Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to State Operating Permit for Wheelabrator Environmental System Inc., Wheelabrator Concord Company, L.P., Concord, New Hampshire, 5956-5957 [2020-02010]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
5956
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 22 / Monday, February 3, 2020 / Notices
and the telephone number for the OEI
Docket is (202) 566–1752.
An electronic version of the public
docket is available on EPA’s website at
https://www.epa.gov/ogc/proposedconsent-decrees-and-draft-settlementagreements#NRDCetalv.epa and through
www.regulations.gov. You may use
www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search.’’ It is important to note that
EPA’s policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in
paper, will be made available for public
viewing online at www.regulations.gov
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket.
EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Although not all docket
materials may be available
electronically, you may still access any
of the publicly available docket
materials through the EPA Docket
Center.
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov
website to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, email address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an email comment
directly to the Docket without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA’s
electronic public docket.
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section,
above. Please ensure that your
comments are submitted within the
specified comment period.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Jan 31, 2020
Jkt 250001
Dated: January 23, 2020.
John R. Michaud,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2020–01998 Filed 1–31–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[Petition I–2019–3; FRL–10004–45–Region
1]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit
Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for
Wheelabrator Environmental System
Inc., Wheelabrator Concord Company,
L.P., Concord, New Hampshire
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition
to object to state operating permits.
The EPA Administrator
signed an Order, dated October 30,
2019, denying a petition dated March
14, 2019, filed by Anthony Caplan,
Katherine Lajoie, Rebecca MacKenzie,
and Janet Ward (the Petitioners). The
Petitioners requested that the EPA
object to a proposed Clean Air Act
(CAA) title V operating permit (Permit
No. TV–0032) issued by the New
Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services (NHDES) to
Wheelabrator Environmental System,
Inc., Wheelabrator Concord Company,
L.P. (Wheelabrator), a large municipal
waste incinerator located in Concord,
New Hampshire.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the
petition, and all pertinent information
relating thereto are on file at the
following location: EPA Region 1; Air
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Radiation Division; 5 Post Office
Square—Suite 100, (Mail code 05–2),
Boston, MA 02109–3912. The Order is
also available electronically at the
following address: https://www.epa.gov/
sites/production/files/2019-11/
documents/wheelabrator_
rensponse2019.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Kilpatrick, Air Permits, Toxics,
and Indoor Programs Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
Region 1, 5 Post Office Square—Suite
100, (Mail code 05–2), Boston, MA
02109–3912, tel. (617) 918–1652, email
kilpatrick.jessica@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA
affords the EPA a 45-day period to
review and, as appropriate, the
authority to object to operating permits
proposed by state permitting authorities
under title V of the CAA, 42 U.S.C.
7661–7661f. Section 505(b)(2) of the
CAA and 40 CFR 70.8(d) authorizes any
person to petition the EPA
Administrator to object to a title V
operating permit within 60 days after
the expiration of the EPA’s 45-day
review period if the EPA has not
objected on its own initiative. Petitions
must be based only on objections to the
permit that were raised with reasonable
specificity during the public comment
period provided by the state, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was
impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the
grounds for the issues arose after this
period.
The Petitioners submitted a petition
on March 14, 2019, requesting that the
EPA object to the proposed CAA title V
operating permit issued by NHDES to
Wheelabrator (Permit No. TV–0032).
The Petitioners alleged that (1) the
operation of the Wheelabrator
incinerator violates New Hampshire’s
Revised Statutes Annotated (RSA) 125–
C, Title 10 Public Health, Chapter 125–
C Air Pollution Control, Section 125–
C:1 and releases persistent toxic
substances, such as lead, mercury,
cadmium, and dioxin, that ‘‘accumulate
in our bodies (known as body burden)
and in our environment (known as toxic
loading) and cause harm in low doses;’’
(2) that ‘‘[s]napshot testing of
smokestack emissions can neither
determine nor ensure continuous
compliance with air standards that are
themselves not health based;’’ and that
NHDES ‘‘has discretionary authority to
either deny or approve a Title V permit
and is not constrained by a requirement
to only consider whether Wheelabrator’s
stack test results comply with emission
standards;’’ (3) Wheelabrator violated
state and federal law by incinerating
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 22 / Monday, February 3, 2020 / Notices
used baghouse filters; and (4) the
NHDES has mischaracterized its
authority under New Hampshire’s RSA
125C:13 and CAA § 129(e) and that
NHDES can deny, suspend, or revoke
the permit, or order measures beyond
existing emission limitations to protect
public health.
On October 30, 2019, the
Administrator issued an Order denying
the petition. The Order explains the
EPA’s basis for denying the petition.
Pursuant to sections 307(b) and
505(b)(2) of the CAA, a petition for
judicial review of those parts of the
Order that deny issues in the petition
may be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by
April 3, 2020, 60 days from the date this
notice is published in the Federal
Register.
Dated: January 21, 2020.
Dennis Deziel,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2020–02010 Filed 1–31–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0751; FRL–10004–39]
Pesticide Registration Review; Interim
Decision for Glyphosate; Notice of
Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
For
pesticide specific information: Contact
the glyphosate registration review email
address and phone number identified in
Unit IV.
For general information on the
registration review program, contact:
Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 305–7106; email address:
biscoe.melanie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, contact the
glyphosate registration review email
address and phone number identified in
the Table in Unit IV.
AGENCY:
B. How can I access the docket?
This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s interim registration
review decision for glyphosate.
