National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the OU1 of the Libby Asbestos Superfund Site, 4249-4250 [2020-00983]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 16 / Friday, January 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules
withdrawn and all public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. Please note
that, if EPA receives adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment. For additional
information see the direct final rule,
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register.
Dated: December 30, 2019.
Cheryl L Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2020–00540 Filed 1–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–2002–0008; FRL–10004–
52–Region 8]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Partial
Deletion of the OU1 of the Libby
Asbestos Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 8 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete Operable Unit
1 (OU1), Former Export Plant, of the
Libby Asbestos Superfund Site (Site),
located in Lincoln County, Montana,
from the National Priorities List (NPL)
and requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL, promulgated
pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and
the State of Montana (State), through the
Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ), have determined that all
appropriate response actions at OU1
under CERCLA, other than operation
and maintenance and five-year reviews
(FYR), have been completed. However,
this partial deletion does not preclude
future actions under Superfund. This
partial deletion pertains only to OU1.
Operable Unit 2 (OU2), Former
Screening Plant, was deleted from the
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jan 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
NPL on April 10, 2019. Operable Unit
3 (OU3), Former Vermiculite Mine;
Operable Unit 4 and Operable Unit 7
(OU4/OU7), Residential/Commercial
Properties of Libby and Troy; Operable
Unit 5 (OU5), Former Stimson Lumber
Mill; Operable Unit 6 (OU6), BNSF Rail
Corridor; and Operable Unit 8 (OU8),
Highways and Roadways, are not being
considered for deletion as part of this
proposed action and will remain on the
NPL.
DATES: Comments must be received by
February 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–2002–0008 by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow on-line instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa2.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
• Email: Dania Zinner, zinner.dania@
epa.gov.
• Mail: Dania Zinner, Remedial
Project Manager, U.S. EPA, Region 8,
Mail Code 8SEM–RB, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, CO 80202–1129.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID no. EPA–HQ–SFUND–2002–
0008. The EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4249
https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to the EPA without going through
https://www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, the EPA may not
be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in the
hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically in
https://www.regulations.gov; by calling
EPA Region 8 at (303) 312–7279 and
leaving a message; and at the EPA Info
Center, 108 E 9th Street, Libby, MT
59923, (406) 293–6194, Monday through
Thursday from 8:00 a.m.–4:00 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dania Zinner, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 8, Mailcode SEM–RB,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO
80202–1129, (303) 312–7122, email
zinner.dania@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 8 announces its intent to
delete all of Operable Unit 1 (OU1),
Former Export Plant, of the Libby
Asbestos Superfund Site (Site) from the
NPL and requests public comment on
this proposed action. The NPL
constitutes appendix B of 40 CFR part
300 which is the NCP, which the EPA
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the CERCLA of 1980, as amended. The
EPA maintains the NPL as those sites
E:\FR\FM\24JAP1.SGM
24JAP1
4250
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 16 / Friday, January 24, 2020 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
that appear to present a significant risk
to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be
the subject of remedial actions financed
by the Hazardous Substance Superfund
(Fund). This partial deletion of OU1 of
the Libby Asbestos Superfund Site is
proposed in accordance with 40 CFR
300.425(e) and is consistent with the
Notice of Policy Change: Partial
Deletion of Sites Listed on the National
Priorities List. 60 FR 55466 (Nov. 1,
1995). As described in § 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP, a portion of a site deleted from
the NPL remains eligible for Fundfinanced remedial action if future
conditions warrant such actions.
The EPA will accept comments on the
proposal to partially delete this site for
thirty (30) days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that the EPA is using for this action.
Section IV discusses where to access
and review information that
demonstrates how the deletion criteria
have been met at OU1 of the Libby
Asbestos Superfund Site.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), the EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures in not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c)
and the NCP, the EPA conducts fiveyear reviews to ensure the continued
protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at a site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. The EPA
conducts such five-year reviews even if
a site is deleted from the NPL. The EPA
may initiate further action to ensure
continued protectiveness at a deleted
site if new information becomes
available that indicates it is appropriate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jan 23, 2020
Jkt 250001
Whenever there is a significant release
from a site deleted from the NPL, the
deleted site may be restored to the NPL
without application of the hazard
ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of OU1 of the Libby Asbestos
Superfund Site:
(1) The EPA consulted with the State
before developing this Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion.
(2) The EPA has provided the State 30
working days for review of this
document prior to its publication in the
Federal Register.
(3) In accordance with the criteria
discussed above, EPA has determined
that no further response is appropriate;
(4) The State of Montana, through the
DEQ, has concurred with deletion of
OU1 of the Libby Asbestos Superfund
Site, from the NPL.
(5) Concurrently with the publication
of this Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion in the Federal Register, notices
are being published in the Western
News, the Kootenai Valley Record, and
The Montanian. The newspaper notices
announce the 30-day public comment
period concerning the Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion of the Site from the
NPL.
(6) The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket,
made these items available for public
inspection, and copying at the Site
information repositories identified
above.
If comments are received within the
30-day comment period on this
document, the EPA will evaluate and
respond to the comments before making
a final decision to delete OU1. If
necessary, the EPA will prepare a
Responsiveness Summary to address
any significant public comments
received. After the public comment
period, if the EPA determines it is still
appropriate to delete OU1 of the Libby
Asbestos Superfund Site, the Regional
Administrator will publish a final
Notice of Partial Deletion in the Federal
Register. Public notices, public
submissions and copies of the
Responsiveness Summary, if prepared,
will be made available to interested
parties and included in the site
information repositories listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the
NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual’s rights or
obligations. Deletion of a portion of a
site from the NPL does not in any way
alter the EPA’s right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that the deletion of a site
from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site
Deletion
The EPA placed copies of documents
supporting the proposed partial deletion
in the deletion docket. The material
provides explanation of EPA’s rationale
for the partial deletion and
demonstrates how it meets the deletion
criteria. This information is made
available for public inspection in the
dockets identified above.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR,
2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,
3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52
FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: December 9, 2019.
