Registration Fee Requirement for Petitioners Seeking To File H-1B Petitions on Behalf of Cap Subject Aliens, 60307-60316 [2019-24292]
Download as PDF
60307
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 217
Friday, November 8, 2019
4. Equity of Registration Fee
E. Impact on Small Entities
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
G. Implementation Timeframe
H. Out of Scope
III. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Other Regulatory Requirements
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
requests are deposited into the
Immigration Examinations Fee Account
(IEFA) and used to fund the cost of
processing immigration benefit
requests.2 Consistent with that authority
and USCIS’ reliance on fees for its
funding, DHS is amending its
regulations to require a fee for
submitting H–1B registrations.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
I. Background
8 CFR Part 103
On January 31, 2019, DHS published
a final rule requiring petitioners seeking
to file H–1B cap-subject petitions,
including those eligible for the
advanced degree exemption, to first
electronically register with USCIS
during a designated registration period,
unless the requirement is suspended
(‘‘H–1B registration final rule’’).1 USCIS
stated in the H–1B registration final rule
that it was suspending the registration
requirement for the fiscal year 2020 cap
season to complete required user testing
of the new H–1B registration system and
otherwise ensure the system and
process work correctly.
Once USCIS implements the system
and requires registration, USCIS will not
consider an H–1B cap-subject petition to
be properly filed unless it is based on
a valid registration selection for the
applicable fiscal year. See 8 CFR
214.2(h)(8)(iii)(A)(1) and (h)(8)(iii)(D).
USCIS will reject or deny H–1B capsubject petitions that are not properly
filed. 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(iii)(D).
C. Registration Fee
On September 4, 2019, DHS
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking seeking public comments on
its proposal to require a $10 fee per H–
1B registration. See 84 FR 46460. DHS
is amending its regulations to require a
$10 fee for each registration submitted
to register for the H–1B cap selection
process. See 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(i)(NNN).
As stated in the proposed rule, USCIS
operations are funded by fees collected
for adjudication and naturalization
services, and USCIS must expend
resources to implement and maintain
the registration system. Therefore, DHS
is requiring a fee for submitting H–1B
registrations to recover those costs.
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
A. The H–1B Registration System
[CIS No. 2652–19; DHS Docket No. USCIS–
2019–0006]
RIN 1615–AC36
Registration Fee Requirement for
Petitioners Seeking To File H–1B
Petitions on Behalf of Cap Subject
Aliens
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) regulations to require petitioners
seeking to file H–1B cap-subject
petitions to pay a $10 fee for each
registration they submit to U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) for the H–1B cap selection
process.
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 9, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Nimick, Chief, Business &
Foreign Workers Division, Office of
Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department
of Homeland Security, 20 Massachusetts
Avenue NW, Suite 1100, Washington,
DC 20529–2140; Telephone (202) 272–
8377.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. The H–1B Registration System
B. Legal Authority
C. Registration Fee
II. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
A. Summary of Public Comments
B. General Support for the Proposed Rule
C. General Opposition to the Proposed
Rule
D. Establishment of Registration Fee
1. Fee Payment System
2. Fee Amount ($10 per registration)
3. Fraud Deterrent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
B. Legal Authority
The Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA) authorizes DHS to establish and
collect fees for adjudication and
naturalization services to ‘‘ensure
recovery of the full costs of providing all
such services, including the costs of
similar services provided without
charge to asylum applicants or other
immigrants.’’ INA section 286(m), 8
U.S.C. 1356(m). Through the collection
of fees established under that authority,
USCIS is primarily funded by
immigration and naturalization fees
charged to applicants, petitioners, and
other requestors. See INA sections
286(m) and (n), 8 U.S.C. 1356(m) and
(n); 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(i)(USCIS fees).
Fees collected from individuals and
entities filing immigration benefit
1 See 84 FR 888 (Jan. 31, 2019); 8 CFR
214.2(h)(8)(iii)(A)(1).
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Public Comments on the Proposed
Rule
A. Summary of Public Comments
In response to the proposed rule, DHS
received 22 comments during the 30day public comment period. There were
no duplicate submissions or letters
submitted through mass mailing
campaigns. DHS considered all of these
comment submissions. Commenters
consisted of individuals (including U.S.
workers), law firms, professional
organizations, and advocacy groups.
Some commenters expressed support for
the rule and/or offered suggestions for
improvement. Two commenters
expressed general opposition to the rule,
suggesting that DHS should not impose
a fee for registration. For many of the
public comments, DHS could not
ascertain whether the commenter
supported or opposed the proposed
rule. A number of comments received
addressed subjects beyond those
covered by the proposed rule, and were
deemed out of scope.
DHS has reviewed all of the public
comments received in response to the
proposed rule and is addressing relevant
comments in this final rule. DHS’s
responses are grouped by subject area,
2 See
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
81 FR 26904, 26905 (May 4, 2016).
08NOR1
60308
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
with a focus on the most common issues
and suggestions raised by commenters.
DHS is not addressing comments
seeking changes in U.S. laws,
regulations, or agency policies that are
out of scope and unrelated to the
changes proposed on September 4,
2019, or to the H–1B registration system
generally.
