Cyflumetofen; Pesticide Tolerances, 64777-64779 [2019-25543]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.586, add alphabetically the
entry ‘‘Persimmon 1’’ to the table in
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 180.586 Clothianidin; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Persimmon 1 ................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
I. General Information
*
0.5
*
*
[FR Doc. 2019–25535 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0636; FRL–9996–61]
Cyflumetofen; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes a
tolerance for residues of the insecticide
cyflumetofen in or on coffee, green
bean. OAT Agrio. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan c/
o Landis International, Inc. requested
this tolerance under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
November 25, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before January 24, 2020 and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0636, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael L. Goodis, P.E., Director,
Registration Division (750P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
main telephone number: (703) 305–
7090; email address: RDFRNotices@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2018–0636 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
January 24, 2020. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64777
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2018–0636, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of October 24,
2018 (83 FR 53594) (FRL–9983–46),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 8E8693) by OAT
Agrio. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, c/o Landis
International, Inc., 3185 Madison
Highway, P.O. Box 5126, Valdosta,
Georgia 31603–5126. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.677 be
amended by establishing a tolerance for
residues of the insecticide cyflumetofen,
(2-methoxyethyl a-cyano-a-[4-(1,1dimethylethyl)phenyl]-b-oxo-2(trifluoromethyl)benzenepropanoate), in
or on coffee, green bean at 0.08 parts per
million (ppm). That document
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by OAT Agrio. Ltd. c/o Landis
International, Inc., the registrant, which
is available in docket number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2018–0636, https://
www.regulations.gov. These tolerances
were requested to cover residues of
cyflumetofen in or on coffee, green bean
resulting from use of this pesticide on
coffee outside the United States. There
is no current U.S. registration for use of
cyflumetofen on coffee. There were no
substantive comments received in
response to the notice of filing for this
pesticide petition.
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64778
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Based upon review of the data
supporting the referenced petition, EPA
is establishing a tolerance for residues of
cyflumetofen on coffee, green bean.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for cyflumetofen in
or on coffee, green bean.
On May 8, 2019 (82 FR 20037) (FRL–
9990–60), EPA published in the Federal
Register a final rule establishing a
tolerance for residues of the insecticide
cyflumetofen in or on tea, dried is safe
for the general population, including
infants and children. See 84 FR 20037
(FRL–9990–60). That document
contains a summary of the toxicological
profile and points of departure,
assumptions for exposure assessment,
and the safety factor for children, which
have not changed. The Agency
conducted a revised risk assessment to
incorporate exposure to residues of
cyflumetofen from use on coffee.
EPA’s exposure assessments have
been updated to include the additional
exposure from use of cyflumetofen on
coffee, i.e., reliance on tolerance-level
residues and an assumption of 100
percent crop treated (PCT). Because the
use on coffee is not an approved
domestic use, there is no expectation of
an increased exposure in drinking water
or for non-dietary, non-occupational
sources, although the additional dietary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
exposure contributes to overall
aggregate exposure. Further information
about EPA’s risk assessment and
determination of safety supporting the
tolerances established in the May 8,
2019 Federal Register action, as well as
the new cyflumetofen tolerance can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov in
the document entitled ‘‘Cyflumetofen.
Human Health Risk Assessment to
Support New Uses on Imported Tea,’’
dated March 4, 2019. The documents
can be found in docket ID EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0532.
As indicated in the supporting
documents, no acute dietary exposure
and risk analysis was performed for
cyflumetofen since there were no
appropriate studies identified in the
toxicology database that demonstrated
evidence of toxicity attributable to a
single dose. Chronic dietary risks are
below the Agency’s level of concern:
2.4% of the chronic population adjusted
dose (cPAD) for children 1–2 years old,
the group with the highest exposure
level. Moreover, the short-term
aggregate risk for the population with
the highest total exposure (adults 50–99
years old) was chosen since this is
protective for all other adult subpopulations. There are no residential
exposures expected for children;
therefore, a short-term aggregate risk
assessment for children is equal to the
chronic food and drinking water
exposure and risk estimates and is not
of concern. Using the exposure
assumptions described for short-term
exposures, EPA has concluded the
combined short-term food, water, and
residential exposures result in aggregate
MOEs above the LOC of 100 for all
scenarios assessed and are not of
concern.
Therefore, based on the risk
assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to cyflumetofen residues.
More detailed information on the
subject action to establish a tolerance in
or on coffee, green bean can be found in
the document entitled, ‘‘Cyflumetofen.
