Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources, 66096-66098 [2019-26002]

Download as PDF lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS 66096 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules Environmental Appeals Board may exclude any motion that does not meet word limitations. Where a party can demonstrate a compelling and documented need to exceed such limitations, such party must seek advance leave of the Environmental Appeals Board. Such requests are discouraged and will be granted only in unusual circumstances. (6) Disposition of a motion for a procedural order. The Environmental Appeals Board may act on a motion for a procedural order at any time without awaiting a response. (g) Motions for extension of time. (1) Parties must file motions for extensions of time sufficiently in advance of the due date to allow other parties to have a reasonable opportunity to respond to the request for more time and to provide the Environmental Appeals Board with a reasonable opportunity to issue an order. (2) Each party may only file one motion for extension and the requested extension may not exceed 30 days. (h) Filing and service requirements. Documents filed under this section must be filed and serviced in accordance with the requirements of § 124.19(c) of this chapter. (i) Final disposition. (1) The Environmental Appeals Board shall issue its decision on a permit appeal by the later date occurring 60 days after the date on which: (i) The final brief has been submitted; or (ii) Oral argument is concluded. (2) Any written opinion issued by the Environmental Appeals Board should only be as long as necessary to address the specific issues presented to the Board in the appeal. (3) The Regional Administrator must issue a final permit decision: (i) When the Environmental Appeals Board issues a decision on the merits of the appeal and the decision does not include a remand of the proceedings; or (ii) Upon the completion of remand proceedings if the proceedings are remanded, unless the Environmental Appeals Board’s remand order specifically provides that appeal of the remand decision will be required to exhaust administrative remedies. (4) The Regional Administrator must promptly publish notice of any final agency action regarding a PSD permit in the Federal Register. (j) Motions for reconsideration or clarification. Motions to reconsider or clarify any final disposition of the Environmental Appeals Board must be filed within 10 days after service of that disposition. Motions for reconsideration must set forth the matters claimed to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 have been erroneously decided and the nature of the alleged errors. Motions for clarification must set forth with specificity the portion of the decision for which clarification is being sought and the reason clarification is necessary. Motions for reconsideration or clarification under this provision must be directed to, and decided by, the Environmental Appeals Board. Motions for reconsideration or clarification directed to the Administrator, rather than the Environmental Appeals Board, will not be considered, unless such motion relates to a matter that the Environmental Appeals Board has referred to the Administrator pursuant to § 124.2 and for which the Administrator has issued the final order. A motion for reconsideration or clarification does not stay the effective date of the final order unless the Environmental Appeals Board specifically so orders. (k) Board authority. In exercising its duties and responsibilities under this part, the Environmental Appeals Board may do all acts and take all measures necessary for the efficient, fair, and impartial adjudication of issues arising in an appeal under this part including, but not limited to, imposing procedural sanctions against a party who, without adequate justification, fails or refuses to comply with this part or an order of the Environmental Appeals Board. Such sanctions may include drawing adverse inferences against a party, striking a party’s pleadings or other submissions from the record, and denying any or all relief sought by the party in the proceeding. Additionally, for good cause, the Board may relax or suspend the filing requirements prescribed by these rules or Board order. ■ 7. Revise § 124.20 to read as follows: § 124.20 Computation of time. (a) Any time period scheduled to begin on the occurrence of an act or event shall begin on the day after the act or event. (b) Any time period scheduled to begin before the occurrence of an act or event shall be computed so that the period ends on the day before the act or event. (c) If the final day of any time period falls on a weekend or legal holiday, the time period shall be extended to the next working day. (d) When a party or interested person may or must act within a prescribed period after being served and service is made by U.S. mail, EPA’s internal mail, or reliable commercial delivery service, 3 days shall be added to the prescribed time. The prescribed period for acting after being served is not expanded by 3 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 days when service is made by personal delivery, facsimile, or email. [FR Doc. 2019–24940 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0656; FRL–10002– 64–Region 7] Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri to EPA on October 25, 2019. The purpose of the revisions is to provide a more efficient way to perform emissions sampling on air pollution sources throughout Missouri. The State is requesting approval of incorporating by reference the federally defined methods for stack testing. These proposed revisions are administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP. DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 2, 2020. