Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 71379-71381 [2019-27913]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
Section 104 of the MMPA also provides
for Letters of Confirmation under a
General Authorization for scientific
research and permits for commercial
and educational photography of marine
mammals that involve only Level B
harassment of marine mammals; permits
for capture and/or import of marine
mammals for public display; and
inventory reporting pertaining to marine
mammals in public display facilities.
The regulations pertaining to permits
and associated reporting requirements
under the MMPA and FSA are at 50 CFR
part 216; the regulations for permit
requirements under the ESA are at 50
CFR part 222. The required information
in this collection is used to make the
determinations required by the MMPA,
FSA, ESA and their implementing
regulations prior to issuing a permit; to
establish appropriate permit conditions;
to evaluate the impacts of the proposed
activity on protected species; and, to
ensure compliance with the Acts. The
marine mammal inventory forms ensure
compliance with MMPA reporting
requirements and allow NMFS to
maintain the National Inventory of
Marine Mammals (NIMM), as required
by the MMPA.
This information collection applies to
certain protected species for which
NMFS is responsible: Cetaceans
(whales, dolphins and porpoises) and
pinnipeds (seals and sea lions); and, for
ESA scientific research and
enhancement permits: Sawfish
(largetooth and smalltooth), sea turtles
(in water), sturgeon (Atlantic and
shortnose), and certain foreign ESAlisted species. This information
collection may be used for future ESAlisted species.
Affected Public: Individuals; Business
or other for-profit organizations; Not-forprofit institutions; State, Local, or Tribal
government; Federal government.
Frequency: Permit applications, once
every five or ten years; permit reports,
annually or more frequently if incidents
occur; amendments and modifications
to permits, as frequently as requested by
permit holders; public display inventory
reporting, 15 days prior to transporting
or transferring marine mammals and 30
days after the date of birth or death of
a marine mammal.
Respondent’s Obligation: $986.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2019–27890 Filed 12–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[RTID 0648–XG573]
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plans
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the
adoption of a Final Endangered Species
Act (ESA) recovery plan for the
threatened Puget Sound steelhead
Distinct Population Segment (DPS)
(herein referred to as steelhead). The
Final Recovery Plan for this species
(Final Recovery Plan) is now available.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
Final Recovery Plan are available online
at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
resource/document/esa-recovery-planpuget-sound-steelhead-distinctpopulation-segment-oncorhynchus
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Price, (360) 753–9598,
david.price@noaa.gov; or Elizabeth
Babcock, (206) 526–4505,
elizabeth.babcock@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Endangered Species Act of 1973
(ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) requires that we develop and
implement recovery plans for the
conservation and survival of threatened
and endangered species under our
jurisdiction, unless it is determined that
such plans would not result in the
conservation of the species. The Puget
Sound steelhead (Oncorhynchus
mykiss) DPS was listed as a threatened
species under the ESA in May 11, 2007
(72 FR 26722). We published a Notice
of Availability of the Draft Recovery
Plan in the Federal Register on
December 13, 2018 (83 FR 64110) to
obtain comments on the Draft Plan. The
public comment period for this action
was set to end on February 11, 2019;
however, we extended the public
comment period through March 28,
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71379
2019, to provide additional opportunity
for public comment (84 FR 1707). We
received extensive comments on the
Draft Plan, summarized the comments
and identified comments that prompted
revisions for the Final Recovery Plan.
We revised the Draft Plan based on
comments received, and this final
version now constitutes the Recovery
Plan for the Puget Sound steelhead DPS.
The Final Plan
We are responsible for developing and
implementing recovery plans for Pacific
salmon and steelhead listed under the
ESA. Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires
that recovery plans include, to the
extent practicable: (1) Objective,
measurable criteria which, when met,
would result in a determination that the
species is no longer threatened or
endangered; (2) site-specific
management actions necessary to
achieve the plan’s goals; and (3)
estimates of the time required and costs
to achieve the recovery plan’s goal. Our
goal is to restore Puget Sound steelhead
to the point where they are viable and
no longer need the protections of the
ESA. The ESA requires the development
of recovery plans for each listed species
unless such a plan would not promote
its recovery.
We believe it is essential to have local
support of recovery plans by those
whose activities directly affect the listed
species and whose continued
commitment and leadership will be
needed to implement the necessary
recovery actions. We therefore support
and participate in collaborative efforts
to develop recovery plans that involve
state, tribal, and federal entities, local
communities, and other stakeholders.
