Filing Window for New Rural Digital Low Power Television and TV Translator Applicants Displaced by Incentive Auction and Station Repack December 2, 2019 to January 31, 2020, 71411-71413 [2019-27941]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
monitor the effectiveness of the ICS
reforms, the Commission required all
ICS providers to file annual reports
providing data and other information on
their ICS operations.
In particular, the Commission
required each ICS provider to file a
report annually specifying, for the prior
calendar year: Interstate, international,
and intrastate minutes of use by facility;
and the name, size, and type of facility
being served; fees for any ancillary
services, the amount of these fees, and
the number of times each fee was
imposed; monthly site commission
payments; rates and minutes of use for
video calling services by facility, as well
as ancillary fee charges for such
services; the number of disabilityrelated calls, problems associated with
such calls, and ancillary fees charged in
connection with such calls; and the
number of complaints received related
to, for example, dropped calls and poor
call quality and the number of instances
of each by TTY and TRS users. The
annual reports ensure that the
Commission has access to the
information it needs to fulfill its
regulatory duties, while minimizing the
burden on ICS providers.
The Commission required that an ICS
provider certify annually the accuracy
of the data and other information
submitted in the provider’s annual
report and the provider’s compliance
with the Commission’s ICS rates.
Pursuant to the authority delegated to it
by the Commission in the Second
Report and Order, the Commission’s
Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau)
created standardized templates for the
annual reports (FCC Form 2301(a)) and
certifications (FCC Form 2301(b)). The
Bureau provided instructions that
explain the reporting and certification
requirements and reduce the burden of
the data collection. The Commission
also required ICS providers to disclose
to consumers their interstate, intrastate,
and international rates and ancillary
service charges.
On June 13, 2017, the D.C. Circuit
vacated the video visitation
requirements in the annual report.
Pursuant to the D.C. Circuit’s mandate,
the Commission has removed the video
visitation reporting requirements in the
annual report and amended the
instructions to reflect the removal of
this requirement. As part of the
Commission’s continued administration
of the ICS data collection, the
Commission has modified the
instructions for FCC Form 2301(a) and
FCC Form 2301(b) in several additional
respects. These changes make the
instructions clearer and will make the
annual reports easier to understand and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
analyze. The amended instructions
require ICS providers to: Submit all
reports using the electronic Excel
template provided by the Commission,
and to provide the data in a machinereadable, manipulatable format; provide
city and state information for each
facility served; group the facilities
served by underlying contracts in the
section for ICS Rates; separately report
and explain their rates for debit/prepaid
calls and collect calls; report fixed site
commission payments by facility as well
as by contract; and explain certain
entries, including any entry that omits
requested information. These changes
will impose only a minimal additional
burden on providers because they
address only information that providers
usually and customarily compile in the
normal course of their business
activities. The information will help the
Commission continue to analyze
changes in the ICS industry, to monitor
compliance with the ICS rules, and to
enforce these rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Cecilia Sigmund,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–27925 Filed 12–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[DA 19–1215]
Filing Window for New Rural Digital
Low Power Television and TV
Translator Applicants Displaced by
Incentive Auction and Station Repack
December 2, 2019 to January 31, 2020
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Media Bureau of the
Federal Communications Commission
announces a window filing opportunity
for pending new digital low power and
TV translator stations (LPTV/translator
stations) displaced by the Incentive
Auction and station repack to amend
their applications to specify a new
channel between 2 to 36 (in core
channels).
DATES: The window will open December
2, 2019 and close on January 31, 2020
at 11:59 p.m. ET.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, Shaun.Maher@fcc.gov,
(202) 418–2324.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2009,
the Media Bureau began accepting
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71411
applications for new rural digital LPTV/
translator stations on a limited basis and
then later froze those filings. The Media
Bureau suspended processing of these
applications due to the possibility that
they could be displaced by the
forthcoming Incentive Auction and
repacking process. With the completion
of the Incentive Auction and the
progress made in the post-Incentive
Auction transition, it is appropriate to
give these applicants an opportunity to
amend their applications to specify a
new digital in core channel.
