Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company-Acquisition and Operation-Certain Rail Lines of CSX Transportation, Inc. in Onondaga, Oswego, Jefferson, Saint Lawrence, and Franklin Counties, NY, 60468-60472 [2019-24438]
Download as PDF
60468
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Notices
Badger Group, a Wisconsin corporation
that holds all equity interests in Badger
Coaches,1 which operates primarily as a
motor carrier providing interstate
charter services in Wisconsin and its
surrounding areas, as well as intrastate
passenger line run, shuttle, and charter
services in Wisconsin. (Id. at 1, 3.)
Badger Coaches holds interstate, and
Wisconsin intrastate, passenger motor
carrier authority. Badger Coaches
utilizes approximately 71 passenger
vehicles and 96 drivers.2 (Id. at 3.)
Holdings represents that Sellers own
all the issued and outstanding equity
stock of Badger Group. (Id. at 5.)
Holdings also states that Sellers do not
have any direct or indirect ownership
interest in any interstate passenger
motor carrier other than Badger Coaches
as described above. (Id.)
Holdings represents that, through this
transaction, it will acquire all of the
outstanding equity and voting stock of
Badger Group, which will place Badger
Coaches under Holdings’ control. (Id.)
Under 49 U.S.C. 14303(b), the Board
must approve and authorize a
transaction that it finds consistent with
the public interest, taking into
consideration at least: (1) The effect of
the proposed transaction on the
adequacy of transportation to the public,
(2) the total fixed charges that result,
and (3) the interest of affected carrier
employees. Holdings has submitted the
information required by 49 CFR 1182.2,
including information to demonstrate
that the proposed transaction is
consistent with the public interest
under 49 U.S.C. 14303(b), see 49 CFR
1182.2(a)(7), and a jurisdictional
statement under 49 U.S.C. 14303(g) that
the aggregate gross operating revenues
of TDM and Badger Coaches exceeded
$2 million during the 12-month period
immediately preceding the filing of the
application, see 49 CFR 1182.2(a)(5).
Holdings states that it does not expect
the proposed transaction to have a
material, detrimental impact on the
adequacy of transportation services
available to the public. (Appl. 6.)
Holdings anticipates that services to the
public will be improved as efficiencies
are realized and capacity is added. (Id.)
Holdings states that for the foreseeable
future, Badger Coaches will continue to
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
1 Additional
information about Badger Coaches
(also referred to in the application as Badger Coach)
and TDM, including U.S. Department of
Transportation (USDOT) numbers, motor carrier
numbers, and USDOT safety fitness ratings, can be
found in the application. (See Appl. 2–4.)
2 Holdings states that Badger Group also holds all
of the equity interests in Wisconsin intrastate
passenger carriers Badger Bus Lines, Inc., and Meier
Truck Services, LLC, and in noncarriers Badger
Tour & Travel, LLC, and Meier Coach Leasing. (Id.
at 3–4.)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
provide the same services it currently
provides under the same name, but will
operate as a subsidiary of Holdings,
which is experienced in passenger
transportation operations. (Id.) Holdings
explains that Badger Coaches is
experienced in some of the same market
segments already served by Holdings’
subsidiary, TDM. (Id. at 6–7.) Thus, the
transaction is expected to result in
operating efficiencies and cost savings
derived from economies of scale and
increased purchasing power, all of
which will help ensure the provision of
adequate service to the public. (Id. at 7.)
Holdings also asserts that its acquisition
of control of Badger Coaches will
enhance the viability of Badger Coaches,
Holdings, and TDM, which will in turn
ensure the continued availability of
adequate passenger transportation
service for the public. (Id.)
Holdings claims that neither
competition nor the public interest will
be adversely affected by the proposed
transaction. (Id. at 9.) Holdings explains
that the market is competitive for motor
coach passenger line-run, shuttle, and
interstate charter services in Madison,
Wis., and Southern Wisconsin (the
Service Area). (Id.) Holdings states that
Badger Coaches competes directly with
other motor coach passenger line-run
providers in the Service Area, including
Megabus, Greyhound, Lamers Bus
Lines, and Jefferson Lines. (Id.)
Holdings notes that Lamers Bus Lines
and Jefferson Lines, among others, also
provide shuttle and charter services in
the Service Area. (Id.) Holdings states
that passenger transportation arrangers
for charter and tour services, as well as
rail transportation, air transportation,
and automobiles, provide further
competition in the Service Area. (Id.)
Holdings affirms that the services
offered by Badger Coaches are
geographically ‘‘dispersed’’ from those
offered by TDM, and there is no overlap
in the service areas and customer bases
between Badger Coaches and TDM. (Id.)
TDM operates in Washington and
elsewhere, and Badger Coaches operates
in Wisconsin and its surrounding area.
(Id. at 2–3.)
Holdings states that the proposed
transaction will increase fixed charges
in the form of interest expenses because
funds will be borrowed to assist in
financing the transaction; however,
Holdings maintains that the increase
will not impact the provision of
transportation services to the public. (Id.
at 7.) Holdings also asserts that it does
not expect the transaction to have
substantial impacts on employees or
labor conditions, and it does not
anticipate a measurable reduction in
force or changes in compensation levels
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or benefits at Badger Coaches. (Id. at 7–
8.) Holdings submits, however, that
staffing redundancies could result in
limited downsizing of back-office or
managerial-level personnel. (Id. at 8.)
The Board finds that the acquisition
as proposed in the application is
consistent with the public interest and
should be tentatively approved and
authorized. If any opposing comments
are timely filed, these findings will be
deemed vacated, and, unless a final
decision can be made on the record as
developed, a procedural schedule will
be adopted to reconsider the
application. See 49 CFR 1182.6. If no
opposing comments are filed by
expiration of the comment period, this
notice will take effect automatically and
will be the final Board action.
This action is categorically excluded
from environmental review under 49
CFR 1105.6(c).
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
It is ordered:
1. The proposed transaction is
approved and authorized, subject to the
filing of opposing comments.
2. If opposing comments are timely
filed, the findings made in this notice
will be deemed vacated.
3. This notice will be effective
December 24, 2019, unless opposing
comments are filed by December 23,
2019.
4. A copy of this notice will be served
on: (1) The U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (2)
the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust
Division, 10th Street & Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530;
and (3) the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Office of the General
Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
Decided: October 31, 2019.
By the Board, Board Members Begeman,
Fuchs, and Oberman.
