Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Washington; Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Regulation I, 4921-4928 [2020-01465]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage Grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 2071; 46 U.S.C.
70034; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 110.197 paragraph (b)(2) to
read as follows:
■
§ 110.197 Galveston Harbor, Bolivar Roads
Channel, Texas.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Except when stress of weather
makes sailing impractical or hazardous,
vessels shall not anchor in anchorage
areas (A), (B), or (C) for more than 48
hours unless expressly authorized by
the Captain of the Port HoustonGalveston. Permission to anchor for
longer periods may be obtained through
Coast Guard Vessel Traffic Service
Houston/Galveston on VHF–FM
channels 12 (156.60 MHz) or 13 (156.65
MHz).
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 3, 2020.
John P. Nadeau,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2020–01347 Filed 1–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2019–0710; FRL–10004–
71–Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Washington;
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency,
Regulation I
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Washington State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that were
submitted by the Washington
Department of Ecology (Ecology) in
coordination with the Puget Sound
Clean Air Agency (PSCAA). This
proposed revision would update certain
PSCAA regulations currently in the SIP,
remove obsolete regulations, and
approve a subset of updated Ecology
regulations to apply in PSCAA’s
jurisdiction.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before February 27, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2019–0710 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue—Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101,
at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@epa.gov.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4921
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA. This
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is
arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background for Proposed Action
II. Changes to PSCAA Regulation I
A. WSR 04–08–017—Incorporation by
Reference of Chapter 173–400 WAC
B. WSR 01–16–034—‘‘Trivial’’ Emissions
Source Categories
C. WSR 12–01–067—Federally Enforceable
Regulatory Orders
III. Application of WAC 173–400–020
IV. The EPA’s Proposed Action
A. Regulations To Approve and
Incorporate by Reference Into the SIP
B. Approved But Not Incorporated by
Reference Regulations
C. Regulations To Remove From the SIP
D. Scope of Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background for Proposed Action
On January 27, 2014, Ecology
submitted revisions to update the
general air quality regulations contained
in Chapter 173–400 Washington
Administrative Code (WAC), which the
EPA approved in three phases on
October 3, 2014 (79 FR 59653),
November 7, 2014 (79 FR 66291), and
April 29, 2015 (80 FR 23721).1 Under
the revised applicability provisions of
WAC 173–400–020 approved into the
SIP on October 3, 2014, the regulations
contained in Chapter 173–400 WAC
apply statewide, ‘‘. . . except for
specific subsections where a local
authority has adopted and implemented
corresponding local rules that apply
only to sources subject to local
jurisdiction as provided under Revised
Code of Washington (RCW) 70.94.141
and 70.94.331.’’ 2 Therefore, the EPA’s
approval of Ecology’s January 2014
submittal applies only to geographic
areas and source categories under
Ecology’s direct jurisdiction. We stated
that we would address the revised
Chapter 173–400 WAC regulations as
they apply to local clean air agency
jurisdictions on a case-by-case basis in
separate, future actions. On December
20, 2019, the Director of Ecology, as the
Governor’s designee for SIP revisions,
submitted a request to update the air
1 In subsequent actions on September 29, 2016
(81 FR 66823) and October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69385)
we made minor corrections to our previous
approval of Chapter 173–400 WAC and approved
revised WAC provisions that incorporated by
reference the most recent changes to the federal
regulations.
2 For a more detailed discussion see page 39352
of the EPA’s proposed approval of WAC 173–400–
020 (79 FR 39351, July 10, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4922
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
quality regulations in the SIP as they
apply to PSCAA’s jurisdiction in 40 CFR
52.2470(c), Table 7—Additional
Regulations Approved for the Puget
Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA)
Jurisdiction. PSCAA’s jurisdiction
consists of King, Kitsap, Pierce, and
Snohomish counties, excluding certain
facilities discussed in section IV.D.
Scope of Proposed Action. PSCAA’s
jurisdiction also excludes Indian
reservation land or any other area where
the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction (except non-trust land
within the exterior boundaries of the
Puyallup Indian Reservation, as
described in section IV.D. Scope of
Proposed Action).
Appendix A of the SIP revision shows
how the submitted regulatory updates
would apply to PSCAA’s jurisdiction.
These revisions can be summarized in
three general categories, which are
discussed in more detail in sections II
and III. The first category consists of
updates to the PSCAA Regulation I
provisions currently in the SIP. These
updated provisions apply in lieu of, or
serve as a supplement to, the statewide
Chapter 173–400 WAC provisions, as
shown in Table 1. The second category
consists of those parts of Chapter 173–
400 WAC incorporated by reference in
Regulation I. The EPA’s proposed
approval of the Chapter 173–400 WAC
provisions incorporated by reference in
Regulation I would be subject to the
same exceptions that apply to Ecology’s
direct jurisdiction, as shown in Table 2.
For example, as part of the January 2014
submittal of Chapter 173–400 WAC,
Ecology did not submit for approval
those provisions related to the
regulation of toxic air pollutants,
because such provisions are outside the
scope of SIPs under Clean Air Act
(CAA) section 110. The last category
consists of certain parts of Chapter 173–
400 WAC which do not have a direct
corollary under PSCAA Regulation I,
nor are they incorporated by reference
in Regulation I. In these cases, Ecology
and PSCAA requested that the EPA
revise the SIP to include the most
recently approved updates to Chapter
173–400 WAC to apply in PSCAA’s
jurisdiction, as shown in Table 3.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Changes to PSCAA Regulation I
The EPA last approved updates to
PSCAA Regulation I on September 17,
2013 (78 FR 57073); however, many of
the SIP-approved provisions relating to
pre-construction permitting of new and
modified stationary sources (called the
new source review or NSR permitting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
program) date back to the 1990s.3
PSCAA’s updates to Regulation I are
documented in the Washington State
Register (WSR) entries included in the
docket for this action. Each WSR gives
a redline/strikeout of changes to the
regulations, with a brief summary
describing the purpose of the changes.
Additional information can also be
found in the proposed WSR actions.4
The majority of changes over the years
were routine in nature, such as revising
the regulations to account for inflation,
incorporating revised federal
regulations, or generally revising the
regulatory language for clarity. The
EPA’s complete line by line review of
changes to the PSCAA regulations is
included in the docket for this action,
and will not be described in detail
here.5 The three most significant
changes to PSCAA Regulation I are
discussed below.
A. WSR 04–08–017—Incorporation by
Reference of Chapter 173–400 WAC
On March 25, 2004 (WSR 04–08–017),
PSCAA made a major overhaul of
Regulation I in order to rely on the
statewide NSR permitting program
requirements contained in Chapter 173–
400 WAC promulgated by Ecology.
PSCAA’s stated purpose was, ‘‘To create
a more consistent notice of construction
process throughout the state of
Washington and to facilitate the United
States Environmental Protection
Agency’s approval of the state
implementation plan.’’ PSCAA created a
new section 6.01 ‘‘Components of a New
Source Review Program’’ which
generally incorporates by reference the
NSR permitting provisions contained in
Chapter 173–400 WAC, as shown in
Table 2. PSCAA also revised or repealed
sections of Regulation I that were
duplicative of the WAC and therefore
obsolete.6 This included deleting most
of the NSR-related definitions in
Regulation I, section 1.07 in order to
rely on the definitions incorporated by
reference in WAC 173–400–030. PSCAA
also repealed sections 6.06 ‘‘Public
Notice,’’ 6.07 ‘‘Order of Approval—
3 See 59 FR 44324 (August 29, 1994), 60 FR 33734
(June 29, 1995), 62 FR 42216 (August 6, 1997), and
63 FR 19658 (April 21, 1998).
4 https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/law/wsr/agency/
PugetSoundCleanAirAgency.htm.
5 See ‘‘Puget Sound comparison_IBR_old vs
current.pdf’’ and ‘‘Puget Sound comparison_not
IBR_old vs. current.pdf’’ included in the docket.
6 WAC 173–400–110(1)(c)(ii), which PSCAA has
not adopted, makes clear that the term ‘‘new
source’’ includes a modification to an existing
source. However, PSCAA has adopted Ecology’s
definition of ‘‘new source’’ in WAC 173–400–
030(56). WAC 173–400–030(56) specifically defines
a ‘‘new source’’ as including ‘‘modifications.’’ Thus,
there is no substantive difference between PSCAA’s
and Ecology’s NSR rules in this respect.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Order to Prevent Construction,’’ and
6.08 ‘‘Emission Reduction Credit
Banking’’ to rely on the corollaries in
the WAC, including WAC 173–400–171
‘‘Public notice and opportunity for
public comment,’’ WAC 173–400–111
‘‘Processing notice of construction
applications for sources, stationary
sources and portable sources,’’ WAC
173–400–131 ‘‘Issuance of emission
reduction credits,’’ WAC 173–400–136
‘‘Use of emission reduction credits
(ERC),’’ and WAC 173–400–840
‘‘Emission offset requirements.’’ Lastly,
PSCAA made minor updates to the cross
references in Regulation I, sections 3.04,
6.03, 6.09, 9.03, 9.04, 9.08, and 12.03 to
reflect the revised regulatory structure.
