Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 61908-61909 [2019-24727]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
61908
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Notices
Dated: November 8, 2019.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–24757 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of
the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, if any, are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank indicated. The
applications will also be available for
inspection at the offices of the Board of
Governors. Interested persons may
express their views in writing on the
standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of
the Act.
Comments regarding each of these
applications must be received at the
Federal Reserve Bank indicated or the
offices of the Board of Governors, Ann
E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20551–0001, not later
than November 27, 2019.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice
President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198–0001:
1. BF Bank Partners LP and Main
Street Banking Partners LP, both of
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; as members
acting in concert with the Rainbolt
Family Control Group, to acquire voting
shares of BancFirst Corporation and
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of BancFirst, both of Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma, and Pegasus Bank, Dallas,
Texas. The individuals who serve as the
general partners of BF Bank Partners LP
and Main Street Banking Partners LP,
David E. Rainbolt and Leslie J. Rainbolt,
respectively, both of Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma, were previously approved
under the Act and Regulation Y to
acquire the voting shares that are the
subject of this notice.
2. The Commerce Bank and Trust
Holding Company Employee Stock
Ownership Plan, David S. Frick as Plan
Administrator, both of Topeka, Kansas;
to acquire voting shares of Commerce
Bank and Trust Holding Company and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares
of CoreFirst Bank & Trust, both of
Topeka, Kansas.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(David L. Hubbard, Senior Manager)
P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri
63166–2034. Comments can also be sent
electronically to
Comments.applications@stls.frb.org:
1. Charles S. Penick, individually, and
together with the Charles S. Penick Mary
Michele Penick Revocable Trust,
Charles S. Penick and Mary Michele
Penick as co-trustees; the M. Michele
Penick Irrevocable Trust, Mary Michele
Penick, trustee; Mary Michele Penick;
Mary Reese Fisher; and Ella Bleu Fisher,
all of Morrilton, Arkansas; Edward M.
Penick; George Penick; and Diane L.
Tait, all of Little Rock, Arkansas; Megan
Penick Voss; Beau Steven Voss; and
Finlee Dru Voss, all of Solgohachia,
Arkansas; and Mollie Penick Tanner,
Rison, Arkansas; as members of a group
acting in concert to retain voting shares
of Petit Jean Bancshares, Inc., and
thereby indirectly retain voting shares of
Petit Jean State Bank, both of Morrilton,
Arkansas.
C. Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director,
Applications and Enforcement) 101
Market Street, San Francisco, California
94105–1579:
1. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Wellfleet
New York Insurance Company,
Berkshire Hathaway Assurance
Corporation, Berkshire Hathaway
Homestate Insurance Company,
Berkshire Hathaway International
Insurance Ltd, Berkshire Hathaway Life
Insurance Company of Nebraska,
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance
Company, BH Finance LLC, BHG Life
Insurance Company, California
Insurance Company, Central States
Indemnity Company of Omaha,
Columbia Insurance Company,
Continental Indemnity Company,
Cypress Insurance Company, Finial
Reinsurance Company, First Berkshire
Hathaway Life Insurance Company,
National Fire & Marine Insurance
Company, National Indemnity
Company, National Liability & Fire
Insurance Company, National
Indemnity Company of Mid America,
National Indemnity Company of the
South, NRG America Holding Company,
and Oak River Insurance Company, all
of Omaha, Nebraska; Am GUARD
Insurance Company and NorGUARD
Insurance Company, both of WilkesBarre, Pennsylvania; Government
Employees Insurance Company, GEICO
Indemnity Company, and GEICO Marine
Insurance Company, all of Chevy Chase,
Maryland; General Re Life Corporation,
General Reinsurance Corporation,
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
General Star Indemnity Company,
General Star National Insurance
Company, and Genesis Insurance
Company, all of Stamford, Connecticut;
Medical Protective Company and
Princeton Insurance Company, both of
Ft. Wayne, Indiana; Mt. Vernon Fire
Insurance Company and United States
Liability Insurance Company, both of
Wayne, Pennsylvania; and Old United
Casualty Company, Merriam, Kansas; to
retain over 10 percent, and to acquire up
to 24.99 percent, of the voting shares of
Bank of America Corporation, Charlotte,
North Carolina, and thereby indirectly
retain and acquire voting shares of Bank
of America, National Association,
Charlotte, North Carolina and Bank of
America California, National
Association, San Francisco, California.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, November 8, 2019.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2019–24735 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–20–19ACI]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
has submitted the information
collection request titled Sealant
Efficiency Assessment for Locals and
States (SEALS) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. CDC previously
published a ‘‘Proposed Data Collection
Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations’’ notice on April 8,
2019 to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. CDC did
not receive comments related to the
previous notice. This notice serves to
allow an additional 30 days for public
and affected agency comments.
