Promotion and Internal Placement, 70906-70908 [2019-27715]
Download as PDF
70906
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 247
Thursday, December 26, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 335
RIN 3206–AN77
Promotion and Internal Placement
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is proposing
regulations to give agencies the
discretion to reinstate certain former
Federal employees without competition
to positions at any grade level for which
the individual is qualified. Agencies
will have greater flexibility in recruiting
back to Government service former
Federal employees who have developed
enhanced or higher-level skill-sets than
they had when they left government.
Individuals seeking to rejoin the Federal
workforce may do so more easily and at
grade levels commensurate with the
skills and experience they actually
possess (and be compensated at such
grade levels).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the docket number or
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) for
this proposed rulemaking, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for sending comments.
• Email: employ@opm.gov. Include
the docket number or RIN in the subject
line of the message.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number or RIN for this rulemaking.
Please arrange and identify your
comments on the regulatory text by
subpart and section number; if your
comments relate to the supplementary
information, please refer to the heading
and page number. All comments
received will be posted without change,
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
including any personal information
provided. Please ensure your comments
are submitted within the specified open
comment period. Comments received
after the close of the comment period
will be marked ‘‘late,’’ and OPM is not
required to consider them in
formulating a final decision. Before
acting on this proposal, OPM will
consider all comments we receive on or
before the closing date for comments.
Changes to this proposal may be made
in light of the comments we receive.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Glynn, Telephone: 202–606–
1571, Fax: 202–606–2329, TDD: 202–
418–3134, or email: michelle.glynn@
opm.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of the Proposed Changes
The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is exercising its
authority under 5 U.S.C. 3301 and 3302
in proposing to revise part 335, title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), to
change the criteria for how an agency
may reinstate certain former Federal
employees to a position in the
competitive service. Under current
rules, an agency may reinstate an
individual, without competition, only to
a position at a grade level that is no
higher than the grade level of a position
the individual held on a permanent
basis in the competitive service.
Reinstatement to a higher-graded
position, or to a position with greater
promotion potential, requires
competition under 5 CFR part 335
Promotion and Internal Placement.
Oftentimes, when an individual
leaves Federal service, he or she
acquires skills and/or experience that
may qualify the individual for a position
at a higher grade level than the one the
individual held prior to leaving
government. The proposed rules place
these reinstatement actions under
discretionary actions at 5 CFR
335.103(c)(3). The proposed rules allow
an agency to reinstate a former career or
career-conditional employee without
competition, and regardless of the
promotion potential, to a position at a
grade level higher than that previously
held by that individual to provide
greater flexibility to agencies when they
need to reinstate a former Federal
employee. The proposed changes will
benefit both agencies as well as
individuals seeking to reenter the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal workforce as the proposed rules
seeks to encourage individuals who
have gained additional skills and
experiences to reenter the Federal
workforce at grade levels equal to the
grade levels they actually qualify for,
not for grade levels they previously
qualified for. Any restriction on the
promotion potential of the position may
be a disincentive to attracting needed
talent with the desired skills and/or
experience. In order to qualify for this
type of reinstatement the individual
must meet the following criteria:
(1) Been voluntarily separated from
his or her most recent career or careerconditional appointment for at least 1
year, and
(2) Received a rating of record for his
or her most recent career or careerconditional position of at least Fully
Successful (or equivalent).
OPM is proposing that individuals
who voluntarily separate must wait 1
year to be eligible for a higher-graded
position under this authority in order to
provide consistency with the general
qualification requirements for
advancement to a higher grade. OPM’s
government-wide qualification
standards require that competitive
service employees have 1 year of
specialized experience before being
promoted to the next highest grade
level. The proposed 1-year requirement
will prevent situations in which
employees seeking a promotion quit and
get reinstated to a higher-graded
position (in essence a promotion) prior
to meeting the specialized experience
requirement. Thus, the proposed rules
benefit both Federal agencies and
former Federal employees seeking
reemployment with the government at a
level commensurate with each
individual’s actual skill and/or
experience level, while preserving a
measure of fairness with respect to
current employees.
