Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources, 66096-66098 [2019-26002]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
66096
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
Environmental Appeals Board may
exclude any motion that does not meet
word limitations. Where a party can
demonstrate a compelling and
documented need to exceed such
limitations, such party must seek
advance leave of the Environmental
Appeals Board. Such requests are
discouraged and will be granted only in
unusual circumstances.
(6) Disposition of a motion for a
procedural order. The Environmental
Appeals Board may act on a motion for
a procedural order at any time without
awaiting a response.
(g) Motions for extension of time. (1)
Parties must file motions for extensions
of time sufficiently in advance of the
due date to allow other parties to have
a reasonable opportunity to respond to
the request for more time and to provide
the Environmental Appeals Board with
a reasonable opportunity to issue an
order.
(2) Each party may only file one
motion for extension and the requested
extension may not exceed 30 days.
(h) Filing and service requirements.
Documents filed under this section must
be filed and serviced in accordance with
the requirements of § 124.19(c) of this
chapter.
(i) Final disposition. (1) The
Environmental Appeals Board shall
issue its decision on a permit appeal by
the later date occurring 60 days after the
date on which:
(i) The final brief has been submitted;
or
(ii) Oral argument is concluded.
(2) Any written opinion issued by the
Environmental Appeals Board should
only be as long as necessary to address
the specific issues presented to the
Board in the appeal.
(3) The Regional Administrator must
issue a final permit decision:
(i) When the Environmental Appeals
Board issues a decision on the merits of
the appeal and the decision does not
include a remand of the proceedings; or
(ii) Upon the completion of remand
proceedings if the proceedings are
remanded, unless the Environmental
Appeals Board’s remand order
specifically provides that appeal of the
remand decision will be required to
exhaust administrative remedies.
(4) The Regional Administrator must
promptly publish notice of any final
agency action regarding a PSD permit in
the Federal Register.
(j) Motions for reconsideration or
clarification. Motions to reconsider or
clarify any final disposition of the
Environmental Appeals Board must be
filed within 10 days after service of that
disposition. Motions for reconsideration
must set forth the matters claimed to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
have been erroneously decided and the
nature of the alleged errors. Motions for
clarification must set forth with
specificity the portion of the decision
for which clarification is being sought
and the reason clarification is necessary.
Motions for reconsideration or
clarification under this provision must
be directed to, and decided by, the
Environmental Appeals Board. Motions
for reconsideration or clarification
directed to the Administrator, rather
than the Environmental Appeals Board,
will not be considered, unless such
motion relates to a matter that the
Environmental Appeals Board has
referred to the Administrator pursuant
to § 124.2 and for which the
Administrator has issued the final order.
A motion for reconsideration or
clarification does not stay the effective
date of the final order unless the
Environmental Appeals Board
specifically so orders.
(k) Board authority. In exercising its
duties and responsibilities under this
part, the Environmental Appeals Board
may do all acts and take all measures
necessary for the efficient, fair, and
impartial adjudication of issues arising
in an appeal under this part including,
but not limited to, imposing procedural
sanctions against a party who, without
adequate justification, fails or refuses to
comply with this part or an order of the
Environmental Appeals Board. Such
sanctions may include drawing adverse
inferences against a party, striking a
party’s pleadings or other submissions
from the record, and denying any or all
relief sought by the party in the
proceeding. Additionally, for good
cause, the Board may relax or suspend
the filing requirements prescribed by
these rules or Board order.
■ 7. Revise § 124.20 to read as follows:
§ 124.20
Computation of time.
(a) Any time period scheduled to
begin on the occurrence of an act or
event shall begin on the day after the act
or event.
(b) Any time period scheduled to
begin before the occurrence of an act or
event shall be computed so that the
period ends on the day before the act or
event.
(c) If the final day of any time period
falls on a weekend or legal holiday, the
time period shall be extended to the
next working day.
(d) When a party or interested person
may or must act within a prescribed
period after being served and service is
made by U.S. mail, EPA’s internal mail,
or reliable commercial delivery service,
3 days shall be added to the prescribed
time. The prescribed period for acting
after being served is not expanded by 3
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
days when service is made by personal
delivery, facsimile, or email.
[FR Doc. 2019–24940 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2019–0656; FRL–10002–
64–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Sampling
Methods for Air Pollution Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
revisions to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of
Missouri to EPA on October 25, 2019.
The purpose of the revisions is to
provide a more efficient way to perform
emissions sampling on air pollution
sources throughout Missouri. The State
is requesting approval of incorporating
by reference the federally defined
methods for stack testing. These
proposed revisions are administrative in
nature and do not affect the stringency
of the SIP.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 2, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2019–0656 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan
Simpson, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7089;
email address simpson.jan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2019–
0656, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Missouri SIP submitted
by the State of Missouri to the EPA on
October 25, 2019. The revisions to the
previously federally approved Missouri
State rule 10 CSR 10–6.030 Sampling
Methods for Air Pollution Sources are
administrative in nature and do not
affect the stringency of the SIP. If
approved, the revisions will provide a
more efficient way to perform emissions
sampling by incorporating by reference
(IBR) federally promulgated methods.
In sections (1) through subsection
(5)(b) and sections (6) through (16) the
State removed the title of the sampling
method and added a reference to the
IBR at section (22) of the revised rule.
The sampling method required in each
section was not changed. In subsection
(5)(c) through (5)(f) the State removed
the title of the sampling method and
added a reference to the IBR at section
(21) of the revised rule. The sampling
method required in each subsection was
not changed. In section (17) the State
removed the title of the sampling
method and added a reference to the
IBR section (23) of the revised rule. The
sampling method required in each
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Dec 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
section was not changed. At section (20)
the State updated its IBR information
and documentation identification.
