Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Revisions to Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Annual Trading Program and Rescission of Clean Air Interstate Rule, 66316-66319 [2019-26102]
Download as PDF
66316
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Original amendment submission
date
*
*
September 30, 2014 ......................
Date of final
publication
*
*
*
*
*
December 4, 2019 ......................... Chap. 1, Sec. 2(aa)(i)–(iii), definition of control or controller;
Chap. 1, Sec. 2(co), notice of violations;
Chap. 2 (Title);
Chap. 2, Sec. 2(a)(i)(B), related to adjudication requirements;
Chap. 2, Sec. 2(a)(ii)(A)(I), related to adjudication requirements;
Chap. 2, Sec. 2(a)(ii)(A)(II), related to adjudication requirements;
Chap. 2, Sec. 2(a)(ii)(B), related to adjudication requirements;
Chap. 6 (Title);
Chap. 6, Sec. 4(b)(i)(A), related to blasting standards;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(vii)(A), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(vii)(B)(IV), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(vii)(E), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(vii)(F), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(x), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(x)(D)(I), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(xiv)(C) related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(xiv)(D)(II), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(a)(xiv)(F), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 12, Sec. 1(b)(ii), related to permitting procedures;
Chap. 16, Sec. 2(h), related to enforcement;
Chap. 16, Sec. 4(c)(i), related to individual civil penalties;
Chap. 16, Sec. 4(c)(i)(A), related to individual civil penalties; and
also all minor grammatical changes.
[FR Doc. 2019–26132 Filed 12–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0337; FRL–10000–
20–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Revisions
to Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Annual Trading Program and
Rescission of Clean Air Interstate Rule
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted on January 15,
2019, and two revisions submitted on
March 7, 2019, by the State of Missouri.
The January 15, 2019, revision requests
EPA remove from the Missouri SIP the
regulations that established state trading
programs under the Clean Air Interstate
Rule (CAIR). The EPA is only finalizing
the removal of the CAIR annual nitrogen
oxides (NOX) and sulfur dioxide (SO2)
trading program rules. The EPA will act
on the revisions to the State’s CAIR
seasonal NOX trading program in a
separate action. The March 7, 2019,
submissions request EPA approve into
the SIP Missouri’s Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR) state trading
program rules for SO2, annual NOX, and
ozone season NOX. This approval
automatically terminates Missouri
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Dec 03, 2019
Citation/description
Jkt 250001
EGUs’ requirements to participate in the
corresponding CSAPR Federal trading
programs. Like the Federal trading
programs being replaced, the state
trading programs approved in this SIP
revision fully satisfy Missouri’s good
neighbor obligations with respect to the
1997 and 2006 fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) and the 1997 ozone
NAAQS and at least partially satisfy the
State’s good neighbor obligations with
respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. This
revision will not have an adverse effect
on air quality. The EPA’s approval of
this rule revision is being done in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) and the regulations
governing approval of CSAPR SIPs.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
January 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0337. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lachala Kemp, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7214;
email address kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Starting January 1, 2015, large
electricity generating units (EGUs) in
Missouri were required under a Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) to participate
in CSAPR Federal trading programs for
SO2 and annual NOX emissions to
address Missouri’s obligations under
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (the good
neighbor provision) with respect to the
1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. At the
same time, the EPA stopped
administering Missouri’s previous CAIR
state trading programs for SO2 and
annual NOX. See 76 FR 48208 (August
8, 2011).
The CSAPR regulations at 40 CFR
52.38 and 52.39 allow states to adopt
either ‘‘abbreviated’’ CSAPR SIP
revisions that modify emission
allowance allocations but leave the
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
CSAPR FIPs in place or ‘‘full’’ CSAPR
SIP revisions that contain complete
CSAPR state trading program rules.