For this Final Recovery Plan for
threatened Puget Sound steelhead, we
worked collaboratively with local, state,
tribal, and federal partners to produce a
recovery plan that satisfies the ESA
requirements. We have determined that
this ESA recovery plan for Puget Sound
steelhead meets the statutory
requirements for a recovery plan and are
adopting it as the Final Recovery Plan
for this threatened species. This notice
provides a notice of availability of the
Plan.
The geographic area covered by the
Final Recovery Plan is the Puget Sound
basin, from the Elwha River (inclusive)
eastward, including rivers in Hood
Canal, South Sound, and North Sound,
including steelhead from six artificial
propagation programs: the Green River
Natural Program; White River Winter
Steelhead Supplementation Program;
Hood Canal Steelhead Supplementation
Off-station Projects in the Dewatto,
Skokomish, and Duckabush Rivers; and
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
71380
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
the Lower Elwha Fish Hatchery Wild
Steelhead Recovery Program.
For the purpose of recovery planning
for the ESA-listed species of Pacific
salmon and steelhead in Idaho, Oregon,
and Washington, NMFS designated five
geographically based ‘‘recovery
domains.’’ The Puget Sound Steelhead
DPS spawning range is in the Puget
Sound domain. For each domain, NMFS
appointed a team of scientists,
nominated for their geographic and
species expertise, to provide a solid
scientific foundation for recovery plans.
The Puget Sound Steelhead Technical
Recovery Team included biologists from
NMFS, other federal agencies, state
agencies, tribes, and academic
institutions.
We also collaborated with the state of
Washington, tribes, other federal
agencies, local governments,
representatives of industry and
environmental groups, other
stakeholders, and the public to develop
the Plan. The Final Recovery Plan for
the Puget Sound steelhead DPS was
developed by NMFS in cooperation
with a recovery team made up of experts
from the Washington Department of
Fish and Wildlife, Northwest Indian
Fisheries Commission, Nooksack Tribe,
Seattle Light, Long Live the Kings, Puget
Sound Partnership, and NMFS’
Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
These groups provided vital input
during the planning process, and their
continued involvement during recovery
plan implementation is critical to the
success of our joint efforts to recover
Puget Sound steelhead.
Contents of the Plan
The Final Recovery Plan contains
biological background and contextual
information that includes description of
the DPS, the planning area, and the
context of the plan’s development. It
presents relevant information on DPS
structure and guidelines for assessing
salmonid population and DPS status. It
provides background on the natural
history of steelhead, population status,
and threats to their sustainability.
The Puget Sound steelhead DPS
consists of three Major Population
Groups (MPGs) and 32 Demographically
Independent Populations (DIPs). Major
risk factors facing Puget Sound
steelhead are widespread declines in
abundance and productivity for most
natural steelhead populations in the
DPS, including those in Skagit and
Snohomish Rivers, previously
considered strongholds for steelhead in
the DPS; the low abundance of several
summer-run populations; and the
sharply diminishing abundance of some
steelhead populations, especially in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
south Puget Sound, Hood Canal, and the
Strait of Juan de Fuca. Continued
releases of out-of-DPS hatchery fish
from Skamania-derived summer run
were a major concern for diversity in the
DPS.
The most recent status assessment of
the DPS found ‘‘[t]he biological risks
faced by the Puget Sound steelhead DPS
have not substantively changed since
the listing in 2007 (NMFS 2016; 81 FR
33468). The abundance of natural
spawners is very low and productivity
remains predominately negative.
Degradation and fragmentation of
freshwater habitat, with consequential
effects on connectivity, remain the
primary limiting factors and threats
facing the Puget Sound steelhead DPS.
The DPS is at very low viability, as are
all three of its constituent MPGs, and
many of its 32 DIPs.
The Final Recovery Plan presents
NMFS’ recovery goals and the viability
and listing factor criteria for making a
delisting decision. The viability criteria
for the Puget Sound steelhead DPS are
designed to improve the DPS so it ‘‘has
a negligible risk of extinction due to
threats from demographic variation,
local environmental variation, and
genetic diversity changes over a 100year time frame’’ based on the status of
the MPGs and DIPs, and supporting
ecosystems (McElhany et al., 2000). A
self-sustaining viable population has a
negligible risk of extinction due to
reasonably foreseeable changes in
circumstances affecting its abundance,
productivity, spatial structure, and
diversity characteristics and achieves
these characteristics without
dependence upon artificial propagation.
