Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Revision to the Minnesota State Implementation Plan, 6482-6490 [2020-02143]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
6482
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 3710d(a) allowing
the inventor to retain title to the
invention; or
(C) a use license to a Federal agency
resulting from retention of rights by the
inventor under 35 U.S.C. 202(d),
provided the conditions under § 401.9
of this title for retention of rights by an
inventor employed by a small business
concern or nonprofit organization
contractor are met, and the license is
equivalent to the license the Federal
agency would have received had the
contractor elected to retain title.
(ii) For small business concerns and
nonprofit organizations under
paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section,
a use license to a Federal agency
resulting from a funding agreement with
that agency pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
202(c)(4) does not preclude claiming
small entity status, provided that:
(A) The subject invention was made
solely by employees of the small
business concern or nonprofit
organization, or
(B) In the case of a Federal employee
co-inventor, the Federal agency
employing such co-inventor took action
pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 202(e)(1) to
exclusively license or assign whatever
rights currently held or that it may
acquire in the subject invention to the
small business concern or nonprofit
organization, subject to the license
under 35 U.S.C. 202(c)(4).
(iii) For small business concerns and
nonprofit organizations under
paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section
that have collaborated with a Federal
agency laboratory pursuant to a
cooperative research and development
agreement (CRADA) under 15 U.S.C.
3710a(a)(1), claiming small entity status
is not prohibited by a use license to the
Government pursuant to:
(A) 15 U.S.C. 3710a(b)(2) that results
from retaining title to an invention
made solely by the employee of the
small business concern or nonprofit
organization; or
(B) 15 U.S.C. 3710a(b)(3)(D) provided
the laboratory has waived in whole any
right of ownership the Government may
have to the subject invention made by
the small business concern or nonprofit
organization, or has exclusively licensed
whatever rights the Government may
acquire in the subject invention to the
small business concern or nonprofit
organization.
(iv) Regardless of whether an
exception under this paragraph (a)(4)
applies, no refund under § 1.28(a) is
available for any patent fee paid by the
Government.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 1.29 to revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (d)(1) as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
§ 1.29
Micro entity status.
(a) * * *
(1) The applicant qualifies as a small
entity as defined in § 1.27 without
relying on a government use license
exception under § 1.27(a)(4);
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) The applicant qualifies as a small
entity as defined in § 1.27 without
relying on a government use license
exception under § 1.27(a)(4); and
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 24, 2020.
Andrei Iancu,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2020–01687 Filed 2–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2018–0839; FRL–10004–
92–Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Minnesota;
Revision to the Minnesota State
Implementation Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) proposes to approve a
revision to the Minnesota State
Implementation Plan (SIP) which
updates Minnesota’s air program rules.
The Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) submitted the request
to EPA on November 14, 2018. The
revision to Minnesota’s air quality rules
will reflect changes that have occurred
to the state air program rules since
August 10, 2011, and updates on actions
deferred from previous SIP submittals.
EPA is proposing to approve the
majority of MPCA’s submittal, which
will result in consistent requirements of
rules at both the state and Federal level.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2018–0839 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Crispell, Environmental Scientist,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–8512, crispell.emily@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. Review of State Submittal
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. Overview of Revisions Made by
Minnesota
On November 14, 2018 MPCA
submitted a SIP revision with numerous
rule updates. MPCA’s submittal
includes amendments to rules governing
air emission permits, the removal of
regulations unnecessary for Minnesota
to attain and maintain the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS), and the addition of new and
previously deferred air program rules.
The following chapters of Minnesota’s
air program rules have undergone
changes: Minnesota Rules Chapter 7000
Procedural Rules; Chapter 7002 Permit
Fees; Chapter 7005 Definitions and
Abbreviations; Chapter 7007 Permits
and Offsets; Chapter 7008 Conditionally
Exempt Stationary Sources and
Conditionally Insignificant Activities;
Chapter 7009 Ambient Air Quality
Standards; Chapter 7011 Standards for
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Stationary Sources; Chapter 7017
Monitoring and Testing Requirements;
and Chapter 7019 Emission Inventory
Requirements. All rule changes were
made under the MPCA’s rulemaking
authority and underwent appropriate
public participation procedures as
required by state law. EPA proposes to
approve the majority of revisions to the
Minnesota SIP and not take action on
several revisions.
administrative procedures that will be
followed in making permitting
decisions.
The revisions to the Minnesota SIP
are intended to recodify, refine and
update the Minnesota SIP, at 40 CFR
52.1220. This SIP revision addresses the
requirements of section 110(a) of the
CAA.
B. Summary of Relevant Statutes
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7410, as amended,
requires state and local air pollution
control agencies to develop and submit
for EPA approval, SIPs that provide for
the attainment, maintenance, and
enforcement of the NAAQS in each air
quality control region (or portion
thereof) within each state. Section 110(l)
of the CAA states that a SIP revision
cannot be approved if the revision
would interfere with any applicable
requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress toward
attainment of a NAAQS or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA.
Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA
requires that each SIP include a program
to provide for the regulation of
construction and modification of
stationary sources as necessary to assure
that the NAAQS are achieved. Specific
elements for an approvable construction
permitting plan are found in the
implementing regulations at 40 CFR 51
subpart I—Review of New Sources and
Modifications. Requirements relevant to
minor construction programs are 40 CFR
51.160—51.163. EPA regulations have
several specific criteria for state minor
new source review (NSR) programs.
Generally, state programs must set forth
legally enforceable procedures that
allow the state to determine if a planned
construction activity would result in a
violation of the state’s SIP or a national
standard and prevent any activity that
would. In accordance with 40 CFR
51.162, the state plan must identify the
responsible agency for making
permitting decisions. 40 CFR 51.160
requires that the plan identify the types
and sizes of facilities and installations
that are subject to review under the
plan, provide that sources undertaking
an activity submit adequate information
regarding the location, design and
emission related information to enable
the state to make a determination, and
discuss the air quality data and
dispersion or other air quality modeling
used. 40 CFR 51.161 provides specific
criteria for public availability of
information and opportunity for public
comment. Finally, 40 CFR 51.164
requires that the plan identify the
A. Administrative Changes
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
II. Review of State Submittal
As part of the submittal, several
Minnesota rules (Minn. R.) included
administrative changes. These changes
consist of updated or corrected citations
to the referenced rules, updated control
equipment codes, removal of
duplicative or outdated references,
spelling or grammar corrections, and
minor language changes, all which have
no impact on the substance of the rule.
EPA proposes to approve the
administrative changes and corrections
into the Minnesota SIP.
B. Chapter 7000: Procedural Rules and
Minnesota Statute 116.11
Chapter 7000 contains procedural
rules regarding Minnesota’s air program.
Changes to Chapter 7000 include the
addition of Minn. R. 7000.5000 which
outlines MPCA’s declaration of
emergency authority. In the submittal,
Minnesota requested the addition of
both Minn. R. 7000.5000 and Minnesota
Statute (Minn. Stat.) 116.11, which
pertain to the declaration of emergency
and emergency powers. Minn. Stat.
116.11 provides emergency powers to
MPCA, which are further discussed in
Minn. R. 7000.5000. Specifically, these
regulations allow the Agency to ‘‘direct
the immediate discontinuance or
abatement of the pollution without
notice and without a hearing or at the
request of the agency, the attorney
general may bring an action in the name
of the state in the appropriate district
court for a temporary restraining order
to immediately abate or prevent the
pollution.’’ MPCA added Minn. Stat.
116.11 and Minn. R. 7000.5000 and
retained Minn. R.7009.1000 through
7009.1110, as these rules provide
specific actions and contingency
measures during air pollution alerts that
are required by CAA section
110(a)(2)(G). EPA proposes to approve
the addition of Minn. R. 7000.5000 and
Minn. Stat. 116.11 into the Minnesota
SIP.
C. Chapter 7002: Permit Fees
Chapter 7002 contains rules related to
permit fees. MPCA amended Minn. R.
7002.0005, which describes the general
scope of permit fees, and Minn. R.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6483
7002.0015, which contains definitions
for terms used throughout Chapter 7002,
to remove references to state rules that
have been repealed, and to clarify terms
related to permit fees. EPA proposes to
approve these administrative revisions
to Minn. R. 7002.0005 and 7002.0015
into the Minnesota SIP.
D. Chapter 7005: Definitions and
Abbreviations
Chapter 7005 contains numerous
definitions and abbreviations relevant to
rules throughout the Minnesota SIP. In
Chapter 7005, MPCA amended several
definitions in Minn. R. 7005.0100, to
define new terms, clarify definitions,
and re-number definitions. EPA finds
these revisions approvable because they
provide clarity to terms used in various
rules throughout the SIP and do not
change the requirements of the rules
themselves. EPA proposes to approve
the revisions to Minn. R. 7005.0100 into
the Minnesota SIP
E. Chapter 7007: Permits and Offsets
Chapter 7007 contains rules
concerning permits and offsets and has
undergone various changes. Note that
because Chapter 7007 combines the
state’s preconstruction and operating
permit programs into a single permitting
program, MPCA uses the broad term
Part 70 permit to reference several types
of permits, including some permits that
authorize construction. However, this
rulemaking is limited solely to approval
of revisions to the state’s
preconstruction permitting program and
federally enforceable state operating
permit program. This is not a
rulemaking under 40 CFR part 70.
1. Air Emission Permits
MPCA revised language in Chapter
7007, to clarify air emission permit
requirements. MPCA amended Minn. R.
7007.0050 to clarify the scope of the air
emission permit rules and the
requirements to which the owners and
operators of stationary sources are
subject. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they do not change the
applicability of the rule and strengthen
the requirements. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.0050 in the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0100 has been revised
to contain definitions and references to
other Federal requirements. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.0100, with the exception
of subparts 9b through 9f, 12c, 24a, and
24b (See Section M. Items EPA is Not
Taking Acting On) into the Minnesota
SIP. EPA finds these added and revised
definitions approvable as they clarify
terms used throughout the rules
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
6484
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
concerning air emission permits, and do
not change the requirements of the
rules.
Minn. R. 7007.0250 has been revised
to include administrative changes and
the addition of a capped permit option
for sources required to obtain a state
permit opting to limit their emissions to
under the threshold of the part 70
permit. Minn. R. 7007.0300 has been
revised to identify sources that are not
required to obtain a permit, with
administrative changes and to limit the
scope of sources not required to obtain
a permit. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they add requirements to
align the rules with Federal permitting
requirements, and do not relax any
previously approved SIP provisions.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions
to Minn. R. 7007.0250, and 7007.0300
into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0350 has been revised
to contain updated definitions and the
removal of references to repealed rules.
EPA finds these revisions approvable as
they provide clarity and do not change
the stringency of the rule. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.0350 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0400 has been revised
to include the addition of a new subpart
5 which establishes the timeframe for
the owner or operator to submit an
application if a new regulation would
make a stationary source subject to part
70 or a state permit. EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they strengthen
current requirements in the SIP. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.0400 into the Minnesota
SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0650 has been revised
to include changes to the electronic
permit application process and removes
references to outdated submittal
methods. Minor language changes were
also made to Minn. R. 7007.0600 and
7007.0700. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they do not change the
substance of the rules. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.0600, 7007.0650, and 7007.0700
into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0750 has been revised
to include a clarification that part 70
permits are applicable for operation, not
construction, and corrects language
surrounding MPCA’s two-step air
permit issuance process to be consistent
with Federal rules. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.0750 Subparts 1 through 7 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0800 has been revised
to confirm the required permit content
for Part 70 permits, including
requirements for emission limitations
and standards and permit deviation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
reporting. MPCA reorganized this
section and provided clarifying
language to subparts 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11,
12, and 14. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they make the rule
consistent with the requirements at 40
CFR 70.6(a)(1). EPA proposes to approve
the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0800 into
the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0850 subpart 3 has
been revised to include a process to
petition for meetings and hearings, and
a changing of the word ‘‘request’’ to the
phrase ‘‘petition for.’’ EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they are minor
wording changes that do not change the
applicability of the rule. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.0850 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0950 has been revised
to include administrative changes, such
as renumbering. EPA proposes to
approve the updates to Minn. R.
