Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards, 907-909 [2020-00073]
Download as PDF
907
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 5 / Wednesday, January 8, 2020 / Notices
history and are potential applicants for
Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
The NextGen Project will use a twophased approach for approval of this
proposed information collection
activity. In Phase 1 (current request) the
research team seeks approval to
formally recruit programs, to administer
the informed consent form and baseline
participant survey, and to collect
identifying and contact information for
study participants. The project intends
for these data collections to be uniform
across programs selected for evaluation
and it does not anticipate that they will
require revisions.
Under Phase 2 of the request, the
project will update the information
collection request for the remaining
instruments to tailor to each program
selected for the evaluation, as needed.
The proposed information collection
activities cover an experimental impact
study, descriptive study, and cost study.
Data collection activities for the impact
study include: (1) Baseline survey and
identifying and contact information data
collection, (2) a first follow-up survey,
and (3) a second follow-up survey. Data
collection activities for the descriptive
study include: (1) Service receipt
tracking; (2) staff characteristics survey;
(3) program leadership survey; (4) semistructured program discussion guide
(conducted with program leaders,
supervisors, partners, staff, and
providers); (5) semi-structured employer
discussion guide (for those
interventions that include an employer
component); and (6) in-depth
participant interviews. Data collection
activities for the cost study include an
Excel-based cost workbook.
Respondents: Program staff, program
partners, employer staff, and
individuals enrolled in the NextGen
Project. Program staff and partners may
include case managers, health
professionals, workshop instructors, job
developers, supervisors, managers, and
administrators. Employers may include
administrators, human resources staff,
and worksite supervisors.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Annual
number of
respondents
Total number
of respondents
Instrument
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Annual burden
hours
PHASE 1
Baseline survey & identifying and contact information—
participants .......................................................................
Baseline survey & identifying and contact information—
staff ...................................................................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours, Phase 1: ........
10,000
3,333
1
0.42
1,400
200
67
50
0.42
1,407
........................
........................
........................
........................
2,807
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
PHASE 2 ESTIMATES
First follow-up survey—participants .....................................
Second follow-up survey—participants ................................
Service receipt tracking—program staff ..............................
Staff characteristics survey—program staff .........................
Program leadership survey—program leaders ....................
Semi-structured program discussion guide—program leaders .....................................................................................
Semi-structured program discussion guide—program supervisors and partners .....................................................
Semi-structured program discussion guide—program staff,
providers ...........................................................................
Semi-structured employer discussion guide—employers ....
In-depth participant interview guide—participants ...............
Cost workbook—program staff ............................................
8,000
8,000
200
200
50
2,667
2,667
67
67
17
1
1
250
1
1
0.83
0.83
0.08
0.42
0.25
2,214
2,214
1,340
28
4
40
13
1
1.5
20
80
27
1
1.0
27
80
50
200
40
27
17
67
13
1
1
1
1
0.75
1.0
2.0
32.0
20
17
134
416
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours, Phase 2: ........
........................
........................
........................
........................
6,434
Comments: The Department
specifically requests comments on (a)
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Authority: Section 413 of the Social
Security Act, as amended by the FY 2017
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017
(Public Law 115–31).
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–00107 Filed 1–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–09–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–N–0764]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Animal Feed
Regulatory Program Standards
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
SUMMARY:
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM
08JAN1
908
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 5 / Wednesday, January 8, 2020 / Notices
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by February 7,
2020.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202–
395–7285, or emailed to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0760. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three
White Flint North, 10A–12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD
20852, 301–796–5733, PRAStaff@
fda.hhs.gov.
In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Animal Feed Regulatory Program
Standards
OMB Control Number 0910–0760—
Extension
I. Background
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
In the United States, Federal and State
Government Agencies ensure the safety
of animal feed. FDA is responsible for
ensuring that all food and feed moving
in interstate commerce, except those
under the U.S. Department of
Agriculture jurisdiction, are safe,
wholesome, and labeled properly. States
are responsible for conducting
inspections and regulatory activities
that help ensure food and feed
produced, processed, and distributed
within their jurisdictions are safe and in
compliance with State laws and
regulations. States primarily perform
inspections under their own regulatory
authority. Some States conduct
inspections of feed facilities under
contract with FDA. Because
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
jurisdictions may overlap, FDA and
States collaborate and share resources to
protect animal feed.
