Collection of Information; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request-Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database, 70158-70163 [2019-27508]
Download as PDF
70158
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2019 / Notices
B. NEISS Estimated Burden
The NEISS system collects
information on consumer productrelated incidents and other injuries from
a statistical sample of 96 hospitals in the
United States. Respondents to NEISS
include hospitals that directly report
information to NEISS, and hospitals that
allow access to a CPSC contractor, who
collects the data. Collecting emergency
department records for review,
correcting error messages, among other
tasks, takes about 36 minutes per day.
Each record takes about 30 seconds to
review. Coding and reporting records
that involve consumer products or other
injuries takes about 2 minutes per
record. Coding and reporting additional
special study information (Adverse Drug
Effects) takes about 2 minutes and 90
seconds per record for other special
studies. Respondents also spend about
36 hours per year in related activities
(training, evaluations, and
communicating with other hospital
staff).
In 2018, there were 130 NEISS
respondents (total hospitals and CPSC
contractors). These NEISS respondents
reviewed an estimated 5.53 million
emergency department records and
reported 727,544 total cases (363,221
consumer product-related injuries for
CPSC, and 364,323 other injuries for the
NEISS–AIP). The table below lists the
number of reported cases, and the
number of reported cases with
additional special study information.
Total NEISS Cases Reported
Consumer Product-Related
Injuries ...............................
CDC NEISS–AIP ..................
727,544
363,221
364,323
Special Studies Reported (subset of above)
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Child Poisoning (CPSC) .......
Adverse Drug Events (CDC)
Assaults (CDC) .....................
Firearm-Related Injuries
(CDC) ................................
Self-Inflicted Violence (CDC)
Work-Related Injuries (CDC)
Motor Vehicle Non-Crash Injuries (NHTSA) ..................
4,734
36,858
32,990
6,159
9,106
38,132
12,813
The total burden hours for all NEISS
respondents are estimated to be 100,781
for 2018. The average burden hour per
respondent is 775 hours. However, the
total burden hour on each respondent
varies due to differences in size of the
hospital (e.g., small rural hospitals
versus large metropolitan hospitals).
The smallest hospital reported 82 cases
with a burden of about 258 hours, while
the largest hospital reported 47,801
cases with a burden of about 4,125
hours.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:53 Dec 19, 2019
Jkt 250001
The total cost to NEISS respondents
for 2018 was approximately $3,391,000.
NEISS respondents enter into contracts
with CPSC and are compensated for
these costs. The average cost per
respondent is estimated to be about
$26,000. The average cost per burden
hour is estimated to be $33.65 per hour
(including wages and overhead).
However, the actual cost to each
respondent varies, due to the type of
respondent (hospital versus CPSC
contractor), size of hospital, and
regional differences in wages and
overhead. Therefore, the actual annual
cost for any given respondent may vary
between $3,048 at a small rural hospital,
and $329,690 at the largest metropolitan
hospital.
C. Other Burden Hours
In cases that require more information
regarding product-related incidents or
injuries, CPSC staff conducts face-toface interviews with approximately 375
persons each year. On average, an onsite interview takes about 4.5 hours.
CPSC staff also conducts about 175 indepth investigations (IDIs) by telephone
annually. Each telephone IDI requires
about 20 minutes. CPSC staff is
planning to conduct about 50 internetbased questionnaires per year, which
require about 20 minutes each. The
CPSC estimates 1,763 annual burden
hours on these respondents: 1,688 hours
for face-to-face interviews; 58 hours for
in-depth telephone interviews, and 17
hours for internet-based questionnaires.
CPSC staff estimates the value of the
time required for reporting at $36.77 an
hour (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics,
‘‘Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation,’’ March 2019: https://
www.bls.gov>new.release>
ecec.toc.htm). At this valuation, the
estimated annual cost to the public is
about $64,826.
The total burden hours for the
information collection is 102,544
(100,781 NEISS and 1,763 other), which
is an increase of 21,334 hours. The
increase in burden is due primarily to
the increase in the number of emergency
department charts being reviewed and
coded since this collection of
information was last approved by OMB
in 2017.
This information collection request
excludes the burden associated with
other publicly available Consumer
Product Safety Information Databases,
such as internet complaints, Hotline,
and Medical Examiners and Coroners
Alert Project (MECAP) reports, which
are approved under OMB control
number 3041–0146. This information
collection request also excludes the
burden associated with follow-up
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
investigations conducted by other
federal agencies.
Abioye Mosheim,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–27509 Filed 12–19–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2010–0041]
Collection of Information; Submission
for OMB Review; Comment Request—
Publicly Available Consumer Product
Safety Information Database
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) announces that the CPSC has
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request for
extension of approval of a collection of
information for the Publicly Available
Consumer Product Safety Information
Database, previously under OMB
Control No. 3041–0146. On October 8,
2019, the CPSC published a notice in
the Federal Register announcing the
agency’s intent to seek this extension.
CPSC made a copy of the supporting
statement available under Supporting
and Related Materials under Docket No.
CPSC–2010–0041. CPSC received no
comments in response to that notice. By
publication of this notice, the
Commission announces that CPSC has
submitted to the OMB a request for
extension of approval of that collection
of information, without change.
