Restricted Area, Curtis Creek and Arundel Cove, United States Coast Guard Yard, Baltimore, Maryland, 64203-64204 [2019-25272]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 334
Restricted Area, Curtis Creek and
Arundel Cove, United States Coast
Guard Yard, Baltimore, Maryland
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
ACTION:
Final rule.
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) is amending its
regulations to establish a restricted area
in the waters of Curtis Creek and
Arundel Cove extending offshore from
the United States Coast Guard Yard,
Baltimore, located in Baltimore,
Maryland. The restricted area is
necessary to address the current security
and safety needs at U.S. Coast Guard
Yard (CG Yard), Baltimore, Maryland,
including the protection of Coast Guardwide military assets as the CG Yard is
the Coast Guard’s only shipyard and
largest industrial facility; performing
major ship, electronics and heavy
weapons overhaul, repair and
manufacture. The CG Yard is also the
host command for various Coast Guard
commands supporting local and
nationwide Coast Guard missions.
DATES: Effective date: December 23,
2019.
SUMMARY:
Headquarters, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Operations and
Regulatory Division, 441 G Street NW,
Washington, DC 20314–1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Olson, Headquarters, Operations
and Regulatory Division, Washington,
DC at 202–761–4922 or by email at
david.b.olson@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to its authorities in Section 7 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat.
266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and Chapter XIX of the
Army Appropriations Act of 1919 (40
Stat. 892; 33 U.S.C. 3), the Corps is
amending its regulations to establish a
restricted area in the waters of Curtis
Creek and Arundel Cove extending
offshore from the United States Coast
Guard Yard, Baltimore, located in
Baltimore, Maryland. The restricted area
is necessary to address the current
security and safety needs at U.S. Coast
Guard Yard (CG Yard), Baltimore,
Maryland, including the protection of
Coast Guard-wide military assets as the
CG Yard is the Coast Guard’s only
shipyard and largest industrial facility;
performing major ship, electronics and
heavy weapons overhaul, repair and
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 250001
manufacture. The CG Yard is also the
host command for various Coast Guard
commands supporting local and
nationwide Coast Guard missions.
The proposed rule was published in
the November 16, 2017, edition of the
Federal Register (82 FR 53438) and the
docket number was COE–2017–0003. In
November 2016, the Corps’ Baltimore
District issued a public notice on its
web page soliciting comments on the
proposal. The District received one
comment from an adjacent property
owner concerning the proposed location
of the restricted area in relation to his
parcel. The CG Yard was contacted by
the District and it was determined that
incorrect coordinates in the vicinity of
the commenters parcel had been
initially provided. Corrected
coordinates were subsequently provided
to the District by the CG Yard. In
response, the District notified the
commenter and the coordinates were
amended in the rule text. In addition,
the CG Yard initially proposed channel
markers within Curtis Creek to
demarcate the restricted area. During the
establishment process, the CG Yard
amended the request and proposed
signage that would be placed along the
shoreline.
In the November 16, 2017, proposal,
the Corps made a preliminary
determination that the proposed rule
does not require the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement, and
that an environmental assessment
would be prepared for the final rule.
The regulations governing the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) do
not require draft environmental
assessments to be available for public
comment. Federal agencies are only
required to solicit public comments to
inform decision-making. Given the
administrative nature of the proposed
rule and the substance of the comments
received, we have determined that an
environmental assessment is the
appropriate mechanism for complying
with NEPA requirements. Public input
on the proposed action was solicited
using Federal Register noticing and
local public noticing. Public comments
received in response to the notices were
documented and fully considered
during final agency decision making.
Administrative Requirements
a. Regulatory Planning and Review.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
64203
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
The Corps has determined this rule is
not a significant regulatory action. This
regulatory action determination is based
on the size, duration, and location of the
restricted area. The restricted area
occupies only a portion of the waterway
and a vessel that needs to transit the
restricted area may do so if the operator
of the vessel obtains permission from
the Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast
Guard Yard or his/her designated
representative. In accordance with 33
CFR 334.3(b), the authority to prescribe
danger zone and restricted area
regulations must be exercised so as not
to unreasonably interfere with or restrict
the food fishing industry. The final rule
states that fishing, crabbing, trawling,
net-fishing, and other aquatic activities
may also be conducted with prior
approval from the Commanding Officer,
U.S. Coast Guard Yard or his/her
designated representative. Entities that
want to conduct other activities in or
near the restricted area may need to
obtain other approvals from the
applicable federal, state, or local
government authority.
b. Impact on Small Entities. The
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5
U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires
Federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Corps certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels that intend to transit the
restricted area may be small entities, for
the reasons stated in paragraph (a) above
this rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator. In addition, the restricted
area is necessary to address the current
security needs at CG Yard, Baltimore,
Maryland, including the protection of
Coast Guard-wide military assets. Small
entities can utilize navigable waters
outside of the restricted area. Small
entities may also transit the restricted
area as long as they obtain permission
from the Commanding Officer, CG Yard
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
64204
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
or his/her designated representative.