The FDA Food Safety Modernization
Act (Pub. L. 111–353) passed on January
4, 2011, calls for enhanced partnerships
and provides a legal mandate for
developing an Integrated Food Safety
System (IFSS). FDA is committed to
implementing an IFSS thereby
optimizing coordination of food and
feed safety efforts with Federal, State,
local, tribal, and territorial regulatory
and public health agencies. Model
standards provide a consistent,
underlying foundation that is critical for
uniformity across State and Federal
Agencies to ensure credibility of food
and feed programs within the IFSS.
II. Significance of Feed Program
Standards
The Animal Feed Regulatory Program
Standards (AFRPS) provide a uniform
and consistent approach to feed
regulation in the United States.
Implementation of the draft feed
program standards is voluntary. States
implementing the standards will
identify and maintain program
improvements that will strengthen the
safety and integrity of the U.S. animal
feed supply.
The feed standards are the framework
that each State should use to design,
manage, and improve its feed program.
The standards include the following: (1)
Regulatory foundation; (2) training; (3)
inspection program; (4) auditing; (5)
feed-related illness or death and
emergency response; (6) enforcement
program; (7) outreach activities; (8)
budget and planning; (9) assessment and
improvement; (10) laboratory services;
and (11) sampling program.
Each standard has a purpose
statement, requirement summary,
description of program elements,
projected outcomes, and a list of
required documentation. When a State
program voluntarily agrees to
implement the feed standards, it must
fully implement and maintain the
individual program elements and
documentation requirements in each
standard in order to fully implement the
standard.
The feed standards package includes
forms, worksheets, and templates to
help the State program assess and meet
the program elements in the standard.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
State programs are not obligated to use
the forms, worksheets, and templates
provided with the feed standards. Other
manual or automated forms, worksheets,
and templates may be used as long as
the pertinent data elements are present.
Records and other documents specified
in the feed standards must be
maintained in good order by the State
program and must be available to verify
the implementation of each standard.
The feed standards are not intended to
address the performance appraisal
processes that a State agency may use to
evaluate individual employee
performance.
As set forth in the feed standards, the
State program is expected to review and
update its improvement plan on an
annual basis. The State program
completes an evaluation of its
implementation status at least every 3
years following the baseline evaluation
by reviewing and updating the selfassessment worksheets and required
documentation for each standard. The
evaluation is needed to determine if
each standard’s requirements are, or
remain, fully met, partially met, or not
met. The State program revises the
improvement plan based upon this
evaluation.
Although FDA plans to provide
financial support to State programs that
implement the feed standards, funding
opportunities are contingent upon the
availability of funds. Funding
opportunities may be only available to
State feed regulatory programs that
currently have an FDA feed inspection
contract. State programs receiving
financial support to implement the feed
standards will be audited by FDA.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet
may submit requests for a single copy of
the current feed standards from OPPRA@fda.hhs.gov.
In the Federal Register of September
20, 2019 (84 FR 49524), we published a
60-day notice requesting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information. One comment was
submitted but did not address any of the
topics solicited and we therefore do not
discuss the comment here.
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM
08JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 5 / Wednesday, January 8, 2020 / Notices
909
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN 1
Type of respondent
Number of
recordkeepers
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
State Animal Feed Regulatory Program in the United
States ...............................................................................
34
1
34
569
19,346
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Respondents to the information
collection are State agencies seeking to
avail themselves of the options
described in the document. State
agencies that conduct feed inspections
under contract are interested in
implementing the standards. The total
estimated annual recordkeeping burden
for implementation is 569 hours per
respondent. The burden was determined
by capturing the average amount of time
for each respondent to assess the current
state of the program and work toward
implementation of each of the 11
standards contained in the AFRPS. The
hours per State feed regulatory program
will average the same to account for
continual improvement and selfsufficiency in the program. Our burden
estimate reflects a decrease of 100,654
hours as a result of fewer respondents
to the collection and a reevaluation of
the time we ascribe for recordkeeping
activities.
