Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally Assisted Programs, 69466-69521 [2019-25558]
Download as PDF
69466
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 24
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2018–0039]
RIN 2125–AF79
Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition for Federal
and Federally Assisted Programs
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FHWA is proposing to
amend its Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970
(Uniform Act) regulations. The revisions
are prompted by enactment of the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP–21), which increases
statutory relocation benefits and reduces
length of occupancy requirements. This
proposal is intended to update existing
regulations on the use of those
amendments. The FHWA is also
proposing to update the Uniform Act
regulations to reflect the Agency’s
experience with the Federal-aid
highway program since the last
comprehensive rulemaking for the part,
which occurred in 2005. The updates
include streamlining processes to better
meet current Uniform Act
implementation needs and eliminating
duplicative and outdated regulatory
language.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
March 17, 2020. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent
practicable.
DATES:
To ensure that you do not
duplicate your docket submissions,
please submit them by only one of the
following means:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is (202)
366–9329.
• Instructions: You must include the
Agency name and docket number or the
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Regulatory Identification Number (RIN)
for the rulemaking at the beginning of
your comments. All comments received
will be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Feldman, Office of Real Estate
Services, (202) 366–2028, email address:
Arnold.Feldman@dot.gov; or David Sett,
Office of the Chief Counsel (HCC), (404)
562–3676, email address: David.Sett@
dot.gov; Federal Highway
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Office hours are from 7:30 a.m. to 5:00
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document and all comments
received may be viewed online through
the Federal eRulemaking portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. The website
is available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. An electronic copy of this
document may also be downloaded by
accessing the Office of the Federal
Register’s home page at: https://
www.federalregister.gov.
Table of Contents for Supplementary
Information
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Section-By-Section Discussion of the
Proposals
I. Executive Summary
The Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4601
et seq. (Uniform Act) provides
important protections and assistance for
people affected by federally funded
projects. Congress enacted this law to
ensure that people whose real property
is acquired, or who move as a result of
projects receiving Federal funds, are
treated fairly and equitably and receive
just compensation for, and assistance in
moving from, the property they occupy.
The governmentwide regulation
implementing the Uniform Act is title
49 CFR part 24.
The Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Assistance Act
(STURAA) (Pub. L. 100–17) of 1987
designated the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) as the Federal
Lead Agency (Lead Agency) for the
Uniform Act. Duties of the Lead Agency
include developing, issuing, and
maintaining the governmentwide
regulation, providing assistance to other
Federal Agencies, and reporting to
Congress on Uniform Act
implementation issues. The DOT has
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
delegated these responsibilities to the
FHWA at 49 CFR 1.85(d)(7).
Acting as Lead Agency, FHWA is
proposing to amend and update 49 CFR
part 24, which would affect the land
acquisition and displacement activities
of all Federal Agencies subject to the
Uniform Act. The proposed changes to
this regulation are necessitated in part
by Section 1521 of the MAP–21 (Pub. L.
112–141, July 6, 2012). Section 1521
included increases in benefit levels for
displaced persons, authority to develop
a regulatory mechanism to consider and
implement future adjustments to those
benefit levels, the requirement for an
annual report on governmentwide real
property acquisitions subject to the
Uniform Act, and provisions for the
funding of Lead Agency services. In
addition to these required changes,
FHWA proposes to amend the
regulations to clarify existing
requirements for implementing the
Uniform Act, meet modern needs, and
improve the Agencies’ service to
individuals and businesses affected by
Federal or federally assisted projects.
The proposed changes would also
reduce the paperwork and
administrative burdens of Government
regulations on Agencies subject to the
Uniform Act.
The costs of the proposed rule for all
Uniform Act Agencies are estimated to
be minor: $1.8 million when discounted
at 7 percent and $2.0 million when
discounted at 3 percent. The 10-year
annualized costs are estimated to be:
$255,000 per year when discounted at 7
percent and $230,000 per year when
discounted at 3 percent. Therefore, the
costs associated with this rule are de
minimis. Moreover, these minor costs
should be fully offset, if not outweighed,
by cost savings resulting from new
flexibilities and streamlining contained
in this proposal. These cost savings are
not quantifiable.
The larger impact of this rule is in the
form of transfers from the government to
property owners whose real estate is
acquired for Federal projects. The
estimated amount of transfers resulting
from this rule are $115 million when
discounted at 7 percent and $146
million when discounted at 3 percent.
This rule can therefore be thought of as
predominantly a transfer rule, as the
estimated costs are significantly smaller
than the estimated transfers. The FHWA
was the only agency that provided data
upon which to base estimates of the
transfers. Therefore, the magnitude of
the change in transfers for all Federal
Agencies may be larger than is reported
here. The Regulatory Impact Analysis
for this rulemaking contains further
breakdown of costs associated with
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
FHWA’s program. Other Federal
Agencies may have additional
regulatory or administrative updates
specific to their programs as a result of
this rulemaking.
The benefits of the proposed rule
primarily relate to improved equity and
fairness to entities that are displaced
from their properties or that move as a
result of projects receiving Federal
funds. For example, the proposed rule
raises the statutory maximums for
payments to displaced entities to assist
with the reestablishment of the
business, farm, or nonprofit
organization. There is strong evidence
that entities experience reestablishment
costs well above the current maximum
amount. Raising the maximum payment
levels will compensate those entities
more fairly and equitably for the
negative impacts they experience as a
result of a Federal or federally assisted
project. However, the fairness and
equity benefits of the proposed rule
cannot be definitively quantified or
monetized. The higher level of
payments may also contribute to more
entities being able to successfully
reestablish after displacement.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Background
The FHWA last updated 49 CFR part
24 in 2005. Since publication of the
2005 rule, FHWA has undertaken a
comprehensive effort to identify
potential opportunities for improving
implementation of the Uniform Act. The
FHWA initiatives have included
research on the need for regulatory and
statutory change to the Uniform Act; cosponsorship of national symposiums on
Uniform Act implementation issues;
implementation of pilot projects
designed to determine the effect of
changes in certain Uniform Act
requirements and procedures; and an
examination of the experiences of
several State departments of
transportation (State DOT) in providing
payments required by State law that
supplemented Uniform Act benefits.
These activities confirmed that there are
a number of enhancements that could be
made to clarify existing requirements,
reduce administrative burdens, and
improve the Government’s service to
individuals and businesses affected by
Federal or federally assisted projects
and programs.
The Uniform Act and the common
rule govern the relocation and land
acquisition programs of all Federal
Agencies. Those Federal Agencies that,
for convenience, provide a cross
reference to this part, and the location
of those cross-references, are listed
below:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Department of Agriculture
7 CFR part 21
Department of Commerce
15 CFR part 11
Department of Defense
32 CFR part 259
Department of Education
34 CFR part 15
Department of Energy
10 CFR part 1039
Environmental Protection Agency
40 CFR part 4
General Services Administration
41 CFR part 105–51
Department of Health and Human Services
45 CFR part 15
Department of Housing and Urban
Development
24 CFR part 42
Department of Justice
41 CFR part 128–18
Department of Labor
29 CFR part 12
National Aeronautics and Space
Administration
14 CFR part 1208
Tennessee Valley Authority
18 CFR part 1306
Veterans Administration
38 CFR part 25
Department of Homeland Security
44 CFR part 25
The Uniform Act applies to all
acquisitions of real property or
displacements of persons resulting from
Federal or federally assisted programs or
projects; the Uniform Act’s application
is not affected by the absence of a cross
reference to 49 CFR part 24 in an
Agency’s regulations. Further, Federal
or federally assisted activities involving
land acquisition or displacement,
undertaken by a newly constituted
Federal Agency, would be covered by
the Uniform Act.
After the publication of the 49 CFR
part 24 final rule, FHWA began a
process to identify additional needs for
regulatory updates and elicit input from
Federal stakeholders and conducted
research projects, which resulted in
many of the regulatory changes
proposed here. The primary focus of the
various efforts was to identify
opportunities to streamline processes to
better meet current Uniform Act
implementation needs and eliminate
duplicative and outdated regulatory
language in that rule. Beginning in 2012,
and culminating in 2018, FHWA held
working group meetings with
representatives of the Federal Agencies
subject to the Uniform Act. The
meetings included a section-by-section
review of the regulation, consideration
of comments received during the 2005
rulemaking process, review of listening
session comments, and consideration of
research findings. Contributions from
working group members were based on
their experiences implementing the rule
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69467
and feedback they had received from
their partners and customers. The early
review by the working group led to a
compilation of potential changes to the
rule. The FHWA considered the group’s
recommendations and proposed
changes for each of the regulation’s
subparts and developed an initial draft
rulemaking. Over a series of several
working group meetings, the draft was
refined and revised based on proposed
edits and comments of the working
group. When the working group
meetings concluded, FHWA worked
internally to finalize the draft
rulemaking and continued to share
drafts and receive additional comments
from the Federal Agencies.
This rulemaking also considers
comments received from two DOT
Federal Register documents requesting
public comments and recommendations
for evaluating existing regulations. The
DOT published these documents on
June 8, 2017 (82 FR 26734) and October
2, 2017 (82 FR 45750). The FHWA
received several comments requesting
streamlining and updates of this rule.
The NPRM is responsive to comments
received through the DOT Federal
Register documents and deregulatory
efforts to update regulations and
streamline processes.
Federal Agency Reporting Requirement
The Lead Agency convened a separate
working group of Federal Agencies to
discuss the reporting requirements
contained in Section 1521(d) of MAP–
21. Federal Agencies that are subject to
the Uniform Act and have programs or
projects requiring the acquisition of real
property or causing a displacement from
real property must provide the Lead
Agency an annual summary report
describing activities conducted by the
Federal Agency.
This group discussed the new
reporting requirements and developed a
proposed template for the annual report.
Each Federal Agency participant was
given an opportunity to review and
comment on draft versions of a
proposed annual Agency report
template. The proposed annual report
template in appendix B of this NPRM is
based on the feedback FHWA received
from this group. The FHWA believes
that the proposed report template
provides Federal Agencies with a
streamlined reporting format that
balances the need to provide Federal
Agencies with appropriate time to
develop necessary reporting systems
with the need to compile this
information into a meaningful report.
The FHWA understands that developing
a data collection mechanism and system
may take Federal Agencies several
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69468
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
years. In the interim Agencies may elect
to provide an annual narrative summary
report instead of the statistical report in
appendix B.
Section-by-Section Discussion of
Proposed Changes
Descriptions of the regulatory changes
proposed in this part are set forth below.
All members of the public who are
affected by relocation or land
acquisition activities undertaken or
funded by Federal Agencies are
encouraged to comment on this NPRM.
Comments from interested State and
local governments are particularly
requested.
Subpart A—General
Section 24.2 Definitions and acronyms
In response to comments and
questions from Federal and State
partners, FHWA proposes to make
additions and modifications to certain
definitions and acronyms in order to
provide clarification. The FHWA
proposes several minor corrections,
including renumbering definitions and
acronyms and organizing them
alphabetically. In addition, FHWA
proposes updating appendix A
references to reflect the proposed
renumbering and alphabetizing of
definitions.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 24.2(a)
Definitions
Agency
Throughout this regulation, references
are made to those who are carrying out
real property acquisition and relocation
assistance, which are subject to Uniform
Act requirements. The current
regulations use a combination of
definitions—Agency, Acquiring Agency,
and Displacing Agency—to describe
Uniform Act applicability to those
parties. The FHWA is proposing to
simplify these references by revising the
current definition of Agency so it can be
used throughout the proposed
regulation to describe all parties
carrying out real property acquisition
and relocation assistance which are
subject to Uniform Act requirements.
The FHWA is also proposing to delete
definitions of Acquiring Agency and
Displacing Agency as the singular
definition of Agency will be used
throughout the regulation to describe
responsible parties and Uniform Act
applicability.
Comparable Replacement Dwelling
The MAP–21 amended Section
203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
reducing the number of days that a
person must have occupied a
displacement dwelling in order to be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
eligible for a replacement housing
payment from 180 to 90 days. The
FHWA proposes to modify this
definition accordingly, and in each
place it appears throughout the
regulation. Many readers of this NPRM
will notice that the length of time a
valid lien (mortgage) must be in place to
qualify for an increased mortgage
interest costs payment remains 180 days
prior to the initiation of negotiations.
The MAP–21 did not change this
requirement. The FHWA also proposes
to combine portions of the appendix for
this definition with the regulatory text
with no change in requirement or
meaning resulting from this
reorganization.
Contribute Materially
The FHWA has received a number of
questions regarding the correct
interpretation of this definition,
especially in regard to displaced
businesses that have not been in
operation for 2 full years prior to
displacement. Practitioners have
questioned whether this definition
means a business must be in operation
for 2 full taxable years prior to
displacement in order to be eligible for
the payment. They have also questioned
how to correctly calculate a prorated
fixed payment if a business were in
operation for less than 2 full years.
While there is no proposed change to
this definition, FHWA is reiterating that
a displaced business may be eligible to
receive payment for a business that is
open for less than 2 full years. The
FHWA believes that this definition and
the regulations at § 24.305(a)(6) and (e),
as currently written, give clear direction
for calculating the prorated payment
and provide broad latitude for equitable
treatment. The FHWA proposes a
clarification of appendix A, Section
24.305(e), to provide a more detailed
discussion about calculating a benefit
and, if necessary, prorating the average
annual net earnings of a business or
farm operation. The proposed
clarifications include sample
calculations for businesses with less
than 1 year in operation, more than 1
year but not 2 full years in operation,
and seasonally operated businesses.
Decent, Safe, and Sanitary Dwelling
The Uniform Act requires that
displaced persons must have decent,
safe, and sanitary (DSS) housing made
available to them. The FHWA has
received a number of questions about
which DSS requirements to apply,
especially in cases where local housing
codes are more stringent than DSS
requirements. The FHWA proposes to
revise the definition of ‘‘DSS dwelling’’
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
by adding language which states that an
Agency must use the more stringent of
either the local housing code, the
regulations, or the Agency’s regulation
or written policy. The purpose of this
change is to clarify that the
requirements in the definition of DSS in
§ 24.2(a) are minimum requirements.
The FHWA also proposes to strike the
portion of this definition which states
that a Federal funding Agency with
good cause could waive those regulatory
DSS requirements which were not met
by local code. The FHWA believes this
portion of the regulation is unnecessary
because Federal Agencies retain such
authority under § 24.7. The FHWA
proposes to move a portion of the
previous appendix from this item to the
regulation to streamline the new rule.
The proposed new organization does
not change requirements or create new
requirements.
In addition, the definition of DSS
dwelling in § 24.2(a) uses the term
‘‘housekeeping dwelling.’’ However,
several Federal Agencies have noted
that housekeeping dwelling is
undefined in the regulation and open to
varying interpretations. The FHWA
agrees that the lack of a definition for
the term is contrary to the Uniform Act’s
goal of providing uniform and equitable
treatment of persons displaced. The
FHWA proposes to remove the
‘‘housekeeping dwelling’’ term from the
regulation. The FHWA also proposes
changes to this definition to clarify that
the requirement that a kitchen be part of
a comparable replacement dwelling is
dependent on local housing code
standards for residential occupancy. In
parallel, FHWA proposes a new
appendix A discussion to further clarify
that FHWA recommends, as a good
practice, that even in instances where
local housing codes do not require a
kitchen, Agencies select a comparable
replacement dwelling that has a kitchen.
Displaced Person
At the request of Federal Agencies
that have programs or projects that do
not require the acquisition of real
property, but instead may require the
rehabilitation or demolition of real
property, FHWA proposes adding the
terms ‘‘rehabilitate or demolish’’ to the
definition of a displaced person. The
purpose of this addition is to clarify that
the term displaced persons includes
those required to move, or move their
personal property, from the real
property as a result of a written notice
of intent to rehabilitate or demolish,
even if the real property is not being
acquired.
The term displaced person is used in
the Uniform Act to describe persons that
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
move because of a Federal or federally
assisted project or program. ‘‘Persons
not displaced’’ is a term used to
describe persons who do not qualify for
Uniform Act benefits. Persons not
displaced generally include those who
will be temporarily relocated. The
FHWA proposes to reorganize the
definition to specifically address
persons who are temporarily displaced
and is proposing a new addition,
§ 24.202(a), to describe the required
assistance and services that must be
made available for persons temporarily
displaced.
The FHWA also proposes to eliminate
the use of the term ‘‘guidelines’’ in this
definition. Several Federal Agencies
have noted that their recipients often
have questions regarding the use and
meaning of this term despite the
explanation in the appendix. Federal
Agencies have also noted that they do
not have ‘‘guidelines,’’ but instead have
relevant policies. The FHWA proposes
to clarify the definition of persons not
displaced by deleting ‘‘guidelines’’ and
replacing it with ‘‘policy or guidance.’’
The FHWA believes that the terms
‘‘policy or guidance’’ more accurately
reflect how Federal Agencies provide
programmatic direction to their
recipients.
One Federal Agency requested an
addition to this regulation that would
require that a non-displacement
relocation notice be provided which
clearly states that a person will not be
displaced by a program or project. It is
FHWA’s opinion that the current
definition of persons displaced or not
displaced already accomplishes this
objective, that such a notice is generally
not necessary for a majority of the
Federal Agencies’ programs, and that
the clarification should not be included
in the regulation. However, such a
notice can be necessitated by Federal
Agency policy. Based on the discussions
in the working groups, FHWA also
believes that Federal Agencies can and
should ensure that informative materials
and advisory services provide clear
information on how to determine when
someone is or is not displaced. Agencies
may develop guidance to address
questions specific to their programs to
better direct those carrying out
relocation assistance for their programs
and projects.
The FHWA proposes adding a
reference to a new definition of ‘‘Federal
down payment assistance.’’ In addition
to the new reference, FHWA proposes
removing the existing example of
American Dream Downpayment
Initiative (ADDI) authorized by section
102 of the American Dream
Downpayment Act (Pub. L. 108–186;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
codified at 42 U.S.C. 12821). The
proposed removal would provide for a
more general reference to similar
programs. In some instances, a person
may have Federal down payment
assistance funds provided for the
purpose of purchasing and occupying a
dwelling. These funds are not Uniform
Act benefits. Agencies providing
persons with only such Federal down
payment assistance funds are not
Agencies causing displacement as
defined by this regulation, and persons
using those funds are not causing
displacements as defined in this
regulation. For example, a person using
Federal down payment assistance to
purchase a home that a tenant also
occupies would not be causing
displacement as defined by this
regulation, and the tenant who would
have to move as a result of the
acquisition of the home would also not
be a displaced person as defined by this
regulation.
The FHWA has received numerous
questions in recent years about whether
persons in occupancy at temporary,
daily, or emergency shelters that are
acquired are in fact displaced persons.
Persons who are occupying a shelter
that only allows overnight stays,
requires the occupants to remove their
personal property and themselves from
the premises on a daily basis, and offers
no guarantee of reentry in the evening
typically would not meet the definition
of displaced persons. The FHWA
believes that each relocation is unique
and requires a fact-based determination
in each instance. Those acquiring a
shelter should consider factors
including, but not limited to, whether
the shelter has specific rules and
requirements as to who can occupy or
use the shelter and whether prolonged
and continuous occupancy is allowed.
In order to clarify when a person
would not be displaced in these
scenarios, FHWA proposes three
changes to this definition. First, FHWA
proposes to add ‘‘occupants of
temporary, daily or emergency shelters’’
to the definition of ‘‘persons not
displaced.’’ Second, FHWA also
recommends that, at a minimum, all
occupants should receive advisory
assistance at initiation of negotiations.
Finally, FHWA proposes adding a new
appendix item for this definition that
provides a discussion of FHWA’s view
of determining occupancy and
eligibility for those who occupy a
shelter. It offers a discussion of certain
shelter occupants who may be
considered displaced persons due to
extenuating reasons, such as
employment by the shelter. The FHWA
believes that acquisition of a shelter
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69469
and/or displacement from a shelter
creates many unique challenges and that
Agencies should address potential
acquisition of shelters early in the
project development process and in the
project environmental review process.
Doing so can facilitate the identification
of required environmental justice
mitigation measures and ensure that all
available assistance is provided to
shelter occupants.
The FHWA also proposes to add a
definition of ‘‘temporary, daily, or
emergency shelter (shelter)’’ at § 24.2(a)
to further assist Agencies in making a
determination of whether a person
residing in a shelter can be considered
displaced.
Dwelling
The FHWA proposes to delete the
term ‘‘non-housekeeping unit’’ from this
definition as it is a term that is not
defined elsewhere in the regulation and
will not enhance an Agency’s ability to
implement the regulation. The FHWA
also proposes to modify the definition of
‘‘other residential units’’ in this
definition to include clarification that
residential units that may seem to be
non-standard dwellings, but that meet
minimum Uniform Act requirements
and local codes for residential
occupancy as a dwelling, such as motel
rooms, must be considered ‘‘dwellings.’’
Federal Down Payment Assistance
Some Federal programs provide some
financial assistance to homebuyers to
purchase a dwelling. These programs
provide funds to an individual who will
be buying a dwelling through an arm’s
length market transaction. The FHWA
has responded to several questions
about whether the use of Federal down
payment assistance in purchasing a
dwelling would trigger Uniform Act
requirements. The FHWA is proposing
to add a new definition of Federal down
payment assistance to clarify that
individuals using only Federal down
payment assistance to purchase a home
as their residence would not be
considered users of Federal financial
assistance for the Uniform Act as it is
defined in § 24.2(a). To supplement this
proposed change, this proposed rule
also includes a new appendix item that
provides further clarification and
explanation on the use of Federal down
payment assistance and Uniform Act
applicability.
Federal Financial Assistance
Federal down payment assistance
provided to a private individual to
purchase a residence is Federal
financial assistance, as defined by the
Uniform Act. It results in an acquisition-
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69470
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
based displacement under the Uniform
Act, however, only when the purpose of
the acquisition is to advance a Federal
project or program designed to benefit
the public as a whole, such as highways,
hospitals, and other public works
projects. The FHWA believes that the
purchase of a dwelling using Federal
down payment assistance, standing
alone, does not constitute an acquisition
as contemplated by the Uniform Act.
Therefore, those who may relocate as
a result of an acquisition funded in part
with down payment assistance are not
displaced persons within the meaning
of the Uniform Act. The Federal
Government’s interest is only that the
property would serve as the purchaser’s
dwelling and that it meets general
criteria including those related to
habitability. The lack of a conscious
governmental decision requiring that a
selected or specific property be acquired
to advance a program or project
demonstrates that the nature of the
acquisition utilizing down payment
assistance funds is nothing more than a
person purchasing a dwelling with
limited Federal financial assistance.
The FHWA also proposes to add a
reference to low income housing tax
credit (LIHTC) to this definition. Over
the last several years, the FHWA has
received numerous questions about the
use of LIHTCs and whether they are
Federal financial assistance as defined
in this rule. The LIHTC is described by
the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency as a program ‘‘. . . established
as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986
and is commonly referred to as section
42, the applicable section of the Internal
Revenue Code. The LIHTC program
provides tax incentives to encourage
individual and corporate investors to
invest in the development, acquisition,
and rehabilitation of affordable rental
housing. The LIHTC is an indirect
Federal subsidy that finances lowincome housing. This allows investors
to claim tax credits on their Federal
income tax returns. The tax credit is
calculated as a percentage of costs
incurred in developing the affordable
housing property, and is claimed
annually over a 10-year period. Some
investors may garner additional tax
benefits by making LIHTC
investments.’’ 1 Given the nature of
these tax credits and because they are
not a grant, loan, or contribution
provided by the United States, FHWA
does not believe that LIHTC is Federal
financial assistance as it is defined in
1 https://www.occ.gov/topics/community-affairs/
publications/insights/insights-low-income-housingtax-credits.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
§ 24.2(a) and therefore is not subject to
Uniform Act requirements.
fulltime student for at least 5 months of
the year.
Recipient
The proposed rule would add a new
definition for the term ‘‘recipient.’’ The
term would mean the party that is the
direct recipient of Federal program
funds, is not a Federal Agency and is
accountable to the Federal funding
Agency for the use of the funds and for
compliance with applicable Federal
requirements. This NPRM proposes to
emphasize that the recipient remains
responsible for ensuring compliance
with Federal requirements when the
recipient provides funds to a
subrecipient.
Initiation of Negotiations
At the request of Federal Agencies
that have programs or projects that
require rehabilitation or demolition of
real property but do not necessarily
require the acquisition of the real
property, FHWA proposes to add
‘‘rehabilitate and demolish’’ real
property to the definition. The FHWA
agrees that some Federal Agency
programs that rehabilitate or demolish
establish eligibility criteria on a basis
other than the initiation of negotiations.
In most instances, a displaced person’s
eligibility for benefits is established at
the initiation of negotiations. However,
in some instances a person’s eligibility
may be established prior to the
initiation of negotiations. This addition
will serve to clarify that when persons
move, or move their personal property
from the real property as a result of a
written notice of intent to rehabilitate or
demolish, or move after that notice but
before delivery of the initial written
offer, initiation of negotiations means
the actual move of the person from the
property. These changes also allow
Agencies to tailor their notices and more
clearly describe when a displaced
person may be eligible for benefits while
ensuring that Federal funds are used in
a manner that prevents waste, fraud and
abuse.
The Federal Agencies that often
acquire property as voluntary
acquisitions, as defined in this
regulation, have noted the current
regulation provides that tenants are
immediately eligible for relocation
assistance at the initiation of
negotiations for a property that the
Agency may not ultimately be able to
acquire through a voluntary and
amicable agreement. Furthermore, in
many cases, until an Agency approves
or administratively accepts a
conditional sale or purchase agreement,
there is no obligation on the Agency’s
part to consummate or finalize a sale.
To address these concerns, FHWA
proposes to modify the definition of
‘‘initiation of negotiations’’ by changing
the timing for establishing the eligibility
of tenants affected by an option to
purchase, conditional sales, or purchase
agreement as the result of the voluntary
acquisition of real property described in
§ 24.101(b)(1)–(5). Under the current
rule, tenants are eligible for relocation
assistance at the initiation of
negotiations. The new rule provides,
when an option is being acquired,
eligibility of tenants for relocation
assistance occurs when there is a
binding agreement for sale between the
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage
A home equity conversion mortgage
(HECM) is the Federal Housing
Administration’s mortgage program that
enables seniors to withdraw some of the
equity in their homes. The HECMs are
commonly referred to as reverse
mortgages. Agencies can face unique
challenges when displacing a
homeowner whose dwelling has a
HECM.
The FHWA proposes to add a
definition for HECM to the regulation
given that these mortgages are being
encountered more frequently on
federally-funded projects. The
definition identifies a HECM as a valid
lien and describes common terms and
conditions of the HECM. To supplement
the proposed definition, FHWA
proposes to add a new provision at
§ 24.401(e), which would clarify how
HECM expenses are an eligible
replacement housing payment
incidental expense and a new section to
appendix A, Section 24.401(e), with
examples of types of HECMs and sample
calculations, both of which will be
discussed later in this NPRM.
Household Income
Agencies have pointed out an
inconsistency between the definition of
‘‘household income’’ and the
corresponding appendix text. The
regulation can be incorrectly read to
state that a fulltime student must be
under the age of 18. The FHWA
proposes to clarify that income from
‘‘dependent children under 18 or
fulltime students’’ is excluded from the
household income calculation. For
clarification, FHWA also proposes to
adopt the standard definition of a
fulltime student in accordance with the
requirements set by the Working
Families Tax Relief Act of 2004, Public
Law 108–311. Under this regulation’s
revised definition, a fulltime student
must be under the age of 24 and a
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
buyer and seller. An option to purchase,
conditional sale, or purchase agreement
is not considered a binding agreement to
purchase real property. See appendix A,
Section 24.2(a) Initiation of
negotiations, Tenants, (iv). The use of
the term ‘‘binding’’ in the context of this
regulation refers to an agreement in
which both parties have formally
accepted the conditions contained in
the agreement, have documented their
agreement in writing, and with their
signature acknowledged their
acceptance. It is a legally enforceable
document in which the property owner
agrees to sell certain property rights
necessary for a project and the Agency
agrees to that purchase for a specified
consideration.
Because State laws may require
differing elements in an agreement in
order to make it a legally binding
contract under State law each recipient
or displacing agency should consult
with their legal counsel and develop
required documents and documentation
necessary to make a sufficiency
determination under State law.
The FHWA also proposes including a
similar change to the discussion in the
appendix that describes the timing of
eligibility for Uniform Act assistance, or
trigger date, for a tenant. The FHWA
believes that this change, from initial
offer to acquire to acceptance of a
binding written agreement, will not
reduce benefits or assistance to tenants
because it is coupled with the
requirements for a clearly written
notification to the tenant of the process
being followed, an explanation of the
trigger date of their eligibility, and for
providing a notification that
negotiations have failed to result in a
binding agreement.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Owner’s Representative
Several Federal Agencies believe that
the current regulation requires that
notifications and documents be given
only to the property owner and thus is
unnecessarily restrictive. The FHWA
agrees that such a requirement, or
interpretation, is too restrictive and
believes that allowing either an owner
or a designated representative to receive
a written offer in no way diminishes a
property owner’s rights. The FHWA
proposes to add a new definition for
owner’s designated representative.
Small Business
The FHWA has often been asked for
guidance on the question of whether
sites occupied solely by outdoor
advertising signs, displays, or devices
qualify for benefits under §§ 24.303 and
24.304.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
The FHWA proposes to clarify that
sites occupied solely by outdoor
advertising signs, displays, or devices
do not qualify for benefits under
§ 24.303 or § 24.304, by adding a
reference to § 24.303 in the last sentence
of the definition. The FHWA believes
that outdoor advertising signs which are
eligible for relocation benefits under
this part are to be treated as personal
property and, as such, would not be
eligible for benefits under § 24.303. The
FHWA continues to believe that
§ 24.301 provides owners of sites
occupied solely by outdoor advertising
signs, displays, or devices with
sufficient allowances for the relocation
of their personal property.
Subrecipient
This NPRM proposes to define
‘‘subrecipient’’ as a governmental
Agency or other legal entity that enters
into an agreement with a recipient to
carry out part or all of the activity
funded by Federal program grant funds.
There are instances when recipients
enter into subgrant agreements with
cities, towns, and other governmental
entities, collectively often referred to as
‘‘local public Agencies’’ or ‘‘local
transportation Agencies,’’ under which
those public Agencies administer
projects and construct facilities. This
NPRM makes a number of changes to
emphasize that the recipient remains
responsible for ensuring compliance
with Federal funding Agency
requirements when the recipient
delegates project activities to
subrecipients, including public
Agencies.
Temporary, Daily, or Emergency Shelter
The FHWA has responded to a
number of questions about temporary,
daily, or emergency shelters, and
whether persons in occupancy at these
shelters are displaced persons. The
FHWA proposes to add a new definition
of the term ‘‘shelter.’’ The definition of
shelter clarifies that emergency,
temporary, or daily shelters are typically
intended as overnight, short term, short
duration accommodation. Persons who
are occupying a shelter that only allows
overnight stays, requires the occupants
to remove their personal property and
themselves from the premises on a daily
basis, and offers no guarantee of reentry
in the evening, typically would not meet
the definition of displaced persons.
The FHWA believes that each
relocation is unique and requires a factbased determination in each instance.
Those acquiring a shelter should
consider factors including, but not
limited to, whether the shelter has
specific rules as to who can occupy or
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69471
use the shelter and whether prolonged
and continuous occupancy is allowed.
Also, there may be certain shelter
occupants who may be considered
displaced persons due to extenuating
reasons such as employment by the
shelter.
Utility Facility
The FHWA has received a number of
questions regarding the interpretation of
the phrase ‘‘any transportation system’’
as used in this definition. The common
concern is that ‘‘any transportation
system’’ can be viewed to mean a
highway system or other similar
transportation system. The FHWA
believes that the current phrase can lead
to an overly expansive view of what
constitutes a utility facility for purposes
of this regulation. The FHWA is
proposing to replace the current
definition of ‘‘utility facility’’ with the
definition of ‘‘utility facility’’ found at
23 CFR 645.207. The proposed new
definition will address the questions
raised by offering a clear and consistent
definition, along with several examples
of utilities.
Section 24.2(b) Acronyms
The Bureau of Citizenship and
Immigration Services (BCIS) has been
renamed the U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Service (USCIS). The UA
has been added as an acronym for the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policy of 1970.
The FHWA proposes to make these
changes in the acronym listing of this
paragraph, remove numbers, and
alphabetize the acronyms.
Section 24.5 Manner of Notices
The current regulation requires that
Agencies personally serve or send
notices to property owners or occupants
by certified or registered first-class mail,
return receipt requested. The FHWA
proposes providing additional flexibility
in the types of notices that can be used
to communicate with property owners.
The first type of flexibility we are
proposing is to allow trackable delivery
and signed receipts via companies other
than the United States Postal Service
that provide the same function as
certified mail with return receipts.
The FHWA also believes that delivery
of notices by digital or electronic means
can provide Agencies and property
owners with an optional
communications method that can
streamline the notice process while not
reducing any benefits or protections to
property owners. Delivery of notices by
digital or electronic means must be done
in a manner that will provide
verification of delivery and receipt and
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69472
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
acceptance confirmation similar to the
current standard of certified mail. The
proposed regulation provides several
minimum requirements that an Agency
must follow if they choose to allow
electronic notices and electronic
signatures.
The FHWA proposes to require that
property owners or occupants must
voluntarily elect to receive notices by
electronic means. The FHWA continues
to believe that there is no substitute for
face-to-face meetings with property
owners but also recognizes that for a
variety of reasons face-to-face meetings
may not be practical. Agencies may not
determine in advance to use this
proposed flexibility for all property
owners on a project or program-wide
basis. The acquisition of a person’s real
property and or displacement from their
real property usually requires an
Agency to make every effort to make
personal contact.
The FHWA proposes to add a new
appendix item that further explains
FHWA’s position regarding when the
use of electronic notifications may be
appropriate and provides several
examples of when it may and may not
be a good option. The new appendix
item describes additional safeguards
that should be included as part of an
Agency’s process. It also reemphasizes
that, should an owner or occupant elect
not to receive offers and notices by
electronic means, an Agency must
accommodate that property owner or
occupant by using certified first class
mail, return receipt requested, or by
personally serving notices. The FHWA
is also proposing a new addition to this
section, paragraph (d), which provides
property owners with the flexibility to
designate a representative to receive
required notices and documents. This
proposal requires that a designation of
an owner’s representative must be in
writing and must identify any notices or
documents that the designated
representative is not authorized to
receive. A properly designated property
owner’s representative would be able to
receive required notices and
information including acquisition and
relocation information and/or the
written offer of the property’s fair
market value on behalf of the owner.
Section 24.9(c)
Recordkeeping and
Reports
Section 1521(d) of MAP–21 requires
that each Federal Agency that has
programs or projects requiring the
acquisition of real property or causing a
displacement from real property subject
to the provisions of the Uniform Act
provide an annual summary report to
the Lead Agency that describes the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
activities conducted by the Federal
Agency. The FHWA proposes to modify
the reporting requirements in this
paragraph accordingly by changing the
first sentence requiring that a Federal
Agency submit a report of its real
property acquisition and displacement
activities to the Federal Agency funding
the project from ‘‘if required’’ to ‘‘as
required.’’ We also propose to delete the
second sentence requiring the reports
not more than every 3 years and unless
the Federal Agency shows good cause
for requiring the report. The last
sentence in this paragraph is deleted
and further discussion of reporting
requirements has been added in the
appendix.
The FHWA proposes to add new
language in this paragraph to detail the
annual reporting requirements that
Section 1521 of MAP–21 introduced.
The proposed paragraph will discuss
the new annual reporting requirements
for each Federal Agency subject to the
Uniform Act. It includes a narrative on
the overarching program and/or related
activities, as well as specific program
metrics, including the number of
acquisitions, relocations,
condemnations, total dollars spent, and
use of housing of last resort. The report
would be due by November 15th of each
year.
The FHWA also proposes to add a
new appendix section explaining that
FHWA realizes that not all Federal
Agencies subject to this reporting
requirement currently have the ability to
collect all information requested on the
reporting form. However, FHWA
envisions that the Federal Agencies may
elect to provide a narrative report
focusing on their respective efforts to
improve and enhance delivery of
Uniform Act benefits and services.
Narrative report information would
include training offered, reviews
conducted, or technical assistance
provided to recipients.
Section 24.10(g) Determination and
Notification After Appeal
The FHWA proposes to revise the
language in the last sentence of this
paragraph to clarify that the
determination on appeal is the Agency’s
final decision. The language on content
and procedures for the written
determination on appeal, including
informing a displaced person of the
right to judicial review of the final
decision, is not substantively changed.
The proposed changes are intended to
more clearly describe the authorities
and rights created by the appeals
process and to more directly provide
information on the process to follow
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
should a determination on the appeal be
desired.
Section 24.11 Adjustments of
Payments
The FHWA proposes to add a new
section to the regulation to implement
the new provision in MAP–21 at Section
1521(d)(2) which provides that if the
head of the Lead Agency determines
that the cost of living, inflation, or other
factors indicate the relocation assistance
benefits should be adjusted to meet the
policy objectives of the Uniform Act,
that the head of the Lead Agency may
adjust: The amounts of relocation
benefits for reestablishment expensesnonresidential moves; fixed payment for
moving expenses-nonresidential moves;
replacement housing payment for 90day homeowner-occupants; and
replacement housing payment for 90day tenants and certain others.
Prior to MAP–21, FHWA led research
projects to examine whether inflation
had an effect on relocation benefit
levels. The research concluded that
since publication of the final rule in
1989, the benefit levels were not able to
meet the policy objectives of the Act
due to inflation.
The FHWA’s research focused
primarily on the use of indexes as a tool
to evaluate inflation’s effects on
Uniform Act benefits. In considering the
most appropriate indexes, several
Consumer Price Indexes appeared to
provide a suite of goods and services
that are related to housing and other
costs associated with displacement.
The FHWA is proposing to evaluate
inflation’s effect on the benefits for
reestablishment for nonresidential
moves, fixed payment for nonresidential moving expenses,
replacement housing payments for 90day owners, and rental assistance
payments for 90-day tenants and certain
others by using the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI–U)
Seasonally Adjusted.2 Guidelines
FHWA used in choosing this index:
1. The CPI–U is a measure of the
average change in consumer prices over
time for a fixed market basket of goods
and services, including food, clothing,
shelter, fuels, transportation, and
charges for medical and dental services
and drugs. The all urban consumers
group represents about 87 percent of the
total U.S. population. It is based on the
expenditures of almost all residents of
urban or metropolitan areas, including
professionals, the self-employed, the
poor, the unemployed and retired
persons as well as urban wage earners
and clerical workers. Bureau of Labor
2 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.t01.htm.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Statistics (BLS) publishes a CPI–U
report monthly and releases an Annual
Report at the end of each fiscal year.
2. It is available on a monthly basis,
free of charge and can be expected to be
tabulated regularly into the future. The
CPI–U is widely used by other Federal
Agencies including FEMA and HUD.
3. The CPI–U is used by other Federal
Agencies for inflation adjustment
indexing. The CPI–U is produced by the
BLS and is subject to verification and
oversight.
Additional information on consumer
price indexes can be found on the
Bureau of Labor Statistics website.3 The
FHWA is proposing that this
determination of whether an increase in
benefit amounts is necessary would be
made no more frequently than every 5
years. If the FHWA determines that the
cost of living, inflation, or other factors
indicate the relocation assistance
benefits should be adjusted to meet the
policy objectives of the Uniform Act,
FHWA will issue a Federal Register
notice of that determination and the
specific adjustments of the relocation
assistance benefits that are being made.
The FHWA believes Federal and State
partners will benefit from several years
of stable and predictable regulatory
benefit amounts.
The FHWA proposes a new item in
appendix A, Section 24.11, which
provides a sample calculation showing
how FHWA will determine whether
future adjustments to these benefit
amounts should be proposed. In
addition to a temporal limit on
adjustments, FHWA attempted to
identify an inflationary impact
threshold or other regulatory condition
indicating when an adjustment should
be proposed. The FHWA recognizes that
prior to MAP–21, relocation benefit
amounts had not been adjusted for
several decades. The FHWA welcomes
comments on use of the CPI–U
Seasonally Adjusted Index, and
suggestions on the inflationary impact
threshold that would warrant
adjustments to the maximum benefit
amounts.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Subpart B—Real Property Acquisition
The FHWA intends for the terms ‘‘fair
market value’’ and ‘‘market value,’’
which may be more typical terminology
in private transactions, to be
synonymous in this regulation. In order
to make this clarification, FHWA
proposes to modify the appendix item
for subpart B by deleting ‘‘may be’’ and
inserting ‘‘are’’ to indicate that ‘‘fair
market value’’ (as used throughout this
3 https://www.bls.gov/cpi/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
subpart) and ‘‘market value’’ are the
same.
Section 24.101(a)(2) Applicability of
Acquisition Requirements
Section 24.101(a)(2) currently
includes the same reference twice,
which may create confusion. The
FHWA is proposing to modify this
paragraph by deleting the first reference
to 49 CFR 24.2(a) and by editing the
second reference at the end of the
paragraph to cross reference § 24.2(a).
The FHWA believes that making a
single reference at the end of the
paragraph to this definition accurately
points readers to the requisite section
and eliminates the need for redundant
references in this paragraph.
Section 24.101(b)(1)(i) Applicability of
Acquisition Requirements
Some Federal Agencies reported that
the terms ‘‘site’’ and ‘‘geographic area’’
were close enough in meaning that they
caused confusion in the second
sentence. They stated that the term
‘‘site’’ did not accurately describe the
type of project needs encountered in
delivering their programs and
recommended changing the term to
property. The FHWA proposes to strike
the term ‘‘site(s)’’ and insert ‘‘property
or properties.’’ The FHWA believes the
proposed change accurately reflects the
types of acquisitions that Agencies may
make and this requirement’s goal of
ensuring that voluntary acquisitions are
truly independent of site and corridor.
The FHWA also proposes to revise the
appendix item for this paragraph. A
Federal Agency suggested that the
appendix to this paragraph be changed
to further define the term ‘‘general
geographic area.’’ Some Federal
Agencies expressed concern that the
appendix definition was too restrictive
for their programs or some projects. The
FHWA reviewed the NPRM and final
rule comments and was unable to
determine why the term ‘‘geographic
area’’ was inserted into the appendix
during the 2005 rulemaking. That
rulemaking stated that is was ‘‘not to be
construed to be a small limited area.’’
The FHWA proposes to delete that
clause and insert a sentence that
describes a ‘‘general geographic area’’ as
any of several properties that are not
necessarily contiguous or are not
limited to a specific group of properties.
Section 24.101(b)(1)(iii)–(iv) and
(b)(2)(i)–(ii) Applicability of
Acquisition Requirements
Several Federal Agencies believe that
the current language of these paragraphs
requiring that notification be given only
to the property owner is unnecessarily
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69473
restrictive. The FHWA agrees and
believes that allowing either an owner
or a designated representative to receive
a written offer in no way diminishes a
property owner’s rights. The FHWA
proposes to make minor revisions to the
language of these parts by adding
allowances for an owner’s properly
designated representative to be able to
receive acquisition and relocation
information and/or the written offer of
the property’s fair market value on
behalf of the owner. The FHWA is
proposing that such designation must be
in writing.
Section 24.101(b)(2)(iii) Applicability
of Acquisition Requirements
Some Agencies possess the power of
eminent domain but do not use it for
specific projects. The FHWA has
received questions about the
interpretation of this paragraph from
several Agencies. Some Agencies have
interpreted this paragraph to mean that
if an Agency possesses the power of
eminent domain but will not use it on
the project, the Agency would not be
able to use the voluntary acquisition
authority for its project or program. The
FHWA proposes to clarify this
paragraph’s applicability by simplifying
the language so it clearly states that if
eminent domain will not be used, then
an Agency may use the voluntary
acquisition requirements provided by
this section. The FHWA believes that
whether an Agency has such authority
is not the relevant issue in determining
whether this section’s requirements are
being met. The relevant issue is that
eminent domain may not be used as part
of the offer and negotiation to acquire
property needed for the project.
Also, FHWA proposes adding
language in appendix A that recognizes
some Agencies may have an
unanticipated need that may require use
of eminent domain authority. The
FHWA views the clear purpose of the
provision as ensuring that voluntary
acquisitions are not simply preludes to
an eminent domain acquisition, should
voluntary acquisition negotiations fail.
The FHWA is proposing a new
paragraph to allow the Federal funding
Agency to permit acquisitions by
eminent domain in extraordinary
circumstances when negotiations were
initially undertaken under the
requirements for voluntary acquisitions.
The FHWA further recognizes that
property owners subjected to such
acquisitions should be assured that they
are being afforded all protections and
eligibilities of this regulation. Therefore,
FHWA is proposing that, should an
Agency carrying out a project advanced
as a voluntary acquisition find an
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69474
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
extraordinary instance requiring the use
of eminent domain, it must request a
waiver of regulations, under authority of
§ 24.7 of this part, from the Federal
Agency funding the project. This
proposed addition is in response to
requests from Agencies that often
acquire property as voluntary
acquisitions. The FHWA is interested in
commenters’ opinions on whether the
use of a waiver of regulations should be
required, whether criteria necessary for
a waiver should be included in this
regulation, what that criteria should
include, and whether and how to define
the exceptional circumstances under
which eminent domain authority may
be permitted under this section.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 24.101(d) Federally Assisted
Projects
The FHWA is proposing to add a new
paragraph to respond to questions it has
received about the applicability of
Uniform Act requirements to properties
that were acquired in advance of a
federally-funded project. The FHWA
recognizes that Agencies may acquire or
own previously acquired properties for
several reasons. This proposed change
will clarify that if such a property were
acquired with the intent of including it
in a planned, anticipated, or designated
federally-funded program or project,
then the acquisition would be subject to
the requirements in subparts B–F, as
applicable. This proposed change would
incorporate guidance that FHWA has
included in its Frequently Asked
Questions for 49 CFR part 24, see
current question number five.4 This
proposed change does not create a new
requirement but is proposed to ensure
that those Agencies acquiring properties
which may be incorporated into a
planned, anticipated, or designated
federally assisted program or project
understand when, why, and how the
requirements of this rule apply. The
FHWA is interested in commenters’
suggestions on how to further clarify
when, how, and why the requirements
of this rule apply.
Section 24.102 Basic Acquisition
Policies
The term ‘‘waiver valuation’’ in this
regulation and the more commonly used
term ‘‘appraisal waiver’’ means the
valuation process used and the product
produced, when the Agency determines
that an appraisal is not required,
pursuant to § 24.102(c)(2). In 1989,
FHWA first adopted a rule on appraisal
waivers. Under that rule, Agencies were
4 See current question number five at: https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/policy_guidance/
uafaqs.cfm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
allowed to decide when an appraisal
was not needed if they first determined
that the valuation was uncomplicated
and the property was ‘‘low-value.’’ Over
the years, we have used the terms ‘‘lowvalue’’ and ‘‘uncomplicated’’
interchangeably. The FHWA is
proposing to eliminate the term ‘‘lowvalue’’ since this proposed regulation
now defines the range of values to
which a waiver can be applied. The rule
initially defined uncomplicated as being
$2,500 or less.
Beginning in 1995, FHWA approved,
for its recipients, increases for the
uncomplicated definition of up to
$10,000 on a State-by-State basis. Since
2002, some agencies have received
approval to use a $25,000
uncomplicated threshold when
applying the appraisal waiver
provisions of the 1989 rule. In January
2005, FHWA issued an updated rule
that acknowledged the trend toward
increasing the threshold for
uncomplicated acquisitions. The current
rule contained in § 24.102(c)(2)(ii)
provides Agencies the latitude to define
‘‘uncomplicated’’ as being up to
$10,000. It also permits an increase in
the amount up to $25,000 provided the
Federal funding Agency approves, and
the Agency agrees to provide the
property owner the option to request an
appraisal.
Appraisal waiver requirements have
proven to be an effective tool in
containing costs and in fostering
accelerated project delivery while
protecting the rights of property owners
under the Uniform Act. A national
survey and various process reviews
have confirmed this to be the case.5 The
FHWA is proposing changes to
§ 24.102(c)(2)(ii)(C) waiver valuation
requirements, as described in the
following three sections, in recognition
of the positive experience using them.
Section 24.102(b)
Notice to Owner
The FHWA is proposing to add a new
appendix item which states that when
condominiums and other types of
housing with common areas or
community property are being acquired,
an Agency should determine who must
receive notification, which could
include a condo or homeowner’s board,
a designated representative, or all
individual owners when common or
5 The FHWA has developed, collected or
reviewed several supporting documents. They
include an FHWA national survey of waiver
valuation in 2005, results from 4 SDOTs which
carried out waiver valuation pilot projects and a
Colorado study of Waivers. FHWA is also
embarking on a new national survey of waiver
valuations in support of this NPRM effort.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
community property is being acquired
for the project.
Section 24.102(c)(2) Appraisal Waiver
The FHWA proposes to modify the
appendix for this paragraph to further
explain the term ‘‘uncomplicated
acquisitions.’’ The FHWA also proposes
to modify the regulation to emphasize
that the person making the
determination to use the waiver
valuation must have sufficient
understanding of the local markets, and
should have knowledge of appraisal
principles and use of valuations to be
able to determine whether the valuation
problem is uncomplicated. The FHWA
also proposes to add to this appendix
that Agencies should put procedures in
place to ensure that waiver valuations
are accurate and are consistent with the
unit values as determined by appraisals
and appraisal reviews. The FHWA
proposes to strike the term
‘‘sophisticated’’ and insert ‘‘complex’’ in
the appendix to more accurately reflect
the intent that the waiver valuation frees
up appraisers to do more complicated
appraisal work. The FHWA also
proposes inserting in the appendix that
those who prepare waiver valuations
have an understanding of appraisal
principles and use of appraisals so as
not to imply that they must be
appraisers. The FHWA is also proposing
to add a reference to the appendix item
for this paragraph.
Section 24.102(c)(2)(ii)(A) Appraisal
Waiver
The FHWA has received questions
about whether and how a licensed
appraiser could develop a waiver
valuation which would be consistent
with professional standards and
licensure requirements. The appendix
states that waiver valuations are not
appraisals under this rule. There is no
national consensus or standard about
the implications of having a licensed or
certified appraiser prepare a waiver
valuation. In some States, when a Statecertified or licensed appraiser estimates
a value, they may be obligated under the
licensing requirements of their State to
perform an appraisal even if the client
requests something less than an
appraisal. Performing appraisals rather
than waiver valuations in situations
where the valuation problem is not
complex can cause unnecessary delay
and adds unnecessary cost to an
acquisition. However, some States have
laws that interpret waiver valuations as
appraisals, and those States only permit
appraisers to perform appraisals, which
effectively nullifies the benefits of the
waiver valuation. In order to encourage
those States to take advantage of the
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
streamlining efficiencies offered by the
waiver valuation, and in an effort to
avoid the increased time and increased
cost associated with providing fully
documented appraisals, FHWA
proposes to incorporate a jurisdictional
exception that preserves the original
intent of the waiver valuation process
while offering appraisers that wish to
perform this type of work for Agencies
an avenue for accepting waiver
valuation assignments while remaining
compliant with the provisions of the
State appraisal licensing enforcement
Agencies. The FHWA also recognizes
that some States prefer to have waiver
valuations reviewed even though this
regulation does not require a formal
review of waiver valuations. Appraisers
can accept these types of assignments as
well with this proposed language. The
FHWA is proposing to add language to
this paragraph that would preclude an
appraiser from complying with
standards rules 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the
‘‘Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice’’ (USPAP), as
promulgated by the Appraisal Standards
Board of The Appraisal Foundation.6
This proposed modification would
afford those States a solution that
preserves the intent of this regulation to
streamline processes and provide
programmatic efficiencies. This
proposal would provide States and
licensed or certified appraisers with
clarity about the requirements of this
regulation and the implications of
developing a waiver valuation. The
FHWA invites comments or suggestions
on this proposed change.
Section 24.102(c)(2)(ii)(D) Appraisal
Waiver Thereof, and Invitation to Owner
The FHWA proposes to add a new
paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(D) to this section to
institute a three-tiered approach to
waiver valuations. The proposed new
third tier of waiver valuations would be
a $50,000 waiver value ceiling available
under clearly defined circumstances.
This change is presented as an option
that Federal funding Agencies and
recipients may consider using on a
project-by-project basis. In proposing
this change, it is important to note that
additional safeguards have been created
to ensure the full protection of property
owners’ rights and interests. The
safeguards include the use of the third
tier being limited to Federal funding
Agencies and recipients, with no
delegation to subrecipients, and that
approvals may be granted on a projectby-project basis with requests made in
writing and when the six pieces of
information required in this paragraph
6 https://www.uspap.org.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
are provided. The required information
is: The anticipated benefits of raising
the ceiling, administrative/managerial
oversight mechanisms, names and
credentials of those performing the
waiver valuations, quality controls to be
used, performance metrics with
quarterly reports, and a close-out report
measuring cost/time benefits and
lessons learned. The FHWA believes
that the proposed required information
provides a set of requirements that
ensure use of waiver valuations above
$25,000 would be carefully considered
and used in appropriate circumstances
with specific safeguards. An important
safeguard of this proposal is the
requirement that the Agency offer an
appraisal. The procedures described in
this paragraph may not be used if the
property owner elects to have the
Agency appraise the property.
Section 24.102(n)(1) Conflict of
Interest
The FHWA proposes to change the
word ‘‘making’’ to ‘‘developing’’ an
appraisal in this paragraph to more
accurately describe the activity of
preparing an appraisal or waiver
valuation. This paragraph ensures that
the valuation process continues to
operate in an independent manner by
prohibiting the compensation for an
appraisal or waiver valuation to be
based on the amount of the valuation
estimate.
Section 24.102(n)(3) Conflict of
Interest
The current regulation allows single
agents who valued properties to also
perform negotiations on properties that
were valued at less than $10,000. The
FHWA has conducted reviews that
provided no indication that the use of
the single agent created a problem to
administer, or led to property owners
receiving offers that were less than the
Agency’s best estimate of just
compensation. The FHWA’s experience
is that the $10,000 limit has been
managed effectively and property
owners’ rights and protections have not
been diminished by this process.
The FHWA now proposes to raise the
limit to $25,000 with a two-tiered
approach. Under the proposed changes,
the single agent concept could still be
applied with waiver valuations up to
the $10,000 amount. The FHWA is
proposing that acquisitions estimated to
be greater than $10,000 but less than
$25,000 would require an appraisal, and
review of the appraisal, if the valuation
preparer is also acting as the negotiator.
The FHWA also proposes that the
Agency or recipient desiring to exercise
this option for acquisitions estimated to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69475
be greater than $10,000 but less than
$25,000 on a project or a program basis
must submit a request in writing to the
Federal funding Agency. The FHWA
proposes to require that Agencies and
recipients that implement this provision
have a separate and distinct quality
control process in place and written
procedures which include an outline of
the quality control process approved by
the Federal funding agency. Federal
Agencies may elect whether to use this
single agent tool and to establish
guidance for its use. The proposed
increase to a $25,000 limit may be
extended to a subrecipient when the
Agency or recipient determines and
documents that the subrecipient has a
separate and distinct quality control
process in place and outlined in written
procedures approved by the Federal
funding agency. The FHWA is also
proposing to add a new appendix item
for this paragraph, which explains the
objective of using the conflict of interest
provisions, the purpose of the three
parts of this provision, and the new
third tier of the conflict of interest
provisions.
Section 24.103(a)
Requirements
Appraisal
The FHWA proposes to delete date
and publication information from the
description of ‘‘Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice
(USPAP).’’ The FHWA believes this
change is needed because the USPAP
has been updated several times since
the publication of the current rule and
may be updated several times over the
next several years. The FHWA also
proposes to add new updated web links
for the USPAP in this paragraph. The
FHWA will monitor future publications
of USPAP to ensure that those
publications continue to be consistent
with the requirements of this rule and
will make technical corrections when
necessary.
We also propose to modify the
appendix item for this part by changing
‘‘Standard Rules 1, 2, 3’’ by striking the
word ‘‘Rules’’ to ‘‘Standards 1, 2, 3 & 4’’
and inserting ‘‘2018–2019 edition of
the’’ before ‘‘USPAP’’ to ensure
consistency with USPAP. The FHWA
also proposes to delete ‘‘Supplemental
Standard Rule’’ as it is no longer
contained in USPAP.
Subpart C—General Relocation
Requirements
Section 24.202(a) Persons Required To
Move Temporarily
Several Agencies have questioned
whether persons temporarily displaced
should receive benefits because they are
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69476
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
identified in the rule as persons not
displaced. The FHWA is proposing to
revise the definition of displaced
persons and to specify the services and
assistance that must be provided to a
temporarily displaced person in this
part. The FHWA also proposes to
incorporate the majority of the appendix
discussion on minimum Agency actions
for temporary displacements into this
section of the regulation. Several
Federal Agencies noted that the
proposed reorganization will provide
their recipients with a more easily
understood and concise discussion of
minimum standards and actions
required when temporarily displacing a
person.
The FHWA believes that the proposed
change to the regulation aligns the
regulation more closely with the
language and requirements of Section
4621 of the Uniform Act. These
requirements include a recognition that
relocation assistance policies must
provide for fair, uniform, and equitable
treatment of all affected persons. In
addition, FHWA believes that providing
services and assistance to temporarily
displaced persons is necessary to
minimize the impacts of displacement
and to maintain the economic and social
well-being of communities. The
proposed changes require that persons
displaced from their dwelling or
business be reimbursed for out-ofpocket expenses associated with the
move and that temporary relocations
may not last more than 12 months. The
FHWA believes that the language in the
current appendix that limits temporary
relocations to no more than 12 months
reflects a standard that some recipients
were not aware of due to its placement
in the appendix. The FHWA believes
that more clearly establishing this
standard as a regulatory requirement by
incorporating it into the regulatory text
will provide recipients with a more
easily understood requirement for
persons who are temporarily displaced.
The new proposal also requires that
appropriate advisory services be
provided. The FHWA is not proposing
to develop an all-inclusive list of actual
and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
because each temporary relocation is
unique and fact-specific. However,
reimbursement should be provided for
those additional costs necessitated by
the temporary move, including lodging,
cost of meals when temporary lodgings
do not include kitchen facilities, and
cost to move personal property when
necessary.
The FHWA is also proposing to add
an item to this part to explicitly state
that aliens not lawfully present in the
United States are not eligible for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
temporary relocation assistance unless
such denial of benefits would create an
extremely unusual hardship to a
designated family member in
accordance with § 24.208(g). This
clarification is not an additional
prohibition or change to the regulation.
The addition is intended to assist
Agencies that frequently do temporary
relocations by ensuring that the existing
provisions and prohibitions are easily
understood.
Section 24.203(a) General Information
Notice
Several Agencies have indicated that
the term ‘‘scheduled’’ in this paragraph
does not have a clear meaning in the
context of their programs. These
Agencies believe that ‘‘may be
displaced’’ more closely fits the
processes they follow since a large part
of their programs are voluntary
acquisitions and ‘‘scheduled to be
displaced’’ could be interpreted to mean
a decision to displace had been made
regardless of the outcome of the
negotiation process. The FHWA believes
that the proposed change would fit both
voluntary and eminent domain
acquisitions and subsequent relocations.
This proposed change would also
promote consistency between this
paragraph and the following paragraph
since the phrase ‘‘may be displaced’’ is
already used in § 24.203(a)(1).
Section 24.203(b) Notice of Relocation
Eligibility and Section 24.203(d)
Notice of Intent To Acquire
One Agency has requested that the
existing ‘‘Notice of intent to acquire’’ in
§ 24.203(d) be revised to eliminate
confusion and to expand its
applicability to rehabilitation and
demolition activities where no
acquisition is involved. They propose to
replace it with an ‘‘Advanced Notice of
relocation eligibility’’ which would
serve to establish relocation eligibility.
Rather than rewriting § 24.203(d) and
eliminating § 24.203(b) in the
regulation, FHWA proposes to simply
rename the ‘‘Notice of intent to acquire’’
as ‘‘Notice of intent to acquire,
rehabilitate, or demolish’’ to cover the
situations unique to the Agency and
similar programs when an acquisition
does not occur but persons are required
to move for some period of time. As a
result, several other parts of the
regulation will be modified to reflect
this new title. Specifically, FHWA
proposes to reword the definition of a
‘‘displaced person’’ at § 24.2(a) and the
definition of ‘‘initiation of negotiations’’
at § 24.2(a) wherever this it appears. The
FHWA also proposes to add
‘‘rehabilitate or demolish’’ wherever
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
‘‘notice of intent to acquire’’ occurs in
§ 24.203(b) and (d). In § 24.203(d),
FHWA proposes to also strike
‘‘acquired’’ from ‘‘property acquired’’ to
again emphasize that the Notice of
Intent to Acquire clearly includes
rehabilitation and demolition projects.
The FHWA believes that renaming the
notice of intent to acquire to include
rehabilitation and demolition clearly
conveys the many types of
displacements to which this notice is
intended to apply. The FHWA believes
that this is the simplest solution to tailor
applicability of this notice to all
programs.
Section 24.204(a) Introductory Text
Through (a)(1) Availability of
Comparable Replacement Dwelling
Before Displacement
The FHWA has received a number of
questions regarding the meaning of the
term ‘‘made available’’ in the context of
this paragraph’s discussion of
comparables. The questions are focused
on the general requirements of this
paragraph’s language providing
direction on the number of comparables
that should be used in the
determination process and is not
focused on benefit determination or
eligibility. A majority of practitioners
believe that ‘‘made available’’ simply
requires that information on the
comparable replacement dwellings be
provided to a displaced person. Others
believe that the regulation requires that
all comparables be inspected before
being used in estimating eligibility.
The FHWA proposes to modify the
language in this paragraph to clearly
state that ‘‘made available’’ means
providing information in writing on the
location of actual comparable
replacement dwellings that were used in
the determination process. The
regulation continues to state that three
or more comparable replacement
dwellings shall be made available,
whenever possible in the determination
process. The FHWA believes that
providing information on at least three
comparable replacement dwellings
should be the standard practice because
it provides the displaced person with
the assurance that the selected
comparable replacement dwellings
fairly represent comparable properties
available on the market. The FHWA is
also proposing changes to
§ 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C) Relocation Planning,
Advisory Services, and Coordination
which are discussed in detail below.
The FHWA agrees that an inspection of
a comparable dwelling should be made
prior to its use in any eligibility
determination. The proposed change
requires Agencies to inform displaced
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
persons in writing of the reason(s) a DSS
inspection of a comparable replacement
dwelling was not made (in cases where
inspections were not made) and to
indicate that, should a displaced person
select one of the comparable dwellings,
a replacement housing payment cannot
be made until a DSS inspection is made
of that dwelling.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C) Relocation
Planning, Advisory Services, and
Coordination
The FHWA proposes to modify the
language in this paragraph to require
Agencies to inform displaced persons in
writing of the reason(s) a DSS
inspection of a comparable replacement
dwelling was not made (in cases where
inspections were not made) and to
indicate that, should a displaced person
select one of the comparable dwellings,
a replacement housing payment cannot
be made until a DSS inspection is made
of that dwelling.
The FHWA also proposes adding a
new item to appendix A, Section
24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C), explaining what
constitutes a DSS inspection and a
further discussion of the requirement
that an Agency must make full
disclosure and explanation to the
displaced person if the comparable
replacement dwelling was not
inspected.
It is the position of FHWA that
comparable replacement housing must
be inspected whenever possible and that
the selected comparable replacement
dwelling should be inspected (e.g., walk
through/physical inspection). The
FHWA proposes to add a part in the
appendix which explains that reliance
on an exterior visual inspection, or
examination of an MLS listing, does not
constitute a full DSS inspection as
required by the regulation in most cases.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(D) Relocation
Planning, Advisory Services, and
Coordination
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
The FHWA is proposing to revise the
appendix for this part to include a
reminder that Agencies should ensure
that they are appropriately documenting
their efforts to provide comparables and
replacement dwellings which are not in
areas of minority concentration.
Section 24.207(f) No Waiver of
Relocation Assistance
The FHWA proposes to add a
reference to appendix A, Section 24.207,
which further explains the requirements
when a displaced person chooses not to
accept some or all of the payments or
assistance to which they are entitled.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Section 24.207(h) Entitlement to
Payments-Deductions From Relocation
Payments
To date, the practice of withholding a
portion of, or deducting from, a
relocation replacement housing
payment to satisfy non-payment of rent
to an Agency, or to satisfy an obligation
to any other creditor, has been clearly
prohibited. Because the current
prohibition is only found in
§ 24.404(a)(6) pertaining to replacement
housing payments, several questions
have been raised regarding whether the
withholding prohibition applies to all
relocation assistance payments or only
to replacement housing payments. The
FHWA proposes to add a new paragraph
to the general requirements for claims
for relocation payments to emphasize
that withholdings or deductions may
not be made from any type of relocation
payments for non-payment of rent or to
satisfy an obligation to any other
creditor. The proposed addition would
also clarify that Agencies must deduct
any advanced relocation payment from
the relocation payments to which the
displaced person is otherwise entitled.
Section 24.208(c) Aliens Not Lawfully
Present in the United States
The FHWA proposes to add a
reference to a new addition to the
appendix for this paragraph that
provides examples of how to calculate
relocation payments if some members of
a displaced family are lawfully present
but others are aliens not lawfully
present. The new addition would
provide calculations that are based on
the ratio of ownership between aliens
not lawfully present and eligible
displaced persons. The proposed
addition to appendix A also
incorporates several current Uniform
Act Frequently Asked Questions,7 to
provide specific calculation examples.
Section 24.208(f)(1)
The FHWA proposes to update the
acronym for the BCIS to the current
USCIS and add a corrected link to that
Agency’s website. The FHWA also
proposes to amend this paragraph by
requiring the use of the USCIS’s
Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE) program to confirm
certifications which an agency believes
may be invalid. The FHWA seeks
comments on whether there may be
other resources that can be used when
an agency considers a certification
invalid. The FHWA would also like
comments on whether and how the
certification process in this part should
7 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/policy_
guidance/uafaqs.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69477
be updated. The FHWA is interested in
comments on whether revisions should
include document review and collection
for all displaced persons.
Section 24.208(g) Aliens Not Lawfully
Present in the United States
The FHWA has received questions
from several Federal Agencies about
providing temporary relocation
assistance to aliens not lawfully present
in the United States. The question arises
because the requirements focus on
displaced persons. In instances of
temporary relocation, persons are not
displaced persons but are eligible for
certain temporary benefits. The Federal
Agencies question whether this
paragraph’s restriction on providing
relocation benefits or assistance would
prohibit or allow an Agency to deny
temporary relocation assistance to an
alien not lawfully present in the United
States. The FHWA believes that the
clear intent in statute and this
regulation do not allow for any Uniform
Act benefits or assistance to be provided
to an alien not lawfully present in the
United States, with the exception being
cases where an exceptional and
extremely unusual hardship to a spouse,
child, or parent who is a U.S. citizen or
alien lawfully admitted for permanent
residence would be created by denying
such benefits and assistance. This
regulation provides specific
considerations and requirements that
allow for benefits to be provided in this
limited instance. Given that this
regulation allows and defines instances
when an alien not lawfully present in
the United States may receive Uniform
Act benefits, the FHWA believes that
the hardship exception also applies to
temporary relocations in cases where an
exceptional and extremely unusual
hardship to a designated family member
would be created by denying such
benefits and assistance. The FHWA does
not believe that any additional changes
are needed to this regulation given the
restrictive and specific language in this
paragraph.
Section 24.208(h) Aliens Not Lawfully
Present in the United States
Some Agencies have asked FHWA
how to determine when there is an
‘‘exceptional and extremely unusual
hardship’’ to a spouse, parent, or child
of a person not lawfully present in the
United States when the determination
results in more than the loss of
relocation payments and/or assistance
alone. The FHWA proposes to add a
reference to appendix A, Section
24.208(h), which incorporates FHWA’s
previously published FAQ explaining
the meaning and intent of the term
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69478
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
‘‘exceptional and extremely unusual
hardship.’’ 8 The FHWA believes that
including existing guidance into the
appendix will provide a clear resource
to address the questions raised.
Subpart D—Payments for Moving and
Related Expenses
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 24.301(b)(2) Moves From a
Dwelling
The FHWA requests comments on
adding an option, similar to that found
in this part for business self-moves, to
allow self-moves from dwellings to be
eligible for reimbursement in the
amount of the lower of two bids or
estimates prepared by a commercial
mover or based on an estimate prepared
by a qualified Agency staff person. The
FHWA would like comments on
whether and how adding new self-move
options for moves from a dwelling
would reduce administrative burden on
the displaced person and the Agency.
The FHWA believes that self-move
options would reduce administrative
burden and eliminate the burden to the
property owner of providing receipts or
proof of expenditures to support
residential self-move claims for
payment. The FHWA is also interested
in comments on how reimbursement
should be made if a self-move
reimbursement is based on a
commercial move bid. Should the
reimbursement be for the full
commercial move bid, or should it be
made after subtracting an amount to
account for overhead and profit in the
commercial move bid?
Section 24.301(b)(3), (c)(2)(ii), and
(d)(2)(ii) Moving Cost Finding and
(d)(2)(iii) Non-Residential Moving Cost
Schedule
The FHWA is interested in
incorporating methods in this regulation
that can reduce administrative burdens
and improve the government’s service to
individuals and businesses affected by
Federal or federally assisted projects
and programs. In previous rules, there
was a provision that allowed moving
expenses to be determined by a
qualified staff person for small,
uncomplicated personal property
moves, commonly called a ‘‘moving cost
finding’’ or ‘‘a finding.’’ Persons
displaced from their dwellings can elect
to receive reimbursement for moving
their personal property by use of a
streamlined process that does not
require commercial move estimates or
receipts documenting moving costs. The
Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule
allows an Agency to determine,
8 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/uniform_
act/relocation/illegaqa.cfm
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
document, and establish moving cost
eligibility based on the number of rooms
of furniture being moved. The FHWA is
considering a similar tool for
nonresidential moves. A business move
cost schedule would conceptually be
established by regulation and would
allow an SDOT to determine eligibility
for reimbursement based on a
predetermined metric such as number of
rooms or number of items. If a nonresidential moving cost schedule were
allowed by regulation, Agencies would
no longer need to document costs based
on moving estimates or receipted bills.
The FHWA would like comments
about move cost findings and
development of a non-residential
moving cost schedule, and whether they
should be considered for incorporation
in a final rule. Specifically, FHWA
would like to know if any Agencies use
a similar process for their programs and
projects which are not subject to the
requirements of the Uniform Act;
whether that process has produced
administrative cost savings; and,
whether the process has been found
satisfactory by displaced persons
relocated by the Agency.
Section 24.301(e) Personal Property
Only
The FHWA proposes to modify
appendix A, Section 24.301(e), to
provide Agencies with additional
flexibility for use in residential moves
where the only personal property to be
moved is located outside of the
dwelling. The FHWA recognizes that in
some instances the costs of obtaining
moving bids for moving personal
property located outside of the dwelling
may exceed the cost of the actual move.
The FHWA proposes to allow a payment
for moves of residential personal
property located outside of the dwelling
to be based on the ‘‘additional room’’
category of the Fixed Residential Move
Cost Schedule. We also propose to
include the link to the Schedule on the
FHWA website in this appendix.
Section 24.301(g)(3) Disconnecting,
Dismantling, Removing, Reassembling,
and Reinstalling Relocated Household
Appliances and Other Personal
Pproperty
The FHWA proposes to add a
clarification in the appendix of this
paragraph to address questions received
about the eligibility of certain costs to
build or rehabilitate structures as a
reimbursable expense. Generally, costs
to construct, rehabilitate, or reconstruct
are capital expenditures and are
ineligible for reimbursement. In
instances where these costs may be
required, a waiver of regulation by the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Federal funding Agency must be
obtained.
Section 24.301(g)(11) Eligible Actual
Moving Expenses—License, Permit, Fees
The FHWA proposes to add ‘‘actual,
reasonable, and necessary’’ before the
words ‘‘license, permit, fees or
certification’’ and ‘‘farms or non-profits’’
and after ‘‘business’’ in this paragraph.
The FHWA believes that each business,
farm, or non-profit move is unique due
to varying local, State, and Federal
requirements and requires a careful
review of the facts in order to determine
whether a permit or fee should be
reimbursable for a specific move. The
FHWA also proposes to clarify that the
permit or fees allowed under this
paragraph are for those necessary to
operate a business, farm, or non-profit
by adding ‘‘to operate a business, farm,
or non-profit’’ after ‘‘required’’ in the
first sentence of this paragraph. The
proposed change would clarify that
permit fees associated with construction
are not included as an actual moving
expense. In most instances, reimbursing
for building a new structure at the
replacement location is not a
permissible actual moving cost expense.
Consequently, the cost of a permit for
new construction in almost all instances
is not an eligible expense under this
part. A new construction permit for
repairs or improvements to the
replacement property or modification to
accommodate the business, farm, or
non-profit operation or make the
replacement structure suitable for
conducting the business, farm, or nonprofit may, however, be eligible for
reimbursement if determined to be
reasonable and necessary under § 24.304
Reestablishment expenses or if required
by local law, code, or ordinances.
Section 24.301(g)(13) Re-Lettering
Signs and Replacing Sationary on Hand
Currently, the regulation specifies that
re-lettering signs and replacing
stationery made obsolete at the time of
the displacement are eligible moving
expenses. The FHWA proposes to
modify this paragraph to recognize that
many businesses use media other than
printed media by adding the phrase
‘‘and making updates to other media.’’
We propose making a reference to a new
item in appendix A, Section
24.301(g)(13), which includes examples
of other potentially reimbursable costs
for other media such as DVDs or CDs
and modification of websites to update
contact and location information made
necessary because of the move. This
proposed change would allow Agencies
to determine if expenses incurred to
update media on hand, such as DVDs,
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
CDs, or updating a website to reflect
information on the new location of the
business, are actual, reasonable, and
necessary expenses which would be
eligible under this paragraph. The
FHWA intends that the compensation
would be limited to costs to reproduce
the number of DVDs and CDs on hand
at the time of displacement, and, in the
case of a website update, only those
costs necessary to edit and modify the
location information.
Section 24.301(g)(14)(i)–(ii) Actual
Direct Loss of Tangible Personal
Property
The FHWA has received a number of
questions regarding the appropriate
method for calculating the actual direct
loss of tangible personal property and
the meaning of ‘‘value in place for
continued use’’ as used in these
paragraphs. Some Agencies have
reported that it can be difficult and very
costly to find machinery and equipment
(M&E) valuation experts who are able to
determine value in place for continued
use. Other Agencies have noted that
considering the value in place for
continued use ensures that payments
made under provisions of these
paragraphs are reasonable and that
procuring the services of an M&E
valuation expert is relatively easy. The
FHWA believes that procuring the
services of an M&E valuation expert is
achievable but perhaps not always
easily.
The FHWA proposes to modify these
paragraphs to allow for a new two-part
consideration of the actual direct loss of
tangible personal property payment.
First, FHWA proposes separate
paragraphs for calculating payments for
items currently in use and for items not
currently in use. For items in use,
reimbursement is based on the lesser of
the cost to move and reinstall the item
or fair market value in place of the item
‘‘as is for continued use.’’ The FHWA
believes that by using ‘‘the lesser of’’
consideration, the eligibility
determination provides options to both
the Agency and the displaced person.
For items not currently in use, FHWA
proposes to base the reimbursement on
the cost to move the item as is, with no
allowance for storage.
The FHWA also proposes to
reorganize these paragraphs by
proposing a separate subordinate
paragraph for goods held for sale. When
payment for property loss is claimed for
goods held for sale, the fair market value
shall be based on the cost of the goods
to the business, not the potential selling
prices. The FHWA proposes to add a
reference to appendix A for this
paragraph.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
The FHWA also proposes to add a
discussion to the end of appendix A
about procuring M&E valuation expert
services. The FHWA welcomes
comments that identify such services
and methods that may be used to direct
the reader to reasonable methods of
estimating value in place either by
hiring an M&E appraiser or by
estimating via websites available for
M&E valuations. Finally, FHWA
proposes updating regulatory references
in the appendix for these paragraphs
due to renumbering and reorganization
of the regulation section.
Section 24.301(g)(17)(i)–(ii) Searching
for a Replacement Location
The FHWA’s Business Relocation
Assistance Retrospective Study 9
reported that businesses incur searching
expenses that routinely exceed the
current regulatory limit of $2,500. The
report recommended increasing the
limit on searching expenses to $5,000
and lessening the burden of
documentation. The FHWA proposes to
increase searching expenses’ eligibility
from $2,500 to $5,000. The FHWA
believes that in some instances
requiring documentation for all
searching expenses can be
administratively burdensome to both
the Agency and the displaced person.
As such, FHWA proposes to add a new
provision at § 24.301(g)(17)(ii) of this
regulation that would provide Federal
Agencies with the option to allow, on a
project or program wide basis, a onetime alternative searching payment of
up to $1,000 with little or no
documentation. The FHWA believes
that the potential savings in
administrative costs offset the
possibility of fraud, waste, and abuse.
The FHWA also proposes to modify the
appendix for these paragraphs by
striking $2,500 and inserting $5,000 and
by proposing new flexibility by allowing
one time alternative searching payments
of up to $1,000 with little or no
documentation.
The FHWA also proposes to
incorporate a frequently asked question
into the appendix to clarify that search
expenses may be incurred anytime the
business anticipates it may be
displaced, including prior to project
authorization or the initiation of
negotiations. However, such expenses
should not be reimbursed until the
business has received the notice,
required in § 24.203(b), and only after
the Agency has determined such costs
to be actual, reasonable, and necessary.
9 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/
publications/business_relocation_assistance/final_
report/page06.cfm.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69479
Section 24.301(g)(17)(i)(F) Searching
for a Replacement Location
The FHWA proposes to change this
paragraph to allow expenses to include
attorney’s fees. The FHWA recognizes
that displaced business owners may
incur actual, reasonable, and necessary
costs for either time spent or fees paid
for services necessary to determine the
adequacy of a potential replacement
property. These costs may include those
necessary to determine appropriate
zoning and resolve other issues during
a search for a replacement location.
Several State Agencies have reasoned
that in a number of instances having
attorneys negotiate for the purchase of
replacement sites could be an actual,
reasonable, and necessary expense. The
FHWA agrees that attorney’s fees for
negotiating a purchase can be
considered a reasonable expense under
this part. The FHWA also proposes to
strike ‘‘time spent’’ and insert
‘‘expenses’’ negotiating the purchase of
a replacement site.
The FHWA is proposing to amend the
appendix for this paragraph to clarify
that attorney’s fees could be considered
eligible as a searching expense. The
FHWA also believes that because the
fees are reimbursed at the Agency’s
discretion based on the actual,
reasonable, and necessary test, the
potential for waste, fraud, and abuse is
manageable.
