Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Renewal of Existing Information Collection Request for Confidential Business Information Substantiation, 3910-3911 [2020-01109]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
3910
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 15 / Thursday, January 23, 2020 / Notices
brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the
eComment system at https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end
of your comments. For assistance,
please contact FERC Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, (866)
208–3676 (toll free), or (202) 502–8659
(TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please
send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
The first page of any filing should
include docket number P–2165–024.
Comments emailed to Commission staff
are not considered part of the
Commission record.
The Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure require all intervenors
filing documents with the Commission
to serve a copy of that document on
each person whose name appears on the
official service list for the project.
Further, if an intervenor files comments
or documents with the Commission
relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must
also serve a copy of the document on
that resource agency.
k. Description of Request: Alabama
Power Company proposes to permit
Mallard Point Marina to install a new
boat docking pier to accommodate 40
watercraft. A marina has existed at this
location for decades but the marina
layout has changed over time. The
marina was previously approved to
construct a 150-foot pier to
accommodate 40 watercraft, but now
instead proposes to construct a 239-foot
pier at the same location. The marina
would be located across from a sandbar
(exposed especially during the winter
drawdown) identified by the Alabama
Marine Patrol and would require
Alabama Power Company to make an
exception from its Non-Commercial
Guidelines due to the length of the pier.
l. Locations of the Application: A
copy of the application is available for
inspection and reproduction at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
located at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426, or by calling
(202) 502–8371. This filing may also be
viewed on the Commission’s website at
https://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
link. Enter the docket number excluding
the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document.
You may also register online at https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via
email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects.
For assistance, call 1–866–208–3676 or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Jan 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, for
TTY, call (202) 502–8659. A copy is also
available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item (h)
above. Agencies may obtain copies of
the application directly from the
applicant.
m. Individuals desiring to be included
on the Commission’s mailing list should
so indicate by writing to the Secretary
of the Commission.
n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to
Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214,
respectively. In determining the
appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests or
other comments filed, but only those
who file a motion to intervene in
accordance with the Commission’s
Rules may become a party to the
proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received
on or before the specified comment date
for the particular application.
o. Filing and Service of Documents:
Any filing must (1) bear in all capital
letters the title COMMENTS, PROTEST,
or MOTION TO INTERVENE as
applicable; (2) set forth in the heading
the name of the applicant and the
project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish
the name, address, and telephone
number of the person commenting,
protesting or intervening; and (4)
otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005.
All comments, motions to intervene, or
protests must set forth their evidentiary
basis. Any filing made by an intervenor
must be accompanied by proof of
service on all persons listed in the
service list prepared by the Commission
in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 385.2010.
Dated: January 16, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–01101 Filed 1–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OGC–2020–0020; FRL–10004–65–
OGC]
Proposed Information Collection
Request; Comment Request; Renewal
of Existing Information Collection
Request for Confidential Business
Information Substantiation
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR),
‘‘Renewal of Existing Information
Collection Request for Confidential
Business Information Substantiation’’
(EPA ICR No. 1665.14, OMB Control No.
2020–003) to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act. Before doing
so, EPA is soliciting public comments
on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described
below. This is a proposed extension of
the ICR, which is currently approved
through May 31, 2020. An Agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before March 23, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OGC–2020–0020, online using
www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to hq.foia@epa.gov,
or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be confidential
business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher T. Creech, National FOIA
Office, (2310A), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: 202–564–4286;
email address: creech.christopher@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will
be collecting are available in the public
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 15 / Thursday, January 23, 2020 / Notices
docket for this ICR. The docket can be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov
or in person at the EPA Docket Center,
WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The telephone number for the Docket
Center is 202–566–1744. For additional
information about EPA’s public docket,
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA is soliciting comments
and information to enable it to: (i)
Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility in completing CBI
determinations; (ii) evaluate the
accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (iv) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses. EPA will consider the
comments received and amend the ICR
as appropriate. The final ICR package
will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, EPA
will issue another Federal Register
notice to announce the submission of
the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) established the
requirements set forth in 40 CFR, part 2,
subpart B, ‘‘Confidentiality of Business
Information.’’ The requirements govern
business confidentiality claims. The
requirements include the handling by
the Agency of business information
which is or may be entitled to
confidential treatment, requiring
business submitters to substantiate CBI
claims, determining whether such
information is entitled to confidential
treatment for reasons of business
confidentiality, and responding to
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
requests pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552 for
information claimed as CBI.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities:
Respondents include any business
submitting information to EPA that it
claims as CBI. EPA receives such
information from both the
manufacturing (SIC codes 20–39) and
non-manufacturing sectors (no SIC
codes identified).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Jan 22, 2020
Jkt 250001
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Voluntary and mandatory.
