Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Moody Air Force Base Comprehensive Airspace Initiative, Georgia, 65790-65791 [2019-25885]
Download as PDF
65790
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alberta E. Mills, Division of the
Secretariat, Office of the General
Counsel, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone 301–
504–7479; email: amills@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
For several years, CPSC has been
studying the potential risks associated
with crib bumpers. In May 2012, the
Juvenile Products Manufacturers
Associated (JPMA) submitted a petition
asking the Commission to initiate
rulemaking under sections 7 and 9 of
the Consumer Product Safety Act
(CPSA) to distinguish ‘‘hazardous
pillow-like’’ crib bumpers from ‘‘nonhazardous traditional’’ crib bumpers. In
2013, the Commission voted to grant the
petition and provided specific direction
to staff. In the FY 2017 Operating Plan,
the Commission directed staff to
develop a proposed standard under
section 104 of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA). On September 4, 2019, in
response to this direction, CPSC staff
submitted a briefing package, including
a draft proposed rule, for crib bumpers/
liners. [https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fspublic/Proposed%20Rule%20%20Safety%20Standard%20for
%20Crib%20Bumpers-Liners%20Under
%20the%20Danny%20..__0.pdf].
II. The Forum
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
A. Topics for Discussion
The Commission would like to hear
comments and information from
interested parties concerning the
potential hazards associated with crib
bumpers. The goal of the forum is to
hear from the public about their views
of the potential hazards associated with
crib bumpers and their suggestions for
ways to address those hazards. In
addition to these general issues, the
Commission invites comments on the
following, more specific topics:
1. The utility/benefit of crib bumpers,
including, but not limited to:
(a) Whether babies suffer head
injuries from crib slats without crib
bumpers; and
(b) whether babies suffer limb injuries
from entrapment in crib slats without
crib bumpers.
2. Consumers’ understanding of the
‘‘Bare is Best’’ safety messaging related
to infant sleep safety, including, but not
limited to, whether consumers consider
the presence of crib bumpers to be
consistent with that messaging.
3. Any current or proposed state laws
relating to crib bumpers, and whether
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Nov 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
and how those laws reflect or conflict
with staff’s recommendation.
4. Any performance requirements and
test methods for crib bumpers (or
similar crib accessories) relevant to the
identification and elimination of
suffocation hazards, including, but not
limited to:
(a) Air permeability;
(b) Firmness or the conforming of
bumper materials to the facial features
of infants, and
(c) Any other aspects of crib bumpers
(or similar crib accessories).
5. The potential effects of the
preemption of state and local laws
addressing crib bumpers.
B. How To Make a Presentation, Attend,
or Provide Written Comments
The forum will be held at 10 a.m. on
January 22, 2020, at the CPSC’s office in
Bethesda, MD (see the ADDRESSES
section of this notice for more
information). The Commission forum
will also be available through a webcast,
but viewers will not be able to interact
with the panels and presenters through
the webcast.
• If you would like to make an oral
presentation at the forum, please send
an email to cpsc-os@cpsc.gov by January
6, 2020, with a summary of your
presentation, as well as a brief
biography. Presentations should be
limited to approximately 10 minutes.
The Commission reserves the right to
impose further time limitations or other
restrictions, if needed, to avoid
duplication of presentations.
• If you would like to provide written
comments, please follow the
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of
this notice.
Abioye E. Mosheim,
Acting Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–25890 Filed 11–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Moody Air Force Base
Comprehensive Airspace Initiative,
Georgia
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DOD.
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
In accordance with 40 Code of
Federal Regulations Section 1508.22,
the United States Air Force (Air Force)
is issuing this notice of intent to prepare
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) to assess the potential
environmental consequences associated
with modifying existing and creating
new special use airspace (SUA) in the
Moody Airspace Complex to support the
training missions at Moody Air Force
Base (AFB).
