Recent Postings of Broadly Applicable Alternative Test Methods, 5204-5206 [2020-01576]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
5204
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2020 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OECA–2013–0342; FRL–10004–
80–OMS]
Information Collection Request
Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP
for Lime Manufacturing (Renewal)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR),
NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40
CFR part 63, subpart AAAAA) (EPA ICR
Number 2072.08, OMB Control Number
2060–0544), to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is
currently approved through March 31,
2020. Public comments were previously
requested, via the Federal Register, on
May 6, 2019 during a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments.
A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may
neither conduct nor sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before February 28,
2020.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID Number EPA–
HQ–OECA–2013–0342, to: (1) EPA
online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to
docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via
email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Yellin, Monitoring, Assistance,
and Media Programs Division, Office of
Compliance, Mail Code 2227A,
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Jan 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460; telephone number: (202) 564–
2970; fax number: (202) 564–0050;
email address: yellin.patrick@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will
be collecting are available in the public
docket for this ICR. The docket can be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov,
or in person at the EPA Docket Center,
WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The telephone number for the Docket
Center is 202–566–1744. For additional
information about EPA’s public docket,
visit: https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Abstract: The National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) for Lime Manufacturing (40
CR Part 63, Subpart AAAAA) apply to
existing facilities and new facilities that
either emit or has the potential to emit
any single hazardous air pollutant
(HAP) at a rate of 9.07 megagrams (10
tons) or more per year or any
combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68
megagrams (25 tons) or more per year
from all emission sources at the plant
site. This subpart covers lime kilns,
their associated coolers, and processed
stone handling (PSH) operation systems
located at a lime manufacturing plant
that is a major source. New facilities
include those that commenced
construction, modification or
reconstruction after the date of proposal.
The EPA proposed revised standards to
the NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing on
September 16, 2019 (84 FR 48708),
however, the proposed amendments
have not been finalized; therefore, the
burden reflected in this ICR does not
consider burden from the proposed
amendments, but is based on the
existing standards. This information is
being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR part 63, subpart AAAAA.
In general, all NESHAP standards
require initial notifications,
performance tests, and periodic reports
by the owners/operators of the affected
facilities. They are also required to
maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or
malfunction in the operation of an
affected facility, or any period during
which the monitoring system is
inoperative. These notifications, reports,
and records are essential in determining
compliance, and are required of all
affected facilities subject to NESHAP.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: New
and existing lime manufacturing
facilities that are major sources of HAP.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (40 CFR part 63, subpart
AAAAA).
Estimated number of respondents: 37
(total).
Frequency of response: Initially,
occasionally, and semiannually.
Total estimated burden: 9,700 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $1,460,000 (per
year), which includes $335,000 in
annualized capital/startup and/or
operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a
decrease in the total estimated burden
as currently identified in the OMB
Inventory of Approved Burdens. This
decrease is not due to any program
changes. The change in the burden and
cost estimates occurred due to several
factors. First, as part of a recent
inventory of facilities subject to the
NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing by
OAQPS, including consultations with
industry representatives and industry
trade associations, EPA has concluded
that the number of sources subject to the
regulation has decreased. Second, the
recent inventory revealed an increase in
the number of sources using bag leak
detectors to comply with regulations,
leading to an increase in O&M costs.
The overall result is a decrease in
burden hours and costs.
Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2020–01541 Filed 1–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–1196; FRL–10004–28–
OAR]
Recent Postings of Broadly Applicable
Alternative Test Methods
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
This document announces the
broadly applicable alternative test
method approval decisions that the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
made under and in support of New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS)
and the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
between January 1, 2019, and December
31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: An
electronic copy of each alternative test
method approval document is available
at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadlyapplicable-approved-alternative-testSUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2020 / Notices
methods. For questions about this
document, contact Mrs. Lula H. Melton,
Air Quality Assessment Division, Office
of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(E143–02), Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
2910; fax number: (919) 541–0516;
email address: melton.lula@epa.gov. For
technical questions about individual
alternative test method decisions, refer
to the contact person identified in the
individual approval document(s).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this document apply to me?
This document will be of interest to
entities regulated under 40 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 60, 61,
and 63; state, local, and tribal agencies;
and the EPA Regional offices
responsible for implementation and
enforcement of regulations under 40
CFR parts 60, 61, and 63.
B. How can I get copies of this
information?
You may access copies of the broadly
applicable alternative test method
approval documents at https://
www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicableapproved-alternative-test-methods.
