Action Affecting Export Privilege: Rasheed Al Jijakli; Correction, 61870 [2019-24738]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES 61870 Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Notices B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or engaging in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or from any other activity subject to the Regulations. Second, no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Third, after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to Biria by ownership, control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business may also be made subject to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Nov 13, 2019 Jkt 250001 the provisions of this Order in order to prevent evasion of this Order. Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Biria may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of the Regulations. Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be delivered to Biria and shall be published in the Federal Register. Sixth, this Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until August 14, 2029. Issued this 7th day of November 2019. Karen H. Nies-Vogel, Director, Office of Exporter Services. [FR Doc. 2019–24737 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security Action Affecting Export Privilege: Rasheed Al Jijakli; Correction Summary: In the Federal Register of Monday, October 7, 2019, the Bureau of Industry and Security published an Order denying the export privileges of Rasheed Al Jijakli. The Order inadvertently referenced the U.S. District Court as the ‘‘U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia’’ instead of the ‘‘United States District Court for the Central District of California’’. This notice is being published to correct the name of the U.S. District Court. Correction: In the Federal Register of Monday, October 7, 2019, in FR Doc. 2019– 21745, on page 53405, in the first full paragraph of the third column, the correct name of the U.S. District Court should read as follows ‘‘. . . in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California . . .’’ Issued this 7th day of November 2019. Karen H. Nies-Vogel, Director, Office of Exporter Services. [FR Doc. 2019–24738 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security [Case No. 18–BIS–0002] In the Matter of: Ali Caby, a/k/a ‘‘Alex’’ Caby, Blvd. James Boucher 91, Apt. 13, Floor 4, Lozenets, Sofia, Bulgaria 1407, et al., Respondents; Order Relating to Ali Caby, a/k/a ‘‘Alex’’ Caby The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), has notified Ali Caby, a/k/a ‘‘Alex’’ Caby, of Sofia, Bulgaria, that it has initiated an administrative proceeding against him pursuant to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (the ‘‘Regulations’’),1 through the issuance of a Charging Letter alleging that Ali Caby, Arash Caby, Marjan Caby, AW-Tronics LLC, (‘‘AW-Tronics’’) and Arrowtronic, LLC (‘‘Arrowtronic’’) (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’) violated the Regulations as follows: Charge 1 15 CFR 764.2(d)—Conspiracy Beginning as early as in or about September 2013, and continuing through in or about March 2014, Respondents conspired and acted in concert with others, known and unknown, to bring about one or more acts that constitute a violation of the Regulations. The purpose and object of the conspiracy was to unlawfully export goods from the United States through transshipment points to Syria, including to Syrian Arab Airlines (‘‘Syrian Air’’), the flag carrier airline of Syria and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (‘‘SDGT’’), and in doing so evade the prohibitions and licensing requirements of the Regulations and avoid detection by U.S. law enforcement. 1 The Regulations originally issued under the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, 50 U.S.C. 4601–4623 (Supp. III 2015) (‘‘the EAA’’), which lapsed on August 21, 2001. The President, through Executive Order 13,222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which was extended by successive Presidential Notices, continued the Regulations in full force and effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2012) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which includes the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852 (‘‘ECRA’’). While Section 1766 of ECRA repeals the provisions of the EAA (except for three sections which are inapplicable here), Section 1768 of ECRA provides, in pertinent part, that all rules and regulations that were made or issued under the EAA, including as continued in effect pursuant to IEEPA, and were in effect as of ECRA’s date of enactment (August 13, 2018), shall continue in effect according to their terms until modified, superseded, set aside, or revoked through action undertaken pursuant to the authority provided under ECRA. The Regulations are currently codified in the Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–774 (2018). The charged violation occurred in 2013–2014. The Regulations governing the violation at issue are found in the 2013–2014 versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774 (2013– 2014)). The 2019 Regulations set forth the procedures that apply to this matter. E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 61870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Action Affecting Export Privilege: Rasheed Al Jijakli; Correction

    Summary: In the Federal Register of Monday, October 7, 2019, the 
Bureau of Industry and Security published an Order denying the export 
privileges of Rasheed Al Jijakli. The Order inadvertently referenced 
the U.S. District Court as the ``U.S. District Court for the Middle 
District of Georgia'' instead of the ``United States District Court for 
the Central District of California''. This notice is being published to 
correct the name of the U.S. District Court.

Correction:

    In the Federal Register of Monday, October 7, 2019, in FR Doc. 
2019-21745, on page 53405, in the first full paragraph of the third 
column, the correct name of the U.S. District Court should read as 
follows ``. . . in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of 
California . . .''

    Issued this 7th day of November 2019.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2019-24738 Filed 11-13-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P