The Corps determined that the restricted
area would have practically no
economic impact on the public, would
not result in an anticipated navigational
hazard, and would not cause
interference with existing waterway
traffic. After considering the economic
impacts of this restricted area regulation
on small entities, I certify that this
action will not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
c. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act. An
environmental assessment (EA) has
been prepared. We concluded that the
establishment of a restricted area at
United States Coast Guard Yard,
Baltimore, will not have a significant
impact to the quality of the human
environment and, therefore, preparation
of an environmental impact statement is
not required. The final EA and Finding
of No Significant Impact may be
reviewed at the Baltimore District
Office. Please contact Mr. Steve Elinsky
at the phone number specified above for
further information.
d. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.
This rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private
sector and, therefore, is not a Federal
private sector mandate and is not
subject to the requirements of Section
202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48,
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). We have also
found, under Section 203 of the Act,
that small governments will not be
significantly or uniquely affected by this
rule.
e. Congressional Review Act. The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., generally provides that before a
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. We will submit a report
containing the final rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger zones, Navigation (water),
Transportation, Waterways.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Corps is amending 33
CFR part 334 to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 20, 2019
Jkt 250001
PART 334—DANGER ZONE AND
RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR
part 334 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and
40 Stat. 892 (33 U.S.C. 3).
■
2. Add § 334.145 to read as follows:
§ 334.145 Curtis Creek and Arundel Cove,
U.S. Coast Guard Yard, Baltimore;
restricted area.
(a) The area. All of the navigable
waters of Curtis Creek extending
approximately 120 meters from the
high-water mark of the United States
Coast Guard facility, bounded by these
coordinates (including the Arundel
Cove): Commencing from the shoreline
at latitude 39°12′05.8″ N, longitude
076°34′28.4″ W; thence to latitude
39°12′04.8″ N, longitude 076′34′32″ W;
thence to latitude 39°11′59″ N,
longitude 076°34′28″ W; thence to
latitude 39°11′44.8″ N, longitude
076°34′25″ W; thence to latitude
39°11′44.5″ N, longitude 076°34′07″ W;
and thence along the shoreline to the
point of origin. The datum for these
coordinates is NAD–83.
(b) The regulations. (1) The restricted
area as described in paragraph (a) of this
section is only open to government
vessels. Government vessels include,
but are not limited to, U.S. Coast Guard,
U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary, Department
of Defense, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, state and
local law enforcement, emergency
services and vessels under contract with
the U.S. Government. Vessels transiting
the restricted area shall proceed across
the area by the most direct route and
without unnecessary delay. Fishing,
crabbing, trawling, net-fishing and other
aquatic activities are prohibited without
prior approval from the Commanding
Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Yard or his/
her designated representative. The Coast
Guard will install warning signs along
the shoreline notifying individuals of
the restricted area and prohibiting all
unauthorized entry into the area along
the property boundary.
(2) All persons, vessels and other craft
are prohibited from entering, transiting,
drifting, dredging or anchoring within
the restricted area as described in
paragraph (a) of this section without
prior approval from the Commanding
Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Yard or his/
her designated representative.
(3) The restrictions described in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section are in
effect 24 hours a day, seven days a
week.
(c) Enforcement. The regulations in
this section shall be enforced by the
Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Yard or such persons or agencies he/she
may designate.
Dated: November 14, 2019.
Thomas P. Smith,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division,
Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2019–25272 Filed 11–20–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board
37 CFR Part 380
[Docket No. 14–CRB–0001–WR (2016–2020)
COLA 2020]
Cost of Living Adjustment to Royalty
Rates for Webcaster Statutory License
Copyright Royalty Board (CRB),
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final rule; cost of living
adjustment.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Royalty Judges
announce a cost of living adjustment
(COLA) in the royalty rates that
commercial and noncommercial
noninteractive webcasters pay for
eligible transmissions pursuant to the
statutory licenses for the public
performance of and for the making of
ephemeral reproductions of sound
recordings.
SUMMARY:
Effective date: January 1, 2020.