Section 24.301(h)(13) Ineligible
Moving and Related Expenses
State DOTs have asked about the
eligibility of costs to make cosmetic
alterations or improvements to
replacement dwellings, such as
painting, fitting draperies, and replacing
carpet or flooring. The FHWA believes
that expenses for cosmetic changes to a
dwelling are not moving costs which are
reimbursable under the Uniform Act.
This proposed change is not intended to
prohibit alterations to a dwelling to
make it accessible and free of barriers
for ingress, egress, or use as required
under the definition of a DSS dwelling,
for a displaced person with a disability
at § 24.2(a).
Section 24.302 Fixed Payment for
Moving Expenses-Residential Moves
Persons displaced from a seasonal
residence or dormitory style room may
receive a fixed moving cost payment as
an alternative to a payment for actual
moving and related expenses. A number
of questions have been raised about the
appropriate uses of the moving cost
schedule, including whether storage can
be included as part of a fixed cost move
and what the allowance for storage can
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69480
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
include. The FHWA proposes to add
language to the appendix to clarify that
if an Agency determines that storage is
an actual, reasonable, and necessary
expense in conjunction with this
schedule, payment may be paid in
accordance with § 24.301(g)(4) for a
period not to exceed 12 months. The
FHWA also proposes to revise language
in appendix A, Section 24.302, to clarify
the applicability of the Fixed
Residential Move Cost Schedule
(Schedule) to seasonal residents and
temporary moves from a dwelling and to
add a reference to the revised appendix
item.
The FHWA proposes to add a new
paragraph to this section to allow for
actual reasonable and necessary storage.
This proposed addition requires that the
Agency notify the displaced person in
writing that the Fixed Residential Move
Cost Schedule is only for one move. In
instances where storage was approved,
only the costs to move the personal
property from the displacement location
to storage would be reimbursable. The
FHWA believes that in most cases the
use of a fixed cost move is meant to be
a one-time uncomplicated move, and if
storage is necessary, it would be in the
displaced person’s interest to use a
commercial move to ensure that all
costs related to moving and storage are
reimbursed.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 24.303(a) Related NonResidential Eligible Expenses
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Impact fees or one-time assessment
for anticipated heavy utility usage are
eligible expenses. The FHWA is
proposing to clarify that ‘‘impact fees’’
are only related to anticipated ‘‘heavy
utility usage’’ at the replacement
location. Generally, the terms ‘‘heavy
utility usage’’ and impact fees recognize
costs associated with utility usage
including water, sewer, gas, and
electric. Impact fees associated with
major infrastructure construction, such
as adding a lane for additional traffic
capacity or other similar required
infrastructure improvements, fire
stations, regional drainage
improvements, and parks are not
eligible. The FHWA proposes changing
the ‘‘or’’ before ‘‘one time assessments’’
to ‘‘and.’’ The FHWA believes this
change, a subsequent new appendix A,
Section 24.303(c), and a reference to it
in the regulation will adequately
respond to the questions about correctly
interpreting and applying this benefit.
Section 24.304 Reestablishment
Expenses—Non-Residential Moves
Section 1521(a)(1) of MAP–21 amends
Section 202 of the Uniform Act by
raising the statutory limit to $25,000.
The FHWA proposes to revise this
section to reflect the new statutory limit
of $25,000.
Section 24.304(b)
The FHWA has received a number of
questions regarding the meaning of
‘‘nearby utilities’’ and whether ‘‘nearby’’
allows for reimbursement for certain
utility service modifications and
reconnection costs. In general, there has
been confusion about whether ‘‘nearby’’
meant from the property line or some
other defined point. The intent of this
paragraph was to recognize that
relocating a business may require some
utility service modifications and
reconnection costs. ‘‘Nearby’’ has
sometimes been interpreted to mean
anywhere from several feet to several
miles away. The FHWA proposes to
strike ‘‘nearby’’ and ‘‘right-of-way’’ and
add ‘‘from the replacement site’s
property line.’’ The FHWA believes that
the proposed changes will more clearly
and accurately indicate the kinds of
expenses that are eligible under this
part. The FHWA proposes adding a new
appendix item for this paragraph that
includes examples to more clearly
describe eligible costs. The FHWA also
proposes to add a reference to the new
appendix A, Section 24.303(a), to the
end of this paragraph.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Section 24.303(c) Related
Nonresidential Eligible Expenses—
Impact Fees or One-Time Assessments
Ineligible Expenses
Several Federal Agencies and FHWA
have received questions from their
program partners regarding whether
construction of a facility, where little or
no structure currently exists, would be
an eligible reestablishment expense.
They have reasoned that § 24.401(a)(1),
which allows for ‘‘improvements to the
real property,’’ and § 24.401(a)(2), which
allows for ‘‘modifications to the
replacement property,’’ may be read to
allow for new construction or
substantially new construction where
there is little or no structure.
The FHWA proposes to add a new
§ 24.304(b)(5) to clarify exclusion of
costs to construct a new facility such as
a new business building on a vacant
replacement property or to substantially
construct or reconstruct a building.
These costs are considered capital
expenditures and are generally
ineligible for reimbursement as a
reestablishment expense. The FHWA
believes that building from the ground
up or substantially reconstructing a
building, or the rehabilitation or
rebuilding of a shell, is beyond the
intended scope of § 24.304(a). The
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
FHWA recognizes that there may be
special cases where substantial
reconstruction or building from the
ground up may be necessary. Agencies
will need to consider each request for
eligibility on a case-by-case basis and
determine whether that eligibility
should be requested. Agencies that
determine that eligibility should be
provided must request a waiver of
§ 24.304(b)(1) under the provisions of
§ 24.7 from the Federal Agency funding
the project or program
The FHWA also proposes
incorporating two current Frequently
Asked Questions into a new appendix
item with an example of when such a
waiver is requested and discusses the
costs that may be eligible for
reimbursement.
Section 24.305 Fixed Payment for
Moving Expenses-Nonresidential Moves,
Paragraphs (a) Business, (c) Farm
Operation, and (d) Nonprofit
Organization
Section 1521(a)(2) of MAP–21 amends
Section 202 of the Uniform Act by
raising the statutory limit for a fixed
payment for moving expensesnonresidential moves to $40,000. The
FHWA proposes to revise these three
paragraphs to reflect the new statutory
limit of $40,000.
Several Federal Agencies and some
program partners have raised questions
about whether a fixed payment for
moving expenses in nonresidential
moves prohibits other relocation
assistance payments for moving and
related expenses and reestablishment
payments. The FHWA proposes to add
clarifying language to ensure that the
regulation is clearly understood to
prohibit payments for any moving and
related expenses or reestablishment
payments when a displaced person
elects to receive a fixed cost moving
payment under this section of the
regulation. The fixed payment option’s
purpose is to provide a displaced person
with an alternative method of receiving
reimbursement for all costs associated
with a move. This alternative fixed
payment is a one-time payment that
exhausts and eliminates other
eligibilities and payments for any
moving and related expenses (including
actual direct loss of tangible personal
property and searching) or
reestablishment payments.
The FHWA also proposes a new
appendix item for these parts to further
clarify that this fixed payment
represents a one-time alternative for
businesses, farms, and non-profits.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Section 24.305(e)
Earnings
Average Annual Net
Practitioners have asked FHWA about
the requirement that a business must
have been in operation for at least 2 full
years to qualify for the fixed payment
based on the average annual net
earnings and what to do in instances
where the business was not in operation
for two full years. The FHWA proposes
to add a reference in this paragraph to
a revised appendix A, Section 24.305(e).
The revisions clarify that a business
must only contribute materially to the
income of the displaced person for a
period of time during the 2 taxable years
prior to displacement but does not have
to be in existence for 2 full years prior
to displacement in order to be eligible
for this benefit. The proposed new
appendix item also provides sample
calculations of benefits when a business
was in operation for less than 1 year,
more than 1 year but not 2 full years,
and when a business only operates
seasonally. We propose that the
seasonal net income be considered the
entire income for that year when making
the payment calculation. The appendix
also restates, as currently provided for
in the regulation, that average annual
net earnings may be based upon a
different period of time that an Agency
determines to be more equitable. The
FHWA believes that the combination of
the proposed new item in appendix A
and the specific examples of
calculations will ensure that businesses
that contribute materially, but are in
operation less than 2 years prior to
displacement, will have their annual net
earnings correctly determined.
Section 24.306(a) Discretionary Utility
Relocation Payments
The FHWA proposes to revise the
reference to § 24.2(a), Utility facility.
Subpart E—Replacement Housing
Payments
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 1521(b)(2) of MAP–21 amends
Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
reducing the number of days a person
must have owned and occupied a
displacement dwelling from 180 days to
90 days in order to be eligible for a
replacement housing payment. The
FHWA proposes to modify the heading
for § 24.401 and paragraphs (a)
introductory text and (a)(1) and the
appendix entries for these parts by
deleting ‘‘180 days’’ and inserting ‘‘90
days’’ in each place it appears.
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Amount of Payment
Section 1521(b)(1) of MAP–21 amends
Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
raising the statutory limit for
replacement housing payments to
$31,000. The FHWA proposes to modify
this section by deleting $22,500 and
inserting $31,000 in each place it
appears.
Section 24.401(d) Introductory Text
Through (d)(1) Increased Mortgage
Interest Costs
The FHWA is not proposing a change
in this section but believes it is
important to note that MAP–21 did not
change the requirement that a lien must
have been in place for 180 days prior to
the initiation of negotiations in order to
be considered a valid lien and to be
eligible for an increased mortgage
interest cost payment under this part.
Prior to MAP–21, the eligibility
requirements for occupancy of a
displacement dwelling and for a valid
lien were both 180 days prior to the
initiation of negotiations.
The FHWA proposes to modify the
appendix item for § 24.401(d) to
improve clarity by striking ‘‘and that the
person must obtain a mortgage of at
least the same amount as the old
mortgage and for at least the same term
in order to receive the full amount of
this payment’’ from the sentence after
the sample computation. This does not
necessarily occur often in practice since
a displaced person may obtain a lesser
mortgage amount or term on their
replacement dwelling. The rest of the
sentence remains to inform the
displaced person of the approximate
amount of the payment and interest rate
and points used to calculate the
payment.
The FHWA also proposes to add a
link in the appendix to increased
interest cost calculators available on its
website.
Section 24.401(e)
Section 24.401 Replacement Housing
Payment for 90-Day HomeownerOccupants
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Section 24.401(b)
HECM
The FHWA proposes to add a new
definition, paragraph, and appendix
item to address HECM (also known as
reverse mortgages). Although the actual
number of HECM type mortgages is still
relatively low in comparison to all types
of mortgages, FHWA believes that this
may change in the future due in part to
the number of aging homeowners in the
marketplace and also because the
marketplace and marketing practices for
HECMs are evolving and growing.
Since these mortgages did not exist
when the Uniform Act was enacted,
their unique and particular financial
construction was not accounted for in
the development of relocation assistance
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69481
benefits. Because there are unknown
factors in calculating exact costs to
replace a HECM, the services of a
mortgage broker are required. The
FHWA believes that there is ample
authority in the Uniform Act, its
legislative history, and implementing
regulations to support the strategies
proposed in this NPRM for addressing
displaced persons with HECMs.
We have incorporated in the NPRM
information from a 2013 Study of
Reverse Mortgages in Relocation
Assistance conducted by FHWA. These
mortgages often have unique terms. We
are proposing that every reasonable
attempt should be made to make
available a replacement HECM with
similar terms. The FHWA is also
proposing that the displaced
homeowner is eligible for costs
associated with origination of a
replacement HECM, such as mortgage
insurance, origination fee, and other
incidental expenses, in accordance with
§ 24.401(f).
Our research has revealed that the
cost of replacing a HECM can be
substantial, especially when the owner
has little or no equity left and their
equity is being dispersed as term or
tenure payments. The FHWA is also
proposing options to replace the HECM
with a mortgage with terms similar to
the displacement HECM loan or the use
of other methods such as a life estate for
securing a dwelling for the person’s
remaining lifetime. In cases where there
is a tenure or term payment, FHWA has
developed a simple online calculator to
estimate the cost to purchase a
replacement HECM. However, the exact
payment required to purchase a
replacement HECM includes
information and calculations which are
proprietary to HECM mortgage
brokerages. The FHWA believes the use
of a calculator which provides an
estimate will serve to inform the Agency
and displaced person of approximate
eligibility and a method for determining
whether HECM replacement costs are
actual, reasonable, and necessary.
The new item in appendix A presents
the various HECM terms that can be
encountered with solutions for Agencies
to consider. It also provides a link to the
FHWA online calculator to estimate the
eligibility and costs to replace the
HECM. This calculator uses basic
information readily available to an
Agency to calculate this estimated
payment. It only requires the value of
the acquired dwelling, existing balance
of the displacement HECM, and price of
the selected comparable or actual
replacement dwelling. Next, it
calculates an estimate of the remaining
equity on the displacement HECM, the
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69482
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
initial principal limit of the replacement
HECM (current HUD rules require 60
percent minimum equity in the
dwelling be available at the time of
purchase of the HECM) and funds
needed to purchase a replacement
HECM. Then, it subtracts the remaining
equity and price differential payment
from the total funds needed to arrive at
the estimated HECM supplemental
payment eligibility.
for owners in Section 1521(a)(1) of
MAP–21, which reduced the number of
days a person must have owned and
occupied a displacement dwelling in
order to be eligible for a replacement
housing payment from 180 days to 90
days. This change eliminates the need
or requirement to discuss eligibilities for
homeowners of more than 90 but less
than 180 days. Consequently, FHWA is
proposing to reorganize the section.
Section 24.401(f) Rental Assistance
Payment
This paragraph has been re-lettered (g)
due to the insertion of the new
§ 24.401(e) on HECMs. Section
1521(c)(1) of MAP–21 amends Section
204(a) of the Uniform Act by increasing
the statutory limit for rental assistance
payments to $7,200. Similarly, section
1521(b)(2) of MAP–21 also amends
Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
reducing the number of days a person
must have owned and occupied an
acquired dwelling in order to be eligible
for a rental assistance payment from 180
days to 90 days. The FHWA proposes to
modify this paragraph and the appendix
to reflect both changes.
Section 24.402(b)
Payment
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 24.402 Replacement Housing
Payments for 90-Day Tenants and
Certain Others
The FHWA proposes to strike ‘‘90-day
occupants,’’ which included tenants or
owner-occupants, from this section’s
current title and replace it with ‘‘tenants
and certain others.’’ The FHWA is
proposing this change to be consistent
with the heading ‘‘Tenants and certain
others’’ contained in both the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Polices Act as amended in
1987, and the statute Title 42, U.S.C.
Chapter 61, section 4624—Replacement
housing for tenants and certain others.
Section 24.402(a) Eligibility
Section 24.402 of the regulations sets
out criteria for when 90-day tenants and
certain others displaced from a dwelling
are eligible for a payment for rental
assistance or down payment assistance.
Section 1521(b)(2) of MAP–21 amends
Section 204(a) of the Uniform Act by
increasing the statutory limit for
replacement housing payment to tenants
to $7,200. The FHWA proposes to
update the amount listed in this
paragraph accordingly.
Section 24.402(a)(2) Eligibility
The FHWA proposes to add ‘‘the date
he or she moves from the displacement
dwelling’’ to the end of § 24.402(a) and
to delete the remainder of this
paragraph. These changes are necessary
because of changes to eligibility criteria
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Rental Assistance
Section 1521(a)(1) of MAP–21 amends
Section 204(a) of the Uniform Act by
increasing the statutory limit for
replacement housing payment to tenants
to $7,200. The FHWA proposes to
update the amount listed in this
paragraph accordingly.
The FHWA also proposes to correct
the web link to the Uniform Act Low
Income Limits Survey, which currently
points to an inactive website.
Section 24.402(b)(1)(i)
Assistance Payment
Rental
The FHWA has received some
questions about calculating and
developing a base monthly rental.
Developing a base monthly rental
requires information on costs of
utilities. The question that arises is
whether the allowance in
§ 24.402(b)(1)(i) of using the ‘‘. . .
estimated average monthly cost of
utilities for a comparable replacement
dwelling’’ can be applied, as opposed to
the actual utility costs, when
determining base monthly rental of the
displacement dwelling. The FHWA
believes that Agencies should attempt to
secure actual costs of utilities from the
displaced person in order to calculate
and determine base monthly rental, to
the extent practicable. Should those
costs not be available, the Agency
should so document its file and then
utilize an estimate to develop a base
monthly rental at the displacement
dwelling. The FHWA invites comments
and suggestions as to what estimates
may best approximate actual monthly
utility costs and what additional
guidance or support may be needed in
meeting the requirements of this
paragraph.
Section 24.402(b)(2)
Payments
Rental Assistance
The FHWA is proposing to revise the
low income calculation example in the
appendix by striking reference to
‘‘(a)(14)’’ and inserting to refer to the
definition of ‘‘household income’’ in
§ 24.2(a).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Section 24.402(b)(3)
Disbursement
Manner of
The FHWA proposes to add the word
‘‘replacement’’ to housing in this
paragraph to clarify the type of housing
covered. The sentence states that the
full amount of the rental assistance
payment vests with a tenant regardless
of the later condition or location of the
replacement dwelling.
Section 24.402(c) Down Payment
Assistance Payment
Section 204 of the Uniform Act sets
criteria for when 90-day tenants and
certain others displaced from a dwelling
are eligible for a payment for rental
assistance or down payment assistance.
Section 1521(c)(1) of MAP–21 amends
Section 204(c) of the Uniform Act by
increasing the statutory limit for down
payment assistance to $7,200. The
FHWA proposes to update the amount
listed in this paragraph and the
appendix accordingly.
The FHWA also proposes to modify
this paragraph by deleting ‘‘180 days’’
and inserting ‘‘90 days’’ in each place it
appears in this paragraph and appendix.
The FHWA also proposes to add
clarifying language in the appendix to
describe rental assistance payment
eligibilities for a displaced homeowner
who fails to meet the 90-day occupancy
requirements.
Section 24.403(a)(1) Additional Rules
Governing Replacement Housing
Payments
Comparable replacement housing
must be inspected whenever possible.
The selected comparable replacement
dwelling should be inspected with a
walk through or physical inspection.
Reliance on an exterior visual
inspection of comparables, or
examination and review of an MLS
listing’s details, does not, in most cases,
constitute a full DSS inspection as
required by the regulation and may not
reveal deficiencies in a property that
would render it not decent, safe, and
sanitary.
The FHWA proposes to modify
language in this paragraph to require
that Agencies inform displaced persons
in writing of the reason the full DSS
inspection of the comparable
replacement dwelling was not made and
that, should a displaced person select
one of the comparable dwellings as a
replacement dwelling, a replacement
housing payment cannot be made until
a DSS inspection is made of that
dwelling.
The FHWA also proposes to add a
new item to appendix A, Section
24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C), explaining what
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
constitutes a DSS inspection and a
further discussion of the requirement
that an Agency must make full
disclosure and explanation to the
displaced person if the comparable
replacement dwelling did not receive a
full DSS inspection.
The FHWA also is proposing to
change the sentence in the regulation ‘‘if
available, at least three comparable
replacement dwellings shall be
examined’’ to ‘‘shall be considered.’’
The FHWA also proposes to add an
appendix clarification at Section
24.403(a)(1) that the term ‘‘examined’’
does not necessarily equate to
‘‘inspected’’ for the payment
computation.
Section 24.403(a)(3) Acquisition of a
Portion of a Typical Residential
Property
The FHWA has received questions
regarding the term ‘‘buildable lot,’’ in
particular regarding circumstances
when a lot might not be buildable but
the Agency determines it does have
economic value to the owner and/or the
market. The FHWA believes
clarification of the term buildable lot is
warranted and thus proposes to replace
the phrase ‘‘is a buildable lot’’ with the
phrase ‘‘and the Agency determines that
the remainder has economic value to the
owner, which more accurately describes
these remainders.
In the past, some Agencies, when a
remainder had economic value to the
owner or market, would allow a
displaced person to decide to retain the
‘‘buildable lot’’ or remainder and would
calculate a replacement housing
eligibility based on only the portion of
the property that the Agency was
acquiring. This could cause a
substantial increase in calculated
eligibility or a windfall by virtue of the
property owner electing to retain the
remainder. The FHWA believes that it is
more reasonable to allow Agencies the
option to offer to purchase the
remainder and to base the replacement
housing eligibility on the offer for the
entire parcel regardless of the owner’s
decision to sell or retain the remainder.
The FHWA also proposes to offer a
sample calculation and to add language
to appendix A, Section 24.403(a)(3), to
explain that the purpose of this
paragraph is to clarify when to apply
this calculation method and how to
correctly calculate relocation eligibility
and payments. Also in appendix A,
Section 24.403(a)(3), FHWA proposes to
explain that if an Agency presents a
written offer to acquire the whole
parcel, the price differential portion of
the replacement housing payment
should be based upon the difference
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
between the comparable replacement
dwelling and the Agency’s written offer
to acquire the whole parcel. Under the
proposed changes, property owners may
elect to retain the remainder, but the
decision to do so would not require a
recalculation of relocation assistance
eligibility.
Subpart F—Mobile Homes
In the 2005 rulemaking, FHWA
reorganized the mobile home section to
streamline and better describe the
requirements for determining eligibility
and calculating benefits for mobile
home occupants. We continue to receive
questions which point to an undue
complexity in both determining
eligibility and calculating benefits in
this subpart. The FHWA believes that
the majority of the questions arise
because there is a two-part benefit
determination process that considers the
dwelling and the site the mobile home
is on as independent eligibilities.
Because they are independent
eligibilities (for example, a displaced
person could be a dwelling owner and
a tenant on the land), the permutations
and combinations of eligibilities and
related policy questions about proper
application of benefits are complex and
unwieldy. The FHWA has several FAQs
on the FHWA website 10 to address
these issues but continues to receive
questions about the determination and
calculation of benefits.
During the development of this
NPRM, FHWA conducted several
meetings with its Federal Agency
partners to identify methods of
restructuring and reorganizing Subpart
F. Several proposed changes were
considered but ultimately not adopted.
One method of clarifying mobile home
occupant payment eligibility and
computation would be based on the
displaced person’s ownership or rental
of the mobile home dwelling (dwelling
test). If the displaced person owns the
mobile home, he or she would be
considered an owner regardless of
whether he or she owns or rents the site,
and, as a dwelling owner, would not be
eligible for a utility payment. If the
displaced person is a tenant in the
mobile home, he or she would be a
tenant regardless of whether he or she
owns or rents the site, and, as such,
would be eligible for a utility payment.
Ultimately this approach was not
included in this NPRM. Some Agencies
were concerned that the dwelling test
would reduce overall benefits available
to displaced mobile home occupants
under the current two-part eligibility
calculation method and specifically to
10 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69483
those who are displaced low income
mobile home occupants.
The FHWA would like comments and
suggestions on methods to reorganize
and streamline the calculation and
determination of benefits for displaced
mobile home occupants, or whether
further changes are warranted. The
FHWA is interested in comments on
whether the dwelling test would
streamline and improve the process of
calculating and determining benefits for
a mobile home occupant, why and how
would benefits be reduced using the
dwelling test for mobile home
occupants, examples of how and why
the current regulation and method of
benefit determinations work well, or
have not worked well and
implementation challenges which the
current rule creates.
Section 24.502 Replacement Housing
Payment for 90-Day Mobile Homeowner
Displaced From a Mobile Home, and/or
From the Acquired Mobile Home Site
Section 1521(b)(2) of MAP–21 amends
Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
reducing the eligibility requirement
from 180 days to 90 days the number of
days a person must have owned and
occupied a displacement dwelling in
order to be eligible for a replacement
housing payment. The FHWA proposes
to update this paragraph accordingly.
Section 24.502(a) Eligibility
Section 1521(b)(1) of MAP–21 amends
Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
raising the statutory limit for
replacement housing payments to
$31,000. The FHWA proposes to modify
this paragraph by deleting $22,500 and
inserting $31,000 in each place it
appears.
Section 24.502(b) Replacement
Housing Payment Computation for a 90Day Owner That Is Displaced From a
Mobile Home
Section 1521(a)(1) of MAP–21 amends
Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
reducing the number of days a
homeowner-occupant must have owned
and occupied a displacement dwelling
in order to be eligible for a replacement
housing payment from 180 days to 90
days. The FHWA proposes to update
this paragraph accordingly.
Section 24.502(c) Rental Assistance
Payment for a 90-Day Owner-Occupant
Displaced From a Leased or Rented
Mobile Home Site
Section 1521(b)(2) of MAP–21 amends
Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by
reducing the eligibility requirement for
the number of days a person must have
owned and occupied a displacement
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69484
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
dwelling in order to be eligible for a
replacement housing payment from 180
days to 90 days. The FHWA proposes to
update this section and the appendix
accordingly.
This paragraph of the regulation was
not substantially changed except to
clarify that the base monthly rent for the
displacement site shall be the actual
cost paid to the landlord for the site. If
the tenant paid little or no rent, the new
regulation states that the market rent is
to be used, unless it would result in a
hardship to the displaced person.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 24.502(d) Owner-Occupant
Not Displaced From a Mobile Home
This paragraph was not substantially
changed. The FHWA continues to
believe that if a mobile home is personal
property and may be relocated, but the
owner elects not to move it, that the
owner is not entitled to a replacement
housing payment (RHP) for the purchase
of a replacement mobile home, but that
they are entitled to moving costs.
Section 24.503 Replacement Housing
Payment for 90-Day Mobile Home
Tenants and Certain Others
Section 1521(c)(1) of MAP–21 amends
Section 204(a) of the Uniform Act by
increasing the statutory limit for
replacement housing payment to tenants
to $7,200. The FHWA proposes to
update this section accordingly.
The FHWA also proposes to change
this section heading from ‘‘90-day
mobile home occupants,’’ which
included tenants or owner-occupants, to
‘‘tenants and certain others’’ since all
possible entitlements for 90-day owneroccupants are now addressed in
§ 24.401. This section now addresses
only 90-day tenants ‘‘and certain
others’’ to cover displaced persons
under § 24.404, housing of last resort.
The FHWA proposes this change
because the heading ‘‘Tenants and
certain others’’ is contained in the
statutory language. Those persons may
not meet length of occupancy
requirements, or a project may not be
able to proceed on a timely basis,
because replacement rental dwellings
are not available within the monetary
limits for those owners and tenants, as
specified in §§ 24.401–24.402. When
these situations arise, the Agency
provides additional or alternative
assistance under the section housing of
last resort, which then may include a
calculation of a replacement rental
assistance payment covering 42 months.
A displaced person may claim a rental
assistance payment to apply it to the
purchase of a DSS conventional
dwelling or mobile home. The FHWA
also proposes to add language to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
appendix A, Section 24.503, to clarify
that the combined mobile home and site
replacement housing payment cannot
exceed the cost of the actual
replacement dwelling or site.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
All comments received before the
close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above will be
considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above
address. Comments received after the
comment closing date will be filed in
the docket and will be considered to the
extent practicable. In addition to late
comments, the FHWA may also
continue to file relevant information in
the docket as it becomes available after
the comment period closing date, and
interested persons should continue to
examine the docket for new material. A
final rule may be published at any time
after close of the comment period and
after DOT has had the opportunity to
review the comments submitted.
The FHWA filed a redline version of
49 CFR part 24 in the docket to show
all changes to the regulation text and
facilitate public review and comment.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), Executive Order
13771 (Reducing Regulations and
Controlling Regulatory Costs), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and
13563 direct Agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). This proposed rule is a
significant regulatory action within the
meaning of E.O. 12866 and DOT’s
regulatory policies and procedures (44
FR 11032). This action complies with
EOs 12866, 13563, and 13771 to
improve regulation.
A more detailed discussion of the
economic analysis associated with this
rulemaking can be found in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis, which is
available in the docket. The FHWA
invites comments on its cost estimates
and discussion of benefits. Many of the
changes that this rule proposes are
requirements mandated by MAP–21,
which increased the statutory limits of
relocation residential and business
benefit eligibility and reduced the
length of occupancy requirements prior
to initiation of negotiations for
homeowners from 180 days to 90 days.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
This NPRM also proposes to streamline
program requirements and carry out a
comprehensive update of 49 CFR part
24 to better align the language of the
regulations with current program needs
and best practices. This proposed rule
would also address changes identified
by the public in response to the DOT’s
initiative on implementation of January
18, 2011, E.O. 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review in
Federal Register Notice 82 FR 45750
published on October 2, 2017.11 The
FHWA believes that the proposed
streamlining and updating in this NPRM
will result in a reduction of Federal
requirements and will afford the States
and Federal Agencies subject to the
Uniform Act new flexibilities to more
efficiently acquire real property and
relocate displaced persons.
The FHWA has had an ongoing dialog
with stakeholders and has developed
the proposed rule in a manner that
balances stakeholder concerns and
practical implementation issues to allow
SDOTs and Federal Agency recipients to
utilize the new flexibilities while
minimizing their effects on existing
requirements and procedures.
The Uniform Act provides important
protections and assistance for people
affected by federally-funded projects.
Congress passed the law to safeguard
people whose real property is acquired
or who move from their homes,
businesses, or farms as a result of
projects receiving Federal funds. The
most recent Federal act authorizing
surface transportation spending
modified the statutory payment levels
for which displaced persons may be
eligible under the Uniform Act’s
implementing regulations, necessitating
the current proposed rulemaking. In
addition, FHWA is proposing to make
changes to wording and section
organization to better reflect the Federal
experience implementing Uniform Act
programs. At the Federal level, 18
departments and Agencies are subject to
the Uniform Act and their input is
reflected in the proposed changes.
The costs of the proposed rule for all
Uniform Act Agencies over a 10-year
analysis period from 2019 to 2028 are
estimated to be: $1.8 million when
discounted at 7 percent and $2.0 million
when discounted at 3 percent. The bulk
of the costs are related to updating
program materials to reflect the changes
in the regulation.
The benefits of the proposed rule
primarily relate to improved equity and
fairness to entities that are displaced
11 https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2017/10/02/2017-21101/notification-of-regulatoryreview.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
from their properties or that move as a
result of projects receiving Federal
funds. For example, the proposed rule
raises the statutory maximums for
payments to displaced businesses to
assist with the reestablishment of the
business. There is strong evidence that
businesses experience reestablishment
costs well above the current maximum
amount.12 Raising the maximum
payment levels, as required by statute,
will compensate those businesses more
fairly and equitably for the negative
impacts they experience as a result of a
Federal or federally-assisted project.
However, the fairness and equity
benefits of the proposed rule cannot be
quantified or monetized. The higher
level of payments may also contribute to
more businesses being able to
successfully reestablish after
displacement.
The proposed rule contains changes,
such as a requirement for annual
reporting, that can be expected to
improve transparency, and, therefore,
oversight of the program. Again, that
benefit cannot be quantified or
monetized. The proposed rule changes
also provide clarity on how to
implement the Uniform Act and offer
Agencies additional options for
streamlining the administration of their
Uniform Act programs. These benefits
have not been quantified. Some minor
administrative cost savings have been
estimated. The FHWA was the only
Agency that had a detailed dataset
available for its Uniform Act program,
and, therefore, only the administrative
69485
cost savings to FHWA have been
estimated here. Based on
communications with other Uniform
Act Agencies, FHWA analysts believe
that FHWA has the largest Uniform Act
program; however, other Agencies have
sizable programs, as well. Therefore, the
total cost savings across all Agencies
will likely be larger.
The table below offers a summary of
the costs and benefits of the proposed
rule over the 10-year analysis period.
Given that the benefits of the rule
related to equity and fairness have not
been quantified, it would be misleading
to report a calculation of net benefits for
this proposed rule. Nonetheless, the
benefits related to equity and fairness
are believed to be sufficient to justify
the modest cost of the rule.
SUMMARY OF COSTS AND BENEFITS FOR ANALYSIS PERIOD 2019–2028
Item
Discounted 7%
Discounted 3%
Annualized 7%
Annualized 3%
Costs:
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) ..........
Revising Program Material ......................................
Federal Agency Reporting Requirement ................
Revising Max. RHP/RAP (FHWA Cost Savings) ....
Homeowner 90 Eligibility (FHWA Cost Savings) ....
Appraisal Waivers ...................................................
Third Tier of Waiver Valuations ..............................
Use of Single Agents ..............................................
Inspection of Comparable Housing .........................
Clarity & Streamlining .............................................
$11,947 ..................
1,787,731 ...............
166,290 ..................
(160,025) ...............
(7,040) ...................
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
$15,073 ..................
1,947,651 ...............
209,804 ..................
(204,380) ...............
(8,882) ...................
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
$1,701 ....................
254,533 ..................
23,676 ....................
(22,784) .................
(1,002) ...................
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
$1,767.
228,324.
24,595.
(23,960).
(1,041).
Not Quantified.
Not Quantified.
Not Quantified.
Not Quantified.
Not Quantified.
Total Costs * .....................................................
1,798,903 ...............
1,959,266 ...............
256,123 ..................
229,686.
Benefits:
Equity & Fairness ....................................................
Program Oversight ..................................................
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified.
Not Quantified.
* Totals may not match sums due to rounding.
The proposed rule would result in
additional payments made to displaced
businesses. However, these
expenditures are reimbursements for
costs that these businesses incur
regardless of the proposed rule and are
therefore considered transfers in the
context of a benefit-cost analysis. The
table below presents the estimated
amount of these transfers for FHWA’s
Uniform Act program. The FHWA was
the only Agency that provided data
upon which to base estimates.
Therefore, the magnitude of the change
in transfers for all Federal Agencies may
be larger than is reported here.
TRANSFERS TO DISPLACED PERSONS FOR ANALYSIS PERIOD 2019–2028
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Item
Discounted 7%
Discounted 3%
Annualized 7%
Annualized 3%
Residents:
Revising Replacement Housing and Rental Assistance Payments.
Homeowner 90-day Eligibility ..................................
Home Equity Conversion Mortgages ......................
$1,792,926 .............
$2,272,671 .............
$255,272 ................
$266,426.
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified ........
Not Quantified.
Not Quantified.
Non-residential displaced persons:
Reimbursement for Updating Other Media .............
Search Expenses ....................................................
Re-Establishment Expenses ...................................
Fixed Payments ......................................................
Not Quantified ........
8,117,037 ...............
82,335,367 .............
22,649,659 .............
Not Quantified ........
10,285,293 .............
104,271,810 ...........
28,709,348 .............
Not Quantified ........
1,164,226 ...............
11,722,704 .............
3,224,802 ...............
Not Quantified.
1,249,723.
12,223,837.
3,365,611.
12 The FHWA and other Agencies have conducted
studies over the years which conclude that benefit
levels are inadequate. Examples include FHWA’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
business relocation retrospective study: https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/publications/
business_relocation_assistance/index.cfm and GAO
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
report GAO–07–28GA, Eminent Domain, https://
www.gao.gov/assets/260/253929.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69486
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
TRANSFERS TO DISPLACED PERSONS FOR ANALYSIS PERIOD 2019–2028—Continued
Item
Total .................................................................
Discounted 7%
Discounted 3%
Annualized 7%
114,954,990 ...........
145,539,123 ...........
16,357,004 .............
Annualized 3%
17,061,625.
* Totals may not match sums due to rounding.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
60l–612), FHWA has evaluated the
effects of this proposed rule on small
entities and anticipates that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities, which includes SDOTs, Local
Public Agencies, other State
governmental Agencies or recipients
and subrecipients of Federal Agencies
subject to this regulation. This action
proposes to update the governmentwide regulation that provides assistance
for persons, including small businesses,
displaced by government acquisition of
real property. One of the reasons for
proposing the update is to increase
assistance for the small number
displaced small businesses impacted by
the Uniform Relocation Act. We
anticipate this proposal would have a
positive impact on those relatively few
small businesses that are affected by
government acquisition of real property.
We anticipate the number of small
businesses potentially impacted at all by
this proposed rule to be small. For
example, between 2013 to 2017 FHWA
had an average of 1,511 non-residential
relocations annually. The FHWA does
not have the data to determine how
many of the 1,511 non-residential
moves were small businesses, but even
if one were to assume each of those
moves impacted a small business, that
impact would account for .005 percent
of all U.S. small businesses.13 Financial
impacts on local governments are
mitigated by the fact that any increased
costs would accrue only on federallyassisted programs, which would include
participation of Federal funds. For these
reasons, FHWA certifies that this action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This proposed rule would not impose
unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48). This
proposed rule will not result in the
13 The United States Small Business
Administration’s 2018 Small Business Profile
estimates 30.2 million small businesses in the
United States.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $155 million or more
in any 1 year (2 U.S.C. 1532). Further,
in compliance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995, FHWA
would evaluate any regulatory action
that might be proposed in subsequent
stages of the proceeding to assess the
effects on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. In
addition, the definition of ‘‘Federal
Mandate’’ in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act excludes financial
assistance of the type in which State,
local, or tribal governments have
authority to adjust their participation in
the program in accordance with changes
made in the program by the Federal
Government.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires
Agencies to ensure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that may have a substantial,
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This proposed
action has been analyzed in accordance
with the principles and criteria
contained in E.O. 13132, and FHWA has
preliminarily determined that this
proposed action would not warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
The FHWA has also determined that
this proposed action would not preempt
any State law or State regulation or
affect any State’s ability to discharge
traditional State governmental
functions.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this action
under E.O. 13175 and believes that the
proposed action would not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes; would not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
tribal governments; and, would not
preempt tribal law. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The FHWA has analyzed this action
under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
The FHWA has determined that the
proposed action is not a significant
energy action under that order because
it is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects under E.O.
13211 is not required.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing E.O.
12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities apply to this program. Local
entities should refer to the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Program
Number 20.205, Highway Planning and
Construction, for further information.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.),
Federal Agencies must obtain approval
from the OMB for collections of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. The PRA
applies to Federal Agencies’ collections
of information imposed on 10 or more
persons. ‘‘Persons’’ include a State,
territorial, tribal, or local government, or
branch thereof, or their political
subdivisions.
This NPRM would call for a collection
of information under the PRA. As
defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ‘‘collection
of information’’ comprised of reporting,
recordkeeping, monitoring, posting,
labeling, and other similar actions. This
action contains amendments to the
existing information collection
requirements previously approved
under OMB Control Number 2125–0586.
The title and description of the
information collection, a description of
those who must collect the information,
and an estimate of the total annual
burden follow and are outlined in full
in the RIA contained in the docket for
this rulemaking.
The Uniform Act provides important
protections and assistance for people
affected by federally funded projects.
Congress passed the law to safeguard
people whose real property is acquired
or who move from their homes,
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
businesses, nonprofit organizations, or
farms as a result of projects receiving
Federal financial assistance. The
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP–21) modified the
statutory payment levels for which
displaced persons may be eligible under
the Uniform Act’s implementing
regulations, necessitating the current
proposed rulemaking. Additionally,
FHWA is proposing to make changes to
wording and section organization to
better reflect the Federal experience
implementing Uniform Act programs,
since the last comprehensive
rulemaking for 49 CFR part 24 occurred
in 2005.
This proposed requirement would
amend an existing collection of
information by increasing the number of
instances requiring information to be
collected under OMB control number
2125–0586. The burden hours reserved
under these requirements are not
sufficient to cover the additional indepth updates resulting from regulatory
revisions; thereby necessitating this
request for additional burden hours. The
hours requested are in addition to the
hours already set aside.
Agencies conducting a program or
project under the Uniform Act must
carry out their legal responsibilities to
affected property owners and displaced
persons. Recipients and subrecipients
must collect information in order to
determine, document and provide
Uniform Act benefits and assistance.
Federal agencies are also required to
develop and provide to the lead agency,
FHWA, an annual summary report the
describes the Uniform Act activities
conducted by the Federal agency and
their funding recipients.
The FHWA does not have available to
it information which would allow for
the calculation of burden hours for each
Federal agencies administration and
oversight of the government-wide
program. Each Federal agency will
separately develop information
collection requests for their program’s
administration and oversight. The
FHWA has developed a separate
regulatory impact analysis which
documents the costs for its program
administration and oversight. That
analysis is included as part of the 49
CFR part 24 NPRM publication.
The FHWA can estimate the one-time
government-wide cost of implementing
the new provisions of this rule to be
37,800 hours. This estimate includes
costs and benefits for the necessary
updates and revisions to program
materials including operations manuals.
The FHWA bases this estimate on
approximately 168 respondent’s efforts
to perform the necessary updates and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
revisions. The estimated burden hours
are for a one-time update and result
from the publication of a final rule.
The FHWA is required to submit this
proposed collection of information to
OMB for review and approval and,
accordingly, seeks public comments.
Interested parties are invited to send
comments regarding any aspect of these
information collection requirements,
including, but not limited to: (1)
Whether the collection of information is
necessary for the performance of the
functions of the FHWA, including
whether the information has practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the estimated
burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the collection of
information; and (4) ways to minimize
the collection burden without reducing
the quality of the information collected.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This action meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental
Justice)
Executive Order 12898, Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (the DOT Order), 91 FR
27534 (May 10, 2012) 14 require DOT
Agencies to achieve environmental
justice (EJ) as part of their mission by
identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects, including
interrelated social and economic effects,
of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and
low-income populations in the United
States. The DOT Order requires DOT
Agencies to address compliance with
E.O. 12898 and the DOT Order in all
rulemaking activities. In addition,
FHWA has issued additional documents
relating to administration of E.O. 12898
and the DOT Order. On June 14, 2012,
FHWA issued an update to its EJ order,
FHWA Order 6640.23A, FHWA Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations (the FHWA Order).15
The FHWA has evaluated this
proposed rule under the E.O., the DOT
Order, and the FHWA Order. The
FHWA has determined that the
14 Available online at www.fhwa.dot.gov/
enviornment/environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/
order_56102a/index.cfm.
15 Available online at www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/
directives/orders/664023a.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69487
proposed regulations, if finalized,
would not cause disproportionately
high and adverse human health and
environmental effects on minority or
low income populations. The proposed
regulations, if finalized, would establish
procedures and requirements for
agencies and others when acquiring,
managing, and disposing of real
property interests. The EJ principles, in
the context of acquisition, management,
and disposition of real property, should
be considered during the planning and
environmental review processes for the
particular proposal. The FHWA will
consider EJ when it makes a future
funding or other approval decision on a
project-level basis.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
The FHWA has analyzed this action
under E.O. 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. The FHWA
certifies that this proposed action would
not concern an environmental risk to
health or safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
The FHWA does not anticipate that
this proposed action would effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under E.O.
12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights. This action
proposes to update the governmentwide regulation that provides assistance
for persons displaced by government
acquisition of real property. This action
updates this regulation to reflect
increases in benefit levels for displaced
persons and to improve the Agencies’
service to individuals and businesses
affected by Federal or federally assisted
projects.
National Environmental Policy Act
Agencies are required to adopt
implementing procedures for NEPA that
establish specific criteria for, and
identification of, three classes of
actions: Those that normally require
preparation of an environmental impact
statement; those that normally require
preparation of an environmental
assessment; and; those that are
categorically excluded from further
NEPA review (40 CFR 1507.3(b)). The
proposed action is the adoption of
regulations that provide the policies,
procedures, and requirements for
acquisition of real property interests for
Federal and federally assisted projects.
The proposed action has no potential for
environmental impacts until the
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69488
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
regulations, if adopted, are applied at
the project level. The FHWA would
have an obligation to evaluate the
potential environmental impacts of such
a future project-level action if the action
constitutes a major Federal action under
NEPA.
This proposed action qualifies for
categorical exclusions under 23 CFR
771.117(c)(20) (promulgation of rules,
regulations, and directives) and
771.117(c)(1) (activities that do not lead
directly to construction). The FHWA
has evaluated whether the proposed
action would involve unusual
circumstances or extraordinary
circumstances and has determined that
this proposed action would not involve
such circumstances. As a result, FHWA
finds that this proposed rulemaking
would not result in significant impacts
on the human environment.
Regulation Identification Number
A RIN is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RIN contained
in the heading of this document can be
used to cross reference this action with
the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 24
Appraisal, Appraisal review, Just
compensation, Real property
acquisition, Relocation assistance,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Waiver
valuations.
Issued on November 19, 2019 under
authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.85(d)(7):
Nicole R. Nason,
Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
In consideration of the foregoing,
FHWA proposes to revise title 49, Code
of Federal Regulations, part 24 as
follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
PART 24—UNIFORM RELOCATION
ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY
ACQUISITION FOR FEDERAL AND
FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS
Subpart A—General
Sec.
24.1 Purpose.
24.2 Definitions and acronyms.
24.3 No duplication of payments.
24.4 Assurances, monitoring, and corrective
action.
24.5 Manner of notices.
24.6 Administration of jointly-funded
projects.
24.7 Federal Agency waiver of regulations
in this part.
24.8 Compliance with other laws and
regulations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
24.9 Recordkeeping and reports.
24.10 Appeals.
24.11 Adjustments of relocation benefits.
Subpart B—Real Property Acquisition
24.101 Applicability of acquisition
requirements.
24.102 Basic acquisition policies.
24.103 Criteria for appraisals.
24.104 Review of appraisals.
24.105 Acquisition of tenant-owned
improvements.
24.106 Expenses incidental to transfer of
title to the Agency.
24.107 Certain litigation expenses.
24.108 Donations.
Subpart C—General Relocation
Requirements
24.201 Purpose.
24.202 Applicability.
24.203 Relocation notices.
24.204 Availability of comparable
replacement dwelling before
displacement.
24.205 Relocation planning, advisory
services, and coordination.
24.206 Eviction for cause.
24.207 General requirements—claims for
relocation payments.
24.208 Aliens not lawfully present in the
United States.
24.209 Relocation payments not considered
as income.
Subpart D—Payments for Moving and
Related Expenses
24.301 Payment for actual reasonable
moving and related expenses.
24.302 Fixed payment for moving
expenses—residential moves.
24.303 Related nonresidential eligible
expenses.
24.304 Reestablishment expenses—
nonresidential moves.
24.305 Fixed payment for moving
expenses—nonresidential moves.
24.306 Discretionary utility relocation
payments.
Subpart E—Replacement Housing
Payments
24.401 Replacement housing payment for
90-day homeowner-occupants.
24.402 Replacement housing payment for
90-day tenants and certain others.
24.403 Additional rules governing
replacement housing payments.
24.404 Replacement housing of last resort.
Subpart F—Mobile Homes
24.501 Applicability.
24.502 Replacement housing payment for a
90-day mobile homeowner displaced
from mobile home.
24.503 Rental assistance payment for 90day mobile home tenants and certain
others.
Subpart G—Certification
24.601 Purpose.
24.602 Certification application.
24.603 Monitoring and corrective action.
Appendix A to Part 24—Additional
Information
Appendix B to Part 24—Statistical Report
Form
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 49 CFR
1.85.
Subpart A—General
§ 24.1
Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to
promulgate rules to implement the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Policies Act of
1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601 et
seq.) (Uniform Act), in accordance with
the following objectives:
(a) To ensure that owners of real
property to be acquired for Federal and
federally assisted projects are treated
fairly and consistently, to encourage and
expedite acquisition by agreements with
such owners, to minimize litigation and
relieve congestion in the courts, and to
promote public confidence in Federal
and federally assisted land acquisition
programs;
(b) To ensure that persons displaced
as a direct result of Federal or federally
assisted projects are treated fairly,
consistently, and equitably so that such
displaced persons will not suffer
disproportionate injuries as a result of
projects designed for the benefit of the
public as a whole; and
(c) To ensure that Agencies
implement the regulations in this part in
a manner that is efficient and cost
effective.
§ 24.2
Definitions and acronyms.
(a) Definitions. Unless otherwise
noted, the following terms used in this
part shall be understood as defined in
this section:
Agency. The term Agency means any
entity utilizing Federal funds or Federal
financial assistance for a project or
program that acquires real property or
displaces a person.
(i) Federal Agency. The term Federal
Agency means any department, Agency,
or instrumentality in the executive
branch of the United States
Government, any wholly owned U.S.
Government corporation, the Architect
of the Capitol, the Federal Reserve
Banks and branches thereof, and any
person who has the authority to acquire
property by eminent domain under
Federal law.
(ii) State Agency. The term State
Agency means any department, Agency
or instrumentality of a State or of a
political subdivision of a State, any
department, Agency, or instrumentality
of two or more States or of two or more
political subdivisions of a State or
States, and any person who has the
authority to acquire property by
eminent domain under State law.
Alien not lawfully present in the
United States. The phrase alien not
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
lawfully present in the United States
means an alien who is not ‘‘lawfully
present’’ in the United States.
(i) An alien present in the United
States who has not been admitted or
paroled into the United States pursuant
to the Immigration and Nationality Act
(8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) and whose stay
in the United States has not been
authorized by the Secretary of
Homeland; and
(ii) An alien who is present in the
United States after the expiration of the
period of stay authorized by the
Secretary of Homeland Security or who
otherwise violates the terms and
conditions of admission, parole, or
authorization to stay in the United
States.
Appraisal. The term appraisal means
a written statement independently and
impartially prepared by a qualified
appraiser setting forth an opinion of
defined value of an adequately
described property as of a specific date,
supported by the presentation and
analysis of relevant market information.
Business. The term business means
any lawful activity, except a farm
operation, that is conducted:
(i) Primarily for the purchase, sale,
lease, and/or rental of personal and/or
real property, and/or for the
manufacture, processing, and/or
marketing of products, commodities,
and/or any other personal property;
(ii) Primarily for the sale of services
to the public;
(iii) Primarily for outdoor advertising
display purposes, when the display
must be moved as a result of the project;
or
(iv) By a nonprofit organization that
has established its nonprofit status
under applicable Federal or State law.
Citizen. The term citizen for purposes
of this part includes both citizens of the
United States and noncitizen nationals.
Comparable replacement dwelling.
The term comparable replacement
dwelling means a dwelling which is:
(i) Decent, safe, and sanitary as
described in the definition of decent,
safe, and sanitary in this paragraph (a);
(ii) Functionally equivalent to the
displacement dwelling. The term
functionally equivalent means that it
performs the same function and
provides the same utility. While a
comparable replacement dwelling need
not possess every feature of the
displacement dwelling, the principal
features must be present. Generally,
functional equivalency is an objective
standard, reflecting the range of
purposes for which the various physical
features of a dwelling may be used.
However, in determining whether a
replacement dwelling is functionally
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
equivalent to the displacement
dwelling, the Agency may consider
reasonable trade-offs for specific
features when the replacement unit is
equal to or better than the displacement
dwelling (see appendix A of this part,
Section 24.2(a) Comparable
replacement dwelling);
(iii) Adequate in size to accommodate
the occupants;
(iv) In an area not subject to
unreasonable adverse environmental
conditions;
(v) In a location generally not less
desirable than the location of the
displaced person’s dwelling with
respect to public utilities and
commercial and public facilities, and
reasonably accessible to the person’s
place of employment;
(vi) On a site that is typical in size for
residential development with normal
site improvements, including customary
landscaping. The site need not include
special improvements such as
outbuildings, swimming pools, or
greenhouses. (See also § 24.403(a)(2));
(vii) Currently available to the
displaced person on the private market
except as provided in paragraph (ix) of
this definition (see appendix A of this
part, Section 24.2(a) Comparable
replacement dwelling); and
(viii) Within the financial means of
the displaced person:
(A) A replacement dwelling
purchased by a homeowner in
occupancy at the displacement dwelling
for at least 90 days prior to initiation of
negotiations (90-day homeowner) is
considered to be within the
homeowner’s financial means if the
homeowner will receive the full price
differential as described in § 24.401(c),
all increased mortgage interest costs as
described at § 24.401(d) and all
incidental expenses as described at
§ 24.401(e), plus any additional amount
required to be paid under § 24.404.
(B) A replacement dwelling rented by
an eligible displaced person is
considered to be within his or her
financial means if, after receiving rental
assistance under this part, the person’s
monthly rent and estimated average
monthly utility costs for the
replacement dwelling do not exceed the
person’s base monthly rental for the
displacement dwelling as described at
§ 24.402(b)(2).
(C) For a displaced person who is not
eligible to receive a replacement
housing payment because of the
person’s failure to meet length-ofoccupancy requirements, comparable
replacement rental housing is
considered to be within the person’s
financial means if an Agency pays that
portion of the monthly housing costs of
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69489
a replacement dwelling which exceeds
the person’s base monthly rent for the
displacement dwelling as described in
§ 24.402(b)(2). Such rental assistance
must be paid under § 24.404,
Replacement housing of last resort.
(ix) For a person receiving
government housing assistance before
displacement, a dwelling that may
reflect similar government housing
assistance. In such cases any
requirements of the government housing
assistance program relating to the size of
the replacement dwelling shall apply.
However, nothing in this part prohibits
an Agency from offering, or precludes a
person from accepting, assistance under
a government housing program, even if
the person did not receive similar
assistance before displacement, subject
to the eligibility requirements of the
government housing assistance program.
An Agency is obligated to inform the
person of his or her options under this
part. If a person accepts assistance
under a government housing assistance
program, the rules of that program
governing the size of the dwelling
apply, and the rental assistance
payment under § 24.402 would be
computed on the basis of the person’s
actual out-of-pocket cost for the
replacement housing and associated
utilities after the applicable government
assistance has been applied. In
determining comparability of housing
under this part:
(A) A public housing unit may qualify
as a comparable replacement dwelling
only for a person displaced from a
public housing unit.
(B) A privately owned dwelling with
a housing program subsidy tied to the
unit may qualify as a comparable
replacement dwelling only for a person
displaced from a similarly subsidized
unit or public housing unit.
(C) A housing program subsidy that is
paid to a person (not tied to the
building), such as a HUD Section 8
Housing Voucher Program, may be
reflected in an offer of a comparable
replacement dwelling to a person
receiving a similar subsidy or occupying
a privately owned subsidized unit or
public housing unit before
displacement. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.2(a) Comparable
replacement dwelling.)
Contribute materially. The term
contribute materially means that during
the 2 taxable years prior to the taxable
year in which displacement occurs, or
during such other period as the Agency
determines to be more equitable, a
business or farm operation:
(i) Had average annual gross receipts
of at least $5,000; or
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69490
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Had average annual net earnings
of at least $1,000; or
(iii) Contributed at least 331⁄3 percent
of the owner’s or operator’s average
annual gross income from all sources.
(iv) If the application of the above
criteria creates an inequity or hardship
in any given case, the Agency may
approve the use of other criteria as
determined appropriate. (See appendix
A of this part, Section 24.305(e) Average
annual net earnings of a business or
farm operation.)
Decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling.
The term decent, safe, and sanitary
(DSS) dwelling means a dwelling which
meets the requirements of paragraphs (i)
through (vii) of this definition or the
most stringent of the local housing code,
Federal Agency regulations, or the
Agency’s regulations or written policy.
The DSS dwelling shall:
(i) Be structurally sound, weather
tight, and in good repair;
(A) Many local housing and
occupancy codes require the abatement
of deteriorating paint, including leadbased paint and lead-based paint dust,
in protecting the public health and
safety. Where such standards exist, they
must be honored;
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Contain a safe electrical wiring
system adequate for lighting and other
devices;
(iii) Contain a heating system capable
of sustaining a healthful temperature (of
approximately 70 degrees) for a
displaced person, except in those areas
where local climatic conditions do not
require such a system;
(iv) Be adequate in size with respect
to the number of rooms and area of
living space needed to accommodate the
displaced person. The number of
persons occupying each habitable room
used for sleeping purposes shall not
exceed that permitted by local housing
codes or the more stringent the Federal
funding Agency requirements. In
addition, the Federal funding agency
shall follow the requirements for
separate bedrooms for children of the
opposite gender included in local
housing codes or in the absence of local
codes, the policies of such Agencies;
(v) There shall be a separate, well
lighted and ventilated bathroom that
provides privacy to the user and
contains a sink, bathtub or shower stall,
and a toilet, all in good working order
and properly connected to appropriate
sources of water and to a sewage
drainage system. When required by
local code standards for residential
occupancy, there shall be a kitchen area
that contains a fully usable sink,
properly connected to potable hot and
cold water and to a sewage drainage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
system, and adequate space and utility
service connections for a stove and
refrigerator (see appendix A of this part,
Section 24.2(a), definition of DSS);
(vi) Contains unobstructed egress to
safe, open space at ground level; and
(vii) For a displaced person with a
disability, be free of any barriers which
would preclude reasonable ingress,
egress, or use of the dwelling by such
displaced person. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.2(a), definition of
DSS.)
Displaced person—(i) General. The
term displaced person means, except as
provided in paragraph (ii) of this
definition, any person who moves from
the real property or moves his or her
personal property from the real
property. (This includes a person who
occupies the real property prior to its
acquisition, but who does not meet the
length of occupancy requirements of the
Uniform Act as described at §§ 24.401(a)
and 24.402(a)):
(A) As a direct result of a written
notice of intent to acquire, rehabilitate,
and/or demolish (see § 24.203(d)), the
initiation of negotiations for, or the
acquisition of, such real property in
whole or in part for a project;
(B) As a direct result of rehabilitation
or demolition for a project; or
(C) As a direct result of a written
notice of intent to acquire, or the
acquisition, rehabilitation or demolition
of, in whole or in part, other real
property on which the person conducts
a business or farm operation, for a
project. However, eligibility for such
person under this paragraph (i)(C)
applies only for purposes of obtaining
relocation assistance advisory services
under § 24.205(c), and moving expenses
under § 24.301, § 24.302, or § 24.303.
(ii) Persons required to move
temporarily. A person who is not
required to relocate permanently as a
direct result of a project. Such
determination shall be made by the
Agency in accordance with any
requirement, policy, or guidance
established by the Federal Agency
funding the project (see appendix A of
this part, Section 24.2(a)). At a
minimum, for persons required to move
on a temporary basis, Agencies must
ensure that required services and
assistance are provided (see § 24.202(a)).
(iii) Persons not displaced. The
following is a nonexclusive listing of
persons who do not qualify as displaced
persons under this part:
(A) A person who moves before the
initiation of negotiations (see
§ 24.403(d)), unless the Agency
determines that the person was
displaced as a direct result of the
program or project;
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(B) A person who initially enters into
occupancy of the property after the date
of its acquisition for the project;
(C) A person who has occupied the
property for the purpose of obtaining
assistance under the Uniform Act;
(D) An owner-occupant who moves as
a result of an acquisition of real
property as described in § 24.101(a)(2)
or (b)(1) or (2), or as a result of the
rehabilitation or demolition of the real
property. (However, the displacement of
a tenant as a direct result of any
acquisition, rehabilitation or demolition
for a Federal or federally assisted project
is subject to this part.);
(E) A person whom the Agency
determines is not displaced as a direct
result of a partial acquisition;
(F) A person who, after receiving a
notice of relocation eligibility (described
at § 24.203(b)), is notified in writing that
he or she will not be displaced for a
project. Such written notification shall
not be issued unless the person has not
moved and the Agency agrees to
reimburse the person for any expenses
incurred to satisfy any binding
contractual relocation obligations
entered into after the effective date of
the notice of relocation eligibility;
(G) An owner-occupant who conveys
his or her property, as described in
§ 24.101(a)(2) or (b)(1) or (2), after being
informed in writing that if a mutually
satisfactory agreement on terms of the
conveyance cannot be reached, the
Agency will not acquire the property. In
such cases, however, any resulting
displacement of a tenant is subject to
the regulations in this part;
(H) A person who retains the right of
use and occupancy of the real property
for life following its acquisition by the
Agency;
(I) An owner who retains the right of
use and occupancy of the real property
for a fixed term after its acquisition by
the Department of the Interior under
Public Law 93–477, Appropriations for
National Park System, or Public Law
93–303, Land and Water Conservation
Fund, except that such owner remains
a displaced person for purposes of
subpart D of this part;
(J) A person who is determined to be
in unlawful occupancy prior to or after
the initiation of negotiations, or a
person who has been evicted for cause,
under applicable law, as provided for in
§ 24.206. However, advisory assistance
may be provided to unlawful occupants
at the option of the Agency in order to
facilitate the project;
(K) A person who is not lawfully
present in the United States and who
has been determined to be ineligible for
relocation assistance in accordance with
§ 24.208; or
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(L) Tenants required to move as a
result of the sale of their dwelling to a
person using Federal down payment
assistance funds as they are defined in
this section (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.2(a)).
(M) Temporary, daily, or emergency
shelter occupants are typically not
considered displaced persons. However,
Agencies may determine that a person
occupying a shelter is a displaced
person due to factors which could
include reasonable expectation of a
prolonged stay, or other extenuating
circumstances. At a minimum, Agencies
shall provide advisory assistance to all
occupants at initiation of negotiations.
(See appendix A of this part, Section
24.2(a) (Displaced persons).)
Dwelling. The term dwelling means
the place of permanent or customary
and usual residence of a person,
according to local custom or law,
including a single-family house; a
single-family unit in a two-family,
multi-family, or multi-purpose property;
a unit of a condominium or cooperative
housing project; a mobile home; or any
other residential unit.
Dwelling site. The term dwelling site
means a land area that is typical in size
for similar dwellings located in the
same neighborhood or rural area. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.2(a).)
Farm operation. The term farm
operation means any activity conducted
solely or primarily for the production of
one or more agricultural products or
commodities, including timber, for sale
or home use, and customarily producing
such products or commodities in
sufficient quantity to be capable of
contributing materially to the operator’s
support.
Federal down payment assistance.
The term Federal down payment
assistance means funds other than
Uniform Act benefits provided to an
individual for the purpose of purchasing
and occupying a residence. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.2(a).)
Federal financial assistance. The term
Federal financial assistance means a
grant, loan, or contribution provided by
the United States, except any Federal
down payment assistance, tax credits
such as the Low Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC), guarantee or insurance
and any interest reduction payment to
an individual in connection with the
purchase and occupancy of a residence
by that individual.
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage
(HECM) (also known as a reverse
mortgage). A HECM is a first mortgage
which provides for future payments to
the homeowner based on accumulated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
equity and which a housing creditor is
authorized to make under any Federal
law or State constitution, law, or
regulation. See 12 U.S.C. 1715z–20. It is
a class of lien generally available to
persons 62 years of age or older. HECMs
do not require a monthly mortgage
payment and can also be used to access
a home’s equity. The HECM becomes
due when none of the original
borrowers lives in the home, if taxes or
insurance become delinquent, or if the
property falls into disrepair.
Household income. The term
household income means total gross
income received for a 12-month period
from all sources (earned and unearned)
including, but not limited to wages,
salary, child support, alimony,
unemployment benefits, workers
compensation, social security, or the net
income from a business. It does not
include income received or earned by
dependent children under 18, or fulltime students who are students for at
least 5 months of the year and are under
the age of 24. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.2(a), for examples of
exclusions to income.)
Initiation of negotiations. Unless a
different action is specified in
applicable Federal program regulations,
the term initiation of negotiations means
the following:
(i) Whenever the displacement results
from the acquisition of the real property
by a Federal Agency or State Agency,
the initiation of negotiations means the
delivery of the initial written offer of
just compensation by the Agency to the
owner or the owner’s representative to
purchase the real property for the
project. However, if the Federal Agency
or State Agency issues a notice of its
intent to acquire, rehabilitate, or
demolish the real property, and a person
moves after that notice, but before
delivery of the initial written purchase
offer, the initiation of negotiations
means the actual move of the person
from the property.
(ii) Whenever the displacement is
caused by rehabilitation, demolition, or
privately undertaken acquisition of the
real property (and there is no related
acquisition by a Federal Agency or a
State Agency), the initiation of
negotiations means the notice to the
person that he or she will be displaced
by the project or, if there is no notice,
the actual move of the person from the
property.
(iii) In the case of a permanent
relocation to protect the public health
and welfare, under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–
510, or Superfund) (CERCLA) the
initiation of negotiations means the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69491
formal announcement of such relocation
or the Federal or federally-coordinated
health advisory where the Federal
Government later decides to conduct a
permanent relocation.
(iv) In the case of permanent
relocation of a tenant as a result of a
voluntary acquisition of real property
described in § 24.101(b)(1) through (5),
the initiation of negotiations means the
actions described in paragraphs (i) and
(ii) of this definition, except that the
tenant is not eligible for relocation
assistance under this part, until there is
a binding written agreement between
the Agency and the owner to purchase
the real property. An option to
purchase, conditional sale, or purchase
agreement is not considered a binding
agreement to purchase real property.
(See appendix A of this part, Section
24.2(a).)
Lead Agency. The term Lead Agency
means the Department of Transportation
acting through the Federal Highway
Administration.
Mobile home. The term mobile home
includes manufactured homes and
recreational vehicles used as residences.
(See appendix A of this part, Section
24.2(a).)
Mortgage. The term mortgage means
such classes of liens as are commonly
given to secure advances on, or the
unpaid purchase price of, real property,
under the laws of the State in which the
real property is located, together with
the credit instruments, if any, secured
thereby.
Nonprofit organization. The term
nonprofit organization means an
organization that is incorporated under
the applicable laws of a State as a
nonprofit organization, and exempt
from paying Federal income taxes under
section 501 of the Internal Revenue
Code (26 U.S.C. 501).
Owner of a dwelling. The term owner
of a dwelling means a person who is
considered to have met the requirement
to own a dwelling if the person
purchases or holds any of the following
interests in real property:
(i) Fee title, a life estate, a land
contract, a 99-year lease, or a lease
including any options for extension
with at least 50 years to run from the
date of acquisition; or
(ii) An interest in a cooperative
housing project which includes the right
to occupy a dwelling; or
(iii) A contract to purchase any of the
interests or estates described in this
section; or
(iv) Any other interest, including a
partial interest, which in the judgment
of the Agency warrants consideration as
ownership.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69492
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Owner’s designated representative. A
property owner may designate a
representative to receive all required
notifications and documents from the
Agency. The owner must provide the
Agency a written notification which
states that they will be designating a
representative, provide that person’s
name and contact information and what
if any notices or information, the
representative is not authorized to
receive.
Person. The term person means any
individual, family, partnership,
corporation, or association.
Program or project. The phrase
program or project means any activity or
series of activities undertaken by a
Federal Agency or with Federal
financial assistance received or
anticipated in any phase of an
undertaking in accordance with the
Federal funding Agency guidelines.
Recipient. The term recipient means a
non-Federal entity that receives a
Federal award directly from a Federal
Agency to carry out an activity under a
Federal program. The recipient is
accountable to the Federal-funding
Agency for the use of the funds and for
compliance with applicable Federal
requirements. The term recipient does
not include subrecipients.
Salvage value. The term salvage value
means the probable sale price of an item
offered for sale to knowledgeable buyers
with the requirement that it be removed
from the property at a buyer’s expense
(i.e., not eligible for relocation
assistance). This includes items for reuse as well as items with components
that can be re-used or recycled when
there is no reasonable prospect for sale
except on this basis.
Small business. A small business is a
business having not more than 500
employees working at the site being
acquired or displaced by a program or
project, which site is the location of
economic activity. Sites occupied solely
by outdoor advertising signs, displays,
or devices do not qualify as a business
for purposes of § 24.303 or § 24.304.
State. Any of the several States of the
United States or the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, any territory or possession of the
United States, or a political subdivision
of any of these jurisdictions.
Subrecipient. The term subrecipient
means a government Agency or legal
entity that enters into an agreement with
a recipient to carry out part or all of the
activity funded by Federal program
grant funds. A subrecipient is
accountable to the recipient for the use
of the funds and for compliance with
applicable Federal requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Temporary, daily, or emergency
shelter (shelter). The phrase temporary,
daily, or emergency shelter (shelter)
means any facility, the primary purpose
of which is to provide a person with a
temporary overnight shelter which does
not generally allow prolonged or
guaranteed occupancy. A shelter
typically requires the occupants to
remove their personal property and
themselves from the premises on a daily
basis, offers no guarantee of reentry in
the evening, and does not meet the
definition of dwelling as used in this
part.
Tenant. The term tenant means a
person who has the temporary use and
occupancy of real property owned by
another.
Uneconomic remnant. The term
uneconomic remnant means a parcel of
real property in which the owner is left
with an interest after the partial
acquisition of the owner’s property, and
which the Agency has determined has
little or no value or utility to the owner.
Uniform Act. The term Uniform Act
or Act means the Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Pub. L.
91–646, 84 Stat. 1894; 42 U.S.C. 4601 et
seq.), and amendments thereto.
Unlawful occupant. A person who
occupies without property right, title, or
payment of rent, or a person legally
evicted, with no legal rights to occupy
a property under State law. An Agency,
at its discretion, may consider such
person to be in lawful occupancy for the
purpose of determining eligibility for
assistance under the Uniform Act.
Utility costs. The term utility costs
means expenses for electricity, gas,
other heating and cooking fuels, water,
and sewer.
Utility facility. The term utility facility
means:
(i) Any line, facility, or system for
producing, transporting, transmitting, or
distributing communications, cable,
television, power, electricity, light, heat,
gas, oil, crude products, water, steam,
waste, storm water not connected with
highway drainage, or any other similar
commodity, including any fire or police
signal system or street lighting system,
which directly or indirectly serves the
public; any fixtures, equipment, or other
property associated with the operation,
maintenance, or repair of any such
system. A utility facility may be
publicly, privately, or cooperatively
owned.
(ii) The term shall also mean the
utility company including any
substantially owned or controlled
subsidiary. For the purposes of this part
the term includes those utility-type
facilities which are owned or leased by
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
a government Agency for its own use, or
otherwise dedicated solely to
governmental use. The term utility
includes those facilities used solely by
the utility which are part of its operating
plant.
Utility relocation. The term utility
relocation means the adjustment of a
utility facility required by the program
or project undertaken by the Agency. It
includes removing and reinstalling the
facility, including necessary temporary
facilities; necessary right-of-way on a
new location; moving, rearranging, or
changing the type of existing facilities;
and, taking any necessary safety and
protective measures. It shall also mean
constructing a replacement facility that
has the functional equivalency of the
existing facility and is necessary for the
continued operation of the utility
service, the project economy, or
sequence of project construction.
Waiver valuation. The term waiver
valuation means the valuation process
used and the product produced when
the Agency determines that an appraisal
is not required, pursuant to
§ 24.102(c)(2) appraisal waiver
provisions.
(b) Acronyms. The following
acronyms are commonly used in the
implementation of programs subject to
this part:
DOT (U.S. Department of
Transportation).
FEMA (Federal Emergency
Management Agency).
FHA (Federal Housing
Administration).
FHWA (Federal Highway
Administration).
FIRREA (Financial Institutions
Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act
of 1989).
HLR (Housing of last resort).
HUD (U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development).
MIDP (Mortgage interest differential
payment).
RHP (Replacement housing payment).
STURAA (Surface Transportation and
Uniform Relocation Act Amendments of
1987).
UA or URA (Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970).
USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Service).
USPAP (Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice).
§ 24.3
No duplication of payments.
No person shall receive any payment
under this part if that person receives a
payment under Federal, State, local law,
or insurance proceeds which is
determined by the Agency to have the
same purpose and effect as such
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
payment under this part. (See appendix
A of this part, Section 24.3.)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.4 Assurances, monitoring, and
corrective action.
(a) Assurances. (1) Before a Federal
Agency may approve any grant to, or
contract, or agreement with, an Agency
under which Federal financial
assistance will be made available for a
project which results in real property
acquisition or displacement that is
subject to the Uniform Act, the Agency
must provide appropriate assurances
that it will comply with the Uniform
Act and this part. An Agency’s
assurances shall be in accordance with
sections 210 and 305 of the Uniform
Act. The Agency’s section 305
assurances must contain specific
reference to any State law which the
Agency believes provides an exception
to section 301 or 302 of the Uniform
Act. If, in the judgment of the Federal
Agency, Uniform Act compliance will
be served, an Agency may provide these
assurances at one time to cover all
subsequent federally assisted programs
or projects. An Agency, which both
acquires real property and displaces
persons, may combine its sections 210
and 305 assurances in one document.
(2) If a Federal Agency or recipient
provides Federal financial assistance to
a party or person causing displacement,
such Federal Agency or recipient is
responsible for ensuring compliance
with the requirements of this part,
notwithstanding the person’s
contractual obligation to the recipient to
comply with the requirements of this
part.
(3) As an alternative to the assurance
requirement described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section, a Federal Agency
may provide Federal financial
assistance to a recipient after it has
accepted a certification by such
recipient in accordance with the
requirements in subpart G of this part.
(b) Monitoring and corrective action.
The Federal Agency will monitor
compliance with this part, and the
recipient shall take whatever corrective
action is necessary to comply with the
Uniform Act and this part. The Federal
Agency may also apply sanctions in
accordance with applicable program
regulations. (Also see § 24.603.)
(c) Prevention of fraud, waste, and
mismanagement. The Agency shall take
appropriate measures to carry out this
part in a manner that minimizes fraud,
waste, and mismanagement.
§ 24.5
Manner of notices.
(a) Each notice which the Agency is
required to provide to a property owner
or occupant under this part, except the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
notice described at § 24.102(b), shall be
personally served or sent by certified or
registered first-class mail, return receipt
requested (or by companies other than
the United States Postal Service that
provide the same function as certified
mail with return receipts) and
documented in Agency files. A Federal
funding Agency may approve the use of
electronic delivery of notices in lieu of
the use of certified or registered firstclass mail, return receipt requested, or
personally served notices, when an
Agency demonstrates a means to
document receipt of such notices by the
property owner or occupant.
(b) An Agency requesting use of
electronic delivery of notices must
include the following safeguards:
(1) A process to inform property
owners and occupants that they must
voluntarily elect to receive electronic
notices.
(2) A process to document and record
when information is legally delivered in
digital format. A date and timestamp
must establish the date of delivery and
receipt with an electronic record
capable of retention.
(3) A method to link the electronic
signature with an electronic document
in a way that can be used to determine
whether the electronic document was
changed subsequent to when an
electronic signature was applied to the
document.
(4) A certification that use of
electronic notices or signatures is
consistent with existing State and
Federal laws.
(c) Each notice shall be written in
plain, understandable language. Persons
who are unable to read and understand
the notice must be provided with
appropriate translation and counseling.
Each notice shall indicate the name and
telephone number of a person who may
be contacted for answers to questions or
other needed help. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.5.)
(d) A property owner may designate a
representative to receive offers,
correspondence, and information by
providing a written request to the
Agency (§ 24.2(a)).
§ 24.6 Administration of jointly-funded
projects.
Whenever two or more Federal
Agencies provide financial assistance to
an Agency or Agencies, other than a
Federal Agency, to carry out
functionally or geographically related
activities which will result in the
acquisition of property or the
displacement of a person, the Federal
Agencies may by agreement designate
one such Agency as the cognizant
Federal Agency. In the unlikely event
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69493
that agreement among the Agencies
cannot be reached as to which Agency
shall be the cognizant Federal Agency,
then the Lead Agency shall designate
one of such Agencies to assume the
cognizant role. At a minimum, the
agreement shall set forth the federally
assisted activities which are subject to
its terms and cite any policies and
procedures, in addition to this part, that
are applicable to the activities under the
agreement. Under the agreement, the
cognizant Federal Agency shall assure
that the project is in compliance with
the provisions of the Uniform Act and
this part. All federally assisted activities
under the agreement shall be deemed a
project for the purposes of this part.
§ 24.7 Federal Agency waiver of
regulations in this part.
The Federal Agency funding the
project may waive any requirement in
this part not required by law if it
determines that the waiver does not
reduce any assistance or protection
provided to an owner or displaced
person under this part. Any request for
a waiver shall be justified on a case-bycase basis.
§ 24.8 Compliance with other laws and
regulations.
The implementation of this part must
be in compliance with other applicable
Federal laws and implementing
regulations, including, but not limited
to, the following:
(a) Section I of the Civil Rights Act of
1866 (42 U.S.C. 1982 et seq.).
(b) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.).
(c) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of
1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), as
amended.
(d) The National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.).
(e) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 790 et seq.).
(f) The Flood Disaster Protection Act
of 1973 (Pub. L. 93–234).
(g) The Age Discrimination Act of
1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.).
(h) Executive Order 11063—Equal
Opportunity and Housing, as amended
by Executive Order 12892.
(i) Executive Order 11246—Equal
Employment Opportunity, as amended.
(j) Executive Order 11625—Minority
Business Enterprise.
(k) Executive Orders 11988—
Floodplain Management, and 11990—
Protection of Wetlands.
(l) Executive Order 12250—
Leadership and Coordination of NonDiscrimination Laws.
(m) Executive Order 12630—
Governmental Actions and Interference
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69494
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(a) Records. The Agency shall
maintain adequate records of its
acquisition and displacement activities
in sufficient detail to demonstrate
compliance with this part. These
records shall be retained for at least 3
years after each owner of a property and
each person displaced from the property
receives the final payment to which he
or she is entitled under this part, or in
accordance with the applicable
regulations of the Federal funding
Agency, whichever is later.
(b) Confidentiality of records. Records
maintained by an Agency in accordance
with this part are confidential regarding
their use as public information, unless
applicable law provides otherwise.
(c) Reports. Each Federal Agency that
has programs or projects requiring the
acquisition of real property or causing a
displacement from real property subject
to the provisions of the Act shall
provide to the Lead Agency an annual
summary report by November 15 that
describes the real property acquisitions,
displacements, and related activities
conducted by the Federal Agency for the
calendar year. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.9(c).)
(d) Right to representation. A person
has a right to be represented by legal
counsel or other representative in
connection with his or her appeal, but
solely at the person’s own expense.
(e) Review of files by person making
appeal. The Agency shall permit a
person to inspect and copy all materials
pertinent to his or her appeal, except
materials which are classified as
confidential by the Agency. The Agency
may, however, impose reasonable
conditions on the person’s right to
inspect, consistent with applicable laws.
(f) Scope of review of appeal. In
deciding an appeal, the Agency shall
consider all pertinent justification and
other material submitted by the person,
and all other available information that
is needed to ensure a fair and full
review of the appeal.
(g) Determination and notification
after appeal. Promptly after receipt of
all information submitted by a person in
support of an appeal, the Agency shall
make a written determination on the
appeal, including an explanation of the
basis on which the decision was made,
and furnish the person a copy. If the full
relief requested is not granted, the
Agency shall inform the person that the
determination is the Agency’s final
decision and that the person may seek
judicial review of the Agency’s
determination.
(h) Agency official to review appeal.
The Agency official conducting the
review of the appeal shall be either the
head of the Agency or his or her
authorized designee. However, the
official shall not have been directly
involved in the action appealed.
§ 24.10
§ 24.11
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
(n) Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief
and Emergency Assistance Act, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
(o) Executive Order 12892—
Leadership and Coordination of Fair
Housing in Federal Programs:
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
(January 17, 1994).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.9
Recordkeeping and reports.
Appeals.
(a) General. The Agency shall
promptly review appeals in accordance
with the requirements of applicable law
and this part.