SUMMARY:
Written comments on this
request for extension of approval of
information collection requirements
should be submitted by January 21,
2020.
DATES:
Submit comments about
this request by email: OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov or fax: 202–
395–6881. Comments by mail should be
sent to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk
Officer for the CPSC, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC
20503. In addition, written comments
that are sent to OMB, also should be
submitted electronically at: https://
www.regulations.gov, under Docket No.
CPSC–2010–0041.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
70159
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2019 / Notices
For
further information, or a copy of the
supporting statement, contact: Bretford
Griffin, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East-West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 504–7037, or
by email to: bgriffin@cpsc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Section 212 of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA) added section 6A to the
Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA),
which requires the CPSC to establish
and maintain a publicly available,
searchable database (Database) on the
safety of consumer products and other
products or substances regulated by the
CPSC. Among other things, section 6A
of the CPSA requires the CPSC to collect
reports of harm from the public for
potential publication in the publicly
available Database, and to collect and
publish comments from manufacturers
about reports of harm.
The CPSC announced that a proposed
collection of information in conjunction
with the Database, called the Publicly
Available Consumer Product Safety
Information Database, had been
submitted to OMB for review and
clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520 in
a proposed rule published on May 24,
2010 (75 FR 29156). The CPSC issued a
final rule on the Database on December
9, 2010 (75 FR 76832). The final rule
interprets various statutory
requirements in section 6A of the CPSA
pertaining to the information to be
included in the Database; and the final
rule also establishes provisions
regarding submitting reports of harm;
providing notice of reports of harm to
manufacturers; publishing reports of
harm and manufacturer comments in
the Database; and dealing with
confidential and materially inaccurate
information.
information in a report of harm. Such a
request may be made using the business
portal, by email, by mail, or by fax.
Additionally, any person or entity
reviewing a report of harm or
manufacturer comment, either before or
after publication in the Database, may
request that the report or comment, or
portions of the report or comment, be
excluded from the Database because it
contains materially inaccurate
information. Such a request may be
made by manufacturers using the
business portal, by email, mail or fax,
and may be submitted by anyone else by
email, mail, or fax.
Branding Information: Using the
business portal, registered businesses
may voluntarily submit branding
information to assist CPSC in correctly
and timely routing reports of harm
involving their products to them. Brand
names may be licensed to another entity
for use in labeling consumer products
manufactured by that entity. CPSC’s
understanding of licensing
arrangements for consumer products
ensures that the correct manufacturer is
timely notified regarding a report of
harm.
Small Batch Manufacturers Registry:
The business portal also contains the
SBMR, which is the online mechanism
by which ‘‘small batch manufacturers’’
(as defined in the CPSA) can identify
themselves to obtain relief from certain
third party testing requirements for
children’s products. To register as a
small batch manufacturer, a business
must attest that the company’s income
level, and the number of units of the
covered product manufactured for
which relief is sought, both fall within
the statutory limits to receive relief from
third party testing.
B. Information Collected Through the
Database
The primary purpose of this
information collection is to populate the
publicly searchable Database of
consumer product safety information
mandated by section 6A of the CPSA.
The Database information collection has
four components: Reports of harm,
manufacturer comments, branding
information, and the Small Batch
Manufacturer Registry (SBMR).
Reports of Harm: Reports of harm
communicate information regarding an
injury, illness, or death, or any risk (as
determined by CPSC) of injury, illness,
or death, relating to the use of a
consumer product. Reports can be
submitted to the CPSC by consumers;
local, state, or federal government
agencies; health care professionals;
child service providers; public safety
entities; and others. Reports may be
submitted in one of three ways: Via the
CPSC website (www.SaferProducts.gov),
by telephone via a CPSC call center, or
by email, fax, or mail using the incident
report form (available for download or
printing via the CPSC website). Reports
may also originate as a free-form letter
or email. Submitters must consent to
including their report of harm in the
publicly searchable Database.
Manufacturer Comments: A
manufacturer or private labeler may
submit a comment related to a report of
harm after the CPSC transmits the report
to the manufacturer or private labeler
identified in the report. Manufacturer
comments may be submitted through
the business portal, by email, mail, or
fax. The business portal is a feature of
the Database that allows manufacturers
who register there to receive reports of
harm and comment on such reports
through the business portal. Use of the
business portal expedites the receipt of
reports of harm and business response
times.
A manufacturer may request that the
CPSC designate as confidential
C. Estimated Burden
1. Estimated Annual Burden for
Respondents
We estimate the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN FOR REPORTS OF HARM
Number of
respondents
Collection type
Response
frequency 1
Total annual
responses
Minutes per
response
Total burden,
in hours 2
Reports of Harm—submitted through website ......................................................
Reports of Harm—submitted by phone ................................................................
Reports of Harm—submitted by mail, email, fax ..................................................
5,646
1,397
349
1.07
1.02
43.88
6,023
1,418
15,314
12
10
20
1,205
236
5,105
Total ...............................................................................................................
7,392
........................
22,755
........................
6,546
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
1 Frequency
of responses is calculated by dividing the number of responses by the number of respondents.
