Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, 69396-69400 [2019-27278]
Download as PDF
69396
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
Consolidated Reply, whether or not you
submit a comment. If you have a
question, you can submit it as a
comment, and can also submit any
concerns or comments you would have
to a possible response to the question.
We will address these items in
consolidated replies along with any
other comments submitted on that
schedule.
We will post schedules on our
website in the Records Control Schedule
(RCS) Repository, at https://
www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/rcs,
after the Archivist approves them. The
RCS contains all schedules approved
since 1973.
3. Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Agency-wide, External
Outreach Records (DAA–0180–2018–
0007).
4. Office of Personnel Management,
Agency-wide, Records of the Agency
Compliance and Evaluation Program
(DAA–0478–2019–0001).
5. Securities and Exchange
Commission, Division of Corporation
Finance, Confidential Treatment
Materials (DAA–0266–2019–0002).
Laurence Brewer,
Chief Records Officer for the U.S.
Government.
[FR Doc. 2019–27203 Filed 12–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
Background
Each year, Federal agencies create
billions of records. To control this
accumulation, agency records managers
prepare schedules proposing retention
periods for records and submit these
schedules for NARA’s approval. Once
approved by NARA, records schedules
provide mandatory instructions on what
happens to records when no longer
needed for current Government
business. The records schedules
authorize agencies to preserve records of
continuing value in the National
Archives or to destroy, after a specified
period, records lacking continuing
administrative, legal, research, or other
value. Some schedules are
comprehensive and cover all the records
of an agency or one of its major
subdivisions. Most schedules, however,
cover records of only one office or
program or a few series of records. Many
of these update previously approved
schedules, and some include records
proposed as permanent.
Agencies may not destroy Federal
records without the approval of the
Archivist of the United States. The
Archivist grants this approval only after
thorough consideration of the records’
administrative use by the agency of
origin, the rights of the Government and
of private people directly affected by the
Government’s activities, and whether or
not the records have historical or other
value. Public review and comment on
these records schedules is part of the
Archivist’s consideration process.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Schedules Pending
1. Department of Homeland Security,
Agency-wide, Administrative and
Operational Records Common to All
Offices (DAA–0563–2019–0008).
2. Department of Transportation,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, Engineering and
Research Records (DAA–0571–2015–
0015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Proposal Review Panel for Ocean
Sciences
Notice of Meeting
In accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, as amended), the National Science
Foundation (NSF) announces the
following meeting:
Name and Committee Code: Proposal
Review Panel for Ocean Sciences OCE
(#10752).
Date and Time: February 26–28, 2020;
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Place: JOIDES Resolution Science
Operator (JRSO), 1000 Discovery Drive,
College Station, TX 77840.
Type of Meeting: Part Open.
Contact Person: James Allan, Program
Director, Division of Ocean Science;
National Science Foundation, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314; Telephone: (703) 292–8583.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide
advice and recommendations regarding
Operations and Management of the
Drilling Vessel JOIDES Resolution for
the International Ocean Discovery
Program (IODP) and JR100 program
relating to performance in FY2019
under Cooperative Agreement Award
1326927.
Agenda
Wednesday, February 26, 2020
9:00 a.m.–9:15 a.m. NSF and panel
introduction
9:15 a.m.–11:00 a.m. Initial Report of
the JOIDES Resolution Science
Operator (JRSO)—(Open)
11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m. Co-Chief Review
Report for FY2019—(Open)
12:00 p.m.–1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00 p.m.–3:00 p.m. JRSO response to
Co-Chief Review Report—(Open)
3:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m. Meet with JRSO
Staff—(Open)
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m. Site Visit Panel
discussion of presentations and
overnight questions to JRSO—(Closed)
Thursday, February 27, 2020
9:00 a.m.–11:00 a.m. JRSO discussion of
major challenges and successes in
operational context, and how they are
responding—(Open)
11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m. Effectiveness of
IODP Programmatic Planning
Structure—(Open)
12:00 p.m.–1:00 p.m. Lunch
1:00 p.m.–2:00 p.m. JRSO discussion of
major challenges in providing services
and innovation to IODP science
community, and how they are
responding—(Open)
2:00 p.m.–3:00 p.m. Response of JRSO
to any remaining Panel questions—
(Open)
3:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m. Break
3:30 p.m.–5:00 p.m. Site Visit Panel
Discussion on panel report structure
and overnight questions to JRSO—
(Closed)
Friday, February 28, 2020
9:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m. Site Visit Panel
discussion; work on report—(Closed)
10:00 a.m.–11:00 a.m. Response of JRSO
to Panel questions—(Open)
11:00 a.m.–12:00 p.m. Site Visit Panel
discussion; work on report—(Closed)
12:00 p.m.–1:00 p.m. Lunch—(Closed)
1:00 p.m.–3:30 p.m. Site Visit Panel
discussion; work on report—(Closed)
3:30 p.m.–4:00 p.m. Break
4:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m. Site Visit Panel
presents report and recommendations
to JRSO—(Closed)
Reason for Closing: The program
being reviewed during closed portions
of the meeting will include information
of a proprietary or confidential nature,
including technical information;
financial data, such as salaries; and
personal information concerning
individuals associated with the
program. These matters are exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Dated: December 12, 2019.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–27180 Filed 12–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–293; NRC–2019–0247]
Holtec Decommissioning International,
LLC; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
Environmental assessment and
finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
ACTION:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of exemptions that would
permit the licensee to reduce its
emergency planning (EP) activities at
the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
(Pilgrim). Specifically, the licensee is
seeking exemptions that would
eliminate the requirements for the
licensee to maintain offsite radiological
emergency plans and reduce some of the
onsite EP activities based on the
reduced risks at Pilgrim, which is
permanently shut down and defueled.