Regena Smith-Bernard,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019–24419 Filed 11–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36347]
Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad
Company—Acquisition and
Operation—Certain Rail Lines of CSX
Transportation, Inc. in Onondaga,
Oswego, Jefferson, Saint Lawrence,
and Franklin Counties, NY
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
Surface Transportation Board.
08NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Notices
Decision No. 1 in Docket No. FD
36347; notice of acceptance of
application; issuance of Procedural
Schedule.
ACTION:
The Surface Transportation
Board (Board) is accepting for
consideration the application filed on
October 11, 2019, by Bessemer and Lake
Erie Railroad Company (B&LE or
Applicant).1 The application seeks
Board approval for B&LE, an indirect
wholly owned rail carrier subsidiary of
Canadian National Railway Company
(CNR), to acquire from CSX
Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), and to
operate approximately 236.3 miles of
rail line in New York. This proposal is
referred to as the Transaction.
The Board finds that the application
is complete and that the Transaction is
a minor transaction based upon the
preliminary determination that the
Transaction clearly would not have any
anticompetitive effects and that, if any
such anticompetitive effects were found
to exist, they would clearly be
outweighed by the Transaction’s
anticipated contribution to the public
interest in meeting significant
transportation needs. The Board makes
this preliminary determination based on
the evidence presented in the
application. The Board emphasizes that
this is not a final determination and
may be rebutted by subsequent filings
and evidence submitted into the record
for this proceeding. The Board will
carefully consider any claims that the
Transaction would have anticompetitive
effects.
DATES: The effective date of this
decision is November 8, 2019. Any
person who wishes to participate in this
proceeding as a Party of Record must
file, no later than November 25, 2019, a
notice of intent to participate. All
comments, protests, requests for
conditions, and any other evidence and
argument in opposition to the primary
application and related filings,
including filings by the U.S. Department
of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT), must be filed
by December 9, 2019. Responses to
comments, protests, requests for
conditions, other opposition, and
rebuttal in support of the primary
application or related filings must be
filed by January 8, 2020. See Procedural
Schedule. A final decision in this matter
will be served no later than February 21,
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
1 Applicant initially submitted its application on
October 10, 2019. On October 11, 2019, Applicant
amended its original submission to correct a
signature page that was inadvertently left blank.
Accordingly, October 11, 2019 will be considered
the filing date of the application for the purposes
of this proceeding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
2020. Further procedural orders, if any,
would be issued by the Board, if
necessary.
ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this
proceeding must be filed with the Board
either via e-filing or in writing
addressed to: Surface Transportation
Board, 395 E Street, SW, Washington,
DC 20423–0001. In addition, one copy
of each filing must be sent (and may be
sent by email only if service by email is
acceptable to the recipient) to each of
the following: (1) Secretary of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (2)
Attorney General of the United States, c/
o Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust
Division, Room 3109, Department of
Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (3)
Applicant’s representative, Claire M.
Maddox, Dentons US LLP, 1900 K Street
NW, Washington, DC 20006; and (4) any
other person designated as a Party of
Record on the service list notice. As
explained below, the service list notice
will be issued as soon after November
25, 2019, as practicable.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Ziehm at (202) 245–0391.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal Relay
Service at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicant
is an indirect wholly owned rail carrier
subsidiary of CNR that owns and
operates approximately 159 miles of
railroad lines in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
(Appl. 1, 19.) CSXT is a Class I railroad
that owns and operates approximately
21,000 miles of railroad lines. (Id. at 19.)
Applicant seeks the Board’s prior
review and authorization pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 11323–25 to acquire and operate
certain CSXT lines, collectively known
as the Massena Lines, from Woodard,
NY, to the U.S.-Canadian border near
Fort Covington, NY. (Appl. 1–2.) More
specifically, these lines consist of
CSXT’s St. Lawrence Subdivision
between CSXT milepost QM 3.0 at or
near Woodard and CSXT milepost QM
183.1 at or near Fort Covington, on the
U.S.-Canadian border, a distance of
approximately 179.2 miles; CSXT’s
Fulton Subdivision between CSXT
milepost QMF 7.2 at or near a
connection to CSXT’s St. Lawrence
Subdivision near Woodard and CSXT
milepost QMF 37.95 at or near Fort
Ontario, NY, a distance of
approximately 31 miles; CSXT’s Balmat
Industrial Track between CSXT
milepost QMB 0 at or near a connection
with CSXT’s St. Lawrence Subdivision
near CSXT milepost QM 107 and CSXT
milepost QMB 9, a distance of
approximately 9 miles; CSXT’s
Rooseveltown Industrial Track between
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60469
CSXT milepost QMR 63 at or near a
connection with the St. Lawrence
Subdivision at Helena, NY, and CSXT
milepost QMR 68 at or near
Rooseveltown, NY, a distance of
approximately 5 miles; and CSXT’s
Carthage Branch between CSXT
milepost QMC 86.8 at or near a
connection with CSXT’s St. Lawrence
Subdivision near Philadelphia, NY, and
CSXT milepost QMC 74.7 at or near
Regis, NY, a distance of approximately
12 miles and CSXT’s connection with
Mohawk, Adirondack, and Northern
Railroad Corporation. (Id. at 21–22.) The
Transaction is part of a larger purchase
agreement, under which CNR and B&LE
have agreed to acquire from CSXT
approximately 278.1 miles of rail line
(including the 236.3 miles that comprise
the Massena Lines) between
Beauharnois, Que., and Woodard,
pursuant to a Purchase and Sale
Agreement (PSA) 2 that was executed on
August 29, 2019.3 (Id. at 1–2, 7 & Ex. 2,
Purchase & Sale Agreement.)
Applicant states that more than 45%
of current carload traffic on the Massena
Lines is overhead traffic exchanged
between the CN System 4 and CSXT, for
which the Massena Lines provide a
direct connection and gateway. (Id. at
9.) By acquiring the Massena Lines,
Applicant seeks to preserve the CN
System’s direct connection with CSXT
for overhead traffic that currently moves
over the Massena Lines and to ensure
that traffic using the Massena Lines
would continue to move directly
between the two systems, rather than
through an additional railroad. (Id.)
Applicant also seeks to improve
efficiencies of operations along the
Massena Lines and work with customers
on the Massena Lines to understand
their rail service needs, develop
efficient plans for rail operations to their
facilities, and help them grow their
future businesses. (Id. at 10.)