OPM is proposing that individuals
who did not receive a rating of record
for his or her most recent career or
career-conditional position of at least
Fully Successful (or equivalent) are not
eligible for reinstatement without
competition under this rule because if
the individual was not performing to
expectations at the time s/he left Federal
service, that rationale for liberalizing the
rules for re-entry would not be present,
and we would want agencies to put the
candidate through a more rigorous
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
process to accurately evaluate current
capabilities before hiring the individual
again. An individual whose most recent
evaluation was less than Fully
Successful would have been headed for
potential demotion or termination if s/
he had remained.
For individuals who resigned and did
not wait 1 year or more before applying
for reinstatement, or for individuals
who did not receive a rating of record
for his or her most recent career or
career-conditional position of at least
Fully Successful (or equivalent), the
proposed rule will require competition
for higher graded positions, or positions
with greater promotion potential.
However, the individuals remain
eligible for reinstatement without
competition for positions with no higher
grade or with no more promotion
potential than a position previously
held by the individual on a permanent
basis in the competitive service.
The specific proposed changes are as
follows:
OPM is proposing to modify current
§ 335.103(c)(1)(vi), by requiring
competition under this part for an
individual seeking reinstatement,
within 1 calendar year from the date of
his or her separation, to a position at a
higher grade level or promotion
potential than previously held, or for an
individual who did not receive a rating
of record of Fully Successful (or
equivalent).
New paragraph § 335.103(c)(3)(viii)
creates as a discretionary action that is
not subject to competitive procedures
reinstatement to a position at a higher
grade level or promotion potential than
previously held provided the individual
resigned 1 year or more prior to the date
he or she applies for reinstatement, and
that the individual received a rating of
record for his or her most recent career
or career-conditional position of at least
Fully Successful (or equivalent).
OPM is proposing these changes
under Civil Service Rules II and VII,
codified at 5 CFR parts 2 and 7, to
establish and administer a system that
provides for career appointments for
former employees eligible for career
appointment upon reinstatement.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities
because it applies only to Federal
agencies and employees.
E.O. 13563 and E.O. 12866, Regulatory
Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866 and has been reviewed by
OMB.
70907
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 335
Government employees.
Office of Personnel Management
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
Executive Order 13771, Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This proposed rule is not expected to
be subject to the requirements of E.O.
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017)
because this proposed rule is expected
to be related to agency organization,
management, or personnel.
Accordingly, OPM proposed to amend
5 CFR part 335 as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
E.O. 13132, Federalism
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 2301, 2302, 3301,
3302, 3330; E.O. 10577, E.O. 11478, 3 CFR
1966–1970, Comp., page 803, unless
otherwise noted, E.O. 13087; and E.O. 13152,
3 CFR 19554–58 Comp., p.218; 5 U.S.C.
3304(f), and Pub. L. 106–117.
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standard set forth in section 3(a) and
(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency
management, personnel and
organization and does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of
nonagency parties and, accordingly, is
not a ‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 335—PROMOTION AND
INTERNAL PLACEMENT
1. The authority citation for part 335
continues to read as follows:
■
Subpart A—General Provisions
2. In § 335.103, revise paragraph
(c)(1)(vi) and add paragraph (c)(3)(viii)
to read as follows:
■
§ 335.103
Agency promotion programs.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Reinstatement to a permanent or
temporary position at a higher grade or
with more promotion potential than a
position previously held on a
permanent basis in the competitive
service if the individual did not wait 1
year or more after separating from
Federal employment before applying for
reinstatement, or did not receive a rating
of record for his or her most recent
career or career-conditional position of
at least Fully Successful (or equivalent).
*
*
*
*
*
(viii) Reinstatement in accordance
with 5 CFR part 315 to any position in
the competitive service for which the
individual is qualified at a higher grade
level or with more promotion potential
than a career or career-conditional
position previously held by the
individual; provided,—the individual
has been voluntarily separated for at
least 1 year before being reinstated, and
the individual must have received a
rating of record for his or her most
recent career or career-conditional
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
70908
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Proposed Rules
position of at least Fully Successful (or
equivalent).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–27715 Filed 12–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AQ63
Specialty Education Loan Repayment
Program
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
regulations that govern scholarship
programs to certain health care
professionals. This rulemaking would
implement the mandates of the VA
MISSION Act of 2018 by establishing a
Specialty Education Loan Repayment
Program, which would assist VA in
meeting the staffing needs of VA
physicians in medical specialties for
which VA has determined that
recruitment or retention of qualified
personnel is difficult.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted through https://
www.Regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to: Director, Office of
Regulation Policy and Management
(00REG), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Room
1064, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax
to (202) 273–9026. (This is not a toll-free
telephone number.) Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in
response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AQ63—
Specialty Education Loan Repayment
Program.’’ Copies of comments received
will be available for public inspection in
the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1063B, between the
hours of 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday (except holidays). Please
call (202) 461–4902 for an appointment.
