Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Spa Creek, Annapolis, MD, 66069-66072 [2019-26094]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
§ 71.1
radials; Raleigh-Durham, NC; to Richmond,
VA. The portion within Canada is excluded.
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 2004
Jet Routes.
*
*
*
*
J–53 [Amended]
From INT Craig 347° and Colliers, SC, 174°
radials; Colliers; Spartanburg, SC; to Pulaski,
VA.
J–55 [Amended]
*
J–4 [Amended]
From Los Angeles, CA, via INT Los
Angeles 083° and Twentynine Palms, CA,
269° radials; Twentynine Palms; Parker, CA;
Buckeye, AZ; San Simon, AZ; Newman, TX;
Wink, TX; Abilene, TX; Ranger, TX; Belcher,
LA; Magnolia, MS; Meridian, MS;
Montgomery, AL; INT Montgomery 051° and
Colliers, SC, 268° radials; to Colliers.
J–20 [Amended]
From Seattle, WA, via Yakima, WA;
Pendleton, OR; Donnelly, ID; Pocatello, ID;
Rock Springs, WY; Falcon, CO; Hugo, CO;
Lamar, CO; Liberal, KS; INT Liberal 137° and
Will Rogers, OK, 284° radials; Will Rogers;
Belcher, LA; Magnolia, MS; Meridian, MS;
Montgomery, AL; to Seminole, FL.
J–37 [Amended]
From Hobby, TX, via INT of the Hobby
090° and Harvey, LA, 266° radials; Harvey;
Semmes, AL; to Montgomery, AL. From
Lynchburg, VA; Gordonsville, VA; Brooke,
VA; INT Brooke 067° and Coyle, NJ, 226°
radials; to Coyle. From Kennedy, NY;
Kingston, NY; Albany, NY; to Massena, NY.
J–41 [Amended]
From Seminole, FL; Montgomery, AL;
Vulcan, AL; Memphis, TN; Springfield, MO,
Kansas City, MO, to Omaha, NE.
J–43 [Amended]
From INT Cross City, FL 322° and
Seminole, FL 359° radials; Atlanta, GA;
Volunteer, TN; Falmouth, KY; Rosewood,
OH; to Carleton, MI.
J–51 [Amended]
From INT Columbia 042° and Flat Rock,
VA, 212° radials; Flat Rock; Nottingham, MD;
Dupont, DE; to Yardley, NJ.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
J–75 [Amended]
From Greensboro, NC; Gordonsville, VA;
INT Gordonsville 040° and Modena, PA, 231°
radials; Modena; Solberg, NJ; Carmel, NY;
INT Carmel 045° and Boston, MA, 252°
radials; to Boston.
J–79 [Amended]
From Charleston, SC; Tar River, NC;
Franklin, VA; Salisbury, MD; INT Salisbury
018°and Kennedy, NY, 218° radials;
Kennedy; INT Kennedy 080°and Nantucket,
MA, 254° radials; INT Nantucket 254° and
Marconi, MA, 205° radials; Marconi; INT
Marconi 006° and Bangor, ME, 206° radials;
Bangor.
J–81 [Amended]
J–151 [Amended]
From Vulcan, AL; Farmington, MO; St.
Louis, MO; Kirksville, MO; Omaha, NE;
O’Neil, NE; Rapid City, SD; Billings, MT; INT
Billings 266° and Whitehall, MT, 103°
radials; to Whitehall.
J–165 [Amended]
From INT Charleston, SC, 025° and
Florence, SC, 085° radials to Richmond, VA.
J–174 [Amended]
From Charleston, SC; Wilmington, NC;
Dixon NDB, NC; Norfolk, VA; INT Norfolk
023° and Snow Hill, MD, 211° radials; Snow
Hill; Hampton, NY; INT Hampton 069° and
Marconi, MA 228° radials; Marconi, to the
INT of Marconi 090° and Nantucket, MA,
066° radials. The airspace below FL 240 is
excluded between Snow Hill and lat.
