Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2020, 69393-69395 [2019-27284]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
Notice of a new matching
program.
ACTION:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ) is issuing a public notice of its
intent to conduct a computer matching
program with the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), Department of the
Treasury. Under this matching program,
entitled Taxpayer Address Request
(TAR), the IRS will provide information
relating to taxpayers’ mailing addresses
to the DOJ for purposes of enabling DOJ
to locate debtors to initiate litigation
and/or enforce the collection of debts
owed by the taxpayers to the United
States.
DATES: This matching program will
become effective on January 30, 2020.
This matching program will continue
for 18 months after the effective date.
Please submit any comments by January
17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
regarding this notice by mail to Dennis
Dauphin, Director, Debt Collection
Management Staff, Justice Management
Division, 145 N St. NE, Rm 6W.102,
Washington, DC 20530, or by email at
Dennis.E.Dauphin2@usdoj.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Dauphin, Director, Debt
Collection Management Staff, Justice
Management Division,
Dennis.E.Dauphin2@usdoj.gov, 145 N
St. NE, Rm 6W.102, Washington, DC
20530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
agreement re-establishes a matching
program between the IRS and the DOJ
to provide DOJ with the mailing address
of taxpayers to assist the Department in
its effort to collect or to compromise
debts owed to the United States. DOJ
will provide to the IRS an electronic file
containing the names and Social
Security Numbers (SSN) of individuals
who owe debts to the U.S. and whose
debts have been referred to DOJ for
litigation and/or enforced collection.
The IRS provides direct notice to
taxpayers in the instructions to Forms
1040, 1040A, and 1040EZ, and
constructive notice in the Federal
Register system of records notice. The
notice provides taxpayers that
information provided to the U.S.
Individual Income Tax Returns may be
given to other Federal agencies, as
provided by law. For the records
involved in this match, both IRS and
DOJ have provided constructive notice
to record subjects through the
publication, in the Federal Register, of
systems of records notices that contain
routine uses permitting disclosures for
this matching program.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Participating Agencies: The
participating agencies include: DOJ and
the IRS.
Authority for Conducting the
Matching Program: This matching
agreement is executed pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(o), the Privacy Act of 1974,
as amended, and sets forth the terms
under which the IRS agrees to disclose
taxpayer mailing addresses to the DOJ.
This matching program is being
conducted under the authority of the
Internal Revenue Code § 6103(m)(2),
and the routine uses published in the
agencies’ Privacy Act systems of records
notices for the systems of records used
in this match. This provides for
disclosure, upon written request, of a
taxpayer’s mailing address for use by
officers, employees, or agents of a
Federal agency for the purpose of
locating such taxpayer to collect or
compromise a Federal claim against the
taxpayer in accordance with Title 31,
§§ 3711, 3717, and 3718. These statutory
provisions authorize DOJ to collect
debts on behalf of the United States
through litigation.
Purposes: The purpose of this
program is to provide DOJ with the most
current addresses of taxpayers, to notify
debtors of legal actions that may be
taken by DOJ and the rights afforded
them in the litigation, and to enforce
collection of debts owed to the United
States.
Categories of Individuals: Individuals
who owe debts to the United States and
whose debts have been referred to the
DOJ for litigation and/or enforced
collection.
Categories of Records: DOJ will
submit the nine-digit SSN and fourcharacter Name Control (the first four
letters of the surname) of each
individual whose current address is
requested. IRS will provide:
a. Nine-digit SSN and four-character
Name Control; and
b. The latest street address, P.O. Box,
or other address, city, State and ZIP
Code, only if the input SSN and Name
Control both match the Individual
Master File (IMF); or
c. A code explaining that no match
was found on the IMF.
Systems of Records: DOJ will provide
records from the Debt Enforcement
System, JUSTICE/DOJ–016, last
published in its entirety at 77 FR 9965–
9968 (February 21, 2012). This system of
records contains information on persons
who owe debts to the United States and
whose debts have been referred to the
DOJ for litigation and/or enforced
collection. DOJ records will be matched
against records contained in Treasury’s
Privacy Act System of Records:
Customer Account Data Engine (CADE)
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69393
IMF, Treasury/IRS 24.030, last
published at 77 FR 47948 (Aug. 10,
2012). This system of records contains,
among other information, the taxpayer’s
name, SSN, and most recent address
known by IRS. CADE is maintained at
the Martinsburg Computing Center
(MCC), and the notice for this system of
records was last published at 80 FR
54082 (September 8, 2015).