CDC will accept all comments for this
proposed information collection project.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
that:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
61909
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Notices
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected;
(d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including, through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and
(e) Assess information collection
costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Direct
written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice to the Attention: CDC Desk
Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202)
395–5806. Provide written comments
within 30 days of notice publication.
Proposed Project
Sealant Efficiency Assessment for
Locals and States (SEALS)—Existing
Collection in use without an OMB
Control Number—National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
By age 19, 67% of U.S. adolescents
living in poverty have experienced tooth
decay and 27% have at least one
decayed tooth needing treatment.
School sealant programs (SSP) provide
dental sealants, which protect against
80% of cavities for two years, and
continue to protect against 50% of
cavities for up to four years.
Little is known about school sealant
program delivery logistics, resource
costs, or the quantity of resources used
per unit of service or per averted cavity.
The previously mentioned economic
model on the cost-effectiveness of SSPs
could find no recent studies on SSP cost
in the U.S. and relied on the findings
from four studies, all published before
2001. A systematic review of economic
evaluations of SSPs conducted further
found wide variation in reported cost
per child, ranging from $33 to $163.
Information on the cost and efficiency of
SSPs could help these programs become
more efficient and provide more
services per dollar in their budget.
CDC requests information from states
regarding children’s cavity risk, oneyear sealant retention rate, sealant
program services delivered, and school
sealant program cost and quantity of
resources used at each school event.
This data will allow CDC and states to
monitor the performance and efficiency
of their SSPs, which will improve and
extend program delivery to more
children.
At the beginning of each school year,
SSPs electronically enter a list of
schools they plan to serve (Add
Schools), information about their
program delivery logistics (Program
Options), and per unit resource costs
(Cost Options). Data from the previous
funding period suggest that one SSP
typically serves 20 schools. At each
school event, SSPs enter information
about resource use, children’s risk for
tooth decay, and delivered services
(Add Event). Information collected at
each school can be entered
electronically onsite, or collected on
paper form and entered electronically at
a later date. At the end of the school
year, SSPs enter administrative costs
(e.g., office supplies, rent, computers)
electronically, and within nine to 15
months after first visiting the school,
they enter information about sealant
retention. Effectiveness of resin-based
sealants is directly tied to retention, in
that a retained sealant is 100% effective
at preventing cavities. Because of this,
many SSPs sample a few children for
retention when they visit the school the
next year to deliver services to new
students.
CDC proposes to conduct a
benchmarking analysis to identify the
set of efficient SSPs and factors/
practices associated with efficiency.
Findings from the CDC benchmarking
analyses will be submitted for
publication in peer-reviewed journals
and presented at the National Oral
Health Conference. Findings will also be
shared with the Association of State and
Territorial Dental Directors (ASTDD),
the oral health divisions in HRSA and
CMS, and the National Institutes of
Dental and Craniofacial Research. This
information will inform entities
considering implementing SSPs; assist
local SSPs and state oral health
departments to monitor efficiency and
impact; identify best practices; and
document if and how SSPs are a good
investment of public health dollars.
CDC requests OMB clearance for three
years. The total estimated annualized
burden hours is 1,388. There are no
costs to respondents other than their
time.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Form name
State Sealant Administrator ............................
SSP Local Administrator .................................
Add Program and Add User ..........................
Add User and Add School .............................
