Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band, 61863-61867 [2019-24670]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
this chapter of such notice, or on appeal
under section 307 of the Clean Air Act
of a decision rendered under part 78 of
this chapter on appeal of such notice,
then the Administrator will use the data
as so revised to recalculate the amounts
of Texas SO2 Trading Program
allowances that owners and operators
are required to hold in accordance with
the calculation formula in
§ 97.906(c)(2)(i) for such control period
with regard to the Texas SO2 Trading
Program sources and Texas SO2 Trading
Program units involved, provided that
such litigation under part 78 of this
chapter, or the proceeding under part 78
of this chapter that resulted in the
decision appealed in such litigation
under section 307 of the Clean Air Act,
was initiated no later than 30 days after
promulgation of such notice required in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B) of this section.
(ii) [Reserved]
(iii) If the revised data are used to
recalculate, in accordance with
paragraph (b)(6)(i) of this section, the
amount of Texas SO2 Trading Program
allowances that the owners and
operators are required to hold for such
control period with regard to the Texas
SO2 Trading Program sources and Texas
SO2 Trading Program units involved—
(A) Where the amount of Texas SO2
Trading Program allowances that the
owners and operators are required to
hold increases as a result of the use of
all such revised data, the Administrator
will establish a new, reasonable
deadline on which the owners and
operators shall hold the additional
amount of Texas SO2 Trading Program
allowances in the assurance account
established by the Administrator for the
appropriate Texas SO2 Trading Program
sources and Texas SO2 Trading Program
units under paragraph (b)(3) of this
section. The owners’ and operators’
failure to hold such additional amount,
as required, before the new deadline
shall not be a violation of the Clean Air
Act. The owners’ and operators’ failure
to hold such additional amount, as
required, as of the new deadline shall be
a violation of the Clean Air Act. Each
Texas SO2 Trading Program allowance
that the owners and operators fail to
hold as required as of the new deadline,
and each day in such control period,
shall be a separate violation of the Clean
Air Act.
(B) For the owners and operators for
which the amount of Texas SO2 Trading
Program allowances required to be held
decreases as a result of the use of all
such revised data, the Administrator
will record, in all accounts from which
Texas SO2 Trading Program allowances
were transferred by such owners and
operators for such control period to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
assurance account established by the
Administrator for the appropriate Texas
SO2 Trading Program sources and Texas
SO2 Trading Program units under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section, a total
amount of the Texas SO2 Trading
Program allowances held in such
assurance account equal to the amount
of the decrease. If Texas SO2 Trading
Program allowances were transferred to
such assurance account from more than
one account, the amount of Texas SO2
Trading Program allowances recorded in
each such transferor account will be in
proportion to the percentage of the total
amount of Texas SO2 Trading Program
allowances transferred to such
assurance account for such control
period from such transferor account.
(C) Each Texas SO2 Trading Program
allowance held under paragraph
(b)(6)(iii)(A) of this section as a result of
recalculation of requirements under the
Texas SO2 Trading Program assurance
provisions for such control period must
be a Texas SO2 Trading Program
allowance allocated for a control period
in a year before or the year immediately
following, or in the same year as, the
year of such control period.
§ 97.926
[Amended]
12. Amend § 97.926 paragraph (b) by
adding after the text ‘‘§ 97.924,’’ the text
‘‘§ 97.925,’’.
■
§ 97.928
[Amended]
13. Amend § 97.928 paragraph (b) by
removing the text ‘‘a compliance
account,’’ and adding in its place the
text ‘‘a compliance account or an
assurance account,’’.
■
§ 97.931
[Amended]
14. Amend § 97.931 paragraph (d)(3)
introductory text by removing after the
text ‘‘is replaced by’’ the text ‘‘with’’.
■
[FR Doc. 2019–24286 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[WT Docket No. 02–55; FCC 19–108]
Improving Public Safety
Communications in the 800 MHz Band
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document the
Commission takes steps to streamline
our rules and procedures to accelerate
the successful conclusion of the
Commission’s 800 MHz band
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61863
reconfiguration program, or rebanding.
The document seeks comment on the
proposed rule deletions.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
December 16, 2019 and reply comments
are due on or before December 30, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by WT Docket No. 02–55, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal Communications
Commission’s website: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roberto Mussenden, Policy and
Licensing Division, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418–
1428.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking in WT Docket No.
02–55, FCC 19–108, released on October
28, 2019. The complete text of this
document is available for download at
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/.
