Simplified Proceedings, 64754 [2019-25503]
Download as PDF
64754
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
material fact not appearing in the
record, the administrative law judge
shall so state in his findings and any
party shall, on timely request, be
afforded an opportunity to show facts to
the contrary.
§ 771.136
Availability.
A copy of the record shall be available
for inspection or copying by the parties
to the proceedings during business
hours at the office of the administrative
law judge or the Director of Industry
Operations or, pending administrative
review, at the Office of the Director.
Dated: November 5, 2019.
William P. Barr,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2019–24570 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 2700
Simplified Proceedings
Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
AGENCY:
The Federal Mine Safety and
Health Review Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is an independent
adjudicatory agency that provides
hearings and appellate review of cases
arising under the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977. On October 11,
2019, the Commission published in the
Federal Register a direct final rule
which would withdraw the
Commission’s procedures for simplified
proceedings. The Commission received
one comment on the rule and is
confirming the withdrawal of its
simplified proceeding rules.
DATES: The effective date of November
25, 2019, for the direct final rule
published October 11, 2019 (84 FR
54782), is confirmed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Stewart, Deputy General Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, Federal
Mine Safety and Health Review
Commission, at (202) 434–9935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
A. Background
In 2010, the Commission published in
the Federal Register a final rule to
simplify the procedures for handling
certain civil penalty proceedings. The
Commission evaluated the procedures
in a pilot program extending almost
nine years.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
Based upon its evaluation of the
simplified proceedings pilot program,
the Commission determined that a
special set of procedures for its simplest
cases is not necessary at the present
time. The Commission’s overall
caseload has decreased since the
simplified proceedings rule was
promulgated. Moreover, parties may
request on a case-by-case basis that the
Commission adapt the Commission’s
conventional procedures as necessary to
expedite or simplify the processing of a
case.
On October 11, 2019 (84 FR 54782),
the Commission published a direct final
rule withdrawing the simplified
proceedings rule and permitting
comment. The Commission received
one comment from the Solicitor of
Labor, on behalf of the U.S. Department
of Labor. The Solicitor made no specific
comments on the procedural rules
themselves. Rather, the Solicitor
suggested that the Commission should
solicit more comments and data on the
manner to improve the proceedings,
including considering in part the
simplified proceeding rules of the
Occupational Safety and Health Review
Commission (‘‘OSHRC’’).
The Commission already considered
OSHRC’s simplified proceeding rules in
its determination that the Commission’s
simplified rules should be withdrawn.
Having considered the comments
received, the Commission has
determined that subpart J should be
withdrawn at the present time. If
practice proves the necessity for
different rules applicable to the
Commission’s simplest cases, the
Commission will publish a proposal of
such rules at that time.
B. Notice and Public Procedure
1. Executive Orders
The Commission is an independent
regulatory agency under section 3(b) of
Executive Order (‘‘E.O.’’) 12866 (Sept.
30, 1993), 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993);
E.O. 13563 (Jan. 18, 2011), 76 FR 3821
(Jan. 21, 2011); E.O. 13771 (Jan. 30,
2017), 82 FR 9339 (Feb. 3, 2017); E.O.
13777 (Feb. 24, 2017), 82 FR 12285
(Mar. 1, 2017); and E.O. 13132 (Aug. 4,
1999), 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999).
The Commission has determined that
this rulemaking does not have ‘‘takings
implications’’ under E.O. 12630 (Mar.
15, 1988), 53 FR 8859 (Mar. 18, 1988).
The Commission has determined that
these regulations meet all applicable
standards set forth in E.O. 12988 (Feb.
5, 1996), 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996).
2. Statutory Requirements
The Commission has determined that
this rulemaking is exempt from the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (‘‘RFA’’) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), because the rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Commission has determined that
this rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (‘‘SBREFA’’) (5 U.S.C.
804(2)).
The Commission has determined that
the Paperwork Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’)
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) does not apply
because these rules do not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the OMB.
The Commission has determined that
the Congressional Review Act (‘‘CRA’’)
(5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) does not apply
because, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C),
these rules are rules of agency
procedure or practice that do not
substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
The Commission has determined that
this rulemaking is not a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment requiring an
environmental assessment under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(‘‘NEPA’’) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
The Commission is an independent
regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(‘‘UMRA’’) (2 U.S.C. 1532 et seq.).