WAC 173–400–700 through 173–400–
750 implement the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) new
source review permitting program for
major stationary sources in attainment
and unclassifiable areas. Regulation I,
section 6.01 incorporates by reference
WAC 173–400–700 through 173–400–
750, but clearly states that only Ecology
and EFSEC have authority to issue
permits under WAC 173–400–700
through 173–400–750 within PSCAA’s
geographic area. PSCAA has advised
EPA that it incorporates by reference
WAC 173–400–700 through 173–400–
750 for purposes such as working on
permit coordination with Ecology,
enforcing existing PSD permit
conditions not yet incorporated into
Title V permits, and determining
violations for inspected facilities that
failed to obtain the necessary PSD
permits. Therefore, PSCAA is not
requesting, and the EPA is not
proposing to approve, the authority to
issue PSD permits under WAC 173–
400–700 through 173–400–750 for
PSCAA’s direct permitting jurisdiction
(Table 7). The EPA will retain our
current approval of WAC 173–400–700
through 173–400–750 in the SIP under
Ecology and EFSEC direct permitting
jurisdiction (see 40 CFR 52.2470(c),
Tables 2 and 3), which will continue to
apply within PSCAA’s geographic area.
PSCAA also incorporates by reference
WAC 173–400–800 through 173–400–
860, which implement the new source
review permitting program for major
stationary sources in nonattainment
areas (major nonattainment NSR). The
EPA approved WAC 173–400–800
through 173–400–860 for Ecology’s
direct permitting jurisdiction on
November 7, 2014 (79 FR 59653), with
minor revisions to reflect updated
federal citations on October 6, 2016 (81
FR 69385). In connection with our
November 7, 2014 approval, we
reviewed WAC 173–400–800 through
173–400–860 pursuant to the federal
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
regulatory requirements in existence at
that time and discussed the fact that the
EPA’s 2008 PM2.5 New Source Review
Rule (73 FR 28321, May 16, 2008), had
been remanded to the EPA by the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit. See 79 FR 43345,
43347 (July 25, 2014) (proposed action);
79 FR 59653 (final action). EPA’s 2008
PM2.5 New Source Review Rule has
since been replaced by a revised
implementation rule published August
24, 2016, which imposed additional
NSR requirements for PM2.5
nonattainment areas (81 FR 58010).
Because there are currently no
nonattainment areas within PSCAA’s
jurisdiction or Washington State for any
criteria pollutant, including PM2.5, the
EPA did not review PSCAA’s
incorporation by reference of WAC 173–
400–800 through 173–400–860 for
consistency with the newly revised
PM2.5 implementation rule; nor does
Ecology or PSCAA have an obligation to
submit rule revisions to address the
2016 PM2.5 implementation rule at this
time. However, we note that the federal
major nonattainment NSR requirements
remain unchanged for all other criteria
pollutants since our review and
approval of WAC 173–400–800 through
173–400–860. We are therefore
proposing to approve of PSCAA’s
incorporation by reference of WAC 173–
400–800 through 173–400–860 as
meeting the current major
nonattainment NSR requirements for all
criteria pollutants except PM2.5.
B. WSR 01–16–034—‘‘Trivial’’
Emissions Source Categories
Effective June 6, 1996, the
Washington Legislature amended the
Washington Clean Air Act (Revised
Code of Washington 70.94), requiring
Ecology to establish NSR permitting
exemptions based on category, size, or
emissions thresholds representing ‘‘. . .
trivial levels of emissions that do not
pose a threat to human health or the
environment.’’ Ecology implemented
this statutory change by establishing
emission unit and activity exemptions
under WAC 173–400–110(4), and
exemptions based on emissions
thresholds under WAC 173–400–110(5).
The EPA approved these changes on
April 29, 2015 (80 FR 23721).7
Unlike Ecology, PSCAA already had
‘‘trivial’’ emissions source category
exemptions for minor NSR permitting
approved as part of the SIP under
Regulation I, section 6.03 (62 FR 42216,
August 6, 1997). Therefore, PSCAA
7 For a more detailed discussion please see page
39354 of our July 10, 2014 proposed rulemaking (79
FR 39351).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
opted to retain its existing minor NSR
source category exemptions rather than
incorporate by reference WAC 173–400–
110(4) and (5). While there have been
numerous updates to PSCAA’s source
category exemptions list since the EPA’s
last approval, the most significant
revision occurred on July 12, 2001 (WSR
01–16–034). After a review of
approximately 485 emission units
permitted during calendar year 2000,
PSCAA revised the list of source
category exemptions to better focus on
the most environmentally relevant
source categories. As described in the
supporting documents for PSCAA’s
rulemaking at that time, approximately
one third of the units permitted in 2000
were gas stations, dry cleaners, or
concrete batch plants which are already
subject to Best Available Control
Technology (BACT) requirements in
other regulations approved into the SIP,
such as Regulation II, section 2.07
‘‘Gasoline Stations,’’ which significantly
reduce potential emissions from such
source categories to levels expected to
be inconsequential to attainment and
maintenance of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Other
minor NSR source category exemptions
were derived from exemptions approved
into the SIP for the South Coast Air
Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) and Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (BAAQMD).
‘‘Engineering Notes for Exemption List
Development,’’ included in the docket
for this action, shows the process used
by PSCAA in 2001 to update the set of
minor NSR source category exemptions.
Following 2001, PSCAA continued to
update the set of minor NSR source
category exemptions based on its
evaluation and experience permitting
certain source categories, including the
2012 establishment of stand-alone
performance standards for rock crushing
in section 9.18 that reduce potential
emissions to levels expected to be
inconsequential for attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS.8 For more
detail on the EPA’s review of PSCAA’s
revised minor NSR source category
exemption list, please see ‘‘Puget Sound
comparison IBR old vs current’’
included in the docket for this action.
Based on our review, the EPA is
proposing to approve PSCAA’s updated
minor NSR source category exemption
list based on our determination that the
impact of emissions from such sources
is inconsequential to attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS. We are also
proposing to approve PSCAA’s request
to apply Regulation I, section 6.03 to act
8 See ‘‘January 19 2018 e-Hunt SIP Support w
attachments’’ included in the docket.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4923
in lieu of those parts of WAC 173–400–
110 for determining NSR applicability
for PSCAA’s permitting jurisdiction.
We note that our prior approval of
section 6.03 included a broad director’s
discretion provision that allowed a
minor NSR exemption for, ‘‘Any source
that has been determined through
review by the Control Officer not to
warrant a ‘Notice of Construction and
Application for Approval’, due to the
minimal amount and nature of air
contaminants produced and potential to
contribute to air pollution, with special
reference to effects on health, economic
and social factors, and physical effects
on property.’’ See 62 FR 42216, August
6, 1997. This provision, formerly in
subsection (b)(17), is now in subsection
(b)(10). It is the EPA’s longstanding
position that these types of broad
director discretion provisions are not
appropriate for approval into the SIP.
See 69 FR 17368, 17370 (April 2, 2004);
see also 80 FR 33840, 33917–33918
(June 12, 2015). PSCAA and Ecology are
not seeking approval of section
6.03(b)(10) and we are proposing to
correct this error from our August 1997
action. Section 110(k)(6) of the CAA
authorizes EPA, upon a determination
that EPA’s action approving,
disapproving or promulgating any SIP
or plan revision (or any part thereof)
was in error, to revise such action as
appropriate in the same manner as the
approval, disapproval or promulgation.
In making such a correction, EPA must
provide such determination and the
basis therefore to the State and the
public. EPA is by this proposal notifying
the PSCAA, Ecology and the public that
EPA is removing Section 6.03(b)(17)
from the SIP and from incorporation by
reference into federal law.
Lastly, we note that Article 6 in
particular, but also other sections of
PSCAA’s regulations, reference the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR). For all
references to the CFR in the PSCAA
rules proposed for approval, not
otherwise specified with an effective
date, our proposed approval refers to the
CFR with an effective date of July 1,
2019. This date corresponds to PSCAA’s
last incorporation by reference of the
CFR in Regulation 1, section 3.25.9
9 As part of PSCAA’s adoption by reference of the
WAC in section 6.01, PSCAA explicitly did not
adopt by reference WAC 173–400–025 Adoption of
Federal Rules in order to avoid conflicting with
section 3.25. Therefore, for this proposed approval
references to ‘‘in effect on the date in WAC 173–
400–025’’ as part of the PSCAA’s adoption by
reference of the WAC shall be July 1, 2019,
consistent with section 3.25.
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4924
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
C. WSR 12–01–067—Federally
Enforceable Regulatory Orders
On December 15, 2015 (WSR 12–01–
067), PSCAA added section 3.03(f) to
Regulation I, which states, ‘‘When an
applicant requests a federally
enforceable regulatory order to limit the
potential to emit any air contaminant or
contaminants pursuant to WAC 173–
400–091, or requests a modification to
such an order, the Control Officer or a
duly authorized representative may
issue such order consistent with the
requirements of WAC 173–400–091 and
173–400–171 and Section 3.03(e) above.
