Air Plan Approval; Oklahoma; Infrastructure for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 54-59 [2019-28329]
Download as PDF
54
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
this action are available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm
St., Suite 500, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI).
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2018–0786; FRL–10002–
90–Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; Oklahoma;
Infrastructure for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Under the Federal Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve elements of a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
from the State of Oklahoma for the 2015
Ozone (O3) National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). This
submittal addresses how the existing
SIP provides for implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of the
2015 O3 NAAQS (infrastructure SIP or
i-SIP). The i-SIP ensures that the
Oklahoma SIP is adequate to meet the
state’s responsibilities under the CAA
for this NAAQS.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before February 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2018–0786, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email
todd.robert@epa.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact Robert Todd, (214) 665–2156,
todd.robert@epa.gov. For the full EPA
public comment policy, information
about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making
effective comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
Docket: The docket index and
publicly available docket materials for
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 31, 2019
Jkt 250001
Robert Todd, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure & Ozone Section, 1201
Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, TX 75270,
214–665–2156, todd.robert@epa.gov. To
inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment with Mr. Todd
or Mr. Bill Deese at 214–665–7253.
In this
document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ means
the EPA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Below is a short discussion of
background on the 2015 Ozone NAAQS
addressed in this action. For more
information, please see the Technical
Support Document (TSD) in the docket
for this action.
Following a periodic review of the
2008 NAAQS for O3, EPA revised the
primary and secondary O3 NAAQS to
0.070 ppm (80 FR 65291, October 26,
2015).1 The primary NAAQS is
designed to protect human health, and
the secondary NAAQS is designed to
protect the public welfare.2
Whenever EPA promulgates a new or
revised NAAQS, CAA section 110(a)(1)
requires states to make SIP submissions
to provide for the implementation,
maintenance, and enforcement of the
NAAQS. This particular type of SIP
submission is commonly referred to as
an ‘‘infrastructure SIP’’ or ‘‘i-SIP’’.
These submissions must meet the
various requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2), as applicable. Due to
ambiguity in some of the language of
CAA section 110(a)(2), EPA believes
that it is appropriate to interpret these
provisions in the specific context of
acting on infrastructure SIP
submissions. EPA has previously
provided comprehensive guidance on
the application of these provisions
through a guidance document for
infrastructure SIP submissions and
through regional actions on
1 Additional information on the history of the
NAAQS for ozone is available at https://
www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/tablehistoricalozone-national-ambient-air-qualitystandardsnaaqs.
2 Information on ozone formation and health
effects is available at https://www.epa.gov/
ozonepollution.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
infrastructure submissions.3 We are
following that existing approach in
acting on this submission. In addition,
in the context of acting on such
infrastructure submissions, EPA
evaluates the submitting state’s SIP for
facial compliance with statutory and
regulatory requirements, not for the
state’s implementation of its SIP.4 The
EPA has other authority to address any
issues concerning a state’s
implementation of the rules,
regulations, consent orders, etc. that
comprise its SIP.
The State of Oklahoma’s i-SIP
certification, submitted on October 25,
2018, provides a demonstration of how
the existing Oklahoma SIP meets the
applicable section 110(a)(2)
requirements for the 2015 O3 NAAQS.
Our technical evaluation of the
submittal is provided in the TSD for this
action.5
Each state must submit a SIP within
three years after the promulgation of a
new or revised NAAQS showing how it
meets the elements of section 110(a)(2)
of the CAA. This section of the CAA
includes a list of specific elements
necessary for a state’s air quality
program. We term this SIP an
infrastructure SIP or i-SIP. On
September 13, 2013, the EPA issued
guidance addressing the i-SIP elements
for NAAQS.6 On October 25, 2018, the
Oklahoma Secretary of Energy and the
Environment made one submission to
address the 2015 NAAQS for O3.7 The
3 EPA explains and elaborates on these
ambiguities and its approach to address them in its
September 13, 2013 Infrastructure SIP Guidance
(available at https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/
urbanair/sipstatus/docs/Guidance_on_
Infrastructure_SIP_Elements_Multipollutant_
FINAL_Sept_2013.pdf), as well as in numerous
agency actions, including EPA’s prior action on
Louisiana’s infrastructure SIP to address the 2006
PM2.5, 2008 PB, 2008 O3, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2 and
2012 PM2.5 NAAQS (81 FR 68322 (October 4,
2016)).
4 See U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
decision in Montana Environmental Information
Center v. EPA, No. 16–71933 (Aug. 30, 2018).
5 The TSD for this action can be accessed through
www.regulations.gov (Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–
2018–0786).
6 ‘‘Guidance on Infrastructure State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean
Air Act sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2),’’
Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, September 13,
2013.
7 Additional information, including the history of
the priority pollutants, their levels, the forms of the
standard and the determination of compliance;
EPA’s approach for reviewing the i-SIP submittal
and EPA’s evaluation; the statute and regulatory
citations in the Oklahoma SIP specific to the review
of this i-SIP, applicable CAA and EPA regulatory
citations, Federal Register citations for the
Oklahoma SIP approvals; Oklahoma minor New
Source Review program and EPA approval
activities, and Oklahoma’s Prevention of Significant
Deterioration program can be found in the TSD for
this action.
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
submittal addressed CAA sections
110(a)(2)(A) through (M).
We are proposing that CAA section
110(a)(1) and parts of section 110(a)(2)
are met by the State. Specifically, we are
proposing to approve the state’s
compliance with CAA sections 110(a)(1)
and 110(a)(2)(A) through (C) and (E)
through (M). In this action we are also
proposing to approve Oklahoma’s
representations that CAA sections
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), Interference with
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(often referred to as prong 3) and
110(a)(2)(D)(ii), Interstate Pollution
Abatement (which refers to CAA section
126) and International Air Pollution
(which refers to CAA section 115)
requirements are met. The remaining
portions of the October 25, 2018,
submittal, addressing CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), often referred to as
prongs 1 and 2, and CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), often referred to as
prong 4, will be addressed in
subsequent actions. A copy of the
State’s entire submittal is provided in
the docket for this proposed rulemaking.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. EPA’s Evaluation of the Oklahoma
2015 O3 NAAQS Submission
Below is a summary of our evaluation
of the October 25, 2018, Oklahoma
submittal for each element of 110(a)(2)
that we are proposing to approve.8
(A) Emission limits and other control
measures: The SIP must include
enforceable emission limits and other
control measures, means or techniques,
as well as schedules and timetables for
compliance, as may be appropriate to
meet the applicable requirements of the
Act and other related matters as needed
to implement, maintain and enforce
each of the NAAQS.9
The Oklahoma Environmental Quality
Act, the Oklahoma Environmental
Quality Code, the Oklahoma Clean Air
Act (OCAA) and other portions of the
Oklahoma’s Administrative Code
(OAC), including the rules of Practice
and Procedure (OAC 252:4) and the Air
Pollution Control Rules (OAC 252:100)
provide the Oklahoma Department of
8 A detailed discussion of our evaluation can be
found in the TSD for this action.
