National Freight Strategic Plan: Request for Information, 71529-71531 [2019-27897]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that FTA has taken final
agency actions by issuing certain
approvals for the public transportation
projects listed below. The actions on the
projects, as well as the laws under
which such actions were taken, are
described in the documentation issued
in connection with the projects to
comply with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
in other documents in the FTA
environmental project file for the
projects. Interested parties may contact
either the project sponsor or the relevant
FTA Regional Office for more
information. Contact information for
FTA’s Regional Offices may be found at
https://www.fta.dot.gov.
This notice applies to all FTA
decisions on the listed projects as of the
issuance date of this notice and all laws
under which such actions were taken,
including, but not limited to, NEPA [42
U.S.C. 4321–4375], Section 4(f)
requirements [23 U.S.C. 138, 49 U.S.C.
303], Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act [54 U.S.C.
306108], and the Clean Air Act [42
U.S.C. 7401–7671q]. This notice does
not, however, alter or extend the
limitation period for challenges of
project decisions subject to previous
notices published in the Federal
Register. The projects and actions that
are the subject of this notice follow:
1. Project name and location: The16th
Street Mall Improvement Project in
Denver, Colorado. Project Sponsor: The
Regional Transportation District and the
City and County of Denver. Project
description: The 16th Street Mall
Improvement Project will reconstruct
the 16th Street Mall between Market
Street and Broadway. The project will
reconstruct 12.5 blocks of the historic
16th Street Mall to address
infrastructure, mobility, safety and
public use needs and install a new
granite paver system with improved
surface friction and proper drainage.
The spatial reconfiguration will create
wider pedestrian areas, transit lanes will
be consolidated in the center of the
Mall, and the Free MallRide shuttle bus
service will continue. Final agency
action: Section 4(f) determination of the
historic 16th Street Mall, concurrence
dated October 4, 2019; Section 106
finding of adverse effect to the historic
16th Street Mall, concurrence dated
June 5, 2018, and executed Section 106
Programmatic Agreement, dated
September 18, 2019; and the 16th Street
Mall Alternatives Analysis and
Environmental Clearance Finding of No
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
Significant Impact, dated November 25,
2019. Supporting Documentation: the
16th Street Mall Alternatives Analysis
and Environmental Assessment, April,
2019; and the 16th Street Mall
Alternatives Analysis and
Environmental Assessment Errata Sheet,
November, 2019.
2. Project name and location: MAX
Red Line Extension and Reliability
Improvements Project, Portland,
Oregon. Project Sponsor: The TriCounty Metropolitan Transportation
District of Oregon. Project description:
The MAX Red Line Extension and
Reliability Improvements Project
includes capital improvements of the
MAX light rail system at four station
locations to improve MAX systemwide
reliability. The project will extend MAX
Red Line service to ten existing MAX
Blue Line stations from west of the
Beaverton Transit Center to a terminus
at the existing Fair Complex/Hillsboro
Airport Station. Final agency actions:
Section 4(f) exception and Section 4(f)
de minimis impact determination;
Section 106 finding of no adverse effect,
concurrence dated August 16 and 19,
2019; and determination of the
applicability of a Categorical Exclusion
pursuant to 23 CFR 771.118(d), dated
October 1, 2019. Supporting
documentation: Documented
Categorical Exclusion checklist and
supporting materials, dated July 9, 2019.
3. Project name and location:
Maryland Parkway High Capacity
Transit Project, City of Las Vegas,
Nevada. Project Sponsor: The Regional
Transportation Commission of Southern
Nevada. Project description: The project
consists of an 8.7-mile-long route that
will replace the existing local Route 109
bus service with an enhanced bus rapid
transit system from Las Vegas Medical
District to the Bonneville Transit Center
and through downtown Las Vegas, along
Maryland Parkway to Russell Road. The
project encompasses the construction of
24 new bus stations, with accompanying
44 new platforms, spaced approximately
0.35-mile apart, and all associated bus
rapid transit roadway and hard surface
improvements. Final agency action:
Section 4(f) de minimis impact
determination; project-level air quality
conformity; Section 106 finding of no
adverse effect to historic properties,
concurrence dated July 18, 2019; and
Maryland Parkway High Capacity
Transit Project Finding of No Significant
Impact, dated December 16, 2019.