Applicability dates: These rates are
applicable to the period January 1, 2020,
through December 31, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Blaine, CRB Program Assistant, by
telephone at (202) 707–7658 or by email
at crb@loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Sections
112(e) and 114(f) of the Copyright Act,
title 17 of the United States Code, create
statutory licenses for certain digital
performances of sound recordings and
the making of ephemeral reproductions
to facilitate transmission of those sound
recordings. On May 2, 2016, the
Copyright Royalty Judges (Judges)
adopted final regulations governing the
rates and terms of copyright royalty
payments under those licenses for the
license period 2016–2020 for
performances of sound recordings via
eligible transmissions by commercial
and noncommercial noninteractive
webcasters. See 81 FR 26316.
Pursuant to those regulations, at least
25 days before January 1 of each year
from 2017 to 2020, the Judges shall
publish in the Federal Register notice of
a COLA applicable to the royalty fees for
performances of sound recordings via
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\21NOR1.SGM
21NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64203-64204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25272]
[[Page 64203]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
33 CFR Part 334
Restricted Area, Curtis Creek and Arundel Cove, United States
Coast Guard Yard, Baltimore, Maryland
AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is amending its
regulations to establish a restricted area in the waters of Curtis
Creek and Arundel Cove extending offshore from the United States Coast
Guard Yard, Baltimore, located in Baltimore, Maryland. The restricted
area is necessary to address the current security and safety needs at
U.S. Coast Guard Yard (CG Yard), Baltimore, Maryland, including the
protection of Coast Guard-wide military assets as the CG Yard is the
Coast Guard's only shipyard and largest industrial facility; performing
major ship, electronics and heavy weapons overhaul, repair and
manufacture. The CG Yard is also the host command for various Coast
Guard commands supporting local and nationwide Coast Guard missions.
DATES: Effective date: December 23, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Operations and
Regulatory Division, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Olson, Headquarters,
Operations and Regulatory Division, Washington, DC at 202-761-4922 or
by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to its authorities in Section 7 of
the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1917 (40 Stat. 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) and
Chapter XIX of the Army Appropriations Act of 1919 (40 Stat. 892; 33
U.S.C. 3), the Corps is amending its regulations to establish a
restricted area in the waters of Curtis Creek and Arundel Cove
extending offshore from the United States Coast Guard Yard, Baltimore,
located in Baltimore, Maryland. The restricted area is necessary to
address the current security and safety needs at U.S. Coast Guard Yard
(CG Yard), Baltimore, Maryland, including the protection of Coast
Guard-wide military assets as the CG Yard is the Coast Guard's only
shipyard and largest industrial facility; performing major ship,
electronics and heavy weapons overhaul, repair and manufacture. The CG
Yard is also the host command for various Coast Guard commands
supporting local and nationwide Coast Guard missions.
The proposed rule was published in the November 16, 2017, edition
of the Federal Register (82 FR 53438) and the docket number was COE-
2017-0003. In November 2016, the Corps' Baltimore District issued a
public notice on its web page soliciting comments on the proposal. The
District received one comment from an adjacent property owner
concerning the proposed location of the restricted area in relation to
his parcel. The CG Yard was contacted by the District and it was
determined that incorrect coordinates in the vicinity of the commenters
parcel had been initially provided. Corrected coordinates were
subsequently provided to the District by the CG Yard. In response, the
District notified the commenter and the coordinates were amended in the
rule text. In addition, the CG Yard initially proposed channel markers
within Curtis Creek to demarcate the restricted area. During the
establishment process, the CG Yard amended the request and proposed
signage that would be placed along the shoreline.
In the November 16, 2017, proposal, the Corps made a preliminary
determination that the proposed rule does not require the preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement, and that an environmental
assessment would be prepared for the final rule. The regulations
governing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) do not require
draft environmental assessments to be available for public comment.
Federal agencies are only required to solicit public comments to inform
decision-making. Given the administrative nature of the proposed rule
and the substance of the comments received, we have determined that an
environmental assessment is the appropriate mechanism for complying
with NEPA requirements. Public input on the proposed action was
solicited using Federal Register noticing and local public noticing.
Public comments received in response to the notices were documented and
fully considered during final agency decision making.
Administrative Requirements
a. Regulatory Planning and Review. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771
directs agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting
process. This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory
action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the requirements of
Executive Order 13771.