DATES: A public scoping meeting will be
held at the University of Georgia, Tifton
Campus Conference Center, 15 R D C
Road, Tifton, Georgia 31794, on
Thursday, December 5, 2019, 5:00 p.m.
to 8:00 p.m. (local time). Although
comments can be submitted to the Air
Force any time during the EIS process,
scoping comments are requested by
December 20, 2019, to ensure full
consideration in the Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: For questions regarding the
Proposed Action, scoping, and EIS
development, please contact the Moody
AFB Public Affairs Office at (229) 257–
4146 or at 23wg.pa@us.af.mil. The
public and interested parties can submit
their comments through the project
website at
www.moodyafbairspaceeis.com; mail
comments to AFCEC/CZN, Attn: Moody
AFB Comprehensive Airspace Initiative,
2261 Hughes Avenue, Suite 155, JBSA
Lackland, TX 78236–9853; FedEx and
UPS deliveries to AFCEC/CZN, Attn:
Moody AFB Comprehensive Airspace
Initiative; 3515 S General McMullen,
San Antonio, TX 78226–9853; and/or
attend the public scoping meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Moody Airspace Complex, located
above 28 counties in south Georgia and
north Florida, consists primarily of midto higher-altitude (8,000 feet above
mean sea level [MSL] to FL180 [18,000
feet]) SUA with limited low-altitude
SUA (less than 8,000 feet MSL). A–10C,
A–29, HH–60G, and HC–130J aircrews
assigned to Moody Air Force Base
(AFB), Georgia, have severely
constrained access to few existing,
overly congested low-altitude SUAs
wherein they can conduct required
training operations at low-altitude to
gain operational proficiency and meet
their low-altitude close air support
(CAS), personnel recovery (PR), and
combat search and rescue (CSAR)
mission objectives for combat readiness.
Providing additional low-altitude
Moody AFB-controlled SUA would
support the low-altitude training
missions (CSAR, PR, CAS) for aircrews
stationed at Moody AFB to ensure
aircrew protection, readiness, and
increase aircrew lethality in addition to
survivability in real-world combat
situations.
The Air Force has preliminarily
identified three action alternatives to
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2019 / Notices
expand low-altitude training airspace at
Moody AFB as meeting the purpose of
and need for this Proposed Action, and
a No Action Alternative. The three
action alternatives would create new
low-altitude Military Operations Areas
(MOAs) beneath and within the lateral
confines of existing MOAs and
Restricted Areas of the Moody Airspace
Complex. While the three alternatives
are independent of each other, the
decision maker may choose to
implement one, a combination of lowaltitude MOAs from among the three, or
none of the alternatives based on the
analysis provided in the EIS. Alternative
1 would create the Corsair North Low,
Corsair South Low, Mustang Low, and
Warhawk Low MOAs with a floor of
1,000 feet AGL and a ceiling of 7,999
feet MSL; create a Thud Low MOA with
a floor of 4,000 feet AGL and a ceiling
of 7,999 feet MSL; a Grand Bay MOA
with a floor of 100 feet AGL and a
ceiling of 499 feet AGL; and lower the
floor of the existing Moody 2 North
MOA from 500 feet AGL to 100 feet
AGL. Alternative 2 would create and
modify MOAs as described under
Alternative 1, except that the new
Corsair North Low, Corsair South Low,
Mustang Low, and Warhawk Low MOAs
would be created with a floor of 2,000
feet AGL instead of 1,000 feet AGL.
Alternative 3 would create and modify
MOAs as described under Alternative 1,
except that the new Corsair North Low,
Corsair South Low, Mustang Low, and
Warhawk Low MOAs would be created
with a floor of 4,000 feet AGL instead
of 1,000 feet AGL.
Training within the new low MOAs
would include the use of chaff and
flares, with flare use limited to altitudes
above 2,000 feet AGL and no use of
chaff allowed in the Corsair North Low
MOA. Urban Close Air Support,
helicopter landing zones, drop zones,
and the use of training ordnance at the
Grand Bay Range would continue
unchanged under all three alternatives.
The Proposed Action would not change
the number of sorties at Moody AFB
airfield or the number of aircraft
operations in the Moody Airspace
Complex.
