Air Plan Approval; Washington; Revised Public Notice Provisions and Other Miscellaneous Revisions, 66363-66366 [2019-26147]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or
criminal enforcement under one of these
programs could not be privileged
because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing
enforcement in a manner required by
Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval.’’
Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code
Sec. 10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the
extent consistent with requirements
imposed by Federal law,’’ any person
making a voluntary disclosure of
information to a state agency regarding
a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative
order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The
Attorney General’s January 12, 1998
opinion states that the quoted language
renders this statute inapplicable to
enforcement of any Federally authorized
programs, since ‘‘no immunity could be
afforded from administrative, civil, or
criminal penalties because granting
such immunity would not be consistent
with Federal law, which is one of the
criteria for immunity.’’
Therefore, EPA has determined that
Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the
Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal
requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a state
audit privilege and immunity law can
affect only state enforcement and cannot
have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at
any time invoke its authority under the
CAA, including, for example, sections
113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the
requirements or prohibitions of the state
plan, independently of any state
enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the
CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or
any, state audit privilege or immunity
law.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Dec 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not proposed for approval
to apply on any Indian reservation land
as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151 or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule proposing to approve
Virginia’s submittal addressing the
infrastructure requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II),
D(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and
(M) for the 2015 ozone NAAQS does not
have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66363
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 21, 2019.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2019–26145 Filed 12–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2019–0635, FRL–10002–
87–Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; Washington;
Revised Public Notice Provisions and
Other Miscellaneous Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the general air quality
regulations submitted by the
Washington Department of Ecology. The
four categories of revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) proposed for
approval in this action are: Revising the
adoption by reference date for federal
regulations cross referenced in the state
regulations; revising the definition of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) to
match changes to the federal definition;
updating public involvement
procedures for the new source review
air permitting program to reflect
changes to the federal requirements,
allowing greater use of electronic notice
and electronic access to information;
and correcting typographical errors and
minor wording changes for clarity.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2019–0635 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
66364
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue—Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101,
at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA. This
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section is
arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Analysis of Rule Updates
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) governs the process by which a
state submits air quality requirements to
the EPA for approval into the SIP. The
SIP is a state’s plan to implement,
maintain, and enforce the national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
Washington’s general air quality
regulations are set forth at Chapter 173–
400 of the Washington Administrative
Code (WAC). On November 5, 2019, the
Washington Department of Ecology
(Ecology) submitted a SIP revision titled
Revised Public Notice Provisions in
Chapter 173–400 Washington
Administrative Code and Other
Miscellaneous Changes. This SIP
revision includes changes to the public
notice process as well as several
miscellaneous changes proposed for
approval as described below. We note
that Ecology’s SIP revision also
included miscellaneous changes to the
statewide Chapter 173–405 WAC Kraft
Pulping Mills, Chapter 173–410 WAC
Sulfite Pulping Mills, and Chapter 173–
415 WAC Primary Aluminum Plants
regulations which we will address in a
separate action.
II. Analysis of Rule Updates
A. WAC 173–400–025
WAC 173–400–025 Adoption of
Federal Rules, last approved by the EPA
on October 6, 2016, adopts by reference
the federal air quality regulations as
they existed on January 1, 2016 (81 FR
69385). As part of the current submittal,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Dec 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
Ecology revised WAC 173–400–025 to
include changes to the federal air
quality regulations as of January 24,
2018. This includes, with certain
exceptions, Ecology’s adoption by
reference of 40 CFR 52.21, which
implements the Prevention of
Significant Deterioration permitting
program. The EPA is proposing to
approve this change.
B. Definition of VOC
In several actions promulgated
between 2012 and 2016, the EPA
revised the federal definition of VOC in
40 CFR 51.100(s) to add ten compounds
defined as VOC-exempt.1 In our
February 25, 2016, final rule (81 FR
9339), the EPA also eliminated
recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and
inventory requirements related to tbutyl acetate (also known as tertiary
butyl acetate or TBAC; CAS Number:
540–88–5). As part of the current
submittal, Ecology revised the definition
for ‘‘Volatile organic compound (VOC)’’
in WAC 173–400–030(102) to include
all federal updates as of Ecology’s rule
adoption.2 The EPA is proposing to
approve this change.