[FR Doc. 2020–00073 Filed 1–7–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2019–N–5550]
Elite Laboratories, Inc., et al.;
Withdrawal of Approval of 23
Abbreviated New Drug Applications
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
withdrawing approval of 23 abbreviated
new drug applications (ANDAs) from
multiple applicants. The applicants
notified the Agency in writing that the
SUMMARY:
drug products were no longer marketed
and requested that the approval of the
applications be withdrawn.
DATES: Approval is withdrawn as of
February 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martha Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1676,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–6980, Martha.Nguyen@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
applicants listed in the table have
informed FDA that these drug products
are no longer marketed and have
requested that FDA withdraw approval
of the applications under the process
described in § 314.150(c) (21 CFR
314.150(c)). The applicants have also,
by their requests, waived their
opportunity for a hearing. Withdrawal
of approval of an application or
abbreviated application under
§ 314.150(c) is without prejudice to
refiling.
Application No.
Drug
Applicant
ANDA 040448 ......................
Elite Laboratories, Inc., 165 Ludlow Ave., Northvale, NJ
07647.
Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, 6 Concourse Parkway,
Suite 1800, Atlanta, GA 30328.
Do.
ANDA 073416 ......................
Phentermine Hydrochloride (HCl) Capsules USP, 30
milligrams (mg).
E-Mycin (erythromycin) Delayed-Release Tablets USP,
250 mg and 333 mg.
E.E.S. 200 (erythromycin ethylsuccinate) for Oral Suspension, Equivalent to (EQ) 200 mg base/5 milliliters
(mL).E.E.S. 400 (erythromycin ethylsuccinate) for
Oral Suspension, EQ 400 mg base/5 mL.
EryDerm (erythromycin) Topical Solution USP, 2% .......
Pediamycin (erythromycin ethylsuccinate) Oral Suspension USP, EQ 200 mg base/5 mL Pediamycin 400
(erythromycin ethylsuccinate) Oral Suspension USP,
EQ 400 mg base/5 mL.
Claforan ADD-Vantage (cefotaxime) for Injection USP,
EQ 1 gram (g) base/vial and EQ 2 g base/vial.
Hydro-Ride (amiloride HCl and hydrochlorothiazide)
Tablets, EQ 5 mg Anhydrous/50 mg.
Clonidine HCl and Chlorthalidone Tablets USP, 0.3 mg/
15 mg.
Clonidine HCl and Chlorthalidone Tablets USP, 0.2 mg/
15 mg.
Clonidine HCl and Chlorthalidone Tablets USP, 0.1 mg/
15 mg.
Triamterene and Hydrochlorothiazide Capsules USP,
50 mg/25 mg.
E–Z Scrub (chlorhexidine gluconate) Sponge, 4% .........
ANDA 076075 ......................
ANDA 076192 ......................
ANDA 076514 ......................
Econazole Nitrate Cream, 1% ........................................
Ribavirin Capsules USP, 200 mg ...................................
Midodrine HCl Tablets USP, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg
ANDA 060272 ......................
ANDA 061639 ......................
ANDA 062290 ......................
ANDA 062304 ......................
ANDA 062659 ......................
ANDA 070347 ......................
ANDA 071142 ......................
ANDA 071178 ......................
ANDA 071179 ......................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Dated: January 2, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
ANDA 073191 ......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 07, 2020
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
Do.
Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC, 55 Corporate Dr., Bridgewater, NJ 08807.
Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., One Ram Ridge Rd., Spring
Valley, NY 10977.
Do.
Do.
Do.
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., c/o Target Health, Inc.,
261 Madison Ave., 24th Floor, New York, NY 10016.
Becton, Dickinson and Co., 9450 South State St.,
Sandy, UT 84070.
CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., c/o Target Health, Inc.
Do.
Do.
E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM
08JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 907-909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00073]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0764]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Animal Feed
Regulatory Program Standards
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing
[[Page 908]]
that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
February 7, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax: 202-395-7285, or emailed to [email protected]. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0760.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-5733,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards
OMB Control Number 0910-0760--Extension
I. Background
In the United States, Federal and State Government Agencies ensure
the safety of animal feed. FDA is responsible for ensuring that all
food and feed moving in interstate commerce, except those under the
U.S. Department of Agriculture jurisdiction, are safe, wholesome, and
labeled properly. States are responsible for conducting inspections and
regulatory activities that help ensure food and feed produced,
processed, and distributed within their jurisdictions are safe and in
compliance with State laws and regulations. States primarily perform
inspections under their own regulatory authority. Some States conduct
inspections of feed facilities under contract with FDA. Because
jurisdictions may overlap, FDA and States collaborate and share
resources to protect animal feed.