Regulatory orders issued pursuant to
this section are effective the day the
Control Officer or representative
approves the order and may be appealed
to the Pollution Control Hearings Board
pursuant to Section 3.17 of Regulation
I and RCW 43.21B.310.’’ We are
proposing to approve this provision into
the SIP because it implements
authorities already approved or
proposed for approval in the SIP and is
consistent with CAA requirements.
III. Application of WAC 173–400–020
As previously discussed, a local clean
air agency generally has the authority
under WAC 173–400–020 to establish
local regulations to supplement, or act
in lieu of, the statewide Chapter 173–
400 WAC provisions for sources within
its jurisdiction. This approach is
consistent with our previous SIP actions
for Benton Clean Air Agency (80 FR
71695, November 17, 2015) and
Southwest Clean Air Agency (82 FR
17136, April 10, 2017). Specifically, as
part of the December 20, 2019 submittal,
PSCAA and Ecology requested that the
EPA approve: Regulation I, section 1.01
‘‘Policy’’ to replace WAC 173–400–010;
section 3.04 ‘‘Reasonably Available
Control Technology’’ to replace the
corresponding provision in WAC 173–
400–040(1)(c); section 3.25 ‘‘Federal
Regulations Reference Date’’ to replace
WAC 173–400–025; section 9.03
‘‘Emission of Air Contaminant: Visual
Standard’’ to replace WAC 173–400–
040(2); section 9.07 ‘‘Sulfur Dioxide
Emission Standard’’ to replace WAC
173–400–040(7); section 9.09
‘‘Particulate Matter Emission
Standards’’ to replace WAC 173–400–
050 and 173–400–060; section 9.11(a)
‘‘Emission of Air Contaminant:
Detriment to Person or Property’’ to
replace WAC 173–400–040(6); section
9.13 ‘‘Emission of Air Contaminant:
Concealment and Masking Restricted’’
to replace WAC 173–400–040(8); section
9.15 ‘‘Fugitive Dust Control Measures’’
to replace WAC 173–400–040(9)(a); and
section 12.03 ‘‘Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems’’ to replace WAC
173–400–105(7).
We have completed a side by side
comparison of the respective provisions
and are proposing to approve these
Regulation I provisions to apply in lieu
of the corresponding Chapter 173–400
WAC provisions in the SIP.10 In
addition, as discussed above regarding
minor NSR source category exemptions,
we are proposing to approve section
6.03 ‘‘Notice of Construction’’ to apply
in lieu of those parts of WAC 173–400–
110 ‘‘New source review (NSR) for
sources and portable sources’’ for
determining NSR applicability and
Notice of Construction application
procedures.11
Lastly, for those parts of Chapter 173–
400 WAC not already incorporated by
reference in section 6.01, or replaced by
the corresponding Regulation I
provisions discussed above, PSCAA and
Ecology requested that the EPA approve
into the SIP for PSCAA’s jurisdiction
the most recently updated versions of
Chapter 173–400 WAC, with certain
exceptions as shown in Table 3. For
example, WAC 173–400–116
‘‘Increment Protection’’ is part of the
PSD program for permits issued directly
by Ecology or EFSEC and, as discussed
above, PSCAA does not issue such
permits. PSCAA also did not request
approval for WAC 173–400–036
‘‘Relocation of Portable Sources’’
because this is an optional State
provision that a local clean air agency
may adopt if it so chooses, but is not
required to adopt.
IV. The EPA’s Proposed Action
A. Regulations To Approve and
Incorporate by Reference Into the SIP
The EPA is proposing to approve and
incorporate by reference into the
Washington SIP at 40 CFR 52.2470(c)—
Table 7—Additional Regulations
Approved for the Puget Sound Clean Air
Agency (PSCAA) Jurisdiction, the
PSCAA and Ecology regulations listed
in Tables 1, 2, and 3 below for sources
within PSCAA’s jurisdiction. We note
that some of the Regulation I provisions
listed below remain unchanged since
our previous approval. We are
proposing to approve them as shown in
Table 1, however, to act in lieu of the
corresponding Chapter 173–400 WAC
provisions.
TABLE 1—PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY (PSCAA) REGULATIONS FOR PROPOSED APPROVAL AND INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE
State/local
citation
State/local
effective date
Title/subject
Explanation
Regulation I
1.01 ...................
1.07 ...................
Policy ..............................................
Definitions .......................................
11/01/99
12/01/18
3.03(f) ...............
3.04 ...................
General Regulatory Orders ............
Reasonably
Available
Control
Technology.
Federal Regulation Reference Date
Applicability of Registration Program.
Registration Requirements .............
Components of New Source Review Program.
02/01/12
07/01/12
Except 3.04(e). Replaces WAC 173–400–040(1)(c).
11/01/19
11/01/16
Replaces WAC 173–400–025.
Except 5.03(a)(8)(Q) and 5.03(b)(5).
02/01/17
05/01/13
Except 5.05(b)(1) and (2).
Except the parenthetical in 6.01(b) which states ‘‘as delegated by
agreement with the US Environmental Protection Agency, Region
10.’’ See table below for revised Chapter 173–400 WAC provisions
incorporated by reference.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
3.25 ...................
5.03 ...................
5.05 ...................
6.01 ...................
10 See ‘‘PSCAA v WAC cross walk’’ included in
the docket for this action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Replaces WAC 173–400–010.
Except the definition ‘‘toxic air pollutant (TAP) or toxic air contaminant.’’
11 PSCAA continues to incorporate WAC 173–
400–110(1)(c)(i) and WAC 173–400–110(1)(d) by
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reference. All other provisions are replaced by
PSCAA Regulation I, section 6.03 provisions.
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
4925
TABLE 1—PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY (PSCAA) REGULATIONS FOR PROPOSED APPROVAL AND INCORPORATION
BY REFERENCE—Continued
State/local
citation
Title/subject
6.03 ...................
Notice of Construction ....................
11/01/15
6.09 ...................
6.10 ...................
7.09 ...................
Notice of Completion ......................
Work Done Without an Approval ...
General Reporting Requirements
for Operating Permits.
Emission of Air Contaminant: Visual Standard.
Opacity Standards for Equipment
with Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems.
Sulfur Dioxide Emission Standard
Fuel Oil Standards .........................
Particulate Matter Emission Standards.
Emission of Air Contaminant: Detriment to Person or Property.
Emission of Air Contaminant: Concealment and Masking Restricted.
Fugitive Dust Control Measures .....
Spray-Coating Operations ..............
Crushing Operations ......................
Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems.
05/01/04
09/01/01
02/01/17
Excluding toxic air pollutants.
05/01/04
Except 9.03(e). Replaces WAC 173–400–040(2).
05/01/04
Except 9.04(d)(2) and 9.04(f).
05/19/94
05/01/04
06/01/98
Replaces WAC 173–400–040(7).
Approved only as it applies to the regulation of criteria pollutants.
Replaces WAC 173–400–050(1) & (3) and 173–400–060.
04/17/99
Replaces WAC 173–400–040(6).
06/09/88
Replaces WAC 173–400–040(8).
04/17/99
12/02/10
03/02/12
11/01/15
Replaces WAC 173–400–040(9)(a).
9.03 ...................
9.04 ...................
9.07 ...................
9.08 ...................
9.09 ...................
9.11(a) ..............
9.13 ...................
9.15 ...................
9.16 ...................
9.18 ...................
12.03 .................
State/local
effective date
We are also proposing to approve
PSCAA’s incorporation by reference of
certain Chapter 173–400 WAC
provisions, subject to the exceptions
Explanation
Except 6.03(b)(10). Section 6.03 replaces WAC 173–400–110, except
WAC 173–400–110(1)(c)(i) and (1)(d) which are incorporated by reference.
Replaces WAC 173–400–105(7).
listed in Table 2. We note that these
exceptions, primarily relating to the
regulation of toxic air pollutants, are
consistent with our prior approvals of
Chapter 173–400 WAC for Ecology’s
direct permitting jurisdiction.
TABLE 2—WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REGULATIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN PSCAA
REGULATION I
State/local
citation
State/local
effective
date
Title/subject
Explanation
Chapter 173–400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
173–400–030 ....
173–400–081 ....
173–400–110 ....
173–400–111 ....
173–400–112 ....
173–400–113 ....
173–400–117 ....
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
173–400–171 ....
173–400–200 ....
173–400–560 ....
173–400–800 ....
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Definitions .......................................
Startup and shutdown ....................
New source review (NSR) for
sources and portable sources.
Processing notice of construction
applications for sources, stationary sources and portable
sources.
Requirements for new sources in
nonattainment areas.
Requirements for new sources in
attainment
or
unclassifiable
areas.
Special protection requirements for
federal Class I areas.
Public Notice and Opportunity for
Public Comment.
12/29/12
04/01/11
12/29/12
Creditable stack height and dispersion techniques.
General order of approval ..............
Major stationary source and major
modification in a nonattainment
area.
02/10/05
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
07/01/16
Except: 173–400–030(91).
173–400–110(1)(c)(i) and 173–400–110(1)(d) only.