C. Permitting Public Involvement
Requirements
On October 18, 2016, the EPA revised
the public involvement requirements for
federal, state, and local permitting
programs, including the new source
review permitting program (81 FR
71613). The EPA’s final rule removed
the mandatory requirement to provide
public notice of a draft air permit
through publication in a newspaper.
Instead, the final rule allows for
electronic notice (e-notice), including
electronic access to the draft permit (eaccess), as an option for permitting
authorities implementing EPA-approved
programs. The EPA anticipated that enotice would enable permitting
authorities to communicate permitting
actions to the public more quickly and
efficiently. The EPA further anticipated
that e-access would expand access to
permit-related documents. Ecology
submitted revised versions of WAC
173–400–171 Public Notice and
Opportunity for Public Comment and
WAC 173–400–740 Permitting Public
Involvement Requirements
1 See 77 FR 37610 (June 22, 2012), 78 FR 9823
(February 12, 2013), 78 FR 53029 (August 28, 2013),
78 FR 62451 (October 22, 2013), 79 FR 17037
(March 27, 2014), 81 FR 9339 (February 25, 2016),
and 81 FR 50330 (August 1, 2016).
2 On November 16, 2018, the EPA added HFO–
1336mzz-Z to the list of compounds excluded from
the regulatory definition of volatile organic
compounds (83 FR 61127, November 28, 2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
implementing these changes. A redline/
strikeout analysis of the changes is
included in the docket for this action.
Ecology also added a definition in WAC
173–400–030(26) for the term
‘‘electronic means’’ to support the use of
e-notice and e-access. The EPA is
proposing to approve the submitted
changes. We note that Ecology did not
submit, and the EPA is not proposing to
approve, WAC 173–400–171
subsections (3)(o), (12), and the portion
of (3)(b) related to the regulation of toxic
air pollutants, because these subsections
are outside the scope of this current
action.
D. Typographical Corrections and
Stylistic Changes
As part of the Revised Public Notice
Provisions in Chapter 173–400
Washington Administrative Code and
Other Miscellaneous Changes submittal,
Ecology submitted several nonsubstantive typographical and stylistic
updates to WAC 173–400–030
Definitions, WAC 173–400–040 General
Standards for Maximum Emissions,
WAC 173–400–050 Emission Standards
for Combustion and Incineration Units,
WAC 173–400–060 Emission Standards
for General Process Units, and WAC
173–400–105 Records, Monitoring, and
Reporting. A redline/strikeout of the
changes is included in the docket for
this action. We note that Ecology did
not submit all changes to Chapter 173–
400 WAC as part of this current update.
Specifically, Ecology submitted nonsubstantive revisions to WAC 173–400–
030 subsections: (5), (13), (18), (29), (30),
(35), (48), (53), (56), (59), (62), (72), (74),
(82), (90), (91), (94), and (105). We note
that Ecology renumbered many of the
definitions contained in WAC 173–400–
030 since our last approval (79 FR
59653, October 3, 2014). As noted in the
proposed rulemaking for our October 3,
2014, final action, Ecology did not
submit for approval the definition of
‘Toxic air pollutant (TAP)’ or ‘toxic air
contaminant’ contained in WAC 173–
400–030(91), because these pollutants
are not criteria pollutants or EPAidentified precursors under section 110
of the CAA.3 This definition was
subsequently renumbered to WAC 173–
400–030(96) and was again not
submitted for approval. We also note
that Washington did not submit as part
of this SIP revision several new
definitions added to WAC 173–400–030.
Specifically, these definitions are WAC
173–400–030 subsections: (6), (45), (83),
(89), (97), (100), (103) and (104). Ecology
also did not submit as part of this SIP
revision, changes to the definitions in
3 79
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
FR 39351, July 10, 2014, at page 39352.
04DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
subsubsections (30) and (36),
subsequently renumbered to (32) and
(38). Therefore, the EPA will retain the
definitions last approved on October 3,
2014 (79 FR 59653). Similarly, Ecology
submitted non-substantive changes to
WAC 173–400–040 subsection (1) but
did not submit the more substantive
changes to subsection (2) as part of this
update.4 The EPA will retain the version
of WAC 173–400–040(2) last approved
on October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69386). We
also note that our prior approval of
WAC 173–400–040 did not include
subsections (3) and (5), which were also
not submitted as part of this update.
Other non-substantive revisions
submitted for approval include
clarifying changes to WAC 173–400–050
subsection (1), WAC 173–400–060, and
WAC 173–400–105, which are included
in the docket for this action.
E. Benton Clean Air Agency
As discussed in our November 17,
2015 final approval, Benton Clean Air
Agency (BCAA) generally uses Chapter
State citation
173–400 WAC for program
implementation, with certain exceptions
(80 FR 71695). Ecology requested that
the EPA approve the Chapter 173–400
WAC revisions discussed above to apply
within BCAA’s jurisdiction, with one
exception. BCAA does not implement
WAC provisions related to the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
permitting program under 173–400–700
through 173–400–750. Therefore,
Ecology did not request approval of
WAC 173–400–740 Permitting Public
Involvement Requirements for BCAA’s
direct permitting jurisdiction. We also
note that in our November 17, 2015,
final approval, BCAA Regulation I,
sections 4.01(A) and 4.01(B) replaced
the WAC 173–400–030 definitions for
‘‘fugitive dust’’ and ‘‘fugitive
emissions.’’ These two definitions were
renumbered in the most recent rule
revision to WAC 173–400–030(40) and
(41), respectively. Similarly, in our prior
approval, BCAA sections 4.02(B),
4.02(C)(1), and 4.02(C)(3) replaced WAC
173–400–040 subsections (4), (9)(a), and
State effective
date
Title/subject
66365
(9)(b), respectively. We are proposing to
revise our approval of the Benton Clean
Air Agency regulations accordingly.
We are also proposing to correct a
typographical error from a previous
approval. In our November 17, 2015
final approval, we approved WAC 173–
400–081 (state effective April 1, 2011) to
apply in BCAA’s jurisdiction. In a
subsequent final action published
October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69389), our prior
approval of WAC 173–400–081 was
inadvertently deleted from 40 CFR
52.2470(c), Table 4—Additional
Regulations Approved for Benton Clean
Air Agency (BCAA) Jurisdiction. We are
proposing to amend 40 CFR 52.2470 to
correct this error.
III. Proposed Action
We are proposing to approve and
incorporate by reference in the
Washington SIP at 40 CFR 52.2470(c)
the following revisions as shown in the
table below. We are also proposing to
correct 40 CFR 52.2470 for BCAA’s
jurisdiction, as discussed above.
Explanations
40 CFR 52.2470(c), TABLE 2—ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS APPROVED FOR WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (ECOLOGY)
DIRECT JURISDICTION
Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173–400—General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
173–400–025 ..........
173–400–030 ..........
173–400–040 ..........
173–400–050 ..........
173–400–060 ..........
173–400–105 ..........
173–400–171 ..........
173–400–740 ..........
Adoption of Federal
Rules.
Definitions .......................
General Standards for
Maximum Emissions.
Emission Standards for
Combustion and Incineration Units.
Emission Standards for
General Process Units.
Records, Monitoring, and
Reporting.
Public Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment.
PSD Permitting Public Involvement Requirements.
9/16/18
9/16/18
9/16/18
9/16/18
Except: 173–400–030(6); 173–400–030(32); 173–400–030(38); 173–400–
030(45); 173–400–030(83); 173–400–030(89); 173–400–030(96); 173–
400–030(97); 173–400–030(100); 173–400–030(103); 173–400–030(104).
Except: 173–400–040(2); 173–400–040(3); 173–400–040(5).