However, requirements for certain
onsite capabilities to communicate and
coordinate with offsite response
authorities would be retained. In
addition, offsite EP provisions would
still exist through State and local
government use of a comprehensive
emergency management plan process, in
accordance with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency’s (FEMA’s)
Comprehensive Preparedness Guide
(CPG) 101, ‘‘Developing and
Maintaining Emergency Operations
Plans.’’ The NRC staff is issuing a final
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
final Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) associated with the proposed
exemptions.
SUMMARY:
The EA and FONSI referenced in
this document are available on
December 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2019–0247 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2019–0247. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301–287–9127; email:
Jennifer.Borges@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is
available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this
document. In addition, for the
convenience of the reader, instructions
about obtaining materials referenced in
this document are provided in the
AVAILABILITY OF DOCUMENTS
section of this document.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott P. Wall, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–2855; email:
Scott.Wall@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
By letter dated November 10, 2015
(ADAMS Accession No. ML15328A053),
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENOI)
certified to the NRC that it planned to
permanently cease power operations at
Pilgrim no later than June 1, 2019. By
letter dated June 10, 2019 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML19161A033), ENOI
certified to the NRC that power
operations permanently ceased at
Pilgrim on May 31, 2019, and that the
fuel was permanently removed from the
Pilgrim reactor vessel and placed in the
spent fuel pool (SFP) on June 9, 2019.
Accordingly, pursuant to section
50.82(a)(2) of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the
Pilgrim renewed facility operating
license no longer authorizes operation
of the reactor or emplacement or
retention of fuel in the reactor vessel.
The facility is still authorized to possess
and store irradiated (i.e., spent) nuclear
fuel. Spent fuel is currently stored
onsite at the Pilgrim facility in the SFP
and in a dry cask independent spent
fuel storage installation (ISFSI).
By letter dated July 3, 2018 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18186A635), as
supplemented by letters dated
November 30 and December 4, 2018,
and February 14 and February 18, 2019
(ADAMS Accession Nos.
ML18338A205, ML18341A219,
ML19050A298, and ML19056A260,
respectively), ENOI requested
exemptions from certain EP
requirements in 10 CFR part 50 for
Pilgrim.
By letter dated November 16, 2018
(ADAMS Accession No. ML18320A031),
ENOI, on behalf of itself and Entergy
Nuclear Generation Company (ENGC)
(to be known as Holtec Pilgrim, LLC),
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69397
Holtec International (Holtec), and
Holtec Decommissioning International,
LLC (HDI, the licensee) (together,
Applicants), requested that the NRC
consent to: (1) The indirect transfer of
control of Renewed Facility Operating
License No. DPR–35 for Pilgrim, as well
as the general license for the Pilgrim
ISFSI (together, the Licenses), to Holtec;
and (2) the direct transfer of ENOI’s
operating authority (i.e., its authority to
conduct licensed activities at Pilgrim) to
HDI. In addition, the Applicants
requested that the NRC approve a
conforming administrative amendment
to the Licenses to reflect the proposed
direct transfer of the Licenses from
ENOI to HDI; a planned name change
for ENGC from ENGC to Holtec Pilgrim,
LLC; and deletion of certain license
conditions to reflect satisfaction and
termination of all ENGC obligations
after the license transfer and equity sale.
By Order dated August 22, 2019
(ADAMS Accession No. ML19170A265),
the NRC staff approved the direct and
indirect transfers requested in the
November 16, 2018, application.
Additionally, on August 22, 2019, HDI
informed the NRC (ADAMS Accession
No. ML19234A357) that:
HDI will assume responsibility for all
ongoing NRC regulatory actions and reviews
currently underway for Pilgrim Nuclear
Power Station. HDI respectfully requests NRC
continuation of these regulatory actions and
reviews.
On August 26, 2019, ENOI informed
the NRC that the license transfer
transaction closed on August 26, 2019
(ADAMS Accession No. ML19239A037).
On August 27, 2019 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML19235A050), the NRC staff
issued Amendment No. 249 to reflect
the license transfer. Accordingly, HDI is
now the licensee for decommissioning
operations at Pilgrim.
The NRC regulations concerning EP
do not recognize the reduced risks after
a reactor is permanently shut down and
defueled. As such, a permanently shut
down and defueled reactor must
continue to maintain the same EP
requirements as an operating power
reactor under the existing regulatory
requirements. To establish a level of EP
commensurate with the reduced risks of
a permanently shut down and defueled
reactor, the licensee requires
exemptions from certain EP regulatory
requirements before it can change its
emergency plans.
