Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3: Revise Technical Specifications 3.7.6 and 3.7.7, 3081-3085 [2020-00695]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 12 / Friday, January 17, 2020 / Notices
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces the
following meeting:
Name and Committee Code: Proposal
Review Panel for Office of International
Science and Engineering—PIRE: Black
Hole Astrophysics in the Era of
Distributed Resources and Expertise—
Reverse Site Visit (#10749).
Date and Time: February 13, 2020;
8:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.
Place: National Science Foundation,
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria
VA 22314.
Type of Meeting: Part open.
Contact Person: Cassandra Dudka,
PIRE Program Manager, National
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314;
Telephone 703/292–7250.
Purpose of Meeting: NSF reverse site
visit to conduct a review during year 3
of the five-year award period. To
conduct an in-depth evaluation of
performance, to assess progress towards
goals, and to provide recommendations.
Agenda: See Attached.
Reason for Closing: Topics to be
discussed and evaluated during closed
portions of the reverse site review will
include information of a proprietary or
confidential nature, including technical
information; and information on
personnel. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: January 14, 2020.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–00714 Filed 1–16–20; 8:45 am]
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–286; NRC–2020–0019]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.;
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit
No. 3: Revise Technical Specifications
3.7.6 and 3.7.7
Partnerships for International Research
and Education (PIRE)
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: License amendment application;
opportunity to comment, request a
hearing, and petition for leave to
intervene.
Reverse Site Visit Agenda
SUMMARY:
PIRE: Black Hole Astrophysics in the
Era of Distributed Resources and
Expertise
(PI: Psaltis)
NSF Room W17000
Date: February 13, 2020
8:00 a.m. Panelists arrive. Coffee/light
refreshments available.
8:15 a.m.–8:45 a.m. Panel Orientation
(CLOSED)
PIRE Rationale and Goals
Charge to Panel
8:45 a.m. PIs Arrive/Introductions
9:00 a.m.–11:00 a.m. PIRE Project
Presentation
Overview of the Project and Project
Management
Research Accomplishments and
Impacts to Date
Benefits of International Partnerships
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Jan 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0019. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• Mail comments to: Office of
Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7–
A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001, ATTN: Program Management,
Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard V. Guzman, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415–
1030; email: Richard.Guzman@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
AGENCY:
National Science Foundation, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Integrating Research and Education
Educational Impact on Students
Research Plan and Future Activities to
Achieve the Projects Goals
11:00 a.m.–11:30 a.m. Questions and
Answers
12:00 p.m.–1:30 p.m. Working
Lunch—Panel Discussion—
(CLOSED)
1:30 p.m.–2:00 p.m. Student
recruitment
Diversity
Communication and Outreach
Evaluation and Assessment
Institutional Support
2:00 p.m.–3:00 p.m. Initial Feedback to
the PIRE Project Team (CLOSED)
3:00 p.m. PIRE Project Team is
dismissed
3:00 p.m.–4:30 p.m. Panel Meets to
Prepare Reverse Site Visit Report
(CLOSED)
4:30 p.m.–4:45 p.m. Panel Meets with
NSF Staff to Discuss the Report
(CLOSED)
5:00 p.m. End of Reverse Site Visit
3081
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an amendment to Renewed
Facility Operating License No. DPR–64,
issued to Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc. (the licensee), for operation of
Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit
No. 3 (Indian Point Unit 3 or IP3). The
proposed amendment would modify
Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.7, ‘‘City
Water (CW),’’ Surveillance Requirement
(SR) 3.7.7.2, and TS 3.7.6, ‘‘Condensate
Storage Tank (CST),’’ Required Action
A.1.
Submit comments by February
18, 2020. Requests for a hearing or
petition for leave to intervene must be
filed by March 17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2020–
0019 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0019.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The license amendment request
dated November 21, 2019, is available in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML19325E913.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC–2020–
0019 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
3082
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 12 / Friday, January 17, 2020 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://www.regulations
.gov as well as enter the comment
submissions into ADAMS. The NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove identifying or
contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an
amendment to Renewed Facility
Operating License No. DPR–64 issued to
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., for
operation of Indian Point Unit 3, located
in Westchester County, New York.
Specifically, the proposed amendment
would revise TS SR 3.7.7.2 to allow one
of the backflow preventer isolation
valves on the Indian Point Unit 3 city
water (CW) header supply to be
maintained closed when in the modes of
applicability for TS Limiting Condition
for Operation (LCO) 3.7.7 (i.e., during
Modes 1, 2, and 3, and Mode 4 when the
steam generators are relied upon for
heat removal), provided that the
requirements of TS LCO 3.7.6 are met.
The proposed change would eliminate
intrusion of CW into the auxiliary
feedwater (AFW) system and the CST
due to leak-by past a downstream
isolation valve and allow removal of a
temporary modification that provides
continuous flushing of the 33 AFW
pump suction line. In addition, the
proposed amendment would revise TS
3.7.6 Required Action A.1 to require the
closed backflow preventer isolation
valve on the Indian Point Unit 3 CW
header supply to be reopened
immediately in the event that the CST
is declared inoperable.