2 Numbers have been rounded.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN FOR MANUFACTURER SUBMISSIONS
Number of
respondents
Collection type
Manufacturer Comments—submitted through website .........................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Dec 19, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Response
frequency 1
2,311
Sfmt 4703
Total annual
responses
1.06
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
2,461
20DEN1
Minutes per
response
117
Total burden,
in hours 2
4,799
70160
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2019 / Notices
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN FOR MANUFACTURER SUBMISSIONS—Continued
Number of
respondents
Collection type
Manufacturer Comments—submitted by mail, email, fax .....................................
Requests to Treat Information as Confidential—submitted through website .......
Requests to Treat Information as Confidential—submitted by mail, email, fax ...
Requests to Treat Information as Materially Inaccurate—submitted through
website ...............................................................................................................
Requests to Treat Information as Materially Inaccurate—submitted by mail,
email, fax ...........................................................................................................
Voluntary Brand Identification ...............................................................................
Small Batch Manufacturer Identification ...............................................................
Total ...............................................................................................................
Total annual
responses
Response
frequency 1
Minutes per
response
Total burden,
in hours 2
182
2
0
1.90
1.00
n/a
346
2
0
147
42
72
848
1
0
141
1.19
168
165
462
25
932
2,292
1.12
1.37
1
28
1,281
2,292
195
10
10
91
214
382
5,885
........................
6,578
........................
6,797
1 Frequency
of responses is calculated by dividing the number of responses by the number of respondents.
2 Numbers have been rounded.
Based on the data set forth in Tables
1 and 2 above, the annual reporting cost
is estimated to be $691,884. This
estimate is based on the sum of two
estimated total figures for reports of
harm and manufacturer submissions.
The estimated number of respondents
and responses are based on the actual
responses received in FY 2018. We
assume that the number of responses
and respondents will be similar in
future years.
Reports of Harm: Table 1 sets forth
the data used to estimate the burden
associated with submitting reports of
harm. We had previously estimated the
time associated with the electronic and
telephone submission of reports of harm
at 12 and 10 minutes, respectively; and
because we have had no indication that
these estimates are not appropriate or
accurate, we used those figures for
present purposes as well. We estimate
that the time associated with a paper or
PDF form would be 20 minutes, on
average.
To estimate the costs for submitting
reports of harm, we multiplied the
estimated total burden hours associated
with reports of harm (1,205 hours + 236
hours + 5,105 hours = 6,546 hours) by
an estimated total compensation for all
workers in private industry of $34.05
per hour,3 which results in an estimated
cost of $222,891 (6,546 hours × $34.05
per hour = $222,891).
Manufacturer Submissions: Table 2
sets forth the data used to estimate the
burden associated with manufacturers’
submissions to the Database. We
observed that a large percentage of the
general comments come from a few
businesses, and we assumed that the
experience of a business that submits
many comments each year would be
different from one that submits only a
few. Accordingly, we divided all
responding businesses into three groups
based on the number of general
comments submitted in FY 2018, and
then we selected several businesses to
contact from each group. The first group
contacted consisted of businesses that
submitted 50 or more comments in FY
2018, accounting for 31 percent of all
general comments received. The second
group contacted included businesses
that submitted 6 to 49 comments,
accounting for 39 percent of all general
comments received. The last group
contacted included businesses that
submitted no more than 5 comments,
accounting for 30 percent of all general
comments received. We asked each
company how long it typically takes to
research, compose, and enter a comment
or a claim of materially inaccurate
information.
To estimate the burden associated
with submitting a general comment
regarding a report of harm through the
business portal, we averaged the burden
provided by each company within each
group, and then we calculated a
weighted average from the three groups,
weighting each group by the proportion
of comments received from that group.
We found that the average time to
submit a general comment regarding a
report of harm is 117 minutes, based on
the data in Table 3 (((15 minutes + 45
minutes + 30 minutes + 15 minutes)/4
companies) * .31 + ((105 minutes + 45
minutes + 150 minutes + 15 minutes)/
4 companies) * .39 + ((240 minutes + 60
minutes + 480 minutes)/3 companies) *
.30 = 117 minutes).
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED BURDEN TO ENTER A GENERAL COMMENT IN THE DATABASE
Group
Group 1 (>= 50 comments) ........................................................
Group 2 (6–49 comments) .........................................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Group 3 (<= 5 comments) ..........................................................
3 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Table 9 of the Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private Industry,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Dec 19, 2019
Jkt 250001
General
comments
(minutes)
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
.................................................................................
.................................................................................
.................................................................................
................................................................................
.................................................................................
.................................................................................
................................................................................
.................................................................................
.................................................................................
.................................................................................
................................................................................
goods-producing and service-providing industries,
by occupational group, Dec 2018 (data extracted on
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15
45
30
15
105
45
150
15
240
60
480
8/2/2019 from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/
ecec.t09.htm.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2019 / Notices
Registered businesses generally
submit comments through our website.
Unregistered businesses submit
comments by mail, email, or fax. We
estimate that submitting comments via
mail, email, or fax takes a little longer
because often, we must ask businesses
to amend their submissions to include
the required certifications. Thus, we
estimated that, on average, comments
submitted by mail, email, or fax take 30
minutes longer than comments
submitted through our website (117
minutes + 30 minutes = 147 minutes).
The submission of a claim of
materially inaccurate information is a
relatively rare event for all respondents,
so we averaged all responses together.
