Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (STRL) Personnel Demonstration Project in the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center (NAVFAC EXWC), 64495-64517 [2019-25200]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
Dated: November 15, 2019.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2019–25201 Filed 11–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–C
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DOD–2019–OS–0126]
Science and Technology Reinvention
Laboratory (STRL) Personnel
Demonstration Project in the Naval
Facilities Engineering Command,
Engineering and Expeditionary
Warfare Center (NAVFAC EXWC)
Under Secretary of Defense for
Research and Engineering (USD(R&E)),
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Notice of proposal to adopt and
modify an existing personnel
management demonstration project.
AGENCY:
This Federal Register Notice
(FRN) serves as notice of the proposed
adoption of an existing STRL Personnel
Management Demonstration Project by
the Naval Facilities Engineering
Command, Engineering and
Expeditionary Warfare Center (NAVFAC
EXWC). NAVFAC EXWC proposes to
adopt, with some modifications, the
STRL Personnel Demonstration Project
implemented at the: Naval Air Systems
Command (NAVAIR) Naval Warfare
Center, Aircraft Division, Naval Air
Warfare Center, Weapons Division;
Naval Information Warfare Centers
Atlantic and Pacific (NIWC Atlantic and
Pacific) (previously designated as the
Space and Naval Warfare Systems
Command, Space and Naval Warfare
Systems Centers Atlantic and Pacific),
Naval Sea Systems Command Warfare
Centers (NAVSEA), and the Combat
Capabilities Development Command
(CCDC) Army Research Laboratory
(ARL) (previously designated as ARL).
DATES: NAVFAC EXWC’s personnel
demonstration project proposal may not
be implemented until a 30-day comment
period is provided, comments
addressed, and a final FRN published.
To be considered, written comments
must be submitted on or before
December 23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of
the Chief Management Officer,
Directorate for Oversight and
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria,
VA 22350–1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
NAVFAC EXWC: Ms. Carol Frash,
1000 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA
93043 (805) 982–2422, or
reinventnavfacexwc@navy.mil.
DoD: Dr. Jagadeesh Pamulapati,
Director, Laboratories and Personnel
Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22350, (571) 372–6372,
jagadeesh.pamulapati.civ@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
342(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 1995, Public Law (Pub. L.)
103–337; as amended, authorizes the
Secretary of Defense (SECDEF), through
the USD(R&E), to conduct personnel
demonstration projects at DoD
laboratories designated as STRLs. All
STRLs authorized by section 1105(a) of
the NDAA for FY 2010, Public Law 111–
84, as well as any newly designated
STRLs authorized by SECDEF, or future
legislation, may use the provisions
described in this FRN.
1. Background
Many studies have been conducted
since 1966 on the quality of the
laboratories and personnel. Most of the
studies recommended improvements in
civilian personnel policy, organization,
and management. Pursuant to the
authority provided in section 342(b) of
Public Law 103–337, as amended, a
number of DoD STRL personnel
demonstration projects were approved.
The demonstration projects are
‘‘generally similar in nature’’ to the
Department of Navy’s China Lake
Personnel Demonstration Project. The
terminology, ‘‘generally similar in
nature,’’ does not imply an emulation of
various features, but rather implies a
similar opportunity and authority to
develop personnel flexibilities that
significantly increase the decision
authority of laboratory commanders
and/or directors.
2. Overview
Section 1104 of the FY18 NDAA,
Public Law 115–91 authorizes NAVFAC
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64495
EXWC to implement a STRL Personnel
Demonstration Project. Upon
designation, NAVFAC EXWC chartered
an Implementation Team (Team) to
design and implement a new
demonstration project plan. The Team is
developing all associated deliverables,
proposals and implementation details.
The Team is working with the
Laboratories and Personnel Office
(L&PO), the Lab Quality Enhancement
Program Panel on Personnel, Workforce
Development, and Talent Management
(LQEP–P) and organizations with
ongoing demonstration projects for
information and advice. NAVFAC
EXWC employees are updated through
ongoing communications such as fact
sheets, briefings and small group
meetings. This FRN is based on specific
flexibilities adopted by other STRLs and
global flexibilities available for use by
all DoD STRLs.
NAVFAC EXWC will adopt, with
some modifications, flexibilities from
the following approved STRL personnel
demonstration projects:
• Department of the Navy: NAVAIR—
76 FR 8530, February 14, 2011.
• Department of the Navy: NIWC
Atlantic and Pacific—76 FR 1924,
January 11, 2011.
• Department of the Navy:
NAVSEA—62 FR 64050, December 3,
1997.
• Department of the Army: CCDC
ARL—63 FR 10679, March 4, 1998.
3. Access to Flexibilities of Other STRLs
Flexibilities published in this FRN
will be available for use by the STRLs
enumerated in section 1105(a) of the
NDAA for FY 2010, Public Law 111–84
as amended, if they wish to adopt them
in accordance with DoD Instruction
1400.37, ‘‘Science and Technology
Reinvention Laboratory (STRL)
Personnel Demonstration Projects’’
(available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/
Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/
dodi/140037p.pdf) (including revised or
superseded instructions) and after the
fulfillment of any collective bargaining
obligations.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
B. Problems With the Present System
C. Expected Benefits
D. Participating Organizations, Employees
and Union Representation
E. Project Design
F. Executive STRL Policy Board
G. Funding Level
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Hiring, Appointment, and Related
Authorities
B. Classification, Career Paths and Pay
Banding
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
64496
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
C. Pay and Compensation
D. Employee Development and Awards
E. Performance Management
F. Workforce Shaping
IV. Conversion
A. Initial Conversion or Movement Into the
Demonstration Project
B. Movement Out of the Demonstration
Project
C. Implementation Training
V. Project Duration
VI. Evaluation Plan
A. Overview
B. Data Collection To Support Evaluation
VII. Demonstration Project Costs
VIII. Management and Oversight
A. Project Management With Automation
B. Oversight
IX. Required Waivers to Laws and
Regulations
A. Waivers to Title 5, United States Code
B. Waivers to Title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations
Appendix A: Career Paths and Occupational
Series
Appendix B: Rating Benchmark Examples
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Executive Summary
NAVFAC EXWC is a Warfare Center
and distinguished DoD laboratory
established in 2012. NAVFAC EXWC’s
dedicated workforce provides
specialized facilities engineering,
technology solutions, and life-cycle
management of expeditionary
equipment to the Navy, Marine Corps,
Federal agencies, and other DoD
customers. A majority of NAVFAC
EXWC’s civilian employees were hired
in the General Schedule (GS)
classification and pay scale. The GS
classification and pay scale does not
offer the same flexibilities and tools to
attract, retain, motivate and fully
compensate staff as the NAVFAC EXWC
personnel demonstration project.
Through this project, NAVFAC EXWC
competes with the private sector for the
best talent by making timely job offers
with attractive compensation packages
that land high-quality employees. Once
these employees are hired, NAVFAC
EXWC incentivizes performance and
rewards innovation and motivation
through compensation directly linked to
individual performance. Linking
compensation to performance increases
job satisfaction and retention of high
performing employees and encourages
continued performance because reduced
performance will draw less reward.
NAVFAC EXWC’s personnel
demonstration project takes advantage
of flexibilities to simplify and speed
classification and staffing actions for
employees, such as direct hire
authorities, expanded details, temporary
promotions, and modified/flexible term
appointments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The purpose of the project is to
demonstrate that the effectiveness of
DoD laboratories can be enhanced by
greater managerial control over
personnel functions and to expand the
opportunities available to employees
through a more responsive and flexible
personnel system. The NAVFAC EXWC
personnel demonstration project will
incorporate legal authorities and adopt
practices from other STRLs to meet the
specific needs of this command. These
tools will enable NAVFAC EXWC to
dynamically shape the mix of technical
skills and expertise in the laboratory
workforce. As the Navy’s leader in
specialized facilities engineering,
technology solutions, and life-cycle
management of expeditionary
equipment, NAVFAC EXWC must have
the flexibility needed to quickly
respond to changes in mission,
organizational constraints, workload,
and market conditions.
NAVFAC EXWC’s Technical Director
has overall oversight and management
of these authorities. Unless specifically
stated otherwise, the Technical Director
of NAVFAC EXWC may delegate
authority to effectively implement the
provisions of this notice. NAVFAC
EXWC Internal Operating Procedures
(IOPs) will document any delegation,
including details of implementation.
Many aspects of a demonstration
project are experimental. Modifications
may be made from time to time as we
gain experience, analyze results, and
reach conclusions on how the system is
working. The provisions of Department
of Defense Instruction (‘‘DoDI’’) 1400.37,
‘‘Science and Technology Reinvention
Laboratory (STRL) Personnel
Demonstration Projects’’ (including
subsequently issued or superseding
instructions) will be followed to modify,
supplement through adoption, or
otherwise change this demonstration
project plan.
B. Problems With the Present System
Using the current Federal personnel
system is incompatible with NAVFAC
EXWC’s need for a highly specialized,
quality workforce to support the DoD
and the Department of the Navy’s
overall strategic objectives. The
characteristics of the current general
schedule (GS) system have remained
unchanged since its inception many
years ago. Under the GS system, work is
classified into 15 grades with 10 interim
steps within each grade. It is rigidly
defined by occupational series and
grade with precise qualifications for
each position. This system does not
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
enable management to respond quickly
to new ways of designing work or
changes in the work itself. It does not
offer flexibilities to accurately capture
employee performance or to quickly
adjust management expectations for
critical scientific, engineering,
acquisition support and other
professional positions, including skilled
technicians. The current hiring system’s
inability to provide job offers in a timely
manner also hampers the NAVFAC
EXWC’s ability to attract high quality
candidates.
C. Expected Benefits
To remain the Department of the
Navy’s leader in supporting combatant
capabilities and sustainable facilities,
NAVFAC EXWC must compete with the
private sector for the most talented,
technically proficient candidates.
NAVFAC EXWC must have a human
resource system that fosters employee
development, enhances performance
and experience, and provides a strong
retention incentive. This personnel
demonstration project is expected to
enable and enhance:
1. Recruitment of highly qualified
scientific, technical, business, and
support employees in today’s
competitive environment;
2. Selection of candidates and
extension of job offers in a timely and
efficient manner, with compensation
sufficient to attract high quality, indemand employees;
3. Employee satisfaction with pay
setting and adjustment, recognition, and
career advancement opportunities;
4. A quality workforce that rapidly
adjusts to evolving requirements for the
future;
5. Retention of high-level performers;
6. Simple and cost-effective HR
management processes.
To effectively meet the above
expectations, this notice identifies and
establishes those features and
flexibilities this demonstration project
will use to achieve these objectives. The
demonstration project primarily
emphasizes streamlined hiring, a more
flexible performance-based
compensation system, talent acquisition
and retention, and professional human
capital planning and execution. Those
features and flexibilities alone, however,
will not ensure success. Delivering that
vision requires a human resources
service model that is highly proactive,
expertly skilled in analytical tools, and
fully engaged as a strategic partner and
trusted agent of this modern multifaceted defense laboratory.
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
D. Participating Organizations,
Employees and Union Representation
NAVFAC EXWC has major facilities
in three geographic locations: Port
Hueneme, California, Gulfport,
Mississippi, and Washington, DC.
Additionally, the organization employs
personnel at more than ten sites
worldwide. The sites are diverse in
employment profiles and size and have
bargaining unit populations. The
organization operates throughout the
full spectrum of research, development,
test and evaluation, engineering and
fleet support delivered by five business
lines and six support lines. Wage Grade
positions will not be included in this
personnel demonstration project;
however, NAVFAC EXWC will continue
to evaluate possible future inclusion.
Prior to including bargaining unit
employees in the personnel
demonstration project, NAVFAC EXWC
will fulfill its obligation to consult and/
or negotiate with the labor organizations
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4703(f) and
7117 as appropriate.
NAVFAC EXWC is predominantly a
Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF)
activity. Over 60 percent of the
employees to be initially included in the
personnel demonstration project are
funded by NWCF. Under NWCF, the
cost of business and operations is built
into the Stabilized Billing Rate (SBR)
paid by customers for work performed;
by maximizing management flexibility,
NAVFAC EXWC can remain cost
competitive.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
E. Project Design
There are four fundamental elements
of this personnel demonstration project:
(1) Hiring and staffing flexibilities, (2)
simplified classification, (3) pay
banding, and (4) performance-based
compensation and assessment. The
hiring and staffing flexibilities will help
to better recruit, hire, and retain the
most capable, qualified, and competent
workforce in the job market today.
Simplified classification will streamline
the job classification process, reduce the
effect of administrative processes on
personnel, and allow for more flexibility
in making job reassignments. The pay
banding structure will create four career
paths with multiple pay bands within
each career path representing the phases
of career progression that are typical for
the respective career paths. This
banding structure will enable managers
to more appropriately reward and retain
a diverse workforce using principles of
pay equity and career progression. The
performance-based compensation
system is characterized by an
assessment of an employee’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
performance and an appropriate pay
allocation predicated on the assessed
level of performance.
F. Executive STRL Policy Board
The Executive STRL Policy Board
(ESPB) will oversee and monitor the
fair, equitable, and consistent
implementation of the provisions of the
demonstration project to include
establishment of internal controls and
accountability. Members of the ESPB
will be appointed by the Technical
Director. Ad hoc members may serve in
an advisory capacity to the ESPB. The
ESPB duties will include the following:
• Establish policies and issue
guidance on composition of pay pools
in accordance with the guidelines of
this proposal and internal procedures;
• Review pay pool operation and
resolve pay pool disputes;
• Establish policies and issue
guidance concerning the civilian pay
budget, pay administration, awards and
performance based pay increases;
• Establish policies and issue
guidance to ensure in-house budget
discipline and implement workforce
staffing and budget plans;
• Develop policies and procedures for
administering Developmental
Opportunity Programs; ensure all
employees are treated in a fair, equitable
manner.
G. Funding Level
The Under Secretary of Defense
(Personnel & Readiness) may, at his/her
discretion, adjust the minimum funding
levels to take into account factors such
as the Department’s fiscal condition,
guidance from the Office of
Management and Budget, and equity in
circumstances when funding is reduced
or eliminated for GS pay raises or
awards.
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Hiring, Appointment, and Related
Authorities
1. Qualifications
OPM’s ‘‘Qualification Standards for
General Schedule Positions,’’ with
minor modifications to address
application of OPM qualifications in a
pay banding environment, are used to
determine qualifications for personnel
demonstration project positions. ‘‘Band’’
is substituted for ‘‘Grade’’ where
appropriate and time in grade
requirements are eliminated.
Since the pay bands are anchored to
the GS grade levels, the minimum
qualification requirements for a position
will be the requirements corresponding
to the lowest GS grade incorporated into
that pay band. For example, for a
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64497
position in the S&E career path Pay
Band II, individuals must meet the basic
requirements for a GS–5 as specified in
the OPM ‘‘Qualification Standard for
Professional and Scientific Positions.’’
Selective factors may be established
for a position in accordance with the
OPM’s ‘‘Operating Manual:
Qualifications Standards for General
Schedule Positions,’’ when determined
to be critical to successful job
performance. These factors may become
part of the minimum requirements for
the position, and applicants must meet
them in order to be eligible. If used,
selective factors will be stated as part of
the qualification requirements in
vacancy announcements and recruiting
bulletins.
2. Science and Engineering Direct Hire
Authorities
a. NAVFAC EXWC will use the direct
hire authorities authorized by section
1108 of the NDAA for FY 2009, as
amended by section 1103 of the NDAA
FY 2012; the direct hire authorities
published in 79 FR 43722, and the
direct hire authorities in 10 U.S.C.
2358a to appoint the following:
(1) Candidates with advanced degrees
to scientific and engineering positions;
(2) Candidates with bachelor’s degrees
to scientific and engineering positions;
(3) Veteran candidates to scientific,
technical, engineering, and mathematics
positions (STEM), including technician
positions; and
(4) Student candidates enrolled in a
program of instruction leading to a
bachelors or advanced degree in a STEM
discipline.
b. STEM Student Employment
Program (SSEP).
NAVFAC EXWC will use this direct
hire authority for students in a
scientific, technical, engineering, and
mathematical course of study at an
accredited institution of higher
education. The purpose of this direct
hire authority is to provide a
streamlined and accelerated hiring
process that allows NAVFAC EXWC to
compete successfully with private
industry for high quality scientific,
technical, engineering, or mathematics
students for filling scientific and
engineering positions. Students
appointed under the SSEP are afforded
an opportunity for non-competitive
conversion to a permanent scientific or
engineering position upon graduation
from an accredited institution of higher
education. Use of this authority will be
consistent with the merit system
principles. The SSEP student
employment standards will be similar to
the Pathways qualification standards,
which will allow students appointed
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
64498
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
under this authority to be aligned to a
pay band commensurate with the
highest level of education completed
and/or prior experience. SSEP students
will remain on a term appointment until
the completion of their educational
program.
3. Distinguished Scholastic
Achievement Appointments (DSAA)
NAVFAC EXWC will use the
Distinguished Scholastic Achievement
Appointment Authority (DSAA) for pay
banded positions. The DSAA uses an
alternative examining process which
provides the authority to appoint
candidates possessing a bachelor’s
degree or higher to positions up to the
equivalent of GS–12 for positions in the
Science and Engineering (S&E) pay
bands. This enables NAVFAC EXWC to
respond quickly to hiring needs for
eminently qualified candidates
possessing distinguished scholastic
achievements.
The alternative examining process
specifies that candidates may be
appointed provided they meet the
minimum standards for the position as
published in OPM’s operating manual,
‘‘Qualification Standards for General
Schedule Positions,’’ plus any selective
placement factors stated in the vacancy
announcement; the occupation has a
positive education requirement; and the
candidate has a cumulative grade point
average of 3.5 (on a 4.0 scale) or better
in their field of study (or other
equivalent score) or are within the top
10 percent in their field of study in a
graduate program.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
4. Reemployment of Annuitants
NAVFAC EXWC will use the
authorities provided by 5 U.S.C. 9902(g)
and 82 FR 43339 to appoint reemployed
annuitants, as appropriate. The
laboratory director may approve the
appointment of reemployed annuitants
and determine the salary, to include
whether the annuitant’s salary will be
reduced by any portion of the annuity
received, up to the amount of the full
annuity as a condition of employment.
Use of this authority will be consistent
with merit system principles.
5. Volunteer Emeritus Program (VEP)
NAVFAC EXWC Director will have
the authority to offer former Federal
employees who have retired or
separated from the Federal service,
voluntary assignments in NAVFAC
EXWC. Volunteer Emeritus Program
assignments are not considered
‘‘employment’’ by the Federal
government. Thus, such assignments do
not affect an employee’s entitlement to
buyouts or severance payments based
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
on an earlier separation from Federal
service. The Volunteer Emeritus
Program will ensure continued quality
research while reducing the overall
salary line by allowing higher paid
individuals to accept retirement
incentives with the opportunity to
retain a presence in the scientific
community. The program will be of
most benefit during manpower
reductions as senior employees could
accept retirement and return to provide
valuable on-the-job training or
mentoring to less experienced
employees. Volunteer service will not
be used to replace any employee, or
interfere with career opportunities of
employees. The Volunteer Emeritus
Program may not be used to replace or
substitute for work performed by
civilian employees occupying regular
positions required to perform the
NAVFAC EXWC mission.
To be accepted into the Volunteer
Emeritus Program, a candidate must be
recommended by a NAVFAC EXWC
manager to the Director. Everyone who
applies is not entitled to participate in
the program. The NAVFAC EXWC
Director will document the decision
process for each candidate and retain
selection and non-selection
documentation for the duration of the
assignment or two years, whichever is
longer.
To ensure success and encourage
participation, the volunteer’s federal
retirement pay (whether military or
civilian) will not be affected while
serving in a volunteer capacity. Retired
or separated federal employees may
accept an emeritus position without a
break or mandatory waiting period.
Volunteers will not be permitted to
monitor contracts on behalf of the
government or to participate on any
contracts or solicitations where a
conflict of interest exists. The same
rules that currently apply to source
selection members will apply to
volunteers.
An agreement will be established
between the volunteer and the NAVFAC
EXWC Director. The agreement will be
reviewed by the servicing legal office.
The agreement must be finalized before
the assumption of duties and will
include:
a. A statement that the service
provided is gratuitous, that the
volunteer assignment does not
constitute an appointment in the civil
service and is without compensation or
other benefits except as provided for in
the agreement itself, and that, except as
provided in the agreement regarding
work-related injury compensation, any
and all claims against the Government
(stemming from or in connection with
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the volunteer assignment) are waived by
the volunteer;
b. A statement that the volunteer will
be considered a federal employee for the
purpose of:
(1) 18 U.S.C. 201, 203, 205, 207, 208,
209, 603, 606, 607, 643, 654, 1905, and
1913;
(2) 31 U.S.C. 1343, 1344, and 1349(b);
(3) 5 U.S.C. chapters 73 and 81;
(4) The Ethics in Government Act of
1978;
(5) 41 U.S.C. chapter 21;
(6) 28 U.S.C. chapter 171 (tort claims
procedure), and any other Federal tort
liability statute;
(7) 5 U.S.C. 552a (records maintained
on individuals); and
c. The volunteer’s work schedule;
d. The length of agreement (defined
by length of project or time defined by
weeks, months, or years),
e. The support to be provided by the
NAVFAC EXWC (travel, administrative,
office space, supplies),
f. The volunteer’s duties,
g. A provision that states no
additional time will be added to a
volunteer’s service credit for such
purposes as retirement, severance pay,
and leave as a result of being a
participant in the Volunteer Emeritus
Program,
h. A provision allowing either party to
void the agreement with 10 working
days written notice;
i. The level of security access required
(any security clearance required by the
assignment will be managed by the
NAVFAC EXWC while the volunteer is
a participant in the Volunteer Emeritus
Program);
j. A provision that any written
products prepared for publication that
are related to Volunteer Emeritus
Program participation will be submitted
to the NAVFAC EXWC Director for
review and must be approved prior to
publication;
k. A statement that the volunteer
accepts accountability for loss or
damage to Government property
occasioned by the volunteer’s
negligence or willful action;
1. A statement that the volunteer’s
activities on the premises will conform
to the NAVFAC EXWC regulations and
requirements;
m. A statement that the volunteer will
not improperly use or disclose any nonpublic information, to include any predecisional or draft deliberative
information related to DoD
programming, budgeting, resourcing,
acquisition, procurement or other
matter, for the benefit or advantage of
the Volunteer Emeritus Program
participant or any non-Federal entities.
Volunteer Emeritus Program
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
participants will handle all non-public
information in a manner that reduces
the possibility of improper disclosure.
n. A statement that the volunteer
agrees to disclose any inventions made
in the course of work performed at
NAVFAC EXWC. The NAFVAC EXWC
Director will have the option to obtain
title to any such invention on behalf of
the U.S. Government. Should the
Director elect not to take title, the Center
will retain a non-exclusive, irrevocable,
paid up, royalty-free license to practice
or have practiced the invention
worldwide on behalf of the U.S.
Government.
o. A statement that the Volunteer
Emeritus Program participant must
complete either a Confidential or Public
Financial Disclosure Report, whichever
applies, and ethics training in
accordance with office of Government
Ethics regulations prior to
implementation of the agreement; and
p. A statement that the Volunteer
Emeritus Program participant must
receive post-government employment
advice from a DoD ethics counselor at
the conclusion of program participation.
