Hearing Procedures Governing the Denial, Revocation, or Suspension of an OTI License, 5579-5583 [2020-00907]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
5579
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically in
https://www.regulations.gov; by calling
EPA Region 8 at (406) 457–5046 and
leaving a message; and at the U.S EPA
Montana Office, Federal Building, Suite
3200, 10 West 15th Street, Helena, MT
59626, Hours: Monday to Friday from
8:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.; and the Bozeman
Public Library, 626 East Main Street,
Bozeman, MT 59715; (406) 582–2400,
Hours: (Library hours vary).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Hoogerheide, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. EPA Montana Office,
Federal Building, Suite 3200, 10 West
15th Street Helena, MT 59626: (406)
457–5031 or (866) 457–2690 extension
1, email hoogerheide.roger@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
portion of the site to be deleted from the
NPL is: Surface and unsaturated
subsurface soils outside of the Treated
Soils Area of the Idaho Pole Co.
Superfund Site in Bozeman, Montana. A
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion for
this Site was published in the Federal
Register (84 FR 34839) on July 19, 2019.
The closing date for comments on the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion was
August 19, 2019 and extended to
September 6, 2019. Two written and
three oral public comments were
received and expressed concerns about
future redevelopment of the Site, the
extent of the Superfund investigation
and remedy, as well as the source and
fate of the contaminants. The properties
that were remediated under the
Superfund process have land and
groundwater use restrictions placed on
them to ensure future redevelopment of
the property will remain protective of
human health and the environment. A
Notice of Institutional Control was filed
with the Gallatin County Clerk and
Recorder in 2010 on this 4.5 acres that
applies restrictions on new construction
and excavation. EPA investigations
identified all possible sources of surface
and unsaturated soils that needed
cleanup. Contaminated soils were
excavated, treated and placed on-site.
The 4.5 acre Treated Soils Area is the
location where all treated soils were
placed after on-site treatment. Treated
soils are located on the 4.5 acres that
remain on the NPL. Additional data
needs to be collected before the Site’s
sediments can be deleted.
EPA believes the partial deletion
action is appropriate. A responsiveness
summary to public comments with
supporting materials was prepared and
placed in both the docket, EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1986–0005, on
www.regulations.gov, and in the local
repositories listed above.
EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
sites that appear to present a significant
risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Deletion of a site from the
NPL does not preclude further remedial
action. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL,
the deleted site may be restored to the
NPL without application of the hazard
ranking system. Deletion of portions of
a site from the NPL does not affect
responsible party liability, in the
unlikely event that future conditions
warrant further actions.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: January 22, 2020.
Gregory E. Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
For reasons set out in the preamble,
40 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:
PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES
POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR,
2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,
3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52
FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B to Part 300—[Amended]
2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300
is amended by revising the listing under
Montana for ‘‘Idaho Pole Co’’ to read as
follows:
■
Appendix B to Part 300—National
Priorities List
TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
State
Site name
City/county
Notes (a)
*
*
MT ..........................................................
*
*
Idaho Pole Co .......................................
*
*
Bozeman ...............................................
*
P
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(a)
= Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, HRS score need not be greater
than or equal to 28.50).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–01748 Filed 1–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Parts 502 and 515
[Docket No. 19–04]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
RIN 3072–AC75
Hearing Procedures Governing the
Denial, Revocation, or Suspension of
an OTI License
Federal Maritime Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Jan 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Federal Maritime
Commission (Commission) is modifying
the hearing procedures governing the
denial, revocation, or suspension of an
ocean transportation intermediary (OTI)
license. The revised hearing procedures
align more with other Commission
hearing procedures, ensure a more
streamlined process, and fulfill the need
for more detailed procedural
requirements.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
5580
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
This final rule is effective March
2, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rachel E. Dickon, Secretary; Phone:
(202) 523–5725; Email: secretary@
fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Introduction
Through this final rule, the
Commission is modifying its processes
for the denial, suspension, and
revocation of OTI licenses.1 The revised
hearing procedures are based on the
procedure for formal small Shipping Act
claims under 46 CFR part 502, subpart
T. The new hearing procedure, overseen
by an administrative law judge (ALJ),
represents an expedient, low-burden
process that also fulfills the need for
more structure in the proceedings.
A notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) was issued by the Commission
on September 3, 2019.2 The
Commission received no comments.
II. Background
The Shipping Act requires anyone
desiring to operate as an OTI to obtain
a license from the Commission.3 The
Act provides that ‘‘[t]he Commission
shall issue a license to a person that the
Commission determines to be qualified
by experience and character to act as an
ocean transportation intermediary.’’ 4
The Commission has delegated the
authority to approve or disapprove
applications for OTI licenses to the
Bureau of Certification and Licensing
(BCL).5
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
A. Current Procedure
Hearings on the revocation, denial, or
suspension of an OTI license are
conducted under the procedures in 46
CFR 515.17. All hearing requests are
submitted to the Commission’s
Secretary. The Secretary then designates
a hearing officer. After being advised by
the hearing officer that a hearing request
had been made, BCL sends the hearing
officer and applicant or licensee a copy
of the notice of intent (which had
already been sent to the applicant or
licensee) along with materials
supporting the notice under § 515.15 or
§ 515.16.6
1 These hearing procedures also apply to
suspensions and terminations of foreign-based nonvessel-operating common carrier (NVOCC)
registrations. See 46 CFR 515.19(g)(2).