7007.0950 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1000 subpart 1 is
reworded to provide clarity for permit
issuance and denial. MPCA did not
make any substantive changes to the
rule. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1000 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1050 has been revised
to provide the duration of air emission
permits. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1050 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1100 has been revised
to provide a path forward for sources
that, due to changes to operations or in
regulations, invalidate the current
permit. Minn. R. 7007.1100 now
contains four new subparts. Subpart 8
provides the process when undergoing a
name change or a change in ownership.
Subpart 9 clarifies the requirements to
obtain a new permit prior to
commencing the modification that will
invalidate the current permit. Subpart
10 provides the process for a source that
becomes subject to a new regulation,
invalidating the current permit. The
amendment provides timeframes for the
source to contact the commissioner
regarding the new regulation and the
new permit application, which the
source must submit within 180 days of
the new regulation’s effective date.
Further, if a source does not submit a
new permit application within the
timeframes specified in Minn. R.
7007.1100, the source will not hold a
valid permit and will be in violation of
Minn. R. 7007.0150, subpart 1. Subpart
11 cites Minn. R. 7007.1150 to
7007.1250, and Minn. R. 7007.1350 to
7007.1500, as rules that do not apply to
certain general permits which cover an
entire stationary source. EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they strengthen
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
MPCA’s permitting rules to ensure
continued compliance. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1100 into the Minnesota SIP.
MPCA made various changes to its
registration permit rules. Registration
permits allow sources with low levels of
actual emissions greater flexibility to
make changes, provided they can
demonstrate continued eligibility for a
registration permit. In addition to
requiring eligible sources to comply
with all applicable state or Federal
regulations, the rule includes specific
compliance requirements for each
registration permit option.
Minn. R. 7007.1110 has been revised
to provide general requirements for
registration permits. MPCA added to the
categories of new source performance
standards for which sources remain
eligible for registration permits. These
include 40 CFR, part 60, subpart I, hot
mix asphalt facilities; subpart GG,
stationary gas turbines; subpart IIII,
stationary compression ignition internal
combustion engines with displacement
less than 30 liters per cylinder; and,
subpart JJJJ, stationary spark ignition
combustion engines. Minn. R.
7007.1110 has been revised to specify
the calculation methodology to
demonstrate compliance with
registration permit option C or D, when
there is less than 12 months of
emissions data available and provides
procedures and allotted timeframes
when a stationary source is no longer
eligible for a registration permit. Minn.
R. 7007.1110 has been revised to
address requirements for sources
holding a registration permit when a
change in ownership or control occurs,
or when the source relocates. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they add
additional requirements a source must
comply with in order to receive a
registration permit. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1110 into the Minnesota SIP.
MPCA updated registration permit
options A and B. Minn. R. 7007.1115
registration permit option A has been
revised to include minor clarifications
and corrections. Minn. R. 7007.1120
registration permit option B has been
revised to include the addition of
subpart 4, which describes the
calculation method for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they clarify the
rule language and do not change the
substance of the rule. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1115 and 7007.1120 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1125 was added to
describe the requirements for sources to
obtain a new registration permit option
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
C. Option C is intended for sources
consisting only of boilers, reciprocating
internal combustion engines, and/or
emissions from VOC-containing
materials, and which meet additional
limiting criteria. The rule also excludes
from eligibility any source that uses or
generates nitrous oxide (NOX) other
than from combustion units and
insignificant activities, and any source
that uses or generates
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons,
or sulfur hexafluoride other than from
insignificant activities.
The SIP revision includes methods for
calculating emissions from boilers,
internal combustion engines and the use
of VOC-containing materials. The rule
also includes emission factors and
calculations to be used to determine
eligibility and compliance under option
C. Further, it adds instructions for
sources that may no longer qualify for
a registration permit due to regulatory
changes.
Minn. R. 7007.1130 has been revised
to add compliance requirements for
registration permit option D sources. A
source is eligible for a registration
permit option D if it has the potential to
emit pollutants at levels exceeding a
state or Federal threshold but reduces
emissions by using pollution control
equipment, or some other measure, so
that the annual actual emissions for
each pollutant are less than half the
Federal permit threshold. Sources can
demonstrate that actual emissions are
below the thresholds with actual
emissions calculations based on
emission factors, performance tests,
continuous emission monitoring and
material balance methodology.
Additionally, MPCA updated the
registration permit option D by adding
another eligible category of sources—
low-emitting option D sources. MPCA
did not change existing emissions
thresholds under option D.
EPA proposes to find that the addition
of Minn. R. 7007.1125 and revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.1130 are consistent with
CAA section 110(l) as these changes do
not relax any previously approved SIP
provision. Limitations are created in
Minn. R. 7007.1125 and 7007.1130 that
are equivalent to the types of limits that
would have been established in an
individual permit. Due to the low levels
of actual emissions from these sources,
EPA believes that the SIP revision will
not interfere with attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA
proposes to approve the addition of
Minn. R. 7007.1125 and revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.1130 into the Minnesota
SIP.
MPCA added the following rules
which pertain to capped permit option
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
requirements: Minn. R. 7007.1140,
7007.1141, 7007.1142, 7007.1143,
7007.1144, 7007.1145, 7007.1146,
7007.1147, and 7007.1148. Minnesota’s
capped emission permit option is a rulebased permit in which all requirements
are contained in a rule rather than a sitespecific permit document. The capped
permit restricts a facility’s emissions
below Federal permitting thresholds
and requires the facility to comply with
all applicable requirements. The capped
permit allows the facility to make
changes as long as emissions remain
below the facility-wide thresholds and
the facility is able to demonstrate
continued compliance with all
requirements. The capped permit was
created to help reduce the permit
backlog for small and medium-size
sources that do not qualify for
Minnesota’s registration permits, to
create incentives to reduce emissions to
qualify for the capped permit, and to
reduce administrative costs related to
permitting for facilities and Minnesota.
There are two options available to
facilities that choose a capped permit.
Option 1 is for sources that will include
actual emissions from all emissions
units and insignificant activities, for
which emissions factors or other
calculation methods do not exist.
Option 2 is for sources that will include
actual emissions from all emissions
units, insignificant activities and
conditionally insignificant activities, as
described in chapter 7008. Option 1 has
higher allowable facility-wide emission
limits than option 2.
Certain types of sources, however, are
not eligible for a capped permit, even if
their actual emissions fall below the
capped permit thresholds. The sources
that are not eligible for a capped permit
are listed in Minn. R. 7007.1140, subparagraph 2. The rule also outlines
procedures for sources that no longer
meet the eligibility requirements of the
capped permit option.
The capped permit option includes a
public participation process. MPCA
must electronically post notice of
receipt of an application for a capped
permit. The notice must identify the
name and location of the facility to be
permitted, the facility’s SIC code,
information on whether the facility is
new or existing, a brief description of
the comment period procedures, and
contact information for additional
information. The public comment
period must be at least 30 days. In
addition, during the public comment
period, a contested case hearing on the
application may be requested. The
public participation requirements do
not apply to applications in which a
source is transferring from one capped
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6485
permit option to another or if there is a
change in name, mailing address,
ownership, or control of the stationary
source.
EPA proposes to find that the addition
of Minn. R. 7007.1140–7007.1148 to the
SIP is consistent with CAA section
110(l). These revisions do not relax any
previously approved SIP provision.
Limitations are created throughout
Minn. R. 7007.1140–7007.1148 that are
equivalent to the types of limits that
would have been established in an
individual permit. Because of the low
levels of actual emissions from these
sources, the SIP revisions are not
expected to interfere with attainment
and maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA
proposes to approve the addition of
Minn. R. 7007.1140–7007.1148 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1150 has been revised
to provide the criteria for a source to
qualify for a replacement of existing
control equipment. The replacement
control equipment must be listed by
MPCA as control equipment with
sufficient control efficiency. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they do
not relax the stringency of the rule. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.1150 into the Minnesota
SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1200 has been revised
to include subpart 4 which describes
recordkeeping requirements for
calculations required by this Minn. R.
7007.1200. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they add recordkeeping
requirements and do not change the
applicability of the rule. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1200 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1250 subpart 1 has
been revised to include only emission
units and activities listed as
insignificant activities in Minn. R.
7007.1300 subparts 2 and 3, and to
require the permittee to initiate an
administrative amendment within 30
days if a modification triggers new
monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting
requirements. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they align the rule with
Federal permitting requirements. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.1250 into the Minnesota
SIP.
EPA proposes to approve the removal
of Minn. R. 7007.1251 from the
Minnesota SIP as it solely contains a
table listing hazardous air pollutants
(HAPs). MPCA added the HAPs table to
Minn. R. 7007.1300 subpart 5. Minn. R.
7007.1300 subpart 2 has been revised to
add an additional requirement for
emissions calculations related to
insignificant activities to ensure that
adequate information is provided to
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
6486
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
determine the applicability of the rules
for various emissions sources. Minn. R.
7007.1300 subpart 3 has been revised to
specify and correct insignificant
activities. Minn. R. 7007.1300 subpart 4
has been revised to clarify language for
insignificant activities as they relate to
the initial issuance of part 70 permits.
Subpart 4 does not apply to permit
amendments or reissuance. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they add
requirements and do not relax the
stringency of the rule. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1300 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1400 subpart 1 (D) has
been revised to clarify situations where
certain monitoring, recordkeeping, or
reporting requirements are no longer
applicable. Minn. R. 7007.1400 subpart
1 (H) has been revised to allow an
administrative amendment to extend a
testing deadline in a permit if the
extension is needed to allow the
permittee to test at worst case
conditions. Minn. R. 7007.1400 subpart
1 has been revised to add include
subparts I, J, and H which amend permit
administrative requirements. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they make
the rule consistent with 40 CFR 70.7(d)
and 40 CFR part 63 and part C
requirements. EPA proposes to approve
the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1400 into
the Minnesota SIP.
Both Minn. R. 7007.1450 and
7007.1500 have been revised to clarify
the differences between requirements of
minor and major permit amendments.
Minn. R. 7007.1500 has been revised to
clarify what changes may be made by
major permit amendment to make the
rule compliant with Federal permitting
requirements. EPA proposes to approve
the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1450 and
7007.1500 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1600 has been revised
to require that a permittee submit a
permit application when additional
Federal requirements become applicable
to a stationary source with a remaining
permit term of three or more years or
with a non expiring permit. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they make
the rule consistent with Federal part 70
rule requirements. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1600 into the Minnesota SIP.
2. Miscellaneous
Several miscellaneous changes were
made to Minn. R. 7007.4010–7007.5000.
Minn. R. 7007.4010 has been revised to
remove obsolete definitions of terms no
longer used in Minn. R. 7007.4000 to
7007.4030. The conditions for permit at
Minn. R. 7007.4020 was updated to add
a reference to appendix S, part (II),
section (A). Minn. R. 7007.5000 has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
been revised to incorporate by reference
the Federal guidelines for Best Available
Retrofit Technology (BART) and
describes the requirements for BART
determination and implementation. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.4010–7007.4020 and the
addition of Minn. R. 7007.5000 into the
Minnesota SIP.
F. Chapter 7008: Conditionally Exempt
Stationary Sources and Conditionally
Insignificant Activities
MPCA promulgated Chapter 7008
rules to streamline and simplify
Minnesota’s air quality permitting
program. The addition of Chapter 7008
establishes conditions under which
sources are exempt from the
requirement to apply for and obtain an
air emission permit. Chapter 7008 also
establishes the conditions under which
certain activities will qualify as
insignificant activities. The sources that
may qualify as conditionally exempt
include gasoline service stations and
concrete manufacturing plants that have
throughput and production limited to
below thresholds outlined in the rule. In
addition, material usage in coating and
cleaning operations could be exempted
from permitting requirements if usage
remains below thresholds for VOC and
particulate matter (PM). The rule cannot
apply to any material activity with lead
as a component. PM and particulate
matter 10 micrometers and smaller
(PM10) emitting operations that vent
inside a building may also qualify as
conditionally insignificant activities.