9 The specific nonattainment area plan
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(I) are subject to
the timing requirements of section 172, not the
timing requirement of section 110(a)(1). Thus,
section 110(a)(2)(A) does not require that states
submit regulations or emissions limits specifically
for attaining the 2015 Ozone NAAQS. Those SIP
provisions are due as part of each state’s attainment
plan and will be addressed separately from the
requirements of section 110(a)(2)(A). In the context
of an infrastructure SIP, EPA is not evaluating the
existing SIP provisions for this purpose. Instead,
EPA is only evaluating whether the state’s SIP has
basic structural provisions for the implementation
of the NAAQS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 31, 2019
Jkt 250001
Environmental Quality (ODEQ or State)
and its staff the legal authority needed
to implement, maintain and enforce the
NAAQS within Oklahoma. They may
adopt emission standards and
compliance schedules applicable to
regulated entities; emission standards
and limitations and any other measures
necessary for attainment and
maintenance of national standards; and
enforce applicable laws, regulations,
standards and compliance schedules,
and seek injunctive relief. This
authority has been employed in the past
to adopt and submit multiple revisions
to the Oklahoma SIP. The federallyapproved SIP for Oklahoma is
documented at 40 CFR part 52.1920.
The State’s air quality rules and
standards are codified at Title 252 of the
Oklahoma Administrative Code
(denoted here as OAC 252). Numerous
parts of these regulations necessary for
implementing and enforcing the
NAAQS have been already been
adopted into the SIP. (See the TSD to
this proposal for a thorough discussion
of the State’s authorities.)
(B) Ambient air quality monitoring/
data system: The SIP must provide for
establishment and implementation of
ambient air quality monitors, collection
and analysis of ambient air quality data,
and providing such data to EPA upon
request.
The Oklahoma Clean Air Act provides
the authority allowing the ODEQ to
collect air monitoring data, qualityassure the results, and report the data.
ODEQ maintains and operates a
monitoring network to measure levels of
ozone, as well as other pollutants, in
accordance with EPA regulations
specifying siting and monitoring
requirements. All monitoring data is
measured using EPA approved methods
and subject to the EPA quality assurance
requirements. ODEQ submits all
required data to us, following the EPA
regulations. The Oklahoma statewide
monitoring network was approved into
the SIP on May 31, 1972 (37 FR 10842,
10887), was revised on March 28, 1979
(44 FR 18490), and it undergoes annual
review by EPA.10 In addition, ODEQ
submits an assessment of its monitoring
network every five years, as required by
EPA rules. The most recent of these
annual monitoring network assessments
was submitted by ODEQ and approved
by us October 15, 2018. The most recent
of the five year monitoring assessments
was submitted by ODEQ and approved
by us July 22, 2016. The ODEQ website
10 A copy of the 2018 Annual Air Monitoring
Network Plan and our approval letter, as well as the
most recent five year assessment and approval
letter, are included in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55
provides the monitor locations and
posts past and current concentrations of
criteria pollutants measured by the
State’s network of monitors.11
(C) Program for enforcement of
control measures: The SIP must include
the following three elements: (1) A
program providing for enforcement of
the measures in CAA section
110(a)(2)(A); (2) a minor new source
review (NSR) program for the regulation
of new and modified minor stationary
sources and minor modifications of new
major stationary sources as necessary to
protect the applicable NAAQS; and (3)
a major stationary source permit
program to meet the prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD)
permitting requirements of the CAA (for
areas designated as attainment or
unclassifiable for the NAAQS in
question). Each of these elements is
described in more detail in the TSD for
this action.
(1) Enforcement of SIP measures: The
state must provide a program for
enforcement of the necessary control
measures described in subparagraph
(A). As noted earlier, the OCAA
provides authority for the ODEQ, and its
Executive Director, to enforce the
requirements of the OCAA, and any
regulations, permits, or final compliance
orders. These statutes also provide the
ODEQ with general enforcement
powers. Among other things, they can
file lawsuits to compel compliance with
the statutes and regulations; commence
civil actions; conduct investigations of
regulated entities; collect criminal and
civil penalties; develop and enforce
rules and standards related to protection
of air quality; issue compliance orders;
pursue criminal prosecutions;
investigate, enter into remediation
agreements; and issue emergency cease
and desist orders. The OCAA also
provides additional enforcement
authorities and funding mechanisms.
(2) Minor New Source Review (NSR).
The SIP is required to include measures
to regulate construction and
modification of minor stationary sources
and minor modifications to major
stationary sources to protect the
NAAQS. The Oklahoma minor NSR
permitting requirements are approved as
part of the SIP.12
11 See https://www.deq.ok.gov/air-qualitydivision/ambient-monitoring/.
12 EPA is not proposing in this action to approve
or disapprove the existing Oklahoma minor NSR
program to the extent that it may be inconsistent
with EPA’s regulations governing this program. EPA
has maintained that the CAA does not require that
new infrastructure SIP submissions correct any
defects in existing EPA-approved provisions of
minor NSR programs for EPA to approve the
infrastructure SIP for element C, program for
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
Continued
02JAP1
56
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
(3) PSD permit program for major
stationary sources. The Oklahoma PSD
portion of the SIP covers all NSR
regulated pollutants as well as the
requirements for the 2015 O3 NAAQS.
However, in order for the State’s PSD
permitting program to fully meet the
requirements of 110(a)(2)(C)(3), our
recent proposal to approve the state’s
adoption by reference of the Guideline
to Air Quality Models, 2017 Appendix
W, 40 CFR part 51, must be approved.
We proposed to approve the updated
version of Oklahoma’s PSD program
December 3, 2019.13
(D) Interstate and international
transport: The requirements for
interstate transport of O3 emissions are
that the SIP contain adequate provisions
prohibiting O3 emission transport to
other states which will (1) contribute
significantly to nonattainment of the
NAAQS, (2) interfere with maintenance
of the NAAQS, (3) interfere with
measures required to prevent significant
deterioration or (4) interfere with
measures to protect visibility (CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)). In addition, states must
comply with requirements to prevent
transport of international air pollution
(CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii)). As noted
earlier, EPA often refers to these four
requirements within CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i) as prongs or subelements. We are not evaluating prongs
1, 2, and 4 in this rulemaking action, but
will address them in separate actions.
However, we are proposing to approve
prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i),
pertaining to interference with measures
to prevent significant deterioration in
other states for O3. Oklahoma has a SIPapproved PSD program that regulates all
NSR pollutants, and thus, prevents
significant deterioration in nearby
states. See the TSD for more detail.
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) of the CAA
requires SIPs to include adequate
provisions to ensure compliance with
sections 115 and 126 of the Act, relating
to international and interstate pollution
abatement. Section 115 of the Act
addresses endangerment of public
health or welfare in foreign countries
from pollution emitted in the United
States. There are no final findings by the
EPA that Oklahoma air emissions affect
other countries. Section 126(a) of the
Act requires new or modified sources to
enforcement of control measures (e.g., 76 FR 41076–
41079). The statutory requirements of section
110(a)(2)(C) of the Act provide for considerable
flexibility in designing minor NSR programs. See
the TSD for more information.
13 For details of our proposed action, please see
84 FR 66103, December 3, 2019 and the materials
provided in the associated docket number EPA–
R06–OAR–2018–0208 available at https://
www.regulations.gov/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 31, 2019
Jkt 250001
notify neighboring states of potential
impacts from such sources. The
Oklahoma SIP requires that each major
proposed new or modified source
provide such notification.14 The State
also has no pending obligations under
CAA section 126. See the TSD for more
detail.