The NRC is considering issuing to the
licensee exemptions from portions of 10
CFR 50.47, ‘‘Emergency plans,’’ and
appendix E to 10 CFR part 50,
‘‘Emergency Planning and Preparedness
for Production and Utilization
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
69398
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
Facilities,’’ which would eliminate the
requirements for the licensee to
maintain offsite radiological emergency
plans in accordance with 44 CFR,
‘‘Emergency Management and
Assistance,’’ part 350, ‘‘Review and
Approval of State and Local
Radiological Emergency Plans and
Preparedness,’’ and reduce some of the
onsite EP activities based on the
reduced risks 10 months after Pilgrim
has permanently ceased power
operations.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the
NRC has determined that an EA is the
appropriate form of environmental
review for the requested action. Based
on the results of the EA, which is
provided in Section II of this document,
the NRC has determined not to prepare
an environmental impact statement for
the proposed action, and is issuing a
FONSI.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt
the licensee from (1) certain standards
as set forth in 10 CFR 50.47(b) regarding
onsite and offsite emergency response
plans for nuclear power reactors; (2)
requirements in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) to
establish plume exposure and ingestion
pathway emergency planning zones
(EPZs) for nuclear power reactors; and
(3) certain requirements in 10 CFR part
50, appendix E, section IV, which
establishes the elements that make up
the content of emergency plans. The
proposed action of granting these
exemptions would eliminate the
requirements for the licensee to
maintain offsite radiological emergency
plans in accordance with 44 CFR part
350 and reduce some of the onsite EP
activities at Pilgrim, based on the
reduced risks once the reactor has been
permanently shut down for a period of
10 months. However, requirements for
certain onsite capabilities to
communicate and coordinate with
offsite response authorities would be
retained to an extent consistent with the
approved exemptions. Additionally, if
necessary, offsite protective actions
could still be implemented using a
comprehensive emergency management
plan (CEMP) process. A CEMP in this
context, also referred to as an emergency
operations plan (EOP), is addressed in
FEMA’s CPG 101, ‘‘Developing and
Maintaining Emergency Operations
Plans.’’ The CPG 101 is the foundation
for State, territorial, tribal, and local EP
in the United States under the National
Preparedness System. It promotes a
common understanding of the
fundamentals of risk-informed planning
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
and decision making, and assists
planners at all levels of government in
their efforts to develop and maintain
viable, all-hazards, all-threats
emergency plans. An EOP is flexible
enough for use in all emergencies. It
describes how people and property will
be protected; details who is responsible
for carrying out specific actions;
identifies the personnel, equipment,
facilities, supplies, and other resources
available; and outlines how all actions
will be coordinated. A CEMP is often
referred to as a synonym for ‘‘allhazards’’ planning. The proposed action
is in accordance with the licensee’s
application dated July 3, 2018, as
supplemented by letters dated
November 30 and December 4, 2018,
and February 14 and February 18, 2019.
Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is needed for the
licensee to revise the Pilgrim Emergency
Plan once the reactor has been
permanently shutdown for a period of
10 months. The EP requirements
currently applicable to Pilgrim are for
an operating power reactor. Since the
certifications for permanent cessation of
operations and permanent removal of
fuel from the reactor vessel have been
docketed, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.82(a)(2), the Pilgrim license no longer
authorizes use of the facility for power
operation or emplacement or retention
of fuel into the reactor vessel and,
therefore, the occurrence of postulated
accidents associated with reactor
operation is no longer credible.
However, there are no explicit
regulatory provisions distinguishing EP
requirements for a power reactor that
has been permanently shut down and
defueled from those for an operating
power reactor.
In its exemption request, the licensee
identified four possible radiological
accidents at Pilgrim in its permanently
shutdown and defueled condition.
These are: (1) A fuel-handling accident;
(2) a radioactive waste-handling
accident; (3) a loss of SFP normal
cooling (i.e., boil off); and (4) an
adiabatic heat up of the hottest fuel
assembly. The NRC staff evaluated these
possible radiological accidents in the
Commission Paper (SECY) 19–0078,
‘‘Request by Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. for Exemptions from
Certain Emergency Planning
Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear
Power Station,’’ dated August 9, 2019
(ADAMS Package Accession No.
ML18347A717). In SECY–19–0078, the
NRC staff verified that the licensee’s
analyses and calculations provided
reasonable assurance that if the
requested exemptions were granted,
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
then: (1) For a design-basis accident
(DBA), an offsite radiological release
will not exceed the early phase
protective action guides (PAGs) at the
site boundary, as detailed in Table 1–1
to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA’s), ‘‘PAG Manual:
Protective Action Guides and Planning
Guidance for Radiological Incidents,’’
EPA–400/R–17/001, dated January 2017,
and (2) in the highly unlikely event of
a beyond DBA resulting in a loss of all
SFP cooling, there is sufficient time to
initiate appropriate mitigating actions,
and in the event a radiological release
has or is projected to occur, there would
be sufficient time for offsite agencies to
take protective actions using a CEMP to
protect the health and safety of the
public if offsite governmental officials
determine that such action is warranted.
The Commission approved the NRC
staff’s recommendation to grant the
exemptions based on this evaluation in
its Staff Requirements Memorandum
(SRM) to SECY–19–0078, dated
November 4, 2019 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML19308A034).