Activities such as buffing, polishing,
carving, cutting, drilling, machining,
routing, sanding, sawing, surface
grinding or turning equipment must be
filtered through an air cleaning system
and vented inside the building at all
times in order to be considered
insignificant activities. Chapter 7008
requires sources who claim their
operations are conditionally exempt or
conditionally insignificant to maintain
records that demonstrate eligibility with
the rule.
The minor NSR provisions at 40 CFR
51.160 require state programs to
determine if activities would violate an
applicable SIP or national standard and
to prevent construction of an activity
that would violate an applicable SIP
provision or national standard.
Minnesota Rule 7008 exempts certain
eligible stationary sources from air
permitting requirements. When
determining adequacy of state rules,
EPA is concerned with the possibility
that an exemption might allow an
activity that should be subject to major
source permitting requirements to
escape appropriate review and
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
permitting, that sources are required to
maintain information adequate for the
state to ensure that exemptions have
been applied appropriately, and that the
exemptions would not interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA.
Minnesota Chapter 7008 provides
limitations on the use of the specific
exemptions in Minn. R. 7008.0050–
7008.4100 and requires sources using
the exemptions to maintain certain
records to demonstrate that the
exemptions have been applied
appropriately. Specific conditionally
exempt sources and conditionally
insignificant sources may be required to
implement additional monitoring and
recordkeeping as required to ensure that
the equipment is operating as required
under the exemption.
Section 110(l) of the CAA states that
a SIP revision cannot be approved if the
revision would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress toward attainment of a NAAQS
or any other applicable requirement of
the CAA. These conditionally exempt
sources or conditionally insignificant
activities are expected to yield very low
levels of actual emissions of regulated
pollutants and are not expected to
interfere with attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA
proposes to approve the addition of
Minn. R. 7008.0050, 7008.0100,
7008.0200, 7008.0300, 7008.2000,
7008.2100, 7008.2200, 7008.2250,
7008.4000, 7008.4100, and 7008.4110
into the Minnesota SIP.
G. Chapter 7009: Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Chapter 7009 contains rules
concerning ambient air quality
standards, air pollution episodes, and
adoption of Federal regulations.
Changes to Chapter 7009 include
amendments to Minn. R. 7009.0010,
7009.0020, and 7009.1060, the addition
of Minn. R. 7009.0090, and the removal
of Minn. R. 7009.0060–7009.0080. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Chapter 7009 into the Minnesota SIP.
1. Ambient Air Quality Standards
MPCA amended two rules, Minn. R.
7009.0010 and 7009.0020, which
pertain to ambient air quality standards.
Minn. R. 7009.0010 has been revised to
define terms related to ambient air
quality standards used throughout
Chapter 7009. Minn. R. 7009.0010 has
been revised to add three definitions for
the terms ‘‘averaging time’’, ‘‘form of the
standard’’, and ‘‘total suspended
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
particulate’’. EPA finds the addition of
these definitions approvable as they are
in line with Federal definitions of these
terms and do not lessen the stringency
of the rules to which they apply. Minn.
R. 7009.0020 has been revised to apply
specifically to the Minnesota Ambient
Air Quality Standards (MAAQS) and to
align the rule with the Federal
definition of ambient air. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7009.0010 and 7009.0020 into the
Minnesota SIP.
MPCA removed several rules under
Chapter 7009 as they were either not
NAAQS related or no longer relevant.
Minn. R. 7009.0060 solely described a
measurement methodology for hydrogen
sulfide, which is not considered to be a
criteria pollutant. Therefore, the
removal of Minn. R. 7009.0060 from
Minnesota’s SIP will not impact
Minnesota’s ability to attain or maintain
the NAAQS. Minn. R. 7009.0070
referred to the time of compliance for
attaining the ozone and sulfur dioxide
(SO2) standards by 1984. MPCA
removed this rule because it is outdated
and unnecessary. Compliance dates for
NAAQS pollutants are set during the
NAAQS revision process. Minnesota is
also currently attaining and maintaining
the NAAQS for ozone and SO2.
Minnesota requested that Minn. R.
7009.0080, Minnesota Ambient Air
Quality Standards, be removed and
replaced with Minn. R. 7009.0090.
Minn. R. 7009.0080 contains a table of
the MAAQS which are tracked at the
state level. Minn. R. 7009.0090
incorporates by reference the NAAQS
for SO2, PM10, PM2.5, carbon monoxide
(CO), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and lead
as amended. Adding Minn. R.
7009.0090 will improve enforceability
of the NAAQS and ensure that data for
those pollutants is collected. EPA
proposes to approve the removal of
Minn. R. 7009.0060–7009.0080 and the
addition of Minn. R. 7009.0090.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Air Pollution Episodes
Minn. R. 7009.1060 has been revised
to include the episode levels for PM10
24-hour average, to add significant harm
levels for 1-hour and 4-hour CO
averaging times, and to remove the
episode levels for ‘‘SO2 x Part’’, all in
the table containing alert levels related
to declaration of emergency. These
revisions of Minn. R. 7009.1060 meet
the requirements of CAA section 110(l)
because the revised episode levels are
stricter than the original episode levels.
The removal of the ‘‘SO2 x Part’’ episode
levels is approvable because Minnesota
is retaining separate episode levels for
SO2 and PM10. EPA proposes to approve
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
the revisions to Minn. R. 7009.1060 into
Minnesota’s SIP.
H. Chapter 7011: Standards for
Stationary Sources
Chapter 7011 contains rules
concerning standards for stationary
sources. MPCA updated various rules
throughout chapter 7011. Further,
MPCA requested the removal of Minn.
R. 7011.0725 and 7011.1415.
In the following rules, MPCA updated
control equipment codes due to
irrelevance or unnecessary state
duplication of EPA control equipment
codes: Minn. R. 7011.0070 and
7011.0080. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0070 and
7011.0080 into the Minnesota SIP.
The following rules underwent minor
language changes such as changing the
word ‘‘shall’’ to ‘‘must’’ or ‘‘which’’ to
‘‘that’’: Minn. R. 7011.0065, 7011.0080,
7011.0510, 7011.0515, 7011.0530,
7011.0535, 7011.0610, 7011.0615,
7011.0620, 7011.0710, 7011.1105,
7011.1115, 7011.1135, 7011.1305,
7011.1310, 7011.1320, 7011.1405,
7011.1425, 7017.1080, 7017.1110, and
7017.1170. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they are minor language
changes that do not affect the
requirements of the rule. EPA proposes
to approve the revised aforementioned
rules into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0070 and 7017.2060
have been revised for spelling or
grammar corrections, such as changing
the spelling of ‘‘condensible’’ to
‘‘condensable.’’ EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they are minor
language changes that do not affect the
requirements of the rule. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.0070 and 7017.2060 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0065 has been revised
to define the applicability of the rules
concerning control equipment for
stationary sources, and to clarify which
state rules apply if a change regarding
facility control equipment triggers a
notification requirement under part
Minn. R. 7007.1150, item C, subitem (3).
The revision to Minn. R. 7011.0065 will
assist permittees in determining
compliance with notifications sent to
MPCA and does not affect the
applicability of the rule. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.0065 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0070 has been revised
to specify that condensable PM refers to
both organic and inorganic compounds.
EPA finds this revision approvable as it
is merely a clarification and does not
affect the applicability of the rule. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6487
Minn. R. 7011.0070 into the Minnesota
SIP.
Several rules underwent minor
language changes such as clarifying the
form of PM being measured. In Minn. R.
7011.0510, 7011.0515, 7011.0530, 7011.
0610, 7011.0615, 7011.0710, 7011.0715,
7011.0720, 7011.0905, 7011.1105,
7011.1115, 7011.1130, 7011.1305,
7011.1310, 7011.1320, 7017.2060,
7011.1425, 7011.1405, 7011.1410, and
7011.1425 the terms ‘‘filterable’’ and/or
‘‘condensable’’ were added to clarify the
form of PM referenced in these rules.
Filterable PM is the fraction of particles
that are solid and captured on a filter in
the stack sampling procedure, which for
indirect heating equipment sources is
the PM measured with reference
Method 5 and, thus, is the fraction of
particles regulated by this standard.
EPA proposes to approve the revised
aforementioned rules into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0530, 7011.0615,
7011.0720, 7011.1320 and 7011.1425
have been revised to add the term ‘‘to
demonstrate compliance’’ to clarify the
distinction in the forms of PM being
measured and the subset of data to be
used to determine compliance. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7011.0530, 7011.0615,
7011.0720, 7011.1320 and 7011.1425
into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0535 has been revised
to delete duplicative references to
Federal reference methods as it is
unnecessary to state in the state rule test
procedures included in the reference
methods. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0535 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0551 and 7011.0625
have been revised to amend references
to regulatory provisions. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they do
not change the meaning of the rules or
lessen their stringency. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.0551 and 7011.0625 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Older versions of Minn. R. 7011.0725
set forth an outdated protocol developed
by MPCA in 1969 for recovering organic
condensable material samples and
determining particulate emissions.
Minn. R. 7011.0725 has been revised to
remove the outdated protocol and
replace references to the rule with
specific instruction to use EPA Method
202 (40 CFR part 51, appendix M) for
performance tests. EPA’s Method 202—
Dry Impinger Method for Determining
Condensable Particulate Emissions from
Stationary Sources provides a test
method for measuring condensable
particulate matter. Replacing references
of 7011.0725 with EPA Method 202 will
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
6488
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
improve consistency and update
precision for most emission sources.
Several rules were amended to
incorporate Method 202 for
measurement of the organic portion of
condensable PM, which replaced the
procedures in Minn. R. 7011.0725. The
following rules have been revised to
incorporate EPA Method 202 for
measurement of the organic portion of
condensable PM: Minn. R. 7011.0615,
7011.0620, 7011.0720, and 7017.2060.
These changes align the rule with
Federal methods. EPA proposes to
approve the removal of Minn. R.
7011.0725 and revisions to Minn. R.
7011.0615, 7011.0620, 7011.0720, and
7017.2060 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0620 has been revised
to clarify that owners and operators may
request approval of smaller sampling
times or volumes when necessitated by
process variables or site-specific
limitations. EPA proposes to approve
the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0620 into
the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1135 subpart 2 has
been revised to restrict the conditions
under which a facility may modify a PM
test, by requiring a description of sitespecific conditions necessitating the test
modification. These changes align the
rule with Federal methods. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7011.1135 into the Minnesota
SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1201 has been revised
to update definitions for waste
combustors. Updates include rule
citation corrections, renumbering
subparts, removal of obsolete
definitions, addition of definitions for
terms used throughout sections of the
SIP such as resinated wood and retrofit,
and other clarifying language. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they do
not change the meaning or lessen the
stringency of the rule. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.1201 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1205 has been revised
to update the rule citations to also
include 7011.1290–7011.1294, since the
documents incorporated by reference in
7011.1205 are also relevant to these
rules. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7011.1205 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1405 and 7011.1410
have been revised to clarify which
contain the standards of performance for
existing and new affected facilities at
petroleum refineries. In subpart 2 of
Minn. R. 7011.1405 and 7011.1410,
MPCA clarified that flares that are
subject to the conditions of 40 CFR part
60, subpart Ja, are not subject to the
limits of this subpart. In subpart 3 of
Minn. R. 7011.1405 and 7011.1410, a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
statement was added to clarify that the
standards of performance for indirect
heating equipment in Minn. R.
7011.0500 to 7011.0530, do not apply to
indirect heating equipment at petroleum
refineries, and that the standards of
performance for indirect heating
equipment at petroleum refineries is
listed in Minn. R. 7011.1405 and
7011.1410 subpart 3. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.1405 and 7011.1410 into the
Minnesota SIP.