The complete text of this document is
also available for inspection and
copying during normal business hours
in the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an email to
FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
1. In the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM), the Commission,
recognizing that it has determined that
Sprint did not reap an economic
windfall from the spectrum award that
Sprint received in exchange for
undertaking the financial obligation to
support 800 MHz rebanding, proposes
eliminating the rule that requires an
annual auditing of Sprint’s rebanding
expenditures by the 800 MHz Transition
Administrator. The NPRM seeks
comment on proposed procedures for
eliminating the requirement that each
rebanding agreement be reviewed and
E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM
14NOP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
61864
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
approved by the 800 MHz Transition
Administrator.
2. Pursuant to §§ 1.415 and 1.419 of
the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments in WT
Docket No. 02–55 on or before the dates
indicated on the first page of this
document. Comments may be filed
using the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS). See
Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW, Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed
of before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
Accessible Formats: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
3. Commenters who file information
that they believe should be withheld
from public inspection may request
confidential treatment pursuant to
§ 0.459 of the Commission’s rules.
Commenters should file both their
original comments for which they
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
request confidentiality and redacted
comments, along with their request for
confidential treatment. Commenters
should not file proprietary information
electronically. See Examination of
Current Policy Concerning the
Treatment of Confidential Information
Submitted to the Commission, Report
and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 24816 (1998),
Order on Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd
20128 (1999). Even if the Commission
grants confidential treatment,
information that does not fall within a
specific exemption pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
must be publicly disclosed pursuant to
an appropriate request. See 47 CFR
0.461; 5 U.S.C. 552. We note that the
Commission may grant requests for
confidential treatment either
conditionally or unconditionally. As
such, we note that the Commission has
the discretion to release information on
public interest grounds that does fall
within the scope of a FOIA exemption.
4. This proceeding shall be treated as
a ‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with Section
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
Section 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Procedural Matters
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
5. The Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis required by section 604 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 604,
is included in Appendix B of the NPRM.
6. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA), the Commission prepared this
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) of the possible significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities by the policies
and rules proposed in this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Written
public comments are requested on this
IRFA. Comments must be filed by the
same dates as listed on the first page of
the NPRM and must have a separate and
distinct heading designating them as
responses to this IRFA. The Commission
will send a copy of the NPRM, including
this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA). In addition, the
NPRM and IRFA (or summaries thereof)
will be published in the Federal
Register.
B. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
7. The Commission initiates this
rulemaking proceeding to seek comment
on certain proposals designed to
improve the efficiency of the 800 MHz
band reconfiguration process set out in
the 800 MHz Report and Order, and to
advance the conclusion the rebanding
process. The Commission initiated the
800 MHz rebanding program to alleviate
harmful interference to 800 MHz public
safety radio systems caused by their
proximity in the band to the 800 MHz
commercial cellular system operated by
Sprint Corporation (Sprint). To increase
the spectral separation between Sprint
and public safety, Sprint was required
to relocate its system to spectrum at the
upper end of the band and public safety
licensees were relocated to the lower
end of the band. Sprint was also
required to pay the accumulated
relocation costs of public safety
licensees as well as its own relocation
costs, and in exchange Sprint received
a separate block of spectrum outside of
the 800 MHz band from the
Commission. At the outset of the
rebanding program, the Commission
E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM
14NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
imposed an ‘‘anti-windfall’’ obligation
on Sprint to ensure that Sprint did not
reap an economic windfall from the
spectrum award that Sprint received in
exchange for undertaking the financial
obligation to support 800 MHz
rebanding.
8. In the Order the Commission
eliminates certain obligations imposed
on the 800 MHz Transition
Administrator which are no longer
necessary in light of the Public Safety
and Homeland Security Bureau’s order
determining that Sprint no longer is
responsible for making a windfall
payment to the Treasury. The changes
apply to 800 MHz licensees that either
(a) have not completed the rebanding
process; or (b) having completed the
rebanding process have not fulfilled the
contract-closing obligations imposed on
them by the Commission’s rules and
their Frequency Reconfiguration
Agreements (FRAs) with Sprint. The
changes make relatively small
adjustments to the policies that affect
800 MHz Private Land Mobile Radio
(PLMR) licensees. Additionally, the
changes will also apply to the 800 MHz
Transition Administrator and Sprint,
which as discussed below are not small
entities for purposes of the RFA.