Eight of the businesses contacted had
submitted claims of materially
inaccurate information. We found that
the average time to submit a claim that
a report of harm contains a material
inaccuracy is 165 minutes ((30 minutes
+ 90 minutes + 45 minutes + 90 minutes
+ 60 minutes + 660 minutes + 45
minutes + 300 minutes)/8 companies =
165 minutes).
Registered businesses generally
submit claims through the business
portal. Unregistered businesses submit
claims by mail, email, or fax. We
estimate that submitting claims via mail,
email, or fax takes a little longer because
often, we must ask businesses to amend
their submission to include the required
certifications. Thus, we estimated that,
on average, claims submitted by mail,
email, or fax take 30 minutes longer
than those submitted through our
website (165 minutes + 30 minutes =
195 minutes).
The submission of a claim of
confidential information is a relatively
rare event for all respondents, so we
averaged all responses together. Five of
the businesses contacted had submitted
claims of confidential information. We
found that the average time to submit a
claim that a report of harm contains
confidential information is 42 minutes
((45 minutes + 15 minutes + 60 minutes
+ 30 minutes + 60 minutes)/5
companies = 42 minutes).
Registered businesses generally
submit confidential information claims
through the business portal.
Unregistered businesses submit
confidential information claims by mail,
email, or fax. We estimate that
submitting claims by mail, email, or fax
takes a little longer because often, we
must ask businesses to amend their
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Dec 19, 2019
Jkt 250001
submission to include the required
certifications. Thus, we estimate that a
confidential information claim
submitted by mail, email, or fax would
take 30 minutes longer than those
submitted through our website (42
minutes + 30 minutes = 72 minutes).
For voluntary brand identification, we
estimate that a response would take 10
minutes, on average. Most responses
consist only of the brand name and a
product description. In many cases, a
business will submit multiple entries in
a brief period of time, and we can see
from the date and time stamps on these
records that an entry often takes less
than 2 minutes. CPSC staff enters the
same data in a similar form, based on
our own research, and that experience
was also factored into our estimate.
For small batch manufacturer
identification, we estimate that a
response would take 10 minutes, on
average. The form consists of three
check boxes and the information should
be readily accessible to the respondent.
The responses summarized in Table 2
are generally submitted by
manufacturers. To avoid
underestimating the cost associated
with the collection of this data, we
assigned the higher hourly wage
associated with a manager or
professional in goods-producing
industries to these tasks. To estimate the
cost of manufacturer submissions, we
multiplied the estimated total burden
hours in Table 2 (6,797 hours), by an
estimated total compensation for a
manager or professional in goodsproducing industries of $69.00 per
hour,4 which results in an estimated
cost of $468,993 (6,797 hours × $69.00
per hour = $468,993).
Therefore, the total estimated annual
cost to respondents is $691,884
($222,891 burden for reports of harm +
$468,993 burden for manufacturer
submissions = $691,884).
2. Estimated Annual Burden on
Government
We estimate the annualized cost to
the CPSC to be $982,166. This figure is
based on the costs for four categories of
work for the Database: Reports of Harm,
4 U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Table 9 of the Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private Industry,
goods-producing and service-providing industries,
by occupational group, December 2018 (data
extracted on 09/13/2019 from: https://www.bls.gov/
news.release/ecec.t09.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70161
Materially Inaccurate Information
Claims, Manufacturer Comments, and
Small Batch Identification. Each
category is described below. No
government cost is associated with
voluntary brand identification because
this information is entered directly into
the Database by the manufacturer with
no processing required by the
government. The information assists the
government in directing reports of harm
to the correct manufacturer. We did not
attempt to calculate separately the
government cost for claims of
confidential information because the
number of claims is so small. The time
to process these claims is included with
claims of materially inaccurate
information.
Reports of Harm: The Reports of Harm
category includes many different tasks.
Some costs related to this category are
from two data entry contracts. Tasks
related to these contracts include
clerical coding of the report, such as
identifying the type of consumer
product reported and the appropriate
associated hazard, as well as performing
quality control on the data in the report.
Contractor A spends an estimated 5,267
hours per year performing these tasks.
With an hourly rate of $38.10 for
contractor services, the annual cost to
the government of contract A is
$200,673. Contractor B spends an
estimated 2,029 hours per year
performing these tasks. With an hourly
rate of $41.33 for contractor services, the
annual cost to the government of
contract B is $83,859.
The Reports of Harm category also
includes sending consent requests for
reports when necessary, processing that
consent when received, determining
whether a product is out of CPSC’s
jurisdiction, and confirming that
pictures and attachments do not have
any personally identifiable information.
The Reports of Harm category also
entails notifying manufacturers when
one of their products is reported,
completing a risk of harm determination
form for every report eligible for
publication, referring some reports to a
Subject Matter Expert (SME) within the
CPSC for a determination on whether
the reports meet the requirement of
having a risk of harm, and determining
whether a report meets all the statutory
and regulatory requirements for
publication. Detailed costs are:
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
70162
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2019 / Notices
TABLE 4—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REPORTS OF HARM TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)
Grade level
Total
compensation
per hour
Total annual
cost
Contract A ....................................................................................................................................
Contract B ....................................................................................................................................
7 ...................................................................................................................................................
9 ...................................................................................................................................................
12 .................................................................................................................................................
13 .................................................................................................................................................
