2019 Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones, Security Zones, and Special Local Regulations, 6428-6430 [2020-01660]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
6428
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
paragraphs (d)(5)(v)(G) and (H), revising
paragraph (e)(1)(iii)(A), revising
paragraph (e)(5)(i), and adding
paragraphs (e)(5)(vi) and (e)(6), to read
as follows:
§ 1.61–21
Taxation of fringe benefits.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(5) * * *
(v) * * *
(D) Limitations on use of fleet-average
rule. The rule provided in this
paragraph (d)(5)(v) may not be used for
any automobile the fair market value of
which (determined pursuant to
paragraphs (d)(5)(i) through (iv) of this
section as of the first date on which the
automobile is made available to any
employee of the employer for personal
use) exceeds $50,000, as adjusted by
section 280F(d)(7). The first such
adjustment shall be for calendar year
2019. In addition, the rule provided in
this paragraph (d)(5)(v) may only be
used for automobiles that the employer
reasonably expects will regularly be
used in the employer’s trade or
business. For rules concerning when an
automobile is regularly used in the
employer’s business, see paragraph
(e)(1)(iv) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(G) Transition rule for 2018 and 2019.
Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(5)(v)(B)
of this section, an employer that did not
qualify to use the fleet-average valuation
rule prior to January 1, 2018, with
respect to any automobile (including a
truck or van) because the fair market
value of the vehicle exceeded the
inflation-adjusted maximum value
requirement of paragraph (d)(5)(v)(D) of
this section, as published by the Service
in a notice or revenue procedure
applicable to the year the vehicle was
first made available to any employee of
the employer, may adopt the fleetaverage valuation rule for 2018 or 2019
with respect to the vehicle, provided the
fair market value of the vehicle does not
exceed $50,000 on January 1, 2018, or
$50,400 on January 1, 2019,
respectively.
(H) Applicability date. Paragraphs
(d)(5)(v)(D), and (G) of this section apply
to taxable years beginning on or after
February 5, 2020. Notwithstanding the
first sentence of this paragraph
(d)(5)(v)(H), any taxpayer may choose to
apply paragraph (d)(5)(v)(G) of this
section beginning on or after January 1,
2018.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) * * *
(A) In general. The value of the use of
an automobile (as defined in paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
(d)(1)(ii) of this section) may not be
determined under the vehicle cents-permile valuation rule of this paragraph (e)
for a calendar year if the fair market
value of the automobile (determined
pursuant to paragraphs (d)(5)(i) through
(iv) of this section as of the first date on
which the automobile is made available
to any employee of the employer for
personal use) exceeds $50,000, as
adjusted by section 280F(d)(7). The first
such adjustment shall be for calendar
year 2019.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) * * *
(i) Use of the vehicle cents-per-mile
valuation rule by an employer. An
employer must adopt the vehicle centsper-mile valuation rule of this paragraph
(e) for a vehicle to take effect by the first
day on which the vehicle is used by an
employee of the employer for personal
use (or, if the commuting valuation rule
of paragraph (f) of this section is used
when the vehicle is first used by an
employee of the employer for personal
use, the first day on which the
commuting valuation rule is not used).
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) Transition rule for 2018 and 2019.
For a vehicle first made available to any
employee of an employer for personal
use before calendar year 2018, an
employer that did not qualify under this
paragraph (e)(5) to adopt the vehicle
cents-per-mile valuation rule on the first
day on which the vehicle is used by the
employee for personal use because the
fair market value of the vehicle
exceeded the inflation-adjusted
limitation of paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this
section, as published by the Service in
a notice or revenue procedure
applicable to the year the vehicle was
first used by the employee for personal
use, may first adopt the vehicle centsper-mile valuation rule for the 2018 or
2019 taxable year, provided the fair
market value of the vehicle does not
exceed $50,000 on January 1, 2018, or
$50,400 on January 1, 2019,
respectively. Similarly, for a vehicle
first made available to any employee of
the employer for personal use before
calendar year 2018, if the commuting
valuation rule of paragraph (f) of this
section was used when the vehicle was
first used by the employee for personal
use, and the employer did not qualify to
switch to the vehicle cents-per-mile
valuation rule of this paragraph (e) on
the first day on which the commuting
valuation rule of paragraph (f) of this
section was not used because the
vehicle had a fair market value in excess
of the inflation-adjusted limitation of
paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section, as
published by the Service in a notice or
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
revenue procedure applicable to the
year the commuting valuation rule was
first not used, the employer may adopt
the vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule
for the 2018 or 2019 taxable year,
provided the fair market value of the
vehicle does not exceed $50,000 on
January 1, 2018, or $50,400 on January
1, 2019, respectively. However, in
accordance with paragraph (e)(5)(ii) of
this section, an employer that adopts the
vehicle cents-per-mile valuation rule
pursuant to this paragraph (e)(5)(vi)
must continue to use the rule for all
subsequent years in which the vehicle
qualifies for use of the rule, except that
the employer may, for any year during
which use of the vehicle qualifies for
the commuting valuation rule of
paragraph (f) of this section, use the
commuting valuation rule with regard to
the vehicle.
