and antenna height.
(a) DSRCS and C-V2X Service licensees shall transmit only the power
(EIRP) needed to communicate with an On-Board Unit (OBU) within the
communications zone and must take steps to limit the Roadside Unit
(RSU) signal within the zone to the maximum extent practicable.
(b) DSRCS and C-V2X Service licensees must limit RSU output power
to 20 dBm and equivalent isotopically radiated power (EIRP) to 33 dBm.
The EIRP is measured as the maximum EIRP toward the horizon or
horizontal, whichever is greater, of the gain associated with the main
or center of the transmission beam.
(c) The radiation center of an RSU antenna shall not exceed 8
meters above the roadway bed surface, except that an RSU may employ an
antenna with a height exceeding 8 meters but not exceeding 15 meters
provided the EIRP specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section
is reduced by a factor of 20 log(Ht/8) in dB where Ht is the height of
the radiation center of the antenna in meters above the roadway bed
surface. The RSU antenna height shall not exceed 15 meters above the
roadway bed surface.
0
23. Section 90.379 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 90.379 Technical standards for Roadside Units.
(a) DSRCS Roadside Units (RSUs) operating in the 5895-5905 MHz band
must comply with the technical standard Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.11p-2010.
(b) C-V2X Service RSUs operating in the 5905-5925 MHz band shall
comply with the V2X sidelink service for this band as described in the
ATIS transposed standards of the 3GPP specifications except where these
rules and regulations take precedence.
[[Page 6855]]
(c) The standards required in this section are incorporated by
reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the
Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
material is available for inspection at the Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554 and is available
from the sources indicated below. It is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030 or go to www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
(1) 802.11p-2010, IEEE Standard for Information technology--Local
and metropolitan area networks--Specific requirements--Part 11:
Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY)
Specifications Amendment 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments
(2010). This standard is available from the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 3025 Boardwalk Drive, Suite 220, Ann
Arbor, MI 48108, 1-855-999-9870, https://www.techstreet.com/ieee.
(2) 3GPP Release 14, 3rd Generation Partnership Project Technical
Specification Group Services and System Aspects (2018). This standard
is available from ATIS, 1200 G Street NW Suite 500, Washington, DC
20005, https://www.atis.org/docstore/default.aspx.
0
24. Section 90.381 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 90.381 C-V2X Service emissions limits.
C-V2X Service Roadside Units (RSUs) must comply with the following
out-of-band emissions limits:
(a) Conducted limits measured at the antenna input shall not
exceed:
(1) -29 dBm/100 kHz at the band edge (The band is defined in Sec.
90.370 of this part);
(2) -35 dBm/100 kHz 1 megahertz from the band edge;
(3) -43 dBm/100 kHz 10 megahertz from the band edge;
and
(4) -53 dBm/100 kHz 20 megahertz from the band edge.
(b) Radiated limits: All C-V2X Service RSUs must limit radiated
emissions to -25 dBm/100 kHz EIRP or less outside the band edges where
the band is defined in Sec. 90.370 of this part.
0
25. Section 90.383 is amended by revising the introductory text and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 90.383 RSU sites near the U.S./Canada or U.S./Mexico border.
Until such time as agreements between the United States and Canada
or the United States and Mexico, as applicable, become effective
governing border area use of the 5850-5925 MHz band, authorizations to
operate Roadside Units (RSUs) are granted subject to the following
conditions:
* * * * *
(b) Authority to operate RSUs is subject to modifications and
future agreements between the United States and Canada or the United
States and Mexico, as applicable.
Sec. 90.415 [AMENDED]
0
26. Section 90.415 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
* * * * *
(b) Render a communications common carrier service, except for
stations in the Public Safety Pool providing communications standby
facilities under Sec. 90.20(a)(2)(xi) and stations licensed under this
part in the SMR, private carrier paging, Industrial/Business Pool, 220-
222 MHz or the DSRCS and C-V2X Service.
0
27. Section 90.421 is revised by adding paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.421 Operation of mobile station units not under the control
of the licensee.
* * * * *
(d) DSRCS and C-V2X Service On-Board Units licensed by rule under
part 95 of this chapter may communicate with any roadside unit
authorized under this part or any licensed commercial mobile radio
service station as defined in part 20 of this chapter.
0
28. Section 90.425 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(10) to read as
follows:
Sec. 90.425 Station identification.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(10) It is a Roadside Unit (RSU) in an ITS system.
* * * * *
PART 95--PERSONAL RADIO SERVICES
0
29. The authority citation for part 95 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, and 307.
Subpart L--[Amended].
0
30. Subpart L, consisting of Sec. Sec. 95.3101 through 95.3189, is
amended by revising the subpart heading to read as follows:
Subpart L--DSRCS and C-V2X Service On-Board Units
0
31. Section 95.3101 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 95.3101 Scope.
This subpart contains rules that apply only to On-Board Units
(OBUs) transmitting in the 5895-5925 MHz frequency band in the
Dedicated Short-Range Communications Services (DSRCS) and the Cellular
Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) Service (see Sec. 90.371 of this
chapter).