Except: 173–400–111(3)(h);—The part of 173–400–111(8)(a)(v) that
says, ‘‘and 173–460–040,’’; 173–400–111(9).
12/29/12
12/29/12
Except: 173–400–113(3), second sentence.
12/29/12
07/01/16
12/29/12
4/01/11
Fmt 4702
Except:—The part of 173–400–171(3)(b) that says, ‘‘or any increase in
emissions of a toxic air pollutant above the acceptable source impact level for that toxic air pollutant as regulated under chapter 173–
460 WAC’’; 173–400–171(12).
Except:—The part of 173–400–560(1)(f) that says, ‘‘173–460 WAC’’.
EPA did not review WAC 173–400–800 through 860 for consistency
with the August 24, 2016 PM2.5 implementation rule (81 FR 58010);
nor does PSCAA have an obligation to submit rule revisions to address the 2016 PM2.5 implementation rule at this time.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4926
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REGULATIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN PSCAA
REGULATION I—Continued
State/local
effective
date
State/local
citation
Title/subject
173–400–810 ....
Major stationary source and major
modification definitions.
Determining if a new stationary
source or modification to a stationary source is subject to these
requirements.
Permitting requirements .................
Emission offset requirements .........
Actual emissions plantwide applicability limitation (PAL).
Public involvement procedures ......
173–400–820 ....
173–400–830 ....
173–400–840 ....
173–400–850 ....
173–400–860 ....
Table 3 shows the updated Chapter
173–400 WAC provisions that PSCAA
and Ecology requested to apply within
the SIP for PSCAA’s jurisdiction. We
note that many of the exclusions are
identical to the exclusions for Ecology’s
Explanation
07/01/16
12/29/12
07/01/16
07/01/16
07/01/16
4/01/11
direct jurisdiction; however, Table 3
also excludes those parts of the WAC
explicitly replaced by the Regulation 1
provisions in Table 1. We also note that
PSCAA and Ecology did not submit
Chapter 173–400 WAC provisions that
remain unchanged since our last
approval (60 FR 28726, June 2, 1995) or
recently revised WAC updates that have
not yet been approved for Ecology’s
direct jurisdiction.
TABLE 3—WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY REGULATIONS FOR PROPOSED APPROVAL AND INCORPORATION BY
REFERENCE
State/local
citation
State/local
effective
date
Title/subject
Explanation
Chapter 173–400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
173–400–020 ....
173–400–040 ....
173–400–091 ....
173–400–105 ....
173–400–118 ....
173–400–131 ....
173–400–136 ....
173–400–151 ....
173–400–175 ....
Applicability .....................................
General Standards for Maximum
Emissions.
Voluntary Limits on Emissions .......
12/29/12
09/16/18
Records, Monitoring and Reporting
Designation of Class I, II, and III
Areas.
Issuance of Emission Reduction
Credits.
Use of Emission Reduction Credits
(ERC).
Retrofit Requirements for Visibility
Protection.
Public Information ...........................
09/16/18
12/29/12
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Approved But Not Incorporated by
Reference Regulations
In addition to the regulations
proposed for approval and
incorporation by reference above, the
EPA reviews and approves state and
local clean air agency submissions to
ensure they provide adequate
enforcement authority and other general
authority to implement and enforce the
SIP. However, regulations describing
such agency enforcement and other
general authority are generally not
incorporated by reference so as to avoid
potential conflict with the EPA’s
independent authorities. On August 31,
2004, the EPA reviewed and approved
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
4/1/11
173–400–040(1)(a) & (b), 173–400–040(4); and 173–400–040(9)(b)
only.
9/20/93 version continues to be approved under the authority of CAA
Section 112(l) with respect to Section 112 hazardous air pollutants.
See 60 FR 28726 (June 2, 1995).
Except: 173–400–105(7).
04/1/11
12/29/12
2/10/05
2/10/05
Regulation I, sections 3.01, 3.05, 3.09,
3.13, 3.15, 3.17, 3.19, and 3.21 as
providing PSCAA adequate enforcement
and other general authority for purposes
of implementing and enforcing its SIP
but did not incorporate these provisions
by reference (69 FR 53007). While these
provisions remain unchanged since our
last review and approval, we are
proposing to include these sections in
40 CFR 52.2470(e), EPA Approved
Nonregulatory Provisions and QuasiRegulatory Measures, as approved but
not incorporated by reference regulatory
provisions. We also note that effective
May 1, 2006, PSCAA made a minor
update to section 3.07 since our last
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
approval. A redline/strikeout of the
changes is detailed in WSR 06–08–031
included in the docket for this action.
Lastly, PSCAA updates Regulation 1,
section 3.11 annually to adjust civil
penalties for inflation. We are proposing
to approve, but not incorporate by
reference, the updated version of section
3.11, effective November 1, 2019.
C. Regulations To Remove From the SIP
PSCAA and Ecology’s December 20,
2019 submittal included a request to
remove several obsolete provisions from
the SIP and to remove other provisions
that are not required SIP elements under
CAA section 110. As previously
discussed in section II, PSCAA
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
eliminated Regulation I, sections 6.06
‘‘Public Notice,’’ 6.07 ‘‘Order of
Approval—Order to Prevent
Construction,’’ and 6.08 ‘‘Emission
Reduction Credit Banking’’ in order to
rely on the statewide Chapter 173–400
WAC provisions. PSCAA also requested
that the EPA remove from the SIP
section 5.02 ‘‘Applicability and Purpose
of the Registration Program,’’ which was
repealed in 2004 because revised
versions of sections 5.03 and 5.05
subsumed the substantive provisions
formerly in section 5.02. The revised
versions of 5.03 and 5.05 are proposed
for approval into the SIP. We are
removing the former provisions of
section 6.03(b)(17) [subsequently
renumbered to (b)(10)] because this
broad, discretionary provision is not
appropriate for approval into the SIP, as
described above.
Under section 110(a)(2)(L) of the
CAA, the State, or local agencies acting
in lieu of the State, must demonstrate
the ability to collect adequate fees for
permitting major sources. PSCAA is
therefore submitting section 6.04
‘‘Notice of Construction Fees’’ to
demonstrate adequate fee authority to
implement the major source
nonattainment NSR program under
WAC 173–400–800 through 173–400–
860, as incorporated by reference. While
the EPA reviews these submissions to
confirm adequate authority, the EPA
generally does not include local or state
agency fees as part of the Washington
SIP incorporated by reference in 40 CFR
52.2470(c). We are therefore proposing
to correct an error from our previous
approval on April 21, 1998, when the
fee provisions of section 6.04 were
inadvertently incorporated by reference
(63 FR 19658).
Lastly, as described above regarding
the applicability of WAC 173–400–020,
we are removing outdated WAC
provisions from our previous June 2,
1995 approval and replacing them with
the updated versions of the WAC shown
in Table 3 or the appropriate PSCAA
corollaries as shown in Table 1.
D. Scope of Proposed Action
This proposed revision to the SIP
applies specifically to the PSCAA
jurisdiction incorporated into the SIP at
40 CFR 52.2470(c)—Table 7. As
discussed in our October 3, 2014 action,
local air agency jurisdiction in
Washington is generally defined on a
geographic basis; however, there are
exceptions (79 FR 59653, at page
59654). By statute, PSCAA does not
have authority for sources under the
jurisdiction of the Energy Facility Site
Evaluation Council (EFSEC). See
Revised Code of Washington Chapter
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
80.50. Under the applicability
provisions of WAC 173–405–012, 173–
410–012, and 173–415–012, PSCAA also
does not have jurisdiction for kraft pulp
mills, sulfite pulping mills, and primary
aluminum plants. For these sources,
Ecology retains statewide, direct
jurisdiction. Ecology and EFSEC also
retain statewide, direct jurisdiction for
issuing PSD permits. Therefore, the EPA
is not approving into 40 CFR
52.2470(c)—Table 7 those provisions of
Chapter 173–400 WAC related to the
PSD program. Specifically, these
provisions are WAC 173–400–116 and
WAC 173–400–700 through 173–400–
750, which the EPA has already
approved as applying state-wide under
40 CFR 52.2470(c)—Tables 2 and 3.
As described in our April 29, 2015
action, jurisdiction to implement the
visibility permitting program contained
in WAC 173–400–117 varies depending
on the situation. Ecology retains
authority to implement WAC 173–400–
117 as it relates to PSD permits. See 80
FR 23721. However, for facilities subject
to major nonattainment NSR under the
applicability provisions of WAC 173–
400–800, incorporated by reference in
Regulation I, we are proposing that
PSCAA would be responsible for
implementing those parts of WAC 173–
400–117 as they relate to major
nonattainment NSR permits. See 80 FR
23726. If finalized, the EPA is also
proposing to modify the visibility
protection Federal Implementation Plan
contained in 40 CFR 52.2498 to reflect
the approval of WAC 173–400–117 as it
applies to implementation of the major
nonattainment NSR program in
PSCAA’s jurisdiction.
Lastly, this SIP revision is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land in Washington except
as specifically noted below and is also
not approved to apply in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Washington’s SIP is approved to apply
on non-trust land within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation, also known as the 1873
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe
of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly
provided state and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4927
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the regulations
shown in the tables in section IV.A.