Before any issuance of the proposed
license amendment, the NRC will need
to make the findings required by the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), and NRC regulations.
The NRC has made a proposed
determination that the license
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration. Under
the NRC’s regulations in section 50.92 of
title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), this means that
operation of the facility in accordance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Jan 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
with the proposed amendment would
not (1) involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2)
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated; or (3)
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. As required by 10 CFR
50.91(a), the licensee has provided its
analysis of the issue of no significant
hazards consideration, which is
presented below:
1. Does the proposed amendment involve
a significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed amendment does not involve
a significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated.
The proposed amendment would modify
IP3 TS SR 3.7.7.2 to allow one of the
backflow preventer isolation valves on the
IP3 CW Header Supply to be maintained
closed, provided the requirements of TS LCO
3.7.6 are met. In addition, the proposed
change to TS 3.7.6 Required Action A.1
would require the closed backflow preventer
isolation valve to be re-opened immediately
in the event the CST is declared inoperable.
The proposed changes to SR 3.7.7.2 and TS
3.7.6, Required Action 1 do not affect any
initiator or precursor of any accident
previously evaluated. Therefore, the
proposed change does not involve a
significant increase in the probability of an
accident previously evaluated.
The CST is the preferred source of water
for the AFW System, and this remains
unchanged. The consequences of accidents or
events in which the AFW is credited or
required are normally mitigated by operation
of the AFW System. The CW system can be
used as a backup to the CST in the event the
CST is unavailable for any reason, including
due to CST damage from a tornado-generated
missile.
In order to place the CW System in service,
the proposed changes will add a field action
by a nuclear plant operator to open one of the
backflow preventer isolation valves on the
IP3 CW Header Supply, in addition to the
already required manual action to open the
individual AFW pump suction valves from
the control room. The proposed changes will
also require the closed backflow preventer
isolation valve on the IP3 CW Header Supply
to be re-opened immediately in the event the
CST is declared inoperable. As a result, the
CW system will continue to provide a
reliable means of backup cooling to the AFW
pumps. Therefore, the proposed amendment
does not involve a significant increase in the
consequences of an accident previously
evaluated.
2. Does the proposed amendment create
the possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed changes do not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accident from any accident previously
evaluated.
The proposed amendment would modify
IP3 TS SR 3.7.7.2 to allow one of the
backflow preventer isolation valves on the
IP3 CW Header Supply to be maintained
closed, provided the requirements of TS LCO
3.7.6 are met. In addition, the proposed
changes to TS 3.7.6, Required Action A.1
would require the closed backflow preventer
isolation valve to be re-opened immediately
in the event the CST is declared inoperable.
The proposed amendment will not involve
any physical changes to the existing plant, so
no new malfunctions could create the
possibility of a new or different kind of
accident. The proposed amendment makes
no changes to conditions external to the plant
that could create the possibility of a new or
different kind of. accident. The proposed
change will not create the possibility of a
new or different kind of accident as no new
accident initiators, precursors, failure
mechanisms, or malfunctions are being
introduced by the proposed changes.
The AFW System, the CST, and the CW
System will continue to perform their design
basis cooling functions for previously
evaluated accidents or events for which the
AFW System is credited or required. The
normal source of CST cooling water for the
AFW pumps is unaffected by the proposed
changes. The AFW System is provided
sufficient redundancy of water supplies such
that the alternate source of water from the
CW System is available in the event the CST
is unavailable.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does
not create the possibility of a new or different
kind of accident from any previously
evaluated.
3. Does the proposed amendment involve
a significant reduction in the margin of
safety?
The proposed amendment does not involve
a significant reduction in the margin of
safety.
The proposed amendment would modify
IP3 TS SR 3.7.7.2 to allow one of the
backflow preventer isolation valves on the
IP3 CW Header Supply to be maintained
closed, provided the requirements of TS LCO
3.7.6 are met. In addition, the proposed
changes to TS 3.7.6, Required Action A.1
would require the closed backflow preventer
isolation valve to be re-opened immediately
in the event the CST is declared inoperable.
The change does not exceed or alter any
controlling numerical value for a parameter
established in the FSAR [Final Safety
Analysis Report] or elsewhere in the IP3
licensing basis related to design basis or
safety limits. Entergy has performed a risk
assessment in support of the proposed
amendment and concluded that this change
is not risk significant.
The proposed changes only affect the
manual actions required to place the CW
system in service. No automatic actions are
affected by the proposed changes. This
request does not replace an automatic action
with a manual action, isolate a safety related
source of water that was previously
unisolated, or close a valve that was
previously required to be locked open. The
CW system will continue to provide a
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 12 / Friday, January 17, 2020 / Notices
reliable means of backup cooling to the AFW
pumps.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does
not involve a significant reduction in the
margin of safety.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
The NRC staff has reviewed the
licensee’s analysis and, based on this
review, it appears that the three
standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff
proposes to determine that the license
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration.
