Proposed Amendments to the Stress Test Rule, 68350-68353 [2019-26950]
Download as PDF
68350
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 241
Monday, December 16, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE
AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1238
RIN 2590–AB05
Proposed Amendments to the Stress
Test Rule
Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
with request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA) is requesting comment
on a proposed rule that would amend its
stress testing rule, consistent with
section 401 of the Economic Growth,
Regulatory Relief, and Consumer
Protection Act (EGRRCPA). Specifically,
the proposed rule would revise the
minimum threshold for the regulated
entities to conduct stress tests from $10
billion to $250 billion, remove the
requirements for Federal Home Loan
Banks (Banks) subject to stress testing,
and remove the adverse scenario from
the list of required scenarios. These
amendments align FHFA’s rule with
rules adopted by other financial
institution regulators that implement
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act) stress testing requirements, as
amended by EGRRCPA. The proposed
rule also makes certain conforming and
technical changes.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
amendments must be received on or
before January 15, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comments, identified by regulatory
identification number (RIN) 2590–AB05,
by any of the following methods:
• Agency Website: www.fhfa.gov/
open-for-comment-or-input.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. If
you submit your comment to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also
send it by email to FHFA at
RegComments@fhfa.gov to ensure
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:14 Dec 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
timely receipt by the agency. Please
include ‘‘RIN 2590–AB05’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Hand Delivered/Courier: The hand
delivery address is: Alfred M. Pollard,
General Counsel, Attention: Comments/
RIN 2590–AB05, Federal Housing
Finance Agency, Eighth Floor, 400
Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC
20219. Deliver the package to the
Seventh Street entrance Guard’s Desk,
First Floor, on business days between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m.
• U.S. Mail, United Parcel Service,
Federal Express, or Other Mail Service:
The mailing address for comments is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel,
Attention: Comments/RIN 2590–AB05,
Federal Housing Finance Agency,
Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW,
Washington, DC 20219. Please note that
all mail sent to FHFA via U.S. Mail is
routed through a national irradiation
facility, a process that may delay
delivery by approximately two weeks.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on submission
and posting of comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Naa
Awaa Tagoe, Senior Associate Director,
Office of Financial Analysis, Modeling
and Simulations, (202) 649–3140,
naaawaa.tagoe@fhfa.gov; Karen Heidel,
Assistant General Counsel, Office of
General Counsel, (202) 649–3073,
karen.heidel@fhfa.gov; or Mark D.
Laponsky, Deputy General Counsel,
Office of General Counsel, (202) 649–
3054, mark.laponsky@fhfa.gov. The
telephone number for the
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
is (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Comments
FHFA invites comment on all aspects
of the proposed amendments and will
take all comments into consideration
before adopting amendments through a
final rule. Copies of all comments
received will be posted without change
on the FHFA website at https://
www.fhfa.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide, such
as your name, address, email address,
and telephone number. In addition,
copies of all comments received will be
available for examination by the public
through the electronic rulemaking
docket for this proposed rule also
located on the FHFA website.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
II. Background
Section 401 of the EGRRCPA, (Pub. L.
115–174, section 401) amended the
Dodd-Frank Act requirements to
implement stress testing. Prior to the
passage of the EGRRCPA,1 section 165(i)
of the Dodd-Frank Act 2 required each
financial company with total
consolidated assets of more than $10
billion to conduct annual stress tests. In
addition, section 165 required FHFA to
issue regulations for regulated entities to
conduct their stress tests, which were
required to include at least three
different stress testing scenarios:
‘‘baseline,’’ ‘‘adverse,’’ and ‘‘severely
adverse.’’ 3 In September 2013, FHFA
published in the Federal Register a final
rule implementing the Dodd-Frank Act
stress testing requirements. FHFA’s
regulation, located at 12 CFR part 1238,
requires each regulated entity to
conduct an annual stress test based on
scenarios provided by FHFA and
consistent with FHFA prescribed
methodologies and practices. The
regulation also requires that the agency
issue to the regulated entities stress test
scenarios that are generally consistent
with and comparable to those developed
by the FRB not later than 30 days after
the FRB publishes its scenarios.4
Section 401 of EGRRCPA amended
certain aspects of the stress testing
requirements applicable to financial
companies in section 165(i) of the DoddFrank Act.5 Specifically, after 18
months, section 401 of EGRRCPA raises
the minimum asset threshold for
application of the stress testing
requirement from $10 billion to $250
billion in total consolidated assets,
revises the requirement for financial
companies to conduct stress tests
‘‘annually,’’ and instead requires them
to conduct stress tests ‘‘periodically’’,
and no longer requires the stress test to
include an ‘‘adverse’’ scenario, thus
reducing the number of required stress
test scenarios from three to two.
III. Analysis of Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to revise FHFA’s stress testing rules
applicable to its regulated entities,
1 Public
Law 115–174, 132 Stat. 1296 (2018).
Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010),
codified at 12 U.S.C. 5365.
3 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)(C).
4 12 CFR 1238.3(b).
5 Public Law 115–174, 132 Stat. 1296–1368
(2018).
2 Public
E:\FR\FM\16DEP1.SGM
16DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
consistent with amendments made by
section 401 of EGRRCPA. The proposed
rule would also make additional
technical changes to the stress testing
rule. In sum, the proposed rule would
discontinue the Dodd-Frank Act stress
testing of the Banks and reduce the
number of scenarios mandated for
Enterprise Dodd-Frank Act stress
testing.
A. Minimum Asset Threshold
As described above, section 401 of
EGRRCPA amended section 165 of the
Dodd-Frank Act by raising the
minimum threshold for financial
companies required to conduct stress
tests from $10 billion to $250 billion. As
there are no Banks with total
consolidated assets of over $250 billion,
the Banks will no longer be subject to
the stress testing requirements of this
rule. Though each of the Banks has total
consolidated assets of less than $250
billion, the rule expressly maintains the
Director’s discretion to require any
regulated entity with assets below the
$250 billion threshold to conduct the
stress test. As the total consolidated
assets for each Enterprise exceed the
$250 billion threshold, the Enterprises
remain subject to stress testing under
this rule.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Frequency of Stress Testing
Section 401 of EGRRCPA also revised
the requirement under section 165 of
the Dodd-Frank Act for financial
companies to conduct stress tests,
changing the required frequency from
‘‘annual’’ to ‘‘periodic.’’ The term
‘‘periodic’’ is not defined in EGRRCPA.
Because of the Enterprises’ total
consolidated asset amounts, their
function in the mortgage market, size of
their retained portfolios, and their share
of the mortgage securitization market,
FHFA proposes to require the
Enterprises to conduct stress tests on an
annual basis. This is consistent with
FHFA’s regulatory mission to ensure
each of the regulated entities ‘‘operates
in a safe and sound manner.’’ 6
C. Removal of the ‘‘Adverse’’ Scenario
As discussed above, section 401 of
EGRRCPA amended section 165(i) of the
Dodd-Frank Act to no longer require the
Board to include an ‘‘adverse’’ stresstesting scenario, reducing the number of
stress test scenarios from three to two.
The ‘‘baseline’’ scenario is a set of
conditions that affect the U.S. economy
or the financial condition of the
regulated entities, and that reflect the
consensus views of the economic and
financial outlook, and the ‘‘severely
6 12
U.S.C. 4513(a)(1)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:14 Dec 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
adverse’’ scenario is a more severe set of
conditions and the most stringent of the
former three scenarios. Although the
‘‘adverse’’ scenario has provided some
additional value in limited
circumstances, the ‘‘baseline’’ and
‘‘severely adverse’’ scenarios largely
cover the full range of expected and
stressful conditions. Therefore FHFA
does not consider it necessary, for its
supervisory purposes, to require the
additional burden of analyzing an
‘‘adverse’’ scenario.
VI. Coordination With the FRB and the
Federal Insurance Office
In accordance with section
165(i)(2)(C), FHFA has coordinated with
both the FRB and the Federal Insurance
Office (FIO). On November 29, 2018, the
FRB published a proposed rule which
revised ‘‘the minimum threshold for
state member banks to conduct stress
tests from $10 billion to $250 billion,’’
and revised ‘‘the frequency with which
state member banks with assets greater
than $250 billion would be required to
conduct stress tests,’’ in addition to
removing the adverse scenario from the
list of required scenarios.7 The FDIC
adopted its final rule; 8 and the OCC its
final rule.9 Although FHFA’s amended
proposed rule would not be identical to
those of the FRB, the FDIC, and the
OCC, it is consistent and comparable
with them. FHFA consulted with the
FRB and FIO before proposing these
amendments.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain
any collections of information pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.). Therefore,
FHFA has not submitted any
information to the Office of
Management and Budget for review.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule applies only to the
regulated entities, which do not come
within the meaning of small entities as
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(see 5 U.S.C. 601(6)). Therefore, in
accordance with section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), the General Counsel of FHFA
certifies that this proposed rule, if
promulgated as a final rule, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1238
Administrative practice and
procedure, Capital, Federal Home Loan
7 83
FR 61408 (Nov. 29, 2018).
8 84 FR 56929 (Oct. 24, 2019).
9 84 FR 54472 (Oct. 10, 2019).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68351
Banks, Government-sponsored
enterprises, Regulated entities,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Stress test.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the
section,
and under the authority of 12 U.S.C.
5365(i), FHFA proposes to amend part
1238 of Title 12 of the Code of Federal
Regulations to read as follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
PART 1238—STRESS TESTING OF
REGULATED ENTITIES
1. The authority citation for part 1238
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1426; 4513; 4526;
4612; 5365(i).
■
2. Amend § 1238.1 to read as follows:
§ 1238.1
Authority and Purpose.