Volunteer Emeritus Program
participants are deemed Federal
employees for purposes of postgovernment employment restrictions.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
6. Expanded Detail Authority and
Temporary Promotions
NAVFAC EXWC will have an
Expanded Detail and Temporary
Promotion Authority providing the
ability to:
(1) Effect details up to one year to
specified positions at the same or
similar level (positions in a pay band
with the same maximum salary) without
the current 120-day renewal
requirement specified at 5 U.S.C. 3341;
and
(2) Effect details or temporary
promotions to a higher-level position up
to 1 year within a 24-month period
without competition. Details to higherlevel positions beyond one year in a 24month period require approval of the
Technical Director and are subject to
competitive procedures. The specifics of
these authorities will be stipulated by
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
7. Flexible Length and Renewable Term
Technical Appointments
NAVFAC EXWC may use the Flexible
Length and Renewable Term Technical
Appointments workforce shaping tool
temporarily authorized by section 1109
(b) of the NDAA for FY 2016, as
amended by section 1112(b) of the
NDAA for FY 2019. Further details on
the implementation of this authority are
contained in 82 FR 43339. Until this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
authority expires or is rescinded, it may
be used to appoint qualified candidates
who are not currently DoD civilian
employees, or DoD employees on term
appointments into any scientific,
technical, engineering, and mathematic
positions, including technicians, for a
period of more than one year but not
more than six years. The appointment of
any individual under this authority may
be extended without limit in up to sixyear increments at any time during any
term of service under conditions set
forth by the Technical Director.
The Technical Director, or designee,
will establish implementing guidance
and procedures on the use of this
authority.
B. Classification, Career Paths and Pay
Banding
1. Delegation of Classification Authority
Managers will provide input to
classification requests as a means of
increasing managerial effectiveness and
expediting the classification function.
Classification authority will be
delegated as follows: The NAVFAC
EXWC Technical Director may delegate
classification authority to the Human
Resources Office (HRO) Director. The
HRO Director may further delegate
authority to Human Resource
professionals of the immediate
organization of the position being
classified. If so delegated, the HRO
Director will exercise oversight to
ensure consistency across the
organization.
2. Classification
The present system of OPM
classification standards will be used for
the identification of the proper
occupational series of positions and
certain occupational titles within the
NAVFAC EXWC demonstration project.
Current OPM position classification
standards will not be used to grade
positions in this project. However, the
grading criteria in those standards will
be used as a framework to develop new
and simplified standards for the
purpose of pay band determinations.
The classification standard for each pay
band will serve as an important
component in the creation of Standard
Level Descriptors (SLDs) that record the
essential criteria for each pay band
within each career path by stating the
characteristics of the work, the
responsibilities of the position, and the
competencies required. SLDs replace
current position descriptions. SLDs
combined with the Position
Requirements Document (PRD) will
include position specific information
such as Fair Labor Standards Act
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64499
(FLSA) coverage; selective placement
factors or specialized knowledge, skills
and abilities; degree requirements or
other professional certification
requirements; staffing requirements; and
other data element information
pertinent to the position.
3. Simplified Assignment Process
Today’s environment of rapid
technology development and workforce
transition mandates that the
organization have maximum flexibility
to assign individuals. Pay banding may
be used to address these needs. As a
result of the assignment to a particular
pay band descriptor, the organization
will have maximum flexibility to assign
an employee within pay band
descriptors consistent with the needs of
the organization, the individual’s
qualifications and rank, and pay band.
Subsequent assignments to projects,
tasks, or functions anywhere within the
organization requiring the same area of
expertise and qualifications would not
constitute an assignment outside the
scope or coverage of the employee’s pay
band descriptor.
4. Career Paths
A fundamental element of the
NAVFAC EXWC personnel
demonstration project is a simplified
classification and pay component. Like
other STRL demonstration projects, the
proposed pay banding approach is tied
to the 15 GS grade levels and the above
GS–15 grade level. Career paths at
NAVFAC EXWC are grouped by four
career paths based on similarities in the
type of work and customary
requirements for formal education,
training and credentials. Common
patterns of advancement within the
occupations as practiced at NAVFAC
EXWC were considered. Current
occupations and grades were examined
and their characteristics and
distribution were used to develop the
career paths described below:
a. Science and Engineering (ND Pay
Plan): This career path includes
technical professional positions, such as
engineers, physicists, chemists,
mathematicians, operations analysts,
and computer scientists. Specific course
work or educational degrees are
required for these occupations.
b. Science and Engineering
Technician (NR Pay Plan): This career
path includes technician positions such
as engineering technicians, electronics
technicians, and physical science
technicians. These occupations require
practical expertise in scientific or
engineering support but specific course
work or educational degrees are not
required for these occupations.
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
c. Administrative/Professional (NT
Pay Plan): This career path includes
positions such as attorneys, IT
specialists, paralegals, program
managers, accountants, budget analysts,
administrative officers, human
resources specialists, and management
analysts. Employees in these positions
may or may not require specific course
work or educational degrees.
d. General Support (NG Pay Plan):
This career path includes the clerical
and administrative support positions
providing support in such fields as
finance, supply, and human resources;
positions applying typing, clerical or
secretarial knowledge and skills; and
student positions for training in these
disciplines.
Each career path is composed of
discrete pay bands (levels)
corresponding to recognized
advancement within these occupations.
These pay bands replace grades and are
not the same for all career paths. Each
career path is divided into three to five
pay bands; each pay band covering the
same pay range formerly covered by one
or more GS grades. The salary range of
each band begins with step 1 of the
lowest grade in that pay band and ends
with step 10 of the highest grade in the
pay band. The grouping of GS grades
into a particular band was based on a
careful examination of NAVFAC
EXWC’s occupations, grade levels, and
career development practices. Career
paths and the associated classification
occupational series for each are
provided in Appendix A. The
distribution of the occupational series to
career paths reflects only those
occupational series that currently exist
within NAVFAC EXWC. Additional
occupational series may be added as a
result of changes in mission
requirements or OPM-recognized
occupations. These additional
occupational series will be placed in the
appropriate career path consistent with
the established career path definitions.
6. Fair Labor Standards Act
7. Senior Scientific Technical Managers
(SSTM)
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
exemption and nonexempt
determinations will be made consistent
with criteria found in 5 CFR part 551.
Generally, employees will be converted
to the demonstration project with the
same FLSA status they had previously.
All employees are covered by the FLSA
unless they meet the criteria for
exemption. The duties and
responsibilities outlined in the
classification standards for each pay
band will be compared to the FLSA
criteria.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
5. Pay Band Structure
The pay banding structure is the
structure in use at the CCDC ARL. The
pay bands and their relation to the
current GS framework are shown in
Figure 1. This pay band structure allows
greater flexibility to define and classify
work assignments and to reward
The SSTM program will be managed
and administered by the Technical
Director, consistent with the provisions
10 U.S.C. 2358a and NAVFAC EXWC
IOPs. The primary function of these
positions is to engage in research and
development in the physical, biological,
medical, or engineering sciences, or
another field closely related to the
NAVFAC EXWC mission and to carry
out technical supervisory
responsibilities. The number of such
positions may not exceed two percent of
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
performance. A key feature is the
overlap in Science and Engineering
(ND) career path between bands III and
IV. ND–III begins at GS–12, step 1, and
ends at GS–14, step 10. ND–IV begins at
GS–14, step 1, and ends at GS–15, step
10. A second noteworthy feature is the
introduction of categories within the
Administrative/Professional (NT) career
path, Bands III and IV. These bands
contain two full performance levels
because not all work assignments
support movement to the top of the
band. The NT–III band includes
Category I, where the full performance
maximum salary rate is equivalent to
GS–12, step 10, and Category II, where
the full performance maximum salary
rate is equivalent to GS–13, step 10. The
NT–IV band includes Category I, where
the full performance maximum salary
rate is equivalent to GS–14 step 10, and
Category II, where the full performance
maximum salary rate is equivalent to
GS–15, Step 10. In order to move
beyond Category I, duties and work
assignments must satisfy the highest
level of the criteria in the classification
for the applicable pay band.
the number of scientists and engineers
employed at the Technical Center as of
the close of the last fiscal year before the
fiscal year in which any appointments
subject to the numerical limitation are
made. This authority is expected to
provide an opportunity for career
development and expansion of a pool of
experienced, prominent technical
candidates meeting the levels of
proficiency and leadership essential to
create and maintain a DoD state-of-theart scientific, engineering and
technological facility. The minimum
basic pay for SSTM positions is 120
percent of the minimum rate of basic
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
EN22NO19.010
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
64500
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
pay for GS–15. Maximum SSTM basic
pay with locality pay is limited to
Executive Level III (EX–III), and
maximum salary without locality pay
may not exceed EX–IV. The
contribution management system used
to evaluate an SSTM employee will be
documented in the NAVFAC EXWC
IOPs. Pay retention may be provided to
SSTM, under criteria required by
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs for those
impacted by a reduction in force, work
realignment or other planned
management action that would
necessitate moving the incumbent to a
position in a lower pay band within the
STRL for other than cause (performance
or conduct).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
8. Professional Licensure Designations
for Architectural and Engineering
Positions
The Technical Director and the
NAVFAC EXWC Chief Engineer have
non-delegable authority to designate
those positions within NAVFAC EXWC
requiring professional licensure.
Engineering and Architectural positions
requiring professional licensure will be
monitored by the EXWC Chief Engineer.
It is the policy of NAVFAC EXWC to
recruit, hire, professionally develop,
and maintain a professional workforce
of the highest caliber. Professional
licensing is required for any position,
regardless of pay band, in responsible
charge of engineering/architectural
work, whether performed in-house or by
contract. The specific guidelines will be
documented in NAVFAC EXWC’s IOPs.
However, the Technical Director has
final authority regarding professional
licensure requirements.
9. Classification Appeals
Employees have the right to appeal
the classification of their position at any
time. A classification complaint is an
employee’s request for a review, at the
activity level, of the pay plan,
occupational series, position title, and
pay band of their position. The
employee must formally make a
complaint which raises the area of
concern to their immediate supervisor
to initiate the classification complaint
review process. The Human Resource
Office will review the complaint and
issue a determination. If the employee is
dissatisfied with the outcome of the
classification complaint review, the
employee may appeal the classification
of the position to the Technical Director.
If the employee is dissatisfied with the
decision rendered by the Technical
Director, the employee may initiate a
formal classification appeal to the DoD
appellate level. Appeal decisions
rendered by DoD will be final and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
binding on all administrative, certifying,
payroll, disbursing, and accounting
officials of the government.
Classification appeals are not accepted
on positions that exceed the equivalent
of a GS–15 level. An employee may not
appeal the accuracy of the position
description, the demonstration project
classification criteria, or the pay-setting
criteria; the assignment of occupational
series to the career path; the propriety
of a pay schedule; command developed
position titles; or matters covered by an
administrative or negotiated grievance
procedure or an alternative dispute
resolution procedure. The evaluations of
classification appeal are based upon the
demonstration project classification
criteria. Additional guidance will be
documented in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
C. Pay and Compensation
Pay administration policies are
established by the ESPB. The following
definitions and policies will apply to
the pay setting of new hires, movement
of employees within the demonstration
project from one career path or pay band
to another, as well as any other pay
action outside the performance-based
assessment system.
1. Pay Setting for Appointment
For initial appointments to the
Federal service, base pay may be set
anywhere within the pay band
consistent with the special
qualifications of the individual and the
unique requirements of the position.
These special qualifications may be in
the form of education, training, and/or
experience. Unique position
requirements may include scarcity of
qualified candidates, labor market
considerations, programmatic urgency,
or any combination thereof that is
pertinent to the position in which the
employee is being placed. Specific
guidelines for application of pay setting
for appointments will be contained in
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
2. Promotion
The minimum base pay increase upon
promotion to a higher pay band will be
six percent or the minimum base pay
rate of the new pay band, whichever is
greater. A promotion is the movement of
an employee to a higher pay band in the
same career path or to a higher pay band
in a different career path. It also
includes movement of an employee
currently covered by a nondemonstration project personnel system
to a demonstration project position in a
pay band with a higher level of work.
Positions with a known promotion
potential to a specific band will be
identified when they are filled. Not all
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64501
positions in a career path will have
promotion potential to the same band.
Movement from one career path to
another will depend upon individual
competencies, and qualifications.
Progression within a pay band is
based upon performance-based pay
increases; as such, these actions are not
considered promotions and are not
subject to provisions of this section.
Promotions will follow Merit System
Principles and basic Federal Merit
Staffing policy that provides for
competitive and non-competitive
promotions. To be promoted
competitively or non-competitively,
from one pay band to the next, an
employee must meet the minimum
qualifications for the job and have a
current rating of record of ‘‘mission
success’’ or better, or equivalent under
a different appraisal system. Other
specific guidelines regarding
promotions will be documented in
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
3. Reassignment
A reassignment occurs when an
employee moves, voluntarily or
involuntarily, to a different position or
set of duties within their pay band or to
a position in a comparable pay band at
a comparable level of work, or from a
non-demonstration project position to a
demonstration project position at a
comparable level of work, on either a
temporary or permanent basis. Under
this system, employees may be eligible
for an increase to base pay upon
temporary or permanent reassignment.
Such an increase is subject to the
specific guidelines established by the
ESPB and documented in NAVFAC
EXWC IOPs.
4. Demotion or Change to Lower Pay
Band
A demotion is the placement of an
employee into a lower pay band or
movement from a non-demonstration
project position to a demonstration
project position at a lower level of work.
Demotions may be for cause
(performance or conduct) or for reasons
other than cause (e.g., erosion of duties,
reclassification of duties to a lower pay
band, application under competitive
announcements, at the employee’s
request, or placement actions resulting
from Reduction-in-Force (RIF)
procedures). In cases where change to a
lower pay band is involuntary and
accompanied by a reduction in pay,
procedures under 5 CFR part 752 and
432 remain unchanged.
5. Locality Pay
Employees will be entitled to the
locality pay authorized for their official
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
64502
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
duty station in accordance with 5 CFR
part 531 subpart F. The locality adjusted
pay of any employee may not exceed the
rate for Executive Level IV. Geographic
movement within the demonstration
project will result in the employee’s
locality pay being recomputed using the
newly applicable locality pay
percentage which may result in a higher
or lower locality payment.
6. Staffing Supplements
Employees assigned to occupational
categories and geographic areas where
GS special rates apply may be entitled
to a staffing supplement if the maximum
adjusted base pay rate for the
demonstration band to which the
employee is assigned is exceeded by a
GS special rate for the employee’s
occupational category and geographic
area. Employees receiving a staffing
supplement remain entitled to an
underlying locality rate, which may
over time supersede the need for a
staffing supplement. If OPM
discontinues or decreases a special rate
schedule, retained pay provisions will
be applied. If at any time after
establishment of the demonstration
project, special salary rates (SSRs) are
deemed necessary by NAVFAC EXWC
leadership, they will be implemented
via a staffing supplement, and also
documented in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
8. Recruitment, Retention, and
Relocation Incentives
The project will continue to employ
recruitment, retention, and relocation
incentives as described in 5 CFR part
575. Approval for use of recruitment,
retention, and relocation incentives is
delegated to the Technical Director and
further described in an NAVFAC EXWC
IOP.
10. Pay Differential for Supervisory
Positions
NAVFAC EXWC will establish a pay
differential to be provided at the
discretion of the Technical Director or
assigned delegates to incentivize and
reward personnel in supervisory
positions. A pay differential is a cash
incentive that may range up to 10
percent of the employee’s base rate of
pay. It is paid on a pay period basis and
is not included as part of the employee’s
base rate of pay. The pay differential
must be terminated if the employee is
removed from the supervisory position
(and is not placed in another
supervisory position), regardless of
cause. All personnel actions involving a
pay differential will require a statement
signed by the employee acknowledging
that the differential is not part of base
pay for any purpose and may be
terminated or reduced as dictated by
fiscal limitations, changes in assignment
or scope of work, or by the Technical
Director. Positions, titles, duties and
responsibilities that are eligible for
supervisory differential, as well as
standards for differential awards, will be
defined in an NAVFAC EXWC IOP. Any
adjustment or termination of a
supervisory pay differential will be in
accordance with NAVFAC EXWC’s IOPs
and all applicable laws and regulations.
The termination or reduction of the
differential is not an adverse action and
is not subject to appeal or grievance.
9. Extraordinary Achievement
Allowance (EAA)
NAVFAC EXWC will employ an
Extraordinary Achievement Allowance
(EAA) designed to optimize
organizational effectiveness. An EAA is
defined as a temporary monetary
allowance up to 25 percent of base pay,
11. Educational Base Pay Adjustment
NAVFAC EXWC will establish an
educational base pay adjustment that is
separate from other incentive pay and
may not exceed the top of the
employee’s assigned pay band. The
educational base pay adjustment may be
used to adjust the base pay of
7. Grade and Pay Retention
The project will eliminate retained
grade under 5 CFR part 536. Pay
retention will follow current law and
regulations at 5 U.S.C. 5362 and 5363,
and 5 CFR part 536, except as modified
in the Staffing Supplements section and
waived in Section IX of this plan. If an
employee is receiving retained pay
under the personnel demonstration
project, the employee’s GS-equivalent
grade is the highest grade encompassed
in their pay band level.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
provided that an employee’s total
compensation does not exceed the rate
of basic pay for Executive Level IV in
effect at the end of such calendar year.
It is paid on either a bi-weekly basis
concurrent with normal pay days, or as
a lump sum following completion of a
designated contribution period, or
combination of these, at the discretion
of the Technical Director (or designee).
It is not base pay for any purpose, e.g.,
retirement, life insurance, severance
pay, promotion, or any other payment or
benefit calculated as a percentage of
base pay. The EAA will be available to
certain employees whose present
contributions are worthy of a higher
career level and whose level of
achievement is expected to continue at
the higher career level for at least one
year as specified by the ESPB and
outlined in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
individuals who have acquired a level
of mission-related education that would
otherwise make the employee qualified
for an appointment at a higher level and
would be used in lieu of a new
appointment. For example, this
authority may be used to adjust the base
pay of employees who are participating
in a graduate level Student Educational
Employment Program, or employees
who have obtained an advanced degree,
such as a Ph.D., in a field related to the
work of their position or the mission of
their organization.
D. Employee Development and Awards
1. Expanded Development
Opportunities Program
NAVFAC EXWC will establish an
Expanded Development Opportunities
Program that will cover all
demonstration project employees.
Expanded development opportunities
include: (1) Long term training, (2) oneyear work experiences in an industrial
setting via the Relations With Industry
Program, (3) one-year work experiences
in laboratories of allied nations via the
Science and Engineer Exchange
Program, (4) rotational job assignments
within NAVFAC EXWC, (5)
developmental assignments in higher
headquarters within the DON and DoD,
(6) self-directed study via
correspondence courses and at colleges
and universities, (7) details within
NAVFAC EXWC and to other Federal
agencies, (8) Intergovernmental
Personnel Act Program Agreements, and
(9) sabbaticals. Each developmental
opportunity period should benefit the
organization and increase the
employee’s individual effectiveness as
well. Various learning or developmental
work experiences may be considered,
such as advanced academic teaching or
research and sabbaticals. An expanded
developmental opportunity period will
not result in loss of or reduction in base
pay, loss of leave to which the employee
is otherwise entitled, or any loss of
credit for time or service.
Program openings will be announced
as opportunities arise. Instructions for
application and the selection criteria
will be included in the announcement.
Final selection/approval for
participation in the program will be
made by the Technical Director. The
position of an employee participating in
an expanded development opportunity
may be backfilled by temporary
assignment of other employee or
temporary redistribution of work.
However, that position or its equivalent
must be made available to the employee
upon return from the expanded
developmental opportunity. An
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
employee accepting an Expanded
Developmental Opportunity must sign a
continuing service agreement up to
three times the length of the assignment,
with the service obligation to NAVFAC
EXWC. If the employee voluntarily
leaves the organization before the
service obligation is completed, the
employee is liable for repayment unless
the service agreement or the repayment
is waived by Technical Director.
Conditions for waiver of service
agreements or repayments will be
established in the NAVFAC EXWC IOP.
2. Skills Training
a. Training is essential for an
organization that requires continuous
development of advanced and
specialized knowledge. Degree studies
are also critical tools for recruiting and
retaining employees with skills essential
to the NAVFAC EXWC mission. The
Technical Director has the authority to
approve training.
b. Individual training programs may
be approved based upon a complete
individual study program plan. Such
training programs will ensure
continuous development of advanced
specialized knowledge essential to the
organization and enhance the ability to
recruit and retain personnel critical to
the present and future requirements of
the organization. Tuition payment may
not be authorized where it would result
in a tax liability for the employee
without the employee’s express and
written consent. Any variance from this
policy must be rigorously determined
and documented. Guidelines will be
developed to ensure competitive
approval of training and those decisions
will be fully documented. Employees
approved for training must sign a
service obligation agreement to continue
service at NAVFAC EXWC for a period
three times the length of the training
period commencing after the
completion of the entire training
program. If an employee voluntarily
leaves NAVFAC EXWC before the
service obligation is completed, he/she
is liable for repayment of expenses
incurred by NAVFAC EXWC that are
related to the training. Expenses do not
include salary costs. The Technical
Director has the authority to waive this
requirement. Criteria for such waivers
will be addressed in NAVFAC EXWC
IOPs.
3. Developmental Promotions
NAVFAC EXWC will continue to
utilize student training, internship
programs (such as Pathways, SSEP), and
career development positions under the
demonstration project to recognize
growth and development in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
acquisition of job related competencies
combined with successful performance.
Promotions for such employees are
limited to: (1) Employees in
developmental or trainee level positions
and (2) those employees in Pathways or
other career training or internship
programs. Promotions for those
employees in developmental positions
will be provided in NAVFAC EXWC
IOPs.
4. Awards
To provide additional flexibility to
motivate and reward individuals and
groups, some portion of the performance
award budget will be reserved for
special acts and other categories as they
occur. Awards may include, but are not
limited to, recognition for special/
extraordinary achievements, patents,
inventions, suggestions, and on-the-spot
awards. The funds available for awards
are separately funded within the
constraints of the organization’s overall
award budget. While not directly linked
to the mission aligned objectives and
performance compensation system, this
additional flexibility is important to
encourage outstanding
accomplishments and innovation in
accomplishing NAVFAC EXWC’s
diverse missions. Additionally, group
awards may be given to foster and
encourage teamwork. The Technical
Director will have the authority to grant
special act or achievement awards to
covered employees of up to $25,000.
E. Performance Management
1. Mission Aligned Objectives and
Performance Compensation
The purpose of mission aligned
objectives and performance
compensation is to link the work of the
employee to the mission of the
organization and to provide a
mechanism for recognizing the impact
of the employee’s accomplishments and
performance to help achieve that
mission. It provides an effective,
efficient, and flexible method for
assessing, compensating, and managing
NAVFAC EXWC’s workforce. This
performance management system better
aligns with developing a highly
productive workforce and for providing
the authority, control, and flexibility to
achieve a quality organization and meet
mission requirements. Mission aligned
objectives and performance
compensation encourages more
employee involvement in the
assessment process, strives to increase
communication between supervisor and
employee and promotes performance
accountability. By linking mission
directly to both annual evaluations and
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64503
compensation outcomes, objectives
facilitate employee career progression
and provide an understandable and
rational basis for pay changes. The
normal rating period will be one year.
Objectives, developed jointly by
employees and their supervisors must
be in place within 30 days from the
beginning of each rating period. The
minimum rating period is 90 days.
Employees who do not meet the 90-day
minimum requirement will be ineligible
for a normal rating and will be given a
presumptive rating. They may receive
only the general pay increase and they
may also receive Title 5 cash awards, if
appropriate. First-time hires must have
performance plans in place within 30
days of their demonstration project
entry effective date. Current
demonstration performance project
employees who change positions during
the performance year should have their
plans updated with new objectives no
later than 30 days after assignment to
their new position.
Mission aligned objective and
performance compensation can be in the
form of increases to base pay and/or
lump sum cash bonuses that are not
added to base pay. The system can be
modified, if necessary, as more
experience is gained under the project.