The NRC is seeking public comments
on this proposed determination that the
license amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration. Any
comments received within 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice
will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license
amendment before expiration of the 60day notice period if the Commission
concludes the amendment involves no
significant hazards consideration. In
addition, the Commission may issue the
amendment prior to the expiration of
the 30-day comment period if
circumstances change during the 30-day
comment period such that failure to act
in a timely way would result, for
example, in derating or shutdown of the
facility. If the Commission takes action
prior to the expiration of either the
comment period or the notice period, it
will publish in the Federal Register a
notice of issuance. If the Commission
makes a final no significant hazards
consideration determination, any
hearing will take place after issuance.
The Commission expects that the need
to take this action will occur very
infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing
and Petition for Leave To Intervene
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, any persons
(petitioner) whose interest may be
affected by this action may file a request
for a hearing and petition for leave to
intervene (petition) with respect to the
action. Petitions shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission’s
‘‘Agency Rules of Practice and
Procedure’’ in 10 CFR part 2. Interested
persons should consult a current copy
of 10 CFR 2.309. The NRC’s regulations
are accessible electronically from the
NRC Library on the NRC’s website at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/cfr/. Alternatively, a copy of
the regulations is available at the NRC’s
Public Document Room, located at One
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Jan 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
White Flint North, Room O1–F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (First Floor), Rockville,
Maryland 20852. If a petition is filed,
the Commission or a presiding officer
will rule on the petition and, if
appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be
issued.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309(d) the
petition should specifically explain the
reasons why intervention should be
permitted with particular reference to
the following general requirements for
standing: (1) The name, address, and
telephone number of the petitioner; (2)
the nature of the petitioner’s right to be
made a party to the proceeding; (3) the
nature and extent of the petitioner’s
property, financial, or other interest in
the proceeding; and (4) the possible
effect of any decision or order which
may be entered in the proceeding on the
petitioner’s interest.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f),
the petition must also set forth the
specific contentions which the
petitioner seeks to have litigated in the
proceeding. Each contention must
consist of a specific statement of the
issue of law or fact to be raised or
controverted. In addition, the petitioner
must provide a brief explanation of the
bases for the contention and a concise
statement of the alleged facts or expert
opinion which support the contention
and on which the petitioner intends to
rely in proving the contention at the
hearing. The petitioner must also
provide references to the specific
sources and documents on which the
petitioner intends to rely to support its
position on the issue. The petition must
include sufficient information to show
that a genuine dispute exists with the
applicant or licensee on a material issue
of law or fact. Contentions must be
limited to matters within the scope of
the proceeding. The contention must be
one which, if proven, would entitle the
petitioner to relief. A petitioner who
fails to satisfy the requirements at 10
CFR 2.309(f) with respect to at least one
contention will not be permitted to
participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become
parties to the proceeding, subject to any
limitations in the order granting leave to
intervene. Parties have the opportunity
to participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing with respect to resolution of
that party’s admitted contentions,
including the opportunity to present
evidence, consistent with the NRC’s
regulations, policies, and procedures.
Petitions must be filed no later than
60 days from the date of publication of
this notice. Petitions and motions for
leave to file new or amended
contentions that are filed after the
deadline will not be entertained absent
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3083
a determination by the presiding officer
that the filing demonstrates good cause
by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR
2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii). The petition
must be filed in accordance with the
filing instructions in the ‘‘Electronic
Submissions (E-Filing)’’ section of this
document.
If a hearing is requested, and the
Commission has not made a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration, the
Commission will make a final
determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration. The
final determination will serve to
establish when the hearing is held. If the
final determination is that the
amendment request involves no
significant hazards consideration, the
Commission may issue the amendment
and make it immediately effective,
notwithstanding the request for a
hearing. Any hearing would take place
after issuance of the amendment. If the
final determination is that the
amendment request involves a
significant hazards consideration, then
any hearing held would take place
before the issuance of the amendment
unless the Commission finds an
imminent danger to the health or safety
of the public, in which case it will issue
an appropriate order or rule under 10
CFR part 2.
A State, local governmental body,
Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or
agency thereof, may submit a petition to
the Commission to participate as a party
under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(1). The petition
should state the nature and extent of the
petitioner’s interest in the proceeding.
The petition should be submitted to the
Commission no later than 60 days from
the date of publication of this notice.
The petition must be filed in accordance
with the filing instructions in the
‘‘Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)’’
section of this document, and should
meet the requirements for petitions set
forth in this section, except that under
10 CFR 2.309(h)(2) a State, local
governmental body, or Federallyrecognized Indian Tribe, or agency
thereof does not need to address the
standing requirements in 10 CFR
2.309(d) if the facility is located within
its boundaries. Alternatively, a State,
local governmental body, Federallyrecognized Indian Tribe, or agency
thereof may participate as a non-party
under 10 CFR 2.315(c).
If a hearing is granted, any person
who is not a party to the proceeding and
is not affiliated with or represented by
a party may, at the discretion of the
presiding officer, be permitted to make
a limited appearance pursuant to the
provisions of 10 CFR 2.315(a). A person
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
3084
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 12 / Friday, January 17, 2020 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
making a limited appearance may make
an oral or written statement of his or her
position on the issues but may not
otherwise participate in the proceeding.