Financial Arrangements. According to
Applicant, no new securities would be
issued in connection with the
Transaction. Applicant states that the
only relevant financial arrangement is
the payment of the purchase price by
CNR and B&LE, as provided in the PSA.
(Id. at 11.)
2 Applicant submitted a copy of the PSA with its
application and designated the PSA as ‘‘highly
confidential,’’ thus subject to the provisions of the
protective order issued by the Board on October 22,
2019.
3 Applicant identifies CSX Intermodal Terminals,
Inc., and St. Lawrence and Adirondack Railway
Company, together with CSXT, as ‘‘CSX Parties’’ to
the PSA. (Appl. 7.)
4 Applicant defines ‘‘CN System’’ as the rail
system operated in Canada by CNR and in the
United States by CN, which it defines as CNR’s U.S.
rail operating subsidies, including B&LE. (Appl. iv.)
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
60470
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Notices
Passenger Service Impacts. Applicant
states that the Transaction would have
no impact on commuter or other
passenger rail service, because no such
services are provided on the Massena
Lines, nor have there been any such
services on the lines since at least the
establishment of the National Railroad
Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) in 1971.
(Id., Ex. 15 at 10.)
Discontinuances/Abandonments.
Applicant states that it does not plan to
abandon or discontinue service on rail
lines in the United States as a result of
the Transaction. (Id., Ex. 15 at 10.) As
discussed below, Applicant states that,
before closing, it plans to seek formal
discontinuance of its inactive 1989
trackage rights on CSXT’s St. Lawrence
Subdivision between Fort Covington
and Massena, NY, under the Board’s
class exemption procedures at 49 CFR
1152.50 for trackage rights that have not
been utilized within the past two years.
(Id. at 10–11.)
Public Interest Considerations.
Applicant asserts that the Transaction
would not result in the lessening of rail
competition, creation of a monopoly, or
restraint of trade in freight surface
transportation in any region of the
United States. (Appl. at 12.) Applicant
states that the transaction is an end-toend line acquisition, with a ‘‘principal
effect’’ being the relocation of an
interchange point between the CN
System and CSXT from Huntingdon,
Que., to Woodard, extending the length
of the CN System’s haul and shifting
operations on the Massena Lines from
CSXT to B&LE. (Id.) Applicant notes
that the Transaction would not render
other trackage duplicative or redundant
and that the CN System and CSXT have
no network overlap in the United States
in the vicinity of the Massena Lines.
(Id.)
Applicant asserts that the Transaction
would maintain the competitive status
quo. According to the Applicant,
customers on the Massena Line
currently receive direct service from a
single carrier, CSXT, and they would
not see a reduction in the number of
competitive rail options available by
substituting direct B&LE service for
direct CSXT service. (Id. at 12.)
Applicant states that, in 1989, CNR
retained trackage rights over the main
line between Fort Covington and
Massena in connection with the
purchase by Consolidated Rail
Corporation (Conrail) of what was
previously CNR’s line between Massena
and Huntingdon. (Id. at 12–13.) As part
of that line sale, CNR retained certain
limited trackage rights to exclusively
serve ‘‘present industries [as of 1989]
and their successors’’; Conrail obtained
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
the exclusive right (held by CSXT since
1999) to serve new industries. Thus, no
individual industry on that line segment
has ever been served by more than one
carrier. (Id.) The 1989 trackage rights
also permitted CNR to interchange with
the Massena Terminal Railroad
Company (MSTR) at Massena. (Id. at
13.) However, Applicant asserts that
CNR has neither operated to Massena
nor conducted any interchange with
MSTR for at least 14 years and that the
substitution of B&LE for CSXT as the
owner of the Massena Lines would
effectuate no meaningful change in the
interchange and handling of traffic with
MSTR at Massena. (Id. at 14 & V.S.
Drysdale 7–8.) As noted above,
Applicant states that, before closing,
CNR plans to seek formal
discontinuance of its inactive 1989
trackage rights under the Board’s class
exemption procedures at 49 CFR
1152.50. (Id. at 13–14.)
Moreover, Applicant asserts that the
Transaction would cause no reduction
in the number of transloading or
intermodal service options. (Id. at 14.)
Applicant states that, by maintaining
the existing CN System-CSXT gateway
over the Massena Lines, without the
need for an added interchange with a
third rail carrier, the Transaction would
preserve existing levels of competition
for rail transportation to and from the
northeastern United States. (Id. at 15.)
Applicant further states that,
following B&LE’s acquisition of the
Massena Lines, it would have
opportunities to improve the
efficiencies of operations along the
Massena Lines, such as eliminating two
CSXT transfer assignments now
operating between Massena and
Huntingdon. (Id. at 10.) Applicant
contends that elimination of these two
transfer assignments would avoid delays
and improve overall efficiency of
operations by reducing estimated total
transit time by approximately 24 hours.
(Id.)
Time Schedule for Consummation.
Applicant states that the Transaction is
scheduled to be consummated
immediately upon satisfaction of all
conditions precedent set forth in the
PSA, including Board approval of
B&LE’s application and the Board’s
approval decision becoming effective.
(Id. at 8.)
Environmental Impacts. Applicant
states that, pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.6(c)(1), the Transaction is exempt
from environmental reporting
requirements because the environmental
impacts of the Transaction fall below
the thresholds established in 49 CFR
1105.7(e)(4) and (5). (Id. at 23–25.)
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Historic Preservation Impacts.
Applicant states that no historical
reporting is required under 49 CFR
1105.8, as rail operations would
continue after Applicant’s purchase of
the Massena Lines, and Applicant has
no plans to dispose of or alter properties
subject to the Board’s jurisdiction that
are 50 years old or older. (Id. at 25.)
Labor Impacts. Applicant states that
CSXT currently employs 50 employees
on the Massena Lines who may be
adversely affected by the Transaction.
(Id. at 17.) Applicant states that no
current CN employees in the United
States would be adversely affected by
the Transaction. (Id.) B&LE states that it
does not have employees in New York
and would therefore be hiring an
estimated 53 employees to operate the
Massena Lines. (Id., Ex. 15 at 11.) B&LE
plans to offer priority hiring
consideration to CSXT employees
working on the Massena Lines in New
York. (Id. at 17 & Ex. 15 at 11.)