(b) Actions which may be appealed.
Any aggrieved person may file a written
appeal with the Agency in any case in
which the person believes that the
Agency has failed to properly consider
the person’s application for assistance
under this part. Such assistance may
include, but is not limited to, the
person’s eligibility for, or the amount of,
a payment required under § 24.106 or
§ 24.107, or a relocation payment
required under this part. The Agency
shall consider a written appeal
regardless of form.
(c) Time limit for initiating appeal.
The Agency may set a reasonable time
limit for a person to file an appeal. The
time limit shall not be less than 60 days
after the person receives written
notification of the Agency’s
determination on the person’s claim.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Adjustments of relocation benefits.
(a) The Lead Agency may adjust the
amounts of relocation benefits provided
under this part at §§ 24.304, 24.305,
24.401, and 24.402.
(b) No more frequently than every 5
years the head of the Lead Agency will
evaluate whether the cost of living,
inflation, or other factors indicate that
relocation benefits provided in the
sections in paragraph (a) of this section
should be adjusted to meet the policy
objectives of the Uniform Act. The Lead
Agency will divide the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI–U)
index for the year of the assessment
(base year index), by the CPI–U index
for the year of assessment to determine
the effect of inflation over the
assessment period. If adjustments are
determined to be necessary, the head of
the Lead Agency will publish the new
maximum benefits eligible for Federal
participation in the Federal Register.
(See appendix A of this part, Section
24.11.)
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Subpart B—Real Property Acquisition
§ 24.101 Applicability of acquisition
requirements.
(a) Direct Federal program or project.
(1) The requirements of this subpart
apply to any acquisition of real property
for a direct Federal program or project,
except acquisition for a program or
project that is undertaken by the
Tennessee Valley Authority or the Rural
Utilities Service. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.101(a).)
(2) If a Federal Agency (except for the
Tennessee Valley Authority or the Rural
Utilities Service) will not acquire a
property because negotiations fail to
result in an agreement, the owner of the
property or the owner’s designated
representative shall be so informed in
writing. Owners of such properties are
not displaced persons, as such, are not
entitled to relocation assistance benefits.
However, tenants on such properties
may be eligible for relocation assistance
benefits. (See § 24.2(a).)
(b) Programs and projects receiving
Federal financial assistance. The
requirements of this subpart apply to
any acquisition of real property for
programs and projects where there is
Federal financial assistance in any part
of project costs except for the
acquisitions described in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (5) of this section. The
relocation assistance provisions in this
part are applicable to any tenants that
must move as a result of an acquisition
described in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(5) of this section. Such tenants are
considered displaced persons. (See
§ 24.2(a).)
(1) The requirements of this subpart
do not apply to acquisitions that meet
all of the conditions in paragraphs
(b)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section:
(i) No specific property needs to be
acquired, although the Agency may
limit its search for alternative properties
to a general geographic area. Where an
Agency wishes to purchase more than
one property within a general
geographic area on this basis, all owners
are to be treated similarly. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.101(b)(1)(i).)
(ii) The property to be acquired is not
part of an intended, planned, or
designated project area where all or
substantially all of the property within
the area is to be acquired within specific
time limits.
(iii) No later than the time of the offer
the Agency shall inform the owner of
the property or the owner’s designated
representative in writing that it will not
acquire the property if negotiations fail
to result in an amicable agreement.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(iv) No later than the time of the offer
the Agency shall inform the owner of
the property or the owner’s designated
representative in writing of what it
believes to be the fair market value of
the property.
(2) Acquisitions for programs or
projects undertaken by an Agency that
receives Federal financial assistance and
will not use eminent domain to acquire
the property. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.101(b)(2).) When
making an offer to acquire such Agency
or person shall:
(i) No later than the time of the offer
clearly advise the owner of the property
or the owner’s designated representative
that the Agency will not acquire the
property if negotiations fail to result in
an amicable agreement.
(ii) No later than the time of the offer
inform the owner of the property, or the
owner’s designated representative, in
writing of what it believes to be the fair
market value of the property. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.101(b)(1)(iv) and (b)(2)(ii).)
(iii) Not use eminent domain to
acquire properties for that project
should the negotiations for purchase fail
to result in an agreement to sell the real
property. In extraordinary situations in
which an unanticipated and unplanned
need arises after carrying out voluntary
acquisition activities, the Agency may
request a waiver of regulation under
§ 24.7 to pursue acquisition by eminent
domain for a specific parcel or parcels
while remaining in compliance with the
Uniform Act’s prohibition on coercive
actions. Such request must identify the
specific parcels that would be acquired
by eminent domain, the reason for the
need, and the steps the Agency will take
to ensure that property owner’s
assistance and protection are not
reduced.
(3) The acquisition of real property
from a Federal Agency, State, or State
Agency, if the Agency desiring to make
the purchase does not have authority to
acquire the property through
condemnation.
(4) The acquisition of real property by
a cooperative from a person who, as a
condition of membership in the
cooperative, has agreed to provide
without charge any real property that is
needed by the cooperative.
(5) Acquisition for a program or
project that receives Federal financial
assistance from the Tennessee Valley
Authority or the Rural Utilities Service.
(c) Less-than-full-fee interest in real
property. (1) The provisions of this
subpart apply when acquiring fee title
subject to retention of a life estate or a
life use; to acquisition by leasing where
the lease term, including option(s) for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
extension, is 50 years or more; and, to
the acquisition of permanent and/or
temporary easements necessary for the
project. However, the Agency may apply
the regulations in this subpart to any
less-than-full-fee acquisition that, in its
judgment, should be covered.
(2) The provisions of this subpart do
not apply to temporary easements or
permits needed solely to perform work
intended exclusively for the benefit of
the property owner, which work may
not be done if agreement cannot be
reached.
(d) Federally assisted projects. (1) For
projects receiving Federal financial
assistance, the provisions of §§ 24.102,
24.103, 24.104, and 24.105 apply to the
greatest extent practicable under State
law. (See § 24.4(a).)
(2) For real property acquired which
may later be incorporated into an
anticipated, designated, or planned
federally-funded or assisted project or
program the provisions of §§ 24.102,
24.103, 24.104, and 24.105 apply to the
greatest extent practicable under State
law. (See § 24.4(a).)
(3) The Relocation assistance
provisions included in this part are
applicable to any property owner or
tenants who must move as a result of an
acquisition described in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section. Such owners and
tenants are to be considered displaced
persons. (See § 24.2(a).)
§ 24.102
Basic acquisition policies.
(a) Expeditious acquisition. The
Agency shall make every reasonable
effort to acquire the real property
expeditiously by negotiation.
(b) Notice to owner. As soon as
feasible, the Agency shall notify the
owner in writing of the Agency’s
interest in acquiring the real property
and the basic protections provided to
the owner by law and this part. (See
§§ 24.203 and 24.5(d) and appendix A of
this part, Section 24.102(b).)
(c) Appraisal, waiver thereof, and
invitation to owner. (1) Before the
initiation of negotiations, the real
property to be acquired shall be
appraised, except as provided in
paragraph (c)(2) of this section, and the
owner, or the owner’s designated
representative, shall be given an
opportunity to accompany the appraiser
during the appraiser’s inspection of the
property.
(2) An appraisal is not required if:
(i) The owner is donating the property
and releases the Agency from its
obligation to appraise the property; or
(ii) The Agency determines that an
appraisal is unnecessary because the
valuation problem is uncomplicated and
the anticipated value of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69495
acquisition is estimated at $10,000 or
less, based on a review of available data.
The Agency employee or contractor
making the determination to use the
waiver valuation option must
understand valuation principles,
techniques, and use of appraisals in
order to be able to determine whether
the proposed acquisition is
uncomplicated. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.102(c)(2).)
(A) When an appraisal is determined
to be unnecessary, the Agency shall
prepare a waiver valuation. Licensed or
certified appraisers preparing, or
reviewing a waiver valuation are
precluded from complying with
standards rules 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the
‘‘Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice’’ (USPAP), as
promulgated by the Appraisal Standards
Board of The Appraisal Foundation.1
(See appendix A of this part, Section
24.103(a).)
(B) The person performing the waiver
valuation must have sufficient
understanding of the local real estate
market to be qualified to make the
waiver valuation.
(C) The Federal Agency funding the
project may approve exceeding the
$10,000 threshold, up to an amount of
$25,000, if the Agency acquiring the real
property offers the property owner the
option of having the Agency appraise
the property. (D) If the Agency
determines that the proposed
acquisition is uncomplicated, and if the
Agency acquiring the real property
offers the property owner the option of
having the Agency appraise the
property, the Agency may request
approval from the Federal funding
Agency to use a waiver valuation of up
to $50,000. The use of waiver valuations
between $25,000 and $50,000 is limited
to the Federal funding Agencies and
recipients and shall not be further
delegated. Approval for utilizing a
waiver valuation of more than $25,000,
but up to $50,000, may only be
requested on a project-by-project basis
and the request for doing so shall be
made in writing to the Federal funding
Agency setting forth:
(1) The anticipated benefits of, and
reasons for, raising the waiver valuation
ceiling above $25,000;
(2) The administrative/managerial
oversight mechanisms used to assure
proper use and review;
(3) The names/credentials of
individuals who will be performing the
waiver valuations;
1 Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP). Published by The Appraisal
Foundation, a nonprofit educational organization.
Copies may be ordered from The Appraisal
Foundation.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69496
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(4) The quality control procedures to
be utilized;
(5) Performance/results metrics with
quarterly reports provided to the
Federal funding Agency; and
(6) Within 6 months of completion of
acquisition activities a close-out report
measuring cost/time benefits, lessons
learned, best practices, etc., shall be
submitted to the Federal funding
Agency.
(E) If the property owner elects to
have the Agency appraise the property,
the Agency must obtain an appraisal
and shall not use the waiver valuation
procedures described above. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.102(c)(2).)
(d) Establishment and offer of just
compensation. Before the initiation of
negotiations, the Agency shall establish
an amount which it believes is just
compensation for the real property. The
amount shall not be less than the
approved appraisal or waiver valuation
of the fair market value of the property,
taking into account the value of
allowable damages or benefits to any
remaining property. An Agency official
must establish the amount believed to
be just compensation. (See § 24.104.)
Promptly thereafter, the Agency shall
make a written offer to the owner or the
designated owner’s representative to
acquire the property for the full amount
believed to be just compensation. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.102(d).)
(e) Summary statement. Along with
the initial written purchase offer, the
owner or the designated owner’s
representative shall be given a written
statement of the basis for the offer of just
compensation, which shall include:
(1) A statement of the amount offered
as just compensation. In the case of a
partial acquisition, the compensation for
the real property to be acquired and the
compensation for damages, if any, to the
remaining real property shall be
separately stated.
(2) A description and location
identification of the real property and
the interest in the real property to be
acquired.
(3) An identification of the buildings,
structures, and other improvements
(including removable building
equipment and trade fixtures) which are
included as part of the offer of just
compensation. Where appropriate, the
statement shall identify any other
separately held ownership interest in
the property, e.g. a tenant-owned
improvement, and indicate that such
interest is not covered by this offer.
(f) Basic negotiation procedures. The
Agency shall make all reasonable efforts
to contact the owner or the owner’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
designated representative and discuss
its offer to purchase the property,
including the basis for the offer of just
compensation and explain its
acquisition policies and procedures,
including its payment of incidental
expenses in accordance with § 24.106.
The owner shall be given reasonable
opportunity to consider the offer and
present material which the owner
believes is relevant to determining the
value of the property and to suggest
modification in the proposed terms and
conditions of the purchase. The Agency
shall consider the owner’s or the
designated owner’s representative’s
presentation. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.102(f).)
(g) Updating offer of just
compensation. If the information
presented by the owner, or a material
change in the character or condition of
the property, indicates the need for new
waiver valuation or appraisal
information, or if a significant delay has
occurred since the time of the
appraisal(s) or waiver valuation of the
property, the Agency shall have the
appraisal(s) or waiver valuation updated
or obtain a new appraisal(s) or waiver
valuation. If the latest appraisal or
waiver valuation information indicates
that a change in the purchase offer is
warranted, the Agency shall promptly
reestablish just compensation and offer
that amount to the owner in writing.
(h) Coercive action. The Agency shall
not advance the time of condemnation,
or defer negotiations or condemnation
or the deposit of funds with the court,
or take any other coercive action in
order to induce an agreement on the
price to be paid for the property.
(i) Administrative settlement. The
purchase price for the property may
exceed the amount offered as just
compensation when reasonable efforts
to negotiate an agreement at that amount
have failed and an authorized Agency
official approves such administrative
settlement as being reasonable, prudent,
and in the public interest. When Federal
funds pay for or participate in
acquisition costs, a written justification
shall be prepared, which states what
available information, including trial
risks, supports such a settlement. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.102(i).)
(j) Payment before taking possession.
Before requiring the owner to surrender
possession of the real property, the
Agency shall pay the agreed purchase
price to the owner, or in the case of a
condemnation, deposit with the court,
for the benefit of the owner, an amount
not less than the Agency’s approved
appraisal of the fair market value of
such property, or the court award of
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
compensation in the condemnation
proceeding for the property. In
exceptional circumstances, with the
prior approval of the owner or the
owner’s designated representative, the
Agency may obtain a right-of-entry for
construction purposes before making
payment available to an owner. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.102(j).)
(k) Uneconomic remnant. If the
acquisition of only a portion of a
property would leave the owner with an
uneconomic remnant, the Agency shall
offer to acquire the uneconomic
remnant along with the portion of the
property needed for the project. (See
§ 24.2(a).)
(l) Inverse condemnation. If the
Agency intends to acquire any interest
in real property by exercise of the power
of eminent domain, it shall institute
formal condemnation proceedings and
not intentionally make it necessary for
the owner to institute legal proceedings
to prove the fact of the taking of the real
property.
(m) Fair rental. If the Agency permits
a former owner or tenant to occupy the
real property after acquisition for a short
term, or a period subject to termination
by the Agency on short notice, the rent
shall not exceed the fair market rent for
such occupancy. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.102(m).)
(n) Conflict of interest. (1) The
appraiser, review appraiser, or person
performing the waiver valuation shall
not have any interest, direct or indirect,
in the real property being valued for the
Agency. Compensation for developing
an appraisal or waiver valuation shall
not be based on the amount of the
valuation estimate.
(2) No person shall attempt to unduly
influence or coerce an appraiser, review
appraiser, or waiver valuation preparer
regarding any valuation aspect of an
appraisal, waiver valuation, or review of
appraisals or waiver valuations. Persons
functioning as negotiators may not
supervise or formally evaluate the
performance of any appraiser or review
appraiser performing appraisal or
appraisal review work, except that, for
a program or project receiving Federal
financial assistance, the Federal funding
Agency may waive this requirement if it
determines it would create a hardship
for the Agency.
(3) An appraiser, review appraiser, or
waiver valuation preparer may be
authorized by the Agency to act as a
negotiator for the acquisition of real
property for which that person has
made an appraisal, appraisal review or
waiver valuation only if the offer to
acquire the property is $10,000, or less.
If the valuer will also act as the
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
negotiator on a valuation greater than
$10,000, and up to $25,000, an appraisal
must be prepared and reviewed.
Agencies desiring to exercise this option
must request approval in writing from
the Federal funding Agency. The
requesting Agency shall have a separate
and distinct quality control process in
place and set forth in the written
procedures approved by the Federal
funding agency. Agencies wishing to
extend their Federal funding Agency
approval for conflict of interest waivers
of more than $10,000 to their
subrecipients must determine and
document that the subrecipient has a
separate and distinct quality control
process in place and set forth in written
procedures approved by the Federal
funding agency or in approved
subrecipient written procedures. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.102(n).)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.103
Criteria for appraisals.
(a) Appraisal requirements. This
section sets forth the requirements for
real property acquisition appraisals for
Federal and federally assisted programs.
Appraisals are to be prepared according
to this section, which is intended to be
consistent with the USPAP. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.103(a).) The Agency may have
appraisal requirements that supplement
this section, including, to the extent
appropriate, the Uniform Appraisal
Standards for Federal Land Acquisition
(UASFLA), also commonly referred to as
the ‘‘Yellow Book’’.) The USPAP is
published by The Appraisal
Foundation. The USFLA is published by
the Appraisal Foundation in partnership
with the Department of Justice on behalf
of the Interagency Land Acquisition
Conference. The USFLA is a
compendium of Federal eminent
domain appraisal law, both case and
statute, regulations and practices.2
Copies of the USPAP and the UASFLA
may be ordered from The Appraisal
Foundation in print and electronic
forms.3 The USPAP may be viewed on
The Appraisal Foundation’s website.4 A
free electronic version of the UASFLA is
available for download on the U.S.
Department of Justice website.5
(1) The Agency acquiring real
property has a legitimate role in
contributing to the appraisal process,
especially in developing the scope of
work and defining the appraisal
problem. The scope of work and
2 www.justice.gov/file/408306/download.
3 https://www.appraisalfoundation.org/imis/TAF/
Standards/Appraisal_Standards/TAF/
Standards.aspx.
4 https://www.uspap.org.
5 https://www.justice.gov/file/408306/download.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
development of an appraisal under this
section depends on the complexity of
the appraisal problem.
(2) The Agency has the responsibility
to assure that the appraisals it obtains
are relevant to its program needs, reflect
established and commonly accepted
Federal and federally assisted program
appraisal practice, and at a minimum,
comply with the definition of appraisal
in § 24.2(a) and the requirements in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (v) of this
section (see appendix A of this part,
Section 24.103 and Section 24.103(a)):
(i) An adequate description of the
physical characteristics of the property
being appraised (and, in the case of a
partial acquisition, an adequate
description of the remaining property),
including items identified as personal
property, a statement of the known and
observed encumbrances, if any, title
information, location, zoning, present
use, an analysis of highest and best use,
and at least a 5-year sales history of the
property. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.103(a)(1).)
(ii) All relevant and reliable
approaches to value consistent with
established Federal and federally
assisted program appraisal practices. If
the appraiser uses more than one
approach, there shall be an analysis and
reconciliation of approaches to value
used that is sufficient to support the
appraiser’s opinion of value. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.103(a).)
(iii) A description of comparable
sales, including a description of all
relevant physical, legal, and economic
factors such as parties to the transaction,
source and method of financing, and
verification by a party involved in the
transaction.
(iv) A statement of the value of the
real property to be acquired and, for a
partial acquisition, a statement of the
value of the damages and benefits, if
any, to the remaining real property,
where appropriate.
(v) The effective date of valuation,
date of appraisal, signature, and
certification of the appraiser.
(b) Influence of the project on just
compensation. The appraiser shall
disregard any decrease or increase in the
fair market value of the real property
caused by the project for which the
property is to be acquired, or by the
likelihood that the property would be
acquired for the project, other than that
due to physical deterioration within the
reasonable control of the owner. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.103(b).)
(c) Owner retention of improvements.
If the owner of a real property
improvement is permitted to retain it for
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69497
removal from the project site, the
amount to be offered for the interest in
the real property to be acquired shall
not be less than the difference between
the amount determined to be just
compensation for the owner’s interest in
the real property and the salvage value
(defined at § 24.2(a)) of the retained
improvement.
(d) Qualifications of appraisers and
review appraisers. (1) The Agency shall
establish criteria for determining the
minimum qualifications and
competency of appraisers and review
appraisers. Qualifications shall be
consistent with the scope of work for
the assignment. The Agency shall
review the experience, education,
training, certification/licensing,
designation(s), and other qualifications
of appraisers, and review appraisers,
and use only those determined by the
Agency to be qualified. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.103(d)(1).)
(2) If the Agency uses a contract (fee)
appraiser to perform the appraisal, such
appraiser shall be State licensed or
certified in accordance with title XI of
the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989
(12 U.S.C. 3331 et seq.).
§ 24.104
Review of appraisals.
The Agency shall have an appraisal
review process and, at a minimum:
(a) A qualified review appraiser (see
§ 24.103(d)(1) and appendix A of this
part, Section 24.104) shall examine the
presentation and analysis of market
information in all appraisals to assure
that they meet the definition of
appraisal found in § 24.2(a), appraisal
requirements found in 49 CFR 24.103,
and other applicable requirements,
including, to the extent appropriate, the
UASFLA, and support the appraiser’s
opinion of value. The level of review
analysis depends on the complexity of
the appraisal problem. As needed, the
review appraiser shall, prior to
acceptance, seek necessary corrections
or revisions. The review appraiser shall
identify each appraisal report as
recommended (as the basis for the
establishment of the amount believed to
be just compensation), accepted (meets
all requirements, but not selected as
recommended or approved), or not
accepted. If authorized by the Agency to
do so, the staff review appraiser shall
also approve the appraisal (as the basis
for the establishment of the amount
believed to be just compensation), and,
if also authorized to do so, develop and
report the amount believed to be just
compensation. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.104(a).)
(b) If the review appraiser is unable to
recommend (or approve) an appraisal as
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69498
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
an adequate basis for the establishment
of the offer of just compensation, and it
is determined by the Agency that it is
not practical to obtain an additional
appraisal, the review appraiser may, as
part of the review, present and analyze
market information in conformance
with § 24.103 to support a
recommended (or approved) value. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.104(b).)
(c) The review appraiser shall prepare
a written report that identifies the
appraisal reports reviewed and
documents the findings and conclusions
arrived at during the review of the
appraisal(s). Any damages or benefits to
any remaining property shall be
identified in the review appraiser’s
report. The review appraiser shall also
prepare a signed certification that states
the parameters of the review. The
certification shall state the approved
value and, if the review appraiser is
authorized to do so, the amount
believed to be just compensation for the
acquisition. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.104(c).)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.105 Acquisition of tenant-owned
improvements.
(a) Acquisition of improvements.
When acquiring any interest in real
property, the Agency shall offer to
acquire at least an equal interest in all
buildings, structures, or other
improvements located upon the real
property to be acquired, which it
requires to be removed or which it
determines will be adversely affected by
the use to which such real property will
be put. This shall include any
improvement of a tenant-owner who has
the right or obligation to remove the
improvement at the expiration of the
lease term.
(b) Improvements considered to be
real property. Any building, structure,
or other improvement, which would be
considered real property if owned by
the owner of the real property on which
it is located, shall be considered to be
real property for purposes of this
subpart.
(c) Appraisal and establishment of
just compensation for a tenant-owned
improvement. Just compensation for a
tenant-owned improvement is the
amount which the improvement
contributes to the fair market value of
the whole property, or its salvage value,
whichever is greater. (Salvage value is
defined at § 24.2(a).)
(d) Special conditions for tenantowned improvements. No payment shall
be made to a tenant-owner for any real
property improvement unless:
(1) The tenant-owner, in
consideration for the payment, assigns,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
transfers, and releases to the Agency all
of the tenant-owner’s right, title, and
interest in the improvement;
(2) The owner of the real property on
which the improvement is located
disclaims all interest in the
improvement; and
(3) The payment does not result in the
duplication of any compensation
otherwise authorized by law.
(e) Alternative compensation. Nothing
in this subpart shall be construed to
deprive the tenant-owner of any right to
reject payment under this subpart and to
obtain payment for such property
interests in accordance with other
applicable law.
§ 24.106 Expenses incidental to transfer of
title to the Agency.
(a) The owner of the real property
shall be reimbursed for all reasonable
expenses the owner necessarily incurred
for:
(1) Recording fees, transfer taxes,
documentary stamps, evidence of title,
boundary surveys, legal descriptions of
the real property, and similar expenses
incidental to conveying the real
property to the Agency. However, the
Agency is not required to pay costs
solely required to perfect the owner’s
title to the real property;
(2) Penalty costs and other charges for
prepayment of any preexisting recorded
mortgage entered into in good faith
encumbering the real property; and
(3) The pro rata portion of any
prepaid real property taxes which are
allocable to the period after the Agency
obtains title to the property or effective
possession of it, whichever is earlier.
(b) Whenever feasible, the Agency
shall pay these costs directly to the
billing agent so that the owner will not
have to pay such costs and then seek
reimbursement from the Agency.
§ 24.107
Certain litigation expenses.
The owner of the real property shall
be reimbursed for any reasonable
expenses, including reasonable attorney,
appraisal, and engineering fees, which
the owner actually incurred because of
a condemnation proceeding, if:
(a) The final judgment of the court is
that the Agency cannot acquire the real
property by condemnation;
(b) The condemnation proceeding is
abandoned by the Agency other than
under an agreed-upon settlement; or
(c) The court having jurisdiction
renders a judgment in favor of the
owner in an inverse condemnation
proceeding or the Agency effects a
settlement of such proceeding.
§ 24.108
Donations.
An owner whose real property is
being acquired may, after being fully
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
informed by the Agency of the right to
receive just compensation for such
property, donate such property or any
part thereof, any interest therein, or any
compensation paid therefore, to the
Agency as such owner shall determine.
The Agency is responsible for ensuring
that an appraisal of the real property is
obtained unless the owner releases the
Agency from such obligation, except as
provided in § 24.102(c)(2).
Subpart C—General Relocation
Requirements
§ 24.201
Purpose.
This subpart prescribes general
requirements governing the provision of
relocation payments and other
relocation assistance in this part.
§ 24.202
Applicability.
The requirements in this subpart
apply to the relocation of any displaced
person as defined at § 24.2(a). Any
person who qualifies as a displaced
person must be fully informed of his or
her rights and entitlements to relocation
assistance and payments provided by
the Uniform Act and this part. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.202.)
(a) Persons temporarily displaced. (1)
Appropriate advisory services must be
provided;
(2) For persons occupying a dwelling,
at least one DSS dwelling is made
available prior to requiring a person to
move, except in the case of an
emergency move as described in
§ 24.204(b)(1), (2), or (3);
(3) Similarly, if a person’s business
will be shut-down due to rehabilitation
of a site, it may be temporarily relocated
and reimbursed for all reasonable out of
pocket expenses or must be determined
to be displaced at the Agency’s option;
(4) Payment is provided for all out-ofpocket expenses incurred in connection
with the temporary relocation as the
Agency determines to be reasonable and
necessary;
(5) A person’s temporary relocation
from their dwelling or business for the
project may not exceed 12 months. The
Agency must contact any person who
has been temporarily relocated for a
period beyond 12 months because that
person is a displaced person. The
Agency shall offer all required
relocation assistance benefits and
services. An Agency may not deduct
any temporary relocation assistance
benefits previously provided from these
benefits;
(6) A person who is not lawfully
present in the United States and who
has been determined to be ineligible for
relocation assistance in accordance with
§ 24.208 is not eligible for temporary
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
relocation assistance. Unless such
denial of benefits would create an
extremely unusual hardship to a
designated family member in
accordance with § 24.208(g).
(b) [Reserved]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.203
Relocation notices.
(a) General information notice. As
soon as feasible, a person who may be
displaced shall be furnished with a
general written description of the
Agency’s relocation program which
does at least the following:
(1) Informs the person that he or she
may be displaced for the project and
generally describes the relocation
payment(s) for which the person may be
eligible, the basic conditions of
eligibility, and the procedures for
obtaining the payment(s);
(2) Informs the displaced person that
he or she will be given reasonable
relocation advisory services, including
referrals to replacement properties, help
in filing payment claims, and other
necessary assistance to help the
displaced person successfully relocate;
(3) Informs the displaced person that
he or she will not be required to move
without at least 90 days advance written
notice (see paragraph (c) of this section),
and informs any person to be displaced
from a dwelling that he or she cannot be
required to move permanently unless at
least one comparable replacement
dwelling has been made available;
(4) Informs the displaced person that
any person who is an alien not lawfully
present in the United States is ineligible
for relocation advisory services and
relocation payments, unless such
ineligibility would result in exceptional
and extremely unusual hardship to a
qualifying spouse, parent, or child,
pursuant to § 24.208(h); and
(5) Describes the displaced person’s
right to appeal the Agency’s
determination as to a person’s
application for assistance for which a
person may be eligible under this part.
(b) Notice of relocation eligibility.
Eligibility for relocation assistance shall
begin on the earliest of: The date of a
notice of intent to acquire, rehabilitate,
and/or demolish (described in
paragraph (d) of this section); the
initiation of negotiations (defined in
§ 24.2(a)); or actual acquisition. When
this occurs, the Agency shall promptly
notify all occupants in writing of their
eligibility for applicable relocation
assistance.
(c) Ninety-day notice—(1) General. No
lawful occupant shall be required to
move unless he or she has received at
least 90 days advance written notice of
the earliest date by which he or she may
be required to move.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
(2) Timing of notice. The Agency may
issue the notice 90 days or earlier before
it expects the person to be displaced.
(3) Content of notice. The 90-day
notice shall either state a specific date
as the earliest date by which the
occupant may be required to move, or
state that the occupant will receive a
further notice indicating, at least 30
days in advance, the specific date by
which he or she must move. If the 90day notice is issued before a comparable
replacement dwelling is made available,
the notice must state clearly that the
occupant will not have to move earlier
than 90 days after such a dwelling is
made available. (See § 24.204(a).)
(4) Urgent need. In unusual
circumstances, an occupant may be
required to vacate the property on less
than 90 days advance written notice if
the Agency determines that a 90-day
notice is impracticable, such as when
the person’s continued occupancy of the
property would constitute a substantial
danger to health or safety. A copy of the
Agency’s determination shall be
included in the applicable case file.
(d) Notice of intent to acquire,
rehabilitate, and/or demolish. A notice
of intent to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or
demolish is an Agency’s written
communication that is provided to a
person to be displaced, including those
to be displaced by rehabilitation and/or
demolition activities from property
prior to the commitment of Federal
financial assistance to the activity,
which clearly sets forth that the Agency
intends to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or
demolish the property. A notice of
intent to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or
demolish establishes eligibility for
relocation assistance prior to the
initiation of negotiations and/or prior to
the commitment of Federal financial
assistance. (See § 24.2 (a).)
§ 24.204 Availability of comparable
replacement dwelling before displacement.
(a) General. No person to be displaced
shall be required to move from his or
her dwelling unless at least one
comparable replacement dwelling
(defined at § 24.2) has been made
available to the person. Information on
comparable replacement dwellings that
were used in the determination process
must be provided to displaced persons.
When possible, three or more
comparable replacement dwellings shall
be made available. A comparable
replacement dwelling will be
considered to have been made available
to a person, if:
(1) The person is informed in writing
of its location;
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69499
(2) The person has sufficient time to
negotiate and enter into a purchase
agreement or lease for the property; and
(3) Subject to reasonable safeguards,
the person is assured of receiving the
relocation assistance and acquisition
payment to which the person is entitled
in sufficient time to complete the
purchase or lease of the property.
(b) Circumstances permitting waiver.
The Federal Agency funding the project
may grant a waiver of the policy in
paragraph (a) of this section in any case
where it is demonstrated that a person
must move because of:
(1) A major disaster as defined in
section 102 of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act, as amended (42 U.S.C.
5122);
(2) A presidentially declared national
emergency; or
(3) Another emergency which requires
immediate vacation of the real property,
such as when continued occupancy of
the displacement dwelling constitutes a
substantial danger to the health or safety
of the occupants or the public.
(c) Basic conditions of emergency
move. Whenever a person to be
displaced is required to relocate from
the displacement dwelling for a
temporary period because of an
emergency as described in paragraph (b)
of this section, the Agency shall:
(1) Take whatever steps are necessary
to assure that the person is temporarily
relocated to a DSS dwelling;
(2) Pay the actual reasonable out-ofpocket moving expenses and any
reasonable increase in rent and utility
costs incurred in connection with the
temporary relocation; and
(3) Make available to the displaced
person as soon as feasible, at least one
comparable replacement dwelling. (For
purposes of filing a claim and meeting
the eligibility requirements for a
relocation payment, the date of
displacement is the date the person
moves from the temporarily occupied
dwelling.)
§ 24.205 Relocation planning, advisory
services, and coordination.
(a) Relocation planning. During the
early stages of development, an Agency
shall plan Federal and federally assisted
programs or projects in such a manner
that recognizes the problems associated
with the displacement of individuals,
families, businesses, farms, and
nonprofit organizations and develop
solutions to minimize the adverse
impacts of displacement. Such
planning, where appropriate, shall
precede any action by an Agency which
will cause displacement, and should be
scoped to the complexity and nature of
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69500
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
the anticipated displacing activity
including an evaluation of program
resources available to carry out timely
and orderly relocations. Planning may
involve a relocation survey or study,
which may include the following:
(1) An estimate of the number of
households to be displaced including
information such as owner/tenant
status, estimated value and rental rates
of properties to be acquired, family
characteristics, and special
consideration of the impacts on
minorities, the elderly, large families,
and persons with disabilities when
applicable.
(2) An estimate of the number of
comparable replacement dwellings in
the area (including price ranges and
rental rates) that are expected to be
available to fulfill the needs of those
households displaced. When an
adequate supply of comparable housing
is not expected to be available, the
Agency should consider housing of last
resort actions.
(3) An estimate of the number, type,
and size of the businesses, farms, and
nonprofit organizations to be displaced
and the approximate number of
employees that may be affected.
(4) An estimate of the availability of
replacement business sites. When an
adequate supply of replacement
business sites is not expected to be
available, the impacts of displacing the
businesses should be considered and
addressed. Planning for displaced
businesses which are reasonably
expected to involve complex or lengthy
moving processes or small businesses
with limited financial resources and/or
few alternative relocation sites should
include an analysis of business moving
problems.
(5) Consideration of any special
relocation advisory services that may be
necessary from the Agency displacing a
person and other cooperating Agencies.
(b) Loans for planning and
preliminary expenses. In the event that
an Agency elects to consider using the
duplicative provision in section 215 of
the Uniform Act which permits the use
of project funds for loans to cover
planning and other preliminary
expenses for the development of
additional housing, the Lead Agency
will establish criteria and procedures for
such use upon the request of the Federal
Agency funding the program or project.
(c) Relocation assistance advisory
services—(1) General. The Agency shall
carry out a relocation assistance
advisory program which satisfies the
requirements of Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et
seq.), Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Executive Order 11063 (3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 652), and offer the
services described in paragraph (c)(2) of
this section. If the Agency determines
that a person occupying property
adjacent to the real property acquired
for the project is caused substantial
economic injury because of such
acquisition, it may offer advisory
services to such person.
(2) Services to be provided. The
advisory program shall include such
measures, facilities, and services as may
be necessary or appropriate in order to:
(i) Determine, for nonresidential
(businesses, farm and nonprofit
organizations) displacements, the
relocation needs and preferences of each
business (farm and nonprofit
organization) to be displaced and
explain the relocation payments and
other assistance for which the business
may be eligible, the related eligibility
requirements, and the procedures for
obtaining such assistance. This shall
include a personal interview with each
business. At a minimum, interviews
with displaced business owners and
operators should include the following
items:
(A) The business’s replacement site
requirements, current lease terms and
other contractual obligations and the
financial capacity of the business to
accomplish the move.
(B) Determination of the need for
outside specialists in accordance with
§ 24.301(g)(12) that will be required to
assist in planning the move, assistance
in the actual move, and in the
reinstallation of machinery and/or other
personal property.
(C) For businesses, an identification
and resolution of personalty and/or
realty issues. Every effort must be made
to identify and resolve personalty and/
or realty issues prior to, or at the time
of, the appraisal of the property.
(D) An estimate of the time required
for the business to vacate the site.
(E) An estimate of the anticipated
difficulty in locating a replacement
property.
(F) An identification of any advance
relocation payments required for the
move, and the Agency’s legal capacity to
provide them.
(ii) Determine, for residential
displacements, the relocation needs and
preferences of each person to be
displaced and explain the relocation
payments and other assistance for
which the person may be eligible, the
related eligibility requirements, and the
procedures for obtaining such
assistance. This shall include a personal
interview with each residential
displaced person.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(A) Provide current and continuing
information on the availability,
purchase prices, and rental costs of
comparable replacement dwellings, and
explain that the person cannot be
required to move unless at least one
comparable replacement dwelling is
made available as set forth in
§ 24.204(a).
(B) As soon as feasible, the Agency
shall inform the person in writing of the
specific comparable replacement
dwelling and the price or rent used for
establishing the upper limit of the
replacement housing payment (see
§ 24.403(a) and (b)) and the basis for the
determination, so that the person is
aware of the maximum replacement
housing payment for which he or she
may qualify.
(C) Where feasible, comparable
housing shall be inspected prior to
being made available to assure that it
meets applicable standards (see
§ 24.2(a).) If such an inspection is not
made, the Agency shall notify the
person to be displaced in writing of the
reason that an inspection of the
comparable was not made and, that if
the comparable is purchased or rented
by the displaced person, a replacement
housing payment may not be made
unless the replacement dwelling is
subsequently inspected and determined
to be decent, safe, and sanitary. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C).)
(D) Whenever possible, minority
persons shall be given reasonable
opportunities to relocate to decent, safe,
and sanitary replacement dwellings, not
located in an area of minority
concentration, that are within their
financial means. This paragraph
(c)(2)(ii)(D), however, does not require
an Agency to provide a person a larger
payment than is necessary to enable a
person to relocate to a comparable
replacement dwelling. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(D).)
(E) The Agency shall offer all persons
transportation to inspect housing to
which they are referred.
(F) Any displaced person that may be
eligible for government housing
assistance at the replacement dwelling
shall be advised of any requirements of
such government housing assistance
program that would limit the size of the
replacement dwelling (see § 24.2(a)), as
well as of the long-term nature of such
rent subsidy, and the limited (42 month)
duration of the relocation rental
assistance payment.
(iii) Provide, for nonresidential
moves, current and continuing
information on the availability,
purchase prices, and rental costs of
suitable commercial and farm properties
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
and locations. Assist any person
displaced from a business or farm
operation to obtain and become
established in a suitable replacement
location.
(iv) Minimize hardships to persons in
adjusting to relocation by providing
counseling, advice as to other sources of
assistance that may be available, and
such other help as may be appropriate.
(v) Supply persons to be displaced
with appropriate information
concerning Federal and State housing
programs, disaster loan and other
programs administered by the Small
Business Administration, and other
Federal and State programs offering
assistance to displaced persons, and
technical help to persons applying for
such assistance.
(d) Coordination of relocation
activities. Relocation activities shall be
coordinated with project work and other
displacement-causing activities to
ensure that, to the extent feasible,
persons displaced receive consistent
treatment and the duplication of
functions is minimized. (See § 24.6.)
(e) Subsequent occupants. Any person
who occupies property acquired by an
Agency, when such occupancy began
subsequent to the acquisition of the
property, and the occupancy is
permitted by a short-term rental
agreement or an agreement subject to
termination when the property is
needed for a program or project, shall be
eligible for advisory services, as
determined by the Agency.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.206
Eviction for cause.
(a) Eviction for cause must conform to
applicable State and local law. Any
person who occupies the real property
and is in lawful occupancy on the date
of the initiation of negotiations is
presumed to be entitled to relocation
payments and other assistance set forth
in this part unless the Agency
determines that:
(1) The person received an eviction
notice prior to the initiation of
negotiations and as a result of that
notice is later evicted; or
(2) The person is evicted after the
initiation of negotiations for serious or
repeated violation of material terms of
the lease or occupancy agreement; and
(3) In either case the eviction was not
undertaken for the purpose of evading
the obligation to make available the
payments and other assistance set forth
in this part.
(b) For purposes of determining
eligibility for relocation payments, the
date of displacement is the date the
person moves, or if later, the date a
comparable replacement dwelling is
made available. This section applies
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
only to persons who would otherwise
have been displaced by the project. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.206.)
§ 24.207 General requirements—claims for
relocation payments.
(a) Documentation. Any claim for a
relocation payment shall be supported
by such documentation as may be
reasonably required to support expenses
incurred, such as bills, certified prices,
appraisals, or other evidence of such
expenses. A displaced person must be
provided reasonable assistance
necessary to complete and file any
required claim for payment.
(b) Expeditious payments. The
Agency shall review claims in an
expeditious manner. The claimant shall
be promptly notified as to any
additional documentation that is
required to support the claim. Payment
for a claim shall be made as soon as
feasible following receipt of sufficient
documentation to support the claim.
(c) Advanced payments. If a person
demonstrates the need for an advanced
relocation payment in order to avoid or
reduce a hardship, the Agency shall
issue the payment, subject to such
safeguards as are appropriate to ensure
that the objective of the payment is
accomplished.
(d) Time for filing. (1) All claims for
a relocation payment shall be filed with
the Agency no later than 18 months
after:
(i) For tenants, the date of
displacement.
(ii) For owners, the date of
displacement or the date of the final
payment for the acquisition of the real
property, whichever is later.
(2) The Agency shall waive this time
period for good cause.
(e) Notice of denial of claim. If the
Agency disapproves all or part of a
payment claimed or refuses to consider
the claim on its merits because of
untimely filing or other grounds, it shall
promptly notify the claimant in writing
of its determination, the basis for its
determination, and the procedures for
appealing that determination.
(f) No waiver of relocation assistance.
An Agency shall not propose or request
that a displaced person waive his or her
rights or entitlements to relocation
assistance and benefits provided by the
Uniform Act and this part. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.207(f).)
(g) Expenditure of payments.
Payments, provided pursuant to this
part, shall not be considered to
constitute Federal financial assistance.
Accordingly, this part does not apply to
the expenditure of such payments by, or
for, a displaced person.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69501
(h) Deductions from relocation
payments. An Agency shall deduct the
amount of any advance relocation
payment from the relocation payment(s)
to which a displaced person is
otherwise entitled. The Agency shall not
withhold any part of a relocation
payment to a displaced person to satisfy
any other obligation.
§ 24.208 Aliens not lawfully present in the
United States.
(a) Each person seeking relocation
payments or relocation advisory
assistance shall, as a condition of
eligibility, certify:
(1) In the case of an individual, that
they are a citizen, or an alien who is
lawfully present in the United States.
(2) In the case of a family, that each
family member is a citizen or an alien
who is lawfully present in the United
States. The certification may be made by
the head of the household on behalf of
other family members.
(3) In the case of an unincorporated
business, farm, or nonprofit
organization, that each owner is a
citizen or an alien who is lawfully
present in the United States. The
certification may be made by the
principal owner, manager, or operating
officer on behalf of other persons with
an ownership interest.
(4) In the case of an incorporated
business, farm, or nonprofit
organization, that the corporation is
authorized to conduct business within
the United States.
(b) The certification provided
pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and
(3) of this section shall specify the
person’s status as a citizen or an alien
who is lawfully present in the United
States. Requirements concerning the
certification in addition to those
contained in this section shall be within
the discretion of the Federal funding
Agency and, within those parameters,
that of the Agency carrying out such
displacements.
(c) In computing relocation payments
under the Uniform Act, if any
member(s) of a household or owner(s) of
an unincorporated business, farm, or
nonprofit organization is (are)
determined to be ineligible because of a
failure to be lawfully present in the
United States, no relocation payments
may be made to him or her. Any
payment(s) for which such household,
unincorporated business, farm, or
nonprofit organization would otherwise
be eligible shall be computed for the
household, based on the number of
eligible household members and for the
unincorporated business, farm, or
nonprofit organization, based on the
ratio of ownership between eligible and
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69502
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
ineligible owners. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.208(c).)
(d) The Agency shall consider the
certification provided pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section to be valid,
unless the Agency determines in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this
section that it is invalid based on a
review of documentation or other
information that the Agency considers
reliable and appropriate.
(e) Any review by the Agency of the
certifications provided pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this section shall be
conducted in a nondiscriminatory
fashion. Each Agency will apply the
same standard of review to all such
certifications it receives, except that
such standard may be revised
periodically.
(f) If, based on a review of a person’s
documentation or other credible
evidence, an Agency has reason to
believe that a person’s certification is
invalid (for example a document
reviewed does not on its face reasonably
appear to be genuine), and that, as a
result, such person may be an alien not
lawfully present in the United States, it
shall obtain the following information
before making a final determination:
(1) For a person who has certified that
they are an alien lawfully present in the
United States, the Agency shall obtain
verification of the person’s status by
using the Systematic Alien Verification
for Entitlements (SAVE) program
administered by U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) to verify
immigration status.
(2) For a person who has certified that
they are a citizen or national, if the
Agency has reason to believe that the
certification is invalid, the Agency shall
request evidence of United States
citizenship or nationality and, if
considered necessary, verify the
accuracy of such evidence with the
issuer or other appropriate source.
(g) No relocation payments or
relocation advisory assistance shall be
provided to a person who has not
provided the certification described in
this section or who has been determined
to be not lawfully present in the United
States, unless such person can
demonstrate to the Agency’s satisfaction
that the denial of relocation assistance
will result in an exceptional and
extremely unusual hardship to such
person’s spouse, parent, or child who is
a citizen of the United States or an alien
lawfully admitted for permanent
residence in the United States.
(h) For purposes of paragraph (g) of
this section, ‘‘exceptional and extremely
unusual hardship’’ to such spouse,
parent, or child of the person not
lawfully present in the United States
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
means that the denial of relocation
payments and advisory assistance to
such person will directly result in (see
appendix A of this part, Section
24.208(h)):
(1) A significant and demonstrable
adverse impact on the health or safety
of such spouse, parent, or child;
(2) A significant and demonstrable
adverse impact on the continued
existence of the family unit of which
such spouse, parent, or child is a
member; or
(3) Any other impact that the Agency
determines will have a significant and
demonstrable adverse impact on such
spouse, parent, or child.
(i) The certification referred to in
paragraph (a) of this section may be
included as part of the claim for
relocation payments described in
§ 24.207.
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Budget under control number 2105–0508)
§ 24.209 Relocation payments not
considered as income.
No relocation payment received by a
displaced person under this part shall
be considered as income for the purpose
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
which has been redesignated as the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (Title 26,
U.S. Code), or for the purpose of
determining the eligibility or the extent
of eligibility of any person for assistance
under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.
Code 301 et seq.) or any other Federal
law, except for any Federal law
providing low-income housing
assistance.
Subpart D—Payments for Moving and
Related Expenses
§ 24.301 Payment for actual reasonable
moving and related expenses.
(a) General. (1) Any owner-occupant
or tenant who qualifies as a displaced
person (defined at § 24.2(a)) and who
moves from a dwelling (including a
mobile home) or who moves from a
business, farm, or nonprofit
organization is entitled to payment of
his or her actual moving and related
expenses, as the Agency determines to
be reasonable and necessary.
(2) A non-occupant owner of a rented
mobile home is eligible for actual cost
reimbursement under this section to
relocate the mobile home. If the mobile
home is not acquired as real estate, but
the homeowner-occupant obtains a
replacement housing payment under
one of the circumstances described at
§ 24.502(a)(3), the home-owner
occupant is not eligible for payment for
moving the mobile home, but may be
eligible for a payment for moving
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
personal property from the mobile
home.
(b) Moves from a dwelling. A
displaced person’s actual, reasonable,
and necessary moving expenses for
moving personal property from a
dwelling may be determined based on
the cost of one, or a combination of the
methods in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of
this section (eligible expenses for moves
from a dwelling include the expenses
described in paragraphs (g)(1) through
(7) of this section):
(1) Commercial move. Moves
performed by a professional mover.
(2) Self-move. Moves that may be
performed by the displaced person in
one or a combination of the following
methods:
(i) Fixed Residential Moving Cost
Schedule. The Fixed Residential
Moving Cost Schedule described in
§ 24.302.
(ii) Actual cost move. Supported by
receipted bills for labor and equipment.
Hourly labor rates should not exceed the
cost paid by a commercial mover.
Equipment rental fees should be based
on the actual cost of renting the
equipment but not exceed the cost paid
by a commercial mover.
(c) Moves from a mobile home.
Eligible expenses for moves from a
mobile home include those expenses
described in paragraphs (g)(1) through
(7) of this section. In addition to the
items in paragraph (a) of this section,
the owner-occupant of a mobile home
that is moved as personal property and
used as the person’s replacement
dwelling, is also eligible for the moving
expenses described in paragraphs (g)(8)
through (10) of this section. A displaced
person’s actual, reasonable, and
necessary moving expenses for moving
personal property from a mobile home
may be determined based on the cost of
one, or a combination of the following
methods:
(1) Commercial move. Moves
performed by a professional mover.
(2) Self-move. Moves that may be
performed by the displaced person in
one or a combination of the following
methods:
(i) Fixed Residential Moving Cost
Schedule. The Fixed Residential
Moving Cost Schedule described in
§ 24.302.
(ii) Actual cost move. Supported by
receipted bills for labor and equipment.
Hourly labor rates should not exceed the
cost paid by a commercial mover.
Equipment rental fees should be based
on the actual cost of renting the
equipment but not exceed the cost paid
by a commercial mover.
(d) Moves from a business, farm, or
nonprofit organization. Eligible
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
expenses for moves from a business,
farm, or nonprofit organization include
those expenses described in paragraphs
(g)(1) through (7) and (11) through (18)
of this section and § 24.303. Personal
property as determined by an inventory
from a business, farm, or nonprofit
organization may be moved by one or a
combination of the following methods:
(1) Commercial move. Based on the
lower of two bids or estimates prepared
by a commercial mover. At the Agency’s
discretion, payment for a low cost or
uncomplicated move may be based on a
single bid or estimate.
(2) Self-move. A self-move payment
may be based on one or a combination
of the following:
(i) The lower of two bids or estimates
prepared by a commercial mover or
qualified Agency staff person. At the
Agency’s discretion, payment for a low
cost or uncomplicated move may be
based on a single bid or estimate; or
(ii) Supported by receipted bills for
labor and equipment. Hourly labor rates
should not exceed the rates paid by a
commercial mover to employees
performing the same activity and,
equipment rental fees should be based
on the actual rental cost of the
equipment but not to exceed the cost
paid by a commercial mover.
(e) Personal property only. Eligible
expenses for a person who is required
to move personal property from real
property but is not required to move
from a dwelling (including a mobile
home), business, farm, or nonprofit
organization include those expenses
described in paragraphs (g)(1) through
(7) and (18) of this section. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.301(e).)
(f) Advertising signs. The amount of a
payment for direct loss of an advertising
sign, which is personal property shall be
the lesser of:
(1) The depreciated reproduction cost
of the sign, as determined by the
Agency, less the proceeds from its sale;
or
(2) The estimated cost of moving the
sign, but with no allowance for storage.
(g) Eligible actual moving expenses.
(1) Transportation of the displaced
person and personal property.
Transportation costs for a distance
beyond 50 miles are not eligible, unless
the Agency determines that relocation
beyond 50 miles is justified.
(2) Packing, crating, unpacking, and
uncrating of the personal property.
(3) Disconnecting, dismantling,
removing, reassembling, and reinstalling
relocated household appliances and
other personal property. For businesses,
farms, or nonprofit organizations this
includes machinery, equipment,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
substitute personal property, and
connections to utilities available within
the building; it also includes
modifications to the personal property,
including those mandated by Federal,
State, or local law, code, or ordinance,
necessary to adapt it to the replacement
structure, the replacement site, or the
utilities at the replacement site, and
modifications necessary to adapt the
utilities at the replacement site to the
personal property.
(4) Storage of the personal property
for a period not to exceed 12 months,
unless the Agency determines that a
longer period is necessary.
(5) Insurance for the replacement
value of the property in connection with
the move and necessary storage.
(6) The replacement value of property
lost, stolen, or damaged in the process
of moving (not through the fault or
negligence of the displaced person, his
or her agent, or employee) where
insurance covering such loss, theft, or
damage is not reasonably available.
(7) Other moving-related expenses
that are not listed as ineligible under
paragraph (h) of this section, as the
Agency determines to be reasonable and
necessary.
(8) The reasonable cost of
disassembling, moving, and
reassembling any appurtenances
attached to a mobile home, such as
porches, decks, skirting, and awnings,
which were not acquired, anchoring of
the unit, and utility ‘‘hookup’’ charges.
(9) The reasonable cost of repairs and/
or modifications so that a mobile home
can be moved and/or made decent, safe,
and sanitary.
(10) The cost of a nonrefundable
mobile home park entrance fee, to the
extent it does not exceed the fee at a
comparable mobile home park, if the
person is displaced from a mobile home
park or the Agency determines that
payment of the fee is necessary to effect
relocation.
(11) Any actual, reasonable, or
necessary costs of a license, permit, fee,
or certification required of the displaced
person to operate a business, farm, or
non-profit at the replacement location.
However, the payment may be based on
the remaining useful life of the existing
license, permit, fees, or certification.
(12) Professional services as the
Agency determines to be actual,
reasonable, and necessary for:
(i) Planning the move of the personal
property;
(ii) Moving the personal property; and
(iii) Installing the relocated personal
property at the replacement location.
(13) Relettering signs, replacing
stationery on hand at the time of
displacement, and making reasonable
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69503
and necessary updates to other media
that are made obsolete as a result of the
move. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.301(g)(13).)
(14) Actual direct loss of tangible
personal property incurred as a result of
moving or discontinuing the business or
farm operation. The payment shall
consist of:
(i) If the item is currently in use, the
lesser of:
(A) The estimated cost to move and
reinstall (to be eligible for payment, the
claimant must make a good faith effort
to sell the personal property, unless the
Agency determines that such effort is
not necessary); or
(B) The fair market value in place of
the item, as is for continued use, less the
proceeds from its sale.
(ii) If the item is not currently in use:
The estimated cost of moving the item
as is but not including any allowance
for storage.
(iii) When payment for property loss
is claimed for goods held for sale, the
fair market value shall be based on the
cost of the goods to the business, not the
potential selling prices. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.301(g)(14).)
(15) The reasonable cost incurred in
attempting to sell an item that is not to
be relocated.
(16) If an item of personal property,
which is used as part of a business or
farm operation is not moved but is
promptly replaced with a substitute
item that performs a comparable
function at the replacement site, the
displaced person is entitled to payment
of the lesser of:
(i) The cost of the substitute item,
including installation costs of the
replacement site, minus any proceeds
from the sale or trade-in of the replaced
item; or
(ii) The estimated cost of moving and
reinstalling the replaced item but with
no allowance for storage. At the
Agency’s discretion, the estimated cost
for a low cost or uncomplicated move
may be based on a single bid or
estimate.
(17) Searching for a replacement
location.
(i) A business or farm operation is
entitled to reimbursement for actual
expenses, not to exceed $5,000, as the
Agency determines to be reasonable,
which are incurred in searching for a
replacement location, including:
(A) Transportation;
(B) Meals and lodging away from
home;
(C) Time spent searching, based on
reasonable salary or earnings;
(D) Fees paid to a real estate agent or
broker to locate a replacement site,
exclusive of any fees or commissions
related to the purchase of such sites;
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69504
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(E) Time spent in obtaining permits
and attending zoning hearings; and
(F) Expenses negotiating the purchase
of a replacement site based on a
reasonable salary or fee, including
actual, reasonable, and necessary
attorney’s fees.
(ii) The Federal funding Agency may,
on a program wide or project basis,
allow a one-time payment of up to
$1,000 for search expenses with little or
no documentation as an alternative
payment method to paragraph (g)(17)(i)
of this section. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.301(g)(17).)
(18) When the personal property to be
moved is of low value and high bulk,
and the cost of moving the property
would be disproportionate to its value
in the judgment of the Agency, the
allowable moving cost payment shall
not exceed the lesser of: The amount
which would be received if the property
were sold at the site; or the replacement
cost of a comparable quantity delivered
to the new business location. Examples
of personal property covered by this
paragraph (g)(18) include, but are not
limited to, stockpiled sand, gravel,
minerals, metals, and other similar
items of personal property as
determined by the Agency.
(h) Ineligible moving and related
expenses. A displaced person is not
entitled to payment for:
(1) The cost of moving any structure
or other real property improvement in
which the displaced person reserved
ownership. (However, this part does not
preclude the computation under
§ 24.401(c)(2)(iii));
(2) Interest on a loan to cover moving
expenses;
(3) Loss of goodwill;
(4) Loss of profits;
(5) Loss of trained employees;
(6) Any additional operating expenses
of a business or farm operation incurred
because of operating in a new location
except as provided in § 24.304(a)(6);
(7) Personal injury;
(8) Any legal fee or other cost for
preparing a claim for a relocation
payment or for representing the
claimant before the Agency;
(9) Expenses for searching for a
replacement dwelling;
(10) Physical changes to the real
property at the replacement location of
a business or farm operation except as
provided in paragraph (g)(3) of this
section and § 24.304(a);
(11) Costs for storage of personal
property on real property already owned
or leased by the displaced person;
(12) Refundable security and utility
deposits; and
(13) Cosmetic changes to a
replacement dwelling such as painting,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
draperies, or replacement carpet or
flooring.
(i) Notification and inspection
(nonresidential). The Agency shall
inform the displaced person, in writing,
of the requirements of this section as
soon as possible after the initiation of
negotiations. This information may be
included in the relocation information
provided the displaced person as set
forth in § 24.203. To be eligible for
payments under this section the
displaced person must:
(1) Provide the Agency reasonable
advance notice of the approximate date
of the start of the move or disposition
of the personal property and an
inventory of the items to be moved.
However, the Agency may waive this
notice requirement after documenting
its file accordingly.
(2) Permit the Agency to make
reasonable and timely inspections of the
personal property at both the
displacement and replacement sites and
to monitor the move.
(j) Transfer of ownership
(nonresidential). Upon request and in
accordance with applicable law, the
claimant shall transfer to the Agency
ownership of any personal property that
has not been moved, sold, or traded in.
§ 24.302 Fixed payment for moving
expenses—residential moves.
Any person displaced from a dwelling
or a seasonal residence or a dormitory
style room is entitled to receive a fixed
moving cost payment as an alternative
to a payment for actual moving and
related expenses under § 24.301. This
payment shall be determined according
to the Fixed Residential Moving Cost
Schedule approved by the Federal
Highway Administration and published
in the Federal Register on a periodic
basis. The payment to a person with
minimal personal possessions who is in
occupancy of a dormitory style room or
a person whose residential move is
performed by an Agency at no cost to
the person shall be limited to the
amount stated in the most recent edition
of the Fixed Residential Moving Cost
Schedule.
(a) An Agency may determine that the
storage of personal property is a
reasonable and necessary moving
expense for a displaced person under
this part. The determination shall be
based on the needs of the displaced
person; the nature of the move; the
plans for permanent relocation; the
amount of time available for the
relocation process; and, whether storage
will facilitate relocation. If the Agency
determines that storage is reasonable
and necessary in conjunction with this
payment, the Agency shall pay the
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
actual, reasonable, and necessary
storage expenses in accordance with
§ 24.301(g)(4). However, regardless of
whether storage is approved, the Fixed
Residential Move Cost Schedule
provides a one-time payment for one
move from the displacement dwelling to
the replacement dwelling, dwelling, or
storage facility. Consequently, displaced
persons must be fully informed that
reimbursement of costs to move the
personal property to storage and the cost
of approved storage represent a full
reimbursement of their eligibility for
moving costs under this part. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.302.)
(b) [Reserved]
(c) The Fixed Residential Moving Cost
Schedule is available at the following
URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_
estate/practitioners/uniform_act/
relocation/moving_cost_schedule.cfm.
§ 24.303 Related nonresidential eligible
expenses.
The following expenses, in addition
to those provided by § 24.301 for
moving personal property, shall be
provided if the Agency determines that
they are actual, reasonable, and
necessary:
(a) Connection to available utilities
from the replacement site’s property
line to improvements at the replacement
site. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.303(a).)
(b) Professional services performed
prior to the purchase or lease of a
replacement site to determine its
suitability for the displaced person’s
business operation including but not
limited to soil testing or feasibility and
marketing studies (excluding any fees or
commissions directly related to the
purchase or lease of such site). At the
discretion of the Agency a reasonable
pre-approved hourly rate may be
established. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.303(b).)
(c) Impact fees and one-time
assessments for anticipated heavy utility
usage, as determined necessary by the
Agency. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.303(c).)
§ 24.304 Reestablishment expenses—
nonresidential moves.
In addition to the payments available
under §§ 24.301 and 24.303, a small
business, farm, or nonprofit
organization is entitled to receive a
payment, not to exceed $25,000, for
expenses actually incurred in relocating
and reestablishing such small business,
farm, or nonprofit organization at a
replacement site.
(a) Eligible expenses. Reestablishment
expenses must be reasonable and
necessary, as determined by the Agency.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
They include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(1) Repairs or improvements to the
replacement real property as required by
Federal, State, or local law, code, or
ordinance.
(2) Modifications to the replacement
property to accommodate the business
operation or make replacement
structures suitable for conducting the
business.
(3) Construction and installation costs
for exterior signing to advertise the
business.
(4) Redecoration or replacement of
soiled or worn surfaces at the
replacement site, such as paint,
paneling, or carpeting.
(5) Advertisement of replacement
location.
(6) Estimated increased costs of
operation during the first 2 years at the
replacement site for such items as:
(i) Lease or rental charges;
(ii) Personal or real property taxes;
(iii) Insurance premiums; and
(iv) Utility charges, excluding impact
fees.
(7) Other items that the Agency
considers essential to the
reestablishment of the business.
(b) Ineligible expenses. The following
is a nonexclusive listing of
reestablishment expenditures not
considered to be reasonable, necessary,
or otherwise eligible:
(1) Purchase of capital assets, such as
office furniture, filing cabinets,
machinery, or trade fixtures.
(2) Purchase of manufacturing
materials, production supplies, product
inventory, or other items used in the
normal course of the business operation.
(3) Interest on money borrowed to
make the move or purchase the
replacement property.
(4) Payment to a part-time business in
the home which does not contribute
materially, defined at § 24.2(a), to the
household income.
(5) Construction costs for a new
building at the business replacement
site, or costs to build out a shell, or costs
to substantially reconstruct a building.
(See appendix A of this part, Section
24.304(b)(5).)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.305 Fixed payment for moving
expenses—nonresidential moves.
(a) Business. A displaced business
may be eligible to choose a fixed
payment in lieu of the payments for
both actual moving and related
expenses, as well as actual reasonable
reestablishment expenses provided by
§§ 24.301, 24.303, and 24.304. Such
fixed payment, except for payment to a
nonprofit organization, shall equal the
average annual net earnings of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
business, as computed in accordance
with paragraph (e) of this section, but
not less than $1,000 nor more than
$40,000. The displaced business is
eligible for the payment if the Agency
determines that:
(1) The business owns or rents
personal property which must be moved
in connection with such displacement
and for which an expense would be
incurred in such move and the business
vacates or relocates from its
displacement site;
(2) The business cannot be relocated
without a substantial loss of its existing
patronage (clientele or net earnings). A
business is assumed to meet this test
unless the Agency determines that it
will not suffer a substantial loss of its
existing patronage;
(3) The business is not part of a
commercial enterprise having more than
three other entities which are not being
acquired by the Agency, and which are
under the same ownership and engaged
in the same or similar business
activities;
(4) The business is not operated at a
displacement dwelling solely for the
purpose of renting such dwelling to
others;
(5) The business is not operated at the
displacement site solely for the purpose
of renting the site to others; and
(6) The business contributed
materially to the income of the
displaced person during the 2 taxable
years prior to displacement. (See
§ 24.2(a).)
(b) Determining the number of
businesses. In determining whether two
or more displaced legal entities
constitute a single business, which is
entitled to only one fixed payment, all
pertinent factors shall be considered,
including the extent to which:
(1) The same premises and equipment
are shared;
(2) Substantially identical or
interrelated business functions are
carried out and business and financial
affairs are commingled;
(3) The entities are held out to the
public, and to those customarily dealing
with them, as one business; and
(4) The same person or closely related
persons own, control, or manage the
affairs of the entities.
(c) Farm operation. A displaced farm
operation (defined at § 24.2(a)) may
choose a fixed payment, in lieu of the
payments for both actual moving as well
as related expenses and actual
reasonable reestablishment expenses, in
an amount equal to its average annual
net earnings as computed in accordance
with paragraph (e) of this section, but
not less than $1,000 nor more than
$40,000. In the case of a partial
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69505
acquisition of land, which was a farm
operation before the acquisition, the
fixed payment shall be made only if the
Agency determines that:
(1) The acquisition of part of the land
caused the operator to be displaced from
the farm operation on the remaining
land; or
(2) The partial acquisition caused a
substantial change in the nature of the
farm operation.
(d) Nonprofit organization. A
displaced nonprofit organization may
choose a fixed payment of $1,000 to
$40,000, in lieu of the payments for both
actual moving as well as related
expenses and actual reasonable
reestablishment expenses, if the Agency
determines that it cannot be relocated
without a substantial loss of existing
patronage (membership or clientele). A
nonprofit organization is assumed to
meet this test, unless the Agency
demonstrates otherwise. Any payment
in excess of $1,000 must be supported
with financial statements for the two 12month periods prior to the acquisition.
The amount to be used for the payment
is the average of 2 years annual gross
revenues less administrative expenses.
(See appendix A of this part, Section
24.305(d).)
(e) Average annual net earnings of a
business or farm operation. The average
annual net earnings of a business or
farm operation are one-half of its net
earnings before Federal, State, and local
income taxes during the 2 taxable years
immediately prior to the taxable year in
which it was displaced. If the business
or farm was not in operation for the full
2 taxable years prior to displacement,
net earnings shall be based on the actual
period of operation at the displacement
site during the 2 taxable years prior to
displacement, projected to an annual
rate. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.305(e) for sample
calculations.) Average annual net
earnings may be based upon a different
period of time when the Agency
determines it to be more equitable. Net
earnings include any compensation
obtained from the business or farm
operation by its owner, the owner’s
spouse, and dependents. The displaced
person shall furnish the Agency proof of
net earnings through income tax returns,
certified financial statements, or other
reasonable evidence, which the Agency
determines is satisfactory. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.305(e).)
§ 24.306 Discretionary utility relocation
payments.
(a) Whenever a program or project
undertaken by an Agency causes the
relocation of a utility facility (defined at
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69506
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
§ 24.2(a)) and the relocation of the
facility creates extraordinary expenses
for its owner, the Agency may, at its
option, make a relocation payment to
the owner for all or part of such
expenses, if the following criteria are
met:
(1) The utility facility legally occupies
State or local government property, or
property over which the State or local
government has an easement or right-ofway;
(2) The utility facility’s right of
occupancy thereon is pursuant to State
law or local ordinance specifically
authorizing such use, or where such use
and occupancy has been granted
through a franchise, use and occupancy
permit, or other similar agreement;
(3) Relocation of the utility facility is
required by and is incidental to the
primary purpose of the project or
program undertaken by the Agency;
(4) There is no Federal law, other than
the Uniform Act, which clearly
establishes a policy for the payment of
utility moving costs that is applicable to
the Agency’s program or project; and
(5) State or local government
reimbursement for utility moving costs
or payment of such costs by the Agency
is in accordance with State law.
(b) For the purposes of this section,
the term extraordinary expenses mean
those expenses which, in the opinion of
the Agency, are not routine or
predictable expenses relating to the
utility’s occupancy of rights-of-way, and
are not ordinarily budgeted as operating
expenses, unless the owner of the utility
facility has explicitly and knowingly
agreed to bear such expenses as a
condition for use of the property, or has
voluntarily agreed to be responsible for
such expenses.
(c) A relocation payment to a utility
facility owner for moving costs under
this section may not exceed the cost to
functionally restore the service
disrupted by the federally assisted
program or project, less any increase in
value of the new facility and salvage
value of the old facility. The Agency
and the utility facility owner shall reach
prior agreement on the nature of the
utility relocation work to be
accomplished, the eligibility of the work
for reimbursement, the responsibilities
for financing and accomplishing the
work, and the method of accumulating
costs and making payment. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.306.)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Subpart E—Replacement Housing
Payments
§ 24.401 Replacement housing payment
for 90-day homeowner-occupants.
(a) Eligibility. A displaced person is
eligible for the replacement housing
payment for a 90-day homeowneroccupant if the person:
(1) Has actually owned and occupied
the displacement dwelling for not less
than 90 days immediately prior to the
initiation of negotiations; and
(2) Purchases and occupies a decent,
safe, and sanitary replacement dwelling
within 1 year after the later of the
following dates (except that the Agency
may extend such 1 year period for good
cause):
(i) The date the displaced person
receives final payment for the
displacement dwelling or, in the case of
condemnation, the date the full amount
of the estimate of just compensation is
deposited in the court; or
(ii) The date the Agency’s obligation
under § 24.204 is met.
(b) Amount of payment. The
replacement housing payment for an
eligible 90-day homeowner-occupant
may not exceed $31,000. (See also
§ 24.404.) The payment under this
subpart is limited to the amount
necessary to relocate to a comparable
replacement dwelling within 1 year
from the date the displaced homeowneroccupant is paid for the displacement
dwelling, or the date a comparable
replacement dwelling is made available
to such person, whichever is later. The
payment shall be the sum of:
(1) The amount by which the cost of
a replacement dwelling exceeds the
acquisition cost of the displacement
dwelling, as determined in accordance
with paragraph (c) of this section;
(2) The increased interest costs and
other debt service costs which are
incurred in connection with the
mortgage(s) on the replacement
dwelling, as determined in accordance
with paragraph (d) of this section; and
(3) The reasonable expenses
incidental to the purchase of the
replacement dwelling, as determined in
accordance with paragraph (f) of this
section.
(c) Price differential—(1) Basic
computation. The price differential to
be paid under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section is the amount which must be
added to the acquisition cost of the
displacement dwelling and site (see
§ 24.2(a)) to provide a total amount
equal to the lesser of:
(i) The reasonable cost of a
comparable replacement dwelling as
determined in accordance with
§ 24.403(a); or
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(ii) The purchase price of the DSS
replacement dwelling actually
purchased and occupied by the
displaced person.
(2) Owner retention of displacement
dwelling. If the owner retains ownership
of his or her dwelling, moves it from the
displacement site, and reoccupies it on
a replacement site, the purchase price of
the replacement dwelling shall be the
sum of:
(i) The cost of moving and restoring
the dwelling to a condition comparable
to that prior to the move;
(ii) The cost of making the unit a DSS
replacement dwelling (see § 24.2(a));
and
(iii) The current fair market value for
residential use of the replacement
dwelling site (see appendix A of this
part, Section 24.401(c)(2)(iii)), unless
the claimant rented the displacement
site and there is a reasonable
opportunity for the claimant to rent a
suitable replacement site; and
(iv) The retention value of the
dwelling, if such retention value is
reflected in the ‘‘acquisition cost’’ used
when computing the replacement
housing payment.
(d) Increased mortgage interest costs.
The Agency shall determine the factors
to be used in computing the amount to
be paid to a displaced person under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section. The
payment for increased mortgage interest
cost shall be the amount which will
reduce the mortgage balance on a new
mortgage to an amount which could be
amortized with the same monthly
payment for principal and interest as
that for the mortgage(s) on the
displacement dwelling. In addition,
payments shall include other debt
service costs, if not paid as incidental
costs, and shall be based only on bona
fide mortgages that were valid liens on
the displacement dwelling for at least
180 days prior to the initiation of
negotiations. Paragraphs (d)(1) through
(5) of this section shall apply to the
computation of the increased mortgage
interest costs payment, which payment
shall be contingent upon a mortgage
being placed on the replacement
dwelling.
(1) The payment shall be based on the
unpaid mortgage balance(s) on the
displacement dwelling; however, in the
event the displaced person obtains a
smaller mortgage than the mortgage
balance(s) computed in the buydown
determination, the payment will be
prorated and reduced accordingly. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.401(d).) In the case of a home equity
loan the unpaid balance shall be that
balance which existed 180 days prior to
the initiation of negotiations or the
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
balance on the date of acquisition,
whichever is less.
(2) The payment shall be based on the
remaining term of the mortgage(s) on the
displacement dwelling or the term of
the new mortgage, whichever is shorter.
(3) The interest rate on the new
mortgage used in determining the
amount of the payment shall not exceed
the prevailing fixed interest rate for
conventional mortgages currently
charged by mortgage lending
institutions in the area in which the
replacement dwelling is located.
(4) Purchaser’s points and loan
origination or assumption fees, but not
seller’s points, shall be paid to the
extent:
(i) They are not paid as incidental
expenses;
(ii) They do not exceed rates normal
to similar real estate transactions in the
area;
(iii) The Agency determines them to
be necessary; and
(iv) The computation of such points
and fees shall be based on the unpaid
mortgage balance on the displacement
dwelling, less the amount determined
for the reduction of the mortgage
balance under this section.
(5) The displaced person shall be
advised of the approximate amount of
this payment and the conditions that
must be met to receive the payment as
soon as the facts relative to the person’s
current mortgage(s) are known and the
payment shall be made available at or
near the time of closing on the
replacement dwelling in order to reduce
the new mortgage as intended.
(e) Home equity conversion mortgage.
The payment for replacing a HECM
shall be the difference between the
existing HECM balance and the
minimum dollar amount necessary to
purchase a replacement HECM which
will provide the same or similar terms
as that for the HECM on the
displacement dwelling. In addition,
payments shall include other debt
service costs, if not paid as incidental
costs, and shall be based only on
HECMs that were valid liens on the
displacement dwelling for at least 180
days prior to the initiation of
negotiations. Paragraphs (e)(1) through
(4) of this section shall apply to the
computation of the mortgage interest
differential payment (MIDP) required,
which payment shall be contingent
upon a new HECM mortgage being
purchased for the replacement dwelling.
(1) The payment shall be based on the
difference between the HECM balance
and the minimum amount needed to
qualify for a HECM with the similar
terms as the HECM mortgage on the
displacement dwelling; however, in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
event the displaced person obtains a
smaller HECM than the HECM
balance(s) computed in the buydown
determination, the payment will be
prorated and reduced accordingly. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.401(e).) The HECM balance shall be
that balance which existed 180 days
prior to the initiation of negotiations or
the HECM balance on the date of
acquisition, whichever is less.
(2) The interest rate on the new HECM
used in determining the amount of the
eligibility shall not exceed the
prevailing rate for HECMs currently
charged by mortgage lending
institutions for owners with similar
amounts of equity in their units in the
area in which the replacement dwelling
is located.
(3) Purchaser’s points and loan
origination, but not seller’s points, shall
be paid to the extent:
(i) They are not paid as incidental
expenses;
(ii) They do not exceed rates normal
to similar real estate transactions in the
area;
(iii) The Agency determines them to
be necessary; and
(iv) The computation of such points
and fees shall be based on the HECM
balance on the displacement dwelling
plus any amount necessary to purchase
the new HECM.
(4) The displaced person or their
representative shall be advised of the
approximate amount of this eligibility
and the conditions that must be met to
receive the reimbursement as soon as
the facts relative to the person’s current
HECM are known; the payment shall be
made available at or near the time of
closing on the replacement dwelling in
order to purchase the new HECM as
intended.
(f) Incidental expenses. The incidental
expenses to be paid under paragraph
(b)(3) of this section or § 24.402(c)(1) are
those necessary and reasonable costs
actually incurred by the displaced
person incident to the purchase of a
replacement dwelling, and customarily
paid by the buyer, including:
(1) Legal, closing, and related costs,
including those for title search,
preparing conveyance instruments,
notary fees, preparing surveys and plats,
and recording fees.
(2) Lender, FHA, or VA application
and appraisal fees.
(3) Loan origination or assumption
fees that do not represent prepaid
interest.
(4) Professional home inspection,
certification of structural soundness,
and termite inspection.
(5) Credit report.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69507
(6) Owner’s and mortgagee’s evidence
of title, e.g., title insurance, not to
exceed the costs for a comparable
replacement dwelling.
(7) Escrow agent’s fee.
(8) State revenue or documentary
stamps, sales or transfer taxes (not to
exceed the costs for a comparable
replacement dwelling).
(9) Such other costs as the Agency
determine to be incidental to the
purchase.
(g) Rental assistance payment for 90day homeowner. A 90-day homeowneroccupant, who could be eligible for a
replacement housing payment under
paragraph (a) of this section but elects
to rent a replacement dwelling, is
eligible for a rental assistance payment.
The amount of the rental assistance
payment is based on a determination of
market rent for the acquired dwelling
compared to a comparable rental
dwelling available on the market. The
difference, if any, is computed in
accordance with § 24.402(b)(1), except
that the limit of $7,200 does not apply,
and disbursed in accordance with
§ 24.402(b)(3). Under no circumstances
would the rental assistance payment
exceed the amount that could have been
received under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section had the 90-day homeowner
elected to purchase and occupy a
comparable replacement dwelling.
§ 24.402 Replacement housing payment
for 90-day tenants and certain others.
(a) Eligibility. A tenant displaced from
a dwelling is entitled to a payment not
to exceed $7,200 for rental assistance, as
computed in accordance with paragraph
(b) of this section, or down payment
assistance, as computed in accordance
with paragraph (c) of this section, if
such displaced person:
(1) Has actually and lawfully
occupied the displacement dwelling for
at least 90 days immediately prior to the
initiation of negotiations; and
(2) Has rented or purchased and
occupied a DSS replacement dwelling
within 1 year (unless the Agency
extends this period for good cause) after
the date he or she moves from the
displacement dwelling.
(b) Rental assistance payment—(1)
Amount of payment. An eligible
displaced person who rents a
replacement dwelling is entitled to a
payment not to exceed $7,200 for rental
assistance. (See § 24.404.) Such payment
shall be 42 times the amount obtained
by subtracting the base monthly rental
for the displacement dwelling from the
lesser of:
(i) The monthly rent and estimated
average monthly cost of utilities for a
comparable replacement dwelling; or
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69508
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The monthly rent and estimated
average monthly cost of utilities for the
DSS replacement dwelling actually
occupied by the displaced person.
(2) Base monthly rental for
displacement dwelling. The base
monthly rental for the displacement
dwelling is the lesser of:
(i) The average monthly cost for rent
and utilities at the displacement
dwelling for a reasonable period prior to
displacement, as determined by the
Agency (for an owner-occupant, use the
fair market rent for the displacement
dwelling; for a tenant who paid little or
no rent for the displacement dwelling,
use the fair market rent, unless its use
would result in a hardship because of
the person’s income or other
circumstances); or
(ii)(A) Thirty (30) percent of the
displaced person’s average monthly
gross household income if the amount is
classified as ‘‘low income’’ by the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s Uniform Relocation Act
Income (‘‘Survey’’). The base monthly
rental shall be established solely on the
criteria in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
section for persons with income
exceeding the Survey’s ‘‘low income’’
limits, for persons refusing to provide
appropriate evidence of income, and for
persons who are dependents. A fulltime student or resident of an institution
may be assumed to be a dependent,
unless the person demonstrates
otherwise; or,
(B) The Surveys U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development’s
Public Housing Uniform Relocation Act
Income Limits are updated annually and
are available on FHWA’s website.6
(iii) The total of the amounts
designated for shelter and utilities if the
displaced person is receiving a welfare
assistance payment from a program that
designates the amounts for shelter and
utilities.
(3) Manner of disbursement. A rental
assistance payment may, at the Agency’s
discretion, be disbursed in either a lump
sum or in installments. However, except
as limited by § 24.403(f), the full amount
vests immediately, whether or not there
is any later change in the person’s
income or rent, or in the condition or
location of the person’s replacement
housing.