To be eligible to file in this window,
the applicant must have a pending
application for new digital LPTV/
translator station that was displaced by
the Incentive Auction and repacking
process. In order to be considered
‘‘displaced’’ for purposes of filing in this
window, an LPTV/translator applicant
must: (1) Be subject to displacement by
a full power or Class A television station
on the repacked television band
(channels 2–36) as a result of the
Incentive Auction and repacking
process, (2) have proposed a frequency
repurposed for new, flexible use by a
600 MHz Band wireless licensee, or (3)
have proposed a frequency that will
serve as part of the 600 MHz Band guard
bands (which includes the duplex gap).
In addition to specifying a new in
core digital channel, applicants may
modify their technical specifications
provided such changes do not result in
a change in transmitter site of more than
48 kilometers from the reference
coordinates specified in their original
application. To preserve the ‘‘rural’’
filing restriction in the original 2009
window, amended facilities must
specify transmitting antenna site
coordinates (geographic latitude and
longitude) located more than 121
kilometers (75 miles) from the reference
coordinates of the cities listed in
Appendix A of the Public Notice. The
proposed facilities may not cause
interference to the predicted service of
licenses and valid construction permits
for full power television, Class A
television and LPTV/translator stations
nor the predicted service of any
previously-filed application for any of
these services. Eligible applicants may
file an amendment to their pending
application and such filing will be
treated as a minor amendment provided
it complies with these restrictions.
There is no fee for filing this
amendment.
All amendments submitted during the
window will be considered filed on the
last day of the window. Mutually
exclusive (MX) applicants will be given
an opportunity to resolve their MX
through settlement or engineering
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
71412
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
amendment that may be submitted
during a settlement window to be
announced by the Media Bureau by
separate public notice. If two or more
applications remain MX with one
another after the close of the settlement
window, the applications will be subject
to the Commission’s competitive
bidding rules.
Applications that are not amended to
specify an in core channel during this
window will be subsequently
dismissed.
For additional information or
questions, please contact Mark Colombo
(technical), Mark.Colombo@fcc.gov,
(202) 418–7611 or Shaun Maher (legal),
Shaun.Maher@fcc.gov, (202) 418–2324
of the Video Division, Media Bureau.
Barbara Kreisman,
Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
APPENDIX A
television and television translator stations
on channels 37 to 51 (out of core channels)
to specify a channel between 2 and 36 (in
core channels) may not propose facilities
located within 121 kilometers (75 miles) of
the reference coordinates listed below for the
following cities. Source of cities: January 1,
2008 Nielsen Media Research Estimates.
Source of coordinates: Section 76.53 of the
Commission’s Rules.
Amendments filed during the window to
allow applicants for new digital low power
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
DMA Ranking Market
North latitude
1. New York City, New York .............................................................................................................................
2. Los Angeles, California .................................................................................................................................
3. Chicago, Illinois .............................................................................................................................................
4. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ...........................................................................................................................
5. Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas ..............................................................................................................................
6. San Francisco, California .............................................................................................................................
7. Boston, Massachusetts .................................................................................................................................
8. Atlanta, Georgia ............................................................................................................................................
9. Washington, District of Columbia .................................................................................................................
10. Houston, Texas ............................................................................................................................................
11. Detroit, Michigan ..........................................................................................................................................
12. Phoenix, Arizona ..........................................................................................................................................
13. Tampa, Florida .............................................................................................................................................
14. Seattle, Washington .....................................................................................................................................
15. Minneapolis, Minnesota ................................................................................................................................
16. Miami, Florida ...............................................................................................................................................
17. Cleveland, Ohio ............................................................................................................................................
18. Denver, Colorado .........................................................................................................................................
19. Orlando, Florida ............................................................................................................................................
20. Sacramento, California .................................................................................................................................
