Rules of Practice in Explosives License and Permit Proceedings (2007R-5P); Revisions Reflecting Changes Consistent With the Homeland Security Act of 2002, 64740-64754 [2019-24570]
Download as PDF
64740
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility to minimize
burden.
This rule makes only a procedural
change to allow flexibility to manage
and oversee the Job Corps procurement
process in a manner that the Department
determines appropriate. Therefore, this
rule is not expected to have any
regulatory impacts.
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
at 5 U.S.C. 603(a), requires agencies to
prepare and make available for public
comment an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis, which describes the impact of
the final rule on small entities. Section
605 of the RFA allows an agency to
certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an
analysis, if the final rule is not expected
to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This final rule does not affect
small entities as defined in the RFA.
Therefore, the Department certifies that
the final rule will not have a significant
economic impacts on a substantial
number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
Department consider the impact of
paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the
public. The Department has determined
that this rule does not alter any
information collection burdens.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Section 6 of E.O. 13132 requires
Federal agencies to consult with State
entities when a regulation or policy may
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, within the
meaning of the E.O. Section 3(b) of the
E.O. further provides that Federal
agencies must implement regulations
that have a substantial direct effect only
if statutory authority permits the
regulation and it is of national
significance.
This final rule does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States,
the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
levels of government, within the
meaning of the E.O. This final rule
merely makes a procedural change for
internal Departmental operations and
management for Job Corps procurement.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This regulatory action has been
reviewed in accordance with the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(the Reform Act). Under the Reform Act,
a Federal agency must determine
whether a regulation proposes a Federal
mandate that would result in the
increased expenditures by State, local,
or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any single year. This final
rule merely makes an administrative
change regarding the Departmental
entity authorized for Job Corps
procurement responsibilities. Therefore,
the relevant requirements the Reform
Act do not apply.
Executive Order 13175 (Indian Tribal
Governments)
The Department has reviewed the
final rule under the terms of E.O. 13175
and DOL’s Tribal Consultation Policy,
and have concluded that the changes to
regulatory text which are the focus of
the final rule would not have tribal
implications, as these changes do not
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, nor the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Therefore, no consultations with tribal
governments, officials, or other tribal
institutions were necessary.
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 686
Employment, Grant programs—labor,
Job Corps.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department amends 20
CFR part 686 as follows:
PART 686—THE JOBS CORPS UNDER
TITLE I OF THE WORKFORCE
INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT
1. The authority citation for part 686
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 142, 144, 146, 147, 159,
189, 503, Pub. L. 113–128, 128 Stat. 1425
(Jul. 22, 2014).
2. Amend § 686.310 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 686.310 How are entities selected to
receive funding to operate centers?
(a) The Secretary selects eligible
entities to operate contract centers on a
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 686.340 How are entities selected to
receive funding to provide outreach and
admission, career transition and other
operations support services?
(a) The Secretary selects eligible
entities to provide outreach and
admission, career transition, and
operational services on a competitive
basis in accordance with applicable
statutes and regulations. In selecting an
entity, the Secretary issues requests for
proposals (RFP) for operational support
services according to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter
1) and Department of Labor Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29). The
Secretary develops RFPs for operational
support services in consultation with
the Governor, the center workforce
council (if established), and the Local
WDB for the workforce development
area in which the center is located.
*
*
*
*
*
John Pallasch,
Assistant Secretary for Employment and
Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2019–25441 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
Amended Regulatory Text
PO 00000
competitive basis in accordance with
applicable statutes and regulations. In
selecting an entity, the Secretary issues
requests for proposals (RFPs) for the
operation of all contract centers
according to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) and
Department of Labor Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29). The
Secretary develops RFPs for center
operators in consultation with the
Governor, the center workforce council
(if established), and the Local WDB for
the workforce development area in
which the center is located.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 686.340 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
27 CFR Parts 478, 555, and 771
[Docket No. ATF 33F; AG Order No. 4577–
2019]
RIN 1140–AA40
Rules of Practice in Explosives
License and Permit Proceedings
(2007R–5P); Revisions Reflecting
Changes Consistent With the
Homeland Security Act of 2002
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Department of Justice is
amending the regulations of the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives (ATF) concerning
procedures and practices in connection
with denials of initial applications,
denials of renewals, and revocations of
explosives licenses or permits. These
regulations are being codified in a new
part entitled, ‘‘Rules and Practice in
License and Permit Proceedings.’’ These
regulations are based upon the
regulations that ATF relied upon prior
to its transfer from the Department of
the Treasury to the Department of
Justice. This final rule makes minor
revisions to regulations governing
administrative proceedings related to
the denial, suspension, or revocation of
a license, and the imposition of a civil
fine under Federal firearms law to
reference regulations under ATF
authority. These revisions remove all
references to statutes, regulations,
positions, and other terms that are
applicable only to the Department of the
Treasury. These revisions reflect ATF’s
position as a regulatory and
enforcement agency under the
Department of Justice and are consistent
with the regulations governing
administrative hearing processes for
explosives licenses and permits.
DATES: This rule is effective December
26, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs
and Services, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice, 99 New York
Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20226;
telephone: (202) 648–7070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The Attorney General has delegated to
the Director of ATF responsibility for
administering and enforcing title I of the
Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA), Public
Law 90–618, as amended, 18 U.S.C.
chapter 44, relating to commerce in
firearms and ammunition; and title XI,
Regulation of Explosives, of the
Organized Crime Control Act of 1970
(OCCA), Public Law 91–452, as
amended, 18 U.S.C. chapter 40. See 18
U.S.C. 926(a); 18 U.S.C. 843; 28 CFR
0.130. Under the GCA, ATF has the
authority to license applicants, renew
licenses, and revoke Federal firearms
licenses. 18 U.S.C. 923. The OCCA, as
amended by the Safe Explosives Act,
title XI, subtitle C of Public Law 107–
296, the Homeland Security Act of 2002
(enacted November 25, 2002),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
authorizes ATF to provide licenses and
permits to qualified applicants for the
acquisition, distribution, storage, or use
of explosive materials and to renew or
revoke such licenses and permits. 18
U.S.C. 843.
A. Rules of Practice in Permit
Proceedings (27 CFR Part 71)
On November 25, 2002, President
George W. Bush signed the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107–
296 (the Act), which divided the
regulatory functions of the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms into
two separate agencies. The Act renamed
the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and
Firearms as the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and
transferred law enforcement and certain
regulatory functions to the Department
of Justice. The Act also retained in the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury)
certain functions of the former Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The
functions retained by Treasury became
the responsibility of a new Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).
As a result of the Act, TTB has all
regulatory authority under 27 CFR part
71 and ATF therefore cannot
promulgate new regulations under that
part, although ATF has continued to
follow the procedures set forth in part
71 to administer hearings related to the
application and revocation of Federal
explosives licenses and permits. See 28
CFR 0.133(a)(2).
B. License Proceedings (27 CFR Part
478)
Regulations that implement the
provisions of the GCA are set forth in 27
CFR part 478. Subpart E of part 478
relates to proceedings involving Federal
firearms licensees, including the denial,
suspension, or revocation of licenses
and the imposition of civil fines.
Specifically, 27 CFR 478.76 provides
that, at a hearing for the disapproval of
applications for firearms licenses, for
the denial, suspension, or revocation of
a firearms license, or for imposition of
a civil fine under Federal firearms law,
an applicant or licensee may be
represented by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person
recognized to practice before ATF as
provided in 31 CFR part 8, if the
representative complies with the
applicable practice requirements of 26
CFR 601.521 through 601.527.
C. License and Permit Proceedings (27
CFR Part 555)
The regulations that implement OCCA
procedural and substantive
requirements are found in 27 CFR part
555. Subpart E of part 555 relates to
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64741
proceedings involving Federal
explosives licensees and permittees,
including the denial of an initial
application, denial of a renewal, and
revocation of a license or permit.
Specifically, 27 CFR 555.78 provides
that, at a hearing for the disapproval of
applications for explosives licenses, and
for the denial of renewal or revocation
of such licenses or permits under
Federal explosives law, an applicant,
licensee, or permittee may be
represented by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person
recognized to practice before ATF as
provided in 31 CFR part 8, if the
representative complies with the
applicable practice requirements of 26
CFR 601.521 through 601.527.
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On October 7, 2014, the Department
of Justice published a notice of
proposed rulemaking with a request for
comments entitled, ‘‘Rules of Practice in
Explosives License and Permit
Proceedings (2007R–5P); Revisions
Reflecting Changes Consistent with the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.’’ 79 FR
60391–60405. The proposed rule sought
to revise ATF regulations to add a new
part that implements 18 U.S.C. 843 and
847 relating to the procedures and
practice for the denials of initial
applications, denials of renewal, and
revocations of explosives licenses or
permits by ATF under Federal
explosives law. Additionally, the
proposed rule sought to make minor
revisions to regulations governing
administrative proceedings related to
the denial, suspension, or revocation of
a license, and the imposition of a civil
fine under Federal firearms law to
reference regulations under ATF
authority. These changes clarify ATF’s
role in explosives license proceedings
and remove references to any
regulations outside the scope of ATF’s
authority.
Comments on the notice of proposed
rulemaking were to be submitted to ATF
on or before January 5, 2015.
III. Comment Analysis and Department
Response
Comments Received
In response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking, ATF received two
comments. One commenter is an
explosive and fertilizer trade
association; and the other is a university
student. Both commenters support
ATF’s proposal to transfer and
consolidate regulations governing
explosives license applications and
renewals or revocation of licenses and
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64742
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
permits, improving the enforcement of
ATF’s regulations.
One of the commenters, the Institute
of Makers of Explosives (IME), notes
that the creation of a new part 771
addresses jurisdictional and authority
issues within ATF. IME agrees that ATF
should maintain jurisdiction for all
explosives programs and since the
regulatory authority over part 71 resides
with another agency, ATF should
promulgate new regulations affecting
the procedures for hearings that it is
responsible for conducting. IME further
states: ‘‘If promulgated, the new Part
will bring all administrative and
enforcement responsibilities connected
with the explosives licensing and
permitting program under the
jurisdiction of ATF and will allow the
Bureau, itself, to affect any necessary
changes to the procedural rules
governing its due process proceedings.’’
Further, IME agrees with ATF’s
clarification of 27 CFR 555.78 that will
allow for self-representation in licensing
and permit hearings conducted by ATF.
The second commenter, a student,
generally supports the rule because the
proscribed regulation changes will not
hurt the economy but rather ‘‘help[s] the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, State, local, or tribal government
and communities.’’ The same
commenter further notes that the rule
gives every person the right to due
process if their application has been
denied for a firearm.
Department Response
The Department agrees that by
promulgating regulations in a new part,
27 CFR part 771, ATF will be able to
better govern and administer explosives
license and permit proceedings that
come under its jurisdiction.
IV. Final Rule
This final rule implements the
amendments to the regulations in 27
CFR 478.76, 555.73, 555.75, 555.78,
555.79, 555.82, and adds new part 771,
as specified in the notice of proposed
rulemaking published on October 7,
2014 (79 FR 60391–60405).
Additionally, this final rule includes
some minor technical amendments.
First, in 27 CFR 771.5, the definition of
‘‘Application’’ is amended to include
renewal applications and the definition
of ‘‘Person’’ is amended to include
‘‘company.’’ Second, § 771.59, which
governs an initial application for a
license or permit, is amended to
eliminate the statement that a request
for hearing should include a statement
of the reasons for a hearing; this change
makes this provision consistent with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
requirements for an existing Federal
explosive licensee requesting a hearing
in § 771.60. Third, §§ 771.59 and 771.60
are amended to add that the licensee or
permittee will receive notice of the
assignment of an administrative law
judge (ALJ) by the Director of Industry
Operations (DIO), if the ALJ has not
already provided such notice; this
clarifies that the ALJ will often provide
this notification but the DIO must
provide this notice if not already
provided by the ALJ. Fourth, a reference
to § 771.59 is added in § 771.64, which
concerns part of the process following a
request for a hearing, to reflect the fact
that requests for a hearing can be made
as a result of denial of an initial
application in addition to the revocation
or denial of a renewal application. Fifth,
§ 771.82 is amended to include a
statement that the Federal Rules of
Evidence are not binding on these
proceedings, and to include a reference
to expert testimony and the relevant
Federal Rule of Evidence in § 771.82(a).
These changes are necessary to clarify
what is admissible in a hearing and to
clarify that both opinion and expert
testimony shall be admitted in a hearing
when the ALJ is satisfied that the
witness is properly qualified pursuant
to Federal Rules of Evidence 701 or 702.
Sixth, § 771.95, which governs the
responsibilities of an ALJ, is amended to
eliminate the sentence that ALJs shall be
under the administrative control of the
Director. This sentence addresses the
responsibilities of the Director and not
the responsibilities of the ALJs.
Therefore, the sentence is unnecessary
as to the responsibilities of the ALJ and
confusing as to application. Seventh,
§ 771.97(k), which authorizes the ALJ to
take any action authorized by an ATF
rule and consistent with the
Administrative Procedure Act, is
amended to add a cross-reference to
ATF’s authority concerning licenses and
permits, 18 U.S.C. 843, and the
provision of the Administrative
Procedure Act setting out authority for
individuals presiding over agency
hearings, 5 U.S.C. 556(c). Eighth, the
final rule amends 27 CFR 771.99 to state
that disorderly or contemptuous
language or conduct by an attorney
(either for a licensee or permittee or for
the Government), may be reported to the
Department of Justice, Office of
Professional Responsibility, consistent
with 28 CFR 0.39a(a)(9). Finally, other
changes eliminate superfluous language
or correct stylistic errors.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
A. Executive Order 12866, 13563, and
13771
This final rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review,’’ section 1(b), The Principles of
Regulation; Executive Order 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ section 1(b), General
Principles of Regulation, and section 6,
Retrospective Analyses of Existing
Rules; and Executive Order 13771,
‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs.’’
Both Executive Orders 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
consolidates and clarifies regulations
governing explosives license application
renewal or revocation of licenses and
permits. This rule would not add any
costs to industry because this rule puts
into regulation current industry and
agency practices; therefore, the
explosives industry would not need to
incur any hourly or capital burdens in
order to comply with this final rule. The
Department has assessed the costs and
benefits of this regulation and believes
that the regulatory approach selected
imposes no new regulatory costs and
maximizes net benefits.
This final rule will not have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, nor will it adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal government or communities.
Similarly, it does not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another agency, materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients
thereof, or raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in Executive Order 12866. The
Department has determined that this
final rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as defined in Executive Order
12866, section 3(f). Accordingly, this
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
final rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Because this rule is not significant
under Executive Order 12866, this
action is not subject to Executive Order
13771, ‘‘Reducing Regulations and
Controlling Regulatory Costs.’’
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563
directs agencies to develop a plan to
review existing significant rules that
may be ‘‘outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively
burdensome,’’ and to make appropriate
changes where warranted. The
Department selected and reviewed this
rule under the criteria set forth in its
Plan for Retrospective Analysis of
Existing Rules, and determined that this
rule merely transfers and consolidates
regulations governing explosives license
application renewal or revocation of
licenses and permits, improving the
enforcement of ATF regulations.
B. Executive Order 13132
This final rule will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive
Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ the
Attorney General has determined that
this final rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This final rule meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil
Justice Reform.’’