Except: 173–400–050(2); 173–400–050(4); 173–400–050(5); 173–400–
050(6).
11/25/18
11/25/18
9/16/18
Except: The part of 173–400–171(3)(b) that says, • ‘‘or any increase in
emissions of a toxic air pollutant above the acceptable source impact level
for that toxic air pollutant as regulated under chapter 173–460 WAC’’;
173–400–171(3)(o); 173–400–171(12).
9/16/18
40 CFR 52.2470(c), TABLE 4—ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS APPROVED FOR BENTON CLEAN AIR AGENCY (BCAA) JURISDICTION
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173–400—General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
173–400–025 ..........
173–400–030 ..........
Adoption of Federal
Rules.
Definitions .......................
9/16/18
9/16/18
Except: 173–400–030(6); 173–400–030(32); 173–400–030(38); 173–400–
030(40); 173–400–030(41); 173–400–030(45); 173–400–030(83); 173–
400–030(89); 173–400–030(96); 173–400–030(97); 173–400–030(100);
173–400–030(103); 173–400–030(104).
4 Ecology also revised WAC 173–400–040
subsection (7), however the revised text was not
part of the SIP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Dec 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
66366
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
State effective
date
State citation
Title/subject
173–400–040 ..........
General Standards for
Maximum Emissions.
Emission Standards for
Combustion and Incineration Units.
Emission Standards for
General Process Units.
Records, Monitoring, and
Reporting.
Public Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment..
173–400–050 ..........
173–400–060 ..........
173–400–105 ..........
173–400–171 ..........
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the regulations in section III above and
correct the typographical error
discussed in section II.E. in this
preamble. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Dec 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
9/16/18
9/16/18
Explanations
Except: 173–400–040(2); 173–400–040(3); 173–400–040(4); 173–400–
040(5); 173–400–040(9).
Except: 173–400–050(2); 173–400–050(4); 173–400–050(5); 173–400–
050(6).
11/25/18
11/25/18
9/16/18
Except: The part of 173–400–171(3)(b) that says, • ‘‘or any increase in
emissions of a toxic air pollutant above the acceptable source impact level
for that toxic air pollutant as regulated under chapter 173–460 WAC’’;
173–400–171(3)(o); 173–400–171(12).
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted
below and is also not approved to apply
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Washington’s SIP is approved to apply
on non-trust land within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation, also known as the 1873
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe
of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly
provided state and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the
EPA provided a consultation
opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a
letter dated March 21, 2018.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 22, 2019.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2019–26147 Filed 12–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2019–0636: FRL–10002–
84–Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; WA; Updates to
Source-Category Regulations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Washington State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that were
submitted by the Department of Ecology
(Ecology). In 1991, Ecology established
source-category regulations for kraft
pulp mills, sulfite pulping mills, and
primary aluminum plants. These
source-category regulations contain
requirements specific to these types of
facilities. However, the source-category
regulations also rely upon crossreferences to the general air quality
regulations to implement program
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66363-66366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26147]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2019-0635, FRL-10002-87-Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; Washington; Revised Public Notice Provisions
and Other Miscellaneous Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the general air quality regulations submitted by
the Washington Department of Ecology. The four categories of revisions
to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) proposed for approval in this
action are: Revising the adoption by reference date for federal
regulations cross referenced in the state regulations; revising the
definition of volatile organic compounds (VOC) to match changes to the
federal definition; updating public involvement procedures for the new
source review air permitting program to reflect changes to the federal
requirements, allowing greater use of electronic notice and electronic
access to information; and correcting typographical errors and minor
wording changes for clarity.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R10-
OAR-2019-0635 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not
[[Page 66364]]
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-0256, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA. This
supplementary information section is arranged as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Analysis of Rule Updates
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) governs the process by which
a state submits air quality requirements to the EPA for approval into
the SIP. The SIP is a state's plan to implement, maintain, and enforce
the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Washington's
general air quality regulations are set forth at Chapter 173-400 of the
Washington Administrative Code (WAC). On November 5, 2019, the
Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) submitted a SIP revision
titled Revised Public Notice Provisions in Chapter 173-400 Washington
Administrative Code and Other Miscellaneous Changes. This SIP revision
includes changes to the public notice process as well as several
miscellaneous changes proposed for approval as described below. We note
that Ecology's SIP revision also included miscellaneous changes to the
statewide Chapter 173-405 WAC Kraft Pulping Mills, Chapter 173-410 WAC
Sulfite Pulping Mills, and Chapter 173-415 WAC Primary Aluminum Plants
regulations which we will address in a separate action.