Applicant states that any employees
adversely impacted by the Transaction
would be entitled to labor protective
conditions in accordance with New
York Dock Railway—Control—Brooklyn
Eastern District Terminal, 360 I.C.C 60,
aff’d New York Dock Railway v. United
States, 609 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1979), as
modified by Wilmington Terminal
Railroad—Purchase & Lease—CSX
Transportation Inc., 6 I.C.C. 2d 799,
814–26 (1990), aff’d sub nom. Railway
Labor Executives’ Ass’n v. ICC, 930 F.2d
511 (6th Cir. 1991).
Primary Application and Related
Filings Accepted. The Board finds that
the proposed Transaction would be a
‘‘minor transaction’’ under 49 CFR
1180.2(c), and the Board accepts the
application for consideration because it
is in substantial compliance with the
applicable regulations governing minor
transactions. See 49 U.S.C. 11321–26; 49
CFR pt. 1180. The Board reserves the
right to require the filing of
supplemental information as necessary
to complete the record.
When a transaction does not involve
the merger or control of two or more
Class I railroads, the Board’s treatment
differs depending upon whether the
transaction would have ‘‘regional or
national transportation significance.’’ 49
U.S.C. 11325. Under 49 CFR 1180.2, a
transaction that does not involve two or
more Class I railroads is to be classified
as ‘‘minor’’—and thus not having
regional or national transportation
significance—if a determination can be
made that either: (1) The transaction
clearly will not have any
anticompetitive effects; or (2) any
anticompetitive effects will clearly be
outweighed by the transaction’s
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Notices
60471
anticipated contribution to the public
interest in meeting significant
transportation needs. A transaction not
involving the control or merger of two
or more Class I railroads is to be
classified as ‘‘significant’’ if neither of
these determinations can be made.
Nothing in the record thus far
suggests that the Transaction would
have anticompetitive effects. The
Transaction is an end-to-end acquisition
involving approximately 236.3 miles of
rail line in the state of New York. As
Applicant notes, the Board has held that
end-to-end transactions are unlikely to
raise competitive concerns. See Norfolk
S. Ry.—Joint Control & Operating/
Pooling Agreements—Pan Am S. LLC,
FD 35147 et al., slip op. at 5 (STB served
Mar. 10, 2009). The application
indicates that the Transaction would
maintain the competitive status quo, as
local customers located on the Massena
Lines are exclusively served by CSXT
now and would be exclusively served
by B&LE following the Transaction.
Additionally, it appears that the
Transaction would not cause a
reduction in the number of transloading
or intermodal service options.
Moreover, if anticompetitive effects
resulting from the Transaction should
later be shown to be likely, they would
appear, from the face of the application,
to be clearly outweighed by the
Transaction’s contribution to the public
interest in meeting significant
transportation needs. As noted in the
application, CSXT announced in June
2018 that it was rationalizing its system
by selling several lines, including the
Massena Lines, that CSXT identified as
not being core to its business and that
could be more valuable to other
operators well positioned to further
improve the lines and better serve local
customers. (See Appl. 8–9.) With B&LE
acquiring the Massena Lines, the
Transaction would ensure that overhead
traffic currently moving over the
Massena Lines between the CN System
and CSXT would continue to move
directly between the two systems on
that route, rather than via a third, bridge
carrier on that route or via a different
direct CN System-CSXT gateway that
likely would be longer and less efficient
than the current route.
Therefore, based on the information
provided in the application, the Board
finds the proposed Transaction to be a
minor transaction under 49 CFR
1180.2(c). Such a categorization does
not mean that the proposed Transaction
is insignificant or not of importance.
Indeed, after the record in the
proceeding is fully developed, the Board
will carefully review the proposed
Transaction to make certain that it does
not substantially lessen competition,
create a monopoly, or restrain trade and
that any anticompetitive effects are
outweighed by the public interest. See
49 U.S.C. 11324(d)(1)–(2). The Board
may also impose conditions to mitigate
or eliminate any anticompetitive
impacts of the transaction.
Procedural Schedule. The Board has
considered Applicant’s motion for a
procedural schedule, filed October 10,
2019. Applicant’s proposed procedural
schedule provides 30 days for
comments from all parties on the
application and 32 days for the
concurrent filing of replies to comments
and rebuttal in support of the
application. The proposed procedural
schedule then provides 85 days after the
close of the evidentiary period for the
Board to issue its final decision. The
Board will adopt a procedural schedule
that will allow 31 days for comments on
the application and 30 days for replies
to comments and rebuttal in support of
the application. The Board is required to
issue ‘‘a final decision by the 45th day
after the date on which it concludes the
evidentiary proceedings,’’ 49 U.S.C.
11325(d)(2), and will do so here.5
For further information regarding
procedural dates, see the Procedural
Schedule to this decision.
Notice of Intent to Participate. Any
person who wishes to participate in this
proceeding as a Party of Record must
file with the Board, no later than
November 25, 2019, a notice of intent to
participate, accompanied by a certificate
of service indicating that the notice has
been properly served on the Secretary of
Transportation, the Attorney General of
the United States, and Applicant’s
representative.
If a request is made in the notice of
intent to participate to have more than
one name added to the service list as a
Party of Record representing a particular
entity, the extra name(s) will be added
to the service list as a ‘‘Non-Party.’’ Any
person designated as a Non-Party will
receive copies of Board decisions,
orders, and notices but not copies of
official filings. Persons seeking to
change their status must accompany
that request with a written certification
that he or she has complied with the
service requirements set forth at 49 CFR
1180.4 and any other requirements set
forth in this decision.
Service List Notice. The Board will
serve, as soon after November 25, 2019,
as practicable, a notice containing the
official service list (the service list
notice). Each Party of Record will be
required to serve upon all other Parties
of Record, within 10 days of the service
date of the service list notice, copies of
all filings previously submitted by that
party (to the extent such filings have not
previously been served upon such other
parties). Each Party of Record will also
be required to file with the Board,
within 10 days of the service date of the
service list notice, a certificate of service
indicating that the service required by
the preceding sentence has been
accomplished. Every filing made by a
Party of Record after the service date of
the service list notice must have its own
certificate of service indicating that all
Parties of Record on the service list have
been served with a copy of the filing.
Members of the United States Congress
and Governors are not Parties of Record
and need not be served with copies of
filings, unless any Member or Governor
has requested to be, and is designated
as, a Party of Record.
Service of Decisions, Orders, and
Notices. The Board will serve copies of
its decisions, orders, and notices on
those persons who are designated on the
official service list as a Party of Record
or Non-Party. All other interested
persons are encouraged to secure copies
of decisions, orders, and notices via the
Board’s website at www.stb.gov.