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)) exempts an agency from
the requirement to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements if the agency certifies that
the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small not-forprofit enterprises, and small
governmental jurisdictions. The
Attorney General has reviewed this final
rule and, by approving it, certifies that
it will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This final rule codifies the ATF
regulations governing the procedure and
practice for denying applications,
denying renewals, and revoking
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
explosives licenses or permits under
Federal explosives law in a new part
771 under ATF’s regulatory authority.
Additionally, this final rule updates the
regulations governing the denial,
suspension, or revocation of a firearms
license, and imposition of a civil fine
under Federal firearms law to only
reference regulations under ATF
authority. This rule also amends the
regulations to require an applicant or
licensee in a proceeding concerning the
denial, suspension, or revocation of a
firearms license, or the imposition of a
civil fine under Federal firearms law, to
file a duly executed power of attorney
designating his representative, and
waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy
Act of 1974. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a), and 26
U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and
disclosure of returns and return
information). This is required in the
current regulations by reference to 31
CFR part 8 and 26 CFR 601.521 through
601.527. The changes in this final rule
are purely administrative and do not
add any new requirements that would
have any impact on the economy.
E. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. See 5 U.S.C. 804.
This final rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This final rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not impose any
new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
Drafting Information
The author of this document is Denise
Brown; Enforcement Programs and
Services; Office of Regulatory Affairs,
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64743
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives.
List of Subjects
27 CFR Part 478
Administrative practice and
procedure, Arms and munitions,
Customs duties and inspection, Exports,
Imports, Intergovernmental relations,
Law enforcement officers, Military
personnel, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research,
Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation.
27 CFR Part 555
Administrative practice and
procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Explosives, Hazardous
substances, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety, Security measures,
Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation,
Warehouses.
27 CFR Part 771
Administrative practice and
procedure, Explosives.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for reasons discussed in
the preamble, 27 CFR chapter II is
amended as follows:
PART 478—COMMERCE IN FIREARMS
AND AMMUNITION
1. The authority citation for 27 part
478 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 18 U.S.C. 921–
931; 44 U.S.C. 3504(h).
■
2. Revise § 478.76 to read as follows:
§ 478.76
Representation at a hearing.
Applicants or licensees may represent
themselves or be represented by an
attorney, a certified public accountant,
or any other person, specifically
designated in a duly executed power of
attorney that shall be filed in the
proceeding by the applicant or licensee.
The applicant or licensee shall file
waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy
Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings under
§§ 478.72 and 478.74 by an attorney in
the Office of Chief Counsel who is
authorized to execute and file motions,
briefs, and other papers in the
proceeding, on behalf of the Director of
Industry Operations, in the attorney’s
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64744
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
771.2
771.3
PART 555—COMMERCE IN
EXPLOSIVES
Subpart B—Definitions
771.5 Meaning of terms.
3. The authority citation for 27 CFR
part 555 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 847.
§ 555.73
[Amended]
4. Amend § 555.73 by removing ‘‘part
71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.
■
§ 555.75
[Amended]
5. Amend § 555.75 by removing ‘‘part
71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.
■ 6. Revise § 555.78 to read as follows:
■
§ 555.78
Representation at a hearing.
An applicant, licensee, or permittee
may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person,
specifically designated in a duly
executed power of attorney that shall be
filed in the proceeding by the applicant,
licensee, or permittee. The applicant,
licensee, or permittee shall file waivers,
if applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings under
§§ 555.73 and 555.75 by an attorney in
the Office of Chief Counsel who is
authorized to execute and file motions,
briefs and other papers in the
proceeding, on behalf of the Director of
Industry Operations, in the attorney’s
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
§ 555.79
[Amended]
7. Amend § 555.79 by removing ‘‘(a)’’,
‘‘(b)’’, and ‘‘(c)’’ and removing ‘‘part 71’’
and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.
■ 8. Revise § 555.82 to read as follows:
■
§ 555.82 Rules of practice in license and
permit proceedings.
Regulations governing the procedure
and practice for disapproval of
applications for explosives licenses and
permits and for the denial of renewal or
revocation of such licenses and permits
under the Act are contained in part 771
of this chapter.
■ 9. Add subchapter E, consisting of
part 771, to read as follows:
SUBCHAPTER E—EXPLOSIVE LICENSE
AND PERMIT PROCEEDINGS
PART 771—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT
PROCEEDINGS
Subpart A—Scope and Construction of
Regulations
Sec.
771.1 Scope of part.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
771.74
771.75
Liberal construction.
Forms prescribed.
Subpart C—General
771.25 Communications and pleadings.
771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or
permittee.
771.27 Service on the Director of Industry
Operations or Director.
Time
771.28
771.29
Computation.
Continuances and extensions.
Representation at Hearings
771.30 Personal representation.
771.31 Attorneys and other representatives.
Subpart D—Compliance and Settlement
771.35 Opportunity for compliance.
771.36 Settlement.
771.37 Notice of contemplated action.
771.38 Licensee’s or permittee’s failure to
meet requirements within reasonable
time.
771.39 Authority of Director of Industry
Operations to proceed with revocation or
denial action.
Subpart E—Revocation or Denial
771.40 Denial of initial application.
771.41 Denial of renewal application or
revocation of license or permit.
771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses or
permits.
771.43 Grounds for denial of applications
for licenses or permits.
Subpart F—Hearing Procedure
Notices
771.55
771.56
771.57
771.58
Content.
Forms.
Execution and disposition.
Designated place of hearing.
Request for Hearing
771.59 Initial application proceedings.
771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
771.61 Notice of hearing.
Non-Request for Hearing
771.62 Initial application.
771.63 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Responses to Notices
771.64 Answers.
771.65 Responses admitting facts.
771.66 Initial conferences.
Failure to Appear
771.67 Initial applications.
771.68 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Waiver of Hearing
771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.
771.70 Adjudication based upon written
submissions.
Surrender of License or Permit
771.71 Before citation.
771.72 After citation.
Motions
771.73 General.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Prior to hearing.
At hearing.
Hearing
771.76 General.
771.77 Initial applications.
771.78 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Burden of Proof
771.79 Initial applications.
771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.
General
771.81 Stipulations at hearing.
771.82 Evidence.
771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments,
briefs, and proposed findings.
771.84 Reopening of the hearing.
Record of Testimony
771.85 Stenographic record.
771.86 Oath of reporter.
Subpart G—Administrative Law Judges
771.95 Responsibilities of administrative
law judges.
771.96 Disqualification.
771.97 Powers.
771.98 Separation of functions.
771.99 Conduct of hearing.
771.100 Unavailability of administrative
law judge.
Subpart H—Decisions
771.105 Administrative law judge’s
findings and recommended decision.
771.106 Certification and transmittal of
record and decision.
Action by Director of Industry Operations
771.107 Initial application proceedings.
771.108 Director of Industry Operations’
decision.
771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
771.110 Revocation or denial of renewal.
771.111 Proceedings involving violations
not within the division of issuance of
license or permit.
Subpart I—Review
771.120 Appeal on petition to the Director.
771.121 Review by Director.
771.122 Denial of renewal or revocation.
771.123 Court review.
Subpart J—Miscellaneous
771.124 Depositions.
771.125 Witnesses and fees.
771.126 Discovery.
771.127 Privileges.
Record
771.135
771.136
What constitutes record.
Availability.
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 843, 847.
Subpart A—Scope and Construction of
Regulations
§ 771.1
Scope of part.
Regulations in this part govern
procedures and practices for
disapproving applications for licenses
and permits and denying renewal of or
revocation of such licenses or permits
under 18 U.S.C. chapter 40.
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
§ 771.2
Liberal construction.
Director of Industry Operations. The
principal ATF official in a Field
Operations division responsible for
administering regulations in this part.
Ex parte communication. An oral or
written communication not on the
public record with respect to which
reasonable prior notice to all parties is
not given, but not including requests for
status reports.
Initial decision. The decision of the
Director of Industry Operations in a
proceeding concerning the revocation
§ 771.3 Forms prescribed.
of, denial of renewal of, or denial of
application for a license or permit. This
(a) The Director is authorized to
prescribe all forms required by this part. decision becomes the agency’s final
All of the information called for in each decision in the absence of an appeal.
Final decision. The definitive
form shall be furnished as indicated by
decision of ATF, e.g., the agency’s
the headings on the form and the
decision in the absence of an appeal or
instructions on or pertaining to the
form. In addition, information called for the Director’s decision following an
appeal to the Director.
in each form shall be furnished as
License. Subject to applicable law,
required by this part.
(b) Requests for forms should be made entitles the licensee to transport, ship,
and receive explosive materials in
to the ATF Distribution Center or
interstate or foreign commerce, and to
through the ATF website at https://
engage in the business specified by the
www.atf.gov.
license, at the location described on the
Subpart B—Definitions
license.
Licensee. Any importer,
§ 771.5 Meaning of terms.
manufacturer, or dealer licensed under
When used in this part and in forms
the provisions of 18 U.S.C. chapter 40
prescribed under this part, where not
and 27 CFR part 555.
otherwise distinctly expressed or
Limited permit. A permit issued to a
manifestly incompatible with the intent person authorizing him to receive for
thereof, terms shall have the meaning
his use explosive materials from a
provided in this subpart. Words in the
licensee or permittee in his State of
plural form shall include the singular,
residence on no more than six occasions
and vice versa, and words importing the during the 12-month period in which
masculine gender shall include the
the permit is valid. A limited permit
feminine.
does not authorize the receipt or
Administrative law judge. The person transportation of explosive materials in
appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105,
interstate or foreign commerce.
designated to preside over any
Other term. Any other term defined in
administrative proceedings under this
the Federal explosives laws (18 U.S.C.
part.
chapter 40), the regulations promulgated
Applicant. Any person who has filed
thereunder (27 CFR part 555), or the
an application for a license or permit
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
under 18 U.S.C. chapter 40.
551 et seq.), where used in this part,
Application. Any application for a
shall have the meaning assigned to it
license or permit, including renewal
therein.
applications, under 18 U.S.C. chapter
Permittee. Any user of explosives for
40.
a lawful purpose who has obtained
ATF. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, either a user permit or a limited permit
Firearms, and Explosives, Department of under 18 U.S.C. chapter 40 and 27 CFR
Justice.
part 555.
Attorney for the Government. An
Person. Any individual, corporation,
attorney in the ATF Office of Chief
company, association, firm, partnership,
Counsel authorized to represent the
society, or joint stock company.
Director of Industry Operations in the
Recommended decision. The advisory
proceeding.
decision of the administrative law judge
CFR. The Code of Federal
in any proceeding regarding the
Regulations.
revocation of, denial of renewal of, or
Contemplated notice. Includes any
denial of application for a license or
notice contemplating the revocation or
permit. ATF must act on a
denial of renewal of a license or permit. recommended decision with its own
Director. The Director, Bureau of
initial or final decision.
User-limited permit. A user permit
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
valid only for a single purchase
Explosives, Department of Justice.
Regulations in this part shall be
liberally construed to secure just,
expeditious, and efficient determination
of the issues presented. The Rules of
Civil Procedure for the U.S. District
Courts (28 U.S.C. appendix) are not
controlling, but may act as a guide in
any situation not provided for or
controlled by this part and shall be
liberally construed or relaxed when
necessary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64745
transaction. Recipients of a user-limited
permit must obtain a new permit for any
subsequent purchase transaction.
User permit. A permit issued to a
person authorizing him to—
(1) Acquire for his own use explosive
materials from a licensee in a State other
than the State in which he resides or
from a foreign country; and
(2) Transport explosive materials in
interstate or foreign commerce.
Willfulness. The plain indifference to,
or purposeful disregard of, a known
legal duty. Willfulness may be
demonstrated by, but does not require,
repeat violations involving a known
legal duty.
Subpart C—General
§ 771.25
Communications and pleadings.
(a) All communications to the
Government regarding the procedures
set forth in this part and all pleadings,
such as answers, motions, requests, or
other papers or documents required or
permitted to be filed under this part,
relating to a proceeding pending before
an administrative law judge, shall be
addressed to the administrative law
judge at his post of duty and the
Attorney for the Government.
Communications concerning
proceedings not pending before an
administrative law judge should be
addressed to the Director of Industry
Operations or Director, as the case may
be.
(b) Except to the extent required for
the disposition of ex parte matters as
authorized by law, no ex parte
communications shall be made to or
from the administrative law judge
concerning the merits of the
adjudication. If the administrative law
judge receives or makes an ex parte
communication not authorized by law,
the administrative law judge shall place
on the record of the proceeding:
(1) All such written communications;
(2) Memoranda stating the substance
of all such oral communications; and
(3) All written responses and
memoranda stating the substance of all
oral responses to paragraphs (b)(1) and
(2) of this section.
§ 771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or
permittee.
All orders, notices, motions, and other
formal documents required to be served
under the regulations in this part may
be served by mailing a signed, original
copy thereof to the designated
representative of the applicant, licensee,
or permittee by certified mail, with
request for return receipt card, at the
representative’s business address, by
personal service, or as otherwise agreed
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64746
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
to by the parties. If the applicant,
licensee, or permittee has not yet
designated a representative, all orders,
notices, motions, and other formal
documents required to be served under
the regulations in this part may be
served by mailing a signed, original
copy thereof to the applicant, licensee,
or permittee at the address stated on his
application, license, or permit, or at his
last known address, or by delivery of
such original copy to the applicant,
licensee, or permittee personally, or in
the case of a corporation, partnership, or
other unincorporated association, by
delivering the same to an officer, or
manager, or general agent thereof, or to
its attorney of record. Such personal
service may be made by any employee
of the Department of Justice designated
by the Attorney General or by any
employee of ATF. A certificate of
mailing and the return receipt card, or
certificate of service signed by the
person making such service, shall be
filed as a part of the record.
§ 771.27 Service on the Director of
Industry Operations or Director.
Pleadings, motions, notices, and other
formal documents may be served by
certified mail, by personal service, or as
otherwise agreed to by the parties, on
the Director of Industry Operations (or
upon the Attorney for the Government
on behalf of the Director of Industry
Operations), or on the Director, if the
proceeding is before him for review on
appeal.
Representation at Hearings
§ 771.30
Personal representation.
Any individual or member of a
partnership may appear for himself, or
for such partnership, and a corporation
or association may be represented by a
bona fide officer of such corporation or
association, upon showing of adequate
authorization.
§ 771.31 Attorneys and other
representatives.
An applicant, licensee, or permittee
may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person,
specifically designated in a duly
executed power of attorney that shall be
filed in the proceeding by the applicant,
licensee, or permittee. The applicant,
licensee, or permittee shall file waivers,
if applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of
returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings by an
attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel
who is authorized to execute and file
motions, briefs, and other papers in the
proceeding on behalf of the Director of
Industry Operations, in the attorney’s
own name as ‘‘Attorney for the
Government.’’
Subpart D—Compliance and
Settlement
§ 771.35
Opportunity for compliance.
In computing any period of time
prescribed or allowed by this part, the
day of the act, event, or default after
which the designated period of time is
to run is not to be included. The last day
of the period to be computed is to be
included, unless it is a Saturday,
Sunday, or Federal holiday, in which
event the period runs until the next day
that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or
Federal holiday. Pleadings, requests, or
other papers or documents required or
permitted to be filed under this part
must be received for filing at the
appropriate office within the time
limits, if any, for such filing.