II. Analysis of Rule Updates
A. WAC 173-400-025
WAC 173-400-025 Adoption of Federal Rules, last approved by the EPA
on October 6, 2016, adopts by reference the federal air quality
regulations as they existed on January 1, 2016 (81 FR 69385). As part
of the current submittal, Ecology revised WAC 173-400-025 to include
changes to the federal air quality regulations as of January 24, 2018.
This includes, with certain exceptions, Ecology's adoption by reference
of 40 CFR 52.21, which implements the Prevention of Significant
Deterioration permitting program. The EPA is proposing to approve this
change.
B. Definition of VOC
In several actions promulgated between 2012 and 2016, the EPA
revised the federal definition of VOC in 40 CFR 51.100(s) to add ten
compounds defined as VOC-exempt.\1\ In our February 25, 2016, final
rule (81 FR 9339), the EPA also eliminated recordkeeping, emissions
reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling and inventory requirements
related to t-butyl acetate (also known as tertiary butyl acetate or
TBAC; CAS Number: 540-88-5). As part of the current submittal, Ecology
revised the definition for ``Volatile organic compound (VOC)'' in WAC
173-400-030(102) to include all federal updates as of Ecology's rule
adoption.\2\ The EPA is proposing to approve this change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 77 FR 37610 (June 22, 2012), 78 FR 9823 (February 12,
2013), 78 FR 53029 (August 28, 2013), 78 FR 62451 (October 22,
2013), 79 FR 17037 (March 27, 2014), 81 FR 9339 (February 25, 2016),
and 81 FR 50330 (August 1, 2016).
\2\ On November 16, 2018, the EPA added HFO-1336mzz-Z to the
list of compounds excluded from the regulatory definition of
volatile organic compounds (83 FR 61127, November 28, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Permitting Public Involvement Requirements
On October 18, 2016, the EPA revised the public involvement
requirements for federal, state, and local permitting programs,
including the new source review permitting program (81 FR 71613). The
EPA's final rule removed the mandatory requirement to provide public
notice of a draft air permit through publication in a newspaper.
Instead, the final rule allows for electronic notice (e-notice),
including electronic access to the draft permit (e-access), as an
option for permitting authorities implementing EPA-approved programs.
The EPA anticipated that e-notice would enable permitting authorities
to communicate permitting actions to the public more quickly and
efficiently. The EPA further anticipated that e-access would expand
access to permit-related documents. Ecology submitted revised versions
of WAC 173-400-171 Public Notice and Opportunity for Public Comment and
WAC 173-400-740 Permitting Public Involvement Requirements implementing
these changes. A redline/strikeout analysis of the changes is included
in the docket for this action. Ecology also added a definition in WAC
173-400-030(26) for the term ``electronic means'' to support the use of
e-notice and e-access. The EPA is proposing to approve the submitted
changes. We note that Ecology did not submit, and the EPA is not
proposing to approve, WAC 173-400-171 subsections (3)(o), (12), and the
portion of (3)(b) related to the regulation of toxic air pollutants,
because these subsections are outside the scope of this current action.