B. General Support for the Proposed
Rule
Comment: Two commenters stated
that they agreed with the proposed fee
without providing any additional or
substantive rationale. While DHS
appreciates the input, a response to
these general support comments is not
necessary.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
C. General Opposition to the Proposed
Rule
Comment: Two commenters said the
rule would cause an unnecessary
financial obstacle to an already tedious
and burdensome process for prospective
immigrants. One commenter said that
the additional fee would oppress
minorities and put unnecessary
financial barriers on families and extend
the time it takes for them to receive
clearance. The commenter explained
that the process to become a legalized
citizen is already an extensive process
and extending it further could turn
away families from receiving
legalization.
Response: The H–1B classification is
an employment-based nonimmigrant
classification that allows U.S. employers
to temporarily employ foreign workers
in specialty occupations. DHS notes that
this rule is not addressing the process of
obtaining an immigrant visa or lawful
permanent resident status. Rather, this
rule addresses the fee for filing an H–1B
registration which is a prerequisite to
being able to file a nonimmigrant
petition for a foreign worker in the H–
1B nonimmigrant classification. The fee
paid for the registration is a
responsibility of the petitioning
employer, not the foreign worker. DHS
believes that a $10 fee for each
registration a U.S. employer chooses to
submit would not be overly burdensome
for employers, especially when
considering the benefits of not having to
submit a full, paper-based petition as
required for possible selection under the
current cap selection process. Moreover,
the nominal fee would assist DHS in
recovering the cost of administering the
electronic registration process.
Requiring such a fee would not have
any impact on the time to adjudicate an
immigration benefit request.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
D. Establishment of Registration Fee
1. Fee Payment System
Pay.gov
Comments: A few commenters asked
DHS to explain with specificity in the
final rule how the payment system and
payment mechanics will work. The
comments related to pay.gov are as
follows:
• Will DHS utilize pay.gov for the
payment portal? If an employer is
already registered in pay.gov, will that
registration control for the H–1B
registration fee payment?
• Is submission of the registration fee
payment via pay.gov limited to
employers, or may attorneys also submit
payments via pay.gov on behalf of their
U.S. employer clients? The commenter
stated that attorneys should be able to
submit registration fee payments via the
pay.gov portal for their U.S. employer
clients.
• A professional association stated
that, given the limited familiarity of
stakeholders with the pay.gov portal,
USCIS should conduct stakeholder
outreach and provide guidance and
trainings on how to utilize the pay.gov
portal well in advance of the initial
registration period.
Response: DHS will use pay.gov for
the payment portal. DHS is using the
pay.gov architecture to process the
payment on the back end, however,
petitioners do not need to create a
pay.gov account to pay the fee.
Registrants only have to enter in
checking/savings account information to
do an ACH (Automated Clearing House)
or credit/debit card information to pay
via card.3 G–28 Representatives will be
able to pay on pay.gov as well, given
that there is no need for an account, just
basic payment details. USCIS is
planning to conduct stakeholder
outreach and provide training on how to
use the pay.gov portal and will
announce these trainings on the USCIS
website.
Payment Sources
Comments: The comments on
payment sources include the following:
• An advocacy group asked if pay.gov
would allow access to payment via
computerized access to bank account
and ACH payment systems. This
commenter also asked if there would be
a one-time registration per user of
banking and pay.gov information.
• A professional association stated
that it appears that the registration fee
3 Per 8 CFR 103.7(a)(2), remittances must be
drawn on a bank or other institution located in the
United States and be payable in United States
currency.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
payment can be paid with either a debit
or credit card, or with a withdrawal
from a checking or savings account, but
USCIS only provides a screen shot in
the workflow document for the credit
card payment transaction. The
commenter urged USCIS to allow for the
registration fee to be paid with a
withdrawal from a checking or savings
account (ACH), as this is a common
method of payment and will better
accommodate U.S. employers and
immigration practitioners submitting
registrations on behalf of a high volume
registrants.
• A business association asked if
there would be an ACH processing fee
associated with using this method of
payment. If so, the commenter asked if
USCIS incorporated those costs into
how it factored the $10/registration fee
such that it would be covered by the $10
fee or in addition to the $10 fee. If the
processing fee is separate from the $10
registration fee, the commenter asked
how much these processing fees would
add onto the $10 fee.
Response: The registration system
will permit payments to be made from
a bank account (checking or savings), a
credit card, or debit card. No ACH fee
will be charged. The registration fee
cannot be made using cash, a certified
(bank) check, or money order.
Batch Payments
Comments: The comments on batch
payments include the following:
• A couple of commenters asked if
employers would be able to batch
payments for multiple registrations.
• A business association supported
the ability of the employer or
representative to file registrations for
more than one beneficiary under one
account, but said the NPRM does not
indicate how many registrations a
petitioner can file at the same time or
exactly how the payment system will
operate. Similarly, another commenter
asked whether the payment system
would limit the amount of beneficiaries
that can be batched for simultaneous
payment at any given time.
• Another commenter also stated that
they support the ability to bundle the
H–1B registration fees for multiple
registrations into one payment, but said
it is unclear whether the pay.gov portal
would permit a registrant to make
several bundled registration fee
payments on multiple occasions over a
period of several days, or if only one
bundled registration fee could be
submitted during the registration
period. Because large U.S. employers
will likely submit registrations
throughout the registration period, the
commenter recommended that the
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
system should allow registrants to make
several bundled registration fee
payments through the pay.gov portal.
• A business association said the final
H–1B Registration Rule stated that
employers would not be required to
enter their corporate information for
each potential beneficiary. The
commenter asked if employers would be
able to file information regarding the
corporation, the authorized employee of
the corporation, and the payment
method/information used to pay the fees
one time throughout this process, and if
so, how that would be done.