2 NPRM: Hearing Procedures Governing the
Denial, Revocation, or Suspension of an OTI
License, 84 FR 45934 (Sept. 3, 2019), as corrected
by 84 FR 48578 (Sep. 16, 2019).
3 46 U.S.C. 40901.
4 Id. at section 40901(a).
5 46 CFR 501.26(a)(1).
6 46 CFR 515.17(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Jan 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
The hearing officer then provides the
licensee or applicant with a written
notice advising the party of its right to
submit written arguments, affidavits of
fact, and documents. The licensee or
applicant then has 30 days to submit
information and documents in support
of a license or in support of
continuation of a license. BCL then
submits its response within 20 days of
the licensee or applicant’s submission.
These records and submissions
constitute the entire record for the
hearing officer’s decision. The hearing
officer’s decision must be issued within
40 days of the record being closed.7 The
applicant or licensee, but not BCL, can
seek review of the hearing officer’s
decision by the Commission by filing
exceptions in accordance with 46 CFR
502.227, and the Commission can
determine to conduct a formal
evidentiary hearing under part 502.8
B. Concerns With Current Procedure
Despite the Commission’s goal of
streamlining OTI proceedings with the
§ 515.17 procedures, hearings under
§ 515.17 have taken over 150 days to
complete. A contributing factor to the
length of time in these cases is the delay
in the selection of an appropriate
hearing officer, which took between 13
and 50 days. These delays resulted from
not having a designated office from
which to select the hearing officer.
In addition to the delays in selecting
a hearing officer, because § 515.17
provides little detail about the hearing
procedure other than deadlines for
submission of information, Commission
staff have had to resolve several
procedural issues arising in hearing
proceedings. These experiences
demonstrated the need for additional
clarification of the procedure and the
authority of the hearing officer.
III. Final Rule
For the reasons stated in the NPRM
and described above, the Commission is
adopting the proposed rule with
virtually no changes.9 The new hearing
procedures will be conducted by an
ALJ, thereby removing the delay in the
appointment of a hearing officer. Using
a modified form of the subpart T
procedures will ensure a more
streamlined procedure than a typical
hearing under part 502, which allows
7 46
CFR 515.17(b).
CFR 515.17(c).
9 The NPRM inadvertently listed the wrong
authorities for part 502. This has been corrected in
the final rule. The final rule also makes very minor
wording changes to the new § 502.706 governing
requests for oral hearing and argument.
8 46
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for 150 days of discovery,10 while giving
the presiding officer more flexibility in
conducting the hearing than the current
§ 515.17 procedures. The new
proceedings will be included in part 502
as subpart X (the existing subpart X will
be redesignated) and cross-referenced in
§ 515.17.
A. New Procedure for License Hearings
As described in the NPRM, the
Commission will not change the process
for requesting a hearing as stated in
§§ 515.15(c) and 515.16(a). If an
applicant or licensee requests a hearing
after receiving a notice of intent to deny,
suspend, or revoke their license, they
will continue to have 20 days to do so,
and, if no hearing is requested, the
decision to deny, revoke, or suspend
will become final.
If a hearing request is received, the
Secretary will transmit the request to
the Office of Administrative Law Judges
for assignment. The hearing will then
take place under the new subpart X of
part 502. Section 515.17 retains its first
sentence, indicating that hearing
requests under §§ 515.15 and 515.16
must be submitted to the Commission’s
Secretary, and then cross-references
subpart X.
The preliminary portions of the new
subpart X mirror the previous
procedures in § 515.17, save that an ALJ,
rather than a hearing officer, will
preside over the proceeding. Once a
timely request is received, the Secretary
will transmit the request to the Office of
Administrative Law Judges who would
notify BCL and Bureau of Enforcement
(BOE) of the hearing request. BOE will
provide the applicant or licensee a copy
of the notice previously given as well as
the BCL materials supporting the
decision. The ALJ will then issue a
notice advising the applicant or licensee
of the right to respond in support of a
license application or continuation of a
current OTI license. The licensee or
applicant will have 30 days to file a
response and supporting
documentation. BOE will then have 20
days to submit a reply memorandum
and supporting documents. These
proposed deadlines are identical to
those currently listed in § 515.17.
To provide the ALJ with discretion
and flexibility, the new subpart X will
permit the ALJ to require additional
information from the parties.
Additionally, the new subpart X allows
for parties to request oral hearing or oral
argument in either the applicant/
10 See 46 CFR 502.141–502.150. Given that the
record in OTI license application and revocation/
suspension is generally more limited, such a
substantial discovery process is not necessary.
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
licensee’s response or BOE’s reply to the
response. A request for oral hearing or
argument will be ruled on within 10
days of receipt of the request and will
only occur at the discretion of the ALJ.
While neither oral proceedings nor
additional information were expressly
permitted under § 515.17 and could
potentially extend the proceeding
beyond the current § 515.17 timeline,
we expect use of these procedures to be
the exception rather than the norm. In
addition, expressly permitting the use of
these procedures when necessary will
help ensure that determinations are
based on a complete and accurate record
and eliminate confusion regarding the
presiding officer’s authority.
