Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 61526-61529 [2019-24508]
Download as PDF
61526
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2019–0042 specifies
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@
faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA;
or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any
service information referenced in EASA AD
2019–0042 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD, RC procedures and tests must be
done to comply with this AD; any procedures
or tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance
with the operator’s maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3229.
15:58 Nov 12, 2019
Jkt 250001
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
October 28, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–24507 Filed 11–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0254; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–011–AD; Amendment
39–19763; AD 2019–20–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319
series airplanes, Model A320–211, –212,
–214, –216, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes, and Model A321–111, –112,
–131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232
airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
report that cracks were detected on
frame (FR) 16 and FR 20 web holes and
passenger door intercostal fitting holes
at the door stop fitting locations. This
AD requires repetitive rototest
inspections of the holes at the door stop
fittings for any cracking, and corrective
actions if necessary, as specified in a
SUMMARY:
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on December 18, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2019–0042, dated February 27,
2019.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) For information about EASA AD 2019–
0042, contact the EASA, Konrad-AdenauerUfer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 89990 6017; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(5) You may view this material at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206–231–3195. This material may
be found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–0439.
(6) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which is incorporated by
reference. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective December
18, 2019.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of December 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: For the material
incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 89990
1000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0254.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0254; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain Airbus SAS Model
A318 and A319 series airplanes, Model
A320–211, –212, –214, –216, –231,
–232, and –233 airplanes, and Model
A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212,
–213, –231, and –232 airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 8, 2019 (84 FR 20054).
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
The NPRM was prompted by a report
that cracks were detected on FR 16 and
FR 20 web holes and passenger door
intercostal fitting holes at the door stop
fitting locations. The NPRM proposed to
require repetitive rototest inspections of
the holes at the door stop fittings for any
cracking, and corrective actions if
necessary.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address
such cracking, which could affect the
structural integrity of the airplane.
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018–0289, dated December 21, 2018
(‘‘EASA AD 2018–0289’’) (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Airbus SAS Model A318 and
A319 series airplanes, Model A320–211,
–212, –214, –216, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes, and Model A321–111, –112,
–131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232
airplanes. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address cracking of FR 16 and FR 20
web holes and passenger door
intercostal fitting holes at the door stop
fitting locations. Such cracking could
affect the structural integrity of the
airplane. See the MCAI for additional
background information.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0254.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the
opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents
the comments received on the NPRM
and the FAA’s response to each
comment.
Request To Provide Relief to
Requirements in an Affected AD
Allegiant Air commented that the
proposed AD states that no AD would
be affected; however, it believes that AD
2018–25–02 would be affected by the
proposed AD. Allegiant Air stated that
paragraph (g)(1) of AD 2018–25–02
requires a revision to the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate Airbus A318/
A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness
Limitation Section Part 2—Damage
Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation Items
(DT–ALI), Variation 6.3, dated October
24, 2017. Allegiant Air commented that
this variation includes ALI tasks
531103–01–2 and 531103–01–3, which
EASA AD 2018–0289 indicated will be
deleted from Airworthiness Limitation
Section Part 2. Allegiant Air stated that
if the NPRM becomes an AD, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Nov 12, 2019
Jkt 250001
proposed AD should be revised to show
that it affects AD 2018–25–02, and it
should also provide relief to the
requirement to include these two ALI
tasks in an operator’s maintenance or
inspection program. Allegiant Air
further commented that EASA AD
2018–0289 states that Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1330 is a terminating
action for the inspections required by
ALI task 531103, which EASA AD
2018–0289 indicates will be deleted.
The FAA agrees to clarify. This AD
does not supersede or terminate AD
2018–25–02. However, ALI tasks
531103–01–2 and 531103–01–3, which
were incorporated into the maintenance
or inspection program as part of the
revision required by AD 2018–25–02,
are affected. This AD allows those tasks
to be terminated as specified in the
provisions of EASA 2018–0289.
• As specified in paragraph (5) of
EASA AD 2018–0289, the inspection
requirements for ALI task 531103 are
cancelled for an airplane if the optional
terminating action specified in
paragraph (5) of EASA AD 2018–0289 is
done.
• As specified in paragraph (6) of
EASA AD 2018–0289, the inspection
requirements for ALI task 531103 are
cancelled at repaired door stop locations
if the optional terminating action
specified in paragraphs (6) of EASA AD
2018–0289 is done.
• As specified in paragraph (7) of
EASA AD 2018–0289, the inspection
requirements for ALI task 531103 are
cancelled if the applicable actions
required by paragraphs (1) through (4) of
EASA AD 2018–0289 are done.
The FAA has not changed this AD in
this regard.