The Corps has determined this rule is not a significant regulatory
action. This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
duration, and location of the restricted area. The restricted area
occupies only a portion of the waterway and a vessel that needs to
transit the restricted area may do so if the operator of the vessel
obtains permission from the Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Yard
or his/her designated representative. In accordance with 33 CFR
334.3(b), the authority to prescribe danger zone and restricted area
regulations must be exercised so as not to unreasonably interfere with
or restrict the food fishing industry. The final rule states that
fishing, crabbing, trawling, net-fishing, and other aquatic activities
may also be conducted with prior approval from the Commanding Officer,
U.S. Coast Guard Yard or his/her designated representative. Entities
that want to conduct other activities in or near the restricted area
may need to obtain other approvals from the applicable federal, state,
or local government authority.
b. Impact on Small Entities. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to
consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during
rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses,
not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated
and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Corps certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. While some owners or operators of vessels that intend to
transit the restricted area may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in paragraph (a) above this rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. In addition, the
restricted area is necessary to address the current security needs at
CG Yard, Baltimore, Maryland, including the protection of Coast Guard-
wide military assets. Small entities can utilize navigable waters
outside of the restricted area. Small entities may also transit the
restricted area as long as they obtain permission from the Commanding
Officer, CG Yard
[[Page 64204]]
or his/her designated representative. The Corps determined that the
restricted area would have practically no economic impact on the
public, would not result in an anticipated navigational hazard, and
would not cause interference with existing waterway traffic. After
considering the economic impacts of this restricted area regulation on
small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
c. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act. An
environmental assessment (EA) has been prepared. We concluded that the
establishment of a restricted area at United States Coast Guard Yard,
Baltimore, will not have a significant impact to the quality of the
human environment and, therefore, preparation of an environmental
impact statement is not required. The final EA and Finding of No
Significant Impact may be reviewed at the Baltimore District Office.
Please contact Mr. Steve Elinsky at the phone number specified above
for further information.
d. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. This rule does not impose an
enforceable duty among the private sector and, therefore, is not a
Federal private sector mandate and is not subject to the requirements
of Section 202 or 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (Pub. L. 104-
4, 109 Stat. 48, 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). We have also found, under
Section 203 of the Act, that small governments will not be
significantly or uniquely affected by this rule.
e. Congressional Review Act. The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
801 et seq., generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. We will submit a report
containing the final rule and other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General
of the United States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 334
Danger zones, Navigation (water), Transportation, Waterways.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Corps is amending 33
CFR part 334 to read as follows:
PART 334--DANGER ZONE AND RESTRICTED AREA REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 33 CFR part 334 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 Stat. 266 (33 U.S.C. 1) and 40 Stat. 892 (33
U.S.C. 3).
0
2. Add Sec. 334.145 to read as follows:
Sec. 334.145 Curtis Creek and Arundel Cove, U.S. Coast Guard Yard,
Baltimore; restricted area.
(a) The area. All of the navigable waters of Curtis Creek extending
approximately 120 meters from the high-water mark of the United States
Coast Guard facility, bounded by these coordinates (including the
Arundel Cove): Commencing from the shoreline at latitude
39[deg]12'05.8'' N, longitude 076[deg]34'28.4'' W; thence to latitude
39[deg]12'04.8'' N, longitude 076'34'32'' W; thence to latitude
39[deg]11'59'' N, longitude 076[deg]34'28'' W; thence to latitude
39[deg]11'44.8'' N, longitude 076[deg]34'25'' W; thence to latitude
39[deg]11'44.5'' N, longitude 076[deg]34'07'' W; and thence along the
shoreline to the point of origin. The datum for these coordinates is
NAD-83.
(b) The regulations. (1) The restricted area as described in
paragraph (a) of this section is only open to government vessels.
Government vessels include, but are not limited to, U.S. Coast Guard,
U.S. Coast Guard Auxiliary, Department of Defense, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, state and local law enforcement, emergency
services and vessels under contract with the U.S. Government. Vessels
transiting the restricted area shall proceed across the area by the
most direct route and without unnecessary delay. Fishing, crabbing,
trawling, net-fishing and other aquatic activities are prohibited
without prior approval from the Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard
Yard or his/her designated representative. The Coast Guard will install
warning signs along the shoreline notifying individuals of the
restricted area and prohibiting all unauthorized entry into the area
along the property boundary.
(2) All persons, vessels and other craft are prohibited from
entering, transiting, drifting, dredging or anchoring within the
restricted area as described in paragraph (a) of this section without
prior approval from the Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Yard or
his/her designated representative.
(3) The restrictions described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
are in effect 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
(c) Enforcement. The regulations in this section shall be enforced
by the Commanding Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Yard or such persons or
agencies he/she may designate.
Dated: November 14, 2019.
Thomas P. Smith,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory Division, Directorate of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2019-25272 Filed 11-20-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P