(This is not a toll-free telephone
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.Regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Whitney Henderson, Manager,
Education Loan Repayment Services,
810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20420, Whitney.Henderson2@va.gov,
(501) 918–3256. (This is not a toll-free
number.)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
On June 6,
2018, section 303 of Public Law 115–
182, the John S. McCain III, Daniel K.
Akaka, and Samuel R. Johnson VA
Maintaining Internal Systems and
Strengthening Integrated Outside
Networks Act of 2018, or the VA
MISSION Act of 2018, amended title 38
of the United States Code (U.S.C.) by
establishing new sections 7691 through
7697 and created a new student loan
repayment program known as the
Specialty Education Loan Repayment
Program (SELRP). The SELRP would
serve as an incentive for physicians
starting or currently in residency
programs in medical specialties for
which VA has determined that
recruitment and retention of qualified
personnel is difficult to work for VA at
VA facilities that need more physicians
with that medical specialty after the
individual completes their residency
program. VA would determine the
anticipated needs for medical
specialties during a period of two to six
years in the future. In taking this
proactive approach, VA would
commence recruitment for physicians in
these specialties before the projected
need to help ensure adequate health
care coverage for VA beneficiaries. This
proposed rule would establish the
requirements for the SELRP in proposed
38 CFR 17.525 through 17.531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
17.525
Purpose
Proposed § 17.525 would establish the
purpose of the SELRP. We would state
that the SELRP is an incentive program
for certain individuals to meet VA’s
need for physicians in medical
specialties for which VA determines
that recruitment and retention of
qualified personnel is difficult. We
would also state that assistance under
the SELRP may be in addition to other
assistance available to individuals
under the Educational Assistance
Program under 38 U.S.C. 7601. This
section would be in alignment with 38
U.S.C. 7691 and 7692.
17.526
Definitions
Proposed § 17.526 would be the
definitions section applicable to
§§ 17.525 through 17.530. The term
educational loan is defined in § 17.641
for the Program for the Repayment of
Educational Loans for Certain VA
Psychiatrists (PREL). We would use this
definition, with minimal edits by
eliminating references to the PREL, to
state that the term applies to the SELRP,
to maintain consistency in application
of similar VA scholarship programs and
to ease the implementation of such
programs by VA personnel.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We propose to define the term SELRP
to mean the Specialty Education Loan
Repayment Program established in
§§ 17.525 through 17.530.
To define the term State, we would
refer to 38 U.S.C. 101(20), or a political
subdivision of such a State. We propose
to provide this definition to inform the
potential participant where the period
of obligated service would be
performed.
We would also define the term ‘‘VA’’
to mean the Department of Veterans
Affairs.
17.527 Eligibility
Proposed § 17.527 would establish the
eligibility criteria for participants of the
SELRP. Proposed paragraph (a) would
state that to be eligible to participate in
the SELRP, an individual will be
eligible for appointment under 38 U.S.C.
7401 to work as a physician in a
medical specialty for which VA
determines that recruitment or retention
of qualified personnel is difficult. We
would add that in determining staffing
needs, VA will consider the anticipated
needs of VA for a period of two to six
years in the future, and utilize staffing
shortage occupation, vacancy data, and
national health care workforce and other
relevant data in such determinations.
VA will publish these vacancies in a
notice in the Federal Register on a
yearly basis until vacancies are filled.
Although sections 7691 to 7697 do not
provide for how VA would publish the
vacancies or the frequency of such
publications, we believe that adding
these requirements via regulation would
provide for transparency in VA’s needs.