A limited appearance may be made at
any session of the hearing or at any
prehearing conference, subject to the
limits and conditions as may be
imposed by the presiding officer. Details
regarding the opportunity to make a
limited appearance will be provided by
the presiding officer if such sessions are
scheduled.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC
adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing and petition for
leave to intervene (petition), any motion
or other document filed in the
proceeding prior to the submission of a
request for hearing or petition to
intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities that
request to participate under 10 CFR
2.315(c), must be filed in accordance
with the NRC’s E-Filing rule (72 FR
49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at
77 FR 46562; August 3, 2012). The EFiling process requires participants to
submit and serve all adjudicatory
documents over the internet, or in some
cases to mail copies on electronic
storage media. Detailed guidance on
making electronic submissions may be
found in the Guidance for Electronic
Submissions to the NRC and on the NRC
website at https://www.nrc.gov/sitehelp/e-submittals.html. Participants
may not submit paper copies of their
filings unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures
described below.
To comply with the procedural
requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the
participant should contact the Office of
the Secretary by email at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone
at 301–415–1677, to (1) request a digital
identification (ID) certificate, which
allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign
submissions and access the E-Filing
system for any proceeding in which it
is participating; and (2) advise the
Secretary that the participant will be
submitting a petition or other
adjudicatory document (even in
instances in which the participant, or its
counsel or representative, already holds
an NRC-issued digital ID certificate).
Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic
docket for the hearing in this proceeding
if the Secretary has not already
established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a
digital ID certificate is available on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Jan 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/
getting-started.html. Once a participant
has obtained a digital ID certificate and
a docket has been created, the
participant can then submit
adjudicatory documents. Submissions
must be in Portable Document Format
(PDF). Additional guidance on PDF
submissions is available on the NRC’s
public website at https://www.nrc.gov/
site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A
filing is considered complete at the time
the document is submitted through the
NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an
electronic filing must be submitted to
the E-Filing system no later than 11:59
p.m. Eastern Time on the due date.
Upon receipt of a transmission, the EFiling system time-stamps the document
and sends the submitter an email notice
confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email
notice that provides access to the
document to the NRC’s Office of the
General Counsel and any others who
have advised the Office of the Secretary
that they wish to participate in the
proceeding, so that the filer need not
serve the document on those
participants separately. Therefore,
applicants and other participants (or
their counsel or representative) must
apply for and receive a digital ID
certificate before adjudicatory
documents are filed so that they can
obtain access to the documents via the
E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using
the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system
may seek assistance by contacting the
NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk
through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located
on the NRC’s public website at https://
www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to
MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC
Electronic Filing Help Desk is available
between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday,
excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they
have a good cause for not submitting
documents electronically must file an
exemption request, in accordance with
10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper
filing stating why there is good cause for
not filing electronically and requesting
authorization to continue to submit
documents in paper format. Such filings
must be submitted by: (1) First class
mail addressed to the Office of the
Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or
(2) courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service to the Office of the
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing adjudicatory
documents in this manner are
responsible for serving the document on
all other participants. Filing is
considered complete by first-class mail
as of the time of deposit in the mail, or
by courier, express mail, or expedited
delivery service upon depositing the
document with the provider of the
service. A presiding officer, having
granted an exemption request from
using E-Filing, may require a participant
or party to use E-Filing if the presiding
officer subsequently determines that the
reason for granting the exemption from
use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in the NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://
adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission
or the presiding officer. If you do not
have an NRC-issued digital ID certificate
as described above, click ‘‘Cancel’’
when the link requests certificates and
you will be automatically directed to the
NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where
you will be able to access any publicly
available documents in a particular
hearing docket. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
personal phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. For example, in some
instances, individuals provide home
addresses in order to demonstrate
proximity to a facility or site. With
respect to copyrighted works, except for
limited excerpts that serve the purpose
of the adjudicatory filings and would
constitute a Fair Use application,
participants are requested not to include
copyrighted materials in their
submission.
For further details with respect to this
action, see the licensee’s application
dated November 21, 2019 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML19325E913).
Attorney for licensee: Bill Glew,
Associate General Counsel, Entergy
Services, Inc., 639 Loyola Avenue, 22nd
Floor, New Orleans, LA 70113.
NRC Branch Chief: James G. Danna.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day
of January, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 12 / Friday, January 17, 2020 / Notices
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard V. Guzman, Sr.,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I,
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2020–00695 Filed 1–16–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Request for Public Comment on Draft
Desirable Characteristics of
Repositories for Managing and Sharing
Data Resulting From Federally Funded
Research
Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP).
ACTION: Request for Comments.