(6) Applicability date. Paragraphs
(e)(1)(iii)(A) and (e)(5)(i) and (vi) of this
section apply to taxable years beginning
on or after February 5, 2020.
Notwithstanding the first sentence of
this paragraph (e)(6), any taxpayer may
choose to apply paragraph (e)(5)(vi) of
this section beginning on or after
January 1, 2018.
*
*
*
*
*
Sunita Lough,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: January 17, 2020.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2020–02158 Filed 2–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
[USCG–2019–0916]
2019 Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones,
Security Zones, and Special Local
Regulations
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of expired
temporary rules issued.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This document provides
notification of substantive rules issued
by the Coast Guard that were made
temporarily effective but expired before
they could be published in the Federal
Register. This document lists temporary
safety zones, security zones, and special
local regulations, all of limited duration
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
and for which timely publication in the
Federal Register was not possible.
DATES: This document lists temporary
Coast Guard rules that became effective,
primarily between October 2019 and
December 2019, unless otherwise
indicated, and were terminated before
they could be published in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Temporary rules listed in
this document may be viewed online,
under their respective docket numbers,
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions on this document contact
Yeoman First Class Glenn Grayer, Office
of Regulations and Administrative Law,
telephone (202) 372–3862.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast
Guard District Commanders and
Captains of the Port (COTP) must be
immediately responsive to the safety
and security needs within their
jurisdiction; therefore, District
Commanders and COTPs have been
delegated the authority to issue certain
local regulations. Safety zones may be
established for safety or environmental
purposes. A safety zone may be
stationary and described by fixed limits
or it may be described as a zone around
a vessel in motion. Security zones limit
access to prevent injury or damage to
vessels, ports, or waterfront facilities.
Special local regulations are issued to
enhance the safety of participants and
spectators at regattas and other marine
events.
Timely publication of these rules in
the Federal Register may be precluded
when a rule responds to an emergency,
or when an event occurs without
sufficient advance notice. The affected
public is, however, often informed of
these rules through Local Notices to
Mariners, press releases, and other
means. Moreover, actual notification is
provided by Coast Guard patrol vessels
Docket No.
USCG–2019–0770
USCG–2019–0810
USCG–2019–0786
USCG–2019–0808
Rule type
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
The following unpublished rules were
placed in effect temporarily during the
period between October 2019 and
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
USCG–2019–0840
USCG–2019–0839
USCG–2019–0832
USCG–2019–0777
USCG–2019–0616
USCG–2019–0831
USCG–2019–0851
USCG–2019–0854
USCG–2019–0716
USCG–2019–0576
USCG–2019–0863
USCG–2019–0707
USCG–2019–0873
USCG–2019–0858
USCG–2019–0677
USCG–2019–0888
USCG–2019–0073
USCG–2019–0886
USCG–2019–0930
USCG–2019–0939
USCG–2019–0944
USCG–2019–0927
USCG–2019–0928
USCG–2019–0941
USCG–2019–0957
USCG–2019–0913
VerDate Sep<11>2014
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
..................................
16:08 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
Zones
Zones
Zones
Zones
(Part
(Part
(Part
(Part
165)
165)
165)
165)
Santa Cruz Island, CA ............................
Port Jefferson, NY ...................................
Ludlow, KY ..............................................
COTP New York Zone ............................
December 2019 unless otherwise
indicated. To view copies of these rules,
visit www.regulations.gov and search by
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Security Zones (Part 165) .......................
Special Local Regulations (Part 100) .....
Security Zones (Part 165) .......................
Special Local Regulations (Part 100) .....
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Security Zones (Part 165) .......................
Security Zones (Part 165) .......................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Security Zones (Part 165) .......................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Security Zones (Part 165) .......................
Security Zones (Part 165) .......................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
Safety Zones (Part 165) ..........................
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
enforcing the restrictions imposed by
the rule. Because Federal Register
publication was not possible before the
end of the effective period, mariners
were personally notified of the contents
of the safety zones, security zones, or
special local regulations listed in this
notice by Coast Guard officials on-scene
prior to any enforcement action.
However, the Coast Guard, by law, must
publish in the Federal Register notice of
substantive rules adopted. To meet this
obligation without imposing undue
expense on the public, the Coast Guard
periodically publishes a list of these
temporary safety zones, security zones,
and special local regulations. Permanent
rules are not included in this list
because they are published in their
entirety in the Federal Register.
Temporary rules are also published in
their entirety if sufficient time is
available to do so before they are placed
in effect or terminated.