Regulations to Approve and Incorporate
by Reference into the SIP and the rules
proposed for removal from the SIP in
section IV.C. Regulations to Remove
from the SIP. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 10 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
4928
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2020 / Proposed Rules
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
As discussed above, the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land in Washington, or any
other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction (excluding non-trust land
within the exterior boundaries of the
Puyallup Indian Reservation), as
described in Section IV.D above. In
those areas of Indian country, the rule
does not have tribal implications and
will not impose substantial direct costs
on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA
provided a consultation opportunity to
the Puyallup Tribe in a letter dated
October 18, 2019.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: January 13, 2020.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2020–01465 Filed 1–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0423; FRL–10004–
66–Region 9]
Air Plan Conditional Approval;
Arizona; Maricopa County
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to
conditionally approve revisions to the
Maricopa County Air Quality
Department (MCAQD or the ‘‘County’’)
portion of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from surface
coating operations. We are proposing to
conditionally approve a local rule to
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the ‘‘Act’’)
and to conditionally approve the
County’s demonstration regarding
Reasonably Available Control
Technology requirements for the 2008 8hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the
Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment
area, with respect to surface coating
operations. We are taking comments on
this proposal and plan to follow with a
final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
February 27, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2019–0423 at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
SUMMARY:
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3024 or by
email at lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these SIP
revisions?
C. What is the purpose of the SIP
revisions?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the SIP
revisions?
B. Do the SIP revisions meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. What are the deficiencies?
D. What are the commitments to remedy
the deficiencies?
E. The EPA’s Recommendations To Further
Improve the SIP Revisions
F. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the documents addressed
by this proposal with the dates that they
were adopted by the local air agency
and submitted by the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ or the ‘‘State’’).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS
Local agency
Document
MCAQD ............
Analysis of Reasonably Available Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) State Implementation Plan (RACT SIP).
Rule 336: Surface Coating Operations ....................................................................................
MCAQD ............
On December 22, 2017, the submittal
containing the documents listed in
Table 1 was deemed by operation of law
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Revised
to meet the completeness criteria in 40
CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be
met before formal EPA review. In
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Submitted
06/16/2017
06/22/2017
11/02/2016
06/22/2017
addition to these SIP submittals, the
County and the ADEQ transmitted a
E:\FR\FM\28JAP1.SGM
28JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4921-4928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01465]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2019-0710; FRL-10004-71-Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Washington;
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Regulation I
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Washington State Implementation Plan (SIP)
that were submitted by the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology)
in coordination with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA). This
proposed revision would update certain PSCAA regulations currently in
the SIP, remove obsolete regulations, and approve a subset of updated
Ecology regulations to apply in PSCAA's jurisdiction.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 27,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2019-0710 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-0256, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA. This
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background for Proposed Action
II. Changes to PSCAA Regulation I
A. WSR 04-08-017--Incorporation by Reference of Chapter 173-400
WAC
B. WSR 01-16-034--``Trivial'' Emissions Source Categories
C. WSR 12-01-067--Federally Enforceable Regulatory Orders
III. Application of WAC 173-400-020
IV. The EPA's Proposed Action
A. Regulations To Approve and Incorporate by Reference Into the
SIP
B. Approved But Not Incorporated by Reference Regulations
C. Regulations To Remove From the SIP
D. Scope of Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background for Proposed Action
On January 27, 2014, Ecology submitted revisions to update the
general air quality regulations contained in Chapter 173-400 Washington
Administrative Code (WAC), which the EPA approved in three phases on
October 3, 2014 (79 FR 59653), November 7, 2014 (79 FR 66291), and
April 29, 2015 (80 FR 23721).\1\ Under the revised applicability
provisions of WAC 173-400-020 approved into the SIP on October 3, 2014,
the regulations contained in Chapter 173-400 WAC apply statewide, ``. .
. except for specific subsections where a local authority has adopted
and implemented corresponding local rules that apply only to sources
subject to local jurisdiction as provided under Revised Code of
Washington (RCW) 70.94.141 and 70.94.331.'' \2\ Therefore, the EPA's
approval of Ecology's January 2014 submittal applies only to geographic
areas and source categories under Ecology's direct jurisdiction. We
stated that we would address the revised Chapter 173-400 WAC
regulations as they apply to local clean air agency jurisdictions on a
case-by-case basis in separate, future actions. On December 20, 2019,
the Director of Ecology, as the Governor's designee for SIP revisions,
submitted a request to update the air
[[Page 4922]]
quality regulations in the SIP as they apply to PSCAA's jurisdiction in
40 CFR 52.2470(c), Table 7--Additional Regulations Approved for the
Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) Jurisdiction. PSCAA's jurisdiction
consists of King, Kitsap, Pierce, and Snohomish counties, excluding
certain facilities discussed in section IV.D. Scope of Proposed Action.
PSCAA's jurisdiction also excludes Indian reservation land or any other
area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction (except non-trust land within the exterior boundaries of
the Puyallup Indian Reservation, as described in section IV.D. Scope of
Proposed Action).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In subsequent actions on September 29, 2016 (81 FR 66823)
and October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69385) we made minor corrections to our
previous approval of Chapter 173-400 WAC and approved revised WAC
provisions that incorporated by reference the most recent changes to
the federal regulations.
\2\ For a more detailed discussion see page 39352 of the EPA's
proposed approval of WAC 173-400-020 (79 FR 39351, July 10, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix A of the SIP revision shows how the submitted regulatory
updates would apply to PSCAA's jurisdiction. These revisions can be
summarized in three general categories, which are discussed in more
detail in sections II and III. The first category consists of updates
to the PSCAA Regulation I provisions currently in the SIP. These
updated provisions apply in lieu of, or serve as a supplement to, the
statewide Chapter 173-400 WAC provisions, as shown in Table 1. The
second category consists of those parts of Chapter 173-400 WAC
incorporated by reference in Regulation I. The EPA's proposed approval
of the Chapter 173-400 WAC provisions incorporated by reference in
Regulation I would be subject to the same exceptions that apply to
Ecology's direct jurisdiction, as shown in Table 2. For example, as
part of the January 2014 submittal of Chapter 173-400 WAC, Ecology did
not submit for approval those provisions related to the regulation of
toxic air pollutants, because such provisions are outside the scope of
SIPs under Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110. The last category consists
of certain parts of Chapter 173-400 WAC which do not have a direct
corollary under PSCAA Regulation I, nor are they incorporated by
reference in Regulation I. In these cases, Ecology and PSCAA requested
that the EPA revise the SIP to include the most recently approved
updates to Chapter 173-400 WAC to apply in PSCAA's jurisdiction, as
shown in Table 3.
II. Changes to PSCAA Regulation I
The EPA last approved updates to PSCAA Regulation I on September
17, 2013 (78 FR 57073); however, many of the SIP-approved provisions
relating to pre-construction permitting of new and modified stationary
sources (called the new source review or NSR permitting program) date
back to the 1990s.\3\ PSCAA's updates to Regulation I are documented in
the Washington State Register (WSR) entries included in the docket for
this action. Each WSR gives a redline/strikeout of changes to the
regulations, with a brief summary describing the purpose of the
changes. Additional information can also be found in the proposed WSR
actions.\4\ The majority of changes over the years were routine in
nature, such as revising the regulations to account for inflation,
incorporating revised federal regulations, or generally revising the
regulatory language for clarity. The EPA's complete line by line review
of changes to the PSCAA regulations is included in the docket for this
action, and will not be described in detail here.\5\ The three most
significant changes to PSCAA Regulation I are discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 59 FR 44324 (August 29, 1994), 60 FR 33734 (June 29,
1995), 62 FR 42216 (August 6, 1997), and 63 FR 19658 (April 21,
1998).
\4\ https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/law/wsr/agency/PugetSoundCleanAirAgency.htm.
\5\ See ``Puget Sound comparison_IBR_old vs current.pdf'' and
``Puget Sound comparison_not IBR_old vs. current.pdf'' included in
the docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. WSR 04-08-017--Incorporation by Reference of Chapter 173-400 WAC
On March 25, 2004 (WSR 04-08-017), PSCAA made a major overhaul of
Regulation I in order to rely on the statewide NSR permitting program
requirements contained in Chapter 173-400 WAC promulgated by Ecology.