In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552a(o)(2)(A) and 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), the
Department has provided a report to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and Congress on this new
Computer Matching Program.
Dated: November 4, 2019.
Lee J. Lofthus,
Assistant Attorney General for
Administration, United States Department of
Justice.
[FR Doc. 2019–27174 Filed 12–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–CN–P
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION
[MCC FR 19–10]
Report on the Selection of Eligible
Countries for Fiscal Year 2020
Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This report is provided in
accordance with section 608(d)(2) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as
amended (the ‘‘Act’’), 22 U.S.C.
7707(d)(2).
SUMMARY:
Dated: December 13, 2019.
Christopher J. Dunn,
Acting VP/General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary.
Report on the Selection of Eligible
Countries for Fiscal Year 2020
Summary
This report is provided in accordance
with section 608(d)(1) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as
amended (the Act) (22 U.S.C.
7707(d)(1)).
The Act authorizes the provision of
assistance under section 605 of the Act
(22 U.S.C. 7704) to countries that enter
into compacts with the United States to
support policies and programs that
advance the progress of such countries
in achieving lasting economic growth
and poverty reduction, and are in
furtherance of the Act. The Act requires
the Millennium Challenge Corporation
(MCC) to determine the countries that
will be eligible to receive assistance for
the fiscal year, based on their
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
69394
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
demonstrated commitment to just and
democratic governance, economic
freedom, and investing in their people,
as well as on the opportunity to reduce
poverty and generate economic growth
in the country. The Act also requires the
submission of reports to appropriate
congressional committees and the
publication of notices in the Federal
Register that identify, among other
things:
1. The countries that are ‘‘candidate
countries’’ for assistance for fiscal year
(FY) 2020 based on their per-capita
income levels and their eligibility to
receive assistance under U.S. law, and
countries that would be candidate
countries but for specified legal
prohibitions on assistance (section
608(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(a)));
2. The criteria and methodology that
the Board of Directors of MCC (the
Board) will use to measure and evaluate
the policy performance of the
‘‘candidate countries’’ consistent with
the requirements of section 607 of the
Act in order to determine ‘‘eligible
countries’’ from among the ‘‘candidate
countries’’ (section 608(b) of the Act (22
U.S.C. 7707(b))); and
3. The list of countries determined by
the Board to be ‘‘eligible countries’’ for
FY 2020, with justification for eligibility
determination and selection for compact
negotiation, including with which of the
eligible countries the Board will seek to
enter into compacts (section 608(d) of
the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(d))).
This is the third of the abovedescribed reports by MCC for FY 2020.
It identifies countries determined by the
Board to be eligible under section 607
of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY 2020
with which the MCC will seek to enter
into compacts under section 609 of the
Act (22 U.S.C. 7708), as well as the
justification for such decisions. The
report also identifies countries selected
by the Board to receive assistance under
MCC’s threshold program pursuant to
section 616 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7715).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Eligible Countries
The Board met on December 9, 2019,
to select those eligible countries with
which the United States, through MCC,
will seek to enter into a Millennium
Challenge Compact pursuant to section
607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706). The
Board selected the following eligible
country for such assistance for FY 2020:
Mozambique. The Board also selected
the following previously-selected
countries for compact assistance for FY
2020: Benin, Burkina Faso, Coˆte
d’Ivoire, Indonesia, Lesotho, Malawi,
Niger, Timor-Leste, and Tunisia.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Criteria
In accordance with the Act and with
the ‘‘Report on the Criteria and
Methodology for Determining the
Eligibility of Candidate Countries for
Millennium Challenge Account
Assistance in Fiscal Year 2020’’
formally submitted to Congress on
September 18, 2019, selection was based
primarily on a country’s overall
performance in three broad policy
categories: Ruling Justly, Encouraging
Economic Freedom, and Investing in
People. The Board relied, to the fullest
extent possible, upon transparent and
independent indicators to assess
countries’ policy performance and
demonstrated commitment in these
three broad policy areas. The Board
compared countries’ performance on the
indicators relative to their income-level
peers, evaluating them in comparison to
either the group of countries with a GNI
per capita equal to or less than $1,925,
or the group with a GNI per capita
between $1,925 and $3,995.
