Hours of Service of Drivers: PJ Helicopters, Inc.; Application for Exemption, 64397-64398 [2019-25336]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2019 / Notices
back the same 100 miles). This would
also mean that the CMV would continue
to be driven by the driver most familiar
with it, rather than a part-time driver.
• Drivers would be less stressed,
knowing that they have sufficient time
to complete their weekly schedule even
if they are delayed by heavy traffic,
weather conditions, etc.
A copy of Wolfe’s application for
exemption is available for review in the
docket for this notice.
V. Public Comments
On October 18, 2018, FMCSA
published notice of this application and
requested public comment (83 FR
52872). The Agency received two
comments.
Mr. Michael Millard wrote, ‘‘If the
FMCSA considers approving the request
there should be additional requirements
to address training on driver fatigue so
drivers and supervisors can recognize
the symptoms and not allow drivers to
violate Part 392.3 regarding ill or
fatigued drivers. If the petition is
approved the carrier should only be
allowed to use the 34-hour restart once
every six days.’’
Mr. Stanley Roberts stated that ‘‘If
they get a waiver then there would have
to be waivers for several industries and
businesses. I contend that the majority
of their work would be considered
regional at best and that their drivers are
close enough to make it home on 60-hr/
7-day rules.’’
VI. FMCSA Decision
FMCSA has evaluated Wolfe’s
application and the public comments
and decided to deny Wolfe’s exemption
request to operate up to 70 hours in a
6-day period; the company does not
operate CMVs on Sundays. Wolfe did
not demonstrate how operating up to 70
hours within 6 consecutive days of
operations (compared to the limit of 60
hours within 6 consecutive days of
operations) would maintain a level of
safety equivalent to, or greater than, the
level of safety that would be achieved
without the exemption [49 CFR
381.305(a)]. The company did not
provide any countermeasures (e.g.,
additional off-duty time, etc.) to address
the approximately 17 percent increase
in the maximum amount of on-duty
time that may be accumulated before
driving is prohibited.
Issued on: November 15, 2019.
Jim Mullen,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–25330 Filed 11–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 250001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2019–0079]
Hours of Service of Drivers: PJ
Helicopters, Inc.; Application for
Exemption
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition;
denial of application for exemption.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to deny PJ Helicopters, Inc.’s
(PJH) request for an exemption from the
Federal hours-of-service (HOS) rules for
its ground support equipment operators.
The requested exemption would have
allowed PJH’s ground support
equipment operators a 16-hour window
within which to complete all driving,
and enable these operators to use an 8consecutive hour off-duty break,
combined with at least two other offduty hours during the 16-hour window
within which driving would be
completed, in lieu of taking 10
consecutive hours off duty. FMCSA
analyzed the exemption application and
public comments and determined that
the applicant would not achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater
than, the level that would be achieved
absent such exemption.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: 202–366–2722.
Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, FMCSA–2019–0079, in
the ‘‘Keyword’’ box and click ‘‘Search.’’
Next, click the ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’
button and choose the document to
review. If you do not have access to the
internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the DOT West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64397
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from certain Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA
must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The Agency must publish its decision in
the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying
or granting the application, and if
granted, the name of the person or class
of persons receiving the exemption and
the regulatory provision from which the
exemption is granted. The notice must
specify the effective period (up to 5
years) and explain the terms and
conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
PJH’s exemption application states
that the company has been serving the
utility helicopter industry as an
emergency response company for more
than 45 years. Most of its customers are
firefighting agencies, law enforcement
agencies, and public utilities. PJH’s
customers require timely responses and
long hours when dealing with
emergency-related incidents. PJH’s
helicopters must be fueled and serviced
in a timely fashion by its ground
support crews. PJH requested an
exemption from 49 CFR 395.3(a)(1) and
(2) for its ground support equipment
operators.
The requested exemption would
apply to approximately 32 ground
support equipment operators, each of
whom possesses a commercial driver’s
license with applicable endorsements,
including the tank vehicle endorsement.
PJH states that it is an emergency
response company contracted to
agencies focused on public safety and
that there currently are no exemption
provisions in the 49 CFR part 395 for
private companies that assist in
emergency efforts. PJH’s Federal and
State government contracts specify that
ground support equipment operators
must be available for a maximum of 14
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
64398
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2019 / Notices
hours. At the end of the day, when the
helicopter has finished flying, a
mechanic must inspect and repair the
aircraft as needed. With a long flight day
and these added duties, a PJH mechanic
will exceed the ‘‘14-hour rule’’ when
traveling between the helicopter landing
zone and the mechanic’s lodging.
Without the requested 16-hour
exemption, PJH’s ground crew must be
released earlier to reach their lodging
before reaching the 14-hour ‘‘driving
window’’ limit, which decreases the
availability of the aircraft by a minimum
of 14 total hours each week.