(c) Down payment assistance
payment—(1) Amount of payment. An
eligible displaced person who purchases
a replacement dwelling is entitled to a
down payment assistance payment in
the amount the person would receive
6 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/
practitioners/uniform_act/policy_and_guidance/
low_income_calculations/index.cfm.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
under paragraph (b) of this section if the
person rented a comparable replacement
dwelling. At the Agency’s discretion, a
down payment assistance payment that
is less than $7,200 may be increased to
any amount not to exceed $7,200.
However, the payment to a displaced
homeowner shall not exceed the amount
the owner would receive under
§ 24.401(b) if he or she met the 90-day
occupancy requirement. If the Agency
elects to provide the maximum payment
of $7,200 as a down payment, the
Agency shall apply this discretion in a
uniform and consistent manner, so that
eligible displaced persons in like
circumstances are treated equally. A
displaced person eligible to receive a
payment as a 90-day owner-occupant
under § 24.401(a) is not eligible for this
payment. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.402(c).)
(2) Application of payment. The full
amount of the replacement housing
payment for down payment assistance
must be applied to the purchase price of
the replacement dwelling and related
incidental expenses.
§ 24.403 Additional rules governing
replacement housing payments.
(a) Determining cost of comparable
replacement dwelling. The upper limit
of a replacement housing payment shall
be based on the cost of a comparable
replacement dwelling. (See § 24.2(a).)
(1) If available, at least three
comparable replacement dwellings shall
be considered and the payment
computed on the basis of the dwelling
most nearly representative of, and equal
to or better than, the displacement
dwelling. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.403(a)(1).)
(2) If the site of the comparable
replacement dwelling lacks a major
exterior attribute of the displacement
dwelling site (e.g., the site is
significantly smaller or does not contain
a swimming pool), the value of such
attribute shall be subtracted from the
acquisition cost of the displacement
dwelling for purposes of computing the
payment.
(3) If the acquisition of a portion of a
typical residential property causes the
displacement of the owner from the
dwelling and the Agency determines
that the remainder has economic value
to the owner, the Agency may offer to
purchase the entire property. If the
owner refuses to sell the remainder to
the Agency, the fair market value of the
remainder may be added to the
acquisition cost of the displacement
dwelling for purposes of computing the
replacement housing payment. (See
appendix A of this part, Section
24.403(a)(3).)
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(4) To the extent feasible, comparable
replacement dwellings shall be selected
from the neighborhood in which the
displacement dwelling was located or, if
that is not possible, in nearby or similar
neighborhoods where housing costs are
generally the same or higher.
(5) If two or more occupants of the
displacement dwelling move to separate
replacement dwellings, each occupant is
entitled to a reasonable prorated share,
as determined by the Agency, of any
relocation payments that would have
been made if the occupants moved
together to a comparable replacement
dwelling. However, if the Agency
determines that two or more occupants
maintained separate households within
the same dwelling, such occupants have
separate entitlements to relocation
payments.
(6) An Agency shall deduct the
amount of any advance relocation
payment from the relocation payment(s)
to which a displaced person is
otherwise entitled. The Agency shall not
withhold any part of a relocation
payment to a displaced person to satisfy
an obligation to any other creditor.
(7) If the displacement dwelling was
part of a property that contained another
dwelling unit and/or space used for
nonresidential purposes, and/or is
located on a lot larger than typical for
residential purposes, only that portion
of the acquisition payment which is
actually attributable to the displacement
dwelling shall be considered the
acquisition cost when computing the
replacement housing payment.
(b) Inspection of replacement
dwelling. Before making a replacement
housing payment or releasing the initial
payment from escrow, the Agency or its
designated representative shall inspect
the replacement dwelling and determine
whether it is a DSS dwelling as defined
at § 24.2(a).
(c) Purchase of replacement dwelling.
A displaced person is considered to
have met the requirement to purchase a
replacement dwelling, if the person:
(1) Purchases a dwelling;
(2) Purchases and rehabilitates a
substandard dwelling;
(3) Relocates to a dwelling which he
or she owns or purchases;
(4) Constructs a dwelling on a site he
or she owns or purchases;
(5) Contracts for the purchase or
construction of a dwelling on a site
provided by a builder or on a site the
person owns or purchases; or
(6) Currently owns a previously
purchased dwelling and site, valuation
of which shall be on the basis of current
fair market value.
(d) Occupancy requirements for
displacement or replacement dwelling.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
No person shall be denied eligibility for
a replacement housing payment solely
because the person is unable to meet the
occupancy requirements set forth in this
part for a reason beyond his or her
control, including:
(1) A disaster, an emergency, or an
imminent threat to the public health or
welfare, as determined by the President,
the Federal Agency funding the project,
or the Agency; or
(2) Another reason, such as a delay in
the construction of the replacement
dwelling, military duty, or hospital stay,
as determined by the Agency.
(e) Conversion of payment. A
displaced person who initially rents a
replacement dwelling and receives a
rental assistance payment under
§ 24.402(b) is eligible to receive a
payment under § 24.401 or § 24.402(c) if
he or she meets the eligibility criteria for
such payments, including purchase and
occupancy within the prescribed 1-year
period. Any portion of the rental
assistance payment that has been
disbursed shall be deducted from the
payment computed under § 24.401 or
§ 24.402(c).
(f) Payment after death. A
replacement housing payment is
personal to the displaced person and
upon his or her death the undisbursed
portion of any such payment shall not
be paid to the heirs or assigns, except
that:
(1) The amount attributable to the
displaced person’s period of actual
occupancy of the replacement housing
shall be paid.
(2) Any remaining payment shall be
disbursed to the remaining family
members of the displaced household in
any case in which a member of a
displaced family dies.
(3) Any portion of a replacement
housing payment necessary to satisfy
the legal obligation of an estate in
connection with the selection of a
replacement dwelling by or on behalf of
a deceased person shall be disbursed to
the estate.
(g) Insurance proceeds. To the extent
necessary to avoid duplicate
compensation, the amount of any
insurance proceeds received by a person
in connection with a loss to the
displacement dwelling due to a
catastrophic occurrence (fire, flood, etc.)
shall be included in the acquisition cost
of the displacement dwelling when
computing the price differential. (See
§ 24.3.)
§ 24.404
resort.
Replacement housing of last
(a) Determination to provide
replacement housing of last resort.
Whenever a program or project cannot
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
proceed on a timely basis because
comparable replacement dwellings are
not available within the monetary limits
for owners or tenants, as specified in
§ 24.401 or § 24.402, as appropriate, the
Agency shall provide additional or
alternative assistance under the
provisions of this subpart. Any decision
to provide last resort housing assistance
must be adequately justified either:
(1) On a case-by-case basis, for good
cause, which means that appropriate
consideration has been given to:
(i) The availability of comparable
replacement housing in the program or
project area;
(ii) The resources available to provide
comparable replacement housing; and
(iii) The individual circumstances of
the displaced person; or
(2) By a determination that:
(i) There is little, if any, comparable
replacement housing available to
displaced persons within an entire
program or project area; and, therefore,
last resort housing assistance is
necessary for the area as a whole;
(ii) A program or project cannot be
advanced to completion in a timely
manner without last resort housing
assistance; and
(iii) The method selected for
providing last resort housing assistance
is cost effective, considering all
elements, which contribute to total
program or project costs.
(b) Basic rights of persons to be
displaced. Notwithstanding any
provision of this subpart, no person
shall be required to move from a
displacement dwelling unless
comparable replacement housing is
available to such person. No person may
be deprived of any rights the person
may have under the Uniform Act or this
part. The Agency shall not require any
displaced person to accept a dwelling
provided by the Agency under the
procedures in this part (unless the
Agency and the displaced person have
entered into a contract to do so) in lieu
of any acquisition payment or any
relocation payment for which the
person may otherwise be eligible.
(c) Methods of providing comparable
replacement housing. Agencies shall
have broad latitude in implementing
this subpart, but implementation shall
be for reasonable cost, on a case-by-case
basis unless an exception to case-bycase analysis is justified for an entire
project.
(1) The methods of providing
replacement housing of last resort
include, but are not limited to:
(i) A replacement housing payment in
excess of the limits set forth in § 24.401
or § 24.402. A replacement housing
payment under this section may be
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69509
provided in installments or in a lump
sum at the Agency’s discretion.
(ii) Rehabilitation of and/or additions
to an existing replacement dwelling.
(iii) The construction of a new
replacement dwelling.
(iv) The provision of a direct loan,
which requires regular amortization or
deferred repayment. The loan may be
unsecured or secured by the real
property. The loan may bear interest or
be interest-free.
(v) The relocation and, if necessary,
rehabilitation of a dwelling.
(vi) The purchase of land and/or a
replacement dwelling by the Agency
and subsequent sale or lease to, or
exchange with a displaced person.
(vii) The removal of barriers for
persons with disabilities.
(2) Under special circumstances,
consistent with the definition of a
comparable replacement dwelling,
modified methods of providing
replacement housing of last resort
permit consideration of replacement
housing based on space and physical
characteristics different from those in
the displacement dwelling (see
appendix A of this part, Section
24.404(c)), including upgraded, but
smaller replacement housing that is DSS
and adequate to accommodate
individuals or families displaced from
marginal or substandard housing with
probable functional obsolescence. In no
event, however, shall a displaced person
be required to move into a dwelling that
is not functionally equivalent in
accordance with § 24.2(a), comparable
replacement dwelling.
(3) The Agency shall provide
assistance under this subpart to a
displaced person who is not eligible to
receive a replacement housing payment
under §§ 24.401 and 24.402 because of
failure to meet the length of occupancy
requirement when comparable
replacement rental housing is not
available at rental rates within the
displaced person’s financial means. (See
§ 24.2(a).) Such assistance shall cover a
period of 42 months.
Subpart F—Mobile Homes
§ 24.501
Applicability.
(a) General. This subpart describes the
requirements governing the provision of
replacement housing payments to a
person displaced from a mobile home
and/or mobile home site who meets the
basic eligibility requirements of this
part. Except as modified by this subpart,
such a displaced person is entitled to:
(1) A moving expense payment in
accordance with subpart D of this part;
and
(2) A replacement housing payment in
accordance with subpart E of this part
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69510
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
to the same extent and subject to the
same requirements as persons displaced
from conventional dwellings. Moving
cost payments to persons occupying
mobile homes are covered in
§ 24.301(g)(1) through (10).
(b) Partial acquisition of mobile home
park. The acquisition of a portion of a
mobile home park property may leave a
remaining part of the property that is
not adequate to continue the operation
of the park. If the Agency determines
that a mobile home located in the
remaining part of the property must be
moved as a direct result of the project,
the occupant of the mobile home shall
be considered to be a displaced person
who is entitled to relocation payments
and other assistance under this part.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 24.502 Replacement housing payment
for a 90-day mobile homeowner displaced
from a mobile home.
(a) Eligibility. An owner-occupant
displaced from a mobile home is
entitled to a replacement housing
payment, not to exceed $31,000, under
§ 24.401 if:
(1) The person occupied the mobile
home on the displacement site for at
least 90 days immediately before:
(i) The initiation of negotiations to
acquire the mobile home—if the person
owned the mobile home and the mobile
home is real property;
(ii) The initiation of negotiations to
acquire the mobile home site if the
mobile home is personal property, but
the person owns the mobile home site;
or
(iii) The date of the Agency’s written
notification to the owner-occupant that
the owner is determined to be displaced
from the mobile home as described in
paragraphs (a)(3)(i) through (iv) of this
section;
(2) The person meets the other basic
eligibility requirements at § 24.401(a)(2);
and
(3) The Agency acquires the mobile
home as real estate, or acquires the
mobile home site from the displaced
owner, or the mobile home is personal
property but the owner is displaced
from the mobile home because the
Agency determines that the mobile
home:
(i) Is not, and cannot economically be
made decent, safe, and sanitary;
(ii) Cannot be relocated without
substantial damage or unreasonable
cost;
(iii) Cannot be relocated because there
is no available comparable replacement
site; or
(iv) Cannot be relocated because it
does not meet mobile home park
entrance requirements.
(b) Replacement housing payment
computation for a 90-day owner that is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
displaced from a mobile home. The
replacement housing payment for an
eligible displaced 90-day owner is
computed as described at § 24.401(b)
incorporating the following, as
applicable:
(1) If the Agency acquires the mobile
home as real estate and/or acquires the
owned site, the acquisition cost used to
compute the price differential payment
is the actual amount paid to the owner
as just compensation for the acquisition
of the mobile home, and/or site, if
owned by the displaced mobile home
owner.
(2) If the Agency does not purchase
the mobile home as real estate but the
owner is determined to be displaced
from the mobile home and eligible for
a replacement housing payment based
on paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section,
the eligible price differential payment
for the purchase of a comparable
replacement mobile home, is the lesser
of the displaced mobile home owneroccupant’s net cost to purchase a
replacement mobile home (i.e., purchase
price of the replacement mobile home
less trade-in or sale proceeds of the
displacement mobile home); or, the cost
of the Agency’s selected comparable
mobile home less the Agency’s estimate
of the salvage or trade-in value for the
mobile home from which the person is
displaced.
(3) If a comparable replacement
mobile home site is not available, the
price differential payment shall be
computed on the basis of the reasonable
cost of a conventional comparable
replacement dwelling.
(c) Replacement housing payment for
a 90-day owner-occupant that is
displaced from a leased or rented
mobile home site. If the displacement
mobile home owner-occupant’s site is
leased or rented, a 90-day owneroccupant is entitled to a rental
assistance payment computed as
described in § 24.402(b). This rental
assistance replacement housing
payment may be used to lease a
replacement site, may be applied to the
purchase price of a replacement site, or
may be applied, with any replacement
housing payment attributable to the
mobile home, toward the purchase of a
replacement mobile home and the
purchase or lease of a site or the
purchase of a conventional decent, safe,
and sanitary dwelling.
(d) Owner-occupant not displaced
from the mobile home. If the Agency
determines that a mobile home is
personal property and may be relocated
to a comparable replacement site, but
the owner-occupant elects not to do so,
the owner is not entitled to a
replacement housing payment for the
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
purchase of a replacement mobile home.
However, the owner is eligible for
moving costs described at § 24.301 and
any replacement housing payment for
the purchase or rental of a comparable
site as described in this section as
applicable.
§ 24.503 Rental assistance payment for 90day mobile home tenants and certain
others.
A displaced tenant or owner-occupant
of a mobile home and/or site is eligible
for a replacement housing payment, not
to exceed $7,200, under § 24.402 if:
(a) The person actually occupied the
displacement mobile home on the
displacement site for at least 90 days
immediately prior to the initiation of
negotiations;
(b) The person meets the other basic
eligibility requirements at § 24.402(a);
and
(c) The Agency acquires the mobile
home and/or mobile home site, or the
mobile home is not acquired by the
Agency but the Agency determines that
the occupant is displaced from the
mobile home because of one of the
circumstances described at
§ 24.502(a)(3).
Subpart G—Certification
§ 24.601
Purpose.
This subpart permits a State Agency
to fulfill its responsibilities under the
Uniform Act by certifying that it shall
operate in accordance with State laws
and regulations which shall accomplish
the purpose and effect of the Uniform
Act, in lieu of providing the assurances
required by § 24.4.
§ 24.602
Certification application.
An Agency wishing to proceed on the
basis of a certification may request an
application for certification from the
Lead Agency Director, Office of Real
Estate Services, HEPR–1, Federal
Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The completed application for
certification must be approved by the
governor of the State, or the governor’s
designee, and must be coordinated with
the Federal funding Agency, in
accordance with application
procedures.
§ 24.603
Monitoring and corrective action.
(a) The Federal Lead Agency shall, in
coordination with other Federal
Agencies, monitor from time to time
State Agency implementation of
programs or projects conducted under
the certification process and the State
Agency shall make available any
information required for this purpose.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
(b) The Lead Agency may require
periodic information or data from
affected Federal or State Agencies.
(c) A Federal Agency may, after
consultation with the Lead Agency, and
notice to and consultation with the
governor, or his or her designee, rescind
any previous approval provided under
this subpart if the certifying State
Agency fails to comply with its
certification or with applicable State
law and regulations. The Federal
Agency shall initiate consultation with
the Lead Agency at least 30 days prior
to any decision to rescind approval of a
certification under this subpart. The
Lead Agency will also inform other
Federal Agencies, which have accepted
a certification under this subpart from
the same State Agency, and will take
whatever other action that may be
appropriate.
(d) Section 103(b)(2) of the Uniform
Act, as amended, requires that the head
of the Lead Agency report biennially to
the Congress on State Agency
implementation of section 103. To
enable adequate preparation of the
prescribed biennial report, the Lead
Agency may require periodic
information or data from affected
Federal or State Agencies.
Appendix A to Part 24—Additional
Information
This appendix provides additional
information to explain the intent of certain
provisions of this part.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Subpart A—General
Section 24.2 Definitions and Acronyms
Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement
dwelling, (ii). The requirement that a
comparable replacement dwelling be
‘‘functionally equivalent’’ to the
displacement dwelling, means that it must
perform the same function and provide the
same utility. The section states that it need
not possess every feature of the displacement
dwelling. However, the principal features
must be present.
For example, if the displacement dwelling
contains a pantry and a similar dwelling is
not available, a replacement dwelling with
ample kitchen cupboards may be acceptable.
Insulated and heated space in a garage might
prove an adequate substitute for basement
workshop space. A dining area may
substitute for a separate dining room. Under
some circumstances, attic space could
substitute for basement space for storage
purposes, and vice versa.
Only in unusual circumstances may a
comparable replacement dwelling contain
fewer rooms or, consequentially, less living
space than the displacement dwelling. Such
may be the case when a decent, safe, and
sanitary replacement dwelling (which by
definition is ‘‘adequate to accommodate’’ the
displaced person) may be found to be
‘‘functionally equivalent’’ to a larger but very
run-down substandard displacement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
dwelling. Another example is when a
displaced person accepts an offer of
government housing assistance and the
applicable requirements of such housing
assistance program require that the displaced
person occupy a dwelling that has fewer
rooms or less living space than the
displacement dwelling.
Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement
dwelling, (vii). The definition of comparable
replacement dwelling requires that a
comparable replacement dwelling for a
person, who is not receiving assistance under
any government housing program before
displacement, must be currently available on
the private market without any subsidy
under a government housing program.
Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement
dwelling, (ix). If a person accepts assistance
under a government housing assistance
program, the rules of that program governing
the size of the dwelling apply, and the rental
assistance payment under § 24.402 would be
computed on the basis of the person’s actual
out-of-pocket cost for the replacement
housing and associated utilities after the
applicable government assistance has been
applied.
Section 24.2(a) Decent, safe, and
sanitary, (i)(A). Even where local law does
not mandate adherence to such standards, it
is strongly recommended that they be
considered as a matter of public policy.
Section 24.2(a) Decent, safe, and
sanitary, (v). Some local code standards for
occupancy do not require kitchens. However,
selection of comparables that provide a
kitchen is recommended. The FHWA
believes this is good practice and in most
cases should be easily achievable. If the
displacement dwelling had a kitchen, the
comparable dwelling must have a kitchen. If
the displacement dwelling did not have a
kitchen but local code standards for
occupancy require one, the comparable
dwelling must contain a kitchen. If the
displacement dwelling did not have a
kitchen and local code standards for
occupancy do not require one, an Agency
does not have to provide a kitchen in the
comparable dwelling. If a kitchen is provided
in the comparable dwelling, at a minimum it
must contain a fully usable sink, properly
connected to potable hot and cold water and
to a sewage drainage system, and adequate
space and utility service connections for a
stove and refrigerator.
Section 24.2(a) DSS-Persons with a
disability, (vii). Reasonable accommodation
of a displaced person with a disability at the
replacement dwelling means the Agency is
required to address persons with a physical
impairment that substantially limits one or
more of the major life activities. In these
situations, reasonable accommodation should
include the following at a minimum: Doors
of adequate width; ramps or other assistance
devices to traverse stairs and access bathtubs,
shower stalls, toilets and sinks; storage
cabinets, vanities, sink and mirrors at
appropriate heights. Kitchen
accommodations will include sinks and
storage cabinets built at appropriate heights
for access. The Agency shall also consider
other items that may be necessary, such as
physical modification to a unit, based on the
displaced person’s needs.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69511
Section 24.2(a) Displaced person—
Occupants of a temporary, daily, or
emergency shelter, (iii)(M). Shelters can serve
many purposes and each will have specific
rules and requirements as to who can occupy
or use the shelter and whether prolonged and
continuous occupancy is allowed. Persons
who are occupying a shelter that only allows
overnight stays and requires the occupants to
remove their personal property and
themselves from the premises on a daily
basis and that offers no guarantee of reentry
in the evening typically would not meet the
definition of displaced persons as used in
this part, nor would the shelter meet the
definition of dwelling as used in this part.
Persons who live at the shelter on a
continuous, prolonged, or permanent basis
for reasons including that they are employed
there or because they work to pay their rent
there may be considered displaced. Providing
advisory assistance to shelter occupants may
be a challenge due to their transient nature.
Agencies should make reasonable effort to
provide information about proposed vacation
date or other plans for the shelter to relocate.
Section 24.2(a) Dwelling site. This
definition ensures that the computation of
replacement housing payments are accurate
and realistic (a) when the dwelling is located
on a larger than normal site, (b) when mixeduse properties are acquired, (c) when more
than one dwelling is located on the acquired
property, or (d) when the replacement
dwelling is retained by an owner and moved
to another site.
Section 24.2(a) Federal down payment
assistance. In some instances, a person may
have Federal down payment assistance funds
provided for the purpose of purchasing and
occupying a dwelling. These funds are not
Uniform Act benefits and are not used in
combination with Uniform Act benefits. The
FHWA believes that the purchase of a
dwelling using Federal down payment
assistance, standing alone, does not
constitute an acquisition as contemplated by
the Uniform Act. However, Federal down
payment assistance provided to a private
individual to purchase a residence is Federal
financial assistance, as defined by the
Uniform Act. It results in an acquisitionbased displacement under the Uniform Act,
however, only when the purpose of the
acquisition is to advance a Federal project or
program designed to benefit the public as a
whole, such as highways, hospitals, and
other public works projects. Therefore, those
who may relocate as a result of an acquisition
funded in part with down payment
assistance are not displaced persons within
the meaning of the Uniform Act.
Furthermore, in the vast majority of instances
where Federal down payment assistance is
provided, the Federal Government does not
have an interest in whether a specific
property is acquired. The Federal
Government’s interest is only that the
property would serve as the purchaser’s
dwelling and that it meets general criteria
including those related to habitability. The
lack of a conscious governmental decision
requiring that a selected or specific property
be acquired to advance a program or project
demonstrates that the nature of the
acquisition utilizing down payment
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69512
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
assistance funds is nothing more than a
person purchasing a dwelling with limited
Federal financial assistance. For instance, a
person using Federal down payment
assistance to purchase a home that a tenant
occupies would not be an Agency causing a
displacement, and the tenant who would
have to move as a result of the acquisition
of the home would not be a displaced person.
Section 24.2(a) Household income
(exclusions). Household income for purposes
of this part does not include program benefits
that are not considered income by Federal
law such as food stamps and the Women
Infants and Children program. For a more
detailed list of income exclusions see Federal
Highway Administration, Office of Real
Estate Services website.1 Contact the Federal
Agency administering the program, if there is
a question on whether to include income
from a specific program.
Section 24.2(a) Initiation of negotiations.
This section provides a special definition for
acquisition and displacements under Public
Law 96–510 or Superfund. The order of
activities under Superfund may differ
slightly in that temporary relocation may
precede acquisition. Superfund is a program
designed to clean up hazardous waste sites.
When such a site is discovered, it may be
necessary, in certain limited circumstances,
to alert individual owners and tenants to
potential health or safety threats and to offer
to temporarily relocate them while additional
information is gathered. If a decision is later
made to permanently relocate such persons,
those who had been temporarily relocated
under Superfund authority would no longer
be on site when a formal, written offer to
acquire the property was made, and thus
would lose their eligibility for a replacement
housing payment. In order to prevent this
unfair outcome, we have provided a
definition of initiation of negotiation, which
is based on the date the Federal Government
offers to temporarily relocate an owner or
tenant from the subject property.
Section 24.2(a) Initiation of negotiations,
Tenants, (iv). Tenants who occupy property
that may be voluntarily acquired amicably,
without recourse to the use of the power of
eminent domain, must be fully informed as
to their potential eligibility for relocation
assistance when negotiations are initiated.
An option to purchase property, or similar
instrument, is not a binding agreement
because it gives the Agency a right, but not
an obligation, to elect to purchase the
property necessary for the project. A binding
agreement as used in this appendix is a
legally enforceable document in which the
property owner agrees to sell certain property
rights necessary for a project and the Agency
agrees, without further election, to make that
purchase.
If negotiations fail to result in a binding
agreement the Agency should notify tenants
that negotiations have failed to result in a
binding agreement and that the Agency has
concluded its efforts to acquire the property.
If a tenant is not readily accessible, as the
result of a disaster or emergency, the Agency
must make a good faith effort to provide
these notifications and document its efforts
1 https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
in writing. For example, as used in this part,
an option to purchase property is not a
binding agreement because it gives the
Agency a right to choose whether or not to
purchase the property necessary for the
project. A binding agreement as used in this
appendix is a legally enforceable document
in which the property owner agrees to sell
certain property rights necessary for a project
and the Agency agrees to that purchase for
a specified consideration.
Section 24.2(a) Mobile home. The
following examples provide additional
guidance on the types of mobile homes and
manufactured housing that can be found
acceptable as comparable replacement
dwellings for persons displaced from mobile
homes. A recreational vehicle that is capable
of providing living accommodations may be
considered a replacement dwelling if the
following criteria are met: The recreational
vehicle is purchased and occupied as the
‘‘primary’’ place of residence; it is located on
a purchased or leased site and connected to
or has available all necessary utilities for
functioning as a housing unit on the date of
the Agency’s inspection; and, the dwelling,
as sited, meets all local, State, and Federal
requirements for a decent, safe, and sanitary
dwelling. (The regulations of some local
jurisdictions will not permit the
consideration of these vehicles as DSS
dwellings. In those cases, the recreational
vehicle will not qualify as a replacement
dwelling.)
Title 24 CFR 3280.2 defines mobile home.
In 1979 the term ‘‘mobile home’’ was
changed to ‘‘manufactured home.’’ For
purposes of this part, the terms mobile home
and manufactured home are synonymous.
When assembled, manufactured homes
built after 1976 contain no less than 320
square feet. They may be single or multisectioned units when installed. Their
designation as personalty or realty will be
determined by State law. When determined
to be realty, most are eligible for
conventional mortgage financing.
The 1976 HUD standards distinguish
manufactured homes from factory-built
‘‘modular homes’’ as well as conventional or
‘‘stick-built’’ homes. Both of these types of
housing are required to meet State and local
construction codes.
Section 24.3 No duplication of payments.
This section prohibits an Agency from
making a payment to a person under this part
that would duplicate another payment the
person receives under Federal, State, or local
law. The Agency is not required to conduct
an exhaustive search for such other
payments; it is only required to avoid
creating a duplication based on the Agency’s
knowledge at the time a payment is
computed.
Section 24.5 Manner of notices. Property
owners or occupants must voluntarily elect
to receive notices via electronic methods.
Alternatively, property owners or occupants
may request delivery of notices via certified
or registered first class mail, return receipt
requested, instead of electronic means.
Agencies must accommodate the property
owner’s or occupant’s preference. The FHWA
continues to believe that providing notices by
either first class mail or electronic means
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
should not to be used as a substitute for faceto-face meetings, but rather as a
supplemental means of communication that
accommodates an owner’s or occupant’s
preference. The FHWA understands that
certain documents that are essential to the
conveyance of the real property interests may
not allow for electronic signature(s).
In order to use electronic delivery notices,
an Agency must be able to demonstrate the
ability to securely document the notice
delivery and receipt confirmation. Additional
minimum safeguards that the Agency must
put in place prior to delivering notices by
electronic means are included in the
regulation at § 24.5. Prior to the use of
electronic delivery, there must be a process
or procedure outlined in written procedures
approved by the Federal funding Agency that
details the requirements and rules the State
will follow when using electronic means for
delivery of notices.
Agencies must determine and document
instances when electronic deliveries of
notices are appropriate. An example of an
appropriate use of electronic delivery of
notices might be to notify a property owner
of his or her right to accompany an appraiser
as required at § 24.102(c). Other appropriate
uses may be to secure a release of mortgage
or to confirm a property owners’ receipt of
the acquisition and relocation brochures.
An example of when the use of electronic
delivery of notices may not be appropriate is
when the document being signed requires
notarization or other similar verification.
Electronic delivery of notices may not always
be a good option for relocation assistance
where many actions are conducted in person
at the displacement or replacement dwelling
or business and require advisory services to
be provided as part of the process.
These examples are not intended to be allinclusive, nor are they exclusive of other
opportunities to use this tool. For additional
information, the specific Federal regulations
that set out the format and examples for an
electronic signature can be found at 37 CFR
1.4(d)(2). The regulations in 37 CFR 1.4(d)(2)
fall under the purview of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office, which provides
examples of what is considered to be proper
format in a variety of electronically signed
documents.
Section 24.9(c) Reports. The Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act
(MAP–21) amended 42 U.S.C. 4633(b)(4) to
require that each Federal Agency subject to
the Uniform Act submit an annual report
describing activities conducted by the
Agency. The FHWA believes that such a
report that details activity provides a good
indication of program health and scope.
The FHWA realizes that not all Agencies
subject to this reporting requirement
currently have the ability to collect all
information requested on the reporting form.
However, Federal Agencies may elect to
provide a narrative report that focuses on
their respective efforts to improve and
enhance delivery of Uniform Act benefits and
services. Narrative report information would
include information on training offered,
reviews conducted, or technical assistance
provided to recipients.
Section 24.11 Adjustment of relocation
benefits. No more frequently than every 5
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
years, FHWA will use the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI–U)
Seasonally Adjusted to determine if inflation,
cost of living, or other factors indicate that
an adjustment to relocation benefits is
warranted.
Sample calculation:
Assume CPI–U is 110.0 as of [EFFECTIVE
DATE OF FINAL RULE]. The fixed payment
for non-residential moving expenses has a
ceiling of $40,000. Five years after
[EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], or
during a subsequent 5th year evaluation, the
CPI–U is calculated to be 115.5.
Divide the new index by the base year
index = 115.5/110.0 = 1.050 or 5 percent.
This means there has been a 5 percent
increase in prices and the fixed payment for
non-residential moving expenses ceiling
should be increased 5 percent.
Calculate fixed payment benefit ceiling =
$40,000 × 1.05 = $42,000.
Subpart B—Real Property Acquisition
For Federal eminent domain purposes, the
terms ‘‘fair market value’’ (as used
throughout this subpart) and ‘‘market value,’’
which may be the more typical term in
private transactions, are synonymous.
Section 24.101(a) Direct Federal program
or project. All the requirements in subpart B
of this part (real property acquisition) apply
to all direct acquisitions for Federal programs
and projects by Federal Agencies, except for
acquisitions undertaken by the Tennessee
Valley Authority or the Rural Utilities
Service. There are no exceptions for
‘‘voluntary transactions.’’
Section 24.101(b)(1)(i). The term ‘‘general
geographic area’’ is used to clarify that an
Agency carrying out a project or program can
achieve the purpose of the project or program
by purchasing any of several properties that
are not necessarily contiguous or are not
limited to a specific group of properties.
Section 24.101(b)(1)(iv) and (b)(2)(ii).
Section 24.101(b)(1)(iv) and (b)(2)(ii) provide
that, for programs and projects receiving
Federal financial assistance described in
§ 24.101(b)(1) and (2), Agencies are to inform
the owner(s) or their designated
representative(s) in writing of the Agency’s
estimate of the fair market value for the
property to be acquired.
While this part does not require an
appraisal for these transactions, Agencies
may still decide that an appraisal is
necessary to support their determination of
the fair market value of these properties, and,
in any event, persons developing a waiver
valuation must have some reasonable basis
for their determination of fair market value.
In addition, some of the concepts inherent in
Federal Program appraisal practice are
appropriate for these estimates. It would be
appropriate for Agencies to adhere to project
influence restrictions, as well as guard
against discredited ‘‘public interest value’’
valuation concepts.
After an Agency has established an amount
it believes to be the fair market value of the
property and has notified the owner of this
amount in writing, an Agency may negotiate
freely with the owner in order to reach
agreement. Since these transactions are
voluntary, accomplished by a willing buyer
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
and a willing seller, negotiations may result
in agreement for the amount of the original
estimate, an amount exceeding it, or for a
lesser amount. Although not required by this
part, it would be entirely appropriate for
Agencies to apply the administrative
settlement concept and procedures in
§ 24.102(i) to negotiate amounts that exceed
the original estimate of fair market value.
Agencies shall not take any coercive action
in order to reach agreement on the price to
be paid for the property.
Section 24.101(b)(2)(iii). The intent of this
section is to ensure that a property owner or
their designated representative is clearly
informed that an Agency will not utilize its
eminent domain authority to acquire the
property if negotiations fail to result in an
amicable agreement. In instances where an
unanticipated or unplanned need arises
which may require use of eminent domain
authority to acquire a property on which the
Agency has made a voluntary acquisition
offer, the Agency must request permission to
waive the requirements of the applicable
parts of the regulations in this part. Because
the purpose of this section is to allow for
voluntary acquisitions, the subsequent use of
eminent domain authority must only be in
exceptional circumstances which must be
infrequent and well documented as to the
reason for needing to use eminent domain
authority to acquire a property after failing to
acquire it voluntarily.
Section 24.101(c) Less-than-full-fee
interest in real property. Section 24.101(c)
provides a benchmark beyond which the
requirements of the subpart clearly apply to
leases.
Section 24.102(b) Notice to owner. In the
case of condominiums and other types of
housing with common or community areas,
notification should be given to the
appropriate parties. The appropriate parties
could be a condo or homeowner’s board, a
designated representative, or all individual
owners when common or community
property is being acquired for the project.
Section 24.102(c)(2) Appraisal, waiver
thereof, and invitation to owner. The purpose
of the appraisal waiver provision is to
provide Agencies a technique to avoid the
costs and time delay associated with
appraisal requirements for uncomplicated
acquisitions. In most cases, uncomplicated
acquisitions are considered to be those
involving unimproved strips of land.
Acquisitions involving improvements,
damages, changes of highest and best use, or
significant costs to cure are considered to be
complicated and, as such, are beyond the
application of waiver valuations as
contemplated in this part. The intent is that
non-appraisers make the waiver valuations,
freeing appraisers to do more complex work.
The Agency employee or contractor
making the determination to use the waiver
valuation option must have enough
understanding of appraisal principles,
techniques, and use of appraisals to be able
to determine whether the proposed
acquisition is uncomplicated.
Waiver valuations are not appraisals as
defined by the Uniform Act and this part;
therefore, appraisal performance
requirements or standards, regardless of their
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69513
source, are not required for waiver valuations
by this part. Since waiver valuations are not
appraisals, neither is there a requirement for
an appraisal review. Agencies should put
procedures in place to ensure that waiver
valuations are accurate and that they are
consistent with the unit values on the project
as determined by appraisals and appraisal
reviews. The Agency must have a reasonable
basis for the waiver valuation and an Agency
official must still establish an amount
believed to be just compensation to offer the
property owner(s).
The definition of ‘‘appraisal’’ in the
Uniform Act and waiver valuation provisions
of the Uniform Act and this part are Federal
law and public policy and should be
considered as such when determining the
impact of appraisal requirements levied by
others.
Section 24.102(d) Establishment of offer
of just compensation. The initial offer to the
property owner may not be less than the
amount of the Agency’s approved appraisal,
but may exceed that amount if the Agency
determines that a greater amount reflects just
compensation for the property.
Section 24.102(f) Basic negotiation
procedures. An offer should be adequately
presented to an owner, and the owner should
be properly informed. Personal, face-to-face
contact should take place, if feasible, but this
section does not require such contact in all
cases.
This section also provides that the property
owner be given a reasonable opportunity to
consider the Agency’s offer and to present
relevant material to the Agency. In order to
satisfy the requirement in § 24.102(f),
Agencies must allow owners time for
analysis, research and development, and
compilation of a response, including perhaps
getting an appraisal. The needed time can
vary significantly, depending on the
circumstances, but thirty (30) days would
seem to be the minimum time these actions
can be reasonably expected to require.
Regardless of project time pressures, property
owners must be afforded this opportunity.
In some jurisdictions, there is pressure to
initiate formal eminent domain procedures at
the earliest opportunity because completing
the eminent domain process, including
gaining possession of the needed real
property, is very time consuming. The
provisions of § 24.102(f) are not intended to
restrict this practice, so long as it does not
interfere with the reasonable time that must
be provided for negotiations, described in the
preceding paragraph, and the Agencies
adhere to the Uniform Act ban on coercive
action (section 301(7) of the Uniform Act).
If the owner expresses intent to provide an
appraisal report, Agencies are encouraged to
provide the owner and/or their appraiser a
copy of Agency appraisal requirements and
inform them that their appraisal should be
based on those requirements.
Section 24.102(i) Administrative
settlement. This section provides guidance
on administrative settlement as an alternative
to judicial resolution of a difference of
opinion on the value of a property in order
to avoid unnecessary litigation and
congestion in the courts.
All relevant facts and circumstances
should be considered by an Agency official
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69514
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
delegated this authority. Appraisers,
including review appraisers, must not be
pressured to adjust their estimate of value for
the purpose of justifying such settlements.
Such action would invalidate the appraisal
process.
Section 24.102(j) Payment before taking
possession. It is intended that a right-of-entry
for construction purposes be obtained only in
the exceptional case, such as an emergency
project, when there is no time to make an
appraisal and purchase offer and the property
owner is agreeable to the process.
Section 24.102(m) Fair rental. Section
301(6) of the Uniform Act limits what an
Agency may charge when a former owner or
previous occupant of a property is permitted
to rent the property for a short term or when
occupancy is subject to termination by the
Agency on short notice. Such rent may not
exceed ‘‘the fair rental value of the property
to a short-term occupier.’’ Generally, the
Agency’s right to terminate occupancy on
short notice (whether or not the renter also
has that right) supports the establishment of
a lesser rental than might be found in a
longer, fixed-term situation.
Section 24.102(n) Conflict of interest. The
overall objective is to minimize the risk of
fraud, waste, and abuse while allowing
Agencies to operate as efficiently as possible.
There are three parts to the provision in
§ 24.102(n).
The first provision is the prohibition
against having any interest in the real
property being valued by the appraiser (for
an appraisal), the valuer (for a waiver
valuation), or the review appraiser (for an
appraisal review).
The second provision is that no person
functioning as a negotiator for a project or
program can supervise or formally evaluate
the performance of any appraiser, valuer, or
review appraiser performing appraisal,
waiver valuation, or appraisal review work
for that project or program. The intent of this
provision is to ensure appraisal and/or
valuation independence and to prevent
inappropriate influence. It is not intended to
prevent Agencies or recipients from
providing appraiser and/or valuers with
appropriate project information or
participating in determining the scope of
work for the appraisal or valuation. For a
program or project receiving Federal
financial assistance, the Federal funding
Agency may waive this requirement if it
would create a hardship for the Agency or
recipient. The intent is to accommodate
Federal financial aid recipients that have a
small staff where this provision would be
unworkable.
The third provision is to minimize
situations where administrative costs exceed
acquisition costs. Section 24.102(n) provides
that the same person may prepare a valuation
estimate (including an appraisal) and
negotiate that acquisition, if the valuation
estimate amount is $10,000 or less. Agencies
or recipients are not required to use those
who prepare a waiver valuation or appraisal
of $10,000 or less to negotiate the acquisition.
All appraisals must be reviewed in
accordance with § 24.104. This includes
appraisals of real property valued at $10,000,
or less.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
The third provision has been expanded to
allow Federal Agencies to permit use of a
single agent for values of more than $10,000,
but less than $25,000, but, as a safeguard,
requires that an appraisal and appraisal
review be done to allow the appraiser to also
act as the negotiator. Agencies or recipients
desiring to exercise this option must request
approval in writing from the Federal funding
Agency. The Agency request to exercise
single agent option for properties with a
value of between $10,000 and $25,000 must
include the anticipated benefits of, and
reasons for, raising the ceiling above $10,000,
the oversight mechanism used to assure
proper use and review, the names and
credentials of individuals who will be
performing as single agents, and quality
control procedures to be utilized. Agencies
and recipients may allow a subrecipient to
use their approved authority if the
subrecipient has an Agency or recipient
approved oversight mechanism to assure
proper use and review of the authority. This
mechanism must include documentation of,
the names and credentials of individuals who
will be performing as single agents, and
quality control procedures to be utilized.
Section 24.103 Criteria for Appraisals.
The term ‘‘requirements’’ is used throughout
this section to avoid confusion with The
Appraisal Foundation’s Uniform Standards
of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP)
‘‘standards.’’ Although this section discusses
appraisal requirements, the definition of
‘‘appraisal’’ itself at § 24.2(a) includes
appraisal performance requirements that are
an inherent part of this section.
The term ‘‘Federal and federally assisted
program or project’’ is used to better identify
the type of appraisal practices that are to be
referenced and to differentiate them from the
private sector, especially mortgage lending,
appraisal practice.
Section 24.103(a) Appraisal
requirements. The first sentence instructs
readers that requirements for appraisals for
Federal and federally assisted programs or
projects are located in this part. These are the
basic appraisal requirements for Federal and
federally assisted programs or projects.
However, Agencies may enhance and expand
on them, and there may be specific project
or program legislation that references other
appraisal requirements.
The appraisal requirements in § 24.103(a)
are necessarily designed to comply with the
Uniform Act and other Federal eminent
domain based appraisal requirements. They
are also considered to be consistent with
Standards 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the USPAP.
Consistency with USPAP has been a feature
of these appraisal requirements since the
beginning of USPAP. This ‘‘consistent’’
relationship was more formally recognized in
OMB Bulletin 92–06. While these
requirements are considered consistent with
USPAP, neither can supplant the other; their
provisions are neither identical, nor
interchangeable. Appraisals performed for
Federal and federally assisted real property
acquisition must follow the requirements in
this part. Compliance with any other
appraisal requirements is not the purview of
this part. An appraiser who is committed to
working within the bounds of USPAP should
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
recognize that compliance with both USPAP
and these requirements may be achieved by
using the Scope of Work Rule and the
Jurisdictional Exception Rule of USPAP,
where applicable.
The term ‘‘scope of work’’ defines the
general parameters of the appraisal. It reflects
the needs of the Agency and the
requirements of Federal and federally
assisted program appraisal practice. It should
be developed cooperatively by the assigned
appraiser and an Agency official who is
competent to both represent the Agency’s
needs and respect valid appraisal practice.
The scope of work statement should include
the purpose and/or function of the appraisal,
a definition of the estate being appraised,
whether it is fair market value, its applicable
definition, and the assumptions and limiting
conditions affecting the appraisal. It may
include parameters for the data search and
identification of the technology, including
approaches to value, to be used to analyze
the data. The scope of work should consider
the specific requirements in § 24.103(a)(2)(i)
through (v) and address them as appropriate.
Section 24.103(a)(1). The appraisal report
should identify the items considered in the
appraisal to be real property, as well as those
identified as personal property.
Section 24.103(a)(2). All relevant and
reliable approaches to value are to be used.
However, where an Agency determines that
the sales comparison approach will be
adequate by itself and yield credible
appraisal results because of the type of
property being appraised and the availability
of sales data, it may limit the appraisal
assignment to the sales comparison
approach. This should be reflected in the
scope of work.
Section 24.103(b) Influence of the project
on just compensation. As used in this
section, the term ‘‘project’’ means an
undertaking which is planned, designed, and
intended to operate as a unit.
When the public is aware of the proposed
project, project area property values may be
affected. Therefore, property owners should
not be penalized because of a decrease in
value caused by the proposed project nor
reap a windfall at public expense because of
increased value created by the proposed
project.
Section 24.103(d)(1). The appraiser and
review appraiser must each be qualified and
competent to perform the appraisal and
appraisal review assignments, respectively.
Among other qualifications, State licensing
or certification and professional society
designations can help provide an indication
of an appraiser’s abilities.
Section 24.104 Review of appraisals. The
term ‘‘review appraiser’’ is used rather than
‘‘reviewing appraiser,’’ to emphasize that
‘‘review appraiser’’ is a separate specialty
and not just an appraiser who happens to be
reviewing an appraisal. Federal Agencies
have long held the perspective that appraisal
review is a unique skill that, while it
certainly builds on appraisal skills, requires
more. The review appraiser should possess
both appraisal technical abilities and the
ability to be the two-way bridge between the
Agency’s real property valuation needs and
the appraiser.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Agency review appraisers typically
perform a role greater than technical
appraisal review. They are often involved in
early project development. Later they may be
involved in devising the scope of work
statements and participate in making
appraisal assignments to fee and/or staff
appraisers. They are also mentors and
technical advisors, especially on Agency
policy and requirements, to appraisers, both
staff and fee. In addition, review appraisers
are frequently technical advisors to other
Agency officials.
Section 24.104(a). Section 24.104(a) states
that the review appraiser is to review the
appraiser’s presentation and analysis of
market information and that it is to be
reviewed against § 24.103 and other
applicable requirements, including, to the
extent appropriate, the Uniform Appraisal
Standards for Federal Land Acquisition. The
appraisal review is to be a technical review
by an appropriately qualified review
appraiser. The qualifications of the review
appraiser and the level of explanation of the
basis for the review appraiser’s
recommended (or approved) value depend on
the complexity of the appraisal problem. If
the initial appraisal submitted for review is
not acceptable, the review appraiser is to
communicate and work with the appraiser to
the greatest extent possible to facilitate the
appraiser’s development of an acceptable
appraisal.
In doing this, the review appraiser is to
remain in an advisory role, not directing the
appraisal, and retaining objectivity and
options for the appraisal review itself.
If the Agency intends that the staff review
appraiser approve the appraisal (as the basis
for the establishment of the amount believed
to be just compensation), or establish the
amount the Agency believes is just
compensation, she/he must be specifically
authorized by the Agency to do so. If the
review appraiser is not specifically
authorized to approve the appraisal (as the
basis for the establishment of the amount
believed to be just compensation), or
establish the amount believed to be just
compensation, that authority remains with
another Agency official.
Section 24.104(b). In developing an
independent approved or recommended
value, the review appraiser may reference
any acceptable resource, including
acceptable parts of any appraisal, including
an otherwise unacceptable appraisal. When a
review appraiser develops an independent
value, while retaining the appraisal review,
that independent value also becomes the
approved appraisal of the fair market value
for Uniform Act Section 301(3) purposes. It
is within Agency discretion to decide
whether a second review is needed if the first
review appraiser establishes a value different
from that in the appraisal report or reports on
the property.
Section 24.104(c). Before acceptance of an
appraisal, the review appraiser must
determine that the appraiser’s
documentation, including valuation data and
analysis of that data, demonstrates the
soundness of the appraiser’s opinion of
value. For the purposes of this part, an
acceptable appraisal is any appraisal that, on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
its own, meets the requirements of § 24.103.
An approved appraisal is the one acceptable
appraisal that is determined to best fulfill the
requirement to be the basis for the amount
believed to be just compensation.
Recognizing that appraisal is not an exact
science, there may be more than one
acceptable appraisal of a property, but for the
purposes of this part, there can be only one
approved appraisal.
At the Agency’s discretion, for a low value
property requiring only a simple appraisal
process, the review appraiser’s
recommendation (or approval), endorsing the
appraiser’s report, may be determined to
satisfy the requirement for the review
appraiser’s signed report and certification.
Section 24.106(b) Expenses incidental to
transfer of title to the Agency. Generally, the
Agency is able to pay such incidental costs
directly and, where feasible, is required to do
so. In order to prevent the property owner
from making unnecessary out-of-pocket
expenditures and to avoid duplication of
expenses, the property owner should be
informed early in the acquisition process of
the Agency’s intent to make such
arrangements. Such expenses must be
reasonable.
Subpart C—General Relocation
Requirements
Section 24.202 Applicability and section
205(c) services to be provided. In
extraordinary circumstances, when a
displaced person is not readily accessible,
the Agency must make a good faith effort to
comply with § 24.202 and section 205(c) of
the Uniform Act and document its efforts in
writing.
Section 24.204 Availability of comparable
replacement dwelling before displacement.
Section 24.204(a) General. Section
24.204(a) requires that no one may be
required to move from a dwelling without a
comparable replacement dwelling having
been made available. In addition, § 24.204(a)
requires that where possible, three or more
comparable replacement dwellings shall be
made available. Thus, the basic standard for
the number of referrals required under this
section is three. Only in situations where
three comparable replacement dwellings are
not available (e.g., when the local housing
market does not contain three comparable
dwellings) may the Agency make fewer than
three referrals.
Section 24.205 Relocation assistance
advisory services.
Section 24.205(a). As part of the relocation
planning process Agencies should, to the
extent practical, identify relocations that may
require additional time for advisory services
and coordination for their relocations. Such
relocations may include the elderly, those
with medical needs, and those in public
housing. In each of these examples, the
relocation requires that the unique needs of
the relocated person be determined early and
that the relocation agent make full use of
available social services and other program
support (examples include local
transportation services that may be available
in certain areas, financial support available
from local, Federal, and State Agencies, and
community support services that may be
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69515
available) in considering and developing a
relocation plan.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C). Whenever
possible, comparable replacement housing
must be inspected. The selected comparable
replacement dwelling should be inspected by
a walk through and physical interior and
exterior inspection. Reliance on an exterior
visual inspection or examination of a
multiple listing service (MLS) listing, in most
cases, does not constitute a complete DSS
inspection. If an inspection is not possible,
the relocated person must be informed in
writing that an inspection was not possible
and be provided an explanation of why the
inspection was not possible.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(D) emphasizes that
if the comparable replacement dwellings are
located in areas of minority concentration,
minority persons should, if possible, also be
given opportunities to relocate to
replacement dwellings not located in such
areas. Agencies should maintain adequate
written documentation of compliance with
this requirement. Documentation should
address efforts made to locate such
comparable and replacement housing to the
extent practical.
Section 24.206 Eviction for cause. An
eviction related to non-compliance with a
requirement related to carrying out a project
(e.g., failure to move or relocate when
instructed, or to cooperate in the relocation
process) shall not negate a person’s
entitlement to relocation payments and other
assistance set forth in this part.
Section 24.207 General Requirements—
Claims for relocation payments. Section
24.207(a) allows an Agency to make a
payment for low cost or uncomplicated
nonresidential moves without additional
documentation, as long as the payment is
limited to the amount of the lowest
acceptable bid or estimate, as provided for in
§ 24.301(d)(1).
While § 24.207(f) prohibits an Agency from
proposing or requesting that a displaced
person waive his or her rights or entitlements
to relocation assistance and payments, an
Agency may accept a written statement from
the displaced person that states that they
have chosen not to accept some or all of the
payments or assistance to which they are
entitled. Any such written statement must
clearly show that the individual knows what
they are entitled to receive (a copy of the
Notice of Eligibility which was provided may
serve as documentation) and their statement
must specifically identify which assistance or
payments they have chosen not to accept.
The statement must be signed and dated and
may not be coerced by the Agency.
Section 24.208(c) Aliens not lawfully
present in the United States—computing
relocation payments if some members of a
displaced family are present lawfully but
others are present unlawfully.
There are two different methods for
computing relocation payments in situations
where some members of a displaced family
are present lawfully but others are present
unlawfully. For moving expenses, the
payment is to be based on the proportion of
lawfully present occupants to the total
number of occupants. For example, if four
out of five members of a family to be
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
69516
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
displaced are lawfully present, the
proportion of lawful occupants is 80 percent
and that percentage is to be applied against
the moving expenses payment that otherwise
would have been received. Similarly,
unlawful occupants are not counted as a part
of the family for RHP calculations. Thus, a
family of five, one of whom is a person not
lawfully present in the U.S., would be
counted as a family of four. The comparable
replacement dwelling for the family would
reflect the makeup of the remaining four
persons, and the RHP would be computed
accordingly.
A ‘‘pro rata’’ approach to an RHP
calculation is not permitted (consistent with
Pub. L. 105–117; codified at 42 U.S.C. 4605).
Following such a calculation would require
that the Agency disregards alien status for
comparability determination, select a
comparable and then apply a percentage to
the RHP amount. A ‘‘pro rata’’ calculation
approach for RHP may result in a higher RHP
eligibility than the displaced persons would
otherwise be eligible to receive.
The ‘‘pro rata’’ approach of providing a
percentage of the calculated RHP eligibility is
contrary to the requirements of the Uniform
Act and this part.
A correct example of a calculation would
be:
Household of seven (including one alien not
lawfully present individually occupying
one bedroom.)
Displacement dwelling—4 BR unit, with
rent/utilities of $1,200/month
Housing requirements for all lawful
occupants (six) is a 3 BR unit
Comparable dwelling
3 BR unit with rent/utilities of $1,300/month
Calculation of RHP under § 24.208(c) (alien
not lawfully present excluded)
$1,300 (comparable)¥$1,200 (displacement
unit) = $100 RHP × 42 months = $4,200
RHP
If a person who is a member of a family
being displaced is not eligible for and does
not receive Uniform Act benefits because he
or she is not lawfully in the United States,
that person’s income shall not be excluded
from the computation of family income. The
person’s income is counted unless the
Agency is certain that the ineligible person
will not continue to reside with the family.
To exclude the ineligible person’s income
would result in a windfall by providing a
higher relocation payment.
Section 24.208(h). The meaning of the term
‘‘exceptional and extremely unusual
hardship’’ focuses on significant and
demonstrable impacts on health, safety, or
family cohesion. This phrase is intended to
allow judgment on the part of the Agency
and does not lend itself to an absolute
standard applicable in all situations.
When considering whether a hardship
exemption is appropriate, an Agency may
examine only the impact on an alien’s
spouse, parent, or child who is a citizen or
an alien lawfully admitted for permanent
residence in the United States. In
determining who is a spouse, Agencies
should use the definition of that term under
State or other applicable law.
A standard of hardship involves more than
the loss of relocation payments and/or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
assistance alone. Also, income alone (for
example, measured as a percentage of income
spent on housing) would not make the denial
of benefits an ‘‘exceptional and extremely
unusual hardship’’ and qualify for a hardship
exemption. In keeping with the principle of
allowing Agencies maximum reasonable
discretion, FHWA believes the decision
regarding what documentation is required to
support a claim of hardship is one best left
to the Federal funding Agency, as long as the
decision is handled in a nondiscriminatory
manner.
Subpart D—Payment for Moving and
Related Expenses
Section 24.301 Payment for Actual
Reasonable Moving and Related Expenses.
Section 24.301(e) Personal property only.
Examples of personal property only moves
might be: Personal property that is located on
a portion of property that is being acquired,
but the business or residence will not be
acquired and can still operate after the
acquisition; personal property that is located
in a mini-storage facility that will be acquired
or relocated; or, personal property that is
stored on vacant land that is to be acquired.
For such a residential personal property
move, there may be situations in which the
costs of obtaining moving bids may exceed
the cost to move. In those situations, the
Agency may allow an eligibility
determination and payment based upon the
use of the ‘‘additional room’’ category of the
Fixed Residential Move Cost Schedule at
www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/
uniform_act/relocation/moving_cost_
schedule.cfm.
For a nonresidential personal property
only move, the owner of the personal
property has the options of moving the
personal property by using a commercial
mover or a self-move. If a question arises
concerning the reasonableness of an actual
cost move, the Agency may obtain estimates
from qualified movers to use as the standard
in determining the payment.
Section 24.301(g)(3) through (5).
Construction costs for a new building at the
business replacement site, costs to build out
a shell, or costs substantially reconstruct a
building are generally ineligible for
reimbursement of expenses for
disconnecting, dismantling, removing,
reassembling, and reinstalling relocated
household appliances and other personal
property. (See Section 24.304(b)(5) of this
appendix for further discussion of ineligible
capital expenses).
Section 24.301(g)(13) Relettering signs
and replacing stationery. This may include
the content of other media that need
correcting such as DVDs and CDs. This may
also include modifications to websites that
would modify and edit contact and new
location information made necessary because
of the move. Agencies will need to determine
whether these costs are actual, reasonable,
and necessary.
Section 24.301(g)(14)(i) through (iii). If the
piece of equipment is operational at the
acquired site, the estimated cost to reconnect
the equipment shall be based on the cost to
install the equipment as it currently exists,
and shall not include the cost of code-
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
required betterments or upgrades that may
apply at the replacement site. As prescribed
in the part, the allowable in-place value
estimate (§ 24.301(g)(14)(ii)) and moving cost
estimate (§ 24.301(g)(14)(iii)) must reflect
only the ‘‘as is’’ condition and installation of
the item at the displacement site. The inplace value estimate may not include costs
that reflect code or other requirements that
were not in effect at the displacement site.
The in-place value estimate may also not
include installation costs for machinery or
equipment that is not operable or not
installed at the displacement site. Value in
place can be obtained by hiring a machinery
and equipment (M&E) appraiser or value can
be estimated via websites available for M&E
valuations. An example of one resource is
The Association of Machinery and
Equipment Appraisers (AMEA) website.2 The
AMEA is a nonprofit professional association
whose mission is to accredit certified
equipment appraisers. Another example of
available resources can be found on the
website of The American Society of
Appraisers; a multi-discipline, non-profit,
international organization of professional
appraisers. They maintain a separate web
page for machinery and equipment
appraisers.3 Should an Agency find itself in
need of a machinery and equipment
appraisal a web search for either ‘‘machinery
and equipment appraisers’’ or ‘‘machinery
and equipment appraisers organizations’’
will provide a number of resources which
can be used to find the necessary services
and resources. It is important to note that
FHWA does not endorse or recommend any
organization, society or professional group.
The information provided in this appendix is
strictly informational.
Section 24.301(g)(17) Searching
expenses. In special cases where the Agency
determines it to be reasonable and necessary,
certain additional categories of searching
costs may be considered for reimbursement.
These include those costs involved in
investigating potential replacement sites and
the time of the business owner, based on
salary or earnings, required to apply for
licenses or permits, zoning changes, and
attendance at zoning hearings. Necessary
attorney’s fees required to obtain such
licenses or permits are also reimbursable.
Time spent in negotiating the purchase of a
replacement business site is also
reimbursable based on a reasonable salary or
earnings rate. In those instances when such
additional costs to investigate and acquire
the site exceed $5,000, the Agency may
consider requesting a waiver of the cost
limitation under the § 24.7, waiver provision.
Such a waiver should be subject to the
approval of the Federal-funding Agency in
accordance with existing delegation of
authority. As an alternative to the preceding
sentences in this section, Federal funding
Agencies may determine that it is appropriate
to allow for payment of searching expenses
of up to $1,000 with little or no
documentation under this part. It is expected
that each Federal funding Agency will
2 https://www.amea.org/.
3 https://www.appraisers.org/Disciplines/
Machinery-Technical-Specialties.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
consider and address the potential for waste,
fraud, or abuse and may develop additional
requirements to implement this provision.
Such requirements may include development
of policy or procedure or by requiring
specific changes or inclusions in the written
procedures approved by the Federal funding
agency.
Search expenses may be incurred anytime
the business anticipates it may be displaced,
including prior to project authorization or the
initiation of negotiations. However, such
expenses cannot be reimbursed until the
business has received the notice in
§ 24.203(b) and only after the Agency has
determined such costs to be actual,
reasonable, and necessary.
Section 24.302. The occupant of a seasonal
residence could receive a payment based
upon the Fixed Residential Move Cost
Schedule or actual moving expenses in
accordance with § 24.301. Persons owning or
renting seasonal residences are generally not
eligible for any relocation payments other
than personal property moving expenses.
Section 24.303(a). Actual, reasonable, and
necessary reimbursement for connection to
available utilities are for the necessary
improvements to utility services currently
available at the replacement property.
Examples include (a) a Laundromat business
that requires a larger service tap than the
typical business service tap already on the
property, and (b) a business that requires an
upgrade or enhancement of the existing
single phase electrical service to provide 3phase electrical service.
Section 24.303(b) Professional services. If
a question should arise as to what is a
‘‘reasonable hourly rate,’’ the Agency should
compare the rates of other similar
professional providers in that area.
Section 24.303(c) Impact fees and onetime assessments for anticipated heavy utility
usage.
Section 24.303(c) limits impact fees or onetime assessments to those for anticipated
heavy utility usage to utilities, i.e., water,
sewer, gas, and electric. Impact fees and one
time assessments that may be levied on a
non-residential relocated person in their
replacement location for other major
infrastructure construction or use such as
roads, fire stations, regional drainage
improvements, and parks are not eligible.
Providing information on the potential
eligibility of impact fees for anticipated
heavy utility usage is an important advisory
service.
Section 24.304(b)(5) Ineligible expenses.
The cost of constructing a replacement
structure, building out of a shell, or
substantially reconstructing a building is a
capital expenditure and is generally
ineligible for reimbursement as a
reestablishment expense. In those rare
instances when a business cannot relocate
without construction of a replacement
structure, an Agency or recipient may request
a waiver of § 24.304(b)(1) under the
provisions of § 24.7. An example of such an
instance would be in a rural area where there
are no suitable buildings available and the
new construction, reconstruction, or build
out of a shell as a replacement structure is
the only option that will enable the business
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
to remain a viable commercial operation. If
a waiver is granted, the cost of new
construction, reconstruction, or build out of
a shell as a replacement structure will be
considered an eligible reestablishment
expense subject to the $25,000 statutory limit
on such payment.
In markets where existing and new
buildings are available for rental (and
sometimes for purchase), the buildings or the
various units available within the buildings
often have only the basic amenities such as
heat, light, and water, and sewer available.
These buildings or units are shells. The cost
of the building (shell) is not an eligible
expense because the shell is considered a
capital real estate improvement (a capital
asset). A certain degree of construction costs
are generally expected by the market because
shells are designed to be customized by the
tenant. However, a shell which is dilapidated
or is in disrepair and which requires major
reconstruction or rehabilitation would not be
eligible for reimbursement under this part.
However, this determination does not
preclude the consideration by an Agency of
certain modifications to an existing
replacement business building. Eligible
improvements or modifications up to the
amount of $25,000 may include the addition
of necessary facilities such as bathrooms,
room partitions, built-in display cases, and
similar items, if required by Federal, State, or
local codes, ordinances, or simply considered
reasonable and necessary for the operation of
the business.
Section 24.305 Fixed payment for moving
expenses—nonresidential moves.
Section 24.305(a) Business. If a business
elects the fixed payment for moving expenses
(in lieu of payment) option, the payment
represents its full and final payment for all
relocation expenses. Should the business
elect to receive this payment, it would not be
eligible for any other relocation assistance
payments including actual moving or related
expenses, or reestablishment expenses.
Section 24.305(c) Farm operation. If a
farm operation elects the fixed payment for
moving expenses (in lieu of payment) option,
the payment represents its full and final
payment for all relocation expenses. Should
the farm elect to receive this payment, it
would not be eligible for any other relocation
assistance payments including actual moving
or related expenses, and reestablishment
expenses.
Section 24.305(d) Nonprofit organization.
Gross revenues may include membership
fees, class fees, cash donations, tithes,
receipts from sales, or other forms of fund
collection that enables the nonprofit
organization to operate. Administrative
expenses are those for administrative support
such as rent, utilities, salaries, advertising,
and other like items, as well as fundraising
expenses. Operating expenses for carrying
out the purposes of the nonprofit
organization are not included in
administrative expenses. The monetary
receipts and expense amounts may be
verified with certified financial statements or
financial documents required by public
Agencies.
If a nonprofit organization elects the fixed
payment for moving expenses (in lieu of
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69517
payment) option, the payment represents its
full and final payment for all relocation
expenses. Should the nonprofit organization
elect to receive this payment, it would not be
eligible for any other relocation assistance
payments including actual moving or related
expenses, or reestablishment expenses.
Section 24.305(e) Average annual net
earnings of a business or farm operation.
Section 24.305(a)(6) requires that the
business contribute materially to the income
of the displaced person during the 2 taxable
years prior to displacement. This does not
mean that the business needed to be in
existence for a minimum of 2 years prior to
displacement to be eligible for this payment.
If a business has been in operation for only
a short period of time (i.e., 6 months) prior
to displacement, the fixed payment would be
based on the net earnings of the business at
the displacement site for the actual period of
operation projected to an annual rate. If a
business was not in operation for a full 2
years, the existing net earnings income data
should be used to project what the net
earnings could be if the business were in
operation for a full 2 years. If the business
is seasonal, the business’ operating season
net income represents the full annual income
for the purposes of calculating this benefit.
For Example:
(1) Business in operation for only 6 months
earned $10,000.
Computation: ($10,000 / 6) × 12 = $20,000
annual net earnings × 2 years = $40,000
divided by 2 = $20,000; Eligibility =
$20,000. (Average annual net earnings.)
(2) Business in operation 18 months earned
$20,000.
Computation: $20,000 divided by 18 months
= $1,111 per month × 24 months =
$26,664 divided by 2 years = $13,332;
Eligibility = $13,332 (Average annual net
earnings)
(3) Business is seasonal—open summer
only for 4 months and earns $5,000.
Computation: $5,000 was the seasonal net
earnings 1 year and $6,000 was the
seasonal net earnings a second year.
$11,000 divided by 2 = $5,500; Eligibility
= $5,500. (Average annual net earnings)
If the average annual net earnings of the
displaced business, farm, or nonprofit
organization are determined to be less than
$1,000, even $0 or a negative amount, the
minimum payment of $1,000 shall be
provided.
Section 24.306 Discretionary utility
relocation payments. Section 24.306(c)
describes the issues that the Agency and the
utility facility owner must agree to in
determining the amount of the relocation
payment. To facilitate and aid in reaching
such agreement, the practices in the Federal
Highway Administration regulation, 23 CFR
part 645, subpart A, Utility Relocations,
Adjustments and Reimbursement, should be
followed.
Subpart E—Replacement Housing Payments
Section 24.401 Replacement housing
payment for 90-day homeowner-occupants.
Section 24.401(a)(2). An extension of
eligibility may be granted if some event
beyond the control of the displaced person
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69518
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
such as acute or life threatening illness, bad
weather preventing the completion of
construction, or physical modifications
required for reasonable accommodation of a
replacement dwelling, or other like
circumstances causes a delay in occupying a
decent, safe, and sanitary replacement
dwelling.
Section 24.401(c)(2)(iii) Price differential.
The provision in § 24.401(c)(2)(iii) to use the
current fair market value for residential use
does not mean the Agency must have the
property appraised. Any reasonable method
for arriving at the fair market value may be
used.
Section 24.401(d) Increased mortgage
interest costs. The provision in § 24.401(d)
sets forth the factors to be used in computing
the payment that will be required to reduce
a person’s replacement mortgage (added to
the down payment) to an amount which can
be amortized at the same monthly payment
for principal and interest over the same
period of time as the remaining term on the
displacement mortgages. This payment is
commonly known as the ‘‘buydown.’’
The Agency must know the remaining
principal balance, the interest rate, and
monthly principal and interest payments for
the old mortgage as well as the interest rate,
points, and term for the new mortgage to
compute the increased mortgage interest
costs. If the combination of interest and
points for the new mortgage exceeds the
current prevailing fixed interest rate and
points for conventional mortgages and there
is no justification for the excessive rate, then
the current prevailing fixed interest rate and
points shall be used in the computations.
Justification may be the unavailability of the
current prevailing rate due to the amount of
the new mortgage, credit difficulties, or other
similar reasons.
SAMPLE COMPUTATION
Old Mortgage:
Remaining Principal Balance ...............
Monthly Payment (principal and interest) ...................................................
Interest rate (percent) ..........................
New Mortgage:
Interest rate (percent) ..........................
Points ...................................................
Term (years) ........................................
$50,000
$458.22
7
10
3
15
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Remaining term of the old mortgage is
determined to be 174 months. Determining,
or computing, the actual remaining term is
more reliable than using the data supplied by
the mortgagee. However, if it is shorter, use
the term of the new mortgage and compute
the needed monthly payment.
Amount to be financed to maintain
monthly payments of $458.22 at 10% =
$42,010.18.
Calculation:
Remaining Principal Balance .......
Minus Annual Monthly Payment
(principal and interest) .............
Increased
mortgage
interest
costs .........................................
3 points on $42,010.18 ................
Total buydown necessary to
maintain
payments
at
$458.22/month ..................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
$50,000.00
¥42,010.18
7,989.82
1,260.31
9,250.13
Jkt 250001
If the new mortgage actually obtained is
less than the computed amount for a new
mortgage ($42,010.18), the buydown shall be
prorated accordingly. If the actual mortgage
obtained in our example were $35,000, the
buydown payment would be $7,706.57
($35,000 divided by $42,010.18 = .8331;
$9,250.13 multiplied by .83 = $7,706.57).
The Agency is obligated to inform the
displaced person of the approximate amount
of this payment and to advise the displaced
person of the interest rate and points used to
calculate the payment.
The FHWA has an online tool to calculate
increased mortgage interest costs for fixed,
and interest only loans at: www.fhwa.dot.gov/
real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/
relocation/midpcalcs/.
Section 24.401(e) Home equity
conversion mortgage (HECM). The provision
in § 24.401(e) sets forth the factors to be
considered to estimating an amount, after
paying off the existing HECM balance,
sufficient to purchase a replacement HECM
that provides a tenure or term payment, line
of credit, or lump-sum disbursement. The
Agency must know the value of the acquired
dwelling, existing balance of displacement
HECM, remaining equity, and price of the
selected comparable or actual replacement
dwelling, to compute the estimated HECM
supplement payment for a replacement
HECM. The FHWA website provides a simple
calculator to estimate the HECM supplement
payment needed to purchase a replacement
HECM at www.fhwa.dot.gov/realty/. In cases
where there is a tenure or term payment
additional information such as the age of the
youngest borrower, amounts of the tenure
payment, amount and remaining term of term
payment and the current interest rate, is
needed to calculate the payment and will
require the assistance of a HECM mortgage
broker.
Below are four scenarios and suggestions
for relocation payment eligibilities. As you
will note, the eligibility is the same in each
case; however, amounts will vary depending
on the individual’s circumstance and existing
HECM terms. This appendix also contains a
list of other possible Agency options, should
a displaced person elect to use them;
however, they are not recommended by
FHWA because they do not place the person
into a replacement HECM.
Situation 1—Owner has sufficient
remaining equity to obtain a replacement
HECM for purchase.
Situation 2—Owner’s existing HECM has a
tenure disbursement payment and there is
not sufficient remaining equity to obtain a
replacement HECM.
Situation 3—Owner’s existing HECM has a
term disbursement payment and there is not
sufficient remaining equity to obtain a
replacement HECM.
Situation 4—Owner’s existing HECM is a
line of credit and there is not sufficient
remaining equity to obtain a replacement
HECM.
The displaced homeowner may be eligible
for the following relocation payments:
• A price differential payment in
accordance with § 24.401(c).
The owner would be eligible for a price
differential payment (the difference between
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the comparable replacement dwelling and
the acquisition cost of the displacement
dwelling).
• The administrative costs and incidental
expenses necessary to establish the new
HECM.
Incidental costs incurred with a
replacement HECM are reimbursable and fall
into three categories- Mortgage insurance
premium (MIP), loan origination fee, and
closing costs.
• A mortgage interest differential payment
if the homeowner incurs a higher interest rate
on the new HECM.
The payment would be based on the
difference between the displacement
adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) cap rate and
the available ARM cap rate and those rates
would be used as the components to
calculate the MIDP in accordance with the
sample calculation provided at Section
24.401(d) of this appendix. The Agency must
advise the displaced person of the interest
rate used to calculate the payment. Note that
most HECMs are monthly adjustable rate
mortgages, so any interest differential
payment would be minimal.
• If the displaced homeowner elects to
relocate into rental housing rather than
remain a homeowner, then the Agency will
calculate relocation assistance payments in
accordance with § 24.401(g).
For example, the Agency computes a rental
assistance payment of $10,000 for the owners
based on a comparable replacement rental
dwelling. When the owners settle with the
Agency they will pay off the balance of the
HECM and retain any remaining equity in the
property. They are eligible for the rental
assistance payment when they rent and
occupy the DSS replacement dwelling.
Note: In all situations, if the displaced
homeowner elects to relocate into rental
housing rather than remain homeowner, then
the Agency will calculate relocation
assistance payments in accordance with
§ 24.401(g).
Note: If the existing HECM was a lumpsum or line-of-credit which has been
exhausted, then the Agency is not under
obligation to replace those amounts, but only
to replace the HECM with a HECM with
terms and equity similar to the displacement
HECM.
Other Agency options (not recommended
unless elected by the displaced person, since
they do not place the person into the same
situation as the displacement HECM
provided):
• A direct loan as set forth in § 24.404
under housing of last resort.
• A life estate interest in a comparable
replacement dwelling under replacement
housing of last resort.
• Agency purchases a comparable
replacement dwelling and retains ownership
and conveys a leasehold interest to the owner
for his/her lifetime.
• Agency offers a comparable replacement
rental dwelling to convert the homeowner
occupant to tenant status.
Section 24.402 Replacement Housing
Payment for 90-day tenants and certain
others.
Section 24.402(b)(2) Low income
calculation example. The Uniform Act
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
requires that an eligible displaced person
who rents a replacement dwelling is entitled
to a rental assistance payment calculated in
accordance with § 24.402(b). One factor in
this calculation is to determine if a displaced
person is ‘‘low income,’’ as defined by the
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development’s annual survey of income
limits for the Public Housing and Section 8
Programs. To make such a determination, the
Agency must: (1) Determine the total number
of members in the household (including all
adults and children); (2) locate the
appropriate table for income limits
applicable to the Uniform Act for the State
in which the displaced residence is located
(found at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/
realestate/ua/ualic.htm); (3) from the list of
local jurisdictions shown, identify the
appropriate county, Metropolitan Statistical
Area (MSA),4 or Primary Metropolitan
Statistical Area (PMSA) 5 in which the
displacement property is located; and (4)
locate the appropriate income limit in that
jurisdiction for the size of this displaced
person/family. The income limit must then
be compared to the household income
(defined at § 24.2(a)) which is the gross
annual income received by the displaced
family, excluding income from any
dependent children and full-time students
under the age of 18. If the household income
for the eligible displaced person/family is
less than or equal to the income limit, the
family is considered ‘‘low income.’’ For
example:
Tom and Mary Smith and their three
children are being displaced. The
information obtained from the family and
verified by the Agency is as follows:
Tom Smith, employed, earns $21,000/yr.
Mary Smith, receives disability payments of
$6,000/yr.
Tom Smith, Jr., 21, employed, earns $10,000/
yr.
Mary Jane Smith, 17, student, has a paper
route, earns $3,000/yr. (Income is not
included because she is a dependent child
and a full-time student under 18)
Sammie Smith, 10, full-time student, no
income.
Total family income for five persons is:
$21,000 + $6,000 + $10,000 = $37,000
The displacement residence is located in
the State of Maryland, Caroline County. The
low income limit for a five person household
is: $64,300. (2014 Income Limits)
This household is considered ‘‘low
income.’’
Section 24.402(c) Down payment
assistance. The down payment assistance
provisions in § 24.402(c) limit such
assistance to the amount of the computed
rental assistance payment for a tenant. It
does, however, provide the latitude for
Agency discretion in offering down payment
assistance that exceeds the computed rental
assistance payment, up to the $7,200
statutory maximum. This does not mean,
4 A complete list of counties and towns included
in the identified MSAs and PMSAs can be found
under the bulleted item ‘‘Income Limit Area
Definition’’ posted on the FHWA’s website at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/ua/ualic.htm.
5 See footnote 4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
however, that such Agency discretion may be
exercised in a selective or discriminatory
fashion. The Agency should develop a policy
that affords equal treatment for displaced
persons in like circumstances and this policy
should be applied uniformly throughout the
Agency’s programs or projects.
For the purpose of this section, should the
amount of the rental assistance payment, for
a displaced homeowner who elects to rent a
replacement dwelling may not be more than
the eligibility the homeowner would have
received as an eligible displaced home
owner.
Section 24.403(a)(1) Determining cost of
comparable replacement dwelling. In
§ 24.403(a)(1) the term ‘‘examined’’ an MLS
listing does not equate to ‘‘inspected’’ but
rather to ‘‘considered’’ for the payment
eligibility computation. At a minimum, the
selected comparable dwelling should be
physically inspected or, if an inspection is
not feasible, the displaced person shall be
informed in writing that a physical
inspection of the interior or exterior was not
performed, the reason that the inspection was
not performed, and that if the comparable is
selected as a replacement dwelling a
replacement housing payment may not be
made unless the replacement dwelling is
subsequently inspected and determined to be
decent, safe, and sanitary. Reliance on an
exterior visual inspection, or examination of
an MLS listing does not in most cases
constitute a full DSS inspection.
Each Agency should clearly inform
displaced persons that a DSS inspection as
required by this part is only a cursory
inspection to ensure that certain minimum
requirements (e.g., local housing codes) are
being met versus doing a full home
inspection of all systems similar to that
which a home inspector would be hired to
do.
Section 24.403(a)(3) Additional rules
governing replacement housing payments.
The economic value to the owner of a
remainder may be as an actual buildable lot
for sale to an adjoining property owner, or for
some other purpose for which the Agency
attributes an economic value to the owner.
When allowed for under applicable law, a
single offer that includes the value of the
remainder property should be made. The
purpose of making an offer to purchase the
remainder is to allow for an RHP calculation
and benefit determination that includes the
value of the remainder as part of the
compensation offered to the owner for
acquisition, whether the property owner sells
the remainder or choses to retain it. Should
a property owner decide to retain a
remainder then he would be responsible for
the value of the remainder when he
purchases his replacement property. Example
B shows the effect that a property owner’s
decision to retain a remainder or a States
inability to make an offer to purchase the
remainder would have on the calculation of
benefits.
The price differential portion of the
replacement housing payment would be the
difference between the comparable
replacement dwelling and the Agency’s
highest written acquisition offer. In the
examples below, the before value of the
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
69519
typical residential dwelling and lot is
$180,000; the remnant is valued at $15,000,
and the part needed for the project, including
the dwelling, is valued at $165,000 the
comparable replacement dwelling is valued
at $200,000. The price differential would be
calculated as follows in the two scenarios:
(EXAMPLE A) AGENCY OFFERS TO
ACQUIRE REMAINDER
Comparable replacement
dwelling ............................
Before value of parcel .........
Minus: Remainder Value .....
Acquisition of Part Needed
Agency’s highest written
offer ..................................
Price Differential Payment
Eligibility ...........................
................
$180,000
15,000
165,000
$200,000
................
................
................
................
180,000
................
