Priority Topics for the Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF); Request for Information, 66198-66199 [2019-26092]
Download as PDF
66198
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
In addition, there are also concerns
about a history of anticompetitive
conduct.8 Expansive investigation for
mergers like these is time well spent.
Again, with a few exceptions,9 many
FTC Commissioners have primarily
scrutinized pharmaceutical mergers
based on an examination of whether
there are any product overlaps between
the merging corporations, or where
there may be clear-cut incentives to
foreclose rivals with the ability to
compete.10 When there are no obvious
overlaps or foreclosure possibilities, the
Commission typically does not
challenge any aspect of the
transaction.11
deal, Reuters (Feb. 28, 2019, 6:59 a.m.), https://
www.reuters.com/article/us-celgene-m-a-bristolmyers-wellington/starboard-joins-opposition-tobristol-myers-74-billion-celgene-dealidUSKCN1QH1K7.
8 For example, last year, the Food & Drug
Administration published a list of drug makers that
were the subject of complaints that they had
restricted generic drug companies from accessing
drug samples, which enable generic firms to
develop viable alternatives. Celgene was a top
recipient of these complaints. Alison Kodjak, How
a Drugmaker Gamed The System To Keep Generic
Competition Away, NPR (May 17, 2018; 5:00 a.m.),
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/05/
17/571986468/how-a-drugmaker-gamed-the-systemto-keep-generic-competition-away.
9 See, e.g., Statement of the Federal Trade
Commission, In the Matter of Teva Pharmaceuticals
Industries Ltd. and Allergan plc (July 27, 2016),
https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2016/07/
statement-federal-trade-commission-matter-tevapharmaceuticals-industries; cf. Concurring
Statement of Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch,
Federal Trade Commission v. Ovation
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Dec. 16, 2008), https://
www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2008/12/concurringstatement-commissioner-j-thomas-rosch-federaltrade-commission.
10 In this matter, the Analysis of Agreement
Containing Consent Orders to Aid Public Comment
focuses primarily on a specific product market
overlap. This is similar to many past analyses
contained in public notices seeking comment on
proposed consent orders in the FTC’s
pharmaceutical merger actions. See, e.g., Analysis
Of Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid
Public Comment, In the Matter of Boston Scientific
Corporation, File No. 191–0039, https://
www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/191_
0039_boston_scientific_aapc.pdf; Analysis Of
Agreement Containing Consent Orders To Aid
Public Comment, In the Matter of Amneal Holdings,
LLC, Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, Impax
Laboratories, Inc., and Impax Laboratories, LLC,
File No. 181–0017, https://www.ftc.gov/system/
files/documents/cases/1810017_amneal_impax_
analysis_4-27-18.pdf. See also Markus Meier et al.,
Fed. Trade Comm’n, Overview of FTC Actions In
Pharmaceutical Products and Distribution (2019),
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/attachments/
competition-policy-guidance/overview_pharma_
june_2019.pdf.
11 For example, in January 2015 the Commission
granted early termination of the Hart-Scott-Rodino
waiting period and took no enforcement action
against the proposed $66 billion merger between
Actavis plc and Allergan, Inc. See Fed. Trade
Comm’n, Early Termination Notices, 20150313:
Actavis plc; Allergan, Inc. (Jan. 9, 2015), https://
www.ftc.gov/enforcement/premerger-notificationprogram/early-termination-notices/20150313.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:27 Dec 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
I am deeply skeptical that this
approach can unearth the complete set
of harms to patients and innovation,
based on the history of anticompetitive
conduct of the firms seeking to merge
and the characteristics of today’s
pharmaceutical industry when it comes
to innovation. Will the merger facilitate
a capital structure that magnifies
incentives to engage in anticompetitive
conduct or abuse of intellectual
property? Will the merger deter
formation of biotechnology firms that
fuel much of the industry’s innovation?