The viability criteria for Puget Sound
steelhead require that all three MPGs be
viable because the three MPGs differ
substantially in key biological and
habitat characteristics that contribute in
distinct ways to the overall viability,
diversity, and spatial structure of the
DPS.
The Final Recovery Plan lays out a
recovery strategy to address the
potential threats based on the best
available science and includes goals that
incorporate objective, measurable
criteria which, when met, would result
in a determination that the species be
removed from the list. The Final
Recovery Plan is not regulatory, but
presents guidance for use by agencies
and interested parties to assist in the
recovery of steelhead. The Final
Recovery Plan identifies substantive
actions needed to achieve recovery by
addressing the threats to the species.
The strategy for recovery includes a
linkage between management actions
and an active research and monitoring
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
program intended to fill data gaps and
assess effectiveness. The Final Recovery
Plan incorporates an adaptive
management framework by which
management actions and other elements
will evolve and adapt as we gain
information through research and
monitoring. The Final Recovery Plan
references many of the significant efforts
already underway to allow steelhead in
the Puget Sound to access a diversity of
high quality habitats that have been lost
or degraded due to human land use.
The Final Recovery Plan also
describes specific information on the
following: Current status of Puget Sound
steelhead; pressures (limiting factors)
and threats throughout the life cycle
that have contributed to the species
decline; recovery strategies to address
the threats based on the best available
science; site-specific actions with
timelines; and an adaptive management
framework for focusing needed research
and evaluations and revising our
recovery strategies and actions. The
Final Recovery Plan also summarizes
time and costs required to implement
recovery actions.
How NMFS and Others Expect To Use
the Plan
With this Final Recovery Plan, we
commit to implementing the actions in
the plan for which we have authority
and funding; encourage other federal,
state and local agencies and tribal
governments to implement recovery
actions for which they have
responsibility, authority, and funding;
and work cooperatively with the public
and local stakeholders on
implementation of other actions. We
expect the recovery plan to guide us and
other federal agencies in evaluating
federal actions under ESA section 7, as
well as in implementing other
provisions of the ESA and other
statutes. For example, the plan will
provide greater biological context for
evaluating the effects that a proposed
action may have on a species by
providing delisting criteria, information
on priority areas for addressing specific
limiting factors, and information on
how the DPS can tolerate varying levels
of risk.
When we are considering a species for
delisting, the agency will examine
whether the section 4(a)(1) listing
factors have been addressed. To assist in
this examination, we will use the
delisting criteria described in Chapter 4
of the Plan, which include both viability
criteria and listing factor criteria
addressing each of the ESA section
4(a)(1) listing factors, as well as any
other relevant data and policy
considerations.
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
Conclusion
NMFS has reviewed the Plan for
compliance with the requirements of the
ESA section 4(f), determined that it does
incorporate the required elements and is
therefore adopting it as the Final
Recovery Plan for the Puget Sound
steelhead DPS.
Literature Cited
The complete citations for the
references used in this document can be
obtained by contacting NMFS (See
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2019.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–27913 Filed 12–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[RTID 0648–XR060]
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Take of Anadromous Fish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; extension
of public comment period.
AGENCY:
We, NMFS, announce the
extension of the comment period for the
receipt of 14 (Permit Numbers 23271,
23276, 23278, 23279, 23280, 23284,
23285, 23286, 23287, 23288, 23289,
23290, 23291, 23434) applications for
enhancement of survival permits under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), and proposed entry into an
associated Template Safe Harbor
Agreement (Agreement) between the
applicants and NMFS. The notice of
receipt for the 14 applications published
on October 15, 2019. The proposed
enhancement of survival permits and
Agreement are intended to promote the
survival and recovery of the Southern
Oregon/Northern California Coast
(SONCC) coho salmon (Oncorhynchus
kisutch) Evolutionary Significant Unit
(ESU), which is listed as threatened
under the ESA. On November 4, 2019,
we announced the extension of the
comment period to December 31, 2019.
We continue to solicit review and
comment from the public and all
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
interested parties on the applications
and associated documents. The close of
the comment period is being extended
from December 31, 2019, to February 15,
2020 to provide additional opportunity
for public comment.
DATES: Comments or requests for a
public hearing on the actions proposed
in the applications must be received at
the appropriate address or fax number
(see ADDRESSES) no later than 5 p.m.