21. St. Louis, Missouri ........................................................................................................................................
22. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ..............................................................................................................................
23. Portland, Oregon ..........................................................................................................................................
24. Baltimore, Maryland .....................................................................................................................................
25. Charlotte, North Carolina .............................................................................................................................
26. Indianapolis, Indiana ....................................................................................................................................
27. San Diego, California ...................................................................................................................................
28. Raleigh, North Carolina ................................................................................................................................
29. Hartford, Connecticut ...................................................................................................................................
30. Nashville, Tennessee ...................................................................................................................................
31. Kansas City, Missouri ...................................................................................................................................
32. Columbus, Ohio ............................................................................................................................................
33. Cincinnati, Ohio ............................................................................................................................................
34. Milwaukee, Wisconsin ..................................................................................................................................
35. Salt Lake City, Utah .....................................................................................................................................
36. Greenville, South Carolina ...........................................................................................................................
37. San Antonio, Texas ......................................................................................................................................
38. West Palm Beach, Florida ...........................................................................................................................
39. Grand Rapids, Michigan ...............................................................................................................................
40. Birmingham, Alabama ..................................................................................................................................
41. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania .............................................................................................................................
42. Norfolk, Virginia ............................................................................................................................................
43. Las Vegas, Nevada ......................................................................................................................................
44. Albuquerque, New Mexico ...........................................................................................................................
45. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma ...........................................................................................................................
46. Greensboro, North Carolina .........................................................................................................................
47. Memphis, Tennessee ...................................................................................................................................
48. Louisville, Kentucky ......................................................................................................................................
49. Jacksonville, Florida .....................................................................................................................................
50. Buffalo, New York ........................................................................................................................................
51. Austin, Texas ................................................................................................................................................
52. Providence, Rhode Island ............................................................................................................................
53. New Orleans, Louisiana ...............................................................................................................................
54. Scranton, Pennsylvania ................................................................................................................................
55. Fresno, California .........................................................................................................................................
56. Albany, New York .........................................................................................................................................
57. Little Rock, Arkansas ...................................................................................................................................
58. Knoxville, Tennessee ...................................................................................................................................
59. Richmond, Virginia .......................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
40–45–06
34–03–15
41–52–28
39–56–58
32–47–09
37–46–39
42–21–24
33–45–10
38–53–51
29–45–26
42–19–48
33–27–12
27–56–58
47–36–32
44–58–57
25–46–37
41–29–51
39–44–58
28–32–42
38–34–57
38–37–45
40–26–19
45–31–6
39–17–26
35–13–44
39–46–7
32–42–53
35–46–38
41–46–12
36–9–33
39–4–56
39–57–47
39–6–7
43–2–19
40–45–23
34–50–50
29–25–37
26–42–36
42–58–3
33–31–1
40–15–43
36–51–10
36–10–20
35–5–1
35–28–26
36–4–17
35–8–46
38–14–47
30–19–44
42–52–52
30–16–9
41–49–32
29–56–53
41–24–32
36–44–12
42–39–1
34–44–52
35–57–39
37–32–15
27DEN1
West longitude
073–59–39
118–14–28
87–38–22
75–9–21
096–47–37
122–24–40
71–3–25
84–23–37
77–0–33
95–21–37
83–2–57
112–4–28
82–27–26
122–20–12
93–15–43
80–11–32
81–41–50
104–59–22
81–22–38
122–23–34
90–12–22
80–0–0
122–40–35
76–36–45
80–50–45
86–9–46
117–9–21
78–38–21
72–40–49
86–46–55
94–35–20
83–0–17
84–30–35
87–54–15
111–51–26
82–24–1
98–29–6
80–3–5
85–40–13
86–48–36
76–52–59
76–17–21
115–8–37
106–39–5
97–31–4
79–47–25
90–3–13
85–45–49
81–39–42
78–52–21
97–44–37
71–24–41
90–4–10
75–39–46
119–47–11
73–45–1
92–16–37
83–55–7
77–26–9
71413
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
DMA Ranking Market
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
Tulsa, Oklahoma ..........................................................................................................................................