Supporting Documentation: Maryland
Parkway High Capacity Transit
Environmental Assessment, November,
2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71529
Authority: Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Felicia L. James,
Associate Administrator for Planning and
Environment.
[FR Doc. 2019–27902 Filed 12–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT–OST—2019–0184]
National Freight Strategic Plan:
Request for Information
ACTION:
Request for information (RFI).
The safe and efficient
movement of freight is vital to the
Nation’s economic growth and to the
creation of well-paying jobs for millions
of Americans. The Fixing America’s
Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
required DOT to develop a National
Freight Strategic Plan (NFSP) that
includes eleven statutorily required
components to address multimodal
freight transportation. The Department
of Transportation (DOT) seeks
information from the public, including
stakeholders (e.g., State and local
agencies, private owners and operators,
industry trade groups, shippers and
beneficial cargo owners, etc.) to aid
development of the NFSP.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 10, 2020. DOT will
consider comments filed after this date
to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT Docket Number OST–
2019–0184 by any of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submission: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Search by using
the docket number (provided above).
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the electronic docket site.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Room PL–401,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 of the
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
numbers.
Note: All comments received,
including any personal information,
will be posted without change to the
docket and is accessible via https://
www.regulations.gov. Input submitted
online via www.regulations.gov is not
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
71530
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
immediately posted to the site. It may
take several business days before your
submission is posted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Endorf at ryan.endorf@dot.gov or
at 202–366–4835.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Background
The nation’s freight transportation
system is a complex network of almost
seven million miles of highways,
railways, navigable waterways, and
pipelines. The components of this
network are linked through hundreds of
seaports, airports, and intermodal
facilities. This system accommodates
the movement of raw materials and
finished products from the entire
spectrum of the agricultural,
manufacturing, energy, retail, and other
sectors of the United States’ economy.
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century Act (MAP–21; Pub. L. 112–
141) required DOT to develop a
National Freight Strategic Plan (NFSP).
On October 18, 2015, DOT issued the
draft NFSP (compliant with the MAP–
21 requirements) for public comment,
available at www.transportation.gov/
freight and at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
D=DOT-OST-2015-0248. On December
4, 2015, the President signed the FAST
Act (Pub. L. 114–94) into law. Section
8001 of the FAST Act continues the
requirement that the DOT develop an
NFSP, expanding the focus to include a
multimodal approach.
The FAST Act required DOT to
develop a National Freight Strategic
Plan (NFSP) that included (1) an
assessment of the condition and
performance of the National Multimodal
Freight Network; (2) forecasts of freight
volumes for the succeeding 5-, 10-, and
20-year periods; (3) an identification of
major trade gateways and national
freight corridors that connect major
population centers, trade gateways, and
other major freight generators; (4) an
identification of bottlenecks on the
National Multimodal Freight Network
that create significant freight congestion,
based on a quantitative methodology
developed by the Under Secretary,
which shall include at a minimum—(a)
information from the Freight Analysis
Framework (FAF); and (b) to the
maximum extent practicable, an
estimate of the cost of addressing each
bottleneck and an operational
improvements that could be
implemented; (5) an assessment of
statutory, regulatory, technological,
institutional, financial, and other
barriers to improved freight
transportation performance, and a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
description of opportunities for
overcoming those barriers; (6) a process
for addressing multistate projects and
encouraging jurisdictions to collaborate;
(7) strategies to improve freight
intermodal connectivity; (8) an
identification of corridors providing
access to energy exploration,
development, installation, or production
areas; (9) an identification of corridors
providing access to major areas for
manufacturing, agriculture, or natural
resources; (10) an identification of best
practices for improving the performance
of the National Multimodal Freight
Network, including critical commerce
corridors and rural and urban access to
critical freight corridors; and (11) an
identification of best practices to
mitigate the impacts of freight
movement on communities.
A national freight strategy will be
helpful to inform infrastructure
planning and to support future freight
efficiencies. The safe and efficient
movement of freight is vital to the
Nation’s economic growth and to the
creation of well-paying jobs for millions
of Americans. In 2015, the U.S.
transportation system moved
approximately 49 million tons of freight
per day worth more than $52 billion and
DOT estimates 13.3 million people were
employed in transportation or
transportation-related industries in
2017. DOT estimates the net value of
U.S. transportation capital to be $7.7
trillion in 2016 with the public sector
owning $4.2 trillion and the private
sector owning $3.5 trillion. DOT
estimates that freight tonnage will
increase by 44 percent between 2015
and 2045 which will place increasing
strain on our Nation’s freight system.
