Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Production of Pesticides and Herbicides, 6123-6125 [2020-02004]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
6123
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Subpart—AA Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entries
■
§ 52.1320
‘‘10–2.205’’ and ‘‘10–5.295’’ to read as
follows:
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
*
10–2.205 ........
*
*
Control of Emissions from
Aerospace
Manufacturing
and Rework Facilities.
*
*
3/30/2019
*
*
[Date of publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register], [Federal Register
citation of the final rule].
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
*
10–5.295 ........
*
*
Control of Emissions from
Aerospace
Manufacturing
and Rework Facilities.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0014; FRL–10004–
77–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From Production of
Pesticides and Herbicides
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by Missouri on
January 14, 2019. Missouri requests that
EPA revise its rule related to control of
emissions from production of pesticides
and herbicides. These revisions include
removing certain provisions from the
rule, consolidating requirements,
including incorporations by reference
and revising unnecessarily restrictive
language. The EPA’s proposed approval
of this rule revision is being done in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
Comments must be received on
or before March 5, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2020–0014 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will
Stone, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7714;
email address stone.william@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
DATES:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
16:10 Feb 03, 2020
*
*
[Date of publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register], [Federal Register
citation of the final rule].
*
[FR Doc. 2020–01997 Filed 2–3–20; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
3/30/2019
Jkt 250001
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–
0014, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM
04FEP1
6124
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to 10 Code of State Regulation
(CSR) 10–2.320, Control of Emissions
from Production of Pesticides and
Herbicides, in the Missouri SIP.
Missouri made several revisions to the
rule. These revisions are described in
detail in the technical support
document (TSD) included in the docket
for this action.
Missouri received ten comments from
EPA during the comment period.
Missouri responded to all ten
comments, as noted in the State
submission included in the docket for
this action. Missouri responded to
EPA’s comments and, as described in
the TSD for this action, amended the
rule, in response to some of EPA’s
comments.
Therefore, the EPA is proposing to
approve the revisions to this rule
because it will not have a negative
impact on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
June 25, 2018 to August 1, 2018 and
received ten comments on this
rulemaking. As explained in the TSD for
this rule, MDNR adequately responded
to the comments. As explained above,
the revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing
regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to approve
Missouri’s request to revise 10 CSR 10–
2.320. We are processing this as a
proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on this proposed
action. Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to include regulatory text in
an EPA final rule that includes
incorporation by reference. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Feb 03, 2020
Jkt 250001
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri
Regulation described in the proposed
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen oxide, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: January 28, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart—AA Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
‘‘10–2.320’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM
04FEP1
*
*
6125
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2020 / Proposed Rules
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 2—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
*
10–2.320 ........
*
*
Control of Emissions from Production of Pesticides and
Herbicides.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–02004 Filed 2–3–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2010–0037; FRL–10004–
62–Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Minnesota;
Revision to Taconite Federal
Implementation Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing revisions to
a Federal implementation plan (FIP)
addressing the requirement for best
available retrofit technology (BART) for
the United States Steel Corporation’s
(U.S. Steel) taconite plant located in Mt.
Iron, Minnesota (Minntac or Minntac
facility). We are proposing to revise the
nitrogen oxides (NOX) limits for U.S.
Steel’s taconite furnaces at its Minntac
facility because new information has
come to light that was not available
when we originally promulgated the FIP
on February 6, 2013. The EPA is
proposing this action pursuant to
sections 110 and 169A of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 5, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2010–0037 at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Feb 03, 2020
1/30/19
Jkt 250001
*
*
[Date of publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register], [Federal Register
citation of the final rule].
*
*
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen D’Agostino, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning &
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–1767,
dagostino.kathleen@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. What action is EPA taking?
On February 6, 2013, EPA
promulgated a FIP that included BART
limits for certain taconite furnaces in
Minnesota and Michigan (2013 Taconite
FIP; 78 FR 8706). EPA is proposing to
revise the 2013 Taconite FIP with
respect to the NOX BART emission
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
limitations and compliance schedules
for U.S. Steel’s Minntac facility in
Minnesota.
II. Background
A. Requirements of the Clean Air Act
and EPA’s Regional Haze Rule
In section 169A of the 1977
Amendments to the CAA, Congress
created a program for protecting
visibility in the nation’s national parks
and wilderness areas. This section of the
CAA establishes as a national goal the
‘‘prevention of any future, and the
remedying of any existing, impairment
of visibility in mandatory Class I
Federal areas 1 which impairment
results from manmade air pollution.’’
Congress added section 169B to the
CAA in 1990 to address regional haze
issues. EPA promulgated a rule to
address regional haze on July 1, 1999.
64 FR 35714 (July 1, 1999), codified at
40 CFR part 51, subpart P (herein after
referred to as the ‘‘Regional Haze Rule’’).
The Regional Haze Rule codified and
clarified the BART provisions in the
CAA and revised the existing visibility
regulations to add provisions addressing
regional haze impairment and to
1 Areas designated as mandatory Class I Federal
areas consist of national parks exceeding 6000
acres, wilderness areas and national memorial parks
exceeding 5000 acres, and all international parks
that were in existence on August 7, 1977. 42 U.S.C.
7472(a). In accordance with section 169A of the
CAA, EPA, in consultation with the Department of
Interior, promulgated a list of 156 areas where
visibility is identified as an important value. 44 FR
69122 (November 30, 1979). The extent of a
mandatory Class I area includes subsequent changes
in boundaries, such as park expansions. 42 U.S.C.
7472(a). Although states and tribes may designate
as Class I additional areas which they consider to
have visibility as an important value, the
requirements of the visibility program set forth in
section 169A of the CAA apply only to ‘‘mandatory
Class I Federal areas.’’ Each mandatory Class I
Federal area is the responsibility of a ‘‘Federal Land
Manager.’’ 42 U.S.C. 7602(i). When we use the term
‘‘Class I area’’ in this action, we mean a ‘‘mandatory
Class I Federal area.’’
E:\FR\FM\04FEP1.SGM
04FEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6123-6125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02004]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0014; FRL-10004-77-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Production
of Pesticides and Herbicides
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by
Missouri on January 14, 2019. Missouri requests that EPA revise its
rule related to control of emissions from production of pesticides and
herbicides. These revisions include removing certain provisions from
the rule, consolidating requirements, including incorporations by
reference and revising unnecessarily restrictive language. The EPA's
proposed approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 5, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0014 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Will Stone, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7714; email
address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0014, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
[[Page 6124]]
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to 10 Code of State
Regulation (CSR) 10-2.320, Control of Emissions from Production of
Pesticides and Herbicides, in the Missouri SIP. Missouri made several
revisions to the rule. These revisions are described in detail in the
technical support document (TSD) included in the docket for this
action.
Missouri received ten comments from EPA during the comment period.
Missouri responded to all ten comments, as noted in the State
submission included in the docket for this action. Missouri responded
to EPA's comments and, as described in the TSD for this action, amended
the rule, in response to some of EPA's comments.
Therefore, the EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to this
rule because it will not have a negative impact on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from June 25, 2018 to
August 1, 2018 and received ten comments on this rulemaking. As
explained in the TSD for this rule, MDNR adequately responded to the
comments. As explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing
regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to approve Missouri's request to revise 10 CSR
10-2.320. We are processing this as a proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulation described in the
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen oxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: January 28, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart--AA Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for ``10-2.320'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 6125]]
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 2--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-2.320................ Control of Emissions 1/30/19 [Date of publication of ....................
from Production of the final rule in the
Pesticides and Federal Register],
Herbicides. [Federal Register
citation of the final
rule].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-02004 Filed 2-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