Response: The registration system
will allow for batch payments to pay the
fee for multiple registrations submitted
simultaneously. For example, one
registrant may submit five registrations
at one time and make one payment of
$50 for the cost of the five registrations.
There is no limit to the number of
registrations that can be submitted at
one time. Registrants would be able to
submit as many registrations in as many
batches as they see fit during the
registration period. For example, a
registrant could submit five registrations
and pay a $50 fee on March 2, a batch
of five registrations on March 5 and pay
another $50 fee, and a batch of eight
registrations with an $80 fee on March
15.
Registrants will not be required to
enter their corporate information for
each potential beneficiary. Corporate
and payment information will only need
to be entered one time for each batch of
registrations and associated payments.
However, the corporate and payment
information will not carry over between
subsequent batches of registrations and
fees.
Other Comments/Questions on Fee
Payment Processing
Comments: Additional comments on
fee payment processing are as follows:
• A business association stated that
they were concerned about the lack of
specificity regarding how the $10 fee
will be collected. The commenter wrote
that, as USCIS moves to finalize this
proposal, the agency should clearly lay
out how employers will have to use the
H–1B registration’s system payment
mechanism.
• An advocacy group asked how far
in advance of the registration period
would registration be permitted for the
payment portal.
Response: DHS will use pay.gov for
the payment portal, however, there is no
need to register with pay.gov in order to
pay for an H–1B registration. The
pay.gov architecture is used only to
process the payments. USCIS will
advise registrants of the location of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
H–1B registration portal, and any
deadlines or other restrictions that will
apply. The H–1B registration system
will contain clear instructions for
completing and submitting registrations
and fees.
2. Fee Amount ($10 per Registration)
Comment: Two commenters wrote
that the proposed fee was too low
without providing an alternative
amount. One commenter noted that they
were in favor of requiring a fee for H–
1B petitions, but that it should be a
larger fee. This commenter wrote that a
fee free H–1B application and the lower
wages paid to those granted H–1B status
provides incentive to hire non-U.S.
citizens for U.S. based careers. One
commenter suggested a $500 fee, while
another suggested a $1,000 fee. One
commenter said that based upon the
assertion that the registration would be
a 7-minute additional time burden, the
$10 registration fee is appropriate and
can be considered a nominal expense
for most petitioners.
Response: First, DHS notes that the
$10 registration fee is separate from and
in addition to the H–1B petition filing
fee.4 The registration fee will be charged
regardless of whether the potential
petitioner’s registration is selected; i.e.
even if the petitioner may not ultimately
file an H–1B petition. As stated in the
NPRM, USCIS lacks sufficient data to
precisely estimate the costs of the
registration process. DHS proposed a
$10 fee to provide an initial stream of
revenue to mitigate potential fiscal
effects on USCIS. Following
implementation of the registration fee
provided for in this rule, USCIS will
gather data on the costs and burdens of
administering the registration process in
its next biennial fee review to determine
whether a fee adjustment is necessary to
ensure full cost recovery.
3. Fraud Deterrent
Comment: One commenter asked how
the nominal fee will prevent large
outsourcing companies from gaming the
4 As stated in the proposed rule, H–1B petitioners
currently pay a $460 filing fee per petition. In
addition to the filing fee, certain H–1B petitions
may have to pay up to $6,000 in statutory fees. DHS
does not have the authority to adjust the amount of
these statutory fees. USCIS does not retain most of
the revenue. CBP receives 50 percent of the $4,000
9–11 Response and Biometric Entry-Exit fee and the
remaining 50 percent is deposited into the General
Fund of the Treasury. USCIS retains 5 percent of
the $1,500 or $750 American Competitiveness and
Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA) fee. The
remainder goes to the Department of Labor and the
National Science Foundation. USCIS retains one
third of the $500 Fraud Detection and Prevention
fee, while the remainder is split between the
Department of State and the Department of Labor.
See 84 FR 46462–46463.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60309
H–1B system, when their revenue is in
the billions. A professional association
stated that the addition of a $10
registration fee will not sufficiently
deter speculative and/or fraudulent
filings. Another commenter noted that
requiring employers to pay a more
substantial fee may protect employees
from predatory employers and that we
should include a provision barring
employers from passing the fee on to
their employees or garnishing it from
their wages.
Response: As stated in the proposed
rule, the purpose of the registration fee
is to recover the costs of the registration
system and process; however, the fee
may have an added benefit of deterring
frivolous registrations. USCIS will
monitor the system for potential fraud
and abuse (e.g. monitoring the system to
determine if employers are submitting
many registrations but filing petitions
based on selected registrations at a
significantly lower rate, which could
reflect gaming of the system to unfairly
improve their odds of being selected).
Further, DHS will require registrants to
attest that they intend to file an H–1B
petition for the beneficiary in the
position for which the registration is
filed. This attestation is intended to
ensure that each registration is
connected with a bona fide job offer
and, if selected, will result in the filing
of an H–1B petition.
In response to a commenter’s proposal
to bar employers from passing the fee on
to the beneficiary (foreign worker), DHS
is not adopting this suggestion because
it is unnecessary and already prohibited
by DOL regulations as an unauthorized
deduction. See 20 CFR 655.731(b)(9)(ii)
(‘‘ . . . except that the deduction may
not recoup a business expense(s) of the
employer (including attorney fees and
other costs connected to the
performance of H–1B program functions
which are required to be performed by
the employer, e.g., preparation and
filing of LCA and H–1B petition); . . .’’).