Access to Filings. Under the Board’s
rules, any document filed with the
Board (including applications,
pleadings, etc.) shall be promptly
furnished to interested persons on
request, unless subject to a protective
order. 49 CFR 1180.4(a)(3). The
application and other filings in this
proceeding will be furnished to
interested persons upon request and
will also be available on the Board’s
website at www.stb.gov. 6 In addition,
the application may be obtained from
Applicant’s representative at the
address indicated above.
This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of
energy resources.
5 This notice will be published in the Federal
Register on November 8, 2019; all subsequent
deadlines will be calculated from this date.
Deadlines for filings are calculated in accordance
with 49 CFR 1104.7(a).
6 Applicant has submitted a public version and
highly confidential version of its application. The
public version is available on the Board’s website.
The highly confidential version may be obtained
subject to the provisions of the protective order
issued by the Board on October 22, 2019.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
60472
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Notices
PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
October 10, 2019 ...............
October 11, 2019 ...............
November 8, 2019 ..............
November 25, 2019 ............
December 9, 2019 ..............
January 8, 2020 .................
February 21, 2020 ..............
March 22, 2020.7 ................
Motion for Protective Order and Motion for Establishment of Procedural Schedule filed.
Application (amended) filed.
Board notice of acceptance of application served and published in the Federal Register.
Notices of intent to participate in this proceeding due.
All comments, protests, requests for conditions, and any other evidence and argument in opposition to the application, including filings of DOJ and DOT, due.
Responses to comments, protests, requests for conditions, and other opposition due. Rebuttal in support of the
application due.
Date by which a final decision will be served.
Date by which a final decision will become effective.
It is ordered:
1. The application is accepted for
consideration.
2. The parties to this proceeding must
comply with the procedural schedule
adopted by the Board in this proceeding
as shown in this decision. The parties
to this proceeding must comply with the
procedural requirements described in
this decision.
3. This decision is effective on
November 8, 2019.
Decided: November 4, 2019.
By the Board, Board Members Begeman,
Fuchs, and Oberman.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019–24438 Filed 11–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Release of Land Affecting
Federal Grant Assurance Obligations
at Tucson International Airport,
Tucson, Pima County, Arizona
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of request to release
airport land.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes to rule
and invites public comment for the
release of approximately 297 acres of
airport land, otherwise known as Parcel
H, at Tucson International Airport
(TUS), Tucson, Pima County, Arizona
from the aeronautical use provisions of
the Grant Agreement Assurances since
the land is not needed for airport
purposes. The land for proposed release
consists of two parcels along the
southern boundary of the abandoned
Hughes Access Road, adjacent to the
main airport airfield sand campus, and
a portion of property which is used by
Aerospace Parkway. The land will be
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
7 The final decision will become effective 30 days
after it is served.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
sold to the City of Tucson, to
accommodate future expansion of a
public roadway, and to permit future
compatible development adjacent to
United States Air Force Plant 44. The
airport will be compensated for the fair
market value of the land. The use of the
land for a roadway and industrial
development represents a compatible
land use that will not interfere with the
airport or its operation, thereby
protecting the interests of civil aviation.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 9, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Comments on the request may be mailed
or delivered to the FAA at the following
address: Mr. Mike N. Williams,
Manager, Phoenix Airports District
Office, Federal Register Comment,
Federal Aviation Administration,
Phoenix Airports District Office, 3800
N. Central Avenue, Suite 1025, Phoenix,
Arizona 85012. In addition, one copy of
the comment submitted to the FAA
must be mailed or delivered to Ms.
Danette Bewley, Interim President/CEO,
Tucson Airport Authority, 7200 S.
Tucson Boulevard, Suite 300, Tucson,
Arizona 85756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for
the 21st Century (AIR 21), Public Law
10–181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61), this
notice must be published in the Federal
Register 30 days before the DOT
Secretary may waive any condition
imposed on a federally obligated airport
by surplus property conveyance deeds
or grant agreements.
The following is a brief overview of
the request:
The Tucson Airport Authority (TAA)
requested a release from the provisions
of the Grant Agreement Assurances to
permit the disposal of approximately
297 acres of land, otherwise known as
Parcel H, at Tucson International
Airport, Tucson, Pima County, Arizona
to permit the expansion of a public road
(Aerospace Parkway), and to permit
future compatible development adjacent
to United States Air Force Plant 44. The
Tucson Airport Authority will sell the
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
land, obligated by Airport Improvement
Program grants, and Passenger Facility
Charge funding. In return, TAA will be
compensated for the fair market value
for the property. An Environmental
Impact Statement was completed for
Parcel H, and a Record of Decision
executed on November 28, 2018. The
proposed use of the land is a compatible
land use that will not interfere with or
impede the operations and development
of the airport. Based on the benefits of
fair compensation and enhanced public
safety, the interests of civil aviation will
be properly served.
Issued in El Segundo, California, on
November 4, 2019.
Original signed by
Brian Q. Armstrong,
Manager, Safety and Standards Branch,
Airports Division, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2019–24452 Filed 11–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement:
Charleston County, South Carolina;
Notice of Intent
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
The FHWA is issuing this
notice of intent to advise the public that
an Environmental Impact Statement will
be prepared for a proposed highway
project in Charleston County, South
Carolina.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily O. Lawton, Division
Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration, Strom Thurmond
Federal Building, 1835 Assembly Street,
Suite 1270, Columbia, South Carolina
29201, Telephone: (803) 765–5411,
Email: emily.lawton@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA), in cooperation with the South
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM
08NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60468-60472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24438]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36347]
Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company--Acquisition and
Operation--Certain Rail Lines of CSX Transportation, Inc. in Onondaga,
Oswego, Jefferson, Saint Lawrence, and Franklin Counties, NY
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
[[Page 60469]]
ACTION: Decision No. 1 in Docket No. FD 36347; notice of acceptance of
application; issuance of Procedural Schedule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board (Board) is accepting for
consideration the application filed on October 11, 2019, by Bessemer
and Lake Erie Railroad Company (B&LE or Applicant).\1\ The application
seeks Board approval for B&LE, an indirect wholly owned rail carrier
subsidiary of Canadian National Railway Company (CNR), to acquire from
CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), and to operate approximately 236.3
miles of rail line in New York. This proposal is referred to as the
Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Applicant initially submitted its application on October 10,
2019. On October 11, 2019, Applicant amended its original submission
to correct a signature page that was inadvertently left blank.