The criteria and methodology used to
assess countries on the annual
scorecards are outlined in the ‘‘Report
on the Criteria and Methodology for
Determining the Eligibility of Candidate
Countries for Millennium Challenge
Account Assistance in Fiscal Year
2020 1’’. Scorecards reflecting each
country’s performance on the indicators
are available on MCC’s website at
www.mcc.gov/scorecards.
The Board also considered whether
any adjustments should be made for
data gaps, data lags, or recent events
since the indicators were published, as
well as strengths or weaknesses in
particular indicators. Where
appropriate, the Board took into account
additional quantitative and qualitative
information, such as evidence of a
country’s commitment to fighting
corruption, investments in human
development outcomes, or poverty rates.
In keeping with legislative directives,
the Board also considered the
opportunity to reduce poverty and
promote economic growth in a country,
in light of the overall information
available, as well as the availability of
appropriated funds.
The Board sees the selection decision
as an annual opportunity to determine
where MCC funds can be most
effectively used to support poverty
reduction through economic growth in
relatively well-governed, poor countries.
The Board carefully considers the
appropriate nature of each country
partnership—on a case-by-case basis—
based on factors related to economic
1 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/report-selection-criteria-methodology-fy20.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
growth and poverty reduction, the
sustainability of MCC’s programs, and
the country’s ability to attract and
leverage public and private resources in
support of development.
This was the second year the Board
considered the eligibility of countries
for concurrent compacts. In addition to
the considerations for compact
eligibility detailed above, the Board
considered whether a country being
considered for a concurrent compact is
making considerable and demonstrable
progress in implementing the terms of
its existing Compact.
This was the eleventh year the Board
considered the eligibility of countries
for subsequent compacts, as permitted
under section 609(l) of the Act. MCC’s
engagement with partner countries is
not open-ended, and the Board is
deliberate when selecting countries for
follow-on partnerships, particularly
regarding the higher bar applicable to
subsequent compact countries. In
making these selection decisions, the
Board considered—in addition to the
criteria outlined above—the country’s
performance implementing its first
compact, including the nature of the
country’s partnership with MCC, the
degree to which the country has
demonstrated a commitment and
capacity to achieve program results, and
the degree to which the country has
implemented the compact in accordance
with MCC’s core policies and standards.
To the greatest extent possible, these
factors were assessed using pre-existing
monitoring and evaluation targets and
regular quarterly reporting. This
information was supplemented with
direct surveys and consultation with
MCC staff responsible for compact
implementation, monitoring, and
evaluation. MCC published a Guide to
Supplemental Information 2 and a Guide
to the Compact Survey Summary 3 in
order to increase transparency about the
type of supplemental information the
Board uses to assess a country’s policy
performance and compact
implementation performance. The
Board also considered a country’s
commitment to further sector reform, as
well as evidence of improved scorecard
policy performance.
In addition, this is the fourth year
where the Board considered an explicit
higher bar for those countries close to
the upper end of the candidate pool,
looking closely in such cases at a
country’s access to development
2 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/guide-to-supplemental-information-fy20.
3 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/guide-to-the-compact-survey-summary-fy20.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
financing, the nature of poverty in the
country, and its policy performance.
Countries Newly Selected for Compact
Assistance
Using the criteria described above,
one candidate country under section
606(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7705(a) was
newly selected for assistance under
section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706):
Mozambique. In accordance with
section 609(k) of the Act, no candidate
countries were newly selected to
explore development of a concurrent
compact program under section 607 of
the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706).
Mozambique: Mozambique
successfully completed its first MCC
compact in September 2013 and has
recently demonstrated encouraging
policy improvement on the MCC
scorecard, passing 13 of 20 indicators,
with clear improvement on its Control
of Corruption score. A new compact
would build on the country’s continued
commitment to sector reform and MCC’s
strong relationship with the country
developed under the first compact
partnership. By selecting Mozambique
for a compact, MCC will support the
government’s efforts to strengthen
economic growth to reduce poverty.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Countries Selected To Continue
Compact Development
Nine of the countries selected for
compact assistance for FY 2020 were
previously selected for FY 2019.
Burkina Faso, Indonesia, Lesotho,
Malawi, Timor-Leste, and Tunisia were
selected to continue developing bilateral
compacts. Benin, Burkina Faso, Coˆte
d’Ivoire, and Niger were selected to
continue developing concurrent
compacts for the purpose of regional
integration. Selection of these countries
for FY 2020 was based on their
continued or improved policy
performance since their prior selection.