DHS notes that this prohibition
encompasses the costs of an H–1B
registration.
Comment: A professional association
recommended that, in its calculations
for how many registrations will be
selected in the registration lottery,
USCIS take into consideration that there
may be a significantly higher rate of
selected registrations resulting in
unfiled, denied, or revoked petitions.
This commenter also recommended that
USCIS reserve enough unselected
registrations that could be invited to file
in the situation where the H–1B petition
approval rate will not result in meeting
the H–1B numerical limitations for FY
2021.
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
60310
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Response: When registration is not
required, USCIS randomly selects a
certain number of H–1B cap-subject
petitions projected as needed to meet
the numerical allocations. USCIS makes
projections on the number of H–1B capsubject petitions necessary to meet the
numerical limits, taking into account
historical data related to approvals,
denials, revocations, and other relevant
factors.5 USCIS uses these projections to
determine the number of petitions to
select to meet, but not exceed, the
65,000 regular cap and 20,000 advanced
degree exemption, although the exact
percentage and number of petitions may
vary depending on the applicable
projections for a particular fiscal year.
Similarly, in years when USCIS will use
the registration system, it will project
how many registrations need to be
selected in order to meet, but not exceed
the numerical limitations. Unselected
registrations will remain on reserve for
the applicable fiscal year. If USCIS
determines that it needs to increase the
number of registrations projected to
meet the regular cap or advanced degree
exemption, and select additional
registrations, USCIS would select from
among the registrations that are on
reserve a sufficient number to meet the
cap or advanced degree exemption, or
re-open the registration period if
additional registrations are needed to
meet the new projected amount.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
4. Equity of Registration Fee
Comment: A commenter stated that
H–1B petitioners have established
willingness and ability to pay the
nominal H–1B registration fee. The
commenter stated a $10 fee is justifiable
because the employers are the ones who
pay existing H–1B related filing fees
rather than investing this money to
cultivate the knowledge of existing
employees to better their business.
Response: DHS agrees that a $10 fee
for each registration will not be overly
burdensome for employers and will
assist DHS in recovering the cost of
administering the registration process.
E. Impact on Small Entities
Comment: Two commenters
addressed the proposal’s impact on
small entities. A business association
said USCIS stated that the $10
registration fee might minimize the
possibility that larger employers could
flood the system crowding out smaller,
compliant firms. The commenter said it
remains concerned about how the
overall H–1B registration system will
impact small businesses and urged
USCIS to monitor and report on the
5 See
8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(ii)(B).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
filings. One commenter said that they
were concerned there were not enough
safeguards in place to prevent
unscrupulous petitioners from flooding
the H–1B system. This commenter wrote
that DHS should conduct additional
outreach consistent with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), especially to
small business entities, so that concerns
about potential flooding of the
registration system can be addressed
prior to implementation.
Response: DHS has already put
several safeguards in place to prevent
employers from flooding the H–1B
registration system, and will monitor
the system throughout the registration
process. As noted in the H–1B
registration final rule, DHS believes it is
too speculative to conclude that the H–
1B registration system would result in
large entities crowding out smaller
entities for H–1B prospective
employees. With the registration system,
and the lower nominal fee, the barrier
to entry associated with the registration
system could result in increased
participation by small entities in the
competition for H–1B cap-subject
nonimmigrant visas. As noted in the
proposed rule, the new fee will impose
a nominal compliance cost for any
entity, including small entities, that
choose to compete for an H–1B capsubject visa. DHS maintains that the
proposed fee will not impose a
significant impact on small entities.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Comment: A professional association
stated that USCIS’ estimate of a 7minute additional time burden for
reading the instructions and completing
the electronic fee payment was
‘‘extremely low’’ and appears to assume
that stakeholders are familiar with the
pay.gov portal, rather than first time
users. However, the commenter stated
that many U.S. employers and attorneys
have little or no experience using the
pay.gov portal. The commenter wrote
that USCIS should recalculate the total
public burden (in time) to take into
consideration that in many, if not most
cases, registrants will be accessing and
navigating the pay.gov portal for the
very first time when submitting initial
H–1B registrations.
Response: The pay.gov screen will be
seamlessly linked to the registration
platform and will not require a separate
log in, password, or navigation to a
separate website. Paying the $10 fee will
be very similar to paying for events or
airline tickets, merchandise, and other
orders placed online, and USCIS
anticipates it will be a straightforward
process for the public. In addition and
as noted above, USCIS intends to
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
conduct outreach and training on how
to use the registration system, including
making payments on the pay.gov portal,
and will announce these trainings on
the USCIS website. USCIS has received
approval from OMB–OIRA to
discontinue the approval of this
collection of information as guidance
found at the website pra.digital.gov
stated that such payment transactions
are not subject to the PRA.
G. Implementation Timeframe
Comment: Two commenters
addressed the implementation
timeframe for the proposed fee or the H–
1B registration process more generally
and expressed concern about the lack of
a definitive decision from USCIS to
implement the new H–1B registration
requirement to which the $10
registration fee will be attached. These
commenters asked that USCIS notify the
public as soon as possible with a final
decision on whether usability testing
supports proceeding with the
registration tool. One commenter stated
that, without a final decision and proper
notice being provided to stakeholders at
this point in time, many business have
already begun expending resources in
the preparation of various supporting
documents for the cap-subject H–1B
petitions as they normally would, thus
negating the cost savings intended by
the rule. One commenter noted that if
USCIS does not announce that it will
proceed with registration until shortly
before the FY2021 cap season begins in
April 2020, it will likely be most
harmful to the interests of smaller
employers who have less overall
resources to deal with new regulatory
requirements in a short period of time.