No license or permit shall be revoked
or denied renewal unless, prior to the
institution of proceedings, facts or
conduct warranting such action shall
have been called to the attention of the
licensee or permittee by the Director of
Industry Operations in writing in a
contemplated notice, and the licensee or
permittee shall have been accorded an
opportunity to demonstrate or achieve
compliance with all lawful
requirements as set forth in section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act. In
cases in which the Director of Industry
Operations alleges in his contemplated
notice, with supporting reasons, willful
violations or that the public interest
requires otherwise, this section does not
apply and the issuance of a
contemplated notice is unnecessary.
§ 771.29
§ 771.36
Time
§ 771.28
Computation.
Continuances and extensions.
For good cause shown, the
administrative law judge, Director, or
Director of Industry Operations, as the
case may be, may grant continuances
and, as to all matters pending before
him, extend any time limit prescribed
by the regulations in this part (except
where the time limit is statutory).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
Settlement.
Any proposals of settlement should be
made to the Director of Industry
Operations, but may be made through
the Attorney for the Government. Where
necessary, the date of the hearing may
be postponed pending consideration of
such proposals when they are made in
good faith and not for the purpose of
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
delay. If proposals of settlement are
submitted, and they are considered
unsatisfactory, the Director of Industry
Operations may reject the proposals and
may, either directly or through the
Attorney for the Government, inform the
licensee or permittee of any conditions
on which the alleged violations may be
settled. If the proposals of settlement are
considered satisfactory to the Director of
Industry Operations, the licensee or
permittee shall be notified thereof and
the proceeding shall be dismissed.
§ 771.37
Notice of contemplated action.
Where the Director of Industry
Operations has not ascertained whether
the licensee or permittee has willfully
violated the Federal explosives laws and
where he believes the matter has the
potential to be settled informally, i.e.,
without formal administrative
proceedings, he shall, in accordance
with section 5(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act, prior to the issuance of
a notice of revocation or denial of
renewal, give the licensee or permittee
a contemplated notice of such action
and an opportunity to show why the
license or permit should not be revoked
or denied renewal. The notice should
inform the licensee or permittee of the
charges on which the notice would be
based, if issued, and afford him a period
of 15 days from the date of the notice,
or such longer period as the Director of
Industry Operations deems necessary, in
which to submit proposals of settlement
to the Director of Industry Operations.
Where informal settlement is not
reached promptly because of inaction by
the applicant, licensee, or permittee or
proposals are made for the purpose of
delay, a notice shall be issued in
accordance with § 771.42 or § 771.43, as
appropriate. The issuance of a notice of
contemplated action does not entitle the
recipient to a hearing before an
administrative law judge.
§ 771.38 Licensee’s or permittee’s failure
to meet requirements within reasonable
time.
If the licensee or permittee fails to
meet the requirements of applicable
laws and regulations in this part within
such reasonable time as may be
specified by the Director of Industry
Operations, proceedings for revocation
or denial of renewal of the license or
permit shall be initiated.
§ 771.39 Authority of Director of Industry
Operations to proceed with revocation or
denial action.
Where the evidence is conclusive and
the nature of the violation is such as to
preclude any settlement, the violation is
of a continuing character that
necessitates immediate action to protect
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the public interest, or the Director of
Industry Operations believes that any
informal settlement of the alleged
violation will not ensure future
compliance with applicable laws and
regulations in this part, or in any similar
case where the circumstances are such
as to clearly preclude informal
settlement, and the Director of Industry
Operations so finds and states the
reasons therefor in the notice, the
Director of Industry Operations may
proceed with the revocation or denial of
renewal.
Subpart E—Revocation or Denial
§ 771.40
Denial of initial application.
Whenever the Director of Industry
Operations has reason to believe that an
applicant for an original license or
permit is not eligible to receive a license
or permit under the provisions of
§ 555.49 of this chapter, the Director of
Industry Operations shall issue a notice
of denial on ATF Form 5400.11 (Notice
of Denial of Application for License or
Permit) (F 5400.11). The notice will set
forth the matters of fact and law relied
upon in determining that the
application should be denied and will
afford the applicant 15 days from the
date of receipt of the notice in which to
request a hearing to review the denial.
If no request for a hearing is filed within
that time, a copy of the application,
marked ‘‘Disapproved,’’ will be returned
to the applicant.
§ 771.41 Denial of renewal application or
revocation of license or permit.
If, following the opportunity for
compliance under § 555.71 of this
chapter, or without opportunity for
compliance under § 555.71 of this
chapter as circumstances warrant, the
Director of Industry Operations finds
that the licensee or permittee is not
likely to comply with applicable laws or
regulations in this part or is otherwise
not eligible to continue operations
authorized under his license or permit,
the Director of Industry Operations shall
issue a notice of denial of the renewal
application or revocation of the license
or permit, ATF F 5400.11 (Notice of
Denial of Application for License or
Permit) or ATF Form 5400.10 (Notice of
Revocation of License or Permit) (F
5400.10), as appropriate. The notice will
set forth the matters of fact constituting
the violations specified, dates, places,
and the sections of law and regulations
violated. In the case of the revocation of
a license or permit, the notice will
specify the date on which the action is
effective, which date will be on or after
the date the notice is served on the
licensee or permittee. The notice will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
also advise the licensee or permittee
that he may, within 15 days after receipt
of the notice, request a hearing and, if
applicable, a stay of the effective date of
the revocation of his license or permit.
§ 771.42 Grounds for revocation of
licenses or permits.
Whenever the Director of Industry
Operations has reason to believe that
any holder of a license or permit has
willfully violated any provision of 18
U.S.C. chapter 40 or 27 CFR part 555 or
has become ineligible to continue
operations authorized under the license
or permit, the Director of Industry
Operations shall issue a notice for the
revocation of such license or permit, as
the case may be.
§ 771.43 Grounds for denial of
applications for licenses or permits.
If, upon examination of any
application (including a renewal
application) for a license or permit, the
Director of Industry Operations has
reason to believe that the applicant is
not entitled to such license or permit,
the Director of Industry Operations shall
issue a denial of the application. An
applicant is not eligible for a license or
permit if he fails to meet the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. 843(b) and
§ 555.49 of this chapter.
Subpart F—Hearing Procedure
Notices
§ 771.55
PO 00000
requested within 15 days from receipt of
the notice.
§ 771.56
Content.
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Forms.
Notices shall be issued on the
following forms:
(a) ATF Form 5400.9, ‘‘Order After
Denial or Revocation Hearing,’’ for all
revocations or denials of renewal of
licenses or permits pursuant to 18
U.S.C. chapter 40 after a hearing has
been held and a Recommended Decision
has been issued by the administrative
law judge;
(b) Form 5400.10, ‘‘Notice of
Revocation for License or Permit,’’ for
all revocations of licenses or permits
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. chapter 40, except
as provided for in paragraph (a) of this
section;
(c) Form 5400.11, ‘‘Notice of Denial of
Application for License or Permit,’’ for
the denial of renewal or original
applications for licenses or permits
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. chapter 40, except
as provided for in paragraph (a) of this
section;
(d) Form 5400.12, ‘‘Notice of
Contemplated Denial or Revocation of
License or Permit,’’ for the
contemplated revocation or denial of
renewal application of licenses or
permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. chapter
40; or
(e) Such other forms as the Director
may prescribe.
§ 771.57
(a) Notices for the revocation or denial
of renewal of a license or permit shall
be promptly issued by the Director of
Industry Operations and shall set forth:
(1) The sections of law and
regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which
the revocation or denial is based, i.e.,
the matters of fact constituting the
violations specified, dates, places, and
sections of law and regulations violated;
(3) In the case of a revocation, the date
on which the action is effective; and
(4) That the licensee or permittee has
15 days from receipt of the notice
within which to request a hearing before
an administrative law judge.
(b) Notices for the denial of an initial
application for a license or permit shall
set forth:
(1) The sections of law and
regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which
the denial is based, i.e., the matters of
fact and law relied upon for the
disapproval of the application; and
(3) That the application will be
disapproved unless a hearing is
64747
Execution and disposition.
A signed original of the applicable
form shall be served on the licensee or
permittee. If a hearing is requested, a
copy shall be sent to the administrative
law judge designated to conduct the
hearing. Any remaining copies shall be
retained for the office of the Director of
Industry Operations.
§ 771.58
Designated place of hearing.
The designated place of hearing shall
be determined by the administrative law
judge, taking into consideration the
convenience and necessity of the parties
and their representatives.
Request for Hearing
§ 771.59
Initial application proceedings.
(a) If the applicant for an initial
license or permit desires a hearing, he
shall file a request in writing with the
Director of Industry Operations within
15 days after receipt of notice of the
disapproval, in whole or in part, of the
application.
(b) On receipt of the request, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
forward a copy of the request, together
with a copy of the notice, to the Office
of Chief Counsel for the assignment of
an administrative law judge.
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64748
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel
notifies the Director of Industry
Operations or the Attorney for the
Government of the assignment of an
administrative law judge, the Director of
Industry Operations shall notify the
licensee or permittee of the assignment,
if the administrative law judge has not
already done so.
§ 771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
(a) If the licensee or permittee desires
a hearing, he shall file a request, in
writing, with the Director of Industry
Operations within 15 days after receipt
of the notice or within such time as the
Director of Industry Operations may
allow.
(b) Where a licensee or permittee
requests a hearing, the Director of
Industry Operations shall forward a
copy of the request, together with a copy
of the notice, to the Office of Chief
Counsel for the assignment of an
administrative law judge.
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel
notifies the Director of Industry
Operations or the Attorney for the
Government of the assignment of an
administrative law judge, the Director of
Industry Operations shall notify the
licensee or permittee of the assignment,
if the administrative law judge has not
already done so.
(d) In the case of a revocation, a
licensee or permittee may include a
request for a stay of the effective date of
revocation with the request for a
hearing.
(e) On receipt of a request for a stay
of the effective date of a revocation, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
timely advise the licensee or permittee
whether the stay is granted.
(1) If the stay is granted, the matter
shall be referred to an administrative
law judge pursuant to paragraph (b) of
this section.
(2) If the stay is denied, the licensee
or permittee may request an immediate
hearing. In this event, the Director of
Industry Operations shall immediately
refer the matter to the Office of Chief
Counsel for the assignment of an
administrative law judge, who shall set
a date and place for hearing, which date
shall be no later than 10 days from the
date the licensee or permittee requested
the immediate hearing.
§ 771.61
Notice of hearing.
Once a request for a hearing has been
referred to the administrative law judge,
the administrative law judge shall set a
time and place for a hearing and shall
serve notice thereof upon the parties at
least 10 days in advance of the hearing
date.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
Non-Request for Hearing
§ 771.62
Initial application.
In the case of an initial application, if
the applicant does not request a hearing
within 15 days, or within such
additional time as the Director of
Industry Operations may in his
discretion allow, the Director of
Industry Operations will return a copy
of the application, marked
‘‘Disapproved,’’ to the applicant,
accompanied by a brief statement
including the findings upon which the
denial is based.
§ 771.63
Revocation or denial of renewal.
In the case of a revocation or denial
of renewal of an application, if the
licensee or permittee does not request a
hearing within 15 days, or within such
additional time as the Director of
Industry Operations may in his
discretion allow, the Director of
Industry Operations shall make the
initial decision in the case pursuant to
§ 771.78(b).
Responses to Notices
§ 771.64
Answers.
(a) Where the licensee or permittee
requests a hearing in accordance with
§§ 771.59 and 771.60, a written response
to the relevant notice may be filed with
the administrative law judge and served
on the Director of Industry Operations
within 15 days after the licensee or
permittee receives service of the
designation of the administrative law
judge.
(b) Where no hearing is requested, the
licensee or permittee may file a written
answer to the relevant notice with the
Director of Industry Operations within
15 days after service of the notice.
(c) An answer shall contain a concise
statement of the facts that constitute the
grounds for defense. A hearing, if
requested, may be limited to the issues
contained in the notice and the answer.
The administrative law judge or Director
of Industry Operations, as the case may
be, may, as a matter of discretion, waive
any requirement of this section.
(d) Answers need not be filed in
initial application proceedings.
§ 771.65
Responses admitting facts.
If the licensee or permittee desires to
waive the hearing on the allegations of
fact set forth in the notice and does not
contest the facts, the answer may consist
of a statement that the licensee or
permittee admits all material allegations
of fact charged in the notice to be true.
The Director of Industry Operations
shall base the decision on the notice and
such answer, although such an answer
shall not affect the licensee’s or
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
permittee’s right to submit proposed
findings of fact and conclusions of law
or right to appeal.
§ 771.66
Initial conferences.
(a) In any proceeding, the
administrative law judge, upon his own
motion or upon the motion of one of the
parties or their qualified representatives,
may in the administrative law judge’s
discretion direct the parties or their
qualified representatives to appear at a
specified time and place for a
conference to consider:
(1) Simplification of the issues;
(2) The necessity of amendments to
the pleadings;
(3) The possibility of obtaining
stipulations, admissions of facts, and
documents;
(4) The possibility of both parties
exchanging information or scheduling
discovery;
(5) A date on which both parties will
simultaneously submit lists of proposed
hearing exhibits;
(6) Limiting the number of expert
witnesses;
(7) Identifying and, if practicable,
scheduling all witnesses to be called;
however, there is no requirement in
these proceedings for the parties to
submit pre-hearing statements or
statements of proposed testimony by
witnesses; and
(8) Such other matters as may aid in
the disposition of the proceeding.
(b) As soon as practicable after such
conference, the administrative law judge
shall issue an order that recites the
action taken, the amendments allowed
to the pleadings, and the agreements
made by the parties or their qualified
representatives as to any of the matters
considered. The order shall also limit
the issues for hearing to those not
disposed of by admission or agreement.
Such order shall control the subsequent
course of the proceedings, unless
modified for good cause by a subsequent
order. After discovery is complete, the
order may be amended or supplemented
if necessary.
Failure To Appear
§ 771.67
Initial applications.
Where the applicant on an initial
application for a license or permit has
requested a hearing and does not appear
at the appointed time and place,
evidence has not been offered to refute
or explain the grounds upon which
disapproval of the application is
contemplated, and no good cause has
been shown for the failure to appear, the
applicant shall be considered to have
waived the hearing. When such waiver
occurs, a default judgment against the
applicant will be entered and the
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
administrative law judge shall
recommend disapproval of said
application.
§ 771.68
Revocation or denial of renewal.
If, on the date set for a hearing
concerning the revocation or denial of
renewal of a license or permit, the
licensee or permittee does not appear,
no evidence has been offered, and no
good cause has been shown for the
failure to appear, the Attorney for the
Government will proceed ex parte and
offer for the record sufficient evidence
to make a prima facie case. At such
hearing, documents, statements, and
affidavits may be submitted in lieu of
testimony of witnesses.
Appeals for the circuit in which the
licensee or permittee resides or has his
principle place of business pursuant to
§ 555.80 of this chapter.
Surrender of License or Permit
§ 771.71
Before citation.
Waiver of Hearing
If a licensee or permittee surrenders
the license or permit before the notice
of revocation or denial of renewal, the
Director of Industry Operations may
accept the surrender. But if the
evidence, in the opinion of the Director
of Industry Operations, warrants
issuance of a notice for revocation or
denial of renewal, the surrender shall be
refused and the Director of Industry
Operations shall issue the notice.
§ 771.69
§ 771.72
Withdrawal of request for hearing.