Human Health Risk Assessment to
Support New Uses without U.S.
Registration in/on Imported Coffee,’’
dated September 16, 2019, by going to
https://www.regulations.gov. The
referenced document is available in the
docket established by this action, which
is described under ADDRESSES. Locate
and click on the hyperlink for docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2018–0636.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An adequate enforcement
methodology is available to enforce the
HED-recommended tolerances for
cyflumetofen in plant commodities. The
high-performance liquid
chromatography with tandem mass
spectrometry (HPLC–MS/MS) method
has been adequately validated, has
undergone a successful ILV
(independent laboratory validation), is
considered adequately radio-validated
and has been reviewed by the Agency
for appropriateness as an enforcement
method. The method limit of
quantitation (LOQ) for residues of
cyflumetofen in coffee is 0.01 ppm.
Cyflumetofen has also been subjected to
analysis by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) multi-residue
method (MRM) protocols. Cyflumetofen
is not adequately recovered through any
of the FDA multi-residue protocols.
The method may be requested from:
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
Codex has not established maximum
residue limits (MRLs) for residues of
cyflumetofen in coffee commodities;
therefore, there are no harmonization
issues.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, a tolerance is established
for residues of the insecticide
cyflumetofen, (2-methoxyethyl a-cyanoa-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-b-oxo-
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
2-(trifluoromethyl)benzenepropanoate),
in or on coffee, green bean at 0.08 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
64779
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
*
VII. Congressional Review Act
Federal Travel Regulation; Taxes on
Relocation Expenses, Relocation
Expense Reimbursement
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 8, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.677, add a footnote and
alphabetically the entry for ‘‘Coffee,
green bean 2’’ to the table in paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
■
§ 180.677 Cyflumetofen; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
*
*
Coffee, green bean
*
*
2
Parts per
million
*
.............
*
*
*
0.08
*
*
2 There are no U.S. registrations for these
commodities as of November 25, 2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Parts 302–1, 302–2, 302–4, and
302–17
[FTR Amendment 2020–02; FTR Case 2019–
302; Docket No. 2019–0011, Sequence 1]
RIN 3090–AK00
Office of Government-wide
Policy (OGP), General Services
Administration (GSA).
AGENCY:
Direct final rule; request for
comments.
ACTION:
The General Services
Administration (GSA), in consultation
with the Secretary of the Treasury, is
issuing a direct final rule to amend the
Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) to
authorize relocation reimbursement for
a number of expenditures. This
amendment is necessary because the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017
suspended both the moving expenses
income tax deduction and the exclusion
from income for qualified moving
expense reimbursements for tax years
2018 through 2025.
SUMMARY:
Effective date: This rule is
effective on January 9, 2020 without
further action, unless GSA receives
adverse comments by December 26,
2019. GSA will consider whether these
comments are significant enough to
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect. Please see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for more information on
significant adverse comments.
Applicability date: This direct final
rule is applicable to employees who are
authorized reimbursement for relocation
expenses under the FTR and who
receive some or all reimbursements,
direct payments, or indirect payments
on or after January 1, 2018, and on or
before December 31, 2025.
Comment Date: Interested parties
should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat Division at one of
the addresses shown below on or before
December 26, 2019 to be considered in
the formation of the final rule.
DATES:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
Commodity
*
[FR Doc. 2019–25543 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64777-64779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25543]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0636; FRL-9996-61]
Cyflumetofen; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of the
insecticide cyflumetofen in or on coffee, green bean. OAT Agrio. Ltd.,
Tokyo, Japan c/o Landis International, Inc. requested this tolerance
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective November 25, 2019. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 24, 2020
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0636, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael L. Goodis, P.E., Director,
Registration Division (750P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0636 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
January 24, 2020. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0636, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of October 24, 2018 (83 FR 53594) (FRL-
9983-46), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
8E8693) by OAT Agrio. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, c/o Landis International,
Inc., 3185 Madison Highway, P.O. Box 5126, Valdosta, Georgia 31603-
5126. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.677 be amended by
establishing a tolerance for residues of the insecticide cyflumetofen,
(2-methoxyethyl [alpha]-cyano-[alpha]-[4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-
[beta]-oxo-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzenepropanoate), in or on coffee,
green bean at 0.08 parts per million (ppm). That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by OAT Agrio. Ltd. c/o Landis
International, Inc., the registrant, which is available in docket
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0636, https://www.regulations.gov. These
tolerances were requested to cover residues of cyflumetofen in or on
coffee, green bean resulting from use of this pesticide on coffee
outside the United States. There is no current U.S. registration for
use of cyflumetofen on coffee. There were no substantive comments
received in response to the notice of filing for this pesticide
petition.