MPCA updated the definitions for
liquid petroleum and volatile organic
liquid storage vessels in Minn. R.
7011.1500 to include the definition of
‘‘commenced.’’ MPCA updated the
definitions for sulfuric acid plants in
Minn. R. 7011.1600 to include a
definition for ‘‘existing sulfuric acid
production unit.’’ EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.1500 and 7011.1600 into the
Minnesota SIP.
I. Chapter 7017: Monitoring and Testing
Requirements
Chapter 7017 contains rules regarding
monitoring and testing requirements.
Several updates were made to the rules
in Chapter 7017, and both Minn. R.
7017.1210 and 7017.2018 were removed
and replaced by Minn. R. 7017.1215 and
7017.2017 respectively. EPA proposes to
approve these revisions into the
Minnesota SIP.
1. Continuous Monitoring Systems
Minn. R. 7017.1002 has been revised
to include definitions relevant to
continuous monitoring systems,
specifically, for the terms ‘‘grace
period,’’ ‘‘quality assurance operating
quarter,’’ ‘‘stack operating hour,’’ and
‘‘unit operating hour.’’ EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they clarify
terms used in the SIP and do not change
the applicability or stringency of the
rules. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7017.1002 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Both Minn. R. 7007.1350 and
7017.1080 have been revised to clarify
that certification test reports must be
submitted in the format specified by the
commissioner. Minn. R. 7017.1080 has
been revised to remove subpart 3, the
microfiche submittal deadline, as it is
outdated and has since been repealed by
the state. MPCA revised subparts 1–4 of
Minn. R. 7017.1120. Subpart 1 has been
revised to delete the address previously
listed and require submittal ‘‘in a
physical or electronic format as
specified by the commissioner and to
the address identified on the required
form or as provided by the agency.’’
Subpart 2, which had specified alternate
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
formats for making submissions, e.g.,
facsimile or CD ROM, has been repealed
by the state because MPCA now
includes electronic format as a standard
submission method in other subparts.
Subpart 3 has been revised to indicate
that submittal dates may be specified
not only in a compliance document but
also in a regulation. Subpart 4 has been
revised to more generally require
certification statements to be submitted
‘‘in a format specified by the
commissioner,’’ and to delete outdated
submission procedures. Minn. R.
7017.2035 has been revised to remove
an outdated submittal option that
allowed for performance test reports to
be submitted as a microfiche. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.1350, 7017.1080,
7017.1120, and 7017.2035 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.1110 has been revised
to add two requirements regarding the
contents of excess emissions reports.
These new requirements include a
summary of the cylinder gas audit and
relative accuracy test audit (RATA)
required by Minn. R. 7017.1180 and
7017.1220 if the audits were completed
in the previous quarter and if
applicable, notifications of exceptions of
applicability from audit frequencies as
allowed in Minn. R. 7017.1170, subparts
4a and 5a, and Minn. R. 7017.1215. EPA
finds these revisions approvable as they
do not change the stringency of the rule.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions
to Minn. R. 7017.1110 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.1170 describes quality
assurance and control requirements for
continuous emissions monitoring
systems (CEMS). Minn. R. 7017.1170
has been revised to remove subpart 1
and include 1a, which states that the
quality assurance and control
requirements apply to each CEMS
unless otherwise specified by another
applicable standard. Minn. R. 7017.1170
subpart 2 has been revised by adding
the requirement that the quality
assurance plan contain the information
required by 40 CFR part 75, appendix B.
Minn. R. 7017.1170 subpart 3 has been
revised by adding a requirement for
facilities to conduct daily calibration
drift assessments and adjustments in
accordance with the procedures in 40
CFR part 75, appendix B, section 2.1.
Minn. R. 7017.1170 subpart 4 has been
revised to remove the semiannual
cylinder gas audit requirements and
replaced them with the cylinder gas
audit provisions of subpart 4a. Subpart
4 incorrectly cited procedures in 40 CFR
part 60 appendix G, section 5.1.2 rather
than 4 CFR part 60 appendix F, section
5.1.2 and contained an obsolete
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
compliance date. Subpart 4a requires
cylinder gas audits according to 40 CFR
part 60, appendix F, section 5.12, or 40
CFR part 75, appendix A, section 6.2,
for sources not subject to 40 CFR part
60. It also provides a 168-hour grace
period if the unit being monitored by
the CEMS is not in operation when the
cylinder gas audit is due. Minn. R.
7017.1170 has been revised to remove
subpart 5 and add subpart 5a which
contains the RATA requirements.
Subpart 5a requires RATAs according to
40 CFR part 60, appendix B, or 40 CFR
part 75, appendix A, sections 6.5 to
6.5.2.2, and appendix B, sections 2.3.1.3
and 2.3.1.4, as amended. Minn. R.
7017.1170 subpart 6 has been revised to
add a citation to 40 CFR part 75,
appendix A, section 3.3, as amended.
Minn. R. 7017.1170 has been revised to
add subpart 8 which states that data
collected during out of control periods
is not valid and may not be used for
compliance demonstrations. EPA finds
the addition of subpart 8 approvable as
it meets the requirements of 40 CFR part
60, appendix F, sections 4.3.2 and 5.2.2.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions
to Minn. R. 7017.1170.
Minn. R. 7017.1210 includes outdated
Continuous Opacity Monitoring
Systems (COMS) procedures used to
demonstrate compliance with New
Source Performance Standards. Minn. R.
7017.1210 has been revised to remove
monitoring and testing requirements
and replaced it with Minn. R.
7017.1215, which incorporates by
reference ‘‘Procedure 3—Quality
Assurance Requirements for Continuous
Opacity Monitoring Systems at
Stationary Sources, Code of Federal
Regulations, title 40, part 60, Appendix
F’’, as amended. Replacing Minn. R.
7017.1210 with Minn. R. 7017.1215 will
ensure that MPCA’s COMS procedures
are up to date and in compliance with
EPA regulations. EPA proposes to
approve the removal of Minn. R.
7017.1210 and the addition of Minn. R.
7017.1215 into the Minnesota SIP.
2. Performance Tests
Minn. R. 7017.2001 has been revised
to define the applicability for
performance tests, by removing subpart
2 because it referenced an outdated
transition period deadline for
performance test procedures. The
deadline passed in 1993 and the
transition has been implemented so
removal of this subpart does not affect
Minnesota’s air quality management
program. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7017.2001 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.2018 has been removed
and replaced with Minn. R. 7017.2017
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
as it provides the current procedure for
submittals required under Minn. R.
7017.2015 to 7017.2060. Minn. R.
7017.2015 subpart 4 has been revised to
reflect the repeal of part Minn. R.
7017.2018 and its replacement by part
Minn. R. 7017.2017. EPA proposes to
approve the removal of Minn. R.
7017.2018 and the addition of Minn. R.
7017.2017 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.2025 has been revised
to clarify rule language and provide rule
citations concerning operational
requirements and limitations. In subpart
3a part C, MPCA revised the language to
state that for new operating limits and
pollution control equipment limits not
specified in item A or B, the averaging
time and any extension of the range of
values must be defined in the test plan
approved under Minn. R. 7017.2030,
subpart 2. EPA finds this revision
approvable as it does not change the
requirements of the rule and clarifies
the test plan requirements by citing
Minn. R. 7017.2030, subpart 2. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7017.2025 into the Minnesota
SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.2050 subpart 1 has
been revised to clarify that if test
methods incorporated by reference
contain exemptions and exclusions that
do not meet the requirements of Minn.
R. 7017.2001 to 7017.2060, the
exemptions and exclusions do not
apply. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7017.2050 into the
Minnesota SIP.
MPCA made several updates to
performance test procedures in Minn. R.
7017.2060. MPCA removed language
referring to emissions test procedures
for Federal methods, such as Method 5
Method 202 for determining PM
emissions, which has been revised to
instruct owners and operators to use the
Federal methods as amended to avoid
future conflict with state rules if Federal
methods are revised. Minn. R.
7017.2060 subpart 3.B. has been revised
to provide clarity on how a facility
determines PM emissions, which is
based on the sum of filterable and
organic condensable PM unless
otherwise required in chapter 7011.
Minn. R. 7017.2060 subpart 3.C. has
been revised to clarify that a facility’s
compliance status is determined by the
sum of filterable and organic
condensable PM. Minn. R. 7017.2060
has been revised to add Subpart 3.D.
which allows an owner or operator to
apply to the commissioner to exclude
condensable PM from a performance
test for PM provided that previous
performance test results show that the
emissions unit is not a source of organic
condensable PM emissions or an
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6489
exception in Method 202, section 1.4(h),
as amended, applies. Further, Minn. R.
7017.2060 subpart 3.D. removes the
ability of a facility owner or operator to
use a mass balance calculation as a
rationale for waiving measurement of
condensable PM. Minn. R. 7017.2060
subpart 4 has been revised to clarify
testing requirements for PM10 by
identifing the test methods used, and
how to demonstrate compliance with
applicable PM10 emission limits. Minn.
R. 7017.2060 subpart 4 has been revised
to allow an owner or operator to apply
to the commissioner to exclude organic
and inorganic condensable PM from a
performance test for PM10 provided that
previous performance test results show
that the emissions unit is not a source
of organic or inorganic condensable PM
emissions or that an exception in
Method 202, section 1.4(h), as amended,
applies. Minn. R. 7017.2060 has been
revised to add subpart 4a to establish
testing requirements for PM2.5, to
describe how to demonstrate
compliance with PM2.5 emission limits.
Minn. R. 7017.2060 subpart 4q will
reference Federal rules for Methods
201A and 202, establish how to report
PM2.5 emissions, and define and
establish an emission facility’s
compliance status. Subpart 4a includes
a provision to allow an owner or
operator to apply to the commissioner to
exclude organic and inorganic
condensable PM from a performance
test for PM2.5 provided that previous
performance test results show that the
emissions unit is not a source of organic
or inorganic condensable PM emissions
or that an exception in Method 202,
section 1.4(h), as amended, applies. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7017.2060 into the Minnesota
SIP.
J. Chapter 7019: Emission Inventory
Requirements
Minn. R. 7019.3020 has been revised
to add different types of registration
permits, including requirements for
calendar year actual emission reporting
for option A registration permits. EPA
finds these revisions approvable as they
add requirements and do not reduce any
previously SIP approved requirements.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions
to Minn. R. 7019.3020.
Minn. R. 7019.3030 has been revised
to add a mercury material balance
reference. Minn. R. 7019.3050 has been
revised to add the performance test
requirements for mercury emission
sources in Minn. R. 7019.3050. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7019.3030 and Minn. R.
7019.3050 into the Minnesota SIP.
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
6490
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
III. What action is EPA taking?
K. Chapter 7023: Mobile and Indirect
Sources
No changes were made to Chapter
7023. EPA proposes to reapprove
Chapter 7023 into the Minnesota SIP.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
L. EPA Corrections
On August 10, 2011 (76 FR 49303),
EPA approved the removal of all of
Chapter 7001 from Minnesota’s SIP,
however, 40 CFR 52.1220(c) was not
revised accordingly. EPA proposes to
approve and take an administrative
action to correct the table at 40 CFR
52.1220(c) by removing all entries for
Chapter 7001.
In addition to the correction
mentioned above, the submittal also
included corrections to administrative
errors contained in the Minnesota PM10
designation table at 40 CFR 81.324 to
help clarify which areas in the state are
listed as unclassifiable/attainment. EPA
proposes to approve and take an
administrative action to correct the table
at 40 CFR 81.324.
M. Items EPA Is Not Taking Action On
EPA proposes to take no action on the
definitions at Minn. R. 7007.0100,
subpart 9b through 9f, 12c and 24b.
These definitions are related to the
environmental management system
(EMS). Minnesota has not submitted the
EMS provisions as part of this SIP
submittal. Since the definitions do not
reference provisions in the SIP and
MPCA plans to remove the EMS
conditions from its rules at a later date,
EPA proposes to take no action on
Minn. R. 7007.0100, subpart 9b through
9f, 12c and 24b.