(E) Adequate authority, resources,
implementation, and oversight: The SIP
must provide for the following: (1)
Necessary assurances that the state (and
other entities within the state
responsible for implementing the SIP)
will have adequate personnel, funding,
and authority under state or local law to
implement the SIP, and that there are no
legal impediments to such
implementation; (2) requirements
relating to state boards; and (3)
necessary assurances that the state has
responsibility for ensuring adequate
implementation of any plan provision
for which it relies on local governments
or other entities to carry out that portion
of the plan. Both elements (A) and (E)
address the requirement that there is
adequate authority to implement and
enforce the SIP and that there are no
legal impediments. The i-SIP
submission for the 2015 O3 NAAQS
describes the SIP regulations governing
the various functions of personnel
within the ODEQ, including the
administrative, technical support,
planning, enforcement, and permitting
functions of the program. With respect
to funding, state law establishes the
ODEQ’s authority to accept and expend
funds necessary to carry out the
requirements of the Act. The ODEQ
receives air quality program funds
through state appropriations, permit
application fees, annual operating fees,
and federal grants. As required by the
CAA, the Oklahoma Environmental
Quality Code lays out the composition,
powers and duties of the state’s
Environmental Quality Board and the
Air Quality Council. The members of
the board and council are required to
abide by conflict of interest provisions
for DEQ staff and the DEQ Executive
Director as described in the state’s
statutes. The requirement to comply
with the section 128 (State boards) of
the Act is met.15 With respect to
assurances that the State has
responsibility to implement the SIP
adequately when it authorizes local or
other agencies to carry out portions of
the plan, the ODEQ is the primary air
pollution control agency and does not
rely on local or regional boards to
14 See EPA docket number EPA–R06–OAR–2018–
0208.
15 Last approved by EPA at 81 FR 89008,
December 9, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
implement any portion of the portion of
the state’s air quality implementation
plan. More detail is provided in the TSD
for this action.
(F) Stationary source monitoring
system: The SIP must provide for the
establishment of a system to monitor
emissions from stationary sources and
to submit periodic emission reports. It
must require the installation,
maintenance, and replacement of
equipment, and the implementation of
other necessary steps, by owners or
operators of stationary sources, to
monitor emissions from such sources.
The SIP shall also require periodic
reports on the nature and amounts of
emissions and emissions-related data
from such sources and require that the
state correlate the source reports with
emission limitations or standards
established under the CAA. These
reports must be made available for
public inspection at reasonable times.
The OCAA authorizes the ODEQ to
require persons engaged in operations
which result in air pollution to monitor
or test emissions and to file reports
containing information relating to the
nature and amount of emissions. There
also are SIP-approved state regulations
pertaining to sampling and testing and
requirements for reporting of emissions
inventories. In addition, SIP-approved
rules establish general requirements for
maintaining records and reporting
emissions. The ODEQ uses this
information, in addition to information
obtained from other sources, to track
progress towards maintaining the
NAAQS, developing control and
maintenance strategies, identifying
sources and general emission levels and
determining compliance with SIPapproved regulations and additional
EPA requirements. The SIP requires this
information be made available to the
public. Provisions concerning the
handling of confidential data and
proprietary business information are
included in the SIP-approved
regulations. These rules specifically
exclude from confidential treatment any
records concerning the nature and
amount of emissions reported by
sources. More detail and links to
Oklahoma’s emissions data are provided
in the TSD for this action.
(G) Emergency authority: The SIP
must provide for authority to address
activities causing imminent and
substantial endangerment to public
health or welfare or the environment
and to include contingency plans to
implement such authorities as
necessary. The OCAA provides ODEQ
with authority to address environmental
emergencies, and ODEQ has an
‘‘emergency episode plan,’’ which
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
includes contingency plans which are
included in the SIP (56 FR 5656,
February 2, 1991). The ODEQ has
authority to respond to possible
dangerous ozone air pollution episodes
if necessary to protect the environment
and public health.
(H) Future SIP revisions: States must
have the authority to revise their SIPs in
response to changes in the NAAQS,
availability of improved methods for
attaining the NAAQS, or in response to
an EPA finding that the SIP is
substantially inadequate to attain the
NAAQS. The OCAA authorizes the
ODEQ to revise the SIP, as necessary, to
account for revisions of an existing
NAAQS, establishment of a new
NAAQS, to attain and maintain a
NAAQS, to abate air pollution, to adopt
more effective methods of attaining a
NAAQS, and to respond to EPA SIP
calls concerning NAAQS adoption or
implementation.
(I) Nonattainment areas: The CAA
section 110(a)(2)(I) requires that in the
case of a plan or plan revision for areas
designated as nonattainment, states
must meet applicable requirements of
part D of the CAA, relating to SIP
requirements for designated
nonattainment areas. EPA does not
expect infrastructure SIP submissions to
address CAA section 110(a)(2)(I). The
specific SIP submissions for designated
nonattainment areas, as required under
CAA title I, part D, are subject to
different submission schedules than
those for section 110 infrastructure
elements. Instead, EPA will act on any
part D nonattainment plan SIP
submissions through a separate
rulemaking process governed by the
requirements for nonattainment areas,
as described in part D.16
(J) Consultation with government
officials, public notification, PSD and
visibility protection: The SIP must meet
the following three CAA requirements:
(1) Section 121, relating to interagency
consultation regarding certain CAA
requirements; (2) section 127, relating to
public notification of NAAQS
exceedances and related issues; (3)
prevention of significant deterioration of
air quality; and (4) visibility protection.
(1) Interagency consultation: As
required by the OCAA, there must be a
public hearing before the adoption of
any regulations or emission control
requirements, and all interested persons
are given a reasonable opportunity to
review the action that is being proposed
and to submit data or arguments, either
orally or in writing, and to examine the
testimony of witnesses from the public
16 Oklahoma does not presently have any
designated ozone nonattainment areas.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 31, 2019
Jkt 250001
hearing. In addition, the OCAA provides
the ODEQ the power and duty to advise,
consult, and cooperate with other
agencies of the State, towns, cities,
counties, other states, the federal
government and other interested
persons or groups in regard to matters
of common interest in the field of air
quality control. Furthermore, the
Oklahoma PSD SIP rules mandate that
the ODEQ shall provide for public
participation and notification regarding
permitting applications to any other
state or local air pollution control
agencies, local government officials of
the city or county where the source will
be located, tribal authorities, and
Federal Land Manager (FLMs) whose
lands may be affected by emissions from
the source or modification.
Additionally, the State’s PSD SIP rules
require the ODEQ to consult with FLMs
regarding permit applications for
sources with the potential to impact
Class I Federal Areas. The SIP also
includes a commitment to consult, as
required, with the FLMs on the review
and implementation of the visibility
program. The State recognizes the
expertise of the FLMs in monitoring and
new source review applicability
analyses for visibility and has agreed to
notify the FLMs of any advance
notification or early consultation with a
new or modifying source prior to the
submission of a permit application.