Under the No Action Alternative,
there would be no addition of lowaltitude SUA at Moody Airspace
Complex. As such, aircrews at Moody
AFB would either continue to conduct
limited training operations within
existing low-altitude MOAs or continue
the time- and cost-intensive practice of
scheduling and traveling to distant lowaltitude airspace complexes within the
region where their ability to actually
train within scheduled airspaces could
be denied. Under the No Action
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Nov 27, 2019
Jkt 250001
Alternative, the current airspace
constraints would continue and would
not provide for realistic training within
SUAs associated with Moody AFB. The
analysis of the No Action Alternative
will provide a benchmark to enable Air
Force decision makers to compare the
magnitude of the environmental effects
of the Proposed Action.
Scoping and Agency Coordination: To
effectively define the full range of issues
and alternatives to be evaluated in the
EIS, the Air Force will determine the
scope of the analysis by soliciting
comments from interested local, state,
and federal elected officials and
agencies, as well as interested members
of the public and others. The Air Force
will also pursue government-togovernment consultations with
interested Native American tribes.
Adriane Paris,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–25885 Filed 11–27–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; High
School Equivalency Program
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for
the High School Equivalency Program
(HEP), Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.141A.
This notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB
control number 1894–0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: December 2,
2019.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: January 28, 2020.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: March 30, 2020.
Pre-Application Webinar Information:
The Department will hold a preapplication workshop via webinar for
prospective applicants on December 11,
2019, 1:30 p.m. Eastern Time.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019
(84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
65791
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Carr, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 3E321, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 260–2067. Email:
steven.carr@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The HEP is
designed to assist migratory or seasonal
farmworkers (or immediate family
members of such workers) to obtain the
equivalent of a secondary school
diploma and subsequently to gain
improved employment, enter into
military service, or be placed in an
institution of higher education (IHE) or
other postsecondary education or
training.
Priorities: This competition includes
two competitive preference priorities
and one invitational priority.
Competitive Preference Priority 1 is
from the Secretary’s Final Supplemental
Priorities and Definitions for
Discretionary Grant Programs
(Supplemental Priorities) published in
the Federal Register on March 2, 2018
(83 FR 9096). In accordance with 34
CFR 75.105(b)(2)(iv), Competitive
Preference Priority 2 is from section
418A(e) of the Higher Education Act of
1965, as amended (HEA) (20 U.S.C.
1070d–2(e)). The purpose of the
program aligns with priority 9(c) of the
Supplemental Priorities, which
promotes projects aimed at creating or
supporting alternative paths to a regular
high school diploma (as defined in
section 8101(43) of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965, as
amended) or recognized postsecondary
credentials (as defined in section 3(52)
of the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act) for students whose
environments outside of school,
disengagement with a traditional
curriculum, homelessness, or other
challenges make it more difficult for
them to complete an educational
program.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2020 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to
an additional 5 points to an application
for Competitive Preference Priority 1
and up to an additional 15 points to an
E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM
29NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65790-65791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25885]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Moody Air Force Base Comprehensive Airspace Initiative, Georgia
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations Section
1508.22, the United States Air Force (Air Force) is issuing this notice
of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to assess
the potential environmental consequences associated with modifying
existing and creating new special use airspace (SUA) in the Moody
Airspace Complex to support the training missions at Moody Air Force
Base (AFB).
DATES: A public scoping meeting will be held at the University of
Georgia, Tifton Campus Conference Center, 15 R D C Road, Tifton,
Georgia 31794, on Thursday, December 5, 2019, 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
(local time). Although comments can be submitted to the Air Force any
time during the EIS process, scoping comments are requested by December
20, 2019, to ensure full consideration in the Draft EIS.
