Regulated Navigation Area; Lake Washington, Seattle, WA, 71823-71824 [2019-27985]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0296]
RIN 1625–AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Lake
Washington, Seattle, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a permanent regulated
navigation area for certain waters of
Lake Washington. The regulated
navigation area is intended to protect
personnel and vessels from potential
hazards created by excessive vessel
wake prior to and following high traffic
Seafair events.
DATES: This rule is effective January 29,
2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0296 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Ellie Wu, Sector Puget
Sound Waterways Management, Coast
Guard; telephone 206–217–6051,
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard was notified by the
Mercer Island Police Department of
hazardous conditions associated with
increased vessel and swimmer
congestion after high traffic Seafair
marine events, which can make routine
navigation for persons and vessels
unsafe. The Seafair event draws an
extraordinary amount of boaters and
persons to the waterway to observe
several high traffic events, such as the
Seafair Hydroplane Races and Seafair
Air Shows. The wakes created by
transiting vessels near the vicinity of
vessels moored to the log boom during
high traffic events pose a safety concern
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:33 Dec 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
to vessels and swimmers in the area.
Coast Guard action is needed to restrict
vessel movement prior to and after
Seafair events where significant marine
traffic endanger the safety of swimmers
and vessels proximate to the log boom.
In response, on May 28, 2019, the
Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled
Regulated Navigation Area; Lake
Washington, Seattle, WA 84 FR 24418.
There we stated why we issued the
NPRM, and invited comments on our
proposed regulatory action related to
this regulated navigation area. During
the comment period that ended June 27,
2019, we received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Coast
Guard Thirteenth District Commander
has determined that there are potential
hazards associated with Seafair
activities, which usually occur on Lake
Washington during the last week of July
and the first two weeks of August. The
purpose of this rule is to ensure safety
of vessels and the navigable waters in
the regulated navigation area prior to
and after Seafair activities.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM published May
28, 2019. There are no changes in the
regulatory text of this rule from the
proposed rule in the NPRM.
The regulated navigation area will
cover all navigable waters within Lake
Washington south of the Interstate 90
floating Bridge and north of a line
between Bailey Peninsula and Mercer
Island. The duration of the regulated
navigation area is intended to protect
personnel and vessels in these navigable
waters from excessive wake associated
with vessels before and after high traffic
Seafair events. Vessels transiting the
area will be required to create minimum
wake, at speeds of 7 miles per hour or
less, unless a higher minimum speed is
necessary to maintain bare steerageway.
Enforcement periods for this rule will
occur daily prior to and immediately
following Seafair events.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71823
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration
and time-of-day of the regulated
navigation area. Vessel traffic will be
able to transit through the regulated
navigation area, and the regulation will
only impact a small designated area of
Lake Washington for less than four days.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 about the
regulated navigation area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the regulated
navigation area may be small entities,
for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
E:\FR\FM\30DER1.SGM
30DER1
71824
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it would not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:33 Dec 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Environmental
Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
regulated navigation area enforced
annually for a total of less than 4 days
that would restrict vessel speed. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) in Table
3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures
5090.1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.1341 before the
undesignated center heading
‘‘Fourteenth Coast Guard District’’ to
read as follows:
■
§ 165. 1341 Regulated Navigation Area;
Lake Washington, Seattle, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
regulated navigation area: All waters of
Lake Washington south of the Interstate
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
90 Floating West Bound Bridge and
north of the points between Bailey
Peninsula at 47°33′14.4″ N, 122°14′47.3″
W and Mercer Island at 47°33′24.5″ N,
122°13′52.5″ W.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the
enforcement of the regulated navigation
zone.
(c) Regulations. All vessels and
persons transiting the regulated
navigation area described in paragraph
(a) of this section must proceed at a
speed which creates minimum wake, 7
miles per hour or less, unless a higher
minimum speed is necessary to
maintain bare steerageway.
(d) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced annually immediately
before and after Seafair events which
usually occurs during the last week in
July and the first two weeks of August.
The event will be one week or less in
duration and the specific dates and
times of the enforcement periods will be
published in a notice of enforcement in
the Federal Register.
Dated: September 26, 2019.