(2) Public Notification: ODEQ
regularly notifies the public of instances
or areas in which any NAAQS are
exceeded. Included in the SIP are the
rules for ODEQ to advise the public of
the health hazard associated with such
exceedances; and enhance public
awareness of measures that can prevent
such exceedances and of ways in which
the public can participate in the
regulatory and other efforts to improve
air quality. In addition, as discussed
earlier for CAA section 110(a)(2)(B), the
ODEQ air monitoring website provides
air quality data for each of the
monitoring stations in Oklahoma; this
data is provided in real time for certain
pollutants, such as ozone. The website
also provides information on the health
effects of lead, ozone, particulate matter,
and other criteria pollutants.
(3) PSD: The PSD requirements for
this sub-element are the same as those
addressed earlier under CAA section
110(a)(2)(C), Program for enforcement of
control measures. The State has a SIPapproved PSD program. This
requirement is met.17
17 For details of our recent proposed action to
update the state SIP with regard to PSD, please see
84 FR 66103, December 3, 2019 and the materials
provided in the associated docket number EPA–
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57
(4) Visibility Protection: The ODEQ
SIP requirements relating to visibility
protection are not affected when EPA
establishes or revises a NAAQS.
Therefore, EPA believes that there are
no new visibility protection
requirements due to the revision of the
NAAQS, and consequently there are no
newly applicable visibility protection
obligations pursuant to CAA section
110(a)(2)(J).
(K) Air quality and modeling/data:
The SIP must provide for performing air
quality modeling, as prescribed by EPA,
to predict the effects on ambient air
quality of any emissions of any NAAQS
pollutant, and for submission of such
data to EPA upon request.
The ODEQ has the power and duty,
under OCAA to conduct air quality
research and assessments, including the
causes, effects, prevention, control and
abatement of air pollution. Past
modeling and emissions reductions
measures have been submitted by the
State and approved into the SIP.
Additionally, ODEQ can perform
modeling for primary and secondary
NAAQS on a case-by-case permit basis
consistent with their SIP approved PSD
rules and with EPA guidance.18
The OCAA authorizes and empowers
the ODEQ to cooperate with the federal
government and local authorities
concerning matters of common interest
in the field of air quality control,
thereby allowing the agency to make
such submissions to the EPA.
(L) Permitting Fees: The SIP must
require each major stationary source to
pay permitting fees to the permitting
authority, as a condition of any permit
required under the CAA, to cover the
cost of reviewing and acting upon any
application for such a permit, and, if the
permit is issued, the costs of
implementing and enforcing the terms
of the permit. The fee requirement
applies until a fee program established
by the state pursuant to Title V of the
CAA, relating to operating permits, is
approved by EPA.
With respect to funding, the OCAA
and the SIP provide the ODEQ with
authority to hire. The EPA conducts
periodic program reviews to ensure that
the state has adequate resources and
funding to, among other things,
implement and enforce the SIP.
Oklahoma’s statutes authorize ODEQ
‘‘to promulgate rules regarding permit
fees and . . . establish that the owner or
R06–OAR–2018–0208 available at https://
www.regulations.gov/.
18 Note that our recent proposed action to update
the state SIP included citations adopting the most
current version of EPA’s Guideline on Air Quality
Models at 40 CFR part 51, 2017 Appendix W. See
84 FR 66103.
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
58
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
operator of any source required to have
a permit must pay a permit fee to cover
the cost of implementing and enforcing
Oklahoma’s Air Qualtiy permit
program.’’ The OCAA provides the
ODEQ with authority to hire and
compensate employees; accept and
administer grants or other funds;
requires the ODEQ to establish an
emissions fee schedule for sources in
order to fund the reasonable costs of
administering various air pollution
control programs; and authorizes the
ODEQ to collect additional fees
necessary to cover reasonable costs
associated with processing air permit
applications and the costs of
implementing and enforcing the terms
and provisions of the permits. The state
has in place fee programs for major and
minor sources of air pollution, as well
as an area source operating fee program
that covers other sources in the state.
This requirement is met.19
(M) Consultation/participation by
affected local entities: The SIP must
provide for consultation and
participation by local political
subdivisions affected by the SIP.
See the earlier discussions for CAA
sections 110(a)(2)(J), sub-elements (1)
and (2) for a description of the SIP’s
public participation process, the
authority to advise and consult, and the
PSD SIP’s public participation
requirements. Additionally, the OCAA
requires cooperative action between
ODEQ and local authorities, other
agencies of the State, other states, Indian
Tribes, other affected groups and the
federal government in the prevention
and control of air pollution.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve portions
of the October 25, 2018, Oklahoma i-SIP
submittal for the 2015 ozone NAAQS as
detailed in Table 1, below. The portions
of the submittal dealing with CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), prongs 1 and 2,
Significant Contribution to
Nonattainment and Interference with
Maintenance in other States, and CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), prong 4,
Interference with Visibility Protection in
other States will be addressed in
separate, future actions.
TABLE 1—PROPOSED ACTION ON OKLAHOMA INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRANSPORT SIP SUBMITTALS FOR THE 2015 OZONE
NAAQS
Element
Proposed action
(A): Emission limits and other control measures ..........................................................................................................................
(B): Ambient air quality monitoring and data system ....................................................................................................................
(C)(i): Enforcement of SIP measures ............................................................................................................................................
(C)(ii):PSD program for major sources and major modifications ..................................................................................................
(C)(iii): Permitting program for minor sources and minor modifications .......................................................................................
(D)(i)(I): Contribute to nonattainment/interfere with maintenance of NAAQS (prongs 1 and 2) ...................................................
(D)(i)(II): PSD (prong 3) .................................................................................................................................................................
(D)(i)(II): Visibility Protection (prong 4) ..........................................................................................................................................
(D)(ii): Interstate and International Pollution Abatement ...............................................................................................................
(E)(i): Adequate resources ............................................................................................................................................................
(E)(ii): State boards .......................................................................................................................................................................
(E)(iii): Necessary assurances with respect to local agencies ......................................................................................................
(F): Stationary source monitoring system .....................................................................................................................................
(G): Emergency power ..................................................................................................................................................................
(H): Future SIP revisions ...............................................................................................................................................................
(I): Nonattainment area plan or plan revisions under part D ........................................................................................................
(J)(i): Consultation with government officials ................................................................................................................................
(J)(ii): Public notification ................................................................................................................................................................
(J)(iii): PSD ....................................................................................................................................................................................
(J)(iv): Visibility protection ..............................................................................................................................................................
(K): Air quality modeling and data .................................................................................................................................................
(L): Permitting fees ........................................................................................................................................................................
(M): Consultation and participation by affected local entities .......................................................................................................
A
A
A
A
A
SA
A
SA
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
+
A
A
A
+
A
A
A
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Key to Table 1:
A: Proposing to Approve.
+: Not germane to infrastructure SIPs.
SA: EPA is acting on this infrastructure requirement in a separate rulemaking action.
Based upon review of the State’s
infrastructure SIP submission and
relevant statutory and regulatory
authorities and provisions referenced in
this submission or referenced in the
EPA-approved ODEQ SIP, EPA believes
that Oklahoma has the infrastructure in
place to address all applicable required
elements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and
(2), except as noted above, to ensure that
the 2015 O3 NAAQS is implemented in
the State. However, as mentioned above,
our approval of this proposed action is
dependent upon finalization of our
proposal to approve updates to
Oklahoma’s new source review
permitting requirements. (see 84 FR
66103, December 3, 2019).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
19 Last approved by EPA at 81 FR 89008,
December 9, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 31, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not
have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 23, 2019.