20,000
(EXAMPLE B) AGENCY DOES NOT
OFFER TO ACQUIRE REMAINDER
Comparable Replacement
Dwelling ...........................
Before value of parcel .........
Minus: Remainder Value
(owner retains) .................
Acquisition of Part Needed
Agency’s highest written
offer for part needed ........
Price Differential Payment
Eligibility ...........................
................
$180,000
$200,000
................
15,000
165,000
................
................
................
165,000
................
35,000
Section 24.404 Replacement housing of
last resort.
Section 24.404(b) Basic rights of persons
to be displaced. Section 24.404(b) affirms the
right of a 90-day homeowner-occupant, who
is eligible for a replacement housing payment
under § 24.401, to a reasonable opportunity
to purchase a comparable replacement
dwelling. However, it should be read in
conjunction with the definition of ‘‘owner of
a dwelling’’ at § 24.2(a). The Agency is not
required to provide persons owning only a
fractional interest in the displacement
dwelling a greater level of assistance to
purchase a replacement dwelling than the
Agency would be required to provide such
persons if they owned fee simple title to the
displacement dwelling. If such assistance is
not sufficient to buy a replacement dwelling,
the Agency may provide additional purchase
assistance or rental assistance.
Section 24.404(c) Methods of providing
comparable replacement housing. Section
24.404(c) emphasizes the use of cost effective
means of providing comparable replacement
housing. The term ‘‘reasonable cost’’ is used
to highlight the fact that while innovative
means to provide housing are encouraged,
they should be cost-effective. Section
24.404(c)(2) permits the use of last resort
housing, in special cases, which may involve
variations from the usual methods of
obtaining comparability. However, such
variation should never result in a lowering of
housing standards nor should it ever result
in a lower quality of living style for the
displaced person. The physical
characteristics of the comparable
replacement dwelling may be dissimilar to
those of the displacement dwelling but they
may never be inferior.
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
69520
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
One example might be the use of a new
mobile home to replace a very substandard
conventional dwelling in an area where
comparable conventional dwellings are not
available.
Another example could be the use of a
superior, but smaller, decent, safe and
sanitary dwelling to replace a large, old
substandard dwelling, only a portion of
which is being used as living quarters by the
occupants and no other large comparable
dwellings are available in the area.
Appendix B to Part 24—Statistical
Report Form
This appendix sets forth the statistical
information collected from Agencies in
accordance with § 24.9(c).
General
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1. Report coverage. This report covers all
relocation and real property acquisition
activities under a Federal or a federally
assisted project or program subject to the
provisions of the Uniform Act. If the exact
numbers are not easily available, an Agency
may provide what it believes to be a
reasonable estimate.
2. Report period. Activities shall be
reported on a Federal fiscal year basis, i.e.
October 1 through September 30.
3. Where and when to submit report.
Submit a copy of this report to the lead
Agency as soon as possible after September
30, but not later than November 15. Lead
Agency address: Federal Highway
Administration, Office of Real Estate Services
(HEPR), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
4. How to report relocation payments. The
full amount of a relocation payment shall be
reported as if disbursed in the year during
which the claim was approved, regardless of
whether the payment is to be paid in
installments.
5. How to report dollar amounts. Round off
all money entries in Parts of this section A,
B, and C to the nearest dollar.
6. Regulatory references. The references in
Parts A, B, C, and D of this section indicate
the subpart of this part pertaining to the
requested information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
Part A. Real Property Acquisition Under the
Uniform Act
Line 1. Report all parcels acquired during
the report year where title or possession was
vested in the Agency during the reporting
period. The parcel count reported should
relate to ownerships and not to the number
of parcels of different property interests (such
as fee, perpetual easement, temporary
easement, etc.) that may have been part of an
acquisition from one owner. For example, an
acquisition from a property that includes a
fee simple parcel, a perpetual easement
parcel, and a temporary easement parcel
should be reported as 1 parcel not 3 parcels.
(Include parcels acquired without Federal
financial assistance, if there was or will be
Federal financial assistance in other phases
of the project or program.)
Line 2. Report the number of parcels
reported on Line 1 that were acquired by
condemnation. Include those parcels where
compensation for the property was paid,
deposited in court, or otherwise made
available to a property owner pursuant to
applicable law in order to vest title or
possession in the Agency through
condemnation authority.
Line 3. Report the number of parcels in
Line 1 acquired through administrative
settlement where the purchase price for the
property exceeded the amount offered as just
compensation and efforts to negotiate an
agreement at that amount have failed.
Line 4. Report the total of the amounts
paid, deposited in court, or otherwise made
available to a property owner pursuant to
applicable law in order to vest title or
possession in the Agency in Line 1.
Part B. Residential Relocation Under the
Uniform Act
Line 5. Report the number of households
who were permanently displaced during the
fiscal year by project or program activities
and moved to their replacement dwelling.
The term ‘‘households’’ includes all families
and individuals. A family shall be reported
as ‘‘one’’ household, not by the number of
people in the family unit.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Line 6. Report the total amount paid for
residential moving expenses (actual expense
and fixed payment).
Line 7. Report the total amount paid for
residential replacement housing payments
including payments for replacement housing
of last resort provided pursuant to § 24.404.
Line 8. Report the number of households in
Line 5 who were permanently displaced
during the fiscal year by project or program
activities and moved to their replacement
dwelling as part of last resort housing
assistance.
Line 9. Report the number of tenant
households in Line 5 who were permanently
displaced during the fiscal year by project or
program activities, and who purchased and
moved to their replacement dwelling using a
down payment assistance payment under
this part.
Line 10. Report the total sum costs of
residential relocation expenses and payments
(excluding Agency administrative expenses)
in Lines 6 and 7.
Part C. Nonresidential Relocation Under the
Uniform Act
Line 11. Report the number of businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and farms who were
permanently displaced during the fiscal year
by project or program activities and moved
to their replacement location. This includes
businesses, nonprofit organizations, and
farms, that upon displacement, discontinued
operations.
Line 12. Report the total amount paid for
nonresidential moving expenses (actual
expense and fixed payment.)
Line 13. Report the total amount paid for
nonresidential reestablishment expenses.
Line 14. Report the total sum costs of
nonresidential relocation expenses and
payments (excluding Agency administrative
expenses) in Lines 12 and 13.
Part D. Relocation Appeals
Line 15. Report the total number of
relocation appeals filed during the fiscal year
by aggrieved persons (residential and
nonresidential).
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 / Proposed Rules
69521
[FR Doc. 2019–25558 Filed 12–17–19; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Dec 17, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\18DEP2.SGM
18DEP2
EP18DE19.001
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 18, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69466-69521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25558]
[[Page 69465]]
Vol. 84
Wednesday,
No. 243
December 18, 2019
Part II
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
49 CFR Part 24
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal
and Federally Assisted Programs; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 84 , No. 243 / Wednesday, December 18, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 69466]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 24
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2018-0039]
RIN 2125-AF79
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for
Federal and Federally Assisted Programs
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is proposing to amend its Uniform Relocation
Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Uniform
Act) regulations. The revisions are prompted by enactment of the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), which increases
statutory relocation benefits and reduces length of occupancy
requirements. This proposal is intended to update existing regulations
on the use of those amendments. The FHWA is also proposing to update
the Uniform Act regulations to reflect the Agency's experience with the
Federal-aid highway program since the last comprehensive rulemaking for
the part, which occurred in 2005. The updates include streamlining
processes to better meet current Uniform Act implementation needs and
eliminating duplicative and outdated regulatory language.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 17, 2020. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that you do not duplicate your docket submissions,
please submit them by only one of the following means:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is (202) 366-9329.
Instructions: You must include the Agency name and docket
number or the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for the rulemaking
at the beginning of your comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Feldman, Office of Real Estate
Services, (202) 366-2028, email address: [email protected]; or
David Sett, Office of the Chief Counsel (HCC), (404) 562-3676, email
address: [email protected]; Federal Highway Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 7:30 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document and all comments received may be viewed online
through the Federal eRulemaking portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
The website is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. An
electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded by accessing
the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: https://www.federalregister.gov.
Table of Contents for Supplementary Information
I. Executive Summary
II. Background
III. Section-By-Section Discussion of the Proposals
I. Executive Summary
The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq. (Uniform Act)
provides important protections and assistance for people affected by
federally funded projects. Congress enacted this law to ensure that
people whose real property is acquired, or who move as a result of
projects receiving Federal funds, are treated fairly and equitably and
receive just compensation for, and assistance in moving from, the
property they occupy. The governmentwide regulation implementing the
Uniform Act is title 49 CFR part 24.
The Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act
(STURAA) (Pub. L. 100-17) of 1987 designated the U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT) as the Federal Lead Agency (Lead Agency) for the
Uniform Act. Duties of the Lead Agency include developing, issuing, and
maintaining the governmentwide regulation, providing assistance to
other Federal Agencies, and reporting to Congress on Uniform Act
implementation issues. The DOT has delegated these responsibilities to
the FHWA at 49 CFR 1.85(d)(7).
Acting as Lead Agency, FHWA is proposing to amend and update 49 CFR
part 24, which would affect the land acquisition and displacement
activities of all Federal Agencies subject to the Uniform Act. The
proposed changes to this regulation are necessitated in part by Section
1521 of the MAP-21 (Pub. L. 112-141, July 6, 2012). Section 1521
included increases in benefit levels for displaced persons, authority
to develop a regulatory mechanism to consider and implement future
adjustments to those benefit levels, the requirement for an annual
report on governmentwide real property acquisitions subject to the
Uniform Act, and provisions for the funding of Lead Agency services. In
addition to these required changes, FHWA proposes to amend the
regulations to clarify existing requirements for implementing the
Uniform Act, meet modern needs, and improve the Agencies' service to
individuals and businesses affected by Federal or federally assisted
projects. The proposed changes would also reduce the paperwork and
administrative burdens of Government regulations on Agencies subject to
the Uniform Act.
The costs of the proposed rule for all Uniform Act Agencies are
estimated to be minor: $1.8 million when discounted at 7 percent and
$2.0 million when discounted at 3 percent. The 10-year annualized costs
are estimated to be: $255,000 per year when discounted at 7 percent and
$230,000 per year when discounted at 3 percent. Therefore, the costs
associated with this rule are de minimis. Moreover, these minor costs
should be fully offset, if not outweighed, by cost savings resulting
from new flexibilities and streamlining contained in this proposal.
These cost savings are not quantifiable.
The larger impact of this rule is in the form of transfers from the
government to property owners whose real estate is acquired for Federal
projects. The estimated amount of transfers resulting from this rule
are $115 million when discounted at 7 percent and $146 million when
discounted at 3 percent. This rule can therefore be thought of as
predominantly a transfer rule, as the estimated costs are significantly
smaller than the estimated transfers. The FHWA was the only agency that
provided data upon which to base estimates of the transfers. Therefore,
the magnitude of the change in transfers for all Federal Agencies may
be larger than is reported here. The Regulatory Impact Analysis for
this rulemaking contains further breakdown of costs associated with
[[Page 69467]]
FHWA's program. Other Federal Agencies may have additional regulatory
or administrative updates specific to their programs as a result of
this rulemaking.
The benefits of the proposed rule primarily relate to improved
equity and fairness to entities that are displaced from their
properties or that move as a result of projects receiving Federal
funds. For example, the proposed rule raises the statutory maximums for
payments to displaced entities to assist with the reestablishment of
the business, farm, or nonprofit organization. There is strong evidence
that entities experience reestablishment costs well above the current
maximum amount. Raising the maximum payment levels will compensate
those entities more fairly and equitably for the negative impacts they
experience as a result of a Federal or federally assisted project.
However, the fairness and equity benefits of the proposed rule cannot
be definitively quantified or monetized. The higher level of payments
may also contribute to more entities being able to successfully
reestablish after displacement.
Background
The FHWA last updated 49 CFR part 24 in 2005. Since publication of
the 2005 rule, FHWA has undertaken a comprehensive effort to identify
potential opportunities for improving implementation of the Uniform
Act. The FHWA initiatives have included research on the need for
regulatory and statutory change to the Uniform Act; co-sponsorship of
national symposiums on Uniform Act implementation issues;
implementation of pilot projects designed to determine the effect of
changes in certain Uniform Act requirements and procedures; and an
examination of the experiences of several State departments of
transportation (State DOT) in providing payments required by State law
that supplemented Uniform Act benefits. These activities confirmed that
there are a number of enhancements that could be made to clarify
existing requirements, reduce administrative burdens, and improve the
Government's service to individuals and businesses affected by Federal
or federally assisted projects and programs.
The Uniform Act and the common rule govern the relocation and land
acquisition programs of all Federal Agencies. Those Federal Agencies
that, for convenience, provide a cross reference to this part, and the
location of those cross-references, are listed below:
Department of Agriculture
7 CFR part 21
Department of Commerce
15 CFR part 11
Department of Defense
32 CFR part 259
Department of Education
34 CFR part 15
Department of Energy
10 CFR part 1039
Environmental Protection Agency
40 CFR part 4
General Services Administration
41 CFR part 105-51
Department of Health and Human Services
45 CFR part 15
Department of Housing and Urban Development
24 CFR part 42
Department of Justice
41 CFR part 128-18
Department of Labor
29 CFR part 12
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
14 CFR part 1208
Tennessee Valley Authority
18 CFR part 1306
Veterans Administration
38 CFR part 25
Department of Homeland Security
44 CFR part 25
The Uniform Act applies to all acquisitions of real property or
displacements of persons resulting from Federal or federally assisted
programs or projects; the Uniform Act's application is not affected by
the absence of a cross reference to 49 CFR part 24 in an Agency's
regulations. Further, Federal or federally assisted activities
involving land acquisition or displacement, undertaken by a newly
constituted Federal Agency, would be covered by the Uniform Act.
After the publication of the 49 CFR part 24 final rule, FHWA began
a process to identify additional needs for regulatory updates and
elicit input from Federal stakeholders and conducted research projects,
which resulted in many of the regulatory changes proposed here. The
primary focus of the various efforts was to identify opportunities to
streamline processes to better meet current Uniform Act implementation
needs and eliminate duplicative and outdated regulatory language in
that rule. Beginning in 2012, and culminating in 2018, FHWA held
working group meetings with representatives of the Federal Agencies
subject to the Uniform Act. The meetings included a section-by-section
review of the regulation, consideration of comments received during the
2005 rulemaking process, review of listening session comments, and
consideration of research findings. Contributions from working group
members were based on their experiences implementing the rule and
feedback they had received from their partners and customers. The early
review by the working group led to a compilation of potential changes
to the rule. The FHWA considered the group's recommendations and
proposed changes for each of the regulation's subparts and developed an
initial draft rulemaking. Over a series of several working group
meetings, the draft was refined and revised based on proposed edits and
comments of the working group. When the working group meetings
concluded, FHWA worked internally to finalize the draft rulemaking and
continued to share drafts and receive additional comments from the
Federal Agencies.
This rulemaking also considers comments received from two DOT
Federal Register documents requesting public comments and
recommendations for evaluating existing regulations. The DOT published
these documents on June 8, 2017 (82 FR 26734) and October 2, 2017 (82
FR 45750). The FHWA received several comments requesting streamlining
and updates of this rule. The NPRM is responsive to comments received
through the DOT Federal Register documents and deregulatory efforts to
update regulations and streamline processes.
Federal Agency Reporting Requirement
The Lead Agency convened a separate working group of Federal
Agencies to discuss the reporting requirements contained in Section
1521(d) of MAP-21. Federal Agencies that are subject to the Uniform Act
and have programs or projects requiring the acquisition of real
property or causing a displacement from real property must provide the
Lead Agency an annual summary report describing activities conducted by
the Federal Agency.
This group discussed the new reporting requirements and developed a
proposed template for the annual report. Each Federal Agency
participant was given an opportunity to review and comment on draft
versions of a proposed annual Agency report template. The proposed
annual report template in appendix B of this NPRM is based on the
feedback FHWA received from this group. The FHWA believes that the
proposed report template provides Federal Agencies with a streamlined
reporting format that balances the need to provide Federal Agencies
with appropriate time to develop necessary reporting systems with the
need to compile this information into a meaningful report. The FHWA
understands that developing a data collection mechanism and system may
take Federal Agencies several
[[Page 69468]]
years. In the interim Agencies may elect to provide an annual narrative
summary report instead of the statistical report in appendix B.
Section-by-Section Discussion of Proposed Changes
Descriptions of the regulatory changes proposed in this part are
set forth below. All members of the public who are affected by
relocation or land acquisition activities undertaken or funded by
Federal Agencies are encouraged to comment on this NPRM. Comments from
interested State and local governments are particularly requested.
Subpart A--General
Section 24.2 Definitions and acronyms
In response to comments and questions from Federal and State
partners, FHWA proposes to make additions and modifications to certain
definitions and acronyms in order to provide clarification. The FHWA
proposes several minor corrections, including renumbering definitions
and acronyms and organizing them alphabetically. In addition, FHWA
proposes updating appendix A references to reflect the proposed
renumbering and alphabetizing of definitions.
Section 24.2(a) Definitions
Agency
Throughout this regulation, references are made to those who are
carrying out real property acquisition and relocation assistance, which
are subject to Uniform Act requirements. The current regulations use a
combination of definitions--Agency, Acquiring Agency, and Displacing
Agency--to describe Uniform Act applicability to those parties. The
FHWA is proposing to simplify these references by revising the current
definition of Agency so it can be used throughout the proposed
regulation to describe all parties carrying out real property
acquisition and relocation assistance which are subject to Uniform Act
requirements. The FHWA is also proposing to delete definitions of
Acquiring Agency and Displacing Agency as the singular definition of
Agency will be used throughout the regulation to describe responsible
parties and Uniform Act applicability.
Comparable Replacement Dwelling
The MAP-21 amended Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by reducing
the number of days that a person must have occupied a displacement
dwelling in order to be eligible for a replacement housing payment from
180 to 90 days. The FHWA proposes to modify this definition
accordingly, and in each place it appears throughout the regulation.
Many readers of this NPRM will notice that the length of time a valid
lien (mortgage) must be in place to qualify for an increased mortgage
interest costs payment remains 180 days prior to the initiation of
negotiations. The MAP-21 did not change this requirement. The FHWA also
proposes to combine portions of the appendix for this definition with
the regulatory text with no change in requirement or meaning resulting
from this reorganization.
Contribute Materially
The FHWA has received a number of questions regarding the correct
interpretation of this definition, especially in regard to displaced
businesses that have not been in operation for 2 full years prior to
displacement. Practitioners have questioned whether this definition
means a business must be in operation for 2 full taxable years prior to
displacement in order to be eligible for the payment. They have also
questioned how to correctly calculate a prorated fixed payment if a
business were in operation for less than 2 full years. While there is
no proposed change to this definition, FHWA is reiterating that a
displaced business may be eligible to receive payment for a business
that is open for less than 2 full years. The FHWA believes that this
definition and the regulations at Sec. 24.305(a)(6) and (e), as
currently written, give clear direction for calculating the prorated
payment and provide broad latitude for equitable treatment. The FHWA
proposes a clarification of appendix A, Section 24.305(e), to provide a
more detailed discussion about calculating a benefit and, if necessary,
prorating the average annual net earnings of a business or farm
operation. The proposed clarifications include sample calculations for
businesses with less than 1 year in operation, more than 1 year but not
2 full years in operation, and seasonally operated businesses.
Decent, Safe, and Sanitary Dwelling
The Uniform Act requires that displaced persons must have decent,
safe, and sanitary (DSS) housing made available to them. The FHWA has
received a number of questions about which DSS requirements to apply,
especially in cases where local housing codes are more stringent than
DSS requirements. The FHWA proposes to revise the definition of ``DSS
dwelling'' by adding language which states that an Agency must use the
more stringent of either the local housing code, the regulations, or
the Agency's regulation or written policy. The purpose of this change
is to clarify that the requirements in the definition of DSS in Sec.
24.2(a) are minimum requirements. The FHWA also proposes to strike the
portion of this definition which states that a Federal funding Agency
with good cause could waive those regulatory DSS requirements which
were not met by local code. The FHWA believes this portion of the
regulation is unnecessary because Federal Agencies retain such
authority under Sec. 24.7. The FHWA proposes to move a portion of the
previous appendix from this item to the regulation to streamline the
new rule. The proposed new organization does not change requirements or
create new requirements.
In addition, the definition of DSS dwelling in Sec. 24.2(a) uses
the term ``housekeeping dwelling.'' However, several Federal Agencies
have noted that housekeeping dwelling is undefined in the regulation
and open to varying interpretations. The FHWA agrees that the lack of a
definition for the term is contrary to the Uniform Act's goal of
providing uniform and equitable treatment of persons displaced. The
FHWA proposes to remove the ``housekeeping dwelling'' term from the
regulation. The FHWA also proposes changes to this definition to
clarify that the requirement that a kitchen be part of a comparable
replacement dwelling is dependent on local housing code standards for
residential occupancy. In parallel, FHWA proposes a new appendix A
discussion to further clarify that FHWA recommends, as a good practice,
that even in instances where local housing codes do not require a
kitchen, Agencies select a comparable replacement dwelling that has a
kitchen.
Displaced Person
At the request of Federal Agencies that have programs or projects
that do not require the acquisition of real property, but instead may
require the rehabilitation or demolition of real property, FHWA
proposes adding the terms ``rehabilitate or demolish'' to the
definition of a displaced person. The purpose of this addition is to
clarify that the term displaced persons includes those required to
move, or move their personal property, from the real property as a
result of a written notice of intent to rehabilitate or demolish, even
if the real property is not being acquired.
The term displaced person is used in the Uniform Act to describe
persons that
[[Page 69469]]
move because of a Federal or federally assisted project or program.
``Persons not displaced'' is a term used to describe persons who do not
qualify for Uniform Act benefits. Persons not displaced generally
include those who will be temporarily relocated. The FHWA proposes to
reorganize the definition to specifically address persons who are
temporarily displaced and is proposing a new addition, Sec. 24.202(a),
to describe the required assistance and services that must be made
available for persons temporarily displaced.
The FHWA also proposes to eliminate the use of the term
``guidelines'' in this definition. Several Federal Agencies have noted
that their recipients often have questions regarding the use and
meaning of this term despite the explanation in the appendix. Federal
Agencies have also noted that they do not have ``guidelines,'' but
instead have relevant policies. The FHWA proposes to clarify the
definition of persons not displaced by deleting ``guidelines'' and
replacing it with ``policy or guidance.'' The FHWA believes that the
terms ``policy or guidance'' more accurately reflect how Federal
Agencies provide programmatic direction to their recipients.
One Federal Agency requested an addition to this regulation that
would require that a non-displacement relocation notice be provided
which clearly states that a person will not be displaced by a program
or project. It is FHWA's opinion that the current definition of persons
displaced or not displaced already accomplishes this objective, that
such a notice is generally not necessary for a majority of the Federal
Agencies' programs, and that the clarification should not be included
in the regulation. However, such a notice can be necessitated by
Federal Agency policy. Based on the discussions in the working groups,
FHWA also believes that Federal Agencies can and should ensure that
informative materials and advisory services provide clear information
on how to determine when someone is or is not displaced. Agencies may
develop guidance to address questions specific to their programs to
better direct those carrying out relocation assistance for their
programs and projects.
The FHWA proposes adding a reference to a new definition of
``Federal down payment assistance.'' In addition to the new reference,
FHWA proposes removing the existing example of American Dream
Downpayment Initiative (ADDI) authorized by section 102 of the American
Dream Downpayment Act (Pub. L. 108-186; codified at 42 U.S.C. 12821).
The proposed removal would provide for a more general reference to
similar programs. In some instances, a person may have Federal down
payment assistance funds provided for the purpose of purchasing and
occupying a dwelling. These funds are not Uniform Act benefits.
Agencies providing persons with only such Federal down payment
assistance funds are not Agencies causing displacement as defined by
this regulation, and persons using those funds are not causing
displacements as defined in this regulation. For example, a person
using Federal down payment assistance to purchase a home that a tenant
also occupies would not be causing displacement as defined by this
regulation, and the tenant who would have to move as a result of the
acquisition of the home would also not be a displaced person as defined
by this regulation.
The FHWA has received numerous questions in recent years about
whether persons in occupancy at temporary, daily, or emergency shelters
that are acquired are in fact displaced persons. Persons who are
occupying a shelter that only allows overnight stays, requires the
occupants to remove their personal property and themselves from the
premises on a daily basis, and offers no guarantee of reentry in the
evening typically would not meet the definition of displaced persons.
The FHWA believes that each relocation is unique and requires a fact-
based determination in each instance. Those acquiring a shelter should
consider factors including, but not limited to, whether the shelter has
specific rules and requirements as to who can occupy or use the shelter
and whether prolonged and continuous occupancy is allowed.
In order to clarify when a person would not be displaced in these
scenarios, FHWA proposes three changes to this definition. First, FHWA
proposes to add ``occupants of temporary, daily or emergency shelters''
to the definition of ``persons not displaced.'' Second, FHWA also
recommends that, at a minimum, all occupants should receive advisory
assistance at initiation of negotiations. Finally, FHWA proposes adding
a new appendix item for this definition that provides a discussion of
FHWA's view of determining occupancy and eligibility for those who
occupy a shelter. It offers a discussion of certain shelter occupants
who may be considered displaced persons due to extenuating reasons,
such as employment by the shelter. The FHWA believes that acquisition
of a shelter and/or displacement from a shelter creates many unique
challenges and that Agencies should address potential acquisition of
shelters early in the project development process and in the project
environmental review process. Doing so can facilitate the
identification of required environmental justice mitigation measures
and ensure that all available assistance is provided to shelter
occupants.
The FHWA also proposes to add a definition of ``temporary, daily,
or emergency shelter (shelter)'' at Sec. 24.2(a) to further assist
Agencies in making a determination of whether a person residing in a
shelter can be considered displaced.
Dwelling
The FHWA proposes to delete the term ``non-housekeeping unit'' from
this definition as it is a term that is not defined elsewhere in the
regulation and will not enhance an Agency's ability to implement the
regulation. The FHWA also proposes to modify the definition of ``other
residential units'' in this definition to include clarification that
residential units that may seem to be non-standard dwellings, but that
meet minimum Uniform Act requirements and local codes for residential
occupancy as a dwelling, such as motel rooms, must be considered
``dwellings.''
Federal Down Payment Assistance
Some Federal programs provide some financial assistance to
homebuyers to purchase a dwelling. These programs provide funds to an
individual who will be buying a dwelling through an arm's length market
transaction. The FHWA has responded to several questions about whether
the use of Federal down payment assistance in purchasing a dwelling
would trigger Uniform Act requirements. The FHWA is proposing to add a
new definition of Federal down payment assistance to clarify that
individuals using only Federal down payment assistance to purchase a
home as their residence would not be considered users of Federal
financial assistance for the Uniform Act as it is defined in Sec.
24.2(a). To supplement this proposed change, this proposed rule also
includes a new appendix item that provides further clarification and
explanation on the use of Federal down payment assistance and Uniform
Act applicability.
Federal Financial Assistance
Federal down payment assistance provided to a private individual to
purchase a residence is Federal financial assistance, as defined by the
Uniform Act. It results in an acquisition-
[[Page 69470]]
based displacement under the Uniform Act, however, only when the
purpose of the acquisition is to advance a Federal project or program
designed to benefit the public as a whole, such as highways, hospitals,
and other public works projects. The FHWA believes that the purchase of
a dwelling using Federal down payment assistance, standing alone, does
not constitute an acquisition as contemplated by the Uniform Act.
Therefore, those who may relocate as a result of an acquisition
funded in part with down payment assistance are not displaced persons
within the meaning of the Uniform Act. The Federal Government's
interest is only that the property would serve as the purchaser's
dwelling and that it meets general criteria including those related to
habitability. The lack of a conscious governmental decision requiring
that a selected or specific property be acquired to advance a program
or project demonstrates that the nature of the acquisition utilizing
down payment assistance funds is nothing more than a person purchasing
a dwelling with limited Federal financial assistance.
The FHWA also proposes to add a reference to low income housing tax
credit (LIHTC) to this definition. Over the last several years, the
FHWA has received numerous questions about the use of LIHTCs and
whether they are Federal financial assistance as defined in this rule.
The LIHTC is described by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
as a program ``. . . established as part of the Tax Reform Act of 1986
and is commonly referred to as section 42, the applicable section of
the Internal Revenue Code. The LIHTC program provides tax incentives to
encourage individual and corporate investors to invest in the
development, acquisition, and rehabilitation of affordable rental
housing. The LIHTC is an indirect Federal subsidy that finances low-
income housing. This allows investors to claim tax credits on their
Federal income tax returns. The tax credit is calculated as a
percentage of costs incurred in developing the affordable housing
property, and is claimed annually over a 10-year period. Some investors
may garner additional tax benefits by making LIHTC investments.'' \1\
Given the nature of these tax credits and because they are not a grant,
loan, or contribution provided by the United States, FHWA does not
believe that LIHTC is Federal financial assistance as it is defined in
Sec. 24.2(a) and therefore is not subject to Uniform Act requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.occ.gov/topics/community-affairs/publications/insights/insights-low-income-housing-tax-credits.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recipient
The proposed rule would add a new definition for the term
``recipient.'' The term would mean the party that is the direct
recipient of Federal program funds, is not a Federal Agency and is
accountable to the Federal funding Agency for the use of the funds and
for compliance with applicable Federal requirements. This NPRM proposes
to emphasize that the recipient remains responsible for ensuring
compliance with Federal requirements when the recipient provides funds
to a subrecipient.
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage
A home equity conversion mortgage (HECM) is the Federal Housing
Administration's mortgage program that enables seniors to withdraw some
of the equity in their homes. The HECMs are commonly referred to as
reverse mortgages. Agencies can face unique challenges when displacing
a homeowner whose dwelling has a HECM.
The FHWA proposes to add a definition for HECM to the regulation
given that these mortgages are being encountered more frequently on
federally-funded projects. The definition identifies a HECM as a valid
lien and describes common terms and conditions of the HECM. To
supplement the proposed definition, FHWA proposes to add a new
provision at Sec. 24.401(e), which would clarify how HECM expenses are
an eligible replacement housing payment incidental expense and a new
section to appendix A, Section 24.401(e), with examples of types of
HECMs and sample calculations, both of which will be discussed later in
this NPRM.
Household Income
Agencies have pointed out an inconsistency between the definition
of ``household income'' and the corresponding appendix text. The
regulation can be incorrectly read to state that a fulltime student
must be under the age of 18. The FHWA proposes to clarify that income
from ``dependent children under 18 or fulltime students'' is excluded
from the household income calculation. For clarification, FHWA also
proposes to adopt the standard definition of a fulltime student in
accordance with the requirements set by the Working Families Tax Relief
Act of 2004, Public Law 108-311. Under this regulation's revised
definition, a fulltime student must be under the age of 24 and a
fulltime student for at least 5 months of the year.
Initiation of Negotiations
At the request of Federal Agencies that have programs or projects
that require rehabilitation or demolition of real property but do not
necessarily require the acquisition of the real property, FHWA proposes
to add ``rehabilitate and demolish'' real property to the definition.
The FHWA agrees that some Federal Agency programs that rehabilitate or
demolish establish eligibility criteria on a basis other than the
initiation of negotiations. In most instances, a displaced person's
eligibility for benefits is established at the initiation of
negotiations. However, in some instances a person's eligibility may be
established prior to the initiation of negotiations. This addition will
serve to clarify that when persons move, or move their personal
property from the real property as a result of a written notice of
intent to rehabilitate or demolish, or move after that notice but
before delivery of the initial written offer, initiation of
negotiations means the actual move of the person from the property.
These changes also allow Agencies to tailor their notices and more
clearly describe when a displaced person may be eligible for benefits
while ensuring that Federal funds are used in a manner that prevents
waste, fraud and abuse.
The Federal Agencies that often acquire property as voluntary
acquisitions, as defined in this regulation, have noted the current
regulation provides that tenants are immediately eligible for
relocation assistance at the initiation of negotiations for a property
that the Agency may not ultimately be able to acquire through a
voluntary and amicable agreement. Furthermore, in many cases, until an
Agency approves or administratively accepts a conditional sale or
purchase agreement, there is no obligation on the Agency's part to
consummate or finalize a sale.
To address these concerns, FHWA proposes to modify the definition
of ``initiation of negotiations'' by changing the timing for
establishing the eligibility of tenants affected by an option to
purchase, conditional sales, or purchase agreement as the result of the
voluntary acquisition of real property described in Sec. 24.101(b)(1)-
(5). Under the current rule, tenants are eligible for relocation
assistance at the initiation of negotiations. The new rule provides,
when an option is being acquired, eligibility of tenants for relocation
assistance occurs when there is a binding agreement for sale between
the
[[Page 69471]]
buyer and seller. An option to purchase, conditional sale, or purchase
agreement is not considered a binding agreement to purchase real
property. See appendix A, Section 24.2(a) Initiation of negotiations,
Tenants, (iv). The use of the term ``binding'' in the context of this
regulation refers to an agreement in which both parties have formally
accepted the conditions contained in the agreement, have documented
their agreement in writing, and with their signature acknowledged their
acceptance. It is a legally enforceable document in which the property
owner agrees to sell certain property rights necessary for a project
and the Agency agrees to that purchase for a specified consideration.
Because State laws may require differing elements in an agreement
in order to make it a legally binding contract under State law each
recipient or displacing agency should consult with their legal counsel
and develop required documents and documentation necessary to make a
sufficiency determination under State law.
The FHWA also proposes including a similar change to the discussion
in the appendix that describes the timing of eligibility for Uniform
Act assistance, or trigger date, for a tenant. The FHWA believes that
this change, from initial offer to acquire to acceptance of a binding
written agreement, will not reduce benefits or assistance to tenants
because it is coupled with the requirements for a clearly written
notification to the tenant of the process being followed, an
explanation of the trigger date of their eligibility, and for providing
a notification that negotiations have failed to result in a binding
agreement.
Owner's Representative
Several Federal Agencies believe that the current regulation
requires that notifications and documents be given only to the property
owner and thus is unnecessarily restrictive. The FHWA agrees that such
a requirement, or interpretation, is too restrictive and believes that
allowing either an owner or a designated representative to receive a
written offer in no way diminishes a property owner's rights. The FHWA
proposes to add a new definition for owner's designated representative.
Small Business
The FHWA has often been asked for guidance on the question of
whether sites occupied solely by outdoor advertising signs, displays,
or devices qualify for benefits under Sec. Sec. 24.303 and 24.304.
The FHWA proposes to clarify that sites occupied solely by outdoor
advertising signs, displays, or devices do not qualify for benefits
under Sec. 24.303 or Sec. 24.304, by adding a reference to Sec.
24.303 in the last sentence of the definition. The FHWA believes that
outdoor advertising signs which are eligible for relocation benefits
under this part are to be treated as personal property and, as such,
would not be eligible for benefits under Sec. 24.303. The FHWA
continues to believe that Sec. 24.301 provides owners of sites
occupied solely by outdoor advertising signs, displays, or devices with
sufficient allowances for the relocation of their personal property.
Subrecipient
This NPRM proposes to define ``subrecipient'' as a governmental
Agency or other legal entity that enters into an agreement with a
recipient to carry out part or all of the activity funded by Federal
program grant funds.
There are instances when recipients enter into subgrant agreements
with cities, towns, and other governmental entities, collectively often
referred to as ``local public Agencies'' or ``local transportation
Agencies,'' under which those public Agencies administer projects and
construct facilities. This NPRM makes a number of changes to emphasize
that the recipient remains responsible for ensuring compliance with
Federal funding Agency requirements when the recipient delegates
project activities to subrecipients, including public Agencies.
Temporary, Daily, or Emergency Shelter
The FHWA has responded to a number of questions about temporary,
daily, or emergency shelters, and whether persons in occupancy at these
shelters are displaced persons. The FHWA proposes to add a new
definition of the term ``shelter.'' The definition of shelter clarifies
that emergency, temporary, or daily shelters are typically intended as
overnight, short term, short duration accommodation. Persons who are
occupying a shelter that only allows overnight stays, requires the
occupants to remove their personal property and themselves from the
premises on a daily basis, and offers no guarantee of reentry in the
evening, typically would not meet the definition of displaced persons.
The FHWA believes that each relocation is unique and requires a
fact-based determination in each instance. Those acquiring a shelter
should consider factors including, but not limited to, whether the
shelter has specific rules as to who can occupy or use the shelter and
whether prolonged and continuous occupancy is allowed. Also, there may
be certain shelter occupants who may be considered displaced persons
due to extenuating reasons such as employment by the shelter.
Utility Facility
The FHWA has received a number of questions regarding the
interpretation of the phrase ``any transportation system'' as used in
this definition. The common concern is that ``any transportation
system'' can be viewed to mean a highway system or other similar
transportation system. The FHWA believes that the current phrase can
lead to an overly expansive view of what constitutes a utility facility
for purposes of this regulation. The FHWA is proposing to replace the
current definition of ``utility facility'' with the definition of
``utility facility'' found at 23 CFR 645.207. The proposed new
definition will address the questions raised by offering a clear and
consistent definition, along with several examples of utilities.
Section 24.2(b) Acronyms
The Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (BCIS) has been
renamed the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS). The UA
has been added as an acronym for the Uniform Relocation Assistance and
Real Property Acquisition Policy of 1970. The FHWA proposes to make
these changes in the acronym listing of this paragraph, remove numbers,
and alphabetize the acronyms.
Section 24.5 Manner of Notices
The current regulation requires that Agencies personally serve or
send notices to property owners or occupants by certified or registered
first-class mail, return receipt requested. The FHWA proposes providing
additional flexibility in the types of notices that can be used to
communicate with property owners. The first type of flexibility we are
proposing is to allow trackable delivery and signed receipts via
companies other than the United States Postal Service that provide the
same function as certified mail with return receipts.
The FHWA also believes that delivery of notices by digital or
electronic means can provide Agencies and property owners with an
optional communications method that can streamline the notice process
while not reducing any benefits or protections to property owners.
Delivery of notices by digital or electronic means must be done in a
manner that will provide verification of delivery and receipt and
[[Page 69472]]
acceptance confirmation similar to the current standard of certified
mail. The proposed regulation provides several minimum requirements
that an Agency must follow if they choose to allow electronic notices
and electronic signatures.
The FHWA proposes to require that property owners or occupants must
voluntarily elect to receive notices by electronic means. The FHWA
continues to believe that there is no substitute for face-to-face
meetings with property owners but also recognizes that for a variety of
reasons face-to-face meetings may not be practical. Agencies may not
determine in advance to use this proposed flexibility for all property
owners on a project or program-wide basis. The acquisition of a
person's real property and or displacement from their real property
usually requires an Agency to make every effort to make personal
contact.
The FHWA proposes to add a new appendix item that further explains
FHWA's position regarding when the use of electronic notifications may
be appropriate and provides several examples of when it may and may not
be a good option. The new appendix item describes additional safeguards
that should be included as part of an Agency's process. It also
reemphasizes that, should an owner or occupant elect not to receive
offers and notices by electronic means, an Agency must accommodate that
property owner or occupant by using certified first class mail, return
receipt requested, or by personally serving notices. The FHWA is also
proposing a new addition to this section, paragraph (d), which provides
property owners with the flexibility to designate a representative to
receive required notices and documents. This proposal requires that a
designation of an owner's representative must be in writing and must
identify any notices or documents that the designated representative is
not authorized to receive. A properly designated property owner's
representative would be able to receive required notices and
information including acquisition and relocation information and/or the
written offer of the property's fair market value on behalf of the
owner.
Section 24.9(c) Recordkeeping and Reports
Section 1521(d) of MAP-21 requires that each Federal Agency that
has programs or projects requiring the acquisition of real property or
causing a displacement from real property subject to the provisions of
the Uniform Act provide an annual summary report to the Lead Agency
that describes the activities conducted by the Federal Agency. The FHWA
proposes to modify the reporting requirements in this paragraph
accordingly by changing the first sentence requiring that a Federal
Agency submit a report of its real property acquisition and
displacement activities to the Federal Agency funding the project from
``if required'' to ``as required.'' We also propose to delete the
second sentence requiring the reports not more than every 3 years and
unless the Federal Agency shows good cause for requiring the report.
The last sentence in this paragraph is deleted and further discussion
of reporting requirements has been added in the appendix.
The FHWA proposes to add new language in this paragraph to detail
the annual reporting requirements that Section 1521 of MAP-21
introduced. The proposed paragraph will discuss the new annual
reporting requirements for each Federal Agency subject to the Uniform
Act. It includes a narrative on the overarching program and/or related
activities, as well as specific program metrics, including the number
of acquisitions, relocations, condemnations, total dollars spent, and
use of housing of last resort. The report would be due by November 15th
of each year.
The FHWA also proposes to add a new appendix section explaining
that FHWA realizes that not all Federal Agencies subject to this
reporting requirement currently have the ability to collect all
information requested on the reporting form. However, FHWA envisions
that the Federal Agencies may elect to provide a narrative report
focusing on their respective efforts to improve and enhance delivery of
Uniform Act benefits and services. Narrative report information would
include training offered, reviews conducted, or technical assistance
provided to recipients.
Section 24.10(g) Determination and Notification After Appeal
The FHWA proposes to revise the language in the last sentence of
this paragraph to clarify that the determination on appeal is the
Agency's final decision. The language on content and procedures for the
written determination on appeal, including informing a displaced person
of the right to judicial review of the final decision, is not
substantively changed. The proposed changes are intended to more
clearly describe the authorities and rights created by the appeals
process and to more directly provide information on the process to
follow should a determination on the appeal be desired.
Section 24.11 Adjustments of Payments
The FHWA proposes to add a new section to the regulation to
implement the new provision in MAP-21 at Section 1521(d)(2) which
provides that if the head of the Lead Agency determines that the cost
of living, inflation, or other factors indicate the relocation
assistance benefits should be adjusted to meet the policy objectives of
the Uniform Act, that the head of the Lead Agency may adjust: The
amounts of relocation benefits for reestablishment expenses-
nonresidential moves; fixed payment for moving expenses-nonresidential
moves; replacement housing payment for 90-day homeowner-occupants; and
replacement housing payment for 90-day tenants and certain others.
Prior to MAP-21, FHWA led research projects to examine whether
inflation had an effect on relocation benefit levels. The research
concluded that since publication of the final rule in 1989, the benefit
levels were not able to meet the policy objectives of the Act due to
inflation.
The FHWA's research focused primarily on the use of indexes as a
tool to evaluate inflation's effects on Uniform Act benefits. In
considering the most appropriate indexes, several Consumer Price
Indexes appeared to provide a suite of goods and services that are
related to housing and other costs associated with displacement.
The FHWA is proposing to evaluate inflation's effect on the
benefits for reestablishment for nonresidential moves, fixed payment
for non-residential moving expenses, replacement housing payments for
90-day owners, and rental assistance payments for 90-day tenants and
certain others by using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) Seasonally Adjusted.\2\ Guidelines FHWA used in
choosing this index:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.t01.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The CPI-U is a measure of the average change in consumer prices
over time for a fixed market basket of goods and services, including
food, clothing, shelter, fuels, transportation, and charges for medical
and dental services and drugs. The all urban consumers group represents
about 87 percent of the total U.S. population. It is based on the
expenditures of almost all residents of urban or metropolitan areas,
including professionals, the self-employed, the poor, the unemployed
and retired persons as well as urban wage earners and clerical workers.
Bureau of Labor
[[Page 69473]]
Statistics (BLS) publishes a CPI-U report monthly and releases an
Annual Report at the end of each fiscal year.
2. It is available on a monthly basis, free of charge and can be
expected to be tabulated regularly into the future. The CPI-U is widely
used by other Federal Agencies including FEMA and HUD.
3. The CPI-U is used by other Federal Agencies for inflation
adjustment indexing. The CPI-U is produced by the BLS and is subject to
verification and oversight.
Additional information on consumer price indexes can be found on
the Bureau of Labor Statistics website.\3\ The FHWA is proposing that
this determination of whether an increase in benefit amounts is
necessary would be made no more frequently than every 5 years. If the
FHWA determines that the cost of living, inflation, or other factors
indicate the relocation assistance benefits should be adjusted to meet
the policy objectives of the Uniform Act, FHWA will issue a Federal
Register notice of that determination and the specific adjustments of
the relocation assistance benefits that are being made. The FHWA
believes Federal and State partners will benefit from several years of
stable and predictable regulatory benefit amounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://www.bls.gov/cpi/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FHWA proposes a new item in appendix A, Section 24.11, which
provides a sample calculation showing how FHWA will determine whether
future adjustments to these benefit amounts should be proposed. In
addition to a temporal limit on adjustments, FHWA attempted to identify
an inflationary impact threshold or other regulatory condition
indicating when an adjustment should be proposed. The FHWA recognizes
that prior to MAP-21, relocation benefit amounts had not been adjusted
for several decades. The FHWA welcomes comments on use of the CPI-U
Seasonally Adjusted Index, and suggestions on the inflationary impact
threshold that would warrant adjustments to the maximum benefit
amounts.
Subpart B--Real Property Acquisition
The FHWA intends for the terms ``fair market value'' and ``market
value,'' which may be more typical terminology in private transactions,
to be synonymous in this regulation. In order to make this
clarification, FHWA proposes to modify the appendix item for subpart B
by deleting ``may be'' and inserting ``are'' to indicate that ``fair
market value'' (as used throughout this subpart) and ``market value''
are the same.
Section 24.101(a)(2) Applicability of Acquisition Requirements
Section 24.101(a)(2) currently includes the same reference twice,
which may create confusion. The FHWA is proposing to modify this
paragraph by deleting the first reference to 49 CFR 24.2(a) and by
editing the second reference at the end of the paragraph to cross
reference Sec. 24.2(a). The FHWA believes that making a single
reference at the end of the paragraph to this definition accurately
points readers to the requisite section and eliminates the need for
redundant references in this paragraph.
Section 24.101(b)(1)(i) Applicability of Acquisition Requirements
Some Federal Agencies reported that the terms ``site'' and
``geographic area'' were close enough in meaning that they caused
confusion in the second sentence. They stated that the term ``site''
did not accurately describe the type of project needs encountered in
delivering their programs and recommended changing the term to
property. The FHWA proposes to strike the term ``site(s)'' and insert
``property or properties.'' The FHWA believes the proposed change
accurately reflects the types of acquisitions that Agencies may make
and this requirement's goal of ensuring that voluntary acquisitions are
truly independent of site and corridor.
The FHWA also proposes to revise the appendix item for this
paragraph. A Federal Agency suggested that the appendix to this
paragraph be changed to further define the term ``general geographic
area.'' Some Federal Agencies expressed concern that the appendix
definition was too restrictive for their programs or some projects. The
FHWA reviewed the NPRM and final rule comments and was unable to
determine why the term ``geographic area'' was inserted into the
appendix during the 2005 rulemaking. That rulemaking stated that is was
``not to be construed to be a small limited area.'' The FHWA proposes
to delete that clause and insert a sentence that describes a ``general
geographic area'' as any of several properties that are not necessarily
contiguous or are not limited to a specific group of properties.
Section 24.101(b)(1)(iii)-(iv) and (b)(2)(i)-(ii) Applicability of
Acquisition Requirements
Several Federal Agencies believe that the current language of these
paragraphs requiring that notification be given only to the property
owner is unnecessarily restrictive. The FHWA agrees and believes that
allowing either an owner or a designated representative to receive a
written offer in no way diminishes a property owner's rights. The FHWA
proposes to make minor revisions to the language of these parts by
adding allowances for an owner's properly designated representative to
be able to receive acquisition and relocation information and/or the
written offer of the property's fair market value on behalf of the
owner. The FHWA is proposing that such designation must be in writing.
Section 24.101(b)(2)(iii) Applicability of Acquisition Requirements
Some Agencies possess the power of eminent domain but do not use it
for specific projects. The FHWA has received questions about the
interpretation of this paragraph from several Agencies. Some Agencies
have interpreted this paragraph to mean that if an Agency possesses the
power of eminent domain but will not use it on the project, the Agency
would not be able to use the voluntary acquisition authority for its
project or program. The FHWA proposes to clarify this paragraph's
applicability by simplifying the language so it clearly states that if
eminent domain will not be used, then an Agency may use the voluntary
acquisition requirements provided by this section. The FHWA believes
that whether an Agency has such authority is not the relevant issue in
determining whether this section's requirements are being met. The
relevant issue is that eminent domain may not be used as part of the
offer and negotiation to acquire property needed for the project.
Also, FHWA proposes adding language in appendix A that recognizes
some Agencies may have an unanticipated need that may require use of
eminent domain authority. The FHWA views the clear purpose of the
provision as ensuring that voluntary acquisitions are not simply
preludes to an eminent domain acquisition, should voluntary acquisition
negotiations fail.
The FHWA is proposing a new paragraph to allow the Federal funding
Agency to permit acquisitions by eminent domain in extraordinary
circumstances when negotiations were initially undertaken under the
requirements for voluntary acquisitions. The FHWA further recognizes
that property owners subjected to such acquisitions should be assured
that they are being afforded all protections and eligibilities of this
regulation. Therefore, FHWA is proposing that, should an Agency
carrying out a project advanced as a voluntary acquisition find an
[[Page 69474]]
extraordinary instance requiring the use of eminent domain, it must
request a waiver of regulations, under authority of Sec. 24.7 of this
part, from the Federal Agency funding the project. This proposed
addition is in response to requests from Agencies that often acquire
property as voluntary acquisitions. The FHWA is interested in
commenters' opinions on whether the use of a waiver of regulations
should be required, whether criteria necessary for a waiver should be
included in this regulation, what that criteria should include, and
whether and how to define the exceptional circumstances under which
eminent domain authority may be permitted under this section.
Section 24.101(d) Federally Assisted Projects
The FHWA is proposing to add a new paragraph to respond to
questions it has received about the applicability of Uniform Act
requirements to properties that were acquired in advance of a
federally-funded project. The FHWA recognizes that Agencies may acquire
or own previously acquired properties for several reasons. This
proposed change will clarify that if such a property were acquired with
the intent of including it in a planned, anticipated, or designated
federally-funded program or project, then the acquisition would be
subject to the requirements in subparts B-F, as applicable. This
proposed change would incorporate guidance that FHWA has included in
its Frequently Asked Questions for 49 CFR part 24, see current question
number five.\4\ This proposed change does not create a new requirement
but is proposed to ensure that those Agencies acquiring properties
which may be incorporated into a planned, anticipated, or designated
federally assisted program or project understand when, why, and how the
requirements of this rule apply. The FHWA is interested in commenters'
suggestions on how to further clarify when, how, and why the
requirements of this rule apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See current question number five at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/policy_guidance/uafaqs.cfm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 24.102 Basic Acquisition Policies
The term ``waiver valuation'' in this regulation and the more
commonly used term ``appraisal waiver'' means the valuation process
used and the product produced, when the Agency determines that an
appraisal is not required, pursuant to Sec. 24.102(c)(2). In 1989,
FHWA first adopted a rule on appraisal waivers. Under that rule,
Agencies were allowed to decide when an appraisal was not needed if
they first determined that the valuation was uncomplicated and the
property was ``low-value.'' Over the years, we have used the terms
``low-value'' and ``uncomplicated'' interchangeably. The FHWA is
proposing to eliminate the term ``low-value'' since this proposed
regulation now defines the range of values to which a waiver can be
applied. The rule initially defined uncomplicated as being $2,500 or
less.
Beginning in 1995, FHWA approved, for its recipients, increases for
the uncomplicated definition of up to $10,000 on a State-by-State
basis. Since 2002, some agencies have received approval to use a
$25,000 uncomplicated threshold when applying the appraisal waiver
provisions of the 1989 rule. In January 2005, FHWA issued an updated
rule that acknowledged the trend toward increasing the threshold for
uncomplicated acquisitions. The current rule contained in Sec.
24.102(c)(2)(ii) provides Agencies the latitude to define
``uncomplicated'' as being up to $10,000. It also permits an increase
in the amount up to $25,000 provided the Federal funding Agency
approves, and the Agency agrees to provide the property owner the
option to request an appraisal.
Appraisal waiver requirements have proven to be an effective tool
in containing costs and in fostering accelerated project delivery while
protecting the rights of property owners under the Uniform Act. A
national survey and various process reviews have confirmed this to be
the case.\5\ The FHWA is proposing changes to Sec. 24.102(c)(2)(ii)(C)
waiver valuation requirements, as described in the following three
sections, in recognition of the positive experience using them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The FHWA has developed, collected or reviewed several
supporting documents. They include an FHWA national survey of waiver
valuation in 2005, results from 4 SDOTs which carried out waiver
valuation pilot projects and a Colorado study of Waivers. FHWA is
also embarking on a new national survey of waiver valuations in
support of this NPRM effort.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 24.102(b) Notice to Owner
The FHWA is proposing to add a new appendix item which states that
when condominiums and other types of housing with common areas or
community property are being acquired, an Agency should determine who
must receive notification, which could include a condo or homeowner's
board, a designated representative, or all individual owners when
common or community property is being acquired for the project.
Section 24.102(c)(2) Appraisal Waiver
The FHWA proposes to modify the appendix for this paragraph to
further explain the term ``uncomplicated acquisitions.'' The FHWA also
proposes to modify the regulation to emphasize that the person making
the determination to use the waiver valuation must have sufficient
understanding of the local markets, and should have knowledge of
appraisal principles and use of valuations to be able to determine
whether the valuation problem is uncomplicated. The FHWA also proposes
to add to this appendix that Agencies should put procedures in place to
ensure that waiver valuations are accurate and are consistent with the
unit values as determined by appraisals and appraisal reviews. The FHWA
proposes to strike the term ``sophisticated'' and insert ``complex'' in
the appendix to more accurately reflect the intent that the waiver
valuation frees up appraisers to do more complicated appraisal work.
The FHWA also proposes inserting in the appendix that those who prepare
waiver valuations have an understanding of appraisal principles and use
of appraisals so as not to imply that they must be appraisers. The FHWA
is also proposing to add a reference to the appendix item for this
paragraph.
Section 24.102(c)(2)(ii)(A) Appraisal Waiver
The FHWA has received questions about whether and how a licensed
appraiser could develop a waiver valuation which would be consistent
with professional standards and licensure requirements. The appendix
states that waiver valuations are not appraisals under this rule. There
is no national consensus or standard about the implications of having a
licensed or certified appraiser prepare a waiver valuation. In some
States, when a State-certified or licensed appraiser estimates a value,
they may be obligated under the licensing requirements of their State
to perform an appraisal even if the client requests something less than
an appraisal. Performing appraisals rather than waiver valuations in
situations where the valuation problem is not complex can cause
unnecessary delay and adds unnecessary cost to an acquisition. However,
some States have laws that interpret waiver valuations as appraisals,
and those States only permit appraisers to perform appraisals, which
effectively nullifies the benefits of the waiver valuation. In order to
encourage those States to take advantage of the
[[Page 69475]]
streamlining efficiencies offered by the waiver valuation, and in an
effort to avoid the increased time and increased cost associated with
providing fully documented appraisals, FHWA proposes to incorporate a
jurisdictional exception that preserves the original intent of the
waiver valuation process while offering appraisers that wish to perform
this type of work for Agencies an avenue for accepting waiver valuation
assignments while remaining compliant with the provisions of the State
appraisal licensing enforcement Agencies. The FHWA also recognizes that
some States prefer to have waiver valuations reviewed even though this
regulation does not require a formal review of waiver valuations.
Appraisers can accept these types of assignments as well with this
proposed language. The FHWA is proposing to add language to this
paragraph that would preclude an appraiser from complying with
standards rules 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the ``Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice'' (USPAP), as promulgated by the
Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation.\6\ This proposed
modification would afford those States a solution that preserves the
intent of this regulation to streamline processes and provide
programmatic efficiencies. This proposal would provide States and
licensed or certified appraisers with clarity about the requirements of
this regulation and the implications of developing a waiver valuation.
The FHWA invites comments or suggestions on this proposed change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ https://www.uspap.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 24.102(c)(2)(ii)(D) Appraisal Waiver Thereof, and Invitation to
Owner
The FHWA proposes to add a new paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(D) to this
section to institute a three-tiered approach to waiver valuations. The
proposed new third tier of waiver valuations would be a $50,000 waiver
value ceiling available under clearly defined circumstances. This
change is presented as an option that Federal funding Agencies and
recipients may consider using on a project-by-project basis. In
proposing this change, it is important to note that additional
safeguards have been created to ensure the full protection of property
owners' rights and interests. The safeguards include the use of the
third tier being limited to Federal funding Agencies and recipients,
with no delegation to subrecipients, and that approvals may be granted
on a project-by-project basis with requests made in writing and when
the six pieces of information required in this paragraph are provided.
The required information is: The anticipated benefits of raising the
ceiling, administrative/managerial oversight mechanisms, names and
credentials of those performing the waiver valuations, quality controls
to be used, performance metrics with quarterly reports, and a close-out
report measuring cost/time benefits and lessons learned. The FHWA
believes that the proposed required information provides a set of
requirements that ensure use of waiver valuations above $25,000 would
be carefully considered and used in appropriate circumstances with
specific safeguards. An important safeguard of this proposal is the
requirement that the Agency offer an appraisal. The procedures
described in this paragraph may not be used if the property owner
elects to have the Agency appraise the property.
Section 24.102(n)(1) Conflict of Interest
The FHWA proposes to change the word ``making'' to ``developing''
an appraisal in this paragraph to more accurately describe the activity
of preparing an appraisal or waiver valuation. This paragraph ensures
that the valuation process continues to operate in an independent
manner by prohibiting the compensation for an appraisal or waiver
valuation to be based on the amount of the valuation estimate.
Section 24.102(n)(3) Conflict of Interest
The current regulation allows single agents who valued properties
to also perform negotiations on properties that were valued at less
than $10,000. The FHWA has conducted reviews that provided no
indication that the use of the single agent created a problem to
administer, or led to property owners receiving offers that were less
than the Agency's best estimate of just compensation. The FHWA's
experience is that the $10,000 limit has been managed effectively and
property owners' rights and protections have not been diminished by
this process.
The FHWA now proposes to raise the limit to $25,000 with a two-
tiered approach. Under the proposed changes, the single agent concept
could still be applied with waiver valuations up to the $10,000 amount.
The FHWA is proposing that acquisitions estimated to be greater than
$10,000 but less than $25,000 would require an appraisal, and review of
the appraisal, if the valuation preparer is also acting as the
negotiator.
The FHWA also proposes that the Agency or recipient desiring to
exercise this option for acquisitions estimated to be greater than
$10,000 but less than $25,000 on a project or a program basis must
submit a request in writing to the Federal funding Agency. The FHWA
proposes to require that Agencies and recipients that implement this
provision have a separate and distinct quality control process in place
and written procedures which include an outline of the quality control
process approved by the Federal funding agency. Federal Agencies may
elect whether to use this single agent tool and to establish guidance
for its use. The proposed increase to a $25,000 limit may be extended
to a subrecipient when the Agency or recipient determines and documents
that the subrecipient has a separate and distinct quality control
process in place and outlined in written procedures approved by the
Federal funding agency. The FHWA is also proposing to add a new
appendix item for this paragraph, which explains the objective of using
the conflict of interest provisions, the purpose of the three parts of
this provision, and the new third tier of the conflict of interest
provisions.
Section 24.103(a) Appraisal Requirements
The FHWA proposes to delete date and publication information from
the description of ``Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
Practice (USPAP).'' The FHWA believes this change is needed because the
USPAP has been updated several times since the publication of the
current rule and may be updated several times over the next several
years. The FHWA also proposes to add new updated web links for the
USPAP in this paragraph. The FHWA will monitor future publications of
USPAP to ensure that those publications continue to be consistent with
the requirements of this rule and will make technical corrections when
necessary.
We also propose to modify the appendix item for this part by
changing ``Standard Rules 1, 2, 3'' by striking the word ``Rules'' to
``Standards 1, 2, 3 & 4'' and inserting ``2018-2019 edition of the''
before ``USPAP'' to ensure consistency with USPAP. The FHWA also
proposes to delete ``Supplemental Standard Rule'' as it is no longer
contained in USPAP.
Subpart C--General Relocation Requirements
Section 24.202(a) Persons Required To Move Temporarily
Several Agencies have questioned whether persons temporarily
displaced should receive benefits because they are
[[Page 69476]]
identified in the rule as persons not displaced. The FHWA is proposing
to revise the definition of displaced persons and to specify the
services and assistance that must be provided to a temporarily
displaced person in this part. The FHWA also proposes to incorporate
the majority of the appendix discussion on minimum Agency actions for
temporary displacements into this section of the regulation. Several
Federal Agencies noted that the proposed reorganization will provide
their recipients with a more easily understood and concise discussion
of minimum standards and actions required when temporarily displacing a
person.
The FHWA believes that the proposed change to the regulation aligns
the regulation more closely with the language and requirements of
Section 4621 of the Uniform Act. These requirements include a
recognition that relocation assistance policies must provide for fair,
uniform, and equitable treatment of all affected persons. In addition,
FHWA believes that providing services and assistance to temporarily
displaced persons is necessary to minimize the impacts of displacement
and to maintain the economic and social well-being of communities. The
proposed changes require that persons displaced from their dwelling or
business be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses associated with the
move and that temporary relocations may not last more than 12 months.
The FHWA believes that the language in the current appendix that limits
temporary relocations to no more than 12 months reflects a standard
that some recipients were not aware of due to its placement in the
appendix. The FHWA believes that more clearly establishing this
standard as a regulatory requirement by incorporating it into the
regulatory text will provide recipients with a more easily understood
requirement for persons who are temporarily displaced. The new proposal
also requires that appropriate advisory services be provided. The FHWA
is not proposing to develop an all-inclusive list of actual and
reasonable out-of-pocket expenses because each temporary relocation is
unique and fact-specific. However, reimbursement should be provided for
those additional costs necessitated by the temporary move, including
lodging, cost of meals when temporary lodgings do not include kitchen
facilities, and cost to move personal property when necessary.
The FHWA is also proposing to add an item to this part to
explicitly state that aliens not lawfully present in the United States
are not eligible for temporary relocation assistance unless such denial
of benefits would create an extremely unusual hardship to a designated
family member in accordance with Sec. 24.208(g). This clarification is
not an additional prohibition or change to the regulation. The addition
is intended to assist Agencies that frequently do temporary relocations
by ensuring that the existing provisions and prohibitions are easily
understood.
Section 24.203(a) General Information Notice
Several Agencies have indicated that the term ``scheduled'' in this
paragraph does not have a clear meaning in the context of their
programs. These Agencies believe that ``may be displaced'' more closely
fits the processes they follow since a large part of their programs are
voluntary acquisitions and ``scheduled to be displaced'' could be
interpreted to mean a decision to displace had been made regardless of
the outcome of the negotiation process. The FHWA believes that the
proposed change would fit both voluntary and eminent domain
acquisitions and subsequent relocations. This proposed change would
also promote consistency between this paragraph and the following
paragraph since the phrase ``may be displaced'' is already used in
Sec. 24.203(a)(1).
Section 24.203(b) Notice of Relocation Eligibility and Section
24.203(d) Notice of Intent To Acquire
One Agency has requested that the existing ``Notice of intent to
acquire'' in Sec. 24.203(d) be revised to eliminate confusion and to
expand its applicability to rehabilitation and demolition activities
where no acquisition is involved. They propose to replace it with an
``Advanced Notice of relocation eligibility'' which would serve to
establish relocation eligibility.
Rather than rewriting Sec. 24.203(d) and eliminating Sec.
24.203(b) in the regulation, FHWA proposes to simply rename the
``Notice of intent to acquire'' as ``Notice of intent to acquire,
rehabilitate, or demolish'' to cover the situations unique to the
Agency and similar programs when an acquisition does not occur but
persons are required to move for some period of time. As a result,
several other parts of the regulation will be modified to reflect this
new title. Specifically, FHWA proposes to reword the definition of a
``displaced person'' at Sec. 24.2(a) and the definition of
``initiation of negotiations'' at Sec. 24.2(a) wherever this it
appears. The FHWA also proposes to add ``rehabilitate or demolish''
wherever ``notice of intent to acquire'' occurs in Sec. 24.203(b) and
(d). In Sec. 24.203(d), FHWA proposes to also strike ``acquired'' from
``property acquired'' to again emphasize that the Notice of Intent to
Acquire clearly includes rehabilitation and demolition projects.
The FHWA believes that renaming the notice of intent to acquire to
include rehabilitation and demolition clearly conveys the many types of
displacements to which this notice is intended to apply. The FHWA
believes that this is the simplest solution to tailor applicability of
this notice to all programs.
Section 24.204(a) Introductory Text Through (a)(1) Availability of
Comparable Replacement Dwelling Before Displacement
The FHWA has received a number of questions regarding the meaning
of the term ``made available'' in the context of this paragraph's
discussion of comparables. The questions are focused on the general
requirements of this paragraph's language providing direction on the
number of comparables that should be used in the determination process
and is not focused on benefit determination or eligibility. A majority
of practitioners believe that ``made available'' simply requires that
information on the comparable replacement dwellings be provided to a
displaced person. Others believe that the regulation requires that all
comparables be inspected before being used in estimating eligibility.
The FHWA proposes to modify the language in this paragraph to
clearly state that ``made available'' means providing information in
writing on the location of actual comparable replacement dwellings that
were used in the determination process. The regulation continues to
state that three or more comparable replacement dwellings shall be made
available, whenever possible in the determination process. The FHWA
believes that providing information on at least three comparable
replacement dwellings should be the standard practice because it
provides the displaced person with the assurance that the selected
comparable replacement dwellings fairly represent comparable properties
available on the market. The FHWA is also proposing changes to Sec.
24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C) Relocation Planning, Advisory Services, and
Coordination which are discussed in detail below. The FHWA agrees that
an inspection of a comparable dwelling should be made prior to its use
in any eligibility determination. The proposed change requires Agencies
to inform displaced
[[Page 69477]]
persons in writing of the reason(s) a DSS inspection of a comparable
replacement dwelling was not made (in cases where inspections were not
made) and to indicate that, should a displaced person select one of the
comparable dwellings, a replacement housing payment cannot be made
until a DSS inspection is made of that dwelling.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C) Relocation Planning, Advisory Services, and
Coordination
The FHWA proposes to modify the language in this paragraph to
require Agencies to inform displaced persons in writing of the
reason(s) a DSS inspection of a comparable replacement dwelling was not
made (in cases where inspections were not made) and to indicate that,
should a displaced person select one of the comparable dwellings, a
replacement housing payment cannot be made until a DSS inspection is
made of that dwelling.
The FHWA also proposes adding a new item to appendix A, Section
24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C), explaining what constitutes a DSS inspection and a
further discussion of the requirement that an Agency must make full
disclosure and explanation to the displaced person if the comparable
replacement dwelling was not inspected.
It is the position of FHWA that comparable replacement housing must
be inspected whenever possible and that the selected comparable
replacement dwelling should be inspected (e.g., walk through/physical
inspection). The FHWA proposes to add a part in the appendix which
explains that reliance on an exterior visual inspection, or examination
of an MLS listing, does not constitute a full DSS inspection as
required by the regulation in most cases.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(D) Relocation Planning, Advisory Services, and
Coordination
The FHWA is proposing to revise the appendix for this part to
include a reminder that Agencies should ensure that they are
appropriately documenting their efforts to provide comparables and
replacement dwellings which are not in areas of minority concentration.
Section 24.207(f) No Waiver of Relocation Assistance
The FHWA proposes to add a reference to appendix A, Section 24.207,
which further explains the requirements when a displaced person chooses
not to accept some or all of the payments or assistance to which they
are entitled.
Section 24.207(h) Entitlement to Payments-Deductions From Relocation
Payments
To date, the practice of withholding a portion of, or deducting
from, a relocation replacement housing payment to satisfy non-payment
of rent to an Agency, or to satisfy an obligation to any other
creditor, has been clearly prohibited. Because the current prohibition
is only found in Sec. 24.404(a)(6) pertaining to replacement housing
payments, several questions have been raised regarding whether the
withholding prohibition applies to all relocation assistance payments
or only to replacement housing payments. The FHWA proposes to add a new
paragraph to the general requirements for claims for relocation
payments to emphasize that withholdings or deductions may not be made
from any type of relocation payments for non-payment of rent or to
satisfy an obligation to any other creditor. The proposed addition
would also clarify that Agencies must deduct any advanced relocation
payment from the relocation payments to which the displaced person is
otherwise entitled.
Section 24.208(c) Aliens Not Lawfully Present in the United States
The FHWA proposes to add a reference to a new addition to the
appendix for this paragraph that provides examples of how to calculate
relocation payments if some members of a displaced family are lawfully
present but others are aliens not lawfully present. The new addition
would provide calculations that are based on the ratio of ownership
between aliens not lawfully present and eligible displaced persons. The
proposed addition to appendix A also incorporates several current
Uniform Act Frequently Asked Questions,\7\ to provide specific
calculation examples.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/policy_guidance/uafaqs.cfm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 24.208(f)(1)
The FHWA proposes to update the acronym for the BCIS to the current
USCIS and add a corrected link to that Agency's website. The FHWA also
proposes to amend this paragraph by requiring the use of the USCIS's
Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program to
confirm certifications which an agency believes may be invalid. The
FHWA seeks comments on whether there may be other resources that can be
used when an agency considers a certification invalid. The FHWA would
also like comments on whether and how the certification process in this
part should be updated. The FHWA is interested in comments on whether
revisions should include document review and collection for all
displaced persons.
Section 24.208(g) Aliens Not Lawfully Present in the United States
The FHWA has received questions from several Federal Agencies about
providing temporary relocation assistance to aliens not lawfully
present in the United States. The question arises because the
requirements focus on displaced persons. In instances of temporary
relocation, persons are not displaced persons but are eligible for
certain temporary benefits. The Federal Agencies question whether this
paragraph's restriction on providing relocation benefits or assistance
would prohibit or allow an Agency to deny temporary relocation
assistance to an alien not lawfully present in the United States. The
FHWA believes that the clear intent in statute and this regulation do
not allow for any Uniform Act benefits or assistance to be provided to
an alien not lawfully present in the United States, with the exception
being cases where an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a
spouse, child, or parent who is a U.S. citizen or alien lawfully
admitted for permanent residence would be created by denying such
benefits and assistance. This regulation provides specific
considerations and requirements that allow for benefits to be provided
in this limited instance. Given that this regulation allows and defines
instances when an alien not lawfully present in the United States may
receive Uniform Act benefits, the FHWA believes that the hardship
exception also applies to temporary relocations in cases where an
exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a designated family
member would be created by denying such benefits and assistance. The
FHWA does not believe that any additional changes are needed to this
regulation given the restrictive and specific language in this
paragraph.
Section 24.208(h) Aliens Not Lawfully Present in the United States
Some Agencies have asked FHWA how to determine when there is an
``exceptional and extremely unusual hardship'' to a spouse, parent, or
child of a person not lawfully present in the United States when the
determination results in more than the loss of relocation payments and/
or assistance alone. The FHWA proposes to add a reference to appendix
A, Section 24.208(h), which incorporates FHWA's previously published
FAQ explaining the meaning and intent of the term
[[Page 69478]]
``exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.'' \8\ The FHWA believes
that including existing guidance into the appendix will provide a clear
resource to address the questions raised.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/uniform_act/relocation/illegaqa.cfm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart D--Payments for Moving and Related Expenses
Section 24.301(b)(2) Moves From a Dwelling
The FHWA requests comments on adding an option, similar to that
found in this part for business self-moves, to allow self-moves from
dwellings to be eligible for reimbursement in the amount of the lower
of two bids or estimates prepared by a commercial mover or based on an
estimate prepared by a qualified Agency staff person. The FHWA would
like comments on whether and how adding new self-move options for moves
from a dwelling would reduce administrative burden on the displaced
person and the Agency. The FHWA believes that self-move options would
reduce administrative burden and eliminate the burden to the property
owner of providing receipts or proof of expenditures to support
residential self-move claims for payment. The FHWA is also interested
in comments on how reimbursement should be made if a self-move
reimbursement is based on a commercial move bid. Should the
reimbursement be for the full commercial move bid, or should it be made
after subtracting an amount to account for overhead and profit in the
commercial move bid?
Section 24.301(b)(3), (c)(2)(ii), and (d)(2)(ii) Moving Cost Finding
and (d)(2)(iii) Non-Residential Moving Cost Schedule
The FHWA is interested in incorporating methods in this regulation
that can reduce administrative burdens and improve the government's
service to individuals and businesses affected by Federal or federally
assisted projects and programs. In previous rules, there was a
provision that allowed moving expenses to be determined by a qualified
staff person for small, uncomplicated personal property moves, commonly
called a ``moving cost finding'' or ``a finding.'' Persons displaced
from their dwellings can elect to receive reimbursement for moving
their personal property by use of a streamlined process that does not
require commercial move estimates or receipts documenting moving costs.
The Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule allows an Agency to
determine, document, and establish moving cost eligibility based on the
number of rooms of furniture being moved. The FHWA is considering a
similar tool for nonresidential moves. A business move cost schedule
would conceptually be established by regulation and would allow an SDOT
to determine eligibility for reimbursement based on a predetermined
metric such as number of rooms or number of items. If a non-residential
moving cost schedule were allowed by regulation, Agencies would no
longer need to document costs based on moving estimates or receipted
bills.
The FHWA would like comments about move cost findings and
development of a non-residential moving cost schedule, and whether they
should be considered for incorporation in a final rule. Specifically,
FHWA would like to know if any Agencies use a similar process for their
programs and projects which are not subject to the requirements of the
Uniform Act; whether that process has produced administrative cost
savings; and, whether the process has been found satisfactory by
displaced persons relocated by the Agency.
Section 24.301(e) Personal Property Only
The FHWA proposes to modify appendix A, Section 24.301(e), to
provide Agencies with additional flexibility for use in residential
moves where the only personal property to be moved is located outside
of the dwelling. The FHWA recognizes that in some instances the costs
of obtaining moving bids for moving personal property located outside
of the dwelling may exceed the cost of the actual move. The FHWA
proposes to allow a payment for moves of residential personal property
located outside of the dwelling to be based on the ``additional room''
category of the Fixed Residential Move Cost Schedule. We also propose
to include the link to the Schedule on the FHWA website in this
appendix.
Section 24.301(g)(3) Disconnecting, Dismantling, Removing,
Reassembling, and Reinstalling Relocated Household Appliances and Other
Personal Pproperty
The FHWA proposes to add a clarification in the appendix of this
paragraph to address questions received about the eligibility of
certain costs to build or rehabilitate structures as a reimbursable
expense. Generally, costs to construct, rehabilitate, or reconstruct
are capital expenditures and are ineligible for reimbursement. In
instances where these costs may be required, a waiver of regulation by
the Federal funding Agency must be obtained.
Section 24.301(g)(11) Eligible Actual Moving Expenses--License, Permit,
Fees
The FHWA proposes to add ``actual, reasonable, and necessary''
before the words ``license, permit, fees or certification'' and ``farms
or non-profits'' and after ``business'' in this paragraph. The FHWA
believes that each business, farm, or non-profit move is unique due to
varying local, State, and Federal requirements and requires a careful
review of the facts in order to determine whether a permit or fee
should be reimbursable for a specific move. The FHWA also proposes to
clarify that the permit or fees allowed under this paragraph are for
those necessary to operate a business, farm, or non-profit by adding
``to operate a business, farm, or non-profit'' after ``required'' in
the first sentence of this paragraph. The proposed change would clarify
that permit fees associated with construction are not included as an
actual moving expense. In most instances, reimbursing for building a
new structure at the replacement location is not a permissible actual
moving cost expense. Consequently, the cost of a permit for new
construction in almost all instances is not an eligible expense under
this part. A new construction permit for repairs or improvements to the
replacement property or modification to accommodate the business, farm,
or non-profit operation or make the replacement structure suitable for
conducting the business, farm, or non-profit may, however, be eligible
for reimbursement if determined to be reasonable and necessary under
Sec. 24.304 Reestablishment expenses or if required by local law,
code, or ordinances.
Section 24.301(g)(13) Re-Lettering Signs and Replacing Sationary on
Hand
Currently, the regulation specifies that re-lettering signs and
replacing stationery made obsolete at the time of the displacement are
eligible moving expenses. The FHWA proposes to modify this paragraph to
recognize that many businesses use media other than printed media by
adding the phrase ``and making updates to other media.'' We propose
making a reference to a new item in appendix A, Section 24.301(g)(13),
which includes examples of other potentially reimbursable costs for
other media such as DVDs or CDs and modification of websites to update
contact and location information made necessary because of the move.
This proposed change would allow Agencies to determine if expenses
incurred to update media on hand, such as DVDs,
[[Page 69479]]
CDs, or updating a website to reflect information on the new location
of the business, are actual, reasonable, and necessary expenses which
would be eligible under this paragraph. The FHWA intends that the
compensation would be limited to costs to reproduce the number of DVDs
and CDs on hand at the time of displacement, and, in the case of a
website update, only those costs necessary to edit and modify the
location information.
Section 24.301(g)(14)(i)-(ii) Actual Direct Loss of Tangible Personal
Property
The FHWA has received a number of questions regarding the
appropriate method for calculating the actual direct loss of tangible
personal property and the meaning of ``value in place for continued
use'' as used in these paragraphs. Some Agencies have reported that it
can be difficult and very costly to find machinery and equipment (M&E)
valuation experts who are able to determine value in place for
continued use. Other Agencies have noted that considering the value in
place for continued use ensures that payments made under provisions of
these paragraphs are reasonable and that procuring the services of an
M&E valuation expert is relatively easy. The FHWA believes that
procuring the services of an M&E valuation expert is achievable but
perhaps not always easily.
The FHWA proposes to modify these paragraphs to allow for a new
two-part consideration of the actual direct loss of tangible personal
property payment. First, FHWA proposes separate paragraphs for
calculating payments for items currently in use and for items not
currently in use. For items in use, reimbursement is based on the
lesser of the cost to move and reinstall the item or fair market value
in place of the item ``as is for continued use.'' The FHWA believes
that by using ``the lesser of'' consideration, the eligibility
determination provides options to both the Agency and the displaced
person.
For items not currently in use, FHWA proposes to base the
reimbursement on the cost to move the item as is, with no allowance for
storage.
The FHWA also proposes to reorganize these paragraphs by proposing
a separate subordinate paragraph for goods held for sale. When payment
for property loss is claimed for goods held for sale, the fair market
value shall be based on the cost of the goods to the business, not the
potential selling prices. The FHWA proposes to add a reference to
appendix A for this paragraph.
The FHWA also proposes to add a discussion to the end of appendix A
about procuring M&E valuation expert services. The FHWA welcomes
comments that identify such services and methods that may be used to
direct the reader to reasonable methods of estimating value in place
either by hiring an M&E appraiser or by estimating via websites
available for M&E valuations. Finally, FHWA proposes updating
regulatory references in the appendix for these paragraphs due to
renumbering and reorganization of the regulation section.