38°45′00″ N, long. 74°43′59″ W. The airspace
above FL 410 is excluded between Snow Hill
and Hampton.
J–207 [Amended]
From Florence, SC; Raleigh-Durham, NC;
to Franklin, VA.
J–208 [Remove]
J–209 [Amended]
From Raleigh-Durham, NC; Tar River, NC;
Norfolk, VA; INT Norfolk 023° and Salisbury,
MD, 199° radials; Salisbury; INT Salisbury
018° and Coyle, NJ, 226° radials; Coyle; to
INT Coyle 036° and Robbinsville, NJ, 136°
radials.
J–210 [Amended]
From Vance, SC; to Wilmington, NC.
J–614 [Remove]
J–616 [Remove]
*
From INT Craig, FL, 347° and Colliers, SC,
174°, radials; Colliers.
*
J–89 [Amended]
From INT Atlanta, GA 161° and Alma, GA,
252° radials; Atlanta; Louisville, KY; Boiler,
IN; Northbrook, IL; Badger, WI; Duluth, MN;
to Winnipeg, MB, Canada. The portion
within Canada is excluded.
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 2006 United States Area
Navigation Routes.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Q–112 [Remove]
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on November
25, 2019.
Rodger A. Dean Jr.,
Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2019–25921 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
J–91 [Amended]
J–47 [Remove]
J–52 [Amended]
From Vancouver, BC, Canada; via Spokane,
WA; Salmon, ID; Dubois, ID; Rock Springs,
WY; Falcon, CO; Hugo, CO; Lamar, CO;
Liberal, KS; INT Liberal 137° and Ardmore,
OK, 309° radials; Ardmore; Texarkana, AR;
Sidon, MS; Bigbee, MS; Vulcan, AL; Atlanta,
GA; Colliers, SC; to Columbia, SC. From INT
Columbia 042° and Flat Rock, VA 212°
Jkt 250001
From INT Seminole, FL 344° and Cross
City, FL, 322° radials; La Grange, GA;
Nashville, TN; Pocket City, IN; to
Northbrook, IL.
From Alma, GA; Colliers, SC; Spartanburg,
SC; Charleston, WV; INT Charleston 357° and
Dryer, OH, 172° radials; Dryer.
J–46 [Amended]
From Tulsa, OK, via Walnut Ridge, AR;
Nashville, TN; to Volunteer, TN.
16:44 Dec 02, 2019
J–73 [Amended]
J–85 [Amended]
J–45 [Amended]
From Alma, GA; Macon, GA; Atlanta, GA;
Nashville, TN; St Louis, MO; Kirksville, MO;
Des Moines, IA; Sioux Falls, SD; to
Aberdeen, SD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
From Charleston, SC; Florence, SC; INT
Florence 003° and Raleigh-Durham, NC, 224°
radials; Raleigh-Durham; INT RaleighDurham 035° and Hopewell, VA, 234°
radials; Hopewell; INT Hopewell 030° and
Nottingham, MD, 174° radials. From Sea Isle,
NJ; INT Sea Isle 050°and Hampton, NY, 223°
radials; Hampton; Providence, RI; Boston,
MA; Kennebunk, ME; to Presque Isle, ME.