Based on these analyses, the licensee
states that complete application of the
EP rule to Pilgrim 10 months after its
permanent cessation of power
operations would not serve the
underlying purpose of the rule or is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule. The licensee also
states that it would incur undue costs in
the application of operating plant EP
requirements for the maintenance of an
emergency response organization in
excess of that actually needed to
respond to the diminished scope of
credible accidents for Pilgrim 10 months
after its permanent cessation of power
operations.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed
Action
The NRC staff has completed its
evaluation of the environmental impacts
of the proposed action.
The proposed action consists mainly
of changes related to the elimination of
requirements for the licensee to
maintain offsite radiological emergency
plans in accordance with 44 CFR part
350 and reduce some of the onsite EP
activities at Pilgrim, based on the
reduced risks once the reactor has been
permanently shutdown for a period of
10 months. However, requirements for
certain onsite capabilities to
communicate and coordinate with
offsite response authorities will be
retained and offsite EP provisions to
protect public health and safety will
still exist through State and local
government use of a CEMP.
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
With regard to potential
nonradiological environmental impacts,
the proposed action would have no
direct impacts on land use or water
resources, including terrestrial and
aquatic biota, as it involves no new
construction or modification of plant
operational systems. There would be no
changes to the quality or quantity of
nonradiological effluents and no
changes to the plants’ National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System permits
would be needed. In addition, there
would be no noticeable effect on
socioeconomic conditions in the region,
no environment justice impacts, no air
quality impacts, and no impacts to
historic and cultural resources from the
proposed action. Therefore, there are no
significant nonradiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action.
With regard to potential radiological
environmental impacts, as stated above,
the proposed action would not increase
the probability or consequences of
radiological accidents. Additionally, the
NRC staff has concluded that the
proposed action would have no direct
radiological environmental impacts.
There would be no change to the types
or amounts of radioactive effluents that
may be released and, therefore, no
change in occupational or public
radiation exposure from the proposed
action. Moreover, no changes would be
made to plant buildings or the site
property from the proposed action.
Therefore, there are no significant
radiological environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed
action, the NRC staff considered the
denial of the proposed action (i.e., the
‘‘no-action’’ alternative). The denial of
the application would result in no
change in current environmental
impacts. Therefore, the environmental
impacts of the proposed action and the
alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
There are no unresolved conflicts
concerning alternative uses of available
resources under the proposed action.
Agencies or Persons Consulted
No additional agencies or persons
were consulted regarding the
environmental impact of the proposed
action. On November 5, 2019, the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
representative was notified of this EA
and FONSI.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The licensee has proposed
exemptions from: (1) Certain standards
in 10 CFR 50.47(b) regarding onsite and
offsite emergency response plans for
nuclear power reactors; (2) requirement
in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) to establish plume
exposure and ingestion pathway EPZs
for nuclear power reactors; and (3)
certain requirements in 10 CFR part 50,
appendix E, section IV, which
establishes the elements that make up
the content of emergency plans. The
proposed action of granting these
exemptions would eliminate the
requirements for the licensee to
maintain offsite radiological emergency
plans in accordance with 44 CFR part
350 and reduce some of the onsite EP
activities at Pilgrim, based on the
reduced risks once the reactor has been
permanently shutdown for a period of
10 months. However, requirements for
certain onsite capabilities to
communicate and coordinate with
offsite response authorities will be
retained and offsite EP provisions to
protect public health and safety will
still exist through State and local
government use of a CEMP.
The NRC is considering issuing the
exemptions. The proposed action would
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Document
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
not significantly affect plant safety,
would not have a significant adverse
effect on the probability of an accident
occurring, and would not have any
significant radiological or
nonradiological impacts. This FONSI
incorporates by reference the EA in
Section II of this document. Therefore,
the NRC concludes that the proposed
action will not have a significant effect
on the quality of the human
environment. Accordingly, the NRC has
determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the
proposed action.
The related environmental document
is the ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact
Statement for License Renewal of
Nuclear Plants: Regarding Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Station, Final Report,’’
NUREG–1437, Supplement 29, Volumes
1 and 2, which provides the latest
environmental review of current
operations and description of
environmental conditions at Pilgrim.
The finding and other related
environmental documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR),
located at One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland
20852. Publicly-available records are
accessible electronically from ADAMS
Public Electronic Reading Room on the
internet at the NRC’s website: https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC’s PDR
Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–
397–4209 or 301–415–4737, or by email
to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
IV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the
following table are available to
interested persons through one or more
of the following methods, as indicated.
ADAMS accession No./web link
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Developing and Maintaining
Emergency Operations Plans, Comprehensive Preparedness Guide
(CPG) 101, Version 2.0, November 2010.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E,’’ July 3, 2018.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Response to Request for Additional Information—Exemption from the Requirements
of 10 CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50,’’ November 30,
2018.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Response to Request for Additional Information—Exemption from the Requirements
of 10 CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50,’’ December 4,
2018.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Response to Request for Additional Information—Exemption from the Requirements
of 10 CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50,’’ February 14,
2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
69399
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1828-25045-0014/
cpg_101_comprehensive_preparedness_guide_developing_and_
maintaining_emergency_operations_plans_2010.pdf.
ML18186A635.
ML18338A205.
ML18341A219.
ML19050A298 (Package).
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
69400
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Notices
Document
ADAMS accession No./web link
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Response to Request for Additional Information—Exemption from the Requirements
of 10 CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50,’’ February 18,
2019.