AGENCY:
The White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy is
seeking public comments on a draft set
of desirable characteristics of data
repositories used to locate, manage,
share, and use data resulting from
Federally funded research. The purpose
of this effort is to identify and help
Federal agencies provide more
consistent information on desirable
characteristics of data repositories for
data subject to agency Public Access
Plans and data management and sharing
policies, whether those repositories are
operated by government or nongovernmental entities. Optimization and
improved consistency in agencyprovided information for data
repositories is expected to reduce the
burden for researchers. Feedback
obtained through this Request for
Comments (RFC) will help to inform
coordinated agency action.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
will be considered, please submit your
response on or before 11:59 p.m. ET on
March 6, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
submitted online to: OpenScience@
ostp.eop.gov. Email submissions should
be machine-readable [pdf, word] and
not copy-protected. Submissions should
include ‘‘RFC Response: Desirable
Repository Characteristics’’ in the
subject line of the message.
Instructions: Response to this RFC is
voluntary. Each individual or institution
is requested to submit only one
response. Submission should not exceed
5 pages in 12 point or larger font, and
should be paginated. Responses should
include the name and organizational
affiliation(s) of the person(s) filing the
comment. Additionally, to assist in
analyzing responses, respondents are
requested to indicate the primary
scientific discipline(s) in which they
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:20 Jan 16, 2020
Jkt 250001
work (e.g., life sciences, physical
sciences, social sciences) and their role
(e.g., researcher, librarian, data manager,
administrator). Comments containing
references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely
published should include copies or
electronic links of the referenced
materials. Comments containing
profanity, vulgarity, threats, or other
inappropriate language or content will
not be considered.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice are subject to FOIA.
Responses to this RFC may also be
posted, without change, on a Federal
website. Therefore, we request that no
business proprietary information,
copyrighted information, or personally
identifiable information (beyond filing
name and institution) be submitted in
response to this RFC.
In accordance with FAR 15.202(3),
responses to this notice are not offers
and cannot be accepted by the
Government to form a binding contract.
Additionally, those submitting
responses are solely responsible for all
expenses associated with response
preparation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Nichols at OpenScience@ostp.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Subcommittee on Open Science
(SOS) of the National Science and
Technology Council’s Committee on
Science (https://www.whitehouse.gov/
ostp/nstc/) convenes more than twenty
Federal departments and agencies
(hereafter ‘‘agencies’’) that support
research and development (R&D). It
aims to advance open science and foster
implementation of agency Public Access
Plans that were developed in response
to the 2013 White House Office of
Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)
memorandum entitled ‘‘Increasing
Access to the Results of Federally
Funded Scientific Research’’ that called
for improved access to data and
publications resulting from Federally
funded R&D. [For more information on
agency Public Access Plans, see https://
www.cendi.gov/projects/Public_Access_
Plans_US_Fed_Agencies.html. For more
explanation regarding Federally funded
research data, see 2 CFR 200.315(e)(3).]
One goal of the Subcommittee’s efforts
is to improve the consistency of
guidelines and best practices that
agencies provide about the long-term
preservation of data from Federally
funded research, including suitable
repositories for preserving and
providing access to such data,
considering agency missions, best
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3085
practices, and relevant standards.
According to OMB Circular A–81,
section 200.315, ‘‘Research data means
the recorded factual material commonly
accepted in the scientific community as
necessary to validate research findings,
but not any of the following:
preliminary analyses, drafts of scientific
papers, plans for future research, peer
reviews, or communications with
colleagues.’’ [See: https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2013/12/26/2013-30465/uniformadministrative-requirements-costprinciples-and-audit-requirements-forfederal-awards#sec-200-315.] These
efforts are consistent with and
supportive of other Administration
priorities, such as the Federal Data
Strategy and its associated set of
Practices to leverage data as a strategic
asset [For more information on Federal
Data Strategy Practices, see https://
strategy.data.gov/practices/].
In support of its work, the SOS has
developed a proposed set of desirable
characteristics of data repositories for
data resulting from Federally funded
research. The proposed characteristics
could apply to repositories operated by
government or non-governmental
entities. They draw from agency
experience in developing and
supporting data repositories and build
on existing information for selecting
repositories that agencies developed as
part of their public access policies.
Through public comment, the SOS aims
to refine and develop a common set of
characteristics that Federal R&D-funding
agencies can use to support their Public
Access and data sharing efforts.
These characteristics are not intended
to be an exhaustive set of design
features for data repositories. Federal
agencies would not plan to use these
characteristics to assess, evaluate, or
certify the acceptability of a specific
data repository, unless otherwise
specified for a particular agency
program, initiative, or funding
opportunity. Rather, the set of
characteristics is intended to be used as
a tool for agencies and Federally funded
investigators when, for example, they
are:
• Assisting Federally funded
investigators in identifying data
repositories to use for storing and
providing access to research data (e.g.,
when funding agencies do not host the
data and/or have not designated specific
repositories for use);
• Identifying specific repositories that
a Federal agency might designate for use
for particular types of research data
resulting from Federally funded
research;
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3081-3085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00695]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-286; NRC-2020-0019]
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Indian Point Nuclear Generating
Unit No. 3: Revise Technical Specifications 3.7.6 and 3.7.7
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: License amendment application; opportunity to comment, request
a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-
64, issued to Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the licensee), for
operation of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3 (Indian Point
Unit 3 or IP3). The proposed amendment would modify Technical
Specification (TS) 3.7.7, ``City Water (CW),'' Surveillance Requirement
(SR) 3.7.7.2, and TS 3.7.6, ``Condensate Storage Tank (CST),'' Required
Action A.1.