A few commenters stated that, no later
than November 1, 2019, USCIS should
publicly announce its decision to
implement the registration system in the
Spring of 2020 for FY 2021 cap-subject
H–1B cases. An advocacy group stated
that this notice could be posted on the
agency’s website or could come with the
publication of the H–1B registration fee
final rule, so it can be announced in the
Federal Register months before any
registration period would be opened.
This commenter also said USCIS should
indicate as early as possible the dates
when the specific registration period
will occur and should consider a
registration period longer than the 2week minimum registration period
identified in the final rule.
Response: USCIS intends to
implement the registration process for
FY 2021, subject to continued testing of
the system. DHS will publish a notice in
the Federal Register to announce the
initial implementation of the H–1B
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
registration process in advance of the
cap season in which it will first
implement the requirement. USCIS will
notify the public about the
implementation timeframe of the
registration system and the initial
registration period as soon as possible,
and will provide stakeholders with
plenty of notice prior to implementing
the registration requirement.
Comment: One commenter asked that
as DHS moves to finalize and
implement the H–1B registration fee, it
continue public outreach on usability
testing as a means to further assess the
technical details of the registration
mechanics. A business association said
USCIS should (1) engage stakeholders
and fully vet the new platform before
instituting the electronic registration
system and (2) extend the registration
period to at least 30 days to account for
any system outages, difficulties in
entering data, or other unforeseen
problems.
Response: USCIS intends to continue
stakeholder outreach and training prior
to the initial implementation of the
registration system to allow
stakeholders the opportunity to
familiarize themselves with the
electronic registration process. USCIS
will provide guidance on how to use the
registration system and edit registrations
prior to opening the registration system
for the initial registration period. DHS
will announce the duration of the initial
registration period in the Federal
Register notice.
additional requirements designed to
ensure employers pay appropriate
wages to H–1B nonimmigrant workers.
Comments from the public outside the
scope of this rulemaking concerned the
following issues:
• Some commenters provided
suggestions for improvement of the H–
1B program in general, including to
raise the H–1B salary minimum.
• Some commenters said DHS should
review the B–1, [Optional Practical
Training] OPT, EB–1, H–4,
[Employment Authorization Document]
EAD, and L–1/L–2 visa programs to
address unfairness, reduce fraud and
abuse within the programs, address
specific companies known for abuses,
and protect wages of American workers.
• One commenter expressed safety
concerns that H–1B workers are
managing critical infrastructure at state
government facilities due to an influx of
H–1B workers in the fields of IT, human
resources, and contracting.
• Another commenter said H–1B is a
‘‘legalized scam.’’
Response: DHS appreciates these
suggestions, however, DHS did not
propose to address these issues in the
proposed rule, therefore these
suggestions fall outside of the scope of
this rulemaking.
As discussed previously, DHS is
finalizing this rule as proposed.
H. Out of Scope
DHS received many comments that
were unrelated to the proposed
revisions regarding the registration fee.
Many of these comments would require
Congressional action or additional
regulatory action by DHS unrelated to
the H–1B registration fee requirement.
Although DHS has summarized the
comments it received below, DHS is not
providing substantive responses to those
comments as they are beyond the scope
of this rulemaking. To the extent that
comments are seeking further revisions
to the H–1B program, DHS recognizes
that additional regulatory changes could
improve the H–1B program and intends
to propose a separate rule to strengthen
the H–1B visa classification. As stated
in the Unified Agenda of Proposed
Regulatory Actions, 83 FR 57803, DHS
plans to propose to revise the definition
of specialty occupation to increase focus
on obtaining the best and the brightest
foreign nationals via the H–1B program,
and revise the definition of employment
and employer-employee relationship to
better protect U.S. workers and wages.
In addition, DHS will propose
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
IV. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs,
benefits, and transfers of available
alternatives, and if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has not
designated this rule a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
OIRA has not reviewed this rule. As this
rule is not a significant regulatory
action, this rule is exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 13771.
See OMB’s Memorandum ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771,
Titled ‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (April 5,
2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60311
1. Summary
DHS will amend its regulations to
require a fee for each registration
submitted to register for the H–1B cap
selection process. DHS will require a fee
of $10 per registration to recover some
of the costs that are associated with
implementing and maintaining the H–
1B cap registration system. USCIS
suspended the registration requirement
for the FY 2020 H–1B cap selection
process. DHS recognizes that the
registration requirement was established
to provide efficiency savings to both
USCIS and H–1B cap-subject petitioners
associated with the current paper-based
cap selection process. In the H–1B
registration final rule, DHS estimated
significant cost savings for both USCIS
and those H–1B petitioners. DHS stands
by that analysis and believes that USCIS
will still reap significant efficiency and
cost savings when comparing an
electronic registration process relative to
the current paper filing and cap
selection process. DHS acknowledges
that the $10 registration fee will reduce
some of the estimated cost savings for
unselected H–1B cap-subject petitioners
as described in the H–1B registration
final rule. As discussed in the
Regulatory Review section, DHS does
not believe that the proposed
registration fee will significantly factor
into the decision-making of potential H–
1B petitioners, nor does DHS believe
that the fee will be perceived as being
cost-prohibitive by these potential H–1B
petitioners. After the registration
requirement is implemented and
reviewed over the coming years, DHS
will consider the costs associated with
the system as required during biennial
fee reviews and adjust the registration
fee accordingly via notice-and-comment
rulemaking.
