Action Affecting Export Privilege: Rasheed Al Jijakli; Correction, 61870 [2019-24738]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
61870
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Notices
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or engaging
in any other activity subject to the
Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or
from any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and which is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, after notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in Section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Biria by
ownership, control, position of
responsibility, affiliation, or other
connection in the conduct of trade or
business may also be made subject to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
the provisions of this Order in order to
prevent evasion of this Order.
Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of
the Regulations, Biria may file an appeal
of this Order with the Under Secretary
of Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be
delivered to Biria and shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Sixth, this Order is effective
immediately and shall remain in effect
until August 14, 2029.
Issued this 7th day of November 2019.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2019–24737 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privilege:
Rasheed Al Jijakli; Correction
Summary: In the Federal Register of
Monday, October 7, 2019, the Bureau of
Industry and Security published an
Order denying the export privileges of
Rasheed Al Jijakli. The Order
inadvertently referenced the U.S.
District Court as the ‘‘U.S. District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia’’
instead of the ‘‘United States District
Court for the Central District of
California’’. This notice is being
published to correct the name of the
U.S. District Court.
Correction:
In the Federal Register of Monday,
October 7, 2019, in FR Doc. 2019–
21745, on page 53405, in the first full
paragraph of the third column, the
correct name of the U.S. District Court
should read as follows ‘‘. . . in the U.S.
District Court for the Central District of
California . . .’’
Issued this 7th day of November 2019.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2019–24738 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Case No. 18–BIS–0002]
In the Matter of: Ali Caby, a/k/a ‘‘Alex’’
Caby, Blvd. James Boucher 91, Apt.
13, Floor 4, Lozenets, Sofia, Bulgaria
1407, et al., Respondents; Order
Relating to Ali Caby, a/k/a ‘‘Alex’’ Caby
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’),
has notified Ali Caby, a/k/a ‘‘Alex’’
Caby, of Sofia, Bulgaria, that it has
initiated an administrative proceeding
against him pursuant to Section 766.3 of
the Export Administration Regulations
(the ‘‘Regulations’’),1 through the
issuance of a Charging Letter alleging
that Ali Caby, Arash Caby, Marjan Caby,
AW-Tronics LLC, (‘‘AW-Tronics’’) and
Arrowtronic, LLC (‘‘Arrowtronic’’)
(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’) violated
the Regulations as follows:
Charge 1 15 CFR 764.2(d)—Conspiracy
Beginning as early as in or about
September 2013, and continuing through in
or about March 2014, Respondents conspired
and acted in concert with others, known and
unknown, to bring about one or more acts
that constitute a violation of the Regulations.
The purpose and object of the conspiracy was
to unlawfully export goods from the United
States through transshipment points to Syria,
including to Syrian Arab Airlines (‘‘Syrian
Air’’), the flag carrier airline of Syria and a
Specially Designated Global Terrorist
(‘‘SDGT’’), and in doing so evade the
prohibitions and licensing requirements of
the Regulations and avoid detection by U.S.
law enforcement.
1 The Regulations originally issued under the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended, 50
U.S.C. 4601–4623 (Supp. III 2015) (‘‘the EAA’’),
which lapsed on August 21, 2001. The President,
through Executive Order 13,222 of August 17, 2001
(3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which was
extended by successive Presidential Notices,
continued the Regulations in full force and effect
under the International Emergency Economic
Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2012)
(‘‘IEEPA’’). On August 13, 2018, the President
signed into law the John S. McCain National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019,
which includes the Export Control Reform Act of
2018, 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852 (‘‘ECRA’’). While
Section 1766 of ECRA repeals the provisions of the
EAA (except for three sections which are
inapplicable here), Section 1768 of ECRA provides,
in pertinent part, that all rules and regulations that
were made or issued under the EAA, including as
continued in effect pursuant to IEEPA, and were in
effect as of ECRA’s date of enactment (August 13,
2018), shall continue in effect according to their
terms until modified, superseded, set aside, or
revoked through action undertaken pursuant to the
authority provided under ECRA. The Regulations
are currently codified in the Code of Federal
Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730–774 (2018). The
charged violation occurred in 2013–2014. The
Regulations governing the violation at issue are
found in the 2013–2014 versions of the Code of
Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774 (2013–
2014)). The 2019 Regulations set forth the
procedures that apply to this matter.
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 61870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24738]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Action Affecting Export Privilege: Rasheed Al Jijakli; Correction
Summary: In the Federal Register of Monday, October 7, 2019, the
Bureau of Industry and Security published an Order denying the export
privileges of Rasheed Al Jijakli. The Order inadvertently referenced
the U.S. District Court as the ``U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Georgia'' instead of the ``United States District Court for
the Central District of California''. This notice is being published to
correct the name of the U.S. District Court.
Correction:
In the Federal Register of Monday, October 7, 2019, in FR Doc.
2019-21745, on page 53405, in the first full paragraph of the third
column, the correct name of the U.S. District Court should read as
follows ``. . . in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California . . .''
Issued this 7th day of November 2019.
Karen H. Nies-Vogel,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 2019-24738 Filed 11-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-P