14 .................................................................................................................................................
5,267
2,029
200
300
5,528
428
1,068
$38.10
41.33
37.37
45.72
66.31
78.84
93.18
$200,673
83,859
7,474
13,716
366,562
33,744
99,516
Total ......................................................................................................................................
14,820
........................
825,544
Materially Inaccurate Information
(MII) Claims: The MII claims category
includes reviewing and responding to
claims, participating in meetings where
the claims are discussed, and
completing a risk of harm determination
on reports when a company alleges that
a report does not describe a risk of
harm.
TABLE 5—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MII CLAIMS TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)
Grade level
Total
compensation
per hour
Total annual
cost
12 .................................................................................................................................................
13 .................................................................................................................................................
14 .................................................................................................................................................
15 .................................................................................................................................................
SES ..............................................................................................................................................
275
167
323
50
50
$66.31
78.84
93.18
109.60
131.52
$18,235
13,166
30,097
5,480
6,576
Total ......................................................................................................................................
865
........................
73,554.00
Manufacturer Comments: The
Comments category includes reviewing
and accepting or rejecting comments.
TABLE 6—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR MANUFACTURER COMMENTS TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)
Grade level
Total
compensation
per hour
Total annual
cost
12 .................................................................................................................................................
13 .................................................................................................................................................
62
109
$66.31
78.84
$4,111
8,594
Total ......................................................................................................................................
171
........................
12,705
Small Batch Manufacturer
Identification: The Small Batch
Manufacturer Identification category
includes time spent posting the list of
small batch registrations, as well as
answering companies’ questions on
registering as a Small Batch
Manufacturer and the implications of
small batch registration.
TABLE 7—ESTIMATED COSTS FOR SMALL BATCH TASK
Number of
hours
(annual)
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Grade level
Total
compensation
per hour
Total annual
cost
15 .................................................................................................................................................
642
$109.60
$70,363
Total ......................................................................................................................................
642
........................
70,363
We estimate the annualized cost to
the CPSC of $954,531, by adding the
four categories of work related to the
Database summarized in Tables 4
through 7 (Reports of Harm ($825,544)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Dec 19, 2019
Jkt 250001
+ MII Claims ($73,554) + Manufacturer
Comments ($12,705) + Small Batch
Identification ($70,363) = $982,166).
This information collection renewal
request is based on an estimated 13,343
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
burden hours per year for the Database,
which represents an increase of 983
hours since this collection of
information was last approved by OMB
in 2017. The increase in burden is due
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2019 / Notices
primarily to the increase in the number
of incoming reports of harm, and the
increase in the number of claims based
on those reports. Comments have also
increased significantly, but shifted to
the more efficient, online submission. A
slight increase in small batch
manufacturer activity occurred, as well,
continuing a long-term trend.
Abioye Mosheim,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–27508 Filed 12–19–19; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:30 Dec 19, 2019
Jkt 250001
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 19–44]
Arms Sales Notification
Defense Security Cooperation
Agency, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Arms sales notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense is
publishing the unclassified text of an
arms sales notification.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karma Job at karma.d.job.civ@mail.mil
or (703) 697–8976.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This
36(b)(1) arms sales notification is
published to fulfill the requirements of
section 155 of Public Law 104–164
dated July 21, 1996. The following is a
copy of a letter to the Speaker of the
House of Representatives, Transmittal
19–44 with attached Policy Justification
and Sensitivity of Technology.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
SUMMARY:
70163
Dated: December 16, 2019.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70158-70163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC-2010-0041]
Collection of Information; Submission for OMB Review; Comment
Request--Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information
Database
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announces that the CPSC has
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for
extension of approval of a collection of information for the Publicly
Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database, previously
under OMB Control No. 3041-0146. On October 8, 2019, the CPSC published
a notice in the Federal Register announcing the agency's intent to seek
this extension. CPSC made a copy of the supporting statement available
under Supporting and Related Materials under Docket No. CPSC-2010-0041.
CPSC received no comments in response to that notice. By publication of
this notice, the Commission announces that CPSC has submitted to the
OMB a request for extension of approval of that collection of
information, without change.
DATES: Written comments on this request for extension of approval of
information collection requirements should be submitted by January 21,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments about this request by email:
[email protected] or fax: 202-395-6881. Comments by mail
should be sent to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the CPSC, Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. In addition,
written comments that are sent to OMB, also should be submitted
electronically at: https://www.regulations.gov, under Docket No. CPSC-
2010-0041.
[[Page 70159]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, or a copy of
the supporting statement, contact: Bretford Griffin, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301)
504-7037, or by email to: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Section 212 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA) added section 6A to the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA),
which requires the CPSC to establish and maintain a publicly available,
searchable database (Database) on the safety of consumer products and
other products or substances regulated by the CPSC. Among other things,
section 6A of the CPSA requires the CPSC to collect reports of harm
from the public for potential publication in the publicly available
Database, and to collect and publish comments from manufacturers about
reports of harm.