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2019–0656 to https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan Simpson, Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551–7089; email address simpson.jan@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. SUMMARY: Table of Contents I. Written Comments II. What is being addressed in this document? E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM 03DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? IV. What action is the EPA taking? V. Incorporation by Reference VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Written Comments Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019– 0656, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS II. What is being addressed in this document? The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Missouri SIP submitted by the State of Missouri to the EPA on October 25, 2019. The revisions to the previously federally approved Missouri State rule 10 CSR 10–6.030 Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources are administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP. If approved, the revisions will provide a more efficient way to perform emissions sampling by incorporating by reference (IBR) federally promulgated methods. In sections (1) through subsection (5)(b) and sections (6) through (16) the State removed the title of the sampling method and added a reference to the IBR at section (22) of the revised rule. The sampling method required in each section was not changed. In subsection (5)(c) through (5)(f) the State removed the title of the sampling method and added a reference to the IBR at section (21) of the revised rule. The sampling method required in each subsection was not changed. In section (17) the State removed the title of the sampling method and added a reference to the IBR section (23) of the revised rule. The sampling method required in each VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 section was not changed. At section (20) the State updated its IBR information and documentation identification. In order to consolidate IBRs and for ease of updating the IBRs in the future, the State is adding sections (21), (22) and (23), of the Federal rule, effective July 1, 2018. Section (21) incorporates by reference 40 CFR part 51, appendix M ‘‘Recommended Test Methods for State Implementation Plans’’. Section (22) incorporates by reference 40 CFR part 60, appendix A ‘‘Test Methods’’, appendix B ‘‘Performance Specifications’’, and appendix F ‘‘Quality Assurance Procedures’’. Section (23) incorporates by reference 40 CFR part 61, appendix B ‘‘Test Methods’’. III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The State provided public notice on this SIP revision from May 15, 2018 to August 2, 2018 and received eight comments. Based on the comments received the State made revisions to rule text in sections (21), (22), and (23) that incorporated by reference specific appendices and subparts. The State provided a second public notice on this SIP revision from April 15, 2019 to June 6, 2019 and received no comments. In addition, as explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), including section 110 and implementing regulations. IV. What action is the EPA taking? We are processing this as a proposed action because we are soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will occur after consideration of any comments. V. Incorporation by Reference In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulation described in the proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 66097 VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866. • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub.L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not involve technical standards; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM 03DEP1 66098 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Subpart AA—Missouri Dated: November 22, 2019. James Gulliford, Regional Administrator, Region 7. 2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entry ‘‘10–6.030’’ to read as follows: ■ For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: § 52.1320 * PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Identification of plan. * * (c)* * * * * 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS Missouri citation State effective date Title EPA approval date Explanation Missouri Department of Natural Resources * * * * * * * Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of Missouri * * 10–6.030 .................................... * * * * * * Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources. * * January 3, 2020, [Federal Register citation of the final rule]. * * which will significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the NAAQS in other states. The EPA is proposing to approve these submittals based on the conclusion that New Mexico will not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in any other state. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R06–OAR–2018–0705; FRL–10002– 28–Region 6] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, (CAA or Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing action on submissions from the State of New Mexico and the City of Albuquerque—Bernalillo County that are intended to demonstrate that the New Mexico State Implementation Plan (SIP) meets certain interstate transport requirements of the CAA for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These submissions address interstate transport, CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which requires each state’s SIP to prohibit emissions SUMMARY: 18:33 Dec 02, 2019 Jkt 250001 * * Written comments must be received on or before January 2, 2020. DATES: Air Plan Approval; New Mexico; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS 11/30/2019 * [FR Doc. 2019–26002 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am] VerDate Sep<11>2014 * Submit your comments, identified by Docket Number EPA–R06– OAR–2018–0705, at http:// www.regulations.gov or via email to fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 * * * consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact Sherry Fuerst, 214–665–6454, fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly available at either location (e.g., CBI). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sherry Fuerst, 214–665–6454, fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment with Ms. Fuerst or Mr. Bill Deese at 214–665–7253. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean the EPA. E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM 03DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66096-66098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26002]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0656; FRL-10002-64-Region 7]


Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Sampling Methods for Air Pollution 
Sources

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing 
approval of revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted 
by the State of Missouri to EPA on October 25, 2019. The purpose of the 
revisions is to provide a more efficient way to perform emissions 
sampling on air pollution sources throughout Missouri. The State is 
requesting approval of incorporating by reference the federally defined 
methods for stack testing. These proposed revisions are administrative 
in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 2, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2019-0656 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 
instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID 
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without 
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal 
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and 
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written 
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this 
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan Simpson, Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner 
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7089; email 
address [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?

[[Page 66097]]

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Written Comments

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2019-
0656, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot 
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any 
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any 
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) 
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a 
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment 
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA 
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located 
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other 
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA 
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, 
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

II. What is being addressed in this document?

    The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Missouri SIP 
submitted by the State of Missouri to the EPA on October 25, 2019. The 
revisions to the previously federally approved Missouri State rule 10 
CSR 10-6.030 Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources are 
administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP. 
If approved, the revisions will provide a more efficient way to perform 
emissions sampling by incorporating by reference (IBR) federally 
promulgated methods.
    In sections (1) through subsection (5)(b) and sections (6) through 
(16) the State removed the title of the sampling method and added a 
reference to the IBR at section (22) of the revised rule. The sampling 
method required in each section was not changed. In subsection (5)(c) 
through (5)(f) the State removed the title of the sampling method and 
added a reference to the IBR at section (21) of the revised rule. The 
sampling method required in each subsection was not changed. In section 
(17) the State removed the title of the sampling method and added a 
reference to the IBR section (23) of the revised rule. The sampling 
method required in each section was not changed. At section (20) the 
State updated its IBR information and documentation identification.
    In order to consolidate IBRs and for ease of updating the IBRs in 
the future, the State is adding sections (21), (22) and (23), of the 
Federal rule, effective July 1, 2018. Section (21) incorporates by 
reference 40 CFR part 51, appendix M ``Recommended Test Methods for 
State Implementation Plans''. Section (22) incorporates by reference 40 
CFR part 60, appendix A ``Test Methods'', appendix B ``Performance 
Specifications'', and appendix F ``Quality Assurance Procedures''. 
Section (23) incorporates by reference 40 CFR part 61, appendix B 
``Test Methods''.

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP 
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also 
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The 
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from May 15, 2018 to 
August 2, 2018 and received eight comments. Based on the comments 
received the State made revisions to rule text in sections (21), (22), 
and (23) that incorporated by reference specific appendices and 
subparts. The State provided a second public notice on this SIP 
revision from April 15, 2019 to June 6, 2019 and received no comments. 
In addition, as explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP 
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), including section 110 and 
implementing regulations.

IV. What action is the EPA taking?

    We are processing this as a proposed action because we are 
soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will 
occur after consideration of any comments.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text 
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In 
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to 
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulation described in the 
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has 
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available 
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and 
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state 
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub.L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology 
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not 
involve technical standards; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or 
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian

[[Page 66098]]

country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose 
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 22, 2019.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend 
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. In Sec.  52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising 
the entry ``10-6.030'' to read as follows:


Sec.  52.1320   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c)* * *

                                        EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        State        EPA approval
       Missouri citation              Title        effective date        date                Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
                                      Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
10-6.030......................  Sampling Methods       11/30/2019  January 3, 2020,  ...........................
                                 for Air                            [Federal
                                 Pollution                          Register
                                 Sources.                           citation of the
                                                                    final rule].
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-26002 Filed 12-2-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P