Kenley McQueen,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2019–28329 Filed 12–31–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 31, 2019
Jkt 250001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0658; FRL–10003–
16–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Revisions
to the General Conformity Rules
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
a Missouri State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted on February 15,
2019. The submission revises the State’s
general conformity rule. Specifically,
the proposed action revises the rule to
add definitions specific to the rule,
remove references to a rule that is being
rescinded, remove the unnecessary use
of restrictive words and make other
clarifying changes. The revision does
not have an adverse effect on air quality.
The EPA’s proposed approval of this
rule revision is being done in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2019–0658 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jed
Wolkins, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7588;
email address wolkins.jed@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019–
0658, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve a
revision to Missouri’s rule 10–6.300
‘‘Conformity of General Federal Actions
to State Implementation Plans.’’ There
are several proposed revisions to the
rule. The proposed revisions modify
text that Missouri has determined make
the rule more understandable while
retaining the intent of the rule. The
following changes to the rule have been
made:
10–6.300(1) the title changed from
‘‘General’’ to ‘‘Applicability’’;
10–6.300(1)(B) insertion of ‘‘de
minimis’’;
10–6.300(1)(C) change from ‘‘shall’’ to
‘‘do’’;
10–6.300(1)(C)2. and 2.V. insertion
‘‘below the’’ and ‘‘levels identified in
subsection (1)(B) of this rule’’;
10–6.300(1)(C)2.H. and I. change from
‘‘required’’ to ‘‘necessary’’;
10–6.300(1)(C)2.J. removal of
‘‘Actions’’;
10–6.300(1)(K) removal of ‘‘shall’’;
10–6.300(2) removal of existing
incorporation by reference and insertion
of rule specific definitions (A) thru (JJ);
10–6.300(3)(A)1. change from ‘‘shall’’
to ‘‘may’’;
10–6.300(3)(E)3. change from ‘‘may’’
to ‘‘will’’;
10–6.300(3)(E)4. and (3)(F)1., 2., 3.,
and 4. change from ‘‘required’’ to
‘‘conducted’’;
E:\FR\FM\02JAP1.SGM
02JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54-59]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-28329]
[[Page 54]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2018-0786; FRL-10002-90-Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; Oklahoma; Infrastructure for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve elements
of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the State of
Oklahoma for the 2015 Ozone (O3) National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). This submittal addresses how the existing SIP
provides for implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2015
O3 NAAQS (infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). The i-SIP ensures
that the Oklahoma SIP is adequate to meet the state's responsibilities
under the CAA for this NAAQS.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2018-0786, at https://www.regulations.gov or via email
[email protected]. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact Robert Todd, (214) 665-
2156, [email protected]. For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The docket index and publicly available docket materials
for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm St., Suite 500,
Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the
index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly
available at either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Todd, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure & Ozone Section, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, TX
75270, 214-665-2156, [email protected]. To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment with Mr. Todd or Mr. Bill
Deese at 214-665-7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our''
means the EPA.
I. Background
Below is a short discussion of background on the 2015 Ozone NAAQS
addressed in this action. For more information, please see the
Technical Support Document (TSD) in the docket for this action.
Following a periodic review of the 2008 NAAQS for O3,
EPA revised the primary and secondary O3 NAAQS to 0.070 ppm
(80 FR 65291, October 26, 2015).\1\ The primary NAAQS is designed to
protect human health, and the secondary NAAQS is designed to protect
the public welfare.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Additional information on the history of the NAAQS for ozone
is available at https://www.epa.gov/ozone-pollution/table-historicalozone-national-ambient-air-quality-standardsnaaqs.
\2\ Information on ozone formation and health effects is
available at https://www.epa.gov/ozonepollution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Whenever EPA promulgates a new or revised NAAQS, CAA section
110(a)(1) requires states to make SIP submissions to provide for the
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the NAAQS. This
particular type of SIP submission is commonly referred to as an
``infrastructure SIP'' or ``i-SIP''. These submissions must meet the
various requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2), as applicable. Due to
ambiguity in some of the language of CAA section 110(a)(2), EPA
believes that it is appropriate to interpret these provisions in the
specific context of acting on infrastructure SIP submissions. EPA has
previously provided comprehensive guidance on the application of these
provisions through a guidance document for infrastructure SIP
submissions and through regional actions on infrastructure
submissions.\3\ We are following that existing approach in acting on
this submission. In addition, in the context of acting on such
infrastructure submissions, EPA evaluates the submitting state's SIP
for facial compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements, not
for the state's implementation of its SIP.\4\ The EPA has other
authority to address any issues concerning a state's implementation of
the rules, regulations, consent orders, etc. that comprise its SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPA explains and elaborates on these ambiguities and its
approach to address them in its September 13, 2013 Infrastructure
SIP Guidance (available at https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/docs/Guidance_on_Infrastructure_SIP_Elements_Multipollutant_FINAL_Sept_2013.pdf), as well as in numerous agency actions, including EPA's prior
action on Louisiana's infrastructure SIP to address the 2006
PM2.5, 2008 PB, 2008 O3, 2010 NO2,
2010 SO2 and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS (81 FR 68322
(October 4, 2016)).
\4\ See U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in
Montana Environmental Information Center v. EPA, No. 16-71933 (Aug.
30, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The State of Oklahoma's i-SIP certification, submitted on October
25, 2018, provides a demonstration of how the existing Oklahoma SIP
meets the applicable section 110(a)(2) requirements for the 2015
O3 NAAQS. Our technical evaluation of the submittal is
provided in the TSD for this action.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The TSD for this action can be accessed through
www.regulations.gov (Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2018-0786).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each state must submit a SIP within three years after the
promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS showing how it meets the
elements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA. This section of the CAA
includes a list of specific elements necessary for a state's air
quality program. We term this SIP an infrastructure SIP or i-SIP. On
September 13, 2013, the EPA issued guidance addressing the i-SIP
elements for NAAQS.\6\ On October 25, 2018, the Oklahoma Secretary of
Energy and the Environment made one submission to address the 2015
NAAQS for O3.\7\ The
[[Page 55]]
submittal addressed CAA sections 110(a)(2)(A) through (M).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ ``Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Elements under Clean Air Act sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2),''
Memorandum from Stephen D. Page, September 13, 2013.
\7\ Additional information, including the history of the
priority pollutants, their levels, the forms of the standard and the
determination of compliance; EPA's approach for reviewing the i-SIP
submittal and EPA's evaluation; the statute and regulatory citations
in the Oklahoma SIP specific to the review of this i-SIP, applicable
CAA and EPA regulatory citations, Federal Register citations for the
Oklahoma SIP approvals; Oklahoma minor New Source Review program and
EPA approval activities, and Oklahoma's Prevention of Significant
Deterioration program can be found in the TSD for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are proposing that CAA section 110(a)(1) and parts of section
110(a)(2) are met by the State. Specifically, we are proposing to
approve the state's compliance with CAA sections 110(a)(1) and
110(a)(2)(A) through (C) and (E) through (M). In this action we are
also proposing to approve Oklahoma's representations that CAA sections
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), Interference with Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (often referred to as prong 3) and 110(a)(2)(D)(ii),
Interstate Pollution Abatement (which refers to CAA section 126) and
International Air Pollution (which refers to CAA section 115)
requirements are met. The remaining portions of the October 25, 2018,
submittal, addressing CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), often referred to
as prongs 1 and 2, and CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), often referred
to as prong 4, will be addressed in subsequent actions. A copy of the
State's entire submittal is provided in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking.