To ensure a streamlined process, the
Commission will still require that the
presiding officer issue a decision within
40 days of the record being closed,
which will be either when the reply to
the response is submitted, or, if
additional information is required or
oral hearing or argument is conducted,
the completion of either event.
The exceptions process remains the
same as under the current § 515.17,
except that either party (BOE or the
applicant/licensee) has the ability to file
exceptions within 22 days after the
ALJ’s decision is issued.
The discretionary review process has
also been altered somewhat. Previously,
discretionary Commission review of
hearing officer decisions was governed
by the general provisions in 46 CFR
501.27, which allowed for review if one
less than a majority of Commissioners
(i.e., two Commissioners if there are four
or five Commissioners total) voted to
review the matter. The change makes
the discretionary review procedures
consistent with those for other decisions
under part 502 (i.e., ALJ and small
claims officer decisions), and a single
Commissioner may now request
Commission review within 30 days after
the ALJ’s decision is issued.
Through this rule, the Commission
also incorporates via cross-reference
nearly all of subparts G, governing time,
and H, governing service of documents,
of part 502. This brings license hearings
in line with other proceedings under
part 502 and any future improvements
to the Commission rules on service and
time will automatically apply to these
proceedings. The only section in these
subparts that will not apply to license
hearings under subpart X is § 502.115,
which concerns service in rulemaking
and petition proceedings.
To ensure consistency across part 502
proceedings, other sections of part 502
will also apply to license hearings under
subpart X, including: §§ 502.1–502.13
(General information); 502.21–502.23
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Jan 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
(Appearance, Authority for
representation, Notice of appearance;
substitution and withdrawal of a
representative); 502.42 (Bureau of
Enforcement); 502.43 (Substitution of
parties); and 502.223–502.230
(Decisions).
IV. Conclusion
Under the hearing procedures in
§ 515.17, the Commission has
encountered issues with regards to
expediency and clarity of process. To
resolve these issues and improve the
license hearing process, the Commission
is replacing the current hearing
procedures with a modified version of
the procedures in subpart T of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure. This new procedure will
provide additional structure while
ensuring a low-burden and efficient
process.
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not a ‘‘rule’’ as
defined by the Congressional Review
Act (CRA), codified at 5 U.S.C. 801 et
seq., and is not subject to the provisions
of the CRA. The CRA adopts the
Administrative Procedure Act’s
definition of a ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 551,
subject to certain exclusions. See 5
U.S.C. 804(3). In particular, the CRA
does not apply to rules of agency
organization, procedure, and practice
that do not substantially affect the rights
or obligations of non-agency parties. Id.
This final rule relates to agency
organization, procedures, and practices.
Specifically, the rule will amend the
Commission’s procedures for OTI
license hearings. These changes will
not, however, substantially affect the
rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. Applicants and licensees will
still have the opportunity to request a
hearing on proposed denials,
suspensions, or revocations, and will
still have the ability to seek Commission
review of initial decisions. The final
rule merely designates an ALJ as the
presiding officer, brings the OTI license
hearing procedures into alignment with
other Commission proceedings, and
adds additional procedural flexibility by
allowing the ALJ to request additional
information and documents from the
parties, as well as allowing parties to
request oral hearing or argument. The
final rule also creates additional
avenues for Commission review of
initial license decisions by: (1)
Permitting BOE to file exceptions; and
(2) allowing a single Commissioner to
request review of the ALJ’s decision.
While these changes will alter the way
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5581
OTI license hearings are conducted,
they do not substantially affect the
rights of applicants or licensees, and
therefore the final rule is not a ‘‘rule’’
under the CRA and is not subject to the
CRA’s requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(codified as amended at 5 U.S.C. 601–
612) provides that whenever an agency
is required to publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553), the agency must prepare
and make available a final regulatory
flexibility analysis (FRFA) describing
the impact of the rule on small entities.
5 U.S.C. 604. An agency is not required
to publish an FRFA, however, for the
following types of rules, which are
excluded from the APA’s notice-andcomment requirement: Interpretative
rules; general statements of policy; rules
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice; and rules for which the agency
for good cause finds that notice and
comment is impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to public interest. See 5
U.S.C. 553(b).
Although the Commission elected to
seek public comment, the rule is a rule
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice. Therefore, the APA did not
require publication of a notice of
proposed rulemaking in this instance,
and the Commission is not required to
prepare a FRFA.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Commission’s regulations
categorically exclude certain
rulemakings from any requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
an environmental impact statement
because they do not increase or decrease
air, water or noise pollution or the use
of fossil fuels, recyclables, or energy. 46
CFR 504.4. The proposed rule would
amend the Commission procedures for
the revocation, suspension, and denial
of OTI licenses. This rulemaking thus
falls within the categorical exclusion for
‘‘issuance, modification, denial and
revocation of ocean transportation
intermediary licenses.’’ 46 CFR
504.4(a)(1). Therefore, no environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement is required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3521) (PRA) requires an
agency to seek and receive approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) before collecting
information from the public. 44 U.S.C.
3507. The agency must submit
collections of information in proposed
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
5582
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
rules to OMB in conjunction with the
publication of the notice of proposed
rulemaking. 5 CFR 1320.11. This rule
does not contain any collections of
information as defined by 44 U.S.C.
3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c).