Dated: November 20, 2019.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.,
Chairman, Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–25503 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9 and 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2018–0627; FRL–10001–
30]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances (18–1)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is issuing significant new
use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 22
chemical substances which are the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). The chemical substances are
subject to Orders issued by EPA under
TSCA. This action requires persons who
intend to manufacture (defined by
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25503]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 2700
Simplified Proceedings
AGENCY: Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the
``Commission'') is an independent adjudicatory agency that provides
hearings and appellate review of cases arising under the Federal Mine
Safety and Health Act of 1977. On October 11, 2019, the Commission
published in the Federal Register a direct final rule which would
withdraw the Commission's procedures for simplified proceedings. The
Commission received one comment on the rule and is confirming the
withdrawal of its simplified proceeding rules.
DATES: The effective date of November 25, 2019, for the direct final
rule published October 11, 2019 (84 FR 54782), is confirmed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Stewart, Deputy General Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review
Commission, at (202) 434-9935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
In 2010, the Commission published in the Federal Register a final
rule to simplify the procedures for handling certain civil penalty
proceedings. The Commission evaluated the procedures in a pilot program
extending almost nine years.
Based upon its evaluation of the simplified proceedings pilot
program, the Commission determined that a special set of procedures for
its simplest cases is not necessary at the present time. The
Commission's overall caseload has decreased since the simplified
proceedings rule was promulgated. Moreover, parties may request on a
case-by-case basis that the Commission adapt the Commission's
conventional procedures as necessary to expedite or simplify the
processing of a case.
On October 11, 2019 (84 FR 54782), the Commission published a
direct final rule withdrawing the simplified proceedings rule and
permitting comment. The Commission received one comment from the
Solicitor of Labor, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Labor. The
Solicitor made no specific comments on the procedural rules themselves.
Rather, the Solicitor suggested that the Commission should solicit more
comments and data on the manner to improve the proceedings, including
considering in part the simplified proceeding rules of the Occupational
Safety and Health Review Commission (``OSHRC'').
The Commission already considered OSHRC's simplified proceeding
rules in its determination that the Commission's simplified rules
should be withdrawn. Having considered the comments received, the
Commission has determined that subpart J should be withdrawn at the
present time. If practice proves the necessity for different rules
applicable to the Commission's simplest cases, the Commission will
publish a proposal of such rules at that time.
B. Notice and Public Procedure
1. Executive Orders
The Commission is an independent regulatory agency under section
3(b) of Executive Order (``E.O.'') 12866 (Sept. 30, 1993), 58 FR 51735
(Oct. 4, 1993); E.O. 13563 (Jan. 18, 2011), 76 FR 3821 (Jan. 21, 2011);
E.O. 13771 (Jan. 30, 2017), 82 FR 9339 (Feb. 3, 2017); E.O. 13777 (Feb.
24, 2017), 82 FR 12285 (Mar. 1, 2017); and E.O. 13132 (Aug. 4, 1999),
64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999).
The Commission has determined that this rulemaking does not have
``takings implications'' under E.O. 12630 (Mar. 15, 1988), 53 FR 8859
(Mar. 18, 1988).
The Commission has determined that these regulations meet all
applicable standards set forth in E.O. 12988 (Feb. 5, 1996), 61 FR 4729
(Feb. 7, 1996).
2. Statutory Requirements
The Commission has determined that this rulemaking is exempt from
the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA'') (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.), because the rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Commission has determined that this rule is not a ``major
rule'' under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(``SBREFA'') (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
The Commission has determined that the Paperwork Reduction Act
(``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) does not apply because these rules
do not contain any information collection requirements that require the
approval of the OMB.
The Commission has determined that the Congressional Review Act
(``CRA'') (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) does not apply because, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 804(3)(C), these rules are rules of agency procedure or practice
that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-
agency parties.
The Commission has determined that this rulemaking is not a major
Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human
environment requiring an environmental assessment under the National
Environmental Policy Act (``NEPA'') (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
The Commission is an independent regulatory agency, and as such, is
not subject to the requirements of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(``UMRA'') (2 U.S.C. 1532 et seq.).
Dated: November 20, 2019.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.,
Chairman, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019-25503 Filed 11-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-P