Bakken III, A. Christopher, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Application for Order Consenting to Direct and Indirect Transfers of Control
of Licenses and Approving Conforming License Amendment; and
Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(i)(A),’’ November
16, 2018.
Ventosa, John, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Notification of Permanent Cessation of Power Operations,’’ November 10, 2015.
Sullivan, Brian R., Energy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ‘‘Certifications of
Permanent Cessation of Power Operations and Permanent Removal
of Fuel from the Reactor Vessel,’’ June 10, 2019.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, PAG Manual: Protective Action
Guides and Planning Guidance for Radiological Incidents, January
2017.
SECY–19–0078, ‘‘Request by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station,’’ August 9, 2019.
Staff Requirements Memorandum to SECY–19–0078, ‘‘Request by
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station,’’ November 4, 2019.
NUREG–1437, Supplement 29, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station,’’ Volumes 1 and 2, July 2007.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day
of December, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Scott P. Wall,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch III, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2019–27278 Filed 12–17–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MC2015–8; Order No. 5351]
Market Dominant Products
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is noticing a
recent Postal Service filing requesting
the removal of Return Receipt for
Merchandise Service from the Market
Dominant product list. This notice
informs the public of the filing, invites
public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: January 9,
2020.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
ML19056A260 (Package).
ML18320A031.
ML15328A053.
ML19161A033.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-01/documents/epa_
pag_manual_final_revisions_01-11-2017_cover_disclaimer_8.pdf.
ML18347A717 (Package).
ML19308A034.
ML071990020, ML071990027.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Notice of Commission Action
III. Ordering Paragraphs
On December 10, 2019, the Postal
Service filed a renewed request to
remove Return Receipt for Merchandise
(RRM) service from the Mail
Classification Schedule (MCS).1 For the
reasons discussed below, the
Commission reopens the docket to
consider matters concerning this
request.
I. Background
The Postal Service filed its original
request to remove the RRM service from
the MCS on November 17, 2014.2 The
Commission approved the request but
found that the removal was subject to
adjustments to the unused rate
adjustment authority for the Special
Services class.3 Subsequently, the Postal
Service provided notice that it elected to
1 Renewed Request of the United States Postal
Service to Remove Return Receipt for Merchandise
and Motion to Reopen Docket, December 10, 2019
(Renewed Request).
2 Request of the United States Postal Service to
Remove Return Receipt for Merchandise Service
from the Mail Classification Schedule, November
17, 2014.
3 Order Conditionally Approving Removal of
Return Receipt for Merchandise Service from Mail
Classification Schedule, January 15, 2015 (Order
No. 2322).
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
indefinitely defer the removal.4 After a
series of appeals, the D.C. Circuit issued
its opinion on April 6, 2018, vacating
the Commission’s previous orders on
the removal of the RRM service.5
On August 29, 2019, the Commission
closed Docket Nos. MC2015–8 and
MC2015–8R because it had been more
than one year since the RRM Opinion
and the Postal Service had not indicated
a renewed intent to discontinue the
RRM service.6 The Commission directed
the Postal Service to file a request in a
new docket if it decided to discontinue
RRM service in the future. Order No.
5214 at 3. The Commission also held
that it would evaluate any future
requests to remove a product from the
MCS in light of the RRM Opinion. Id.
In its renewed request, the Postal
Service asks the Commission to reopen
this docket because it contains the
record on which the Postal Service
relies in renewing its request.7
Moreover, the Postal Service seeks
expedited review of this request. Id. The
Postal Service states that the
Commission has already held that the
removal of the RRM service comports
with 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 CFR 3020.30
et seq., and therefore, no new Section
3642 analysis is necessary. Id. In
4 Response of the United States Postal Service to
Order No. 2322, January 28, 2015.
5 See United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Reg.
Comm’n, No. 16–14 (D.C. Cir. Apr. 6, 2018) (RRM
Opinion).
6 Order Closing Dockets, August 29, 2019, at 3
(Order No. 5214).
7 Renewed Request at 1 (citing Order No. 2322).
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69396-69400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27278]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-293; NRC-2019-0247]
Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC; Pilgrim Nuclear Power
Station
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
[[Page 69397]]
ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact;
issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering
issuance of exemptions that would permit the licensee to reduce its
emergency planning (EP) activities at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
(Pilgrim). Specifically, the licensee is seeking exemptions that would
eliminate the requirements for the licensee to maintain offsite
radiological emergency plans and reduce some of the onsite EP
activities based on the reduced risks at Pilgrim, which is permanently
shut down and defueled. However, requirements for certain onsite
capabilities to communicate and coordinate with offsite response
authorities would be retained. In addition, offsite EP provisions would
still exist through State and local government use of a comprehensive
emergency management plan process, in accordance with the Federal
Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) Comprehensive Preparedness Guide
(CPG) 101, ``Developing and Maintaining Emergency Operations Plans.''
The NRC staff is issuing a final Environmental Assessment (EA) and
final Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) associated with the
proposed exemptions.