Request To Retain Certain
Requirements
An anonymous commenter requested
that the proposed AD and paragraphs (5)
and (6) of EASA AD 2018–0289, dated
December 21, 2018, be ‘‘retained in any
FAA AD.’’ The commenter also
requested that modification using
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1330
be counted as a terminating action to
any FAA AD, and if this is not possible,
then the commenter requested that the
FAA retain the same requirements of
paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2018–0289.
The FAA infers that the commenter
wants to ensure that the proposed
requirements and provisions are carried
over into the final rule. For clarification,
paragraphs (2), (5), and (6) of EASA AD
2018–0289 are included in the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this
AD, which requires compliance with all
required actions and compliance times
specified in, and in accordance with,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61527
EASA AD 2018–0289. All provisions,
including credit and terminating action
specified in EASA AD 2018–0289 also
apply to this AD. The FAA has not
changed this AD in this regard.
Request To Revise the Compliance
Time
United Airlines (UAL) requested that
ALI task 531103–01–2 be carried over in
the proposed AD with a compliance
time of up to 120 days from the effective
date of the AD or until the ALI is
deleted, whichever occurs later. UAL
commented that EASA AD 2018–0289
specifies that ALI tasks 531103–01–2
and 531103–01–3 will be deleted by
Airbus at the next airworthiness
limitations section revision opportunity;
therefore, there is no reason the ALI task
cannot be carried over because ALI task
531103–01–2 and Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1339 describe
procedures for the same open hole
rotating probe high frequency eddy
current inspection. UAL stated that the
ALI task and the service information
have the same inspection threshold and
intervals. UAL stated that this will
allow operators’ maintenance program
and engineering departments adequate
time to transition internal task cards
and/or engineering orders from the ALI
task to the service information
instructions; transitioning internal
documents immediately after
publication of the proposed AD is not
feasible.
The FAA disagrees with the
commenter’s request. For clarification,
EASA AD 2018–0289 is replacing the
requirements imposed by ALI tasks
531103–01–2 and 531103–01–3. This
AD, as specified in paragraphs (5), (6),
and (7) of EASA AD 2018–0289, allows
for the termination of the ALI tasks if
the conditions stated in the applicable
paragraph are met. Operators have the
option to perform the repetitive
inspections (no change to ALI tasks), or
terminate the repetitive inspections by
complying with the provisions specified
in paragraphs (5), (6), or (7) of EASA AD
2018–0289. The FAA may issue separate
rulemaking in the future that will
require tasks that will replace the
applicable existing ALI tasks. The FAA
has not revised this AD in this regard.
Request To Use a Certain Repair
Drawing
UAL requested that the FAA allow
repair drawing R53113118 to be used for
repair instructions as an alternative to
the corrective action specified in
paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2018–0289.
The FAA disagrees with the
commenter’s request. The repair
drawing will vary based on the
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
61528
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
configuration of the airplane and the
extent of the findings during the
inspection. However, any person may
request approval of an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) under
the provisions of paragraph (i) of this
AD. The FAA has not changed this AD
in this regard.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule as proposed, except for minor
editorial changes. The FAA has
determined that these minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part
51
EASA AD 2018–0289 describes
procedures for repetitive rototest
inspections of the holes at the door stop
fittings for any cracking, and corrective
actions if necessary. This material is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 1,229 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs
to comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
33 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,805 .....................................................................................
$0
$2,805
$3,447,345
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on
the results of any required actions. The
FAA has no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need this
on-condition action:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR ON-CONDITION ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
51 work-hours × $85 per hour = $4,335 .................................................................................................................
$350
$4,685
The FAA has received no definitive
data that would enable the agency to
provide cost estimates for the oncondition repairs specified in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Nov 12, 2019
Jkt 250001
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes and associated appliances to
the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2019–20–10 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39–
19763; Docket No. FAA–2019–0254;
Product Identifier 2019–NM–011–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective December 18, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus SAS
airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
category, as identified in European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2018–0289, dated
December 21, 2018 (‘‘EASA AD 2018–0289’’).
(1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122
airplanes.
(2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes.
(3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216,
–231, –232, and –233 airplanes.
(4) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211,
–212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that
cracks were detected on frame (FR) 16 and
FR 20 web holes and passenger door
intercostal fitting holes at the door stop
fitting locations. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address such cracking, which could affect
the structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018–0289.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018–0289
(1) For purposes of determining
compliance with the requirements of this AD:
Where EASA AD 2018–0289 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2018–0289 does not apply to this AD.
(3) Where Table 1 of EASA AD 2018–0289
refers to a compliance time ‘‘after 31 May
2017,’’ this AD requires using a compliance
time after May 31, 2018 (the effective date of
task 531103–01–1 in ‘‘ALS Part 2 rev. 6’’).