ADDRESSES: For questions regarding the Proposed Action, scoping, and
EIS development, please contact the Moody AFB Public Affairs Office at
(229) 257-4146 or at [email protected]. The public and interested
parties can submit their comments through the project website at
www.moodyafbairspaceeis.com; mail comments to AFCEC/CZN, Attn: Moody
AFB Comprehensive Airspace Initiative, 2261 Hughes Avenue, Suite 155,
JBSA Lackland, TX 78236-9853; FedEx and UPS deliveries to AFCEC/CZN,
Attn: Moody AFB Comprehensive Airspace Initiative; 3515 S General
McMullen, San Antonio, TX 78226-9853; and/or attend the public scoping
meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Moody Airspace Complex, located above 28
counties in south Georgia and north Florida, consists primarily of mid-
to higher-altitude (8,000 feet above mean sea level [MSL] to FL180
[18,000 feet]) SUA with limited low-altitude SUA (less than 8,000 feet
MSL). A-10C, A-29, HH-60G, and HC-130J aircrews assigned to Moody Air
Force Base (AFB), Georgia, have severely constrained access to few
existing, overly congested low-altitude SUAs wherein they can conduct
required training operations at low-altitude to gain operational
proficiency and meet their low-altitude close air support (CAS),
personnel recovery (PR), and combat search and rescue (CSAR) mission
objectives for combat readiness. Providing additional low-altitude
Moody AFB-controlled SUA would support the low-altitude training
missions (CSAR, PR, CAS) for aircrews stationed at Moody AFB to ensure
aircrew protection, readiness, and increase aircrew lethality in
addition to survivability in real-world combat situations.
The Air Force has preliminarily identified three action
alternatives to
[[Page 65791]]
expand low-altitude training airspace at Moody AFB as meeting the
purpose of and need for this Proposed Action, and a No Action
Alternative. The three action alternatives would create new low-
altitude Military Operations Areas (MOAs) beneath and within the
lateral confines of existing MOAs and Restricted Areas of the Moody
Airspace Complex. While the three alternatives are independent of each
other, the decision maker may choose to implement one, a combination of
low-altitude MOAs from among the three, or none of the alternatives
based on the analysis provided in the EIS. Alternative 1 would create
the Corsair North Low, Corsair South Low, Mustang Low, and Warhawk Low
MOAs with a floor of 1,000 feet AGL and a ceiling of 7,999 feet MSL;
create a Thud Low MOA with a floor of 4,000 feet AGL and a ceiling of
7,999 feet MSL; a Grand Bay MOA with a floor of 100 feet AGL and a
ceiling of 499 feet AGL; and lower the floor of the existing Moody 2
North MOA from 500 feet AGL to 100 feet AGL. Alternative 2 would create
and modify MOAs as described under Alternative 1, except that the new
Corsair North Low, Corsair South Low, Mustang Low, and Warhawk Low MOAs
would be created with a floor of 2,000 feet AGL instead of 1,000 feet
AGL. Alternative 3 would create and modify MOAs as described under
Alternative 1, except that the new Corsair North Low, Corsair South
Low, Mustang Low, and Warhawk Low MOAs would be created with a floor of
4,000 feet AGL instead of 1,000 feet AGL.
Training within the new low MOAs would include the use of chaff and
flares, with flare use limited to altitudes above 2,000 feet AGL and no
use of chaff allowed in the Corsair North Low MOA. Urban Close Air
Support, helicopter landing zones, drop zones, and the use of training
ordnance at the Grand Bay Range would continue unchanged under all
three alternatives. The Proposed Action would not change the number of
sorties at Moody AFB airfield or the number of aircraft operations in
the Moody Airspace Complex.
Under the No Action Alternative, there would be no addition of low-
altitude SUA at Moody Airspace Complex. As such, aircrews at Moody AFB
would either continue to conduct limited training operations within
existing low-altitude MOAs or continue the time- and cost-intensive
practice of scheduling and traveling to distant low-altitude airspace
complexes within the region where their ability to actually train
within scheduled airspaces could be denied. Under the No Action
Alternative, the current airspace constraints would continue and would
not provide for realistic training within SUAs associated with Moody
AFB. The analysis of the No Action Alternative will provide a benchmark
to enable Air Force decision makers to compare the magnitude of the
environmental effects of the Proposed Action.
Scoping and Agency Coordination: To effectively define the full
range of issues and alternatives to be evaluated in the EIS, the Air
Force will determine the scope of the analysis by soliciting comments
from interested local, state, and federal elected officials and
agencies, as well as interested members of the public and others. The
Air Force will also pursue government-to-government consultations with
interested Native American tribes.
Adriane Paris,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019-25885 Filed 11-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P