The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (Pub. L. 111-353) passed on
January 4, 2011, calls for enhanced partnerships and provides a legal
mandate for developing an Integrated Food Safety System (IFSS). FDA is
committed to implementing an IFSS thereby optimizing coordination of
food and feed safety efforts with Federal, State, local, tribal, and
territorial regulatory and public health agencies. Model standards
provide a consistent, underlying foundation that is critical for
uniformity across State and Federal Agencies to ensure credibility of
food and feed programs within the IFSS.
II. Significance of Feed Program Standards
The Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards (AFRPS) provide a
uniform and consistent approach to feed regulation in the United
States. Implementation of the draft feed program standards is
voluntary. States implementing the standards will identify and maintain
program improvements that will strengthen the safety and integrity of
the U.S. animal feed supply.
The feed standards are the framework that each State should use to
design, manage, and improve its feed program. The standards include the
following: (1) Regulatory foundation; (2) training; (3) inspection
program; (4) auditing; (5) feed-related illness or death and emergency
response; (6) enforcement program; (7) outreach activities; (8) budget
and planning; (9) assessment and improvement; (10) laboratory services;
and (11) sampling program.
Each standard has a purpose statement, requirement summary,
description of program elements, projected outcomes, and a list of
required documentation. When a State program voluntarily agrees to
implement the feed standards, it must fully implement and maintain the
individual program elements and documentation requirements in each
standard in order to fully implement the standard.
The feed standards package includes forms, worksheets, and
templates to help the State program assess and meet the program
elements in the standard. State programs are not obligated to use the
forms, worksheets, and templates provided with the feed standards.
Other manual or automated forms, worksheets, and templates may be used
as long as the pertinent data elements are present. Records and other
documents specified in the feed standards must be maintained in good
order by the State program and must be available to verify the
implementation of each standard. The feed standards are not intended to
address the performance appraisal processes that a State agency may use
to evaluate individual employee performance.
As set forth in the feed standards, the State program is expected
to review and update its improvement plan on an annual basis. The State
program completes an evaluation of its implementation status at least
every 3 years following the baseline evaluation by reviewing and
updating the self-assessment worksheets and required documentation for
each standard. The evaluation is needed to determine if each standard's
requirements are, or remain, fully met, partially met, or not met. The
State program revises the improvement plan based upon this evaluation.
Although FDA plans to provide financial support to State programs
that implement the feed standards, funding opportunities are contingent
upon the availability of funds. Funding opportunities may be only
available to State feed regulatory programs that currently have an FDA
feed inspection contract. State programs receiving financial support to
implement the feed standards will be audited by FDA.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the internet may submit requests for a
single copy of the current feed standards from [email protected].
In the Federal Register of September 20, 2019 (84 FR 49524), we
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. One comment was submitted but did not
address any of the topics solicited and we therefore do not discuss the
comment here.
We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
[[Page 909]]
Table 1--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondent Number of records per Total annual per Total hours
recordkeepers recordkeeper records recordkeeping
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Animal Feed Regulatory Program in the United States.......... 34 1 34 569 19,346
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Respondents to the information collection are State agencies
seeking to avail themselves of the options described in the document.
State agencies that conduct feed inspections under contract are
interested in implementing the standards. The total estimated annual
recordkeeping burden for implementation is 569 hours per respondent.
The burden was determined by capturing the average amount of time for
each respondent to assess the current state of the program and work
toward implementation of each of the 11 standards contained in the
AFRPS. The hours per State feed regulatory program will average the
same to account for continual improvement and self-sufficiency in the
program. Our burden estimate reflects a decrease of 100,654 hours as a
result of fewer respondents to the collection and a reevaluation of the
time we ascribe for recordkeeping activities.
Dated: January 2, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-00073 Filed 1-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P