Subpart X—Hearing Procedure
Governing Denial, Suspension, or
Revocation of OTI License
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This rule meets the applicable
standards in E.O. 12988 titled, ‘‘Civil
Justice Reform,’’ to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Regulation Identifier Number
The Commission assigns a regulation
identifier number (RIN) to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified
Agenda of Federal Regulatory and
Deregulatory Actions (Unified Agenda).
The Regulatory Information Service
Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. You
may use the RIN contained in the
heading at the beginning of this
document to find this action in the
Unified Agenda, available at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
eAgendaMain.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 502
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Equal access to
justice, Investigations, Lawyers,
Maritime carriers, Penalties, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
46 CFR Part 515
For the reasons set forth above, the
Federal Maritime Commission amends
46 CFR parts 502 and 515 as follows:
PART 502—RULES OF PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for part 502
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504, 551, 552, 553,
556(c), 559, 561–569, 571–596; 18 U.S.C. 207;
28 U.S.C. 2112(a); 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C.
305, 40103–40104, 40304, 40306, 40501–
40503, 40701–40706, 41101–41109, 41301–
41309, 44101–44106; 5 CFR part 2635.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Subpart X [Redesignated as Subpart Y]
2. Redesignate subpart X, consisting of
§ 502.991, as subpart Y.
■
3. Add new subpart X, consisting of
§§ 502.701 through 502.709, to read as
follows:
■
15:45 Jan 30, 2020
Subpart X—Hearing Procedure
Governing Denial, Suspension, or
Revocation of OTI License
§ 502.701
Jkt 250001
Purpose and scope.
(a) The purpose of this subpart is to
provide the hearing procedures for the
denial, suspension, or revocation of an
ocean transportation intermediary (OTI)
license applied for or issued under part
515 of this chapter when the Bureau of
Certification and Licensing has issued a
notice of intent to deny under § 515.15
of this chapter or notice of revocation or
suspension under § 515.16 of this
chapter and the applicant or licensee
timely requests a hearing under those
sections.
(b) Denial, suspension, and revocation
proceedings under this subpart will be
adjudicated by the administrative law
judges of the Commission under the
procedures set forth in this subpart.
[Rule 701.]
§ 502.702
Freight, Freight forwarders, Maritime
carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Sec.
502.701 Purpose and scope.
502.702 Hearing requests.
502.703 Applicant or licensee response.
502.704 Reply.
502.705 Additional information.
502.706 Request for an oral hearing or
argument.
502.707 Intervention.
502.708 Decision.
502.709 Applicability of other rules to this
subpart.
Hearing requests.
(a) Upon receipt of a timely hearing
request under § 515.17 of this chapter,
the Secretary will transmit the request
to the Office of Administrative Law
Judges.
(b) The assigned administrative law
judge will notify the Bureau of
Certification and Licensing (BCL) and
the Bureau of Enforcement of the
hearing request, and the Bureau of
Enforcement must file with the
administrative law judge and serve on
the applicant or licensee a copy of the
notice given to the applicant or licensee
and a copy of BCL materials supporting
the notice. [Rule 702.]
§ 502.703
Applicant or licensee response.
Upon receiving the materials
described in § 502.702(b), the
administrative law judge will issue a
notice advising the applicant or licensee
of the right to respond in support of an
OTI application or continuation of a
current OTI license. The response must
be:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(a) Filed with the administrative law
judge within 30 days of the
administrative law judge’s notice; and
(b) Include any supporting
information or documents, such as
affidavits of fact, memoranda, or written
argument. [Rule 703.]
§ 502.704
Reply.
The Bureau of Enforcement may,
within twenty (20) days of service of the
response filed by the applicant or
licensee, file with the administrative
law judge and serve upon the applicant
or licensee a reply memorandum
accompanied by appropriate affidavits
and supporting documents.
§ 502.705
Additional information.
The administrative law judge may
require the submission of additional
affidavits, documents, or memoranda
from the Bureau of Enforcement or the
licensee or applicant. [Rule 705.]
§ 502.706 Request for an oral hearing or
argument.
(a) In the usual course of disposition
of matters filed under this subpart, no
oral hearing or argument will be held,
but the administrative law judge, in
their discretion, may order such hearing
or argument.
(b) A request for oral hearing or
argument may be incorporated in the
applicant or licensee’s response or in
the Bureau of Enforcement’s reply to the
response. Requests for oral hearing or
argument will not be entertained unless
they set forth in detail the reasons why
the filing of affidavits or other
documents will not permit the fair and
expeditious disposition of the matter,
and the precise nature of the facts
sought to be proved or issues to be
addressed at an oral hearing or
argument.
(c) The administrative law judge will
rule upon a request for oral hearing or
argument within ten (10) days of its
receipt.
(d) In the event oral hearing or
argument is ordered, it will be held in
accordance with the rules applicable to
other formal proceedings, as set forth in
subparts A through Q of this part. [Rule
706.]
§ 502.707
Intervention.
Intervention will ordinarily not be
permitted. [Rule 707.]
§ 502.708
Decision.
(a) Except as described in paragraph
(b) of this section, the administrative
law judge will issue a decision within
forty (40) days after the submission of
the Bureau of Enforcement’s reply.
(b) If oral hearing or argument is
conducted or additional information is
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 21 / Friday, January 31, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
required, then the decision will be
issued within forty (40) days after the
oral proceeding or the deadline for
submission of additional information,
whichever is later.