The following rules reference an
outdated greenhouse threshold for
carbon dioxide equivalent which is less
stringent than the current Federal
requirement: Minn. R. 7007.0100
subpart 24a, 7007.0150, 7007.0200, and
7007.0500. EPA proposes to take no
action on the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.0100 subpart 24a, 7007.0150,
7007.0200, 7007.0500.
EPA proposes to take no action on the
exemptions MPCA requested to remove
at Minn. R. 7011.1415 since they refer
to exemptions for excess emissions
resulting from gas flaring at petroleum
refineries during periods of startup,
shutdown, and malfunction. EPA is
currently deliberating on how to move
forward on startup, shut down, and
malfunction related issues and will take
no action on Minn. R. 7011.1415 in this
SIP action. Subsequently, EPA proposes
to take no action on the revised
definitions at Minn. R. 7011.1400 as the
revised definitions relate to the
requested removal of Minn. R.
7011.1415.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
EPA is proposing to approve MPCA’s
November 14, 2018, submittal as a
revision to its existing SIP with
exception to the definitions at Minn. R.
7007.0100, paragraph 9b through 9f, 12c
and 24b, Minn. R. 7011.1400, and Minn.
R. 7011.1415, where EPA is taking no
action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
revisions to Minnesota Rules Chapter
7000 Procedural Rules; Chapter 7002
Permit Fees; Chapter 7005 Definitions
and Abbreviations; Chapter 7007
Permits and Offsets; Chapter 7008
Conditionally Exempt Stationary
Sources and Conditionally Insignificant
Activities; Chapter 7009 Ambient Air
Quality Standards; Chapter 7011
Standards for Stationary Sources;
Chapter 7017 Monitoring and Testing
Requirements; and Chapter 7019
Emission Inventory Requirements, as
discussed in section II. ‘‘Review of State
Submittal’’ above. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 5 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: January 17, 2020.
Cheryl L. Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2020–02143 Filed 2–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\05FEP1.SGM
05FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6482-6490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02143]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2018-0839; FRL-10004-92-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; Revision to the Minnesota State
Implementation Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve
a revision to the Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP) which
updates Minnesota's air program rules. The Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA) submitted the request to EPA on November 14, 2018. The
revision to Minnesota's air quality rules will reflect changes that
have occurred to the state air program rules since August 10, 2011, and
updates on actions deferred from previous SIP submittals. EPA is
proposing to approve the majority of MPCA's submittal, which will
result in consistent requirements of rules at both the state and
Federal level.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2018-0839 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Crispell, Environmental
Scientist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8512, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. Review of State Submittal
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
A. Overview of Revisions Made by Minnesota
On November 14, 2018 MPCA submitted a SIP revision with numerous
rule updates. MPCA's submittal includes amendments to rules governing
air emission permits, the removal of regulations unnecessary for
Minnesota to attain and maintain the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS), and the addition of new and previously deferred air
program rules.
The following chapters of Minnesota's air program rules have
undergone changes: Minnesota Rules Chapter 7000 Procedural Rules;
Chapter 7002 Permit Fees; Chapter 7005 Definitions and Abbreviations;
Chapter 7007 Permits and Offsets; Chapter 7008 Conditionally Exempt
Stationary Sources and Conditionally Insignificant Activities; Chapter
7009 Ambient Air Quality Standards; Chapter 7011 Standards for
[[Page 6483]]
Stationary Sources; Chapter 7017 Monitoring and Testing Requirements;
and Chapter 7019 Emission Inventory Requirements. All rule changes were
made under the MPCA's rulemaking authority and underwent appropriate
public participation procedures as required by state law. EPA proposes
to approve the majority of revisions to the Minnesota SIP and not take
action on several revisions.
B. Summary of Relevant Statutes
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7410, as amended,
requires state and local air pollution control agencies to develop and
submit for EPA approval, SIPs that provide for the attainment,
maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS in each air quality control
region (or portion thereof) within each state. Section 110(l) of the
CAA states that a SIP revision cannot be approved if the revision would
interfere with any applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress toward attainment of a NAAQS or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA.
Section 110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA requires that each SIP include a
program to provide for the regulation of construction and modification
of stationary sources as necessary to assure that the NAAQS are
achieved. Specific elements for an approvable construction permitting
plan are found in the implementing regulations at 40 CFR 51 subpart I--
Review of New Sources and Modifications. Requirements relevant to minor
construction programs are 40 CFR 51.160--51.163. EPA regulations have
several specific criteria for state minor new source review (NSR)
programs. Generally, state programs must set forth legally enforceable
procedures that allow the state to determine if a planned construction
activity would result in a violation of the state's SIP or a national
standard and prevent any activity that would. In accordance with 40 CFR
51.162, the state plan must identify the responsible agency for making
permitting decisions. 40 CFR 51.160 requires that the plan identify the
types and sizes of facilities and installations that are subject to
review under the plan, provide that sources undertaking an activity
submit adequate information regarding the location, design and emission
related information to enable the state to make a determination, and
discuss the air quality data and dispersion or other air quality
modeling used. 40 CFR 51.161 provides specific criteria for public
availability of information and opportunity for public comment.
Finally, 40 CFR 51.164 requires that the plan identify the
administrative procedures that will be followed in making permitting
decisions.
The revisions to the Minnesota SIP are intended to recodify, refine
and update the Minnesota SIP, at 40 CFR 52.1220. This SIP revision
addresses the requirements of section 110(a) of the CAA.
II. Review of State Submittal
A. Administrative Changes
As part of the submittal, several Minnesota rules (Minn. R.)
included administrative changes. These changes consist of updated or
corrected citations to the referenced rules, updated control equipment
codes, removal of duplicative or outdated references, spelling or
grammar corrections, and minor language changes, all which have no
impact on the substance of the rule. EPA proposes to approve the
administrative changes and corrections into the Minnesota SIP.
B. Chapter 7000: Procedural Rules and Minnesota Statute 116.11
Chapter 7000 contains procedural rules regarding Minnesota's air
program. Changes to Chapter 7000 include the addition of Minn. R.
7000.5000 which outlines MPCA's declaration of emergency authority. In
the submittal, Minnesota requested the addition of both Minn. R.
7000.5000 and Minnesota Statute (Minn. Stat.) 116.11, which pertain to
the declaration of emergency and emergency powers. Minn. Stat. 116.11
provides emergency powers to MPCA, which are further discussed in Minn.
R. 7000.5000. Specifically, these regulations allow the Agency to
``direct the immediate discontinuance or abatement of the pollution
without notice and without a hearing or at the request of the agency,
the attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state in
the appropriate district court for a temporary restraining order to
immediately abate or prevent the pollution.'' MPCA added Minn. Stat.
116.11 and Minn. R. 7000.5000 and retained Minn. R.7009.1000 through
7009.1110, as these rules provide specific actions and contingency
measures during air pollution alerts that are required by CAA section
110(a)(2)(G). EPA proposes to approve the addition of Minn. R.
7000.5000 and Minn. Stat. 116.11 into the Minnesota SIP.
C. Chapter 7002: Permit Fees
Chapter 7002 contains rules related to permit fees. MPCA amended
Minn. R. 7002.0005, which describes the general scope of permit fees,
and Minn. R. 7002.0015, which contains definitions for terms used
throughout Chapter 7002, to remove references to state rules that have
been repealed, and to clarify terms related to permit fees. EPA
proposes to approve these administrative revisions to Minn. R.
7002.0005 and 7002.0015 into the Minnesota SIP.
D. Chapter 7005: Definitions and Abbreviations
Chapter 7005 contains numerous definitions and abbreviations
relevant to rules throughout the Minnesota SIP. In Chapter 7005, MPCA
amended several definitions in Minn. R. 7005.0100, to define new terms,
clarify definitions, and re-number definitions. EPA finds these
revisions approvable because they provide clarity to terms used in
various rules throughout the SIP and do not change the requirements of
the rules themselves. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7005.0100 into the Minnesota SIP
E. Chapter 7007: Permits and Offsets
Chapter 7007 contains rules concerning permits and offsets and has
undergone various changes. Note that because Chapter 7007 combines the
state's preconstruction and operating permit programs into a single
permitting program, MPCA uses the broad term Part 70 permit to
reference several types of permits, including some permits that
authorize construction. However, this rulemaking is limited solely to
approval of revisions to the state's preconstruction permitting program
and federally enforceable state operating permit program. This is not a
rulemaking under 40 CFR part 70.
1. Air Emission Permits
MPCA revised language in Chapter 7007, to clarify air emission
permit requirements. MPCA amended Minn. R. 7007.0050 to clarify the
scope of the air emission permit rules and the requirements to which
the owners and operators of stationary sources are subject. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they do not change the applicability of
the rule and strengthen the requirements. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0050 in the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0100 has been revised to contain definitions and
references to other Federal requirements. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0100, with the exception of subparts 9b
through 9f, 12c, 24a, and 24b (See Section M. Items EPA is Not Taking
Acting On) into the Minnesota SIP. EPA finds these added and revised
definitions approvable as they clarify terms used throughout the rules
[[Page 6484]]
concerning air emission permits, and do not change the requirements of
the rules.
Minn. R. 7007.0250 has been revised to include administrative
changes and the addition of a capped permit option for sources required
to obtain a state permit opting to limit their emissions to under the
threshold of the part 70 permit. Minn. R. 7007.0300 has been revised to
identify sources that are not required to obtain a permit, with
administrative changes and to limit the scope of sources not required
to obtain a permit. EPA finds these revisions approvable as they add
requirements to align the rules with Federal permitting requirements,
and do not relax any previously approved SIP provisions. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0250, and 7007.0300 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0350 has been revised to contain updated definitions
and the removal of references to repealed rules. EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they provide clarity and do not change the
stringency of the rule. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn.
R. 7007.0350 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0400 has been revised to include the addition of a
new subpart 5 which establishes the timeframe for the owner or operator
to submit an application if a new regulation would make a stationary
source subject to part 70 or a state permit. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they strengthen current requirements in the SIP. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0400 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0650 has been revised to include changes to the
electronic permit application process and removes references to
outdated submittal methods. Minor language changes were also made to
Minn. R. 7007.0600 and 7007.0700. EPA finds these revisions approvable
as they do not change the substance of the rules. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0600, 7007.0650, and 7007.0700
into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0750 has been revised to include a clarification that
part 70 permits are applicable for operation, not construction, and
corrects language surrounding MPCA's two-step air permit issuance
process to be consistent with Federal rules. EPA proposes to approve
the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0750 Subparts 1 through 7 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0800 has been revised to confirm the required permit
content for Part 70 permits, including requirements for emission
limitations and standards and permit deviation reporting. MPCA
reorganized this section and provided clarifying language to subparts
2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, and 14. EPA finds these revisions approvable
as they make the rule consistent with the requirements at 40 CFR
70.6(a)(1). EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0800
into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0850 subpart 3 has been revised to include a process
to petition for meetings and hearings, and a changing of the word
``request'' to the phrase ``petition for.'' EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they are minor wording changes that do not change the
applicability of the rule. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7007.0850 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.0950 has been revised to include administrative
changes, such as renumbering. EPA proposes to approve the updates to
Minn. R. 7007.0950 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1000 subpart 1 is reworded to provide clarity for
permit issuance and denial. MPCA did not make any substantive changes
to the rule. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1000 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1050 has been revised to provide the duration of air
emission permits. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1050 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1100 has been revised to provide a path forward for
sources that, due to changes to operations or in regulations,
invalidate the current permit. Minn. R. 7007.1100 now contains four new
subparts. Subpart 8 provides the process when undergoing a name change
or a change in ownership. Subpart 9 clarifies the requirements to
obtain a new permit prior to commencing the modification that will
invalidate the current permit. Subpart 10 provides the process for a
source that becomes subject to a new regulation, invalidating the
current permit. The amendment provides timeframes for the source to
contact the commissioner regarding the new regulation and the new
permit application, which the source must submit within 180 days of the
new regulation's effective date. Further, if a source does not submit a
new permit application within the timeframes specified in Minn. R.