66069
From INT Cross City 338° and Atlanta, GA,
169° radials; Atlanta; Volunteer, TN; to
Henderson, WV.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
J–103 [Remove]
Coast Guard
J–113 [Remove]
33 CFR Part 165
J–119 [Remove]
[Docket Number USCG–2019–0846]
J–121 [Amended]
From Charleston, SC; Kinston, NC; Norfolk,
VA; INT Norfolk 023° and Snow Hill, MD,
211° radials; Snow Hill; Sea Isle, NJ; INT Sea
Isle 050° and Hampton, NY, 223° radials;
Hampton; Sandy Point, RI; INT Sandy Point
031° and Kennebunk, ME, 190° radials; to
Kennebunk.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Spa
Creek, Annapolis, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
66070
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of Spa Creek. This action
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life on these navigable waters in
Annapolis, MD, during a fireworks
display on December 31, 2019. This
regulation prohibits persons and vessels
from being in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11
p.m. on December 31, 2019, to 1 a.m. on
January 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2019–
0846 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Ron Houck, Sector MarylandNational Capital Region Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 410–576–2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port MarylandNational Capital Region
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Pyrotecnico, Inc., of New Castle, PA,
notified the Coast Guard that from 11:59
p.m. on December 31, 2019, to 12:11
a.m. on January 1, 2020, it will be
conducting a fireworks display
launched from a barge in Spa Creek,
approximately 600 feet southeast of
Dock Street in Annapolis, MD. In
response, on October 23, 2019, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled ‘‘Safety Zone
for Fireworks Display; Spa Creek,
Annapolis, MD’’ (84 FR 56731). There
we stated why we issued the NPRM,
and invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to this
fireworks display. During the comment
period that ended November 22, 2019,
we received three comments, only one
of which was germane to the
rulemaking.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Dec 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest because
immediate action is needed to respond
to the potential safety hazards
associated with a fireworks display in
this location.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP
has determined that potential hazards
associated with the fireworks to be used
in this December 31, 2019, display will
be a safety concern for anyone within
400 feet of the fireworks barge on Spa
Creek. The purpose of this rule is to
ensure safety of vessels and the
navigable waters in the safety zone
before, during, and after the scheduled
event.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received one
substantive comments on our NPRM
published October 23, 2019. The
comment stated that a distance of the
safety zone of 400 feet from the
fireworks barge seems inadequate.
The minimum safe distance from the
fireworks barge used by the Coast Guard
to determine the size of the safety zone
is based on industry standards for
outdoor aerial fireworks set by the
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA). The NFPA standard for this
fireworks display is 280 feet from the
discharge site. At the request of the
contracted fireworks company,
Pyrotecnico, the Coast Guard is using
400 feet for the size of its safety zone,
which is an increase of more than 40
percent above the safe distance set by
the NFPA.
There are no changes in the regulatory
text of this rule from the proposed rule.
This rule establishes a safety zone
from 11:00 p.m. on December 31, 2019
to 1:00 a.m. on January 1, 2020. The
safety zone will cover all navigable
waters within 400 feet of a fireworks
barge in Spa Creek in approximate
position latitude 38°58′32.48″ N,
longitude 076°28′57.55″ W, located at
Annapolis, MD. A ‘‘FIREWORKS—
DANGER—STAY AWAY’’ sign would
be posted on the port and starboard
sides of the barge on-scene near the
location. The duration and enforcement
of the safety zone is intended to ensure
the safety of vessels and these navigable
waters before, during, and after the
fireworks display scheduled from 11:59
p.m. on December 31, 2019, to 12:11
a.m. on January 1, 2020. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, duration, time-ofday and time-of-year of the safety zone.
This safety zone will impact vessels
intending to transit Spa Creek for 2
hours during the evening when vessel
traffic is normally low. The Coast Guard
will issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please call
or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Dec 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting a total of 2 hours that will
prohibit entry within a small designated
area of Spa Creek in Annapolis, MD. It
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
66071
2. Add § 165.T05–0846 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T05–0846 Safety Zone for Fireworks
Display; Spa Creek, Annapolis, MD.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of Spa
Creek within 400 feet of the fireworks
barge in approximate position latitude
38°58′32.48″ N, longitude 076°28′57.55″
W, located at Annapolis, MD. All
coordinates refer to datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section:
(1) Captain of the Port (COTP) means
the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Maryland-National Capital
Region.
(2) Designated representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Maryland-National Capital Region to
assist in enforcing any safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
All vessels underway within this safety
zone at the time it is activated are to
depart the zone.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative by telephone
at 410–576–2693 or on Marine Band
Radio VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted
on Marine Band Radio VHF–FM
channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) Those in the safety zone must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement officials. The U.S.