DATES: Submit comments by February 18, 2020. Requests for a hearing or
petition for leave to intervene must be filed by March 17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0019. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
TWFN-7-A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001, ATTN: Program Management, Announcements and Editing Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard V. Guzman, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1030; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2020-0019 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly-available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0019.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The license amendment request dated
November 21, 2019, is available in ADAMS under Accession No.
ML19325E913.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
B. Submitting Comments
Please include Docket ID NRC-2020-0019 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly
[[Page 3082]]
disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://www.regulations .gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Introduction
The NRC is considering issuance of an amendment to Renewed Facility
Operating License No. DPR-64 issued to Entergy Nuclear Operations,
Inc., for operation of Indian Point Unit 3, located in Westchester
County, New York. Specifically, the proposed amendment would revise TS
SR 3.7.7.2 to allow one of the backflow preventer isolation valves on
the Indian Point Unit 3 city water (CW) header supply to be maintained
closed when in the modes of applicability for TS Limiting Condition for
Operation (LCO) 3.7.7 (i.e., during Modes 1, 2, and 3, and Mode 4 when
the steam generators are relied upon for heat removal), provided that
the requirements of TS LCO 3.7.6 are met. The proposed change would
eliminate intrusion of CW into the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) system and
the CST due to leak-by past a downstream isolation valve and allow
removal of a temporary modification that provides continuous flushing
of the 33 AFW pump suction line. In addition, the proposed amendment
would revise TS 3.7.6 Required Action A.1 to require the closed
backflow preventer isolation valve on the Indian Point Unit 3 CW header
supply to be reopened immediately in the event that the CST is declared
inoperable.
Before any issuance of the proposed license amendment, the NRC will
need to make the findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), and NRC regulations.
The NRC has made a proposed determination that the license
amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under
the NRC's regulations in section 50.92 of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), this means that operation of the facility
in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) involve a
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As required
by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of the issue
of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented below:
1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase
in the probability or consequences of an accident previously
evaluated.
The proposed amendment would modify IP3 TS SR 3.7.7.2 to allow
one of the backflow preventer isolation valves on the IP3 CW Header
Supply to be maintained closed, provided the requirements of TS LCO
3.7.6 are met. In addition, the proposed change to TS 3.7.6 Required
Action A.1 would require the closed backflow preventer isolation
valve to be re-opened immediately in the event the CST is declared
inoperable. The proposed changes to SR 3.7.7.2 and TS 3.7.6,
Required Action 1 do not affect any initiator or precursor of any
accident previously evaluated. Therefore, the proposed change does
not involve a significant increase in the probability of an accident
previously evaluated.
The CST is the preferred source of water for the AFW System, and
this remains unchanged. The consequences of accidents or events in
which the AFW is credited or required are normally mitigated by
operation of the AFW System. The CW system can be used as a backup
to the CST in the event the CST is unavailable for any reason,
including due to CST damage from a tornado-generated missile.
In order to place the CW System in service, the proposed changes
will add a field action by a nuclear plant operator to open one of
the backflow preventer isolation valves on the IP3 CW Header Supply,
in addition to the already required manual action to open the
individual AFW pump suction valves from the control room. The
proposed changes will also require the closed backflow preventer
isolation valve on the IP3 CW Header Supply to be re-opened
immediately in the event the CST is declared inoperable. As a
result, the CW system will continue to provide a reliable means of
backup cooling to the AFW pumps. Therefore, the proposed amendment
does not involve a significant increase in the consequences of an
accident previously evaluated.
2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new
or different kind of accident from any accident previously
evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
The proposed amendment would modify IP3 TS SR 3.7.7.2 to allow
one of the backflow preventer isolation valves on the IP3 CW Header
Supply to be maintained closed, provided the requirements of TS LCO
3.7.6 are met. In addition, the proposed changes to TS 3.7.6,
Required Action A.1 would require the closed backflow preventer
isolation valve to be re-opened immediately in the event the CST is
declared inoperable.
The proposed amendment will not involve any physical changes to
the existing plant, so no new malfunctions could create the
possibility of a new or different kind of accident. The proposed
amendment makes no changes to conditions external to the plant that
could create the possibility of a new or different kind of.
accident. The proposed change will not create the possibility of a
new or different kind of accident as no new accident initiators,
precursors, failure mechanisms, or malfunctions are being introduced
by the proposed changes.
The AFW System, the CST, and the CW System will continue to
perform their design basis cooling functions for previously
evaluated accidents or events for which the AFW System is credited
or required. The normal source of CST cooling water for the AFW
pumps is unaffected by the proposed changes. The AFW System is
provided sufficient redundancy of water supplies such that the
alternate source of water from the CW System is available in the
event the CST is unavailable.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does not create the
possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any
previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction
in the margin of safety?