The second component of PJH’s
exemption request is intended to work
in conjunction with the first. It would
allow ‘‘ground crew members’’ to take
only 8, instead of 10, consecutive hours
off duty before coming on duty again,
provided they take at least 2 hours off
duty during the prior 16-hour driving
window PJH requested and are
responding to or returning from an
active incident as requested by an
officer of a public agency or public
utility.
PJH estimates that its drivers would
need to use this exemption, on average,
once every two weeks during the
months of April through October.
The PJH application for exemption is
filed in the docket for this notice.
IV. Public Comments
On March 29, 2019, FMCSA
published notice of this application and
requested public comments (84 FR
12018). The Agency received three
comments. The Commercial Vehicle
Safety Alliance (CVSA) opposed this
exemption, stating that the request is
both unjustified and impractical. CVSA
argued that the Federal HOS
requirements exist to help prevent and
manage driver fatigue and set forth a
framework that, if followed, allows for
drivers to get the rest necessary to
operate their vehicles safely. CVSA
argued that the Federal HOS
requirements, if followed, allow drivers
to get the rest necessary to operate their
vehicles safely. Per CVSA, exemptions
from Federal safety regulations have the
potential to undermine safety while
complicating the enforcement process. If
granted, this exemption would place an
excessive burden on the enforcement
community and negatively impact
safety.
CVSA concluded its comment with an
emphasis on PJH’s failure to meet a key
component of a credible exemption
request, i.e., to identify adequately how
its drivers would maintain an
equivalent level of safety while
operating under extended HOS
requirements. Two other comments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 250001
were filed by individuals—one favored
the request, the other took no position
either for or against the request.
V. Equivalent Level of Safety
To ensure an equivalent level of safety
PJH is offering the use of electronic
logging devices, at least 2 hours off-duty
during the requested 16-hour period,
and infrequent use of the exemption if
granted. According to PJH drivers would
need to use the exemption on average
once every 2 weeks during the months
of April through October.
VI. FMCSA Response
When the Agency established the
rules mandating HOS, it relied upon
research indicating that the rules
improve CMV safety. These regulations
put limits in place for when and how
long an individual may drive to ensure
that drivers stay awake and alert while
driving and on a continuing basis to
help reduce the possibility of driver
fatigue. The PJH application does not
provide an analysis of the safety impacts
the requested exemption from the HOS
regulations may cause. Additionally, it
provides no countermeasures that PJH
would undertake to ensure that the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulations.
Although the applicant is offering at
least 2 hours off duty during the
requested 16 hour on duty period, the
applicant offered no data or information
that would suggest that allowing a 16hour window for multiple consecutive
days with only 8 hours off duty would
achieve an equivalent level of safety.
VII. FMCSA Decision
FMCSA has reviewed PJH’s
application and the public comments
and has concluded that the requisite
level of safety cannot be ensured, for the
reasons discussed above. Accordingly,
FMCSA denies the request for
exemption.
Issued on: November 15, 2019.
Jim Mullen,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019–25336 Filed 11–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2018–0312]
Hours of Service of Drivers: American
Bakers Association and International
Dairy Foods Association; Application
for Exemption
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition;
denial of application for exemption.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces its
decision to deny the joint request from
the American Bakers Association (ABA)
and International Dairy Foods
Association (IDFA) for an exemption
from the Federal hours-of-service (HOS)
rules for commercial motor vehicle
(CMV) drivers. The requested
exemption would have covered rivers
engaged in the delivery of baked goods
and milk products in anticipation of a
natural disaster or emergency, such as
extreme weather events, natural
disasters, etc. FMCSA analyzed the
application and public comments, and
determined that drivers operating under
the proposed exemption would not
achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to, or greater than, the level
that would be achieved absent such
exemption.
SUMMARY:
Mr.
Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: 202–366–2722.
Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, FMCSA–2018–0312, in
the ‘‘Keyword’’ box and click ‘‘Search.’’