7007.1100, the source will not hold a valid permit and will be in
violation of Minn. R. 7007.0150, subpart 1. Subpart 11 cites Minn. R.
7007.1150 to 7007.1250, and Minn. R. 7007.1350 to 7007.1500, as rules
that do not apply to certain general permits which cover an entire
stationary source. EPA finds these revisions approvable as they
strengthen MPCA's permitting rules to ensure continued compliance. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1100 into the
Minnesota SIP.
MPCA made various changes to its registration permit rules.
Registration permits allow sources with low levels of actual emissions
greater flexibility to make changes, provided they can demonstrate
continued eligibility for a registration permit. In addition to
requiring eligible sources to comply with all applicable state or
Federal regulations, the rule includes specific compliance requirements
for each registration permit option.
Minn. R. 7007.1110 has been revised to provide general requirements
for registration permits. MPCA added to the categories of new source
performance standards for which sources remain eligible for
registration permits. These include 40 CFR, part 60, subpart I, hot mix
asphalt facilities; subpart GG, stationary gas turbines; subpart IIII,
stationary compression ignition internal combustion engines with
displacement less than 30 liters per cylinder; and, subpart JJJJ,
stationary spark ignition combustion engines. Minn. R. 7007.1110 has
been revised to specify the calculation methodology to demonstrate
compliance with registration permit option C or D, when there is less
than 12 months of emissions data available and provides procedures and
allotted timeframes when a stationary source is no longer eligible for
a registration permit. Minn. R. 7007.1110 has been revised to address
requirements for sources holding a registration permit when a change in
ownership or control occurs, or when the source relocates. EPA finds
these revisions approvable as they add additional requirements a source
must comply with in order to receive a registration permit. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1110 into the
Minnesota SIP.
MPCA updated registration permit options A and B. Minn. R.
7007.1115 registration permit option A has been revised to include
minor clarifications and corrections. Minn. R. 7007.1120 registration
permit option B has been revised to include the addition of subpart 4,
which describes the calculation method for volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). EPA finds these revisions approvable as they clarify the rule
language and do not change the substance of the rule. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1115 and 7007.1120 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1125 was added to describe the requirements for
sources to obtain a new registration permit option
[[Page 6485]]
C. Option C is intended for sources consisting only of boilers,
reciprocating internal combustion engines, and/or emissions from VOC-
containing materials, and which meet additional limiting criteria. The
rule also excludes from eligibility any source that uses or generates
nitrous oxide (NOX) other than from combustion units and
insignificant activities, and any source that uses or generates
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, or sulfur hexafluoride other than
from insignificant activities.
The SIP revision includes methods for calculating emissions from
boilers, internal combustion engines and the use of VOC-containing
materials. The rule also includes emission factors and calculations to
be used to determine eligibility and compliance under option C.
Further, it adds instructions for sources that may no longer qualify
for a registration permit due to regulatory changes.
Minn. R. 7007.1130 has been revised to add compliance requirements
for registration permit option D sources. A source is eligible for a
registration permit option D if it has the potential to emit pollutants
at levels exceeding a state or Federal threshold but reduces emissions
by using pollution control equipment, or some other measure, so that
the annual actual emissions for each pollutant are less than half the
Federal permit threshold. Sources can demonstrate that actual emissions
are below the thresholds with actual emissions calculations based on
emission factors, performance tests, continuous emission monitoring and
material balance methodology. Additionally, MPCA updated the
registration permit option D by adding another eligible category of
sources--low-emitting option D sources. MPCA did not change existing
emissions thresholds under option D.
EPA proposes to find that the addition of Minn. R. 7007.1125 and
revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1130 are consistent with CAA section 110(l)
as these changes do not relax any previously approved SIP provision.
Limitations are created in Minn. R. 7007.1125 and 7007.1130 that are
equivalent to the types of limits that would have been established in
an individual permit. Due to the low levels of actual emissions from
these sources, EPA believes that the SIP revision will not interfere
with attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA proposes to approve
the addition of Minn. R. 7007.1125 and revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1130
into the Minnesota SIP.
MPCA added the following rules which pertain to capped permit
option requirements: Minn. R. 7007.1140, 7007.1141, 7007.1142,
7007.1143, 7007.1144, 7007.1145, 7007.1146, 7007.1147, and 7007.1148.
Minnesota's capped emission permit option is a rule-based permit in
which all requirements are contained in a rule rather than a site-
specific permit document. The capped permit restricts a facility's
emissions below Federal permitting thresholds and requires the facility
to comply with all applicable requirements. The capped permit allows
the facility to make changes as long as emissions remain below the
facility-wide thresholds and the facility is able to demonstrate
continued compliance with all requirements. The capped permit was
created to help reduce the permit backlog for small and medium-size
sources that do not qualify for Minnesota's registration permits, to
create incentives to reduce emissions to qualify for the capped permit,
and to reduce administrative costs related to permitting for facilities
and Minnesota.
There are two options available to facilities that choose a capped
permit. Option 1 is for sources that will include actual emissions from
all emissions units and insignificant activities, for which emissions
factors or other calculation methods do not exist. Option 2 is for
sources that will include actual emissions from all emissions units,
insignificant activities and conditionally insignificant activities, as
described in chapter 7008. Option 1 has higher allowable facility-wide
emission limits than option 2.
Certain types of sources, however, are not eligible for a capped
permit, even if their actual emissions fall below the capped permit
thresholds. The sources that are not eligible for a capped permit are
listed in Minn. R. 7007.1140, sub-paragraph 2. The rule also outlines
procedures for sources that no longer meet the eligibility requirements
of the capped permit option.
The capped permit option includes a public participation process.
MPCA must electronically post notice of receipt of an application for a
capped permit. The notice must identify the name and location of the
facility to be permitted, the facility's SIC code, information on
whether the facility is new or existing, a brief description of the
comment period procedures, and contact information for additional
information. The public comment period must be at least 30 days. In
addition, during the public comment period, a contested case hearing on
the application may be requested. The public participation requirements
do not apply to applications in which a source is transferring from one
capped permit option to another or if there is a change in name,
mailing address, ownership, or control of the stationary source.
EPA proposes to find that the addition of Minn. R. 7007.1140-
7007.1148 to the SIP is consistent with CAA section 110(l). These
revisions do not relax any previously approved SIP provision.
Limitations are created throughout Minn. R. 7007.1140-7007.1148 that
are equivalent to the types of limits that would have been established
in an individual permit. Because of the low levels of actual emissions
from these sources, the SIP revisions are not expected to interfere
with attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA proposes to approve
the addition of Minn. R. 7007.1140-7007.1148 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1150 has been revised to provide the criteria for a
source to qualify for a replacement of existing control equipment. The
replacement control equipment must be listed by MPCA as control
equipment with sufficient control efficiency. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they do not relax the stringency of the rule. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1150 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1200 has been revised to include subpart 4 which
describes recordkeeping requirements for calculations required by this
Minn. R. 7007.1200. EPA finds these revisions approvable as they add
recordkeeping requirements and do not change the applicability of the
rule. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1200 into
the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1250 subpart 1 has been revised to include only
emission units and activities listed as insignificant activities in
Minn. R. 7007.1300 subparts 2 and 3, and to require the permittee to
initiate an administrative amendment within 30 days if a modification
triggers new monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting requirements. EPA
finds these revisions approvable as they align the rule with Federal
permitting requirements. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn.
R. 7007.1250 into the Minnesota SIP.
EPA proposes to approve the removal of Minn. R. 7007.1251 from the
Minnesota SIP as it solely contains a table listing hazardous air
pollutants (HAPs). MPCA added the HAPs table to Minn. R. 7007.1300
subpart 5. Minn. R. 7007.1300 subpart 2 has been revised to add an
additional requirement for emissions calculations related to
insignificant activities to ensure that adequate information is
provided to
[[Page 6486]]
determine the applicability of the rules for various emissions sources.
Minn. R. 7007.1300 subpart 3 has been revised to specify and correct
insignificant activities. Minn. R. 7007.1300 subpart 4 has been revised
to clarify language for insignificant activities as they relate to the
initial issuance of part 70 permits. Subpart 4 does not apply to permit
amendments or reissuance. EPA finds these revisions approvable as they
add requirements and do not relax the stringency of the rule. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1300 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1400 subpart 1 (D) has been revised to clarify
situations where certain monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting
requirements are no longer applicable. Minn. R. 7007.1400 subpart 1 (H)
has been revised to allow an administrative amendment to extend a
testing deadline in a permit if the extension is needed to allow the
permittee to test at worst case conditions. Minn. R. 7007.1400 subpart
1 has been revised to add include subparts I, J, and H which amend
permit administrative requirements. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they make the rule consistent with 40 CFR 70.7(d) and 40
CFR part 63 and part C requirements. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1400 into the Minnesota SIP.
Both Minn. R. 7007.1450 and 7007.1500 have been revised to clarify
the differences between requirements of minor and major permit
amendments. Minn. R. 7007.1500 has been revised to clarify what changes
may be made by major permit amendment to make the rule compliant with
Federal permitting requirements. EPA proposes to approve the revisions
to Minn. R. 7007.1450 and 7007.1500 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7007.1600 has been revised to require that a permittee
submit a permit application when additional Federal requirements become
applicable to a stationary source with a remaining permit term of three
or more years or with a non expiring permit. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they make the rule consistent with Federal part 70 rule
requirements. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7007.1600 into the Minnesota SIP.
2. Miscellaneous
Several miscellaneous changes were made to Minn. R. 7007.4010-
7007.5000. Minn. R. 7007.4010 has been revised to remove obsolete
definitions of terms no longer used in Minn. R. 7007.4000 to 7007.4030.
The conditions for permit at Minn. R. 7007.4020 was updated to add a
reference to appendix S, part (II), section (A). Minn. R. 7007.5000 has
been revised to incorporate by reference the Federal guidelines for
Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) and describes the
requirements for BART determination and implementation. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.4010-7007.4020 and the addition
of Minn. R. 7007.5000 into the Minnesota SIP.
F. Chapter 7008: Conditionally Exempt Stationary Sources and
Conditionally Insignificant Activities
MPCA promulgated Chapter 7008 rules to streamline and simplify
Minnesota's air quality permitting program. The addition of Chapter
7008 establishes conditions under which sources are exempt from the
requirement to apply for and obtain an air emission permit. Chapter
7008 also establishes the conditions under which certain activities
will qualify as insignificant activities. The sources that may qualify
as conditionally exempt include gasoline service stations and concrete
manufacturing plants that have throughput and production limited to
below thresholds outlined in the rule. In addition, material usage in
coating and cleaning operations could be exempted from permitting
requirements if usage remains below thresholds for VOC and particulate
matter (PM). The rule cannot apply to any material activity with lead
as a component. PM and particulate matter 10 micrometers and smaller
(PM10) emitting operations that vent inside a building may
also qualify as conditionally insignificant activities. Activities such
as buffing, polishing, carving, cutting, drilling, machining, routing,
sanding, sawing, surface grinding or turning equipment must be filtered
through an air cleaning system and vented inside the building at all
times in order to be considered insignificant activities. Chapter 7008
requires sources who claim their operations are conditionally exempt or
conditionally insignificant to maintain records that demonstrate
eligibility with the rule.
The minor NSR provisions at 40 CFR 51.160 require state programs to
determine if activities would violate an applicable SIP or national
standard and to prevent construction of an activity that would violate
an applicable SIP provision or national standard. Minnesota Rule 7008
exempts certain eligible stationary sources from air permitting
requirements. When determining adequacy of state rules, EPA is
concerned with the possibility that an exemption might allow an
activity that should be subject to major source permitting requirements
to escape appropriate review and permitting, that sources are required
to maintain information adequate for the state to ensure that
exemptions have been applied appropriately, and that the exemptions
would not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further progress, or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA.