How can we know the effects on
competition if we do not rigorously
study or investigate these and other
critical questions? Given our approach,
I am not confident that the Commission
has sufficient information to determine
the full scope of potential harms to
competition of this massive merger.
Conclusion
The financial crisis and the Great
Recession taught our country a tough
lesson: When watchdogs wear
blindfolds or fail to evolve with the
marketplace, millions of American
families can suffer the consequences.
The regulators and enforcers of the
mortgage industry failed to stop the
widespread abuses that plagued the
marketplace. And there are many more
examples every year, from the opioid
crisis to the failures of the Boeing 737
Max, where blindfolded regulators and
the absence of rigorous investigation
proved to be catastrophic to human life,
despite so many warning signs.
When enforcers conduct wideranging, intensive inquiries that do not
uncover unlawful conduct, then, of
course, they cannot take action.
However, when they wear blindfolds or
cling to the status quo, they cannot
assume that the public is protected.
For these reasons, I respectfully
dissent.
[FR Doc. 2019–26074 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[Docket No. CDC–2019–0112]
Priority Topics for the Community
Preventive Services Task Force
(CPSTF); Request for Information
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) in the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) announces the opening
of a docket to obtain public comment to
identify topics of public health
importance that will form the basis of
Community Preventive Services Task
Force (CPSTF) evidence-based
recommendations. CDC will use this
information to support the CPSTF in its
selection of priority topics to guide its
work over the next five years. This
docket will provide the opportunity to
expand the current body of knowledge
and identify important evidence gaps.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before January 23, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2019–
0112, by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Julie Zajac, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Office
of the Associate Director for Policy and
Strategy, Community Guide Office, 1600
Clifton Road NE, Mail Stop V25–5,
Atlanta, GA 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. All relevant comments
received will be posted without change
to https://regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Zajac MPH, Community Guide Office,
Office of the Associate Director for
Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton
Road NE, Mail Stop V25–5, Atlanta, GA
30329. Phone: 404–498–1827; Email:
cpstf@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Public Participation
Interested persons or organizations
are invited to participate by submitting
written views, recommendations, and
data. In addition, CDC invites comments
specifically on the following questions:
1. What public health topics should
be prioritized for CPSTF systematic
reviews assessing the effectiveness and
economic merits of public health
programs, services, and other
interventions?
2. What is the rationale for choosing
these topics?
3. What are examples of published
studies on interventions within these
topics?
Possible domains to consider in
answering these questions include (but
are not limited to):
E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM
03DEN1
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Notices
• Burden of disease and preventability
• Presence of important health
disparities
• Alignment with national efforts (e.g.,
Healthy People 2020 or 2030)
• Ability to provide users with an
adequate menu of options for
addressing the health topic (i.e.,
recommendations or findings for
multiple interventions within the
same topic)
• Balance across public health topics
• Complementary work of other bodies
that provide guidance or
recommendations on addressing
health issues (e.g., U.S. Preventive
Services Task Force, Advisory
Committee on Immunization
Practices). Specific citations or
websites that support suggested
topics, rationale, or demonstrate
available evidence would be helpful.
Please feel free to respond to any or
all of the questions.
Please note that comments received,
including attachments and other
supporting materials, are part of the
public record and are subject to public
disclosure. Comments will be posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore,
do not include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
Note that personal information such as
name, contact information, or other
information that identifies an individual
appearing in the body of submitted
comments will be on public display.
CDC will review all submissions and
may choose to redact or withhold
submissions containing private or
proprietary information such as Social
Security numbers, medical information,
inappropriate language, or duplicate/
near duplicate examples of a mass-mail
campaign.