Registration review is EPA’s periodic
review of pesticide registrations to
ensure that each pesticide continues to
satisfy the statutory standard for
registration, that is, that the pesticide
can perform its intended function
without unreasonable adverse effects on
human health or the environment.
Through this program, EPA is ensuring
that each pesticide’s registration is
based on current scientific and other
knowledge, including its effects on
human health and the environment.
The docket for this action, identified
by docket identification (ID) number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0751, is available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
SUMMARY:
5957
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
Registration review is EPA’s periodic
review of pesticide registrations to
ensure that each pesticide continues to
satisfy the statutory standard for
registration, that is, the pesticide can
perform its intended function without
unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of
the registration review process, the
Agency has completed interim decisions
for glyphosate. Through this program,
EPA is ensuring that glyphosate’s
registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
III. Authority
EPA is conducting its registration
review of glyphosate pursuant to section
3(g) of the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
and the Procedural Regulations for
Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155,
subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA
provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be
reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA,
a pesticide product may be registered or
remain registered only if it meets the
statutory standard for registration given
in FIFRA section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C.
136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance
with widespread and commonly
recognized practice, the pesticide
product must perform its intended
function without unreasonable adverse
effects on the environment; that is,
without any unreasonable risk to man or
the environment, or a human dietary
risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.
IV. What action is the Agency taking?
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice
announces the availability of EPA’s
interim registration review decision for
glyphosate. The interim registration
review decision is supported by
rationales included in the docket
identified in Unit I.B.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW INTERIM DECISIONS BEING ISSUED
Registration review case name and No.
Docket ID No.
Glyphosate Case Number 0178 ........................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0361 ...................
The proposed interim registration
review decision for glyphosate was
posted to the docket and the public was
invited to submit any comments or new
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Jan 31, 2020
Jkt 250001
Contact information
glyphosateregreview@epa.gov, 703–347–0292.
information. EPA addressed the
comments or information received
during the 120-day comment period for
the proposed interim decisions in the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discussion for glyphosate. Comments
from the 120-day comment period that
were received may or may not have
affected the Agency’s interim decision.
E:\FR\FM\03FEN1.SGM
03FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5956-5957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02010]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[Petition I-2019-3; FRL-10004-45-Region 1]
Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Wheelabrator Environmental System Inc.,
Wheelabrator Concord Company, L.P., Concord, New Hampshire
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final order on petition to object to state operating
permits.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA Administrator signed an Order, dated October 30, 2019,
denying a petition dated March 14, 2019, filed by Anthony Caplan,
Katherine Lajoie, Rebecca MacKenzie, and Janet Ward (the Petitioners).
The Petitioners requested that the EPA object to a proposed Clean Air
Act (CAA) title V operating permit (Permit No. TV-0032) issued by the
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) to
Wheelabrator Environmental System, Inc., Wheelabrator Concord Company,
L.P. (Wheelabrator), a large municipal waste incinerator located in
Concord, New Hampshire.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the petition, and all pertinent
information relating thereto are on file at the following location: EPA
Region 1; Air and Radiation Division; 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100,
(Mail code 05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912. The Order is also available
electronically at the following address: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-11/documents/wheelabrator_rensponse2019.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Kilpatrick, Air Permits,
Toxics, and Indoor Programs Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA Region 1, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, (Mail code 05-
2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, tel. (617) 918-1652, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords the EPA a 45-day period to
review and, as appropriate, the authority to object to operating
permits proposed by state permitting authorities under title V of the
CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661-7661f. Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA and 40 CFR
70.8(d) authorizes any person to petition the EPA Administrator to
object to a title V operating permit within 60 days after the
expiration of the EPA's 45-day review period if the EPA has not
objected on its own initiative. Petitions must be based only on
objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity
during the public comment period provided by the state, unless the
petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues
during the comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after
this period.
The Petitioners submitted a petition on March 14, 2019, requesting
that the EPA object to the proposed CAA title V operating permit issued
by NHDES to Wheelabrator (Permit No. TV-0032). The Petitioners alleged
that (1) the operation of the Wheelabrator incinerator violates New
Hampshire's Revised Statutes Annotated (RSA) 125-C, Title 10 Public
Health, Chapter 125-C Air Pollution Control, Section 125-C:1 and
releases persistent toxic substances, such as lead, mercury, cadmium,
and dioxin, that ``accumulate in our bodies (known as body burden) and
in our environment (known as toxic loading) and cause harm in low
doses;'' (2) that ``[s]napshot testing of smokestack emissions can
neither determine nor ensure continuous compliance with air standards
that are themselves not health based;'' and that NHDES ``has
discretionary authority to either deny or approve a Title V permit and
is not constrained by a requirement to only consider whether
Wheelabrator's stack test results comply with emission standards;'' (3)
Wheelabrator violated state and federal law by incinerating
[[Page 5957]]
used baghouse filters; and (4) the NHDES has mischaracterized its
authority under New Hampshire's RSA 125C:13 and CAA Sec. 129(e) and
that NHDES can deny, suspend, or revoke the permit, or order measures
beyond existing emission limitations to protect public health.
On October 30, 2019, the Administrator issued an Order denying the
petition. The Order explains the EPA's basis for denying the petition.
Pursuant to sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA, a petition
for judicial review of those parts of the Order that deny issues in the
petition may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 3, 2020, 60 days from the date this notice
is published in the Federal Register.
Dated: January 21, 2020.
Dennis Deziel,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2020-02010 Filed 1-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P