Mobile, Alabama ...........................................................................................................................................
Dayton, Ohio ................................................................................................................................................
Fort Myers, Florida .......................................................................................................................................
Lexington, Kentucky .....................................................................................................................................
Huntington, West Virginia .............................................................................................................................
Flint, Michigan ..............................................................................................................................................
Roanoke, Virginia .........................................................................................................................................
Tucson, Arizona ...........................................................................................................................................
Wichita, Kansas ............................................................................................................................................
Green Bay, Wisconsin ..................................................................................................................................
Des Moines, Iowa .........................................................................................................................................
Toledo, Ohio .................................................................................................................................................
Honolulu, Hawaii ..........................................................................................................................................
Springfield, Missouri .....................................................................................................................................
Omaha, Nebraska ........................................................................................................................................
Portland, Maine ............................................................................................................................................
Spokane, Washington ..................................................................................................................................
Rochester, New York ...................................................................................................................................
Paducah, Kentucky ......................................................................................................................................
Syracuse, New York .....................................................................................................................................
Columbia, South Carolina ............................................................................................................................
Shreveport, Louisiana ..................................................................................................................................
Huntsville, Alabama ......................................................................................................................................
Champaign, Illinois .......................................................................................................................................
Madison, Wisconsin .....................................................................................................................................
Chattanooga, Tennessee .............................................................................................................................
Cedar Rapids, Iowa ......................................................................................................................................
Harlingen, Texas ..........................................................................................................................................
South Bend, Indiana .....................................................................................................................................
Jackson, Mississippi .....................................................................................................................................
Johnson City, Tennessee .............................................................................................................................
Burlington, Vermont/Plattsburgh, New York ................................................................................................
Colorado Springs, Colorado .........................................................................................................................
Baton Rouge, Louisiana ...............................................................................................................................
Waco, Texas ................................................................................................................................................
Davenport, Iowa ...........................................................................................................................................
Savannah, Georgia ......................................................................................................................................
El Paso, Texas .............................................................................................................................................
Johnstown, Pennsylvania .............................................................................................................................
Charleston, South Carolina ..........................................................................................................................
[FR Doc. 2019–27941 Filed 12–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[Docket No. OP–1681]
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
RIN 3064–ZA08
Extension of Comment Period;
Request for Information on Application
of the Uniform Financial Institutions
Rating System
The Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System and the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation.
ACTION: Notice and request for
information; extension of comment
period.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
North latitude
On October 31, 2019, the
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Board) and the Federal
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
(collectively, the agencies) published in
the Federal Register a request for
information (RFI) seeking information
and comments from interested parties
regarding the consistency of ratings
assigned by the agencies under the
Uniform Financial Institutions Rating
System (UFIRS). The agencies have
determined that an extension of the
comment period until February 28,
2020, is appropriate.
DATES: The comment period for the
notice published on October 31, 2019
(84 FR 58383), regarding the RFI on
application of UFIRS, is extended from
December 30, 2019, to February 28,
2020.