II. EPA's Evaluation of the Oklahoma 2015 O3 NAAQS Submission
Below is a summary of our evaluation of the October 25, 2018,
Oklahoma submittal for each element of 110(a)(2) that we are proposing
to approve.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ A detailed discussion of our evaluation can be found in the
TSD for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) Emission limits and other control measures: The SIP must
include enforceable emission limits and other control measures, means
or techniques, as well as schedules and timetables for compliance, as
may be appropriate to meet the applicable requirements of the Act and
other related matters as needed to implement, maintain and enforce each
of the NAAQS.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The specific nonattainment area plan requirements of section
110(a)(2)(I) are subject to the timing requirements of section 172,
not the timing requirement of section 110(a)(1). Thus, section
110(a)(2)(A) does not require that states submit regulations or
emissions limits specifically for attaining the 2015 Ozone NAAQS.
Those SIP provisions are due as part of each state's attainment plan
and will be addressed separately from the requirements of section
110(a)(2)(A). In the context of an infrastructure SIP, EPA is not
evaluating the existing SIP provisions for this purpose. Instead,
EPA is only evaluating whether the state's SIP has basic structural
provisions for the implementation of the NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Oklahoma Environmental Quality Act, the Oklahoma Environmental
Quality Code, the Oklahoma Clean Air Act (OCAA) and other portions of
the Oklahoma's Administrative Code (OAC), including the rules of
Practice and Procedure (OAC 252:4) and the Air Pollution Control Rules
(OAC 252:100) provide the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ or State) and its staff the legal authority needed to implement,
maintain and enforce the NAAQS within Oklahoma. They may adopt emission
standards and compliance schedules applicable to regulated entities;
emission standards and limitations and any other measures necessary for
attainment and maintenance of national standards; and enforce
applicable laws, regulations, standards and compliance schedules, and
seek injunctive relief. This authority has been employed in the past to
adopt and submit multiple revisions to the Oklahoma SIP. The federally-
approved SIP for Oklahoma is documented at 40 CFR part 52.1920. The
State's air quality rules and standards are codified at Title 252 of
the Oklahoma Administrative Code (denoted here as OAC 252). Numerous
parts of these regulations necessary for implementing and enforcing the
NAAQS have been already been adopted into the SIP. (See the TSD to this
proposal for a thorough discussion of the State's authorities.)
(B) Ambient air quality monitoring/data system: The SIP must
provide for establishment and implementation of ambient air quality
monitors, collection and analysis of ambient air quality data, and
providing such data to EPA upon request.
The Oklahoma Clean Air Act provides the authority allowing the ODEQ
to collect air monitoring data, quality-assure the results, and report
the data. ODEQ maintains and operates a monitoring network to measure
levels of ozone, as well as other pollutants, in accordance with EPA
regulations specifying siting and monitoring requirements. All
monitoring data is measured using EPA approved methods and subject to
the EPA quality assurance requirements. ODEQ submits all required data
to us, following the EPA regulations. The Oklahoma statewide monitoring
network was approved into the SIP on May 31, 1972 (37 FR 10842, 10887),
was revised on March 28, 1979 (44 FR 18490), and it undergoes annual
review by EPA.\10\ In addition, ODEQ submits an assessment of its
monitoring network every five years, as required by EPA rules. The most
recent of these annual monitoring network assessments was submitted by
ODEQ and approved by us October 15, 2018. The most recent of the five
year monitoring assessments was submitted by ODEQ and approved by us
July 22, 2016. The ODEQ website provides the monitor locations and
posts past and current concentrations of criteria pollutants measured
by the State's network of monitors.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ A copy of the 2018 Annual Air Monitoring Network Plan and
our approval letter, as well as the most recent five year assessment
and approval letter, are included in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking.
\11\ See https://www.deq.ok.gov/air-quality-division/ambient-monitoring/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C) Program for enforcement of control measures: The SIP must
include the following three elements: (1) A program providing for
enforcement of the measures in CAA section 110(a)(2)(A); (2) a minor
new source review (NSR) program for the regulation of new and modified
minor stationary sources and minor modifications of new major
stationary sources as necessary to protect the applicable NAAQS; and
(3) a major stationary source permit program to meet the prevention of
significant deterioration (PSD) permitting requirements of the CAA (for
areas designated as attainment or unclassifiable for the NAAQS in
question). Each of these elements is described in more detail in the
TSD for this action.
(1) Enforcement of SIP measures: The state must provide a program
for enforcement of the necessary control measures described in
subparagraph (A). As noted earlier, the OCAA provides authority for the
ODEQ, and its Executive Director, to enforce the requirements of the
OCAA, and any regulations, permits, or final compliance orders. These
statutes also provide the ODEQ with general enforcement powers. Among
other things, they can file lawsuits to compel compliance with the
statutes and regulations; commence civil actions; conduct
investigations of regulated entities; collect criminal and civil
penalties; develop and enforce rules and standards related to
protection of air quality; issue compliance orders; pursue criminal
prosecutions; investigate, enter into remediation agreements; and issue
emergency cease and desist orders. The OCAA also provides additional
enforcement authorities and funding mechanisms.
(2) Minor New Source Review (NSR). The SIP is required to include
measures to regulate construction and modification of minor stationary
sources and minor modifications to major stationary sources to protect
the NAAQS. The Oklahoma minor NSR permitting requirements are approved
as part of the SIP.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ EPA is not proposing in this action to approve or
disapprove the existing Oklahoma minor NSR program to the extent
that it may be inconsistent with EPA's regulations governing this
program. EPA has maintained that the CAA does not require that new
infrastructure SIP submissions correct any defects in existing EPA-
approved provisions of minor NSR programs for EPA to approve the
infrastructure SIP for element C, program for enforcement of control
measures (e.g., 76 FR 41076-41079). The statutory requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Act provide for considerable flexibility
in designing minor NSR programs. See the TSD for more information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 56]]
(3) PSD permit program for major stationary sources. The Oklahoma
PSD portion of the SIP covers all NSR regulated pollutants as well as
the requirements for the 2015 O3 NAAQS. However, in order
for the State's PSD permitting program to fully meet the requirements
of 110(a)(2)(C)(3), our recent proposal to approve the state's adoption
by reference of the Guideline to Air Quality Models, 2017 Appendix W,
40 CFR part 51, must be approved. We proposed to approve the updated
version of Oklahoma's PSD program December 3, 2019.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For details of our proposed action, please see 84 FR 66103,
December 3, 2019 and the materials provided in the associated docket
number EPA-R06-OAR-2018-0208 available at https://www.regulations.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D) Interstate and international transport: The requirements for
interstate transport of O3 emissions are that the SIP
contain adequate provisions prohibiting O3 emission
transport to other states which will (1) contribute significantly to
nonattainment of the NAAQS, (2) interfere with maintenance of the
NAAQS, (3) interfere with measures required to prevent significant
deterioration or (4) interfere with measures to protect visibility (CAA
110(a)(2)(D)(i)). In addition, states must comply with requirements to
prevent transport of international air pollution (CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(ii)). As noted earlier, EPA often refers to these four
requirements within CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) as prongs or sub-
elements. We are not evaluating prongs 1, 2, and 4 in this rulemaking
action, but will address them in separate actions. However, we are
proposing to approve prong 3 of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i), pertaining
to interference with measures to prevent significant deterioration in
other states for O3. Oklahoma has a SIP-approved PSD program
that regulates all NSR pollutants, and thus, prevents significant
deterioration in nearby states. See the TSD for more detail.