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@
faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Nov 12, 2019
Jkt 250001
or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any
service information referenced in EASA AD
2018–0289 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (i)(2)
of this AD, RC procedures and tests must be
done to comply with this AD; any procedures
or tests that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance
with the operator’s maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–
231–3223.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2018–0289, dated December 21,
2018.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2018–0289, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 89990
6017; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; Internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206–231–3195. EASA AD 2018–
0289 may be found in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2019–0254.
(5) You may view this material that is
incorporated by reference at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@
nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on
October 18, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–24508 Filed 11–12–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61529
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0582; Product
Identifier 2019–NM–034–AD; Amendment
39–19769; AD 2019–21–03]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc., Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc., Model CL–600–1A11
(600), CL–600–2A12 (601), and CL–600–
2B16 (601–3A and 601–3R Variants)
airplanes. This AD was prompted by
reports of the loss of all air data system
information provided to the flightcrew,
which was caused by icing at high
altitudes. This AD requires revising the
existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to
provide the flightcrew with procedures
for ‘‘Unreliable Airspeed’’ that stabilize
the airplane’s airspeed and attitude. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective December
18, 2019.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of December 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 200 Coˆte-Vertu Road
West, Dorval, Que´bec H4S 2A3, Canada;
North America toll-free telephone
1–866–538–1247 or direct-dial
telephone 1–514–855–2999; email
ac.yul@aero.bombardier.com; internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2019–0582.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0582; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61526-61529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24508]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0254; Product Identifier 2019-NM-011-AD; Amendment
39-19763; AD 2019-20-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series airplanes, Model A320-
211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes, and Model A321-
111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. This AD
was prompted by a report that cracks were detected on frame (FR) 16 and
FR 20 web holes and passenger door intercostal fitting holes at the
door stop fitting locations. This AD requires repetitive rototest
inspections of the holes at the door stop fittings for any cracking,
and corrective actions if necessary, as specified in a European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective December 18, 2019.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 18,
2019.
ADDRESSES: For the material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2019-0254.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0254; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-3223.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus SAS
Model A318 and A319 series airplanes, Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216,
-231, -232, and -233 airplanes, and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -
212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 8, 2019 (84 FR 20054).
[[Page 61527]]
The NPRM was prompted by a report that cracks were detected on FR 16
and FR 20 web holes and passenger door intercostal fitting holes at the
door stop fitting locations. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive
rototest inspections of the holes at the door stop fittings for any
cracking, and corrective actions if necessary.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address such cracking, which could
affect the structural integrity of the airplane.
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2018-0289, dated December 21, 2018
(``EASA AD 2018-0289'') (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series
airplanes, Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes, and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and
-232 airplanes. The FAA is issuing this AD to address cracking of FR 16
and FR 20 web holes and passenger door intercostal fitting holes at the
door stop fitting locations. Such cracking could affect the structural
integrity of the airplane. See the MCAI for additional background
information.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2019-0254.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Provide Relief to Requirements in an Affected AD
Allegiant Air commented that the proposed AD states that no AD
would be affected; however, it believes that AD 2018-25-02 would be
affected by the proposed AD. Allegiant Air stated that paragraph (g)(1)
of AD 2018-25-02 requires a revision to the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate Airbus A318/A319/
A320/A321 Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2--Damage Tolerant
Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT-ALI), Variation 6.3, dated October
24, 2017. Allegiant Air commented that this variation includes ALI
tasks 531103-01-2 and 531103-01-3, which EASA AD 2018-0289 indicated
will be deleted from Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2. Allegiant
Air stated that if the NPRM becomes an AD, the proposed AD should be
revised to show that it affects AD 2018-25-02, and it should also
provide relief to the requirement to include these two ALI tasks in an
operator's maintenance or inspection program. Allegiant Air further
commented that EASA AD 2018-0289 states that Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1330 is a terminating action for the inspections required by
ALI task 531103, which EASA AD 2018-0289 indicates will be deleted.
The FAA agrees to clarify. This AD does not supersede or terminate
AD 2018-25-02. However, ALI tasks 531103-01-2 and 531103-01-3, which
were incorporated into the maintenance or inspection program as part of
the revision required by AD 2018-25-02, are affected. This AD allows
those tasks to be terminated as specified in the provisions of EASA
2018-0289.
As specified in paragraph (5) of EASA AD 2018-0289, the
inspection requirements for ALI task 531103 are cancelled for an
airplane if the optional terminating action specified in paragraph (5)
of EASA AD 2018-0289 is done.
As specified in paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2018-0289, the
inspection requirements for ALI task 531103 are cancelled at repaired
door stop locations if the optional terminating action specified in
paragraphs (6) of EASA AD 2018-0289 is done.