The proposed amendment does not involve a significant reduction
in the margin of safety.
The proposed amendment would modify IP3 TS SR 3.7.7.2 to allow
one of the backflow preventer isolation valves on the IP3 CW Header
Supply to be maintained closed, provided the requirements of TS LCO
3.7.6 are met. In addition, the proposed changes to TS 3.7.6,
Required Action A.1 would require the closed backflow preventer
isolation valve to be re-opened immediately in the event the CST is
declared inoperable.
The change does not exceed or alter any controlling numerical
value for a parameter established in the FSAR [Final Safety Analysis
Report] or elsewhere in the IP3 licensing basis related to design
basis or safety limits. Entergy has performed a risk assessment in
support of the proposed amendment and concluded that this change is
not risk significant.
The proposed changes only affect the manual actions required to
place the CW system in service. No automatic actions are affected by
the proposed changes. This request does not replace an automatic
action with a manual action, isolate a safety related source of
water that was previously unisolated, or close a valve that was
previously required to be locked open. The CW system will continue
to provide a
[[Page 3083]]
reliable means of backup cooling to the AFW pumps.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does not involve a significant
reduction in the margin of safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on
this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are
satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the
license amendment request involves no significant hazards
consideration.
The NRC is seeking public comments on this proposed determination
that the license amendment request involves no significant hazards
consideration. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license amendment before expiration of the 60-
day notice period if the Commission concludes the amendment involves no
significant hazards consideration. In addition, the Commission may
issue the amendment prior to the expiration of the 30-day comment
period if circumstances change during the 30-day comment period such
that failure to act in a timely way would result, for example, in
derating or shutdown of the facility. If the Commission takes action
prior to the expiration of either the comment period or the notice
period, it will publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance.
If the Commission makes a final no significant hazards consideration
determination, any hearing will take place after issuance. The
Commission expects that the need to take this action will occur very
infrequently.
III. Opportunity To Request a Hearing and Petition for Leave To
Intervene
Within 60 days after the date of publication of this notice, any
persons (petitioner) whose interest may be affected by this action may
file a request for a hearing and petition for leave to intervene
(petition) with respect to the action. Petitions shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission's ``Agency Rules of Practice and
Procedure'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested persons should consult a
current copy of 10 CFR 2.309. The NRC's regulations are accessible
electronically from the NRC Library on the NRC's website at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. Alternatively, a copy of
the regulations is available at the NRC's Public Document Room, located
at One White Flint North, Room O1-F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (First
Floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852. If a petition is filed, the
Commission or a presiding officer will rule on the petition and, if
appropriate, a notice of a hearing will be issued.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309(d) the petition should specifically
explain the reasons why intervention should be permitted with
particular reference to the following general requirements for
standing: (1) The name, address, and telephone number of the
petitioner; (2) the nature of the petitioner's right to be made a party
to the proceeding; (3) the nature and extent of the petitioner's
property, financial, or other interest in the proceeding; and (4) the
possible effect of any decision or order which may be entered in the
proceeding on the petitioner's interest.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.309(f), the petition must also set
forth the specific contentions which the petitioner seeks to have
litigated in the proceeding. Each contention must consist of a specific
statement of the issue of law or fact to be raised or controverted. In
addition, the petitioner must provide a brief explanation of the bases
for the contention and a concise statement of the alleged facts or
expert opinion which support the contention and on which the petitioner
intends to rely in proving the contention at the hearing. The
petitioner must also provide references to the specific sources and
documents on which the petitioner intends to rely to support its
position on the issue. The petition must include sufficient information
to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant or licensee on
a material issue of law or fact. Contentions must be limited to matters
within the scope of the proceeding. The contention must be one which,
if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A petitioner who
fails to satisfy the requirements at 10 CFR 2.309(f) with respect to at
least one contention will not be permitted to participate as a party.
Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding,
subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene.
Parties have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the
hearing with respect to resolution of that party's admitted
contentions, including the opportunity to present evidence, consistent
with the NRC's regulations, policies, and procedures.
Petitions must be filed no later than 60 days from the date of
publication of this notice. Petitions and motions for leave to file new
or amended contentions that are filed after the deadline will not be
entertained absent a determination by the presiding officer that the
filing demonstrates good cause by satisfying the three factors in 10
CFR 2.309(c)(1)(i) through (iii). The petition must be filed in
accordance with the filing instructions in the ``Electronic Submissions
(E-Filing)'' section of this document.
If a hearing is requested, and the Commission has not made a final
determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration, the
Commission will make a final determination on the issue of no
significant hazards consideration. The final determination will serve
to establish when the hearing is held. If the final determination is
that the amendment request involves no significant hazards
consideration, the Commission may issue the amendment and make it
immediately effective, notwithstanding the request for a hearing. Any
hearing would take place after issuance of the amendment. If the final
determination is that the amendment request involves a significant
hazards consideration, then any hearing held would take place before
the issuance of the amendment unless the Commission finds an imminent
danger to the health or safety of the public, in which case it will
issue an appropriate order or rule under 10 CFR part 2.