Section 24.301(g)(17)(i)-(ii) Searching for a Replacement Location
The FHWA's Business Relocation Assistance Retrospective Study \9\
reported that businesses incur searching expenses that routinely exceed
the current regulatory limit of $2,500. The report recommended
increasing the limit on searching expenses to $5,000 and lessening the
burden of documentation. The FHWA proposes to increase searching
expenses' eligibility from $2,500 to $5,000. The FHWA believes that in
some instances requiring documentation for all searching expenses can
be administratively burdensome to both the Agency and the displaced
person. As such, FHWA proposes to add a new provision at Sec.
24.301(g)(17)(ii) of this regulation that would provide Federal
Agencies with the option to allow, on a project or program wide basis,
a one-time alternative searching payment of up to $1,000 with little or
no documentation. The FHWA believes that the potential savings in
administrative costs offset the possibility of fraud, waste, and abuse.
The FHWA also proposes to modify the appendix for these paragraphs by
striking $2,500 and inserting $5,000 and by proposing new flexibility
by allowing one time alternative searching payments of up to $1,000
with little or no documentation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/publications/business_relocation_assistance/final_report/page06.cfm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FHWA also proposes to incorporate a frequently asked question
into the appendix to clarify that search expenses may be incurred
anytime the business anticipates it may be displaced, including prior
to project authorization or the initiation of negotiations. However,
such expenses should not be reimbursed until the business has received
the notice, required in Sec. 24.203(b), and only after the Agency has
determined such costs to be actual, reasonable, and necessary.
Section 24.301(g)(17)(i)(F) Searching for a Replacement Location
The FHWA proposes to change this paragraph to allow expenses to
include attorney's fees. The FHWA recognizes that displaced business
owners may incur actual, reasonable, and necessary costs for either
time spent or fees paid for services necessary to determine the
adequacy of a potential replacement property. These costs may include
those necessary to determine appropriate zoning and resolve other
issues during a search for a replacement location. Several State
Agencies have reasoned that in a number of instances having attorneys
negotiate for the purchase of replacement sites could be an actual,
reasonable, and necessary expense. The FHWA agrees that attorney's fees
for negotiating a purchase can be considered a reasonable expense under
this part. The FHWA also proposes to strike ``time spent'' and insert
``expenses'' negotiating the purchase of a replacement site.
The FHWA is proposing to amend the appendix for this paragraph to
clarify that attorney's fees could be considered eligible as a
searching expense. The FHWA also believes that because the fees are
reimbursed at the Agency's discretion based on the actual, reasonable,
and necessary test, the potential for waste, fraud, and abuse is
manageable.
Section 24.301(h)(13) Ineligible Moving and Related Expenses
State DOTs have asked about the eligibility of costs to make
cosmetic alterations or improvements to replacement dwellings, such as
painting, fitting draperies, and replacing carpet or flooring. The FHWA
believes that expenses for cosmetic changes to a dwelling are not
moving costs which are reimbursable under the Uniform Act. This
proposed change is not intended to prohibit alterations to a dwelling
to make it accessible and free of barriers for ingress, egress, or use
as required under the definition of a DSS dwelling, for a displaced
person with a disability at Sec. 24.2(a).
Section 24.302 Fixed Payment for Moving Expenses-Residential Moves
Persons displaced from a seasonal residence or dormitory style room
may receive a fixed moving cost payment as an alternative to a payment
for actual moving and related expenses. A number of questions have been
raised about the appropriate uses of the moving cost schedule,
including whether storage can be included as part of a fixed cost move
and what the allowance for storage can
[[Page 69480]]
include. The FHWA proposes to add language to the appendix to clarify
that if an Agency determines that storage is an actual, reasonable, and
necessary expense in conjunction with this schedule, payment may be
paid in accordance with Sec. 24.301(g)(4) for a period not to exceed
12 months. The FHWA also proposes to revise language in appendix A,
Section 24.302, to clarify the applicability of the Fixed Residential
Move Cost Schedule (Schedule) to seasonal residents and temporary moves
from a dwelling and to add a reference to the revised appendix item.
The FHWA proposes to add a new paragraph to this section to allow
for actual reasonable and necessary storage. This proposed addition
requires that the Agency notify the displaced person in writing that
the Fixed Residential Move Cost Schedule is only for one move. In
instances where storage was approved, only the costs to move the
personal property from the displacement location to storage would be
reimbursable. The FHWA believes that in most cases the use of a fixed
cost move is meant to be a one-time uncomplicated move, and if storage
is necessary, it would be in the displaced person's interest to use a
commercial move to ensure that all costs related to moving and storage
are reimbursed.
Section 24.303(a) Related Non-Residential Eligible Expenses
The FHWA has received a number of questions regarding the meaning
of ``nearby utilities'' and whether ``nearby'' allows for reimbursement
for certain utility service modifications and reconnection costs. In
general, there has been confusion about whether ``nearby'' meant from
the property line or some other defined point. The intent of this
paragraph was to recognize that relocating a business may require some
utility service modifications and reconnection costs. ``Nearby'' has
sometimes been interpreted to mean anywhere from several feet to
several miles away. The FHWA proposes to strike ``nearby'' and ``right-
of-way'' and add ``from the replacement site's property line.'' The
FHWA believes that the proposed changes will more clearly and
accurately indicate the kinds of expenses that are eligible under this
part. The FHWA proposes adding a new appendix item for this paragraph
that includes examples to more clearly describe eligible costs. The
FHWA also proposes to add a reference to the new appendix A, Section
24.303(a), to the end of this paragraph.
Section 24.303(c) Related Nonresidential Eligible Expenses--Impact Fees
or One-Time Assessments
Impact fees or one-time assessment for anticipated heavy utility
usage are eligible expenses. The FHWA is proposing to clarify that
``impact fees'' are only related to anticipated ``heavy utility usage''
at the replacement location. Generally, the terms ``heavy utility
usage'' and impact fees recognize costs associated with utility usage
including water, sewer, gas, and electric. Impact fees associated with
major infrastructure construction, such as adding a lane for additional
traffic capacity or other similar required infrastructure improvements,
fire stations, regional drainage improvements, and parks are not
eligible. The FHWA proposes changing the ``or'' before ``one time
assessments'' to ``and.'' The FHWA believes this change, a subsequent
new appendix A, Section 24.303(c), and a reference to it in the
regulation will adequately respond to the questions about correctly
interpreting and applying this benefit.
Section 24.304 Reestablishment Expenses--Non-Residential Moves
Section 1521(a)(1) of MAP-21 amends Section 202 of the Uniform Act
by raising the statutory limit to $25,000. The FHWA proposes to revise
this section to reflect the new statutory limit of $25,000.
Section 24.304(b) Ineligible Expenses
Several Federal Agencies and FHWA have received questions from
their program partners regarding whether construction of a facility,
where little or no structure currently exists, would be an eligible
reestablishment expense. They have reasoned that Sec. 24.401(a)(1),
which allows for ``improvements to the real property,'' and Sec.
24.401(a)(2), which allows for ``modifications to the replacement
property,'' may be read to allow for new construction or substantially
new construction where there is little or no structure.
The FHWA proposes to add a new Sec. 24.304(b)(5) to clarify
exclusion of costs to construct a new facility such as a new business
building on a vacant replacement property or to substantially construct
or reconstruct a building. These costs are considered capital
expenditures and are generally ineligible for reimbursement as a
reestablishment expense. The FHWA believes that building from the
ground up or substantially reconstructing a building, or the
rehabilitation or rebuilding of a shell, is beyond the intended scope
of Sec. 24.304(a). The FHWA recognizes that there may be special cases
where substantial reconstruction or building from the ground up may be
necessary. Agencies will need to consider each request for eligibility
on a case-by-case basis and determine whether that eligibility should
be requested. Agencies that determine that eligibility should be
provided must request a waiver of Sec. 24.304(b)(1) under the
provisions of Sec. 24.7 from the Federal Agency funding the project or
program
The FHWA also proposes incorporating two current Frequently Asked
Questions into a new appendix item with an example of when such a
waiver is requested and discusses the costs that may be eligible for
reimbursement.
Section 24.305 Fixed Payment for Moving Expenses-Nonresidential Moves,
Paragraphs (a) Business, (c) Farm Operation, and (d) Nonprofit
Organization
Section 1521(a)(2) of MAP-21 amends Section 202 of the Uniform Act
by raising the statutory limit for a fixed payment for moving expenses-
nonresidential moves to $40,000. The FHWA proposes to revise these
three paragraphs to reflect the new statutory limit of $40,000.
Several Federal Agencies and some program partners have raised
questions about whether a fixed payment for moving expenses in
nonresidential moves prohibits other relocation assistance payments for
moving and related expenses and reestablishment payments. The FHWA
proposes to add clarifying language to ensure that the regulation is
clearly understood to prohibit payments for any moving and related
expenses or reestablishment payments when a displaced person elects to
receive a fixed cost moving payment under this section of the
regulation. The fixed payment option's purpose is to provide a
displaced person with an alternative method of receiving reimbursement
for all costs associated with a move. This alternative fixed payment is
a one-time payment that exhausts and eliminates other eligibilities and
payments for any moving and related expenses (including actual direct
loss of tangible personal property and searching) or reestablishment
payments.
The FHWA also proposes a new appendix item for these parts to
further clarify that this fixed payment represents a one-time
alternative for businesses, farms, and non-profits.
[[Page 69481]]
Section 24.305(e) Average Annual Net Earnings
Practitioners have asked FHWA about the requirement that a business
must have been in operation for at least 2 full years to qualify for
the fixed payment based on the average annual net earnings and what to
do in instances where the business was not in operation for two full
years. The FHWA proposes to add a reference in this paragraph to a
revised appendix A, Section 24.305(e). The revisions clarify that a
business must only contribute materially to the income of the displaced
person for a period of time during the 2 taxable years prior to
displacement but does not have to be in existence for 2 full years
prior to displacement in order to be eligible for this benefit. The
proposed new appendix item also provides sample calculations of
benefits when a business was in operation for less than 1 year, more
than 1 year but not 2 full years, and when a business only operates
seasonally. We propose that the seasonal net income be considered the
entire income for that year when making the payment calculation. The
appendix also restates, as currently provided for in the regulation,
that average annual net earnings may be based upon a different period
of time that an Agency determines to be more equitable. The FHWA
believes that the combination of the proposed new item in appendix A
and the specific examples of calculations will ensure that businesses
that contribute materially, but are in operation less than 2 years
prior to displacement, will have their annual net earnings correctly
determined.
Section 24.306(a) Discretionary Utility Relocation Payments
The FHWA proposes to revise the reference to Sec. 24.2(a), Utility
facility.
Subpart E--Replacement Housing Payments
Section 24.401 Replacement Housing Payment for 90-Day Homeowner-
Occupants
Section 1521(b)(2) of MAP-21 amends Section 203(a)(1) of the
Uniform Act by reducing the number of days a person must have owned and
occupied a displacement dwelling from 180 days to 90 days in order to
be eligible for a replacement housing payment. The FHWA proposes to
modify the heading for Sec. 24.401 and paragraphs (a) introductory
text and (a)(1) and the appendix entries for these parts by deleting
``180 days'' and inserting ``90 days'' in each place it appears.
Section 24.401(b) Amount of Payment
Section 1521(b)(1) of MAP-21 amends Section 203(a)(1) of the
Uniform Act by raising the statutory limit for replacement housing
payments to $31,000. The FHWA proposes to modify this section by
deleting $22,500 and inserting $31,000 in each place it appears.
Section 24.401(d) Introductory Text Through (d)(1) Increased Mortgage
Interest Costs
The FHWA is not proposing a change in this section but believes it
is important to note that MAP-21 did not change the requirement that a
lien must have been in place for 180 days prior to the initiation of
negotiations in order to be considered a valid lien and to be eligible
for an increased mortgage interest cost payment under this part. Prior
to MAP-21, the eligibility requirements for occupancy of a displacement
dwelling and for a valid lien were both 180 days prior to the
initiation of negotiations.
The FHWA proposes to modify the appendix item for Sec. 24.401(d)
to improve clarity by striking ``and that the person must obtain a
mortgage of at least the same amount as the old mortgage and for at
least the same term in order to receive the full amount of this
payment'' from the sentence after the sample computation. This does not
necessarily occur often in practice since a displaced person may obtain
a lesser mortgage amount or term on their replacement dwelling. The
rest of the sentence remains to inform the displaced person of the
approximate amount of the payment and interest rate and points used to
calculate the payment.
The FHWA also proposes to add a link in the appendix to increased
interest cost calculators available on its website.
Section 24.401(e) HECM
The FHWA proposes to add a new definition, paragraph, and appendix
item to address HECM (also known as reverse mortgages). Although the
actual number of HECM type mortgages is still relatively low in
comparison to all types of mortgages, FHWA believes that this may
change in the future due in part to the number of aging homeowners in
the marketplace and also because the marketplace and marketing
practices for HECMs are evolving and growing.
Since these mortgages did not exist when the Uniform Act was
enacted, their unique and particular financial construction was not
accounted for in the development of relocation assistance benefits.
Because there are unknown factors in calculating exact costs to replace
a HECM, the services of a mortgage broker are required. The FHWA
believes that there is ample authority in the Uniform Act, its
legislative history, and implementing regulations to support the
strategies proposed in this NPRM for addressing displaced persons with
HECMs.
We have incorporated in the NPRM information from a 2013 Study of
Reverse Mortgages in Relocation Assistance conducted by FHWA. These
mortgages often have unique terms. We are proposing that every
reasonable attempt should be made to make available a replacement HECM
with similar terms. The FHWA is also proposing that the displaced
homeowner is eligible for costs associated with origination of a
replacement HECM, such as mortgage insurance, origination fee, and
other incidental expenses, in accordance with Sec. 24.401(f).
Our research has revealed that the cost of replacing a HECM can be
substantial, especially when the owner has little or no equity left and
their equity is being dispersed as term or tenure payments. The FHWA is
also proposing options to replace the HECM with a mortgage with terms
similar to the displacement HECM loan or the use of other methods such
as a life estate for securing a dwelling for the person's remaining
lifetime. In cases where there is a tenure or term payment, FHWA has
developed a simple online calculator to estimate the cost to purchase a
replacement HECM. However, the exact payment required to purchase a
replacement HECM includes information and calculations which are
proprietary to HECM mortgage brokerages. The FHWA believes the use of a
calculator which provides an estimate will serve to inform the Agency
and displaced person of approximate eligibility and a method for
determining whether HECM replacement costs are actual, reasonable, and
necessary.
The new item in appendix A presents the various HECM terms that can
be encountered with solutions for Agencies to consider. It also
provides a link to the FHWA online calculator to estimate the
eligibility and costs to replace the HECM. This calculator uses basic
information readily available to an Agency to calculate this estimated
payment. It only requires the value of the acquired dwelling, existing
balance of the displacement HECM, and price of the selected comparable
or actual replacement dwelling. Next, it calculates an estimate of the
remaining equity on the displacement HECM, the
[[Page 69482]]
initial principal limit of the replacement HECM (current HUD rules
require 60 percent minimum equity in the dwelling be available at the
time of purchase of the HECM) and funds needed to purchase a
replacement HECM. Then, it subtracts the remaining equity and price
differential payment from the total funds needed to arrive at the
estimated HECM supplemental payment eligibility.
Section 24.401(f) Rental Assistance Payment
This paragraph has been re-lettered (g) due to the insertion of the
new Sec. 24.401(e) on HECMs. Section 1521(c)(1) of MAP-21 amends
Section 204(a) of the Uniform Act by increasing the statutory limit for
rental assistance payments to $7,200. Similarly, section 1521(b)(2) of
MAP-21 also amends Section 203(a)(1) of the Uniform Act by reducing the
number of days a person must have owned and occupied an acquired
dwelling in order to be eligible for a rental assistance payment from
180 days to 90 days. The FHWA proposes to modify this paragraph and the
appendix to reflect both changes.
Section 24.402 Replacement Housing Payments for 90-Day Tenants and
Certain Others
The FHWA proposes to strike ``90-day occupants,'' which included
tenants or owner-occupants, from this section's current title and
replace it with ``tenants and certain others.'' The FHWA is proposing
this change to be consistent with the heading ``Tenants and certain
others'' contained in both the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Polices Act as amended in 1987, and the statute
Title 42, U.S.C. Chapter 61, section 4624--Replacement housing for
tenants and certain others.
Section 24.402(a) Eligibility
Section 24.402 of the regulations sets out criteria for when 90-day
tenants and certain others displaced from a dwelling are eligible for a
payment for rental assistance or down payment assistance. Section
1521(b)(2) of MAP-21 amends Section 204(a) of the Uniform Act by
increasing the statutory limit for replacement housing payment to
tenants to $7,200. The FHWA proposes to update the amount listed in
this paragraph accordingly.
Section 24.402(a)(2) Eligibility
The FHWA proposes to add ``the date he or she moves from the
displacement dwelling'' to the end of Sec. 24.402(a) and to delete the
remainder of this paragraph. These changes are necessary because of
changes to eligibility criteria for owners in Section 1521(a)(1) of
MAP-21, which reduced the number of days a person must have owned and
occupied a displacement dwelling in order to be eligible for a
replacement housing payment from 180 days to 90 days. This change
eliminates the need or requirement to discuss eligibilities for
homeowners of more than 90 but less than 180 days. Consequently, FHWA
is proposing to reorganize the section.
Section 24.402(b) Rental Assistance Payment
Section 1521(a)(1) of MAP-21 amends Section 204(a) of the Uniform
Act by increasing the statutory limit for replacement housing payment
to tenants to $7,200. The FHWA proposes to update the amount listed in
this paragraph accordingly.
The FHWA also proposes to correct the web link to the Uniform Act
Low Income Limits Survey, which currently points to an inactive
website.
Section 24.402(b)(1)(i) Rental Assistance Payment
The FHWA has received some questions about calculating and
developing a base monthly rental. Developing a base monthly rental
requires information on costs of utilities. The question that arises is
whether the allowance in Sec. 24.402(b)(1)(i) of using the ``. . .
estimated average monthly cost of utilities for a comparable
replacement dwelling'' can be applied, as opposed to the actual utility
costs, when determining base monthly rental of the displacement
dwelling. The FHWA believes that Agencies should attempt to secure
actual costs of utilities from the displaced person in order to
calculate and determine base monthly rental, to the extent practicable.
Should those costs not be available, the Agency should so document its
file and then utilize an estimate to develop a base monthly rental at
the displacement dwelling. The FHWA invites comments and suggestions as
to what estimates may best approximate actual monthly utility costs and
what additional guidance or support may be needed in meeting the
requirements of this paragraph.
Section 24.402(b)(2) Rental Assistance Payments
The FHWA is proposing to revise the low income calculation example
in the appendix by striking reference to ``(a)(14)'' and inserting to
refer to the definition of ``household income'' in Sec. 24.2(a).
Section 24.402(b)(3) Manner of Disbursement
The FHWA proposes to add the word ``replacement'' to housing in
this paragraph to clarify the type of housing covered. The sentence
states that the full amount of the rental assistance payment vests with
a tenant regardless of the later condition or location of the
replacement dwelling.
Section 24.402(c) Down Payment Assistance Payment
Section 204 of the Uniform Act sets criteria for when 90-day
tenants and certain others displaced from a dwelling are eligible for a
payment for rental assistance or down payment assistance. Section
1521(c)(1) of MAP-21 amends Section 204(c) of the Uniform Act by
increasing the statutory limit for down payment assistance to $7,200.
The FHWA proposes to update the amount listed in this paragraph and the
appendix accordingly.
The FHWA also proposes to modify this paragraph by deleting ``180
days'' and inserting ``90 days'' in each place it appears in this
paragraph and appendix. The FHWA also proposes to add clarifying
language in the appendix to describe rental assistance payment
eligibilities for a displaced homeowner who fails to meet the 90-day
occupancy requirements.
Section 24.403(a)(1) Additional Rules Governing Replacement Housing
Payments
Comparable replacement housing must be inspected whenever possible.
The selected comparable replacement dwelling should be inspected with a
walk through or physical inspection. Reliance on an exterior visual
inspection of comparables, or examination and review of an MLS
listing's details, does not, in most cases, constitute a full DSS
inspection as required by the regulation and may not reveal
deficiencies in a property that would render it not decent, safe, and
sanitary.
The FHWA proposes to modify language in this paragraph to require
that Agencies inform displaced persons in writing of the reason the
full DSS inspection of the comparable replacement dwelling was not made
and that, should a displaced person select one of the comparable
dwellings as a replacement dwelling, a replacement housing payment
cannot be made until a DSS inspection is made of that dwelling.
The FHWA also proposes to add a new item to appendix A, Section
24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C), explaining what
[[Page 69483]]
constitutes a DSS inspection and a further discussion of the
requirement that an Agency must make full disclosure and explanation to
the displaced person if the comparable replacement dwelling did not
receive a full DSS inspection.
The FHWA also is proposing to change the sentence in the regulation
``if available, at least three comparable replacement dwellings shall
be examined'' to ``shall be considered.'' The FHWA also proposes to add
an appendix clarification at Section 24.403(a)(1) that the term
``examined'' does not necessarily equate to ``inspected'' for the
payment computation.
Section 24.403(a)(3) Acquisition of a Portion of a Typical Residential
Property
The FHWA has received questions regarding the term ``buildable
lot,'' in particular regarding circumstances when a lot might not be
buildable but the Agency determines it does have economic value to the
owner and/or the market. The FHWA believes clarification of the term
buildable lot is warranted and thus proposes to replace the phrase ``is
a buildable lot'' with the phrase ``and the Agency determines that the
remainder has economic value to the owner, which more accurately
describes these remainders.
In the past, some Agencies, when a remainder had economic value to
the owner or market, would allow a displaced person to decide to retain
the ``buildable lot'' or remainder and would calculate a replacement
housing eligibility based on only the portion of the property that the
Agency was acquiring. This could cause a substantial increase in
calculated eligibility or a windfall by virtue of the property owner
electing to retain the remainder. The FHWA believes that it is more
reasonable to allow Agencies the option to offer to purchase the
remainder and to base the replacement housing eligibility on the offer
for the entire parcel regardless of the owner's decision to sell or
retain the remainder.
The FHWA also proposes to offer a sample calculation and to add
language to appendix A, Section 24.403(a)(3), to explain that the
purpose of this paragraph is to clarify when to apply this calculation
method and how to correctly calculate relocation eligibility and
payments. Also in appendix A, Section 24.403(a)(3), FHWA proposes to
explain that if an Agency presents a written offer to acquire the whole
parcel, the price differential portion of the replacement housing
payment should be based upon the difference between the comparable
replacement dwelling and the Agency's written offer to acquire the
whole parcel. Under the proposed changes, property owners may elect to
retain the remainder, but the decision to do so would not require a
recalculation of relocation assistance eligibility.
Subpart F--Mobile Homes
In the 2005 rulemaking, FHWA reorganized the mobile home section to
streamline and better describe the requirements for determining
eligibility and calculating benefits for mobile home occupants. We
continue to receive questions which point to an undue complexity in
both determining eligibility and calculating benefits in this subpart.
The FHWA believes that the majority of the questions arise because
there is a two-part benefit determination process that considers the
dwelling and the site the mobile home is on as independent
eligibilities. Because they are independent eligibilities (for example,
a displaced person could be a dwelling owner and a tenant on the land),
the permutations and combinations of eligibilities and related policy
questions about proper application of benefits are complex and
unwieldy. The FHWA has several FAQs on the FHWA website \10\ to address
these issues but continues to receive questions about the determination
and calculation of benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the development of this NPRM, FHWA conducted several
meetings with its Federal Agency partners to identify methods of
restructuring and reorganizing Subpart F. Several proposed changes were
considered but ultimately not adopted. One method of clarifying mobile
home occupant payment eligibility and computation would be based on the
displaced person's ownership or rental of the mobile home dwelling
(dwelling test). If the displaced person owns the mobile home, he or
she would be considered an owner regardless of whether he or she owns
or rents the site, and, as a dwelling owner, would not be eligible for
a utility payment. If the displaced person is a tenant in the mobile
home, he or she would be a tenant regardless of whether he or she owns
or rents the site, and, as such, would be eligible for a utility
payment. Ultimately this approach was not included in this NPRM. Some
Agencies were concerned that the dwelling test would reduce overall
benefits available to displaced mobile home occupants under the current
two-part eligibility calculation method and specifically to those who
are displaced low income mobile home occupants.
The FHWA would like comments and suggestions on methods to
reorganize and streamline the calculation and determination of benefits
for displaced mobile home occupants, or whether further changes are
warranted. The FHWA is interested in comments on whether the dwelling
test would streamline and improve the process of calculating and
determining benefits for a mobile home occupant, why and how would
benefits be reduced using the dwelling test for mobile home occupants,
examples of how and why the current regulation and method of benefit
determinations work well, or have not worked well and implementation
challenges which the current rule creates.
Section 24.502 Replacement Housing Payment for 90-Day Mobile Homeowner
Displaced From a Mobile Home, and/or From the Acquired Mobile Home Site
Section 1521(b)(2) of MAP-21 amends Section 203(a)(1) of the
Uniform Act by reducing the eligibility requirement from 180 days to 90
days the number of days a person must have owned and occupied a
displacement dwelling in order to be eligible for a replacement housing
payment. The FHWA proposes to update this paragraph accordingly.
Section 24.502(a) Eligibility
Section 1521(b)(1) of MAP-21 amends Section 203(a)(1) of the
Uniform Act by raising the statutory limit for replacement housing
payments to $31,000. The FHWA proposes to modify this paragraph by
deleting $22,500 and inserting $31,000 in each place it appears.
Section 24.502(b) Replacement Housing Payment Computation for a 90-Day
Owner That Is Displaced From a Mobile Home
Section 1521(a)(1) of MAP-21 amends Section 203(a)(1) of the
Uniform Act by reducing the number of days a homeowner-occupant must
have owned and occupied a displacement dwelling in order to be eligible
for a replacement housing payment from 180 days to 90 days. The FHWA
proposes to update this paragraph accordingly.
Section 24.502(c) Rental Assistance Payment for a 90-Day Owner-Occupant
Displaced From a Leased or Rented Mobile Home Site
Section 1521(b)(2) of MAP-21 amends Section 203(a)(1) of the
Uniform Act by reducing the eligibility requirement for the number of
days a person must have owned and occupied a displacement
[[Page 69484]]
dwelling in order to be eligible for a replacement housing payment from
180 days to 90 days. The FHWA proposes to update this section and the
appendix accordingly.
This paragraph of the regulation was not substantially changed
except to clarify that the base monthly rent for the displacement site
shall be the actual cost paid to the landlord for the site. If the
tenant paid little or no rent, the new regulation states that the
market rent is to be used, unless it would result in a hardship to the
displaced person.
Section 24.502(d) Owner-Occupant Not Displaced From a Mobile Home
This paragraph was not substantially changed. The FHWA continues to
believe that if a mobile home is personal property and may be
relocated, but the owner elects not to move it, that the owner is not
entitled to a replacement housing payment (RHP) for the purchase of a
replacement mobile home, but that they are entitled to moving costs.
Section 24.503 Replacement Housing Payment for 90-Day Mobile Home
Tenants and Certain Others
Section 1521(c)(1) of MAP-21 amends Section 204(a) of the Uniform
Act by increasing the statutory limit for replacement housing payment
to tenants to $7,200. The FHWA proposes to update this section
accordingly.
The FHWA also proposes to change this section heading from ``90-day
mobile home occupants,'' which included tenants or owner-occupants, to
``tenants and certain others'' since all possible entitlements for 90-
day owner-occupants are now addressed in Sec. 24.401. This section now
addresses only 90-day tenants ``and certain others'' to cover displaced
persons under Sec. 24.404, housing of last resort. The FHWA proposes
this change because the heading ``Tenants and certain others'' is
contained in the statutory language. Those persons may not meet length
of occupancy requirements, or a project may not be able to proceed on a
timely basis, because replacement rental dwellings are not available
within the monetary limits for those owners and tenants, as specified
in Sec. Sec. 24.401-24.402. When these situations arise, the Agency
provides additional or alternative assistance under the section housing
of last resort, which then may include a calculation of a replacement
rental assistance payment covering 42 months.
A displaced person may claim a rental assistance payment to apply
it to the purchase of a DSS conventional dwelling or mobile home. The
FHWA also proposes to add language to appendix A, Section 24.503, to
clarify that the combined mobile home and site replacement housing
payment cannot exceed the cost of the actual replacement dwelling or
site.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
All comments received before the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above will be considered and will be available
for examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received
after the comment closing date will be filed in the docket and will be
considered to the extent practicable. In addition to late comments, the
FHWA may also continue to file relevant information in the docket as it
becomes available after the comment period closing date, and interested
persons should continue to examine the docket for new material. A final
rule may be published at any time after close of the comment period and
after DOT has had the opportunity to review the comments submitted.
The FHWA filed a redline version of 49 CFR part 24 in the docket to
show all changes to the regulation text and facilitate public review
and comment.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), Executive Order
13771 (Reducing Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). This
proposed rule is a significant regulatory action within the meaning of
E.O. 12866 and DOT's regulatory policies and procedures (44 FR 11032).
This action complies with EOs 12866, 13563, and 13771 to improve
regulation.
A more detailed discussion of the economic analysis associated with
this rulemaking can be found in the Regulatory Impact Analysis, which
is available in the docket. The FHWA invites comments on its cost
estimates and discussion of benefits. Many of the changes that this
rule proposes are requirements mandated by MAP-21, which increased the
statutory limits of relocation residential and business benefit
eligibility and reduced the length of occupancy requirements prior to
initiation of negotiations for homeowners from 180 days to 90 days.
This NPRM also proposes to streamline program requirements and carry
out a comprehensive update of 49 CFR part 24 to better align the
language of the regulations with current program needs and best
practices. This proposed rule would also address changes identified by
the public in response to the DOT's initiative on implementation of
January 18, 2011, E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review in Federal Register Notice 82 FR 45750 published on October 2,
2017.\11\ The FHWA believes that the proposed streamlining and updating
in this NPRM will result in a reduction of Federal requirements and
will afford the States and Federal Agencies subject to the Uniform Act
new flexibilities to more efficiently acquire real property and
relocate displaced persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/10/02/2017-21101/notification-of-regulatory-review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FHWA has had an ongoing dialog with stakeholders and has
developed the proposed rule in a manner that balances stakeholder
concerns and practical implementation issues to allow SDOTs and Federal
Agency recipients to utilize the new flexibilities while minimizing
their effects on existing requirements and procedures.
The Uniform Act provides important protections and assistance for
people affected by federally-funded projects. Congress passed the law
to safeguard people whose real property is acquired or who move from
their homes, businesses, or farms as a result of projects receiving
Federal funds. The most recent Federal act authorizing surface
transportation spending modified the statutory payment levels for which
displaced persons may be eligible under the Uniform Act's implementing
regulations, necessitating the current proposed rulemaking. In
addition, FHWA is proposing to make changes to wording and section
organization to better reflect the Federal experience implementing
Uniform Act programs. At the Federal level, 18 departments and Agencies
are subject to the Uniform Act and their input is reflected in the
proposed changes.
The costs of the proposed rule for all Uniform Act Agencies over a
10-year analysis period from 2019 to 2028 are estimated to be: $1.8
million when discounted at 7 percent and $2.0 million when discounted
at 3 percent. The bulk of the costs are related to updating program
materials to reflect the changes in the regulation.
The benefits of the proposed rule primarily relate to improved
equity and fairness to entities that are displaced
[[Page 69485]]
from their properties or that move as a result of projects receiving
Federal funds. For example, the proposed rule raises the statutory
maximums for payments to displaced businesses to assist with the
reestablishment of the business. There is strong evidence that
businesses experience reestablishment costs well above the current
maximum amount.\12\ Raising the maximum payment levels, as required by
statute, will compensate those businesses more fairly and equitably for
the negative impacts they experience as a result of a Federal or
federally-assisted project. However, the fairness and equity benefits
of the proposed rule cannot be quantified or monetized. The higher
level of payments may also contribute to more businesses being able to
successfully reestablish after displacement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The FHWA and other Agencies have conducted studies over the
years which conclude that benefit levels are inadequate. Examples
include FHWA's business relocation retrospective study: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/publications/business_relocation_assistance/index.cfm and GAO report GAO-07-28GA,
Eminent Domain, https://www.gao.gov/assets/260/253929.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule contains changes, such as a requirement for
annual reporting, that can be expected to improve transparency, and,
therefore, oversight of the program. Again, that benefit cannot be
quantified or monetized. The proposed rule changes also provide clarity
on how to implement the Uniform Act and offer Agencies additional
options for streamlining the administration of their Uniform Act
programs. These benefits have not been quantified. Some minor
administrative cost savings have been estimated. The FHWA was the only
Agency that had a detailed dataset available for its Uniform Act
program, and, therefore, only the administrative cost savings to FHWA
have been estimated here. Based on communications with other Uniform
Act Agencies, FHWA analysts believe that FHWA has the largest Uniform
Act program; however, other Agencies have sizable programs, as well.
Therefore, the total cost savings across all Agencies will likely be
larger.
The table below offers a summary of the costs and benefits of the
proposed rule over the 10-year analysis period. Given that the benefits
of the rule related to equity and fairness have not been quantified, it
would be misleading to report a calculation of net benefits for this
proposed rule. Nonetheless, the benefits related to equity and fairness
are believed to be sufficient to justify the modest cost of the rule.
Summary of Costs and Benefits for Analysis Period 2019-2028
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item Discounted 7% Discounted 3% Annualized 7% Annualized 3%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs:
Home Equity Conversion $11,947..................... $15,073..................... $1,701...................... $1,767.
Mortgage (HECM).
Revising Program Material... 1,787,731................... 1,947,651................... 254,533..................... 228,324.
Federal Agency Reporting 166,290..................... 209,804..................... 23,676...................... 24,595.
Requirement.
Revising Max. RHP/RAP (FHWA (160,025)................... (204,380)................... (22,784).................... (23,960).
Cost Savings).
Homeowner 90 Eligibility (7,040)..................... (8,882)..................... (1,002)..................... (1,041).
(FHWA Cost Savings).
Appraisal Waivers........... Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Third Tier of Waiver Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Valuations.
Use of Single Agents........ Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Inspection of Comparable Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Housing.
Clarity & Streamlining...... Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Costs *........... 1,798,903................... 1,959,266................... 256,123..................... 229,686.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits:
Equity & Fairness........... Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Program Oversight........... Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not match sums due to rounding.
The proposed rule would result in additional payments made to
displaced businesses. However, these expenditures are reimbursements
for costs that these businesses incur regardless of the proposed rule
and are therefore considered transfers in the context of a benefit-cost
analysis. The table below presents the estimated amount of these
transfers for FHWA's Uniform Act program. The FHWA was the only Agency
that provided data upon which to base estimates. Therefore, the
magnitude of the change in transfers for all Federal Agencies may be
larger than is reported here.
Transfers to Displaced Persons for Analysis Period 2019-2028
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item Discounted 7% Discounted 3% Annualized 7% Annualized 3%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Residents:
Revising Replacement Housing $1,792,926.................. $2,272,671.................. $255,272.................... $266,426.
and Rental Assistance
Payments.
Homeowner 90-day Eligibility Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Home Equity Conversion Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Mortgages.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-residential displaced
persons:
Reimbursement for Updating Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.............. Not Quantified.
Other Media.
Search Expenses............. 8,117,037................... 10,285,293.................. 1,164,226................... 1,249,723.
Re-Establishment Expenses... 82,335,367.................. 104,271,810................. 11,722,704.................. 12,223,837.
Fixed Payments.............. 22,649,659.................. 28,709,348.................. 3,224,802................... 3,365,611.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 69486]]
Total................... 114,954,990................. 145,539,123................. 16,357,004.................. 17,061,625.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not match sums due to rounding.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354,
5 U.S.C. 60l-612), FHWA has evaluated the effects of this proposed rule
on small entities and anticipates that this action would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
which includes SDOTs, Local Public Agencies, other State governmental
Agencies or recipients and subrecipients of Federal Agencies subject to
this regulation. This action proposes to update the government-wide
regulation that provides assistance for persons, including small
businesses, displaced by government acquisition of real property. One
of the reasons for proposing the update is to increase assistance for
the small number displaced small businesses impacted by the Uniform
Relocation Act. We anticipate this proposal would have a positive
impact on those relatively few small businesses that are affected by
government acquisition of real property. We anticipate the number of
small businesses potentially impacted at all by this proposed rule to
be small. For example, between 2013 to 2017 FHWA had an average of
1,511 non-residential relocations annually. The FHWA does not have the
data to determine how many of the 1,511 non-residential moves were
small businesses, but even if one were to assume each of those moves
impacted a small business, that impact would account for .005 percent
of all U.S. small businesses.\13\ Financial impacts on local
governments are mitigated by the fact that any increased costs would
accrue only on federally-assisted programs, which would include
participation of Federal funds. For these reasons, FHWA certifies that
this action would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The United States Small Business Administration's 2018
Small Business Profile estimates 30.2 million small businesses in
the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed rule would not impose unfunded mandates as defined by
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48).
This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$155 million or more in any 1 year (2 U.S.C. 1532). Further, in
compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, FHWA would
evaluate any regulatory action that might be proposed in subsequent
stages of the proceeding to assess the effects on State, local, and
tribal governments and the private sector. In addition, the definition
of ``Federal Mandate'' in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act excludes
financial assistance of the type in which State, local, or tribal
governments have authority to adjust their participation in the program
in accordance with changes made in the program by the Federal
Government.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires Agencies to ensure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that may have a substantial, direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This proposed action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and criteria contained in E.O. 13132,
and FHWA has preliminarily determined that this proposed action would
not warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. The FHWA has
also determined that this proposed action would not preempt any State
law or State regulation or affect any State's ability to discharge
traditional State governmental functions.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this action under E.O. 13175 and believes
that the proposed action would not have substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes; would not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on tribal governments; and, would not preempt tribal
law. Therefore, a tribal summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The FHWA has analyzed this action under E.O. 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The FHWA has determined that the proposed action
is not a significant energy action under that order because it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects under E.O. 13211 is not required.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing E.O. 12372 regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.
Local entities should refer to the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction,
for further information.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.), Federal Agencies must obtain approval from the OMB for
collections of information they conduct, sponsor, or require through
regulations. The PRA applies to Federal Agencies' collections of
information imposed on 10 or more persons. ``Persons'' include a State,
territorial, tribal, or local government, or branch thereof, or their
political subdivisions.
This NPRM would call for a collection of information under the PRA.
As defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(c), ``collection of information'' comprised
of reporting, recordkeeping, monitoring, posting, labeling, and other
similar actions. This action contains amendments to the existing
information collection requirements previously approved under OMB
Control Number 2125-0586. The title and description of the information
collection, a description of those who must collect the information,
and an estimate of the total annual burden follow and are outlined in
full in the RIA contained in the docket for this rulemaking.
The Uniform Act provides important protections and assistance for
people affected by federally funded projects. Congress passed the law
to safeguard people whose real property is acquired or who move from
their homes,
[[Page 69487]]
businesses, nonprofit organizations, or farms as a result of projects
receiving Federal financial assistance. The Moving Ahead for Progress
in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) modified the statutory payment levels
for which displaced persons may be eligible under the Uniform Act's
implementing regulations, necessitating the current proposed
rulemaking. Additionally, FHWA is proposing to make changes to wording
and section organization to better reflect the Federal experience
implementing Uniform Act programs, since the last comprehensive
rulemaking for 49 CFR part 24 occurred in 2005.
This proposed requirement would amend an existing collection of
information by increasing the number of instances requiring information
to be collected under OMB control number 2125-0586. The burden hours
reserved under these requirements are not sufficient to cover the
additional in-depth updates resulting from regulatory revisions;
thereby necessitating this request for additional burden hours. The
hours requested are in addition to the hours already set aside.
Agencies conducting a program or project under the Uniform Act must
carry out their legal responsibilities to affected property owners and
displaced persons. Recipients and subrecipients must collect
information in order to determine, document and provide Uniform Act
benefits and assistance. Federal agencies are also required to develop
and provide to the lead agency, FHWA, an annual summary report the
describes the Uniform Act activities conducted by the Federal agency
and their funding recipients.
The FHWA does not have available to it information which would
allow for the calculation of burden hours for each Federal agencies
administration and oversight of the government-wide program. Each
Federal agency will separately develop information collection requests
for their program's administration and oversight. The FHWA has
developed a separate regulatory impact analysis which documents the
costs for its program administration and oversight. That analysis is
included as part of the 49 CFR part 24 NPRM publication.
The FHWA can estimate the one-time government-wide cost of
implementing the new provisions of this rule to be 37,800 hours. This
estimate includes costs and benefits for the necessary updates and
revisions to program materials including operations manuals. The FHWA
bases this estimate on approximately 168 respondent's efforts to
perform the necessary updates and revisions. The estimated burden hours
are for a one-time update and result from the publication of a final
rule.
The FHWA is required to submit this proposed collection of
information to OMB for review and approval and, accordingly, seeks
public comments. Interested parties are invited to send comments
regarding any aspect of these information collection requirements,
including, but not limited to: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the performance of the functions of the
FHWA, including whether the information has practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the collection of information; and (4) ways to
minimize the collection burden without reducing the quality of the
information collected.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)
Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (the DOT Order), 91 FR 27534 (May 10, 2012) \14\
require DOT Agencies to achieve environmental justice (EJ) as part of
their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects, including interrelated social and economic effects, of their
programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-
income populations in the United States. The DOT Order requires DOT
Agencies to address compliance with E.O. 12898 and the DOT Order in all
rulemaking activities. In addition, FHWA has issued additional
documents relating to administration of E.O. 12898 and the DOT Order.
On June 14, 2012, FHWA issued an update to its EJ order, FHWA Order
6640.23A, FHWA Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income Populations (the FHWA Order).\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Available online at www.fhwa.dot.gov/enviornment/environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/order_56102a/index.cfm.
\15\ Available online at www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/orders/664023a.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FHWA has evaluated this proposed rule under the E.O., the DOT
Order, and the FHWA Order. The FHWA has determined that the proposed
regulations, if finalized, would not cause disproportionately high and
adverse human health and environmental effects on minority or low
income populations. The proposed regulations, if finalized, would
establish procedures and requirements for agencies and others when
acquiring, managing, and disposing of real property interests. The EJ
principles, in the context of acquisition, management, and disposition
of real property, should be considered during the planning and
environmental review processes for the particular proposal. The FHWA
will consider EJ when it makes a future funding or other approval
decision on a project-level basis.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
The FHWA has analyzed this action under E.O. 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. The FHWA
certifies that this proposed action would not concern an environmental
risk to health or safety that might disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
The FHWA does not anticipate that this proposed action would effect
a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications
under E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. This action proposes to
update the government-wide regulation that provides assistance for
persons displaced by government acquisition of real property. This
action updates this regulation to reflect increases in benefit levels
for displaced persons and to improve the Agencies' service to
individuals and businesses affected by Federal or federally assisted
projects.
National Environmental Policy Act
Agencies are required to adopt implementing procedures for NEPA
that establish specific criteria for, and identification of, three
classes of actions: Those that normally require preparation of an
environmental impact statement; those that normally require preparation
of an environmental assessment; and; those that are categorically
excluded from further NEPA review (40 CFR 1507.3(b)). The proposed
action is the adoption of regulations that provide the policies,
procedures, and requirements for acquisition of real property interests
for Federal and federally assisted projects. The proposed action has no
potential for environmental impacts until the
[[Page 69488]]
regulations, if adopted, are applied at the project level. The FHWA
would have an obligation to evaluate the potential environmental
impacts of such a future project-level action if the action constitutes
a major Federal action under NEPA.
This proposed action qualifies for categorical exclusions under 23
CFR 771.117(c)(20) (promulgation of rules, regulations, and directives)
and 771.117(c)(1) (activities that do not lead directly to
construction). The FHWA has evaluated whether the proposed action would
involve unusual circumstances or extraordinary circumstances and has
determined that this proposed action would not involve such
circumstances. As a result, FHWA finds that this proposed rulemaking
would not result in significant impacts on the human environment.
Regulation Identification Number
A RIN is assigned to each regulatory action listed in the Unified
Agenda of Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service
Center publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year.
The RIN contained in the heading of this document can be used to cross
reference this action with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 24
Appraisal, Appraisal review, Just compensation, Real property
acquisition, Relocation assistance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation, Waiver valuations.
Issued on November 19, 2019 under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.85(d)(7):
Nicole R. Nason,
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
0
In consideration of the foregoing, FHWA proposes to revise title 49,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 24 as follows:
PART 24--UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY
ACQUISITION FOR FEDERAL AND FEDERALLY ASSISTED PROGRAMS
Subpart A--General
Sec.
24.1 Purpose.
24.2 Definitions and acronyms.
24.3 No duplication of payments.
24.4 Assurances, monitoring, and corrective action.
24.5 Manner of notices.
24.6 Administration of jointly-funded projects.
24.7 Federal Agency waiver of regulations in this part.
24.8 Compliance with other laws and regulations.
24.9 Recordkeeping and reports.
24.10 Appeals.
24.11 Adjustments of relocation benefits.
Subpart B--Real Property Acquisition
24.101 Applicability of acquisition requirements.
24.102 Basic acquisition policies.
24.103 Criteria for appraisals.
24.104 Review of appraisals.
24.105 Acquisition of tenant-owned improvements.
24.106 Expenses incidental to transfer of title to the Agency.
24.107 Certain litigation expenses.
24.108 Donations.
Subpart C--General Relocation Requirements
24.201 Purpose.
24.202 Applicability.
24.203 Relocation notices.
24.204 Availability of comparable replacement dwelling before
displacement.
24.205 Relocation planning, advisory services, and coordination.
24.206 Eviction for cause.
24.207 General requirements--claims for relocation payments.
24.208 Aliens not lawfully present in the United States.
24.209 Relocation payments not considered as income.
Subpart D--Payments for Moving and Related Expenses
24.301 Payment for actual reasonable moving and related expenses.
24.302 Fixed payment for moving expenses--residential moves.
24.303 Related nonresidential eligible expenses.
24.304 Reestablishment expenses--nonresidential moves.
24.305 Fixed payment for moving expenses--nonresidential moves.
24.306 Discretionary utility relocation payments.
Subpart E--Replacement Housing Payments
24.401 Replacement housing payment for 90-day homeowner-occupants.
24.402 Replacement housing payment for 90-day tenants and certain
others.
24.403 Additional rules governing replacement housing payments.
24.404 Replacement housing of last resort.
Subpart F--Mobile Homes
24.501 Applicability.
24.502 Replacement housing payment for a 90-day mobile homeowner
displaced from mobile home.
24.503 Rental assistance payment for 90-day mobile home tenants and
certain others.
Subpart G--Certification
24.601 Purpose.
24.602 Certification application.
24.603 Monitoring and corrective action.
Appendix A to Part 24--Additional Information
Appendix B to Part 24--Statistical Report Form
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 49 CFR 1.85.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 24.1 Purpose.
The purpose of this part is to promulgate rules to implement the
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.) (Uniform Act), in
accordance with the following objectives:
(a) To ensure that owners of real property to be acquired for
Federal and federally assisted projects are treated fairly and
consistently, to encourage and expedite acquisition by agreements with
such owners, to minimize litigation and relieve congestion in the
courts, and to promote public confidence in Federal and federally
assisted land acquisition programs;
(b) To ensure that persons displaced as a direct result of Federal
or federally assisted projects are treated fairly, consistently, and
equitably so that such displaced persons will not suffer
disproportionate injuries as a result of projects designed for the
benefit of the public as a whole; and
(c) To ensure that Agencies implement the regulations in this part
in a manner that is efficient and cost effective.
Sec. 24.2 Definitions and acronyms.
(a) Definitions. Unless otherwise noted, the following terms used
in this part shall be understood as defined in this section:
Agency. The term Agency means any entity utilizing Federal funds or
Federal financial assistance for a project or program that acquires
real property or displaces a person.
(i) Federal Agency. The term Federal Agency means any department,
Agency, or instrumentality in the executive branch of the United States
Government, any wholly owned U.S. Government corporation, the Architect
of the Capitol, the Federal Reserve Banks and branches thereof, and any
person who has the authority to acquire property by eminent domain
under Federal law.
(ii) State Agency. The term State Agency means any department,
Agency or instrumentality of a State or of a political subdivision of a
State, any department, Agency, or instrumentality of two or more States
or of two or more political subdivisions of a State or States, and any
person who has the authority to acquire property by eminent domain
under State law.
Alien not lawfully present in the United States. The phrase alien
not
[[Page 69489]]
lawfully present in the United States means an alien who is not
``lawfully present'' in the United States.
(i) An alien present in the United States who has not been admitted
or paroled into the United States pursuant to the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) and whose stay in the United
States has not been authorized by the Secretary of Homeland; and
(ii) An alien who is present in the United States after the
expiration of the period of stay authorized by the Secretary of
Homeland Security or who otherwise violates the terms and conditions of
admission, parole, or authorization to stay in the United States.
Appraisal. The term appraisal means a written statement
independently and impartially prepared by a qualified appraiser setting
forth an opinion of defined value of an adequately described property
as of a specific date, supported by the presentation and analysis of
relevant market information.
Business. The term business means any lawful activity, except a
farm operation, that is conducted:
(i) Primarily for the purchase, sale, lease, and/or rental of
personal and/or real property, and/or for the manufacture, processing,
and/or marketing of products, commodities, and/or any other personal
property;
(ii) Primarily for the sale of services to the public;
(iii) Primarily for outdoor advertising display purposes, when the
display must be moved as a result of the project; or
(iv) By a nonprofit organization that has established its nonprofit
status under applicable Federal or State law.
Citizen. The term citizen for purposes of this part includes both
citizens of the United States and noncitizen nationals.
Comparable replacement dwelling. The term comparable replacement
dwelling means a dwelling which is:
(i) Decent, safe, and sanitary as described in the definition of
decent, safe, and sanitary in this paragraph (a);
(ii) Functionally equivalent to the displacement dwelling. The term
functionally equivalent means that it performs the same function and
provides the same utility. While a comparable replacement dwelling need
not possess every feature of the displacement dwelling, the principal
features must be present. Generally, functional equivalency is an
objective standard, reflecting the range of purposes for which the
various physical features of a dwelling may be used. However, in
determining whether a replacement dwelling is functionally equivalent
to the displacement dwelling, the Agency may consider reasonable trade-
offs for specific features when the replacement unit is equal to or
better than the displacement dwelling (see appendix A of this part,
Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement dwelling);
(iii) Adequate in size to accommodate the occupants;
(iv) In an area not subject to unreasonable adverse environmental
conditions;
(v) In a location generally not less desirable than the location of
the displaced person's dwelling with respect to public utilities and
commercial and public facilities, and reasonably accessible to the
person's place of employment;
(vi) On a site that is typical in size for residential development
with normal site improvements, including customary landscaping. The
site need not include special improvements such as outbuildings,
swimming pools, or greenhouses. (See also Sec. 24.403(a)(2));
(vii) Currently available to the displaced person on the private
market except as provided in paragraph (ix) of this definition (see
appendix A of this part, Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement
dwelling); and
(viii) Within the financial means of the displaced person:
(A) A replacement dwelling purchased by a homeowner in occupancy at
the displacement dwelling for at least 90 days prior to initiation of
negotiations (90-day homeowner) is considered to be within the
homeowner's financial means if the homeowner will receive the full
price differential as described in Sec. 24.401(c), all increased
mortgage interest costs as described at Sec. 24.401(d) and all
incidental expenses as described at Sec. 24.401(e), plus any
additional amount required to be paid under Sec. 24.404.
(B) A replacement dwelling rented by an eligible displaced person
is considered to be within his or her financial means if, after
receiving rental assistance under this part, the person's monthly rent
and estimated average monthly utility costs for the replacement
dwelling do not exceed the person's base monthly rental for the
displacement dwelling as described at Sec. 24.402(b)(2).
(C) For a displaced person who is not eligible to receive a
replacement housing payment because of the person's failure to meet
length-of-occupancy requirements, comparable replacement rental housing
is considered to be within the person's financial means if an Agency
pays that portion of the monthly housing costs of a replacement
dwelling which exceeds the person's base monthly rent for the
displacement dwelling as described in Sec. 24.402(b)(2). Such rental
assistance must be paid under Sec. 24.404, Replacement housing of last
resort.
(ix) For a person receiving government housing assistance before
displacement, a dwelling that may reflect similar government housing
assistance. In such cases any requirements of the government housing
assistance program relating to the size of the replacement dwelling
shall apply. However, nothing in this part prohibits an Agency from
offering, or precludes a person from accepting, assistance under a
government housing program, even if the person did not receive similar
assistance before displacement, subject to the eligibility requirements
of the government housing assistance program. An Agency is obligated to
inform the person of his or her options under this part. If a person
accepts assistance under a government housing assistance program, the
rules of that program governing the size of the dwelling apply, and the
rental assistance payment under Sec. 24.402 would be computed on the
basis of the person's actual out-of-pocket cost for the replacement
housing and associated utilities after the applicable government
assistance has been applied. In determining comparability of housing
under this part:
(A) A public housing unit may qualify as a comparable replacement
dwelling only for a person displaced from a public housing unit.
(B) A privately owned dwelling with a housing program subsidy tied
to the unit may qualify as a comparable replacement dwelling only for a
person displaced from a similarly subsidized unit or public housing
unit.
(C) A housing program subsidy that is paid to a person (not tied to
the building), such as a HUD Section 8 Housing Voucher Program, may be
reflected in an offer of a comparable replacement dwelling to a person
receiving a similar subsidy or occupying a privately owned subsidized
unit or public housing unit before displacement. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement dwelling.)
Contribute materially. The term contribute materially means that
during the 2 taxable years prior to the taxable year in which
displacement occurs, or during such other period as the Agency
determines to be more equitable, a business or farm operation:
(i) Had average annual gross receipts of at least $5,000; or
[[Page 69490]]
(ii) Had average annual net earnings of at least $1,000; or
(iii) Contributed at least 33\1/3\ percent of the owner's or
operator's average annual gross income from all sources.
(iv) If the application of the above criteria creates an inequity
or hardship in any given case, the Agency may approve the use of other
criteria as determined appropriate. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.305(e) Average annual net earnings of a business or farm
operation.)
Decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling. The term decent, safe, and
sanitary (DSS) dwelling means a dwelling which meets the requirements
of paragraphs (i) through (vii) of this definition or the most
stringent of the local housing code, Federal Agency regulations, or the
Agency's regulations or written policy. The DSS dwelling shall:
(i) Be structurally sound, weather tight, and in good repair;
(A) Many local housing and occupancy codes require the abatement of
deteriorating paint, including lead-based paint and lead-based paint
dust, in protecting the public health and safety. Where such standards
exist, they must be honored;
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) Contain a safe electrical wiring system adequate for lighting
and other devices;
(iii) Contain a heating system capable of sustaining a healthful
temperature (of approximately 70 degrees) for a displaced person,
except in those areas where local climatic conditions do not require
such a system;
(iv) Be adequate in size with respect to the number of rooms and
area of living space needed to accommodate the displaced person. The
number of persons occupying each habitable room used for sleeping
purposes shall not exceed that permitted by local housing codes or the
more stringent the Federal funding Agency requirements. In addition,
the Federal funding agency shall follow the requirements for separate
bedrooms for children of the opposite gender included in local housing
codes or in the absence of local codes, the policies of such Agencies;
(v) There shall be a separate, well lighted and ventilated bathroom
that provides privacy to the user and contains a sink, bathtub or
shower stall, and a toilet, all in good working order and properly
connected to appropriate sources of water and to a sewage drainage
system. When required by local code standards for residential
occupancy, there shall be a kitchen area that contains a fully usable
sink, properly connected to potable hot and cold water and to a sewage
drainage system, and adequate space and utility service connections for
a stove and refrigerator (see appendix A of this part, Section 24.2(a),
definition of DSS);
(vi) Contains unobstructed egress to safe, open space at ground
level; and
(vii) For a displaced person with a disability, be free of any
barriers which would preclude reasonable ingress, egress, or use of the
dwelling by such displaced person. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.2(a), definition of DSS.)
Displaced person--(i) General. The term displaced person means,
except as provided in paragraph (ii) of this definition, any person who
moves from the real property or moves his or her personal property from
the real property. (This includes a person who occupies the real
property prior to its acquisition, but who does not meet the length of
occupancy requirements of the Uniform Act as described at Sec. Sec.
24.401(a) and 24.402(a)):
(A) As a direct result of a written notice of intent to acquire,
rehabilitate, and/or demolish (see Sec. 24.203(d)), the initiation of
negotiations for, or the acquisition of, such real property in whole or
in part for a project;
(B) As a direct result of rehabilitation or demolition for a
project; or
(C) As a direct result of a written notice of intent to acquire, or
the acquisition, rehabilitation or demolition of, in whole or in part,
other real property on which the person conducts a business or farm
operation, for a project. However, eligibility for such person under
this paragraph (i)(C) applies only for purposes of obtaining relocation
assistance advisory services under Sec. 24.205(c), and moving expenses
under Sec. 24.301, Sec. 24.302, or Sec. 24.303.
(ii) Persons required to move temporarily. A person who is not
required to relocate permanently as a direct result of a project. Such
determination shall be made by the Agency in accordance with any
requirement, policy, or guidance established by the Federal Agency
funding the project (see appendix A of this part, Section 24.2(a)). At
a minimum, for persons required to move on a temporary basis, Agencies
must ensure that required services and assistance are provided (see
Sec. 24.202(a)).
(iii) Persons not displaced. The following is a nonexclusive
listing of persons who do not qualify as displaced persons under this
part:
(A) A person who moves before the initiation of negotiations (see
Sec. 24.403(d)), unless the Agency determines that the person was
displaced as a direct result of the program or project;
(B) A person who initially enters into occupancy of the property
after the date of its acquisition for the project;
(C) A person who has occupied the property for the purpose of
obtaining assistance under the Uniform Act;
(D) An owner-occupant who moves as a result of an acquisition of
real property as described in Sec. 24.101(a)(2) or (b)(1) or (2), or
as a result of the rehabilitation or demolition of the real property.
(However, the displacement of a tenant as a direct result of any
acquisition, rehabilitation or demolition for a Federal or federally
assisted project is subject to this part.);
(E) A person whom the Agency determines is not displaced as a
direct result of a partial acquisition;
(F) A person who, after receiving a notice of relocation
eligibility (described at Sec. 24.203(b)), is notified in writing that
he or she will not be displaced for a project. Such written
notification shall not be issued unless the person has not moved and
the Agency agrees to reimburse the person for any expenses incurred to
satisfy any binding contractual relocation obligations entered into
after the effective date of the notice of relocation eligibility;
(G) An owner-occupant who conveys his or her property, as described
in Sec. 24.101(a)(2) or (b)(1) or (2), after being informed in writing
that if a mutually satisfactory agreement on terms of the conveyance
cannot be reached, the Agency will not acquire the property. In such
cases, however, any resulting displacement of a tenant is subject to
the regulations in this part;
(H) A person who retains the right of use and occupancy of the real
property for life following its acquisition by the Agency;
(I) An owner who retains the right of use and occupancy of the real
property for a fixed term after its acquisition by the Department of
the Interior under Public Law 93-477, Appropriations for National Park
System, or Public Law 93-303, Land and Water Conservation Fund, except
that such owner remains a displaced person for purposes of subpart D of
this part;
(J) A person who is determined to be in unlawful occupancy prior to
or after the initiation of negotiations, or a person who has been
evicted for cause, under applicable law, as provided for in Sec.
24.206. However, advisory assistance may be provided to unlawful
occupants at the option of the Agency in order to facilitate the
project;
(K) A person who is not lawfully present in the United States and
who has been determined to be ineligible for relocation assistance in
accordance with Sec. 24.208; or
[[Page 69491]]
(L) Tenants required to move as a result of the sale of their
dwelling to a person using Federal down payment assistance funds as
they are defined in this section (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.2(a)).
(M) Temporary, daily, or emergency shelter occupants are typically
not considered displaced persons. However, Agencies may determine that
a person occupying a shelter is a displaced person due to factors which
could include reasonable expectation of a prolonged stay, or other
extenuating circumstances. At a minimum, Agencies shall provide
advisory assistance to all occupants at initiation of negotiations.
(See appendix A of this part, Section 24.2(a) (Displaced persons).)
Dwelling. The term dwelling means the place of permanent or
customary and usual residence of a person, according to local custom or
law, including a single-family house; a single-family unit in a two-
family, multi-family, or multi-purpose property; a unit of a
condominium or cooperative housing project; a mobile home; or any other
residential unit.
Dwelling site. The term dwelling site means a land area that is
typical in size for similar dwellings located in the same neighborhood
or rural area. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.2(a).)
Farm operation. The term farm operation means any activity
conducted solely or primarily for the production of one or more
agricultural products or commodities, including timber, for sale or
home use, and customarily producing such products or commodities in
sufficient quantity to be capable of contributing materially to the
operator's support.
Federal down payment assistance. The term Federal down payment
assistance means funds other than Uniform Act benefits provided to an
individual for the purpose of purchasing and occupying a residence.
(See appendix A of this part, Section 24.2(a).)
Federal financial assistance. The term Federal financial assistance
means a grant, loan, or contribution provided by the United States,
except any Federal down payment assistance, tax credits such as the Low
Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC), guarantee or insurance and any
interest reduction payment to an individual in connection with the
purchase and occupancy of a residence by that individual.
Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM) (also known as a reverse
mortgage). A HECM is a first mortgage which provides for future
payments to the homeowner based on accumulated equity and which a
housing creditor is authorized to make under any Federal law or State
constitution, law, or regulation. See 12 U.S.C. 1715z-20. It is a class
of lien generally available to persons 62 years of age or older. HECMs
do not require a monthly mortgage payment and can also be used to
access a home's equity. The HECM becomes due when none of the original
borrowers lives in the home, if taxes or insurance become delinquent,
or if the property falls into disrepair.
Household income. The term household income means total gross
income received for a 12-month period from all sources (earned and
unearned) including, but not limited to wages, salary, child support,
alimony, unemployment benefits, workers compensation, social security,
or the net income from a business. It does not include income received
or earned by dependent children under 18, or full-time students who are
students for at least 5 months of the year and are under the age of 24.
(See appendix A of this part, Section 24.2(a), for examples of
exclusions to income.)
Initiation of negotiations. Unless a different action is specified
in applicable Federal program regulations, the term initiation of
negotiations means the following:
(i) Whenever the displacement results from the acquisition of the
real property by a Federal Agency or State Agency, the initiation of
negotiations means the delivery of the initial written offer of just
compensation by the Agency to the owner or the owner's representative
to purchase the real property for the project. However, if the Federal
Agency or State Agency issues a notice of its intent to acquire,
rehabilitate, or demolish the real property, and a person moves after
that notice, but before delivery of the initial written purchase offer,
the initiation of negotiations means the actual move of the person from
the property.
(ii) Whenever the displacement is caused by rehabilitation,
demolition, or privately undertaken acquisition of the real property
(and there is no related acquisition by a Federal Agency or a State
Agency), the initiation of negotiations means the notice to the person
that he or she will be displaced by the project or, if there is no
notice, the actual move of the person from the property.
(iii) In the case of a permanent relocation to protect the public
health and welfare, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-510, or Superfund)
(CERCLA) the initiation of negotiations means the formal announcement
of such relocation or the Federal or federally-coordinated health
advisory where the Federal Government later decides to conduct a
permanent relocation.
(iv) In the case of permanent relocation of a tenant as a result of
a voluntary acquisition of real property described in Sec.
24.101(b)(1) through (5), the initiation of negotiations means the
actions described in paragraphs (i) and (ii) of this definition, except
that the tenant is not eligible for relocation assistance under this
part, until there is a binding written agreement between the Agency and
the owner to purchase the real property. An option to purchase,
conditional sale, or purchase agreement is not considered a binding
agreement to purchase real property. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.2(a).)
Lead Agency. The term Lead Agency means the Department of
Transportation acting through the Federal Highway Administration.
Mobile home. The term mobile home includes manufactured homes and
recreational vehicles used as residences. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.2(a).)
Mortgage. The term mortgage means such classes of liens as are
commonly given to secure advances on, or the unpaid purchase price of,
real property, under the laws of the State in which the real property
is located, together with the credit instruments, if any, secured
thereby.
Nonprofit organization. The term nonprofit organization means an
organization that is incorporated under the applicable laws of a State
as a nonprofit organization, and exempt from paying Federal income
taxes under section 501 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. 501).
Owner of a dwelling. The term owner of a dwelling means a person
who is considered to have met the requirement to own a dwelling if the
person purchases or holds any of the following interests in real
property:
(i) Fee title, a life estate, a land contract, a 99-year lease, or
a lease including any options for extension with at least 50 years to
run from the date of acquisition; or
(ii) An interest in a cooperative housing project which includes
the right to occupy a dwelling; or
(iii) A contract to purchase any of the interests or estates
described in this section; or
(iv) Any other interest, including a partial interest, which in the
judgment of the Agency warrants consideration as ownership.
[[Page 69492]]
Owner's designated representative. A property owner may designate a
representative to receive all required notifications and documents from
the Agency. The owner must provide the Agency a written notification
which states that they will be designating a representative, provide
that person's name and contact information and what if any notices or
information, the representative is not authorized to receive.
Person. The term person means any individual, family, partnership,
corporation, or association.
Program or project. The phrase program or project means any
activity or series of activities undertaken by a Federal Agency or with
Federal financial assistance received or anticipated in any phase of an
undertaking in accordance with the Federal funding Agency guidelines.
Recipient. The term recipient means a non-Federal entity that
receives a Federal award directly from a Federal Agency to carry out an
activity under a Federal program. The recipient is accountable to the
Federal-funding Agency for the use of the funds and for compliance with
applicable Federal requirements. The term recipient does not include
subrecipients.
Salvage value. The term salvage value means the probable sale price
of an item offered for sale to knowledgeable buyers with the
requirement that it be removed from the property at a buyer's expense
(i.e., not eligible for relocation assistance). This includes items for
re-use as well as items with components that can be re-used or recycled
when there is no reasonable prospect for sale except on this basis.
Small business. A small business is a business having not more than
500 employees working at the site being acquired or displaced by a
program or project, which site is the location of economic activity.
Sites occupied solely by outdoor advertising signs, displays, or
devices do not qualify as a business for purposes of Sec. 24.303 or
Sec. 24.304.
State. Any of the several States of the United States or the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any territory or
possession of the United States, or a political subdivision of any of
these jurisdictions.
Subrecipient. The term subrecipient means a government Agency or
legal entity that enters into an agreement with a recipient to carry
out part or all of the activity funded by Federal program grant funds.
A subrecipient is accountable to the recipient for the use of the funds
and for compliance with applicable Federal requirements.
Temporary, daily, or emergency shelter (shelter). The phrase
temporary, daily, or emergency shelter (shelter) means any facility,
the primary purpose of which is to provide a person with a temporary
overnight shelter which does not generally allow prolonged or
guaranteed occupancy. A shelter typically requires the occupants to
remove their personal property and themselves from the premises on a
daily basis, offers no guarantee of reentry in the evening, and does
not meet the definition of dwelling as used in this part.
Tenant. The term tenant means a person who has the temporary use
and occupancy of real property owned by another.
Uneconomic remnant. The term uneconomic remnant means a parcel of
real property in which the owner is left with an interest after the
partial acquisition of the owner's property, and which the Agency has
determined has little or no value or utility to the owner.
Uniform Act. The term Uniform Act or Act means the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
1970 (Pub. L. 91-646, 84 Stat. 1894; 42 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.), and
amendments thereto.
Unlawful occupant. A person who occupies without property right,
title, or payment of rent, or a person legally evicted, with no legal
rights to occupy a property under State law. An Agency, at its
discretion, may consider such person to be in lawful occupancy for the
purpose of determining eligibility for assistance under the Uniform
Act.
Utility costs. The term utility costs means expenses for
electricity, gas, other heating and cooking fuels, water, and sewer.
Utility facility. The term utility facility means:
(i) Any line, facility, or system for producing, transporting,
transmitting, or distributing communications, cable, television, power,
electricity, light, heat, gas, oil, crude products, water, steam,
waste, storm water not connected with highway drainage, or any other
similar commodity, including any fire or police signal system or street
lighting system, which directly or indirectly serves the public; any
fixtures, equipment, or other property associated with the operation,
maintenance, or repair of any such system. A utility facility may be
publicly, privately, or cooperatively owned.
(ii) The term shall also mean the utility company including any
substantially owned or controlled subsidiary. For the purposes of this
part the term includes those utility-type facilities which are owned or
leased by a government Agency for its own use, or otherwise dedicated
solely to governmental use. The term utility includes those facilities
used solely by the utility which are part of its operating plant.
Utility relocation. The term utility relocation means the
adjustment of a utility facility required by the program or project
undertaken by the Agency. It includes removing and reinstalling the
facility, including necessary temporary facilities; necessary right-of-
way on a new location; moving, rearranging, or changing the type of
existing facilities; and, taking any necessary safety and protective
measures. It shall also mean constructing a replacement facility that
has the functional equivalency of the existing facility and is
necessary for the continued operation of the utility service, the
project economy, or sequence of project construction.
Waiver valuation. The term waiver valuation means the valuation
process used and the product produced when the Agency determines that
an appraisal is not required, pursuant to Sec. 24.102(c)(2) appraisal
waiver provisions.
(b) Acronyms. The following acronyms are commonly used in the
implementation of programs subject to this part:
DOT (U.S. Department of Transportation).
FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency).
FHA (Federal Housing Administration).
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration).
FIRREA (Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement
Act of 1989).
HLR (Housing of last resort).
HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development).
MIDP (Mortgage interest differential payment).
RHP (Replacement housing payment).
STURAA (Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Act
Amendments of 1987).
UA or URA (Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970).
USCIS (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service).
USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice).
Sec. 24.3 No duplication of payments.
No person shall receive any payment under this part if that person
receives a payment under Federal, State, local law, or insurance
proceeds which is determined by the Agency to have the same purpose and
effect as such
[[Page 69493]]
payment under this part. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.3.)
Sec. 24.4 Assurances, monitoring, and corrective action.
(a) Assurances. (1) Before a Federal Agency may approve any grant
to, or contract, or agreement with, an Agency under which Federal
financial assistance will be made available for a project which results
in real property acquisition or displacement that is subject to the
Uniform Act, the Agency must provide appropriate assurances that it
will comply with the Uniform Act and this part. An Agency's assurances
shall be in accordance with sections 210 and 305 of the Uniform Act.
The Agency's section 305 assurances must contain specific reference to
any State law which the Agency believes provides an exception to
section 301 or 302 of the Uniform Act. If, in the judgment of the
Federal Agency, Uniform Act compliance will be served, an Agency may
provide these assurances at one time to cover all subsequent federally
assisted programs or projects. An Agency, which both acquires real
property and displaces persons, may combine its sections 210 and 305
assurances in one document.
(2) If a Federal Agency or recipient provides Federal financial
assistance to a party or person causing displacement, such Federal
Agency or recipient is responsible for ensuring compliance with the
requirements of this part, notwithstanding the person's contractual
obligation to the recipient to comply with the requirements of this
part.
(3) As an alternative to the assurance requirement described in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, a Federal Agency may provide Federal
financial assistance to a recipient after it has accepted a
certification by such recipient in accordance with the requirements in
subpart G of this part.
(b) Monitoring and corrective action. The Federal Agency will
monitor compliance with this part, and the recipient shall take
whatever corrective action is necessary to comply with the Uniform Act
and this part. The Federal Agency may also apply sanctions in
accordance with applicable program regulations. (Also see Sec.
24.603.)
(c) Prevention of fraud, waste, and mismanagement. The Agency shall
take appropriate measures to carry out this part in a manner that
minimizes fraud, waste, and mismanagement.
Sec. 24.5 Manner of notices.
(a) Each notice which the Agency is required to provide to a
property owner or occupant under this part, except the notice described
at Sec. 24.102(b), shall be personally served or sent by certified or
registered first-class mail, return receipt requested (or by companies
other than the United States Postal Service that provide the same
function as certified mail with return receipts) and documented in
Agency files. A Federal funding Agency may approve the use of
electronic delivery of notices in lieu of the use of certified or
registered first-class mail, return receipt requested, or personally
served notices, when an Agency demonstrates a means to document receipt
of such notices by the property owner or occupant.
(b) An Agency requesting use of electronic delivery of notices must
include the following safeguards:
(1) A process to inform property owners and occupants that they
must voluntarily elect to receive electronic notices.
(2) A process to document and record when information is legally
delivered in digital format. A date and timestamp must establish the
date of delivery and receipt with an electronic record capable of
retention.
(3) A method to link the electronic signature with an electronic
document in a way that can be used to determine whether the electronic
document was changed subsequent to when an electronic signature was
applied to the document.
(4) A certification that use of electronic notices or signatures is
consistent with existing State and Federal laws.
(c) Each notice shall be written in plain, understandable language.
Persons who are unable to read and understand the notice must be
provided with appropriate translation and counseling. Each notice shall
indicate the name and telephone number of a person who may be contacted
for answers to questions or other needed help. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.5.)
(d) A property owner may designate a representative to receive
offers, correspondence, and information by providing a written request
to the Agency (Sec. 24.2(a)).
Sec. 24.6 Administration of jointly-funded projects.
Whenever two or more Federal Agencies provide financial assistance
to an Agency or Agencies, other than a Federal Agency, to carry out
functionally or geographically related activities which will result in
the acquisition of property or the displacement of a person, the
Federal Agencies may by agreement designate one such Agency as the
cognizant Federal Agency. In the unlikely event that agreement among
the Agencies cannot be reached as to which Agency shall be the
cognizant Federal Agency, then the Lead Agency shall designate one of
such Agencies to assume the cognizant role. At a minimum, the agreement
shall set forth the federally assisted activities which are subject to
its terms and cite any policies and procedures, in addition to this
part, that are applicable to the activities under the agreement. Under
the agreement, the cognizant Federal Agency shall assure that the
project is in compliance with the provisions of the Uniform Act and
this part. All federally assisted activities under the agreement shall
be deemed a project for the purposes of this part.
Sec. 24.7 Federal Agency waiver of regulations in this part.
The Federal Agency funding the project may waive any requirement in
this part not required by law if it determines that the waiver does not
reduce any assistance or protection provided to an owner or displaced
person under this part. Any request for a waiver shall be justified on
a case-by-case basis.
Sec. 24.8 Compliance with other laws and regulations.
The implementation of this part must be in compliance with other
applicable Federal laws and implementing regulations, including, but
not limited to, the following:
(a) Section I of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. 1982 et
seq.).
(b) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et
seq.).
(c) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3601 et
seq.), as amended.
(d) The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.).
(e) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 790 et
seq.).
(f) The Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-234).
(g) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.).
(h) Executive Order 11063--Equal Opportunity and Housing, as
amended by Executive Order 12892.
(i) Executive Order 11246--Equal Employment Opportunity, as
amended.
(j) Executive Order 11625--Minority Business Enterprise.
(k) Executive Orders 11988--Floodplain Management, and 11990--
Protection of Wetlands.
(l) Executive Order 12250--Leadership and Coordination of Non-
Discrimination Laws.
(m) Executive Order 12630--Governmental Actions and Interference
[[Page 69494]]
with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.
(n) Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance
Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
(o) Executive Order 12892--Leadership and Coordination of Fair
Housing in Federal Programs: Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing
(January 17, 1994).
Sec. 24.9 Recordkeeping and reports.
(a) Records. The Agency shall maintain adequate records of its
acquisition and displacement activities in sufficient detail to
demonstrate compliance with this part. These records shall be retained
for at least 3 years after each owner of a property and each person
displaced from the property receives the final payment to which he or
she is entitled under this part, or in accordance with the applicable
regulations of the Federal funding Agency, whichever is later.
(b) Confidentiality of records. Records maintained by an Agency in
accordance with this part are confidential regarding their use as
public information, unless applicable law provides otherwise.
(c) Reports. Each Federal Agency that has programs or projects
requiring the acquisition of real property or causing a displacement
from real property subject to the provisions of the Act shall provide
to the Lead Agency an annual summary report by November 15 that
describes the real property acquisitions, displacements, and related
activities conducted by the Federal Agency for the calendar year. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.9(c).)
Sec. 24.10 Appeals.
(a) General. The Agency shall promptly review appeals in accordance
with the requirements of applicable law and this part.
(b) Actions which may be appealed. Any aggrieved person may file a
written appeal with the Agency in any case in which the person believes
that the Agency has failed to properly consider the person's
application for assistance under this part. Such assistance may
include, but is not limited to, the person's eligibility for, or the
amount of, a payment required under Sec. 24.106 or Sec. 24.107, or a
relocation payment required under this part. The Agency shall consider
a written appeal regardless of form.
(c) Time limit for initiating appeal. The Agency may set a
reasonable time limit for a person to file an appeal. The time limit
shall not be less than 60 days after the person receives written
notification of the Agency's determination on the person's claim.
(d) Right to representation. A person has a right to be represented
by legal counsel or other representative in connection with his or her
appeal, but solely at the person's own expense.
(e) Review of files by person making appeal. The Agency shall
permit a person to inspect and copy all materials pertinent to his or
her appeal, except materials which are classified as confidential by
the Agency. The Agency may, however, impose reasonable conditions on
the person's right to inspect, consistent with applicable laws.
(f) Scope of review of appeal. In deciding an appeal, the Agency
shall consider all pertinent justification and other material submitted
by the person, and all other available information that is needed to
ensure a fair and full review of the appeal.
(g) Determination and notification after appeal. Promptly after
receipt of all information submitted by a person in support of an
appeal, the Agency shall make a written determination on the appeal,
including an explanation of the basis on which the decision was made,
and furnish the person a copy. If the full relief requested is not
granted, the Agency shall inform the person that the determination is
the Agency's final decision and that the person may seek judicial
review of the Agency's determination.
(h) Agency official to review appeal. The Agency official
conducting the review of the appeal shall be either the head of the
Agency or his or her authorized designee. However, the official shall
not have been directly involved in the action appealed.
Sec. 24.11 Adjustments of relocation benefits.
(a) The Lead Agency may adjust the amounts of relocation benefits
provided under this part at Sec. Sec. 24.304, 24.305, 24.401, and
24.402.
(b) No more frequently than every 5 years the head of the Lead
Agency will evaluate whether the cost of living, inflation, or other
factors indicate that relocation benefits provided in the sections in
paragraph (a) of this section should be adjusted to meet the policy
objectives of the Uniform Act. The Lead Agency will divide the Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) index for the year of the
assessment (base year index), by the CPI-U index for the year of
assessment to determine the effect of inflation over the assessment
period. If adjustments are determined to be necessary, the head of the
Lead Agency will publish the new maximum benefits eligible for Federal
participation in the Federal Register. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.11.)