Program Options and Cost Options ...............
Add Event .......................................................
Number of
responses per
respondent
18
162
162
162
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of Science,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019–24727 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
1
1
1
20
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
45/60
43/60
46/60
21/60
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61908-61909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24727]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30Day-20-19ACI]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted the information
collection request titled Sealant Efficiency Assessment for Locals and
States (SEALS) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review
and approval. CDC previously published a ``Proposed Data Collection
Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations'' notice on April 8,
2019 to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. CDC did
not receive comments related to the previous notice. This notice serves
to allow an additional 30 days for public and affected agency comments.
CDC will accept all comments for this proposed information
collection project. The Office of Management and Budget is particularly
interested in comments that:
(a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
[[Page 61909]]
(b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected;
(d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including, through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses; and
(e) Assess information collection costs.
To request additional information on the proposed project or to
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to [email protected]. Direct written comments
and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice to the
Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Provide
written comments within 30 days of notice publication.
Proposed Project
Sealant Efficiency Assessment for Locals and States (SEALS)--
Existing Collection in use without an OMB Control Number--National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP),
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
By age 19, 67% of U.S. adolescents living in poverty have
experienced tooth decay and 27% have at least one decayed tooth needing
treatment. School sealant programs (SSP) provide dental sealants, which
protect against 80% of cavities for two years, and continue to protect
against 50% of cavities for up to four years.
Little is known about school sealant program delivery logistics,
resource costs, or the quantity of resources used per unit of service
or per averted cavity. The previously mentioned economic model on the
cost-effectiveness of SSPs could find no recent studies on SSP cost in
the U.S. and relied on the findings from four studies, all published
before 2001. A systematic review of economic evaluations of SSPs
conducted further found wide variation in reported cost per child,
ranging from $33 to $163. Information on the cost and efficiency of
SSPs could help these programs become more efficient and provide more
services per dollar in their budget.
CDC requests information from states regarding children's cavity
risk, one-year sealant retention rate, sealant program services
delivered, and school sealant program cost and quantity of resources
used at each school event. This data will allow CDC and states to
monitor the performance and efficiency of their SSPs, which will
improve and extend program delivery to more children.
At the beginning of each school year, SSPs electronically enter a
list of schools they plan to serve (Add Schools), information about
their program delivery logistics (Program Options), and per unit
resource costs (Cost Options). Data from the previous funding period
suggest that one SSP typically serves 20 schools. At each school event,
SSPs enter information about resource use, children's risk for tooth
decay, and delivered services (Add Event). Information collected at
each school can be entered electronically onsite, or collected on paper
form and entered electronically at a later date. At the end of the
school year, SSPs enter administrative costs (e.g., office supplies,
rent, computers) electronically, and within nine to 15 months after
first visiting the school, they enter information about sealant
retention. Effectiveness of resin-based sealants is directly tied to
retention, in that a retained sealant is 100% effective at preventing
cavities. Because of this, many SSPs sample a few children for
retention when they visit the school the next year to deliver services
to new students.
CDC proposes to conduct a benchmarking analysis to identify the set
of efficient SSPs and factors/practices associated with efficiency.
Findings from the CDC benchmarking analyses will be submitted for
publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at the National
Oral Health Conference. Findings will also be shared with the
Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors (ASTDD), the oral
health divisions in HRSA and CMS, and the National Institutes of Dental
and Craniofacial Research. This information will inform entities
considering implementing SSPs; assist local SSPs and state oral health
departments to monitor efficiency and impact; identify best practices;
and document if and how SSPs are a good investment of public health
dollars.
CDC requests OMB clearance for three years. The total estimated
annualized burden hours is 1,388. There are no costs to respondents
other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondents Form name Number of responses per per response
respondents respondent (in hours)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Sealant Administrator........... Add Program and Add User 18 1 45/60
SSP Local Administrator............... Add User and Add School. 162 1 43/60
Program Options and Cost 162 1 46/60
Options.
Add Event............... 162 20 21/60
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffrey M. Zirger,
Lead, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of Science, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2019-24727 Filed 11-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