DATES: The EA and FONSI referenced in this document are available on
December 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2019-0247 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2019-0247. Address
questions about NRC docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Jennifer Borges;
telephone: 301-287-9127; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first
time that it is mentioned in this document. In addition, for the
convenience of the reader, instructions about obtaining materials
referenced in this document are provided in the AVAILABILITY OF
DOCUMENTS section of this document.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott P. Wall, Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2855; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
By letter dated November 10, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML15328A053), Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENOI) certified to the
NRC that it planned to permanently cease power operations at Pilgrim no
later than June 1, 2019. By letter dated June 10, 2019 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML19161A033), ENOI certified to the NRC that power operations
permanently ceased at Pilgrim on May 31, 2019, and that the fuel was
permanently removed from the Pilgrim reactor vessel and placed in the
spent fuel pool (SFP) on June 9, 2019. Accordingly, pursuant to section
50.82(a)(2) of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
the Pilgrim renewed facility operating license no longer authorizes
operation of the reactor or emplacement or retention of fuel in the
reactor vessel. The facility is still authorized to possess and store
irradiated (i.e., spent) nuclear fuel. Spent fuel is currently stored
onsite at the Pilgrim facility in the SFP and in a dry cask independent
spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI).
By letter dated July 3, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18186A635), as
supplemented by letters dated November 30 and December 4, 2018, and
February 14 and February 18, 2019 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML18338A205,
ML18341A219, ML19050A298, and ML19056A260, respectively), ENOI
requested exemptions from certain EP requirements in 10 CFR part 50 for
Pilgrim.
By letter dated November 16, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML18320A031), ENOI, on behalf of itself and Entergy Nuclear Generation
Company (ENGC) (to be known as Holtec Pilgrim, LLC), Holtec
International (Holtec), and Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC
(HDI, the licensee) (together, Applicants), requested that the NRC
consent to: (1) The indirect transfer of control of Renewed Facility
Operating License No. DPR-35 for Pilgrim, as well as the general
license for the Pilgrim ISFSI (together, the Licenses), to Holtec; and
(2) the direct transfer of ENOI's operating authority (i.e., its
authority to conduct licensed activities at Pilgrim) to HDI. In
addition, the Applicants requested that the NRC approve a conforming
administrative amendment to the Licenses to reflect the proposed direct
transfer of the Licenses from ENOI to HDI; a planned name change for
ENGC from ENGC to Holtec Pilgrim, LLC; and deletion of certain license
conditions to reflect satisfaction and termination of all ENGC
obligations after the license transfer and equity sale.
By Order dated August 22, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19170A265),
the NRC staff approved the direct and indirect transfers requested in
the November 16, 2018, application. Additionally, on August 22, 2019,
HDI informed the NRC (ADAMS Accession No. ML19234A357) that:
HDI will assume responsibility for all ongoing NRC regulatory
actions and reviews currently underway for Pilgrim Nuclear Power
Station. HDI respectfully requests NRC continuation of these
regulatory actions and reviews.
On August 26, 2019, ENOI informed the NRC that the license transfer
transaction closed on August 26, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML19239A037). On August 27, 2019 (ADAMS Accession No. ML19235A050), the
NRC staff issued Amendment No. 249 to reflect the license transfer.
Accordingly, HDI is now the licensee for decommissioning operations at
Pilgrim.
The NRC regulations concerning EP do not recognize the reduced
risks after a reactor is permanently shut down and defueled. As such, a
permanently shut down and defueled reactor must continue to maintain
the same EP requirements as an operating power reactor under the
existing regulatory requirements. To establish a level of EP
commensurate with the reduced risks of a permanently shut down and
defueled reactor, the licensee requires exemptions from certain EP
regulatory requirements before it can change its emergency plans.
The NRC is considering issuing to the licensee exemptions from
portions of 10 CFR 50.47, ``Emergency plans,'' and appendix E to 10 CFR
part 50, ``Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and
Utilization
[[Page 69398]]
Facilities,'' which would eliminate the requirements for the licensee
to maintain offsite radiological emergency plans in accordance with 44
CFR, ``Emergency Management and Assistance,'' part 350, ``Review and
Approval of State and Local Radiological Emergency Plans and
Preparedness,'' and reduce some of the onsite EP activities based on
the reduced risks 10 months after Pilgrim has permanently ceased power
operations.
Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has determined that an EA is
the appropriate form of environmental review for the requested action.
Based on the results of the EA, which is provided in Section II of this
document, the NRC has determined not to prepare an environmental impact
statement for the proposed action, and is issuing a FONSI.
II. Environmental Assessment
Description of the Proposed Action
The proposed action would exempt the licensee from (1) certain
standards as set forth in 10 CFR 50.47(b) regarding onsite and offsite
emergency response plans for nuclear power reactors; (2) requirements
in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) to establish plume exposure and ingestion pathway
emergency planning zones (EPZs) for nuclear power reactors; and (3)
certain requirements in 10 CFR part 50, appendix E, section IV, which
establishes the elements that make up the content of emergency plans.
The proposed action of granting these exemptions would eliminate the
requirements for the licensee to maintain offsite radiological
emergency plans in accordance with 44 CFR part 350 and reduce some of
the onsite EP activities at Pilgrim, based on the reduced risks once
the reactor has been permanently shut down for a period of 10 months.