A State, local governmental body, Federally-recognized Indian
Tribe, or agency thereof, may submit a petition to the Commission to
participate as a party under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(1). The petition should
state the nature and extent of the petitioner's interest in the
proceeding. The petition should be submitted to the Commission no later
than 60 days from the date of publication of this notice. The petition
must be filed in accordance with the filing instructions in the
``Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)'' section of this document, and
should meet the requirements for petitions set forth in this section,
except that under 10 CFR 2.309(h)(2) a State, local governmental body,
or Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof does not need
to address the standing requirements in 10 CFR 2.309(d) if the facility
is located within its boundaries. Alternatively, a State, local
governmental body, Federally-recognized Indian Tribe, or agency thereof
may participate as a non-party under 10 CFR 2.315(c).
If a hearing is granted, any person who is not a party to the
proceeding and is not affiliated with or represented by a party may, at
the discretion of the presiding officer, be permitted to make a limited
appearance pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.315(a). A person
[[Page 3084]]
making a limited appearance may make an oral or written statement of
his or her position on the issues but may not otherwise participate in
the proceeding. A limited appearance may be made at any session of the
hearing or at any prehearing conference, subject to the limits and
conditions as may be imposed by the presiding officer. Details
regarding the opportunity to make a limited appearance will be provided
by the presiding officer if such sessions are scheduled.
IV. Electronic Submissions (E-Filing)
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a
request for hearing and petition for leave to intervene (petition), any
motion or other document filed in the proceeding prior to the
submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and
documents filed by interested governmental entities that request to
participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in accordance with the
NRC's E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 FR
46562; August 3, 2012). The E-Filing process requires participants to
submit and serve all adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in
some cases to mail copies on electronic storage media. Detailed
guidance on making electronic submissions may be found in the Guidance
for Electronic Submissions to the NRC and on the NRC website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html. Participants may not submit
paper copies of their filings unless they seek an exemption in
accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10
days prior to the filing deadline, the participant should contact the
Office of the Secretary by email at [email protected], or by
telephone at 301-415-1677, to (1) request a digital identification (ID)
certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or
representative) to digitally sign submissions and access the E-Filing
system for any proceeding in which it is participating; and (2) advise
the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition or
other adjudicatory document (even in instances in which the
participant, or its counsel or representative, already holds an NRC-
issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the
Secretary will establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this
proceeding if the Secretary has not already established an electronic
docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is
available on the NRC's public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. Once a participant has obtained a
digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant
can then submit adjudicatory documents. Submissions must be in Portable
Document Format (PDF). Additional guidance on PDF submissions is
available on the NRC's public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the
time the document is submitted through the NRC's E-Filing system. To be
timely, an electronic filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system
no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. Upon receipt of
a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an email notice confirming receipt of the document. The
E-Filing system also distributes an email notice that provides access
to the document to the NRC's Office of the General Counsel and any
others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the
document on those participants separately. Therefore, applicants and
other participants (or their counsel or representative) must apply for
and receive a digital ID certificate before adjudicatory documents are
filed so that they can obtain access to the documents via the E-Filing
system.
A person filing electronically using the NRC's adjudicatory E-
Filing system may seek assistance by contacting the NRC's Electronic
Filing Help Desk through the ``Contact Us'' link located on the NRC's
public website at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, by
email to [email protected], or by a toll-free call at 1-866-672-
7640. The NRC Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9 a.m.
and 6 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, excluding government
holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not
submitting documents electronically must file an exemption request, in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper filing
stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and
requesting authorization to continue to submit documents in paper
format. Such filings must be submitted by: (1) First class mail
addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service to the Office of the Secretary, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff. Participants filing adjudicatory documents in this
manner are responsible for serving the document on all other
participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class mail as of
the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon depositing the document with the
provider of the service. A presiding officer, having granted an
exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or
party to use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines
that the reason for granting the exemption from use of E-Filing no
longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the
NRC's electronic hearing docket which is available to the public at
https://adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded pursuant to an order of the
Commission or the presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC-issued
digital ID certificate as described above, click ``Cancel'' when the
link requests certificates and you will be automatically directed to
the NRC's electronic hearing dockets where you will be able to access
any publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket.
Participants are requested not to include personal privacy information,
such as social security numbers, home addresses, or personal phone
numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such information. For example, in some
instances, individuals provide home addresses in order to demonstrate
proximity to a facility or site. With respect to copyrighted works,
except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are
requested not to include copyrighted materials in their submission.
For further details with respect to this action, see the licensee's
application dated November 21, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19325E913).
Attorney for licensee: Bill Glew, Associate General Counsel,
Entergy Services, Inc., 639 Loyola Avenue, 22nd Floor, New Orleans, LA
70113.
NRC Branch Chief: James G. Danna.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of January, 2020.
[[Page 3085]]
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard V. Guzman, Sr.,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I, Division of Operating
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2020-00695 Filed 1-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P