2. Analysis of Costs and Benefits
When registration is required, all
petitioners seeking to file an H–1B capsubject petition, including those eligible
for the advanced degree exemption,
must first electronically register with
USCIS during a designated registration
period. A separate registration must be
submitted for each worker on whose
behalf a petitioner seeks to file an H–1B
cap-subject petition. Only those
petitioners whose registrations are
selected will be eligible to file an H–1B
cap-subject petition during an
associated filing period for the
applicable fiscal year. By means of this
rule, DHS will require payment of a $10
registration fee for each registration,
which will be due and payable at the
time of registration submission. A
registration will not be considered as
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
60312
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
properly submitted until the fee is
paid.6 In the analysis accompanying the
H–1B registration final rule, DHS
estimated that 192,918 H–1B cap-subject
registrations will be submitted annually
based on 5-year historical average Form
I–129 petition filings.7 That estimate
will form the baseline for the analysis of
costs associated with the $10
registration fee. As DHS acknowledged
in the H–1B registration final rule, the
use of this historical average to form the
baseline estimate does not factor in the
possibility that the registration’s lower
barrier to entry could result in
increasing the number of registrations
that USCIS receives.8 To account for
this possibility, this analysis will
present a range analysis of annual costs
up through an escalator of 30 percent
increase over the baseline estimate.
Table 1 presents the annual,
undiscounted, aggregate costs associated
with the $10 registration fee using a
range of escalations over the baseline
estimate of registrations.
TABLE 1—UNDISCOUNTED AGGREGATE COST ESTIMATES BY PROJECTED REGISTRATIONS
Number of
registrations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
...................................................................................................................................................................
Plus 10% ...................................................................................................................................................
Plus 20% ...................................................................................................................................................
Plus 30% ...................................................................................................................................................
192,918
212,210
231,502
250,793
Annual cost—
undiscounted
$1,929,180
2,122,100
2,315,020
2,507,930
USCIS is required to review the cost
of its operations on a biennial basis and
recommend fee adjustments as
necessary. USCIS may adjust the filing
fees for immigration benefits and
services through notice-and-comment
rulemaking. DHS used a 5-year period of
analysis to account for a potential time
lag of the fee review and the actual
adjustment that occurs during the
rulemaking cycle. Therefore, it is
reasonable to conclude that a 5-year
period is a sufficient period for DHS to
base the analysis of the estimated
impact of the registration fee.
In addition to the $10 registration fee,
USCIS projects there will be an
additional 7-minute time burden
associated with reading the instructions
and completing the electronic fee
payment. In the H–1B registration final
rule, DHS monetized time burdens
based on who is expected to submit the
registration: A human resources (HR)
specialist; an in-house lawyer; or an
outsourced lawyer.9 The relevant wage
is currently $32.11 10 per hour for an HR
specialist and $69.34 11 per hour for an
in-house lawyer. DHS accounts for
worker benefits when estimating the
opportunity cost of time by calculating
a benefits-to-wage multiplier using the
Department of Labor, BLS report
detailing the average employer costs for
employee compensation for all civilian
workers in major occupational groups
and industries. DHS estimates that the
benefits-to-wage multiplier is 1.46 and,
therefore, is able to estimate the full
opportunity cost per applicant,
including employee wages and salaries
and the full cost of benefits such as paid
leave, insurance, and retirement.12 DHS
multiplied the average hourly U.S. wage
rate for HR specialists and lawyers by
1.46 to account for the full cost of
employee benefits and overhead, for a
total of $46.88 13 per hour for an HR
specialist and $101.24 14 per hour for an
in-house lawyer. DHS recognizes that a
firm may choose, but is not required, to
outsource the preparation of these
registrations and, therefore, has
presented two wage rates for lawyers.
To determine the full opportunity costs
if a firm hired an outsourced lawyer,
DHS multiplied the average hourly U.S.
wage rate for lawyers by 2.5 for a total
of $173.35 15 to approximate an hourly
billing rate for an outsourced lawyer.16
The monetized equivalent time burden
for 7 minutes (0.12 hours) is $5.63,17
$12.15,18 and $20.80 19 for an HR
specialist, in-house lawyer, and
outsourced lawyer, respectively.
6 See 8 CFR 103.2(a)(1) and 8 CFR
214.2(h)(8)(iii)(A)(1).
7 See 84 FR at 925.
8 Id.
9 See 84 FR at 929.
10 Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of
Labor, ‘‘Occupational Employment Statistics, May
2018, Human Resources Specialist’’: https://
www.bls.gov/oes/2018/may/oes131071.htm. Visited
October 2, 2019.
11 Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of
Labor, ‘‘Occupational Employment Statistics, May
2017, Lawyers’’: https://www.bls.gov/oes/2018/
may/oes231011.htm. Visited October 2, 2019.
12 The benefits-to-wage multiplier is calculated as
follows: (Total Employee Compensation per hour)/
(Wages and Salaries per hour). See Economic News
Release, U.S. Dep’t of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Table 1. Employer costs per hour worked
for employee compensation and costs as a percent
of total compensation: Civilian workers, by major
occupational and industry group (June 2019),
available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/
archives/ecec_09172019.pdf (viewed October 2,
2019). The ECEC measures the average cost to
employers for wages and salaries and benefits per
employee hour worked.