(a) Authority. This part is issued by
the Federal Housing Finance Agency
(FHFA) under section 165(i) of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act), Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat.
1376, 1423–32 (2010), 12 U.S.C. 5365(i),
as amended by section 401 of the
Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act
(EGRRCPA), Public Law 115–174, 132
Stat. 1296 (2018), 12 U.S.C. 5365(i); and
the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C.
4513, 4526, 4612).
(b) Purpose. (1) This part implements
section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act,
as amended by section 401 of the
EGRRCPA, which requires all large
financial companies that have total
consolidated assets of more than $250
billion, and are regulated by a primary
federal financial regulatory agency, to
conduct periodic stress tests.
(2) This part establishes requirements
that apply to each Enterprise’s
performance of periodic stress tests. The
purpose of the periodic stress test is to
provide the Enterprises, FHFA, and the
FRB with additional, forward-looking
information that will help them to
assess capital adequacy at the
Enterprises under various scenarios; to
review the Enterprises’ stress test
results; and to increase public
disclosure of the Enterprises’ capital
condition by requiring broad
dissemination of the stress test scenarios
and results.
■ 3. Amend § 1238.2 to read as follows:
§ 1238.2
Definitions.
For purposes of this part, the
following definitions apply:
Planning horizon means the period of
time over which the stress projections
E:\FR\FM\16DEP1.SGM
16DEP1
68352
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
must extend. The planning horizon
cannot be less than nine quarters.
Scenarios are sets of economic and
financial conditions used in the
Enterprises’ stress tests, including
baseline and severely adverse.
Stress test is a process to assess the
potential impact on an Enterprise of
economic and financial conditions
(‘‘scenarios’’) on the consolidated
earnings, losses, and capital of the
Enterprise over a set planning horizon,
taking into account the current
condition of the Enterprise and the
Enterprise’s risks, exposures, strategies,
and activities.
■ 4. Amend § 1238.3 to read as follows:
§ 1238.3
Annual stress test.
(a) In general. Each Enterprise:
(1) Shall complete an annual stress
test of itself based on its data as of
December 31 of the preceding calendar
year;
(2) The stress test shall be conducted
in accordance with this section and the
methodologies and practices described
in § 1238.4 and in a supplemental
guidance or order.
(b) Scenarios provided by FHFA. In
conducting its annual stress tests under
this section, each Enterprise must use
scenarios provided by FHFA, which
shall be generally consistent with and
comparable to those established by the
FRB, that reflect a minimum of two sets
of economic and financial conditions,
including a baseline and severely
adverse scenario. Not later than 30 days
after the FRB publishes its scenarios,
FHFA will issue to the Enterprises a
description of the baseline and severely
adverse scenarios that each Enterprise
shall use to conduct its annual stress
tests under this part.
■ 5. Amend § 1238.4 to read as follows:
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1238.4
Methodologies and practices.
(a) Potential impact. Except as noted
in this subpart, in conducting a stress
test under § 1238.3, each Enterprise
shall calculate how each of the
following is affected during each quarter
of the stress test planning horizon, for
each scenario:
(1) Potential losses, pre-provision net
revenues, and future pro forma capital
positions over the planning horizon;
and
(2) Capital levels and capital ratios,
including regulatory capital and net
worth, and any capital ratios, specified
by FHFA.
(b) Planning horizon. Each Enterprise
must use a planning horizon of at least
nine quarters over which the impact of
specified scenarios would be assessed.
(c) Additional analytical techniques.
If FHFA determines that the stress test
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:14 Dec 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
methodologies and practices of an
Enterprise are deficient, FHFA may
determine that additional or alternative
analytical techniques and exercises are
appropriate for an Enterprise to use in
identifying, measuring, and monitoring
risks to the financial soundness of the
Enterprise, and require an Enterprise to
implement such techniques and
exercises in order to fulfill the
requirements of this part. In addition,
FHFA will issue guidance annually to
describe the baseline and severely
adverse scenarios, and methodologies to
be used in conducting the annual stress
test.
(d) Controls and oversight of the stress
testing processes. (1) The appropriate
senior management of each Enterprise
must ensure that the Enterprise
establishes and maintains a system of
controls, oversight, and documentation,
including policies and procedures,
designed to ensure that the stress testing
processes used by the Enterprise are
effective in meeting the requirements of
this part. These policies and procedures
must, at a minimum, describe the
Enterprise’s testing practices and
methodologies, validation and use of
stress test results, and processes for
updating the Enterprise’s stress testing
practices consistent with relevant
supervisory guidance;
(2) The board of directors, or a
designated committee thereof, shall
review and approve the policies and
procedures established to comply with
this part as frequently as economic
conditions or the condition of the
Enterprise warrants, but at least
annually; and
(3) Senior management of the
Enterprise and each member of the
board of directors shall receive a
summary of the stress test results.