Countries Selected To Receive
Threshold Program Assistance
The Board selected Kenya to receive
threshold program assistance.
Kenya: Kenya offers MCC the
opportunity to engage with the country
on policy and institutional reform.
Kenya is an important partner in East
Africa, where MCC’s presence is
growing. Although Kenya has not
previously passed the Control of
Corruption indicator on the MCC
scorecard, its performance rose to the
50th percentile this year (a country must
score above the 50th percentile to pass
the indicator). More broadly, Kenya
passes 15 of 20 indicators overall on the
scorecard, including the Democratic
Rights ‘‘hard hurdle’’ indicators.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Countries Selected To Continue
Developing Threshold Programs
The Board selected Ethiopia and
Solomon Islands to continue developing
threshold programs. Ethiopia has
continued on its reform path and saw
improvements on the democratic rights
‘‘hard hurdle’’ indicators of political
rights and civil liberties this year.
Solomon Islands held successful
elections in April 2019 and continues
apace with program development.
Ongoing Review of Partner Countries’
Policy Performance
The Board emphasized the need for
all partner countries to maintain or
improve their policy performance. If it
is determined during compact
implementation that a country has
demonstrated a significant policy
reversal, MCC can hold it accountable
by applying MCC’s Suspension and
Termination Policy.4
[FR Doc. 2019–27284 Filed 12–13–19; 4:15 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 9211–03–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
[NARA–19–0018; NARA–2020–014]
Records Schedules; Availability and
Request for Comments
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of
proposed records schedules; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA)
publishes notice of certain Federal
agency requests for records disposition
authority (records schedules). We
publish notice in the Federal Register
and on regulations.gov for records
schedules in which agencies propose to
dispose of records they no longer need
to conduct agency business. We invite
public comments on such records
schedules.
DATES: NARA must receive comments
by February 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods. You
must cite the control number, which
appears on the records schedule in
parentheses after the name of the agency
that submitted the schedule.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Records Appraisal and
Agency Assistance (ACR); National
SUMMARY:
4 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/policy-on-suspension-and-termination.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69395
Archives and Records Administration;
8601 Adelphi Road; College Park, MD
20740–6001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Records Management Operations by
email at request.schedule@nara.gov, by
mail at the address above, or by phone
at 301–837–1799.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Comment Procedures
We are publishing notice of records
schedules in which agencies propose to
dispose of records they no longer need
to conduct agency business. We invite
public comments on these records
schedules, as required by 44 U.S.C.
3303a(a), and list the schedules at the
end of this notice by agency and
subdivision requesting disposition
authority.
In addition, this notice lists the
organizational unit(s) accumulating the
records or states that the schedule has
agency-wide applicability. It also
provides the control number assigned to
each schedule, which you will need if
you submit comments on that schedule.
We have uploaded the records
schedules and accompanying appraisal
memoranda to the regulations.gov
docket for this notice as ‘‘other’’
documents. Each records schedule
contains a full description of the records
at the file unit level as well as their
proposed disposition. The appraisal
memorandum for the schedule includes
information about the records.
We will post comments, including
any personal information and
attachments, to the public docket
unchanged. Because comments are
public, you are responsible for ensuring
that you do not include any confidential
or other information that you or a third
party may not wish to be publicly
posted. If you want to submit a
comment with confidential information
or cannot otherwise use the
regulations.gov portal, you may contact
request.schedule@nara.gov for
instructions on submitting your
comment.
We will consider all comments
submitted by the posted deadline and
consult as needed with the Federal
agency seeking the disposition
authority. After considering comments,
we will post on regulations.gov a
‘‘Consolidated Reply’’ summarizing the
comments, responding to them, and
noting any changes we have made to the
proposed records schedule. We will
then send the schedule for final
approval by the Archivist of the United
States. You may elect at regulations.gov
to receive updates on the docket,
including an alert when we post the
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69393-69395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27284]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
[MCC FR 19-10]
Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year
2020
AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This report is provided in accordance with section 608(d)(2)
of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended (the ``Act''), 22
U.S.C. 7707(d)(2).
Dated: December 13, 2019.
Christopher J. Dunn,
Acting VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.
Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2020
Summary
This report is provided in accordance with section 608(d)(1) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended (the Act) (22 U.S.C.