Approval of a full CSAPR SIP revision
(but not an abbreviated CSAPR SIP
revision) results in automatic
withdrawal of the corresponding CSAPR
FIP requirements and satisfies the
State’s good neighbor obligations to the
same extent as the FIP requirements
being replaced. See, e.g., 40 CFR
52.38(b)(10)(i). On June 28, 2016, the
EPA approved an abbreviated CSAPR
SIP revision for Missouri adopting Statedetermined allocation methodologies for
emission allowances under the CSAPR
Federal SO2 and annual NOX trading
programs but otherwise leaving the
Federal trading programs in place. See
81 FR 41838 (June 28, 2016).
Starting May 1, 2017, pursuant to a
FIP issued under the CSAPR Update,
large EGUs in Missouri were required to
participate in a new CSAPR Federal
trading program for ozone season NOX
emissions to at least partially address
Missouri’s good neighbor obligation
with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
These FIP requirements also fully
addressed Missouri’s good neighbor
obligation with respect to the 1997
ozone NAAQS that had previously been
partially addressed by the EGUs’
participation in an earlier CSAPR
Federal trading program. See 81 FR
74504 (October 26, 2016).1
On July 30, 2019, the EPA proposed
approval of revisions to the Missouri
SIP in the Federal Register to remove
from the SIP the State’s CAIR trading
program rules for SO2 and annual NOX.
The EPA did not propose action on the
State’s request to also remove from the
SIP the State’s CAIR trading program
rule for ozone season NOX. In the same
Federal Register document, EPA also
proposed to approve Missouri’s full
CSAPR SIP revision adopting complete
1 In September 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the D.C. Circuit issued an opinion remanding
the CSAPR Update to the EPA to address the court’s
holding that the rule unlawfully allows upwind
states’ significant contributions to air quality
problems in downwind areas to continue past the
downwind areas’ attainment deadlines. Wisconsin
v. EPA, 983 F.3d 303 (D.C. Cir. 2019). Relatedly, in
October 2019, the D.C. Circuit issued a judgment
vacating a December 2018 EPA determination that
compliance with the CSAPR Update’s emissions
reduction requirements fully, rather than partially,
satisfied good neighbor obligations with respect to
the 2008 ozone NAAQS for 20 states, including
Missouri. New York v. EPA, No. 19–1019, 2019 WL
5394069 (D.C. Cir. October 1, 2019). However,
neither of these court actions invalidated the EPA’s
conclusions in the CSAPR Update that compliance
with the rule’s emissions reduction requirements
fully addresses Missouri’s good neighbor
obligations with respect to the 1997 ozone NAAQS
and at least partially addresses the state’s good
neighbor obligations with respect to the 2008 ozone
NAAQS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Dec 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
CSAPR state trading program rules for
SO2, annual NOX, and ozone season
NOX to replace the CSAPR Federal
trading program rules. See 84 FR 36859.
The EPA solicited comments on the
proposed revision to Missouri’s SIP, and
received no comments.
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is approving a revision to
Missouri’s SIP by approving the State’s
request to remove 10 CSR 10–6.362
Clean Air Interstate Rule Annual NOX
Trading Program and 10 CSR 10–6.366
Clean Air Interstate Rule Annual SO2
Trading Program, which implemented
the State’s CAIR annual NOX and SO2
trading programs. The EPA is also
finalizing approval of Missouri’s
revisions to 10 CSR 10–6.372 CrossState Air Pollution Rule NOX Annual
Trading Program and 10 CSR 10–6.376
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule SO2
Group 1 Trading Program that add to the
State’s previously approved allocation
provisions all the other provisions
necessary for complete state trading
programs. Finally, the EPA is also
finalizing approval of Missouri’s
addition of 10 CSR 10–6.374 Cross-State
Air Pollution Rule NOX Ozone Season
Group 2 Trading Program.
A discussion of the CSAPR
regulations at 40 CFR 52.38 and 52.39
governing full and abbreviated CSAPR
SIP revisions can be found in the EPA’s
June 28, 2016 approval of Missouri’s
previous abbreviated CSAPR SIP
revision for SO2 and annual NOX. See
81 FR 41838. A detailed discussion of
Missouri’s current SIP revision was
provided in the EPA’s July 30, 2019,
proposed rule. See 84 FR 36859.
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State’s SIP revision meets the
requirements for approval of full CSAPR
SIPs under 40 CFR 52.38 and 52.39.
Missouri’s CSAPR state trading program
rules incorporate by reference the
corresponding provisions of the CSAPR
Federal trading program rules at 40 CFR
part 97, subparts AAAAA, CCCCC, and
EEEEE, with two exceptions. First, the
State has retained the allocation
provisions for SO2 and annual NOX
allowances from the State’s previous
abbreviated CSAPR SIP instead of
adopting the default Federal allocation
provisions for those allowances.