9. The Commission tentatively
concludes that the changes proposed in
the Sixth FNPRM are necessary to
accelerate the conclusion of the
rebanding proceeding initiated in 2002,
thereby lessening the logistic and
economic burdens that certain
procedures impose on the Commission,
the 800 MHz Transition Administrator
and Sprint. The Commission’s
objectives are to improve the rebanding
process now that certain procedures no
longer are necessary and confer no
benefit on the parties to 800 MHz
rebanding.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Legal Basis
10. The proposed action is authorized
under pursuant sections 4(i),4(j), 301,
303, and 403 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
154(i),154(j), 301, 303, and 403.
D. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply
11. The RFA directs the Commission
to provide a description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that will be affected by the
proposed rules. The RFA generally
defines the term ‘‘small entity’’ as
encompassing the terms ‘‘small
business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’ and
‘‘small governmental entity.’’ In
addition, the term ‘‘small business’’ has
the same meaning as the term ‘‘small
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
business concern’’ under the Small
Business Act. A small business concern
is one which: (1) Is independently
owned and operated; (2) is not
dominant in its field of operation; and
(3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
12. Small Businesses, Small
Organizations, and Small Governmental
Jurisdictions. Our actions, over time,
may affect small entities that are not
easily categorized at present. We
therefore describe here, three broad
groups of small entities that could be
directly affected herein. First, while
there are industry specific size
standards for small businesses that are
used in the regulatory flexibility
analysis, according to data from the
SBA’s Office of Advocacy, in general a
small business is an independent
business having fewer than 500
employees. These types of small
businesses represent 99.9% of all
businesses in the United States which
translates to 28.8 million businesses.
13. Next, the type of small entity
described as a ‘‘small organization’’ is
generally ‘‘any not-for-profit enterprise
which is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its
field.’’ Nationwide, as of Aug 2016,
there were approximately 356,494 small
organizations based on registration and
tax data filed by nonprofits with the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
14. Finally, the small entity described
as a ‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’
is defined generally as ‘‘governments of
cities, counties, towns, townships,
villages, school districts, or special
districts, with a population of less than
fifty thousand.’’ U.S. Census Bureau
data from the 2012 Census of
Governments indicates that there were
90,056 local governmental jurisdictions
consisting of general purpose
governments and special purpose
governments in the United States. Of
this number there were 37,132 General
purpose governments (county,
municipal and town or township) with
populations of less than 50,000 and
12,184 Special purpose governments
(independent school districts and
special districts) with populations of
less than 50,000. The 2012 U.S. Census
Bureau data for most types of
governments in the local government
category shows that the majority of
these governments have populations of
less than 50,000. Based on this data we
estimate that at least 49,316 local
government jurisdictions fall in the
category of ‘‘small governmental
jurisdictions.’’
15. Public Safety Radio Licensees. As
a general matter, Public Safety Radio
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
61865
Pool licensees include police, fire, local
government, forestry conservation,
highway maintenance, and emergency
medical services. Because of the vast
array of public safety licensees, the
Commission has not developed a small
business size standard specifically
applicable to public safety licensees.
The closest applicable SBA category is
Wireless Telecommunications Carriers
(except Satellite) which encompasses
business entities engaged in
radiotelephone communications. The
appropriate size standard for this
category under SBA rules is that such a
business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. For this industry, U.S.
Census Bureau data for 2012 show that
there were 967 firms that operated for
the entire year. Of this total, 955 firms
had employment of 999 or fewer
employees and 12 had employment of
1000 employees or more. Thus under
this category and the associated size
standard, the Commission estimates that
the majority of firms can be considered
small.
16. Private Land Mobile Radio
Licensees. Private land mobile radio
(PLMR) systems serve an essential role
in a vast range of industrial, business,
land transportation, and public safety
activities. Companies of all sizes
operating in all U.S. business categories
use these radios. Because of the vast
array of PLMR users, the Commission
has not developed a small business size
standard specifically applicable to
PLMR users. The closest applicable SBA
category is Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite) which encompasses business
entities engaged in radiotelephone
communications. The appropriate size
standard for this category under SBA
rules is that such a business is small if
it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For this
industry, U.S. Census Bureau data for
2012 show that there were 967 firms
that operated for the entire year. Of this
total, 955 firms had employment of 999
or fewer employees and 12 had
employment of 1000 employees or
more. Thus under this category and the
associated size standard, the
Commission estimates that the majority
of PLMR Licensees are small entities.
17. According to the Commission’s
records, a total of approximately
400,622 licenses comprise PLMR users.