The flexibilities in this mission aligned
objectives and performance
compensation section are similar in
nature to the authority granted to: (1)
The Naval Ocean Systems Center and
the Naval Weapons Center, China Lake,
45 FR 26504, (2) the CCDC ARL, 65 FR
3500, and (3) NAVAIR Aircraft and
Weapons Divisions, 76 FR 8529.
2. Individual Mission Objectives
Individual mission objectives are
directly related to achieving the
NAVFAC EXWC mission. Objectives
identify expectations and typically
consist of 3 to 10 results-oriented
statements. Objectives are tangible and
measurable so that achievements can be
identified. These objectives incorporate
important behavioral practices such as
teamwork and cooperation where they
are key to a successful outcome. One
supervisory objective, including
adherence to EEO principles, is
mandatory for all managers/supervisors.
The employee and their supervisor will
jointly develop the employee’s
individual mission objectives at the
beginning of the rating period. The
supervisor has final approval authority
of the objectives. Objectives will reflect
the employee’s duties/responsibilities,
pay band and pay level in the pay band
as well as support the NAVFAC EXWC
mission, organizational goals and
priorities. Objectives will be reviewed
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
64504
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
annually and revised to reflect increased
responsibilities commensurate with pay
increases. Generic one-size-fits-all
objectives are to be avoided, so that
individual mission objectives define an
individual’s specific responsibilities
and expected accomplishments for the
performance year. Supervisors and
employees should focus on overall
organizational objectives and develop
supporting individual mission
objectives.
Individual mission objectives may be
jointly modified, changed, or deleted as
appropriate during the rating cycle. As
a general rule, objectives should only be
changed when circumstances outside
the employee’s control prevent or
hamper the accomplishment of the
original objectives. It is also appropriate
to change objectives when mission or
workload shifts occur.
All objectives are critical. A critical
mission objective is defined as an
attribute of job performance that is of
sufficient importance that achievement
below the minimally acceptable level
requires remedial action and may be the
basis for removing an employee from
his/her position. Each objective may be
assigned a weight, which reflects its
importance in accomplishing an
individual’s mission objectives. The
minimum weight that can be assigned is
10 percent. The sum of the weights for
all of the objectives must equal 100
percent. At the beginning of the rating
period, higher-level managers will
review the objectives and weights
assigned to employees within the pay
pool to verify consistency and
appropriateness.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
3. Rating Benchmarks
Rating benchmarks define
characteristics that will be used to
evaluate the employee’s success in
accomplishing their individual mission
objectives. Scoring characteristics help
to ensure comparable scores are
assigned while accommodating diverse
individual objectives. A single set of
rating benchmarks for each band or
career stage may be used for evaluating
the annual performance of all NAVFAC
EXWC personnel covered by this plan.
An example of rating benchmarks is
shown in Appendix B. The set of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
benchmarks used may evolve over time,
based on experience gained during each
rating cycle. Critical characteristics
evolve as our workforce actively moves
toward meeting their individual and
organizational objectives. This is
particularly true in an environment
where technology and work processes
are changing at an increasingly rapid
pace. The ESPB will annually review
the set of benchmarks and set them for
the entire organization before the
beginning of the rating period.
4. Performance Feedback and Formal
Ratings
Employees, and supervisors, are
expected to actively discuss
expectations and identify potential
obstacles to meeting goals. Employees
should explain (to the extent possible)
what they need from their supervisor to
support goal accomplishment. The
timing of these discussions will vary
based on the nature of work performed,
but will occur at least 30 days from the
beginning of each rating period, at the
mid-point, and at the end of the rating
period. The supervisor and employee
will discuss job performance and
accomplishments in relation to the
expectations in the mission aligned
objectives. At least one review, normally
the mid-point review, will be
documented as a formal progress
review. More frequent, task specific,
discussions may be appropriate in some
organizations. In cases where work is
accomplished by a team, team
discussions regarding goals and
expectations will be appropriate. The
employee may provide a statement of
their accomplishments to the supervisor
at both the mid-point and end of the
rating period. However, this provision
does not preclude an employee from
providing a statement of their
accomplishments to their supervisor
that are outside the mid-year and yearend evaluations and rating period.
Following a review of the employee’s
accomplishments at the end of the
rating period, the supervisor will rate
each of the individual mission
objectives. Benchmark performance
standards will be developed that
describe the level of performance
associated with a score. The supervisor
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
decides where each employee’s
achievements and performance most
closely match the benchmarks and
assigns an appropriate score. These
scores are not discussed with the
employee or considered final until all
scores are reconciled and approved by
the Pay Pool Manager. The scores will
then be multiplied by the objectiveweighting factor to determine the
weighted score expressed to two
decimal points. The weighted scores for
each objective will then be totaled to
determine the employee’s overall
appraisal score and rounded to a whole
number as follows: If the first two digits
to the right of the decimal are 0.51 or
higher, it will be rounded to the next
higher whole number; if the first two
digits to the right of the decimal are 0.50
or lower, then the decimal value is
truncated. The resulting score
determines the rating.
NAVFAC EXWC will use a five-level
rating methodology with associated
payout point ranges in which level five
signifies the highest level of
performance. The supervisor will
prepare and recommend the rating,
number of payout points, and the
distribution of the payout between base
pay increase and bonus, as applicable,
for each employee. These
recommendations will then be reviewed
by the pay pool panel to ensure
equitable rating criteria and
methodologies have been applied to all
pay pool employees. The final
determination of the rating, number of
payout points, and payout distribution
will be a function of the pay pool panel
process and will be approved by the Pay
Pool Manager. The criteria used to
determine the number and distribution
of payout points to assign an employee
may include: Assessment of the
employee’s contribution towards
achieving the mission, the employee’s
type and level of work, the employee’s
current compensation and the criticality
of their contribution to mission success,
consideration of specific achievements,
or other job-related significant
accomplishments or contributions.
The proposed rating and payout point
schema is:
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
5. Pay Pools
The Technical Director (or designee)
of NAVFAC EXWC will establish pay
pools. Typically, pay pools will have
between 35 and 300 employees. A pay
pool should be large enough to
encompass a reasonable distribution of
ratings but not so large as to
compromise rating consistency. Large
pay pools may use sub pay pools
subordinate to the pay pool due to the
size of the pay pool population, the
complexity of the mission, or other
similar criteria. The covered
organizations’ employees will be placed
into pay pools. Neither the Pay Pool
Manager, supervisors, or pay pool panel
members within a pay pool will in any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
way recommend or participate in setting
their own rating or individual payout
except for the normal employee selfassessment process.
Each employee is initially scored by
their supervisor. Next, the rating
officials in an organizational unit
(Directorates, Divisions, Branches,
Teams, etc.), along with their next level
of supervision, will review and compare
recommended ratings to ensure
consistency and equity of the ratings. In
this step, each employee’s individual
mission objectives, accomplishments,
preliminary scores, and pay are
compared to benchmark performance
standards. Through discussion and
consensus building, consistent and
equitable ratings are reached. Managers
will not prescribe a distribution of
ratings. The Pay Pool Manager will then
chair a final review with the rating
officials who report directly to him or
her to validate these ratings and resolve
any scoring issues. If consensus cannot
be reached in this process, the Pay Pool
Manager makes all final decisions.
Ratings are finalized after this
reconciliation process is complete.
Decisions regarding the amount and
distribution of the payouts are based on
the employee’s most recent rating of
record for the performance year, the
criteria listed above under performance
feedback, the type and nature of the
funding available to the pay pool, and
the number of payout points assigned by
the pay pool. In the case of NAVFAC
EXWC attorneys, special consideration
must be made relative to assigned score.
To avoid conflict with state bar rules,
the pay pool panel may not alter the
mission aligned objective performance
ratings or the overall score that
NAVFAC HQ counsel assigns to an
attorney; however, the pay pool panel
may make independent judgments, such
as pay adjustments after considering
that score. A reconsideration from a
NAVFAC EXWC attorney will be
handled in accordance with the Office
of General Counsel’s grievance
procedures after NAVFAC HQ counsel
and the pay pool panel recommends a
resolution.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Funds within a pay pool available for
performance payouts are divided into
two components, base pay and bonus.
The funds within a pay pool used for
base pay increases are those that would
have been available for within-grade
increases, quality step increases and
promotions under the GS system
(excluding the costs of promotions still
provided under the pay banding
system). The funds available to be used
for bonus payouts are funded separately
within the constraints of the
organization’s overall award budget.
Both amounts will be defined based on
historical data and will initially be set
at no less than one percent of total base
pay annually. As changes in the
demographics of the workforce or other
exigencies occur, adjustments may be
made to these two factors. The sum of
these two factors is referred to as the
pay pool percentage factor. The ESPB
will annually review the pay pool
funding and recommend adjustments to
the Technical Director (or designee) to
ensure cost discipline over the life of
the demonstration project. Additional
guidance on pay pool design and
composition will be included in
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
6. Performance Payout Determination
The payout an employee will receive
is based on the total performance rating
from the mission aligned objectives and
performance compensation assessment
process. An employee will receive a
payout as a percentage of base pay. This
percentage is based on the number of
payout points that equates to their final
appraisal score. The value of a payout
point cannot be determined until the
rating and reconciliation process is
completed and all scores are finalized.
The payout point value is expressed as
a percentage.
The formula that computes the value
of each payout point uses base pay rates
and is based on:
a. The sum of the base pay of all the
employees in the pay pool times the pay
pool percentage factor;
b. The employee’s base pay;
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
EN22NO19.011
Employees with a rating of two or
above for each mission aligned objective
will receive the equivalent of the
authorized GS general pay increase
(GPI). An employee receiving an
‘‘Unacceptable’’ rating of one for any
mission-aligned objective will not
receive the GPI and will require
administrative action to address the
performance deficiency. A rating of ‘‘1’’
on a single objective will also result in
a rating of ‘‘Unacceptable.’’ Supervisors
of employees who are assessed to be at
the ‘‘Unacceptable’’ level, will take
appropriate action as soon as
practicable. However, at the end of the
performance year, employees who are
assessed to be at the ‘‘Unacceptable’’
level will have their rating deferred
until the end of a performance
improvement period. If the employee’s
performance is found to be unacceptable
following a performance improvement
period a rating of record will be ‘‘1’’ and
administrative action will be taken. If
the employee’s performance is found to
be acceptable at the end of the
improvement period, rating of record
and associated payouts will be
applicable to the end of the appraisal
period. If an employee’s performance
deteriorates again in any objective
within two years from the beginning of
the performance improvement period,
actions may be initiated to effect a
performance based action with no
additional opportunity to improve.
64505
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
c. The number of payout points
awarded to each employee in the pay
pool; and
d. The total number of payout points
awarded in the pay pool.
This formula assures that each
employee within the pool receives a
payout point amount equal to all others
in the same pool who are at the same
rate of base pay and receiving the same
score. The formula is shown in Figure
2.
An individual payout is calculated by
first multiplying the payout points
earned by the payout point value and
multiplying that product by base pay.
An adjustment is then made to account
for locality pay or staffing supplement.
A Pay Pool Manager is accountable for
staying within pay pool limits and final
decisions on base pay increases and/or
bonuses to individuals based on rater
recommendations, the final score, the
pay pool funds available, and the
employee’s base pay.
unadjusted base pay rate of GS–15, Step
10, except for employees in ND Pay
Band V.
the agency administrative grievance
system, or any negotiated grievance
procedures.
Consistent with this part, a
Designated Management Official (DMO)
will make the decision on
reconsiderations of rating of record. The
DMOs’ decisions are final. The DMO is
a senior EXWC manager who is
appointed by the Technical Director to
make this final determination. The DMO
will not be the pay pool manager who
made the decision on the subject rating.
The payout point determination, payout
distribution determination, or any other
payout matter will not be subject to the
reconsideration process, any other
agency administrative grievance system
or any negotiated grievance procedures.
In the event of a reconsideration that
results in an adjusted rating of record,
the revised rating will be referred to the
Pay Pool Manager for recalculation of
the employee’s performance payout
amount and distribution. Any
adjustment to base pay will be
retroactive to the effective date of the
performance payout. Base pay
adjustments will be based on the payout
point range appropriate for the adjusted
rating of record. Payout point values for
the adjusted rating of record will reflect
the payout point value paid to other
members across the pay pool for that
rating cycle. Decisions made through
the reconsideration process will not
result in recalculation of the payout
made to other employees in the pay
pool.
Appeals that contain allegations that
a performance rating was based on
prohibited actions that are subject to
formal review and adjudication by a
third party may not be processed
through the reconsideration process, but
instead may be processed by the
employee through an applicable third
party process. Such third parties
include, but are not limited to: The
Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB),
the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), the
OPM, the Federal Labor Relations
Authority (FLRA) and the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC).
7. Base Pay Increases and Bonuses
The amount of money available for
the performance payouts is divided into
two components: Base pay increases
and bonuses. The base pay and bonus
funds are based on the pay pool funding
formula established annually. Once the
individual performance amounts have
been determined, the next step is to
determine what portion of each payout
will be in the form of a base pay
increase as opposed to a bonus
payment. The payouts made to
employees from the pay pool may be a
mix of base pay and bonus, such that all
of the allocated funds are disbursed. To
continue to provide performance
incentives while also ensuring cost
discipline, base pay increases may be
limited or capped. Certain employees
will not be able to receive the projected
base pay increase due to base pay caps.
Base pay is capped when an employee
reaches the maximum rate of base pay
in an assigned pay band, category, or
when a control point applies. Also, for
employees receiving retained rates
above the applicable pay band
maximum, the entire performance
payout will be in the form of a bonus
payment.
When capped, the total payout an
employee receives will be in the form of
a bonus versus the combination of base
pay and bonus. Bonuses are cash
payments and are not part of the base
pay for any purpose (e.g., lump sum
payments of annual leave on separation,
life insurance, and retirement). The
maximum base pay rate under this
demonstration project will be the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
8. Pay Band Progression
As a compensation management tool,
NAVFAC EXWC will use salary points
and categories to manage position and
pay progression within each band.
Salary points may be set within each
band and may be used in the pay pool
process to manage performance salary
increases. Taking an employee’s salary
across a point will require review of
both the position and performance of
the employee. Advancement may not
occur without approval of the Pay Pool
Manager and the ESPB.
Employees who display exemplary
performance for two consecutive years
may be candidates for pay band
movement to the next higher pay band.
The request must be made by a Pay Pool
Manager and must demonstrate that an
employee’s high-level of performance is
commensurate with the complexities
and responsibilities of a position in the
next higher pay band and will continue
into the future. Movement to a higher
pay band level is not guaranteed.
Approval of requests for movement to
the next higher level pay band based on
employee performance reside with the
ESPB. Criteria for crossing salary points,
categories, and movement to a higher
pay band based on high-level
performance will be contained in
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
9. Requests for Reconsideration
An employee may request
reconsideration of the rating-of-record
received under the mission aligned
objectives and performance
compensation system. A rating of record
or job objective rating may be
reconsidered by request of an employee
only through the reconsideration
process specified in an NAVFAC EXWC
IOP (except for NAVFAC EXWC’s
attorneys, see section III.E.5.). This
process will be the sole and exclusive
agency administrative process for
employees to request reconsideration of
a rating of record and is not subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
EN22NO19.012
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
64506
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
F. Workforce Shaping
1. Modified Voluntary Early Retirement
(VERA) and Voluntary Separation
Incentive Pay (VSIP)
NAVFAC EXWC will use the
modified VERA and VSIP authorities
authorized by sections 1109(b)(3) and
(4) of the NDAA for FY 2016. The
Technical Director may use VERA and
VSIP whenever such incentives will
help the STRL to achieve one or more
of the objectives in section 1109(a). This
authority may not be delegated further.
DOD has published, at 82 FR 43339,
specific direction and authorization for
the use of VERA and VSIP authorities by
STRLs for workforce shaping. If the
laboratory workforce is being
downsized, VERA and VSIP incentives
may be used to minimize the need for
involuntary separations. VERA and
VSIP may also be used to restructure the
laboratory workforce without reducing
the number of assigned personnel. In
this restructuring scenario, incentives
may be offered for the purpose of
creating vacancies that will be reshaped
to align with mission objectives. Details
on the specific use of this authority are
contained in 82 FR 43339.
IV. Conversion
A. Initial Conversion or Movement Into
the Demonstration Project
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
1. Placement Into Career Paths and Pay
Bands
Employees will be converted
automatically from their current GS
series and grade to the appropriate
career paths and pay band levels. It is
essential to the success of the project
that employees, upon entering the
project, know that they are not losing a
pay entitlement accrued under the GS
system. Employees that were covered by
local or national special salary rates will
no longer be considered a special salary
employee under the demonstration
project and thus will gain eligibility for
full locality pay. To control conversion
costs and to avoid a salary increase
windfall for these employees, the
adjusted salaries will not change.
Rather, the employees will receive a
new basic pay rate computed by the
locality pay factor for their area. A full
locality adjustment will then be added
to the new basic pay rate. Adverse
action provisions will not apply to the
conversion process, as there will be no
change to total salary. New hires,
including employees transferring from
other Federal activities, will be
converted into the demonstration
project in the career path and at the
level and pay consistent with the duties
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
and responsibilities of the position and
individual qualifications.
2. Within-Grade Increase (WGI) Buy-In
On the date that employees are
converted to the project pay plans, they
will be given a prorated permanent
increase in pay equal to the earned (time
spent in step) portion of their next
Within Grade Increase (WGI) based on
the value of the WGI at the time of
conversion. Employees at the 10th step
or receiving a retained rate will not be
eligible for the increase.
3. Transition Equity
During the first 12 months following
conversion, employees may receive pay
increases for non-competitive
promotion equivalents when the grade
level of the promotion is encompassed
within the same pay band, the
employee’s performance warrants the
promotion and promotions would have
otherwise occurred during that period.
Employees who receive an in-pay band
level promotion at the time of
conversion will not receive a prorated
step increase equivalent. Employees
will not be eligible for a basic pay
increase if their current rating of record
is unacceptable at the time of
conversion. The decision to grant a pay
equity adjustment is at the sole
discretion of management and is not
subject to employee appeal procedures.
4. Conversion From Other Personnel
Systems
Employees who enter this
demonstration project from other
personnel systems (e.g., Defense
Civilian Intelligence Personnel System,
DoD Civilian Acquisition Workforce
Demonstration Project, or other STRLs)
due to a reorganization, mandatory
conversion, Base Closure and
Realignment Commission decision, or
other directed action will be converted
into the NAVFAC EXWC personnel
demonstration project via movement of
their positions using the appropriate
Nature of Action Code. If applicable, a
WGI buy-in may also be applied. The
employee’s position will be classified
based upon the position classification
criteria under the NAVFAC EXWC IOP
and their pay upon conversion,
maintained under applicable pay setting
rules.
5. Initial Probationary Period
Employees who have completed an
initial probationary period prior to
conversion to the NAVFAC EXWC
personnel demonstration project plan
will not be required to serve another
probationary period. Employees who are
still serving an initial probationary
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64507
period upon conversion from GS to the
demonstration plan will receive credit
for probationary service to date,
however they must serve any remaining
probationary time to complete the full
two-year DOD probationary period.
6. Supervisory Probationary Period
NAVFAC EXWC will implement an
extended supervisory probationary
period. The probationary period for new
supervisors will be two years, rather
than the normal one-year probationary
period specified by 5 CFR part 315.
Except for the increased length,
supervisory probationary periods will
be made consistent with 5 CFR part 315.
Employees who have already
successfully completed an initial oneyear probationary period for supervisory
positions will not be required to
complete a two-year probationary
period for initial appointment to a
supervisory position. Employees who
are serving an initial supervisory
probationary period upon conversion
into this demonstration project will
serve the time remaining on their oneyear supervisory probationary period. If
the decision is made to return the
employee to a non-supervisory position
for reasons related to supervisory
performance and/or conduct, the
employee will be returned to a
comparable position of no lower base
pay that the position from which
promoted or reassigned immediately
prior to the supervisory assignment.
B. Movement Out of the Demonstration
Project
1. Termination of Coverage Under the
Demonstration Project Pay Plans
In the event employees’ coverage
under the NAVFAC EXWC STRL
personnel demonstration project pay
plans is terminated, employees move
with their position to another system
applicable to NAVFAC EXWC STRL
employees. The grade of their
demonstration project position in the
new system will be based upon the
position classification criteria of the
gaining system. Employees may be
eligible for pay retention under 5 CFR
part 536 when converted to their
positions classified under the new
system, if applicable.
2. Determining GS Equivalent Grade and
Pay When an Employee Exits the
Demonstration Project
If a demonstration project employee is
moving to a GS or other pay system
position, the following procedures will
be used to translate the employee’s
personnel demonstration project pay
band to a GS-equivalent grade and the
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
64508
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
employee’s project base pay to the GSequivalent rate of pay for pay setting
purposes. The equivalent GS grade and
GS rate of pay must be determined
before movement out of the personnel
demonstration project and any
accompanying geographic movement,
promotion, or other simultaneous
action. For lateral reassignments, the
equivalent GS grade and rate will
become the employee’s converted GS
grade and rate after leaving the
demonstration project (before any other
action). For transfers, promotions, and
other actions, the converted GS grade
and rate will be used in applying any
GS pay administration rules applicable
in connection with the employee’s
movement out of the project (e.g.,
promotion rules, highest previous rate
rules, pay retention rules), as if the GS
converted grade and rate were actually
in effect immediately before the
employee left the demonstration project.
3. Equivalent GS-Grade-Setting
Provisions
An employee in a pay band
corresponding to a single GS grade is
provided that grade as the GS equivalent
grade. An employee in a pay band
corresponding to two or more grades is
determined to have a GS equivalent
grade corresponding to one of those
grades according to the following rules:
a. The employee’s adjusted base pay
under the demonstration project
(including any locality payment or
staffing supplement) is compared with
step four rates in the highest applicable
GS rate range. For this purpose, a GS
rate range includes a rate in:
i. The GS base schedule;
ii. The locality rate schedule for the
locality pay area in which the position
is located; or
iii. The appropriate special rate
schedule for the employee’s
occupational series, as applicable.
If the series is a two-grade interval
series, only odd-numbered grades are
considered below GS–11.
b. If the employee’s adjusted base pay
under the demonstration project equals
or exceeds the applicable step four
adjusted base pay rate of the highest GS
grade in the band, the employee is
converted to that grade.
c. If the employee’s adjusted base pay
under the demonstration project is
lower than the applicable step four
adjusted base pay rate of the highest
grade, the adjusted base pay under the
demonstration project is compared with
the step four adjusted base pay rate of
the second highest grade in the
employee’s pay band. If the employee’s
adjusted base pay under the
demonstration project equals or exceeds
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
the step four adjusted base pay rate of
the second highest grade, the employee
is converted to that grade.
d. This process is repeated for each
successively lower grade in the band
until a grade is found in which the
employee’s adjusted base pay under the
demonstration project rate equals or
exceeds the applicable step four
adjusted base pay rate of the grade. The
employee is then converted at that
grade. If the employee’s adjusted base
pay is below the step four adjusted base
pay rate of the lowest grade in the band,
the employee is converted to the lowest
grade.
e. Exception: An employee will not be
provided a lower grade than the grade
held by the employee immediately
preceding a conversion, lateral
reassignment, or lateral transfer into the
project, unless since that time the
employee has either undergone a
reduction in pay band or a reduction
within the same pay band due to
unacceptable performance. This
provision does not apply to voluntary
movement out of the demonstration
project.