(c) The decision of the administrative
law judge will be final, unless, within
twenty-two (22) days from the date of
service of the decision, either party files
exceptions under § 502.227(a)(1) or the
Commission makes a determination to
review under § 502.227(a)(3) and (d).
[Rule 708.]
§ 502.709 Applicability of other rules to
this subpart.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
(a) Except as otherwise specifically
provided in this subpart or in paragraph
(b) of this section, the sections in
subparts A through Q, inclusive, of this
part do not apply to proceedings
covered by this subpart.
(b) The following sections in subparts
A through Q apply to proceedings
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:45 Jan 30, 2020
Jkt 250001
covered by this subpart: §§ 502.1
through 502.11, 502.13 (Filing
requirements, Document requirements,
and General rules); 502.21 through
502.23 (Appearance, Authority for
representation, Notice of appearance,
Substitution, and Withdrawal of
representative); 502.42 (Bureau of
Enforcement); 502.43 (Substitution of
parties); 502.101 through 502.105
(Computation of time); 502.114, 502.116
through 502.117 (Service of documents);
502.223 through 502.230 (Decisions).
[Rule 709.]
PART 515—LICENSING,
REGISTRATION, FINANCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
AND GENERAL DUTIES FOR OCEAN
TRANSPORTATION INTERMEDIARIES
4. The authority citation for part 515
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
5583
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46
U.S.C. 305, 40102, 40104, 40501–40503,
40901–40904, 41101–41109, 41301–41302,
41305–41307; Pub. L. 105–383, 112 Stat.
3411; 21 U.S.C. 862.
■
5. Revise § 515.17 to read as follows:
§ 515.17 Hearing procedures governing
denial, revocation, or suspension of OTI
license.
All hearing requests under §§ 515.15
and 515.16 shall be submitted to the
Commission’s Secretary. The hearing
will be adjudicated under the
procedures set forth in subpart X of part
502 of this chapter.
By the Commission.
Rachel Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–00907 Filed 1–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P
E:\FR\FM\31JAR1.SGM
31JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5579-5583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00907]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Parts 502 and 515
[Docket No. 19-04]
RIN 3072-AC75
Hearing Procedures Governing the Denial, Revocation, or
Suspension of an OTI License
AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) is modifying the
hearing procedures governing the denial, revocation, or suspension of
an ocean transportation intermediary (OTI) license. The revised hearing
procedures align more with other Commission hearing procedures, ensure
a more streamlined process, and fulfill the need for more detailed
procedural requirements.
[[Page 5580]]
DATES: This final rule is effective March 2, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel E. Dickon, Secretary; Phone:
(202) 523-5725; Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
Through this final rule, the Commission is modifying its processes
for the denial, suspension, and revocation of OTI licenses.\1\ The
revised hearing procedures are based on the procedure for formal small
Shipping Act claims under 46 CFR part 502, subpart T. The new hearing
procedure, overseen by an administrative law judge (ALJ), represents an
expedient, low-burden process that also fulfills the need for more
structure in the proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These hearing procedures also apply to suspensions and
terminations of foreign-based non-vessel-operating common carrier
(NVOCC) registrations. See 46 CFR 515.19(g)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was issued by the Commission
on September 3, 2019.\2\ The Commission received no comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ NPRM: Hearing Procedures Governing the Denial, Revocation,
or Suspension of an OTI License, 84 FR 45934 (Sept. 3, 2019), as
corrected by 84 FR 48578 (Sep. 16, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background
The Shipping Act requires anyone desiring to operate as an OTI to
obtain a license from the Commission.\3\ The Act provides that ``[t]he
Commission shall issue a license to a person that the Commission
determines to be qualified by experience and character to act as an
ocean transportation intermediary.'' \4\ The Commission has delegated
the authority to approve or disapprove applications for OTI licenses to
the Bureau of Certification and Licensing (BCL).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 46 U.S.C. 40901.
\4\ Id. at section 40901(a).
\5\ 46 CFR 501.26(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Current Procedure
Hearings on the revocation, denial, or suspension of an OTI license
are conducted under the procedures in 46 CFR 515.17. All hearing
requests are submitted to the Commission's Secretary. The Secretary
then designates a hearing officer. After being advised by the hearing
officer that a hearing request had been made, BCL sends the hearing
officer and applicant or licensee a copy of the notice of intent (which
had already been sent to the applicant or licensee) along with
materials supporting the notice under Sec. 515.15 or Sec. 515.16.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 46 CFR 515.17(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hearing officer then provides the licensee or applicant with a
written notice advising the party of its right to submit written
arguments, affidavits of fact, and documents. The licensee or applicant
then has 30 days to submit information and documents in support of a
license or in support of continuation of a license. BCL then submits
its response within 20 days of the licensee or applicant's submission.
These records and submissions constitute the entire record for the
hearing officer's decision. The hearing officer's decision must be
issued within 40 days of the record being closed.\7\ The applicant or
licensee, but not BCL, can seek review of the hearing officer's
decision by the Commission by filing exceptions in accordance with 46
CFR 502.227, and the Commission can determine to conduct a formal
evidentiary hearing under part 502.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 46 CFR 515.17(b).
