Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac, MI, 70893-70895 [2019-27706]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
transfer to a person prohibited from
receiving the technical data.
(4) Shipping, moving, or transferring
defense articles between or among the
United States as defined in § 120.13 of
this subchapter.
(5) Sending, taking, or storing
technical data that is:
(i) Unclassified;
(ii) Secured using end-to-end
encryption;
(iii) Secured using cryptographic
modules (hardware or software)
compliant with the Federal Information
Processing Standards Publication 140–2
(FIPS 140–2) or its successors,
supplemented by software
implementation, cryptographic key
management, and other procedures and
controls that are in accordance with
guidance provided in current U.S.
National Institute for Standards and
Technology (NIST) publications, or by
other cryptographic means that provide
security strength that is at least
comparable to the minimum 128 bits of
security strength achieved by the
Advanced Encryption Standard (AES–
128);
(iv) Not intentionally sent to a person
in or stored in a country proscribed in
§ 126.1 of this subchapter or the Russian
Federation; and
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Note to paragraph (a)(5)(iv): Data in-transit
via the internet is not deemed to be stored.
(v) Not sent from a country proscribed
in § 126.1 of this subchapter or the
Russian Federation.
(b)(1) For purposes of this section,
end-to-end encryption is defined as:
(i) The provision of cryptographic
protection of data, such that the data is
not in an unencrypted form, between an
originator (or the originator’s in-country
security boundary) and an intended
recipient (or the recipient’s in-country
security boundary); and
(ii) The means of decryption are not
provided to any third party.
(2) The originator and the intended
recipient may be the same person. The
intended recipient must be the
originator, a U.S. person in the United
States, or a person otherwise authorized
to receive the technical data, such as by
a license or other approval pursuant to
this subchapter.
(c) The ability to access technical data
in encrypted form that satisfies the
criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(5) of
this section does not constitute the
release or export of such technical data.
■ 9. Section 120.55 is added to read as
follows:
§ 120.55
Access Information.
Access information is information
that allows access to encrypted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
technical data subject to this subchapter
in an unencrypted form. Examples
include decryption keys, network access
codes, and passwords.
Christopher A. Ford,
Assistant Secretary, International Security
and Nonproliferation, U.S. Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2019–27438 Filed 12–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2019–0942]
Safety Zone, Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan Including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
Ship Canal, Chicago River, and
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel,
Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a segment of the Safety Zone; Brandon
Road Lock and Dam to Lake Michigan
including Des Plaines River, Chicago
Sanitary and Ship Canal, Chicago River,
Calumet-Saganashkee Channel on all
waters of the Main Branch of the
Chicago River 600 feet west of the N
Orleans Street Bridge and 1000 feet east
of the N Columbus Street Bridge. This
action is necessary and intended to
protect the safety of life and property on
navigable waters prior to, during, and
immediately after firework displays.
During the enforcement periods listed
below, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a
designated representative.
DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR
165.930 will be enforced from 11:30
p.m. on December 31, 2019 through
12:15 a.m. on January 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email LT Tiziana C.
Garner, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Chicago,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (630) 986–
2155, email D09-DG-MSUChicagoWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce a segment of the
Safety Zone; Brandon Road Lock and
Dam to Lake Michigan including Des
Plaines River, Chicago Sanitary and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70893
Ship Canal, Chicago River, CalumetSaganashkee Channel on all waters of
the main branch of the Chicago River
600 feet west of the N Orleans Street
Bridge and 1000 feet east of the N
Columbus Street bridge. During the
enforcement period, no vessel may
transit this regulated area without
approval from the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or a designated
representative. Vessels and persons
granted permission to enter the safety
zone shall obey all lawful orders or
directions of the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan, or an on-scene
representative.
This notice of enforcement is issued
under authority of 33 CFR 165.930 and
5 U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this
notice in the Federal Register, the Coast
Guard will also provide notice through
other means, which will include
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Local
Notice to Mariners, distribution in
leaflet form, and on-scene oral notice.
The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or a designated on-scene representative
may be contacted via Channel 16, VHF–
FM or at (414) 747–7182.
Dated: December 17, 2019.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2019–27625 Filed 12–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0965]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte
Marie zone in Mackinac City, MI. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect the public and private
contractors from potential hazards
associated with remotely operated
underwater vehicle operations in the
Straits of Mackinac. During the effective
dates of the rule, vessels will not be able
to operate in certain U.S. navigable
waters in the Straits of Mackinac within
500 yards of the Tug Nancy Anne and
Deck Barge MM–142 without
authorization from the Captain of the
Port.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
70894
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
This rule is effective without
actual notice from December 26, 2019
through December 27, 2019. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from December 19, 2019
through December 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0965 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LT Sean V. Murphy, Sector
Sault Sainte Marie Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
at telephone (906) 635–3223, and email
Sean.V.Murphy@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule
because doing so would be
impracticable and contrary to the public
interest. The final details of the specific
dates, vessel names, and safety zone
distances concerning the safety zone
were not finalized within a sufficient
time to allow for notice and a
subsequent 30-day comment period
before commencement of remotely
operated underwater vehicle (ROV)
operations. Delaying this rule to allow
for a notice and comment period would
be impracticable and contrary to the
public interest because it would inhibit
the Coast Guard’s ability to protect the
public from the potential hazards
associated with the ROV operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
days after publication in the Federal
Register. For the same reasons
discussed in the preceding paragraph,
delaying the effective date of this rule
would be impracticable and contrary to
public interest because immediate
action is needed to respond to the
potential safety hazards associated with
the ROV operations.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with ROV operations
starting December 19, 2019, will be a
safety concern for anyone within a 500yard radius of all U.S. navigable waters
of the Tug Nancy Anne and Deck Barge
MM–142 conducting ROV operations.