D. Typographical Corrections and Stylistic Changes
As part of the Revised Public Notice Provisions in Chapter 173-400
Washington Administrative Code and Other Miscellaneous Changes
submittal, Ecology submitted several non-substantive typographical and
stylistic updates to WAC 173-400-030 Definitions, WAC 173-400-040
General Standards for Maximum Emissions, WAC 173-400-050 Emission
Standards for Combustion and Incineration Units, WAC 173-400-060
Emission Standards for General Process Units, and WAC 173-400-105
Records, Monitoring, and Reporting. A redline/strikeout of the changes
is included in the docket for this action. We note that Ecology did not
submit all changes to Chapter 173-400 WAC as part of this current
update. Specifically, Ecology submitted non-substantive revisions to
WAC 173-400-030 subsections: (5), (13), (18), (29), (30), (35), (48),
(53), (56), (59), (62), (72), (74), (82), (90), (91), (94), and (105).
We note that Ecology renumbered many of the definitions contained in
WAC 173-400-030 since our last approval (79 FR 59653, October 3, 2014).
As noted in the proposed rulemaking for our October 3, 2014, final
action, Ecology did not submit for approval the definition of `Toxic
air pollutant (TAP)' or `toxic air contaminant' contained in WAC 173-
400-030(91), because these pollutants are not criteria pollutants or
EPA-identified precursors under section 110 of the CAA.\3\ This
definition was subsequently renumbered to WAC 173-400-030(96) and was
again not submitted for approval. We also note that Washington did not
submit as part of this SIP revision several new definitions added to
WAC 173-400-030. Specifically, these definitions are WAC 173-400-030
subsections: (6), (45), (83), (89), (97), (100), (103) and (104).
Ecology also did not submit as part of this SIP revision, changes to
the definitions in
[[Page 66365]]
subsubsections (30) and (36), subsequently renumbered to (32) and (38).
Therefore, the EPA will retain the definitions last approved on October
3, 2014 (79 FR 59653). Similarly, Ecology submitted non-substantive
changes to WAC 173-400-040 subsection (1) but did not submit the more
substantive changes to subsection (2) as part of this update.\4\ The
EPA will retain the version of WAC 173-400-040(2) last approved on
October 6, 2016 (81 FR 69386). We also note that our prior approval of
WAC 173-400-040 did not include subsections (3) and (5), which were
also not submitted as part of this update. Other non-substantive
revisions submitted for approval include clarifying changes to WAC 173-
400-050 subsection (1), WAC 173-400-060, and WAC 173-400-105, which are
included in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 79 FR 39351, July 10, 2014, at page 39352.
\4\ Ecology also revised WAC 173-400-040 subsection (7), however
the revised text was not part of the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Benton Clean Air Agency
As discussed in our November 17, 2015 final approval, Benton Clean
Air Agency (BCAA) generally uses Chapter 173-400 WAC for program
implementation, with certain exceptions (80 FR 71695). Ecology
requested that the EPA approve the Chapter 173-400 WAC revisions
discussed above to apply within BCAA's jurisdiction, with one
exception. BCAA does not implement WAC provisions related to the
Prevention of Significant Deterioration permitting program under 173-
400-700 through 173-400-750. Therefore, Ecology did not request
approval of WAC 173-400-740 Permitting Public Involvement Requirements
for BCAA's direct permitting jurisdiction. We also note that in our
November 17, 2015, final approval, BCAA Regulation I, sections 4.01(A)
and 4.01(B) replaced the WAC 173-400-030 definitions for ``fugitive
dust'' and ``fugitive emissions.'' These two definitions were
renumbered in the most recent rule revision to WAC 173-400-030(40) and
(41), respectively. Similarly, in our prior approval, BCAA sections
4.02(B), 4.02(C)(1), and 4.02(C)(3) replaced WAC 173-400-040
subsections (4), (9)(a), and (9)(b), respectively. We are proposing to
revise our approval of the Benton Clean Air Agency regulations
accordingly.
We are also proposing to correct a typographical error from a
previous approval. In our November 17, 2015 final approval, we approved
WAC 173-400-081 (state effective April 1, 2011) to apply in BCAA's
jurisdiction. In a subsequent final action published October 6, 2016
(81 FR 69389), our prior approval of WAC 173-400-081 was inadvertently
deleted from 40 CFR 52.2470(c), Table 4--Additional Regulations
Approved for Benton Clean Air Agency (BCAA) Jurisdiction. We are
proposing to amend 40 CFR 52.2470 to correct this error.