Coast Guard may be assisted in the
patrol and enforcement of the safety
zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
(e) Enforcement. This safety zone will
be enforced during the periods
described in paragraph (f) of this
section. A ‘‘FIREWORKS—DANGER—
STAY AWAY’’ sign will be posted on
the port and starboard sides of the barge
on-scene near the location described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(f) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 11 p.m. on
December 31, 2019, to 1 a.m. on January
1, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
66072
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: November 27, 2019.
Joseph B. Loring,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2019–26094 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 20
International Country Listing for South
Sudan
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service is revising
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, International Mail
Manual (IMM®), to incorporate minor
changes.
SUMMARY:
Effective date: January 26, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Lassiter at 202–268–2914.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Modifications to the country price list
for international mail that appears in
Part D of the Mail Classification
Schedule have been posted under
Docket Number MC2020–27 on the
Postal Regulatory Commission’s website
at https://www.prc.gov.
On May 6, 2019, the designated
operator for the Republic of South
Sudan sent International Bureau
Circular number 76 to remind
designated operators to send dispatches
DATES:
addressed to South Sudan using ISO
country code ‘‘SS’’. The Postal Service
will add South Sudan to the following
sections of the Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service,
International Mail Manual (IMM):
Section 292.45a; the Index of Countries
and Localities; the Country Price Groups
and Weight Limits; and the Individual
Country Listings.
The Postal Service hereby adopts the
following changes to the IMM, which
are incorporated by reference in the
Code of Federal Regulations. See 39
CFR 20.1.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 20
Foreign relations, International postal
services.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 20 is
amended as follows:
Conditions for Mailing
*
*
*
*
*
213 Prices and Postage Payment
Methods
*
*
*
*
*
213.5 Destinating Countries and Price
Groups
*
*
*
*
*
Exhibit 213.5 Destinating Countries
and Price Groups
[Add a new entry for South Sudan to
read as follows]
Country name
GXG price group
South Sudan, Republic of.
No Service.
PART 20—[AMENDED]
*
*
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 20 continues to read as follows:
290
Commercial Services
*
*
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301–
307; 18 U.S.C. 1692–1737; 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 407, 414, 416, 3001–3011,
3201–3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626,
3632, 3633, and 5001.
*
*
*
*
*
*
292 International Priority Airmail
(IPA) Service
*
*
*
*
*
2. Revise the following sections of
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, International Mail
Manual (IMM), as follows:
292.45 IPA Foreign Office of Exchange
Codes and Price Groups
Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, International
Mail Manual (IMM)
Exhibit 292.45a IPA Foreign Office of
Exchange Codes and Price Groups
■
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[Add an entry in alphabetical order to
read as follows:]
*
Country name
Foreign office of exchange code
*
*
*
South Sudan, Republic of ...........................................................
*
*
*
JUB ............................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
South Sudan, Republic of
Index of Countries and Localities
[Add an entry in alphabetical order to
read as follows:]
*
*
*
*
*
*
South Sudan, Republic of .................... n/a ..........
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:44 Dec 02, 2019
19
*
Priority mail express
international
Max. Wt.
(lbs.)
Price
group
Max. Wt.
*
n/a ..........
n/a ..........
*
n/a ..........
*
Jkt 250001
*
*
Country Price Groups and Weight
Limits
*
Country
Price
group
Price group
[Add an entry in alphabetical order to
read as follows:]
Global express
guaranteed
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with RULES
2
*
PO 00000
Frm 00010
PMEI flat
rate
envelopes
price
group 1
Price
group
Max. Wt.
(lbs.)
*
n/a ..........
*
Fmt 4700
Priority mail
international
7
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
*
44
*
03DER1
PMI flat
rate
envelopes
and
boxes
price
group 2
First-class mail international and first-class
package international
service
Price
group
Max. Wt.
(lbs.)
*
8
7
*
See Note 3.