This rule is needed to protect personnel
and vessels in the navigable waters
within the safety zones while ROV
operations is conducted.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from December 19, 2019 through
December 27, 2019. The safety zones
will cover all navigable waters within
500 yards of the Tug Nancy Anne and
Deck Barge MM–142. The duration of
the zone is intended to protect
personnel and vessels in these navigable
waters while vessels conduct ROV
operations. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size and location of the
safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit around this safety zone
which would impact a small designated
area of the Straits of Mackinac.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels
to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 247 / Thursday, December 26, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please call
or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Coast Guard
Environmental Planning Policy,
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that does not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone that will prohibit entry within 500
yards of U.S. navigable waters of a
vessel and barge being used to conduct
ROV operations. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 23, 2019
Jkt 250001
paragraph L60(a) in Table 3–1 of U.S.
Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
must obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie,
or his on-scene representative via VHF
Channel 16 or telephone at (906) 635–
3233. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all orders given to
them by the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie or his on-scene
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from December 19,
2019 through December 27, 2019.
Dated: December 18, 2019.
A.E. Florentino,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2019–27706 Filed 12–23–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2019–0203; FRL–10003–
55–Region 4]
Air Quality Plans; Tennessee;
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2015 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
AGENCY:
2. Add § 165.T09–0965 to read as
follows:
SUMMARY:
■
§ 165.T09–0965 Safety Zone; Tug Nancy
Anne and Deck Barge MM–142 operating in
the Straits of Mackinac, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters within
500 yards of Tug Nancy Anne and Deck
Barge MM–142 while conducting
remotely operated underwater vehicle
(ROV) operations in the Straits of
Mackinac.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) in
the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie
or his on-scene representative.
(2) Before a vessel operator may enter
or operate within the safety zone, they
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70895
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission,
provided by the State of Tennessee,
through the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation (TDEC),
through a letter dated September 13,
2018, for inclusion into the Tennessee
SIP. This action pertains to the
infrastructure requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2015 8hour ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS). Whenever EPA
promulgates a new or revised NAAQS,
the CAA requires that each state adopt
and submit a SIP for the
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of each NAAQS
promulgated by EPA. TDEC certified
that the Tennessee SIP contains
provisions that ensure the 2015 8-hour
ozone NAAQS is implemented,
enforced, and maintained in Tennessee.
EPA has determined that portions of
Tennessee’s SIP submission satisfy
certain required infrastructure elements
for the 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
DATES: This rule will be effective
January 27, 2020.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 247 (Thursday, December 26, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70893-70895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27706]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0965]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Straits of Mackinac, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie zone in Mackinac City, MI. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to protect the public and private
contractors from potential hazards associated with remotely operated
underwater vehicle operations in the Straits of Mackinac. During the
effective dates of the rule, vessels will not be able to operate in
certain U.S. navigable waters in the Straits of Mackinac within 500
yards of the Tug Nancy Anne and Deck Barge MM-142 without authorization
from the Captain of the Port.
[[Page 70894]]
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from December 26,
2019 through December 27, 2019. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from December 19, 2019 through December 26, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0965 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email LT Sean V. Murphy, Sector Sault Sainte Marie Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard at telephone (906) 635-3223, and
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because doing so would be
impracticable and contrary to the public interest. The final details of
the specific dates, vessel names, and safety zone distances concerning
the safety zone were not finalized within a sufficient time to allow
for notice and a subsequent 30-day comment period before commencement
of remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) operations. Delaying this
rule to allow for a notice and comment period would be impracticable
and contrary to the public interest because it would inhibit the Coast
Guard's ability to protect the public from the potential hazards
associated with the ROV operations.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, delaying the effective date of this rule would
be impracticable and contrary to public interest because immediate
action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated
with the ROV operations.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with ROV
operations starting December 19, 2019, will be a safety concern for
anyone within a 500-yard radius of all U.S. navigable waters of the Tug
Nancy Anne and Deck Barge MM-142 conducting ROV operations. This rule
is needed to protect personnel and vessels in the navigable waters
within the safety zones while ROV operations is conducted.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from December 19, 2019 through
December 27, 2019. The safety zones will cover all navigable waters
within 500 yards of the Tug Nancy Anne and Deck Barge MM-142. The
duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel and vessels in
these navigable waters while vessels conduct ROV operations. No vessel
or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
location of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which would impact a small designated
area of the Straits of Mackinac. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the
[[Page 70895]]
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Coast Guard Environmental Planning Policy,
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves a safety zone that
will prohibit entry within 500 yards of U.S. navigable waters of a
vessel and barge being used to conduct ROV operations. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) in
Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing
Procedures 5090.1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T09-0965 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0965 Safety Zone; Tug Nancy Anne and Deck Barge MM-142
operating in the Straits of Mackinac, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters within 500 yards of Tug Nancy Anne and Deck Barge MM-142 while
conducting remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) operations in the
Straits of Mackinac.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his on-scene representative.
(2) Before a vessel operator may enter or operate within the safety
zone, they must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie, or his on-scene representative via VHF Channel 16 or
telephone at (906) 635-3233. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all orders given to them
by the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his on-scene
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from December
19, 2019 through December 27, 2019.
Dated: December 18, 2019.
A.E. Florentino,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie.
[FR Doc. 2019-27706 Filed 12-23-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P