II. Background
This document identifies broadly
applicable alternative test method
approval decisions made by the EPA in
2019 under the New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS), 40 CFR
part 60 and National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) programs, 40 CFR parts 61
and 63; see Table 1. Source owners and
operators may voluntarily use these
broadly applicable alternative test
methods in lieu of otherwise specified
reference test methods. Use of these
broadly applicable alternative test
methods are not intended to and should
not change the applicable emission
standards.
The Administrator has the authority
to approve the use of alternative test
methods for compliance with
requirements under 40 CFR parts 60, 61,
and 63. This authority is found in 40
CFR 60.8(b)(3), 61.13(h)(1)(ii), and
63.7(e)(2)(ii). Additional and similar
authority can be found in 40 CFR
65.158(a)(2). The criteria for approval
and procedures for submission and
review of broadly applicable alternative
test methods are explained in a previous
Federal Register document published at
72 FR 4257 (January 30, 2007) and
located at https://www.epa.gov/emc/
broadly-applicable-approvedalternative-test-methods. As explained
in this document, we will announce
approvals for broadly applicable
alternative test methods at https://
www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicableapproved-alternative-test-methods and
publish an annual document that
summarizes approvals for broadly
applicable alternative test methods
during the preceding year.
As also explained in the January 30,
2007 document, our approval decisions
involve thorough technical reviews of
numerous source-specific requests for
alternatives and modifications to test
methods and procedures. Based on
these reviews, we have often found that
these modifications or alternatives
would be equally valid and appropriate
to apply to other sources within a
particular class, category, or
subcategory. Consequently, we have
concluded that where a method
modification or an alternative method is
clearly broadly applicable to a class,
category, or subcategory of sources, it is
both equitable and efficient to approve
its use for all appropriate sources and
situations at the same time.
Use of approved alternative test
methods are not mandatory but rather
permissive. Sources are not required to
employ such a method but may choose
to do so in appropriate circumstances.
As specified in 40 CFR 63.7(f)(5),
however, a source owner or operator
electing to use an alternative method for
40 CFR part 63 standards must continue
to use the alternative method until
otherwise authorized. Source owners or
operators should, therefore, review the
5205
specific broadly applicable alternative
method approval decision at https://
www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicableapproved-alternative-test-methods
before electing to employ any
alternative method.
III. Approved Alternative Test Methods
and Modifications to Test Methods
This document specifies three broadly
applicable alternative test methods that
the EPA approved between January 1,
2019, and December 31, 2019. The
alternative method decision letter/
memo number, the reference method
affected, sources allowed to use this
alternative, and the modification or
alternative method allowed are
summarized in Table 1 of this
document. A summary of approval
documents was previously made
available on our Technology Transfer
Network between January 1, 2019, and
December 31, 2019. For more detailed
information, please refer to the complete
copies of these approval documents
available at https://www.epa.gov/emc/
broadly-applicable-approvedalternative-test-methods.
As also explained in our January 30,
2007 document, we will revisit
approvals of alternative test methods in
response to written requests or
objections indicating that a particular
approved alternative test method either
should not be broadly applicable or that
its use should be limited in some way.
Any objection to a broadly applicable
alternative test method, as well as the
resolution of that objection, will be
announced at https://www.epa.gov/emc/
broadly-applicable-approvedalternative-test-methods and in a
subsequent Federal Register document.
If we decide to retract a broadly
applicable test method, we will likely
consider the need for an appropriate
transition period for users either to
request case-by-case approval or to
transition to an approved method.
Dated: January 6, 2020.
Richard A. Wayland,
Director, Air Quality Assessment Division.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
TABLE 1—APPROVED ALTERNATIVE TEST METHODS AND MODIFICATIONS TO TEST METHODS REFERENCED IN OR PUBLISHED UNDER APPENDICES IN 40 CFR PARTS 60, 61, AND 63 POSTED BETWEEN JANUARY 2019 AND DECEMBER
2019
Alternative method
decision letter/memo
number
As an alternative or modification to . . .
For . . .
You may . . .
ALT–133 ..................
Methods 6, 8, 15A, and 16A ................
Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60
federal rules that require sample
analysis using methods 6, 8, 15A, or
16A.
Use procedures specified in SW–846
Method 9056A and the conditions
specified in the Agency’s approval
letter dated August 5, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Jan 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
5206
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 19 / Wednesday, January 29, 2020 / Notices
TABLE 1—APPROVED ALTERNATIVE TEST METHODS AND MODIFICATIONS TO TEST METHODS REFERENCED IN OR PUBLISHED UNDER APPENDICES IN 40 CFR PARTS 60, 61, AND 63 POSTED BETWEEN JANUARY 2019 AND DECEMBER
2019—Continued
Alternative method
decision letter/memo
number
As an alternative or modification to . . .
For . . .
You may . . .
ALT–134 ..................