Of this number there are a total of
approximately 3,174 PLMR licenses in
the 4.9 GHz band; 29,187 PLMR licenses
in the 800 MHz band; and 3,374 licenses
in the frequencies range 173.225 MHz to
173.375 MHz. The Commission does not
require PLMR licensees to disclose
information about number of employees
and does not have information that
E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM
14NOP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
61866
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
could be used to determine how many
PLMR licensees constitute small entities
under this definition. The Commission
however believes that a substantial
number of PLMR licensees may be small
entities despite the lack of specific
information.
18. Specialized Mobile Radio
Licenses. The Commission awards
‘‘small entity’’ bidding credits in
auctions for Specialized Mobile Radio
(SMR) geographic area licenses in the
800 MHz and 900 MHz bands to firms
that had revenues of no more than $15
million in each of the three previous
calendar years. The Commission awards
‘‘very small entity’’ bidding credits to
firms that had revenues of no more than
$3 million in each of the three previous
calendar years. The SBA has approved
these small business size standards for
the 900 MHz Service. The Commission
has held auctions for geographic area
licenses in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz
bands. The 900 MHz SMR auction began
on December 5, 1995 and closed on
April 15, 1996. Sixty bidders claiming
that they qualified as small businesses
under the $15 million size standard won
263 geographic area licenses in the 900
MHz SMR band. The 800 MHz SMR
auction for the upper 200 channels
began on October 28, 1997 and was
completed on December 8, 1997. Ten
bidders claiming that they qualified as
small businesses under the $15 million
size standard won 38 geographic area
licenses for the upper 200 channels in
the 800 MHz SMR band. A second
auction for the 800 MHz band
conducted in 2002 and included 23 BEA
licenses. One bidder claiming small
business status won five licenses.
19. The auction of the 1,053 800 MHz
SMR geographic area licenses for the
General Category channels was
conducted in 2000. Eleven bidders won
108 geographic area licenses for the
General Category channels in the 800
MHz SMR band and qualified as small
businesses under the $15 million size
standard. In an auction completed in
2000, a total of 2,800 Economic Area
licenses in the lower 80 channels of the
800 MHz SMR service were awarded. Of
the 22 winning bidders, 19 claimed
small business status and won 129
licenses. Thus, combining all four
auctions, 41 winning bidders for
geographic licenses in the 800 MHz
SMR band claimed status as small
businesses.
20. In addition, there are numerous
incumbent site-by-site SMR licenses and
licensees with extended implementation
authorizations in the 800 and 900 MHz
bands. We do not know how many firms
provide 800 MHz or 900 MHz
geographic area SMR service pursuant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
to extended implementation
authorizations, nor how many of these
providers have annual revenues of no
more than $15 million. One firm has
over $15 million in revenues. In
addition, we do not know how many of
these firms have 1,500 or fewer
employees, which is the SBAdetermined size standard. We assume,
for purposes of this analysis, that all of
the remaining extended implementation
authorizations are held by small
entities, as defined by the SBA.
21. Wireless Telecommunications
Carriers (except Satellite). This industry
comprises establishments engaged in
operating and maintaining switching
and transmission facilities to provide
communications via the airwaves.
Establishments in this industry have
spectrum licenses and provide services
using that spectrum, such as cellular
services, paging services, wireless
internet access, and wireless video
services. The appropriate size standard
under SBA rules is that such a business
is small if it has 1,500 or fewer
employees. For this industry, U.S.
Census Bureau data for 2012 show that
there were 967 firms that operated for
the entire year. Of this total, 955 firms
had employment of 999 or fewer
employees and 12 had employment of
1000 employees or more. Thus under
this category and the associated size
standard, the Commission estimates that
the majority of wireless
telecommunications carriers (except
satellite) are small entities.
22. The Commission’s own data—
available in its Universal Licensing
System—indicate that, as of August 31,
2018 there are 265 Cellular licensees.
The Commission does not know how
many of these licensees are small, as the
Commission does not collect that
information for these types of entities.
Similarly, according to internally
developed Commission data, 413
carriers reported that they were engaged
in the provision of wireless telephony,
including cellular service, Personal
Communications Service (PCS), and
Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR)
Telephony services. Of this total, an
estimated 261 have 1,500 or fewer
employees, and 152 have more than
1,500 employees. Thus, using available
data, we estimate that the majority of
wireless firms can be considered small.
E. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
23. The requirements that the
Commission proposes to eliminate in
the Sixth FNPRM will not impose new
or additional reporting, recordkeeping,
or other compliance obligations on a
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
substantial number of small entities.