At any time prior to the assignment of
an administrative law judge, the
licensee or permittee may, by filing
written notice with the Director of
Industry Operations, withdraw his
request for a hearing. If such a notice is
filed after assignment to the
administrative law judge and prior to
issuance of his recommended decision
the Director of Industry Operations shall
move the administrative law judge to
dismiss the proceedings as moot. If such
a notice is filed either after issuance of
a notice of denial or notice of revocation
and before assignment of the
administrative law judge, or after
issuance by the administrative law
judge of his recommended decision and
prior to the Director of Industry
Operations’ order disapproving the
application or denying the renewal of or
revoking the license or permit, the
Director of Industry Operations shall, by
order, dismiss the proceeding.
§ 771.70 Adjudication based upon written
submissions.
The licensee or permittee may waive
the hearing before the administrative
law judge and stipulate that the matter
will be adjudicated by the Director of
Industry Operations based upon written
submissions. Written submissions may
include stipulations of law or facts,
proposed findings of fact and
conclusions of law, briefs, or any other
documentary material. The pleadings,
together with the written submissions of
both the licensee or permittee and the
attorney for the Government, shall
constitute the record on which the
initial decision shall be based. The
election to contest the denial or
revocation without a hearing under this
section does not affect the licensee’s or
permittee’s right to appeal to the
Director pursuant to § 555.79 of this
chapter or to the United States Court of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
After citation.
If a licensee or permittee surrenders
the license or permit after notice, but
prior to the referral to an administrative
law judge and prior to an initial
decision, the Director of Industry
Operations may accept the surrender of
the license or permit and dismiss the
proceeding as moot. If a licensee or
permittee surrenders the license or
permit after notice and after the referral
to the administrative law judge, but
prior to the issuance of a recommended
decision, the Director of Industry
Operations may accept the surrender of
the license or permit and shall move the
administrative law judge to dismiss the
proceedings as moot. In either case, if,
in the opinion of the Director of
Industry Operations, the evidence is
such as to warrant revocation or denial
of renewal, as the case may be, the
surrender of the license or permit shall
be refused, and the proceeding shall
continue.
Motions
§ 771.73
General.
All motions shall be made and
addressed to the administrative law
judge before whom the proceeding is
pending, and copies of all motion
papers shall be served upon the other
party or parties. The administrative law
judge may dispose of any motion
without oral argument, but he may, if he
so desires, set it down for hearing and
request argument. The administrative
law judge may dispose of such motion
prior to the hearing on the merits or he
may postpone the disposition until the
hearing on the merits. No appeal may be
taken from any ruling on a motion until
the whole record is certified for review.
Examples of typical motions may be
found in the Rules of Civil Procedure
referred to in § 771.2.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 771.74
64749
Prior to hearing.
All motions that should be made prior
to the hearing, such as a motion directed
to the sufficiency of the pleadings or of
preliminary orders, shall be filed in
writing with the Director of Industry
Operations or the administrative law
judge if the matter has been referred to
him, and shall briefly state the order or
relief applied for and the grounds for
such motion.
§ 771.75
At hearing.
Motions at the hearing may be made
in writing to the administrative law
judge or stated orally on the record.
Hearing
§ 771.76
General.
If a hearing is requested, it shall be
held at the time and place stated in the
notice of hearing unless otherwise
ordered by the administrative law judge.
§ 771.77
Initial applications.
(a) The administrative law judge who
presides at the hearing on initial
applications shall recommend a
decision to the Director of Industry
Operations. The administrative law
judge shall certify the complete record
of the proceedings before him and shall
immediately forward the complete
certified record to the Director of
Industry Operations. The administrative
law judge shall also send one copy of
his recommended decision to the
applicant or the applicant’s
representative, one copy to the Attorney
for the Government, and one copy to the
Director of Industry Operations, who
shall make the initial decision as
provided in § 771.107. The applicant
may be directed by the Director of
Industry Operations to produce such
records as may be deemed necessary for
examination. All hearings on
applications shall be open to the public
subject to such restrictions and
limitations as may be consistent with
orderly procedure.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the
return of the application marked
‘‘Disapproved’’ is the Director of
Industry Operations’ initial decision.
§ 771.78
Revocation or denial of renewal.
(a) The administrative law judge who
presides at the hearing in proceedings
for the revocation or denial of renewal
of licenses or permits shall make a
recommended decision to the Director
of Industry Operations. The
administrative law judge shall certify
the complete record of the proceedings
before him and shall immediately
forward the complete certified record to
the Director of Industry Operations. The
administrative law judge shall also send
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64750
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
one copy of his recommended decision
to the licensee or permittee or the
licensee’s or permittee’s representative,
one copy to the Attorney for the
Government, and one copy to the
Director of Industry Operations, who
shall make the initial decision as
provided in § 771.109.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
make the initial decision.
Burden of Proof
§ 771.79
Initial applications.
In hearings on the initial denial of
applications, the burden of proof is on
the Government to show by a
preponderance of the evidence that the
Director of Industry Operations had
reason to believe that the applicant is
not entitled to a permit or license.
§ 771.80
Revocation or denial of renewal.
In hearings on the revocation or
denial of renewal of a license or permit,
the burden of proof is on the
Government to show that the Director of
Industry Operations had reason to
believe that the licensee or permittee is
not entitled to a permit or license, as
may be the case. The Government must
meet this proof by a preponderance of
the evidence.
General
§ 771.81
Stipulations at hearing.
If there has been no initial conference
under § 771.66, the administrative law
judge may at the beginning of the
hearing require that the parties attempt
to arrive at such stipulations as will
eliminate the necessity of taking
evidence with respect to allegations of
fact about which there is no substantial
dispute. The administrative law judge
should take similar action, where
appropriate, throughout the hearing and
should call and conduct any
conferences that he deems advisable
with a view to the simplification,
clarification, and disposition of any of
the issues involved in the hearing.
§ 771.82
Evidence.
The Federal Rules of Evidence are not
binding on these proceedings. However,
any relevant evidence that would be
admissible under the rules of evidence
governing civil proceedings in matters
not involving trial by jury in the Courts
of the United States shall be admissible.
The administrative law judge may relax
such rules in any hearing when in his
judgment such relaxation would not
impair the rights of either party and
would more speedily conclude the
hearing or would better serve the ends
of justice. However, the administrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
law judge shall provide for the
exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or
unduly repetitious evidence. Every
party shall have the right to present his
case or defense by oral or documentary
evidence, depositions, or duly
authenticated copies of records and
documents; to submit rebuttal evidence;
and to conduct such reasonable crossexamination as may be required for a
full and true disclosure of the facts.
(a) Witnesses. The administrative law
judge shall have the right in his
discretion to limit the number of
witnesses whose testimony may be
merely cumulative and shall, as a matter
of policy, not only exclude irrelevant,
immaterial, or unduly repetitious
evidence but shall also limit the crossexamination of witnesses to that
required for a full and true disclosure of
the facts so as not to unnecessarily
prolong the hearing and unduly burden
the record. Opinion or expert testimony
shall be admitted when the
administrative law judge is satisfied that
the witness is properly qualified as
defined by Federal Rules of Evidence
701 or 702.
(b) Documentary evidence. Material
and relevant evidence shall not be
excluded because it is not the best
evidence unless its authenticity is
challenged, in which case reasonable
time shall be given to establish its
authenticity. When only portions of a
document are to be relied upon, the
offering party shall prepare the
pertinent excerpts, adequately
identified, and shall supply copies of
such excerpts, together with a statement
indicating the purpose for which such
materials will be offered, to the
administrative law judge and to the
other parties. Only the excerpts, so
prepared and submitted, shall be
received in the record. However, the
whole of the original document should
be made available for examination and
for use by opposing counsel for
purposes of cross-examination.
Compilations, charts, summaries of
data, and photocopies of documents
may be admitted in evidence if the
proceedings will thereby be expedited,
and if the material upon which they are
based is available for examination by
the parties. Objections to the evidence
shall be in short form, stating the
grounds relied upon. The transcript
shall not include argument or debate on
objections, except as ordered by the
administrative law judge, but shall
include the rulings thereon. Where
official notice is taken of a material fact
not appearing in the evidence in the
record, any party shall, on timely
request, be afforded an opportunity to
controvert such fact.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(c) Hearsay. Probative, material, and
reliable hearsay evidence is admissible
in proceedings under this subpart.
§ 771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments,
briefs, and proposed findings.
Before closing a hearing, the
administrative law judge shall inquire of
each party whether the party has any
further evidence to offer, which inquiry
and the response thereto shall be shown
in the record. The administrative law
judge may hear arguments of counsel
and the administrative law judge may
limit the time of such arguments at his
discretion. The administrative law judge
may, in his discretion, allow briefs to be
filed on behalf of either party but shall
closely limit the time within which the
briefs for both parties shall be filed, so
as to avoid unreasonable delay. The
administrative law judge shall also
ascertain whether the parties desire to
submit proposed findings and
conclusions, together with supporting
reasons, and, if so, a period of not more
than 15 days (unless extended by the
administrative law judge)—after the
close of the hearing or receipt of a copy
of the record, if one is requested—will
be allowed for such purpose.
§ 771.84
Reopening of the hearing.
The Director, the Director of Industry
Operations, or the administrative law
judge, as the case may be, may, as to all
matters pending before him, in his
discretion reopen a hearing—
(a) In case of default under § 771.67 or
§ 771.68 where the applicant, licensee,
or permittee failed to request a hearing
or to appear after one was set, upon
petition setting forth reasonable grounds
for such failure; and
(b) Where any party desires leave to
adduce additional evidence upon
petition summarizing such evidence,
establishing its materiality, and stating
reasonable grounds why such party with
due diligence was unable to produce
such evidence at the hearing.
Record of Testimony
§ 771.85
Stenographic record.
A stenographic record shall be made
of the testimony and proceedings,
including stipulations, admissions of
fact, and arguments of counsel in all
proceedings. A transcript of the
evidence and proceedings at the hearing
shall be made in all cases.
§ 771.86
Oath of reporter.
The reporter making the stenographic
record shall subscribe an oath before the
administrative law judge, to be filed in
the record of the case, that he will truly
and correctly report the oral testimony
and proceedings at such hearing and
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
accurately transcribe the same to the
best of his ability.
Subpart G—Administrative Law
Judges
§ 771.95 Responsibilities of administrative
law judges.
In hearings under this subpart,
administrative law judges must apply
all governing agency rulings and
governing agency precedent. They shall
be responsible for the conduct of
hearings and shall render their
decisions as soon as is reasonably
possible after the hearing is closed.
Administrative law judges shall also be
responsible for the preparation,
certification, and forwarding of the
complete record of proceedings and the
administrative work relating thereto
and, by arrangement with Directors of
Industry Operations and representatives
of the Office of Chief Counsel shall have
access to facilities and temporary use of
personnel at such times and places as
are needed in the prompt dispatch of
official business.
§ 771.96
Disqualification.
An administrative law judge shall, at
any time, withdraw from any
proceeding if he deems himself
disqualified. Upon the filing in good
faith by the applicant, licensee,
permittee, or Attorney for the
Government of a timely and sufficient
affidavit of facts showing personal bias
or otherwise warranting the
disqualification of any administrative
law judge, if the administrative law
judge fails to disqualify himself, the
Director shall upon appeal, as provided
in § 771.120, determine the matter as a
part of the record and decision in the
proceeding. If the Director decides the
administrative law judge should have
deemed himself disqualified, the
Director will remand the record for
hearing de novo before another
administrative law judge. If the Director
should decide against the
disqualification of the administrative
law judge, the proceeding will be
reviewed on its merits by the original
administrative law judge. The burden is
upon the party seeking disqualification
to set forth evidence sufficient to
overcome the presumption of the
administrative law judge’s honesty and
integrity.
§ 771.97
Powers.
Administrative law judges shall have
authority to:
(a) Administer oaths and affirmations;
(b) Issue subpoenas as authorized by
law;
(c) Rule upon offers of proof and
receive relevant evidence;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
(d) Take or cause depositions to be
taken whenever the ends of justice
would be served thereby;
(e) Regulate the course of the hearing;
(f) Hold conferences for the settlement
or simplification of the issues by
consent of the parties;
(g) Require the attendance at such
conferences of at least one
representative of each party who has the
authority to negotiate concerning
resolution of issues in controversy;
(h) Dispose of procedural requests or
similar matters;
(i) Render recommended decisions in
proceedings on applications for licenses
and permits and on revocation or denial
of renewal of licenses or permits;
(j) Call, examine, and cross-examine
witnesses, including hostile or adverse
witnesses, when the administrative law
judge deems such action to be necessary
to a just disposition of the case, and
introduce into the record documentary
or other evidence; and
(k) Take any other action authorized
by rule of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. 556(c) and
18 U.S.C. 843.
§ 771.98
Separation of functions.
Administrative law judges shall
perform no functions inconsistent with
their duties and responsibilities. The
Director may assign administrative law
judges duties not inconsistent with the
performance of their functions as
administrative law judges. Except to the
extent required for the disposition of ex
parte matters as required by law, no
administrative law judge shall consult
any person or party as to any fact in
issue unless there has been notice and
opportunity for all parties to participate.
The functions of the administrative law
judge shall be entirely separated from
the general investigative functions of the
agency. No officer, employee, or agent
engaged in the performance of
investigative or prosecuting functions in
any proceeding shall, in that proceeding
or a factually related proceeding,
participate or advise in the
administrative law judge’s or Director’s
decision, or in the agency review on
appeal, except as a witness or counsel
in the proceedings. The administrative
law judge may not informally obtain
advice or opinions from the parties or
their counsel, or from any officer or
employee of the ATF, as to the facts or
the weight or interpretation to be given
to the evidence. The administrative law
judge may, however, informally obtain
advice on matters of law or procedure
in a proceeding from officers or
employees who were not engaged in the
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64751
performance of investigative or
prosecuting functions in that proceeding
or a factually related proceeding. The
administrative law judge may, at any
time, consult with and obtain
instructions from the Director on
questions of law and policy.
Furthermore, it is not a violation of the
separation of functions for the
administrative law judge to participate
in the questioning of witnesses, where
the questioning is for clarification or to
move the proceedings along, and where
the questioning is not so extensive as to
place the administrative law judge in
the position of a prosecuting officer.
§ 771.99
Conduct of hearing.
The administrative law judge is
charged with the duty of conducting a
fair and impartial hearing and of
maintaining order in form and manner
consistent with the dignity of a court
proceeding. In the event that counsel or
any person or witness in any proceeding
shall refuse to obey the orders of the
administrative law judge, or be guilty of
disorderly or contemptuous language or
conduct in connection with any hearing,
the administrative law judge may, for
good cause stated in the record, suspend
the hearing, and, in the case of
disorderly or contemptuous language or
conduct by an attorney, report the
matter to the Department of Justice,
Office of Professional Responsibility.
See 28 CFR 0.39a(a)(9). The refusal of a
witness to answer any question that has
been ruled to be proper shall be
considered by the administrative law
judge in determining the weight to be
given all the testimony of that witness.
§ 771.100 Unavailability of administrative
law judge.
In the event that the administrative
law judge designated to conduct a
hearing becomes unavailable before the
filing of his findings and recommended
decision, the Director may assign the
case to another administrative law judge
for the continuance of the proceeding,
in accordance with the regulations in
this part in the same manner as if he had
been designated administrative law
judge at the commencement of the
proceeding.