13 Calculation: $32.11 * 1.46 = $46.88 total wage
rate for HR specialist.
14 Calculation: $69.34 * 1.46 = $101.24 total wage
rate for in-house lawyer.
15 Calculation: $69.34 * 2.5 = $173.35 total wage
rate for an outsourced lawyer.
16 See 83 FR at 24914 (May 31, 2018). The DHS
analysis in, ‘‘Exercise of Time-Limited Authority To
Increase the Fiscal Year 2018 Numerical Limitation
for the H–2B Temporary Nonagricultural Worker
Program’’ used a multiplier of 2.5 to convert inhouse attorney wages to the cost of outsourced
attorney wages. DHS believes the methodology used
in the Final Small Entity Impact Analysis remains
sound for using 2.5 as a multiplier for outsourced
labor wages in this rule.
17 Calculation: $46.88 hourly wage rate for HR
specialist * 0.12 hours = $5.63.
18 Calculation: $101.24 hourly wage rate for inhouse lawyer * 0.12 hours = $12.15.
19 Calculation: $173.35 hourly wage rate for
outsourced lawyer * 0.12 hours = $20.80.
20 See 84 FR at 925.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Based on a review of historical filings,
USCIS determined that approximately
75 percent of H–1B cap-subject petitions
are filed by an attorney or accredited
representative.20 This analysis will
carry that finding forward to estimate
the time burden costs for complying
with the registration fee requirement. In
other words, the analysis of time burden
costs presented assumes that 25 percent
of the registrations will be completed by
an HR specialist or representative, and
75 percent of the registrations will be
completed by an attorney, either inhouse or outsourced. Table 2 presents
the annual, undiscounted, time burden
or opportunity costs associated with
paying the registration fee
electronically, assuming 7 minutes of
time burden, over a range of estimated
numbers of registrations and according
to who submits the H–1B registration.
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
60313
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—ANNUAL TIME BURDEN COST (UNDISCOUNTED) BY PROJECTED REGISTRATIONS & TYPE OF SUBMITTER,
ROUNDED
Number of
registrations
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
...........................................................................................................
Plus 10% ...........................................................................................
Plus 20% ...........................................................................................
Plus 30% ...........................................................................................
Note that the cost estimates in Table
2 are overstated because they do not
account for the scenario of fewer unique
entities submitting registrations for
multiple workers. DHS assumes that in
those cases, the registration submissions
would be done at the same time so the
fee payment could be bundled, thus
192,918
212,210
231,502
250,793
reducing the overall time burden
associated with submitting separate
payments. The DHS analysis in the H–
1B registration final rule found that, on
average, each employer submitted five
petitions.24 Thus, the estimate of
undiscounted costs in Table 2, which is
based on the assumption of one
In-house
lawyer 22
HR
specialist 21
$271,532
298,686
325,839
352,991
Outsourced
lawyer 23
$1,757,965
1,933,764
2,109,562
2,285,351
$3,009,521
3,310,476
3,611,431
3,912,371
petitioning employer filing one petition,
is likely overstated by approximately 80
percent. Estimates that are more likely
to reflect the current business behavior
of five petitions per employer, are
presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3—ANNUAL TIME BURDEN COST (UNDISCOUNTED) BY PROJECTED REGISTRATIONS & TYPE OF SUBMITTER, LESS
80%
Number of
registrations
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
...........................................................................................................
Plus 10% ...........................................................................................
Plus 20% ...........................................................................................
Plus 30% ...........................................................................................
Therefore, the total, undiscounted,
aggregate annual costs of both the
registration fee and time burden costs
are presented in Table 4. The figures in
Table 4 are found by adding the
192,918
212,210
231,502
250,793
proportional costs presented in Table 1
(in other words, assume 25 percent of
registrations are completed by HR
specialist and 75 percent of registrations
are completed by lawyers either in-
In-house
lawyer
HR specialist
$54,306
59,737
65,168
70,598
Outsourced
lawyer
$351,593
386,753
421,912
457,070
$601,904
662,095
722,286
782,474
house or outsourced) with the estimated
costs for entities submitting registrations
in Table 3.
TABLE 4—AGGREGATE COST (UNDISCOUNTED) BY PROJECTED REGISTRATIONS & TYPE OF SUBMITTER
Number of
registrations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
...........................................................................................................
Plus 10% ...........................................................................................
Plus 20% ...........................................................................................
Plus 30% ...........................................................................................
192,918
212,210
231,502
250,793
HR specialist
(table 3 + 25%
of table 1)
In-house
lawyer
(table 3 + 75%
of table 1)
Outsourced
lawyer
(table 3 + 75%
of table 1)
$536,601
590,262
643,923
697,581
$1,798,478
1,978,328
2,158,177
2,338,018
$2,048,789
2,253,670
2,458,551
2,663,422
The lower bound aggregate cost
estimate of complying with the
registration fee requirement is found by
summing the estimated cost of using an
HR specialist with the cost estimate of
using in-house lawyers to complete the
registration. The upper bound aggregate
cost estimate is found by summing the
estimated cost of using an HR specialist
with the cost estimate of using
outsourced lawyers to complete the
registration. Table 5 presents the lower
bound and upper bound aggregate cost
estimates over the projected number of
registrations for a 5-year period,
discounted at 3 and 7 percent.
21 Calculation: Number of Registrations * 25
percent * $5.63 (figures presented in the table are
rounded to the nearest dollar).