Second, consistent with the CSAPR SIP
approval criteria, the State’s rules do not
incorporate the Federal rule provisions
governing allocation of allowances to
new units in Indian country. Missouri’s
CSAPR state trading program rules are
complete, and the State has not adopted
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66317
any other substantive changes to the
CSAPR Federal trading program
regulations.
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on the March 7, 2019, SIP
revisions from August 24, 2018 to
October 4, 2018 and received seven
comments from the EPA during the
Regulatory Impact Review. The EPA’s
comments are in the docket for this
action. Missouri amended the rule in
response to the comments and the EPA
did not comment further. In addition, as
explained above, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
We are taking final action to approve
the removal of 10 CSR 10–6.362 Clean
Air Interstate Rule Annual NOX Trading
Program and 10 CSR 10–6.366 Clean Air
Interstate Rule Annual SO2 Trading
Program from the SIP. The EPA is also
taking final action to approve into the
SIP the revisions to 10 CSR 10–6.372
CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program
and 10 CSR 10–6.376 CSAPR SO2 Group
1 Trading Program and the addition of
10 CSR 10–6.374 CSAPR NOX Ozone
Season Group 2 Trading Program. As a
result of this approval, the FIP
requirements for Missouri EGUs to
participate in the corresponding CSAPR
Federal trading programs are
automatically terminated. Approval of
this SIP revision fully satisfies
Missouri’s good neighbor obligations
with respect to the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS and the 1997 ozone NAAQS
and at least partially satisfies Missouri’s
good neighbor obligations with respect
to the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
66318
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the State Implementation Plan, have
been incorporated by reference by EPA
into that plan, are fully federally
enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rulemaking of the EPA’s approval,
and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.2
Also, in this document, as described
in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below, the EPA is removing
provisions of the EPA-Approved
Missouri Regulations and Statutes from
the Missouri State Implementation Plan,
which is incorporated by reference in
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR part 51.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
2 62
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Dec 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by February 3, 2020. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: November 26, 2019.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 52.38
[Amended]
2. Section 52.38 is amended by:
a. In paragraph (a)(8)(iii), adding the
word ‘‘Missouri,’’ after the word
‘‘Indiana,’’; and
■ b. In paragraph (b)(13)(iv), removing
the words ‘‘Alabama and Indiana’’ and
adding in its place the words ‘‘Alabama,
Indiana, and Missouri’’.
■
■
§ 52.39
[Amended]
3. Section 52.39 is amended in
paragraph (l)(3) by removing the word
‘‘Indiana’’ and adding in its place the
words ‘‘Indiana and Missouri’’.
■
Subpart AA—Missouri
4. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by:
■ a. Removing entries ‘‘10–6.362’’ and
‘‘10–6.366’’;
■ b. Revising the entry ‘‘10–6.372’’;
■ c. Adding entry ‘‘10–6.374’’ in
numerical order; and
■ d. Revising the entry ‘‘10–6.376’’.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
*
*
66319
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 4, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri
citation
State
effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
*
10–6.372 ........
10–6.374 ........
10–6.376 ........
*
*
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule NOX Annual
Trading Program.
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule NOX Ozone
Season Group 2 Trading Program.
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule SO2 Group 1
Trading Program.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–26102 Filed 12–3–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
45 CFR Part 1115
RIN 3135–AA34; 3136–AA40; 3137–AA28
Privacy Act Regulations
National Endowment for the
Arts, National Endowment for the
Humanities, Institute of Museum and
Library Services, National Foundation
on the Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This document removes the
National Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities’ (the ‘‘Foundation’’)
regulations implementing the Privacy
Act of 1974. These regulations are
obsolete because each of the
Foundation’s constituent agencies—the
National Endowment for the Arts
(‘‘NEA’’), the National Endowment for
the Humanities (‘‘NEH’’), the Institute of
Museum and Library Services (‘‘IMLS’’),
and the Federal Council on the Arts and
the Humanities (‘‘FCAH’’)—either have
adopted their own, agency-specific
regulations, or are not required to
implement Privacy Act regulations.