Gregory E. Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020–00983 Filed 1–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 216 and 300
[Docket No. 200113–0011
RIN 0648–BJ23
International Fisheries; Pacific Tuna
Fisheries; Fishing Restrictions for
Silky Shark, Fish Aggregating Device,
and Observer Safety in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes regulations
under the Tuna Conventions Act to
implement Resolutions C–19–01
(Amendment to Resolution C–18–05 on
the Collection and Analyses of Data on
Fish-Aggregating Devices); C–19–05
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JAP1.SGM
24JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4249-4250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00983]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2002-0008; FRL-10004-52-Region 8]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the OU1 of the Libby
Asbestos Superfund Site
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 8 is issuing
a Notice of Intent to Delete Operable Unit 1 (OU1), Former Export
Plant, of the Libby Asbestos Superfund Site (Site), located in Lincoln
County, Montana, from the National Priorities List (NPL) and requests
public comments on this proposed action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant
to section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the State of Montana (State),
through the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), have determined
that all appropriate response actions at OU1 under CERCLA, other than
operation and maintenance and five-year reviews (FYR), have been
completed. However, this partial deletion does not preclude future
actions under Superfund. This partial deletion pertains only to OU1.
Operable Unit 2 (OU2), Former Screening Plant, was deleted from the NPL
on April 10, 2019. Operable Unit 3 (OU3), Former Vermiculite Mine;
Operable Unit 4 and Operable Unit 7 (OU4/OU7), Residential/Commercial
Properties of Libby and Troy; Operable Unit 5 (OU5), Former Stimson
Lumber Mill; Operable Unit 6 (OU6), BNSF Rail Corridor; and Operable
Unit 8 (OU8), Highways and Roadways, are not being considered for
deletion as part of this proposed action and will remain on the NPL.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2002-0008 by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow on-line instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa2.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Email: Dania Zinner, [email protected].
Mail: Dania Zinner, Remedial Project Manager, U.S. EPA,
Region 8, Mail Code 8SEM-RB, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-
1129.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
2002-0008. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov website
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to the EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the
EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should
avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be
free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in the hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov; by calling EPA Region 8 at (303) 312-
7279 and leaving a message; and at the EPA Info Center, 108 E 9th
Street, Libby, MT 59923, (406) 293-6194, Monday through Thursday from
8:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dania Zinner, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mailcode SEM-
RB, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202-1129, (303) 312-7122, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA Region 8 announces its intent to delete all of Operable Unit 1
(OU1), Former Export Plant, of the Libby Asbestos Superfund Site (Site)
from the NPL and requests public comment on this proposed action. The
NPL constitutes appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is the NCP, which
the EPA promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the CERCLA of 1980, as
amended. The EPA maintains the NPL as those sites
[[Page 4250]]
that appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or
the environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of remedial
actions financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This
partial deletion of OU1 of the Libby Asbestos Superfund Site is
proposed in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is consistent with
the Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on the
National Priorities List. 60 FR 55466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described in
Sec. 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a site deleted from the
NPL remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if future
conditions warrant such actions.
The EPA will accept comments on the proposal to partially delete
this site for thirty (30) days after publication of this document in
the Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that the EPA is
using for this action. Section IV discusses where to access and review
information that demonstrates how the deletion criteria have been met
at OU1 of the Libby Asbestos Superfund Site.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), the EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures in not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) and the NCP, the EPA conducts
five-year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial
actions where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain
at a site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. The EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is
deleted from the NPL. The EPA may initiate further action to ensure
continued protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes
available that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a
significant release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site
may be restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking
system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to deletion of OU1 of the Libby
Asbestos Superfund Site:
(1) The EPA consulted with the State before developing this Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion.
(2) The EPA has provided the State 30 working days for review of
this document prior to its publication in the Federal Register.
(3) In accordance with the criteria discussed above, EPA has
determined that no further response is appropriate;
(4) The State of Montana, through the DEQ, has concurred with
deletion of OU1 of the Libby Asbestos Superfund Site, from the NPL.
(5) Concurrently with the publication of this Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion in the Federal Register, notices are being published
in the Western News, the Kootenai Valley Record, and The Montanian. The
newspaper notices announce the 30-day public comment period concerning
the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site from the NPL.
(6) The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket, made these items available for
public inspection, and copying at the Site information repositories
identified above.
If comments are received within the 30-day comment period on this
document, the EPA will evaluate and respond to the comments before
making a final decision to delete OU1. If necessary, the EPA will
prepare a Responsiveness Summary to address any significant public
comments received. After the public comment period, if the EPA
determines it is still appropriate to delete OU1 of the Libby Asbestos
Superfund Site, the Regional Administrator will publish a final Notice
of Partial Deletion in the Federal Register. Public notices, public
submissions and copies of the Responsiveness Summary, if prepared, will
be made available to interested parties and included in the site
information repositories listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
the EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for future
response actions, should future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the proposed partial
deletion in the deletion docket. The material provides explanation of
EPA's rationale for the partial deletion and demonstrates how it meets
the deletion criteria. This information is made available for public
inspection in the dockets identified above.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR
54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR,
1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: December 9, 2019.
Gregory E. Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020-00983 Filed 1-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P