PSCAA's stated purpose was, ``To create a more consistent notice of
construction process throughout the state of Washington and to
facilitate the United States Environmental Protection Agency's approval
of the state implementation plan.'' PSCAA created a new section 6.01
``Components of a New Source Review Program'' which generally
incorporates by reference the NSR permitting provisions contained in
Chapter 173-400 WAC, as shown in Table 2. PSCAA also revised or
repealed sections of Regulation I that were duplicative of the WAC and
therefore obsolete.\6\ This included deleting most of the NSR-related
definitions in Regulation I, section 1.07 in order to rely on the
definitions incorporated by reference in WAC 173-400-030. PSCAA also
repealed sections 6.06 ``Public Notice,'' 6.07 ``Order of Approval--
Order to Prevent Construction,'' and 6.08 ``Emission Reduction Credit
Banking'' to rely on the corollaries in the WAC, including WAC 173-400-
171 ``Public notice and opportunity for public comment,'' WAC 173-400-
111 ``Processing notice of construction applications for sources,
stationary sources and portable sources,'' WAC 173-400-131 ``Issuance
of emission reduction credits,'' WAC 173-400-136 ``Use of emission
reduction credits (ERC),'' and WAC 173-400-840 ``Emission offset
requirements.'' Lastly, PSCAA made minor updates to the cross
references in Regulation I, sections 3.04, 6.03, 6.09, 9.03, 9.04,
9.08, and 12.03 to reflect the revised regulatory structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ WAC 173-400-110(1)(c)(ii), which PSCAA has not adopted,
makes clear that the term ``new source'' includes a modification to
an existing source. However, PSCAA has adopted Ecology's definition
of ``new source'' in WAC 173-400-030(56). WAC 173-400-030(56)
specifically defines a ``new source'' as including
``modifications.'' Thus, there is no substantive difference between
PSCAA's and Ecology's NSR rules in this respect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WAC 173-400-700 through 173-400-750 implement the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) new source review permitting program
for major stationary sources in attainment and unclassifiable areas.
Regulation I, section 6.01 incorporates by reference WAC 173-400-700
through 173-400-750, but clearly states that only Ecology and EFSEC
have authority to issue permits under WAC 173-400-700 through 173-400-
750 within PSCAA's geographic area. PSCAA has advised EPA that it
incorporates by reference WAC 173-400-700 through 173-400-750 for
purposes such as working on permit coordination with Ecology, enforcing
existing PSD permit conditions not yet incorporated into Title V
permits, and determining violations for inspected facilities that
failed to obtain the necessary PSD permits. Therefore, PSCAA is not
requesting, and the EPA is not proposing to approve, the authority to
issue PSD permits under WAC 173-400-700 through 173-400-750 for PSCAA's
direct permitting jurisdiction (Table 7). The EPA will retain our
current approval of WAC 173-400-700 through 173-400-750 in the SIP
under Ecology and EFSEC direct permitting jurisdiction (see 40 CFR
52.2470(c), Tables 2 and 3), which will continue to apply within
PSCAA's geographic area.
PSCAA also incorporates by reference WAC 173-400-800 through 173-
400-860, which implement the new source review permitting program for
major stationary sources in nonattainment areas (major nonattainment
NSR). The EPA approved WAC 173-400-800 through 173-400-860 for
Ecology's direct permitting jurisdiction on November 7, 2014 (79 FR
59653), with minor revisions to reflect updated federal citations on
October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69385). In connection with our November 7, 2014
approval, we reviewed WAC 173-400-800 through 173-400-860 pursuant to
the federal
[[Page 4923]]
regulatory requirements in existence at that time and discussed the
fact that the EPA's 2008 PM2.5 New Source Review Rule (73 FR
28321, May 16, 2008), had been remanded to the EPA by the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See 79 FR 43345, 43347
(July 25, 2014) (proposed action); 79 FR 59653 (final action). EPA's
2008 PM2.5 New Source Review Rule has since been replaced by
a revised implementation rule published August 24, 2016, which imposed
additional NSR requirements for PM2.5 nonattainment areas
(81 FR 58010). Because there are currently no nonattainment areas
within PSCAA's jurisdiction or Washington State for any criteria
pollutant, including PM2.5, the EPA did not review PSCAA's
incorporation by reference of WAC 173-400-800 through 173-400-860 for
consistency with the newly revised PM2.5 implementation
rule; nor does Ecology or PSCAA have an obligation to submit rule
revisions to address the 2016 PM2.5 implementation rule at
this time. However, we note that the federal major nonattainment NSR
requirements remain unchanged for all other criteria pollutants since
our review and approval of WAC 173-400-800 through 173-400-860. We are
therefore proposing to approve of PSCAA's incorporation by reference of
WAC 173-400-800 through 173-400-860 as meeting the current major
nonattainment NSR requirements for all criteria pollutants except
PM2.5.
B. WSR 01-16-034--``Trivial'' Emissions Source Categories
Effective June 6, 1996, the Washington Legislature amended the
Washington Clean Air Act (Revised Code of Washington 70.94), requiring
Ecology to establish NSR permitting exemptions based on category, size,
or emissions thresholds representing ``. . . trivial levels of
emissions that do not pose a threat to human health or the
environment.'' Ecology implemented this statutory change by
establishing emission unit and activity exemptions under WAC 173-400-
110(4), and exemptions based on emissions thresholds under WAC 173-400-
110(5). The EPA approved these changes on April 29, 2015 (80 FR
23721).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For a more detailed discussion please see page 39354 of our
July 10, 2014 proposed rulemaking (79 FR 39351).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unlike Ecology, PSCAA already had ``trivial'' emissions source
category exemptions for minor NSR permitting approved as part of the
SIP under Regulation I, section 6.03 (62 FR 42216, August 6, 1997).
Therefore, PSCAA opted to retain its existing minor NSR source category
exemptions rather than incorporate by reference WAC 173-400-110(4) and
(5). While there have been numerous updates to PSCAA's source category
exemptions list since the EPA's last approval, the most significant
revision occurred on July 12, 2001 (WSR 01-16-034). After a review of
approximately 485 emission units permitted during calendar year 2000,
PSCAA revised the list of source category exemptions to better focus on
the most environmentally relevant source categories. As described in
the supporting documents for PSCAA's rulemaking at that time,
approximately one third of the units permitted in 2000 were gas
stations, dry cleaners, or concrete batch plants which are already
subject to Best Available Control Technology (BACT) requirements in
other regulations approved into the SIP, such as Regulation II, section
2.07 ``Gasoline Stations,'' which significantly reduce potential
emissions from such source categories to levels expected to be
inconsequential to attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Other minor NSR source category
exemptions were derived from exemptions approved into the SIP for the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and Bay Area Air
Quality Management District (BAAQMD). ``Engineering Notes for Exemption
List Development,'' included in the docket for this action, shows the
process used by PSCAA in 2001 to update the set of minor NSR source
category exemptions. Following 2001, PSCAA continued to update the set
of minor NSR source category exemptions based on its evaluation and
experience permitting certain source categories, including the 2012
establishment of stand-alone performance standards for rock crushing in
section 9.18 that reduce potential emissions to levels expected to be
inconsequential for attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS.\8\ For
more detail on the EPA's review of PSCAA's revised minor NSR source
category exemption list, please see ``Puget Sound comparison IBR old vs
current'' included in the docket for this action. Based on our review,
the EPA is proposing to approve PSCAA's updated minor NSR source
category exemption list based on our determination that the impact of
emissions from such sources is inconsequential to attainment and
maintenance of the NAAQS. We are also proposing to approve PSCAA's
request to apply Regulation I, section 6.03 to act in lieu of those
parts of WAC 173-400-110 for determining NSR applicability for PSCAA's
permitting jurisdiction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See ``January 19 2018 e-Hunt SIP Support w attachments''
included in the docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We note that our prior approval of section 6.03 included a broad
director's discretion provision that allowed a minor NSR exemption for,
``Any source that has been determined through review by the Control
Officer not to warrant a `Notice of Construction and Application for
Approval', due to the minimal amount and nature of air contaminants
produced and potential to contribute to air pollution, with special
reference to effects on health, economic and social factors, and
physical effects on property.'' See 62 FR 42216, August 6, 1997. This
provision, formerly in subsection (b)(17), is now in subsection
(b)(10). It is the EPA's longstanding position that these types of
broad director discretion provisions are not appropriate for approval
into the SIP. See 69 FR 17368, 17370 (April 2, 2004); see also 80 FR
33840, 33917-33918 (June 12, 2015). PSCAA and Ecology are not seeking
approval of section 6.03(b)(10) and we are proposing to correct this
error from our August 1997 action. Section 110(k)(6) of the CAA
authorizes EPA, upon a determination that EPA's action approving,
disapproving or promulgating any SIP or plan revision (or any part
thereof) was in error, to revise such action as appropriate in the same
manner as the approval, disapproval or promulgation. In making such a
correction, EPA must provide such determination and the basis therefore
to the State and the public. EPA is by this proposal notifying the
PSCAA, Ecology and the public that EPA is removing Section 6.03(b)(17)
from the SIP and from incorporation by reference into federal law.