You may submit comments
by any of the methods identified in the
proposal.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Board: Alex Kobulsky, Senior
Financial Institution Policy Analyst II,
(202) 452–2031, and Anna Lee Hewko,
Associate Director, (202) 530–6260,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36–9–12
30–41–36
39–45–32
26–38–42
38–2–50
38–25–12
43–0–50
37–16–13
32–13–15
37–41–30
44–30–48
41–35–14
41–39–14
21–18–36
37–13–3
41–15–42
43–39–33
47–39–32
43–9–41
37–5–13
43–3–4
34–0–2
32–30–46
34–44–18
40–7–5
43–4–23
35–2–41
41–58–48
26–11–29
43–40–33
32–17–56
36–19–4
44–28–34
38–50–7
30–26–58
31–33–12
41–31–24
32–4–42
31–45–36
40–19–35
32–46–35
West longitude
95–59–34
88–2–33
84–11–43
81–52–6
84–29–46
82–26–33
83–41–33
79–56–44
110–58–8
97–20–16
88–0–50
93–37–0
83–32–39
157–51–48
93–17–32
95–56–14
70–15–19
117–25–33
77–36–21
88–35–56
76–9–14
81–2–0
93–44–58
86–35–19
88–14–48
89–22–55
85–18–32
91–39–48
97–41–35
86–15–1
90–11–6
82–20–56
73–12–46
104–49–16
91–11–0
97–8–0
90–34–21
81–5–37
106–29–21
78–55–3
79–55–53
Division of Supervision and Regulation;
or Patricia Yeh, Senior Counsel, (202)
452–3089, Legal Division, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th and C Streets NW,
Washington, DC 20551. For the hearing
impaired only, Telecommunication
Device for the Deaf (TDD), (202) 263–
4869.
FDIC: Rae-Ann Miller, Associate
Director, Risk Management Policy;
Samuel B. Lutz, Counsel, Supervision
and Legislation Branch, Legal Division,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20429.
On
October 31, 2019, the agencies
published in the Federal Register a RFI
seeking information and comments from
interested parties regarding the
consistency of ratings assigned by the
agencies under UFIRS. The assigned
ratings are commonly known as
CAMELS ratings. The agencies also
sought feedback concerning the current
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71411-71413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27941]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[DA 19-1215]
Filing Window for New Rural Digital Low Power Television and TV
Translator Applicants Displaced by Incentive Auction and Station Repack
December 2, 2019 to January 31, 2020
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission
announces a window filing opportunity for pending new digital low power
and TV translator stations (LPTV/translator stations) displaced by the
Incentive Auction and station repack to amend their applications to
specify a new channel between 2 to 36 (in core channels).
DATES: The window will open December 2, 2019 and close on January 31,
2020 at 11:59 p.m. ET.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, [email protected], (202)
418-2324.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2009, the Media Bureau began accepting
applications for new rural digital LPTV/translator stations on a
limited basis and then later froze those filings. The Media Bureau
suspended processing of these applications due to the possibility that
they could be displaced by the forthcoming Incentive Auction and
repacking process. With the completion of the Incentive Auction and the
progress made in the post-Incentive Auction transition, it is
appropriate to give these applicants an opportunity to amend their
applications to specify a new digital in core channel.
To be eligible to file in this window, the applicant must have a
pending application for new digital LPTV/translator station that was
displaced by the Incentive Auction and repacking process. In order to
be considered ``displaced'' for purposes of filing in this window, an
LPTV/translator applicant must: (1) Be subject to displacement by a
full power or Class A television station on the repacked television
band (channels 2-36) as a result of the Incentive Auction and repacking
process, (2) have proposed a frequency repurposed for new, flexible use
by a 600 MHz Band wireless licensee, or (3) have proposed a frequency
that will serve as part of the 600 MHz Band guard bands (which includes
the duplex gap).
In addition to specifying a new in core digital channel, applicants
may modify their technical specifications provided such changes do not
result in a change in transmitter site of more than 48 kilometers from
the reference coordinates specified in their original application. To
preserve the ``rural'' filing restriction in the original 2009 window,
amended facilities must specify transmitting antenna site coordinates
(geographic latitude and longitude) located more than 121 kilometers
(75 miles) from the reference coordinates of the cities listed in
Appendix A of the Public Notice. The proposed facilities may not cause
interference to the predicted service of licenses and valid
construction permits for full power television, Class A television and
LPTV/translator stations nor the predicted service of any previously-
filed application for any of these services. Eligible applicants may
file an amendment to their pending application and such filing will be
treated as a minor amendment provided it complies with these
restrictions. There is no fee for filing this amendment.