Previous Areas of Focus: The CPSTF
conducted the previous prioritization
process in 2015 and identified the
following list of topics to guide its work:
• Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
and Control
• Diabetes Prevention and Control
• Environmental Health
• Injury Prevention
• Mental Health
• Obesity Prevention and Control
(includes Nutrition)
• Older Adult Health
• Physical Activity
• Sleep Health
• Social Determinants of Health
• Substance Abuse (e.g., Prescription
Drug Overdose)
• Violence Prevention
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:27 Dec 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
Background
When communities need to know
how to protect and improve their
population’s health, they turn to The
Community Guide, a collection of
evidence-based recommendations and
findings from the CPSTF. The CPSTF
makes evidence-based
recommendations about the
effectiveness and economic merits of
public health programs, services, and
other interventions used in real-world
settings—such as communities,
worksites, schools, faith-based
organizations, military bases, public
health clinics and departments, and
integrated healthcare systems.
Systematic reviews are conducted in
accordance with the highest
international standards, using a
transparent and replicable methodology
that accounts for the complexities of
real-world public health interventions.
CPSTF recommendations are based on
systematic reviews, which help make
sense of large bodies of scientific
literature by applying the scientific
process to summarize evidence about
the effectiveness of particular
approaches for addressing a public
health problem. CDC provides
administrative, scientific, and technical
support for the CPSTF.
The CPSTF periodically updates its
priority topics so that its
recommendations are responsive to
changes in evidence, burden of disease,
changing epidemiology, and changes in
how interventions are delivered (e.g.,
use of technology). The CPSTF uses a
multi-stage process to identify and
prioritize topics. A prioritization
committee seeks input from its members
and liaison organizations, subject matter
experts, public health authorities, the
public, and other stakeholders. The
topic areas identified are then ranked
and prioritized by the full CPSTF using
established criteria.
The criteria established by the CPSTF
(such as the domains listed above) are
then applied to each of the identified
topics and presented to the full CPSTF
for its discussion, expert assessment,
and arrival at a final set of priorities.
CDC welcomes input to this docket
from a diverse range of perspectives.
The input will inform CDC’s support to
the CPSTF in its work to select priority
topics and will improve the credibility
and transparency of the process.
Dated: November 27, 2019.
Sandra Cashman,
Executive Secretary, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019–26092 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66199
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2019–N–5120]
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee;
Notice of Meeting; Establishment of a
Public Docket; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notice; establishment of a
public docket; request for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) announces a
forthcoming public advisory committee
meeting of the Oncologic Drugs
Advisory Committee. The general
function of the committee is to provide
advice and recommendations to FDA on
regulatory issues. The meeting will be
open to the public. FDA is establishing
a docket for public comment on this
document.
SUMMARY:
The meeting will be held on
December 18, 2019, from 8 a.m. to 5
p.m.
DATES:
FDA White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm.
1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002.
Answers to commonly asked questions
including information regarding special
accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may
be accessed at: https://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/
AboutAdvisoryCommittees/
ucm408555.htm.
FDA is establishing a docket for
public comment on this meeting. The
docket number is FDA–2019–N–5120.
The docket will close on December 17,
2019. Submit either electronic or
written comments on this public
meeting by December 17, 2019. Please
note that late, untimely filed comments
will not be considered. Electronic
comments must be submitted on or
before December 17, 2019. The https://
www.regulations.gov electronic filing
system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of
December 17, 2019. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for
written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
Comments received on or before
December 10, 2019, will be provided to
the committee. Comments received after
that date will be taken into
consideration by FDA. In the event that
the meeting is cancelled, FDA will
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\03DEN1.SGM
03DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66198-66199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26092]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[Docket No. CDC-2019-0112]
Priority Topics for the Community Preventive Services Task Force
(CPSTF); Request for Information
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announces the opening of
a docket to obtain public comment to identify topics of public health
importance that will form the basis of Community Preventive Services
Task Force (CPSTF) evidence-based recommendations. CDC will use this
information to support the CPSTF in its selection of priority topics to
guide its work over the next five years. This docket will provide the
opportunity to expand the current body of knowledge and identify
important evidence gaps.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 23, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2019-
0112, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Julie Zajac, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy,
Community Guide Office, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mail Stop V25-5, Atlanta,
GA 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket Number. All relevant comments received will be posted
without change to https://regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. For access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie Zajac MPH, Community Guide
Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mail
Stop V25-5, Atlanta, GA 30329. Phone: 404-498-1827; Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation
Interested persons or organizations are invited to participate by
submitting written views, recommendations, and data. In addition, CDC
invites comments specifically on the following questions:
1. What public health topics should be prioritized for CPSTF
systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness and economic merits of
public health programs, services, and other interventions?