Lastly, we note that Article 6 in particular, but also other
sections of PSCAA's regulations, reference the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR). For all references to the CFR in the PSCAA rules
proposed for approval, not otherwise specified with an effective date,
our proposed approval refers to the CFR with an effective date of July
1, 2019. This date corresponds to PSCAA's last incorporation by
reference of the CFR in Regulation 1, section 3.25.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ As part of PSCAA's adoption by reference of the WAC in
section 6.01, PSCAA explicitly did not adopt by reference WAC 173-
400-025 Adoption of Federal Rules in order to avoid conflicting with
section 3.25. Therefore, for this proposed approval references to
``in effect on the date in WAC 173-400-025'' as part of the PSCAA's
adoption by reference of the WAC shall be July 1, 2019, consistent
with section 3.25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 4924]]
C. WSR 12-01-067--Federally Enforceable Regulatory Orders
On December 15, 2015 (WSR 12-01-067), PSCAA added section 3.03(f)
to Regulation I, which states, ``When an applicant requests a federally
enforceable regulatory order to limit the potential to emit any air
contaminant or contaminants pursuant to WAC 173-400-091, or requests a
modification to such an order, the Control Officer or a duly authorized
representative may issue such order consistent with the requirements of
WAC 173-400-091 and 173-400-171 and Section 3.03(e) above. Regulatory
orders issued pursuant to this section are effective the day the
Control Officer or representative approves the order and may be
appealed to the Pollution Control Hearings Board pursuant to Section
3.17 of Regulation I and RCW 43.21B.310.'' We are proposing to approve
this provision into the SIP because it implements authorities already
approved or proposed for approval in the SIP and is consistent with CAA
requirements.
III. Application of WAC 173-400-020
As previously discussed, a local clean air agency generally has the
authority under WAC 173-400-020 to establish local regulations to
supplement, or act in lieu of, the statewide Chapter 173-400 WAC
provisions for sources within its jurisdiction. This approach is
consistent with our previous SIP actions for Benton Clean Air Agency
(80 FR 71695, November 17, 2015) and Southwest Clean Air Agency (82 FR
17136, April 10, 2017). Specifically, as part of the December 20, 2019
submittal, PSCAA and Ecology requested that the EPA approve: Regulation
I, section 1.01 ``Policy'' to replace WAC 173-400-010; section 3.04
``Reasonably Available Control Technology'' to replace the
corresponding provision in WAC 173-400-040(1)(c); section 3.25
``Federal Regulations Reference Date'' to replace WAC 173-400-025;
section 9.03 ``Emission of Air Contaminant: Visual Standard'' to
replace WAC 173-400-040(2); section 9.07 ``Sulfur Dioxide Emission
Standard'' to replace WAC 173-400-040(7); section 9.09 ``Particulate
Matter Emission Standards'' to replace WAC 173-400-050 and 173-400-060;
section 9.11(a) ``Emission of Air Contaminant: Detriment to Person or
Property'' to replace WAC 173-400-040(6); section 9.13 ``Emission of
Air Contaminant: Concealment and Masking Restricted'' to replace WAC
173-400-040(8); section 9.15 ``Fugitive Dust Control Measures'' to
replace WAC 173-400-040(9)(a); and section 12.03 ``Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems'' to replace WAC 173-400-105(7).
We have completed a side by side comparison of the respective
provisions and are proposing to approve these Regulation I provisions
to apply in lieu of the corresponding Chapter 173-400 WAC provisions in
the SIP.\10\ In addition, as discussed above regarding minor NSR source
category exemptions, we are proposing to approve section 6.03 ``Notice
of Construction'' to apply in lieu of those parts of WAC 173-400-110
``New source review (NSR) for sources and portable sources'' for
determining NSR applicability and Notice of Construction application
procedures.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See ``PSCAA v WAC cross walk'' included in the docket for
this action.
\11\ PSCAA continues to incorporate WAC 173-400-110(1)(c)(i) and
WAC 173-400-110(1)(d) by reference. All other provisions are
replaced by PSCAA Regulation I, section 6.03 provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, for those parts of Chapter 173-400 WAC not already
incorporated by reference in section 6.01, or replaced by the
corresponding Regulation I provisions discussed above, PSCAA and
Ecology requested that the EPA approve into the SIP for PSCAA's
jurisdiction the most recently updated versions of Chapter 173-400 WAC,
with certain exceptions as shown in Table 3. For example, WAC 173-400-
116 ``Increment Protection'' is part of the PSD program for permits
issued directly by Ecology or EFSEC and, as discussed above, PSCAA does
not issue such permits. PSCAA also did not request approval for WAC
173-400-036 ``Relocation of Portable Sources'' because this is an
optional State provision that a local clean air agency may adopt if it
so chooses, but is not required to adopt.
IV. The EPA's Proposed Action
A. Regulations To Approve and Incorporate by Reference Into the SIP
The EPA is proposing to approve and incorporate by reference into
the Washington SIP at 40 CFR 52.2470(c)--Table 7--Additional
Regulations Approved for the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA)
Jurisdiction, the PSCAA and Ecology regulations listed in Tables 1, 2,
and 3 below for sources within PSCAA's jurisdiction. We note that some
of the Regulation I provisions listed below remain unchanged since our
previous approval. We are proposing to approve them as shown in Table
1, however, to act in lieu of the corresponding Chapter 173-400 WAC
provisions.
Table 1--Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (PSCAA) Regulations for Proposed Approval and Incorporation by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/local
State/local citation Title/subject effective date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation I
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.01............................. Policy..................... 11/01/99 Replaces WAC 173-400-010.
1.07............................. Definitions................ 12/01/18 Except the definition ``toxic
air pollutant (TAP) or toxic
air contaminant.''
3.03(f).......................... General Regulatory Orders.. 02/01/12
3.04............................. Reasonably Available 07/01/12 Except 3.04(e). Replaces WAC 173-
Control Technology. 400-040(1)(c).
3.25............................. Federal Regulation 11/01/19 Replaces WAC 173-400-025.
Reference Date.
5.03............................. Applicability of 11/01/16 Except 5.03(a)(8)(Q) and
Registration Program. 5.03(b)(5).
5.05............................. Registration Requirements.. 02/01/17 Except 5.05(b)(1) and (2).
6.01............................. Components of New Source 05/01/13 Except the parenthetical in
Review Program. 6.01(b) which states ``as
delegated by agreement with the
US Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 10.'' See table
below for revised Chapter 173-
400 WAC provisions incorporated
by reference.
[[Page 4925]]
6.03............................. Notice of Construction..... 11/01/15 Except 6.03(b)(10). Section 6.03
replaces WAC 173-400-110,
except WAC 173-400-110(1)(c)(i)
and (1)(d) which are
incorporated by reference.
6.09............................. Notice of Completion....... 05/01/04
6.10............................. Work Done Without an 09/01/01
Approval.
7.09............................. General Reporting 02/01/17 Excluding toxic air pollutants.
Requirements for Operating
Permits.
9.03............................. Emission of Air 05/01/04 Except 9.03(e). Replaces WAC 173-
Contaminant: Visual 400-040(2).
Standard.
9.04............................. Opacity Standards for 05/01/04 Except 9.04(d)(2) and 9.04(f).
Equipment with Continuous
Opacity Monitoring Systems.
9.07............................. Sulfur Dioxide Emission 05/19/94 Replaces WAC 173-400-040(7).
Standard.
9.08............................. Fuel Oil Standards......... 05/01/04 Approved only as it applies to
the regulation of criteria
pollutants.
9.09............................. Particulate Matter Emission 06/01/98 Replaces WAC 173-400-050(1) &
Standards. (3) and 173-400-060.
9.11(a).......................... Emission of Air 04/17/99 Replaces WAC 173-400-040(6).
Contaminant: Detriment to
Person or Property.
9.13............................. Emission of Air 06/09/88 Replaces WAC 173-400-040(8).
Contaminant: Concealment
and Masking Restricted.
9.15............................. Fugitive Dust Control 04/17/99 Replaces WAC 173-400-040(9)(a).
Measures.
9.16............................. Spray-Coating Operations... 12/02/10
9.18............................. Crushing Operations........ 03/02/12
12.03............................ Continuous Emission 11/01/15 Replaces WAC 173-400-105(7).
Monitoring Systems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are also proposing to approve PSCAA's incorporation by reference
of certain Chapter 173-400 WAC provisions, subject to the exceptions
listed in Table 2. We note that these exceptions, primarily relating to
the regulation of toxic air pollutants, are consistent with our prior
approvals of Chapter 173-400 WAC for Ecology's direct permitting
jurisdiction.
Table 2--Washington Department of Ecology Regulations Incorporated by Reference in PSCAA Regulation I
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/local
State/local citation Title/subject effective date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 173-400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
173-400-030...................... Definitions................ 12/29/12 Except: 173-400-030(91).
173-400-081...................... Startup and shutdown....... 04/01/11
173-400-110...................... New source review (NSR) for 12/29/12 173-400-110(1)(c)(i) and 173-400-
sources and portable 110(1)(d) only.
sources.
173-400-111...................... Processing notice of 07/01/16 Except: 173-400-111(3)(h);--The
construction applications part of 173-400-111(8)(a)(v)
for sources, stationary that says, ``and 173-460-
sources and portable 040,''; 173-400-111(9).
sources.
173-400-112...................... Requirements for new 12/29/12
sources in nonattainment
areas.
173-400-113...................... Requirements for new 12/29/12 Except: 173-400-113(3), second
sources in attainment or sentence.
unclassifiable areas.
173-400-117...................... Special protection 12/29/12
requirements for federal
Class I areas.