■ 6. Amend § 1238.5 to read as follows:
§ 1238.5 Required report to FHFA and FRB
of stress test results and related
information.
(a) Report required for stress tests. On
or before May 20 of each year, the
Enterprises must report the results of
the stress tests required under § 1238.3
to FHFA, and to the FRB, in accordance
with paragraph (b) of this section;
(b) Content of the report for annual
stress test. Each Enterprise must file a
report in the manner and form
established by FHFA.
(c) Confidential treatment of
information submitted. Reports
submitted to FHFA under this part are
FHFA property and records (as defined
in 12 CFR part 1202 of this chapter).
The reports are and include non-public
information contained in or related to
examination, operating, or condition
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for
the use of, FHFA in connection with the
performance of the agency’s
responsibilities regulating or
supervising the Enterprises. Disclosure
of any reports submitted to FHFA or the
information contained in any such
report is prohibited unless authorized
by this part, legal obligation, or
otherwise by the Director of FHFA.
■ 7. Amend § 1238.6 to read as follows:
§ 1238.6 Post-assessment actions by the
Enterprises.
Each Enterprise shall take the results
of the stress test conducted under
§ 1238.3 into account in making
changes, as appropriate, to the
Enterprise’s capital structure (including
the level and composition of capital); its
exposures, concentrations, and risk
positions; any plans for recovery and
resolution; and to improve overall risk
management. If an Enterprise is under
FHFA conservatorship, any postassessment actions shall require prior
FHFA approval.
■ 8. Amend § 1238.7 to read as follows:
§ 1238.7 Publication of results by
regulated entities.
(a) Public disclosure of results
required for stress tests of the
Enterprises. The Enterprises must
disclose publicly a summary of the
stress test results for the severely
adverse scenario not earlier than August
1 and not later than August 15 of each
year. The summary may be published
on the Enterprise’s website or in any
other form that is reasonably accessible
to the public.
(b) Information to be disclosed in the
summary. The information disclosed by
each Enterprise shall, at minimum,
include—
(1) A description of the types of risks
being included in the stress test;
(2) A high-level description of the
scenario provided by FHFA, including
key variables (such as GDP,
unemployment rate, housing prices, and
foreclosure rate, etc.);
(3) A general description of the
methodologies employed to estimate
losses, pre-provision net revenue, and
changes in capital positions over the
planning horizon;
(4) A general description of the use of
the required stress test as one element
in an Enterprise’s overall capital
planning and capital assessment. If an
Enterprise is under conservatorship, this
description shall be coordinated with
FHFA;
(5) Aggregate losses, pre-provision net
revenue, net income, net worth, pro
forma capital levels and capital ratios
(including regulatory and any other
E:\FR\FM\16DEP1.SGM
16DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2019 / Proposed Rules
capital ratios specified by FHFA) over
the planning horizon, under the
scenario; and
(6) Such other data fields, in such
form (e.g., aggregated), as the Director
may require.
Dated: December 10, 2019.
Mark A. Calabria,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019–26950 Filed 12–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Parts 303 and 308
RIN 3064–AF19
Incorporation of Existing Statement of
Policy Regarding Requests for
Participation in the Affairs of an
Insured Depository Institution by
Convicted Individuals
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’)
proposes to revise the existing
regulations requiring persons convicted
of certain criminal offenses to obtain
prior written consent before
participating in the conduct of the
affairs of any depository institution to
incorporate the FDIC’s existing
Statement of Policy, and to amend the
regulations setting forth the FDIC’s
procedures and standards applicable to
an application to obtain the FDIC’s prior
written consent. Following the issuance
of final regulations, the FDIC’s existing
Statement of Policy would be rescinded.
The proposed incorporation of the
Statement of Policy into the FDIC’s
regulations would provide for greater
transparency as to its application,
provide greater certainty as to the
FDIC’s application process and help
both insured depository institutions and
affected individuals to understand its
impact and to potentially seek relief
from its provisions.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 14, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 3064–AF19, by any of
the following methods:
• Agency Website: https://
www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/
propose.html. Follow instructions for
submitting comments on the Agency
website.
• Email: Comments@fdic.gov. Include
RIN 3064–AF19 on the subject line of
the message.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:14 Dec 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
• Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary, Attention: Comments, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20429.
• Hand Delivery: Comments may be
hand delivered to the guard station at
the rear of the 550 17th Street, Building
(located on F Street) on business days
between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Public Inspection: All comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/
laws/federal/propose.html, including
any personal information provided.