\8\ 46 CFR 515.17(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Concerns With Current Procedure
Despite the Commission's goal of streamlining OTI proceedings with
the Sec. 515.17 procedures, hearings under Sec. 515.17 have taken
over 150 days to complete. A contributing factor to the length of time
in these cases is the delay in the selection of an appropriate hearing
officer, which took between 13 and 50 days. These delays resulted from
not having a designated office from which to select the hearing
officer.
In addition to the delays in selecting a hearing officer, because
Sec. 515.17 provides little detail about the hearing procedure other
than deadlines for submission of information, Commission staff have had
to resolve several procedural issues arising in hearing proceedings.
These experiences demonstrated the need for additional clarification of
the procedure and the authority of the hearing officer.
III. Final Rule
For the reasons stated in the NPRM and described above, the
Commission is adopting the proposed rule with virtually no changes.\9\
The new hearing procedures will be conducted by an ALJ, thereby
removing the delay in the appointment of a hearing officer. Using a
modified form of the subpart T procedures will ensure a more
streamlined procedure than a typical hearing under part 502, which
allows for 150 days of discovery,\10\ while giving the presiding
officer more flexibility in conducting the hearing than the current
Sec. 515.17 procedures. The new proceedings will be included in part
502 as subpart X (the existing subpart X will be redesignated) and
cross-referenced in Sec. 515.17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The NPRM inadvertently listed the wrong authorities for part
502. This has been corrected in the final rule. The final rule also
makes very minor wording changes to the new Sec. 502.706 governing
requests for oral hearing and argument.
\10\ See 46 CFR 502.141-502.150. Given that the record in OTI
license application and revocation/suspension is generally more
limited, such a substantial discovery process is not necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. New Procedure for License Hearings
As described in the NPRM, the Commission will not change the
process for requesting a hearing as stated in Sec. Sec. 515.15(c) and
515.16(a). If an applicant or licensee requests a hearing after
receiving a notice of intent to deny, suspend, or revoke their license,
they will continue to have 20 days to do so, and, if no hearing is
requested, the decision to deny, revoke, or suspend will become final.
If a hearing request is received, the Secretary will transmit the
request to the Office of Administrative Law Judges for assignment. The
hearing will then take place under the new subpart X of part 502.
Section 515.17 retains its first sentence, indicating that hearing
requests under Sec. Sec. 515.15 and 515.16 must be submitted to the
Commission's Secretary, and then cross-references subpart X.
The preliminary portions of the new subpart X mirror the previous
procedures in Sec. 515.17, save that an ALJ, rather than a hearing
officer, will preside over the proceeding. Once a timely request is
received, the Secretary will transmit the request to the Office of
Administrative Law Judges who would notify BCL and Bureau of
Enforcement (BOE) of the hearing request. BOE will provide the
applicant or licensee a copy of the notice previously given as well as
the BCL materials supporting the decision. The ALJ will then issue a
notice advising the applicant or licensee of the right to respond in
support of a license application or continuation of a current OTI
license. The licensee or applicant will have 30 days to file a response
and supporting documentation. BOE will then have 20 days to submit a
reply memorandum and supporting documents. These proposed deadlines are
identical to those currently listed in Sec. 515.17.
To provide the ALJ with discretion and flexibility, the new subpart
X will permit the ALJ to require additional information from the
parties. Additionally, the new subpart X allows for parties to request
oral hearing or oral argument in either the applicant/
[[Page 5581]]
licensee's response or BOE's reply to the response. A request for oral
hearing or argument will be ruled on within 10 days of receipt of the
request and will only occur at the discretion of the ALJ. While neither
oral proceedings nor additional information were expressly permitted
under Sec. 515.17 and could potentially extend the proceeding beyond
the current Sec. 515.17 timeline, we expect use of these procedures to
be the exception rather than the norm. In addition, expressly
permitting the use of these procedures when necessary will help ensure
that determinations are based on a complete and accurate record and
eliminate confusion regarding the presiding officer's authority.
To ensure a streamlined process, the Commission will still require
that the presiding officer issue a decision within 40 days of the
record being closed, which will be either when the reply to the
response is submitted, or, if additional information is required or
oral hearing or argument is conducted, the completion of either event.
The exceptions process remains the same as under the current Sec.
515.17, except that either party (BOE or the applicant/licensee) has
the ability to file exceptions within 22 days after the ALJ's decision
is issued.
The discretionary review process has also been altered somewhat.
Previously, discretionary Commission review of hearing officer
decisions was governed by the general provisions in 46 CFR 501.27,
which allowed for review if one less than a majority of Commissioners
(i.e., two Commissioners if there are four or five Commissioners total)
voted to review the matter. The change makes the discretionary review
procedures consistent with those for other decisions under part 502
(i.e., ALJ and small claims officer decisions), and a single
Commissioner may now request Commission review within 30 days after the
ALJ's decision is issued.
Through this rule, the Commission also incorporates via cross-
reference nearly all of subparts G, governing time, and H, governing
service of documents, of part 502. This brings license hearings in line
with other proceedings under part 502 and any future improvements to
the Commission rules on service and time will automatically apply to
these proceedings. The only section in these subparts that will not
apply to license hearings under subpart X is Sec. 502.115, which
concerns service in rulemaking and petition proceedings.