Today, that freight system moves
approximately 18 billion tons of freight
every year across all the modes, but
congestion has been increasing,
particularly on our Nation’s highways.
The trucking industry experienced
almost 1.2 billion hours of delay in 2016
because of traffic congestion on the
National Highway System, at a cost of
$34 billion in truck driver wages, not
including wasted fuel and increased
inventory carrying costs for affected
shippers and beneficial cargo owners
(BCOs). Prior to 2005, virtually all crude
oil was moved via pipeline; however, by
2011, rail shipments of crude oil have
increased substantially and increases in
domestic energy production, including
increased liquefied natural gas
movements will require more interplay
between pipelines, rail, and tanker/
barge movements. Air cargo
transportation is particularly important
for high value commodities, such as
PO 00000
Frm 00183
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
electronics and pharmaceuticals, and
the FAF projects air cargo to be the
fastest growing freight mode with
annual tonnage growth of 4.3 percent.
Rural and urban citizens and
businesses depend on the safe and
efficient movement of freight. Many
agricultural, energy, raw inputs, and
other natural resources to our
manufacturing products originate in
rural areas, such as farm commodities,
coal and other fuel inputs, and raw
materials. Approximately two-thirds of
freight tonnage shipped by rail in the
U.S. originates in rural areas. Urban
areas drive domestic freight demand
and depend on reliable deliveries from
ports and railroads by trucks via freight
intermodal connectors to meet that
demand. To safely and efficiently
deliver goods to consumers, freight
supply chains have become increasingly
complex and shippers and BCOs are
reliant on the interplay between
multiple transportation modes. More
than ever, transportation planning and
infrastructure investment, particularly
for freight, must be considered within
the broader systems context that
accounts for all modes and both publicand private-sector actors to retain the
United States’ global competitive
advantage.
DOT recognizes the importance of
engaging with the public and private
industry to develop a clear, national
vision for freight transportation that is
inclusive of both public- and privatesector perspectives. Through State
Freight Plans, all fifty States and the
District of Columbia have contemplated
the importance and impacts of freight
movement to their local and regional
economy and have developed
infrastructure investment plans to
improve freight flows across their
States. As daily users of the system,
private sector and non-public
perspectives are vital inputs for
understanding operational challenges
along the freight system.
DOT seeks information directly from
the public and stakeholders to inform
development of this national freight
strategy. DOT seeks comments and
relevant information on any of the
eleven statutorily defined plan
components (as noted above); in
addition, DOT specifically requests
comments and data in response to the
following questions:
1. What are the three most important
challenges facing the U.S. freight
transportation system?
2. What should be long- and shortterm national freight system goals? How
can States, local agencies, and private
stakeholders most effectively advance
these national goals?
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 248 / Friday, December 27, 2019 / Notices
3. How should DOT measure freight
transportation system performance? In
your response, consider both safety and
efficiency, as well as performance
thresholds across multimodal metrics
(i.e., hours of delay, infrastructure
conditions, planning time index) that
represent untenable performance for the
public or private sector. Consider how
performance metrics could be employed
to inform DOT’s discretionary grant
programs.
4. What industry freight-specific
knowledge is critical to understanding
supply chains and how economic trends
impact freight logistics and cargo
movements? How can such data and/or
knowledge be procured or shared
amongst public and private sector
partners? Are there technological
innovations, such as Blockchain and the
Internet of Things (IoT), that DOT
should know about?
5. What should be considered
regarding vital operational or equipment
innovations, emerging technology
advances from research communities, as
well as infrastructure or facility
concepts in freight transportation?
6. What approach should the federal
government use to invest in the
multimodal freight system? How would
this approach apply to each
transportation mode, for freight in
general, for specific industries, or for
freight assets owned by the private
sector (i.e., rail, pipelines, maritime)?
What are best practices for identifying
projects that involve both public and
private sector assets and for encouraging
communication between the public and
private sector to complete those
projects?