Method 28 WHH-Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating Efficiency of Wood-Fired Hydronic
Heating Appliances.
Sources subject to 40 CFR part 60,
subpart QQQQ-Standards of Performance for New Residential
Hydronic Heaters and Forced Air
Furnaces.
ALT–135 ..................
Method 23-Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P-Dioxins and
Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans from
Stationary Sources.
Sources subject to 40 CFR part 63,
subpart X-National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
from Secondary Lead Smelting.
Use alternative certification testing procedures in the Canadian Standards
Association (CSA) B415.1–10 test
method with the caveats stipulated
in the Agency’s approval letter dated
August 19, 2019.
Use toluene in lieu of methylene chloride for field recovery rinses for
Method 23 sampling trains with the
provisos specified in the Agency’s
approval letter dated September 25,
2019.
Source owners or operators should
review the specific broadly applicable
alternative method approval letter at
https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadlyapplicable-approved-alternative-testmethods before electing to employ it.
[FR Doc. 2020–01576 Filed 1–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–ORD–2016–0010; FRL 10001–90–
OMS]
Information Collection Request
Submittal to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request;
Institutional Dual Use Research of
Concern (iDURC) Policy Compliance
(Renewal)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted
an information collection request (ICR),
Institutional Dual Use Research of
Concern (iDURC) Policy Compliance
(EPA ICR Number 2530.03, OMB
Control Number 2080–0082) to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently
approved through January 31, 2020.
Public comments were previously
requested via the Federal Register on
May 9, 2019, during a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments.
A fuller description of the ICR is given
in this notice, including the ICR’s
estimated burden and cost to the public.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Jan 28, 2020
Jkt 250001
and a person is not required to respond
to a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before February 28,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
ORD–2016–0010, to (1) EPA online
using www.regulations.gov (EPA’s
preferred method), by email to owdocket@epa.gov or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via
email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Viktoriya Plotkin, National Homeland
Security Research Center, Office of
Research and Development, (8101R), 27
Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, Rhode
Island, 02882; telephone number: 401–
782–3178; fax number: 401–782–3030;
email address: plotkin.viktoriya@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents, which explain
in detail the information that EPA will
be collecting, are available in the public
docket for this ICR. The docket can be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov
or in person at the EPA Docket Center,
WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
The telephone number for the Docket
Center is 202–566–1744. For additional
information about EPA’s public docket,
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Abstract: To comply with the U.S.
Government Policy for Institutional
Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use
Research of Concern (DURC Policy),
EPA must ensure that the institutions
subject to DURC Policy appropriately
train their laboratory personnel and
maintain records of their training. This
training is specific to ‘‘dual use research
of concern,’’ and should include
information on how to properly identify
DURC, appropriate methods for
ensuring research that is determined to
be DURC, and that it is conducted and
communicated responsibly.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: Private
sector and federally-owned, contractoroperated labs.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (Per EPA Order 1000,19:
Policy and Procedures for Managing
Dual Use Research of Concern).
Estimated number of respondents: 40.
Frequency of response: Only once
and/or as necessary.
Total estimated burden: 20 hours (per
year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b).
Total estimated cost: $1,590 (per
year), includes $0 annualized capital or
operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in Estimates: There is
decrease of 52 burden hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared
with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This decrease is a result of
adjustments in estimates of time
required for recordkeeping duties.
Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2020–01539 Filed 1–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\29JAN1.SGM
29JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 19 (Wednesday, January 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5204-5206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01576]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1196; FRL-10004-28-OAR]
Recent Postings of Broadly Applicable Alternative Test Methods
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces the broadly applicable alternative
test method approval decisions that the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) made under and in support of New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: An electronic copy of each alternative
test method approval document is available at https://www.epa.gov/emc/
broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-
[[Page 5205]]
methods. For questions about this document, contact Mrs. Lula H.
Melton, Air Quality Assessment Division, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards (E143-02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-2910; fax number:
(919) 541-0516; email address: [email protected]. For technical
questions about individual alternative test method decisions, refer to
the contact person identified in the individual approval document(s).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this document apply to me?
This document will be of interest to entities regulated under 40
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 60, 61, and 63; state, local,
and tribal agencies; and the EPA Regional offices responsible for
implementation and enforcement of regulations under 40 CFR parts 60,
61, and 63.
B. How can I get copies of this information?
You may access copies of the broadly applicable alternative test
method approval documents at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-methods.
II. Background
This document identifies broadly applicable alternative test method
approval decisions made by the EPA in 2019 under the New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS), 40 CFR part 60 and National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) programs, 40 CFR parts
61 and 63; see Table 1. Source owners and operators may voluntarily use
these broadly applicable alternative test methods in lieu of otherwise
specified reference test methods. Use of these broadly applicable
alternative test methods are not intended to and should not change the
applicable emission standards.