DATES: Effective December 4, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Voyatzis, Deputy General
Counsel, National Endowment for the
Humanities, (202) 606–8322;
gencounsel@neh.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:48 Dec 03, 2019
Jkt 250001
*
3/30/2019
*
*
12/4/2019, [insert Federal Register citation].
3/30/2019
12/4/2019, [insert Federal Register citation].
3/30/2019
12/4/2019, [insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
*
*
*
1. Background
2. Public Notice and Comment
The Foundation operates under the
National Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended (20
U.S.C. 951 et seq.), and consists of NEA,
NEH, IMLS, and FCAH (collectively, the
‘‘Foundation’s constituent agencies’’).
The Privacy Act regulations published
at part 1115 within Subchapter A of 45
CFR Chapter XI apply to the entire
Foundation.
As of August 19, 2019, however, the
Foundation’s Privacy Act regulations
are obsolete because NEA, NEH, and
IMLS have each adopted their own,
agency-specific regulations, and FCAH
is not required to implement Privacy
Act regulations. On that date, NEH
added NEH-specific Privacy Act
regulations to 45 CFR Chapter XI,
Subchapter D (45 CFR part 1169),
replacing the Foundation’s Privacy Act
regulations with respect to NEH. NEA
and IMLS had previously added NEAand IMLS-specific Privacy Act
regulations to 45 CFR, subchapters B
and E (45 CFR parts 1159 and 1182),
respectively, which replaced the
Foundation’s Privacy Act regulations
with respect to NEA and IMLS. FCAH
relies upon NEA and NEH for its
administration and does not maintain
any systems of records of its own; thus,
it has no need or obligation to publish
Privacy Act regulations. See 5 U.S.C.
552a(f) (requiring that only an agency
that ‘‘maintains a system of records
shall promulgate rules’’ implementing
the Privacy Act).
Because the Foundation’s Privacy Act
regulations are now obsolete, NEA,
NEH, and IMLS are issuing this joint
final rule to remove them.
Consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), the Foundation’s
constituent agencies find that there is
‘‘good cause’’ to remove the
Foundation’s obsolete Privacy Act
regulations without public notice and
comment. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
Public notice and comment is
unnecessary because this final rule is a
minor, non-controversial technical
amendment that is unlikely to attract
public comment. Moreover, NEA, NEH,
and IMLS previously issued their own
Privacy Act regulations subject to public
notice and comment, and at that time
they indicated that the Foundation’s
regulations would no longer apply to
their specific agency. See 84 FR 34788
(July 19, 2019); 65 FR 46371 (July 28,
2000); and 71 FR 6374 (February 8,
2006).
In addition, the Foundation’s
constituent agencies find ‘‘good cause’’
to issue this final rule without a delayed
effective date. See 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(8). A
delayed effective date is not necessary
in this instance because NEA’s, NEH’s,
and IMLS’s agency-specific regulations
are already in effect, and thus the public
does not need advance notice to prepare
for the removal of the Foundation’s
obsolete regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3. Regulatory Analyses
Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 4, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66316-66319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26102]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0337; FRL-10000-20-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Revisions to Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule Annual Trading Program and Rescission of Clean Air
Interstate Rule
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted
on January 15, 2019, and two revisions submitted on March 7, 2019, by
the State of Missouri. The January 15, 2019, revision requests EPA
remove from the Missouri SIP the regulations that established state
trading programs under the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). The EPA is
only finalizing the removal of the CAIR annual nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) trading program
rules. The EPA will act on the revisions to the State's CAIR seasonal
NOX trading program in a separate action. The March 7, 2019,
submissions request EPA approve into the SIP Missouri's Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR) state trading program rules for SO2,
annual NOX, and ozone season NOX. This approval
automatically terminates Missouri EGUs' requirements to participate in
the corresponding CSAPR Federal trading programs. Like the Federal
trading programs being replaced, the state trading programs approved in
this SIP revision fully satisfy Missouri's good neighbor obligations
with respect to the 1997 and 2006 fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) and
the 1997 ozone NAAQS and at least partially satisfy the State's good
neighbor obligations with respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. This
revision will not have an adverse effect on air quality. The EPA's
approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and the regulations governing
approval of CSAPR SIPs.