Paper copies of public comments may
be ordered from the FDIC Public
Information Center, 3501 North Fairfax
Drive, Room E–1002, Arlington, VA
22226 by telephone at (877) 275–3342 or
(703) 562–2200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Zeller, Review Examiner (319)
395–7394 x4125, or Larisa Collado,
Section Chief (202) 898–8509, in the
Division of Risk Management
Supervision; or Michael Condon,
Counsel, (202) 898–6536, John Dorsey,
Acting Supervisory Counsel, (202) 898–
3807, or Andrea Winkler, Acting
Assistant General Counsel, (202) 898–
3727 in the Legal Division.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Policy Objectives
The policy objective of the proposed
rule is to clarify the FDIC’s application
of section 19 of the FDI Act (section 19),
clarify the application process for
insured depository institutions and
individuals who seek relief from the
provisions of section 19, and seek
public comment on additional proposals
that could expand the scope of relief
available for minor offenses. The FDIC
has issued a Statement of Policy for
Section 19 of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (SOP), which provides
the public with guidance relating to
section 19 and the FDIC’s application
thereof. The current version of the SOP,
with some modifications over time, has
been a published resource for the public
for over twenty years; however, some
uncertainty may exist because the terms
and procedures outlined in the SOP
have not been adopted as regulations by
the FDIC. To remove potential
ambiguities about the FDIC’s
application of section 19 or the
application process, the proposed rule
will incorporate the current content of
the SOP into its rules and procedures,
thereby further clarifying its existing
practices enforcing section 19.
Additionally, the FDIC seeks comment
from members of the public, including
but not limited to, insured depository
institutions, other financial institutions
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68353
and companies, individual depositors
and consumers, employees and
prospective employees of insured
depository institutions or other financial
services institutions that have applied
for or been granted relief from the
provisions of section 19, and civil rights
organizations, consumer groups, trade
associations, and other members of the
financial services industry regarding the
scope of section 19, possible
amendments to the relief process, the
scope of the de minimis offense
exemption, and the treatment of
expunged criminal records.
II. Background
The FDIC seeks to incorporate its
SOP, which is issued pursuant to
section 19 of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act,1 into its existing
Procedures and Rules of Practice.
Section 19 prohibits, without the prior
written consent of the FDIC, any person
from participating in banking who has
been convicted of a crime of dishonesty
or breach of trust or money laundering,
or who has entered a pretrial diversion
or similar program in connection with
the prosecution for such an offense.
Further, the law forbids an insured
institution from permitting such a
person to engage in any conduct or to
continue any relationship prohibited by
section 19. It also imposes a ten-year
ban against the FDIC’s consent for a
person convicted of certain crimes
enumerated in Title 18 of the United
States Code, absent a motion by the
FDIC and approval by the sentencing
court.
The FDIC issued originally, after
notice and comment, the current SOP in
December 1998 2 to provide the public
with guidance relating to section 19 and
the FDIC’s application thereof. The 1998
SOP, among other things, instituted a
set of criteria to provide for blanket
approval of certain low-risk crimes, and
for persons convicted of such de
minimis crimes to forgo filing an
application.
A clarification to the SOP was issued
in 2007, based on the 2006 amendment
to Section 19 of the FDI Act by section
710 of the Financial Services Regulatory
Relief Act of 2006,3 which modified
section 19 to include coverage of
institution-affiliated parties (IAPs)
participating in the affairs of bank
holding companies, or savings and loan
holding companies, and gave
supervisory authority over such entities
to the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board)
1 12
U.S.C. 1829.
FR 66177 (Dec. 1, 1998).
3 Public Law 109–351, 120 Stat. 1966,
2 63
E:\FR\FM\16DEP1.SGM
16DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68350-68353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26950]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2019 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 68350]]
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY
12 CFR Part 1238
RIN 2590-AB05
Proposed Amendments to the Stress Test Rule
AGENCY: Federal Housing Finance Agency.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking with request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) is requesting
comment on a proposed rule that would amend its stress testing rule,
consistent with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,
and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA). Specifically, the proposed rule
would revise the minimum threshold for the regulated entities to
conduct stress tests from $10 billion to $250 billion, remove the
requirements for Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks) subject to stress
testing, and remove the adverse scenario from the list of required
scenarios. These amendments align FHFA's rule with rules adopted by
other financial institution regulators that implement the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) stress
testing requirements, as amended by EGRRCPA. The proposed rule also
makes certain conforming and technical changes.
DATES: Comments on the proposed amendments must be received on or
before January 15, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments, identified by regulatory
identification number (RIN) 2590-AB05, by any of the following methods:
Agency Website: www.fhfa.gov/open-for-comment-or-input.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. If you submit your
comment to the Federal eRulemaking Portal, please also send it by email
to FHFA at [email protected] to ensure timely receipt by the agency.
Please include ``RIN 2590-AB05'' in the subject line of the message.
Hand Delivered/Courier: The hand delivery address is:
Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel, Attention: Comments/RIN 2590-AB05,
Federal Housing Finance Agency, Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW,
Washington, DC 20219. Deliver the package to the Seventh Street
entrance Guard's Desk, First Floor, on business days between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m.
U.S. Mail, United Parcel Service, Federal Express, or
Other Mail Service: The mailing address for comments is: Alfred M.