7707(d)(1)).
The Act authorizes the provision of assistance under section 605 of
the Act (22 U.S.C. 7704) to countries that enter into compacts with the
United States to support policies and programs that advance the
progress of such countries in achieving lasting economic growth and
poverty reduction, and are in furtherance of the Act. The Act requires
the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) to determine the countries
that will be eligible to receive assistance for the fiscal year, based
on their
[[Page 69394]]
demonstrated commitment to just and democratic governance, economic
freedom, and investing in their people, as well as on the opportunity
to reduce poverty and generate economic growth in the country. The Act
also requires the submission of reports to appropriate congressional
committees and the publication of notices in the Federal Register that
identify, among other things:
1. The countries that are ``candidate countries'' for assistance
for fiscal year (FY) 2020 based on their per-capita income levels and
their eligibility to receive assistance under U.S. law, and countries
that would be candidate countries but for specified legal prohibitions
on assistance (section 608(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(a)));
2. The criteria and methodology that the Board of Directors of MCC
(the Board) will use to measure and evaluate the policy performance of
the ``candidate countries'' consistent with the requirements of section
607 of the Act in order to determine ``eligible countries'' from among
the ``candidate countries'' (section 608(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C.
7707(b))); and
3. The list of countries determined by the Board to be ``eligible
countries'' for FY 2020, with justification for eligibility
determination and selection for compact negotiation, including with
which of the eligible countries the Board will seek to enter into
compacts (section 608(d) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(d))).
This is the third of the above-described reports by MCC for FY
2020. It identifies countries determined by the Board to be eligible
under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY 2020 with which
the MCC will seek to enter into compacts under section 609 of the Act
(22 U.S.C. 7708), as well as the justification for such decisions. The
report also identifies countries selected by the Board to receive
assistance under MCC's threshold program pursuant to section 616 of the
Act (22 U.S.C. 7715).
Eligible Countries
The Board met on December 9, 2019, to select those eligible
countries with which the United States, through MCC, will seek to enter
into a Millennium Challenge Compact pursuant to section 607 of the Act
(22 U.S.C. 7706). The Board selected the following eligible country for
such assistance for FY 2020: Mozambique. The Board also selected the
following previously-selected countries for compact assistance for FY
2020: Benin, Burkina Faso, C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire, Indonesia, Lesotho,
Malawi, Niger, Timor-Leste, and Tunisia.
Criteria
In accordance with the Act and with the ``Report on the Criteria
and Methodology for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries
for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance in Fiscal Year 2020''
formally submitted to Congress on September 18, 2019, selection was
based primarily on a country's overall performance in three broad
policy categories: Ruling Justly, Encouraging Economic Freedom, and
Investing in People. The Board relied, to the fullest extent possible,
upon transparent and independent indicators to assess countries' policy
performance and demonstrated commitment in these three broad policy
areas. The Board compared countries' performance on the indicators
relative to their income-level peers, evaluating them in comparison to
either the group of countries with a GNI per capita equal to or less
than $1,925, or the group with a GNI per capita between $1,925 and
$3,995.
The criteria and methodology used to assess countries on the annual
scorecards are outlined in the ``Report on the Criteria and Methodology
for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries for Millennium
Challenge Account Assistance in Fiscal Year 2020 \1\''. Scorecards
reflecting each country's performance on the indicators are available
on MCC's website at www.mcc.gov/scorecards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/report-selection-criteria-methodology-fy20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board also considered whether any adjustments should be made
for data gaps, data lags, or recent events since the indicators were
published, as well as strengths or weaknesses in particular indicators.
Where appropriate, the Board took into account additional quantitative
and qualitative information, such as evidence of a country's commitment
to fighting corruption, investments in human development outcomes, or
poverty rates. In keeping with legislative directives, the Board also
considered the opportunity to reduce poverty and promote economic
growth in a country, in light of the overall information available, as
well as the availability of appropriated funds.
The Board sees the selection decision as an annual opportunity to
determine where MCC funds can be most effectively used to support
poverty reduction through economic growth in relatively well-governed,
poor countries. The Board carefully considers the appropriate nature of
each country partnership--on a case-by-case basis--based on factors
related to economic growth and poverty reduction, the sustainability of
MCC's programs, and the country's ability to attract and leverage
public and private resources in support of development.