Nor will small entities be required to
hire attorneys, engineers, consultants, or
other professionals to comply with the
proposed rule change, if adopted. Small
entities that are 800 MHz licensees
participating in the rebanding program
who have negotiated FRAs with Sprint
will no longer be required to have any
costs/payments covered in the FRA or
in any FRA amendments pre-approved
by the TA which should yield them the
benefit of faster completion of their
rebanding process requirement.
F. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
24. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant, specifically
small business, alternatives that it has
considered in reaching its proposed
approach, which may include the
following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance rather than design
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof
for small entities.
25. The NPRM is deregulatory in
nature and will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As mentioned
above small entities should benefit the
proposed rule elimination with faster
completion of their rebanding process.
Faster completion should result in cost
savings for such entities. The alternative
of continuing to require a pre-approval
requirement which is no longer needed
would impose unnecessary burdens on
and would not further or facilitate
prompt completion of the rebanding
process. We note in the Sixth FNPRM
that we will to continue to require 800
MHz licensees to get pre-approval from
the TA for any non-payment related
FRA amendments and to have the
Bureau address any payment related
issues that arise from FRA amendments.
However, to assist in the Commission’s
evaluation of the economic impact on
small entities, and to better explore
options and alternatives, the
Commission has sought comment from
the parties on these matters. The
Commission expects to more fully
consider the economic impact and
alternatives for small entities following
the review of comments and
recommendations filed in response to
E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM
14NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2019 / Proposed Rules
the Sixth FNPRM. proposed rules will
not affect any small entities.
G. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
26. None.
Procedural Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Analysis
27. The Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking document does not
contains new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 90
Radio.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Ordering Clauses
28. Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 301, 303,
and 403 of the Communications Act of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Nov 13, 2019
Jkt 250001
1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i),
154(j), 301, 303, and 403,the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking is hereby
adopted.
29. It is further ordered that pursuant
to applicable procedures set forth in
§§ 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission’s
rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested
parties may file comments on the NPRM
on or before December 16, 2019 and
reply comments on or before December
30, 2019.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 90 as follows:
PART 90—PRIVATE LAND MOBILE
RADIO SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 90
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 303(g),
303(r), 332(c)(7), 1401–1473.
§ 90.676
[Amended]
2. Amend § 90.676 by removing and
reserving paragraph (b)(4).
■
[FR Doc. 2019–24670 Filed 11–13–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
61867
E:\FR\FM\14NOP1.SGM
14NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 61863-61867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24670]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[WT Docket No. 02-55; FCC 19-108]
Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document the Commission takes steps to streamline our
rules and procedures to accelerate the successful conclusion of the
Commission's 800 MHz band reconfiguration program, or rebanding. The
document seeks comment on the proposed rule deletions.
DATES: Comments are due on or before December 16, 2019 and reply
comments are due on or before December 30, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WT Docket No. 02-55,
by any of the following methods:
Federal Communications Commission's website: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: [email protected] or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberto Mussenden, Policy and
Licensing Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202)
418-1428.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in WT Docket No. 02-55, FCC 19-108, released on
October 28, 2019. The complete text of this document is available for
download at https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/. The complete text
of this document is also available for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals
II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. To request
materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille,
large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to
[email protected] or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at
202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
1. In the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), the Commission,
recognizing that it has determined that Sprint did not reap an economic
windfall from the spectrum award that Sprint received in exchange for
undertaking the financial obligation to support 800 MHz rebanding,
proposes eliminating the rule that requires an annual auditing of
Sprint's rebanding expenditures by the 800 MHz Transition
Administrator. The NPRM seeks comment on proposed procedures for
eliminating the requirement that each rebanding agreement be reviewed
and
[[Page 61864]]
approved by the 800 MHz Transition Administrator.
2. Pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's
rules, 47 CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments and
reply comments in WT Docket No. 02-55 on or before the dates indicated
on the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using the
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). See Electronic
Filing of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket
or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th St. SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.
Accessible Formats: To request materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio
format), send an email to [email protected] or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432
(tty).
3. Commenters who file information that they believe should be
withheld from public inspection may request confidential treatment
pursuant to Sec. 0.459 of the Commission's rules. Commenters should
file both their original comments for which they request
confidentiality and redacted comments, along with their request for
confidential treatment. Commenters should not file proprietary
information electronically. See Examination of Current Policy
Concerning the Treatment of Confidential Information Submitted to the
Commission, Report and Order, 13 FCC Rcd 24816 (1998), Order on
Reconsideration, 14 FCC Rcd 20128 (1999). Even if the Commission grants
confidential treatment, information that does not fall within a
specific exemption pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
must be publicly disclosed pursuant to an appropriate request. See 47
CFR 0.461; 5 U.S.C. 552. We note that the Commission may grant requests
for confidential treatment either conditionally or unconditionally. As
such, we note that the Commission has the discretion to release
information on public interest grounds that does fall within the scope
of a FOIA exemption.
4. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose''
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons
making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within
two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex
parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise
participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was
made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during
the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of
the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the
presenter's written comments, memoranda or other filings in the
proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings
(specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data
or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with Section 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
Section 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method
of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto,
must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available
for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
.doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding
should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
Procedural Matters
A. Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
5. The Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis required by section
604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 604, is included in
Appendix B of the NPRM.
6. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended (RFA), the Commission prepared this Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules
proposed in this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Written public
comments are requested on this IRFA. Comments must be filed by the same
dates as listed on the first page of the NPRM and must have a separate
and distinct heading designating them as responses to this IRFA. The
Commission will send a copy of the NPRM, including this IRFA, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA).
In addition, the NPRM and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published
in the Federal Register.
B. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
7. The Commission initiates this rulemaking proceeding to seek
comment on certain proposals designed to improve the efficiency of the
800 MHz band reconfiguration process set out in the 800 MHz Report and
Order, and to advance the conclusion the rebanding process. The
Commission initiated the 800 MHz rebanding program to alleviate harmful
interference to 800 MHz public safety radio systems caused by their
proximity in the band to the 800 MHz commercial cellular system
operated by Sprint Corporation (Sprint). To increase the spectral
separation between Sprint and public safety, Sprint was required to
relocate its system to spectrum at the upper end of the band and public
safety licensees were relocated to the lower end of the band. Sprint
was also required to pay the accumulated relocation costs of public
safety licensees as well as its own relocation costs, and in exchange
Sprint received a separate block of spectrum outside of the 800 MHz
band from the Commission. At the outset of the rebanding program, the
Commission
[[Page 61865]]
imposed an ``anti-windfall'' obligation on Sprint to ensure that Sprint
did not reap an economic windfall from the spectrum award that Sprint
received in exchange for undertaking the financial obligation to
support 800 MHz rebanding.
8. In the Order the Commission eliminates certain obligations
imposed on the 800 MHz Transition Administrator which are no longer
necessary in light of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau's
order determining that Sprint no longer is responsible for making a
windfall payment to the Treasury. The changes apply to 800 MHz
licensees that either (a) have not completed the rebanding process; or
(b) having completed the rebanding process have not fulfilled the
contract-closing obligations imposed on them by the Commission's rules
and their Frequency Reconfiguration Agreements (FRAs) with Sprint. The
changes make relatively small adjustments to the policies that affect
800 MHz Private Land Mobile Radio (PLMR) licensees. Additionally, the
changes will also apply to the 800 MHz Transition Administrator and
Sprint, which as discussed below are not small entities for purposes of
the RFA.
9. The Commission tentatively concludes that the changes proposed
in the Sixth FNPRM are necessary to accelerate the conclusion of the
rebanding proceeding initiated in 2002, thereby lessening the logistic
and economic burdens that certain procedures impose on the Commission,
the 800 MHz Transition Administrator and Sprint. The Commission's
objectives are to improve the rebanding process now that certain
procedures no longer are necessary and confer no benefit on the parties
to 800 MHz rebanding.
C. Legal Basis
10. The proposed action is authorized under pursuant sections
4(i),4(j), 301, 303, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i),154(j), 301, 303, and 403.
D. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which
the Proposed Rules Will Apply
11. The RFA directs the Commission to provide a description of and,
where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that will
be affected by the proposed rules. The RFA generally defines the term
``small entity'' as encompassing the terms ``small business,'' ``small
organization,'' and ``small governmental entity.'' In addition, the
term ``small business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small
business concern'' under the Small Business Act. A small business
concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is
not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the Small Business Administration
(SBA).
12. Small Businesses, Small Organizations, and Small Governmental
Jurisdictions. Our actions, over time, may affect small entities that
are not easily categorized at present. We therefore describe here,
three broad groups of small entities that could be directly affected
herein. First, while there are industry specific size standards for
small businesses that are used in the regulatory flexibility analysis,
according to data from the SBA's Office of Advocacy, in general a small
business is an independent business having fewer than 500 employees.
These types of small businesses represent 99.9% of all businesses in
the United States which translates to 28.8 million businesses.
13. Next, the type of small entity described as a ``small
organization'' is generally ``any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.''