4. Equivalent GS-Rate-of-Pay-Setting
Provisions
An employee’s pay within the
converted GS grade is set by converting
the employee’s personnel demonstration
project rates of pay to GS rates of pay
in accordance with the following rules:
a. The pay conversion is done before
any geographic movement or other pay
related action that coincides with the
employee’s movement or conversion out
of the demonstration project.
b. An employee’s adjusted base pay
under the demonstration project (i.e.,
including any locality payment or
staffing supplement) is converted to a
GS adjusted base pay rate on the highest
applicable GS rate range for the
converted GS grade. For this purpose, a
GS rate range includes a rate range in:
i. The GS base schedule,
ii. An applicable locality rate
schedule, or
iii. An applicable special rate
schedule.
c. If the highest applicable GS rate
range is a locality pay rate range, the
employee’s adjusted base pay under the
demonstration project is converted to a
GS locality rate of pay. If this rate falls
between two steps in the localityadjusted schedule, the rate must be set
at the higher step. The converted GS
unadjusted rate of base pay would be
the GS base rate corresponding to the
converted GS locality rate (i.e., same
step position).
d. If the highest applicable GS rate
range is a special rate range, the
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
employee’s adjusted base pay under the
demonstration project is converted to a
special rate. If this rate falls between
two steps in the special rate schedule,
the rate must be set at the higher step.
The converted GS unadjusted rate of
base pay will be the GS rate
corresponding to the converted special
rate (i.e., same step position).
C. Implementation Training
Training to promote understanding of
the broad concepts and finer details is
critical to successfully implement and
execute this project. A new pay banding
schema and performance management
system both represent significant
cultural change to the organization.
Training is tailored to address
employee concerns and encourage
comprehensive understanding of the
demonstration project. Training is
required prior to implementation and at
various times during the life of the
demonstration project. The training
program includes modules tailored for
employees, supervisors, senior
managers, and administrative staff.
Typical modules are:
1. An overview of the demonstration
project personnel system;
2. How employees are converted into
and out of the system;
3. Pay banding;
4. The mission aligned objectives and
performance compensation system;
5. Defining mission aligned
performance objectives;
6. How weights may be used with the
mission aligned performance objectives;
7. Assessing performance—giving
feedback;
8. New position descriptions; and
9. Demonstration project
administration and formal evaluation.
Various types of training including
videos, on-line tutorials, and train-thetrainer concepts will be used.
V. Project Duration
Section 342 of the NDAA for FY 1995
(Pub. L. 103–337) does not require a
mandatory expiration date for this
demonstration project. The project
evaluation plan addresses how each
flexibility will be comprehensively
evaluated for at least the first five years
of the demonstration project. Changes
and modifications to the interventions
will be made using the provisions of
DoDI 1400.37, or applicable superseding
instructions.
VI. Evaluation Plan
A. Overview
Chapter 47 of 5 U.S.C. requires that an
evaluation be performed to measure the
effectiveness of the demonstration
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
B. Data Collection To Support
Evaluation
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
The ultimate outcomes sought are
improved organizational effectiveness,
mission accomplishment, and customer
satisfaction. However, the main focus of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
the evaluation will be on intermediate
outcomes, i.e., the results of the
authorized personnel system changes,
which are expected to contribute to the
desired goals and benefits identified
Sections II.A and II.C. Data from several
sources will be used in the evaluation.
Information from existing management
information systems and from personnel
office records will be supplemented
with perceptual survey data from
employees to assess the effectiveness
and perception of the project. The
multiple sources of data collection will
provide a more complete picture as to
how the flexibilities are working. The
information gathered from one source
will serve to validate information
obtained through another source. The
confidence of overall findings will be
strengthened as the different collection
methods substantiate each other. Both
quantitative and qualitative data will be
used when evaluating outcomes. The
following data will be collected:
1. Workforce data (advanced degrees,
etc.);
2. Personnel office data (hiring
actions, time to hire, retention, etc.);
3. Employee attitude surveys;
4. Structured interviews and focus
group data;
5. Comparison of desired results from
the flexibilities implemented with
actual results achieved;
6. Customer satisfaction surveys;
7. Core measures of laboratory
effectiveness; and
8. Any additional data requested by
Director, Defense Laboratories Office.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
The evaluation effort will consist of
two phases, formative and summative
evaluation, covering at least five years to
permit inter- and intra-organizational
estimates of effectiveness. The formative
evaluation phase will include baseline
data collection and analysis,
implementation evaluation, and interim
assessments. The formal reports and
interim assessments will provide
information on the accuracy of project
operation, and current information on
impact of the project on veterans and
protected groups, Merit System
Principles, and Prohibited Personnel
Practices. The summative evaluation
will focus on an overall assessment of
project outcomes after five years. The
final report will provide information on
how well the HR system changes
achieved the desired goals, which
flexibilities were most effective, and
whether the results can be generalized
to other Federal installations.
VII. Demonstration Project Costs
NAVFAC EXWC will model its
demonstration project on existing
demonstration projects but must assume
some expanded project costs. Current
cost estimates associated with
implementing the demonstration project
are shown in Figure 3. These include
possible automation of training and
project evaluation systems. The
automation and training costs are
startup costs. Transition costs are onetime costs. Costs for project evaluation
will be ongoing for at least five years.
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
EN22NO19.013
project and its impact on improving
public management. A comprehensive
evaluation plan for the entire
demonstration program, originally
covering 24 DoD laboratories, was
developed by a joint OPM/DoD
Evaluation Committee in 1995. This
plan was submitted to the Office of
Defense Research & Engineering and
was subsequently approved. The main
purpose of the evaluation is to
determine whether the waivers granted
result in a more effective personnel
system and improvements in ultimate
outcomes (i.e., organizational
effectiveness, mission accomplishment,
and customer satisfaction). That plan,
while useful, is dated and does not fully
afford the laboratories the ability to
evaluate all aspects of the
demonstration project in a way that
fully facilitates assessment and effective
modification based on actionable data.
Therefore, the STRL Director will
conduct an internal evaluation of the
STRL Personnel Demonstration Program
and will ensure USD(R&E) evaluation
requirements are met in addition to
applying knowledge gained from other
DoD laboratories and their evaluations
to ensure a timely, useful evaluation of
the demonstration project.
64509
64510
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
VIII. Management and Oversight
A. Project Management With
Automation
One of the major goals of the
demonstration project is to streamline
the personnel processes to increase cost
effectiveness. Automation should play
an integral role in achieving that goal.
Without the necessary automation to
support the flexibilities proposed for the
demonstration project, optimal cost
benefit may not be realized. In addition,
adequate information to support
decision-making must be available to
managers if line management is to
assume greater authority and
responsibility for human resources
management. Automation to support the
demonstration project is required at the
DON and DoD level (in the form of
changes to the Defense Civilian
Personnel Data System (DCPDS) or
successor DoD personnel system) to
facilitate processing and reporting of
demonstration project personnel actions
and may be ultimately required by the
command to assist in processing a
variety of personnel-related actions in
order to facilitate management processes
and decision making.
DCPDS is the DoD’s authoritative
personnel data system and program of
record and as such, DCPDS or its
successor system will be the system of
choice for the STRL labs. The detailed
specifications for required system
changes will be provided in the System
Change Request (SCR), Form 804,
concurrent with submission of this
document.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
B. Oversight
Oversight will be carried out by the
command’s Senior Leadership,
composed of the Technical Director and
Commanding Officer. The Technical
Director and Commanding Officer will
be assisted initially by the NAVFAC
EXWC STRL Demonstration Project
Implementation Team, and once
established, by the NAVFAC EXWC
STRL Policy Board (ESPB).
1. Personnel Administration
All personnel laws, regulations, and
guidelines not waived by this plan will
remain in effect. Basic employee rights
will be safeguarded and merit system
principles will be maintained. Except
where specifically waived or modified
in this plan, adverse action procedures
under 5 CFR part 752 remain
unchanged.
2. Modifications
Many aspects of a demonstration
project are experimental. Modifications
may be made from time to time as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
experience is gained, results are
analyzed, and conclusions are reached
on how the new system is working.
Modifications will be made in
accordance with the provisions of DoDI
1400.37, or applicable superseding
instructions.
IX. Required Waivers to Laws and
Regulations
Public Law 106–398 gave the DoD the
authority to experiment with several
personnel management innovations. In
addition to the authorities granted by
the law, the following are waivers of law
and regulation that will be necessary for
implementation of the demonstration
project. In due course, additional laws
and regulations may be identified for
waiver request. The following waivers
and adaptations of certain Title 5 U.S.C.
and 5 CFR provisions are required only
to the extent that these statutory
provisions limit or are inconsistent with
the actions contemplated under this
demonstration project. Nothing in this
plan is intended to preclude the
demonstration project from applying,
adopting or incorporating any law or
OPM, DoD, or DON regulation enacted,
adopted, or amended after the effective
date of this demonstration project.
A. Waivers to Title 5, United States
Code
Chapter 5, section 552a: Records.
Waived to the extent required to clarify
that volunteers under the Voluntary
Emeritus Program are considered
employees of the Federal government
for purposes of this section.
Chapter 31, section 3104:
Employment of Specially Qualified
Scientific and Professional Personnel.
Waived to allow SSTM authority as
described in this FRN and 79 FR 43722.
Chapter 31, section 3132: The Senior
Executive Service: Definitions and
Exclusions. Waived to allow SSTMs.
Chapter 33, Subchapter I:
Examination, Certification, and
Appointment. Waived except for
sections 3302 and 3328 to allow for
direct hire authority for scientists and
engineers with advanced degrees for
professional positions, and bachelor
degree candidates for scientific and
engineering positions. Waived for
veteran candidates for scientific,
technical, engineering and mathematics
positions, including technician
positions. Also waived to the extent to
allow employees appointed on a
Flexible Length or Renewable Term
Technical Appointment to apply for
federal positions as status candidates.
Chapter 33, section 3308: Competitive
Service; Examinations; Educational
Requirements Prohibited. This section is
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
waived with respect to the scholastic
achievement appointment authority.
Chapter 33, section 3321: Competitive
Service; Probationary Period. This
section is waived only to the extent
necessary to replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay
band’’ and to allow for probationary
periods of two years.
Chapter 33, section 3324:
Appointments to Positions Classified
Above GS–15; and 5 U.S.C. 3325,
Appointments to Scientific and
Professional Positions. Waived in its
entirety.
Chapter 33, section 3327: Civil service
employment information. Waived to the
extent necessary to allow public notice
other than USAJobs for the
Distinguished Scholastic Appointment
Authority described in this FRN.
Chapter 33, section 3330:
Government-wide List of Vacant
Positions. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow public notice other
than USAJobs for the Distinguished
Scholastic Appointment Authority
described in this FRN.
Chapter 33, section 3341: Details.
Waived in its entirety, to extend the
time limits for details.
Chapter 35, section 3522: Agency
VSIP Plans; Approval. Waived to
remove the requirement to submit a
plan to OPM prior to obligating any
resources for voluntary separation
incentive payments.
Chapter 35, section 3523 (b)(3):
Authority to Provide Voluntary
Separation Incentive Payments. As
provided for in 82 FR 43339, September
15, 2017, waived to remove the
prescribed method of incentive payment
calculation and the $25,000 incentive
limit. Allows STRL director to
determine amount of incentive paid to
employees under the workforce shaping
pilot program voluntary early retirement
and separation incentive payment
authorities within the limit prescribed
herein.
Chapter 41, section 4107(a)(2):
Academic Degree Training. Waived in
its entirety.
Chapter 41, section 4108: Employee
Agreements; Service After Training.
Waived to the extent necessary to: (1)
Provide that the employee’s service
obligation is to NAVFAC EXWC for the
period of the required service; (2) permit
the Technical Director to waive in
whole or in part a right of recovery; and
(3) require an employee in the student
educational employment program who
has received tuition assistance to sign a
service agreement up to three times the
length of the training.
Chapter 43, section 4301–4305:
Related to Performance Appraisal.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
provisions of the performance
compensation system as described in
this FRN. Replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay
band’’; does not apply to employees
reduced in pay band without a
reduction in pay; allows for removal for
unacceptable performance within two
years from the beginning of the
performance improvement period; OPM
responsibilities to the demonstration
project are waived.
Chapter 45, section 4502: Limitation
of Cash Awards to Ten-Thousand
Dollars. Waived to allow Technical
Director to award up to $25,000 with the
same level of authority as the Secretary
of Defense to grant cash awards. The
requirement for certification and
approval of the cash awards by OPM is
not required. All other provisions of
section 4502 apply.
Chapter 51, section 5101–5112:
Purpose, Definitions, Basis,
Classification of Positions, Review,
Authority. Waived to the extent that (1)
white collar employees will be covered
by broad banding, (2) to allow
classification provisions described in
this FRN and to allow for SSTM
positions, and (3) classification appeals
will be decided by the Technical
Director with final appeal to the DoD
Appellate level.
Chapter 53, sections 5301–5307:
Related to Pay Comparability System
and General Schedule Pay Rates.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow
demonstration project employees,
including SSTM employees, to be
treated as GS employees, and to allow
base rates of pay under the
demonstration project to be treated as
scheduled rates of pay. SSTM pay will
not exceed EX–IV and locality adjusted
SSTM rates will not exceed EX III.
Chapter 53, section 5331–5336:
General Schedule Pay Rates. Waived in
entirety.
Chapter 53, sections 5361–5366:
Grade and Pay Retention. Waived to the
extent necessary to: (1) Replace ‘‘grade’’
with ‘‘pay band;’’ (2) allow
demonstration project employees to be
treated as GS employees; (3) provide
that an employee on pay retention
whose rating of record is
‘‘Unacceptable’’ is not entitled to 50
percent of the amount of the increase in
the maximum rate of base pay payable
for the pay band of the employee’s
position; (4) provide that pay retention
does not apply to reduction in base pay
due solely to the reallocation of
demonstration project pay rates in the
implementation of a staffing
supplement; (5) allow no provision of
grade/pay band retention under this
demonstration project; and (6) allow
demonstration project employees
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
receiving a staffing supplement to retain
the adjusted base pay if the staffing
supplement is discontinued or reduced.
This waiver may apply to Scientific and
Professional (ST), Senior Level (SL) and
SSTM employees only if they move to
a GS-equivalent position within the
demonstration project under conditions
that trigger entitlement to pay retention.
Chapter 55, section 5542(a)(1)–(2):
Overtime Rates; Computation. These
sections are adapted only to the extent
necessary to provide that the GS–10
minimum special rate (if any) for the
special rate category to which a project
employee belongs is deemed to be the
‘‘applicable special rate’’ in applying the
pay cap provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5542.
Chapter 55, section 5545(d): Related
to Hazardous Duty Premium Pay.
Waived only to the extent necessary to
allow demonstration project employees
to be treated as GS employees.
Chapter 55, section 5547(a)–(b):
Limitation on Premium Pay. These
sections are adapted only to the extent
necessary to provide that the GS–15
maximum special rate (if any) for the
special rate category to which a project
employee belongs is deemed to be the
‘‘applicable special rate’’ in applying the
pay cap provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5547.
Chapter 57, sections 5753, 5754, and
5755: Related to Recruitment,
Relocation, Retention Payments, and
Supervisory Differential. These sections
waived to the extent necessary to allow:
(1) Employees and positions under the
demonstration project to be treated as
employees and positions under the GS;
and (2) that management may offer a
bonus to incentivize geographic
mobility to employees in a student
educational employment program. Also
to the extent necessary, to allow SSTMs
to receive pay retention and supervisory
differentials as described in this FRN
and 79 FR 43722.
Chapter 59, section 5941: Allowances
Based on Living Costs and Conditions of
Environment; employees stationed
outside continental United States or
Alaska. Waived to the extent necessary
to provide that cost-of-living-adjustment
(COLA)’s paid to employees under the
demonstration project are paid in
accordance with regulations prescribed
by the President (as delegated to OPM).
Chapter 75, section 7512(3)–(4):
Adverse Actions. Waived to the extent
necessary to: (1) Replace ‘‘grade’’ with
‘‘pay band;’’ (2) exclude reductions in
pay band that are not accompanied by
a reduction in pay; (3) exclude
conversions from GS special rates to
demonstration project pay and
reallocations of demonstration project
pay rates within special rate extensions
to locality adjusted pay rates due to
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64511
promotions of general or locality pay
increases, as long as the employee’s
total rate of pay is not reduced; (4)
exclude reductions in base pay due
solely to the operations of the pay
setting rules for geographic movement
within the demonstration project; and
(5) exclude reduction in pay due to the
removal of a supervisory or team leader
pay adjustment upon voluntary
movement to a non-supervisory, or nonteam leader position.
Chapter 99, section 9902(f): Related to
Voluntary Separation Incentive
Payments. Waived to the extent
necessary to utilize the authorities
authorized by Public Law 114–92 and
detailed in 82 FR 43339.
B. Waivers to Title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations
Part 210, section 210.102(b) (12):
Definitions, Reassignment. Waived to
the extent necessary to allow assigning
an employee, without a position change,
to any work falling within their general
level descriptor. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow tracking of such
assignments as a ‘‘realignment.’’
Part 300–330: Employment (General).
Other than Subpart G of 300. Waived to
the extent necessary to allow provisions
of the direct hire authorities as
described in 79 FR 43722 and 82 FR
29280.
Part 300.601–300.605: Time-in-Grade
Requirements. Waived to eliminate
time-in-grade restrictions.
Part 315, section 315.901 and
315.907: Related to Supervisory
Probationary Periods. This waiver
applies to the extent necessary to: (1)
Replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band’’ or
‘‘broad band;’’ (2) allow NAVFAC
EXWC to establish the length of
supervisory probationary period; and (3)
allow time spent in a temporary
position to be creditable toward
completion of a supervisory
probationary period.
Part 316, sections 316.301, 316.303,
and 316.304: Subpart D, Term
Employment and Temporary Limited
Employment. These sections are waived
to the extent necessary to allow
modified term appointments and
Flexible Length and Renewable Term
Technical Appointments as described in
this FRN.
Part 330.103–330.105: Requirement to
Notify OPM. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow the STRL to publish
competitive announcements outside of
USAJobs.
Part 332 and 335: Related to
Competitive Examination. Waived to the
extent necessary to allow employees
appointed on a Flexible Length and
Renewable Term Technical
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
64512
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
Appointment to apply for federal
positions as status candidates.
Part 335, section 335.103: Agency
Promotion Programs. Waived to the
extent necessary to extend the length of
details and temporary promotions
without requiring competitive
procedures or numerous short-term
renewals.
Part 338.301: Competitive Service
Appointment. Waived to allow for
Distinguished Scholastic Achievement
Appointment grade point average
requirements as described in this FRN.
Part 359.705: Related to SES Pay.
Waived to allow demonstration project
rules governing pay retention to apply
to a former SES placed on an SSTM
position.
Part 410, section 410.308(a) and (c):
Related to Degree Programs. Waived to
allow the command to pay for all
courses related to an academic degree
program approved by the NAVFAC
EXWC Technical Director.
Part 410, section 410.309: Agreements
to Continue in Service. Waived to the
extent necessary to allow the Technical
Director to determine requirements
related to continued service agreements,
including employees under the Student
Educational Employment Program who
have received tuition assistance.
Part 430, Subpart B: Performance
Appraisal for General Schedule,
Prevailing Rate and Certain Other
Employees. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow the performance
appraisal program as described in this
FRN. Section 430.208(a)(1) and (2),
waived to allow presumptive ratings for
new employees hired less than 90 days
before the end of the appraisal cycle, or
for other situations not providing
adequate time for an appraisal.
Part 432: Performance Based
Reduction-in-grade and Removal
Actions. Replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay
band.’’ Modified to the extent that an
employee may be removed, reduced in
pay band level with a reduction in pay,
reduced in pay without a reduction in
pay band level and reduced in pay band
level without a reduction in pay based
on unacceptable performance. Also,
modified to delete reference to critical
element and to allow removal for
unacceptable performance with two
years from the beginning of a
performance improvement period. For
employees who are reduced in pay band
level without a reduction in pay,
sections 432.105 and 432.106(a) do not
apply.
Part 451, section 451.106(b): Agency
Responsibilities. Waived to allow the
Technical Director to award up to
$25,000 with the same level of authority
as the Secretary of Defense to grant a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
cash award. The requirement for
certification and approval of cash
awards by OPM is not required. All
other provisions of 5 CFR 451.106
apply.
Part 511, Subpart A, B and F:
Classification Under the General
Schedule. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow classification
provisions outlined in this FRN to
include the list of issues that are neither
appealable nor reviewable, the
assignment of series under the project
plan to appropriate career paths; and to
allow classification appeals to be
decided by the Technical Director with
final appeal to the DoD Appellate level.
Part 530, Subpart C: Special Rate
Schedules for Recruitment and
Retention. Waived in its entirety to
allow for staffing supplements.
Part 531, Subparts B, D, and E:
Determining the Rate of Basic Pay,
Within-Grade Increases and Quality
Step Increases. Waived in its entirety.
Part 531, Subpart F: Locality-Based
Comparability Adjustments. This waiver
applies only to the extent necessary to
allow: (1) Demonstration project
employees covered by broad banding to
be treated as GS employees; (2) basic
rates of pay under the demonstration
project to be treated as scheduled
annual rates of pay; and (3) SSTM
employees to be treated as GS
employees and basic rates of pay under
the SSTM to be treated as scheduled
annual rates of pay. This waiver does
not apply to FWS employees.
Part 536: Grade and Pay Retention:
Waived to the extent necessary to: (1)
Replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band;’’ (2)
provide that pay retention provisions do
not apply to conversions from GS
special rates to demonstration project
pay, as long as total pay is not reduced,
and to movement from a supervisory
position to a non-supervisory position,
as long as total pay is not reduced; (3)
allow demonstration project employees
to be treated as GS employees; (4)
provide that pay retention provisions do
not apply to movements to a lower pay
band as a result of not receiving the
general increase due to an annual
performance rating of ‘‘Unacceptable;’’
(5) provide that an employee on pay
retention whose rating of record is
‘‘Unacceptable’’ is not entitled to 50
percent of the amount of the increase in
the maximum rate of base pay payable
for the pay band of the employee’s
position; (6) allow no provision of
grade/pay band retention under this
demonstration project; (7) provide that
pay retention does not apply to
reduction in base pay due solely to the
reallocation of demonstration project
pay rates in the implementation of a
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
staffing supplement; and (8) allow
demonstration project employees
receiving a staffing supplement to retain
the adjusted base pay if the staffing
supplement is discontinued or reduced.
This waiver may apply to Scientific and
Professional (ST), Senior Level (SL) and
SSTM employees only if they move to
a GS-equivalent position within the
demonstration project under conditions
that trigger entitlement to pay retention.
Part 550, section 550.113(a):
Computation of Overtime Pay. This
section is adapted only to the extent
necessary to provide that the GS–10
minimum special rate (if any) for the
special rate category to which a project
employee belongs is deemed to be the
‘‘applicable special rate’’ in applying the
pay cap provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5542.
Part 550, sections 550.703: Severance
Pay, Definitions. Definition of
‘‘reasonable offer’’ waived by replacing
‘‘two grade or pay levels’’ with ‘‘one pay
band’’ and ‘‘grade or pay level’’ with
‘‘pay band.’’
Part 550, section 550.902: Definition
of ‘‘Employee’’ Hazardous Duty Pay
Differential. Waived to the extent
necessary to treat demonstration project
employees covered by broad banding as
GS employees.
Part 575, Subparts A, B, C, and D:
Recruitment Bonuses, Relocation
Bonuses, Retention Allowances, and
Supervisory Differentials. Waived only
to the extent necessary to allow: (1)
Employees and positions under the
demonstration project covered by broad
banding to be treated as employees and
positions under the GS; (2) relocation
incentives to new employees in the
student educational employment
program whose worksite is in a different
geographic location than that of the
college enrolled; and (3) SSTMs to
receive supervisory pay differentials as
described in this FRN and 79 FR 43726.