See Public Law 115–182, Title III,
§ 303(f). The individual must also owe
any amount of principal or interest for
an educational loan where the proceeds
were used by or on behalf of the
individual to pay costs relating to a
course of medical education or training
that leads to employment as a
physician. Lastly, the individual must
have graduated from an accredited
medical or osteopathic school and
matched to an accredited residency
program in a medical specialty
designated by VA; or [is] a physician in
training with more than 2 years
remaining in such training. These
requirements are stated in 38 U.S.C.
7693.
Proposed paragraph (b) would
provide for instances where an
individual applies for the SELRP before
there is a posting of a residency match
for the individual’s medical specialty.
See section 303(e) of the VA MISSION
Act of 2018. We would state that an
applicant may apply for the SELRP
before receiving a residency match
E:\FR\FM\26DEP1.SGM
26DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70906-70908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27715]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 70906]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 335
RIN 3206-AN77
Promotion and Internal Placement
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is proposing
regulations to give agencies the discretion to reinstate certain former
Federal employees without competition to positions at any grade level
for which the individual is qualified. Agencies will have greater
flexibility in recruiting back to Government service former Federal
employees who have developed enhanced or higher-level skill-sets than
they had when they left government. Individuals seeking to rejoin the
Federal workforce may do so more easily and at grade levels
commensurate with the skills and experience they actually possess (and
be compensated at such grade levels).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 24, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the docket number or
Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) for this proposed rulemaking, by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for sending comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include the docket number or RIN in
the subject line of the message.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this rulemaking. Please arrange and identify
your comments on the regulatory text by subpart and section number; if
your comments relate to the supplementary information, please refer to
the heading and page number. All comments received will be posted
without change, including any personal information provided. Please
ensure your comments are submitted within the specified open comment
period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be
marked ``late,'' and OPM is not required to consider them in
formulating a final decision. Before acting on this proposal, OPM will
consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. Changes to this proposal may be made in light of the comments
we receive.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Glynn, Telephone: 202-606-
1571, Fax: 202-606-2329, TDD: 202-418-3134, or email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Summary of the Proposed Changes
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is exercising its
authority under 5 U.S.C. 3301 and 3302 in proposing to revise part 335,
title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), to change the criteria for
how an agency may reinstate certain former Federal employees to a
position in the competitive service. Under current rules, an agency may
reinstate an individual, without competition, only to a position at a
grade level that is no higher than the grade level of a position the
individual held on a permanent basis in the competitive service.
Reinstatement to a higher-graded position, or to a position with
greater promotion potential, requires competition under 5 CFR part 335
Promotion and Internal Placement.
Oftentimes, when an individual leaves Federal service, he or she
acquires skills and/or experience that may qualify the individual for a
position at a higher grade level than the one the individual held prior
to leaving government. The proposed rules place these reinstatement
actions under discretionary actions at 5 CFR 335.103(c)(3). The
proposed rules allow an agency to reinstate a former career or career-
conditional employee without competition, and regardless of the
promotion potential, to a position at a grade level higher than that
previously held by that individual to provide greater flexibility to
agencies when they need to reinstate a former Federal employee. The
proposed changes will benefit both agencies as well as individuals
seeking to reenter the Federal workforce as the proposed rules seeks to
encourage individuals who have gained additional skills and experiences
to reenter the Federal workforce at grade levels equal to the grade
levels they actually qualify for, not for grade levels they previously
qualified for. Any restriction on the promotion potential of the
position may be a disincentive to attracting needed talent with the
desired skills and/or experience. In order to qualify for this type of
reinstatement the individual must meet the following criteria:
(1) Been voluntarily separated from his or her most recent career
or career-conditional appointment for at least 1 year, and
(2) Received a rating of record for his or her most recent career
or career-conditional position of at least Fully Successful (or
equivalent).
OPM is proposing that individuals who voluntarily separate must
wait 1 year to be eligible for a higher-graded position under this
authority in order to provide consistency with the general
qualification requirements for advancement to a higher grade. OPM's
government-wide qualification standards require that competitive
service employees have 1 year of specialized experience before being
promoted to the next highest grade level. The proposed 1-year
requirement will prevent situations in which employees seeking a
promotion quit and get reinstated to a higher-graded position (in
essence a promotion) prior to meeting the specialized experience
requirement. Thus, the proposed rules benefit both Federal agencies and
former Federal employees seeking reemployment with the government at a
level commensurate with each individual's actual skill and/or
experience level, while preserving a measure of fairness with respect
to current employees.