However, requirements for certain onsite capabilities to communicate
and coordinate with offsite response authorities would be retained to
an extent consistent with the approved exemptions. Additionally, if
necessary, offsite protective actions could still be implemented using
a comprehensive emergency management plan (CEMP) process. A CEMP in
this context, also referred to as an emergency operations plan (EOP),
is addressed in FEMA's CPG 101, ``Developing and Maintaining Emergency
Operations Plans.'' The CPG 101 is the foundation for State,
territorial, tribal, and local EP in the United States under the
National Preparedness System. It promotes a common understanding of the
fundamentals of risk-informed planning and decision making, and assists
planners at all levels of government in their efforts to develop and
maintain viable, all-hazards, all-threats emergency plans. An EOP is
flexible enough for use in all emergencies. It describes how people and
property will be protected; details who is responsible for carrying out
specific actions; identifies the personnel, equipment, facilities,
supplies, and other resources available; and outlines how all actions
will be coordinated. A CEMP is often referred to as a synonym for
``all-hazards'' planning. The proposed action is in accordance with the
licensee's application dated July 3, 2018, as supplemented by letters
dated November 30 and December 4, 2018, and February 14 and February
18, 2019.
Need for the Proposed Action
The proposed action is needed for the licensee to revise the
Pilgrim Emergency Plan once the reactor has been permanently shutdown
for a period of 10 months. The EP requirements currently applicable to
Pilgrim are for an operating power reactor. Since the certifications
for permanent cessation of operations and permanent removal of fuel
from the reactor vessel have been docketed, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.82(a)(2), the Pilgrim license no longer authorizes use of the
facility for power operation or emplacement or retention of fuel into
the reactor vessel and, therefore, the occurrence of postulated
accidents associated with reactor operation is no longer credible.
However, there are no explicit regulatory provisions distinguishing EP
requirements for a power reactor that has been permanently shut down
and defueled from those for an operating power reactor.
In its exemption request, the licensee identified four possible
radiological accidents at Pilgrim in its permanently shutdown and
defueled condition. These are: (1) A fuel-handling accident; (2) a
radioactive waste-handling accident; (3) a loss of SFP normal cooling
(i.e., boil off); and (4) an adiabatic heat up of the hottest fuel
assembly. The NRC staff evaluated these possible radiological accidents
in the Commission Paper (SECY) 19-0078, ``Request by Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning
Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station,'' dated August 9,
2019 (ADAMS Package Accession No. ML18347A717). In SECY-19-0078, the
NRC staff verified that the licensee's analyses and calculations
provided reasonable assurance that if the requested exemptions were
granted, then: (1) For a design-basis accident (DBA), an offsite
radiological release will not exceed the early phase protective action
guides (PAGs) at the site boundary, as detailed in Table 1-1 to the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's), ``PAG Manual:
Protective Action Guides and Planning Guidance for Radiological
Incidents,'' EPA-400/R-17/001, dated January 2017, and (2) in the
highly unlikely event of a beyond DBA resulting in a loss of all SFP
cooling, there is sufficient time to initiate appropriate mitigating
actions, and in the event a radiological release has or is projected to
occur, there would be sufficient time for offsite agencies to take
protective actions using a CEMP to protect the health and safety of the
public if offsite governmental officials determine that such action is
warranted. The Commission approved the NRC staff's recommendation to
grant the exemptions based on this evaluation in its Staff Requirements
Memorandum (SRM) to SECY-19-0078, dated November 4, 2019 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML19308A034).
Based on these analyses, the licensee states that complete
application of the EP rule to Pilgrim 10 months after its permanent
cessation of power operations would not serve the underlying purpose of
the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the
rule. The licensee also states that it would incur undue costs in the
application of operating plant EP requirements for the maintenance of
an emergency response organization in excess of that actually needed to
respond to the diminished scope of credible accidents for Pilgrim 10
months after its permanent cessation of power operations.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
The NRC staff has completed its evaluation of the environmental
impacts of the proposed action.
The proposed action consists mainly of changes related to the
elimination of requirements for the licensee to maintain offsite
radiological emergency plans in accordance with 44 CFR part 350 and
reduce some of the onsite EP activities at Pilgrim, based on the
reduced risks once the reactor has been permanently shutdown for a
period of 10 months. However, requirements for certain onsite
capabilities to communicate and coordinate with offsite response
authorities will be retained and offsite EP provisions to protect
public health and safety will still exist through State and local
government use of a CEMP.
[[Page 69399]]
With regard to potential nonradiological environmental impacts, the
proposed action would have no direct impacts on land use or water
resources, including terrestrial and aquatic biota, as it involves no
new construction or modification of plant operational systems. There
would be no changes to the quality or quantity of nonradiological
effluents and no changes to the plants' National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permits would be needed. In addition, there would be
no noticeable effect on socioeconomic conditions in the region, no
environment justice impacts, no air quality impacts, and no impacts to
historic and cultural resources from the proposed action. Therefore,
there are no significant nonradiological environmental impacts
associated with the proposed action.
With regard to potential radiological environmental impacts, as
stated above, the proposed action would not increase the probability or
consequences of radiological accidents. Additionally, the NRC staff has
concluded that the proposed action would have no direct radiological
environmental impacts. There would be no change to the types or amounts
of radioactive effluents that may be released and, therefore, no change
in occupational or public radiation exposure from the proposed action.
Moreover, no changes would be made to plant buildings or the site
property from the proposed action. Therefore, there are no significant
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action
As an alternative to the proposed action, the NRC staff considered
the denial of the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action''
alternative). The denial of the application would result in no change
in current environmental impacts. Therefore, the environmental impacts
of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
Alternative Use of Resources
There are no unresolved conflicts concerning alternative uses of
available resources under the proposed action.