Part 591, Subpart B: Cost-of-Living
Allowances and Post Differential-Non
Foreign Areas. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow demonstration
project employees covered by broad
banding to be treated as employees
under the GS.
Part 752, sections 752.201, 752.301
and 752.401: Principal Statutory
Requirements and Coverage. Waived to
the extent necessary to: (1) Exclude
reductions in pay band not
accompanied by a reduction in pay; (2)
replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band;’’ (3)
the extent necessary to exclude
conversions from a GS special rate to
demonstration project pay that do not
result in a reduction in the employee’s
total rate of pay; and (4) the extent
necessary to provide that adverse action
provisions do not apply to: (1)
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Conversions from GS special rates to
demonstration project pay; (2)
reallocations of demonstration project
pay rates within special rate extensions
to locality adjusted pay rates due to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
promotions or general or locality pay
increases, as long as the employee’s
total rate of pay is not reduced; and (3)
reductions in base pay due solely to the
operation of the pay setting rules for
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
geographic movement within the
demonstration project.
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
64513
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
EN22NO19.014
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
64514
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
64515
EN22NO19.015
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
EN22NO19.016
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
64516
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 226 / Friday, November 22, 2019 / Notices
Dated: November 15, 2019.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2019–25200 Filed 11–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–C
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2019–ICCD–0118]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Agreements Between an Eligible
School and the Secretary To
Participate in the Direct Loan Program
Federal Student Aid (FSA),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
December 23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2019–ICCD–0118. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
ED will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the
docket ID number and the title of the
information collection request when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those
submitted after the comment period will
not be accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the Strategic
Collections and Clearance Governance
and Strategy Division, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Ave SW,
LBJ, Room 6W208, D, Washington, DC
20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Beth
Grebeldinger, 202–377–4018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Nov 21, 2019
Jkt 250001
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Agreements
between an eligible school and the
Secretary to participate in the Direct
Loan Program.
OMB Control Number: 1845–0143.
Type of Review: An extension of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: Private
Sector.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 1,010,519.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 179,362.
Abstract: The Department of
Education (the Department) requests an
extension of this information collection
tied to the William D. Ford Federal
Direct Loan (Direct Loan) Program
regulations issued under the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA). The 2018 negotiated rulemaking
made final in the rule to be published
in September 2019 makes changes made
to the regulations in § 685.300. These
final regulations are a result of
negotiated rulemaking and will rescind
the requirements of the current
regulations in paragraphs (e), (f), (g), and
(h) . The final rule and this rescission
will not take effect until July 1, 2020.
The Department is asking to extend the
current burden assessment until the
effective date of the change and at that
time a discontinuation request will be
filed.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64517
Dated: November 19, 2019.
Kate Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–25380 Filed 11–21–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2019–ICCD–0112]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Presidential Cybersecurity Education
Award
Office of Planning, Evaluation
and Policy Development (OPEPD),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
December 23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2019–ICCD–0112. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
ED will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the
docket ID number and the title of the
information collection request when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those
submitted after the comment period will
not be accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the Strategic
Collections and Clearance Governance
and Strategy Division, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW,
LBJ, Room 6W208B, Washington, DC
20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Jean Morrow,
202–453–7233.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22NON1.SGM
22NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 226 (Friday, November 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64495-64517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25200]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID DOD-2019-OS-0126]
Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (STRL) Personnel
Demonstration Project in the Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center (NAVFAC EXWC)
AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering
(USD(R&E)), Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Notice of proposal to adopt and modify an existing personnel
management demonstration project.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Federal Register Notice (FRN) serves as notice of the
proposed adoption of an existing STRL Personnel Management
Demonstration Project by the Naval Facilities Engineering Command,
Engineering and Expeditionary Warfare Center (NAVFAC EXWC). NAVFAC EXWC
proposes to adopt, with some modifications, the STRL Personnel
Demonstration Project implemented at the: Naval Air Systems Command
(NAVAIR) Naval Warfare Center, Aircraft Division, Naval Air Warfare
Center, Weapons Division; Naval Information Warfare Centers Atlantic
and Pacific (NIWC Atlantic and Pacific) (previously designated as the
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command, Space and Naval Warfare
Systems Centers Atlantic and Pacific), Naval Sea Systems Command
Warfare Centers (NAVSEA), and the Combat Capabilities Development
Command (CCDC) Army Research Laboratory (ARL) (previously designated as
ARL).
DATES: NAVFAC EXWC's personnel demonstration project proposal may not
be implemented until a 30-day comment period is provided, comments
addressed, and a final FRN published. To be considered, written
comments must be submitted on or before December 23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Chief Management
Officer, Directorate for Oversight and Compliance, 4800 Mark Center
Drive, Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
NAVFAC EXWC: Ms. Carol Frash, 1000 23rd Avenue, Port Hueneme, CA
93043 (805) 982-2422, or [email protected].
DoD: Dr. Jagadeesh Pamulapati, Director, Laboratories and Personnel
Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350, (571) 372-6372,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 342(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 1995, Public Law (Pub.
L.) 103-337; as amended, authorizes the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF),
through the USD(R&E), to conduct personnel demonstration projects at
DoD laboratories designated as STRLs. All STRLs authorized by section
1105(a) of the NDAA for FY 2010, Public Law 111-84, as well as any
newly designated STRLs authorized by SECDEF, or future legislation, may
use the provisions described in this FRN.
1. Background
Many studies have been conducted since 1966 on the quality of the
laboratories and personnel. Most of the studies recommended
improvements in civilian personnel policy, organization, and
management. Pursuant to the authority provided in section 342(b) of
Public Law 103-337, as amended, a number of DoD STRL personnel
demonstration projects were approved. The demonstration projects are
``generally similar in nature'' to the Department of Navy's China Lake
Personnel Demonstration Project. The terminology, ``generally similar
in nature,'' does not imply an emulation of various features, but
rather implies a similar opportunity and authority to develop personnel
flexibilities that significantly increase the decision authority of
laboratory commanders and/or directors.
2. Overview
Section 1104 of the FY18 NDAA, Public Law 115-91 authorizes NAVFAC
EXWC to implement a STRL Personnel Demonstration Project. Upon
designation, NAVFAC EXWC chartered an Implementation Team (Team) to
design and implement a new demonstration project plan. The Team is
developing all associated deliverables, proposals and implementation
details. The Team is working with the Laboratories and Personnel Office
(L&PO), the Lab Quality Enhancement Program Panel on Personnel,
Workforce Development, and Talent Management (LQEP-P) and organizations
with ongoing demonstration projects for information and advice. NAVFAC
EXWC employees are updated through ongoing communications such as fact
sheets, briefings and small group meetings. This FRN is based on
specific flexibilities adopted by other STRLs and global flexibilities
available for use by all DoD STRLs.
NAVFAC EXWC will adopt, with some modifications, flexibilities from
the following approved STRL personnel demonstration projects:
Department of the Navy: NAVAIR--76 FR 8530, February 14,
2011.
Department of the Navy: NIWC Atlantic and Pacific--76 FR
1924, January 11, 2011.
Department of the Navy: NAVSEA--62 FR 64050, December 3,
1997.
Department of the Army: CCDC ARL--63 FR 10679, March 4,
1998.
3. Access to Flexibilities of Other STRLs
Flexibilities published in this FRN will be available for use by
the STRLs enumerated in section 1105(a) of the NDAA for FY 2010, Public
Law 111-84 as amended, if they wish to adopt them in accordance with
DoD Instruction 1400.37, ``Science and Technology Reinvention
Laboratory (STRL) Personnel Demonstration Projects'' (available at
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/140037p.pdf) (including revised or superseded instructions) and after
the fulfillment of any collective bargaining obligations.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
B. Problems With the Present System
C. Expected Benefits
D. Participating Organizations, Employees and Union
Representation
E. Project Design
F. Executive STRL Policy Board
G. Funding Level
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Hiring, Appointment, and Related Authorities
B. Classification, Career Paths and Pay Banding
[[Page 64496]]
C. Pay and Compensation
D. Employee Development and Awards
E. Performance Management
F. Workforce Shaping
IV. Conversion
A. Initial Conversion or Movement Into the Demonstration Project
B. Movement Out of the Demonstration Project
C. Implementation Training
V. Project Duration
VI. Evaluation Plan
A. Overview
B. Data Collection To Support Evaluation
VII. Demonstration Project Costs
VIII. Management and Oversight
A. Project Management With Automation
B. Oversight
IX. Required Waivers to Laws and Regulations
A. Waivers to Title 5, United States Code
B. Waivers to Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
Appendix A: Career Paths and Occupational Series
Appendix B: Rating Benchmark Examples
I. Executive Summary
NAVFAC EXWC is a Warfare Center and distinguished DoD laboratory
established in 2012. NAVFAC EXWC's dedicated workforce provides
specialized facilities engineering, technology solutions, and life-
cycle management of expeditionary equipment to the Navy, Marine Corps,
Federal agencies, and other DoD customers. A majority of NAVFAC EXWC's
civilian employees were hired in the General Schedule (GS)
classification and pay scale. The GS classification and pay scale does
not offer the same flexibilities and tools to attract, retain, motivate
and fully compensate staff as the NAVFAC EXWC personnel demonstration
project.
Through this project, NAVFAC EXWC competes with the private sector
for the best talent by making timely job offers with attractive
compensation packages that land high-quality employees. Once these
employees are hired, NAVFAC EXWC incentivizes performance and rewards
innovation and motivation through compensation directly linked to
individual performance. Linking compensation to performance increases
job satisfaction and retention of high performing employees and
encourages continued performance because reduced performance will draw
less reward.
NAVFAC EXWC's personnel demonstration project takes advantage of
flexibilities to simplify and speed classification and staffing actions
for employees, such as direct hire authorities, expanded details,
temporary promotions, and modified/flexible term appointments.
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The purpose of the project is to demonstrate that the effectiveness
of DoD laboratories can be enhanced by greater managerial control over
personnel functions and to expand the opportunities available to
employees through a more responsive and flexible personnel system. The
NAVFAC EXWC personnel demonstration project will incorporate legal
authorities and adopt practices from other STRLs to meet the specific
needs of this command. These tools will enable NAVFAC EXWC to
dynamically shape the mix of technical skills and expertise in the
laboratory workforce. As the Navy's leader in specialized facilities
engineering, technology solutions, and life-cycle management of
expeditionary equipment, NAVFAC EXWC must have the flexibility needed
to quickly respond to changes in mission, organizational constraints,
workload, and market conditions.
NAVFAC EXWC's Technical Director has overall oversight and
management of these authorities. Unless specifically stated otherwise,
the Technical Director of NAVFAC EXWC may delegate authority to
effectively implement the provisions of this notice. NAVFAC EXWC
Internal Operating Procedures (IOPs) will document any delegation,
including details of implementation.
Many aspects of a demonstration project are experimental.
Modifications may be made from time to time as we gain experience,
analyze results, and reach conclusions on how the system is working.
The provisions of Department of Defense Instruction (``DoDI'') 1400.37,
``Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory (STRL) Personnel
Demonstration Projects'' (including subsequently issued or superseding
instructions) will be followed to modify, supplement through adoption,
or otherwise change this demonstration project plan.
B. Problems With the Present System
Using the current Federal personnel system is incompatible with
NAVFAC EXWC's need for a highly specialized, quality workforce to
support the DoD and the Department of the Navy's overall strategic
objectives. The characteristics of the current general schedule (GS)
system have remained unchanged since its inception many years ago.
Under the GS system, work is classified into 15 grades with 10 interim
steps within each grade. It is rigidly defined by occupational series
and grade with precise qualifications for each position. This system
does not enable management to respond quickly to new ways of designing
work or changes in the work itself. It does not offer flexibilities to
accurately capture employee performance or to quickly adjust management
expectations for critical scientific, engineering, acquisition support
and other professional positions, including skilled technicians. The
current hiring system's inability to provide job offers in a timely
manner also hampers the NAVFAC EXWC's ability to attract high quality
candidates.
C. Expected Benefits
To remain the Department of the Navy's leader in supporting
combatant capabilities and sustainable facilities, NAVFAC EXWC must
compete with the private sector for the most talented, technically
proficient candidates. NAVFAC EXWC must have a human resource system
that fosters employee development, enhances performance and experience,
and provides a strong retention incentive. This personnel demonstration
project is expected to enable and enhance:
1. Recruitment of highly qualified scientific, technical, business,
and support employees in today's competitive environment;
2. Selection of candidates and extension of job offers in a timely
and efficient manner, with compensation sufficient to attract high
quality, in-demand employees;
3. Employee satisfaction with pay setting and adjustment,
recognition, and career advancement opportunities;
4. A quality workforce that rapidly adjusts to evolving
requirements for the future;
5. Retention of high-level performers;
6. Simple and cost-effective HR management processes.
To effectively meet the above expectations, this notice identifies
and establishes those features and flexibilities this demonstration
project will use to achieve these objectives. The demonstration project
primarily emphasizes streamlined hiring, a more flexible performance-
based compensation system, talent acquisition and retention, and
professional human capital planning and execution. Those features and
flexibilities alone, however, will not ensure success. Delivering that
vision requires a human resources service model that is highly
proactive, expertly skilled in analytical tools, and fully engaged as a
strategic partner and trusted agent of this modern multi-faceted
defense laboratory.
[[Page 64497]]
D. Participating Organizations, Employees and Union Representation
NAVFAC EXWC has major facilities in three geographic locations:
Port Hueneme, California, Gulfport, Mississippi, and Washington, DC.
Additionally, the organization employs personnel at more than ten sites
worldwide. The sites are diverse in employment profiles and size and
have bargaining unit populations. The organization operates throughout
the full spectrum of research, development, test and evaluation,
engineering and fleet support delivered by five business lines and six
support lines. Wage Grade positions will not be included in this
personnel demonstration project; however, NAVFAC EXWC will continue to
evaluate possible future inclusion. Prior to including bargaining unit
employees in the personnel demonstration project, NAVFAC EXWC will
fulfill its obligation to consult and/or negotiate with the labor
organizations in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4703(f) and 7117 as
appropriate.
NAVFAC EXWC is predominantly a Navy Working Capital Fund (NWCF)
activity. Over 60 percent of the employees to be initially included in
the personnel demonstration project are funded by NWCF. Under NWCF, the
cost of business and operations is built into the Stabilized Billing
Rate (SBR) paid by customers for work performed; by maximizing
management flexibility, NAVFAC EXWC can remain cost competitive.
E. Project Design
There are four fundamental elements of this personnel demonstration
project: (1) Hiring and staffing flexibilities, (2) simplified
classification, (3) pay banding, and (4) performance-based compensation
and assessment. The hiring and staffing flexibilities will help to
better recruit, hire, and retain the most capable, qualified, and
competent workforce in the job market today. Simplified classification
will streamline the job classification process, reduce the effect of
administrative processes on personnel, and allow for more flexibility
in making job reassignments. The pay banding structure will create four
career paths with multiple pay bands within each career path
representing the phases of career progression that are typical for the
respective career paths. This banding structure will enable managers to
more appropriately reward and retain a diverse workforce using
principles of pay equity and career progression. The performance-based
compensation system is characterized by an assessment of an employee's
performance and an appropriate pay allocation predicated on the
assessed level of performance.
F. Executive STRL Policy Board
The Executive STRL Policy Board (ESPB) will oversee and monitor the
fair, equitable, and consistent implementation of the provisions of the
demonstration project to include establishment of internal controls and
accountability. Members of the ESPB will be appointed by the Technical
Director. Ad hoc members may serve in an advisory capacity to the ESPB.
The ESPB duties will include the following:
Establish policies and issue guidance on composition of
pay pools in accordance with the guidelines of this proposal and
internal procedures;
Review pay pool operation and resolve pay pool disputes;
Establish policies and issue guidance concerning the
civilian pay budget, pay administration, awards and performance based
pay increases;
Establish policies and issue guidance to ensure in-house
budget discipline and implement workforce staffing and budget plans;
Develop policies and procedures for administering
Developmental Opportunity Programs; ensure all employees are treated in
a fair, equitable manner.
G. Funding Level
The Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) may, at his/
her discretion, adjust the minimum funding levels to take into account
factors such as the Department's fiscal condition, guidance from the
Office of Management and Budget, and equity in circumstances when
funding is reduced or eliminated for GS pay raises or awards.
III. Personnel System Changes
A. Hiring, Appointment, and Related Authorities
1. Qualifications
OPM's ``Qualification Standards for General Schedule Positions,''
with minor modifications to address application of OPM qualifications
in a pay banding environment, are used to determine qualifications for
personnel demonstration project positions. ``Band'' is substituted for
``Grade'' where appropriate and time in grade requirements are
eliminated.
Since the pay bands are anchored to the GS grade levels, the
minimum qualification requirements for a position will be the
requirements corresponding to the lowest GS grade incorporated into
that pay band. For example, for a position in the S&E career path Pay
Band II, individuals must meet the basic requirements for a GS-5 as
specified in the OPM ``Qualification Standard for Professional and
Scientific Positions.''
Selective factors may be established for a position in accordance
with the OPM's ``Operating Manual: Qualifications Standards for General
Schedule Positions,'' when determined to be critical to successful job
performance. These factors may become part of the minimum requirements
for the position, and applicants must meet them in order to be
eligible. If used, selective factors will be stated as part of the
qualification requirements in vacancy announcements and recruiting
bulletins.
2. Science and Engineering Direct Hire Authorities
a. NAVFAC EXWC will use the direct hire authorities authorized by
section 1108 of the NDAA for FY 2009, as amended by section 1103 of the
NDAA FY 2012; the direct hire authorities published in 79 FR 43722, and
the direct hire authorities in 10 U.S.C. 2358a to appoint the
following:
(1) Candidates with advanced degrees to scientific and engineering
positions;
(2) Candidates with bachelor's degrees to scientific and
engineering positions;
(3) Veteran candidates to scientific, technical, engineering, and
mathematics positions (STEM), including technician positions; and
(4) Student candidates enrolled in a program of instruction leading
to a bachelors or advanced degree in a STEM discipline.
b. STEM Student Employment Program (SSEP).
NAVFAC EXWC will use this direct hire authority for students in a
scientific, technical, engineering, and mathematical course of study at
an accredited institution of higher education. The purpose of this
direct hire authority is to provide a streamlined and accelerated
hiring process that allows NAVFAC EXWC to compete successfully with
private industry for high quality scientific, technical, engineering,
or mathematics students for filling scientific and engineering
positions. Students appointed under the SSEP are afforded an
opportunity for non-competitive conversion to a permanent scientific or
engineering position upon graduation from an accredited institution of
higher education. Use of this authority will be consistent with the
merit system principles. The SSEP student employment standards will be
similar to the Pathways qualification standards, which will allow
students appointed
[[Page 64498]]
under this authority to be aligned to a pay band commensurate with the
highest level of education completed and/or prior experience. SSEP
students will remain on a term appointment until the completion of
their educational program.
3. Distinguished Scholastic Achievement Appointments (DSAA)
NAVFAC EXWC will use the Distinguished Scholastic Achievement
Appointment Authority (DSAA) for pay banded positions. The DSAA uses an
alternative examining process which provides the authority to appoint
candidates possessing a bachelor's degree or higher to positions up to
the equivalent of GS-12 for positions in the Science and Engineering
(S&E) pay bands. This enables NAVFAC EXWC to respond quickly to hiring
needs for eminently qualified candidates possessing distinguished
scholastic achievements.
The alternative examining process specifies that candidates may be
appointed provided they meet the minimum standards for the position as
published in OPM's operating manual, ``Qualification Standards for
General Schedule Positions,'' plus any selective placement factors
stated in the vacancy announcement; the occupation has a positive
education requirement; and the candidate has a cumulative grade point
average of 3.5 (on a 4.0 scale) or better in their field of study (or
other equivalent score) or are within the top 10 percent in their field
of study in a graduate program.
4. Reemployment of Annuitants
NAVFAC EXWC will use the authorities provided by 5 U.S.C. 9902(g)
and 82 FR 43339 to appoint reemployed annuitants, as appropriate. The
laboratory director may approve the appointment of reemployed
annuitants and determine the salary, to include whether the annuitant's
salary will be reduced by any portion of the annuity received, up to
the amount of the full annuity as a condition of employment. Use of
this authority will be consistent with merit system principles.
5. Volunteer Emeritus Program (VEP)
NAVFAC EXWC Director will have the authority to offer former
Federal employees who have retired or separated from the Federal
service, voluntary assignments in NAVFAC EXWC. Volunteer Emeritus
Program assignments are not considered ``employment'' by the Federal
government. Thus, such assignments do not affect an employee's
entitlement to buyouts or severance payments based on an earlier
separation from Federal service. The Volunteer Emeritus Program will
ensure continued quality research while reducing the overall salary
line by allowing higher paid individuals to accept retirement
incentives with the opportunity to retain a presence in the scientific
community. The program will be of most benefit during manpower
reductions as senior employees could accept retirement and return to
provide valuable on-the-job training or mentoring to less experienced
employees. Volunteer service will not be used to replace any employee,
or interfere with career opportunities of employees. The Volunteer
Emeritus Program may not be used to replace or substitute for work
performed by civilian employees occupying regular positions required to
perform the NAVFAC EXWC mission.
To be accepted into the Volunteer Emeritus Program, a candidate
must be recommended by a NAVFAC EXWC manager to the Director. Everyone
who applies is not entitled to participate in the program. The NAVFAC
EXWC Director will document the decision process for each candidate and
retain selection and non-selection documentation for the duration of
the assignment or two years, whichever is longer.
To ensure success and encourage participation, the volunteer's
federal retirement pay (whether military or civilian) will not be
affected while serving in a volunteer capacity. Retired or separated
federal employees may accept an emeritus position without a break or
mandatory waiting period.
Volunteers will not be permitted to monitor contracts on behalf of
the government or to participate on any contracts or solicitations
where a conflict of interest exists. The same rules that currently
apply to source selection members will apply to volunteers.
An agreement will be established between the volunteer and the
NAVFAC EXWC Director. The agreement will be reviewed by the servicing
legal office. The agreement must be finalized before the assumption of
duties and will include:
a. A statement that the service provided is gratuitous, that the
volunteer assignment does not constitute an appointment in the civil
service and is without compensation or other benefits except as
provided for in the agreement itself, and that, except as provided in
the agreement regarding work-related injury compensation, any and all
claims against the Government (stemming from or in connection with the
volunteer assignment) are waived by the volunteer;
b. A statement that the volunteer will be considered a federal
employee for the purpose of:
(1) 18 U.S.C. 201, 203, 205, 207, 208, 209, 603, 606, 607, 643,
654, 1905, and 1913;
(2) 31 U.S.C. 1343, 1344, and 1349(b);
(3) 5 U.S.C. chapters 73 and 81;
(4) The Ethics in Government Act of 1978;
(5) 41 U.S.C. chapter 21;
(6) 28 U.S.C. chapter 171 (tort claims procedure), and any other
Federal tort liability statute;
(7) 5 U.S.C. 552a (records maintained on individuals); and
c. The volunteer's work schedule;
d. The length of agreement (defined by length of project or time
defined by weeks, months, or years),
e. The support to be provided by the NAVFAC EXWC (travel,
administrative, office space, supplies),
f. The volunteer's duties,
g. A provision that states no additional time will be added to a
volunteer's service credit for such purposes as retirement, severance
pay, and leave as a result of being a participant in the Volunteer
Emeritus Program,
h. A provision allowing either party to void the agreement with 10
working days written notice;
i. The level of security access required (any security clearance
required by the assignment will be managed by the NAVFAC EXWC while the
volunteer is a participant in the Volunteer Emeritus Program);
j. A provision that any written products prepared for publication
that are related to Volunteer Emeritus Program participation will be
submitted to the NAVFAC EXWC Director for review and must be approved
prior to publication;
k. A statement that the volunteer accepts accountability for loss
or damage to Government property occasioned by the volunteer's
negligence or willful action;
1. A statement that the volunteer's activities on the premises will
conform to the NAVFAC EXWC regulations and requirements;
m. A statement that the volunteer will not improperly use or
disclose any non-public information, to include any pre-decisional or
draft deliberative information related to DoD programming, budgeting,
resourcing, acquisition, procurement or other matter, for the benefit
or advantage of the Volunteer Emeritus Program participant or any non-
Federal entities. Volunteer Emeritus Program
[[Page 64499]]
participants will handle all non-public information in a manner that
reduces the possibility of improper disclosure.
n. A statement that the volunteer agrees to disclose any inventions
made in the course of work performed at NAVFAC EXWC. The NAFVAC EXWC
Director will have the option to obtain title to any such invention on
behalf of the U.S. Government. Should the Director elect not to take
title, the Center will retain a non-exclusive, irrevocable, paid up,
royalty-free license to practice or have practiced the invention
worldwide on behalf of the U.S. Government.
o. A statement that the Volunteer Emeritus Program participant must
complete either a Confidential or Public Financial Disclosure Report,
whichever applies, and ethics training in accordance with office of
Government Ethics regulations prior to implementation of the agreement;
and
p. A statement that the Volunteer Emeritus Program participant must
receive post-government employment advice from a DoD ethics counselor
at the conclusion of program participation. Volunteer Emeritus Program
participants are deemed Federal employees for purposes of post-
government employment restrictions.