OPM is proposing that individuals who did not receive a rating of
record for his or her most recent career or career-conditional position
of at least Fully Successful (or equivalent) are not eligible for
reinstatement without competition under this rule because if the
individual was not performing to expectations at the time s/he left
Federal service, that rationale for liberalizing the rules for re-entry
would not be present, and we would want agencies to put the candidate
through a more rigorous
[[Page 70907]]
process to accurately evaluate current capabilities before hiring the
individual again. An individual whose most recent evaluation was less
than Fully Successful would have been headed for potential demotion or
termination if s/he had remained.
For individuals who resigned and did not wait 1 year or more before
applying for reinstatement, or for individuals who did not receive a
rating of record for his or her most recent career or career-
conditional position of at least Fully Successful (or equivalent), the
proposed rule will require competition for higher graded positions, or
positions with greater promotion potential. However, the individuals
remain eligible for reinstatement without competition for positions
with no higher grade or with no more promotion potential than a
position previously held by the individual on a permanent basis in the
competitive service.
The specific proposed changes are as follows:
OPM is proposing to modify current Sec. 335.103(c)(1)(vi), by
requiring competition under this part for an individual seeking
reinstatement, within 1 calendar year from the date of his or her
separation, to a position at a higher grade level or promotion
potential than previously held, or for an individual who did not
receive a rating of record of Fully Successful (or equivalent).
New paragraph Sec. 335.103(c)(3)(viii) creates as a discretionary
action that is not subject to competitive procedures reinstatement to a
position at a higher grade level or promotion potential than previously
held provided the individual resigned 1 year or more prior to the date
he or she applies for reinstatement, and that the individual received a
rating of record for his or her most recent career or career-
conditional position of at least Fully Successful (or equivalent).
OPM is proposing these changes under Civil Service Rules II and
VII, codified at 5 CFR parts 2 and 7, to establish and administer a
system that provides for career appointments for former employees
eligible for career appointment upon reinstatement.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small entities because it applies only to
Federal agencies and employees.
E.O. 13563 and E.O. 12866, Regulatory Review
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action,'' under Executive Order 12866 and has been reviewed by OMB.
Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This proposed rule is not expected to be subject to the
requirements of E.O. 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) because this
proposed rule is expected to be related to agency organization,
management, or personnel.
E.O. 13132, Federalism
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in section
3(a) and (b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency management, personnel and
organization and does not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of nonagency parties and, accordingly, is not a ``rule'' as
that term is used by the Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 335
Government employees.
Office of Personnel Management
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
Accordingly, OPM proposed to amend 5 CFR part 335 as follows:
* * * * *
PART 335--PROMOTION AND INTERNAL PLACEMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 335 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 2301, 2302, 3301, 3302, 3330; E.O. 10577,
E.O. 11478, 3 CFR 1966-1970, Comp., page 803, unless otherwise
noted, E.O. 13087; and E.O. 13152, 3 CFR 19554-58 Comp., p.218; 5
U.S.C. 3304(f), and Pub. L. 106-117.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. In Sec. 335.103, revise paragraph (c)(1)(vi) and add paragraph
(c)(3)(viii) to read as follows:
Sec. 335.103 Agency promotion programs.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Reinstatement to a permanent or temporary position at a higher
grade or with more promotion potential than a position previously held
on a permanent basis in the competitive service if the individual did
not wait 1 year or more after separating from Federal employment before
applying for reinstatement, or did not receive a rating of record for
his or her most recent career or career-conditional position of at
least Fully Successful (or equivalent).
* * * * *
(viii) Reinstatement in accordance with 5 CFR part 315 to any
position in the competitive service for which the individual is
qualified at a higher grade level or with more promotion potential than
a career or career-conditional position previously held by the
individual; provided,--the individual has been voluntarily separated
for at least 1 year before being reinstated, and the individual must
have received a rating of record for his or her most recent career or
career-conditional
[[Page 70908]]
position of at least Fully Successful (or equivalent).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-27715 Filed 12-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P