In order to consolidate IBRs and for
ease of updating the IBRs in the future,
the State is adding sections (21), (22)
and (23), of the Federal rule, effective
July 1, 2018. Section (21) incorporates
by reference 40 CFR part 51, appendix
M ‘‘Recommended Test Methods for
State Implementation Plans’’. Section
(22) incorporates by reference 40 CFR
part 60, appendix A ‘‘Test Methods’’,
appendix B ‘‘Performance
Specifications’’, and appendix F
‘‘Quality Assurance Procedures’’.
Section (23) incorporates by reference
40 CFR part 61, appendix B ‘‘Test
Methods’’.
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
May 15, 2018 to August 2, 2018 and
received eight comments. Based on the
comments received the State made
revisions to rule text in sections (21),
(22), and (23) that incorporated by
reference specific appendices and
subparts. The State provided a second
public notice on this SIP revision from
April 15, 2019 to June 6, 2019 and
received no comments. In addition, as
explained above, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA), including section
110 and implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
We are processing this as a proposed
action because we are soliciting
comments on this proposed action.
Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to include regulatory text in
an EPA final rule that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri
Regulation described in the proposed
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
66097
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub.L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
66098
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2019 / Proposed Rules
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Subpart AA—Missouri
Dated: November 22, 2019.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘10–6.030’’ to read as follows:
■
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
§ 52.1320
*
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c)* * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
*
*
10–6.030 ....................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources.
*
*
January 3, 2020, [Federal Register citation of the final rule].
*
*
which will significantly contribute to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the NAAQS in other
states. The EPA is proposing to approve
these submittals based on the
conclusion that New Mexico will not
significantly contribute to
nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS
in any other state.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2018–0705; FRL–10002–
28–Region 6]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Clean Air Act,
(CAA or Act), the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
action on submissions from the State of
New Mexico and the City of
Albuquerque—Bernalillo County that
are intended to demonstrate that the
New Mexico State Implementation Plan
(SIP) meets certain interstate transport
requirements of the CAA for the 2008
ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). These submissions
address interstate transport, CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which requires
each state’s SIP to prohibit emissions
SUMMARY:
18:33 Dec 02, 2019
Jkt 250001
*
*
Written comments must be
received on or before January 2, 2020.
DATES:
Air Plan Approval; New Mexico;
Interstate Transport Requirements for
the 2008 Ozone NAAQS
lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
11/30/2019
*
[FR Doc. 2019–26002 Filed 12–2–19; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket Number EPA–R06–
OAR–2018–0705, at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact Sherry Fuerst, 214–665–6454,
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. For the full EPA
public comment policy, information
about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making
effective comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the EPA Region 6 Office, 1201 Elm
Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sherry Fuerst, 214–665–6454,
fuerst.sherry@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Ms. Fuerst or Mr. Bill
Deese at 214–665–7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
E:\FR\FM\03DEP1.SGM
03DEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 3, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 66096-66098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26002]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2019-0656; FRL-10002-64-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Sampling Methods for Air Pollution
Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted
by the State of Missouri to EPA on October 25, 2019. The purpose of the
revisions is to provide a more efficient way to perform emissions
sampling on air pollution sources throughout Missouri. The State is
requesting approval of incorporating by reference the federally defined
methods for stack testing. These proposed revisions are administrative
in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 2, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2019-0656 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan Simpson, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7089; email
address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
[[Page 66097]]
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2019-
0656, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Missouri SIP
submitted by the State of Missouri to the EPA on October 25, 2019. The
revisions to the previously federally approved Missouri State rule 10
CSR 10-6.030 Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources are
administrative in nature and do not affect the stringency of the SIP.
If approved, the revisions will provide a more efficient way to perform
emissions sampling by incorporating by reference (IBR) federally
promulgated methods.
In sections (1) through subsection (5)(b) and sections (6) through
(16) the State removed the title of the sampling method and added a
reference to the IBR at section (22) of the revised rule. The sampling
method required in each section was not changed. In subsection (5)(c)
through (5)(f) the State removed the title of the sampling method and
added a reference to the IBR at section (21) of the revised rule. The
sampling method required in each subsection was not changed. In section
(17) the State removed the title of the sampling method and added a
reference to the IBR section (23) of the revised rule. The sampling
method required in each section was not changed. At section (20) the
State updated its IBR information and documentation identification.
In order to consolidate IBRs and for ease of updating the IBRs in
the future, the State is adding sections (21), (22) and (23), of the
Federal rule, effective July 1, 2018. Section (21) incorporates by
reference 40 CFR part 51, appendix M ``Recommended Test Methods for
State Implementation Plans''. Section (22) incorporates by reference 40
CFR part 60, appendix A ``Test Methods'', appendix B ``Performance
Specifications'', and appendix F ``Quality Assurance Procedures''.
Section (23) incorporates by reference 40 CFR part 61, appendix B
``Test Methods''.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from May 15, 2018 to
August 2, 2018 and received eight comments. Based on the comments
received the State made revisions to rule text in sections (21), (22),
and (23) that incorporated by reference specific appendices and
subparts. The State provided a second public notice on this SIP
revision from April 15, 2019 to June 6, 2019 and received no comments.
In addition, as explained above, the revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
We are processing this as a proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulation described in the
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub.L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
[[Page 66098]]
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 22, 2019.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-6.030'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c)* * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval
Missouri citation Title effective date date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control
Regulations for the State of Missouri
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-6.030...................... Sampling Methods 11/30/2019 January 3, 2020, ...........................
for Air [Federal
Pollution Register
Sources. citation of the
final rule].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-26002 Filed 12-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