Estimated number of respondents:
198 (total).
Frequency of response: 1 response per
respondent annually.
Total estimated burden: 752.4 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.03(b).
Total estimated cost: $169,290 (per
year), includes $0 annualized capital or
operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in Estimates: The revised
requests for substantiation will decrease
the estimated burden hours for each
response, although it increases the total
estimated respondent burden compared
with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. The decrease is 2 hours for each
business response; the increase is based
on an expected higher response rate
under the new form, producing an
increase from 488 hours to 752.4 hours
total. These changes are due to the
removal of a question that required a
company to describe, with specificity,
the ‘‘substantial competitive harm’’ that
would occur as a direct result of
disclosing the information. EPA
modified its substantiation questions as
a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s
decision in Food Marketing Institute v.
Argus Leader Media (Argus), 139 S. Ct.
2356 (2019), which evaluated the
definition of ‘‘confidential’’ as used in
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4). In the Argus decision, the
Court held that at least where ‘‘[1]
commercial or financial information is
both customarily and actually treated as
private by its owner and [2] provided to
the government under an assurance of
privacy, the information is ‘confidential’
within the meaning of Exemption 4.’’
Argus, 139 S. Ct. at 2366. EPA has
reduced burdens to business submitters
by removing the requirement to explain
with specificity whatever ‘‘substantial
competitive harm’’ a submitter claims
would ensue from release of each CBI
claim. The evaluation of ‘‘substantial
competitive harm’’ had required
businesses to analyze and describe the
potential impacts of release. EPA has
replaced that question with modified
questions that require a factual
description of the submitter’s handling
and treatment of the CBI-claimed
information, as well as a description of
any assurances provided by EPA at the
time of submission. This replacement
will reduce the burden on companies
since evaluation and analysis of
‘‘substantial competitive harm’’ is no
longer required. Further, EPA reframed
preexisting questions to solicit ‘‘yes’’ or
‘‘no’’ responses, which further reduces
burdens on submitters. These
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3911
modifications will result in greater
clarity to business submitters and
improved responses as the Agency
completes its confidentiality
determinations. The Agency anticipates
that this lower burden on each response
will increase the response rate from
21% in the prior analysis to 66% in the
present analysis. EPA has already
experienced an increase in response rate
as a result of the Supreme Court’s
decision and expects this change to
continue under the new form. EPA also
made other adjustments in its analysis
including adjustments in the hourly
costs for both the Agency and
responding companies as well as
removing a category of burden that was
not relevant to EPA’s information
request.
Dated: January 15, 2020.
Timothy R. Epp,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2020–01109 Filed 1–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Notice
10:00 a.m., Thursday,
February 13, 2020.
TIME AND DATE:
The Richard V. Backley Hearing
Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004
(enter from F Street entrance).
PLACE:
STATUS:
Open.
The
Commission will consider and act upon
the following in open session: Secretary
of Labor v. M-Class Mining, LLC, Docket
No. LAKE 2018–0188–R. (Issues include
whether the Judge erred in ruling that a
section 103(k) safety order was validly
issued and was not an abuse of
discretion.)
Any person attending this meeting
who requires special accessibility
features and/or auxiliary aids, such as
sign language interpreters, must inform
the Commission in advance of those
needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3)
and 2706.160(d).