Pacific standard time on February 15,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
applications should be submitted to the
California Coastal Office, NMFS, 1655
Heindon Road, Arcata, CA 95521, 707–
822–7201. Comments may also be
submitted via fax to 707–822–4840, or
by email to Shasta.sha@noaa.gov
(include the permit numbers in the
subject line of the fax or email).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Simondet, Arcata, CA (ph.: 707–822–
7201; Fax: 707–825–4840; email:
Shasta.sha@noaa.gov. Permit
application are available upon request
through the contact information above,
or online at https://apps.nmfs.noaa.gov
and https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
resource/document/shasta-rivertemplate-safe-harbor-agreements-andsite-plans-review.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Extension of Comment Period
On October 15, 2019 (84 FR 55145)
we (NMFS) published in the Federal
Register a request for public comment
14 applications for enhancement of
survival permits. The public comment
period for this action was set to end on
November 15, 2019. On November 4,
2019, we extended the public comment
period through December 31, 2019. The
comment period is now being extended
through February 15, 2020, to provide
additional opportunity for public
comment.
Species Covered in This Notice
The following ESA-listed species is
covered in this notice:
• Threatened coho salmon
(Oncorhynchus kisutch): Southern
Oregon/Northern California Coast
(SONCC) Evolutionary Significant Unit
(ESU).
Authority
Enhancement permits are issued in
accordance with section 10(a)(1)(A) of
the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1539(a)(1)(A)) and
regulations governing listed fish and
wildlife permits (50 CFR part 222,
subpart C). NMFS issues permits based
on findings that such permits: (1) Are
applied for in good faith; (2) if granted
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71381
and exercised, would not operate to the
disadvantage of the listed species that
are the subject of the permit; (3) are
consistent with the purposes and
policies of Section 2 of the ESA; (4)
would further a bona fide and necessary
or desirable scientific purpose or
enhance the propagation or survival of
the endangered species, taking into
account the benefits anticipated to be
derived on behalf of the endangered
species; and additional issuance criteria
(as listed at 50 CFR 222.308(c)(5–12)).
The authority to take listed species is
subject to conditions set forth in the
permits.
Anyone requesting a hearing on an
application listed in this notice should
set out the specific reasons why a
hearing on that application would be
appropriate (see ADDRESSES). Such
hearings are held at the discretion of the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
NMFS.
Permit Applications Received
Fourteen applicants are requesting
individual enhancement of survival
permits and entry of an associated
Agreement that was developed by
NMFS, California Department of Fish
and Wildlife (CDFW), the Shasta
Watershed Conservation Group (SWCG)
and the Applicants. The 14 Applicants
(Table 1) each developed site plans for
their respective properties (i.e., Enrolled
Properties) that describe management
activities that will be implemented,
including beneficial activities for
SONCC coho salmon (the covered
species). The site plans, Agreement, and
enhancement of survival permits are
expected to promote the recovery of the
covered species on non-federal property
within the Shasta River in the
Agreement Area (see Figure 1 in the
Agreement). The Shasta River is a
tributary to the Klamath River and is in
Siskiyou County, California. The
proposed duration of the Agreement and
the associated enhancement of survival
permits is 20 years. The proposed
enhancement of survival permits would
authorize the incidental taking of
SONCC coho salmon that may be
associated with covered activities,
including beneficial management
activities, routine ranch management
activities, and the potential future
return of the enrolled properties to
baseline conditions at the end of the
Agreement, as defined in the
Agreement. The site plans and
Agreement specify the beneficial
management activities to be carried out
on the enrolled properties and a
schedule for implementing those
activities. The site plan and Agreement
are expected to promote the recovery of
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71379-71381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27913]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[RTID 0648-XG573]
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the adoption of a Final Endangered Species Act
(ESA) recovery plan for the threatened Puget Sound steelhead Distinct
Population Segment (DPS) (herein referred to as steelhead). The Final
Recovery Plan for this species (Final Recovery Plan) is now available.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the Final Recovery Plan are available
online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/esa-recovery-plan-puget-sound-steelhead-distinct-population-segment-oncorhynchus
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Price, (360) 753-9598,
[email protected]; or Elizabeth Babcock, (206) 526-4505,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.) requires that we develop and implement recovery plans for
the conservation and survival of threatened and endangered species
under our jurisdiction, unless it is determined that such plans would
not result in the conservation of the species. The Puget Sound
steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) DPS was listed as a threatened species
under the ESA in May 11, 2007 (72 FR 26722). We published a Notice of
Availability of the Draft Recovery Plan in the Federal Register on
December 13, 2018 (83 FR 64110) to obtain comments on the Draft Plan.