Subpart B--Real Property Acquisition
Sec. 24.101 Applicability of acquisition requirements.
(a) Direct Federal program or project. (1) The requirements of this
subpart apply to any acquisition of real property for a direct Federal
program or project, except acquisition for a program or project that is
undertaken by the Tennessee Valley Authority or the Rural Utilities
Service. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.101(a).)
(2) If a Federal Agency (except for the Tennessee Valley Authority
or the Rural Utilities Service) will not acquire a property because
negotiations fail to result in an agreement, the owner of the property
or the owner's designated representative shall be so informed in
writing. Owners of such properties are not displaced persons, as such,
are not entitled to relocation assistance benefits. However, tenants on
such properties may be eligible for relocation assistance benefits.
(See Sec. 24.2(a).)
(b) Programs and projects receiving Federal financial assistance.
The requirements of this subpart apply to any acquisition of real
property for programs and projects where there is Federal financial
assistance in any part of project costs except for the acquisitions
described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section. The
relocation assistance provisions in this part are applicable to any
tenants that must move as a result of an acquisition described in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section. Such tenants are
considered displaced persons. (See Sec. 24.2(a).)
(1) The requirements of this subpart do not apply to acquisitions
that meet all of the conditions in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (iv) of
this section:
(i) No specific property needs to be acquired, although the Agency
may limit its search for alternative properties to a general geographic
area. Where an Agency wishes to purchase more than one property within
a general geographic area on this basis, all owners are to be treated
similarly. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.101(b)(1)(i).)
(ii) The property to be acquired is not part of an intended,
planned, or designated project area where all or substantially all of
the property within the area is to be acquired within specific time
limits.
(iii) No later than the time of the offer the Agency shall inform
the owner of the property or the owner's designated representative in
writing that it will not acquire the property if negotiations fail to
result in an amicable agreement.
[[Page 69495]]
(iv) No later than the time of the offer the Agency shall inform
the owner of the property or the owner's designated representative in
writing of what it believes to be the fair market value of the
property.
(2) Acquisitions for programs or projects undertaken by an Agency
that receives Federal financial assistance and will not use eminent
domain to acquire the property. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.101(b)(2).) When making an offer to acquire such Agency or person
shall:
(i) No later than the time of the offer clearly advise the owner of
the property or the owner's designated representative that the Agency
will not acquire the property if negotiations fail to result in an
amicable agreement.
(ii) No later than the time of the offer inform the owner of the
property, or the owner's designated representative, in writing of what
it believes to be the fair market value of the property. (See appendix
A of this part, Section 24.101(b)(1)(iv) and (b)(2)(ii).)
(iii) Not use eminent domain to acquire properties for that project
should the negotiations for purchase fail to result in an agreement to
sell the real property. In extraordinary situations in which an
unanticipated and unplanned need arises after carrying out voluntary
acquisition activities, the Agency may request a waiver of regulation
under Sec. 24.7 to pursue acquisition by eminent domain for a specific
parcel or parcels while remaining in compliance with the Uniform Act's
prohibition on coercive actions. Such request must identify the
specific parcels that would be acquired by eminent domain, the reason
for the need, and the steps the Agency will take to ensure that
property owner's assistance and protection are not reduced.
(3) The acquisition of real property from a Federal Agency, State,
or State Agency, if the Agency desiring to make the purchase does not
have authority to acquire the property through condemnation.
(4) The acquisition of real property by a cooperative from a person
who, as a condition of membership in the cooperative, has agreed to
provide without charge any real property that is needed by the
cooperative.
(5) Acquisition for a program or project that receives Federal
financial assistance from the Tennessee Valley Authority or the Rural
Utilities Service.
(c) Less-than-full-fee interest in real property. (1) The
provisions of this subpart apply when acquiring fee title subject to
retention of a life estate or a life use; to acquisition by leasing
where the lease term, including option(s) for extension, is 50 years or
more; and, to the acquisition of permanent and/or temporary easements
necessary for the project. However, the Agency may apply the
regulations in this subpart to any less-than-full-fee acquisition that,
in its judgment, should be covered.
(2) The provisions of this subpart do not apply to temporary
easements or permits needed solely to perform work intended exclusively
for the benefit of the property owner, which work may not be done if
agreement cannot be reached.
(d) Federally assisted projects. (1) For projects receiving Federal
financial assistance, the provisions of Sec. Sec. 24.102, 24.103,
24.104, and 24.105 apply to the greatest extent practicable under State
law. (See Sec. 24.4(a).)
(2) For real property acquired which may later be incorporated into
an anticipated, designated, or planned federally-funded or assisted
project or program the provisions of Sec. Sec. 24.102, 24.103, 24.104,
and 24.105 apply to the greatest extent practicable under State law.
(See Sec. 24.4(a).)
(3) The Relocation assistance provisions included in this part are
applicable to any property owner or tenants who must move as a result
of an acquisition described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section. Such
owners and tenants are to be considered displaced persons. (See Sec.
24.2(a).)
Sec. 24.102 Basic acquisition policies.
(a) Expeditious acquisition. The Agency shall make every reasonable
effort to acquire the real property expeditiously by negotiation.
(b) Notice to owner. As soon as feasible, the Agency shall notify
the owner in writing of the Agency's interest in acquiring the real
property and the basic protections provided to the owner by law and
this part. (See Sec. Sec. 24.203 and 24.5(d) and appendix A of this
part, Section 24.102(b).)
(c) Appraisal, waiver thereof, and invitation to owner. (1) Before
the initiation of negotiations, the real property to be acquired shall
be appraised, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section,
and the owner, or the owner's designated representative, shall be given
an opportunity to accompany the appraiser during the appraiser's
inspection of the property.
(2) An appraisal is not required if:
(i) The owner is donating the property and releases the Agency from
its obligation to appraise the property; or
(ii) The Agency determines that an appraisal is unnecessary because
the valuation problem is uncomplicated and the anticipated value of the
proposed acquisition is estimated at $10,000 or less, based on a review
of available data. The Agency employee or contractor making the
determination to use the waiver valuation option must understand
valuation principles, techniques, and use of appraisals in order to be
able to determine whether the proposed acquisition is uncomplicated.
(See appendix A of this part, Section 24.102(c)(2).)
(A) When an appraisal is determined to be unnecessary, the Agency
shall prepare a waiver valuation. Licensed or certified appraisers
preparing, or reviewing a waiver valuation are precluded from complying
with standards rules 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the ``Uniform Standards of
Professional Appraisal Practice'' (USPAP), as promulgated by the
Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation.\1\ (See appendix
A of this part, Section 24.103(a).)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice
(USPAP). Published by The Appraisal Foundation, a nonprofit
educational organization. Copies may be ordered from The Appraisal
Foundation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) The person performing the waiver valuation must have sufficient
understanding of the local real estate market to be qualified to make
the waiver valuation.
(C) The Federal Agency funding the project may approve exceeding
the $10,000 threshold, up to an amount of $25,000, if the Agency
acquiring the real property offers the property owner the option of
having the Agency appraise the property. (D) If the Agency determines
that the proposed acquisition is uncomplicated, and if the Agency
acquiring the real property offers the property owner the option of
having the Agency appraise the property, the Agency may request
approval from the Federal funding Agency to use a waiver valuation of
up to $50,000. The use of waiver valuations between $25,000 and $50,000
is limited to the Federal funding Agencies and recipients and shall not
be further delegated. Approval for utilizing a waiver valuation of more
than $25,000, but up to $50,000, may only be requested on a project-by-
project basis and the request for doing so shall be made in writing to
the Federal funding Agency setting forth:
(1) The anticipated benefits of, and reasons for, raising the
waiver valuation ceiling above $25,000;
(2) The administrative/managerial oversight mechanisms used to
assure proper use and review;
(3) The names/credentials of individuals who will be performing the
waiver valuations;
[[Page 69496]]
(4) The quality control procedures to be utilized;
(5) Performance/results metrics with quarterly reports provided to
the Federal funding Agency; and
(6) Within 6 months of completion of acquisition activities a
close-out report measuring cost/time benefits, lessons learned, best
practices, etc., shall be submitted to the Federal funding Agency.
(E) If the property owner elects to have the Agency appraise the
property, the Agency must obtain an appraisal and shall not use the
waiver valuation procedures described above. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.102(c)(2).)
(d) Establishment and offer of just compensation. Before the
initiation of negotiations, the Agency shall establish an amount which
it believes is just compensation for the real property. The amount
shall not be less than the approved appraisal or waiver valuation of
the fair market value of the property, taking into account the value of
allowable damages or benefits to any remaining property. An Agency
official must establish the amount believed to be just compensation.
(See Sec. 24.104.) Promptly thereafter, the Agency shall make a
written offer to the owner or the designated owner's representative to
acquire the property for the full amount believed to be just
compensation. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.102(d).)
(e) Summary statement. Along with the initial written purchase
offer, the owner or the designated owner's representative shall be
given a written statement of the basis for the offer of just
compensation, which shall include:
(1) A statement of the amount offered as just compensation. In the
case of a partial acquisition, the compensation for the real property
to be acquired and the compensation for damages, if any, to the
remaining real property shall be separately stated.
(2) A description and location identification of the real property
and the interest in the real property to be acquired.
(3) An identification of the buildings, structures, and other
improvements (including removable building equipment and trade
fixtures) which are included as part of the offer of just compensation.
Where appropriate, the statement shall identify any other separately
held ownership interest in the property, e.g. a tenant-owned
improvement, and indicate that such interest is not covered by this
offer.
(f) Basic negotiation procedures. The Agency shall make all
reasonable efforts to contact the owner or the owner's designated
representative and discuss its offer to purchase the property,
including the basis for the offer of just compensation and explain its
acquisition policies and procedures, including its payment of
incidental expenses in accordance with Sec. 24.106. The owner shall be
given reasonable opportunity to consider the offer and present material
which the owner believes is relevant to determining the value of the
property and to suggest modification in the proposed terms and
conditions of the purchase. The Agency shall consider the owner's or
the designated owner's representative's presentation. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.102(f).)
(g) Updating offer of just compensation. If the information
presented by the owner, or a material change in the character or
condition of the property, indicates the need for new waiver valuation
or appraisal information, or if a significant delay has occurred since
the time of the appraisal(s) or waiver valuation of the property, the
Agency shall have the appraisal(s) or waiver valuation updated or
obtain a new appraisal(s) or waiver valuation. If the latest appraisal
or waiver valuation information indicates that a change in the purchase
offer is warranted, the Agency shall promptly reestablish just
compensation and offer that amount to the owner in writing.
(h) Coercive action. The Agency shall not advance the time of
condemnation, or defer negotiations or condemnation or the deposit of
funds with the court, or take any other coercive action in order to
induce an agreement on the price to be paid for the property.
(i) Administrative settlement. The purchase price for the property
may exceed the amount offered as just compensation when reasonable
efforts to negotiate an agreement at that amount have failed and an
authorized Agency official approves such administrative settlement as
being reasonable, prudent, and in the public interest. When Federal
funds pay for or participate in acquisition costs, a written
justification shall be prepared, which states what available
information, including trial risks, supports such a settlement. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.102(i).)
(j) Payment before taking possession. Before requiring the owner to
surrender possession of the real property, the Agency shall pay the
agreed purchase price to the owner, or in the case of a condemnation,
deposit with the court, for the benefit of the owner, an amount not
less than the Agency's approved appraisal of the fair market value of
such property, or the court award of compensation in the condemnation
proceeding for the property. In exceptional circumstances, with the
prior approval of the owner or the owner's designated representative,
the Agency may obtain a right-of-entry for construction purposes before
making payment available to an owner. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.102(j).)
(k) Uneconomic remnant. If the acquisition of only a portion of a
property would leave the owner with an uneconomic remnant, the Agency
shall offer to acquire the uneconomic remnant along with the portion of
the property needed for the project. (See Sec. 24.2(a).)
(l) Inverse condemnation. If the Agency intends to acquire any
interest in real property by exercise of the power of eminent domain,
it shall institute formal condemnation proceedings and not
intentionally make it necessary for the owner to institute legal
proceedings to prove the fact of the taking of the real property.
(m) Fair rental. If the Agency permits a former owner or tenant to
occupy the real property after acquisition for a short term, or a
period subject to termination by the Agency on short notice, the rent
shall not exceed the fair market rent for such occupancy. (See appendix
A of this part, Section 24.102(m).)
(n) Conflict of interest. (1) The appraiser, review appraiser, or
person performing the waiver valuation shall not have any interest,
direct or indirect, in the real property being valued for the Agency.
Compensation for developing an appraisal or waiver valuation shall not
be based on the amount of the valuation estimate.
(2) No person shall attempt to unduly influence or coerce an
appraiser, review appraiser, or waiver valuation preparer regarding any
valuation aspect of an appraisal, waiver valuation, or review of
appraisals or waiver valuations. Persons functioning as negotiators may
not supervise or formally evaluate the performance of any appraiser or
review appraiser performing appraisal or appraisal review work, except
that, for a program or project receiving Federal financial assistance,
the Federal funding Agency may waive this requirement if it determines
it would create a hardship for the Agency.
(3) An appraiser, review appraiser, or waiver valuation preparer
may be authorized by the Agency to act as a negotiator for the
acquisition of real property for which that person has made an
appraisal, appraisal review or waiver valuation only if the offer to
acquire the property is $10,000, or less. If the valuer will also act
as the
[[Page 69497]]
negotiator on a valuation greater than $10,000, and up to $25,000, an
appraisal must be prepared and reviewed. Agencies desiring to exercise
this option must request approval in writing from the Federal funding
Agency. The requesting Agency shall have a separate and distinct
quality control process in place and set forth in the written
procedures approved by the Federal funding agency. Agencies wishing to
extend their Federal funding Agency approval for conflict of interest
waivers of more than $10,000 to their subrecipients must determine and
document that the subrecipient has a separate and distinct quality
control process in place and set forth in written procedures approved
by the Federal funding agency or in approved subrecipient written
procedures. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.102(n).)
Sec. 24.103 Criteria for appraisals.
(a) Appraisal requirements. This section sets forth the
requirements for real property acquisition appraisals for Federal and
federally assisted programs. Appraisals are to be prepared according to
this section, which is intended to be consistent with the USPAP. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.103(a).) The Agency may have
appraisal requirements that supplement this section, including, to the
extent appropriate, the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land
Acquisition (UASFLA), also commonly referred to as the ``Yellow
Book''.) The USPAP is published by The Appraisal Foundation. The USFLA
is published by the Appraisal Foundation in partnership with the
Department of Justice on behalf of the Interagency Land Acquisition
Conference. The USFLA is a compendium of Federal eminent domain
appraisal law, both case and statute, regulations and practices.\2\
Copies of the USPAP and the UASFLA may be ordered from The Appraisal
Foundation in print and electronic forms.\3\ The USPAP may be viewed on
The Appraisal Foundation's website.\4\ A free electronic version of the
UASFLA is available for download on the U.S. Department of Justice
website.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ www.justice.gov/file/408306/download.
\3\ https://www.appraisalfoundation.org/imis/TAF/Standards/Appraisal_Standards/TAF/Standards.aspx.
\4\ https://www.uspap.org.
\5\ https://www.justice.gov/file/408306/download.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) The Agency acquiring real property has a legitimate role in
contributing to the appraisal process, especially in developing the
scope of work and defining the appraisal problem. The scope of work and
development of an appraisal under this section depends on the
complexity of the appraisal problem.
(2) The Agency has the responsibility to assure that the appraisals
it obtains are relevant to its program needs, reflect established and
commonly accepted Federal and federally assisted program appraisal
practice, and at a minimum, comply with the definition of appraisal in
Sec. 24.2(a) and the requirements in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (v)
of this section (see appendix A of this part, Section 24.103 and
Section 24.103(a)):
(i) An adequate description of the physical characteristics of the
property being appraised (and, in the case of a partial acquisition, an
adequate description of the remaining property), including items
identified as personal property, a statement of the known and observed
encumbrances, if any, title information, location, zoning, present use,
an analysis of highest and best use, and at least a 5-year sales
history of the property. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.103(a)(1).)
(ii) All relevant and reliable approaches to value consistent with
established Federal and federally assisted program appraisal practices.
If the appraiser uses more than one approach, there shall be an
analysis and reconciliation of approaches to value used that is
sufficient to support the appraiser's opinion of value. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.103(a).)
(iii) A description of comparable sales, including a description of
all relevant physical, legal, and economic factors such as parties to
the transaction, source and method of financing, and verification by a
party involved in the transaction.
(iv) A statement of the value of the real property to be acquired
and, for a partial acquisition, a statement of the value of the damages
and benefits, if any, to the remaining real property, where
appropriate.
(v) The effective date of valuation, date of appraisal, signature,
and certification of the appraiser.
(b) Influence of the project on just compensation. The appraiser
shall disregard any decrease or increase in the fair market value of
the real property caused by the project for which the property is to be
acquired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for
the project, other than that due to physical deterioration within the
reasonable control of the owner. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.103(b).)
(c) Owner retention of improvements. If the owner of a real
property improvement is permitted to retain it for removal from the
project site, the amount to be offered for the interest in the real
property to be acquired shall not be less than the difference between
the amount determined to be just compensation for the owner's interest
in the real property and the salvage value (defined at Sec. 24.2(a))
of the retained improvement.
(d) Qualifications of appraisers and review appraisers. (1) The
Agency shall establish criteria for determining the minimum
qualifications and competency of appraisers and review appraisers.
Qualifications shall be consistent with the scope of work for the
assignment. The Agency shall review the experience, education,
training, certification/licensing, designation(s), and other
qualifications of appraisers, and review appraisers, and use only those
determined by the Agency to be qualified. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.103(d)(1).)
(2) If the Agency uses a contract (fee) appraiser to perform the
appraisal, such appraiser shall be State licensed or certified in
accordance with title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform,
Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3331 et seq.).
Sec. 24.104 Review of appraisals.
The Agency shall have an appraisal review process and, at a
minimum:
(a) A qualified review appraiser (see Sec. 24.103(d)(1) and
appendix A of this part, Section 24.104) shall examine the presentation
and analysis of market information in all appraisals to assure that
they meet the definition of appraisal found in Sec. 24.2(a), appraisal
requirements found in 49 CFR 24.103, and other applicable requirements,
including, to the extent appropriate, the UASFLA, and support the
appraiser's opinion of value. The level of review analysis depends on
the complexity of the appraisal problem. As needed, the review
appraiser shall, prior to acceptance, seek necessary corrections or
revisions. The review appraiser shall identify each appraisal report as
recommended (as the basis for the establishment of the amount believed
to be just compensation), accepted (meets all requirements, but not
selected as recommended or approved), or not accepted. If authorized by
the Agency to do so, the staff review appraiser shall also approve the
appraisal (as the basis for the establishment of the amount believed to
be just compensation), and, if also authorized to do so, develop and
report the amount believed to be just compensation. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.104(a).)
(b) If the review appraiser is unable to recommend (or approve) an
appraisal as
[[Page 69498]]
an adequate basis for the establishment of the offer of just
compensation, and it is determined by the Agency that it is not
practical to obtain an additional appraisal, the review appraiser may,
as part of the review, present and analyze market information in
conformance with Sec. 24.103 to support a recommended (or approved)
value. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.104(b).)
(c) The review appraiser shall prepare a written report that
identifies the appraisal reports reviewed and documents the findings
and conclusions arrived at during the review of the appraisal(s). Any
damages or benefits to any remaining property shall be identified in
the review appraiser's report. The review appraiser shall also prepare
a signed certification that states the parameters of the review. The
certification shall state the approved value and, if the review
appraiser is authorized to do so, the amount believed to be just
compensation for the acquisition. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.104(c).)
Sec. 24.105 Acquisition of tenant-owned improvements.
(a) Acquisition of improvements. When acquiring any interest in
real property, the Agency shall offer to acquire at least an equal
interest in all buildings, structures, or other improvements located
upon the real property to be acquired, which it requires to be removed
or which it determines will be adversely affected by the use to which
such real property will be put. This shall include any improvement of a
tenant-owner who has the right or obligation to remove the improvement
at the expiration of the lease term.
(b) Improvements considered to be real property. Any building,
structure, or other improvement, which would be considered real
property if owned by the owner of the real property on which it is
located, shall be considered to be real property for purposes of this
subpart.
(c) Appraisal and establishment of just compensation for a tenant-
owned improvement. Just compensation for a tenant-owned improvement is
the amount which the improvement contributes to the fair market value
of the whole property, or its salvage value, whichever is greater.
(Salvage value is defined at Sec. 24.2(a).)
(d) Special conditions for tenant-owned improvements. No payment
shall be made to a tenant-owner for any real property improvement
unless:
(1) The tenant-owner, in consideration for the payment, assigns,
transfers, and releases to the Agency all of the tenant-owner's right,
title, and interest in the improvement;
(2) The owner of the real property on which the improvement is
located disclaims all interest in the improvement; and
(3) The payment does not result in the duplication of any
compensation otherwise authorized by law.
(e) Alternative compensation. Nothing in this subpart shall be
construed to deprive the tenant-owner of any right to reject payment
under this subpart and to obtain payment for such property interests in
accordance with other applicable law.
Sec. 24.106 Expenses incidental to transfer of title to the Agency.
(a) The owner of the real property shall be reimbursed for all
reasonable expenses the owner necessarily incurred for:
(1) Recording fees, transfer taxes, documentary stamps, evidence of
title, boundary surveys, legal descriptions of the real property, and
similar expenses incidental to conveying the real property to the
Agency. However, the Agency is not required to pay costs solely
required to perfect the owner's title to the real property;
(2) Penalty costs and other charges for prepayment of any
preexisting recorded mortgage entered into in good faith encumbering
the real property; and
(3) The pro rata portion of any prepaid real property taxes which
are allocable to the period after the Agency obtains title to the
property or effective possession of it, whichever is earlier.
(b) Whenever feasible, the Agency shall pay these costs directly to
the billing agent so that the owner will not have to pay such costs and
then seek reimbursement from the Agency.
Sec. 24.107 Certain litigation expenses.
The owner of the real property shall be reimbursed for any
reasonable expenses, including reasonable attorney, appraisal, and
engineering fees, which the owner actually incurred because of a
condemnation proceeding, if:
(a) The final judgment of the court is that the Agency cannot
acquire the real property by condemnation;
(b) The condemnation proceeding is abandoned by the Agency other
than under an agreed-upon settlement; or
(c) The court having jurisdiction renders a judgment in favor of
the owner in an inverse condemnation proceeding or the Agency effects a
settlement of such proceeding.
Sec. 24.108 Donations.
An owner whose real property is being acquired may, after being
fully informed by the Agency of the right to receive just compensation
for such property, donate such property or any part thereof, any
interest therein, or any compensation paid therefore, to the Agency as
such owner shall determine. The Agency is responsible for ensuring that
an appraisal of the real property is obtained unless the owner releases
the Agency from such obligation, except as provided in Sec.
24.102(c)(2).
Subpart C--General Relocation Requirements
Sec. 24.201 Purpose.
This subpart prescribes general requirements governing the
provision of relocation payments and other relocation assistance in
this part.
Sec. 24.202 Applicability.
The requirements in this subpart apply to the relocation of any
displaced person as defined at Sec. 24.2(a). Any person who qualifies
as a displaced person must be fully informed of his or her rights and
entitlements to relocation assistance and payments provided by the
Uniform Act and this part. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.202.)
(a) Persons temporarily displaced. (1) Appropriate advisory
services must be provided;
(2) For persons occupying a dwelling, at least one DSS dwelling is
made available prior to requiring a person to move, except in the case
of an emergency move as described in Sec. 24.204(b)(1), (2), or (3);
(3) Similarly, if a person's business will be shut-down due to
rehabilitation of a site, it may be temporarily relocated and
reimbursed for all reasonable out of pocket expenses or must be
determined to be displaced at the Agency's option;
(4) Payment is provided for all out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with the temporary relocation as the Agency determines to be
reasonable and necessary;
(5) A person's temporary relocation from their dwelling or business
for the project may not exceed 12 months. The Agency must contact any
person who has been temporarily relocated for a period beyond 12 months
because that person is a displaced person. The Agency shall offer all
required relocation assistance benefits and services. An Agency may not
deduct any temporary relocation assistance benefits previously provided
from these benefits;
(6) A person who is not lawfully present in the United States and
who has been determined to be ineligible for relocation assistance in
accordance with Sec. 24.208 is not eligible for temporary
[[Page 69499]]
relocation assistance. Unless such denial of benefits would create an
extremely unusual hardship to a designated family member in accordance
with Sec. 24.208(g).
(b) [Reserved]
Sec. 24.203 Relocation notices.
(a) General information notice. As soon as feasible, a person who
may be displaced shall be furnished with a general written description
of the Agency's relocation program which does at least the following:
(1) Informs the person that he or she may be displaced for the
project and generally describes the relocation payment(s) for which the
person may be eligible, the basic conditions of eligibility, and the
procedures for obtaining the payment(s);
(2) Informs the displaced person that he or she will be given
reasonable relocation advisory services, including referrals to
replacement properties, help in filing payment claims, and other
necessary assistance to help the displaced person successfully
relocate;
(3) Informs the displaced person that he or she will not be
required to move without at least 90 days advance written notice (see
paragraph (c) of this section), and informs any person to be displaced
from a dwelling that he or she cannot be required to move permanently
unless at least one comparable replacement dwelling has been made
available;
(4) Informs the displaced person that any person who is an alien
not lawfully present in the United States is ineligible for relocation
advisory services and relocation payments, unless such ineligibility
would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a
qualifying spouse, parent, or child, pursuant to Sec. 24.208(h); and
(5) Describes the displaced person's right to appeal the Agency's
determination as to a person's application for assistance for which a
person may be eligible under this part.
(b) Notice of relocation eligibility. Eligibility for relocation
assistance shall begin on the earliest of: The date of a notice of
intent to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or demolish (described in
paragraph (d) of this section); the initiation of negotiations (defined
in Sec. 24.2(a)); or actual acquisition. When this occurs, the Agency
shall promptly notify all occupants in writing of their eligibility for
applicable relocation assistance.
(c) Ninety-day notice--(1) General. No lawful occupant shall be
required to move unless he or she has received at least 90 days advance
written notice of the earliest date by which he or she may be required
to move.
(2) Timing of notice. The Agency may issue the notice 90 days or
earlier before it expects the person to be displaced.
(3) Content of notice. The 90-day notice shall either state a
specific date as the earliest date by which the occupant may be
required to move, or state that the occupant will receive a further
notice indicating, at least 30 days in advance, the specific date by
which he or she must move. If the 90-day notice is issued before a
comparable replacement dwelling is made available, the notice must
state clearly that the occupant will not have to move earlier than 90
days after such a dwelling is made available. (See Sec. 24.204(a).)
(4) Urgent need. In unusual circumstances, an occupant may be
required to vacate the property on less than 90 days advance written
notice if the Agency determines that a 90-day notice is impracticable,
such as when the person's continued occupancy of the property would
constitute a substantial danger to health or safety. A copy of the
Agency's determination shall be included in the applicable case file.
(d) Notice of intent to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or demolish. A
notice of intent to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or demolish is an
Agency's written communication that is provided to a person to be
displaced, including those to be displaced by rehabilitation and/or
demolition activities from property prior to the commitment of Federal
financial assistance to the activity, which clearly sets forth that the
Agency intends to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or demolish the property.
A notice of intent to acquire, rehabilitate, and/or demolish
establishes eligibility for relocation assistance prior to the
initiation of negotiations and/or prior to the commitment of Federal
financial assistance. (See Sec. 24.2 (a).)
Sec. 24.204 Availability of comparable replacement dwelling before
displacement.
(a) General. No person to be displaced shall be required to move
from his or her dwelling unless at least one comparable replacement
dwelling (defined at Sec. 24.2) has been made available to the person.
Information on comparable replacement dwellings that were used in the
determination process must be provided to displaced persons. When
possible, three or more comparable replacement dwellings shall be made
available. A comparable replacement dwelling will be considered to have
been made available to a person, if:
(1) The person is informed in writing of its location;
(2) The person has sufficient time to negotiate and enter into a
purchase agreement or lease for the property; and
(3) Subject to reasonable safeguards, the person is assured of
receiving the relocation assistance and acquisition payment to which
the person is entitled in sufficient time to complete the purchase or
lease of the property.
(b) Circumstances permitting waiver. The Federal Agency funding the
project may grant a waiver of the policy in paragraph (a) of this
section in any case where it is demonstrated that a person must move
because of:
(1) A major disaster as defined in section 102 of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42
U.S.C. 5122);
(2) A presidentially declared national emergency; or
(3) Another emergency which requires immediate vacation of the real
property, such as when continued occupancy of the displacement dwelling
constitutes a substantial danger to the health or safety of the
occupants or the public.
(c) Basic conditions of emergency move. Whenever a person to be
displaced is required to relocate from the displacement dwelling for a
temporary period because of an emergency as described in paragraph (b)
of this section, the Agency shall:
(1) Take whatever steps are necessary to assure that the person is
temporarily relocated to a DSS dwelling;
(2) Pay the actual reasonable out-of-pocket moving expenses and any
reasonable increase in rent and utility costs incurred in connection
with the temporary relocation; and
(3) Make available to the displaced person as soon as feasible, at
least one comparable replacement dwelling. (For purposes of filing a
claim and meeting the eligibility requirements for a relocation
payment, the date of displacement is the date the person moves from the
temporarily occupied dwelling.)
Sec. 24.205 Relocation planning, advisory services, and
coordination.
(a) Relocation planning. During the early stages of development, an
Agency shall plan Federal and federally assisted programs or projects
in such a manner that recognizes the problems associated with the
displacement of individuals, families, businesses, farms, and nonprofit
organizations and develop solutions to minimize the adverse impacts of
displacement. Such planning, where appropriate, shall precede any
action by an Agency which will cause displacement, and should be scoped
to the complexity and nature of
[[Page 69500]]
the anticipated displacing activity including an evaluation of program
resources available to carry out timely and orderly relocations.
Planning may involve a relocation survey or study, which may include
the following:
(1) An estimate of the number of households to be displaced
including information such as owner/tenant status, estimated value and
rental rates of properties to be acquired, family characteristics, and
special consideration of the impacts on minorities, the elderly, large
families, and persons with disabilities when applicable.
(2) An estimate of the number of comparable replacement dwellings
in the area (including price ranges and rental rates) that are expected
to be available to fulfill the needs of those households displaced.
When an adequate supply of comparable housing is not expected to be
available, the Agency should consider housing of last resort actions.
(3) An estimate of the number, type, and size of the businesses,
farms, and nonprofit organizations to be displaced and the approximate
number of employees that may be affected.
(4) An estimate of the availability of replacement business sites.
When an adequate supply of replacement business sites is not expected
to be available, the impacts of displacing the businesses should be
considered and addressed. Planning for displaced businesses which are
reasonably expected to involve complex or lengthy moving processes or
small businesses with limited financial resources and/or few
alternative relocation sites should include an analysis of business
moving problems.
(5) Consideration of any special relocation advisory services that
may be necessary from the Agency displacing a person and other
cooperating Agencies.
(b) Loans for planning and preliminary expenses. In the event that
an Agency elects to consider using the duplicative provision in section
215 of the Uniform Act which permits the use of project funds for loans
to cover planning and other preliminary expenses for the development of
additional housing, the Lead Agency will establish criteria and
procedures for such use upon the request of the Federal Agency funding
the program or project.
(c) Relocation assistance advisory services--(1) General. The
Agency shall carry out a relocation assistance advisory program which
satisfies the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968
(42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and Executive Order 11063 (3 CFR, 1959-1963
Comp., p. 652), and offer the services described in paragraph (c)(2) of
this section. If the Agency determines that a person occupying property
adjacent to the real property acquired for the project is caused
substantial economic injury because of such acquisition, it may offer
advisory services to such person.
(2) Services to be provided. The advisory program shall include
such measures, facilities, and services as may be necessary or
appropriate in order to:
(i) Determine, for nonresidential (businesses, farm and nonprofit
organizations) displacements, the relocation needs and preferences of
each business (farm and nonprofit organization) to be displaced and
explain the relocation payments and other assistance for which the
business may be eligible, the related eligibility requirements, and the
procedures for obtaining such assistance. This shall include a personal
interview with each business. At a minimum, interviews with displaced
business owners and operators should include the following items:
(A) The business's replacement site requirements, current lease
terms and other contractual obligations and the financial capacity of
the business to accomplish the move.
(B) Determination of the need for outside specialists in accordance
with Sec. 24.301(g)(12) that will be required to assist in planning
the move, assistance in the actual move, and in the reinstallation of
machinery and/or other personal property.
(C) For businesses, an identification and resolution of personalty
and/or realty issues. Every effort must be made to identify and resolve
personalty and/or realty issues prior to, or at the time of, the
appraisal of the property.
(D) An estimate of the time required for the business to vacate the
site.
(E) An estimate of the anticipated difficulty in locating a
replacement property.
(F) An identification of any advance relocation payments required
for the move, and the Agency's legal capacity to provide them.
(ii) Determine, for residential displacements, the relocation needs
and preferences of each person to be displaced and explain the
relocation payments and other assistance for which the person may be
eligible, the related eligibility requirements, and the procedures for
obtaining such assistance. This shall include a personal interview with
each residential displaced person.
(A) Provide current and continuing information on the availability,
purchase prices, and rental costs of comparable replacement dwellings,
and explain that the person cannot be required to move unless at least
one comparable replacement dwelling is made available as set forth in
Sec. 24.204(a).
(B) As soon as feasible, the Agency shall inform the person in
writing of the specific comparable replacement dwelling and the price
or rent used for establishing the upper limit of the replacement
housing payment (see Sec. 24.403(a) and (b)) and the basis for the
determination, so that the person is aware of the maximum replacement
housing payment for which he or she may qualify.
(C) Where feasible, comparable housing shall be inspected prior to
being made available to assure that it meets applicable standards (see
Sec. 24.2(a).) If such an inspection is not made, the Agency shall
notify the person to be displaced in writing of the reason that an
inspection of the comparable was not made and, that if the comparable
is purchased or rented by the displaced person, a replacement housing
payment may not be made unless the replacement dwelling is subsequently
inspected and determined to be decent, safe, and sanitary. (See
appendix A of this part, Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C).)
(D) Whenever possible, minority persons shall be given reasonable
opportunities to relocate to decent, safe, and sanitary replacement
dwellings, not located in an area of minority concentration, that are
within their financial means. This paragraph (c)(2)(ii)(D), however,
does not require an Agency to provide a person a larger payment than is
necessary to enable a person to relocate to a comparable replacement
dwelling. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(D).)
(E) The Agency shall offer all persons transportation to inspect
housing to which they are referred.
(F) Any displaced person that may be eligible for government
housing assistance at the replacement dwelling shall be advised of any
requirements of such government housing assistance program that would
limit the size of the replacement dwelling (see Sec. 24.2(a)), as well
as of the long-term nature of such rent subsidy, and the limited (42
month) duration of the relocation rental assistance payment.
(iii) Provide, for nonresidential moves, current and continuing
information on the availability, purchase prices, and rental costs of
suitable commercial and farm properties
[[Page 69501]]
and locations. Assist any person displaced from a business or farm
operation to obtain and become established in a suitable replacement
location.
(iv) Minimize hardships to persons in adjusting to relocation by
providing counseling, advice as to other sources of assistance that may
be available, and such other help as may be appropriate.
(v) Supply persons to be displaced with appropriate information
concerning Federal and State housing programs, disaster loan and other
programs administered by the Small Business Administration, and other
Federal and State programs offering assistance to displaced persons,
and technical help to persons applying for such assistance.
(d) Coordination of relocation activities. Relocation activities
shall be coordinated with project work and other displacement-causing
activities to ensure that, to the extent feasible, persons displaced
receive consistent treatment and the duplication of functions is
minimized. (See Sec. 24.6.)
(e) Subsequent occupants. Any person who occupies property acquired
by an Agency, when such occupancy began subsequent to the acquisition
of the property, and the occupancy is permitted by a short-term rental
agreement or an agreement subject to termination when the property is
needed for a program or project, shall be eligible for advisory
services, as determined by the Agency.
Sec. 24.206 Eviction for cause.
(a) Eviction for cause must conform to applicable State and local
law. Any person who occupies the real property and is in lawful
occupancy on the date of the initiation of negotiations is presumed to
be entitled to relocation payments and other assistance set forth in
this part unless the Agency determines that:
(1) The person received an eviction notice prior to the initiation
of negotiations and as a result of that notice is later evicted; or
(2) The person is evicted after the initiation of negotiations for
serious or repeated violation of material terms of the lease or
occupancy agreement; and
(3) In either case the eviction was not undertaken for the purpose
of evading the obligation to make available the payments and other
assistance set forth in this part.
(b) For purposes of determining eligibility for relocation
payments, the date of displacement is the date the person moves, or if
later, the date a comparable replacement dwelling is made available.
This section applies only to persons who would otherwise have been
displaced by the project. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.206.)
Sec. 24.207 General requirements--claims for relocation payments.
(a) Documentation. Any claim for a relocation payment shall be
supported by such documentation as may be reasonably required to
support expenses incurred, such as bills, certified prices, appraisals,
or other evidence of such expenses. A displaced person must be provided
reasonable assistance necessary to complete and file any required claim
for payment.
(b) Expeditious payments. The Agency shall review claims in an
expeditious manner. The claimant shall be promptly notified as to any
additional documentation that is required to support the claim. Payment
for a claim shall be made as soon as feasible following receipt of
sufficient documentation to support the claim.
(c) Advanced payments. If a person demonstrates the need for an
advanced relocation payment in order to avoid or reduce a hardship, the
Agency shall issue the payment, subject to such safeguards as are
appropriate to ensure that the objective of the payment is
accomplished.
(d) Time for filing. (1) All claims for a relocation payment shall
be filed with the Agency no later than 18 months after:
(i) For tenants, the date of displacement.
(ii) For owners, the date of displacement or the date of the final
payment for the acquisition of the real property, whichever is later.
(2) The Agency shall waive this time period for good cause.
(e) Notice of denial of claim. If the Agency disapproves all or
part of a payment claimed or refuses to consider the claim on its
merits because of untimely filing or other grounds, it shall promptly
notify the claimant in writing of its determination, the basis for its
determination, and the procedures for appealing that determination.
(f) No waiver of relocation assistance. An Agency shall not propose
or request that a displaced person waive his or her rights or
entitlements to relocation assistance and benefits provided by the
Uniform Act and this part. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.207(f).)
(g) Expenditure of payments. Payments, provided pursuant to this
part, shall not be considered to constitute Federal financial
assistance. Accordingly, this part does not apply to the expenditure of
such payments by, or for, a displaced person.
(h) Deductions from relocation payments. An Agency shall deduct the
amount of any advance relocation payment from the relocation payment(s)
to which a displaced person is otherwise entitled. The Agency shall not
withhold any part of a relocation payment to a displaced person to
satisfy any other obligation.
Sec. 24.208 Aliens not lawfully present in the United States.
(a) Each person seeking relocation payments or relocation advisory
assistance shall, as a condition of eligibility, certify:
(1) In the case of an individual, that they are a citizen, or an
alien who is lawfully present in the United States.
(2) In the case of a family, that each family member is a citizen
or an alien who is lawfully present in the United States. The
certification may be made by the head of the household on behalf of
other family members.
(3) In the case of an unincorporated business, farm, or nonprofit
organization, that each owner is a citizen or an alien who is lawfully
present in the United States. The certification may be made by the
principal owner, manager, or operating officer on behalf of other
persons with an ownership interest.
(4) In the case of an incorporated business, farm, or nonprofit
organization, that the corporation is authorized to conduct business
within the United States.
(b) The certification provided pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1), (2),
and (3) of this section shall specify the person's status as a citizen
or an alien who is lawfully present in the United States. Requirements
concerning the certification in addition to those contained in this
section shall be within the discretion of the Federal funding Agency
and, within those parameters, that of the Agency carrying out such
displacements.
(c) In computing relocation payments under the Uniform Act, if any
member(s) of a household or owner(s) of an unincorporated business,
farm, or nonprofit organization is (are) determined to be ineligible
because of a failure to be lawfully present in the United States, no
relocation payments may be made to him or her. Any payment(s) for which
such household, unincorporated business, farm, or nonprofit
organization would otherwise be eligible shall be computed for the
household, based on the number of eligible household members and for
the unincorporated business, farm, or nonprofit organization, based on
the ratio of ownership between eligible and
[[Page 69502]]
ineligible owners. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.208(c).)
(d) The Agency shall consider the certification provided pursuant
to paragraph (a) of this section to be valid, unless the Agency
determines in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section that it is
invalid based on a review of documentation or other information that
the Agency considers reliable and appropriate.
(e) Any review by the Agency of the certifications provided
pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall be conducted in a
nondiscriminatory fashion. Each Agency will apply the same standard of
review to all such certifications it receives, except that such
standard may be revised periodically.
(f) If, based on a review of a person's documentation or other
credible evidence, an Agency has reason to believe that a person's
certification is invalid (for example a document reviewed does not on
its face reasonably appear to be genuine), and that, as a result, such
person may be an alien not lawfully present in the United States, it
shall obtain the following information before making a final
determination:
(1) For a person who has certified that they are an alien lawfully
present in the United States, the Agency shall obtain verification of
the person's status by using the Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE) program administered by U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) to verify immigration status.
(2) For a person who has certified that they are a citizen or
national, if the Agency has reason to believe that the certification is
invalid, the Agency shall request evidence of United States citizenship
or nationality and, if considered necessary, verify the accuracy of
such evidence with the issuer or other appropriate source.
(g) No relocation payments or relocation advisory assistance shall
be provided to a person who has not provided the certification
described in this section or who has been determined to be not lawfully
present in the United States, unless such person can demonstrate to the
Agency's satisfaction that the denial of relocation assistance will
result in an exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to such
person's spouse, parent, or child who is a citizen of the United States
or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United
States.
(h) For purposes of paragraph (g) of this section, ``exceptional
and extremely unusual hardship'' to such spouse, parent, or child of
the person not lawfully present in the United States means that the
denial of relocation payments and advisory assistance to such person
will directly result in (see appendix A of this part, Section
24.208(h)):
(1) A significant and demonstrable adverse impact on the health or
safety of such spouse, parent, or child;
(2) A significant and demonstrable adverse impact on the continued
existence of the family unit of which such spouse, parent, or child is
a member; or
(3) Any other impact that the Agency determines will have a
significant and demonstrable adverse impact on such spouse, parent, or
child.
(i) The certification referred to in paragraph (a) of this section
may be included as part of the claim for relocation payments described
in Sec. 24.207.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 2105-0508)
Sec. 24.209 Relocation payments not considered as income.
No relocation payment received by a displaced person under this
part shall be considered as income for the purpose of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954, which has been redesignated as the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (Title 26, U.S. Code), or for the purpose of
determining the eligibility or the extent of eligibility of any person
for assistance under the Social Security Act (42 U.S. Code 301 et seq.)
or any other Federal law, except for any Federal law providing low-
income housing assistance.
Subpart D--Payments for Moving and Related Expenses
Sec. 24.301 Payment for actual reasonable moving and related
expenses.
(a) General. (1) Any owner-occupant or tenant who qualifies as a
displaced person (defined at Sec. 24.2(a)) and who moves from a
dwelling (including a mobile home) or who moves from a business, farm,
or nonprofit organization is entitled to payment of his or her actual
moving and related expenses, as the Agency determines to be reasonable
and necessary.
(2) A non-occupant owner of a rented mobile home is eligible for
actual cost reimbursement under this section to relocate the mobile
home. If the mobile home is not acquired as real estate, but the
homeowner-occupant obtains a replacement housing payment under one of
the circumstances described at Sec. 24.502(a)(3), the home-owner
occupant is not eligible for payment for moving the mobile home, but
may be eligible for a payment for moving personal property from the
mobile home.
(b) Moves from a dwelling. A displaced person's actual, reasonable,
and necessary moving expenses for moving personal property from a
dwelling may be determined based on the cost of one, or a combination
of the methods in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section (eligible
expenses for moves from a dwelling include the expenses described in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (7) of this section):
(1) Commercial move. Moves performed by a professional mover.
(2) Self-move. Moves that may be performed by the displaced person
in one or a combination of the following methods:
(i) Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule. The Fixed Residential
Moving Cost Schedule described in Sec. 24.302.
(ii) Actual cost move. Supported by receipted bills for labor and
equipment. Hourly labor rates should not exceed the cost paid by a
commercial mover. Equipment rental fees should be based on the actual
cost of renting the equipment but not exceed the cost paid by a
commercial mover.
(c) Moves from a mobile home. Eligible expenses for moves from a
mobile home include those expenses described in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (7) of this section. In addition to the items in paragraph (a)
of this section, the owner-occupant of a mobile home that is moved as
personal property and used as the person's replacement dwelling, is
also eligible for the moving expenses described in paragraphs (g)(8)
through (10) of this section. A displaced person's actual, reasonable,
and necessary moving expenses for moving personal property from a
mobile home may be determined based on the cost of one, or a
combination of the following methods:
(1) Commercial move. Moves performed by a professional mover.
(2) Self-move. Moves that may be performed by the displaced person
in one or a combination of the following methods:
(i) Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule. The Fixed Residential
Moving Cost Schedule described in Sec. 24.302.
(ii) Actual cost move. Supported by receipted bills for labor and
equipment. Hourly labor rates should not exceed the cost paid by a
commercial mover. Equipment rental fees should be based on the actual
cost of renting the equipment but not exceed the cost paid by a
commercial mover.
(d) Moves from a business, farm, or nonprofit organization.
Eligible
[[Page 69503]]
expenses for moves from a business, farm, or nonprofit organization
include those expenses described in paragraphs (g)(1) through (7) and
(11) through (18) of this section and Sec. 24.303. Personal property
as determined by an inventory from a business, farm, or nonprofit
organization may be moved by one or a combination of the following
methods:
(1) Commercial move. Based on the lower of two bids or estimates
prepared by a commercial mover. At the Agency's discretion, payment for
a low cost or uncomplicated move may be based on a single bid or
estimate.
(2) Self-move. A self-move payment may be based on one or a
combination of the following:
(i) The lower of two bids or estimates prepared by a commercial
mover or qualified Agency staff person. At the Agency's discretion,
payment for a low cost or uncomplicated move may be based on a single
bid or estimate; or
(ii) Supported by receipted bills for labor and equipment. Hourly
labor rates should not exceed the rates paid by a commercial mover to
employees performing the same activity and, equipment rental fees
should be based on the actual rental cost of the equipment but not to
exceed the cost paid by a commercial mover.
(e) Personal property only. Eligible expenses for a person who is
required to move personal property from real property but is not
required to move from a dwelling (including a mobile home), business,
farm, or nonprofit organization include those expenses described in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (7) and (18) of this section. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.301(e).)
(f) Advertising signs. The amount of a payment for direct loss of
an advertising sign, which is personal property shall be the lesser of:
(1) The depreciated reproduction cost of the sign, as determined by
the Agency, less the proceeds from its sale; or
(2) The estimated cost of moving the sign, but with no allowance
for storage.
(g) Eligible actual moving expenses. (1) Transportation of the
displaced person and personal property. Transportation costs for a
distance beyond 50 miles are not eligible, unless the Agency determines
that relocation beyond 50 miles is justified.
(2) Packing, crating, unpacking, and uncrating of the personal
property.
(3) Disconnecting, dismantling, removing, reassembling, and
reinstalling relocated household appliances and other personal
property. For businesses, farms, or nonprofit organizations this
includes machinery, equipment, substitute personal property, and
connections to utilities available within the building; it also
includes modifications to the personal property, including those
mandated by Federal, State, or local law, code, or ordinance, necessary
to adapt it to the replacement structure, the replacement site, or the
utilities at the replacement site, and modifications necessary to adapt
the utilities at the replacement site to the personal property.
(4) Storage of the personal property for a period not to exceed 12
months, unless the Agency determines that a longer period is necessary.
(5) Insurance for the replacement value of the property in
connection with the move and necessary storage.
(6) The replacement value of property lost, stolen, or damaged in
the process of moving (not through the fault or negligence of the
displaced person, his or her agent, or employee) where insurance
covering such loss, theft, or damage is not reasonably available.
(7) Other moving-related expenses that are not listed as ineligible
under paragraph (h) of this section, as the Agency determines to be
reasonable and necessary.
(8) The reasonable cost of disassembling, moving, and reassembling
any appurtenances attached to a mobile home, such as porches, decks,
skirting, and awnings, which were not acquired, anchoring of the unit,
and utility ``hookup'' charges.
(9) The reasonable cost of repairs and/or modifications so that a
mobile home can be moved and/or made decent, safe, and sanitary.
(10) The cost of a nonrefundable mobile home park entrance fee, to
the extent it does not exceed the fee at a comparable mobile home park,
if the person is displaced from a mobile home park or the Agency
determines that payment of the fee is necessary to effect relocation.
(11) Any actual, reasonable, or necessary costs of a license,
permit, fee, or certification required of the displaced person to
operate a business, farm, or non-profit at the replacement location.
However, the payment may be based on the remaining useful life of the
existing license, permit, fees, or certification.
(12) Professional services as the Agency determines to be actual,
reasonable, and necessary for:
(i) Planning the move of the personal property;
(ii) Moving the personal property; and
(iii) Installing the relocated personal property at the replacement
location.
(13) Relettering signs, replacing stationery on hand at the time of
displacement, and making reasonable and necessary updates to other
media that are made obsolete as a result of the move. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.301(g)(13).)
(14) Actual direct loss of tangible personal property incurred as a
result of moving or discontinuing the business or farm operation. The
payment shall consist of:
(i) If the item is currently in use, the lesser of:
(A) The estimated cost to move and reinstall (to be eligible for
payment, the claimant must make a good faith effort to sell the
personal property, unless the Agency determines that such effort is not
necessary); or
(B) The fair market value in place of the item, as is for continued
use, less the proceeds from its sale.
(ii) If the item is not currently in use: The estimated cost of
moving the item as is but not including any allowance for storage.
(iii) When payment for property loss is claimed for goods held for
sale, the fair market value shall be based on the cost of the goods to
the business, not the potential selling prices. (See appendix A of this
part, Section 24.301(g)(14).)
(15) The reasonable cost incurred in attempting to sell an item
that is not to be relocated.
(16) If an item of personal property, which is used as part of a
business or farm operation is not moved but is promptly replaced with a
substitute item that performs a comparable function at the replacement
site, the displaced person is entitled to payment of the lesser of:
(i) The cost of the substitute item, including installation costs
of the replacement site, minus any proceeds from the sale or trade-in
of the replaced item; or
(ii) The estimated cost of moving and reinstalling the replaced
item but with no allowance for storage. At the Agency's discretion, the
estimated cost for a low cost or uncomplicated move may be based on a
single bid or estimate.
(17) Searching for a replacement location.
(i) A business or farm operation is entitled to reimbursement for
actual expenses, not to exceed $5,000, as the Agency determines to be
reasonable, which are incurred in searching for a replacement location,
including:
(A) Transportation;
(B) Meals and lodging away from home;
(C) Time spent searching, based on reasonable salary or earnings;
(D) Fees paid to a real estate agent or broker to locate a
replacement site, exclusive of any fees or commissions related to the
purchase of such sites;
[[Page 69504]]
(E) Time spent in obtaining permits and attending zoning hearings;
and
(F) Expenses negotiating the purchase of a replacement site based
on a reasonable salary or fee, including actual, reasonable, and
necessary attorney's fees.
(ii) The Federal funding Agency may, on a program wide or project
basis, allow a one-time payment of up to $1,000 for search expenses
with little or no documentation as an alternative payment method to
paragraph (g)(17)(i) of this section. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.301(g)(17).)
(18) When the personal property to be moved is of low value and
high bulk, and the cost of moving the property would be
disproportionate to its value in the judgment of the Agency, the
allowable moving cost payment shall not exceed the lesser of: The
amount which would be received if the property were sold at the site;
or the replacement cost of a comparable quantity delivered to the new
business location. Examples of personal property covered by this
paragraph (g)(18) include, but are not limited to, stockpiled sand,
gravel, minerals, metals, and other similar items of personal property
as determined by the Agency.
(h) Ineligible moving and related expenses. A displaced person is
not entitled to payment for:
(1) The cost of moving any structure or other real property
improvement in which the displaced person reserved ownership. (However,
this part does not preclude the computation under Sec.
24.401(c)(2)(iii));
(2) Interest on a loan to cover moving expenses;
(3) Loss of goodwill;
(4) Loss of profits;
(5) Loss of trained employees;
(6) Any additional operating expenses of a business or farm
operation incurred because of operating in a new location except as
provided in Sec. 24.304(a)(6);
(7) Personal injury;
(8) Any legal fee or other cost for preparing a claim for a
relocation payment or for representing the claimant before the Agency;
(9) Expenses for searching for a replacement dwelling;
(10) Physical changes to the real property at the replacement
location of a business or farm operation except as provided in
paragraph (g)(3) of this section and Sec. 24.304(a);
(11) Costs for storage of personal property on real property
already owned or leased by the displaced person;
(12) Refundable security and utility deposits; and
(13) Cosmetic changes to a replacement dwelling such as painting,
draperies, or replacement carpet or flooring.
(i) Notification and inspection (nonresidential). The Agency shall
inform the displaced person, in writing, of the requirements of this
section as soon as possible after the initiation of negotiations. This
information may be included in the relocation information provided the
displaced person as set forth in Sec. 24.203. To be eligible for
payments under this section the displaced person must:
(1) Provide the Agency reasonable advance notice of the approximate
date of the start of the move or disposition of the personal property
and an inventory of the items to be moved. However, the Agency may
waive this notice requirement after documenting its file accordingly.
(2) Permit the Agency to make reasonable and timely inspections of
the personal property at both the displacement and replacement sites
and to monitor the move.
(j) Transfer of ownership (nonresidential). Upon request and in
accordance with applicable law, the claimant shall transfer to the
Agency ownership of any personal property that has not been moved,
sold, or traded in.
Sec. 24.302 Fixed payment for moving expenses--residential moves.
Any person displaced from a dwelling or a seasonal residence or a
dormitory style room is entitled to receive a fixed moving cost payment
as an alternative to a payment for actual moving and related expenses
under Sec. 24.301. This payment shall be determined according to the
Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule approved by the Federal Highway
Administration and published in the Federal Register on a periodic
basis. The payment to a person with minimal personal possessions who is
in occupancy of a dormitory style room or a person whose residential
move is performed by an Agency at no cost to the person shall be
limited to the amount stated in the most recent edition of the Fixed
Residential Moving Cost Schedule.
(a) An Agency may determine that the storage of personal property
is a reasonable and necessary moving expense for a displaced person
under this part. The determination shall be based on the needs of the
displaced person; the nature of the move; the plans for permanent
relocation; the amount of time available for the relocation process;
and, whether storage will facilitate relocation. If the Agency
determines that storage is reasonable and necessary in conjunction with
this payment, the Agency shall pay the actual, reasonable, and
necessary storage expenses in accordance with Sec. 24.301(g)(4).
However, regardless of whether storage is approved, the Fixed
Residential Move Cost Schedule provides a one-time payment for one move
from the displacement dwelling to the replacement dwelling, dwelling,
or storage facility. Consequently, displaced persons must be fully
informed that reimbursement of costs to move the personal property to
storage and the cost of approved storage represent a full reimbursement
of their eligibility for moving costs under this part. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.302.)
(b) [Reserved]
(c) The Fixed Residential Moving Cost Schedule is available at the
following URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/relocation/moving_cost_schedule.cfm.
Sec. 24.303 Related nonresidential eligible expenses.
The following expenses, in addition to those provided by Sec.
24.301 for moving personal property, shall be provided if the Agency
determines that they are actual, reasonable, and necessary:
(a) Connection to available utilities from the replacement site's
property line to improvements at the replacement site. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.303(a).)
(b) Professional services performed prior to the purchase or lease
of a replacement site to determine its suitability for the displaced
person's business operation including but not limited to soil testing
or feasibility and marketing studies (excluding any fees or commissions
directly related to the purchase or lease of such site). At the
discretion of the Agency a reasonable pre-approved hourly rate may be
established. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.303(b).)
(c) Impact fees and one-time assessments for anticipated heavy
utility usage, as determined necessary by the Agency. (See appendix A
of this part, Section 24.303(c).)
Sec. 24.304 Reestablishment expenses--nonresidential moves.
In addition to the payments available under Sec. Sec. 24.301 and
24.303, a small business, farm, or nonprofit organization is entitled
to receive a payment, not to exceed $25,000, for expenses actually
incurred in relocating and reestablishing such small business, farm, or
nonprofit organization at a replacement site.
(a) Eligible expenses. Reestablishment expenses must be reasonable
and necessary, as determined by the Agency.
[[Page 69505]]
They include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Repairs or improvements to the replacement real property as
required by Federal, State, or local law, code, or ordinance.
(2) Modifications to the replacement property to accommodate the
business operation or make replacement structures suitable for
conducting the business.
(3) Construction and installation costs for exterior signing to
advertise the business.
(4) Redecoration or replacement of soiled or worn surfaces at the
replacement site, such as paint, paneling, or carpeting.
(5) Advertisement of replacement location.
(6) Estimated increased costs of operation during the first 2 years
at the replacement site for such items as:
(i) Lease or rental charges;
(ii) Personal or real property taxes;
(iii) Insurance premiums; and
(iv) Utility charges, excluding impact fees.
(7) Other items that the Agency considers essential to the
reestablishment of the business.
(b) Ineligible expenses. The following is a nonexclusive listing of
reestablishment expenditures not considered to be reasonable,
necessary, or otherwise eligible:
(1) Purchase of capital assets, such as office furniture, filing
cabinets, machinery, or trade fixtures.
(2) Purchase of manufacturing materials, production supplies,
product inventory, or other items used in the normal course of the
business operation.
(3) Interest on money borrowed to make the move or purchase the
replacement property.
(4) Payment to a part-time business in the home which does not
contribute materially, defined at Sec. 24.2(a), to the household
income.
(5) Construction costs for a new building at the business
replacement site, or costs to build out a shell, or costs to
substantially reconstruct a building. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.304(b)(5).)
Sec. 24.305 Fixed payment for moving expenses--nonresidential moves.
(a) Business. A displaced business may be eligible to choose a
fixed payment in lieu of the payments for both actual moving and
related expenses, as well as actual reasonable reestablishment expenses
provided by Sec. Sec. 24.301, 24.303, and 24.304. Such fixed payment,
except for payment to a nonprofit organization, shall equal the average
annual net earnings of the business, as computed in accordance with
paragraph (e) of this section, but not less than $1,000 nor more than
$40,000. The displaced business is eligible for the payment if the
Agency determines that:
(1) The business owns or rents personal property which must be
moved in connection with such displacement and for which an expense
would be incurred in such move and the business vacates or relocates
from its displacement site;
(2) The business cannot be relocated without a substantial loss of
its existing patronage (clientele or net earnings). A business is
assumed to meet this test unless the Agency determines that it will not
suffer a substantial loss of its existing patronage;
(3) The business is not part of a commercial enterprise having more
than three other entities which are not being acquired by the Agency,
and which are under the same ownership and engaged in the same or
similar business activities;
(4) The business is not operated at a displacement dwelling solely
for the purpose of renting such dwelling to others;
(5) The business is not operated at the displacement site solely
for the purpose of renting the site to others; and
(6) The business contributed materially to the income of the
displaced person during the 2 taxable years prior to displacement. (See
Sec. 24.2(a).)
(b) Determining the number of businesses. In determining whether
two or more displaced legal entities constitute a single business,
which is entitled to only one fixed payment, all pertinent factors
shall be considered, including the extent to which:
(1) The same premises and equipment are shared;
(2) Substantially identical or interrelated business functions are
carried out and business and financial affairs are commingled;
(3) The entities are held out to the public, and to those
customarily dealing with them, as one business; and
(4) The same person or closely related persons own, control, or
manage the affairs of the entities.
(c) Farm operation. A displaced farm operation (defined at Sec.
24.2(a)) may choose a fixed payment, in lieu of the payments for both
actual moving as well as related expenses and actual reasonable
reestablishment expenses, in an amount equal to its average annual net
earnings as computed in accordance with paragraph (e) of this section,
but not less than $1,000 nor more than $40,000. In the case of a
partial acquisition of land, which was a farm operation before the
acquisition, the fixed payment shall be made only if the Agency
determines that:
(1) The acquisition of part of the land caused the operator to be
displaced from the farm operation on the remaining land; or
(2) The partial acquisition caused a substantial change in the
nature of the farm operation.
(d) Nonprofit organization. A displaced nonprofit organization may
choose a fixed payment of $1,000 to $40,000, in lieu of the payments
for both actual moving as well as related expenses and actual
reasonable reestablishment expenses, if the Agency determines that it
cannot be relocated without a substantial loss of existing patronage
(membership or clientele). A nonprofit organization is assumed to meet
this test, unless the Agency demonstrates otherwise. Any payment in
excess of $1,000 must be supported with financial statements for the
two 12-month periods prior to the acquisition. The amount to be used
for the payment is the average of 2 years annual gross revenues less
administrative expenses. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.305(d).)
(e) Average annual net earnings of a business or farm operation.
The average annual net earnings of a business or farm operation are
one-half of its net earnings before Federal, State, and local income
taxes during the 2 taxable years immediately prior to the taxable year
in which it was displaced. If the business or farm was not in operation
for the full 2 taxable years prior to displacement, net earnings shall
be based on the actual period of operation at the displacement site
during the 2 taxable years prior to displacement, projected to an
annual rate. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.305(e) for sample
calculations.) Average annual net earnings may be based upon a
different period of time when the Agency determines it to be more
equitable. Net earnings include any compensation obtained from the
business or farm operation by its owner, the owner's spouse, and
dependents. The displaced person shall furnish the Agency proof of net
earnings through income tax returns, certified financial statements, or
other reasonable evidence, which the Agency determines is satisfactory.
(See appendix A of this part, Section 24.305(e).)
Sec. 24.306 Discretionary utility relocation payments.
(a) Whenever a program or project undertaken by an Agency causes
the relocation of a utility facility (defined at
[[Page 69506]]
Sec. 24.2(a)) and the relocation of the facility creates extraordinary
expenses for its owner, the Agency may, at its option, make a
relocation payment to the owner for all or part of such expenses, if
the following criteria are met:
(1) The utility facility legally occupies State or local government
property, or property over which the State or local government has an
easement or right-of-way;
(2) The utility facility's right of occupancy thereon is pursuant
to State law or local ordinance specifically authorizing such use, or
where such use and occupancy has been granted through a franchise, use
and occupancy permit, or other similar agreement;
(3) Relocation of the utility facility is required by and is
incidental to the primary purpose of the project or program undertaken
by the Agency;
(4) There is no Federal law, other than the Uniform Act, which
clearly establishes a policy for the payment of utility moving costs
that is applicable to the Agency's program or project; and
(5) State or local government reimbursement for utility moving
costs or payment of such costs by the Agency is in accordance with
State law.
(b) For the purposes of this section, the term extraordinary
expenses mean those expenses which, in the opinion of the Agency, are
not routine or predictable expenses relating to the utility's occupancy
of rights-of-way, and are not ordinarily budgeted as operating
expenses, unless the owner of the utility facility has explicitly and
knowingly agreed to bear such expenses as a condition for use of the
property, or has voluntarily agreed to be responsible for such
expenses.
(c) A relocation payment to a utility facility owner for moving
costs under this section may not exceed the cost to functionally
restore the service disrupted by the federally assisted program or
project, less any increase in value of the new facility and salvage
value of the old facility. The Agency and the utility facility owner
shall reach prior agreement on the nature of the utility relocation
work to be accomplished, the eligibility of the work for reimbursement,
the responsibilities for financing and accomplishing the work, and the
method of accumulating costs and making payment. (See appendix A of
this part, Section 24.306.)
Subpart E--Replacement Housing Payments
Sec. 24.401 Replacement housing payment for 90-day homeowner-
occupants.
(a) Eligibility. A displaced person is eligible for the replacement
housing payment for a 90-day homeowner-occupant if the person:
(1) Has actually owned and occupied the displacement dwelling for
not less than 90 days immediately prior to the initiation of
negotiations; and
(2) Purchases and occupies a decent, safe, and sanitary replacement
dwelling within 1 year after the later of the following dates (except
that the Agency may extend such 1 year period for good cause):
(i) The date the displaced person receives final payment for the
displacement dwelling or, in the case of condemnation, the date the
full amount of the estimate of just compensation is deposited in the
court; or
(ii) The date the Agency's obligation under Sec. 24.204 is met.
(b) Amount of payment. The replacement housing payment for an
eligible 90-day homeowner-occupant may not exceed $31,000. (See also
Sec. 24.404.) The payment under this subpart is limited to the amount
necessary to relocate to a comparable replacement dwelling within 1
year from the date the displaced homeowner-occupant is paid for the
displacement dwelling, or the date a comparable replacement dwelling is
made available to such person, whichever is later. The payment shall be
the sum of:
(1) The amount by which the cost of a replacement dwelling exceeds
the acquisition cost of the displacement dwelling, as determined in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this section;
(2) The increased interest costs and other debt service costs which
are incurred in connection with the mortgage(s) on the replacement
dwelling, as determined in accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section; and
(3) The reasonable expenses incidental to the purchase of the
replacement dwelling, as determined in accordance with paragraph (f) of
this section.
(c) Price differential--(1) Basic computation. The price
differential to be paid under paragraph (b)(1) of this section is the
amount which must be added to the acquisition cost of the displacement
dwelling and site (see Sec. 24.2(a)) to provide a total amount equal
to the lesser of:
(i) The reasonable cost of a comparable replacement dwelling as
determined in accordance with Sec. 24.403(a); or
(ii) The purchase price of the DSS replacement dwelling actually
purchased and occupied by the displaced person.
(2) Owner retention of displacement dwelling. If the owner retains
ownership of his or her dwelling, moves it from the displacement site,
and reoccupies it on a replacement site, the purchase price of the
replacement dwelling shall be the sum of:
(i) The cost of moving and restoring the dwelling to a condition
comparable to that prior to the move;
(ii) The cost of making the unit a DSS replacement dwelling (see
Sec. 24.2(a)); and
(iii) The current fair market value for residential use of the
replacement dwelling site (see appendix A of this part, Section
24.401(c)(2)(iii)), unless the claimant rented the displacement site
and there is a reasonable opportunity for the claimant to rent a
suitable replacement site; and
(iv) The retention value of the dwelling, if such retention value
is reflected in the ``acquisition cost'' used when computing the
replacement housing payment.
(d) Increased mortgage interest costs. The Agency shall determine
the factors to be used in computing the amount to be paid to a
displaced person under paragraph (b)(2) of this section. The payment
for increased mortgage interest cost shall be the amount which will
reduce the mortgage balance on a new mortgage to an amount which could
be amortized with the same monthly payment for principal and interest
as that for the mortgage(s) on the displacement dwelling. In addition,
payments shall include other debt service costs, if not paid as
incidental costs, and shall be based only on bona fide mortgages that
were valid liens on the displacement dwelling for at least 180 days
prior to the initiation of negotiations. Paragraphs (d)(1) through (5)
of this section shall apply to the computation of the increased
mortgage interest costs payment, which payment shall be contingent upon
a mortgage being placed on the replacement dwelling.
(1) The payment shall be based on the unpaid mortgage balance(s) on
the displacement dwelling; however, in the event the displaced person
obtains a smaller mortgage than the mortgage balance(s) computed in the
buydown determination, the payment will be prorated and reduced
accordingly. (See appendix A of this part, Section 24.401(d).) In the
case of a home equity loan the unpaid balance shall be that balance
which existed 180 days prior to the initiation of negotiations or the
[[Page 69507]]
balance on the date of acquisition, whichever is less.
(2) The payment shall be based on the remaining term of the
mortgage(s) on the displacement dwelling or the term of the new
mortgage, whichever is shorter.
(3) The interest rate on the new mortgage used in determining the
amount of the payment shall not exceed the prevailing fixed interest
rate for conventional mortgages currently charged by mortgage lending
institutions in the area in which the replacement dwelling is located.
(4) Purchaser's points and loan origination or assumption fees, but
not seller's points, shall be paid to the extent:
(i) They are not paid as incidental expenses;
(ii) They do not exceed rates normal to similar real estate
transactions in the area;
(iii) The Agency determines them to be necessary; and
(iv) The computation of such points and fees shall be based on the
unpaid mortgage balance on the displacement dwelling, less the amount
determined for the reduction of the mortgage balance under this
section.
(5) The displaced person shall be advised of the approximate amount
of this payment and the conditions that must be met to receive the
payment as soon as the facts relative to the person's current
mortgage(s) are known and the payment shall be made available at or
near the time of closing on the replacement dwelling in order to reduce
the new mortgage as intended.
(e) Home equity conversion mortgage. The payment for replacing a
HECM shall be the difference between the existing HECM balance and the
minimum dollar amount necessary to purchase a replacement HECM which
will provide the same or similar terms as that for the HECM on the
displacement dwelling. In addition, payments shall include other debt
service costs, if not paid as incidental costs, and shall be based only
on HECMs that were valid liens on the displacement dwelling for at
least 180 days prior to the initiation of negotiations. Paragraphs
(e)(1) through (4) of this section shall apply to the computation of
the mortgage interest differential payment (MIDP) required, which
payment shall be contingent upon a new HECM mortgage being purchased
for the replacement dwelling.
(1) The payment shall be based on the difference between the HECM
balance and the minimum amount needed to qualify for a HECM with the
similar terms as the HECM mortgage on the displacement dwelling;
however, in the event the displaced person obtains a smaller HECM than
the HECM balance(s) computed in the buydown determination, the payment
will be prorated and reduced accordingly. (See appendix A of this part,
Section 24.401(e).) The HECM balance shall be that balance which
existed 180 days prior to the initiation of negotiations or the HECM
balance on the date of acquisition, whichever is less.
(2) The interest rate on the new HECM used in determining the
amount of the eligibility shall not exceed the prevailing rate for
HECMs currently charged by mortgage lending institutions for owners
with similar amounts of equity in their units in the area in which the
replacement dwelling is located.
(3) Purchaser's points and loan origination, but not seller's
points, shall be paid to the extent:
(i) They are not paid as incidental expenses;
(ii) They do not exceed rates normal to similar real estate
transactions in the area;
(iii) The Agency determines them to be necessary; and
(iv) The computation of such points and fees shall be based on the
HECM balance on the displacement dwelling plus any amount necessary to
purchase the new HECM.
(4) The displaced person or their representative shall be advised
of the approximate amount of this eligibility and the conditions that
must be met to receive the reimbursement as soon as the facts relative
to the person's current HECM are known; the payment shall be made
available at or near the time of closing on the replacement dwelling in
order to purchase the new HECM as intended.
(f) Incidental expenses. The incidental expenses to be paid under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section or Sec. 24.402(c)(1) are those
necessary and reasonable costs actually incurred by the displaced
person incident to the purchase of a replacement dwelling, and
customarily paid by the buyer, including:
(1) Legal, closing, and related costs, including those for title
search, preparing conveyance instruments, notary fees, preparing
surveys and plats, and recording fees.
(2) Lender, FHA, or VA application and appraisal fees.
(3) Loan origination or assumption fees that do not represent
prepaid interest.
(4) Professional home inspection, certification of structural
soundness, and termite inspection.
(5) Credit report.
(6) Owner's and mortgagee's evidence of title, e.g., title
insurance, not to exceed the costs for a comparable replacement
dwelling.
(7) Escrow agent's fee.
(8) State revenue or documentary stamps, sales or transfer taxes
(not to exceed the costs for a comparable replacement dwelling).
(9) Such other costs as the Agency determine to be incidental to
the purchase.
(g) Rental assistance payment for 90-day homeowner. A 90-day
homeowner-occupant, who could be eligible for a replacement housing
payment under paragraph (a) of this section but elects to rent a
replacement dwelling, is eligible for a rental assistance payment. The
amount of the rental assistance payment is based on a determination of
market rent for the acquired dwelling compared to a comparable rental
dwelling available on the market. The difference, if any, is computed
in accordance with Sec. 24.402(b)(1), except that the limit of $7,200
does not apply, and disbursed in accordance with Sec. 24.402(b)(3).
Under no circumstances would the rental assistance payment exceed the
amount that could have been received under paragraph (b)(1) of this
section had the 90-day homeowner elected to purchase and occupy a
comparable replacement dwelling.
Sec. 24.402 Replacement housing payment for 90-day tenants and
certain others.
(a) Eligibility. A tenant displaced from a dwelling is entitled to
a payment not to exceed $7,200 for rental assistance, as computed in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, or down payment
assistance, as computed in accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section, if such displaced person:
(1) Has actually and lawfully occupied the displacement dwelling
for at least 90 days immediately prior to the initiation of
negotiations; and
(2) Has rented or purchased and occupied a DSS replacement dwelling
within 1 year (unless the Agency extends this period for good cause)
after the date he or she moves from the displacement dwelling.
(b) Rental assistance payment--(1) Amount of payment. An eligible
displaced person who rents a replacement dwelling is entitled to a
payment not to exceed $7,200 for rental assistance. (See Sec. 24.404.)
Such payment shall be 42 times the amount obtained by subtracting the
base monthly rental for the displacement dwelling from the lesser of:
(i) The monthly rent and estimated average monthly cost of
utilities for a comparable replacement dwelling; or
[[Page 69508]]
(ii) The monthly rent and estimated average monthly cost of
utilities for the DSS replacement dwelling actually occupied by the
displaced person.
(2) Base monthly rental for displacement dwelling. The base monthly
rental for the displacement dwelling is the lesser of:
(i) The average monthly cost for rent and utilities at the
displacement dwelling for a reasonable period prior to displacement, as
determined by the Agency (for an owner-occupant, use the fair market
rent for the displacement dwelling; for a tenant who paid little or no
rent for the displacement dwelling, use the fair market rent, unless
its use would result in a hardship because of the person's income or
other circumstances); or
(ii)(A) Thirty (30) percent of the displaced person's average
monthly gross household income if the amount is classified as ``low
income'' by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's
Uniform Relocation Act Income (``Survey''). The base monthly rental
shall be established solely on the criteria in paragraph (b)(2)(i) of
this section for persons with income exceeding the Survey's ``low
income'' limits, for persons refusing to provide appropriate evidence
of income, and for persons who are dependents. A full-time student or
resident of an institution may be assumed to be a dependent, unless the
person demonstrates otherwise; or,
(B) The Surveys U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's
Public Housing Uniform Relocation Act Income Limits are updated
annually and are available on FHWA's website.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/policy_and_guidance/low_income_calculations/index.cfm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iii) The total of the amounts designated for shelter and utilities
if the displaced person is receiving a welfare assistance payment from
a program that designates the amounts for shelter and utilities.
(3) Manner of disbursement. A rental assistance payment may, at the
Agency's discretion, be disbursed in either a lump sum or in
installments. However, except as limited by Sec. 24.403(f), the full
amount vests immediately, whether or not there is any later change in
the person's income or rent, or in the condition or location of the
person's replacement housing.
(c) Down payment assistance payment--(1) Amount of payment. An
eligible displaced person who purchases a replacement dwelling is
entitled to a down payment assistance payment in the amount the person
would receive under paragraph (b) of this section if the person rented
a comparable replacement dwelling. At the Agency's discretion, a down
payment assistance payment that is less than $7,200 may be increased to
any amount not to exceed $7,200. However, the payment to a displaced
homeowner shall not exceed the amount the owner would receive under
Sec. 24.401(b) if he or she met the 90-day occupancy requirement. If
the Agency elects to provide the maximum payment of $7,200 as a down
payment, the Agency shall apply this discretion in a uniform and
consistent manner, so that eligible displaced persons in like
circumstances are treated equally. A displaced person eligible to
receive a payment as a 90-day owner-occupant under Sec. 24.401(a) is
not eligible for this payment. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.402(c).)
(2) Application of payment. The full amount of the replacement
housing payment for down payment assistance must be applied to the
purchase price of the replacement dwelling and related incidental
expenses.
Sec. 24.403 Additional rules governing replacement housing payments.
(a) Determining cost of comparable replacement dwelling. The upper
limit of a replacement housing payment shall be based on the cost of a
comparable replacement dwelling. (See Sec. 24.2(a).)
(1) If available, at least three comparable replacement dwellings
shall be considered and the payment computed on the basis of the
dwelling most nearly representative of, and equal to or better than,
the displacement dwelling. (See appendix A of this part, Section
24.403(a)(1).)
(2) If the site of the comparable replacement dwelling lacks a
major exterior attribute of the displacement dwelling site (e.g., the
site is significantly smaller or does not contain a swimming pool), the
value of such attribute shall be subtracted from the acquisition cost
of the displacement dwelling for purposes of computing the payment.
(3) If the acquisition of a portion of a typical residential
property causes the displacement of the owner from the dwelling and the
Agency determines that the remainder has economic value to the owner,
the Agency may offer to purchase the entire property. If the owner
refuses to sell the remainder to the Agency, the fair market value of
the remainder may be added to the acquisition cost of the displacement
dwelling for purposes of computing the replacement housing payment.
(See appendix A of this part, Section 24.403(a)(3).)
(4) To the extent feasible, comparable replacement dwellings shall
be selected from the neighborhood in which the displacement dwelling
was located or, if that is not possible, in nearby or similar
neighborhoods where housing costs are generally the same or higher.
(5) If two or more occupants of the displacement dwelling move to
separate replacement dwellings, each occupant is entitled to a
reasonable prorated share, as determined by the Agency, of any
relocation payments that would have been made if the occupants moved
together to a comparable replacement dwelling. However, if the Agency
determines that two or more occupants maintained separate households
within the same dwelling, such occupants have separate entitlements to
relocation payments.
(6) An Agency shall deduct the amount of any advance relocation
payment from the relocation payment(s) to which a displaced person is
otherwise entitled. The Agency shall not withhold any part of a
relocation payment to a displaced person to satisfy an obligation to
any other creditor.
(7) If the displacement dwelling was part of a property that
contained another dwelling unit and/or space used for nonresidential
purposes, and/or is located on a lot larger than typical for
residential purposes, only that portion of the acquisition payment
which is actually attributable to the displacement dwelling shall be
considered the acquisition cost when computing the replacement housing
payment.
(b) Inspection of replacement dwelling. Before making a replacement
housing payment or releasing the initial payment from escrow, the
Agency or its designated representative shall inspect the replacement
dwelling and determine whether it is a DSS dwelling as defined at Sec.
24.2(a).