This was the second year the Board considered the eligibility of
countries for concurrent compacts. In addition to the considerations
for compact eligibility detailed above, the Board considered whether a
country being considered for a concurrent compact is making
considerable and demonstrable progress in implementing the terms of its
existing Compact.
This was the eleventh year the Board considered the eligibility of
countries for subsequent compacts, as permitted under section 609(l) of
the Act. MCC's engagement with partner countries is not open-ended, and
the Board is deliberate when selecting countries for follow-on
partnerships, particularly regarding the higher bar applicable to
subsequent compact countries. In making these selection decisions, the
Board considered--in addition to the criteria outlined above--the
country's performance implementing its first compact, including the
nature of the country's partnership with MCC, the degree to which the
country has demonstrated a commitment and capacity to achieve program
results, and the degree to which the country has implemented the
compact in accordance with MCC's core policies and standards. To the
greatest extent possible, these factors were assessed using pre-
existing monitoring and evaluation targets and regular quarterly
reporting. This information was supplemented with direct surveys and
consultation with MCC staff responsible for compact implementation,
monitoring, and evaluation. MCC published a Guide to Supplemental
Information \2\ and a Guide to the Compact Survey Summary \3\ in order
to increase transparency about the type of supplemental information the
Board uses to assess a country's policy performance and compact
implementation performance. The Board also considered a country's
commitment to further sector reform, as well as evidence of improved
scorecard policy performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/guide-to-supplemental-information-fy20.
\3\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/guide-to-the-compact-survey-summary-fy20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, this is the fourth year where the Board considered an
explicit higher bar for those countries close to the upper end of the
candidate pool, looking closely in such cases at a country's access to
development
[[Page 69395]]
financing, the nature of poverty in the country, and its policy
performance.
Countries Newly Selected for Compact Assistance
Using the criteria described above, one candidate country under
section 606(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7705(a) was newly selected for
assistance under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706): Mozambique.
In accordance with section 609(k) of the Act, no candidate countries
were newly selected to explore development of a concurrent compact
program under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706).
Mozambique: Mozambique successfully completed its first MCC compact
in September 2013 and has recently demonstrated encouraging policy
improvement on the MCC scorecard, passing 13 of 20 indicators, with
clear improvement on its Control of Corruption score. A new compact
would build on the country's continued commitment to sector reform and
MCC's strong relationship with the country developed under the first
compact partnership. By selecting Mozambique for a compact, MCC will
support the government's efforts to strengthen economic growth to
reduce poverty.
Countries Selected To Continue Compact Development
Nine of the countries selected for compact assistance for FY 2020
were previously selected for FY 2019. Burkina Faso, Indonesia, Lesotho,
Malawi, Timor-Leste, and Tunisia were selected to continue developing
bilateral compacts. Benin, Burkina Faso, C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire, and Niger
were selected to continue developing concurrent compacts for the
purpose of regional integration. Selection of these countries for FY
2020 was based on their continued or improved policy performance since
their prior selection.
Countries Selected To Receive Threshold Program Assistance
The Board selected Kenya to receive threshold program assistance.
Kenya: Kenya offers MCC the opportunity to engage with the country
on policy and institutional reform. Kenya is an important partner in
East Africa, where MCC's presence is growing. Although Kenya has not
previously passed the Control of Corruption indicator on the MCC
scorecard, its performance rose to the 50th percentile this year (a
country must score above the 50th percentile to pass the indicator).
More broadly, Kenya passes 15 of 20 indicators overall on the
scorecard, including the Democratic Rights ``hard hurdle'' indicators.
Countries Selected To Continue Developing Threshold Programs
The Board selected Ethiopia and Solomon Islands to continue
developing threshold programs. Ethiopia has continued on its reform
path and saw improvements on the democratic rights ``hard hurdle''
indicators of political rights and civil liberties this year. Solomon
Islands held successful elections in April 2019 and continues apace
with program development.
Ongoing Review of Partner Countries' Policy Performance
The Board emphasized the need for all partner countries to maintain
or improve their policy performance. If it is determined during compact
implementation that a country has demonstrated a significant policy
reversal, MCC can hold it accountable by applying MCC's Suspension and
Termination Policy.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/policy-on-suspension-and-termination.
[FR Doc. 2019-27284 Filed 12-13-19; 4:15 p.m.]
BILLING CODE 9211-03-P