7. What barriers (such as regulatory,
technological, institutional, statutory)
are critical to freight efficiency that DOT
should better understand? Please
consider which of these affect freight
origination and/or destination areas, as
well as intermodal transfers, and
describe the root causes of the
inefficiencies.
8. What information is critical to
understanding the unique infrastructure
and operational freight impacts faced by
local communities? Please detail any
best practices in economic development
and planning processes that support
freight intensive activity or innovative
financing. Describe current and
prospective infrastructure safety
enhancements that should be
considered.
9. How would you define a bottleneck
in your industry? (Consider both surface
and maritime transportation).
10. What else should DOT consider
(including the eleven statutory criteria
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Dec 26, 2019
Jkt 250001
listed above) or do to improve freight
transportation in the U.S.?
Public Comment
The DOT invites comments by all
those interested in the draft National
Freight Strategic Plan. Comments on the
draft NFSP may be submitted and
viewed at Docket Number DOT–OST–
2019–0184. The web address is:
XXXXXX. Comments must be received
on or before [45 days from posting of
this notice] to receive full consideration
by DOT with respect to the final NFSP.
After [45 days from posting of this
notice], comments will continue to be
available for viewing by the public.
Dated: December 19, 2019.
Joel Szabat,
Acting Under Secretary Transportation for
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–27897 Filed 12–26–19; 8:45 am]
BILLINGCODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Multiple
Internal Revenue Service Information
Collection Requests
Departmental Offices, U.S.
Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury will submit the following
information collection requests to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, on or after the
date of publication of this notice. The
public is invited to submit comments on
these requests.
DATES: Comments should be received on
or before January 27, 2020 to be assured
of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding
the burden estimate, or any other aspect
of the information collection, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to
(1) Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for
Treasury, New Executive Office
Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC
20503, or email at OIRA_Submission@
OMB.EOP.gov and (2) Treasury PRA
Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Suite 8100, Washington, DC
20220, or email at PRA@treasury.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of the submissions may be
obtained from Spencer W. Clark by
emailing PRA@treasury.gov, calling
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71531
(202) 927–5331, or viewing the entire
information collection request at
www.reginfo.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
1. Title: Form 8233—Exemption From
Withholding on Compensation for
Independent (and Certain Dependent)
Personal Services of a Nonresident
Alien Individual.
OMB Control Number: 1545–0795.
Type of Review: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
Description: Compensation paid to a
nonresident alien (NRA) individual for
independent personal services (selfemployment) is generally subject to
30% withholding or graduated rates.
However, compensation may be exempt
from withholding because of a U.S. tax
treaty. Form 8233 is used to request
exemption from withholding.
Form: 8233.
Affected Public: Individuals and
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
75,617.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Total Number of Annual
Responses: 75,617.
Estimated Time per Response: 8 hours
57 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 676,773.
2. Title: Disclosure Statement (Form
8275), and Regulation Disclosure
Statement (Form 8275–R).
OMB Control Number: 1545–0889.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Description: IRC section 6662 imposes
accuracy related penalties for
substantial understatement of tax
liability or negligence or disregard of
rules and regulations. Section 6694
imposes similar penalties on return
preparers. Regulations section 1.6662–
4(e) and (f) provide for reduction of
these penalties if adequate disclosure of
the tax treatment is made on Form 8275
or, if the position is contrary to a
regulation on Form 8275–R.
Form: 8275, 8275–R.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profits.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
666,666.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
Estimated Total Number of Annual
Responses: 666,666.
Estimated Time per Response: 5 hours
35 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,716,664.
3. Title: Interest Charge on DISCRelated Deferred Tax Liability.
E:\FR\FM\27DEN1.SGM
27DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71529-71531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27897]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
[Docket No. DOT-OST--2019-0184]
National Freight Strategic Plan: Request for Information
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The safe and efficient movement of freight is vital to the
Nation's economic growth and to the creation of well-paying jobs for
millions of Americans. The Fixing America's Surface Transportation
(FAST) Act required DOT to develop a National Freight Strategic Plan
(NFSP) that includes eleven statutorily required components to address
multimodal freight transportation. The Department of Transportation
(DOT) seeks information from the public, including stakeholders (e.g.,
State and local agencies, private owners and operators, industry trade
groups, shippers and beneficial cargo owners, etc.) to aid development
of the NFSP.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 10, 2020. DOT
will consider comments filed after this date to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket Number OST-
2019-0184 by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Search by using the docket number (provided above). Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the electronic docket site.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room PL-401, Washington, DC
20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 of the Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket numbers.