The public comment period for this action was set to end on February
11, 2019; however, we extended the public comment period through March
28, 2019, to provide additional opportunity for public comment (84 FR
1707). We received extensive comments on the Draft Plan, summarized the
comments and identified comments that prompted revisions for the Final
Recovery Plan. We revised the Draft Plan based on comments received,
and this final version now constitutes the Recovery Plan for the Puget
Sound steelhead DPS.
The Final Plan
We are responsible for developing and implementing recovery plans
for Pacific salmon and steelhead listed under the ESA. Section 4(f)(1)
of the ESA requires that recovery plans include, to the extent
practicable: (1) Objective, measurable criteria which, when met, would
result in a determination that the species is no longer threatened or
endangered; (2) site-specific management actions necessary to achieve
the plan's goals; and (3) estimates of the time required and costs to
achieve the recovery plan's goal. Our goal is to restore Puget Sound
steelhead to the point where they are viable and no longer need the
protections of the ESA. The ESA requires the development of recovery
plans for each listed species unless such a plan would not promote its
recovery.
We believe it is essential to have local support of recovery plans
by those whose activities directly affect the listed species and whose
continued commitment and leadership will be needed to implement the
necessary recovery actions. We therefore support and participate in
collaborative efforts to develop recovery plans that involve state,
tribal, and federal entities, local communities, and other
stakeholders. For this Final Recovery Plan for threatened Puget Sound
steelhead, we worked collaboratively with local, state, tribal, and
federal partners to produce a recovery plan that satisfies the ESA
requirements. We have determined that this ESA recovery plan for Puget
Sound steelhead meets the statutory requirements for a recovery plan
and are adopting it as the Final Recovery Plan for this threatened
species. This notice provides a notice of availability of the Plan.
The geographic area covered by the Final Recovery Plan is the Puget
Sound basin, from the Elwha River (inclusive) eastward, including
rivers in Hood Canal, South Sound, and North Sound, including steelhead
from six artificial propagation programs: the Green River Natural
Program; White River Winter Steelhead Supplementation Program; Hood
Canal Steelhead Supplementation Off-station Projects in the Dewatto,
Skokomish, and Duckabush Rivers; and
[[Page 71380]]
the Lower Elwha Fish Hatchery Wild Steelhead Recovery Program.
For the purpose of recovery planning for the ESA-listed species of
Pacific salmon and steelhead in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, NMFS
designated five geographically based ``recovery domains.'' The Puget
Sound Steelhead DPS spawning range is in the Puget Sound domain. For
each domain, NMFS appointed a team of scientists, nominated for their
geographic and species expertise, to provide a solid scientific
foundation for recovery plans. The Puget Sound Steelhead Technical
Recovery Team included biologists from NMFS, other federal agencies,
state agencies, tribes, and academic institutions.
We also collaborated with the state of Washington, tribes, other
federal agencies, local governments, representatives of industry and
environmental groups, other stakeholders, and the public to develop the
Plan. The Final Recovery Plan for the Puget Sound steelhead DPS was
developed by NMFS in cooperation with a recovery team made up of
experts from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Northwest
Indian Fisheries Commission, Nooksack Tribe, Seattle Light, Long Live
the Kings, Puget Sound Partnership, and NMFS' Northwest Fisheries
Science Center. These groups provided vital input during the planning
process, and their continued involvement during recovery plan
implementation is critical to the success of our joint efforts to
recover Puget Sound steelhead.
Contents of the Plan
The Final Recovery Plan contains biological background and
contextual information that includes description of the DPS, the
planning area, and the context of the plan's development. It presents
relevant information on DPS structure and guidelines for assessing
salmonid population and DPS status. It provides background on the
natural history of steelhead, population status, and threats to their
sustainability.
The Puget Sound steelhead DPS consists of three Major Population
Groups (MPGs) and 32 Demographically Independent Populations (DIPs).