To ensure consistency across part 502 proceedings, other sections
of part 502 will also apply to license hearings under subpart X,
including: Sec. Sec. 502.1-502.13 (General information); 502.21-502.23
(Appearance, Authority for representation, Notice of appearance;
substitution and withdrawal of a representative); 502.42 (Bureau of
Enforcement); 502.43 (Substitution of parties); and 502.223-502.230
(Decisions).
IV. Conclusion
Under the hearing procedures in Sec. 515.17, the Commission has
encountered issues with regards to expediency and clarity of process.
To resolve these issues and improve the license hearing process, the
Commission is replacing the current hearing procedures with a modified
version of the procedures in subpart T of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure. This new procedure will provide additional
structure while ensuring a low-burden and efficient process.
V. Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Congressional Review Act
This final rule is not a ``rule'' as defined by the Congressional
Review Act (CRA), codified at 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and is not subject
to the provisions of the CRA. The CRA adopts the Administrative
Procedure Act's definition of a ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C. 551, subject to
certain exclusions. See 5 U.S.C. 804(3). In particular, the CRA does
not apply to rules of agency organization, procedure, and practice that
do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. Id. This final rule relates to agency organization,
procedures, and practices. Specifically, the rule will amend the
Commission's procedures for OTI license hearings. These changes will
not, however, substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-
agency parties. Applicants and licensees will still have the
opportunity to request a hearing on proposed denials, suspensions, or
revocations, and will still have the ability to seek Commission review
of initial decisions. The final rule merely designates an ALJ as the
presiding officer, brings the OTI license hearing procedures into
alignment with other Commission proceedings, and adds additional
procedural flexibility by allowing the ALJ to request additional
information and documents from the parties, as well as allowing parties
to request oral hearing or argument. The final rule also creates
additional avenues for Commission review of initial license decisions
by: (1) Permitting BOE to file exceptions; and (2) allowing a single
Commissioner to request review of the ALJ's decision. While these
changes will alter the way OTI license hearings are conducted, they do
not substantially affect the rights of applicants or licensees, and
therefore the final rule is not a ``rule'' under the CRA and is not
subject to the CRA's requirements.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C.
601-612) provides that whenever an agency is required to publish a
notice of proposed rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553), the agency must prepare and make available a
final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) describing the impact of
the rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 604. An agency is not required to
publish an FRFA, however, for the following types of rules, which are
excluded from the APA's notice-and-comment requirement: Interpretative
rules; general statements of policy; rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice; and rules for which the agency for good cause
finds that notice and comment is impracticable, unnecessary, or
contrary to public interest. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
Although the Commission elected to seek public comment, the rule is
a rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice. Therefore, the
APA did not require publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking in
this instance, and the Commission is not required to prepare a FRFA.
National Environmental Policy Act
The Commission's regulations categorically exclude certain
rulemakings from any requirement to prepare an environmental assessment
or an environmental impact statement because they do not increase or
decrease air, water or noise pollution or the use of fossil fuels,
recyclables, or energy. 46 CFR 504.4. The proposed rule would amend the
Commission procedures for the revocation, suspension, and denial of OTI
licenses. This rulemaking thus falls within the categorical exclusion
for ``issuance, modification, denial and revocation of ocean
transportation intermediary licenses.'' 46 CFR 504.4(a)(1). Therefore,
no environmental assessment or environmental impact statement is
required.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) (PRA)
requires an agency to seek and receive approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting information from the
public. 44 U.S.C. 3507. The agency must submit collections of
information in proposed
[[Page 5582]]
rules to OMB in conjunction with the publication of the notice of
proposed rulemaking. 5 CFR 1320.11. This rule does not contain any
collections of information as defined by 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c).
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets the applicable standards in E.O. 12988 titled,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity,
and reduce burden.
Regulation Identifier Number
The Commission assigns a regulation identifier number (RIN) to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory
and Deregulatory Actions (Unified Agenda). The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of
each year. You may use the RIN contained in the heading at the
beginning of this document to find this action in the Unified Agenda,
available at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 502
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Equal access to
justice, Investigations, Lawyers, Maritime carriers, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
46 CFR Part 515
Freight, Freight forwarders, Maritime carriers, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, the Federal Maritime Commission
amends 46 CFR parts 502 and 515 as follows:
PART 502--RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
0
1. The authority citation for part 502 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 504, 551, 552, 553, 556(c), 559, 561-569,
571-596; 18 U.S.C. 207; 28 U.S.C. 2112(a); 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C.
305, 40103-40104, 40304, 40306, 40501-40503, 40701-40706, 41101-
41109, 41301-41309, 44101-44106; 5 CFR part 2635.
Subpart X [Redesignated as Subpart Y]
0
2. Redesignate subpart X, consisting of Sec. 502.991, as subpart Y.
0
3. Add new subpart X, consisting of Sec. Sec. 502.701 through 502.709,
to read as follows:
Subpart X--Hearing Procedure Governing Denial, Suspension, or
Revocation of OTI License
Sec.
502.701 Purpose and scope.
502.702 Hearing requests.
502.703 Applicant or licensee response.
502.704 Reply.
502.705 Additional information.
502.706 Request for an oral hearing or argument.
502.707 Intervention.
502.708 Decision.
502.709 Applicability of other rules to this subpart.
Subpart X--Hearing Procedure Governing Denial, Suspension, or
Revocation of OTI License
Sec. 502.701 Purpose and scope.