Note: All comments received, including any personal information,
will be posted without change to the docket and is accessible via
https://www.regulations.gov. Input submitted online via
www.regulations.gov is not
[[Page 71530]]
immediately posted to the site. It may take several business days
before your submission is posted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Endorf at [email protected] or
at 202-366-4835.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The nation's freight transportation system is a complex network of
almost seven million miles of highways, railways, navigable waterways,
and pipelines. The components of this network are linked through
hundreds of seaports, airports, and intermodal facilities. This system
accommodates the movement of raw materials and finished products from
the entire spectrum of the agricultural, manufacturing, energy, retail,
and other sectors of the United States' economy.
The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21; Pub.
L. 112-141) required DOT to develop a National Freight Strategic Plan
(NFSP). On October 18, 2015, DOT issued the draft NFSP (compliant with
the MAP-21 requirements) for public comment, available at
www.transportation.gov/freight and at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=DOT-OST-2015-0248. On December 4, 2015, the President
signed the FAST Act (Pub. L. 114-94) into law. Section 8001 of the FAST
Act continues the requirement that the DOT develop an NFSP, expanding
the focus to include a multimodal approach.
The FAST Act required DOT to develop a National Freight Strategic
Plan (NFSP) that included (1) an assessment of the condition and
performance of the National Multimodal Freight Network; (2) forecasts
of freight volumes for the succeeding 5-, 10-, and 20-year periods; (3)
an identification of major trade gateways and national freight
corridors that connect major population centers, trade gateways, and
other major freight generators; (4) an identification of bottlenecks on
the National Multimodal Freight Network that create significant freight
congestion, based on a quantitative methodology developed by the Under
Secretary, which shall include at a minimum--(a) information from the
Freight Analysis Framework (FAF); and (b) to the maximum extent
practicable, an estimate of the cost of addressing each bottleneck and
an operational improvements that could be implemented; (5) an
assessment of statutory, regulatory, technological, institutional,
financial, and other barriers to improved freight transportation
performance, and a description of opportunities for overcoming those
barriers; (6) a process for addressing multistate projects and
encouraging jurisdictions to collaborate; (7) strategies to improve
freight intermodal connectivity; (8) an identification of corridors
providing access to energy exploration, development, installation, or
production areas; (9) an identification of corridors providing access
to major areas for manufacturing, agriculture, or natural resources;
(10) an identification of best practices for improving the performance
of the National Multimodal Freight Network, including critical commerce
corridors and rural and urban access to critical freight corridors; and
(11) an identification of best practices to mitigate the impacts of
freight movement on communities.
A national freight strategy will be helpful to inform
infrastructure planning and to support future freight efficiencies. The
safe and efficient movement of freight is vital to the Nation's
economic growth and to the creation of well-paying jobs for millions of
Americans. In 2015, the U.S. transportation system moved approximately
49 million tons of freight per day worth more than $52 billion and DOT
estimates 13.3 million people were employed in transportation or
transportation-related industries in 2017. DOT estimates the net value
of U.S. transportation capital to be $7.7 trillion in 2016 with the
public sector owning $4.2 trillion and the private sector owning $3.5
trillion. DOT estimates that freight tonnage will increase by 44
percent between 2015 and 2045 which will place increasing strain on our
Nation's freight system. Today, that freight system moves approximately
18 billion tons of freight every year across all the modes, but
congestion has been increasing, particularly on our Nation's highways.
The trucking industry experienced almost 1.2 billion hours of delay in
2016 because of traffic congestion on the National Highway System, at a
cost of $34 billion in truck driver wages, not including wasted fuel
and increased inventory carrying costs for affected shippers and
beneficial cargo owners (BCOs). Prior to 2005, virtually all crude oil
was moved via pipeline; however, by 2011, rail shipments of crude oil
have increased substantially and increases in domestic energy
production, including increased liquefied natural gas movements will
require more interplay between pipelines, rail, and tanker/barge
movements. Air cargo transportation is particularly important for high
value commodities, such as electronics and pharmaceuticals, and the FAF
projects air cargo to be the fastest growing freight mode with annual
tonnage growth of 4.3 percent.