All amendments submitted during the window will be considered filed
on the last day of the window. Mutually exclusive (MX) applicants will
be given an opportunity to resolve their MX through settlement or
engineering
[[Page 71412]]
amendment that may be submitted during a settlement window to be
announced by the Media Bureau by separate public notice. If two or more
applications remain MX with one another after the close of the
settlement window, the applications will be subject to the Commission's
competitive bidding rules.
Applications that are not amended to specify an in core channel
during this window will be subsequently dismissed.
For additional information or questions, please contact Mark
Colombo (technical), [email protected], (202) 418-7611 or Shaun
Maher (legal), [email protected], (202) 418-2324 of the Video
Division, Media Bureau.
Barbara Kreisman,
Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
APPENDIX A
Amendments filed during the window to allow applicants for new
digital low power television and television translator stations on
channels 37 to 51 (out of core channels) to specify a channel
between 2 and 36 (in core channels) may not propose facilities
located within 121 kilometers (75 miles) of the reference
coordinates listed below for the following cities. Source of cities:
January 1, 2008 Nielsen Media Research Estimates. Source of
coordinates: Section 76.53 of the Commission's Rules.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DMA Ranking Market North latitude West longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. New York City, New York.. 40-45-06 073-59-39
2. Los Angeles, California.. 34-03-15 118-14-28
3. Chicago, Illinois........ 41-52-28 87-38-22
4. Philadelphia, 39-56-58 75-9-21
Pennsylvania.
5. Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas. 32-47-09 096-47-37
6. San Francisco, California 37-46-39 122-24-40
7. Boston, Massachusetts.... 42-21-24 71-3-25
8. Atlanta, Georgia......... 33-45-10 84-23-37
9. Washington, District of 38-53-51 77-0-33
Columbia.
10. Houston, Texas.......... 29-45-26 95-21-37
11. Detroit, Michigan....... 42-19-48 83-2-57
12. Phoenix, Arizona........ 33-27-12 112-4-28
13. Tampa, Florida.......... 27-56-58 82-27-26
14. Seattle, Washington..... 47-36-32 122-20-12
15. Minneapolis, Minnesota.. 44-58-57 93-15-43
16. Miami, Florida.......... 25-46-37 80-11-32
17. Cleveland, Ohio......... 41-29-51 81-41-50
18. Denver, Colorado........ 39-44-58 104-59-22
19. Orlando, Florida........ 28-32-42 81-22-38
20. Sacramento, California.. 38-34-57 122-23-34
21. St. Louis, Missouri..... 38-37-45 90-12-22
22. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 40-26-19 80-0-0
23. Portland, Oregon........ 45-31-6 122-40-35
24. Baltimore, Maryland..... 39-17-26 76-36-45
25. Charlotte, North 35-13-44 80-50-45
Carolina.
26. Indianapolis, Indiana... 39-46-7 86-9-46
27. San Diego, California... 32-42-53 117-9-21
28. Raleigh, North Carolina. 35-46-38 78-38-21
29. Hartford, Connecticut... 41-46-12 72-40-49
30. Nashville, Tennessee.... 36-9-33 86-46-55
31. Kansas City, Missouri... 39-4-56 94-35-20
32. Columbus, Ohio.......... 39-57-47 83-0-17
33. Cincinnati, Ohio........ 39-6-7 84-30-35
34. Milwaukee, Wisconsin.... 43-2-19 87-54-15
35. Salt Lake City, Utah.... 40-45-23 111-51-26
36. Greenville, South 34-50-50 82-24-1
Carolina.
37. San Antonio, Texas...... 29-25-37 98-29-6
38. West Palm Beach, Florida 26-42-36 80-3-5
39. Grand Rapids, Michigan.. 42-58-3 85-40-13
40. Birmingham, Alabama..... 33-31-1 86-48-36
41. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 40-15-43 76-52-59
42. Norfolk, Virginia....... 36-51-10 76-17-21
43. Las Vegas, Nevada....... 36-10-20 115-8-37
44. Albuquerque, New Mexico. 35-5-1 106-39-5
45. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 35-28-26 97-31-4
46. Greensboro, North 36-4-17 79-47-25
Carolina.