The CPSC announced that a proposed collection of information in
conjunction with the Database, called the Publicly Available Consumer
Product Safety Information Database, had been submitted to OMB for
review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520 in a proposed rule
published on May 24, 2010 (75 FR 29156). The CPSC issued a final rule
on the Database on December 9, 2010 (75 FR 76832). The final rule
interprets various statutory requirements in section 6A of the CPSA
pertaining to the information to be included in the Database; and the
final rule also establishes provisions regarding submitting reports of
harm; providing notice of reports of harm to manufacturers; publishing
reports of harm and manufacturer comments in the Database; and dealing
with confidential and materially inaccurate information.
B. Information Collected Through the Database
The primary purpose of this information collection is to populate
the publicly searchable Database of consumer product safety information
mandated by section 6A of the CPSA. The Database information collection
has four components: Reports of harm, manufacturer comments, branding
information, and the Small Batch Manufacturer Registry (SBMR).
Reports of Harm: Reports of harm communicate information regarding
an injury, illness, or death, or any risk (as determined by CPSC) of
injury, illness, or death, relating to the use of a consumer product.
Reports can be submitted to the CPSC by consumers; local, state, or
federal government agencies; health care professionals; child service
providers; public safety entities; and others. Reports may be submitted
in one of three ways: Via the CPSC website (www.SaferProducts.gov), by
telephone via a CPSC call center, or by email, fax, or mail using the
incident report form (available for download or printing via the CPSC
website). Reports may also originate as a free-form letter or email.
Submitters must consent to including their report of harm in the
publicly searchable Database.
Manufacturer Comments: A manufacturer or private labeler may submit
a comment related to a report of harm after the CPSC transmits the
report to the manufacturer or private labeler identified in the report.
Manufacturer comments may be submitted through the business portal, by
email, mail, or fax. The business portal is a feature of the Database
that allows manufacturers who register there to receive reports of harm
and comment on such reports through the business portal. Use of the
business portal expedites the receipt of reports of harm and business
response times.
A manufacturer may request that the CPSC designate as confidential
information in a report of harm. Such a request may be made using the
business portal, by email, by mail, or by fax. Additionally, any person
or entity reviewing a report of harm or manufacturer comment, either
before or after publication in the Database, may request that the
report or comment, or portions of the report or comment, be excluded
from the Database because it contains materially inaccurate
information. Such a request may be made by manufacturers using the
business portal, by email, mail or fax, and may be submitted by anyone
else by email, mail, or fax.
Branding Information: Using the business portal, registered
businesses may voluntarily submit branding information to assist CPSC
in correctly and timely routing reports of harm involving their
products to them. Brand names may be licensed to another entity for use
in labeling consumer products manufactured by that entity. CPSC's
understanding of licensing arrangements for consumer products ensures
that the correct manufacturer is timely notified regarding a report of
harm.
Small Batch Manufacturers Registry: The business portal also
contains the SBMR, which is the online mechanism by which ``small batch
manufacturers'' (as defined in the CPSA) can identify themselves to
obtain relief from certain third party testing requirements for
children's products. To register as a small batch manufacturer, a
business must attest that the company's income level, and the number of
units of the covered product manufactured for which relief is sought,
both fall within the statutory limits to receive relief from third
party testing.
C. Estimated Burden
1. Estimated Annual Burden for Respondents
We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden for Reports of Harm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Response Total annual Minutes per Total burden,
Collection type respondents frequency \1\ responses response in hours \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reports of Harm--submitted 5,646 1.07 6,023 12 1,205
through website................
Reports of Harm--submitted by 1,397 1.02 1,418 10 236
phone..........................
Reports of Harm--submitted by 349 43.88 15,314 20 5,105
mail, email, fax...............
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 7,392 .............. 22,755 .............. 6,546
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Frequency of responses is calculated by dividing the number of responses by the number of respondents.
\2\ Numbers have been rounded.
Table 2--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden for Manufacturer Submissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Response Total annual Minutes per Total burden,
Collection type respondents frequency \1\ responses response in hours \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Comments--submitted 2,311 1.06 2,461 117 4,799
through website................
[[Page 70160]]
Manufacturer Comments--submitted 182 1.90 346 147 848
by mail, email, fax............
Requests to Treat Information as 2 1.00 2 42 1
Confidential--submitted through
website........................
Requests to Treat Information as 0 n/a 0 72 0
Confidential--submitted by
mail, email, fax...............
Requests to Treat Information as 141 1.19 168 165 462
Materially Inaccurate--
submitted through website......
Requests to Treat Information as 25 1.12 28 195 91
Materially Inaccurate--
submitted by mail, email, fax..
Voluntary Brand Identification.. 932 1.37 1,281 10 214
Small Batch Manufacturer 2,292 1 2,292 10 382
Identification.................
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 5,885 .............. 6,578 .............. 6,797
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Frequency of responses is calculated by dividing the number of responses by the number of respondents.
\2\ Numbers have been rounded.
Based on the data set forth in Tables 1 and 2 above, the annual
reporting cost is estimated to be $691,884. This estimate is based on
the sum of two estimated total figures for reports of harm and
manufacturer submissions. The estimated number of respondents and
responses are based on the actual responses received in FY 2018. We
assume that the number of responses and respondents will be similar in
future years.
Reports of Harm: Table 1 sets forth the data used to estimate the
burden associated with submitting reports of harm. We had previously
estimated the time associated with the electronic and telephone
submission of reports of harm at 12 and 10 minutes, respectively; and
because we have had no indication that these estimates are not
appropriate or accurate, we used those figures for present purposes as
well. We estimate that the time associated with a paper or PDF form
would be 20 minutes, on average.