6. Expanded Detail Authority and Temporary Promotions
NAVFAC EXWC will have an Expanded Detail and Temporary Promotion
Authority providing the ability to:
(1) Effect details up to one year to specified positions at the
same or similar level (positions in a pay band with the same maximum
salary) without the current 120-day renewal requirement specified at 5
U.S.C. 3341; and
(2) Effect details or temporary promotions to a higher-level
position up to 1 year within a 24-month period without competition.
Details to higher-level positions beyond one year in a 24-month period
require approval of the Technical Director and are subject to
competitive procedures. The specifics of these authorities will be
stipulated by NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
7. Flexible Length and Renewable Term Technical Appointments
NAVFAC EXWC may use the Flexible Length and Renewable Term
Technical Appointments workforce shaping tool temporarily authorized by
section 1109 (b) of the NDAA for FY 2016, as amended by section 1112(b)
of the NDAA for FY 2019. Further details on the implementation of this
authority are contained in 82 FR 43339. Until this authority expires or
is rescinded, it may be used to appoint qualified candidates who are
not currently DoD civilian employees, or DoD employees on term
appointments into any scientific, technical, engineering, and
mathematic positions, including technicians, for a period of more than
one year but not more than six years. The appointment of any individual
under this authority may be extended without limit in up to six-year
increments at any time during any term of service under conditions set
forth by the Technical Director.
The Technical Director, or designee, will establish implementing
guidance and procedures on the use of this authority.
B. Classification, Career Paths and Pay Banding
1. Delegation of Classification Authority
Managers will provide input to classification requests as a means
of increasing managerial effectiveness and expediting the
classification function. Classification authority will be delegated as
follows: The NAVFAC EXWC Technical Director may delegate classification
authority to the Human Resources Office (HRO) Director. The HRO
Director may further delegate authority to Human Resource professionals
of the immediate organization of the position being classified. If so
delegated, the HRO Director will exercise oversight to ensure
consistency across the organization.
2. Classification
The present system of OPM classification standards will be used for
the identification of the proper occupational series of positions and
certain occupational titles within the NAVFAC EXWC demonstration
project. Current OPM position classification standards will not be used
to grade positions in this project. However, the grading criteria in
those standards will be used as a framework to develop new and
simplified standards for the purpose of pay band determinations. The
classification standard for each pay band will serve as an important
component in the creation of Standard Level Descriptors (SLDs) that
record the essential criteria for each pay band within each career path
by stating the characteristics of the work, the responsibilities of the
position, and the competencies required. SLDs replace current position
descriptions. SLDs combined with the Position Requirements Document
(PRD) will include position specific information such as Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA) coverage; selective placement factors or
specialized knowledge, skills and abilities; degree requirements or
other professional certification requirements; staffing requirements;
and other data element information pertinent to the position.
3. Simplified Assignment Process
Today's environment of rapid technology development and workforce
transition mandates that the organization have maximum flexibility to
assign individuals. Pay banding may be used to address these needs. As
a result of the assignment to a particular pay band descriptor, the
organization will have maximum flexibility to assign an employee within
pay band descriptors consistent with the needs of the organization, the
individual's qualifications and rank, and pay band. Subsequent
assignments to projects, tasks, or functions anywhere within the
organization requiring the same area of expertise and qualifications
would not constitute an assignment outside the scope or coverage of the
employee's pay band descriptor.
4. Career Paths
A fundamental element of the NAVFAC EXWC personnel demonstration
project is a simplified classification and pay component. Like other
STRL demonstration projects, the proposed pay banding approach is tied
to the 15 GS grade levels and the above GS-15 grade level. Career paths
at NAVFAC EXWC are grouped by four career paths based on similarities
in the type of work and customary requirements for formal education,
training and credentials. Common patterns of advancement within the
occupations as practiced at NAVFAC EXWC were considered. Current
occupations and grades were examined and their characteristics and
distribution were used to develop the career paths described below:
a. Science and Engineering (ND Pay Plan): This career path includes
technical professional positions, such as engineers, physicists,
chemists, mathematicians, operations analysts, and computer scientists.
Specific course work or educational degrees are required for these
occupations.
b. Science and Engineering Technician (NR Pay Plan): This career
path includes technician positions such as engineering technicians,
electronics technicians, and physical science technicians. These
occupations require practical expertise in scientific or engineering
support but specific course work or educational degrees are not
required for these occupations.
[[Page 64500]]
c. Administrative/Professional (NT Pay Plan): This career path
includes positions such as attorneys, IT specialists, paralegals,
program managers, accountants, budget analysts, administrative
officers, human resources specialists, and management analysts.
Employees in these positions may or may not require specific course
work or educational degrees.
d. General Support (NG Pay Plan): This career path includes the
clerical and administrative support positions providing support in such
fields as finance, supply, and human resources; positions applying
typing, clerical or secretarial knowledge and skills; and student
positions for training in these disciplines.
Each career path is composed of discrete pay bands (levels)
corresponding to recognized advancement within these occupations. These
pay bands replace grades and are not the same for all career paths.
Each career path is divided into three to five pay bands; each pay band
covering the same pay range formerly covered by one or more GS grades.
The salary range of each band begins with step 1 of the lowest grade in
that pay band and ends with step 10 of the highest grade in the pay
band. The grouping of GS grades into a particular band was based on a
careful examination of NAVFAC EXWC's occupations, grade levels, and
career development practices. Career paths and the associated
classification occupational series for each are provided in Appendix A.
The distribution of the occupational series to career paths reflects
only those occupational series that currently exist within NAVFAC EXWC.
Additional occupational series may be added as a result of changes in
mission requirements or OPM-recognized occupations. These additional
occupational series will be placed in the appropriate career path
consistent with the established career path definitions.
5. Pay Band Structure
The pay banding structure is the structure in use at the CCDC ARL.
The pay bands and their relation to the current GS framework are shown
in Figure 1. This pay band structure allows greater flexibility to
define and classify work assignments and to reward performance. A key
feature is the overlap in Science and Engineering (ND) career path
between bands III and IV. ND-III begins at GS-12, step 1, and ends at
GS-14, step 10. ND-IV begins at GS-14, step 1, and ends at GS-15, step
10. A second noteworthy feature is the introduction of categories
within the Administrative/Professional (NT) career path, Bands III and
IV. These bands contain two full performance levels because not all
work assignments support movement to the top of the band. The NT-III
band includes Category I, where the full performance maximum salary
rate is equivalent to GS-12, step 10, and Category II, where the full
performance maximum salary rate is equivalent to GS-13, step 10. The
NT-IV band includes Category I, where the full performance maximum
salary rate is equivalent to GS-14 step 10, and Category II, where the
full performance maximum salary rate is equivalent to GS-15, Step 10.
In order to move beyond Category I, duties and work assignments must
satisfy the highest level of the criteria in the classification for the
applicable pay band.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO19.010
6. Fair Labor Standards Act
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemption and nonexempt
determinations will be made consistent with criteria found in 5 CFR
part 551. Generally, employees will be converted to the demonstration
project with the same FLSA status they had previously. All employees
are covered by the FLSA unless they meet the criteria for exemption.
The duties and responsibilities outlined in the classification
standards for each pay band will be compared to the FLSA criteria.
7. Senior Scientific Technical Managers (SSTM)
The SSTM program will be managed and administered by the Technical
Director, consistent with the provisions 10 U.S.C. 2358a and NAVFAC
EXWC IOPs. The primary function of these positions is to engage in
research and development in the physical, biological, medical, or
engineering sciences, or another field closely related to the NAVFAC
EXWC mission and to carry out technical supervisory responsibilities.
The number of such positions may not exceed two percent of the number
of scientists and engineers employed at the Technical Center as of the
close of the last fiscal year before the fiscal year in which any
appointments subject to the numerical limitation are made. This
authority is expected to provide an opportunity for career development
and expansion of a pool of experienced, prominent technical candidates
meeting the levels of proficiency and leadership essential to create
and maintain a DoD state-of-the-art scientific, engineering and
technological facility. The minimum basic pay for SSTM positions is 120
percent of the minimum rate of basic
[[Page 64501]]
pay for GS-15. Maximum SSTM basic pay with locality pay is limited to
Executive Level III (EX-III), and maximum salary without locality pay
may not exceed EX-IV. The contribution management system used to
evaluate an SSTM employee will be documented in the NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
Pay retention may be provided to SSTM, under criteria required by
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs for those impacted by a reduction in force, work
realignment or other planned management action that would necessitate
moving the incumbent to a position in a lower pay band within the STRL
for other than cause (performance or conduct).
8. Professional Licensure Designations for Architectural and
Engineering Positions
The Technical Director and the NAVFAC EXWC Chief Engineer have non-
delegable authority to designate those positions within NAVFAC EXWC
requiring professional licensure. Engineering and Architectural
positions requiring professional licensure will be monitored by the
EXWC Chief Engineer. It is the policy of NAVFAC EXWC to recruit, hire,
professionally develop, and maintain a professional workforce of the
highest caliber. Professional licensing is required for any position,
regardless of pay band, in responsible charge of engineering/
architectural work, whether performed in-house or by contract. The
specific guidelines will be documented in NAVFAC EXWC's IOPs. However,
the Technical Director has final authority regarding professional
licensure requirements.
9. Classification Appeals
Employees have the right to appeal the classification of their
position at any time. A classification complaint is an employee's
request for a review, at the activity level, of the pay plan,
occupational series, position title, and pay band of their position.
The employee must formally make a complaint which raises the area of
concern to their immediate supervisor to initiate the classification
complaint review process. The Human Resource Office will review the
complaint and issue a determination. If the employee is dissatisfied
with the outcome of the classification complaint review, the employee
may appeal the classification of the position to the Technical
Director. If the employee is dissatisfied with the decision rendered by
the Technical Director, the employee may initiate a formal
classification appeal to the DoD appellate level. Appeal decisions
rendered by DoD will be final and binding on all administrative,
certifying, payroll, disbursing, and accounting officials of the
government. Classification appeals are not accepted on positions that
exceed the equivalent of a GS-15 level. An employee may not appeal the
accuracy of the position description, the demonstration project
classification criteria, or the pay-setting criteria; the assignment of
occupational series to the career path; the propriety of a pay
schedule; command developed position titles; or matters covered by an
administrative or negotiated grievance procedure or an alternative
dispute resolution procedure. The evaluations of classification appeal
are based upon the demonstration project classification criteria.
Additional guidance will be documented in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
C. Pay and Compensation
Pay administration policies are established by the ESPB. The
following definitions and policies will apply to the pay setting of new
hires, movement of employees within the demonstration project from one
career path or pay band to another, as well as any other pay action
outside the performance-based assessment system.
1. Pay Setting for Appointment
For initial appointments to the Federal service, base pay may be
set anywhere within the pay band consistent with the special
qualifications of the individual and the unique requirements of the
position. These special qualifications may be in the form of education,
training, and/or experience. Unique position requirements may include
scarcity of qualified candidates, labor market considerations,
programmatic urgency, or any combination thereof that is pertinent to
the position in which the employee is being placed. Specific guidelines
for application of pay setting for appointments will be contained in
NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
2. Promotion
The minimum base pay increase upon promotion to a higher pay band
will be six percent or the minimum base pay rate of the new pay band,
whichever is greater. A promotion is the movement of an employee to a
higher pay band in the same career path or to a higher pay band in a
different career path. It also includes movement of an employee
currently covered by a non-demonstration project personnel system to a
demonstration project position in a pay band with a higher level of
work. Positions with a known promotion potential to a specific band
will be identified when they are filled. Not all positions in a career
path will have promotion potential to the same band. Movement from one
career path to another will depend upon individual competencies, and
qualifications.
Progression within a pay band is based upon performance-based pay
increases; as such, these actions are not considered promotions and are
not subject to provisions of this section. Promotions will follow Merit
System Principles and basic Federal Merit Staffing policy that provides
for competitive and non-competitive promotions. To be promoted
competitively or non-competitively, from one pay band to the next, an
employee must meet the minimum qualifications for the job and have a
current rating of record of ``mission success'' or better, or
equivalent under a different appraisal system. Other specific
guidelines regarding promotions will be documented in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
3. Reassignment
A reassignment occurs when an employee moves, voluntarily or
involuntarily, to a different position or set of duties within their
pay band or to a position in a comparable pay band at a comparable
level of work, or from a non-demonstration project position to a
demonstration project position at a comparable level of work, on either
a temporary or permanent basis. Under this system, employees may be
eligible for an increase to base pay upon temporary or permanent
reassignment. Such an increase is subject to the specific guidelines
established by the ESPB and documented in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
4. Demotion or Change to Lower Pay Band
A demotion is the placement of an employee into a lower pay band or
movement from a non-demonstration project position to a demonstration
project position at a lower level of work. Demotions may be for cause
(performance or conduct) or for reasons other than cause (e.g., erosion
of duties, reclassification of duties to a lower pay band, application
under competitive announcements, at the employee's request, or
placement actions resulting from Reduction-in-Force (RIF) procedures).
In cases where change to a lower pay band is involuntary and
accompanied by a reduction in pay, procedures under 5 CFR part 752 and
432 remain unchanged.
5. Locality Pay
Employees will be entitled to the locality pay authorized for their
official
[[Page 64502]]
duty station in accordance with 5 CFR part 531 subpart F. The locality
adjusted pay of any employee may not exceed the rate for Executive
Level IV. Geographic movement within the demonstration project will
result in the employee's locality pay being recomputed using the newly
applicable locality pay percentage which may result in a higher or
lower locality payment.
6. Staffing Supplements
Employees assigned to occupational categories and geographic areas
where GS special rates apply may be entitled to a staffing supplement
if the maximum adjusted base pay rate for the demonstration band to
which the employee is assigned is exceeded by a GS special rate for the
employee's occupational category and geographic area. Employees
receiving a staffing supplement remain entitled to an underlying
locality rate, which may over time supersede the need for a staffing
supplement. If OPM discontinues or decreases a special rate schedule,
retained pay provisions will be applied. If at any time after
establishment of the demonstration project, special salary rates (SSRs)
are deemed necessary by NAVFAC EXWC leadership, they will be
implemented via a staffing supplement, and also documented in NAVFAC
EXWC IOPs.
7. Grade and Pay Retention
The project will eliminate retained grade under 5 CFR part 536. Pay
retention will follow current law and regulations at 5 U.S.C. 5362 and
5363, and 5 CFR part 536, except as modified in the Staffing
Supplements section and waived in Section IX of this plan. If an
employee is receiving retained pay under the personnel demonstration
project, the employee's GS-equivalent grade is the highest grade
encompassed in their pay band level.
8. Recruitment, Retention, and Relocation Incentives
The project will continue to employ recruitment, retention, and
relocation incentives as described in 5 CFR part 575. Approval for use
of recruitment, retention, and relocation incentives is delegated to
the Technical Director and further described in an NAVFAC EXWC IOP.
9. Extraordinary Achievement Allowance (EAA)
NAVFAC EXWC will employ an Extraordinary Achievement Allowance
(EAA) designed to optimize organizational effectiveness. An EAA is
defined as a temporary monetary allowance up to 25 percent of base pay,
provided that an employee's total compensation does not exceed the rate
of basic pay for Executive Level IV in effect at the end of such
calendar year. It is paid on either a bi-weekly basis concurrent with
normal pay days, or as a lump sum following completion of a designated
contribution period, or combination of these, at the discretion of the
Technical Director (or designee). It is not base pay for any purpose,
e.g., retirement, life insurance, severance pay, promotion, or any
other payment or benefit calculated as a percentage of base pay. The
EAA will be available to certain employees whose present contributions
are worthy of a higher career level and whose level of achievement is
expected to continue at the higher career level for at least one year
as specified by the ESPB and outlined in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
10. Pay Differential for Supervisory Positions
NAVFAC EXWC will establish a pay differential to be provided at the
discretion of the Technical Director or assigned delegates to
incentivize and reward personnel in supervisory positions. A pay
differential is a cash incentive that may range up to 10 percent of the
employee's base rate of pay. It is paid on a pay period basis and is
not included as part of the employee's base rate of pay. The pay
differential must be terminated if the employee is removed from the
supervisory position (and is not placed in another supervisory
position), regardless of cause. All personnel actions involving a pay
differential will require a statement signed by the employee
acknowledging that the differential is not part of base pay for any
purpose and may be terminated or reduced as dictated by fiscal
limitations, changes in assignment or scope of work, or by the
Technical Director. Positions, titles, duties and responsibilities that
are eligible for supervisory differential, as well as standards for
differential awards, will be defined in an NAVFAC EXWC IOP. Any
adjustment or termination of a supervisory pay differential will be in
accordance with NAVFAC EXWC's IOPs and all applicable laws and
regulations. The termination or reduction of the differential is not an
adverse action and is not subject to appeal or grievance.
11. Educational Base Pay Adjustment
NAVFAC EXWC will establish an educational base pay adjustment that
is separate from other incentive pay and may not exceed the top of the
employee's assigned pay band. The educational base pay adjustment may
be used to adjust the base pay of individuals who have acquired a level
of mission-related education that would otherwise make the employee
qualified for an appointment at a higher level and would be used in
lieu of a new appointment. For example, this authority may be used to
adjust the base pay of employees who are participating in a graduate
level Student Educational Employment Program, or employees who have
obtained an advanced degree, such as a Ph.D., in a field related to the
work of their position or the mission of their organization.
D. Employee Development and Awards
1. Expanded Development Opportunities Program
NAVFAC EXWC will establish an Expanded Development Opportunities
Program that will cover all demonstration project employees. Expanded
development opportunities include: (1) Long term training, (2) one-year
work experiences in an industrial setting via the Relations With
Industry Program, (3) one-year work experiences in laboratories of
allied nations via the Science and Engineer Exchange Program, (4)
rotational job assignments within NAVFAC EXWC, (5) developmental
assignments in higher headquarters within the DON and DoD, (6) self-
directed study via correspondence courses and at colleges and
universities, (7) details within NAVFAC EXWC and to other Federal
agencies, (8) Intergovernmental Personnel Act Program Agreements, and
(9) sabbaticals. Each developmental opportunity period should benefit
the organization and increase the employee's individual effectiveness
as well. Various learning or developmental work experiences may be
considered, such as advanced academic teaching or research and
sabbaticals. An expanded developmental opportunity period will not
result in loss of or reduction in base pay, loss of leave to which the
employee is otherwise entitled, or any loss of credit for time or
service.
Program openings will be announced as opportunities arise.
Instructions for application and the selection criteria will be
included in the announcement. Final selection/approval for
participation in the program will be made by the Technical Director.
The position of an employee participating in an expanded development
opportunity may be backfilled by temporary assignment of other employee
or temporary redistribution of work. However, that position or its
equivalent must be made available to the employee upon return from the
expanded developmental opportunity. An
[[Page 64503]]
employee accepting an Expanded Developmental Opportunity must sign a
continuing service agreement up to three times the length of the
assignment, with the service obligation to NAVFAC EXWC. If the employee
voluntarily leaves the organization before the service obligation is
completed, the employee is liable for repayment unless the service
agreement or the repayment is waived by Technical Director. Conditions
for waiver of service agreements or repayments will be established in
the NAVFAC EXWC IOP.
2. Skills Training
a. Training is essential for an organization that requires
continuous development of advanced and specialized knowledge. Degree
studies are also critical tools for recruiting and retaining employees
with skills essential to the NAVFAC EXWC mission. The Technical
Director has the authority to approve training.
b. Individual training programs may be approved based upon a
complete individual study program plan. Such training programs will
ensure continuous development of advanced specialized knowledge
essential to the organization and enhance the ability to recruit and
retain personnel critical to the present and future requirements of the
organization. Tuition payment may not be authorized where it would
result in a tax liability for the employee without the employee's
express and written consent. Any variance from this policy must be
rigorously determined and documented. Guidelines will be developed to
ensure competitive approval of training and those decisions will be
fully documented. Employees approved for training must sign a service
obligation agreement to continue service at NAVFAC EXWC for a period
three times the length of the training period commencing after the
completion of the entire training program. If an employee voluntarily
leaves NAVFAC EXWC before the service obligation is completed, he/she
is liable for repayment of expenses incurred by NAVFAC EXWC that are
related to the training. Expenses do not include salary costs. The
Technical Director has the authority to waive this requirement.
Criteria for such waivers will be addressed in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
3. Developmental Promotions
NAVFAC EXWC will continue to utilize student training, internship
programs (such as Pathways, SSEP), and career development positions
under the demonstration project to recognize growth and development in
the acquisition of job related competencies combined with successful
performance. Promotions for such employees are limited to: (1)
Employees in developmental or trainee level positions and (2) those
employees in Pathways or other career training or internship programs.
Promotions for those employees in developmental positions will be
provided in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
4. Awards
To provide additional flexibility to motivate and reward
individuals and groups, some portion of the performance award budget
will be reserved for special acts and other categories as they occur.
Awards may include, but are not limited to, recognition for special/
extraordinary achievements, patents, inventions, suggestions, and on-
the-spot awards. The funds available for awards are separately funded
within the constraints of the organization's overall award budget.
While not directly linked to the mission aligned objectives and
performance compensation system, this additional flexibility is
important to encourage outstanding accomplishments and innovation in
accomplishing NAVFAC EXWC's diverse missions. Additionally, group
awards may be given to foster and encourage teamwork. The Technical
Director will have the authority to grant special act or achievement
awards to covered employees of up to $25,000.
E. Performance Management
1. Mission Aligned Objectives and Performance Compensation
The purpose of mission aligned objectives and performance
compensation is to link the work of the employee to the mission of the
organization and to provide a mechanism for recognizing the impact of
the employee's accomplishments and performance to help achieve that
mission. It provides an effective, efficient, and flexible method for
assessing, compensating, and managing NAVFAC EXWC's workforce. This
performance management system better aligns with developing a highly
productive workforce and for providing the authority, control, and
flexibility to achieve a quality organization and meet mission
requirements. Mission aligned objectives and performance compensation
encourages more employee involvement in the assessment process, strives
to increase communication between supervisor and employee and promotes
performance accountability. By linking mission directly to both annual
evaluations and compensation outcomes, objectives facilitate employee
career progression and provide an understandable and rational basis for
pay changes. The normal rating period will be one year.