[[Page 64778]]
Based upon review of the data supporting the referenced petition,
EPA is establishing a tolerance for residues of cyflumetofen on coffee,
green bean.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for cyflumetofen in or on coffee,
green bean.
On May 8, 2019 (82 FR 20037) (FRL-9990-60), EPA published in the
Federal Register a final rule establishing a tolerance for residues of
the insecticide cyflumetofen in or on tea, dried is safe for the
general population, including infants and children. See 84 FR 20037
(FRL-9990-60). That document contains a summary of the toxicological
profile and points of departure, assumptions for exposure assessment,
and the safety factor for children, which have not changed. The Agency
conducted a revised risk assessment to incorporate exposure to residues
of cyflumetofen from use on coffee.
EPA's exposure assessments have been updated to include the
additional exposure from use of cyflumetofen on coffee, i.e., reliance
on tolerance-level residues and an assumption of 100 percent crop
treated (PCT). Because the use on coffee is not an approved domestic
use, there is no expectation of an increased exposure in drinking water
or for non-dietary, non-occupational sources, although the additional
dietary exposure contributes to overall aggregate exposure. Further
information about EPA's risk assessment and determination of safety
supporting the tolerances established in the May 8, 2019 Federal
Register action, as well as the new cyflumetofen tolerance can be found
at https://www.regulations.gov in the document entitled ``Cyflumetofen.
Human Health Risk Assessment to Support New Uses on Imported Tea,''
dated March 4, 2019. The documents can be found in docket ID EPA-HQ-
OPP-2017-0532.
As indicated in the supporting documents, no acute dietary exposure
and risk analysis was performed for cyflumetofen since there were no
appropriate studies identified in the toxicology database that
demonstrated evidence of toxicity attributable to a single dose.
Chronic dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern: 2.4% of
the chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD) for children 1-2 years old,
the group with the highest exposure level. Moreover, the short-term
aggregate risk for the population with the highest total exposure
(adults 50-99 years old) was chosen since this is protective for all
other adult sub-populations. There are no residential exposures
expected for children; therefore, a short-term aggregate risk
assessment for children is equal to the chronic food and drinking water
exposure and risk estimates and is not of concern. Using the exposure
assumptions described for short-term exposures, EPA has concluded the
combined short-term food, water, and residential exposures result in
aggregate MOEs above the LOC of 100 for all scenarios assessed and are
not of concern.
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to cyflumetofen residues. More detailed information
on the subject action to establish a tolerance in or on coffee, green
bean can be found in the document entitled, ``Cyflumetofen. Human
Health Risk Assessment to Support New Uses without U.S. Registration
in/on Imported Coffee,'' dated September 16, 2019, by going to https://www.regulations.gov. The referenced document is available in the docket
established by this action, which is described under ADDRESSES. Locate
and click on the hyperlink for docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0636.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An adequate enforcement methodology is available to enforce the
HED-recommended tolerances for cyflumetofen in plant commodities. The
high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry
(HPLC-MS/MS) method has been adequately validated, has undergone a
successful ILV (independent laboratory validation), is considered
adequately radio-validated and has been reviewed by the Agency for
appropriateness as an enforcement method. The method limit of
quantitation (LOQ) for residues of cyflumetofen in coffee is 0.01 ppm.
Cyflumetofen has also been subjected to analysis by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) multi-residue method (MRM) protocols. Cyflumetofen
is not adequately recovered through any of the FDA multi-residue
protocols.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address:
[email protected].
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
Codex has not established maximum residue limits (MRLs) for
residues of cyflumetofen in coffee commodities; therefore, there are no
harmonization issues.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, a tolerance is established for residues of the
insecticide cyflumetofen, (2-methoxyethyl [alpha]-cyano-[alpha]-[4-
(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-[beta]-oxo-
[[Page 64779]]
2-(trifluoromethyl)benzenepropanoate), in or on coffee, green bean at
0.08 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is considered a regulatory
action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulations and
Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This
action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR
7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 8, 2019.
Michael Goodis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.677, add a footnote and alphabetically the entry for
``Coffee, green bean \2\'' to the table in paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.677 Cyflumetofen; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ There are no U.S. registrations for these commodities as of
November 25, 2019.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Coffee, green bean \ 2\.................................... 0.08
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2019-25543 Filed 11-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P