Nationwide, as of Aug 2016, there were approximately 356,494 small
organizations based on registration and tax data filed by nonprofits
with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
14. Finally, the small entity described as a ``small governmental
jurisdiction'' is defined generally as ``governments of cities,
counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special
districts, with a population of less than fifty thousand.'' U.S. Census
Bureau data from the 2012 Census of Governments indicates that there
were 90,056 local governmental jurisdictions consisting of general
purpose governments and special purpose governments in the United
States. Of this number there were 37,132 General purpose governments
(county, municipal and town or township) with populations of less than
50,000 and 12,184 Special purpose governments (independent school
districts and special districts) with populations of less than 50,000.
The 2012 U.S. Census Bureau data for most types of governments in the
local government category shows that the majority of these governments
have populations of less than 50,000. Based on this data we estimate
that at least 49,316 local government jurisdictions fall in the
category of ``small governmental jurisdictions.''
15. Public Safety Radio Licensees. As a general matter, Public
Safety Radio Pool licensees include police, fire, local government,
forestry conservation, highway maintenance, and emergency medical
services. Because of the vast array of public safety licensees, the
Commission has not developed a small business size standard
specifically applicable to public safety licensees. The closest
applicable SBA category is Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except
Satellite) which encompasses business entities engaged in
radiotelephone communications. The appropriate size standard for this
category under SBA rules is that such a business is small if it has
1,500 or fewer employees. For this industry, U.S. Census Bureau data
for 2012 show that there were 967 firms that operated for the entire
year. Of this total, 955 firms had employment of 999 or fewer employees
and 12 had employment of 1000 employees or more. Thus under this
category and the associated size standard, the Commission estimates
that the majority of firms can be considered small.
16. Private Land Mobile Radio Licensees. Private land mobile radio
(PLMR) systems serve an essential role in a vast range of industrial,
business, land transportation, and public safety activities. Companies
of all sizes operating in all U.S. business categories use these
radios. Because of the vast array of PLMR users, the Commission has not
developed a small business size standard specifically applicable to
PLMR users. The closest applicable SBA category is Wireless
Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite) which encompasses
business entities engaged in radiotelephone communications. The
appropriate size standard for this category under SBA rules is that
such a business is small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For this
industry, U.S. Census Bureau data for 2012 show that there were 967
firms that operated for the entire year. Of this total, 955 firms had
employment of 999 or fewer employees and 12 had employment of 1000
employees or more. Thus under this category and the associated size
standard, the Commission estimates that the majority of PLMR Licensees
are small entities.
17. According to the Commission's records, a total of approximately
400,622 licenses comprise PLMR users. Of this number there are a total
of approximately 3,174 PLMR licenses in the 4.9 GHz band; 29,187 PLMR
licenses in the 800 MHz band; and 3,374 licenses in the frequencies
range 173.225 MHz to 173.375 MHz. The Commission does not require PLMR
licensees to disclose information about number of employees and does
not have information that
[[Page 61866]]
could be used to determine how many PLMR licensees constitute small
entities under this definition. The Commission however believes that a
substantial number of PLMR licensees may be small entities despite the
lack of specific information.
18. Specialized Mobile Radio Licenses. The Commission awards
``small entity'' bidding credits in auctions for Specialized Mobile
Radio (SMR) geographic area licenses in the 800 MHz and 900 MHz bands
to firms that had revenues of no more than $15 million in each of the
three previous calendar years. The Commission awards ``very small
entity'' bidding credits to firms that had revenues of no more than $3
million in each of the three previous calendar years. The SBA has
approved these small business size standards for the 900 MHz Service.
The Commission has held auctions for geographic area licenses in the
800 MHz and 900 MHz bands. The 900 MHz SMR auction began on December 5,
1995 and closed on April 15, 1996. Sixty bidders claiming that they
qualified as small businesses under the $15 million size standard won
263 geographic area licenses in the 900 MHz SMR band. The 800 MHz SMR
auction for the upper 200 channels began on October 28, 1997 and was
completed on December 8, 1997. Ten bidders claiming that they qualified
as small businesses under the $15 million size standard won 38
geographic area licenses for the upper 200 channels in the 800 MHz SMR
band. A second auction for the 800 MHz band conducted in 2002 and
included 23 BEA licenses. One bidder claiming small business status won
five licenses.