Objectives, developed jointly by employees and their supervisors
must be in place within 30 days from the beginning of each rating
period. The minimum rating period is 90 days. Employees who do not meet
the 90-day minimum requirement will be ineligible for a normal rating
and will be given a presumptive rating. They may receive only the
general pay increase and they may also receive Title 5 cash awards, if
appropriate. First-time hires must have performance plans in place
within 30 days of their demonstration project entry effective date.
Current demonstration performance project employees who change
positions during the performance year should have their plans updated
with new objectives no later than 30 days after assignment to their new
position.
Mission aligned objective and performance compensation can be in
the form of increases to base pay and/or lump sum cash bonuses that are
not added to base pay. The system can be modified, if necessary, as
more experience is gained under the project. The flexibilities in this
mission aligned objectives and performance compensation section are
similar in nature to the authority granted to: (1) The Naval Ocean
Systems Center and the Naval Weapons Center, China Lake, 45 FR 26504,
(2) the CCDC ARL, 65 FR 3500, and (3) NAVAIR Aircraft and Weapons
Divisions, 76 FR 8529.
2. Individual Mission Objectives
Individual mission objectives are directly related to achieving the
NAVFAC EXWC mission. Objectives identify expectations and typically
consist of 3 to 10 results-oriented statements. Objectives are tangible
and measurable so that achievements can be identified. These objectives
incorporate important behavioral practices such as teamwork and
cooperation where they are key to a successful outcome. One supervisory
objective, including adherence to EEO principles, is mandatory for all
managers/supervisors. The employee and their supervisor will jointly
develop the employee's individual mission objectives at the beginning
of the rating period. The supervisor has final approval authority of
the objectives. Objectives will reflect the employee's duties/
responsibilities, pay band and pay level in the pay band as well as
support the NAVFAC EXWC mission, organizational goals and priorities.
Objectives will be reviewed
[[Page 64504]]
annually and revised to reflect increased responsibilities commensurate
with pay increases. Generic one-size-fits-all objectives are to be
avoided, so that individual mission objectives define an individual's
specific responsibilities and expected accomplishments for the
performance year. Supervisors and employees should focus on overall
organizational objectives and develop supporting individual mission
objectives.
Individual mission objectives may be jointly modified, changed, or
deleted as appropriate during the rating cycle. As a general rule,
objectives should only be changed when circumstances outside the
employee's control prevent or hamper the accomplishment of the original
objectives. It is also appropriate to change objectives when mission or
workload shifts occur.
All objectives are critical. A critical mission objective is
defined as an attribute of job performance that is of sufficient
importance that achievement below the minimally acceptable level
requires remedial action and may be the basis for removing an employee
from his/her position. Each objective may be assigned a weight, which
reflects its importance in accomplishing an individual's mission
objectives. The minimum weight that can be assigned is 10 percent. The
sum of the weights for all of the objectives must equal 100 percent. At
the beginning of the rating period, higher-level managers will review
the objectives and weights assigned to employees within the pay pool to
verify consistency and appropriateness.
3. Rating Benchmarks
Rating benchmarks define characteristics that will be used to
evaluate the employee's success in accomplishing their individual
mission objectives. Scoring characteristics help to ensure comparable
scores are assigned while accommodating diverse individual objectives.
A single set of rating benchmarks for each band or career stage may be
used for evaluating the annual performance of all NAVFAC EXWC personnel
covered by this plan. An example of rating benchmarks is shown in
Appendix B. The set of benchmarks used may evolve over time, based on
experience gained during each rating cycle. Critical characteristics
evolve as our workforce actively moves toward meeting their individual
and organizational objectives. This is particularly true in an
environment where technology and work processes are changing at an
increasingly rapid pace. The ESPB will annually review the set of
benchmarks and set them for the entire organization before the
beginning of the rating period.
4. Performance Feedback and Formal Ratings
Employees, and supervisors, are expected to actively discuss
expectations and identify potential obstacles to meeting goals.
Employees should explain (to the extent possible) what they need from
their supervisor to support goal accomplishment. The timing of these
discussions will vary based on the nature of work performed, but will
occur at least 30 days from the beginning of each rating period, at the
mid-point, and at the end of the rating period. The supervisor and
employee will discuss job performance and accomplishments in relation
to the expectations in the mission aligned objectives. At least one
review, normally the mid-point review, will be documented as a formal
progress review. More frequent, task specific, discussions may be
appropriate in some organizations. In cases where work is accomplished
by a team, team discussions regarding goals and expectations will be
appropriate. The employee may provide a statement of their
accomplishments to the supervisor at both the mid-point and end of the
rating period. However, this provision does not preclude an employee
from providing a statement of their accomplishments to their supervisor
that are outside the mid-year and year-end evaluations and rating
period.
Following a review of the employee's accomplishments at the end of
the rating period, the supervisor will rate each of the individual
mission objectives. Benchmark performance standards will be developed
that describe the level of performance associated with a score. The
supervisor decides where each employee's achievements and performance
most closely match the benchmarks and assigns an appropriate score.
These scores are not discussed with the employee or considered final
until all scores are reconciled and approved by the Pay Pool Manager.
The scores will then be multiplied by the objective-weighting factor to
determine the weighted score expressed to two decimal points. The
weighted scores for each objective will then be totaled to determine
the employee's overall appraisal score and rounded to a whole number as
follows: If the first two digits to the right of the decimal are 0.51
or higher, it will be rounded to the next higher whole number; if the
first two digits to the right of the decimal are 0.50 or lower, then
the decimal value is truncated. The resulting score determines the
rating.
NAVFAC EXWC will use a five-level rating methodology with
associated payout point ranges in which level five signifies the
highest level of performance. The supervisor will prepare and recommend
the rating, number of payout points, and the distribution of the payout
between base pay increase and bonus, as applicable, for each employee.
These recommendations will then be reviewed by the pay pool panel to
ensure equitable rating criteria and methodologies have been applied to
all pay pool employees. The final determination of the rating, number
of payout points, and payout distribution will be a function of the pay
pool panel process and will be approved by the Pay Pool Manager. The
criteria used to determine the number and distribution of payout points
to assign an employee may include: Assessment of the employee's
contribution towards achieving the mission, the employee's type and
level of work, the employee's current compensation and the criticality
of their contribution to mission success, consideration of specific
achievements, or other job-related significant accomplishments or
contributions.
The proposed rating and payout point schema is:
[[Page 64505]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO19.011
Employees with a rating of two or above for each mission aligned
objective will receive the equivalent of the authorized GS general pay
increase (GPI). An employee receiving an ``Unacceptable'' rating of one
for any mission-aligned objective will not receive the GPI and will
require administrative action to address the performance deficiency. A
rating of ``1'' on a single objective will also result in a rating of
``Unacceptable.'' Supervisors of employees who are assessed to be at
the ``Unacceptable'' level, will take appropriate action as soon as
practicable. However, at the end of the performance year, employees who
are assessed to be at the ``Unacceptable'' level will have their rating
deferred until the end of a performance improvement period. If the
employee's performance is found to be unacceptable following a
performance improvement period a rating of record will be ``1'' and
administrative action will be taken. If the employee's performance is
found to be acceptable at the end of the improvement period, rating of
record and associated payouts will be applicable to the end of the
appraisal period. If an employee's performance deteriorates again in
any objective within two years from the beginning of the performance
improvement period, actions may be initiated to effect a performance
based action with no additional opportunity to improve.
5. Pay Pools
The Technical Director (or designee) of NAVFAC EXWC will establish
pay pools. Typically, pay pools will have between 35 and 300 employees.
A pay pool should be large enough to encompass a reasonable
distribution of ratings but not so large as to compromise rating
consistency. Large pay pools may use sub pay pools subordinate to the
pay pool due to the size of the pay pool population, the complexity of
the mission, or other similar criteria. The covered organizations'
employees will be placed into pay pools. Neither the Pay Pool Manager,
supervisors, or pay pool panel members within a pay pool will in any
way recommend or participate in setting their own rating or individual
payout except for the normal employee self-assessment process.
Each employee is initially scored by their supervisor. Next, the
rating officials in an organizational unit (Directorates, Divisions,
Branches, Teams, etc.), along with their next level of supervision,
will review and compare recommended ratings to ensure consistency and
equity of the ratings. In this step, each employee's individual mission
objectives, accomplishments, preliminary scores, and pay are compared
to benchmark performance standards. Through discussion and consensus
building, consistent and equitable ratings are reached. Managers will
not prescribe a distribution of ratings. The Pay Pool Manager will then
chair a final review with the rating officials who report directly to
him or her to validate these ratings and resolve any scoring issues. If
consensus cannot be reached in this process, the Pay Pool Manager makes
all final decisions. Ratings are finalized after this reconciliation
process is complete. Decisions regarding the amount and distribution of
the payouts are based on the employee's most recent rating of record
for the performance year, the criteria listed above under performance
feedback, the type and nature of the funding available to the pay pool,
and the number of payout points assigned by the pay pool. In the case
of NAVFAC EXWC attorneys, special consideration must be made relative
to assigned score. To avoid conflict with state bar rules, the pay pool
panel may not alter the mission aligned objective performance ratings
or the overall score that NAVFAC HQ counsel assigns to an attorney;
however, the pay pool panel may make independent judgments, such as pay
adjustments after considering that score. A reconsideration from a
NAVFAC EXWC attorney will be handled in accordance with the Office of
General Counsel's grievance procedures after NAVFAC HQ counsel and the
pay pool panel recommends a resolution.
Funds within a pay pool available for performance payouts are
divided into two components, base pay and bonus. The funds within a pay
pool used for base pay increases are those that would have been
available for within-grade increases, quality step increases and
promotions under the GS system (excluding the costs of promotions still
provided under the pay banding system). The funds available to be used
for bonus payouts are funded separately within the constraints of the
organization's overall award budget. Both amounts will be defined based
on historical data and will initially be set at no less than one
percent of total base pay annually. As changes in the demographics of
the workforce or other exigencies occur, adjustments may be made to
these two factors. The sum of these two factors is referred to as the
pay pool percentage factor. The ESPB will annually review the pay pool
funding and recommend adjustments to the Technical Director (or
designee) to ensure cost discipline over the life of the demonstration
project. Additional guidance on pay pool design and composition will be
included in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
6. Performance Payout Determination
The payout an employee will receive is based on the total
performance rating from the mission aligned objectives and performance
compensation assessment process. An employee will receive a payout as a
percentage of base pay. This percentage is based on the number of
payout points that equates to their final appraisal score. The value of
a payout point cannot be determined until the rating and reconciliation
process is completed and all scores are finalized. The payout point
value is expressed as a percentage.
The formula that computes the value of each payout point uses base
pay rates and is based on:
a. The sum of the base pay of all the employees in the pay pool
times the pay pool percentage factor;
b. The employee's base pay;
[[Page 64506]]
c. The number of payout points awarded to each employee in the pay
pool; and
d. The total number of payout points awarded in the pay pool.
This formula assures that each employee within the pool receives a
payout point amount equal to all others in the same pool who are at the
same rate of base pay and receiving the same score. The formula is
shown in Figure 2.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO19.012
An individual payout is calculated by first multiplying the payout
points earned by the payout point value and multiplying that product by
base pay. An adjustment is then made to account for locality pay or
staffing supplement. A Pay Pool Manager is accountable for staying
within pay pool limits and final decisions on base pay increases and/or
bonuses to individuals based on rater recommendations, the final score,
the pay pool funds available, and the employee's base pay.
7. Base Pay Increases and Bonuses
The amount of money available for the performance payouts is
divided into two components: Base pay increases and bonuses. The base
pay and bonus funds are based on the pay pool funding formula
established annually. Once the individual performance amounts have been
determined, the next step is to determine what portion of each payout
will be in the form of a base pay increase as opposed to a bonus
payment. The payouts made to employees from the pay pool may be a mix
of base pay and bonus, such that all of the allocated funds are
disbursed. To continue to provide performance incentives while also
ensuring cost discipline, base pay increases may be limited or capped.
Certain employees will not be able to receive the projected base pay
increase due to base pay caps. Base pay is capped when an employee
reaches the maximum rate of base pay in an assigned pay band, category,
or when a control point applies. Also, for employees receiving retained
rates above the applicable pay band maximum, the entire performance
payout will be in the form of a bonus payment.
When capped, the total payout an employee receives will be in the
form of a bonus versus the combination of base pay and bonus. Bonuses
are cash payments and are not part of the base pay for any purpose
(e.g., lump sum payments of annual leave on separation, life insurance,
and retirement). The maximum base pay rate under this demonstration
project will be the unadjusted base pay rate of GS-15, Step 10, except
for employees in ND Pay Band V.
8. Pay Band Progression
As a compensation management tool, NAVFAC EXWC will use salary
points and categories to manage position and pay progression within
each band. Salary points may be set within each band and may be used in
the pay pool process to manage performance salary increases. Taking an
employee's salary across a point will require review of both the
position and performance of the employee. Advancement may not occur
without approval of the Pay Pool Manager and the ESPB.
Employees who display exemplary performance for two consecutive
years may be candidates for pay band movement to the next higher pay
band. The request must be made by a Pay Pool Manager and must
demonstrate that an employee's high-level of performance is
commensurate with the complexities and responsibilities of a position
in the next higher pay band and will continue into the future. Movement
to a higher pay band level is not guaranteed. Approval of requests for
movement to the next higher level pay band based on employee
performance reside with the ESPB. Criteria for crossing salary points,
categories, and movement to a higher pay band based on high-level
performance will be contained in NAVFAC EXWC IOPs.
9. Requests for Reconsideration
An employee may request reconsideration of the rating-of-record
received under the mission aligned objectives and performance
compensation system. A rating of record or job objective rating may be
reconsidered by request of an employee only through the reconsideration
process specified in an NAVFAC EXWC IOP (except for NAVFAC EXWC's
attorneys, see section III.E.5.). This process will be the sole and
exclusive agency administrative process for employees to request
reconsideration of a rating of record and is not subject to the agency
administrative grievance system, or any negotiated grievance
procedures.
Consistent with this part, a Designated Management Official (DMO)
will make the decision on reconsiderations of rating of record. The
DMOs' decisions are final. The DMO is a senior EXWC manager who is
appointed by the Technical Director to make this final determination.
The DMO will not be the pay pool manager who made the decision on the
subject rating. The payout point determination, payout distribution
determination, or any other payout matter will not be subject to the
reconsideration process, any other agency administrative grievance
system or any negotiated grievance procedures.
In the event of a reconsideration that results in an adjusted
rating of record, the revised rating will be referred to the Pay Pool
Manager for recalculation of the employee's performance payout amount
and distribution. Any adjustment to base pay will be retroactive to the
effective date of the performance payout. Base pay adjustments will be
based on the payout point range appropriate for the adjusted rating of
record. Payout point values for the adjusted rating of record will
reflect the payout point value paid to other members across the pay
pool for that rating cycle. Decisions made through the reconsideration
process will not result in recalculation of the payout made to other
employees in the pay pool.
Appeals that contain allegations that a performance rating was
based on prohibited actions that are subject to formal review and
adjudication by a third party may not be processed through the
reconsideration process, but instead may be processed by the employee
through an applicable third party process. Such third parties include,
but are not limited to: The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), the
Office of Special Counsel (OSC), the OPM, the Federal Labor Relations
Authority (FLRA) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
(EEOC).
[[Page 64507]]
F. Workforce Shaping
1. Modified Voluntary Early Retirement (VERA) and Voluntary Separation
Incentive Pay (VSIP)
NAVFAC EXWC will use the modified VERA and VSIP authorities
authorized by sections 1109(b)(3) and (4) of the NDAA for FY 2016. The
Technical Director may use VERA and VSIP whenever such incentives will
help the STRL to achieve one or more of the objectives in section
1109(a). This authority may not be delegated further. DOD has
published, at 82 FR 43339, specific direction and authorization for the
use of VERA and VSIP authorities by STRLs for workforce shaping. If the
laboratory workforce is being downsized, VERA and VSIP incentives may
be used to minimize the need for involuntary separations. VERA and VSIP
may also be used to restructure the laboratory workforce without
reducing the number of assigned personnel. In this restructuring
scenario, incentives may be offered for the purpose of creating
vacancies that will be reshaped to align with mission objectives.
Details on the specific use of this authority are contained in 82 FR
43339.
IV. Conversion
A. Initial Conversion or Movement Into the Demonstration Project
1. Placement Into Career Paths and Pay Bands
Employees will be converted automatically from their current GS
series and grade to the appropriate career paths and pay band levels.
It is essential to the success of the project that employees, upon
entering the project, know that they are not losing a pay entitlement
accrued under the GS system. Employees that were covered by local or
national special salary rates will no longer be considered a special
salary employee under the demonstration project and thus will gain
eligibility for full locality pay. To control conversion costs and to
avoid a salary increase windfall for these employees, the adjusted
salaries will not change. Rather, the employees will receive a new
basic pay rate computed by the locality pay factor for their area. A
full locality adjustment will then be added to the new basic pay rate.
Adverse action provisions will not apply to the conversion process, as
there will be no change to total salary. New hires, including employees
transferring from other Federal activities, will be converted into the
demonstration project in the career path and at the level and pay
consistent with the duties and responsibilities of the position and
individual qualifications.
2. Within-Grade Increase (WGI) Buy-In
On the date that employees are converted to the project pay plans,
they will be given a prorated permanent increase in pay equal to the
earned (time spent in step) portion of their next Within Grade Increase
(WGI) based on the value of the WGI at the time of conversion.
Employees at the 10th step or receiving a retained rate will not be
eligible for the increase.
3. Transition Equity
During the first 12 months following conversion, employees may
receive pay increases for non-competitive promotion equivalents when
the grade level of the promotion is encompassed within the same pay
band, the employee's performance warrants the promotion and promotions
would have otherwise occurred during that period. Employees who receive
an in-pay band level promotion at the time of conversion will not
receive a prorated step increase equivalent. Employees will not be
eligible for a basic pay increase if their current rating of record is
unacceptable at the time of conversion. The decision to grant a pay
equity adjustment is at the sole discretion of management and is not
subject to employee appeal procedures.
4. Conversion From Other Personnel Systems
Employees who enter this demonstration project from other personnel
systems (e.g., Defense Civilian Intelligence Personnel System, DoD
Civilian Acquisition Workforce Demonstration Project, or other STRLs)
due to a reorganization, mandatory conversion, Base Closure and
Realignment Commission decision, or other directed action will be
converted into the NAVFAC EXWC personnel demonstration project via
movement of their positions using the appropriate Nature of Action
Code. If applicable, a WGI buy-in may also be applied. The employee's
position will be classified based upon the position classification
criteria under the NAVFAC EXWC IOP and their pay upon conversion,
maintained under applicable pay setting rules.
5. Initial Probationary Period
Employees who have completed an initial probationary period prior
to conversion to the NAVFAC EXWC personnel demonstration project plan
will not be required to serve another probationary period. Employees
who are still serving an initial probationary period upon conversion
from GS to the demonstration plan will receive credit for probationary
service to date, however they must serve any remaining probationary
time to complete the full two-year DOD probationary period.
6. Supervisory Probationary Period
NAVFAC EXWC will implement an extended supervisory probationary
period. The probationary period for new supervisors will be two years,
rather than the normal one-year probationary period specified by 5 CFR
part 315. Except for the increased length, supervisory probationary
periods will be made consistent with 5 CFR part 315. Employees who have
already successfully completed an initial one-year probationary period
for supervisory positions will not be required to complete a two-year
probationary period for initial appointment to a supervisory position.
Employees who are serving an initial supervisory probationary period
upon conversion into this demonstration project will serve the time
remaining on their one-year supervisory probationary period. If the
decision is made to return the employee to a non-supervisory position
for reasons related to supervisory performance and/or conduct, the
employee will be returned to a comparable position of no lower base pay
that the position from which promoted or reassigned immediately prior
to the supervisory assignment.
B. Movement Out of the Demonstration Project
1. Termination of Coverage Under the Demonstration Project Pay Plans
In the event employees' coverage under the NAVFAC EXWC STRL
personnel demonstration project pay plans is terminated, employees move
with their position to another system applicable to NAVFAC EXWC STRL
employees. The grade of their demonstration project position in the new
system will be based upon the position classification criteria of the
gaining system. Employees may be eligible for pay retention under 5 CFR
part 536 when converted to their positions classified under the new
system, if applicable.
2. Determining GS Equivalent Grade and Pay When an Employee Exits the
Demonstration Project
If a demonstration project employee is moving to a GS or other pay
system position, the following procedures will be used to translate the
employee's personnel demonstration project pay band to a GS-equivalent
grade and the
[[Page 64508]]
employee's project base pay to the GS-equivalent rate of pay for pay
setting purposes. The equivalent GS grade and GS rate of pay must be
determined before movement out of the personnel demonstration project
and any accompanying geographic movement, promotion, or other
simultaneous action. For lateral reassignments, the equivalent GS grade
and rate will become the employee's converted GS grade and rate after
leaving the demonstration project (before any other action). For
transfers, promotions, and other actions, the converted GS grade and
rate will be used in applying any GS pay administration rules
applicable in connection with the employee's movement out of the
project (e.g., promotion rules, highest previous rate rules, pay
retention rules), as if the GS converted grade and rate were actually
in effect immediately before the employee left the demonstration
project.
3. Equivalent GS-Grade-Setting Provisions
An employee in a pay band corresponding to a single GS grade is
provided that grade as the GS equivalent grade. An employee in a pay
band corresponding to two or more grades is determined to have a GS
equivalent grade corresponding to one of those grades according to the
following rules:
a. The employee's adjusted base pay under the demonstration project
(including any locality payment or staffing supplement) is compared
with step four rates in the highest applicable GS rate range. For this
purpose, a GS rate range includes a rate in:
i. The GS base schedule;
ii. The locality rate schedule for the locality pay area in which
the position is located; or
iii. The appropriate special rate schedule for the employee's
occupational series, as applicable.
If the series is a two-grade interval series, only odd-numbered grades
are considered below GS-11.
b. If the employee's adjusted base pay under the demonstration
project equals or exceeds the applicable step four adjusted base pay
rate of the highest GS grade in the band, the employee is converted to
that grade.
c. If the employee's adjusted base pay under the demonstration
project is lower than the applicable step four adjusted base pay rate
of the highest grade, the adjusted base pay under the demonstration
project is compared with the step four adjusted base pay rate of the
second highest grade in the employee's pay band. If the employee's
adjusted base pay under the demonstration project equals or exceeds the
step four adjusted base pay rate of the second highest grade, the
employee is converted to that grade.
d. This process is repeated for each successively lower grade in
the band until a grade is found in which the employee's adjusted base
pay under the demonstration project rate equals or exceeds the
applicable step four adjusted base pay rate of the grade. The employee
is then converted at that grade. If the employee's adjusted base pay is
below the step four adjusted base pay rate of the lowest grade in the
band, the employee is converted to the lowest grade.
e. Exception: An employee will not be provided a lower grade than
the grade held by the employee immediately preceding a conversion,
lateral reassignment, or lateral transfer into the project, unless
since that time the employee has either undergone a reduction in pay
band or a reduction within the same pay band due to unacceptable
performance. This provision does not apply to voluntary movement out of
the demonstration project.