0
32. Section 95.3103 is amended by adding the definition of ``Cellular
Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) Service'' in alphabetical order and by
revising the definition of ``On-Board Unit (OBU)'' to read as follows:
Sec. 95.3103 Definitions, OBUs.
Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C-V2X) Service. A service providing
for data transfer between various mobile and roadside transmitting
units for the purposes of improving traffic flow, highway safety and
performing other intelligent transportation functions. See Sec. 90.7
of this chapter for a more detailed definition.
* * * * *
On-Board Units (OBUs). OBUs are low-power devices on vehicles that
transfer data to roadside units or other OBUs in the Dedicated Short-
Range Communications Service or the Cellular Vehicle to Everything (C-
V2X) Service (see Sec. Sec. 90.370-90.383 of this chapter), to improve
traffic flow and safety, and for other intelligent transportation
system purposes. See Sec. 90.7 of this chapter.
* * * * *
0
33. Section 95.3131 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 95.3131 Permissible uses, OBUs.
On-Board Units (OBUs) may transmit signals to other OBUs and to
Roadside Units (RSUs), which are authorized under part 90 of this
chapter or to licensees as defined in part 20 of this chapter.
Sec. 95.3159 [Removed].
0
34. Section 95.3159 is removed.
0
35. Section 95.3161 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 95.3161 OBU transmitter certification.
(a) Each On-Board Unit (OBU) C-V2XC-V2Xthat operates or is intended
to operate in the DSRCS or C-V2X Service must be certified in
accordance with this subpart and subpart J of part 2 of this chapter.
* * * * *
0
36. Section 95.3163 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 95.3163 OBU frequencies.
(a) DSRCS On-Board Units (OBUs) are permitted to operate in the
5895-5905 MHz band.
[[Page 6856]]
(b) C-V2X Service OBUs are permitted to operate in the 5905-5925
MHz band.
0
37. Section 95.3167 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 95.3167 OBU transmit power limit.
(a) The maximum output power for portable DSRCS On-Board Unit (OBU)
transmitter types is 1.0 mW.
(b) The maximum output power for vehicular and portable C-V2X
Service OBU transmitter types is 20 dBm and the maximum equivalent
isotopically radiated power (EIRP) is limited to 23 dBm.
(c) The power limits in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section may
be referenced to the antenna input, so that cable losses are taken into
account.
(d) For purposes of this section, a portable unit is a transmitting
device designed to be used so that the radiating structure(s) of the
device is/are within 20 centimeters of the body of the user.
0
38. Section 95.3179 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 95.3179 Unwanted emissions limits.
(a) C-V2X Service Roadside Units must comply with the following
out-of-band emissions limits:
(1) Conducted limits measured at the antenna input shall not
exceed:
(i) -29 dBm/100 kHz at the band edge (The band is defined in
section 95.3163 of this part.);
(ii) -35 dBm/100 kHz 1 megahertz from the band edge;
(iii) -43 dBm/100 kHz 10 megahertz from the band edge;
and
(iv) -53 dBm/100 kHz 20 megahertz from the band edge.
(2) Radiated limits: All C-V2X Service On-Board Units must limit
radiated emissions to -25 dBm/100 kHz EIRP or less outside the band
edges where the band is defined in section 95.3163 of this part.
(b) DSRCS out-of-band emissions limits are specified in the IEEE
802.11p-2010 standard (See section 95.3189 of this part)
0
39. Section 95.3189 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 95.3189 OBU technical standard.
(a) DSRCS On-Board Unit (OBU) transmitter types operating in the
5895-5905 MHz band must be designed to comply with the technical
standard Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
802.11p-2010.
(b) C-V2X Service OBU transmitter types operating in the 5895-5925
MHz band shall comply with the V2X sidelink service for this band as
described in the ATIS transposed standards of the 3GPP specifications
except where these rules and regulations take precedence.
(c) The standards required in this section are incorporated by
reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the
Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
material is available for inspection at the Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554 and is available
from the sources indicated below. It is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030 or go to www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
(1) 802.11p-2010, IEEE Standard for Information technology--Local
and metropolitan area networks--Specific requirements--Part 11:
Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY)
Specifications Amendment 6: Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments
(2010). This standard is available from the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 3025 Boardwalk Drive, Suite 220, Ann
Arbor, MI 48108, 1-855-999-9870, https://www.techstreet.com/ieee.
(2) 3GPP Release 14, 3rd Generation Partnership Project Technical
Specification Group Services and System Aspects (2018). This standard
is available from ATIS, 1200 G Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC
20005, https://www.atis.org/docstore/default.aspx.
Appendix A to part 95 is amended by removing the entry in the table
for ``95.1509--ASTM E2213-03 DSRC Standard.''.
[FR Doc. 2020-02086 Filed 2-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P