Major risk factors facing Puget Sound steelhead are widespread declines
in abundance and productivity for most natural steelhead populations in
the DPS, including those in Skagit and Snohomish Rivers, previously
considered strongholds for steelhead in the DPS; the low abundance of
several summer-run populations; and the sharply diminishing abundance
of some steelhead populations, especially in south Puget Sound, Hood
Canal, and the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Continued releases of out-of-DPS
hatchery fish from Skamania-derived summer run were a major concern for
diversity in the DPS.
The most recent status assessment of the DPS found ``[t]he
biological risks faced by the Puget Sound steelhead DPS have not
substantively changed since the listing in 2007 (NMFS 2016; 81 FR
33468). The abundance of natural spawners is very low and productivity
remains predominately negative. Degradation and fragmentation of
freshwater habitat, with consequential effects on connectivity, remain
the primary limiting factors and threats facing the Puget Sound
steelhead DPS. The DPS is at very low viability, as are all three of
its constituent MPGs, and many of its 32 DIPs.
The Final Recovery Plan presents NMFS' recovery goals and the
viability and listing factor criteria for making a delisting decision.
The viability criteria for the Puget Sound steelhead DPS are designed
to improve the DPS so it ``has a negligible risk of extinction due to
threats from demographic variation, local environmental variation, and
genetic diversity changes over a 100-year time frame'' based on the
status of the MPGs and DIPs, and supporting ecosystems (McElhany et
al., 2000). A self-sustaining viable population has a negligible risk
of extinction due to reasonably foreseeable changes in circumstances
affecting its abundance, productivity, spatial structure, and diversity
characteristics and achieves these characteristics without dependence
upon artificial propagation. The viability criteria for Puget Sound
steelhead require that all three MPGs be viable because the three MPGs
differ substantially in key biological and habitat characteristics that
contribute in distinct ways to the overall viability, diversity, and
spatial structure of the DPS.
The Final Recovery Plan lays out a recovery strategy to address the
potential threats based on the best available science and includes
goals that incorporate objective, measurable criteria which, when met,
would result in a determination that the species be removed from the
list. The Final Recovery Plan is not regulatory, but presents guidance
for use by agencies and interested parties to assist in the recovery of
steelhead. The Final Recovery Plan identifies substantive actions
needed to achieve recovery by addressing the threats to the species.
The strategy for recovery includes a linkage between management actions
and an active research and monitoring program intended to fill data
gaps and assess effectiveness. The Final Recovery Plan incorporates an
adaptive management framework by which management actions and other
elements will evolve and adapt as we gain information through research
and monitoring. The Final Recovery Plan references many of the
significant efforts already underway to allow steelhead in the Puget
Sound to access a diversity of high quality habitats that have been
lost or degraded due to human land use.
The Final Recovery Plan also describes specific information on the
following: Current status of Puget Sound steelhead; pressures (limiting
factors) and threats throughout the life cycle that have contributed to
the species decline; recovery strategies to address the threats based
on the best available science; site-specific actions with timelines;
and an adaptive management framework for focusing needed research and
evaluations and revising our recovery strategies and actions. The Final
Recovery Plan also summarizes time and costs required to implement
recovery actions.
How NMFS and Others Expect To Use the Plan
With this Final Recovery Plan, we commit to implementing the
actions in the plan for which we have authority and funding; encourage
other federal, state and local agencies and tribal governments to
implement recovery actions for which they have responsibility,
authority, and funding; and work cooperatively with the public and
local stakeholders on implementation of other actions. We expect the
recovery plan to guide us and other federal agencies in evaluating
federal actions under ESA section 7, as well as in implementing other
provisions of the ESA and other statutes. For example, the plan will
provide greater biological context for evaluating the effects that a
proposed action may have on a species by providing delisting criteria,
information on priority areas for addressing specific limiting factors,
and information on how the DPS can tolerate varying levels of risk.
When we are considering a species for delisting, the agency will
examine whether the section 4(a)(1) listing factors have been
addressed. To assist in this examination, we will use the delisting
criteria described in Chapter 4 of the Plan, which include both
viability criteria and listing factor criteria addressing each of the
ESA section 4(a)(1) listing factors, as well as any other relevant data
and policy considerations.
[[Page 71381]]
Conclusion
NMFS has reviewed the Plan for compliance with the requirements of
the ESA section 4(f), determined that it does incorporate the required
elements and is therefore adopting it as the Final Recovery Plan for
the Puget Sound steelhead DPS.
Literature Cited
The complete citations for the references used in this document can
be obtained by contacting NMFS (See ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: December 20, 2019.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-27913 Filed 12-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P