Section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) of the CAA requires SIPs to include
adequate provisions to ensure compliance with sections 115 and 126 of
the Act, relating to international and interstate pollution abatement.
Section 115 of the Act addresses endangerment of public health or
welfare in foreign countries from pollution emitted in the United
States. There are no final findings by the EPA that Oklahoma air
emissions affect other countries. Section 126(a) of the Act requires
new or modified sources to notify neighboring states of potential
impacts from such sources. The Oklahoma SIP requires that each major
proposed new or modified source provide such notification.\14\ The
State also has no pending obligations under CAA section 126. See the
TSD for more detail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See EPA docket number EPA-R06-OAR-2018-0208.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E) Adequate authority, resources, implementation, and oversight:
The SIP must provide for the following: (1) Necessary assurances that
the state (and other entities within the state responsible for
implementing the SIP) will have adequate personnel, funding, and
authority under state or local law to implement the SIP, and that there
are no legal impediments to such implementation; (2) requirements
relating to state boards; and (3) necessary assurances that the state
has responsibility for ensuring adequate implementation of any plan
provision for which it relies on local governments or other entities to
carry out that portion of the plan. Both elements (A) and (E) address
the requirement that there is adequate authority to implement and
enforce the SIP and that there are no legal impediments. The i-SIP
submission for the 2015 O3 NAAQS describes the SIP
regulations governing the various functions of personnel within the
ODEQ, including the administrative, technical support, planning,
enforcement, and permitting functions of the program. With respect to
funding, state law establishes the ODEQ's authority to accept and
expend funds necessary to carry out the requirements of the Act. The
ODEQ receives air quality program funds through state appropriations,
permit application fees, annual operating fees, and federal grants. As
required by the CAA, the Oklahoma Environmental Quality Code lays out
the composition, powers and duties of the state's Environmental Quality
Board and the Air Quality Council. The members of the board and council
are required to abide by conflict of interest provisions for DEQ staff
and the DEQ Executive Director as described in the state's statutes.
The requirement to comply with the section 128 (State boards) of the
Act is met.\15\ With respect to assurances that the State has
responsibility to implement the SIP adequately when it authorizes local
or other agencies to carry out portions of the plan, the ODEQ is the
primary air pollution control agency and does not rely on local or
regional boards to implement any portion of the portion of the state's
air quality implementation plan. More detail is provided in the TSD for
this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Last approved by EPA at 81 FR 89008, December 9, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(F) Stationary source monitoring system: The SIP must provide for
the establishment of a system to monitor emissions from stationary
sources and to submit periodic emission reports. It must require the
installation, maintenance, and replacement of equipment, and the
implementation of other necessary steps, by owners or operators of
stationary sources, to monitor emissions from such sources. The SIP
shall also require periodic reports on the nature and amounts of
emissions and emissions-related data from such sources and require that
the state correlate the source reports with emission limitations or
standards established under the CAA. These reports must be made
available for public inspection at reasonable times. The OCAA
authorizes the ODEQ to require persons engaged in operations which
result in air pollution to monitor or test emissions and to file
reports containing information relating to the nature and amount of
emissions. There also are SIP-approved state regulations pertaining to
sampling and testing and requirements for reporting of emissions
inventories. In addition, SIP-approved rules establish general
requirements for maintaining records and reporting emissions. The ODEQ
uses this information, in addition to information obtained from other
sources, to track progress towards maintaining the NAAQS, developing
control and maintenance strategies, identifying sources and general
emission levels and determining compliance with SIP-approved
regulations and additional EPA requirements. The SIP requires this
information be made available to the public. Provisions concerning the
handling of confidential data and proprietary business information are
included in the SIP-approved regulations. These rules specifically
exclude from confidential treatment any records concerning the nature
and amount of emissions reported by sources. More detail and links to
Oklahoma's emissions data are provided in the TSD for this action.
(G) Emergency authority: The SIP must provide for authority to
address activities causing imminent and substantial endangerment to
public health or welfare or the environment and to include contingency
plans to implement such authorities as necessary. The OCAA provides
ODEQ with authority to address environmental emergencies, and ODEQ has
an ``emergency episode plan,'' which
[[Page 57]]
includes contingency plans which are included in the SIP (56 FR 5656,
February 2, 1991). The ODEQ has authority to respond to possible
dangerous ozone air pollution episodes if necessary to protect the
environment and public health.
(H) Future SIP revisions: States must have the authority to revise
their SIPs in response to changes in the NAAQS, availability of
improved methods for attaining the NAAQS, or in response to an EPA
finding that the SIP is substantially inadequate to attain the NAAQS.
The OCAA authorizes the ODEQ to revise the SIP, as necessary, to
account for revisions of an existing NAAQS, establishment of a new
NAAQS, to attain and maintain a NAAQS, to abate air pollution, to adopt
more effective methods of attaining a NAAQS, and to respond to EPA SIP
calls concerning NAAQS adoption or implementation.
(I) Nonattainment areas: The CAA section 110(a)(2)(I) requires that
in the case of a plan or plan revision for areas designated as
nonattainment, states must meet applicable requirements of part D of
the CAA, relating to SIP requirements for designated nonattainment
areas. EPA does not expect infrastructure SIP submissions to address
CAA section 110(a)(2)(I). The specific SIP submissions for designated
nonattainment areas, as required under CAA title I, part D, are subject
to different submission schedules than those for section 110
infrastructure elements. Instead, EPA will act on any part D
nonattainment plan SIP submissions through a separate rulemaking
process governed by the requirements for nonattainment areas, as
described in part D.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Oklahoma does not presently have any designated ozone
nonattainment areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(J) Consultation with government officials, public notification,
PSD and visibility protection: The SIP must meet the following three
CAA requirements: (1) Section 121, relating to interagency consultation
regarding certain CAA requirements; (2) section 127, relating to public
notification of NAAQS exceedances and related issues; (3) prevention of
significant deterioration of air quality; and (4) visibility
protection.
(1) Interagency consultation: As required by the OCAA, there must
be a public hearing before the adoption of any regulations or emission
control requirements, and all interested persons are given a reasonable
opportunity to review the action that is being proposed and to submit
data or arguments, either orally or in writing, and to examine the
testimony of witnesses from the public hearing. In addition, the OCAA
provides the ODEQ the power and duty to advise, consult, and cooperate
with other agencies of the State, towns, cities, counties, other
states, the federal government and other interested persons or groups
in regard to matters of common interest in the field of air quality
control. Furthermore, the Oklahoma PSD SIP rules mandate that the ODEQ
shall provide for public participation and notification regarding
permitting applications to any other state or local air pollution
control agencies, local government officials of the city or county
where the source will be located, tribal authorities, and Federal Land
Manager (FLMs) whose lands may be affected by emissions from the source
or modification. Additionally, the State's PSD SIP rules require the
ODEQ to consult with FLMs regarding permit applications for sources
with the potential to impact Class I Federal Areas. The SIP also
includes a commitment to consult, as required, with the FLMs on the
review and implementation of the visibility program. The State
recognizes the expertise of the FLMs in monitoring and new source
review applicability analyses for visibility and has agreed to notify
the FLMs of any advance notification or early consultation with a new
or modifying source prior to the submission of a permit application.