Pollard, General Counsel, Attention: Comments/RIN 2590-AB05, Federal
Housing Finance Agency, Eighth Floor, 400 Seventh Street SW,
Washington, DC 20219. Please note that all mail sent to FHFA via U.S.
Mail is routed through a national irradiation facility, a process that
may delay delivery by approximately two weeks.
See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for additional information on
submission and posting of comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Naa Awaa Tagoe, Senior Associate
Director, Office of Financial Analysis, Modeling and Simulations, (202)
649-3140, [email protected]; Karen Heidel, Assistant General
Counsel, Office of General Counsel, (202) 649-3073,
[email protected]; or Mark D. Laponsky, Deputy General Counsel,
Office of General Counsel, (202) 649-3054, [email protected]. The
telephone number for the Telecommunications Device for the Deaf is
(800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Comments
FHFA invites comment on all aspects of the proposed amendments and
will take all comments into consideration before adopting amendments
through a final rule. Copies of all comments received will be posted
without change on the FHFA website at https://www.fhfa.gov, and will
include any personal information you provide, such as your name,
address, email address, and telephone number. In addition, copies of
all comments received will be available for examination by the public
through the electronic rulemaking docket for this proposed rule also
located on the FHFA website.
II. Background
Section 401 of the EGRRCPA, (Pub. L. 115-174, section 401) amended
the Dodd-Frank Act requirements to implement stress testing. Prior to
the passage of the EGRRCPA,\1\ section 165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Act \2\
required each financial company with total consolidated assets of more
than $10 billion to conduct annual stress tests. In addition, section
165 required FHFA to issue regulations for regulated entities to
conduct their stress tests, which were required to include at least
three different stress testing scenarios: ``baseline,'' ``adverse,''
and ``severely adverse.'' \3\ In September 2013, FHFA published in the
Federal Register a final rule implementing the Dodd-Frank Act stress
testing requirements. FHFA's regulation, located at 12 CFR part 1238,
requires each regulated entity to conduct an annual stress test based
on scenarios provided by FHFA and consistent with FHFA prescribed
methodologies and practices. The regulation also requires that the
agency issue to the regulated entities stress test scenarios that are
generally consistent with and comparable to those developed by the FRB
not later than 30 days after the FRB publishes its scenarios.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Public Law 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296 (2018).
\2\ Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010), codified at 12
U.S.C. 5365.
\3\ 12 U.S.C. 5365(i)(2)(C).
\4\ 12 CFR 1238.3(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 401 of EGRRCPA amended certain aspects of the stress
testing requirements applicable to financial companies in section
165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Act.\5\ Specifically, after 18 months, section
401 of EGRRCPA raises the minimum asset threshold for application of
the stress testing requirement from $10 billion to $250 billion in
total consolidated assets, revises the requirement for financial
companies to conduct stress tests ``annually,'' and instead requires
them to conduct stress tests ``periodically'', and no longer requires
the stress test to include an ``adverse'' scenario, thus reducing the
number of required stress test scenarios from three to two.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Public Law 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296-1368 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Analysis of Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed rule is to revise FHFA's stress
testing rules applicable to its regulated entities,
[[Page 68351]]
consistent with amendments made by section 401 of EGRRCPA. The proposed
rule would also make additional technical changes to the stress testing
rule. In sum, the proposed rule would discontinue the Dodd-Frank Act
stress testing of the Banks and reduce the number of scenarios mandated
for Enterprise Dodd-Frank Act stress testing.
A. Minimum Asset Threshold
As described above, section 401 of EGRRCPA amended section 165 of
the Dodd-Frank Act by raising the minimum threshold for financial
companies required to conduct stress tests from $10 billion to $250
billion. As there are no Banks with total consolidated assets of over
$250 billion, the Banks will no longer be subject to the stress testing
requirements of this rule. Though each of the Banks has total
consolidated assets of less than $250 billion, the rule expressly
maintains the Director's discretion to require any regulated entity
with assets below the $250 billion threshold to conduct the stress
test. As the total consolidated assets for each Enterprise exceed the
$250 billion threshold, the Enterprises remain subject to stress
testing under this rule.
B. Frequency of Stress Testing
Section 401 of EGRRCPA also revised the requirement under section
165 of the Dodd-Frank Act for financial companies to conduct stress
tests, changing the required frequency from ``annual'' to ``periodic.''
The term ``periodic'' is not defined in EGRRCPA. Because of the
Enterprises' total consolidated asset amounts, their function in the
mortgage market, size of their retained portfolios, and their share of
the mortgage securitization market, FHFA proposes to require the
Enterprises to conduct stress tests on an annual basis. This is
consistent with FHFA's regulatory mission to ensure each of the
regulated entities ``operates in a safe and sound manner.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 12 U.S.C. 4513(a)(1)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Removal of the ``Adverse'' Scenario
As discussed above, section 401 of EGRRCPA amended section 165(i)
of the Dodd-Frank Act to no longer require the Board to include an
``adverse'' stress-testing scenario, reducing the number of stress test
scenarios from three to two. The ``baseline'' scenario is a set of
conditions that affect the U.S. economy or the financial condition of
the regulated entities, and that reflect the consensus views of the
economic and financial outlook, and the ``severely adverse'' scenario
is a more severe set of conditions and the most stringent of the former
three scenarios. Although the ``adverse'' scenario has provided some
additional value in limited circumstances, the ``baseline'' and
``severely adverse'' scenarios largely cover the full range of expected
and stressful conditions. Therefore FHFA does not consider it
necessary, for its supervisory purposes, to require the additional
burden of analyzing an ``adverse'' scenario.