Subpart H—Decisions
§ 771.105 Administrative law judge’s
findings and recommended decision.
Within a reasonable time after the
conclusion of the hearing, and as
expeditiously as possible, the
administrative law judge shall render
his recommended decision. All
decisions shall become a part of the
record and, if proposed findings and
conclusions have been filed, shall show
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64752
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
the administrative law judge’s ruling
upon each of such proposed findings
and conclusions. Decisions shall consist
of:
(a) A brief statement of the issues of
fact involved in the proceeding;
(b) The administrative law judge’s
findings and conclusions, as well as the
reasons or basis therefor with record
references, upon all the material issues
of fact, law, or discretion presented on
the record (including, when
appropriate, comment as to the
credibility and demeanor of the
witnesses); and
(c) The administrative law judge’s
recommended determination as to the
revocation or denial at issue.
§ 771.106 Certification and transmittal of
record and decision.
After reaching his decision, the
administrative law judge shall certify
the complete record of the proceeding
before him and shall immediately
forward the complete certified record
together with one copy of the
administrative law judge’s
recommended decision to the Director
of Industry Operations for initial
decision, one copy of the recommended
decision to the applicant or the
applicant’s representative, and one copy
of the recommended decision to the
Attorney for the Government.
Action by Director of Industry
Operations
§ 771.107
Initial application proceedings.
(a) Accepting the recommended
decision. If the Director of Industry
Operations, after consideration of the
record of the hearing and of any
proposed findings, conclusions, or
exceptions filed with him by the
applicant, accepts the recommended
decision of the administrative law
judge, the Director of Industry
Operations shall by order approve or
disapprove of the application in
accordance with the recommended
decision. If the Director of Industry
Operations approves the application, he
shall briefly state for the record his
reasons therefor. However, if the
Director of Industry Operations
disapproves of the applications, he shall
serve a copy of the administrative law
judge’s recommended decision on the
applicant, informing the applicant of the
Director of Industry Operations’
contemplated action and affording the
applicant not more than 10 days in
which to submit proposed findings and
conclusions or exceptions to the
recommended decision with reasons in
support thereof.
(b) Rejecting the recommended
decision. If, after such consideration
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
referenced in paragraph (a) of this
section, the Director of Industry
Operations rejects the recommended
decision of the administrative law
judge, in whole or in part, the Director
of Industry Operations shall by order
make such findings and conclusions as
in his opinion are warranted by the law
and facts in the record. Any decision of
the Director of Industry Operations
ordering the disapproval of an
application for a permit shall state the
findings and conclusions upon which it
is based, including his ruling upon each
proposed finding, conclusion, and
exception to the administrative law
judge’s recommended decision, together
with a statement of the administrative
law judge’s findings, conclusions, and
reasons or basis therefor, upon all
material issues of fact, law, or discretion
presented on the record. A signed
original of the decision of the Director
of Industry Operations shall be served
upon the applicant and the original
copy containing a certificate of service
shall be placed in the official record of
the proceeding.
such a petition, he shall withhold
issuance of the order pending the
decision of the Director, upon receipt of
which he shall issue the order in
accordance with the Director’s decision.
A signed original of the order of the
Director of Industry Operations shall be
served upon the licensee or permittee or
his representative and the original copy
containing a certificate of service shall
be placed in the official record of the
proceeding.
(c) Decisions pursuant to § 771.78(b).
In a case where the initial decision is
made by the Director of Industry
Operations in accordance with
§ 771.78(b), the Director of Industry
Operations shall also issue an order
revoking or denying the renewal of the
license or permit, or dismissing the
proceedings in accordance with his
initial decision. A signed original of the
decision and order of the Director of
Industry Operations shall be served
upon the licensee or permittee or his
representative and the original copy
placed in the official record of the
proceeding.
§ 771.108
decision.
§ 771.110
Director of Industry Operations’
When the Director of Industry
Operations issues an initial decision in
accordance with § 771.77 or § 771.107
the decision shall become a part of the
record. The decision shall consist of:
(a) A brief statement of the issues
involved in the proceedings;
(b) The Director of Industry
Operations’ findings and conclusions, as
well as the reasons therefor; and
(c) The Director of Industry
Operations’ determination on the
record.
§ 771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal
proceedings.
(a) Accepting the recommended
decision. After consideration of the
complete certified record of the hearing,
if the Director of Industry Operations
agrees with the recommended decision
of the administrative law judge, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
enter an order revoking or denying the
renewal of the license or permit or
dismissing the proceedings in
accordance with the administrative law
judge’s recommended decision.
(b) Rejecting the recommended
decision. After consideration of the
complete certified record of the hearing,
if the Director of Industry Operations
disagrees with the recommended
decision of the administrative law
judge, he may file a petition with the
Director for review of the recommended
decision, as provided in § 771.120. If the
Director of Industry Operations files
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Revocation or denial of renewal.
Pursuant to § 771.109(a), when the
Director of Industry Operations issues
an order revoking or denying the
renewal of a license or permit, he shall
furnish a copy of the order and of the
recommended decision on which it is
based to the Director. Should such order
be subsequently set aside on review by
the courts, the Director of Industry
Operations will so advise the Director.
§ 771.111 Proceedings involving violations
not within the division of issuance of
license or permit.
In the event violations occurred at a
place not within the field division
where the licensee or permittee is
located, the Director of Industry
Operations of the field division where
the licensee or permittee is located will
take jurisdiction over any proceeding
and will take appropriate action in
accordance with this subpart, including
issuing the relevant notice.
Subpart I—Review
§ 771.120
Director.
Appeal on petition to the
(a) An appeal to the Director may be
made by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee, or by the Director of Industry
Operations (DIO). For the applicant,
licensee, or permittee, such appeal shall
be made by filing a petition for review
on appeal with the Director within 15
days of the service of the adverse initial
decision by the Director of Industry
Operations. For the Director of Industry
Operations, such appeal shall be taken
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
by filing a petition for review on appeal
with the Director within 15 days of the
issuance of the administrative law
judge’s decision recommending against
revocation or denial of renewal. The
petitioning applicant, licensee, or
permittee must submit arguments
showing that the Director of Industry
Operations’ initial decision, and if
applicable the underlying
administrative law judge’s
recommended decision, was without
reasonable warrant in fact or contrary to
law and regulations. The petitioning
DIO must submit arguments showing
the administrative law judge’s
recommended decision was without
reasonable warrant in fact or contrary to
law and regulations. Nothing in this part
shall limit the authority of the Director
to review the administrative law judge’s
decision exercising all the powers that
he would have in making the
recommended decision.
(b) A copy of the petition shall be
filed with the Director of Industry
Operations or served on the applicant,
licensee, or permittee, as the case may
be. In the event of an appeal, the
Director of Industry Operations shall
immediately certify and forward the
complete original record, by certified
mail, to the Director, for his
consideration and review.
§ 771.121
Review by Director.
(a) Modification or reversal. On
appeal, the Director shall afford a
reasonable opportunity for the
submission of proposed findings,
conclusions, or exceptions with reasons
in support thereof and an opportunity
for oral argument. The Director may
alter or modify any finding of the
administrative law judge (or of the
Director of Industry Operations as the
case may be) and may affirm, reverse, or
modify the recommended decision of
the administrative law judge, or the
initial decision of the Director of
Industry Operations, or may remand the
case for further hearing, but shall not
consider evidence that is not a part of
the record.
(b) Affirmance. Except in the case of
a remand, when, on appeal, the Director
affirms the initial decision of the
Director of Industry Operations or the
recommended decision of the
administrative law judge, as the case
may be, such decision shall be the
agency’s final decision.
(c) Recusal. Appeals and petitions for
review shall not be decided by the
Director in any proceeding in which the
Director has engaged in an investigation
or prosecution and in such event the
Director shall so state his
disqualification in writing and refer the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
record to the Deputy Director for
appropriate action. The Deputy Director
may designate an Assistant Director or
one of the Deputy Director’s principal
aides to consider any proceeding
instead of the Director. The original
copy of the decision on review shall be
placed in the official record of the
proceeding, a signed duplicate original
shall be served upon the applicant,
licensee, or permittee, and a copy shall
be transmitted to the Director of
Industry Operations.
§ 771.122
Denial of renewal or revocation.
If the Director orders the denial of an
application, a copy of the application
marked ‘‘Disapproved’’ will be returned
to the applicant by the Director of
Industry Operations. If the Director
orders a revocation of a license of
permit, any stay of revocation will be
withdrawn and the revocation will
become effective upon the order of the
Director of Industry Operations. After
the issuance of a denial of a renewal
application or a revocation, and pending
the final determination of a timely
appeal, the licensee or permittee may
continue operations, if at all, pursuant
to § 555.83 of this chapter.
§ 771.123
Court review.
(a) If an applicant, licensee, or
permittee files an appeal in the United
States Court of Appeals for the circuit in
which he resides or has his principle
place of business, within 60 days after
the receipt of the Director’s decision, the
Director, upon notification that an
appeal has been taken, shall prepare the
record for submission to the court in
accordance with applicable court rules.
(b) If an applicant, licensee, or
permittee does not seek review with the
Director, but instead seeks review
within 60 days after the receipt of the
initial decision of the Director of
Industry Operations pursuant to
§ 771.109, the Director of Industry
Operations, upon notification that an
appeal has been taken, shall prepare the
record for submission to the court in
accordance with applicable court rules.
The Director of Industry Operations
shall notify the Director if such an
appeal is taken.
(c) The Director, or the Director of
Industry Operations, as the case may be,
shall certify the correctness of the
transcript of the record, forward one
copy to the attorney for the Government
in the review of the case, and file the
original record of the proceedings with
the original certificate in the appropriate
United States Court of Appeals.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64753
Subpart J—Miscellaneous
§ 771.124
Depositions.
The administrative law judge may
take or order the taking of depositions
by either party to the proceeding at such
time and place as the administrative law
judge may designate before a person
having the power to administer oaths,
upon application therefor and notice to
the parties to the action. The testimony
shall be reduced to writing by the
person taking the deposition, or a
person under his direction, and the
deposition shall be subscribed by the
deponent unless subscribing thereof is
waived in writing by the parties.
§ 771.125
Witnesses and fees.
Witnesses summoned before the
administrative law judge may be paid
the same fees and mileage that are paid
witnesses in the courts of the United
States, and witnesses whose depositions
are taken and the persons taking the
same shall severally be entitled to the
same fees as are paid for like services in
the courts of the United States. Witness
fees and mileage shall be paid by the
party at whose instance the witnesses
appear and the person taking the
deposition shall be paid by the party at
whose instance the deposition is taken.
§ 771.126
Discovery.
The discovery provisions of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are
not controlling with respect to agency
proceedings under this part. However,
fundamental fairness requires a party be
given the opportunity to know what
evidence is offered and a chance to
rebut such evidence. Either party may
petition the administrative law judge for
non-burdensome discovery if the party
can demonstrate that the interests of
justice require disclosure of these
materials.
§ 771.127
Privileges.
The Administrative Procedure Act, 5
U.S.C. 559, provides that, except as
otherwise required by law, privileges
relating to procedure or evidence apply
equally to agencies and persons.
Therefore, an agency may rely on
judicially-approved privileges to resist
production of its files where
appropriate.
Record
§ 771.135
What constitutes record.
The transcript of testimony,
pleadings, exhibits, all papers and
requests filed in the proceeding, and all
findings, decisions, and orders, shall
constitute the exclusive record. Where
the decision rests on official notice of
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
64754
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
material fact not appearing in the
record, the administrative law judge
shall so state in his findings and any
party shall, on timely request, be
afforded an opportunity to show facts to
the contrary.
§ 771.136
Availability.
A copy of the record shall be available
for inspection or copying by the parties
to the proceedings during business
hours at the office of the administrative
law judge or the Director of Industry
Operations or, pending administrative
review, at the Office of the Director.
Dated: November 5, 2019.
William P. Barr,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. 2019–24570 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 2700
Simplified Proceedings
Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
AGENCY:
The Federal Mine Safety and
Health Review Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is an independent
adjudicatory agency that provides
hearings and appellate review of cases
arising under the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977. On October 11,
2019, the Commission published in the
Federal Register a direct final rule
which would withdraw the
Commission’s procedures for simplified
proceedings. The Commission received
one comment on the rule and is
confirming the withdrawal of its
simplified proceeding rules.
DATES: The effective date of November
25, 2019, for the direct final rule
published October 11, 2019 (84 FR
54782), is confirmed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Stewart, Deputy General Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, Federal
Mine Safety and Health Review
Commission, at (202) 434–9935.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
A. Background
In 2010, the Commission published in
the Federal Register a final rule to
simplify the procedures for handling
certain civil penalty proceedings. The
Commission evaluated the procedures
in a pilot program extending almost
nine years.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:57 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
Based upon its evaluation of the
simplified proceedings pilot program,
the Commission determined that a
special set of procedures for its simplest
cases is not necessary at the present
time. The Commission’s overall
caseload has decreased since the
simplified proceedings rule was
promulgated. Moreover, parties may
request on a case-by-case basis that the
Commission adapt the Commission’s
conventional procedures as necessary to
expedite or simplify the processing of a
case.
On October 11, 2019 (84 FR 54782),
the Commission published a direct final
rule withdrawing the simplified
proceedings rule and permitting
comment. The Commission received
one comment from the Solicitor of
Labor, on behalf of the U.S. Department
of Labor. The Solicitor made no specific
comments on the procedural rules
themselves. Rather, the Solicitor
suggested that the Commission should
solicit more comments and data on the
manner to improve the proceedings,
including considering in part the
simplified proceeding rules of the
Occupational Safety and Health Review
Commission (‘‘OSHRC’’).
The Commission already considered
OSHRC’s simplified proceeding rules in
its determination that the Commission’s
simplified rules should be withdrawn.
Having considered the comments
received, the Commission has
determined that subpart J should be
withdrawn at the present time. If
practice proves the necessity for
different rules applicable to the
Commission’s simplest cases, the
Commission will publish a proposal of
such rules at that time.
B. Notice and Public Procedure
1. Executive Orders
The Commission is an independent
regulatory agency under section 3(b) of
Executive Order (‘‘E.O.’’) 12866 (Sept.
30, 1993), 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993);
E.O. 13563 (Jan. 18, 2011), 76 FR 3821
(Jan. 21, 2011); E.O. 13771 (Jan. 30,
2017), 82 FR 9339 (Feb. 3, 2017); E.O.
13777 (Feb. 24, 2017), 82 FR 12285
(Mar. 1, 2017); and E.O. 13132 (Aug. 4,
1999), 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999).
The Commission has determined that
this rulemaking does not have ‘‘takings
implications’’ under E.O. 12630 (Mar.
15, 1988), 53 FR 8859 (Mar. 18, 1988).
The Commission has determined that
these regulations meet all applicable
standards set forth in E.O. 12988 (Feb.
5, 1996), 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996).
2. Statutory Requirements
The Commission has determined that
this rulemaking is exempt from the
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (‘‘RFA’’) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), because the rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Commission has determined that
this rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (‘‘SBREFA’’) (5 U.S.C.
804(2)).
The Commission has determined that
the Paperwork Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’)
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) does not apply
because these rules do not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the OMB.