(a) The purpose of this subpart is to provide the hearing
procedures for the denial, suspension, or revocation of an ocean
transportation intermediary (OTI) license applied for or issued under
part 515 of this chapter when the Bureau of Certification and Licensing
has issued a notice of intent to deny under Sec. 515.15 of this
chapter or notice of revocation or suspension under Sec. 515.16 of
this chapter and the applicant or licensee timely requests a hearing
under those sections.
(b) Denial, suspension, and revocation proceedings under this
subpart will be adjudicated by the administrative law judges of the
Commission under the procedures set forth in this subpart. [Rule 701.]
Sec. 502.702 Hearing requests.
(a) Upon receipt of a timely hearing request under Sec. 515.17 of
this chapter, the Secretary will transmit the request to the Office of
Administrative Law Judges.
(b) The assigned administrative law judge will notify the Bureau of
Certification and Licensing (BCL) and the Bureau of Enforcement of the
hearing request, and the Bureau of Enforcement must file with the
administrative law judge and serve on the applicant or licensee a copy
of the notice given to the applicant or licensee and a copy of BCL
materials supporting the notice. [Rule 702.]
Sec. 502.703 Applicant or licensee response.
Upon receiving the materials described in Sec. 502.702(b), the
administrative law judge will issue a notice advising the applicant or
licensee of the right to respond in support of an OTI application or
continuation of a current OTI license. The response must be:
(a) Filed with the administrative law judge within 30 days of the
administrative law judge's notice; and
(b) Include any supporting information or documents, such as
affidavits of fact, memoranda, or written argument. [Rule 703.]
Sec. 502.704 Reply.
The Bureau of Enforcement may, within twenty (20) days of service
of the response filed by the applicant or licensee, file with the
administrative law judge and serve upon the applicant or licensee a
reply memorandum accompanied by appropriate affidavits and supporting
documents.
Sec. 502.705 Additional information.
The administrative law judge may require the submission of
additional affidavits, documents, or memoranda from the Bureau of
Enforcement or the licensee or applicant. [Rule 705.]
Sec. 502.706 Request for an oral hearing or argument.
(a) In the usual course of disposition of matters filed under this
subpart, no oral hearing or argument will be held, but the
administrative law judge, in their discretion, may order such hearing
or argument.
(b) A request for oral hearing or argument may be incorporated in
the applicant or licensee's response or in the Bureau of Enforcement's
reply to the response. Requests for oral hearing or argument will not
be entertained unless they set forth in detail the reasons why the
filing of affidavits or other documents will not permit the fair and
expeditious disposition of the matter, and the precise nature of the
facts sought to be proved or issues to be addressed at an oral hearing
or argument.
(c) The administrative law judge will rule upon a request for oral
hearing or argument within ten (10) days of its receipt.
(d) In the event oral hearing or argument is ordered, it will be
held in accordance with the rules applicable to other formal
proceedings, as set forth in subparts A through Q of this part. [Rule
706.]
Sec. 502.707 Intervention.
Intervention will ordinarily not be permitted. [Rule 707.]
Sec. 502.708 Decision.
(a) Except as described in paragraph (b) of this section, the
administrative law judge will issue a decision within forty (40) days
after the submission of the Bureau of Enforcement's reply.
(b) If oral hearing or argument is conducted or additional
information is
[[Page 5583]]
required, then the decision will be issued within forty (40) days after
the oral proceeding or the deadline for submission of additional
information, whichever is later.
(c) The decision of the administrative law judge will be final,
unless, within twenty-two (22) days from the date of service of the
decision, either party files exceptions under Sec. 502.227(a)(1) or
the Commission makes a determination to review under Sec.
502.227(a)(3) and (d). [Rule 708.]
Sec. 502.709 Applicability of other rules to this subpart.
(a) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this subpart or in
paragraph (b) of this section, the sections in subparts A through Q,
inclusive, of this part do not apply to proceedings covered by this
subpart.
(b) The following sections in subparts A through Q apply to
proceedings covered by this subpart: Sec. Sec. 502.1 through 502.11,
502.13 (Filing requirements, Document requirements, and General rules);
502.21 through 502.23 (Appearance, Authority for representation, Notice
of appearance, Substitution, and Withdrawal of representative); 502.42
(Bureau of Enforcement); 502.43 (Substitution of parties); 502.101
through 502.105 (Computation of time); 502.114, 502.116 through 502.117
(Service of documents); 502.223 through 502.230 (Decisions). [Rule
709.]
PART 515--LICENSING, REGISTRATION, FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
REQUIREMENTS AND GENERAL DUTIES FOR OCEAN TRANSPORTATION
INTERMEDIARIES
0
4. The authority citation for part 515 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 553; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. 305, 40102,
40104, 40501-40503, 40901-40904, 41101-41109, 41301-41302, 41305-
41307; Pub. L. 105-383, 112 Stat. 3411; 21 U.S.C. 862.
0
5. Revise Sec. 515.17 to read as follows:
Sec. 515.17 Hearing procedures governing denial, revocation, or
suspension of OTI license.
All hearing requests under Sec. Sec. 515.15 and 515.16 shall be
submitted to the Commission's Secretary. The hearing will be
adjudicated under the procedures set forth in subpart X of part 502 of
this chapter.
By the Commission.
Rachel Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-00907 Filed 1-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731-AA-P