173-400-171...................... Public Notice and 07/01/16 Except:--The part of 173-400-
Opportunity for Public 171(3)(b) that says, ``or any
Comment. increase in emissions of a
toxic air pollutant above the
acceptable source impact level
for that toxic air pollutant as
regulated under chapter 173-460
WAC''; 173-400-171(12).
173-400-200...................... Creditable stack height and 02/10/05
dispersion techniques.
173-400-560...................... General order of approval.. 12/29/12 Except:--The part of 173-400-
560(1)(f) that says, ``173-460
WAC''.
173-400-800...................... Major stationary source and 4/01/11 EPA did not review WAC 173-400-
major modification in a 800 through 860 for consistency
nonattainment area. with the August 24, 2016 PM2.5
implementation rule (81 FR
58010); nor does PSCAA have an
obligation to submit rule
revisions to address the 2016
PM2.5 implementation rule at
this time.
[[Page 4926]]
173-400-810...................... Major stationary source and 07/01/16
major modification
definitions.
173-400-820...................... Determining if a new 12/29/12
stationary source or
modification to a
stationary source is
subject to these
requirements.
173-400-830...................... Permitting requirements.... 07/01/16
173-400-840...................... Emission offset 07/01/16
requirements.
173-400-850...................... Actual emissions plantwide 07/01/16
applicability limitation
(PAL).
173-400-860...................... Public involvement 4/01/11
procedures.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3 shows the updated Chapter 173-400 WAC provisions that PSCAA
and Ecology requested to apply within the SIP for PSCAA's jurisdiction.
We note that many of the exclusions are identical to the exclusions for
Ecology's direct jurisdiction; however, Table 3 also excludes those
parts of the WAC explicitly replaced by the Regulation 1 provisions in
Table 1. We also note that PSCAA and Ecology did not submit Chapter
173-400 WAC provisions that remain unchanged since our last approval
(60 FR 28726, June 2, 1995) or recently revised WAC updates that have
not yet been approved for Ecology's direct jurisdiction.
Table 3--Washington Department of Ecology Regulations for Proposed Approval and Incorporation by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State/local
State/local citation Title/subject effective date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 173-400 WAC, General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
173-400-020...................... Applicability.............. 12/29/12
173-400-040...................... General Standards for 09/16/18 173-400-040(1)(a) & (b), 173-400-
Maximum Emissions. 040(4); and 173-400-040(9)(b)
only.
173-400-091...................... Voluntary Limits on 4/1/11 9/20/93 version continues to be
Emissions. approved under the authority of
CAA Section 112(l) with respect
to Section 112 hazardous air
pollutants. See 60 FR 28726
(June 2, 1995).
173-400-105...................... Records, Monitoring and 09/16/18 Except: 173-400-105(7).
Reporting.
173-400-118...................... Designation of Class I, II, 12/29/12
and III Areas.
173-400-131...................... Issuance of Emission 04/1/11
Reduction Credits.
173-400-136...................... Use of Emission Reduction 12/29/12
Credits (ERC).
173-400-151...................... Retrofit Requirements for 2/10/05
Visibility Protection.
173-400-175...................... Public Information......... 2/10/05
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Approved But Not Incorporated by Reference Regulations
In addition to the regulations proposed for approval and
incorporation by reference above, the EPA reviews and approves state
and local clean air agency submissions to ensure they provide adequate
enforcement authority and other general authority to implement and
enforce the SIP. However, regulations describing such agency
enforcement and other general authority are generally not incorporated
by reference so as to avoid potential conflict with the EPA's
independent authorities. On August 31, 2004, the EPA reviewed and
approved Regulation I, sections 3.01, 3.05, 3.09, 3.13, 3.15, 3.17,
3.19, and 3.21 as providing PSCAA adequate enforcement and other
general authority for purposes of implementing and enforcing its SIP
but did not incorporate these provisions by reference (69 FR 53007).
While these provisions remain unchanged since our last review and
approval, we are proposing to include these sections in 40 CFR
52.2470(e), EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures, as approved but not incorporated by reference regulatory
provisions. We also note that effective May 1, 2006, PSCAA made a minor
update to section 3.07 since our last approval. A redline/strikeout of
the changes is detailed in WSR 06-08-031 included in the docket for
this action. Lastly, PSCAA updates Regulation 1, section 3.11 annually
to adjust civil penalties for inflation. We are proposing to approve,
but not incorporate by reference, the updated version of section 3.11,
effective November 1, 2019.
C. Regulations To Remove From the SIP
PSCAA and Ecology's December 20, 2019 submittal included a request
to remove several obsolete provisions from the SIP and to remove other
provisions that are not required SIP elements under CAA section 110. As
previously discussed in section II, PSCAA
[[Page 4927]]
eliminated Regulation I, sections 6.06 ``Public Notice,'' 6.07 ``Order
of Approval--Order to Prevent Construction,'' and 6.08 ``Emission
Reduction Credit Banking'' in order to rely on the statewide Chapter
173-400 WAC provisions. PSCAA also requested that the EPA remove from
the SIP section 5.02 ``Applicability and Purpose of the Registration
Program,'' which was repealed in 2004 because revised versions of
sections 5.03 and 5.05 subsumed the substantive provisions formerly in
section 5.02. The revised versions of 5.03 and 5.05 are proposed for
approval into the SIP. We are removing the former provisions of section
6.03(b)(17) [subsequently renumbered to (b)(10)] because this broad,
discretionary provision is not appropriate for approval into the SIP,
as described above.
Under section 110(a)(2)(L) of the CAA, the State, or local agencies
acting in lieu of the State, must demonstrate the ability to collect
adequate fees for permitting major sources. PSCAA is therefore
submitting section 6.04 ``Notice of Construction Fees'' to demonstrate
adequate fee authority to implement the major source nonattainment NSR
program under WAC 173-400-800 through 173-400-860, as incorporated by
reference. While the EPA reviews these submissions to confirm adequate
authority, the EPA generally does not include local or state agency
fees as part of the Washington SIP incorporated by reference in 40 CFR
52.2470(c). We are therefore proposing to correct an error from our
previous approval on April 21, 1998, when the fee provisions of section
6.04 were inadvertently incorporated by reference (63 FR 19658).
Lastly, as described above regarding the applicability of WAC 173-
400-020, we are removing outdated WAC provisions from our previous June
2, 1995 approval and replacing them with the updated versions of the
WAC shown in Table 3 or the appropriate PSCAA corollaries as shown in
Table 1.
D. Scope of Proposed Action
This proposed revision to the SIP applies specifically to the PSCAA
jurisdiction incorporated into the SIP at 40 CFR 52.2470(c)--Table 7.
As discussed in our October 3, 2014 action, local air agency
jurisdiction in Washington is generally defined on a geographic basis;
however, there are exceptions (79 FR 59653, at page 59654). By statute,
PSCAA does not have authority for sources under the jurisdiction of the
Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC). See Revised Code of
Washington Chapter 80.50. Under the applicability provisions of WAC
173-405-012, 173-410-012, and 173-415-012, PSCAA also does not have
jurisdiction for kraft pulp mills, sulfite pulping mills, and primary
aluminum plants. For these sources, Ecology retains statewide, direct
jurisdiction. Ecology and EFSEC also retain statewide, direct
jurisdiction for issuing PSD permits. Therefore, the EPA is not
approving into 40 CFR 52.2470(c)--Table 7 those provisions of Chapter
173-400 WAC related to the PSD program. Specifically, these provisions
are WAC 173-400-116 and WAC 173-400-700 through 173-400-750, which the
EPA has already approved as applying state-wide under 40 CFR
52.2470(c)--Tables 2 and 3.
As described in our April 29, 2015 action, jurisdiction to
implement the visibility permitting program contained in WAC 173-400-
117 varies depending on the situation. Ecology retains authority to
implement WAC 173-400-117 as it relates to PSD permits. See 80 FR
23721. However, for facilities subject to major nonattainment NSR under
the applicability provisions of WAC 173-400-800, incorporated by
reference in Regulation I, we are proposing that PSCAA would be
responsible for implementing those parts of WAC 173-400-117 as they
relate to major nonattainment NSR permits. See 80 FR 23726. If
finalized, the EPA is also proposing to modify the visibility
protection Federal Implementation Plan contained in 40 CFR 52.2498 to
reflect the approval of WAC 173-400-117 as it applies to implementation
of the major nonattainment NSR program in PSCAA's jurisdiction.
Lastly, this SIP revision is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land in Washington except as specifically noted below and
is also not approved to apply in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those
areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). Washington's SIP is approved to apply on non-trust
land within the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation,
also known as the 1873 Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians
Settlement Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided
state and local agencies in Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey Area.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA
rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the regulations shown in the tables in section
IV.A. Regulations to Approve and Incorporate by Reference into the SIP
and the rules proposed for removal from the SIP in section IV.C.
Regulations to Remove from the SIP. The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10 Office (please contact the
person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of
this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or
[[Page 4928]]
safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
As discussed above, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land in Washington, or any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction (excluding
non-trust land within the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation), as described in Section IV.D above. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA provided a consultation
opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a letter dated October 18, 2019.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: January 13, 2020.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2020-01465 Filed 1-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P