(c) Purchase of replacement dwelling. A displaced person is
considered to have met the requirement to purchase a replacement
dwelling, if the person:
(1) Purchases a dwelling;
(2) Purchases and rehabilitates a substandard dwelling;
(3) Relocates to a dwelling which he or she owns or purchases;
(4) Constructs a dwelling on a site he or she owns or purchases;
(5) Contracts for the purchase or construction of a dwelling on a
site provided by a builder or on a site the person owns or purchases;
or
(6) Currently owns a previously purchased dwelling and site,
valuation of which shall be on the basis of current fair market value.
(d) Occupancy requirements for displacement or replacement
dwelling.
[[Page 69509]]
No person shall be denied eligibility for a replacement housing payment
solely because the person is unable to meet the occupancy requirements
set forth in this part for a reason beyond his or her control,
including:
(1) A disaster, an emergency, or an imminent threat to the public
health or welfare, as determined by the President, the Federal Agency
funding the project, or the Agency; or
(2) Another reason, such as a delay in the construction of the
replacement dwelling, military duty, or hospital stay, as determined by
the Agency.
(e) Conversion of payment. A displaced person who initially rents a
replacement dwelling and receives a rental assistance payment under
Sec. 24.402(b) is eligible to receive a payment under Sec. 24.401 or
Sec. 24.402(c) if he or she meets the eligibility criteria for such
payments, including purchase and occupancy within the prescribed 1-year
period. Any portion of the rental assistance payment that has been
disbursed shall be deducted from the payment computed under Sec.
24.401 or Sec. 24.402(c).
(f) Payment after death. A replacement housing payment is personal
to the displaced person and upon his or her death the undisbursed
portion of any such payment shall not be paid to the heirs or assigns,
except that:
(1) The amount attributable to the displaced person's period of
actual occupancy of the replacement housing shall be paid.
(2) Any remaining payment shall be disbursed to the remaining
family members of the displaced household in any case in which a member
of a displaced family dies.
(3) Any portion of a replacement housing payment necessary to
satisfy the legal obligation of an estate in connection with the
selection of a replacement dwelling by or on behalf of a deceased
person shall be disbursed to the estate.
(g) Insurance proceeds. To the extent necessary to avoid duplicate
compensation, the amount of any insurance proceeds received by a person
in connection with a loss to the displacement dwelling due to a
catastrophic occurrence (fire, flood, etc.) shall be included in the
acquisition cost of the displacement dwelling when computing the price
differential. (See Sec. 24.3.)
Sec. 24.404 Replacement housing of last resort.
(a) Determination to provide replacement housing of last resort.
Whenever a program or project cannot proceed on a timely basis because
comparable replacement dwellings are not available within the monetary
limits for owners or tenants, as specified in Sec. 24.401 or Sec.
24.402, as appropriate, the Agency shall provide additional or
alternative assistance under the provisions of this subpart. Any
decision to provide last resort housing assistance must be adequately
justified either:
(1) On a case-by-case basis, for good cause, which means that
appropriate consideration has been given to:
(i) The availability of comparable replacement housing in the
program or project area;
(ii) The resources available to provide comparable replacement
housing; and
(iii) The individual circumstances of the displaced person; or
(2) By a determination that:
(i) There is little, if any, comparable replacement housing
available to displaced persons within an entire program or project
area; and, therefore, last resort housing assistance is necessary for
the area as a whole;
(ii) A program or project cannot be advanced to completion in a
timely manner without last resort housing assistance; and
(iii) The method selected for providing last resort housing
assistance is cost effective, considering all elements, which
contribute to total program or project costs.
(b) Basic rights of persons to be displaced. Notwithstanding any
provision of this subpart, no person shall be required to move from a
displacement dwelling unless comparable replacement housing is
available to such person. No person may be deprived of any rights the
person may have under the Uniform Act or this part. The Agency shall
not require any displaced person to accept a dwelling provided by the
Agency under the procedures in this part (unless the Agency and the
displaced person have entered into a contract to do so) in lieu of any
acquisition payment or any relocation payment for which the person may
otherwise be eligible.
(c) Methods of providing comparable replacement housing. Agencies
shall have broad latitude in implementing this subpart, but
implementation shall be for reasonable cost, on a case-by-case basis
unless an exception to case-by-case analysis is justified for an entire
project.
(1) The methods of providing replacement housing of last resort
include, but are not limited to:
(i) A replacement housing payment in excess of the limits set forth
in Sec. 24.401 or Sec. 24.402. A replacement housing payment under
this section may be provided in installments or in a lump sum at the
Agency's discretion.
(ii) Rehabilitation of and/or additions to an existing replacement
dwelling.
(iii) The construction of a new replacement dwelling.
(iv) The provision of a direct loan, which requires regular
amortization or deferred repayment. The loan may be unsecured or
secured by the real property. The loan may bear interest or be
interest-free.
(v) The relocation and, if necessary, rehabilitation of a dwelling.
(vi) The purchase of land and/or a replacement dwelling by the
Agency and subsequent sale or lease to, or exchange with a displaced
person.
(vii) The removal of barriers for persons with disabilities.
(2) Under special circumstances, consistent with the definition of
a comparable replacement dwelling, modified methods of providing
replacement housing of last resort permit consideration of replacement
housing based on space and physical characteristics different from
those in the displacement dwelling (see appendix A of this part,
Section 24.404(c)), including upgraded, but smaller replacement housing
that is DSS and adequate to accommodate individuals or families
displaced from marginal or substandard housing with probable functional
obsolescence. In no event, however, shall a displaced person be
required to move into a dwelling that is not functionally equivalent in
accordance with Sec. 24.2(a), comparable replacement dwelling.
(3) The Agency shall provide assistance under this subpart to a
displaced person who is not eligible to receive a replacement housing
payment under Sec. Sec. 24.401 and 24.402 because of failure to meet
the length of occupancy requirement when comparable replacement rental
housing is not available at rental rates within the displaced person's
financial means. (See Sec. 24.2(a).) Such assistance shall cover a
period of 42 months.
Subpart F--Mobile Homes
Sec. 24.501 Applicability.
(a) General. This subpart describes the requirements governing the
provision of replacement housing payments to a person displaced from a
mobile home and/or mobile home site who meets the basic eligibility
requirements of this part. Except as modified by this subpart, such a
displaced person is entitled to:
(1) A moving expense payment in accordance with subpart D of this
part; and
(2) A replacement housing payment in accordance with subpart E of
this part
[[Page 69510]]
to the same extent and subject to the same requirements as persons
displaced from conventional dwellings. Moving cost payments to persons
occupying mobile homes are covered in Sec. 24.301(g)(1) through (10).
(b) Partial acquisition of mobile home park. The acquisition of a
portion of a mobile home park property may leave a remaining part of
the property that is not adequate to continue the operation of the
park. If the Agency determines that a mobile home located in the
remaining part of the property must be moved as a direct result of the
project, the occupant of the mobile home shall be considered to be a
displaced person who is entitled to relocation payments and other
assistance under this part.
Sec. 24.502 Replacement housing payment for a 90-day mobile
homeowner displaced from a mobile home.
(a) Eligibility. An owner-occupant displaced from a mobile home is
entitled to a replacement housing payment, not to exceed $31,000, under
Sec. 24.401 if:
(1) The person occupied the mobile home on the displacement site
for at least 90 days immediately before:
(i) The initiation of negotiations to acquire the mobile home--if
the person owned the mobile home and the mobile home is real property;
(ii) The initiation of negotiations to acquire the mobile home site
if the mobile home is personal property, but the person owns the mobile
home site; or
(iii) The date of the Agency's written notification to the owner-
occupant that the owner is determined to be displaced from the mobile
home as described in paragraphs (a)(3)(i) through (iv) of this section;
(2) The person meets the other basic eligibility requirements at
Sec. 24.401(a)(2); and
(3) The Agency acquires the mobile home as real estate, or acquires
the mobile home site from the displaced owner, or the mobile home is
personal property but the owner is displaced from the mobile home
because the Agency determines that the mobile home:
(i) Is not, and cannot economically be made decent, safe, and
sanitary;
(ii) Cannot be relocated without substantial damage or unreasonable
cost;
(iii) Cannot be relocated because there is no available comparable
replacement site; or
(iv) Cannot be relocated because it does not meet mobile home park
entrance requirements.
(b) Replacement housing payment computation for a 90-day owner that
is displaced from a mobile home. The replacement housing payment for an
eligible displaced 90-day owner is computed as described at Sec.
24.401(b) incorporating the following, as applicable:
(1) If the Agency acquires the mobile home as real estate and/or
acquires the owned site, the acquisition cost used to compute the price
differential payment is the actual amount paid to the owner as just
compensation for the acquisition of the mobile home, and/or site, if
owned by the displaced mobile home owner.
(2) If the Agency does not purchase the mobile home as real estate
but the owner is determined to be displaced from the mobile home and
eligible for a replacement housing payment based on paragraph
(a)(1)(iii) of this section, the eligible price differential payment
for the purchase of a comparable replacement mobile home, is the lesser
of the displaced mobile home owner-occupant's net cost to purchase a
replacement mobile home (i.e., purchase price of the replacement mobile
home less trade-in or sale proceeds of the displacement mobile home);
or, the cost of the Agency's selected comparable mobile home less the
Agency's estimate of the salvage or trade-in value for the mobile home
from which the person is displaced.
(3) If a comparable replacement mobile home site is not available,
the price differential payment shall be computed on the basis of the
reasonable cost of a conventional comparable replacement dwelling.
(c) Replacement housing payment for a 90-day owner-occupant that is
displaced from a leased or rented mobile home site. If the displacement
mobile home owner-occupant's site is leased or rented, a 90-day owner-
occupant is entitled to a rental assistance payment computed as
described in Sec. 24.402(b). This rental assistance replacement
housing payment may be used to lease a replacement site, may be applied
to the purchase price of a replacement site, or may be applied, with
any replacement housing payment attributable to the mobile home, toward
the purchase of a replacement mobile home and the purchase or lease of
a site or the purchase of a conventional decent, safe, and sanitary
dwelling.
(d) Owner-occupant not displaced from the mobile home. If the
Agency determines that a mobile home is personal property and may be
relocated to a comparable replacement site, but the owner-occupant
elects not to do so, the owner is not entitled to a replacement housing
payment for the purchase of a replacement mobile home. However, the
owner is eligible for moving costs described at Sec. 24.301 and any
replacement housing payment for the purchase or rental of a comparable
site as described in this section as applicable.
Sec. 24.503 Rental assistance payment for 90-day mobile home tenants
and certain others.
A displaced tenant or owner-occupant of a mobile home and/or site
is eligible for a replacement housing payment, not to exceed $7,200,
under Sec. 24.402 if:
(a) The person actually occupied the displacement mobile home on
the displacement site for at least 90 days immediately prior to the
initiation of negotiations;
(b) The person meets the other basic eligibility requirements at
Sec. 24.402(a); and
(c) The Agency acquires the mobile home and/or mobile home site, or
the mobile home is not acquired by the Agency but the Agency determines
that the occupant is displaced from the mobile home because of one of
the circumstances described at Sec. 24.502(a)(3).
Subpart G--Certification
Sec. 24.601 Purpose.
This subpart permits a State Agency to fulfill its responsibilities
under the Uniform Act by certifying that it shall operate in accordance
with State laws and regulations which shall accomplish the purpose and
effect of the Uniform Act, in lieu of providing the assurances required
by Sec. 24.4.
Sec. 24.602 Certification application.
An Agency wishing to proceed on the basis of a certification may
request an application for certification from the Lead Agency Director,
Office of Real Estate Services, HEPR-1, Federal Highway Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The completed
application for certification must be approved by the governor of the
State, or the governor's designee, and must be coordinated with the
Federal funding Agency, in accordance with application procedures.
Sec. 24.603 Monitoring and corrective action.
(a) The Federal Lead Agency shall, in coordination with other
Federal Agencies, monitor from time to time State Agency implementation
of programs or projects conducted under the certification process and
the State Agency shall make available any information required for this
purpose.
[[Page 69511]]
(b) The Lead Agency may require periodic information or data from
affected Federal or State Agencies.
(c) A Federal Agency may, after consultation with the Lead Agency,
and notice to and consultation with the governor, or his or her
designee, rescind any previous approval provided under this subpart if
the certifying State Agency fails to comply with its certification or
with applicable State law and regulations. The Federal Agency shall
initiate consultation with the Lead Agency at least 30 days prior to
any decision to rescind approval of a certification under this subpart.
The Lead Agency will also inform other Federal Agencies, which have
accepted a certification under this subpart from the same State Agency,
and will take whatever other action that may be appropriate.
(d) Section 103(b)(2) of the Uniform Act, as amended, requires that
the head of the Lead Agency report biennially to the Congress on State
Agency implementation of section 103. To enable adequate preparation of
the prescribed biennial report, the Lead Agency may require periodic
information or data from affected Federal or State Agencies.
Appendix A to Part 24--Additional Information
This appendix provides additional information to explain the
intent of certain provisions of this part.
Subpart A--General
Section 24.2 Definitions and Acronyms
Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement dwelling, (ii). The
requirement that a comparable replacement dwelling be ``functionally
equivalent'' to the displacement dwelling, means that it must
perform the same function and provide the same utility. The section
states that it need not possess every feature of the displacement
dwelling. However, the principal features must be present.
For example, if the displacement dwelling contains a pantry and
a similar dwelling is not available, a replacement dwelling with
ample kitchen cupboards may be acceptable. Insulated and heated
space in a garage might prove an adequate substitute for basement
workshop space. A dining area may substitute for a separate dining
room. Under some circumstances, attic space could substitute for
basement space for storage purposes, and vice versa.
Only in unusual circumstances may a comparable replacement
dwelling contain fewer rooms or, consequentially, less living space
than the displacement dwelling. Such may be the case when a decent,
safe, and sanitary replacement dwelling (which by definition is
``adequate to accommodate'' the displaced person) may be found to be
``functionally equivalent'' to a larger but very run-down
substandard displacement dwelling. Another example is when a
displaced person accepts an offer of government housing assistance
and the applicable requirements of such housing assistance program
require that the displaced person occupy a dwelling that has fewer
rooms or less living space than the displacement dwelling.
Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement dwelling, (vii). The
definition of comparable replacement dwelling requires that a
comparable replacement dwelling for a person, who is not receiving
assistance under any government housing program before displacement,
must be currently available on the private market without any
subsidy under a government housing program.
Section 24.2(a) Comparable replacement dwelling, (ix). If a
person accepts assistance under a government housing assistance
program, the rules of that program governing the size of the
dwelling apply, and the rental assistance payment under Sec. 24.402
would be computed on the basis of the person's actual out-of-pocket
cost for the replacement housing and associated utilities after the
applicable government assistance has been applied.
Section 24.2(a) Decent, safe, and sanitary, (i)(A). Even where
local law does not mandate adherence to such standards, it is
strongly recommended that they be considered as a matter of public
policy.
Section 24.2(a) Decent, safe, and sanitary, (v). Some local code
standards for occupancy do not require kitchens. However, selection
of comparables that provide a kitchen is recommended. The FHWA
believes this is good practice and in most cases should be easily
achievable. If the displacement dwelling had a kitchen, the
comparable dwelling must have a kitchen. If the displacement
dwelling did not have a kitchen but local code standards for
occupancy require one, the comparable dwelling must contain a
kitchen. If the displacement dwelling did not have a kitchen and
local code standards for occupancy do not require one, an Agency
does not have to provide a kitchen in the comparable dwelling. If a
kitchen is provided in the comparable dwelling, at a minimum it must
contain a fully usable sink, properly connected to potable hot and
cold water and to a sewage drainage system, and adequate space and
utility service connections for a stove and refrigerator.
Section 24.2(a) DSS-Persons with a disability, (vii). Reasonable
accommodation of a displaced person with a disability at the
replacement dwelling means the Agency is required to address persons
with a physical impairment that substantially limits one or more of
the major life activities. In these situations, reasonable
accommodation should include the following at a minimum: Doors of
adequate width; ramps or other assistance devices to traverse stairs
and access bathtubs, shower stalls, toilets and sinks; storage
cabinets, vanities, sink and mirrors at appropriate heights. Kitchen
accommodations will include sinks and storage cabinets built at
appropriate heights for access. The Agency shall also consider other
items that may be necessary, such as physical modification to a
unit, based on the displaced person's needs.
Section 24.2(a) Displaced person--Occupants of a temporary,
daily, or emergency shelter, (iii)(M). Shelters can serve many
purposes and each will have specific rules and requirements as to
who can occupy or use the shelter and whether prolonged and
continuous occupancy is allowed. Persons who are occupying a shelter
that only allows overnight stays and requires the occupants to
remove their personal property and themselves from the premises on a
daily basis and that offers no guarantee of reentry in the evening
typically would not meet the definition of displaced persons as used
in this part, nor would the shelter meet the definition of dwelling
as used in this part. Persons who live at the shelter on a
continuous, prolonged, or permanent basis for reasons including that
they are employed there or because they work to pay their rent there
may be considered displaced. Providing advisory assistance to
shelter occupants may be a challenge due to their transient nature.
Agencies should make reasonable effort to provide information about
proposed vacation date or other plans for the shelter to relocate.
Section 24.2(a) Dwelling site. This definition ensures that the
computation of replacement housing payments are accurate and
realistic (a) when the dwelling is located on a larger than normal
site, (b) when mixed-use properties are acquired, (c) when more than
one dwelling is located on the acquired property, or (d) when the
replacement dwelling is retained by an owner and moved to another
site.
Section 24.2(a) Federal down payment assistance. In some
instances, a person may have Federal down payment assistance funds
provided for the purpose of purchasing and occupying a dwelling.
These funds are not Uniform Act benefits and are not used in
combination with Uniform Act benefits. The FHWA believes that the
purchase of a dwelling using Federal down payment assistance,
standing alone, does not constitute an acquisition as contemplated
by the Uniform Act. However, Federal down payment assistance
provided to a private individual to purchase a residence is Federal
financial assistance, as defined by the Uniform Act. It results in
an acquisition-based displacement under the Uniform Act, however,
only when the purpose of the acquisition is to advance a Federal
project or program designed to benefit the public as a whole, such
as highways, hospitals, and other public works projects. Therefore,
those who may relocate as a result of an acquisition funded in part
with down payment assistance are not displaced persons within the
meaning of the Uniform Act. Furthermore, in the vast majority of
instances where Federal down payment assistance is provided, the
Federal Government does not have an interest in whether a specific
property is acquired. The Federal Government's interest is only that
the property would serve as the purchaser's dwelling and that it
meets general criteria including those related to habitability. The
lack of a conscious governmental decision requiring that a selected
or specific property be acquired to advance a program or project
demonstrates that the nature of the acquisition utilizing down
payment
[[Page 69512]]
assistance funds is nothing more than a person purchasing a dwelling
with limited Federal financial assistance. For instance, a person
using Federal down payment assistance to purchase a home that a
tenant occupies would not be an Agency causing a displacement, and
the tenant who would have to move as a result of the acquisition of
the home would not be a displaced person.
Section 24.2(a) Household income (exclusions). Household income
for purposes of this part does not include program benefits that are
not considered income by Federal law such as food stamps and the
Women Infants and Children program. For a more detailed list of
income exclusions see Federal Highway Administration, Office of Real
Estate Services website.\1\ Contact the Federal Agency administering
the program, if there is a question on whether to include income
from a specific program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 24.2(a) Initiation of negotiations. This section
provides a special definition for acquisition and displacements
under Public Law 96-510 or Superfund. The order of activities under
Superfund may differ slightly in that temporary relocation may
precede acquisition. Superfund is a program designed to clean up
hazardous waste sites. When such a site is discovered, it may be
necessary, in certain limited circumstances, to alert individual
owners and tenants to potential health or safety threats and to
offer to temporarily relocate them while additional information is
gathered. If a decision is later made to permanently relocate such
persons, those who had been temporarily relocated under Superfund
authority would no longer be on site when a formal, written offer to
acquire the property was made, and thus would lose their eligibility
for a replacement housing payment. In order to prevent this unfair
outcome, we have provided a definition of initiation of negotiation,
which is based on the date the Federal Government offers to
temporarily relocate an owner or tenant from the subject property.
Section 24.2(a) Initiation of negotiations, Tenants, (iv).
Tenants who occupy property that may be voluntarily acquired
amicably, without recourse to the use of the power of eminent
domain, must be fully informed as to their potential eligibility for
relocation assistance when negotiations are initiated. An option to
purchase property, or similar instrument, is not a binding agreement
because it gives the Agency a right, but not an obligation, to elect
to purchase the property necessary for the project. A binding
agreement as used in this appendix is a legally enforceable document
in which the property owner agrees to sell certain property rights
necessary for a project and the Agency agrees, without further
election, to make that purchase.
If negotiations fail to result in a binding agreement the Agency
should notify tenants that negotiations have failed to result in a
binding agreement and that the Agency has concluded its efforts to
acquire the property. If a tenant is not readily accessible, as the
result of a disaster or emergency, the Agency must make a good faith
effort to provide these notifications and document its efforts in
writing. For example, as used in this part, an option to purchase
property is not a binding agreement because it gives the Agency a
right to choose whether or not to purchase the property necessary
for the project. A binding agreement as used in this appendix is a
legally enforceable document in which the property owner agrees to
sell certain property rights necessary for a project and the Agency
agrees to that purchase for a specified consideration.
Section 24.2(a) Mobile home. The following examples provide
additional guidance on the types of mobile homes and manufactured
housing that can be found acceptable as comparable replacement
dwellings for persons displaced from mobile homes. A recreational
vehicle that is capable of providing living accommodations may be
considered a replacement dwelling if the following criteria are met:
The recreational vehicle is purchased and occupied as the
``primary'' place of residence; it is located on a purchased or
leased site and connected to or has available all necessary
utilities for functioning as a housing unit on the date of the
Agency's inspection; and, the dwelling, as sited, meets all local,
State, and Federal requirements for a decent, safe, and sanitary
dwelling. (The regulations of some local jurisdictions will not
permit the consideration of these vehicles as DSS dwellings. In
those cases, the recreational vehicle will not qualify as a
replacement dwelling.)
Title 24 CFR 3280.2 defines mobile home. In 1979 the term
``mobile home'' was changed to ``manufactured home.'' For purposes
of this part, the terms mobile home and manufactured home are
synonymous.
When assembled, manufactured homes built after 1976 contain no
less than 320 square feet. They may be single or multi-sectioned
units when installed. Their designation as personalty or realty will
be determined by State law. When determined to be realty, most are
eligible for conventional mortgage financing.
The 1976 HUD standards distinguish manufactured homes from
factory-built ``modular homes'' as well as conventional or ``stick-
built'' homes. Both of these types of housing are required to meet
State and local construction codes.
Section 24.3 No duplication of payments. This section prohibits
an Agency from making a payment to a person under this part that
would duplicate another payment the person receives under Federal,
State, or local law. The Agency is not required to conduct an
exhaustive search for such other payments; it is only required to
avoid creating a duplication based on the Agency's knowledge at the
time a payment is computed.
Section 24.5 Manner of notices. Property owners or occupants
must voluntarily elect to receive notices via electronic methods.
Alternatively, property owners or occupants may request delivery of
notices via certified or registered first class mail, return receipt
requested, instead of electronic means. Agencies must accommodate
the property owner's or occupant's preference. The FHWA continues to
believe that providing notices by either first class mail or
electronic means should not to be used as a substitute for face-to-
face meetings, but rather as a supplemental means of communication
that accommodates an owner's or occupant's preference. The FHWA
understands that certain documents that are essential to the
conveyance of the real property interests may not allow for
electronic signature(s).
In order to use electronic delivery notices, an Agency must be
able to demonstrate the ability to securely document the notice
delivery and receipt confirmation. Additional minimum safeguards
that the Agency must put in place prior to delivering notices by
electronic means are included in the regulation at Sec. 24.5. Prior
to the use of electronic delivery, there must be a process or
procedure outlined in written procedures approved by the Federal
funding Agency that details the requirements and rules the State
will follow when using electronic means for delivery of notices.
Agencies must determine and document instances when electronic
deliveries of notices are appropriate. An example of an appropriate
use of electronic delivery of notices might be to notify a property
owner of his or her right to accompany an appraiser as required at
Sec. 24.102(c). Other appropriate uses may be to secure a release
of mortgage or to confirm a property owners' receipt of the
acquisition and relocation brochures.
An example of when the use of electronic delivery of notices may
not be appropriate is when the document being signed requires
notarization or other similar verification. Electronic delivery of
notices may not always be a good option for relocation assistance
where many actions are conducted in person at the displacement or
replacement dwelling or business and require advisory services to be
provided as part of the process.
These examples are not intended to be all-inclusive, nor are
they exclusive of other opportunities to use this tool. For
additional information, the specific Federal regulations that set
out the format and examples for an electronic signature can be found
at 37 CFR 1.4(d)(2). The regulations in 37 CFR 1.4(d)(2) fall under
the purview of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which
provides examples of what is considered to be proper format in a
variety of electronically signed documents.
Section 24.9(c) Reports. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century Act (MAP-21) amended 42 U.S.C. 4633(b)(4) to require
that each Federal Agency subject to the Uniform Act submit an annual
report describing activities conducted by the Agency. The FHWA
believes that such a report that details activity provides a good
indication of program health and scope.
The FHWA realizes that not all Agencies subject to this
reporting requirement currently have the ability to collect all
information requested on the reporting form. However, Federal
Agencies may elect to provide a narrative report that focuses on
their respective efforts to improve and enhance delivery of Uniform
Act benefits and services. Narrative report information would
include information on training offered, reviews conducted, or
technical assistance provided to recipients.
Section 24.11 Adjustment of relocation benefits. No more
frequently than every 5
[[Page 69513]]
years, FHWA will use the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U) Seasonally Adjusted to determine if inflation,
cost of living, or other factors indicate that an adjustment to
relocation benefits is warranted.
Sample calculation:
Assume CPI-U is 110.0 as of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE]. The
fixed payment for non-residential moving expenses has a ceiling of
$40,000. Five years after [EFFECTIVE DATE OF FINAL RULE], or during
a subsequent 5th year evaluation, the CPI-U is calculated to be
115.5.
Divide the new index by the base year index = 115.5/110.0 =
1.050 or 5 percent. This means there has been a 5 percent increase
in prices and the fixed payment for non-residential moving expenses
ceiling should be increased 5 percent.
Calculate fixed payment benefit ceiling = $40,000 x 1.05 =
$42,000.
Subpart B--Real Property Acquisition
For Federal eminent domain purposes, the terms ``fair market
value'' (as used throughout this subpart) and ``market value,''
which may be the more typical term in private transactions, are
synonymous.
Section 24.101(a) Direct Federal program or project. All the
requirements in subpart B of this part (real property acquisition)
apply to all direct acquisitions for Federal programs and projects
by Federal Agencies, except for acquisitions undertaken by the
Tennessee Valley Authority or the Rural Utilities Service. There are
no exceptions for ``voluntary transactions.''
Section 24.101(b)(1)(i). The term ``general geographic area'' is
used to clarify that an Agency carrying out a project or program can
achieve the purpose of the project or program by purchasing any of
several properties that are not necessarily contiguous or are not
limited to a specific group of properties.
Section 24.101(b)(1)(iv) and (b)(2)(ii). Section
24.101(b)(1)(iv) and (b)(2)(ii) provide that, for programs and
projects receiving Federal financial assistance described in Sec.
24.101(b)(1) and (2), Agencies are to inform the owner(s) or their
designated representative(s) in writing of the Agency's estimate of
the fair market value for the property to be acquired.
While this part does not require an appraisal for these
transactions, Agencies may still decide that an appraisal is
necessary to support their determination of the fair market value of
these properties, and, in any event, persons developing a waiver
valuation must have some reasonable basis for their determination of
fair market value. In addition, some of the concepts inherent in
Federal Program appraisal practice are appropriate for these
estimates. It would be appropriate for Agencies to adhere to project
influence restrictions, as well as guard against discredited
``public interest value'' valuation concepts.
After an Agency has established an amount it believes to be the
fair market value of the property and has notified the owner of this
amount in writing, an Agency may negotiate freely with the owner in
order to reach agreement. Since these transactions are voluntary,
accomplished by a willing buyer and a willing seller, negotiations
may result in agreement for the amount of the original estimate, an
amount exceeding it, or for a lesser amount. Although not required
by this part, it would be entirely appropriate for Agencies to apply
the administrative settlement concept and procedures in Sec.
24.102(i) to negotiate amounts that exceed the original estimate of
fair market value. Agencies shall not take any coercive action in
order to reach agreement on the price to be paid for the property.
Section 24.101(b)(2)(iii). The intent of this section is to
ensure that a property owner or their designated representative is
clearly informed that an Agency will not utilize its eminent domain
authority to acquire the property if negotiations fail to result in
an amicable agreement. In instances where an unanticipated or
unplanned need arises which may require use of eminent domain
authority to acquire a property on which the Agency has made a
voluntary acquisition offer, the Agency must request permission to
waive the requirements of the applicable parts of the regulations in
this part. Because the purpose of this section is to allow for
voluntary acquisitions, the subsequent use of eminent domain
authority must only be in exceptional circumstances which must be
infrequent and well documented as to the reason for needing to use
eminent domain authority to acquire a property after failing to
acquire it voluntarily.
Section 24.101(c) Less-than-full-fee interest in real property.
Section 24.101(c) provides a benchmark beyond which the requirements
of the subpart clearly apply to leases.
Section 24.102(b) Notice to owner. In the case of condominiums
and other types of housing with common or community areas,
notification should be given to the appropriate parties. The
appropriate parties could be a condo or homeowner's board, a
designated representative, or all individual owners when common or
community property is being acquired for the project.
Section 24.102(c)(2) Appraisal, waiver thereof, and invitation
to owner. The purpose of the appraisal waiver provision is to
provide Agencies a technique to avoid the costs and time delay
associated with appraisal requirements for uncomplicated
acquisitions. In most cases, uncomplicated acquisitions are
considered to be those involving unimproved strips of land.
Acquisitions involving improvements, damages, changes of highest and
best use, or significant costs to cure are considered to be
complicated and, as such, are beyond the application of waiver
valuations as contemplated in this part. The intent is that non-
appraisers make the waiver valuations, freeing appraisers to do more
complex work.
The Agency employee or contractor making the determination to
use the waiver valuation option must have enough understanding of
appraisal principles, techniques, and use of appraisals to be able
to determine whether the proposed acquisition is uncomplicated.
Waiver valuations are not appraisals as defined by the Uniform
Act and this part; therefore, appraisal performance requirements or
standards, regardless of their source, are not required for waiver
valuations by this part. Since waiver valuations are not appraisals,
neither is there a requirement for an appraisal review. Agencies
should put procedures in place to ensure that waiver valuations are
accurate and that they are consistent with the unit values on the
project as determined by appraisals and appraisal reviews. The
Agency must have a reasonable basis for the waiver valuation and an
Agency official must still establish an amount believed to be just
compensation to offer the property owner(s).
The definition of ``appraisal'' in the Uniform Act and waiver
valuation provisions of the Uniform Act and this part are Federal
law and public policy and should be considered as such when
determining the impact of appraisal requirements levied by others.
Section 24.102(d) Establishment of offer of just compensation.
The initial offer to the property owner may not be less than the
amount of the Agency's approved appraisal, but may exceed that
amount if the Agency determines that a greater amount reflects just
compensation for the property.
Section 24.102(f) Basic negotiation procedures. An offer should
be adequately presented to an owner, and the owner should be
properly informed. Personal, face-to-face contact should take place,
if feasible, but this section does not require such contact in all
cases.
This section also provides that the property owner be given a
reasonable opportunity to consider the Agency's offer and to present
relevant material to the Agency. In order to satisfy the requirement
in Sec. 24.102(f), Agencies must allow owners time for analysis,
research and development, and compilation of a response, including
perhaps getting an appraisal. The needed time can vary
significantly, depending on the circumstances, but thirty (30) days
would seem to be the minimum time these actions can be reasonably
expected to require. Regardless of project time pressures, property
owners must be afforded this opportunity.
In some jurisdictions, there is pressure to initiate formal
eminent domain procedures at the earliest opportunity because
completing the eminent domain process, including gaining possession
of the needed real property, is very time consuming. The provisions
of Sec. 24.102(f) are not intended to restrict this practice, so
long as it does not interfere with the reasonable time that must be
provided for negotiations, described in the preceding paragraph, and
the Agencies adhere to the Uniform Act ban on coercive action
(section 301(7) of the Uniform Act).
If the owner expresses intent to provide an appraisal report,
Agencies are encouraged to provide the owner and/or their appraiser
a copy of Agency appraisal requirements and inform them that their
appraisal should be based on those requirements.
Section 24.102(i) Administrative settlement. This section
provides guidance on administrative settlement as an alternative to
judicial resolution of a difference of opinion on the value of a
property in order to avoid unnecessary litigation and congestion in
the courts.
All relevant facts and circumstances should be considered by an
Agency official
[[Page 69514]]
delegated this authority. Appraisers, including review appraisers,
must not be pressured to adjust their estimate of value for the
purpose of justifying such settlements. Such action would invalidate
the appraisal process.
Section 24.102(j) Payment before taking possession. It is
intended that a right-of-entry for construction purposes be obtained
only in the exceptional case, such as an emergency project, when
there is no time to make an appraisal and purchase offer and the
property owner is agreeable to the process.
Section 24.102(m) Fair rental. Section 301(6) of the Uniform Act
limits what an Agency may charge when a former owner or previous
occupant of a property is permitted to rent the property for a short
term or when occupancy is subject to termination by the Agency on
short notice. Such rent may not exceed ``the fair rental value of
the property to a short-term occupier.'' Generally, the Agency's
right to terminate occupancy on short notice (whether or not the
renter also has that right) supports the establishment of a lesser
rental than might be found in a longer, fixed-term situation.
Section 24.102(n) Conflict of interest. The overall objective is
to minimize the risk of fraud, waste, and abuse while allowing
Agencies to operate as efficiently as possible. There are three
parts to the provision in Sec. 24.102(n).
The first provision is the prohibition against having any
interest in the real property being valued by the appraiser (for an
appraisal), the valuer (for a waiver valuation), or the review
appraiser (for an appraisal review).
The second provision is that no person functioning as a
negotiator for a project or program can supervise or formally
evaluate the performance of any appraiser, valuer, or review
appraiser performing appraisal, waiver valuation, or appraisal
review work for that project or program. The intent of this
provision is to ensure appraisal and/or valuation independence and
to prevent inappropriate influence. It is not intended to prevent
Agencies or recipients from providing appraiser and/or valuers with
appropriate project information or participating in determining the
scope of work for the appraisal or valuation. For a program or
project receiving Federal financial assistance, the Federal funding
Agency may waive this requirement if it would create a hardship for
the Agency or recipient. The intent is to accommodate Federal
financial aid recipients that have a small staff where this
provision would be unworkable.
The third provision is to minimize situations where
administrative costs exceed acquisition costs. Section 24.102(n)
provides that the same person may prepare a valuation estimate
(including an appraisal) and negotiate that acquisition, if the
valuation estimate amount is $10,000 or less. Agencies or recipients
are not required to use those who prepare a waiver valuation or
appraisal of $10,000 or less to negotiate the acquisition. All
appraisals must be reviewed in accordance with Sec. 24.104. This
includes appraisals of real property valued at $10,000, or less.
The third provision has been expanded to allow Federal Agencies
to permit use of a single agent for values of more than $10,000, but
less than $25,000, but, as a safeguard, requires that an appraisal
and appraisal review be done to allow the appraiser to also act as
the negotiator. Agencies or recipients desiring to exercise this
option must request approval in writing from the Federal funding
Agency. The Agency request to exercise single agent option for
properties with a value of between $10,000 and $25,000 must include
the anticipated benefits of, and reasons for, raising the ceiling
above $10,000, the oversight mechanism used to assure proper use and
review, the names and credentials of individuals who will be
performing as single agents, and quality control procedures to be
utilized. Agencies and recipients may allow a subrecipient to use
their approved authority if the subrecipient has an Agency or
recipient approved oversight mechanism to assure proper use and
review of the authority. This mechanism must include documentation
of, the names and credentials of individuals who will be performing
as single agents, and quality control procedures to be utilized.
Section 24.103 Criteria for Appraisals. The term
``requirements'' is used throughout this section to avoid confusion
with The Appraisal Foundation's Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice (USPAP) ``standards.'' Although this section
discusses appraisal requirements, the definition of ``appraisal''
itself at Sec. 24.2(a) includes appraisal performance requirements
that are an inherent part of this section.
The term ``Federal and federally assisted program or project''
is used to better identify the type of appraisal practices that are
to be referenced and to differentiate them from the private sector,
especially mortgage lending, appraisal practice.
Section 24.103(a) Appraisal requirements. The first sentence
instructs readers that requirements for appraisals for Federal and
federally assisted programs or projects are located in this part.
These are the basic appraisal requirements for Federal and federally
assisted programs or projects. However, Agencies may enhance and
expand on them, and there may be specific project or program
legislation that references other appraisal requirements.
The appraisal requirements in Sec. 24.103(a) are necessarily
designed to comply with the Uniform Act and other Federal eminent
domain based appraisal requirements. They are also considered to be
consistent with Standards 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the USPAP. Consistency
with USPAP has been a feature of these appraisal requirements since
the beginning of USPAP. This ``consistent'' relationship was more
formally recognized in OMB Bulletin 92-06. While these requirements
are considered consistent with USPAP, neither can supplant the
other; their provisions are neither identical, nor interchangeable.
Appraisals performed for Federal and federally assisted real
property acquisition must follow the requirements in this part.
Compliance with any other appraisal requirements is not the purview
of this part. An appraiser who is committed to working within the
bounds of USPAP should recognize that compliance with both USPAP and
these requirements may be achieved by using the Scope of Work Rule
and the Jurisdictional Exception Rule of USPAP, where applicable.
The term ``scope of work'' defines the general parameters of the
appraisal. It reflects the needs of the Agency and the requirements
of Federal and federally assisted program appraisal practice. It
should be developed cooperatively by the assigned appraiser and an
Agency official who is competent to both represent the Agency's
needs and respect valid appraisal practice. The scope of work
statement should include the purpose and/or function of the
appraisal, a definition of the estate being appraised, whether it is
fair market value, its applicable definition, and the assumptions
and limiting conditions affecting the appraisal. It may include
parameters for the data search and identification of the technology,
including approaches to value, to be used to analyze the data. The
scope of work should consider the specific requirements in Sec.
24.103(a)(2)(i) through (v) and address them as appropriate.
Section 24.103(a)(1). The appraisal report should identify the
items considered in the appraisal to be real property, as well as
those identified as personal property.
Section 24.103(a)(2). All relevant and reliable approaches to
value are to be used. However, where an Agency determines that the
sales comparison approach will be adequate by itself and yield
credible appraisal results because of the type of property being
appraised and the availability of sales data, it may limit the
appraisal assignment to the sales comparison approach. This should
be reflected in the scope of work.
Section 24.103(b) Influence of the project on just compensation.
As used in this section, the term ``project'' means an undertaking
which is planned, designed, and intended to operate as a unit.
When the public is aware of the proposed project, project area
property values may be affected. Therefore, property owners should
not be penalized because of a decrease in value caused by the
proposed project nor reap a windfall at public expense because of
increased value created by the proposed project.
Section 24.103(d)(1). The appraiser and review appraiser must
each be qualified and competent to perform the appraisal and
appraisal review assignments, respectively. Among other
qualifications, State licensing or certification and professional
society designations can help provide an indication of an
appraiser's abilities.
Section 24.104 Review of appraisals. The term ``review
appraiser'' is used rather than ``reviewing appraiser,'' to
emphasize that ``review appraiser'' is a separate specialty and not
just an appraiser who happens to be reviewing an appraisal. Federal
Agencies have long held the perspective that appraisal review is a
unique skill that, while it certainly builds on appraisal skills,
requires more. The review appraiser should possess both appraisal
technical abilities and the ability to be the two-way bridge between
the Agency's real property valuation needs and the appraiser.
[[Page 69515]]
Agency review appraisers typically perform a role greater than
technical appraisal review. They are often involved in early project
development. Later they may be involved in devising the scope of
work statements and participate in making appraisal assignments to
fee and/or staff appraisers. They are also mentors and technical
advisors, especially on Agency policy and requirements, to
appraisers, both staff and fee. In addition, review appraisers are
frequently technical advisors to other Agency officials.
Section 24.104(a). Section 24.104(a) states that the review
appraiser is to review the appraiser's presentation and analysis of
market information and that it is to be reviewed against Sec.
24.103 and other applicable requirements, including, to the extent
appropriate, the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land
Acquisition. The appraisal review is to be a technical review by an
appropriately qualified review appraiser. The qualifications of the
review appraiser and the level of explanation of the basis for the
review appraiser's recommended (or approved) value depend on the
complexity of the appraisal problem. If the initial appraisal
submitted for review is not acceptable, the review appraiser is to
communicate and work with the appraiser to the greatest extent
possible to facilitate the appraiser's development of an acceptable
appraisal.
In doing this, the review appraiser is to remain in an advisory
role, not directing the appraisal, and retaining objectivity and
options for the appraisal review itself.
If the Agency intends that the staff review appraiser approve
the appraisal (as the basis for the establishment of the amount
believed to be just compensation), or establish the amount the
Agency believes is just compensation, she/he must be specifically
authorized by the Agency to do so. If the review appraiser is not
specifically authorized to approve the appraisal (as the basis for
the establishment of the amount believed to be just compensation),
or establish the amount believed to be just compensation, that
authority remains with another Agency official.
Section 24.104(b). In developing an independent approved or
recommended value, the review appraiser may reference any acceptable
resource, including acceptable parts of any appraisal, including an
otherwise unacceptable appraisal. When a review appraiser develops
an independent value, while retaining the appraisal review, that
independent value also becomes the approved appraisal of the fair
market value for Uniform Act Section 301(3) purposes. It is within
Agency discretion to decide whether a second review is needed if the
first review appraiser establishes a value different from that in
the appraisal report or reports on the property.
Section 24.104(c). Before acceptance of an appraisal, the review
appraiser must determine that the appraiser's documentation,
including valuation data and analysis of that data, demonstrates the
soundness of the appraiser's opinion of value. For the purposes of
this part, an acceptable appraisal is any appraisal that, on its
own, meets the requirements of Sec. 24.103. An approved appraisal
is the one acceptable appraisal that is determined to best fulfill
the requirement to be the basis for the amount believed to be just
compensation. Recognizing that appraisal is not an exact science,
there may be more than one acceptable appraisal of a property, but
for the purposes of this part, there can be only one approved
appraisal.
At the Agency's discretion, for a low value property requiring
only a simple appraisal process, the review appraiser's
recommendation (or approval), endorsing the appraiser's report, may
be determined to satisfy the requirement for the review appraiser's
signed report and certification.
Section 24.106(b) Expenses incidental to transfer of title to
the Agency. Generally, the Agency is able to pay such incidental
costs directly and, where feasible, is required to do so. In order
to prevent the property owner from making unnecessary out-of-pocket
expenditures and to avoid duplication of expenses, the property
owner should be informed early in the acquisition process of the
Agency's intent to make such arrangements. Such expenses must be
reasonable.
Subpart C--General Relocation Requirements
Section 24.202 Applicability and section 205(c) services to be
provided. In extraordinary circumstances, when a displaced person is
not readily accessible, the Agency must make a good faith effort to
comply with Sec. 24.202 and section 205(c) of the Uniform Act and
document its efforts in writing.
Section 24.204 Availability of comparable replacement dwelling
before displacement.
Section 24.204(a) General. Section 24.204(a) requires that no
one may be required to move from a dwelling without a comparable
replacement dwelling having been made available. In addition, Sec.
24.204(a) requires that where possible, three or more comparable
replacement dwellings shall be made available. Thus, the basic
standard for the number of referrals required under this section is
three. Only in situations where three comparable replacement
dwellings are not available (e.g., when the local housing market
does not contain three comparable dwellings) may the Agency make
fewer than three referrals.
Section 24.205 Relocation assistance advisory services.
Section 24.205(a). As part of the relocation planning process
Agencies should, to the extent practical, identify relocations that
may require additional time for advisory services and coordination
for their relocations. Such relocations may include the elderly,
those with medical needs, and those in public housing. In each of
these examples, the relocation requires that the unique needs of the
relocated person be determined early and that the relocation agent
make full use of available social services and other program support
(examples include local transportation services that may be
available in certain areas, financial support available from local,
Federal, and State Agencies, and community support services that may
be available) in considering and developing a relocation plan.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(C). Whenever possible, comparable
replacement housing must be inspected. The selected comparable
replacement dwelling should be inspected by a walk through and
physical interior and exterior inspection. Reliance on an exterior
visual inspection or examination of a multiple listing service (MLS)
listing, in most cases, does not constitute a complete DSS
inspection. If an inspection is not possible, the relocated person
must be informed in writing that an inspection was not possible and
be provided an explanation of why the inspection was not possible.
Section 24.205(c)(2)(ii)(D) emphasizes that if the comparable
replacement dwellings are located in areas of minority
concentration, minority persons should, if possible, also be given
opportunities to relocate to replacement dwellings not located in
such areas. Agencies should maintain adequate written documentation
of compliance with this requirement. Documentation should address
efforts made to locate such comparable and replacement housing to
the extent practical.
Section 24.206 Eviction for cause. An eviction related to non-
compliance with a requirement related to carrying out a project
(e.g., failure to move or relocate when instructed, or to cooperate
in the relocation process) shall not negate a person's entitlement
to relocation payments and other assistance set forth in this part.
Section 24.207 General Requirements--Claims for relocation
payments. Section 24.207(a) allows an Agency to make a payment for
low cost or uncomplicated nonresidential moves without additional
documentation, as long as the payment is limited to the amount of
the lowest acceptable bid or estimate, as provided for in Sec.
24.301(d)(1).
While Sec. 24.207(f) prohibits an Agency from proposing or
requesting that a displaced person waive his or her rights or
entitlements to relocation assistance and payments, an Agency may
accept a written statement from the displaced person that states
that they have chosen not to accept some or all of the payments or
assistance to which they are entitled. Any such written statement
must clearly show that the individual knows what they are entitled
to receive (a copy of the Notice of Eligibility which was provided
may serve as documentation) and their statement must specifically
identify which assistance or payments they have chosen not to
accept. The statement must be signed and dated and may not be
coerced by the Agency.
Section 24.208(c) Aliens not lawfully present in the United
States--computing relocation payments if some members of a displaced
family are present lawfully but others are present unlawfully.
There are two different methods for computing relocation
payments in situations where some members of a displaced family are
present lawfully but others are present unlawfully. For moving
expenses, the payment is to be based on the proportion of lawfully
present occupants to the total number of occupants. For example, if
four out of five members of a family to be
[[Page 69516]]
displaced are lawfully present, the proportion of lawful occupants
is 80 percent and that percentage is to be applied against the
moving expenses payment that otherwise would have been received.
Similarly, unlawful occupants are not counted as a part of the
family for RHP calculations. Thus, a family of five, one of whom is
a person not lawfully present in the U.S., would be counted as a
family of four. The comparable replacement dwelling for the family
would reflect the makeup of the remaining four persons, and the RHP
would be computed accordingly.
A ``pro rata'' approach to an RHP calculation is not permitted
(consistent with Pub. L. 105-117; codified at 42 U.S.C. 4605).
Following such a calculation would require that the Agency
disregards alien status for comparability determination, select a
comparable and then apply a percentage to the RHP amount. A ``pro
rata'' calculation approach for RHP may result in a higher RHP
eligibility than the displaced persons would otherwise be eligible
to receive.
The ``pro rata'' approach of providing a percentage of the
calculated RHP eligibility is contrary to the requirements of the
Uniform Act and this part.
A correct example of a calculation would be:
Household of seven (including one alien not lawfully present
individually occupying one bedroom.)
Displacement dwelling--4 BR unit, with rent/utilities of $1,200/
month
Housing requirements for all lawful occupants (six) is a 3 BR unit
Comparable dwelling
3 BR unit with rent/utilities of $1,300/month
Calculation of RHP under Sec. 24.208(c) (alien not lawfully present
excluded)
$1,300 (comparable)-$1,200 (displacement unit) = $100 RHP x 42
months = $4,200 RHP
If a person who is a member of a family being displaced is not
eligible for and does not receive Uniform Act benefits because he or
she is not lawfully in the United States, that person's income shall
not be excluded from the computation of family income. The person's
income is counted unless the Agency is certain that the ineligible
person will not continue to reside with the family. To exclude the
ineligible person's income would result in a windfall by providing a
higher relocation payment.
Section 24.208(h). The meaning of the term ``exceptional and
extremely unusual hardship'' focuses on significant and demonstrable
impacts on health, safety, or family cohesion. This phrase is
intended to allow judgment on the part of the Agency and does not
lend itself to an absolute standard applicable in all situations.
When considering whether a hardship exemption is appropriate, an
Agency may examine only the impact on an alien's spouse, parent, or
child who is a citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent
residence in the United States. In determining who is a spouse,
Agencies should use the definition of that term under State or other
applicable law.
A standard of hardship involves more than the loss of relocation
payments and/or assistance alone. Also, income alone (for example,
measured as a percentage of income spent on housing) would not make
the denial of benefits an ``exceptional and extremely unusual
hardship'' and qualify for a hardship exemption. In keeping with the
principle of allowing Agencies maximum reasonable discretion, FHWA
believes the decision regarding what documentation is required to
support a claim of hardship is one best left to the Federal funding
Agency, as long as the decision is handled in a nondiscriminatory
manner.
Subpart D--Payment for Moving and Related Expenses
Section 24.301 Payment for Actual Reasonable Moving and Related
Expenses.
Section 24.301(e) Personal property only. Examples of personal
property only moves might be: Personal property that is located on a
portion of property that is being acquired, but the business or
residence will not be acquired and can still operate after the
acquisition; personal property that is located in a mini-storage
facility that will be acquired or relocated; or, personal property
that is stored on vacant land that is to be acquired. For such a
residential personal property move, there may be situations in which
the costs of obtaining moving bids may exceed the cost to move. In
those situations, the Agency may allow an eligibility determination
and payment based upon the use of the ``additional room'' category
of the Fixed Residential Move Cost Schedule at www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/relocation/moving_cost_schedule.cfm.
For a nonresidential personal property only move, the owner of
the personal property has the options of moving the personal
property by using a commercial mover or a self-move. If a question
arises concerning the reasonableness of an actual cost move, the
Agency may obtain estimates from qualified movers to use as the
standard in determining the payment.
Section 24.301(g)(3) through (5). Construction costs for a new
building at the business replacement site, costs to build out a
shell, or costs substantially reconstruct a building are generally
ineligible for reimbursement of expenses for disconnecting,
dismantling, removing, reassembling, and reinstalling relocated
household appliances and other personal property. (See Section
24.304(b)(5) of this appendix for further discussion of ineligible
capital expenses).
Section 24.301(g)(13) Relettering signs and replacing
stationery. This may include the content of other media that need
correcting such as DVDs and CDs. This may also include modifications
to websites that would modify and edit contact and new location
information made necessary because of the move. Agencies will need
to determine whether these costs are actual, reasonable, and
necessary.
Section 24.301(g)(14)(i) through (iii). If the piece of
equipment is operational at the acquired site, the estimated cost to
reconnect the equipment shall be based on the cost to install the
equipment as it currently exists, and shall not include the cost of
code-required betterments or upgrades that may apply at the
replacement site. As prescribed in the part, the allowable in-place
value estimate (Sec. 24.301(g)(14)(ii)) and moving cost estimate
(Sec. 24.301(g)(14)(iii)) must reflect only the ``as is'' condition
and installation of the item at the displacement site. The in-place
value estimate may not include costs that reflect code or other
requirements that were not in effect at the displacement site. The
in-place value estimate may also not include installation costs for
machinery or equipment that is not operable or not installed at the
displacement site. Value in place can be obtained by hiring a
machinery and equipment (M&E) appraiser or value can be estimated
via websites available for M&E valuations. An example of one
resource is The Association of Machinery and Equipment Appraisers
(AMEA) website.\2\ The AMEA is a nonprofit professional association
whose mission is to accredit certified equipment appraisers. Another
example of available resources can be found on the website of The
American Society of Appraisers; a multi-discipline, non-profit,
international organization of professional appraisers. They maintain
a separate web page for machinery and equipment appraisers.\3\
Should an Agency find itself in need of a machinery and equipment
appraisal a web search for either ``machinery and equipment
appraisers'' or ``machinery and equipment appraisers organizations''
will provide a number of resources which can be used to find the
necessary services and resources. It is important to note that FHWA
does not endorse or recommend any organization, society or
professional group. The information provided in this appendix is
strictly informational.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ https://www.amea.org/.
\3\ https://www.appraisers.org/Disciplines/Machinery-Technical-Specialties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 24.301(g)(17) Searching expenses. In special cases where
the Agency determines it to be reasonable and necessary, certain
additional categories of searching costs may be considered for
reimbursement. These include those costs involved in investigating
potential replacement sites and the time of the business owner,
based on salary or earnings, required to apply for licenses or
permits, zoning changes, and attendance at zoning hearings.
Necessary attorney's fees required to obtain such licenses or
permits are also reimbursable. Time spent in negotiating the
purchase of a replacement business site is also reimbursable based
on a reasonable salary or earnings rate. In those instances when
such additional costs to investigate and acquire the site exceed
$5,000, the Agency may consider requesting a waiver of the cost
limitation under the Sec. 24.7, waiver provision. Such a waiver
should be subject to the approval of the Federal-funding Agency in
accordance with existing delegation of authority. As an alternative
to the preceding sentences in this section, Federal funding Agencies
may determine that it is appropriate to allow for payment of
searching expenses of up to $1,000 with little or no documentation
under this part. It is expected that each Federal funding Agency
will
[[Page 69517]]
consider and address the potential for waste, fraud, or abuse and
may develop additional requirements to implement this provision.
Such requirements may include development of policy or procedure or
by requiring specific changes or inclusions in the written
procedures approved by the Federal funding agency.
Search expenses may be incurred anytime the business anticipates
it may be displaced, including prior to project authorization or the
initiation of negotiations. However, such expenses cannot be
reimbursed until the business has received the notice in Sec.
24.203(b) and only after the Agency has determined such costs to be
actual, reasonable, and necessary.
Section 24.302. The occupant of a seasonal residence could
receive a payment based upon the Fixed Residential Move Cost
Schedule or actual moving expenses in accordance with Sec. 24.301.
Persons owning or renting seasonal residences are generally not
eligible for any relocation payments other than personal property
moving expenses.
Section 24.303(a). Actual, reasonable, and necessary
reimbursement for connection to available utilities are for the
necessary improvements to utility services currently available at
the replacement property. Examples include (a) a Laundromat business
that requires a larger service tap than the typical business service
tap already on the property, and (b) a business that requires an
upgrade or enhancement of the existing single phase electrical
service to provide 3-phase electrical service.
Section 24.303(b) Professional services. If a question should
arise as to what is a ``reasonable hourly rate,'' the Agency should
compare the rates of other similar professional providers in that
area.
Section 24.303(c) Impact fees and one-time assessments for
anticipated heavy utility usage.
Section 24.303(c) limits impact fees or one-time assessments to
those for anticipated heavy utility usage to utilities, i.e., water,
sewer, gas, and electric. Impact fees and one time assessments that
may be levied on a non-residential relocated person in their
replacement location for other major infrastructure construction or
use such as roads, fire stations, regional drainage improvements,
and parks are not eligible. Providing information on the potential
eligibility of impact fees for anticipated heavy utility usage is an
important advisory service.
Section 24.304(b)(5) Ineligible expenses. The cost of
constructing a replacement structure, building out of a shell, or
substantially reconstructing a building is a capital expenditure and
is generally ineligible for reimbursement as a reestablishment
expense. In those rare instances when a business cannot relocate
without construction of a replacement structure, an Agency or
recipient may request a waiver of Sec. 24.304(b)(1) under the
provisions of Sec. 24.7. An example of such an instance would be in
a rural area where there are no suitable buildings available and the
new construction, reconstruction, or build out of a shell as a
replacement structure is the only option that will enable the
business to remain a viable commercial operation. If a waiver is
granted, the cost of new construction, reconstruction, or build out
of a shell as a replacement structure will be considered an eligible
reestablishment expense subject to the $25,000 statutory limit on
such payment.
In markets where existing and new buildings are available for
rental (and sometimes for purchase), the buildings or the various
units available within the buildings often have only the basic
amenities such as heat, light, and water, and sewer available. These
buildings or units are shells. The cost of the building (shell) is
not an eligible expense because the shell is considered a capital
real estate improvement (a capital asset). A certain degree of
construction costs are generally expected by the market because
shells are designed to be customized by the tenant. However, a shell
which is dilapidated or is in disrepair and which requires major
reconstruction or rehabilitation would not be eligible for
reimbursement under this part. However, this determination does not
preclude the consideration by an Agency of certain modifications to
an existing replacement business building. Eligible improvements or
modifications up to the amount of $25,000 may include the addition
of necessary facilities such as bathrooms, room partitions, built-in
display cases, and similar items, if required by Federal, State, or
local codes, ordinances, or simply considered reasonable and
necessary for the operation of the business.
Section 24.305 Fixed payment for moving expenses--nonresidential
moves.
Section 24.305(a) Business. If a business elects the fixed
payment for moving expenses (in lieu of payment) option, the payment
represents its full and final payment for all relocation expenses.
Should the business elect to receive this payment, it would not be
eligible for any other relocation assistance payments including
actual moving or related expenses, or reestablishment expenses.
Section 24.305(c) Farm operation. If a farm operation elects the
fixed payment for moving expenses (in lieu of payment) option, the
payment represents its full and final payment for all relocation
expenses. Should the farm elect to receive this payment, it would
not be eligible for any other relocation assistance payments
including actual moving or related expenses, and reestablishment
expenses.
Section 24.305(d) Nonprofit organization. Gross revenues may
include membership fees, class fees, cash donations, tithes,
receipts from sales, or other forms of fund collection that enables
the nonprofit organization to operate. Administrative expenses are
those for administrative support such as rent, utilities, salaries,
advertising, and other like items, as well as fundraising expenses.
Operating expenses for carrying out the purposes of the nonprofit
organization are not included in administrative expenses. The
monetary receipts and expense amounts may be verified with certified
financial statements or financial documents required by public
Agencies.
If a nonprofit organization elects the fixed payment for moving
expenses (in lieu of payment) option, the payment represents its
full and final payment for all relocation expenses. Should the
nonprofit organization elect to receive this payment, it would not
be eligible for any other relocation assistance payments including
actual moving or related expenses, or reestablishment expenses.
Section 24.305(e) Average annual net earnings of a business or
farm operation. Section 24.305(a)(6) requires that the business
contribute materially to the income of the displaced person during
the 2 taxable years prior to displacement. This does not mean that
the business needed to be in existence for a minimum of 2 years
prior to displacement to be eligible for this payment.
If a business has been in operation for only a short period of
time (i.e., 6 months) prior to displacement, the fixed payment would
be based on the net earnings of the business at the displacement
site for the actual period of operation projected to an annual rate.
If a business was not in operation for a full 2 years, the existing
net earnings income data should be used to project what the net
earnings could be if the business were in operation for a full 2
years. If the business is seasonal, the business' operating season
net income represents the full annual income for the purposes of
calculating this benefit.
For Example:
(1) Business in operation for only 6 months earned $10,000.
Computation: ($10,000 / 6) x 12 = $20,000 annual net earnings x 2
years = $40,000 divided by 2 = $20,000; Eligibility = $20,000.
(Average annual net earnings.)
(2) Business in operation 18 months earned $20,000.
Computation: $20,000 divided by 18 months = $1,111 per month x 24
months = $26,664 divided by 2 years = $13,332; Eligibility = $13,332
(Average annual net earnings)
(3) Business is seasonal--open summer only for 4 months and
earns $5,000.
Computation: $5,000 was the seasonal net earnings 1 year and $6,000
was the seasonal net earnings a second year. $11,000 divided by 2 =
$5,500; Eligibility = $5,500. (Average annual net earnings)
If the average annual net earnings of the displaced business,
farm, or nonprofit organization are determined to be less than
$1,000, even $0 or a negative amount, the minimum payment of $1,000
shall be provided.
Section 24.306 Discretionary utility relocation payments.
Section 24.306(c) describes the issues that the Agency and the
utility facility owner must agree to in determining the amount of
the relocation payment. To facilitate and aid in reaching such
agreement, the practices in the Federal Highway Administration
regulation, 23 CFR part 645, subpart A, Utility Relocations,
Adjustments and Reimbursement, should be followed.
Subpart E--Replacement Housing Payments
Section 24.401 Replacement housing payment for 90-day homeowner-
occupants.
Section 24.401(a)(2). An extension of eligibility may be granted
if some event beyond the control of the displaced person
[[Page 69518]]
such as acute or life threatening illness, bad weather preventing
the completion of construction, or physical modifications required
for reasonable accommodation of a replacement dwelling, or other
like circumstances causes a delay in occupying a decent, safe, and
sanitary replacement dwelling.
Section 24.401(c)(2)(iii) Price differential. The provision in
Sec. 24.401(c)(2)(iii) to use the current fair market value for
residential use does not mean the Agency must have the property
appraised. Any reasonable method for arriving at the fair market
value may be used.
Section 24.401(d) Increased mortgage interest costs. The
provision in Sec. 24.401(d) sets forth the factors to be used in
computing the payment that will be required to reduce a person's
replacement mortgage (added to the down payment) to an amount which
can be amortized at the same monthly payment for principal and
interest over the same period of time as the remaining term on the
displacement mortgages. This payment is commonly known as the
``buydown.''
The Agency must know the remaining principal balance, the
interest rate, and monthly principal and interest payments for the
old mortgage as well as the interest rate, points, and term for the
new mortgage to compute the increased mortgage interest costs. If
the combination of interest and points for the new mortgage exceeds
the current prevailing fixed interest rate and points for
conventional mortgages and there is no justification for the
excessive rate, then the current prevailing fixed interest rate and
points shall be used in the computations. Justification may be the
unavailability of the current prevailing rate due to the amount of
the new mortgage, credit difficulties, or other similar reasons.
Sample Computation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Old Mortgage:
Remaining Principal Balance................................ $50,000
Monthly Payment (principal and interest)................... $458.22
Interest rate (percent).................................... 7
New Mortgage:
Interest rate (percent).................................... 10
Points..................................................... 3
Term (years)............................................... 15
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remaining term of the old mortgage is determined to be 174
months. Determining, or computing, the actual remaining term is more
reliable than using the data supplied by the mortgagee. However, if
it is shorter, use the term of the new mortgage and compute the
needed monthly payment.
Amount to be financed to maintain monthly payments of $458.22 at
10% = $42,010.18.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Calculation:
Remaining Principal Balance........................... $50,000.00
Minus Annual Monthly Payment (principal and interest). -42,010.18
Increased mortgage interest costs..................... 7,989.82
3 points on $42,010.18................................ 1,260.31
---------------
Total buydown necessary to maintain payments at 9,250.13
$458.22/month....................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the new mortgage actually obtained is less than the computed
amount for a new mortgage ($42,010.18), the buydown shall be
prorated accordingly. If the actual mortgage obtained in our example
were $35,000, the buydown payment would be $7,706.57 ($35,000
divided by $42,010.18 = .8331; $9,250.13 multiplied by .83 =
$7,706.57).
The Agency is obligated to inform the displaced person of the
approximate amount of this payment and to advise the displaced
person of the interest rate and points used to calculate the
payment.
The FHWA has an online tool to calculate increased mortgage
interest costs for fixed, and interest only loans at:
www.fhwa.dot.gov/real_estate/practitioners/uniform_act/relocation/midpcalcs/.
Section 24.401(e) Home equity conversion mortgage (HECM). The
provision in Sec. 24.401(e) sets forth the factors to be considered
to estimating an amount, after paying off the existing HECM balance,
sufficient to purchase a replacement HECM that provides a tenure or
term payment, line of credit, or lump-sum disbursement. The Agency
must know the value of the acquired dwelling, existing balance of
displacement HECM, remaining equity, and price of the selected
comparable or actual replacement dwelling, to compute the estimated
HECM supplement payment for a replacement HECM. The FHWA website
provides a simple calculator to estimate the HECM supplement payment
needed to purchase a replacement HECM at www.fhwa.dot.gov/realty/.
In cases where there is a tenure or term payment additional
information such as the age of the youngest borrower, amounts of the
tenure payment, amount and remaining term of term payment and the
current interest rate, is needed to calculate the payment and will
require the assistance of a HECM mortgage broker.
Below are four scenarios and suggestions for relocation payment
eligibilities. As you will note, the eligibility is the same in each
case; however, amounts will vary depending on the individual's
circumstance and existing HECM terms. This appendix also contains a
list of other possible Agency options, should a displaced person
elect to use them; however, they are not recommended by FHWA because
they do not place the person into a replacement HECM.
Situation 1--Owner has sufficient remaining equity to obtain a
replacement HECM for purchase.
Situation 2--Owner's existing HECM has a tenure disbursement
payment and there is not sufficient remaining equity to obtain a
replacement HECM.
Situation 3--Owner's existing HECM has a term disbursement
payment and there is not sufficient remaining equity to obtain a
replacement HECM.
Situation 4--Owner's existing HECM is a line of credit and there
is not sufficient remaining equity to obtain a replacement HECM.
The displaced homeowner may be eligible for the following
relocation payments:
A price differential payment in accordance with Sec.
24.401(c).
The owner would be eligible for a price differential payment
(the difference between the comparable replacement dwelling and the
acquisition cost of the displacement dwelling).
The administrative costs and incidental expenses
necessary to establish the new HECM.
Incidental costs incurred with a replacement HECM are
reimbursable and fall into three categories- Mortgage insurance
premium (MIP), loan origination fee, and closing costs.
A mortgage interest differential payment if the
homeowner incurs a higher interest rate on the new HECM.
The payment would be based on the difference between the
displacement adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) cap rate and the
available ARM cap rate and those rates would be used as the
components to calculate the MIDP in accordance with the sample
calculation provided at Section 24.401(d) of this appendix. The
Agency must advise the displaced person of the interest rate used to
calculate the payment. Note that most HECMs are monthly adjustable
rate mortgages, so any interest differential payment would be
minimal.
If the displaced homeowner elects to relocate into
rental housing rather than remain a homeowner, then the Agency will
calculate relocation assistance payments in accordance with Sec.
24.401(g).
For example, the Agency computes a rental assistance payment of
$10,000 for the owners based on a comparable replacement rental
dwelling. When the owners settle with the Agency they will pay off
the balance of the HECM and retain any remaining equity in the
property. They are eligible for the rental assistance payment when
they rent and occupy the DSS replacement dwelling.
Note: In all situations, if the displaced homeowner elects to
relocate into rental housing rather than remain homeowner, then the
Agency will calculate relocation assistance payments in accordance
with Sec. 24.401(g).
Note: If the existing HECM was a lump-sum or line-of-credit
which has been exhausted, then the Agency is not under obligation to
replace those amounts, but only to replace the HECM with a HECM with
terms and equity similar to the displacement HECM.
Other Agency options (not recommended unless elected by the
displaced person, since they do not place the person into the same
situation as the displacement HECM provided):
A direct loan as set forth in Sec. 24.404 under
housing of last resort.
A life estate interest in a comparable replacement
dwelling under replacement housing of last resort.
Agency purchases a comparable replacement dwelling and
retains ownership and conveys a leasehold interest to the owner for
his/her lifetime.
Agency offers a comparable replacement rental dwelling
to convert the homeowner occupant to tenant status.
Section 24.402 Replacement Housing Payment for 90-day tenants
and certain others.
Section 24.402(b)(2) Low income calculation example. The Uniform
Act
[[Page 69519]]
requires that an eligible displaced person who rents a replacement
dwelling is entitled to a rental assistance payment calculated in
accordance with Sec. 24.402(b). One factor in this calculation is
to determine if a displaced person is ``low income,'' as defined by
the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's annual survey
of income limits for the Public Housing and Section 8 Programs. To
make such a determination, the Agency must: (1) Determine the total
number of members in the household (including all adults and
children); (2) locate the appropriate table for income limits
applicable to the Uniform Act for the State in which the displaced
residence is located (found at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/ua/ualic.htm); (3) from the list of local jurisdictions shown,
identify the appropriate county, Metropolitan Statistical Area
(MSA),\4\ or Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA) \5\ in
which the displacement property is located; and (4) locate the
appropriate income limit in that jurisdiction for the size of this
displaced person/family. The income limit must then be compared to
the household income (defined at Sec. 24.2(a)) which is the gross
annual income received by the displaced family, excluding income
from any dependent children and full-time students under the age of
18. If the household income for the eligible displaced person/family
is less than or equal to the income limit, the family is considered
``low income.'' For example:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A complete list of counties and towns included in the
identified MSAs and PMSAs can be found under the bulleted item
``Income Limit Area Definition'' posted on the FHWA's website at:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/realestate/ua/ualic.htm.
\5\ See footnote 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom and Mary Smith and their three children are being displaced.
The information obtained from the family and verified by the Agency
is as follows:
Tom Smith, employed, earns $21,000/yr.
Mary Smith, receives disability payments of $6,000/yr.
Tom Smith, Jr., 21, employed, earns $10,000/yr.
Mary Jane Smith, 17, student, has a paper route, earns $3,000/yr.
(Income is not included because she is a dependent child and a full-
time student under 18)
Sammie Smith, 10, full-time student, no income.
Total family income for five persons is: $21,000 + $6,000 + $10,000
= $37,000
The displacement residence is located in the State of Maryland,
Caroline County. The low income limit for a five person household
is: $64,300. (2014 Income Limits)
This household is considered ``low income.''
Section 24.402(c) Down payment assistance. The down payment
assistance provisions in Sec. 24.402(c) limit such assistance to
the amount of the computed rental assistance payment for a tenant.
It does, however, provide the latitude for Agency discretion in
offering down payment assistance that exceeds the computed rental
assistance payment, up to the $7,200 statutory maximum. This does
not mean, however, that such Agency discretion may be exercised in a
selective or discriminatory fashion. The Agency should develop a
policy that affords equal treatment for displaced persons in like
circumstances and this policy should be applied uniformly throughout
the Agency's programs or projects.
For the purpose of this section, should the amount of the rental
assistance payment, for a displaced homeowner who elects to rent a
replacement dwelling may not be more than the eligibility the
homeowner would have received as an eligible displaced home owner.
Section 24.403(a)(1) Determining cost of comparable replacement
dwelling. In Sec. 24.403(a)(1) the term ``examined'' an MLS listing
does not equate to ``inspected'' but rather to ``considered'' for
the payment eligibility computation. At a minimum, the selected
comparable dwelling should be physically inspected or, if an
inspection is not feasible, the displaced person shall be informed
in writing that a physical inspection of the interior or exterior
was not performed, the reason that the inspection was not performed,
and that if the comparable is selected as a replacement dwelling a
replacement housing payment may not be made unless the replacement
dwelling is subsequently inspected and determined to be decent,
safe, and sanitary. Reliance on an exterior visual inspection, or
examination of an MLS listing does not in most cases constitute a
full DSS inspection.
Each Agency should clearly inform displaced persons that a DSS
inspection as required by this part is only a cursory inspection to
ensure that certain minimum requirements (e.g., local housing codes)
are being met versus doing a full home inspection of all systems
similar to that which a home inspector would be hired to do.
Section 24.403(a)(3) Additional rules governing replacement
housing payments. The economic value to the owner of a remainder may
be as an actual buildable lot for sale to an adjoining property
owner, or for some other purpose for which the Agency attributes an
economic value to the owner. When allowed for under applicable law,
a single offer that includes the value of the remainder property
should be made. The purpose of making an offer to purchase the
remainder is to allow for an RHP calculation and benefit
determination that includes the value of the remainder as part of
the compensation offered to the owner for acquisition, whether the
property owner sells the remainder or choses to retain it. Should a
property owner decide to retain a remainder then he would be
responsible for the value of the remainder when he purchases his
replacement property. Example B shows the effect that a property
owner's decision to retain a remainder or a States inability to make
an offer to purchase the remainder would have on the calculation of
benefits.
The price differential portion of the replacement housing
payment would be the difference between the comparable replacement
dwelling and the Agency's highest written acquisition offer. In the
examples below, the before value of the typical residential dwelling
and lot is $180,000; the remnant is valued at $15,000, and the part
needed for the project, including the dwelling, is valued at
$165,000 the comparable replacement dwelling is valued at $200,000.
The price differential would be calculated as follows in the two
scenarios:
(Example A) Agency Offers To Acquire Remainder
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable replacement dwelling................... ......... $200,000
Before value of parcel............................ $180,000 .........
Minus: Remainder Value............................ 15,000 .........
Acquisition of Part Needed........................ 165,000 .........
Agency's highest written offer.................... ......... 180,000
Price Differential Payment Eligibility............ ......... 20,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Example B) Agency Does Not Offer To Acquire Remainder
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable Replacement Dwelling................... ......... $200,000
Before value of parcel............................ $180,000 .........
Minus: Remainder Value (owner retains)............ 15,000 .........
Acquisition of Part Needed........................ 165,000 .........
Agency's highest written offer for part needed.... ......... 165,000
Price Differential Payment Eligibility............ ......... 35,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 24.404 Replacement housing of last resort.
Section 24.404(b) Basic rights of persons to be displaced.
Section 24.404(b) affirms the right of a 90-day homeowner-occupant,
who is eligible for a replacement housing payment under Sec.
24.401, to a reasonable opportunity to purchase a comparable
replacement dwelling. However, it should be read in conjunction with
the definition of ``owner of a dwelling'' at Sec. 24.2(a). The
Agency is not required to provide persons owning only a fractional
interest in the displacement dwelling a greater level of assistance
to purchase a replacement dwelling than the Agency would be required
to provide such persons if they owned fee simple title to the
displacement dwelling. If such assistance is not sufficient to buy a
replacement dwelling, the Agency may provide additional purchase
assistance or rental assistance.
Section 24.404(c) Methods of providing comparable replacement
housing. Section 24.404(c) emphasizes the use of cost effective
means of providing comparable replacement housing. The term
``reasonable cost'' is used to highlight the fact that while
innovative means to provide housing are encouraged, they should be
cost-effective. Section 24.404(c)(2) permits the use of last resort
housing, in special cases, which may involve variations from the
usual methods of obtaining comparability. However, such variation
should never result in a lowering of housing standards nor should it
ever result in a lower quality of living style for the displaced
person. The physical characteristics of the comparable replacement
dwelling may be dissimilar to those of the displacement dwelling but
they may never be inferior.
[[Page 69520]]
One example might be the use of a new mobile home to replace a
very substandard conventional dwelling in an area where comparable
conventional dwellings are not available.
Another example could be the use of a superior, but smaller,
decent, safe and sanitary dwelling to replace a large, old
substandard dwelling, only a portion of which is being used as
living quarters by the occupants and no other large comparable
dwellings are available in the area.
Appendix B to Part 24--Statistical Report Form
This appendix sets forth the statistical information collected
from Agencies in accordance with Sec. 24.9(c).
General
1. Report coverage. This report covers all relocation and real
property acquisition activities under a Federal or a federally
assisted project or program subject to the provisions of the Uniform
Act. If the exact numbers are not easily available, an Agency may
provide what it believes to be a reasonable estimate.
2. Report period. Activities shall be reported on a Federal
fiscal year basis, i.e. October 1 through September 30.
3. Where and when to submit report. Submit a copy of this report
to the lead Agency as soon as possible after September 30, but not
later than November 15. Lead Agency address: Federal Highway
Administration, Office of Real Estate Services (HEPR), 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
4. How to report relocation payments. The full amount of a
relocation payment shall be reported as if disbursed in the year
during which the claim was approved, regardless of whether the
payment is to be paid in installments.
5. How to report dollar amounts. Round off all money entries in
Parts of this section A, B, and C to the nearest dollar.
6. Regulatory references. The references in Parts A, B, C, and D
of this section indicate the subpart of this part pertaining to the
requested information.
Part A. Real Property Acquisition Under the Uniform Act
Line 1. Report all parcels acquired during the report year where
title or possession was vested in the Agency during the reporting
period. The parcel count reported should relate to ownerships and
not to the number of parcels of different property interests (such
as fee, perpetual easement, temporary easement, etc.) that may have
been part of an acquisition from one owner. For example, an
acquisition from a property that includes a fee simple parcel, a
perpetual easement parcel, and a temporary easement parcel should be
reported as 1 parcel not 3 parcels. (Include parcels acquired
without Federal financial assistance, if there was or will be
Federal financial assistance in other phases of the project or
program.)
Line 2. Report the number of parcels reported on Line 1 that
were acquired by condemnation. Include those parcels where
compensation for the property was paid, deposited in court, or
otherwise made available to a property owner pursuant to applicable
law in order to vest title or possession in the Agency through
condemnation authority.
Line 3. Report the number of parcels in Line 1 acquired through
administrative settlement where the purchase price for the property
exceeded the amount offered as just compensation and efforts to
negotiate an agreement at that amount have failed.
Line 4. Report the total of the amounts paid, deposited in
court, or otherwise made available to a property owner pursuant to
applicable law in order to vest title or possession in the Agency in
Line 1.
Part B. Residential Relocation Under the Uniform Act
Line 5. Report the number of households who were permanently
displaced during the fiscal year by project or program activities
and moved to their replacement dwelling. The term ``households''
includes all families and individuals. A family shall be reported as
``one'' household, not by the number of people in the family unit.
Line 6. Report the total amount paid for residential moving
expenses (actual expense and fixed payment).
Line 7. Report the total amount paid for residential replacement
housing payments including payments for replacement housing of last
resort provided pursuant to Sec. 24.404.
Line 8. Report the number of households in Line 5 who were
permanently displaced during the fiscal year by project or program
activities and moved to their replacement dwelling as part of last
resort housing assistance.
Line 9. Report the number of tenant households in Line 5 who
were permanently displaced during the fiscal year by project or
program activities, and who purchased and moved to their replacement
dwelling using a down payment assistance payment under this part.
Line 10. Report the total sum costs of residential relocation
expenses and payments (excluding Agency administrative expenses) in
Lines 6 and 7.
Part C. Nonresidential Relocation Under the Uniform Act
Line 11. Report the number of businesses, nonprofit
organizations, and farms who were permanently displaced during the
fiscal year by project or program activities and moved to their
replacement location. This includes businesses, nonprofit
organizations, and farms, that upon displacement, discontinued
operations.
Line 12. Report the total amount paid for nonresidential moving
expenses (actual expense and fixed payment.)
Line 13. Report the total amount paid for nonresidential
reestablishment expenses.
Line 14. Report the total sum costs of nonresidential relocation
expenses and payments (excluding Agency administrative expenses) in
Lines 12 and 13.
Part D. Relocation Appeals
Line 15. Report the total number of relocation appeals filed
during the fiscal year by aggrieved persons (residential and
nonresidential).
[[Page 69521]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP18DE19.001
[FR Doc. 2019-25558 Filed 12-17-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P