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66069-66072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26094]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2019-0846]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Spa Creek, Annapolis, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66070]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of Spa Creek. This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable waters in Annapolis, MD, during a
fireworks display on December 31, 2019. This regulation prohibits
persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11 p.m. on December 31, 2019, to 1
a.m. on January 1, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0846 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Ron Houck, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 410-576-
2674, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
Pyrotecnico, Inc., of New Castle, PA, notified the Coast Guard that
from 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2019, to 12:11 a.m. on January 1, 2020,
it will be conducting a fireworks display launched from a barge in Spa
Creek, approximately 600 feet southeast of Dock Street in Annapolis,
MD. In response, on October 23, 2019, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Safety Zone for Fireworks
Display; Spa Creek, Annapolis, MD'' (84 FR 56731). There we stated why
we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory
action related to this fireworks display. During the comment period
that ended November 22, 2019, we received three comments, only one of
which was germane to the rulemaking.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety
hazards associated with a fireworks display in this location.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP has determined that
potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in this
December 31, 2019, display will be a safety concern for anyone within
400 feet of the fireworks barge on Spa Creek. The purpose of this rule
is to ensure safety of vessels and the navigable waters in the safety
zone before, during, and after the scheduled event.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received one substantive comments on our NPRM
published October 23, 2019. The comment stated that a distance of the
safety zone of 400 feet from the fireworks barge seems inadequate.
The minimum safe distance from the fireworks barge used by the
Coast Guard to determine the size of the safety zone is based on
industry standards for outdoor aerial fireworks set by the National
Fire Protection Association (NFPA). The NFPA standard for this
fireworks display is 280 feet from the discharge site. At the request
of the contracted fireworks company, Pyrotecnico, the Coast Guard is
using 400 feet for the size of its safety zone, which is an increase of
more than 40 percent above the safe distance set by the NFPA.
There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the
proposed rule.
This rule establishes a safety zone from 11:00 p.m. on December 31,
2019 to 1:00 a.m. on January 1, 2020. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters within 400 feet of a fireworks barge in Spa Creek in
approximate position latitude 38[deg]58'32.48'' N, longitude
076[deg]28'57.55'' W, located at Annapolis, MD. A ``FIREWORKS--DANGER--
STAY AWAY'' sign would be posted on the port and starboard sides of the
barge on-scene near the location. The duration and enforcement of the
safety zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these
navigable waters before, during, and after the fireworks display
scheduled from 11:59 p.m. on December 31, 2019, to 12:11 a.m. on
January 1, 2020. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
duration, time-of-day and time-of-year of the safety zone. This safety
zone will impact vessels intending to transit Spa Creek for 2 hours
during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. The Coast Guard
will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
about the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
[[Page 66071]]
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting a total of 2 hours that will prohibit entry within
a small designated area of Spa Creek in Annapolis, MD. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0846 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0846 Safety Zone for Fireworks Display; Spa Creek,
Annapolis, MD.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of Spa Creek within 400 feet of the fireworks barge in
approximate position latitude 38[deg]58'32.48'' N, longitude
076[deg]28'57.55'' W, located at Annapolis, MD. All coordinates refer
to datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section:
(1) Captain of the Port (COTP) means the Commander, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
(2) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing any safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative. All vessels underway within this
safety zone at the time it is activated are to depart the zone.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative by telephone at 410-576-2693 or on Marine
Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM
channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement officials. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in
the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and
local agencies.
(e) Enforcement. This safety zone will be enforced during the
periods described in paragraph (f) of this section. A ``FIREWORKS--
DANGER--STAY AWAY'' sign will be posted on the port and starboard sides
of the barge on-scene near the location described in paragraph (a) of
this section.
(f) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 11 p.m.
on December 31, 2019, to 1 a.m. on January 1, 2020.
[[Page 66072]]
Dated: November 27, 2019.
Joseph B. Loring,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2019-26094 Filed 12-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P