DATES: This final rule is effective on January 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0337. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lachala Kemp, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7214; email
address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Starting January 1, 2015, large electricity generating units (EGUs)
in Missouri were required under a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to
participate in CSAPR Federal trading programs for SO2 and
annual NOX emissions to address Missouri's obligations under
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) (the good neighbor provision) with
respect to the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. At the same time,
the EPA stopped administering Missouri's previous CAIR state trading
programs for SO2 and annual NOX. See 76 FR 48208
(August 8, 2011).
The CSAPR regulations at 40 CFR 52.38 and 52.39 allow states to
adopt either ``abbreviated'' CSAPR SIP revisions that modify emission
allowance allocations but leave the
[[Page 66317]]
CSAPR FIPs in place or ``full'' CSAPR SIP revisions that contain
complete CSAPR state trading program rules. Approval of a full CSAPR
SIP revision (but not an abbreviated CSAPR SIP revision) results in
automatic withdrawal of the corresponding CSAPR FIP requirements and
satisfies the State's good neighbor obligations to the same extent as
the FIP requirements being replaced. See, e.g., 40 CFR 52.38(b)(10)(i).
On June 28, 2016, the EPA approved an abbreviated CSAPR SIP revision
for Missouri adopting State-determined allocation methodologies for
emission allowances under the CSAPR Federal SO2 and annual
NOX trading programs but otherwise leaving the Federal
trading programs in place. See 81 FR 41838 (June 28, 2016).
Starting May 1, 2017, pursuant to a FIP issued under the CSAPR
Update, large EGUs in Missouri were required to participate in a new
CSAPR Federal trading program for ozone season NOX emissions
to at least partially address Missouri's good neighbor obligation with
respect to the 2008 ozone NAAQS. These FIP requirements also fully
addressed Missouri's good neighbor obligation with respect to the 1997
ozone NAAQS that had previously been partially addressed by the EGUs'
participation in an earlier CSAPR Federal trading program. See 81 FR
74504 (October 26, 2016).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In September 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit issued an opinion remanding the CSAPR Update to the EPA to
address the court's holding that the rule unlawfully allows upwind
states' significant contributions to air quality problems in
downwind areas to continue past the downwind areas' attainment
deadlines. Wisconsin v. EPA, 983 F.3d 303 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
Relatedly, in October 2019, the D.C. Circuit issued a judgment
vacating a December 2018 EPA determination that compliance with the
CSAPR Update's emissions reduction requirements fully, rather than
partially, satisfied good neighbor obligations with respect to the
2008 ozone NAAQS for 20 states, including Missouri. New York v. EPA,
No. 19-1019, 2019 WL 5394069 (D.C. Cir. October 1, 2019). However,
neither of these court actions invalidated the EPA's conclusions in
the CSAPR Update that compliance with the rule's emissions reduction
requirements fully addresses Missouri's good neighbor obligations
with respect to the 1997 ozone NAAQS and at least partially
addresses the state's good neighbor obligations with respect to the
2008 ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 30, 2019, the EPA proposed approval of revisions to the
Missouri SIP in the Federal Register to remove from the SIP the State's
CAIR trading program rules for SO2 and annual
NOX. The EPA did not propose action on the State's request
to also remove from the SIP the State's CAIR trading program rule for
ozone season NOX. In the same Federal Register document, EPA
also proposed to approve Missouri's full CSAPR SIP revision adopting
complete CSAPR state trading program rules for SO2, annual
NOX, and ozone season NOX to replace the CSAPR
Federal trading program rules. See 84 FR 36859. The EPA solicited
comments on the proposed revision to Missouri's SIP, and received no
comments.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is approving a revision to Missouri's SIP by approving the
State's request to remove 10 CSR 10-6.362 Clean Air Interstate Rule
Annual NOX Trading Program and 10 CSR 10-6.366 Clean Air
Interstate Rule Annual SO2 Trading Program, which
implemented the State's CAIR annual NOX and SO2
trading programs. The EPA is also finalizing approval of Missouri's
revisions to 10 CSR 10-6.372 Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