Location
..........................
..........................
..........................
..........................
Sfmt 4700
6429
Effective date
9/3/2019
9/18/2019
10/2/2019
10/4/2019
the docket number indicated in the
following table.
Union City, CA .........................................
Union City, CA .........................................
New Orleans, LA .....................................
Helena, AR ..............................................
Lake Charles, LA .....................................
San Diego, CA ........................................
Union City, CA .........................................
Pittsburgh, PA .........................................
Pittsburgh, PA .........................................
Rich Passage, WA ..................................
Pittsburgh, PA .........................................
Jacksonville Beach, FL ...........................
Washington, DC ......................................
Groton, CT ...............................................
San Diego, CA ........................................
San Francisco, CA ..................................
Miami River, FL .......................................
Toledo, OH ..............................................
Helena Island, SC ...................................
Hallandale Beach, FL ..............................
Rochester, PA .........................................
Berkeley, CA ...........................................
Sausalito, CA ...........................................
San Francisco, CA ..................................
San Francisco, CA ..................................
COTP New York Zone ............................
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
10/4/2019
10/4/2019
10/5/2019
10/5/2019
10/11/2019
10/13/2019
10/15/2019
10/17/2019
10/19/2019
10/20/2019
10/23/2019
10/24/2019
10/25/2019
11/1/2019
11/6/2019
11/7/2019
12/3/2019
11/11/2019
11/27/2019
12/7/2019
12/10/2019
12/14/2019
12/14/2019
12/19/2019
12/31/2019
12/31/2019
6430
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 24 / Wednesday, February 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: January 27, 2020.
M.W. Mumbach,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, United States Coast
Guard.
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracey Casburn, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality and Planning Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas
66219; telephone number (913) 551–
7016; email address casburn.tracey@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
INFORMATION CONTACT
[FR Doc. 2020–01660 Filed 2–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0662; FRL–10004–
63–Region 7]
Table of Contents
Air Plan Approval; Missouri;
Restriction of Emissions From BatchType Charcoal Kilns
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a Missouri
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision received on March 7, 2019. The
submission revises a Missouri
regulation that establishes emission
limits for batch-type charcoal kilns
based on operational parameters to
reduce emissions of particulate matter
(PM10), volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) and carbon monoxide (CO).
Specifically, the revisions to the rule
add definitions specific to the rule,
update references to test methods,
remove unnecessary words, remove an
obsolete requirement which applied
only during the phase-in period of the
rule that ended December 31, 2005,
clarify a provision for an alternative
operating temperature, and make other
minor edits. These revisions are
administrative in nature and do not
impact the stringency of the SIP or air
quality. Approval of these revisions will
ensure consistency between State and
federally-approved rules.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0662. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Feb 04, 2020
Jkt 250001
I. Background
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On December 6, 2019, the EPA
proposed approval to revise the SIP
revisions to a State rule that restricts
emissions from batch-type charcoal
kilns in the Federal Register. See 84 FR
66853. The EPA solicited comments on
the proposed SIP revision and received
no comments.
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is approving a request to
revise the Missouri SIP received on
March 7, 2019. Missouri requested that
the EPA approve revisions it made to a
State rule found at title 10, division 10
of the code of state regulations—10 CSR
10–6.330 ‘‘Restriction of Emissions from
Batch-Type Charcoal Kilns’’. A detailed
discussion of the submission, and the
EPA’s review of it, was provided in the
EPA’s December 6, 2019, notice of
proposed rulemaking document
published in the Federal Register. See
84 FR 66853. The EPA received no
comments during the public comment
period.
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission met the public
notice requirements for SIP submissions
in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The
submission satisfied the completeness
criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V.
The State provided public notice of the
revisions from August 1, 2018, to
October 4, 2018, and held a public
hearing on September 27, 2018. The
State received and addressed four
comments. As explained in more detail
in the technical support document
(TSD) which is part of this docket, the
SIP revision submission meets the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
substantive requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA), including section 110
and implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is ammending the Missouri
SIP by approving the State’s request to
revise 10 CSR 10–6.330,’’Restriction of
Emissions From Batch-Type Charcoal
Kilns.’’ Approval of these revisions will
ensure consistency between State and
federally-approved rules. The EPA has
determined that these changes will not
adversely impact air quality.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
approving regulatory text in an EPA
final rule that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with the
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
incorporating amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
if they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6428-6430]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01660]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Parts 100 and 165
[USCG-2019-0916]
2019 Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones, Security Zones, and
Special Local Regulations
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notification of expired temporary rules issued.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notification of substantive rules
issued by the Coast Guard that were made temporarily effective but
expired before they could be published in the Federal Register. This
document lists temporary safety zones, security zones, and special
local regulations, all of limited duration
[[Page 6429]]
and for which timely publication in the Federal Register was not
possible.