III. Proposed Action
We are proposing to approve and incorporate by reference in the
Washington SIP at 40 CFR 52.2470(c) the following revisions as shown in
the table below. We are also proposing to correct 40 CFR 52.2470 for
BCAA's jurisdiction, as discussed above.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective date Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR 52.2470(c), TABLE 2--ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS APPROVED FOR WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY (ECOLOGY)
DIRECT JURISDICTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-400--General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
173-400-025.......................... Adoption of Federal Rules... 9/16/18 ...........................
173-400-030.......................... Definitions................. 9/16/18 Except: 173-400-030(6); 173-
400-030(32); 173-400-
030(38); 173-400-030(45);
173-400-030(83); 173-400-
030(89); 173-400-030(96);
173-400-030(97); 173-400-
030(100); 173-400-
030(103); 173-400-
030(104).
173-400-040.......................... General Standards for 9/16/18 Except: 173-400-040(2); 173-
Maximum Emissions. 400-040(3); 173-400-
040(5).
173-400-050.......................... Emission Standards for 9/16/18 Except: 173-400-050(2); 173-
Combustion and Incineration 400-050(4); 173-400-
Units. 050(5); 173-400-050(6).
173-400-060.......................... Emission Standards for 11/25/18 ...........................
General Process Units.
173-400-105.......................... Records, Monitoring, and 11/25/18 ...........................
Reporting.
173-400-171.......................... Public Notice and 9/16/18 Except: The part of 173-400-
Opportunity for Public 171(3)(b) that says,
Comment. ``or any increase
in emissions of a toxic
air pollutant above the
acceptable source impact
level for that toxic air
pollutant as regulated
under chapter 173-460
WAC''; 173-400-171(3)(o);
173-400-171(12).
173-400-740.......................... PSD Permitting Public 9/16/18 ...........................
Involvement Requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR 52.2470(c), TABLE 4--ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS APPROVED FOR BENTON CLEAN AIR AGENCY (BCAA) JURISDICTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 173-400--General Regulations for Air Pollution Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
173-400-025.......................... Adoption of Federal Rules... 9/16/18 ...........................
173-400-030.......................... Definitions................. 9/16/18 Except: 173-400-030(6); 173-
400-030(32); 173-400-
030(38); 173-400-030(40);
173-400-030(41); 173-400-
030(45); 173-400-030(83);
173-400-030(89); 173-400-
030(96); 173-400-030(97);
173-400-030(100); 173-400-
030(103); 173-400-
030(104).
[[Page 66366]]
173-400-040.......................... General Standards for 9/16/18 Except: 173-400-040(2); 173-
Maximum Emissions. 400-040(3); 173-400-
040(4); 173-400-040(5);
173-400-040(9).
173-400-050.......................... Emission Standards for 9/16/18 Except: 173-400-050(2); 173-
Combustion and Incineration 400-050(4); 173-400-
Units. 050(5); 173-400-050(6).
173-400-060.......................... Emission Standards for 11/25/18 ...........................
General Process Units.
173-400-105.......................... Records, Monitoring, and 11/25/18 ...........................
Reporting.
173-400-171.......................... Public Notice and 9/16/18 Except: The part of 173-400-
Opportunity for Public 171(3)(b) that says,
Comment.. ``or any increase
in emissions of a toxic
air pollutant above the
acceptable source impact
level for that toxic air
pollutant as regulated
under chapter 173-460
WAC''; 173-400-171(3)(o);
173-400-171(12).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the regulations in section III above and correct the
typographical error discussed in section II.E. in this preamble. The
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov.
V. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted below and is also not approved
to apply in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Washington's SIP is approved to apply on non-trust land within the
exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known as
the 1873 Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement
Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly provided state and
local agencies in Washington authority over activities on non-trust
lands within the 1873 Survey Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA
provided a consultation opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe in a letter
dated March 21, 2018.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 22, 2019.
Chris Hladick,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2019-26147 Filed 12-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P