Accordingly, October 11, 2019 will be considered the filing date of
the application for the purposes of this proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board finds that the application is complete and that the
Transaction is a minor transaction based upon the preliminary
determination that the Transaction clearly would not have any
anticompetitive effects and that, if any such anticompetitive effects
were found to exist, they would clearly be outweighed by the
Transaction's anticipated contribution to the public interest in
meeting significant transportation needs. The Board makes this
preliminary determination based on the evidence presented in the
application. The Board emphasizes that this is not a final
determination and may be rebutted by subsequent filings and evidence
submitted into the record for this proceeding. The Board will carefully
consider any claims that the Transaction would have anticompetitive
effects.
DATES: The effective date of this decision is November 8, 2019. Any
person who wishes to participate in this proceeding as a Party of
Record must file, no later than November 25, 2019, a notice of intent
to participate. All comments, protests, requests for conditions, and
any other evidence and argument in opposition to the primary
application and related filings, including filings by the U.S.
Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT), must be filed by December 9, 2019. Responses to comments,
protests, requests for conditions, other opposition, and rebuttal in
support of the primary application or related filings must be filed by
January 8, 2020. See Procedural Schedule. A final decision in this
matter will be served no later than February 21, 2020. Further
procedural orders, if any, would be issued by the Board, if necessary.
ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this proceeding must be filed with
the Board either via e-filing or in writing addressed to: Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW, Washington, DC 20423-0001. In
addition, one copy of each filing must be sent (and may be sent by
email only if service by email is acceptable to the recipient) to each
of the following: (1) Secretary of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; (2) Attorney General of the United
States, c/o Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, Room 3109,
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530; (3) Applicant's
representative, Claire M. Maddox, Dentons US LLP, 1900 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20006; and (4) any other person designated as a Party of
Record on the service list notice. As explained below, the service list
notice will be issued as soon after November 25, 2019, as practicable.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Ziehm at (202) 245-0391.
Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal
Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Applicant is an indirect wholly owned rail
carrier subsidiary of CNR that owns and operates approximately 159
miles of railroad lines in Ohio and Pennsylvania. (Appl. 1, 19.) CSXT
is a Class I railroad that owns and operates approximately 21,000 miles
of railroad lines. (Id. at 19.) Applicant seeks the Board's prior
review and authorization pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 to acquire and
operate certain CSXT lines, collectively known as the Massena Lines,
from Woodard, NY, to the U.S.-Canadian border near Fort Covington, NY.
(Appl. 1-2.) More specifically, these lines consist of CSXT's St.
Lawrence Subdivision between CSXT milepost QM 3.0 at or near Woodard
and CSXT milepost QM 183.1 at or near Fort Covington, on the U.S.-
Canadian border, a distance of approximately 179.2 miles; CSXT's Fulton
Subdivision between CSXT milepost QMF 7.2 at or near a connection to
CSXT's St. Lawrence Subdivision near Woodard and CSXT milepost QMF
37.95 at or near Fort Ontario, NY, a distance of approximately 31
miles; CSXT's Balmat Industrial Track between CSXT milepost QMB 0 at or
near a connection with CSXT's St. Lawrence Subdivision near CSXT
milepost QM 107 and CSXT milepost QMB 9, a distance of approximately 9
miles; CSXT's Rooseveltown Industrial Track between CSXT milepost QMR
63 at or near a connection with the St. Lawrence Subdivision at Helena,
NY, and CSXT milepost QMR 68 at or near Rooseveltown, NY, a distance of
approximately 5 miles; and CSXT's Carthage Branch between CSXT milepost
QMC 86.8 at or near a connection with CSXT's St. Lawrence Subdivision
near Philadelphia, NY, and CSXT milepost QMC 74.7 at or near Regis, NY,
a distance of approximately 12 miles and CSXT's connection with Mohawk,
Adirondack, and Northern Railroad Corporation. (Id. at 21-22.) The
Transaction is part of a larger purchase agreement, under which CNR and
B&LE have agreed to acquire from CSXT approximately 278.1 miles of rail
line (including the 236.3 miles that comprise the Massena Lines)
between Beauharnois, Que., and Woodard, pursuant to a Purchase and Sale
Agreement (PSA) \2\ that was executed on August 29, 2019.\3\ (Id. at 1-
2, 7 & Ex. 2, Purchase & Sale Agreement.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Applicant submitted a copy of the PSA with its application
and designated the PSA as ``highly confidential,'' thus subject to
the provisions of the protective order issued by the Board on
October 22, 2019.
\3\ Applicant identifies CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc., and St.
Lawrence and Adirondack Railway Company, together with CSXT, as
``CSX Parties'' to the PSA. (Appl. 7.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicant states that more than 45% of current carload traffic on
the Massena Lines is overhead traffic exchanged between the CN System
\4\ and CSXT, for which the Massena Lines provide a direct connection
and gateway. (Id. at 9.) By acquiring the Massena Lines, Applicant
seeks to preserve the CN System's direct connection with CSXT for
overhead traffic that currently moves over the Massena Lines and to
ensure that traffic using the Massena Lines would continue to move
directly between the two systems, rather than through an additional
railroad. (Id.) Applicant also seeks to improve efficiencies of
operations along the Massena Lines and work with customers on the
Massena Lines to understand their rail service needs, develop efficient
plans for rail operations to their facilities, and help them grow their
future businesses. (Id. at 10.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Applicant defines ``CN System'' as the rail system operated
in Canada by CNR and in the United States by CN, which it defines as
CNR's U.S. rail operating subsidies, including B&LE. (Appl. iv.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Arrangements. According to Applicant, no new securities
would be issued in connection with the Transaction. Applicant states
that the only relevant financial arrangement is the payment of the
purchase price by CNR and B&LE, as provided in the PSA. (Id. at 11.)
[[Page 60470]]
Passenger Service Impacts. Applicant states that the Transaction
would have no impact on commuter or other passenger rail service,
because no such services are provided on the Massena Lines, nor have
there been any such services on the lines since at least the
establishment of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
in 1971. (Id., Ex. 15 at 10.)
Discontinuances/Abandonments. Applicant states that it does not
plan to abandon or discontinue service on rail lines in the United
States as a result of the Transaction. (Id., Ex. 15 at 10.) As
discussed below, Applicant states that, before closing, it plans to
seek formal discontinuance of its inactive 1989 trackage rights on
CSXT's St. Lawrence Subdivision between Fort Covington and Massena, NY,
under the Board's class exemption procedures at 49 CFR 1152.50 for
trackage rights that have not been utilized within the past two years.