VI. Coordination With the FRB and the Federal Insurance Office
In accordance with section 165(i)(2)(C), FHFA has coordinated with
both the FRB and the Federal Insurance Office (FIO). On November 29,
2018, the FRB published a proposed rule which revised ``the minimum
threshold for state member banks to conduct stress tests from $10
billion to $250 billion,'' and revised ``the frequency with which state
member banks with assets greater than $250 billion would be required to
conduct stress tests,'' in addition to removing the adverse scenario
from the list of required scenarios.\7\ The FDIC adopted its final
rule; \8\ and the OCC its final rule.\9\ Although FHFA's amended
proposed rule would not be identical to those of the FRB, the FDIC, and
the OCC, it is consistent and comparable with them. FHFA consulted with
the FRB and FIO before proposing these amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 83 FR 61408 (Nov. 29, 2018).
\8\ 84 FR 56929 (Oct. 24, 2019).
\9\ 84 FR 54472 (Oct. 10, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The proposed rule does not contain any collections of information
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.). Therefore, FHFA has not submitted any information to the Office
of Management and Budget for review.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The proposed rule applies only to the regulated entities, which do
not come within the meaning of small entities as defined in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (see 5 U.S.C. 601(6)). Therefore, in
accordance with section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), the General Counsel of FHFA certifies that this
proposed rule, if promulgated as a final rule, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1238
Administrative practice and procedure, Capital, Federal Home Loan
Banks, Government-sponsored enterprises, Regulated entities, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Stress test.
Authority and Issuance
For the reasons stated in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section,
and under the authority of 12 U.S.C. 5365(i), FHFA proposes to amend
part 1238 of Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations to read as
follows:
PART 1238--STRESS TESTING OF REGULATED ENTITIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1238 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1426; 4513; 4526; 4612; 5365(i).
0
2. Amend Sec. 1238.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 1238.1 Authority and Purpose.
(a) Authority. This part is issued by the Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA) under section 165(i) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act), Public Law 111-203, 124
Stat. 1376, 1423-32 (2010), 12 U.S.C. 5365(i), as amended by section
401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection
Act (EGRRCPA), Public Law 115-174, 132 Stat. 1296 (2018), 12 U.S.C.
5365(i); and the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C. 4513, 4526, 4612).
(b) Purpose. (1) This part implements section 165(i)(2) of the
Dodd-Frank Act, as amended by section 401 of the EGRRCPA, which
requires all large financial companies that have total consolidated
assets of more than $250 billion, and are regulated by a primary
federal financial regulatory agency, to conduct periodic stress tests.
(2) This part establishes requirements that apply to each
Enterprise's performance of periodic stress tests. The purpose of the
periodic stress test is to provide the Enterprises, FHFA, and the FRB
with additional, forward-looking information that will help them to
assess capital adequacy at the Enterprises under various scenarios; to
review the Enterprises' stress test results; and to increase public
disclosure of the Enterprises' capital condition by requiring broad
dissemination of the stress test scenarios and results.
0
3. Amend Sec. 1238.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 1238.2 Definitions.
For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply:
Planning horizon means the period of time over which the stress
projections
[[Page 68352]]
must extend. The planning horizon cannot be less than nine quarters.
Scenarios are sets of economic and financial conditions used in the
Enterprises' stress tests, including baseline and severely adverse.
Stress test is a process to assess the potential impact on an
Enterprise of economic and financial conditions (``scenarios'') on the
consolidated earnings, losses, and capital of the Enterprise over a set
planning horizon, taking into account the current condition of the
Enterprise and the Enterprise's risks, exposures, strategies, and
activities.
0
4. Amend Sec. 1238.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1238.3 Annual stress test.
(a) In general. Each Enterprise:
(1) Shall complete an annual stress test of itself based on its
data as of December 31 of the preceding calendar year;
(2) The stress test shall be conducted in accordance with this
section and the methodologies and practices described in Sec. 1238.4
and in a supplemental guidance or order.
(b) Scenarios provided by FHFA. In conducting its annual stress
tests under this section, each Enterprise must use scenarios provided
by FHFA, which shall be generally consistent with and comparable to
those established by the FRB, that reflect a minimum of two sets of
economic and financial conditions, including a baseline and severely
adverse scenario. Not later than 30 days after the FRB publishes its
scenarios, FHFA will issue to the Enterprises a description of the
baseline and severely adverse scenarios that each Enterprise shall use
to conduct its annual stress tests under this part.