Minnesota Chapter 7008 provides limitations on the use of the
specific exemptions in Minn. R. 7008.0050-7008.4100 and requires
sources using the exemptions to maintain certain records to demonstrate
that the exemptions have been applied appropriately. Specific
conditionally exempt sources and conditionally insignificant sources
may be required to implement additional monitoring and recordkeeping as
required to ensure that the equipment is operating as required under
the exemption.
Section 110(l) of the CAA states that a SIP revision cannot be
approved if the revision would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress
toward attainment of a NAAQS or any other applicable requirement of the
CAA. These conditionally exempt sources or conditionally insignificant
activities are expected to yield very low levels of actual emissions of
regulated pollutants and are not expected to interfere with attainment
and maintenance of the NAAQS. EPA proposes to approve the addition of
Minn. R. 7008.0050, 7008.0100, 7008.0200, 7008.0300, 7008.2000,
7008.2100, 7008.2200, 7008.2250, 7008.4000, 7008.4100, and 7008.4110
into the Minnesota SIP.
G. Chapter 7009: Ambient Air Quality Standards
Chapter 7009 contains rules concerning ambient air quality
standards, air pollution episodes, and adoption of Federal regulations.
Changes to Chapter 7009 include amendments to Minn. R. 7009.0010,
7009.0020, and 7009.1060, the addition of Minn. R. 7009.0090, and the
removal of Minn. R. 7009.0060-7009.0080. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Chapter 7009 into the Minnesota SIP.
1. Ambient Air Quality Standards
MPCA amended two rules, Minn. R. 7009.0010 and 7009.0020, which
pertain to ambient air quality standards. Minn. R. 7009.0010 has been
revised to define terms related to ambient air quality standards used
throughout Chapter 7009. Minn. R. 7009.0010 has been revised to add
three definitions for the terms ``averaging time'', ``form of the
standard'', and ``total suspended
[[Page 6487]]
particulate''. EPA finds the addition of these definitions approvable
as they are in line with Federal definitions of these terms and do not
lessen the stringency of the rules to which they apply. Minn. R.
7009.0020 has been revised to apply specifically to the Minnesota
Ambient Air Quality Standards (MAAQS) and to align the rule with the
Federal definition of ambient air. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7009.0010 and 7009.0020 into the Minnesota SIP.
MPCA removed several rules under Chapter 7009 as they were either
not NAAQS related or no longer relevant. Minn. R. 7009.0060 solely
described a measurement methodology for hydrogen sulfide, which is not
considered to be a criteria pollutant. Therefore, the removal of Minn.
R. 7009.0060 from Minnesota's SIP will not impact Minnesota's ability
to attain or maintain the NAAQS. Minn. R. 7009.0070 referred to the
time of compliance for attaining the ozone and sulfur dioxide
(SO2) standards by 1984. MPCA removed this rule because it
is outdated and unnecessary. Compliance dates for NAAQS pollutants are
set during the NAAQS revision process. Minnesota is also currently
attaining and maintaining the NAAQS for ozone and SO2.
Minnesota requested that Minn. R. 7009.0080, Minnesota Ambient Air
Quality Standards, be removed and replaced with Minn. R. 7009.0090.
Minn. R. 7009.0080 contains a table of the MAAQS which are tracked at
the state level. Minn. R. 7009.0090 incorporates by reference the NAAQS
for SO2, PM10, PM2.5, carbon monoxide
(CO), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and lead as amended. Adding Minn. R.
7009.0090 will improve enforceability of the NAAQS and ensure that data
for those pollutants is collected. EPA proposes to approve the removal
of Minn. R. 7009.0060-7009.0080 and the addition of Minn. R. 7009.0090.
2. Air Pollution Episodes
Minn. R. 7009.1060 has been revised to include the episode levels
for PM10 24-hour average, to add significant harm levels for
1-hour and 4-hour CO averaging times, and to remove the episode levels
for ``SO2 x Part'', all in the table containing alert levels
related to declaration of emergency. These revisions of Minn. R.
7009.1060 meet the requirements of CAA section 110(l) because the
revised episode levels are stricter than the original episode levels.
The removal of the ``SO2 x Part'' episode levels is
approvable because Minnesota is retaining separate episode levels for
SO2 and PM10. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7009.1060 into Minnesota's SIP.
H. Chapter 7011: Standards for Stationary Sources
Chapter 7011 contains rules concerning standards for stationary
sources. MPCA updated various rules throughout chapter 7011. Further,
MPCA requested the removal of Minn. R. 7011.0725 and 7011.1415.
In the following rules, MPCA updated control equipment codes due to
irrelevance or unnecessary state duplication of EPA control equipment
codes: Minn. R. 7011.0070 and 7011.0080. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0070 and 7011.0080 into the Minnesota SIP.
The following rules underwent minor language changes such as
changing the word ``shall'' to ``must'' or ``which'' to ``that'': Minn.
R. 7011.0065, 7011.0080, 7011.0510, 7011.0515, 7011.0530, 7011.0535,
7011.0610, 7011.0615, 7011.0620, 7011.0710, 7011.1105, 7011.1115,
7011.1135, 7011.1305, 7011.1310, 7011.1320, 7011.1405, 7011.1425,
7017.1080, 7017.1110, and 7017.1170. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they are minor language changes that do not affect the
requirements of the rule. EPA proposes to approve the revised
aforementioned rules into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0070 and 7017.2060 have been revised for spelling or
grammar corrections, such as changing the spelling of ``condensible''
to ``condensable.'' EPA finds these revisions approvable as they are
minor language changes that do not affect the requirements of the rule.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0070 and
7017.2060 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0065 has been revised to define the applicability of
the rules concerning control equipment for stationary sources, and to
clarify which state rules apply if a change regarding facility control
equipment triggers a notification requirement under part Minn. R.
7007.1150, item C, subitem (3). The revision to Minn. R. 7011.0065 will
assist permittees in determining compliance with notifications sent to
MPCA and does not affect the applicability of the rule. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0065 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0070 has been revised to specify that condensable PM
refers to both organic and inorganic compounds. EPA finds this revision
approvable as it is merely a clarification and does not affect the
applicability of the rule. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7011.0070 into the Minnesota SIP.
Several rules underwent minor language changes such as clarifying
the form of PM being measured. In Minn. R. 7011.0510, 7011.0515,
7011.0530, 7011. 0610, 7011.0615, 7011.0710, 7011.0715, 7011.0720,
7011.0905, 7011.1105, 7011.1115, 7011.1130, 7011.1305, 7011.1310,
7011.1320, 7017.2060, 7011.1425, 7011.1405, 7011.1410, and 7011.1425
the terms ``filterable'' and/or ``condensable'' were added to clarify
the form of PM referenced in these rules. Filterable PM is the fraction
of particles that are solid and captured on a filter in the stack
sampling procedure, which for indirect heating equipment sources is the
PM measured with reference Method 5 and, thus, is the fraction of
particles regulated by this standard. EPA proposes to approve the
revised aforementioned rules into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0530, 7011.0615, 7011.0720, 7011.1320 and 7011.1425
have been revised to add the term ``to demonstrate compliance'' to
clarify the distinction in the forms of PM being measured and the
subset of data to be used to determine compliance. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0530, 7011.0615, 7011.0720,
7011.1320 and 7011.1425 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0535 has been revised to delete duplicative
references to Federal reference methods as it is unnecessary to state
in the state rule test procedures included in the reference methods.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0535 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0551 and 7011.0625 have been revised to amend
references to regulatory provisions. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they do not change the meaning of the rules or lessen
their stringency. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.0551 and 7011.0625 into the Minnesota SIP.
Older versions of Minn. R. 7011.0725 set forth an outdated protocol
developed by MPCA in 1969 for recovering organic condensable material
samples and determining particulate emissions. Minn. R. 7011.0725 has
been revised to remove the outdated protocol and replace references to
the rule with specific instruction to use EPA Method 202 (40 CFR part
51, appendix M) for performance tests. EPA's Method 202--Dry Impinger
Method for Determining Condensable Particulate Emissions from
Stationary Sources provides a test method for measuring condensable
particulate matter. Replacing references of 7011.0725 with EPA Method
202 will
[[Page 6488]]
improve consistency and update precision for most emission sources.
Several rules were amended to incorporate Method 202 for measurement of
the organic portion of condensable PM, which replaced the procedures in
Minn. R. 7011.0725. The following rules have been revised to
incorporate EPA Method 202 for measurement of the organic portion of
condensable PM: Minn. R. 7011.0615, 7011.0620, 7011.0720, and
7017.2060. These changes align the rule with Federal methods. EPA
proposes to approve the removal of Minn. R. 7011.0725 and revisions to
Minn. R. 7011.0615, 7011.0620, 7011.0720, and 7017.2060 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.0620 has been revised to clarify that owners and
operators may request approval of smaller sampling times or volumes
when necessitated by process variables or site-specific limitations.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.0620 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1135 subpart 2 has been revised to restrict the
conditions under which a facility may modify a PM test, by requiring a
description of site-specific conditions necessitating the test
modification. These changes align the rule with Federal methods. EPA
proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.1135 into the
Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1201 has been revised to update definitions for waste
combustors. Updates include rule citation corrections, renumbering
subparts, removal of obsolete definitions, addition of definitions for
terms used throughout sections of the SIP such as resinated wood and
retrofit, and other clarifying language. EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they do not change the meaning or lessen the stringency
of the rule. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7011.1201 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1205 has been revised to update the rule citations to
also include 7011.1290-7011.1294, since the documents incorporated by
reference in 7011.1205 are also relevant to these rules. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.1205 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7011.1405 and 7011.1410 have been revised to clarify which
contain the standards of performance for existing and new affected
facilities at petroleum refineries. In subpart 2 of Minn. R. 7011.1405
and 7011.1410, MPCA clarified that flares that are subject to the
conditions of 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ja, are not subject to the limits
of this subpart. In subpart 3 of Minn. R. 7011.1405 and 7011.1410, a
statement was added to clarify that the standards of performance for
indirect heating equipment in Minn. R. 7011.0500 to 7011.0530, do not
apply to indirect heating equipment at petroleum refineries, and that
the standards of performance for indirect heating equipment at
petroleum refineries is listed in Minn. R. 7011.1405 and 7011.1410
subpart 3. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7011.1405
and 7011.1410 into the Minnesota SIP.
MPCA updated the definitions for liquid petroleum and volatile
organic liquid storage vessels in Minn. R. 7011.1500 to include the
definition of ``commenced.'' MPCA updated the definitions for sulfuric
acid plants in Minn. R. 7011.1600 to include a definition for
``existing sulfuric acid production unit.'' EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7011.1500 and 7011.1600 into the Minnesota SIP.
I. Chapter 7017: Monitoring and Testing Requirements
Chapter 7017 contains rules regarding monitoring and testing
requirements. Several updates were made to the rules in Chapter 7017,
and both Minn. R. 7017.1210 and 7017.2018 were removed and replaced by
Minn. R. 7017.1215 and 7017.2017 respectively. EPA proposes to approve
these revisions into the Minnesota SIP.
1. Continuous Monitoring Systems
Minn. R. 7017.1002 has been revised to include definitions relevant
to continuous monitoring systems, specifically, for the terms ``grace
period,'' ``quality assurance operating quarter,'' ``stack operating
hour,'' and ``unit operating hour.'' EPA finds these revisions
approvable as they clarify terms used in the SIP and do not change the
applicability or stringency of the rules. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7017.1002 into the Minnesota SIP.