To estimate the costs for submitting reports of harm, we multiplied
the estimated total burden hours associated with reports of harm (1,205
hours + 236 hours + 5,105 hours = 6,546 hours) by an estimated total
compensation for all workers in private industry of $34.05 per hour,\3\
which results in an estimated cost of $222,891 (6,546 hours x $34.05
per hour = $222,891).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table
9 of the Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private
Industry, goods-producing and service-providing industries, by
occupational group, Dec 2018 (data extracted on 8/2/2019 from:
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t09.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Submissions: Table 2 sets forth the data used to
estimate the burden associated with manufacturers' submissions to the
Database. We observed that a large percentage of the general comments
come from a few businesses, and we assumed that the experience of a
business that submits many comments each year would be different from
one that submits only a few. Accordingly, we divided all responding
businesses into three groups based on the number of general comments
submitted in FY 2018, and then we selected several businesses to
contact from each group. The first group contacted consisted of
businesses that submitted 50 or more comments in FY 2018, accounting
for 31 percent of all general comments received. The second group
contacted included businesses that submitted 6 to 49 comments,
accounting for 39 percent of all general comments received. The last
group contacted included businesses that submitted no more than 5
comments, accounting for 30 percent of all general comments received.
We asked each company how long it typically takes to research, compose,
and enter a comment or a claim of materially inaccurate information.
To estimate the burden associated with submitting a general comment
regarding a report of harm through the business portal, we averaged the
burden provided by each company within each group, and then we
calculated a weighted average from the three groups, weighting each
group by the proportion of comments received from that group. We found
that the average time to submit a general comment regarding a report of
harm is 117 minutes, based on the data in Table 3 (((15 minutes + 45
minutes + 30 minutes + 15 minutes)/4 companies) * .31 + ((105 minutes +
45 minutes + 150 minutes + 15 minutes)/4 companies) * .39 + ((240
minutes + 60 minutes + 480 minutes)/3 companies) * .30 = 117 minutes).
Table 3--Estimated Burden To Enter a General Comment in the Database
------------------------------------------------------------------------
General
Group Company comments
(minutes)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group 1 (>= 50 comments).......... Company A........... 15
Company B........... 45
Company C........... 30
Company D........... 15
Group 2 (6-49 comments)........... Company A........... 105
Company B........... 45
Company C........... 150
Company D........... 15
Group 3 (<= 5 comments)........... Company A........... 240
Company B........... 60
Company C........... 480
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 70161]]
Registered businesses generally submit comments through our
website. Unregistered businesses submit comments by mail, email, or
fax. We estimate that submitting comments via mail, email, or fax takes
a little longer because often, we must ask businesses to amend their
submissions to include the required certifications. Thus, we estimated
that, on average, comments submitted by mail, email, or fax take 30
minutes longer than comments submitted through our website (117 minutes
+ 30 minutes = 147 minutes).
The submission of a claim of materially inaccurate information is a
relatively rare event for all respondents, so we averaged all responses
together. Eight of the businesses contacted had submitted claims of
materially inaccurate information. We found that the average time to
submit a claim that a report of harm contains a material inaccuracy is
165 minutes ((30 minutes + 90 minutes + 45 minutes + 90 minutes + 60
minutes + 660 minutes + 45 minutes + 300 minutes)/8 companies = 165
minutes).
Registered businesses generally submit claims through the business
portal. Unregistered businesses submit claims by mail, email, or fax.
We estimate that submitting claims via mail, email, or fax takes a
little longer because often, we must ask businesses to amend their
submission to include the required certifications. Thus, we estimated
that, on average, claims submitted by mail, email, or fax take 30
minutes longer than those submitted through our website (165 minutes +
30 minutes = 195 minutes).
The submission of a claim of confidential information is a
relatively rare event for all respondents, so we averaged all responses
together. Five of the businesses contacted had submitted claims of
confidential information. We found that the average time to submit a
claim that a report of harm contains confidential information is 42
minutes ((45 minutes + 15 minutes + 60 minutes + 30 minutes + 60
minutes)/5 companies = 42 minutes).
Registered businesses generally submit confidential information
claims through the business portal. Unregistered businesses submit
confidential information claims by mail, email, or fax. We estimate
that submitting claims by mail, email, or fax takes a little longer
because often, we must ask businesses to amend their submission to
include the required certifications. Thus, we estimate that a
confidential information claim submitted by mail, email, or fax would
take 30 minutes longer than those submitted through our website (42
minutes + 30 minutes = 72 minutes).
For voluntary brand identification, we estimate that a response
would take 10 minutes, on average. Most responses consist only of the
brand name and a product description. In many cases, a business will
submit multiple entries in a brief period of time, and we can see from
the date and time stamps on these records that an entry often takes
less than 2 minutes. CPSC staff enters the same data in a similar form,
based on our own research, and that experience was also factored into
our estimate.
For small batch manufacturer identification, we estimate that a
response would take 10 minutes, on average. The form consists of three
check boxes and the information should be readily accessible to the
respondent.