The Commission has determined that
the Congressional Review Act (‘‘CRA’’)
(5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) does not apply
because, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(C),
these rules are rules of agency
procedure or practice that do not
substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
The Commission has determined that
this rulemaking is not a major Federal
action significantly affecting the quality
of the human environment requiring an
environmental assessment under the
National Environmental Policy Act
(‘‘NEPA’’) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
The Commission is an independent
regulatory agency, and as such, is not
subject to the requirements of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(‘‘UMRA’’) (2 U.S.C. 1532 et seq.).
Dated: November 20, 2019.
Marco M. Rajkovich, Jr.,
Chairman, Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2019–25503 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6735–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9 and 721
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2018–0627; FRL–10001–
30]
RIN 2070–AB27
Significant New Use Rules on Certain
Chemical Substances (18–1)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is issuing significant new
use rules (SNURs) under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 22
chemical substances which are the
subject of premanufacture notices
(PMNs). The chemical substances are
subject to Orders issued by EPA under
TSCA. This action requires persons who
intend to manufacture (defined by
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM
25NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64740-64754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24570]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
27 CFR Parts 478, 555, and 771
[Docket No. ATF 33F; AG Order No. 4577-2019]
RIN 1140-AA40
Rules of Practice in Explosives License and Permit Proceedings
(2007R-5P); Revisions Reflecting Changes Consistent With the Homeland
Security Act of 2002
AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,
Department of Justice.
[[Page 64741]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is amending the regulations of the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) concerning
procedures and practices in connection with denials of initial
applications, denials of renewals, and revocations of explosives
licenses or permits. These regulations are being codified in a new part
entitled, ``Rules and Practice in License and Permit Proceedings.''
These regulations are based upon the regulations that ATF relied upon
prior to its transfer from the Department of the Treasury to the
Department of Justice. This final rule makes minor revisions to
regulations governing administrative proceedings related to the denial,
suspension, or revocation of a license, and the imposition of a civil
fine under Federal firearms law to reference regulations under ATF
authority. These revisions remove all references to statutes,
regulations, positions, and other terms that are applicable only to the
Department of the Treasury. These revisions reflect ATF's position as a
regulatory and enforcement agency under the Department of Justice and
are consistent with the regulations governing administrative hearing
processes for explosives licenses and permits.
DATES: This rule is effective December 26, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs and
Services, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice, 99 New York
Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648-7070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Attorney General has delegated to the Director of ATF
responsibility for administering and enforcing title I of the Gun
Control Act of 1968 (GCA), Public Law 90-618, as amended, 18 U.S.C.
chapter 44, relating to commerce in firearms and ammunition; and title
XI, Regulation of Explosives, of the Organized Crime Control Act of
1970 (OCCA), Public Law 91-452, as amended, 18 U.S.C. chapter 40. See
18 U.S.C. 926(a); 18 U.S.C. 843; 28 CFR 0.130. Under the GCA, ATF has
the authority to license applicants, renew licenses, and revoke Federal
firearms licenses. 18 U.S.C. 923. The OCCA, as amended by the Safe
Explosives Act, title XI, subtitle C of Public Law 107-296, the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (enacted November 25, 2002), authorizes
ATF to provide licenses and permits to qualified applicants for the
acquisition, distribution, storage, or use of explosive materials and
to renew or revoke such licenses and permits. 18 U.S.C. 843.
A. Rules of Practice in Permit Proceedings (27 CFR Part 71)
On November 25, 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-296 (the Act), which divided the
regulatory functions of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
into two separate agencies. The Act renamed the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, and Firearms as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives and transferred law enforcement and certain regulatory
functions to the Department of Justice. The Act also retained in the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury) certain functions of the former
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The functions retained by
Treasury became the responsibility of a new Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB). As a result of the Act, TTB has all regulatory
authority under 27 CFR part 71 and ATF therefore cannot promulgate new
regulations under that part, although ATF has continued to follow the
procedures set forth in part 71 to administer hearings related to the
application and revocation of Federal explosives licenses and permits.
See 28 CFR 0.133(a)(2).
B. License Proceedings (27 CFR Part 478)
Regulations that implement the provisions of the GCA are set forth
in 27 CFR part 478. Subpart E of part 478 relates to proceedings
involving Federal firearms licensees, including the denial, suspension,
or revocation of licenses and the imposition of civil fines.
Specifically, 27 CFR 478.76 provides that, at a hearing for the
disapproval of applications for firearms licenses, for the denial,
suspension, or revocation of a firearms license, or for imposition of a
civil fine under Federal firearms law, an applicant or licensee may be
represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other
person recognized to practice before ATF as provided in 31 CFR part 8,
if the representative complies with the applicable practice
requirements of 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527.
C. License and Permit Proceedings (27 CFR Part 555)
The regulations that implement OCCA procedural and substantive
requirements are found in 27 CFR part 555. Subpart E of part 555
relates to proceedings involving Federal explosives licensees and
permittees, including the denial of an initial application, denial of a
renewal, and revocation of a license or permit. Specifically, 27 CFR
555.78 provides that, at a hearing for the disapproval of applications
for explosives licenses, and for the denial of renewal or revocation of
such licenses or permits under Federal explosives law, an applicant,
licensee, or permittee may be represented by an attorney, a certified
public accountant, or any other person recognized to practice before
ATF as provided in 31 CFR part 8, if the representative complies with
the applicable practice requirements of 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527.
II. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
On October 7, 2014, the Department of Justice published a notice of
proposed rulemaking with a request for comments entitled, ``Rules of
Practice in Explosives License and Permit Proceedings (2007R-5P);
Revisions Reflecting Changes Consistent with the Homeland Security Act
of 2002.'' 79 FR 60391-60405. The proposed rule sought to revise ATF
regulations to add a new part that implements 18 U.S.C. 843 and 847
relating to the procedures and practice for the denials of initial
applications, denials of renewal, and revocations of explosives
licenses or permits by ATF under Federal explosives law. Additionally,
the proposed rule sought to make minor revisions to regulations
governing administrative proceedings related to the denial, suspension,
or revocation of a license, and the imposition of a civil fine under
Federal firearms law to reference regulations under ATF authority.
These changes clarify ATF's role in explosives license proceedings and
remove references to any regulations outside the scope of ATF's
authority.
Comments on the notice of proposed rulemaking were to be submitted
to ATF on or before January 5, 2015.
III. Comment Analysis and Department Response
Comments Received
In response to the notice of proposed rulemaking, ATF received two
comments. One commenter is an explosive and fertilizer trade
association; and the other is a university student. Both commenters
support ATF's proposal to transfer and consolidate regulations
governing explosives license applications and renewals or revocation of
licenses and
[[Page 64742]]
permits, improving the enforcement of ATF's regulations.
One of the commenters, the Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME),
notes that the creation of a new part 771 addresses jurisdictional and
authority issues within ATF. IME agrees that ATF should maintain
jurisdiction for all explosives programs and since the regulatory
authority over part 71 resides with another agency, ATF should
promulgate new regulations affecting the procedures for hearings that
it is responsible for conducting. IME further states: ``If promulgated,
the new Part will bring all administrative and enforcement
responsibilities connected with the explosives licensing and permitting
program under the jurisdiction of ATF and will allow the Bureau,
itself, to affect any necessary changes to the procedural rules
governing its due process proceedings.'' Further, IME agrees with ATF's
clarification of 27 CFR 555.78 that will allow for self-representation
in licensing and permit hearings conducted by ATF.
The second commenter, a student, generally supports the rule
because the proscribed regulation changes will not hurt the economy but
rather ``help[s] the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, State, local, or tribal
government and communities.'' The same commenter further notes that the
rule gives every person the right to due process if their application
has been denied for a firearm.
Department Response
The Department agrees that by promulgating regulations in a new
part, 27 CFR part 771, ATF will be able to better govern and administer
explosives license and permit proceedings that come under its
jurisdiction.
IV. Final Rule
This final rule implements the amendments to the regulations in 27
CFR 478.76, 555.73, 555.75, 555.78, 555.79, 555.82, and adds new part
771, as specified in the notice of proposed rulemaking published on
October 7, 2014 (79 FR 60391-60405). Additionally, this final rule
includes some minor technical amendments. First, in 27 CFR 771.5, the
definition of ``Application'' is amended to include renewal
applications and the definition of ``Person'' is amended to include
``company.'' Second, Sec. 771.59, which governs an initial application
for a license or permit, is amended to eliminate the statement that a
request for hearing should include a statement of the reasons for a
hearing; this change makes this provision consistent with the
requirements for an existing Federal explosive licensee requesting a
hearing in Sec. 771.60. Third, Sec. Sec. 771.59 and 771.60 are
amended to add that the licensee or permittee will receive notice of
the assignment of an administrative law judge (ALJ) by the Director of
Industry Operations (DIO), if the ALJ has not already provided such
notice; this clarifies that the ALJ will often provide this
notification but the DIO must provide this notice if not already
provided by the ALJ. Fourth, a reference to Sec. 771.59 is added in
Sec. 771.64, which concerns part of the process following a request
for a hearing, to reflect the fact that requests for a hearing can be
made as a result of denial of an initial application in addition to the
revocation or denial of a renewal application. Fifth, Sec. 771.82 is
amended to include a statement that the Federal Rules of Evidence are
not binding on these proceedings, and to include a reference to expert
testimony and the relevant Federal Rule of Evidence in Sec. 771.82(a).
These changes are necessary to clarify what is admissible in a hearing
and to clarify that both opinion and expert testimony shall be admitted
in a hearing when the ALJ is satisfied that the witness is properly
qualified pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 701 or 702. Sixth,
Sec. 771.95, which governs the responsibilities of an ALJ, is amended
to eliminate the sentence that ALJs shall be under the administrative
control of the Director. This sentence addresses the responsibilities
of the Director and not the responsibilities of the ALJs. Therefore,
the sentence is unnecessary as to the responsibilities of the ALJ and
confusing as to application. Seventh, Sec. 771.97(k), which authorizes
the ALJ to take any action authorized by an ATF rule and consistent
with the Administrative Procedure Act, is amended to add a cross-
reference to ATF's authority concerning licenses and permits, 18 U.S.C.
843, and the provision of the Administrative Procedure Act setting out
authority for individuals presiding over agency hearings, 5 U.S.C.
556(c). Eighth, the final rule amends 27 CFR 771.99 to state that
disorderly or contemptuous language or conduct by an attorney (either
for a licensee or permittee or for the Government), may be reported to
the Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility,
consistent with 28 CFR 0.39a(a)(9). Finally, other changes eliminate
superfluous language or correct stylistic errors.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Review
A. Executive Order 12866, 13563, and 13771
This final rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' section
1(b), The Principles of Regulation; Executive Order 13563, ``Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b), General Principles of
Regulation, and section 6, Retrospective Analyses of Existing Rules;
and Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs.''
Both Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule consolidates and clarifies regulations governing
explosives license application renewal or revocation of licenses and
permits. This rule would not add any costs to industry because this
rule puts into regulation current industry and agency practices;
therefore, the explosives industry would not need to incur any hourly
or capital burdens in order to comply with this final rule. The
Department has assessed the costs and benefits of this regulation and
believes that the regulatory approach selected imposes no new
regulatory costs and maximizes net benefits.
This final rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more, nor will it adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs,
the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal
government or communities. Similarly, it does not create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another agency, materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof, or raise novel legal or policy issues arising out
of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set
forth in Executive Order 12866. The Department has determined that this
final rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f). Accordingly, this
[[Page 64743]]
final rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Because this rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866,
this action is not subject to Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs.''
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563 directs agencies to develop a
plan to review existing significant rules that may be ``outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome,'' and to make
appropriate changes where warranted. The Department selected and
reviewed this rule under the criteria set forth in its Plan for
Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules, and determined that this rule
merely transfers and consolidates regulations governing explosives
license application renewal or revocation of licenses and permits,
improving the enforcement of ATF regulations.
B. Executive Order 13132
This final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6
of Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' the Attorney General has
determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact
statement.
C. Executive Order 12988
This final rule meets the applicable standards set forth in
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice
Reform.''
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)) exempts an agency
from the requirement to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of
any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements if the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small
governmental jurisdictions. The Attorney General has reviewed this
final rule and, by approving it, certifies that it will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule codifies the ATF regulations governing the
procedure and practice for denying applications, denying renewals, and
revoking explosives licenses or permits under Federal explosives law in
a new part 771 under ATF's regulatory authority. Additionally, this
final rule updates the regulations governing the denial, suspension, or
revocation of a firearms license, and imposition of a civil fine under
Federal firearms law to only reference regulations under ATF authority.
This rule also amends the regulations to require an applicant or
licensee in a proceeding concerning the denial, suspension, or
revocation of a firearms license, or the imposition of a civil fine
under Federal firearms law, to file a duly executed power of attorney
designating his representative, and waivers, if applicable, under the
Privacy Act of 1974. See 5 U.S.C. 552(a), and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information).
This is required in the current regulations by reference to 31 CFR part
8 and 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527. The changes in this final rule
are purely administrative and do not add any new requirements that
would have any impact on the economy.
E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. See 5
U.S.C. 804. This final rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping
requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Drafting Information
The author of this document is Denise Brown; Enforcement Programs
and Services; Office of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives.
List of Subjects
27 CFR Part 478
Administrative practice and procedure, Arms and munitions, Customs
duties and inspection, Exports, Imports, Intergovernmental relations,
Law enforcement officers, Military personnel, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Research, Seizures and forfeitures,
Transportation.
27 CFR Part 555
Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and
inspection, Explosives, Hazardous substances, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety, Security measures,
Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation, Warehouses.
27 CFR Part 771
Administrative practice and procedure, Explosives.
Authority and Issuance
Accordingly, for reasons discussed in the preamble, 27 CFR chapter
II is amended as follows:
PART 478--COMMERCE IN FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
0
1. The authority citation for 27 part 478 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 18 U.S.C. 921-931; 44 U.S.C.
3504(h).
0
2. Revise Sec. 478.76 to read as follows:
Sec. 478.76 Representation at a hearing.
Applicants or licensees may represent themselves or be represented
by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person,
specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney that shall
be filed in the proceeding by the applicant or licensee. The applicant
or licensee shall file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of
1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of returns
and return information). The Director of Industry Operations may be
represented in proceedings under Sec. Sec. 478.72 and 478.74 by an
attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel who is authorized to execute
and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding, on behalf
of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney's own name as
``Attorney for the Government.''
[[Page 64744]]
PART 555--COMMERCE IN EXPLOSIVES
0
3. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 555 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 847.
Sec. 555.73 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 555.73 by removing ``part 71'' and adding in its place
``part 771''.
Sec. 555.75 [Amended]
0
5. Amend Sec. 555.75 by removing ``part 71'' and adding in its place
``part 771''.
0
6. Revise Sec. 555.78 to read as follows:
Sec. 555.78 Representation at a hearing.
An applicant, licensee, or permittee may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other
person, specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney
that shall be filed in the proceeding by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee. The applicant, licensee, or permittee shall file waivers, if
applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings under
Sec. Sec. 555.73 and 555.75 by an attorney in the Office of Chief
Counsel who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs and other
papers in the proceeding, on behalf of the Director of Industry
Operations, in the attorney's own name as ``Attorney for the
Government.''
Sec. 555.79 [Amended]
0
7. Amend Sec. 555.79 by removing ``(a)'', ``(b)'', and ``(c)'' and
removing ``part 71'' and adding in its place ``part 771''.