A.J. Vogt,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019–27985 Filed 12–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2019–0165; FRL–10002–
05–Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; YoloSolano Air Quality Management
District; Stationary Source Permits
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing action on a
revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District (YSAQMD or ‘‘the
District’’) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP) to approve a
rule governing issuance of permits for
stationary sources emitting fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) and PM2.5
precursors, including review and
permitting of major sources and major
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30DER1.SGM
30DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71823-71824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27985]
[[Page 71823]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0296]
RIN 1625-AA11
Regulated Navigation Area; Lake Washington, Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a permanent
regulated navigation area for certain waters of Lake Washington. The
regulated navigation area is intended to protect personnel and vessels
from potential hazards created by excessive vessel wake prior to and
following high traffic Seafair events.
DATES: This rule is effective January 29, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0296 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Ellie Wu, Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management, Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6051,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard was notified by the Mercer Island Police Department
of hazardous conditions associated with increased vessel and swimmer
congestion after high traffic Seafair marine events, which can make
routine navigation for persons and vessels unsafe. The Seafair event
draws an extraordinary amount of boaters and persons to the waterway to
observe several high traffic events, such as the Seafair Hydroplane
Races and Seafair Air Shows. The wakes created by transiting vessels
near the vicinity of vessels moored to the log boom during high traffic
events pose a safety concern to vessels and swimmers in the area. Coast
Guard action is needed to restrict vessel movement prior to and after
Seafair events where significant marine traffic endanger the safety of
swimmers and vessels proximate to the log boom.
In response, on May 28, 2019, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Regulated Navigation Area; Lake
Washington, Seattle, WA 84 FR 24418. There we stated why we issued the
NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to
this regulated navigation area. During the comment period that ended
June 27, 2019, we received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Coast Guard Thirteenth District
Commander has determined that there are potential hazards associated
with Seafair activities, which usually occur on Lake Washington during
the last week of July and the first two weeks of August. The purpose of
this rule is to ensure safety of vessels and the navigable waters in
the regulated navigation area prior to and after Seafair activities.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published May
28, 2019. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM.
The regulated navigation area will cover all navigable waters
within Lake Washington south of the Interstate 90 floating Bridge and
north of a line between Bailey Peninsula and Mercer Island. The
duration of the regulated navigation area is intended to protect
personnel and vessels in these navigable waters from excessive wake
associated with vessels before and after high traffic Seafair events.
Vessels transiting the area will be required to create minimum wake, at
speeds of 7 miles per hour or less, unless a higher minimum speed is
necessary to maintain bare steerageway. Enforcement periods for this
rule will occur daily prior to and immediately following Seafair
events.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration and time-of-day of the regulated navigation area.
Vessel traffic will be able to transit through the regulated navigation
area, and the regulation will only impact a small designated area of
Lake Washington for less than four days. Moreover, the Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about
the regulated navigation area.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated navigation area may be small entities, for the reasons stated
in section IV.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person
[[Page 71824]]
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a regulated navigation area enforced
annually for a total of less than 4 days that would restrict vessel
speed. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
L60(a) in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1341 before the undesignated center heading
``Fourteenth Coast Guard District'' to read as follows:
Sec. 165. 1341 Regulated Navigation Area; Lake Washington, Seattle,
WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a regulated navigation area:
All waters of Lake Washington south of the Interstate 90 Floating West
Bound Bridge and north of the points between Bailey Peninsula at
47[deg]33'14.4'' N, 122[deg]14'47.3'' W and Mercer Island at
47[deg]33'24.5'' N, 122[deg]13'52.5'' W.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the enforcement of the
regulated navigation zone.
(c) Regulations. All vessels and persons transiting the regulated
navigation area described in paragraph (a) of this section must proceed
at a speed which creates minimum wake, 7 miles per hour or less, unless
a higher minimum speed is necessary to maintain bare steerageway.
(d) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced annually
immediately before and after Seafair events which usually occurs during
the last week in July and the first two weeks of August. The event will
be one week or less in duration and the specific dates and times of the
enforcement periods will be published in a notice of enforcement in the
Federal Register.
Dated: September 26, 2019.
A.J. Vogt,
RADM, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-27985 Filed 12-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P