0
5. Amend Sec. 1238.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 1238.4 Methodologies and practices.
(a) Potential impact. Except as noted in this subpart, in
conducting a stress test under Sec. 1238.3, each Enterprise shall
calculate how each of the following is affected during each quarter of
the stress test planning horizon, for each scenario:
(1) Potential losses, pre-provision net revenues, and future pro
forma capital positions over the planning horizon; and
(2) Capital levels and capital ratios, including regulatory capital
and net worth, and any capital ratios, specified by FHFA.
(b) Planning horizon. Each Enterprise must use a planning horizon
of at least nine quarters over which the impact of specified scenarios
would be assessed.
(c) Additional analytical techniques. If FHFA determines that the
stress test methodologies and practices of an Enterprise are deficient,
FHFA may determine that additional or alternative analytical techniques
and exercises are appropriate for an Enterprise to use in identifying,
measuring, and monitoring risks to the financial soundness of the
Enterprise, and require an Enterprise to implement such techniques and
exercises in order to fulfill the requirements of this part. In
addition, FHFA will issue guidance annually to describe the baseline
and severely adverse scenarios, and methodologies to be used in
conducting the annual stress test.
(d) Controls and oversight of the stress testing processes. (1) The
appropriate senior management of each Enterprise must ensure that the
Enterprise establishes and maintains a system of controls, oversight,
and documentation, including policies and procedures, designed to
ensure that the stress testing processes used by the Enterprise are
effective in meeting the requirements of this part. These policies and
procedures must, at a minimum, describe the Enterprise's testing
practices and methodologies, validation and use of stress test results,
and processes for updating the Enterprise's stress testing practices
consistent with relevant supervisory guidance;
(2) The board of directors, or a designated committee thereof,
shall review and approve the policies and procedures established to
comply with this part as frequently as economic conditions or the
condition of the Enterprise warrants, but at least annually; and
(3) Senior management of the Enterprise and each member of the
board of directors shall receive a summary of the stress test results.
0
6. Amend Sec. 1238.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 1238.5 Required report to FHFA and FRB of stress test results
and related information.
(a) Report required for stress tests. On or before May 20 of each
year, the Enterprises must report the results of the stress tests
required under Sec. 1238.3 to FHFA, and to the FRB, in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section;
(b) Content of the report for annual stress test. Each Enterprise
must file a report in the manner and form established by FHFA.
(c) Confidential treatment of information submitted. Reports
submitted to FHFA under this part are FHFA property and records (as
defined in 12 CFR part 1202 of this chapter). The reports are and
include non-public information contained in or related to examination,
operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the
use of, FHFA in connection with the performance of the agency's
responsibilities regulating or supervising the Enterprises. Disclosure
of any reports submitted to FHFA or the information contained in any
such report is prohibited unless authorized by this part, legal
obligation, or otherwise by the Director of FHFA.
0
7. Amend Sec. 1238.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 1238.6 Post-assessment actions by the Enterprises.
Each Enterprise shall take the results of the stress test conducted
under Sec. 1238.3 into account in making changes, as appropriate, to
the Enterprise's capital structure (including the level and composition
of capital); its exposures, concentrations, and risk positions; any
plans for recovery and resolution; and to improve overall risk
management. If an Enterprise is under FHFA conservatorship, any post-
assessment actions shall require prior FHFA approval.
0
8. Amend Sec. 1238.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 1238.7 Publication of results by regulated entities.
(a) Public disclosure of results required for stress tests of the
Enterprises. The Enterprises must disclose publicly a summary of the
stress test results for the severely adverse scenario not earlier than
August 1 and not later than August 15 of each year. The summary may be
published on the Enterprise's website or in any other form that is
reasonably accessible to the public.
(b) Information to be disclosed in the summary. The information
disclosed by each Enterprise shall, at minimum, include--
(1) A description of the types of risks being included in the
stress test;
(2) A high-level description of the scenario provided by FHFA,
including key variables (such as GDP, unemployment rate, housing
prices, and foreclosure rate, etc.);
(3) A general description of the methodologies employed to estimate
losses, pre-provision net revenue, and changes in capital positions
over the planning horizon;
(4) A general description of the use of the required stress test as
one element in an Enterprise's overall capital planning and capital
assessment. If an Enterprise is under conservatorship, this description
shall be coordinated with FHFA;
(5) Aggregate losses, pre-provision net revenue, net income, net
worth, pro forma capital levels and capital ratios (including
regulatory and any other
[[Page 68353]]
capital ratios specified by FHFA) over the planning horizon, under the
scenario; and
(6) Such other data fields, in such form (e.g., aggregated), as the
Director may require.
Dated: December 10, 2019.
Mark A. Calabria,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-26950 Filed 12-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070-01-P