0
8. Revise Sec. 555.82 to read as follows:
Sec. 555.82 Rules of practice in license and permit proceedings.
Regulations governing the procedure and practice for disapproval of
applications for explosives licenses and permits and for the denial of
renewal or revocation of such licenses and permits under the Act are
contained in part 771 of this chapter.
0
9. Add subchapter E, consisting of part 771, to read as follows:
SUBCHAPTER E--EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT PROCEEDINGS
PART 771--RULES OF PRACTICE IN EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT
PROCEEDINGS
Subpart A--Scope and Construction of Regulations
Sec.
771.1 Scope of part.
771.2 Liberal construction.
771.3 Forms prescribed.
Subpart B--Definitions
771.5 Meaning of terms.
Subpart C--General
771.25 Communications and pleadings.
771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or permittee.
771.27 Service on the Director of Industry Operations or Director.
Time
771.28 Computation.
771.29 Continuances and extensions.
Representation at Hearings
771.30 Personal representation.
771.31 Attorneys and other representatives.
Subpart D--Compliance and Settlement
771.35 Opportunity for compliance.
771.36 Settlement.
771.37 Notice of contemplated action.
771.38 Licensee's or permittee's failure to meet requirements within
reasonable time.
771.39 Authority of Director of Industry Operations to proceed with
revocation or denial action.
Subpart E--Revocation or Denial
771.40 Denial of initial application.
771.41 Denial of renewal application or revocation of license or
permit.
771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses or permits.
771.43 Grounds for denial of applications for licenses or permits.
Subpart F--Hearing Procedure
Notices
771.55 Content.
771.56 Forms.
771.57 Execution and disposition.
771.58 Designated place of hearing.
Request for Hearing
771.59 Initial application proceedings.
771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.
771.61 Notice of hearing.
Non-Request for Hearing
771.62 Initial application.
771.63 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Responses to Notices
771.64 Answers.
771.65 Responses admitting facts.
771.66 Initial conferences.
Failure to Appear
771.67 Initial applications.
771.68 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Waiver of Hearing
771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.
771.70 Adjudication based upon written submissions.
Surrender of License or Permit
771.71 Before citation.
771.72 After citation.
Motions
771.73 General.
771.74 Prior to hearing.
771.75 At hearing.
Hearing
771.76 General.
771.77 Initial applications.
771.78 Revocation or denial of renewal.
Burden of Proof
771.79 Initial applications.
771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.
General
771.81 Stipulations at hearing.
771.82 Evidence.
771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments, briefs, and proposed
findings.
771.84 Reopening of the hearing.
Record of Testimony
771.85 Stenographic record.
771.86 Oath of reporter.
Subpart G--Administrative Law Judges
771.95 Responsibilities of administrative law judges.
771.96 Disqualification.
771.97 Powers.
771.98 Separation of functions.
771.99 Conduct of hearing.
771.100 Unavailability of administrative law judge.
Subpart H--Decisions
771.105 Administrative law judge's findings and recommended
decision.
771.106 Certification and transmittal of record and decision.
Action by Director of Industry Operations
771.107 Initial application proceedings.
771.108 Director of Industry Operations' decision.
771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.
771.110 Revocation or denial of renewal.
771.111 Proceedings involving violations not within the division of
issuance of license or permit.
Subpart I--Review
771.120 Appeal on petition to the Director.
771.121 Review by Director.
771.122 Denial of renewal or revocation.
771.123 Court review.
Subpart J--Miscellaneous
771.124 Depositions.
771.125 Witnesses and fees.
771.126 Discovery.
771.127 Privileges.
Record
771.135 What constitutes record.
771.136 Availability.
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 843, 847.
Subpart A--Scope and Construction of Regulations
Sec. 771.1 Scope of part.
Regulations in this part govern procedures and practices for
disapproving applications for licenses and permits and denying renewal
of or revocation of such licenses or permits under 18 U.S.C. chapter
40.
[[Page 64745]]
Sec. 771.2 Liberal construction.
Regulations in this part shall be liberally construed to secure
just, expeditious, and efficient determination of the issues presented.
The Rules of Civil Procedure for the U.S. District Courts (28 U.S.C.
appendix) are not controlling, but may act as a guide in any situation
not provided for or controlled by this part and shall be liberally
construed or relaxed when necessary.
Sec. 771.3 Forms prescribed.
(a) The Director is authorized to prescribe all forms required by
this part. All of the information called for in each form shall be
furnished as indicated by the headings on the form and the instructions
on or pertaining to the form. In addition, information called for in
each form shall be furnished as required by this part.
(b) Requests for forms should be made to the ATF Distribution
Center or through the ATF website at https://www.atf.gov.
Subpart B--Definitions
Sec. 771.5 Meaning of terms.
When used in this part and in forms prescribed under this part,
where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible
with the intent thereof, terms shall have the meaning provided in this
subpart. Words in the plural form shall include the singular, and vice
versa, and words importing the masculine gender shall include the
feminine.
Administrative law judge. The person appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
3105, designated to preside over any administrative proceedings under
this part.
Applicant. Any person who has filed an application for a license or
permit under 18 U.S.C. chapter 40.
Application. Any application for a license or permit, including
renewal applications, under 18 U.S.C. chapter 40.
ATF. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives,
Department of Justice.
Attorney for the Government. An attorney in the ATF Office of Chief
Counsel authorized to represent the Director of Industry Operations in
the proceeding.
CFR. The Code of Federal Regulations.
Contemplated notice. Includes any notice contemplating the
revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit.
Director. The Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives, Department of Justice.
Director of Industry Operations. The principal ATF official in a
Field Operations division responsible for administering regulations in
this part.
Ex parte communication. An oral or written communication not on the
public record with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all
parties is not given, but not including requests for status reports.
Initial decision. The decision of the Director of Industry
Operations in a proceeding concerning the revocation of, denial of
renewal of, or denial of application for a license or permit. This
decision becomes the agency's final decision in the absence of an
appeal.
Final decision. The definitive decision of ATF, e.g., the agency's
decision in the absence of an appeal or the Director's decision
following an appeal to the Director.
License. Subject to applicable law, entitles the licensee to
transport, ship, and receive explosive materials in interstate or
foreign commerce, and to engage in the business specified by the
license, at the location described on the license.
Licensee. Any importer, manufacturer, or dealer licensed under the
provisions of 18 U.S.C. chapter 40 and 27 CFR part 555.
Limited permit. A permit issued to a person authorizing him to
receive for his use explosive materials from a licensee or permittee in
his State of residence on no more than six occasions during the 12-
month period in which the permit is valid. A limited permit does not
authorize the receipt or transportation of explosive materials in
interstate or foreign commerce.
Other term. Any other term defined in the Federal explosives laws
(18 U.S.C. chapter 40), the regulations promulgated thereunder (27 CFR
part 555), or the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.),
where used in this part, shall have the meaning assigned to it therein.
Permittee. Any user of explosives for a lawful purpose who has
obtained either a user permit or a limited permit under 18 U.S.C.
chapter 40 and 27 CFR part 555.
Person. Any individual, corporation, company, association, firm,
partnership, society, or joint stock company.
Recommended decision. The advisory decision of the administrative
law judge in any proceeding regarding the revocation of, denial of
renewal of, or denial of application for a license or permit. ATF must
act on a recommended decision with its own initial or final decision.
User-limited permit. A user permit valid only for a single purchase
transaction. Recipients of a user-limited permit must obtain a new
permit for any subsequent purchase transaction.
User permit. A permit issued to a person authorizing him to--
(1) Acquire for his own use explosive materials from a licensee in
a State other than the State in which he resides or from a foreign
country; and
(2) Transport explosive materials in interstate or foreign
commerce.
Willfulness. The plain indifference to, or purposeful disregard of,
a known legal duty. Willfulness may be demonstrated by, but does not
require, repeat violations involving a known legal duty.
Subpart C--General
Sec. 771.25 Communications and pleadings.
(a) All communications to the Government regarding the procedures
set forth in this part and all pleadings, such as answers, motions,
requests, or other papers or documents required or permitted to be
filed under this part, relating to a proceeding pending before an
administrative law judge, shall be addressed to the administrative law
judge at his post of duty and the Attorney for the Government.
Communications concerning proceedings not pending before an
administrative law judge should be addressed to the Director of
Industry Operations or Director, as the case may be.
(b) Except to the extent required for the disposition of ex parte
matters as authorized by law, no ex parte communications shall be made
to or from the administrative law judge concerning the merits of the
adjudication. If the administrative law judge receives or makes an ex
parte communication not authorized by law, the administrative law judge
shall place on the record of the proceeding:
(1) All such written communications;
(2) Memoranda stating the substance of all such oral
communications; and
(3) All written responses and memoranda stating the substance of
all oral responses to paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
Sec. 771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or permittee.
All orders, notices, motions, and other formal documents required
to be served under the regulations in this part may be served by
mailing a signed, original copy thereof to the designated
representative of the applicant, licensee, or permittee by certified
mail, with request for return receipt card, at the representative's
business address, by personal service, or as otherwise agreed
[[Page 64746]]
to by the parties. If the applicant, licensee, or permittee has not yet
designated a representative, all orders, notices, motions, and other
formal documents required to be served under the regulations in this
part may be served by mailing a signed, original copy thereof to the
applicant, licensee, or permittee at the address stated on his
application, license, or permit, or at his last known address, or by
delivery of such original copy to the applicant, licensee, or permittee
personally, or in the case of a corporation, partnership, or other
unincorporated association, by delivering the same to an officer, or
manager, or general agent thereof, or to its attorney of record. Such
personal service may be made by any employee of the Department of
Justice designated by the Attorney General or by any employee of ATF. A
certificate of mailing and the return receipt card, or certificate of
service signed by the person making such service, shall be filed as a
part of the record.
Sec. 771.27 Service on the Director of Industry Operations or
Director.
Pleadings, motions, notices, and other formal documents may be
served by certified mail, by personal service, or as otherwise agreed
to by the parties, on the Director of Industry Operations (or upon the
Attorney for the Government on behalf of the Director of Industry
Operations), or on the Director, if the proceeding is before him for
review on appeal.
Time
Sec. 771.28 Computation.
In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this part,
the day of the act, event, or default after which the designated period
of time is to run is not to be included. The last day of the period to
be computed is to be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or
Federal holiday, in which event the period runs until the next day that
is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. Pleadings, requests, or
other papers or documents required or permitted to be filed under this
part must be received for filing at the appropriate office within the
time limits, if any, for such filing.
Sec. 771.29 Continuances and extensions.
For good cause shown, the administrative law judge, Director, or
Director of Industry Operations, as the case may be, may grant
continuances and, as to all matters pending before him, extend any time
limit prescribed by the regulations in this part (except where the time
limit is statutory).
Representation at Hearings
Sec. 771.30 Personal representation.
Any individual or member of a partnership may appear for himself,
or for such partnership, and a corporation or association may be
represented by a bona fide officer of such corporation or association,
upon showing of adequate authorization.
Sec. 771.31 Attorneys and other representatives.
An applicant, licensee, or permittee may represent himself, or be
represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other
person, specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney
that shall be filed in the proceeding by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee. The applicant, licensee, or permittee shall file waivers, if
applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c)
(confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The
Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings by an
attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel who is authorized to execute
and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding on behalf
of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney's own name as
``Attorney for the Government.''
Subpart D--Compliance and Settlement
Sec. 771.35 Opportunity for compliance.
No license or permit shall be revoked or denied renewal unless,
prior to the institution of proceedings, facts or conduct warranting
such action shall have been called to the attention of the licensee or
permittee by the Director of Industry Operations in writing in a
contemplated notice, and the licensee or permittee shall have been
accorded an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with all
lawful requirements as set forth in section 9(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act. In cases in which the Director of Industry Operations
alleges in his contemplated notice, with supporting reasons, willful
violations or that the public interest requires otherwise, this section
does not apply and the issuance of a contemplated notice is
unnecessary.
Sec. 771.36 Settlement.
Any proposals of settlement should be made to the Director of
Industry Operations, but may be made through the Attorney for the
Government. Where necessary, the date of the hearing may be postponed
pending consideration of such proposals when they are made in good
faith and not for the purpose of delay. If proposals of settlement are
submitted, and they are considered unsatisfactory, the Director of
Industry Operations may reject the proposals and may, either directly
or through the Attorney for the Government, inform the licensee or
permittee of any conditions on which the alleged violations may be
settled. If the proposals of settlement are considered satisfactory to
the Director of Industry Operations, the licensee or permittee shall be
notified thereof and the proceeding shall be dismissed.
Sec. 771.37 Notice of contemplated action.
Where the Director of Industry Operations has not ascertained
whether the licensee or permittee has willfully violated the Federal
explosives laws and where he believes the matter has the potential to
be settled informally, i.e., without formal administrative proceedings,
he shall, in accordance with section 5(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act, prior to the issuance of a notice of revocation or
denial of renewal, give the licensee or permittee a contemplated notice
of such action and an opportunity to show why the license or permit
should not be revoked or denied renewal. The notice should inform the
licensee or permittee of the charges on which the notice would be
based, if issued, and afford him a period of 15 days from the date of
the notice, or such longer period as the Director of Industry
Operations deems necessary, in which to submit proposals of settlement
to the Director of Industry Operations. Where informal settlement is
not reached promptly because of inaction by the applicant, licensee, or
permittee or proposals are made for the purpose of delay, a notice
shall be issued in accordance with Sec. 771.42 or Sec. 771.43, as
appropriate. The issuance of a notice of contemplated action does not
entitle the recipient to a hearing before an administrative law judge.
Sec. 771.38 Licensee's or permittee's failure to meet requirements
within reasonable time.
If the licensee or permittee fails to meet the requirements of
applicable laws and regulations in this part within such reasonable
time as may be specified by the Director of Industry Operations,
proceedings for revocation or denial of renewal of the license or
permit shall be initiated.
Sec. 771.39 Authority of Director of Industry Operations to proceed
with revocation or denial action.
Where the evidence is conclusive and the nature of the violation is
such as to preclude any settlement, the violation is of a continuing
character that necessitates immediate action to protect
[[Page 64747]]
the public interest, or the Director of Industry Operations believes
that any informal settlement of the alleged violation will not ensure
future compliance with applicable laws and regulations in this part, or
in any similar case where the circumstances are such as to clearly
preclude informal settlement, and the Director of Industry Operations
so finds and states the reasons therefor in the notice, the Director of
Industry Operations may proceed with the revocation or denial of
renewal.
Subpart E--Revocation or Denial
Sec. 771.40 Denial of initial application.
Whenever the Director of Industry Operations has reason to believe
that an applicant for an original license or permit is not eligible to
receive a license or permit under the provisions of Sec. 555.49 of
this chapter, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice
of denial on ATF Form 5400.11 (Notice of Denial of Application for
License or Permit) (F 5400.11). The notice will set forth the matters
of fact and law relied upon in determining that the application should
be denied and will afford the applicant 15 days from the date of
receipt of the notice in which to request a hearing to review the
denial. If no request for a hearing is filed within that time, a copy
of the application, marked ``Disapproved,'' will be returned to the
applicant.
Sec. 771.41 Denial of renewal application or revocation of license
or permit.