As specified in paragraph (7) of EASA AD 2018-0289, the
inspection requirements for ALI task 531103 are cancelled if the
applicable actions required by paragraphs (1) through (4) of EASA AD
2018-0289 are done.
The FAA has not changed this AD in this regard.
Request To Retain Certain Requirements
An anonymous commenter requested that the proposed AD and
paragraphs (5) and (6) of EASA AD 2018-0289, dated December 21, 2018,
be ``retained in any FAA AD.'' The commenter also requested that
modification using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1330 be counted as a
terminating action to any FAA AD, and if this is not possible, then the
commenter requested that the FAA retain the same requirements of
paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2018-0289.
The FAA infers that the commenter wants to ensure that the proposed
requirements and provisions are carried over into the final rule. For
clarification, paragraphs (2), (5), and (6) of EASA AD 2018-0289 are
included in the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD, which
requires compliance with all required actions and compliance times
specified in, and in accordance with, EASA AD 2018-0289. All
provisions, including credit and terminating action specified in EASA
AD 2018-0289 also apply to this AD. The FAA has not changed this AD in
this regard.
Request To Revise the Compliance Time
United Airlines (UAL) requested that ALI task 531103-01-2 be
carried over in the proposed AD with a compliance time of up to 120
days from the effective date of the AD or until the ALI is deleted,
whichever occurs later. UAL commented that EASA AD 2018-0289 specifies
that ALI tasks 531103-01-2 and 531103-01-3 will be deleted by Airbus at
the next airworthiness limitations section revision opportunity;
therefore, there is no reason the ALI task cannot be carried over
because ALI task 531103-01-2 and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1339
describe procedures for the same open hole rotating probe high
frequency eddy current inspection. UAL stated that the ALI task and the
service information have the same inspection threshold and intervals.
UAL stated that this will allow operators' maintenance program and
engineering departments adequate time to transition internal task cards
and/or engineering orders from the ALI task to the service information
instructions; transitioning internal documents immediately after
publication of the proposed AD is not feasible.
The FAA disagrees with the commenter's request. For clarification,
EASA AD 2018-0289 is replacing the requirements imposed by ALI tasks
531103-01-2 and 531103-01-3. This AD, as specified in paragraphs (5),
(6), and (7) of EASA AD 2018-0289, allows for the termination of the
ALI tasks if the conditions stated in the applicable paragraph are met.
Operators have the option to perform the repetitive inspections (no
change to ALI tasks), or terminate the repetitive inspections by
complying with the provisions specified in paragraphs (5), (6), or (7)
of EASA AD 2018-0289. The FAA may issue separate rulemaking in the
future that will require tasks that will replace the applicable
existing ALI tasks. The FAA has not revised this AD in this regard.
Request To Use a Certain Repair Drawing
UAL requested that the FAA allow repair drawing R53113118 to be
used for repair instructions as an alternative to the corrective action
specified in paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2018-0289.
The FAA disagrees with the commenter's request. The repair drawing
will vary based on the
[[Page 61528]]
configuration of the airplane and the extent of the findings during the
inspection. However, any person may request approval of an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) under the provisions of paragraph (i) of
this AD. The FAA has not changed this AD in this regard.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule as proposed, except for minor
editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2018-0289 describes procedures for repetitive rototest
inspections of the holes at the door stop fittings for any cracking,
and corrective actions if necessary. This material is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1,229 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
33 work-hours x $85 per hour = $2,805........................ $0 $2,805 $3,447,345
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need this on-condition action:
Estimated Costs for On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
51 work-hours x $85 per hour = $4,335. $350 $4,685
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the
agency to provide cost estimates for the on-condition repairs specified
in this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2019-20-10 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-19763; Docket No. FAA-2019-0254;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-011-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective December 18, 2019.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus SAS airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
[[Page 61529]]
category, as identified in European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2018-0289, dated December 21, 2018 (``EASA AD 2018-0289'').
(1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
(2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
(3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes.
(4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that cracks were detected on
frame (FR) 16 and FR 20 web holes and passenger door intercostal
fitting holes at the door stop fitting locations. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address such cracking, which could affect the structural
integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018-0289.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018-0289
(1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where EASA AD 2018-0289 refers to its effective date,
this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2018-0289 does not apply
to this AD.
(3) Where Table 1 of EASA AD 2018-0289 refers to a compliance
time ``after 31 May 2017,'' this AD requires using a compliance time
after May 31, 2018 (the effective date of task 531103-01-1 in ``ALS
Part 2 rev. 6'').
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2018-0289 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, RC
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax 206-231-3223.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2018-0289, dated
December 21, 2018.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2018-0289, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-
Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 89990 6017; email
[email protected]; Internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. EASA AD
2018-0289 may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2019-0254.
(5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on October 18, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-24508 Filed 11-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P