4. Equivalent GS-Rate-of-Pay-Setting Provisions
An employee's pay within the converted GS grade is set by
converting the employee's personnel demonstration project rates of pay
to GS rates of pay in accordance with the following rules:
a. The pay conversion is done before any geographic movement or
other pay related action that coincides with the employee's movement or
conversion out of the demonstration project.
b. An employee's adjusted base pay under the demonstration project
(i.e., including any locality payment or staffing supplement) is
converted to a GS adjusted base pay rate on the highest applicable GS
rate range for the converted GS grade. For this purpose, a GS rate
range includes a rate range in:
i. The GS base schedule,
ii. An applicable locality rate schedule, or
iii. An applicable special rate schedule.
c. If the highest applicable GS rate range is a locality pay rate
range, the employee's adjusted base pay under the demonstration project
is converted to a GS locality rate of pay. If this rate falls between
two steps in the locality-adjusted schedule, the rate must be set at
the higher step. The converted GS unadjusted rate of base pay would be
the GS base rate corresponding to the converted GS locality rate (i.e.,
same step position).
d. If the highest applicable GS rate range is a special rate range,
the employee's adjusted base pay under the demonstration project is
converted to a special rate. If this rate falls between two steps in
the special rate schedule, the rate must be set at the higher step. The
converted GS unadjusted rate of base pay will be the GS rate
corresponding to the converted special rate (i.e., same step position).
C. Implementation Training
Training to promote understanding of the broad concepts and finer
details is critical to successfully implement and execute this project.
A new pay banding schema and performance management system both
represent significant cultural change to the organization.
Training is tailored to address employee concerns and encourage
comprehensive understanding of the demonstration project. Training is
required prior to implementation and at various times during the life
of the demonstration project. The training program includes modules
tailored for employees, supervisors, senior managers, and
administrative staff. Typical modules are:
1. An overview of the demonstration project personnel system;
2. How employees are converted into and out of the system;
3. Pay banding;
4. The mission aligned objectives and performance compensation
system;
5. Defining mission aligned performance objectives;
6. How weights may be used with the mission aligned performance
objectives;
7. Assessing performance--giving feedback;
8. New position descriptions; and
9. Demonstration project administration and formal evaluation.
Various types of training including videos, on-line tutorials, and
train-the-trainer concepts will be used.
V. Project Duration
Section 342 of the NDAA for FY 1995 (Pub. L. 103-337) does not
require a mandatory expiration date for this demonstration project. The
project evaluation plan addresses how each flexibility will be
comprehensively evaluated for at least the first five years of the
demonstration project. Changes and modifications to the interventions
will be made using the provisions of DoDI 1400.37, or applicable
superseding instructions.
VI. Evaluation Plan
A. Overview
Chapter 47 of 5 U.S.C. requires that an evaluation be performed to
measure the effectiveness of the demonstration
[[Page 64509]]
project and its impact on improving public management. A comprehensive
evaluation plan for the entire demonstration program, originally
covering 24 DoD laboratories, was developed by a joint OPM/DoD
Evaluation Committee in 1995. This plan was submitted to the Office of
Defense Research & Engineering and was subsequently approved. The main
purpose of the evaluation is to determine whether the waivers granted
result in a more effective personnel system and improvements in
ultimate outcomes (i.e., organizational effectiveness, mission
accomplishment, and customer satisfaction). That plan, while useful, is
dated and does not fully afford the laboratories the ability to
evaluate all aspects of the demonstration project in a way that fully
facilitates assessment and effective modification based on actionable
data. Therefore, the STRL Director will conduct an internal evaluation
of the STRL Personnel Demonstration Program and will ensure USD(R&E)
evaluation requirements are met in addition to applying knowledge
gained from other DoD laboratories and their evaluations to ensure a
timely, useful evaluation of the demonstration project.
B. Data Collection To Support Evaluation
The ultimate outcomes sought are improved organizational
effectiveness, mission accomplishment, and customer satisfaction.
However, the main focus of the evaluation will be on intermediate
outcomes, i.e., the results of the authorized personnel system changes,
which are expected to contribute to the desired goals and benefits
identified Sections II.A and II.C. Data from several sources will be
used in the evaluation. Information from existing management
information systems and from personnel office records will be
supplemented with perceptual survey data from employees to assess the
effectiveness and perception of the project. The multiple sources of
data collection will provide a more complete picture as to how the
flexibilities are working. The information gathered from one source
will serve to validate information obtained through another source. The
confidence of overall findings will be strengthened as the different
collection methods substantiate each other. Both quantitative and
qualitative data will be used when evaluating outcomes. The following
data will be collected:
1. Workforce data (advanced degrees, etc.);
2. Personnel office data (hiring actions, time to hire, retention,
etc.);
3. Employee attitude surveys;
4. Structured interviews and focus group data;
5. Comparison of desired results from the flexibilities implemented
with actual results achieved;
6. Customer satisfaction surveys;
7. Core measures of laboratory effectiveness; and
8. Any additional data requested by Director, Defense Laboratories
Office.
The evaluation effort will consist of two phases, formative and
summative evaluation, covering at least five years to permit inter- and
intra-organizational estimates of effectiveness. The formative
evaluation phase will include baseline data collection and analysis,
implementation evaluation, and interim assessments. The formal reports
and interim assessments will provide information on the accuracy of
project operation, and current information on impact of the project on
veterans and protected groups, Merit System Principles, and Prohibited
Personnel Practices. The summative evaluation will focus on an overall
assessment of project outcomes after five years. The final report will
provide information on how well the HR system changes achieved the
desired goals, which flexibilities were most effective, and whether the
results can be generalized to other Federal installations.
VII. Demonstration Project Costs
NAVFAC EXWC will model its demonstration project on existing
demonstration projects but must assume some expanded project costs.
Current cost estimates associated with implementing the demonstration
project are shown in Figure 3. These include possible automation of
training and project evaluation systems. The automation and training
costs are startup costs. Transition costs are one-time costs. Costs for
project evaluation will be ongoing for at least five years.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO19.013
[[Page 64510]]
VIII. Management and Oversight
A. Project Management With Automation
One of the major goals of the demonstration project is to
streamline the personnel processes to increase cost effectiveness.
Automation should play an integral role in achieving that goal. Without
the necessary automation to support the flexibilities proposed for the
demonstration project, optimal cost benefit may not be realized. In
addition, adequate information to support decision-making must be
available to managers if line management is to assume greater authority
and responsibility for human resources management. Automation to
support the demonstration project is required at the DON and DoD level
(in the form of changes to the Defense Civilian Personnel Data System
(DCPDS) or successor DoD personnel system) to facilitate processing and
reporting of demonstration project personnel actions and may be
ultimately required by the command to assist in processing a variety of
personnel-related actions in order to facilitate management processes
and decision making.
DCPDS is the DoD's authoritative personnel data system and program
of record and as such, DCPDS or its successor system will be the system
of choice for the STRL labs. The detailed specifications for required
system changes will be provided in the System Change Request (SCR),
Form 804, concurrent with submission of this document.
B. Oversight
Oversight will be carried out by the command's Senior Leadership,
composed of the Technical Director and Commanding Officer. The
Technical Director and Commanding Officer will be assisted initially by
the NAVFAC EXWC STRL Demonstration Project Implementation Team, and
once established, by the NAVFAC EXWC STRL Policy Board (ESPB).
1. Personnel Administration
All personnel laws, regulations, and guidelines not waived by this
plan will remain in effect. Basic employee rights will be safeguarded
and merit system principles will be maintained. Except where
specifically waived or modified in this plan, adverse action procedures
under 5 CFR part 752 remain unchanged.
2. Modifications
Many aspects of a demonstration project are experimental.
Modifications may be made from time to time as experience is gained,
results are analyzed, and conclusions are reached on how the new system
is working. Modifications will be made in accordance with the
provisions of DoDI 1400.37, or applicable superseding instructions.
IX. Required Waivers to Laws and Regulations
Public Law 106-398 gave the DoD the authority to experiment with
several personnel management innovations. In addition to the
authorities granted by the law, the following are waivers of law and
regulation that will be necessary for implementation of the
demonstration project. In due course, additional laws and regulations
may be identified for waiver request. The following waivers and
adaptations of certain Title 5 U.S.C. and 5 CFR provisions are required
only to the extent that these statutory provisions limit or are
inconsistent with the actions contemplated under this demonstration
project. Nothing in this plan is intended to preclude the demonstration
project from applying, adopting or incorporating any law or OPM, DoD,
or DON regulation enacted, adopted, or amended after the effective date
of this demonstration project.
A. Waivers to Title 5, United States Code
Chapter 5, section 552a: Records. Waived to the extent required to
clarify that volunteers under the Voluntary Emeritus Program are
considered employees of the Federal government for purposes of this
section.
Chapter 31, section 3104: Employment of Specially Qualified
Scientific and Professional Personnel. Waived to allow SSTM authority
as described in this FRN and 79 FR 43722.
Chapter 31, section 3132: The Senior Executive Service: Definitions
and Exclusions. Waived to allow SSTMs.
Chapter 33, Subchapter I: Examination, Certification, and
Appointment. Waived except for sections 3302 and 3328 to allow for
direct hire authority for scientists and engineers with advanced
degrees for professional positions, and bachelor degree candidates for
scientific and engineering positions. Waived for veteran candidates for
scientific, technical, engineering and mathematics positions, including
technician positions. Also waived to the extent to allow employees
appointed on a Flexible Length or Renewable Term Technical Appointment
to apply for federal positions as status candidates.
Chapter 33, section 3308: Competitive Service; Examinations;
Educational Requirements Prohibited. This section is waived with
respect to the scholastic achievement appointment authority.
Chapter 33, section 3321: Competitive Service; Probationary Period.
This section is waived only to the extent necessary to replace
``grade'' with ``pay band'' and to allow for probationary periods of
two years.
Chapter 33, section 3324: Appointments to Positions Classified
Above GS-15; and 5 U.S.C. 3325, Appointments to Scientific and
Professional Positions. Waived in its entirety.
Chapter 33, section 3327: Civil service employment information.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow public notice other than
USAJobs for the Distinguished Scholastic Appointment Authority
described in this FRN.
Chapter 33, section 3330: Government-wide List of Vacant Positions.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow public notice other than
USAJobs for the Distinguished Scholastic Appointment Authority
described in this FRN.
Chapter 33, section 3341: Details. Waived in its entirety, to
extend the time limits for details.
Chapter 35, section 3522: Agency VSIP Plans; Approval. Waived to
remove the requirement to submit a plan to OPM prior to obligating any
resources for voluntary separation incentive payments.
Chapter 35, section 3523 (b)(3): Authority to Provide Voluntary
Separation Incentive Payments. As provided for in 82 FR 43339,
September 15, 2017, waived to remove the prescribed method of incentive
payment calculation and the $25,000 incentive limit. Allows STRL
director to determine amount of incentive paid to employees under the
workforce shaping pilot program voluntary early retirement and
separation incentive payment authorities within the limit prescribed
herein.
Chapter 41, section 4107(a)(2): Academic Degree Training. Waived in
its entirety.
Chapter 41, section 4108: Employee Agreements; Service After
Training. Waived to the extent necessary to: (1) Provide that the
employee's service obligation is to NAVFAC EXWC for the period of the
required service; (2) permit the Technical Director to waive in whole
or in part a right of recovery; and (3) require an employee in the
student educational employment program who has received tuition
assistance to sign a service agreement up to three times the length of
the training.
Chapter 43, section 4301-4305: Related to Performance Appraisal.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow
[[Page 64511]]
provisions of the performance compensation system as described in this
FRN. Replace ``grade'' with ``pay band''; does not apply to employees
reduced in pay band without a reduction in pay; allows for removal for
unacceptable performance within two years from the beginning of the
performance improvement period; OPM responsibilities to the
demonstration project are waived.
Chapter 45, section 4502: Limitation of Cash Awards to Ten-Thousand
Dollars. Waived to allow Technical Director to award up to $25,000 with
the same level of authority as the Secretary of Defense to grant cash
awards. The requirement for certification and approval of the cash
awards by OPM is not required. All other provisions of section 4502
apply.
Chapter 51, section 5101-5112: Purpose, Definitions, Basis,
Classification of Positions, Review, Authority. Waived to the extent
that (1) white collar employees will be covered by broad banding, (2)
to allow classification provisions described in this FRN and to allow
for SSTM positions, and (3) classification appeals will be decided by
the Technical Director with final appeal to the DoD Appellate level.
Chapter 53, sections 5301-5307: Related to Pay Comparability System
and General Schedule Pay Rates. Waived to the extent necessary to allow
demonstration project employees, including SSTM employees, to be
treated as GS employees, and to allow base rates of pay under the
demonstration project to be treated as scheduled rates of pay. SSTM pay
will not exceed EX-IV and locality adjusted SSTM rates will not exceed
EX III.
Chapter 53, section 5331-5336: General Schedule Pay Rates. Waived
in entirety.
Chapter 53, sections 5361-5366: Grade and Pay Retention. Waived to
the extent necessary to: (1) Replace ``grade'' with ``pay band;'' (2)
allow demonstration project employees to be treated as GS employees;
(3) provide that an employee on pay retention whose rating of record is
``Unacceptable'' is not entitled to 50 percent of the amount of the
increase in the maximum rate of base pay payable for the pay band of
the employee's position; (4) provide that pay retention does not apply
to reduction in base pay due solely to the reallocation of
demonstration project pay rates in the implementation of a staffing
supplement; (5) allow no provision of grade/pay band retention under
this demonstration project; and (6) allow demonstration project
employees receiving a staffing supplement to retain the adjusted base
pay if the staffing supplement is discontinued or reduced. This waiver
may apply to Scientific and Professional (ST), Senior Level (SL) and
SSTM employees only if they move to a GS-equivalent position within the
demonstration project under conditions that trigger entitlement to pay
retention.
Chapter 55, section 5542(a)(1)-(2): Overtime Rates; Computation.
These sections are adapted only to the extent necessary to provide that
the GS-10 minimum special rate (if any) for the special rate category
to which a project employee belongs is deemed to be the ``applicable
special rate'' in applying the pay cap provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5542.
Chapter 55, section 5545(d): Related to Hazardous Duty Premium Pay.
Waived only to the extent necessary to allow demonstration project
employees to be treated as GS employees.
Chapter 55, section 5547(a)-(b): Limitation on Premium Pay. These
sections are adapted only to the extent necessary to provide that the
GS-15 maximum special rate (if any) for the special rate category to
which a project employee belongs is deemed to be the ``applicable
special rate'' in applying the pay cap provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5547.
Chapter 57, sections 5753, 5754, and 5755: Related to Recruitment,
Relocation, Retention Payments, and Supervisory Differential. These
sections waived to the extent necessary to allow: (1) Employees and
positions under the demonstration project to be treated as employees
and positions under the GS; and (2) that management may offer a bonus
to incentivize geographic mobility to employees in a student
educational employment program. Also to the extent necessary, to allow
SSTMs to receive pay retention and supervisory differentials as
described in this FRN and 79 FR 43722.
Chapter 59, section 5941: Allowances Based on Living Costs and
Conditions of Environment; employees stationed outside continental
United States or Alaska. Waived to the extent necessary to provide that
cost-of-living-adjustment (COLA)'s paid to employees under the
demonstration project are paid in accordance with regulations
prescribed by the President (as delegated to OPM).
Chapter 75, section 7512(3)-(4): Adverse Actions. Waived to the
extent necessary to: (1) Replace ``grade'' with ``pay band;'' (2)
exclude reductions in pay band that are not accompanied by a reduction
in pay; (3) exclude conversions from GS special rates to demonstration
project pay and reallocations of demonstration project pay rates within
special rate extensions to locality adjusted pay rates due to
promotions of general or locality pay increases, as long as the
employee's total rate of pay is not reduced; (4) exclude reductions in
base pay due solely to the operations of the pay setting rules for
geographic movement within the demonstration project; and (5) exclude
reduction in pay due to the removal of a supervisory or team leader pay
adjustment upon voluntary movement to a non-supervisory, or non-team
leader position.
Chapter 99, section 9902(f): Related to Voluntary Separation
Incentive Payments. Waived to the extent necessary to utilize the
authorities authorized by Public Law 114-92 and detailed in 82 FR
43339.
B. Waivers to Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
Part 210, section 210.102(b) (12): Definitions, Reassignment.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow assigning an employee, without
a position change, to any work falling within their general level
descriptor. Waived to the extent necessary to allow tracking of such
assignments as a ``realignment.''
Part 300-330: Employment (General). Other than Subpart G of 300.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow provisions of the direct hire
authorities as described in 79 FR 43722 and 82 FR 29280.
Part 300.601-300.605: Time-in-Grade Requirements. Waived to
eliminate time-in-grade restrictions.
Part 315, section 315.901 and 315.907: Related to Supervisory
Probationary Periods. This waiver applies to the extent necessary to:
(1) Replace ``grade'' with ``pay band'' or ``broad band;'' (2) allow
NAVFAC EXWC to establish the length of supervisory probationary period;
and (3) allow time spent in a temporary position to be creditable
toward completion of a supervisory probationary period.
Part 316, sections 316.301, 316.303, and 316.304: Subpart D, Term
Employment and Temporary Limited Employment. These sections are waived
to the extent necessary to allow modified term appointments and
Flexible Length and Renewable Term Technical Appointments as described
in this FRN.
Part 330.103-330.105: Requirement to Notify OPM. Waived to the
extent necessary to allow the STRL to publish competitive announcements
outside of USAJobs.
Part 332 and 335: Related to Competitive Examination. Waived to the
extent necessary to allow employees appointed on a Flexible Length and
Renewable Term Technical
[[Page 64512]]
Appointment to apply for federal positions as status candidates.
Part 335, section 335.103: Agency Promotion Programs. Waived to the
extent necessary to extend the length of details and temporary
promotions without requiring competitive procedures or numerous short-
term renewals.
Part 338.301: Competitive Service Appointment. Waived to allow for
Distinguished Scholastic Achievement Appointment grade point average
requirements as described in this FRN.
Part 359.705: Related to SES Pay. Waived to allow demonstration
project rules governing pay retention to apply to a former SES placed
on an SSTM position.
Part 410, section 410.308(a) and (c): Related to Degree Programs.
Waived to allow the command to pay for all courses related to an
academic degree program approved by the NAVFAC EXWC Technical Director.
Part 410, section 410.309: Agreements to Continue in Service.
Waived to the extent necessary to allow the Technical Director to
determine requirements related to continued service agreements,
including employees under the Student Educational Employment Program
who have received tuition assistance.
Part 430, Subpart B: Performance Appraisal for General Schedule,
Prevailing Rate and Certain Other Employees. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow the performance appraisal program as described in
this FRN. Section 430.208(a)(1) and (2), waived to allow presumptive
ratings for new employees hired less than 90 days before the end of the
appraisal cycle, or for other situations not providing adequate time
for an appraisal.
Part 432: Performance Based Reduction-in-grade and Removal Actions.
Replace ``grade'' with ``pay band.'' Modified to the extent that an
employee may be removed, reduced in pay band level with a reduction in
pay, reduced in pay without a reduction in pay band level and reduced
in pay band level without a reduction in pay based on unacceptable
performance. Also, modified to delete reference to critical element and
to allow removal for unacceptable performance with two years from the
beginning of a performance improvement period. For employees who are
reduced in pay band level without a reduction in pay, sections 432.105
and 432.106(a) do not apply.
Part 451, section 451.106(b): Agency Responsibilities. Waived to
allow the Technical Director to award up to $25,000 with the same level
of authority as the Secretary of Defense to grant a cash award. The
requirement for certification and approval of cash awards by OPM is not
required. All other provisions of 5 CFR 451.106 apply.
Part 511, Subpart A, B and F: Classification Under the General
Schedule. Waived to the extent necessary to allow classification
provisions outlined in this FRN to include the list of issues that are
neither appealable nor reviewable, the assignment of series under the
project plan to appropriate career paths; and to allow classification
appeals to be decided by the Technical Director with final appeal to
the DoD Appellate level.
Part 530, Subpart C: Special Rate Schedules for Recruitment and
Retention. Waived in its entirety to allow for staffing supplements.
Part 531, Subparts B, D, and E: Determining the Rate of Basic Pay,
Within-Grade Increases and Quality Step Increases. Waived in its
entirety.
Part 531, Subpart F: Locality-Based Comparability Adjustments. This
waiver applies only to the extent necessary to allow: (1) Demonstration
project employees covered by broad banding to be treated as GS
employees; (2) basic rates of pay under the demonstration project to be
treated as scheduled annual rates of pay; and (3) SSTM employees to be
treated as GS employees and basic rates of pay under the SSTM to be
treated as scheduled annual rates of pay. This waiver does not apply to
FWS employees.
Part 536: Grade and Pay Retention: Waived to the extent necessary
to: (1) Replace ``grade'' with ``pay band;'' (2) provide that pay
retention provisions do not apply to conversions from GS special rates
to demonstration project pay, as long as total pay is not reduced, and
to movement from a supervisory position to a non-supervisory position,
as long as total pay is not reduced; (3) allow demonstration project
employees to be treated as GS employees; (4) provide that pay retention
provisions do not apply to movements to a lower pay band as a result of
not receiving the general increase due to an annual performance rating
of ``Unacceptable;'' (5) provide that an employee on pay retention
whose rating of record is ``Unacceptable'' is not entitled to 50
percent of the amount of the increase in the maximum rate of base pay
payable for the pay band of the employee's position; (6) allow no
provision of grade/pay band retention under this demonstration project;
(7) provide that pay retention does not apply to reduction in base pay
due solely to the reallocation of demonstration project pay rates in
the implementation of a staffing supplement; and (8) allow
demonstration project employees receiving a staffing supplement to
retain the adjusted base pay if the staffing supplement is discontinued
or reduced. This waiver may apply to Scientific and Professional (ST),
Senior Level (SL) and SSTM employees only if they move to a GS-
equivalent position within the demonstration project under conditions
that trigger entitlement to pay retention.
Part 550, section 550.113(a): Computation of Overtime Pay. This
section is adapted only to the extent necessary to provide that the GS-
10 minimum special rate (if any) for the special rate category to which
a project employee belongs is deemed to be the ``applicable special
rate'' in applying the pay cap provisions in 5 U.S.C. 5542.
Part 550, sections 550.703: Severance Pay, Definitions. Definition
of ``reasonable offer'' waived by replacing ``two grade or pay levels''
with ``one pay band'' and ``grade or pay level'' with ``pay band.''
Part 550, section 550.902: Definition of ``Employee'' Hazardous
Duty Pay Differential. Waived to the extent necessary to treat
demonstration project employees covered by broad banding as GS
employees.
Part 575, Subparts A, B, C, and D: Recruitment Bonuses, Relocation
Bonuses, Retention Allowances, and Supervisory Differentials. Waived
only to the extent necessary to allow: (1) Employees and positions
under the demonstration project covered by broad banding to be treated
as employees and positions under the GS; (2) relocation incentives to
new employees in the student educational employment program whose
worksite is in a different geographic location than that of the college
enrolled; and (3) SSTMs to receive supervisory pay differentials as
described in this FRN and 79 FR 43726.
Part 591, Subpart B: Cost-of-Living Allowances and Post
Differential-Non Foreign Areas. Waived to the extent necessary to allow
demonstration project employees covered by broad banding to be treated
as employees under the GS.
Part 752, sections 752.201, 752.301 and 752.401: Principal
Statutory Requirements and Coverage. Waived to the extent necessary to:
(1) Exclude reductions in pay band not accompanied by a reduction in
pay; (2) replace ``grade'' with ``pay band;'' (3) the extent necessary
to exclude conversions from a GS special rate to demonstration project
pay that do not result in a reduction in the employee's total rate of
pay; and (4) the extent necessary to provide that adverse action
provisions do not apply to: (1)
[[Page 64513]]
Conversions from GS special rates to demonstration project pay; (2)
reallocations of demonstration project pay rates within special rate
extensions to locality adjusted pay rates due to promotions or general
or locality pay increases, as long as the employee's total rate of pay
is not reduced; and (3) reductions in base pay due solely to the
operation of the pay setting rules for geographic movement within the
demonstration project.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[[Page 64514]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO19.014
[[Page 64515]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO19.015
[[Page 64516]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN22NO19.016
[[Page 64517]]
Dated: November 15, 2019.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2019-25200 Filed 11-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C