The responses summarized in Table 2 are generally submitted by
manufacturers. To avoid underestimating the cost associated with the
collection of this data, we assigned the higher hourly wage associated
with a manager or professional in goods-producing industries to these
tasks. To estimate the cost of manufacturer submissions, we multiplied
the estimated total burden hours in Table 2 (6,797 hours), by an
estimated total compensation for a manager or professional in goods-
producing industries of $69.00 per hour,\4\ which results in an
estimated cost of $468,993 (6,797 hours x $69.00 per hour = $468,993).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Table
9 of the Employer Costs for Employee Compensation (ECEC), Private
Industry, goods-producing and service-providing industries, by
occupational group, December 2018 (data extracted on 09/13/2019
from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t09.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the total estimated annual cost to respondents is
$691,884 ($222,891 burden for reports of harm + $468,993 burden for
manufacturer submissions = $691,884).
2. Estimated Annual Burden on Government
We estimate the annualized cost to the CPSC to be $982,166. This
figure is based on the costs for four categories of work for the
Database: Reports of Harm, Materially Inaccurate Information Claims,
Manufacturer Comments, and Small Batch Identification. Each category is
described below. No government cost is associated with voluntary brand
identification because this information is entered directly into the
Database by the manufacturer with no processing required by the
government. The information assists the government in directing reports
of harm to the correct manufacturer. We did not attempt to calculate
separately the government cost for claims of confidential information
because the number of claims is so small. The time to process these
claims is included with claims of materially inaccurate information.
Reports of Harm: The Reports of Harm category includes many
different tasks. Some costs related to this category are from two data
entry contracts. Tasks related to these contracts include clerical
coding of the report, such as identifying the type of consumer product
reported and the appropriate associated hazard, as well as performing
quality control on the data in the report. Contractor A spends an
estimated 5,267 hours per year performing these tasks. With an hourly
rate of $38.10 for contractor services, the annual cost to the
government of contract A is $200,673. Contractor B spends an estimated
2,029 hours per year performing these tasks. With an hourly rate of
$41.33 for contractor services, the annual cost to the government of
contract B is $83,859.
The Reports of Harm category also includes sending consent requests
for reports when necessary, processing that consent when received,
determining whether a product is out of CPSC's jurisdiction, and
confirming that pictures and attachments do not have any personally
identifiable information. The Reports of Harm category also entails
notifying manufacturers when one of their products is reported,
completing a risk of harm determination form for every report eligible
for publication, referring some reports to a Subject Matter Expert
(SME) within the CPSC for a determination on whether the reports meet
the requirement of having a risk of harm, and determining whether a
report meets all the statutory and regulatory requirements for
publication. Detailed costs are:
[[Page 70162]]
Table 4--Estimated Costs for Reports of Harm Task
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Grade level Number of compensation Total annual
hours (annual) per hour cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contract A...................................................... 5,267 $38.10 $200,673
Contract B...................................................... 2,029 41.33 83,859
7............................................................... 200 37.37 7,474
9............................................................... 300 45.72 13,716
12.............................................................. 5,528 66.31 366,562
13.............................................................. 428 78.84 33,744
14.............................................................. 1,068 93.18 99,516
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 14,820 .............. 825,544
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Materially Inaccurate Information (MII) Claims: The MII claims
category includes reviewing and responding to claims, participating in
meetings where the claims are discussed, and completing a risk of harm
determination on reports when a company alleges that a report does not
describe a risk of harm.
Table 5--Estimated Costs for MII Claims Task
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Grade level Number of compensation Total annual
hours (annual) per hour cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12.............................................................. 275 $66.31 $18,235
13.............................................................. 167 78.84 13,166
14.............................................................. 323 93.18 30,097
15.............................................................. 50 109.60 5,480
SES............................................................. 50 131.52 6,576
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 865 .............. 73,554.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Comments: The Comments category includes reviewing and
accepting or rejecting comments.
Table 6--Estimated Costs for Manufacturer Comments Task
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Grade level Number of compensation Total annual
hours (annual) per hour cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12.............................................................. 62 $66.31 $4,111
13.............................................................. 109 78.84 8,594
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 171 .............. 12,705
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small Batch Manufacturer Identification: The Small Batch
Manufacturer Identification category includes time spent posting the
list of small batch registrations, as well as answering companies'
questions on registering as a Small Batch Manufacturer and the
implications of small batch registration.
Table 7--Estimated Costs for Small Batch Task
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Grade level Number of compensation Total annual
hours (annual) per hour cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15.............................................................. 642 $109.60 $70,363
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 642 .............. 70,363
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the annualized cost to the CPSC of $954,531, by adding
the four categories of work related to the Database summarized in
Tables 4 through 7 (Reports of Harm ($825,544) + MII Claims ($73,554) +
Manufacturer Comments ($12,705) + Small Batch Identification ($70,363)
= $982,166).
This information collection renewal request is based on an
estimated 13,343 burden hours per year for the Database, which
represents an increase of 983 hours since this collection of
information was last approved by OMB in 2017. The increase in burden is
due
[[Page 70163]]
primarily to the increase in the number of incoming reports of harm,
and the increase in the number of claims based on those reports.
Comments have also increased significantly, but shifted to the more
efficient, online submission. A slight increase in small batch
manufacturer activity occurred, as well, continuing a long-term trend.
Abioye Mosheim,
Acting Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-27508 Filed 12-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P