Rural and urban citizens and businesses depend on the safe and
efficient movement of freight. Many agricultural, energy, raw inputs,
and other natural resources to our manufacturing products originate in
rural areas, such as farm commodities, coal and other fuel inputs, and
raw materials. Approximately two-thirds of freight tonnage shipped by
rail in the U.S. originates in rural areas. Urban areas drive domestic
freight demand and depend on reliable deliveries from ports and
railroads by trucks via freight intermodal connectors to meet that
demand. To safely and efficiently deliver goods to consumers, freight
supply chains have become increasingly complex and shippers and BCOs
are reliant on the interplay between multiple transportation modes.
More than ever, transportation planning and infrastructure investment,
particularly for freight, must be considered within the broader systems
context that accounts for all modes and both public- and private-sector
actors to retain the United States' global competitive advantage.
DOT recognizes the importance of engaging with the public and
private industry to develop a clear, national vision for freight
transportation that is inclusive of both public- and private-sector
perspectives. Through State Freight Plans, all fifty States and the
District of Columbia have contemplated the importance and impacts of
freight movement to their local and regional economy and have developed
infrastructure investment plans to improve freight flows across their
States. As daily users of the system, private sector and non-public
perspectives are vital inputs for understanding operational challenges
along the freight system.
DOT seeks information directly from the public and stakeholders to
inform development of this national freight strategy. DOT seeks
comments and relevant information on any of the eleven statutorily
defined plan components (as noted above); in addition, DOT specifically
requests comments and data in response to the following questions:
1. What are the three most important challenges facing the U.S.
freight transportation system?
2. What should be long- and short-term national freight system
goals? How can States, local agencies, and private stakeholders most
effectively advance these national goals?
[[Page 71531]]
3. How should DOT measure freight transportation system
performance? In your response, consider both safety and efficiency, as
well as performance thresholds across multimodal metrics (i.e., hours
of delay, infrastructure conditions, planning time index) that
represent untenable performance for the public or private sector.
Consider how performance metrics could be employed to inform DOT's
discretionary grant programs.
4. What industry freight-specific knowledge is critical to
understanding supply chains and how economic trends impact freight
logistics and cargo movements? How can such data and/or knowledge be
procured or shared amongst public and private sector partners? Are
there technological innovations, such as Blockchain and the Internet of
Things (IoT), that DOT should know about?
5. What should be considered regarding vital operational or
equipment innovations, emerging technology advances from research
communities, as well as infrastructure or facility concepts in freight
transportation?
6. What approach should the federal government use to invest in the
multimodal freight system? How would this approach apply to each
transportation mode, for freight in general, for specific industries,
or for freight assets owned by the private sector (i.e., rail,
pipelines, maritime)? What are best practices for identifying projects
that involve both public and private sector assets and for encouraging
communication between the public and private sector to complete those
projects?
7. What barriers (such as regulatory, technological, institutional,
statutory) are critical to freight efficiency that DOT should better
understand? Please consider which of these affect freight origination
and/or destination areas, as well as intermodal transfers, and describe
the root causes of the inefficiencies.
8. What information is critical to understanding the unique
infrastructure and operational freight impacts faced by local
communities? Please detail any best practices in economic development
and planning processes that support freight intensive activity or
innovative financing. Describe current and prospective infrastructure
safety enhancements that should be considered.
9. How would you define a bottleneck in your industry? (Consider
both surface and maritime transportation).
10. What else should DOT consider (including the eleven statutory
criteria listed above) or do to improve freight transportation in the
U.S.?
Public Comment
The DOT invites comments by all those interested in the draft
National Freight Strategic Plan. Comments on the draft NFSP may be
submitted and viewed at Docket Number DOT-OST-2019-0184. The web
address is: XXXXXX. Comments must be received on or before [45 days
from posting of this notice] to receive full consideration by DOT with
respect to the final NFSP. After [45 days from posting of this notice],
comments will continue to be available for viewing by the public.
Dated: December 19, 2019.
Joel Szabat,
Acting Under Secretary Transportation for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-27897 Filed 12-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLINGCODE 4910-9X-P