47. Memphis, Tennessee...... 35-8-46 90-3-13
48. Louisville, Kentucky.... 38-14-47 85-45-49
49. Jacksonville, Florida... 30-19-44 81-39-42
50. Buffalo, New York....... 42-52-52 78-52-21
51. Austin, Texas........... 30-16-9 97-44-37
52. Providence, Rhode Island 41-49-32 71-24-41
53. New Orleans, Louisiana.. 29-56-53 90-4-10
54. Scranton, Pennsylvania.. 41-24-32 75-39-46
55. Fresno, California...... 36-44-12 119-47-11
56. Albany, New York........ 42-39-1 73-45-1
57. Little Rock, Arkansas... 34-44-52 92-16-37
58. Knoxville, Tennessee.... 35-57-39 83-55-7
59. Richmond, Virginia...... 37-32-15 77-26-9
[[Page 71413]]
60. Tulsa, Oklahoma......... 36-9-12 95-59-34
61. Mobile, Alabama......... 30-41-36 88-2-33
62. Dayton, Ohio............ 39-45-32 84-11-43
63. Fort Myers, Florida..... 26-38-42 81-52-6
64. Lexington, Kentucky..... 38-2-50 84-29-46
65. Huntington, West 38-25-12 82-26-33
Virginia.
66. Flint, Michigan......... 43-0-50 83-41-33
67. Roanoke, Virginia....... 37-16-13 79-56-44
68. Tucson, Arizona......... 32-13-15 110-58-8
69. Wichita, Kansas......... 37-41-30 97-20-16
70. Green Bay, Wisconsin.... 44-30-48 88-0-50
71. Des Moines, Iowa........ 41-35-14 93-37-0
72. Toledo, Ohio............ 41-39-14 83-32-39
73. Honolulu, Hawaii........ 21-18-36 157-51-48
74. Springfield, Missouri... 37-13-3 93-17-32
75. Omaha, Nebraska......... 41-15-42 95-56-14
76. Portland, Maine......... 43-39-33 70-15-19
77. Spokane, Washington..... 47-39-32 117-25-33
78. Rochester, New York..... 43-9-41 77-36-21
79. Paducah, Kentucky....... 37-5-13 88-35-56
80. Syracuse, New York...... 43-3-4 76-9-14
81. Columbia, South Carolina 34-0-2 81-2-0
82. Shreveport, Louisiana... 32-30-46 93-44-58
83. Huntsville, Alabama..... 34-44-18 86-35-19
84. Champaign, Illinois..... 40-7-5 88-14-48
85. Madison, Wisconsin...... 43-4-23 89-22-55
86. Chattanooga, Tennessee.. 35-2-41 85-18-32
87. Cedar Rapids, Iowa...... 41-58-48 91-39-48
88. Harlingen, Texas........ 26-11-29 97-41-35
89. South Bend, Indiana..... 43-40-33 86-15-1
90. Jackson, Mississippi.... 32-17-56 90-11-6
91. Johnson City, Tennessee. 36-19-4 82-20-56
92. Burlington, Vermont/ 44-28-34 73-12-46
Plattsburgh, New York.
93. Colorado Springs, 38-50-7 104-49-16
Colorado.
94. Baton Rouge, Louisiana.. 30-26-58 91-11-0
95. Waco, Texas............. 31-33-12 97-8-0
96. Davenport, Iowa......... 41-31-24 90-34-21
97. Savannah, Georgia....... 32-4-42 81-5-37
98. El Paso, Texas.......... 31-45-36 106-29-21
99. Johnstown, Pennsylvania. 40-19-35 78-55-3
100. Charleston, South 32-46-35 79-55-53
Carolina.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2019-27941 Filed 12-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