(2) Public Notification: ODEQ regularly notifies the public of
instances or areas in which any NAAQS are exceeded. Included in the SIP
are the rules for ODEQ to advise the public of the health hazard
associated with such exceedances; and enhance public awareness of
measures that can prevent such exceedances and of ways in which the
public can participate in the regulatory and other efforts to improve
air quality. In addition, as discussed earlier for CAA section
110(a)(2)(B), the ODEQ air monitoring website provides air quality data
for each of the monitoring stations in Oklahoma; this data is provided
in real time for certain pollutants, such as ozone. The website also
provides information on the health effects of lead, ozone, particulate
matter, and other criteria pollutants.
(3) PSD: The PSD requirements for this sub-element are the same as
those addressed earlier under CAA section 110(a)(2)(C), Program for
enforcement of control measures. The State has a SIP-approved PSD
program. This requirement is met.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ For details of our recent proposed action to update the
state SIP with regard to PSD, please see 84 FR 66103, December 3,
2019 and the materials provided in the associated docket number EPA-
R06-OAR-2018-0208 available at https://www.regulations.gov/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Visibility Protection: The ODEQ SIP requirements relating to
visibility protection are not affected when EPA establishes or revises
a NAAQS. Therefore, EPA believes that there are no new visibility
protection requirements due to the revision of the NAAQS, and
consequently there are no newly applicable visibility protection
obligations pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(2)(J).
(K) Air quality and modeling/data: The SIP must provide for
performing air quality modeling, as prescribed by EPA, to predict the
effects on ambient air quality of any emissions of any NAAQS pollutant,
and for submission of such data to EPA upon request.
The ODEQ has the power and duty, under OCAA to conduct air quality
research and assessments, including the causes, effects, prevention,
control and abatement of air pollution. Past modeling and emissions
reductions measures have been submitted by the State and approved into
the SIP. Additionally, ODEQ can perform modeling for primary and
secondary NAAQS on a case-by-case permit basis consistent with their
SIP approved PSD rules and with EPA guidance.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ Note that our recent proposed action to update the state
SIP included citations adopting the most current version of EPA's
Guideline on Air Quality Models at 40 CFR part 51, 2017 Appendix W.
See 84 FR 66103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The OCAA authorizes and empowers the ODEQ to cooperate with the
federal government and local authorities concerning matters of common
interest in the field of air quality control, thereby allowing the
agency to make such submissions to the EPA.
(L) Permitting Fees: The SIP must require each major stationary
source to pay permitting fees to the permitting authority, as a
condition of any permit required under the CAA, to cover the cost of
reviewing and acting upon any application for such a permit, and, if
the permit is issued, the costs of implementing and enforcing the terms
of the permit. The fee requirement applies until a fee program
established by the state pursuant to Title V of the CAA, relating to
operating permits, is approved by EPA.
With respect to funding, the OCAA and the SIP provide the ODEQ with
authority to hire. The EPA conducts periodic program reviews to ensure
that the state has adequate resources and funding to, among other
things, implement and enforce the SIP.
Oklahoma's statutes authorize ODEQ ``to promulgate rules regarding
permit fees and . . . establish that the owner or
[[Page 58]]
operator of any source required to have a permit must pay a permit fee
to cover the cost of implementing and enforcing Oklahoma's Air Qualtiy
permit program.'' The OCAA provides the ODEQ with authority to hire and
compensate employees; accept and administer grants or other funds;
requires the ODEQ to establish an emissions fee schedule for sources in
order to fund the reasonable costs of administering various air
pollution control programs; and authorizes the ODEQ to collect
additional fees necessary to cover reasonable costs associated with
processing air permit applications and the costs of implementing and
enforcing the terms and provisions of the permits. The state has in
place fee programs for major and minor sources of air pollution, as
well as an area source operating fee program that covers other sources
in the state. This requirement is met.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ Last approved by EPA at 81 FR 89008, December 9, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(M) Consultation/participation by affected local entities: The SIP
must provide for consultation and participation by local political
subdivisions affected by the SIP.
See the earlier discussions for CAA sections 110(a)(2)(J), sub-
elements (1) and (2) for a description of the SIP's public
participation process, the authority to advise and consult, and the PSD
SIP's public participation requirements. Additionally, the OCAA
requires cooperative action between ODEQ and local authorities, other
agencies of the State, other states, Indian Tribes, other affected
groups and the federal government in the prevention and control of air
pollution.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve portions of the October 25, 2018,
Oklahoma i-SIP submittal for the 2015 ozone NAAQS as detailed in Table
1, below. The portions of the submittal dealing with CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), prongs 1 and 2, Significant Contribution to
Nonattainment and Interference with Maintenance in other States, and
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), prong 4, Interference with Visibility
Protection in other States will be addressed in separate, future
actions.
Table 1--Proposed Action on Oklahoma Infrastructure and Transport SIP
Submittals for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Element Proposed action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A): Emission limits and other control measures..... A
(B): Ambient air quality monitoring and data system. A
(C)(i): Enforcement of SIP measures................. A
(C)(ii):PSD program for major sources and major A
modifications......................................
(C)(iii): Permitting program for minor sources and A
minor modifications................................
(D)(i)(I): Contribute to nonattainment/interfere SA
with maintenance of NAAQS (prongs 1 and 2).........
(D)(i)(II): PSD (prong 3)........................... A
(D)(i)(II): Visibility Protection (prong 4)......... SA
(D)(ii): Interstate and International Pollution A
Abatement..........................................
(E)(i): Adequate resources.......................... A
(E)(ii): State boards............................... A
(E)(iii): Necessary assurances with respect to local A
agencies...........................................
(F): Stationary source monitoring system............ A
(G): Emergency power................................ A
(H): Future SIP revisions........................... A
(I): Nonattainment area plan or plan revisions under +
part D.............................................
(J)(i): Consultation with government officials...... A
(J)(ii): Public notification........................ A
(J)(iii): PSD....................................... A
(J)(iv): Visibility protection...................... +
(K): Air quality modeling and data.................. A
(L): Permitting fees................................ A
(M): Consultation and participation by affected A
local entities.....................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key to Table 1:
A: Proposing to Approve.
+: Not germane to infrastructure SIPs.
SA: EPA is acting on this infrastructure requirement in a separate
rulemaking action.
Based upon review of the State's infrastructure SIP submission and
relevant statutory and regulatory authorities and provisions referenced
in this submission or referenced in the EPA-approved ODEQ SIP, EPA
believes that Oklahoma has the infrastructure in place to address all
applicable required elements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2), except
as noted above, to ensure that the 2015 O3 NAAQS is
implemented in the State. However, as mentioned above, our approval of
this proposed action is dependent upon finalization of our proposal to
approve updates to Oklahoma's new source review permitting
requirements. (see 84 FR 66103, December 3, 2019).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
[[Page 59]]
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed
rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 23, 2019.
Kenley McQueen,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2019-28329 Filed 12-31-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P