Both Minn. R. 7007.1350 and 7017.1080 have been revised to clarify
that certification test reports must be submitted in the format
specified by the commissioner. Minn. R. 7017.1080 has been revised to
remove subpart 3, the microfiche submittal deadline, as it is outdated
and has since been repealed by the state. MPCA revised subparts 1-4 of
Minn. R. 7017.1120. Subpart 1 has been revised to delete the address
previously listed and require submittal ``in a physical or electronic
format as specified by the commissioner and to the address identified
on the required form or as provided by the agency.'' Subpart 2, which
had specified alternate formats for making submissions, e.g., facsimile
or CD ROM, has been repealed by the state because MPCA now includes
electronic format as a standard submission method in other subparts.
Subpart 3 has been revised to indicate that submittal dates may be
specified not only in a compliance document but also in a regulation.
Subpart 4 has been revised to more generally require certification
statements to be submitted ``in a format specified by the
commissioner,'' and to delete outdated submission procedures. Minn. R.
7017.2035 has been revised to remove an outdated submittal option that
allowed for performance test reports to be submitted as a microfiche.
EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7007.1350, 7017.1080,
7017.1120, and 7017.2035 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.1110 has been revised to add two requirements
regarding the contents of excess emissions reports. These new
requirements include a summary of the cylinder gas audit and relative
accuracy test audit (RATA) required by Minn. R. 7017.1180 and 7017.1220
if the audits were completed in the previous quarter and if applicable,
notifications of exceptions of applicability from audit frequencies as
allowed in Minn. R. 7017.1170, subparts 4a and 5a, and Minn. R.
7017.1215. EPA finds these revisions approvable as they do not change
the stringency of the rule. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7017.1110 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.1170 describes quality assurance and control
requirements for continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS). Minn.
R. 7017.1170 has been revised to remove subpart 1 and include 1a, which
states that the quality assurance and control requirements apply to
each CEMS unless otherwise specified by another applicable standard.
Minn. R. 7017.1170 subpart 2 has been revised by adding the requirement
that the quality assurance plan contain the information required by 40
CFR part 75, appendix B. Minn. R. 7017.1170 subpart 3 has been revised
by adding a requirement for facilities to conduct daily calibration
drift assessments and adjustments in accordance with the procedures in
40 CFR part 75, appendix B, section 2.1. Minn. R. 7017.1170 subpart 4
has been revised to remove the semiannual cylinder gas audit
requirements and replaced them with the cylinder gas audit provisions
of subpart 4a. Subpart 4 incorrectly cited procedures in 40 CFR part 60
appendix G, section 5.1.2 rather than 4 CFR part 60 appendix F, section
5.1.2 and contained an obsolete
[[Page 6489]]
compliance date. Subpart 4a requires cylinder gas audits according to
40 CFR part 60, appendix F, section 5.12, or 40 CFR part 75, appendix
A, section 6.2, for sources not subject to 40 CFR part 60. It also
provides a 168-hour grace period if the unit being monitored by the
CEMS is not in operation when the cylinder gas audit is due. Minn. R.
7017.1170 has been revised to remove subpart 5 and add subpart 5a which
contains the RATA requirements. Subpart 5a requires RATAs according to
40 CFR part 60, appendix B, or 40 CFR part 75, appendix A, sections 6.5
to 6.5.2.2, and appendix B, sections 2.3.1.3 and 2.3.1.4, as amended.
Minn. R. 7017.1170 subpart 6 has been revised to add a citation to 40
CFR part 75, appendix A, section 3.3, as amended. Minn. R. 7017.1170
has been revised to add subpart 8 which states that data collected
during out of control periods is not valid and may not be used for
compliance demonstrations. EPA finds the addition of subpart 8
approvable as it meets the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, appendix F,
sections 4.3.2 and 5.2.2. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7017.1170.
Minn. R. 7017.1210 includes outdated Continuous Opacity Monitoring
Systems (COMS) procedures used to demonstrate compliance with New
Source Performance Standards. Minn. R. 7017.1210 has been revised to
remove monitoring and testing requirements and replaced it with Minn.
R. 7017.1215, which incorporates by reference ``Procedure 3--Quality
Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems at
Stationary Sources, Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, part 60,
Appendix F'', as amended. Replacing Minn. R. 7017.1210 with Minn. R.
7017.1215 will ensure that MPCA's COMS procedures are up to date and in
compliance with EPA regulations. EPA proposes to approve the removal of
Minn. R. 7017.1210 and the addition of Minn. R. 7017.1215 into the
Minnesota SIP.
2. Performance Tests
Minn. R. 7017.2001 has been revised to define the applicability for
performance tests, by removing subpart 2 because it referenced an
outdated transition period deadline for performance test procedures.
The deadline passed in 1993 and the transition has been implemented so
removal of this subpart does not affect Minnesota's air quality
management program. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R.
7017.2001 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.2018 has been removed and replaced with Minn. R.
7017.2017 as it provides the current procedure for submittals required
under Minn. R. 7017.2015 to 7017.2060. Minn. R. 7017.2015 subpart 4 has
been revised to reflect the repeal of part Minn. R. 7017.2018 and its
replacement by part Minn. R. 7017.2017. EPA proposes to approve the
removal of Minn. R. 7017.2018 and the addition of Minn. R. 7017.2017
into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.2025 has been revised to clarify rule language and
provide rule citations concerning operational requirements and
limitations. In subpart 3a part C, MPCA revised the language to state
that for new operating limits and pollution control equipment limits
not specified in item A or B, the averaging time and any extension of
the range of values must be defined in the test plan approved under
Minn. R. 7017.2030, subpart 2. EPA finds this revision approvable as it
does not change the requirements of the rule and clarifies the test
plan requirements by citing Minn. R. 7017.2030, subpart 2. EPA proposes
to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7017.2025 into the Minnesota SIP.
Minn. R. 7017.2050 subpart 1 has been revised to clarify that if
test methods incorporated by reference contain exemptions and
exclusions that do not meet the requirements of Minn. R. 7017.2001 to
7017.2060, the exemptions and exclusions do not apply. EPA proposes to
approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7017.2050 into the Minnesota SIP.
MPCA made several updates to performance test procedures in Minn.
R. 7017.2060. MPCA removed language referring to emissions test
procedures for Federal methods, such as Method 5 Method 202 for
determining PM emissions, which has been revised to instruct owners and
operators to use the Federal methods as amended to avoid future
conflict with state rules if Federal methods are revised. Minn. R.
7017.2060 subpart 3.B. has been revised to provide clarity on how a
facility determines PM emissions, which is based on the sum of
filterable and organic condensable PM unless otherwise required in
chapter 7011. Minn. R. 7017.2060 subpart 3.C. has been revised to
clarify that a facility's compliance status is determined by the sum of
filterable and organic condensable PM. Minn. R. 7017.2060 has been
revised to add Subpart 3.D. which allows an owner or operator to apply
to the commissioner to exclude condensable PM from a performance test
for PM provided that previous performance test results show that the
emissions unit is not a source of organic condensable PM emissions or
an exception in Method 202, section 1.4(h), as amended, applies.
Further, Minn. R. 7017.2060 subpart 3.D. removes the ability of a
facility owner or operator to use a mass balance calculation as a
rationale for waiving measurement of condensable PM. Minn. R. 7017.2060
subpart 4 has been revised to clarify testing requirements for
PM10 by identifing the test methods used, and how to
demonstrate compliance with applicable PM10 emission limits.
Minn. R. 7017.2060 subpart 4 has been revised to allow an owner or
operator to apply to the commissioner to exclude organic and inorganic
condensable PM from a performance test for PM10 provided
that previous performance test results show that the emissions unit is
not a source of organic or inorganic condensable PM emissions or that
an exception in Method 202, section 1.4(h), as amended, applies. Minn.
R. 7017.2060 has been revised to add subpart 4a to establish testing
requirements for PM2.5, to describe how to demonstrate
compliance with PM2.5 emission limits. Minn. R. 7017.2060
subpart 4q will reference Federal rules for Methods 201A and 202,
establish how to report PM2.5 emissions, and define and
establish an emission facility's compliance status. Subpart 4a includes
a provision to allow an owner or operator to apply to the commissioner
to exclude organic and inorganic condensable PM from a performance test
for PM2.5 provided that previous performance test results
show that the emissions unit is not a source of organic or inorganic
condensable PM emissions or that an exception in Method 202, section
1.4(h), as amended, applies. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to
Minn. R. 7017.2060 into the Minnesota SIP.
J. Chapter 7019: Emission Inventory Requirements
Minn. R. 7019.3020 has been revised to add different types of
registration permits, including requirements for calendar year actual
emission reporting for option A registration permits. EPA finds these
revisions approvable as they add requirements and do not reduce any
previously SIP approved requirements. EPA proposes to approve the
revisions to Minn. R. 7019.3020.
Minn. R. 7019.3030 has been revised to add a mercury material
balance reference. Minn. R. 7019.3050 has been revised to add the
performance test requirements for mercury emission sources in Minn. R.
7019.3050. EPA proposes to approve the revisions to Minn. R. 7019.3030
and Minn. R. 7019.3050 into the Minnesota SIP.
[[Page 6490]]
K. Chapter 7023: Mobile and Indirect Sources
No changes were made to Chapter 7023. EPA proposes to reapprove
Chapter 7023 into the Minnesota SIP.
L. EPA Corrections
On August 10, 2011 (76 FR 49303), EPA approved the removal of all
of Chapter 7001 from Minnesota's SIP, however, 40 CFR 52.1220(c) was
not revised accordingly. EPA proposes to approve and take an
administrative action to correct the table at 40 CFR 52.1220(c) by
removing all entries for Chapter 7001.
In addition to the correction mentioned above, the submittal also
included corrections to administrative errors contained in the
Minnesota PM10 designation table at 40 CFR 81.324 to help
clarify which areas in the state are listed as unclassifiable/
attainment. EPA proposes to approve and take an administrative action
to correct the table at 40 CFR 81.324.
M. Items EPA Is Not Taking Action On
EPA proposes to take no action on the definitions at Minn. R.
7007.0100, subpart 9b through 9f, 12c and 24b. These definitions are
related to the environmental management system (EMS). Minnesota has not
submitted the EMS provisions as part of this SIP submittal. Since the
definitions do not reference provisions in the SIP and MPCA plans to
remove the EMS conditions from its rules at a later date, EPA proposes
to take no action on Minn. R. 7007.0100, subpart 9b through 9f, 12c and
24b.
The following rules reference an outdated greenhouse threshold for
carbon dioxide equivalent which is less stringent than the current
Federal requirement: Minn. R. 7007.0100 subpart 24a, 7007.0150,
7007.0200, and 7007.0500. EPA proposes to take no action on the
revisions to Minn. R. 7007.0100 subpart 24a, 7007.0150, 7007.0200,
7007.0500.
EPA proposes to take no action on the exemptions MPCA requested to
remove at Minn. R. 7011.1415 since they refer to exemptions for excess
emissions resulting from gas flaring at petroleum refineries during
periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. EPA is currently
deliberating on how to move forward on startup, shut down, and
malfunction related issues and will take no action on Minn. R.
7011.1415 in this SIP action. Subsequently, EPA proposes to take no
action on the revised definitions at Minn. R. 7011.1400 as the revised
definitions relate to the requested removal of Minn. R. 7011.1415.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve MPCA's November 14, 2018, submittal as
a revision to its existing SIP with exception to the definitions at
Minn. R. 7007.0100, paragraph 9b through 9f, 12c and 24b, Minn. R.
7011.1400, and Minn. R. 7011.1415, where EPA is taking no action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference revisions to Minnesota Rules Chapter 7000 Procedural Rules;
Chapter 7002 Permit Fees; Chapter 7005 Definitions and Abbreviations;
Chapter 7007 Permits and Offsets; Chapter 7008 Conditionally Exempt
Stationary Sources and Conditionally Insignificant Activities; Chapter
7009 Ambient Air Quality Standards; Chapter 7011 Standards for
Stationary Sources; Chapter 7017 Monitoring and Testing Requirements;
and Chapter 7019 Emission Inventory Requirements, as discussed in
section II. ``Review of State Submittal'' above. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the
person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: January 17, 2020.
Cheryl L. Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2020-02143 Filed 2-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P