Next, click the ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’
button and choose the document to
review. If you do not have access to the
internet, you may view the docket
online by visiting the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the DOT West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64397-64398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25336]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2019-0079]
Hours of Service of Drivers: PJ Helicopters, Inc.; Application
for Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition; denial of application for
exemption.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to deny PJ Helicopters, Inc.'s
(PJH) request for an exemption from the Federal hours-of-service (HOS)
rules for its ground support equipment operators. The requested
exemption would have allowed PJH's ground support equipment operators a
16-hour window within which to complete all driving, and enable these
operators to use an 8-consecutive hour off-duty break, combined with at
least two other off-duty hours during the 16-hour window within which
driving would be completed, in lieu of taking 10 consecutive hours off
duty. FMCSA analyzed the exemption application and public comments and
determined that the applicant would not achieve a level of safety that
is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved
absent such exemption.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Richard Clemente, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards; Telephone: 202-366-2722. Email: [email protected]. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact
Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to www.regulations.gov and insert
the docket number, FMCSA-2019-0079, in the ``Keyword'' box and click
``Search.'' Next, click the ``Open Docket Folder'' button and choose
the document to review. If you do not have access to the internet, you
may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the
Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The Agency must
publish its decision in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)) with
the reasons for denying or granting the application, and if granted,
the name of the person or class of persons receiving the exemption and
the regulatory provision from which the exemption is granted. The
notice must specify the effective period (up to 5 years) and explain
the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed
(49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Request for Exemption
PJH's exemption application states that the company has been
serving the utility helicopter industry as an emergency response
company for more than 45 years. Most of its customers are firefighting
agencies, law enforcement agencies, and public utilities. PJH's
customers require timely responses and long hours when dealing with
emergency-related incidents. PJH's helicopters must be fueled and
serviced in a timely fashion by its ground support crews. PJH requested
an exemption from 49 CFR 395.3(a)(1) and (2) for its ground support
equipment operators.
The requested exemption would apply to approximately 32 ground
support equipment operators, each of whom possesses a commercial
driver's license with applicable endorsements, including the tank
vehicle endorsement. PJH states that it is an emergency response
company contracted to agencies focused on public safety and that there
currently are no exemption provisions in the 49 CFR part 395 for
private companies that assist in emergency efforts. PJH's Federal and
State government contracts specify that ground support equipment
operators must be available for a maximum of 14
[[Page 64398]]
hours. At the end of the day, when the helicopter has finished flying,
a mechanic must inspect and repair the aircraft as needed. With a long
flight day and these added duties, a PJH mechanic will exceed the ``14-
hour rule'' when traveling between the helicopter landing zone and the
mechanic's lodging. Without the requested 16-hour exemption, PJH's
ground crew must be released earlier to reach their lodging before
reaching the 14-hour ``driving window'' limit, which decreases the
availability of the aircraft by a minimum of 14 total hours each week.
The second component of PJH's exemption request is intended to work
in conjunction with the first. It would allow ``ground crew members''
to take only 8, instead of 10, consecutive hours off duty before coming
on duty again, provided they take at least 2 hours off duty during the
prior 16-hour driving window PJH requested and are responding to or
returning from an active incident as requested by an officer of a
public agency or public utility.
PJH estimates that its drivers would need to use this exemption, on
average, once every two weeks during the months of April through
October.
The PJH application for exemption is filed in the docket for this
notice.
IV. Public Comments
On March 29, 2019, FMCSA published notice of this application and
requested public comments (84 FR 12018). The Agency received three
comments. The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) opposed this
exemption, stating that the request is both unjustified and
impractical. CVSA argued that the Federal HOS requirements exist to
help prevent and manage driver fatigue and set forth a framework that,
if followed, allows for drivers to get the rest necessary to operate
their vehicles safely. CVSA argued that the Federal HOS requirements,
if followed, allow drivers to get the rest necessary to operate their
vehicles safely. Per CVSA, exemptions from Federal safety regulations
have the potential to undermine safety while complicating the
enforcement process. If granted, this exemption would place an
excessive burden on the enforcement community and negatively impact
safety.
CVSA concluded its comment with an emphasis on PJH's failure to
meet a key component of a credible exemption request, i.e., to identify
adequately how its drivers would maintain an equivalent level of safety
while operating under extended HOS requirements. Two other comments
were filed by individuals--one favored the request, the other took no
position either for or against the request.
V. Equivalent Level of Safety
To ensure an equivalent level of safety PJH is offering the use of
electronic logging devices, at least 2 hours off-duty during the
requested 16-hour period, and infrequent use of the exemption if
granted. According to PJH drivers would need to use the exemption on
average once every 2 weeks during the months of April through October.
VI. FMCSA Response
When the Agency established the rules mandating HOS, it relied upon
research indicating that the rules improve CMV safety. These
regulations put limits in place for when and how long an individual may
drive to ensure that drivers stay awake and alert while driving and on
a continuing basis to help reduce the possibility of driver fatigue.
The PJH application does not provide an analysis of the safety impacts
the requested exemption from the HOS regulations may cause.
Additionally, it provides no countermeasures that PJH would undertake
to ensure that the exemption would likely achieve a level of safety
equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved by the
current regulations.
Although the applicant is offering at least 2 hours off duty during
the requested 16 hour on duty period, the applicant offered no data or
information that would suggest that allowing a 16-hour window for
multiple consecutive days with only 8 hours off duty would achieve an
equivalent level of safety.
VII. FMCSA Decision
FMCSA has reviewed PJH's application and the public comments and
has concluded that the requisite level of safety cannot be ensured, for
the reasons discussed above. Accordingly, FMCSA denies the request for
exemption.
Issued on: November 15, 2019.
Jim Mullen,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2019-25336 Filed 11-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P