(Id. at 10-11.)
Public Interest Considerations. Applicant asserts that the
Transaction would not result in the lessening of rail competition,
creation of a monopoly, or restraint of trade in freight surface
transportation in any region of the United States. (Appl. at 12.)
Applicant states that the transaction is an end-to-end line
acquisition, with a ``principal effect'' being the relocation of an
interchange point between the CN System and CSXT from Huntingdon, Que.,
to Woodard, extending the length of the CN System's haul and shifting
operations on the Massena Lines from CSXT to B&LE. (Id.) Applicant
notes that the Transaction would not render other trackage duplicative
or redundant and that the CN System and CSXT have no network overlap in
the United States in the vicinity of the Massena Lines. (Id.)
Applicant asserts that the Transaction would maintain the
competitive status quo. According to the Applicant, customers on the
Massena Line currently receive direct service from a single carrier,
CSXT, and they would not see a reduction in the number of competitive
rail options available by substituting direct B&LE service for direct
CSXT service. (Id. at 12.) Applicant states that, in 1989, CNR retained
trackage rights over the main line between Fort Covington and Massena
in connection with the purchase by Consolidated Rail Corporation
(Conrail) of what was previously CNR's line between Massena and
Huntingdon. (Id. at 12-13.) As part of that line sale, CNR retained
certain limited trackage rights to exclusively serve ``present
industries [as of 1989] and their successors''; Conrail obtained the
exclusive right (held by CSXT since 1999) to serve new industries.
Thus, no individual industry on that line segment has ever been served
by more than one carrier. (Id.) The 1989 trackage rights also permitted
CNR to interchange with the Massena Terminal Railroad Company (MSTR) at
Massena. (Id. at 13.) However, Applicant asserts that CNR has neither
operated to Massena nor conducted any interchange with MSTR for at
least 14 years and that the substitution of B&LE for CSXT as the owner
of the Massena Lines would effectuate no meaningful change in the
interchange and handling of traffic with MSTR at Massena. (Id. at 14 &
V.S. Drysdale 7-8.) As noted above, Applicant states that, before
closing, CNR plans to seek formal discontinuance of its inactive 1989
trackage rights under the Board's class exemption procedures at 49 CFR
1152.50. (Id. at 13-14.)
Moreover, Applicant asserts that the Transaction would cause no
reduction in the number of transloading or intermodal service options.
(Id. at 14.) Applicant states that, by maintaining the existing CN
System-CSXT gateway over the Massena Lines, without the need for an
added interchange with a third rail carrier, the Transaction would
preserve existing levels of competition for rail transportation to and
from the northeastern United States. (Id. at 15.)
Applicant further states that, following B&LE's acquisition of the
Massena Lines, it would have opportunities to improve the efficiencies
of operations along the Massena Lines, such as eliminating two CSXT
transfer assignments now operating between Massena and Huntingdon. (Id.
at 10.) Applicant contends that elimination of these two transfer
assignments would avoid delays and improve overall efficiency of
operations by reducing estimated total transit time by approximately 24
hours. (Id.)
Time Schedule for Consummation. Applicant states that the
Transaction is scheduled to be consummated immediately upon
satisfaction of all conditions precedent set forth in the PSA,
including Board approval of B&LE's application and the Board's approval
decision becoming effective. (Id. at 8.)
Environmental Impacts. Applicant states that, pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.6(c)(1), the Transaction is exempt from environmental reporting
requirements because the environmental impacts of the Transaction fall
below the thresholds established in 49 CFR 1105.7(e)(4) and (5). (Id.
at 23-25.)
Historic Preservation Impacts. Applicant states that no historical
reporting is required under 49 CFR 1105.8, as rail operations would
continue after Applicant's purchase of the Massena Lines, and Applicant
has no plans to dispose of or alter properties subject to the Board's
jurisdiction that are 50 years old or older. (Id. at 25.)
Labor Impacts. Applicant states that CSXT currently employs 50
employees on the Massena Lines who may be adversely affected by the
Transaction. (Id. at 17.) Applicant states that no current CN employees
in the United States would be adversely affected by the Transaction.
(Id.) B&LE states that it does not have employees in New York and would
therefore be hiring an estimated 53 employees to operate the Massena
Lines. (Id., Ex. 15 at 11.) B&LE plans to offer priority hiring
consideration to CSXT employees working on the Massena Lines in New
York. (Id. at 17 & Ex. 15 at 11.)
Applicant states that any employees adversely impacted by the
Transaction would be entitled to labor protective conditions in
accordance with New York Dock Railway--Control--Brooklyn Eastern
District Terminal, 360 I.C.C 60, aff'd New York Dock Railway v. United
States, 609 F.2d 83 (2d Cir. 1979), as modified by Wilmington Terminal
Railroad--Purchase & Lease--CSX Transportation Inc., 6 I.C.C. 2d 799,
814-26 (1990), aff'd sub nom. Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. ICC,
930 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1991).
Primary Application and Related Filings Accepted. The Board finds
that the proposed Transaction would be a ``minor transaction'' under 49
CFR 1180.2(c), and the Board accepts the application for consideration
because it is in substantial compliance with the applicable regulations
governing minor transactions. See 49 U.S.C. 11321-26; 49 CFR pt. 1180.
The Board reserves the right to require the filing of supplemental
information as necessary to complete the record.
When a transaction does not involve the merger or control of two or
more Class I railroads, the Board's treatment differs depending upon
whether the transaction would have ``regional or national
transportation significance.'' 49 U.S.C. 11325. Under 49 CFR 1180.2, a
transaction that does not involve two or more Class I railroads is to
be classified as ``minor''--and thus not having regional or national
transportation significance--if a determination can be made that
either: (1) The transaction clearly will not have any anticompetitive
effects; or (2) any anticompetitive effects will clearly be outweighed
by the transaction's
[[Page 60471]]
anticipated contribution to the public interest in meeting significant
transportation needs. A transaction not involving the control or merger
of two or more Class I railroads is to be classified as ``significant''
if neither of these determinations can be made.
Nothing in the record thus far suggests that the Transaction would
have anticompetitive effects. The Transaction is an end-to-end
acquisition involving approximately 236.3 miles of rail line in the
state of New York. As Applicant notes, the Board has held that end-to-
end transactions are unlikely to raise competitive concerns. See
Norfolk S. Ry.--Joint Control & Operating/Pooling Agreements--Pan Am S.