Agencies or Persons Consulted
No additional agencies or persons were consulted regarding the
environmental impact of the proposed action. On November 5, 2019, the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts representative was notified of this EA
and FONSI.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The licensee has proposed exemptions from: (1) Certain standards in
10 CFR 50.47(b) regarding onsite and offsite emergency response plans
for nuclear power reactors; (2) requirement in 10 CFR 50.47(c)(2) to
establish plume exposure and ingestion pathway EPZs for nuclear power
reactors; and (3) certain requirements in 10 CFR part 50, appendix E,
section IV, which establishes the elements that make up the content of
emergency plans. The proposed action of granting these exemptions would
eliminate the requirements for the licensee to maintain offsite
radiological emergency plans in accordance with 44 CFR part 350 and
reduce some of the onsite EP activities at Pilgrim, based on the
reduced risks once the reactor has been permanently shutdown for a
period of 10 months. However, requirements for certain onsite
capabilities to communicate and coordinate with offsite response
authorities will be retained and offsite EP provisions to protect
public health and safety will still exist through State and local
government use of a CEMP.
The NRC is considering issuing the exemptions. The proposed action
would not significantly affect plant safety, would not have a
significant adverse effect on the probability of an accident occurring,
and would not have any significant radiological or nonradiological
impacts. This FONSI incorporates by reference the EA in Section II of
this document. Therefore, the NRC concludes that the proposed action
will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human
environment. Accordingly, the NRC has determined not to prepare an
environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
The related environmental document is the ``Generic Environmental
Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants: Regarding
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Final Report,'' NUREG-1437, Supplement
29, Volumes 1 and 2, which provides the latest environmental review of
current operations and description of environmental conditions at
Pilgrim.
The finding and other related environmental documents may be
examined, and/or copied for a fee, at the NRC's Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland 20852. Publicly-available records are accessible
electronically from ADAMS Public Electronic Reading Room on the
internet at the NRC's website: https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the
NRC's PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-
4737, or by email to [email protected].
IV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document ADAMS accession No./web link
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Emergency Management Agency, https://www.fema.gov/media-
Developing and Maintaining Emergency library-data/20130726-1828-
Operations Plans, Comprehensive 25045-0014/
Preparedness Guide (CPG) 101, Version cpg_101_comprehensive_prepared
2.0, November 2010. ness_guide_developing_and_main
taining_emergency_operations_p
lans_2010.pdf.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear ML18186A635.
Operations, Inc., ``Request for
Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR
50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix
E,'' July 3, 2018.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear ML18338A205.
Operations, Inc., ``Response to
Request for Additional Information--
Exemption from the Requirements of 10
CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR
Part 50,'' November 30, 2018.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear ML18341A219.
Operations, Inc., ``Response to
Request for Additional Information--
Exemption from the Requirements of 10
CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR
Part 50,'' December 4, 2018.
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear ML19050A298 (Package).
Operations, Inc., ``Response to
Request for Additional Information--
Exemption from the Requirements of 10
CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR
Part 50,'' February 14, 2019.
[[Page 69400]]
Halter, Mandy K., Entergy Nuclear ML19056A260 (Package).
Operations, Inc., ``Response to
Request for Additional Information--
Exemption from the Requirements of 10
CFR 50.47 and Appendix E to 10 CFR
Part 50,'' February 18, 2019.
Bakken III, A. Christopher, Entergy ML18320A031.
Nuclear Operations, Inc.,
``Application for Order Consenting to
Direct and Indirect Transfers of
Control of Licenses and Approving
Conforming License Amendment; and
Request for Exemption from 10 CFR
50.82(a)(8)(i)(A),'' November 16, 2018.
Ventosa, John, Entergy Nuclear ML15328A053.
Operations, Inc., ``Notification of
Permanent Cessation of Power
Operations,'' November 10, 2015.
Sullivan, Brian R., Energy Nuclear ML19161A033.
Operations, Inc., ``Certifications of
Permanent Cessation of Power
Operations and Permanent Removal of
Fuel from the Reactor Vessel,'' June
10, 2019.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, https://www.epa.gov/sites/
PAG Manual: Protective Action Guides production/files/2017-01/
and Planning Guidance for Radiological documents/
Incidents, January 2017. epa_pag_manual_final_revisions
_01-11-
2017_cover_disclaimer_8.pdf.
SECY-19-0078, ``Request by Entergy ML18347A717 (Package).
Nuclear Operations, Inc. for
Exemptions from Certain Emergency
Planning Requirements for the Pilgrim
Nuclear Power Station,'' August 9,
2019.
Staff Requirements Memorandum to SECY- ML19308A034.
19-0078, ``Request by Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. for Exemptions from
Certain Emergency Planning
Requirements for the Pilgrim Nuclear
Power Station,'' November 4, 2019.
NUREG-1437, Supplement 29, ``Generic ML071990020, ML071990027.
Environmental Impact Statement for
License Renewal of Nuclear Plants:
Regarding Pilgrim Nuclear Power
Station,'' Volumes 1 and 2, July 2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day of December, 2019.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Scott P. Wall,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III, Division of
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2019-27278 Filed 12-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P