The Administrator has the authority to approve the use of
alternative test methods for compliance with requirements under 40 CFR
parts 60, 61, and 63. This authority is found in 40 CFR 60.8(b)(3),
61.13(h)(1)(ii), and 63.7(e)(2)(ii). Additional and similar authority
can be found in 40 CFR 65.158(a)(2). The criteria for approval and
procedures for submission and review of broadly applicable alternative
test methods are explained in a previous Federal Register document
published at 72 FR 4257 (January 30, 2007) and located at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-methods.
As explained in this document, we will announce approvals for broadly
applicable alternative test methods at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-methods and publish an annual
document that summarizes approvals for broadly applicable alternative
test methods during the preceding year.
As also explained in the January 30, 2007 document, our approval
decisions involve thorough technical reviews of numerous source-
specific requests for alternatives and modifications to test methods
and procedures. Based on these reviews, we have often found that these
modifications or alternatives would be equally valid and appropriate to
apply to other sources within a particular class, category, or
subcategory. Consequently, we have concluded that where a method
modification or an alternative method is clearly broadly applicable to
a class, category, or subcategory of sources, it is both equitable and
efficient to approve its use for all appropriate sources and situations
at the same time.
Use of approved alternative test methods are not mandatory but
rather permissive. Sources are not required to employ such a method but
may choose to do so in appropriate circumstances. As specified in 40
CFR 63.7(f)(5), however, a source owner or operator electing to use an
alternative method for 40 CFR part 63 standards must continue to use
the alternative method until otherwise authorized. Source owners or
operators should, therefore, review the specific broadly applicable
alternative method approval decision at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-methods before electing to
employ any alternative method.
III. Approved Alternative Test Methods and Modifications to Test
Methods
This document specifies three broadly applicable alternative test
methods that the EPA approved between January 1, 2019, and December 31,
2019. The alternative method decision letter/memo number, the reference
method affected, sources allowed to use this alternative, and the
modification or alternative method allowed are summarized in Table 1 of
this document. A summary of approval documents was previously made
available on our Technology Transfer Network between January 1, 2019,
and December 31, 2019. For more detailed information, please refer to
the complete copies of these approval documents available at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-methods.
As also explained in our January 30, 2007 document, we will revisit
approvals of alternative test methods in response to written requests
or objections indicating that a particular approved alternative test
method either should not be broadly applicable or that its use should
be limited in some way. Any objection to a broadly applicable
alternative test method, as well as the resolution of that objection,
will be announced at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-methods and in a subsequent Federal Register
document. If we decide to retract a broadly applicable test method, we
will likely consider the need for an appropriate transition period for
users either to request case-by-case approval or to transition to an
approved method.
Dated: January 6, 2020.
Richard A. Wayland,
Director, Air Quality Assessment Division.
Table 1--Approved Alternative Test Methods and Modifications to Test Methods Referenced in or Published Under
Appendices in 40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63 Posted Between January 2019 and December 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative method decision As an alternative or
letter/memo number modification to . . . For . . . You may . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALT-133....................... Methods 6, 8, 15A, and 16A Sources subject to 40 CFR Use procedures specified
part 60 federal rules in SW-846 Method 9056A
that require sample and the conditions
analysis using methods specified in the
6, 8, 15A, or 16A. Agency's approval letter
dated August 5, 2019.
[[Page 5206]]
ALT-134....................... Method 28 WHH-Measurement Sources subject to 40 CFR Use alternative
of Particulate Emissions part 60, subpart QQQQ- certification testing
and Heating Efficiency of Standards of Performance procedures in the
Wood-Fired Hydronic for New Residential Canadian Standards
Heating Appliances. Hydronic Heaters and Association (CSA) B415.1-
Forced Air Furnaces. 10 test method with the
caveats stipulated in
the Agency's approval
letter dated August 19,
2019.
ALT-135....................... Method 23-Determination of Sources subject to 40 CFR Use toluene in lieu of
Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P- part 63, subpart X- methylene chloride for
Dioxins and National Emission field recovery rinses
Polychlorinated Standards for Hazardous for Method 23 sampling
Dibenzofurans from Air Pollutants from trains with the provisos
Stationary Sources. Secondary Lead Smelting. specified in the
Agency's approval letter
dated September 25,
2019.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source owners or operators should review the specific broadly
applicable alternative method approval letter at https://www.epa.gov/emc/broadly-applicable-approved-alternative-test-methods before
electing to employ it.
[FR Doc. 2020-01576 Filed 1-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