If, following the opportunity for compliance under Sec. 555.71 of
this chapter, or without opportunity for compliance under Sec. 555.71
of this chapter as circumstances warrant, the Director of Industry
Operations finds that the licensee or permittee is not likely to comply
with applicable laws or regulations in this part or is otherwise not
eligible to continue operations authorized under his license or permit,
the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice of denial of
the renewal application or revocation of the license or permit, ATF F
5400.11 (Notice of Denial of Application for License or Permit) or ATF
Form 5400.10 (Notice of Revocation of License or Permit) (F 5400.10),
as appropriate. The notice will set forth the matters of fact
constituting the violations specified, dates, places, and the sections
of law and regulations violated. In the case of the revocation of a
license or permit, the notice will specify the date on which the action
is effective, which date will be on or after the date the notice is
served on the licensee or permittee. The notice will also advise the
licensee or permittee that he may, within 15 days after receipt of the
notice, request a hearing and, if applicable, a stay of the effective
date of the revocation of his license or permit.
Sec. 771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses or permits.
Whenever the Director of Industry Operations has reason to believe
that any holder of a license or permit has willfully violated any
provision of 18 U.S.C. chapter 40 or 27 CFR part 555 or has become
ineligible to continue operations authorized under the license or
permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice for
the revocation of such license or permit, as the case may be.
Sec. 771.43 Grounds for denial of applications for licenses or
permits.
If, upon examination of any application (including a renewal
application) for a license or permit, the Director of Industry
Operations has reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to
such license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue
a denial of the application. An applicant is not eligible for a license
or permit if he fails to meet the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 843(b) and
Sec. 555.49 of this chapter.
Subpart F--Hearing Procedure
Notices
Sec. 771.55 Content.
(a) Notices for the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or
permit shall be promptly issued by the Director of Industry Operations
and shall set forth:
(1) The sections of law and regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which the revocation or denial is
based, i.e., the matters of fact constituting the violations specified,
dates, places, and sections of law and regulations violated;
(3) In the case of a revocation, the date on which the action is
effective; and
(4) That the licensee or permittee has 15 days from receipt of the
notice within which to request a hearing before an administrative law
judge.
(b) Notices for the denial of an initial application for a license
or permit shall set forth:
(1) The sections of law and regulations relied upon for authority
and jurisdiction;
(2) The specific grounds upon which the denial is based, i.e., the
matters of fact and law relied upon for the disapproval of the
application; and
(3) That the application will be disapproved unless a hearing is
requested within 15 days from receipt of the notice.
Sec. 771.56 Forms.
Notices shall be issued on the following forms:
(a) ATF Form 5400.9, ``Order After Denial or Revocation Hearing,''
for all revocations or denials of renewal of licenses or permits
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. chapter 40 after a hearing has been held and a
Recommended Decision has been issued by the administrative law judge;
(b) Form 5400.10, ``Notice of Revocation for License or Permit,''
for all revocations of licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
chapter 40, except as provided for in paragraph (a) of this section;
(c) Form 5400.11, ``Notice of Denial of Application for License or
Permit,'' for the denial of renewal or original applications for
licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. chapter 40, except as
provided for in paragraph (a) of this section;
(d) Form 5400.12, ``Notice of Contemplated Denial or Revocation of
License or Permit,'' for the contemplated revocation or denial of
renewal application of licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
chapter 40; or
(e) Such other forms as the Director may prescribe.
Sec. 771.57 Execution and disposition.
A signed original of the applicable form shall be served on the
licensee or permittee. If a hearing is requested, a copy shall be sent
to the administrative law judge designated to conduct the hearing. Any
remaining copies shall be retained for the office of the Director of
Industry Operations.
Sec. 771.58 Designated place of hearing.
The designated place of hearing shall be determined by the
administrative law judge, taking into consideration the convenience and
necessity of the parties and their representatives.
Request for Hearing
Sec. 771.59 Initial application proceedings.
(a) If the applicant for an initial license or permit desires a
hearing, he shall file a request in writing with the Director of
Industry Operations within 15 days after receipt of notice of the
disapproval, in whole or in part, of the application.
(b) On receipt of the request, the Director of Industry Operations
shall forward a copy of the request, together with a copy of the
notice, to the Office of Chief Counsel for the assignment of an
administrative law judge.
[[Page 64748]]
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel notifies the Director of
Industry Operations or the Attorney for the Government of the
assignment of an administrative law judge, the Director of Industry
Operations shall notify the licensee or permittee of the assignment, if
the administrative law judge has not already done so.
Sec. 771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.
(a) If the licensee or permittee desires a hearing, he shall file a
request, in writing, with the Director of Industry Operations within 15
days after receipt of the notice or within such time as the Director of
Industry Operations may allow.
(b) Where a licensee or permittee requests a hearing, the Director
of Industry Operations shall forward a copy of the request, together
with a copy of the notice, to the Office of Chief Counsel for the
assignment of an administrative law judge.
(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel notifies the Director of
Industry Operations or the Attorney for the Government of the
assignment of an administrative law judge, the Director of Industry
Operations shall notify the licensee or permittee of the assignment, if
the administrative law judge has not already done so.
(d) In the case of a revocation, a licensee or permittee may
include a request for a stay of the effective date of revocation with
the request for a hearing.
(e) On receipt of a request for a stay of the effective date of a
revocation, the Director of Industry Operations shall timely advise the
licensee or permittee whether the stay is granted.
(1) If the stay is granted, the matter shall be referred to an
administrative law judge pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) If the stay is denied, the licensee or permittee may request an
immediate hearing. In this event, the Director of Industry Operations
shall immediately refer the matter to the Office of Chief Counsel for
the assignment of an administrative law judge, who shall set a date and
place for hearing, which date shall be no later than 10 days from the
date the licensee or permittee requested the immediate hearing.
Sec. 771.61 Notice of hearing.
Once a request for a hearing has been referred to the
administrative law judge, the administrative law judge shall set a time
and place for a hearing and shall serve notice thereof upon the parties
at least 10 days in advance of the hearing date.
Non-Request for Hearing
Sec. 771.62 Initial application.
In the case of an initial application, if the applicant does not
request a hearing within 15 days, or within such additional time as the
Director of Industry Operations may in his discretion allow, the
Director of Industry Operations will return a copy of the application,
marked ``Disapproved,'' to the applicant, accompanied by a brief
statement including the findings upon which the denial is based.
Sec. 771.63 Revocation or denial of renewal.
In the case of a revocation or denial of renewal of an application,
if the licensee or permittee does not request a hearing within 15 days,
or within such additional time as the Director of Industry Operations
may in his discretion allow, the Director of Industry Operations shall
make the initial decision in the case pursuant to Sec. 771.78(b).
Responses to Notices
Sec. 771.64 Answers.
(a) Where the licensee or permittee requests a hearing in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 771.59 and 771.60, a written response to the
relevant notice may be filed with the administrative law judge and
served on the Director of Industry Operations within 15 days after the
licensee or permittee receives service of the designation of the
administrative law judge.
(b) Where no hearing is requested, the licensee or permittee may
file a written answer to the relevant notice with the Director of
Industry Operations within 15 days after service of the notice.
(c) An answer shall contain a concise statement of the facts that
constitute the grounds for defense. A hearing, if requested, may be
limited to the issues contained in the notice and the answer. The
administrative law judge or Director of Industry Operations, as the
case may be, may, as a matter of discretion, waive any requirement of
this section.
(d) Answers need not be filed in initial application proceedings.
Sec. 771.65 Responses admitting facts.
If the licensee or permittee desires to waive the hearing on the
allegations of fact set forth in the notice and does not contest the
facts, the answer may consist of a statement that the licensee or
permittee admits all material allegations of fact charged in the notice
to be true. The Director of Industry Operations shall base the decision
on the notice and such answer, although such an answer shall not affect
the licensee's or permittee's right to submit proposed findings of fact
and conclusions of law or right to appeal.
Sec. 771.66 Initial conferences.
(a) In any proceeding, the administrative law judge, upon his own
motion or upon the motion of one of the parties or their qualified
representatives, may in the administrative law judge's discretion
direct the parties or their qualified representatives to appear at a
specified time and place for a conference to consider:
(1) Simplification of the issues;
(2) The necessity of amendments to the pleadings;
(3) The possibility of obtaining stipulations, admissions of facts,
and documents;
(4) The possibility of both parties exchanging information or
scheduling discovery;
(5) A date on which both parties will simultaneously submit lists
of proposed hearing exhibits;
(6) Limiting the number of expert witnesses;
(7) Identifying and, if practicable, scheduling all witnesses to be
called; however, there is no requirement in these proceedings for the
parties to submit pre-hearing statements or statements of proposed
testimony by witnesses; and
(8) Such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the
proceeding.
(b) As soon as practicable after such conference, the
administrative law judge shall issue an order that recites the action
taken, the amendments allowed to the pleadings, and the agreements made
by the parties or their qualified representatives as to any of the
matters considered. The order shall also limit the issues for hearing
to those not disposed of by admission or agreement. Such order shall
control the subsequent course of the proceedings, unless modified for
good cause by a subsequent order. After discovery is complete, the
order may be amended or supplemented if necessary.
Failure To Appear
Sec. 771.67 Initial applications.
Where the applicant on an initial application for a license or
permit has requested a hearing and does not appear at the appointed
time and place, evidence has not been offered to refute or explain the
grounds upon which disapproval of the application is contemplated, and
no good cause has been shown for the failure to appear, the applicant
shall be considered to have waived the hearing. When such waiver
occurs, a default judgment against the applicant will be entered and
the
[[Page 64749]]
administrative law judge shall recommend disapproval of said
application.
Sec. 771.68 Revocation or denial of renewal.
If, on the date set for a hearing concerning the revocation or
denial of renewal of a license or permit, the licensee or permittee
does not appear, no evidence has been offered, and no good cause has
been shown for the failure to appear, the Attorney for the Government
will proceed ex parte and offer for the record sufficient evidence to
make a prima facie case. At such hearing, documents, statements, and
affidavits may be submitted in lieu of testimony of witnesses.
Waiver of Hearing
Sec. 771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.
At any time prior to the assignment of an administrative law judge,
the licensee or permittee may, by filing written notice with the
Director of Industry Operations, withdraw his request for a hearing. If
such a notice is filed after assignment to the administrative law judge
and prior to issuance of his recommended decision the Director of
Industry Operations shall move the administrative law judge to dismiss
the proceedings as moot. If such a notice is filed either after
issuance of a notice of denial or notice of revocation and before
assignment of the administrative law judge, or after issuance by the
administrative law judge of his recommended decision and prior to the
Director of Industry Operations' order disapproving the application or
denying the renewal of or revoking the license or permit, the Director
of Industry Operations shall, by order, dismiss the proceeding.
Sec. 771.70 Adjudication based upon written submissions.
The licensee or permittee may waive the hearing before the
administrative law judge and stipulate that the matter will be
adjudicated by the Director of Industry Operations based upon written
submissions. Written submissions may include stipulations of law or
facts, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, briefs, or any
other documentary material. The pleadings, together with the written
submissions of both the licensee or permittee and the attorney for the
Government, shall constitute the record on which the initial decision
shall be based. The election to contest the denial or revocation
without a hearing under this section does not affect the licensee's or
permittee's right to appeal to the Director pursuant to Sec. 555.79 of
this chapter or to the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit
in which the licensee or permittee resides or has his principle place
of business pursuant to Sec. 555.80 of this chapter.
Surrender of License or Permit
Sec. 771.71 Before citation.
If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license or permit before
the notice of revocation or denial of renewal, the Director of Industry
Operations may accept the surrender. But if the evidence, in the
opinion of the Director of Industry Operations, warrants issuance of a
notice for revocation or denial of renewal, the surrender shall be
refused and the Director of Industry Operations shall issue the notice.
Sec. 771.72 After citation.
If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license or permit after
notice, but prior to the referral to an administrative law judge and
prior to an initial decision, the Director of Industry Operations may
accept the surrender of the license or permit and dismiss the
proceeding as moot. If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license
or permit after notice and after the referral to the administrative law
judge, but prior to the issuance of a recommended decision, the
Director of Industry Operations may accept the surrender of the license
or permit and shall move the administrative law judge to dismiss the
proceedings as moot. In either case, if, in the opinion of the Director
of Industry Operations, the evidence is such as to warrant revocation
or denial of renewal, as the case may be, the surrender of the license
or permit shall be refused, and the proceeding shall continue.
Motions
Sec. 771.73 General.
All motions shall be made and addressed to the administrative law
judge before whom the proceeding is pending, and copies of all motion
papers shall be served upon the other party or parties. The
administrative law judge may dispose of any motion without oral
argument, but he may, if he so desires, set it down for hearing and
request argument. The administrative law judge may dispose of such
motion prior to the hearing on the merits or he may postpone the
disposition until the hearing on the merits. No appeal may be taken
from any ruling on a motion until the whole record is certified for
review. Examples of typical motions may be found in the Rules of Civil
Procedure referred to in Sec. 771.2.
Sec. 771.74 Prior to hearing.
All motions that should be made prior to the hearing, such as a
motion directed to the sufficiency of the pleadings or of preliminary
orders, shall be filed in writing with the Director of Industry
Operations or the administrative law judge if the matter has been
referred to him, and shall briefly state the order or relief applied
for and the grounds for such motion.
Sec. 771.75 At hearing.
Motions at the hearing may be made in writing to the administrative
law judge or stated orally on the record.
Hearing
Sec. 771.76 General.
If a hearing is requested, it shall be held at the time and place
stated in the notice of hearing unless otherwise ordered by the
administrative law judge.
Sec. 771.77 Initial applications.
(a) The administrative law judge who presides at the hearing on
initial applications shall recommend a decision to the Director of
Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall certify the
complete record of the proceedings before him and shall immediately
forward the complete certified record to the Director of Industry
Operations. The administrative law judge shall also send one copy of
his recommended decision to the applicant or the applicant's
representative, one copy to the Attorney for the Government, and one
copy to the Director of Industry Operations, who shall make the initial
decision as provided in Sec. 771.107. The applicant may be directed by
the Director of Industry Operations to produce such records as may be
deemed necessary for examination. All hearings on applications shall be
open to the public subject to such restrictions and limitations as may
be consistent with orderly procedure.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the return of the application
marked ``Disapproved'' is the Director of Industry Operations' initial
decision.
Sec. 771.78 Revocation or denial of renewal.
(a) The administrative law judge who presides at the hearing in
proceedings for the revocation or denial of renewal of licenses or
permits shall make a recommended decision to the Director of Industry
Operations. The administrative law judge shall certify the complete
record of the proceedings before him and shall immediately forward the
complete certified record to the Director of Industry Operations. The
administrative law judge shall also send
[[Page 64750]]
one copy of his recommended decision to the licensee or permittee or
the licensee's or permittee's representative, one copy to the Attorney
for the Government, and one copy to the Director of Industry
Operations, who shall make the initial decision as provided in Sec.
771.109.
(b) If no hearing is requested, the Director of Industry Operations
shall make the initial decision.
Burden of Proof
Sec. 771.79 Initial applications.
In hearings on the initial denial of applications, the burden of
proof is on the Government to show by a preponderance of the evidence
that the Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the
applicant is not entitled to a permit or license.
Sec. 771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.
In hearings on the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or
permit, the burden of proof is on the Government to show that the
Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the licensee
or permittee is not entitled to a permit or license, as may be the
case. The Government must meet this proof by a preponderance of the
evidence.
General
Sec. 771.81 Stipulations at hearing.
If there has been no initial conference under