19. The auction of the 1,053 800 MHz SMR geographic area licenses
for the General Category channels was conducted in 2000. Eleven bidders
won 108 geographic area licenses for the General Category channels in
the 800 MHz SMR band and qualified as small businesses under the $15
million size standard. In an auction completed in 2000, a total of
2,800 Economic Area licenses in the lower 80 channels of the 800 MHz
SMR service were awarded. Of the 22 winning bidders, 19 claimed small
business status and won 129 licenses. Thus, combining all four
auctions, 41 winning bidders for geographic licenses in the 800 MHz SMR
band claimed status as small businesses.
20. In addition, there are numerous incumbent site-by-site SMR
licenses and licensees with extended implementation authorizations in
the 800 and 900 MHz bands. We do not know how many firms provide 800
MHz or 900 MHz geographic area SMR service pursuant to extended
implementation authorizations, nor how many of these providers have
annual revenues of no more than $15 million. One firm has over $15
million in revenues. In addition, we do not know how many of these
firms have 1,500 or fewer employees, which is the SBA-determined size
standard. We assume, for purposes of this analysis, that all of the
remaining extended implementation authorizations are held by small
entities, as defined by the SBA.
21. Wireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite). This
industry comprises establishments engaged in operating and maintaining
switching and transmission facilities to provide communications via the
airwaves. Establishments in this industry have spectrum licenses and
provide services using that spectrum, such as cellular services, paging
services, wireless internet access, and wireless video services. The
appropriate size standard under SBA rules is that such a business is
small if it has 1,500 or fewer employees. For this industry, U.S.
Census Bureau data for 2012 show that there were 967 firms that
operated for the entire year. Of this total, 955 firms had employment
of 999 or fewer employees and 12 had employment of 1000 employees or
more. Thus under this category and the associated size standard, the
Commission estimates that the majority of wireless telecommunications
carriers (except satellite) are small entities.
22. The Commission's own data--available in its Universal Licensing
System--indicate that, as of August 31, 2018 there are 265 Cellular
licensees. The Commission does not know how many of these licensees are
small, as the Commission does not collect that information for these
types of entities. Similarly, according to internally developed
Commission data, 413 carriers reported that they were engaged in the
provision of wireless telephony, including cellular service, Personal
Communications Service (PCS), and Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR)
Telephony services. Of this total, an estimated 261 have 1,500 or fewer
employees, and 152 have more than 1,500 employees. Thus, using
available data, we estimate that the majority of wireless firms can be
considered small.
E. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements
23. The requirements that the Commission proposes to eliminate in
the Sixth FNPRM will not impose new or additional reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance obligations on a substantial number
of small entities. Nor will small entities be required to hire
attorneys, engineers, consultants, or other professionals to comply
with the proposed rule change, if adopted. Small entities that are 800
MHz licensees participating in the rebanding program who have
negotiated FRAs with Sprint will no longer be required to have any
costs/payments covered in the FRA or in any FRA amendments pre-approved
by the TA which should yield them the benefit of faster completion of
their rebanding process requirement.
F. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
24. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business, alternatives that it has considered in
reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four
alternatives (among others): (1) The establishment of differing
compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small entities; (2) the
clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and
reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use
of performance rather than design standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof for small entities.
25. The NPRM is deregulatory in nature and will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As mentioned above small entities should benefit the proposed rule
elimination with faster completion of their rebanding process. Faster
completion should result in cost savings for such entities. The
alternative of continuing to require a pre-approval requirement which
is no longer needed would impose unnecessary burdens on and would not
further or facilitate prompt completion of the rebanding process. We
note in the Sixth FNPRM that we will to continue to require 800 MHz
licensees to get pre-approval from the TA for any non-payment related
FRA amendments and to have the Bureau address any payment related
issues that arise from FRA amendments. However, to assist in the
Commission's evaluation of the economic impact on small entities, and
to better explore options and alternatives, the Commission has sought
comment from the parties on these matters. The Commission expects to
more fully consider the economic impact and alternatives for small
entities following the review of comments and recommendations filed in
response to
[[Page 61867]]
the Sixth FNPRM. proposed rules will not affect any small entities.
G. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rules
26. None.
Procedural Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
27. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking document does not contains
new or modified information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13.
Ordering Clauses
28. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 4(i),
4(j), 301, 303, and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,
47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 301, 303, and 403,the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking is hereby adopted.
29. It is further ordered that pursuant to applicable procedures
set forth in Sec. Sec. 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47
CFR 1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on the NPRM on
or before December 16, 2019 and reply comments on or before December
30, 2019.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 90
Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 90 as follows:
PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 303(g), 303(r), 332(c)(7),
1401-1473.
Sec. 90.676 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 90.676 by removing and reserving paragraph (b)(4).
[FR Doc. 2019-24670 Filed 11-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P