NOX Annual Trading Program and 10 CSR 10-6.376 Cross-State
Air Pollution Rule SO2 Group 1 Trading Program that add to
the State's previously approved allocation provisions all the other
provisions necessary for complete state trading programs. Finally, the
EPA is also finalizing approval of Missouri's addition of 10 CSR 10-
6.374 Cross-State Air Pollution Rule NOX Ozone Season Group
2 Trading Program.
A discussion of the CSAPR regulations at 40 CFR 52.38 and 52.39
governing full and abbreviated CSAPR SIP revisions can be found in the
EPA's June 28, 2016 approval of Missouri's previous abbreviated CSAPR
SIP revision for SO2 and annual NOX. See 81 FR
41838. A detailed discussion of Missouri's current SIP revision was
provided in the EPA's July 30, 2019, proposed rule. See 84 FR 36859.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State's SIP revision meets the requirements for approval of
full CSAPR SIPs under 40 CFR 52.38 and 52.39. Missouri's CSAPR state
trading program rules incorporate by reference the corresponding
provisions of the CSAPR Federal trading program rules at 40 CFR part
97, subparts AAAAA, CCCCC, and EEEEE, with two exceptions. First, the
State has retained the allocation provisions for SO2 and
annual NOX allowances from the State's previous abbreviated
CSAPR SIP instead of adopting the default Federal allocation provisions
for those allowances. Second, consistent with the CSAPR SIP approval
criteria, the State's rules do not incorporate the Federal rule
provisions governing allocation of allowances to new units in Indian
country. Missouri's CSAPR state trading program rules are complete, and
the State has not adopted any other substantive changes to the CSAPR
Federal trading program regulations.
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on the March 7, 2019, SIP revisions from
August 24, 2018 to October 4, 2018 and received seven comments from the
EPA during the Regulatory Impact Review. The EPA's comments are in the
docket for this action. Missouri amended the rule in response to the
comments and the EPA did not comment further. In addition, as explained
above, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA,
including section 110 and implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
We are taking final action to approve the removal of 10 CSR 10-
6.362 Clean Air Interstate Rule Annual NOX Trading Program
and 10 CSR 10-6.366 Clean Air Interstate Rule Annual SO2
Trading Program from the SIP. The EPA is also taking final action to
approve into the SIP the revisions to 10 CSR 10-6.372 CSAPR
NOX Annual Trading Program and 10 CSR 10-6.376 CSAPR
SO2 Group 1 Trading Program and the addition of 10 CSR 10-
6.374 CSAPR NOX Ozone Season Group 2 Trading Program. As a
result of this approval, the FIP requirements for Missouri EGUs to
participate in the corresponding CSAPR Federal trading programs are
automatically terminated. Approval of this SIP revision fully satisfies
Missouri's good neighbor obligations with respect to the 1997 and 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS and the 1997 ozone NAAQS and at least partially
satisfies Missouri's good neighbor obligations with respect to the 2008
ozone NAAQS.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of
1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
Missouri Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in
[[Page 66318]]
the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by reference by
EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110
and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of
the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, in this document, as described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below, the EPA is removing provisions of the EPA-
Approved Missouri Regulations and Statutes from the Missouri State
Implementation Plan, which is incorporated by reference in accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 3, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 26, 2019.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 52.38 [Amended]
0
2. Section 52.38 is amended by:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(8)(iii), adding the word ``Missouri,'' after the
word ``Indiana,''; and
0
b. In paragraph (b)(13)(iv), removing the words ``Alabama and Indiana''
and adding in its place the words ``Alabama, Indiana, and Missouri''.
Sec. 52.39 [Amended]
0
3. Section 52.39 is amended in paragraph (l)(3) by removing the word
``Indiana'' and adding in its place the words ``Indiana and Missouri''.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
4. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by:
0
a. Removing entries ``10-6.362'' and ``10-6.366'';
0
b. Revising the entry ``10-6.372'';
0
c. Adding entry ``10-6.374'' in numerical order; and
0
d. Revising the entry ``10-6.376''.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 66319]]
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-6.372................ Cross-State Air 3/30/2019 12/4/2019, [insert
Pollution Rule NOX Federal Register
Annual Trading citation].
Program.
10-6.374................ Cross-State Air 3/30/2019 12/4/2019, [insert
Pollution Rule NOX Federal Register
Ozone Season Group 2 citation].
Trading Program.
10-6.376................ Cross-State Air 3/30/2019 12/4/2019, [insert
Pollution Rule SO2 Federal Register
Group 1 Trading citation].
Program.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-26102 Filed 12-3-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P