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Emogene Johnson (202) 434–9935/(202)
708–9300 for TDD Relay/1–800–877–
8339 for toll free.
Phone Number for Listening to
Meeting: 1 (866) 236–7472.
Passcode: 678–100.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3910-3911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01109]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OGC-2020-0020; FRL-10004-65-OGC]
Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Renewal
of Existing Information Collection Request for Confidential Business
Information Substantiation
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit an information collection request (ICR), ``Renewal of Existing
Information Collection Request for Confidential Business Information
Substantiation'' (EPA ICR No. 1665.14, OMB Control No. 2020-003) to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. Before doing so, EPA is
soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed
information collection as described below. This is a proposed extension
of the ICR, which is currently approved through May 31, 2020. An Agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 23, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OGC-
2020-0020, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher T. Creech, National FOIA
Office, (2310A), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-564-4286; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public
[[Page 3911]]
docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is 202-566-1744. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility in completing CBI
determinations; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (iii) enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. EPA will consider the comments received and
amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be
submitted to OMB for review and approval. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR
to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
Abstract: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
established the requirements set forth in 40 CFR, part 2, subpart B,
``Confidentiality of Business Information.'' The requirements govern
business confidentiality claims. The requirements include the handling
by the Agency of business information which is or may be entitled to
confidential treatment, requiring business submitters to substantiate
CBI claims, determining whether such information is entitled to
confidential treatment for reasons of business confidentiality, and
responding to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552 for information claimed as CBI.
Form Numbers: None.
Respondents/affected entities: Respondents include any business
submitting information to EPA that it claims as CBI. EPA receives such
information from both the manufacturing (SIC codes 20-39) and non-
manufacturing sectors (no SIC codes identified).
Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary and mandatory.
Estimated number of respondents: 198 (total).
Frequency of response: 1 response per respondent annually.
Total estimated burden: 752.4 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
Total estimated cost: $169,290 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
Changes in Estimates: The revised requests for substantiation will
decrease the estimated burden hours for each response, although it
increases the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR
currently approved by OMB. The decrease is 2 hours for each business
response; the increase is based on an expected higher response rate
under the new form, producing an increase from 488 hours to 752.4 hours
total. These changes are due to the removal of a question that required
a company to describe, with specificity, the ``substantial competitive
harm'' that would occur as a direct result of disclosing the
information. EPA modified its substantiation questions as a result of
the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Food Marketing Institute v. Argus
Leader Media (Argus), 139 S. Ct. 2356 (2019), which evaluated the
definition of ``confidential'' as used in Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). In the Argus decision, the
Court held that at least where ``[1] commercial or financial
information is both customarily and actually treated as private by its
owner and [2] provided to the government under an assurance of privacy,
the information is `confidential' within the meaning of Exemption 4.''
Argus, 139 S. Ct. at 2366. EPA has reduced burdens to business
submitters by removing the requirement to explain with specificity
whatever ``substantial competitive harm'' a submitter claims would
ensue from release of each CBI claim. The evaluation of ``substantial
competitive harm'' had required businesses to analyze and describe the
potential impacts of release. EPA has replaced that question with
modified questions that require a factual description of the
submitter's handling and treatment of the CBI-claimed information, as
well as a description of any assurances provided by EPA at the time of
submission. This replacement will reduce the burden on companies since
evaluation and analysis of ``substantial competitive harm'' is no
longer required. Further, EPA reframed preexisting questions to solicit
``yes'' or ``no'' responses, which further reduces burdens on
submitters. These modifications will result in greater clarity to
business submitters and improved responses as the Agency completes its
confidentiality determinations. The Agency anticipates that this lower
burden on each response will increase the response rate from 21% in the
prior analysis to 66% in the present analysis. EPA has already
experienced an increase in response rate as a result of the Supreme
Court's decision and expects this change to continue under the new
form. EPA also made other adjustments in its analysis including
adjustments in the hourly costs for both the Agency and responding
companies as well as removing a category of burden that was not
relevant to EPA's information request.
Dated: January 15, 2020.
Timothy R. Epp,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2020-01109 Filed 1-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P