DATES: This document lists temporary Coast Guard rules that became
effective, primarily between October 2019 and December 2019, unless
otherwise indicated, and were terminated before they could be published
in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Temporary rules listed in this document may be viewed
online, under their respective docket numbers, using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this document contact
Yeoman First Class Glenn Grayer, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, telephone (202) 372-3862.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast Guard District Commanders and Captains
of the Port (COTP) must be immediately responsive to the safety and
security needs within their jurisdiction; therefore, District
Commanders and COTPs have been delegated the authority to issue certain
local regulations. Safety zones may be established for safety or
environmental purposes. A safety zone may be stationary and described
by fixed limits or it may be described as a zone around a vessel in
motion. Security zones limit access to prevent injury or damage to
vessels, ports, or waterfront facilities. Special local regulations are
issued to enhance the safety of participants and spectators at regattas
and other marine events.
Timely publication of these rules in the Federal Register may be
precluded when a rule responds to an emergency, or when an event occurs
without sufficient advance notice. The affected public is, however,
often informed of these rules through Local Notices to Mariners, press
releases, and other means. Moreover, actual notification is provided by
Coast Guard patrol vessels enforcing the restrictions imposed by the
rule. Because Federal Register publication was not possible before the
end of the effective period, mariners were personally notified of the
contents of the safety zones, security zones, or special local
regulations listed in this notice by Coast Guard officials on-scene
prior to any enforcement action. However, the Coast Guard, by law, must
publish in the Federal Register notice of substantive rules adopted. To
meet this obligation without imposing undue expense on the public, the
Coast Guard periodically publishes a list of these temporary safety
zones, security zones, and special local regulations. Permanent rules
are not included in this list because they are published in their
entirety in the Federal Register. Temporary rules are also published in
their entirety if sufficient time is available to do so before they are
placed in effect or terminated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Docket No. Rule type Location Effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCG-2019-0770.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Santa Cruz Island, CA..... 9/3/2019
USCG-2019-0810.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Port Jefferson, NY........ 9/18/2019
USCG-2019-0786.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Ludlow, KY................ 10/2/2019
USCG-2019-0808.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... COTP New York Zone........ 10/4/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following unpublished rules were placed in effect temporarily
during the period between October 2019 and December 2019 unless
otherwise indicated. To view copies of these rules, visit
www.regulations.gov and search by the docket number indicated in the
following table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCG-2019-0840.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Union City, CA............ 10/4/2019
USCG-2019-0839.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Union City, CA............ 10/4/2019
USCG-2019-0832.......................... Security Zones (Part 165). New Orleans, LA........... 10/5/2019
USCG-2019-0777.......................... Special Local Regulations Helena, AR................ 10/5/2019
(Part 100).
USCG-2019-0616.......................... Security Zones (Part 165). Lake Charles, LA.......... 10/11/2019
USCG-2019-0831.......................... Special Local Regulations San Diego, CA............. 10/13/2019
(Part 100).
USCG-2019-0851.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Union City, CA............ 10/15/2019
USCG-2019-0854.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Pittsburgh, PA............ 10/17/2019
USCG-2019-0716.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Pittsburgh, PA............ 10/19/2019
USCG-2019-0576.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Rich Passage, WA.......... 10/20/2019
USCG-2019-0863.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Pittsburgh, PA............ 10/23/2019
USCG-2019-0707.......................... Security Zones (Part 165). Jacksonville Beach, FL.... 10/24/2019
USCG-2019-0873.......................... Security Zones (Part 165). Washington, DC............ 10/25/2019
USCG-2019-0858.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Groton, CT................ 11/1/2019
USCG-2019-0677.......................... Security Zones (Part 165). San Diego, CA............. 11/6/2019
USCG-2019-0888.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... San Francisco, CA......... 11/7/2019
USCG-2019-0073.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Miami River, FL........... 12/3/2019
USCG-2019-0886.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Toledo, OH................ 11/11/2019
USCG-2019-0930.......................... Security Zones (Part 165). Helena Island, SC......... 11/27/2019
USCG-2019-0939.......................... Security Zones (Part 165). Hallandale Beach, FL...... 12/7/2019
USCG-2019-0944.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Rochester, PA............. 12/10/2019
USCG-2019-0927.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Berkeley, CA.............. 12/14/2019
USCG-2019-0928.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... Sausalito, CA............. 12/14/2019
USCG-2019-0941.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... San Francisco, CA......... 12/19/2019
USCG-2019-0957.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... San Francisco, CA......... 12/31/2019
USCG-2019-0913.......................... Safety Zones (Part 165)... COTP New York Zone........ 12/31/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 6430]]
Dated: January 27, 2020.
M.W. Mumbach,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, United States
Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2020-01660 Filed 2-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