LLC, FD 35147 et al., slip op. at 5 (STB served Mar. 10, 2009). The
application indicates that the Transaction would maintain the
competitive status quo, as local customers located on the Massena Lines
are exclusively served by CSXT now and would be exclusively served by
B&LE following the Transaction. Additionally, it appears that the
Transaction would not cause a reduction in the number of transloading
or intermodal service options.
Moreover, if anticompetitive effects resulting from the Transaction
should later be shown to be likely, they would appear, from the face of
the application, to be clearly outweighed by the Transaction's
contribution to the public interest in meeting significant
transportation needs. As noted in the application, CSXT announced in
June 2018 that it was rationalizing its system by selling several
lines, including the Massena Lines, that CSXT identified as not being
core to its business and that could be more valuable to other operators
well positioned to further improve the lines and better serve local
customers. (See Appl. 8-9.) With B&LE acquiring the Massena Lines, the
Transaction would ensure that overhead traffic currently moving over
the Massena Lines between the CN System and CSXT would continue to move
directly between the two systems on that route, rather than via a
third, bridge carrier on that route or via a different direct CN
System-CSXT gateway that likely would be longer and less efficient than
the current route.
Therefore, based on the information provided in the application,
the Board finds the proposed Transaction to be a minor transaction
under 49 CFR 1180.2(c). Such a categorization does not mean that the
proposed Transaction is insignificant or not of importance. Indeed,
after the record in the proceeding is fully developed, the Board will
carefully review the proposed Transaction to make certain that it does
not substantially lessen competition, create a monopoly, or restrain
trade and that any anticompetitive effects are outweighed by the public
interest. See 49 U.S.C. 11324(d)(1)-(2). The Board may also impose
conditions to mitigate or eliminate any anticompetitive impacts of the
transaction.
Procedural Schedule. The Board has considered Applicant's motion
for a procedural schedule, filed October 10, 2019. Applicant's proposed
procedural schedule provides 30 days for comments from all parties on
the application and 32 days for the concurrent filing of replies to
comments and rebuttal in support of the application. The proposed
procedural schedule then provides 85 days after the close of the
evidentiary period for the Board to issue its final decision. The Board
will adopt a procedural schedule that will allow 31 days for comments
on the application and 30 days for replies to comments and rebuttal in
support of the application. The Board is required to issue ``a final
decision by the 45th day after the date on which it concludes the
evidentiary proceedings,'' 49 U.S.C. 11325(d)(2), and will do so
here.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ This notice will be published in the Federal Register on
November 8, 2019; all subsequent deadlines will be calculated from
this date. Deadlines for filings are calculated in accordance with
49 CFR 1104.7(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For further information regarding procedural dates, see the
Procedural Schedule to this decision.
Notice of Intent to Participate. Any person who wishes to
participate in this proceeding as a Party of Record must file with the
Board, no later than November 25, 2019, a notice of intent to
participate, accompanied by a certificate of service indicating that
the notice has been properly served on the Secretary of Transportation,
the Attorney General of the United States, and Applicant's
representative.
If a request is made in the notice of intent to participate to have
more than one name added to the service list as a Party of Record
representing a particular entity, the extra name(s) will be added to
the service list as a ``Non-Party.'' Any person designated as a Non-
Party will receive copies of Board decisions, orders, and notices but
not copies of official filings. Persons seeking to change their status
must accompany that request with a written certification that he or she
has complied with the service requirements set forth at 49 CFR 1180.4
and any other requirements set forth in this decision.
Service List Notice. The Board will serve, as soon after November
25, 2019, as practicable, a notice containing the official service list
(the service list notice). Each Party of Record will be required to
serve upon all other Parties of Record, within 10 days of the service
date of the service list notice, copies of all filings previously
submitted by that party (to the extent such filings have not previously
been served upon such other parties). Each Party of Record will also be
required to file with the Board, within 10 days of the service date of
the service list notice, a certificate of service indicating that the
service required by the preceding sentence has been accomplished. Every
filing made by a Party of Record after the service date of the service
list notice must have its own certificate of service indicating that
all Parties of Record on the service list have been served with a copy
of the filing. Members of the United States Congress and Governors are
not Parties of Record and need not be served with copies of filings,
unless any Member or Governor has requested to be, and is designated
as, a Party of Record.
Service of Decisions, Orders, and Notices. The Board will serve
copies of its decisions, orders, and notices on those persons who are
designated on the official service list as a Party of Record or Non-
Party. All other interested persons are encouraged to secure copies of
decisions, orders, and notices via the Board's website at www.stb.gov.
Access to Filings. Under the Board's rules, any document filed with
the Board (including applications, pleadings, etc.) shall be promptly
furnished to interested persons on request, unless subject to a
protective order. 49 CFR 1180.4(a)(3). The application and other
filings in this proceeding will be furnished to interested persons upon
request and will also be available on the Board's website at
www.stb.gov. \6\ In addition, the application may be obtained from
Applicant's representative at the address indicated above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Applicant has submitted a public version and highly
confidential version of its application. The public version is
available on the Board's website. The highly confidential version
may be obtained subject to the provisions of the protective order
issued by the Board on October 22, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
[[Page 60472]]
Procedural Schedule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 10, 2019.................................... Motion for Protective Order and Motion for Establishment
of Procedural Schedule filed.
October 11, 2019.................................... Application (amended) filed.
November 8, 2019.................................... Board notice of acceptance of application served and
published in the Federal Register.
November 25, 2019................................... Notices of intent to participate in this proceeding due.
December 9, 2019.................................... All comments, protests, requests for conditions, and any
other evidence and argument in opposition to the
application, including filings of DOJ and DOT, due.
January 8, 2020..................................... Responses to comments, protests, requests for conditions,
and other opposition due. Rebuttal in support of the
application due.
February 21, 2020................................... Date by which a final decision will be served.
March 22, 2020.\7\.................................. Date by which a final decision will become effective.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is ordered:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The final decision will become effective 30 days after it is
served.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The application is accepted for consideration.
2. The parties to this proceeding must comply with the procedural
schedule adopted by the Board in this proceeding as shown in this
decision. The parties to this proceeding must comply with the
procedural requirements described in this decision.
3. This decision is effective on November 8, 2019.
Decided: November 4, 2019.
By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Fuchs, and Oberman.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2019-24438 Filed 11-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P