2. What is the rationale for choosing these topics?
3. What are examples of published studies on interventions within
these topics?
Possible domains to consider in answering these questions include
(but are not limited to):
[[Page 66199]]
Burden of disease and preventability
Presence of important health disparities
Alignment with national efforts (e.g., Healthy People 2020 or
2030)
Ability to provide users with an adequate menu of options for
addressing the health topic (i.e., recommendations or findings for
multiple interventions within the same topic)
Balance across public health topics
Complementary work of other bodies that provide guidance or
recommendations on addressing health issues (e.g., U.S. Preventive
Services Task Force, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices).
Specific citations or websites that support suggested topics,
rationale, or demonstrate available evidence would be helpful. Please
feel free to respond to any or all of the questions.
Please note that comments received, including attachments and other
supporting materials, are part of the public record and are subject to
public disclosure. Comments will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, do not include any information in your
comment or supporting materials that you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure. Note that personal information
such as name, contact information, or other information that identifies
an individual appearing in the body of submitted comments will be on
public display. CDC will review all submissions and may choose to
redact or withhold submissions containing private or proprietary
information such as Social Security numbers, medical information,
inappropriate language, or duplicate/near duplicate examples of a mass-
mail campaign.
Previous Areas of Focus: The CPSTF conducted the previous
prioritization process in 2015 and identified the following list of
topics to guide its work:
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control
Diabetes Prevention and Control
Environmental Health
Injury Prevention
Mental Health
Obesity Prevention and Control (includes Nutrition)
Older Adult Health
Physical Activity
Sleep Health
Social Determinants of Health
Substance Abuse (e.g., Prescription Drug Overdose)
Violence Prevention
Background
When communities need to know how to protect and improve their
population's health, they turn to The Community Guide, a collection of
evidence-based recommendations and findings from the CPSTF. The CPSTF
makes evidence-based recommendations about the effectiveness and
economic merits of public health programs, services, and other
interventions used in real-world settings--such as communities,
worksites, schools, faith-based organizations, military bases, public
health clinics and departments, and integrated healthcare systems.
Systematic reviews are conducted in accordance with the highest
international standards, using a transparent and replicable methodology
that accounts for the complexities of real-world public health
interventions. CPSTF recommendations are based on systematic reviews,
which help make sense of large bodies of scientific literature by
applying the scientific process to summarize evidence about the
effectiveness of particular approaches for addressing a public health
problem. CDC provides administrative, scientific, and technical support
for the CPSTF.
The CPSTF periodically updates its priority topics so that its
recommendations are responsive to changes in evidence, burden of
disease, changing epidemiology, and changes in how interventions are
delivered (e.g., use of technology). The CPSTF uses a multi-stage
process to identify and prioritize topics. A prioritization committee
seeks input from its members and liaison organizations, subject matter
experts, public health authorities, the public, and other stakeholders.
The topic areas identified are then ranked and prioritized by the full
CPSTF using established criteria.
The criteria established by the CPSTF (such as the domains listed
above) are then applied to each of the identified topics and presented
to the full CPSTF for its discussion, expert assessment, and arrival at
a final set of priorities.
CDC welcomes input to this docket from a diverse range of
perspectives. The input will inform CDC's support to the CPSTF in its
work to select priority topics and will improve the credibility and
transparency of the process.
Dated: November 27, 2019.
Sandra Cashman,
Executive Secretary, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019-26092 Filed 12-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P