22 Calculation: Number of Registrations * 75
percent * $12.15 (figures presented in the table are
rounded to the nearest dollar).
23 Calculation: Number of Registrations * 75
percent * $20.80 (figures presented in the table are
rounded to the nearest dollar).
24 See 84 FR at 948 (January 31, 2019) for the FY
2016 cohort of H–1B cap-subject petitions selected.
Of the 95,839 petitions selected, there were only
20,046 unique entities that filed those petitions.
Calculation: 95,839/20,046 = 4.78.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
60314
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 5—AGGREGATE COST ESTIMATES BY PROJECTED REGISTRATIONS OVER 5-YEAR PERIOD, DISCOUNTED AT 3% AND
7%
Number of
registrations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
Baseline
...............................................................................
Plus 10% ...............................................................
Plus 20% ...............................................................
Plus 30% ...............................................................
As discussed previously, while this
initial registration fee of $10 per
registration may not recover the full
costs associated with implementing and
maintaining the H–1B registration
system, it would allow for USCIS to
recover some of the costs, thus lessening
the fiscal impact to USCIS. DHS does
not anticipate the required registration
fee to represent a significant business
expense for those employers that seek to
employ cap-subject H–1B workers. The
total costs for each registration would
range from $15.63 to $30.80 for a
registration, depending on who the
petitioner uses to submit the
registration. Even with the addition of
the registration fee requirement, as
discussed previously in the preamble,
the registration process is still
anticipated to result in a net benefit
relative to the paper-based cap selection
process.
The registration fee may also provide
some unquantified benefits to the extent
that the fee may help to deter frivolous
registrations. DHS makes no
conclusions on the impact that a $10 fee
would have on the number of
registrations and has no way to estimate
such an impact. As stated in the H–1B
registration final rule, however,
commenters on the H–1B registration
proposed rule expressed various
concerns about potential ‘‘flooding’’ of
the registration system. While there is
no way to estimate if a small fee would
further deter such acts, beyond the
measures identified in the H–1B
registration final rule (e.g., the
attestation requirement), DHS believes
that it is reasonable to conclude that the
existence of a $10 fee could reduce the
likelihood that frivolous registrations
would be submitted to flood or
otherwise game the registration system.
In any event, such a benefit would only
be tangential to the fee’s primary
purpose of recovering USCIS costs.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
5-Year discounted costs, 3%,
($ millions)
5-Year discounted costs, 7%,
($ millions)
Lower bound
Lower bound
192,918
212,210
231,502
250,793
$10.7
11.8
12.8
13.9
Public Law 104–121 (March 29, 1996),
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during the development of
their rules. The term ‘‘small entities’’
comprises of small businesses, not-forprofit organizations that are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. An
‘‘individual’’ is not defined by the RFA
as a small entity and costs to an
individual from a rule are not
considered for RFA purposes. In
addition, the courts have held that the
RFA requires an agency to perform a
regulatory flexibility analysis of small
entity impacts only when a rule directly
regulates small entities. Consequently,
any indirect impacts from a rule to a
small entity are not considered as costs
for RFA purposes.
In the proposed rule, DHS provided a
factual basis in certifying the
registration fee requirement would not
pose a significant impact on small
entities for public comment. DHS
received no challenges to the
certification statement under the RFA,
nor to the factual basis presented in
support of said certification. DHS is
reproducing the factual basis, with
updates to correct costs estimates due to
calculation errors, in certifying this final
rule will not pose a significant impact
on small entities.
This final rule will directly impact
those entities that petition on behalf of
H–1B cap-subject workers. Generally,
H–1B petitions are filed by a sponsoring
employer; by proxy, once the online
registration requirement is
implemented, registrations would
likewise be submitted by a sponsoring
employer or their authorized
representative. The employer intending
to petition for an H–1B cap-subject
worker will incur the registration fee
costs of $10 per registration. Therefore,
DHS examines the direct impact of this
final rule on small entities in the
analysis that follows.
In the H–1B registration final rule,
DHS estimated that approximately 78
percent of selected H–1B petitioners
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Upper bound
$11.8
13.0
14.2
15.4
$9.6
105.0
11.5
12.4
Upper bound
$10.6
11.7
12.7
13.8
were small entities after conducting an
analysis of a statistically significant
sample.25 DHS believes it is reasonable
to carry this finding through and assume
that approximately 78 percent, a
majority, of H–1B registrations would be
submitted by small entities. Thus, for
purposes of the RFA, this final rule is
expected to impact a ‘‘substantial’’
number of small entities.
To determine whether the impact of
the required registration filing fee would
be ‘‘significant,’’ DHS must consider the
estimated fee impacts of individual
petitioning small entities. In the H–1B
registration final rule, DHS found that
the majority of petitioning employers
tended to submit petitions for multiple
employees. Based on a review of filings
received in 2016, DHS determined that
for every one unique petitioning
employer, there were an average of 4.78
petitions submitted.26 For purposes of
this analysis, DHS is rounding that
figure up to form a baseline assumption
that for every one petitioning employer,
a total of five H–1B cap-subject workers
are requested. Therefore, it is reasonable
to conclude that on average each
petitioning employer that is a small
entity will face a total fee impact of $50,
plus a one-time monetized time burden
impact ranging from $5.63 to $20.80, as
a result of the required H–1B
registration fee.27
In that same statistically valid sample
study, DHS was able to determine the
top 10 industries that petitioned for capsubject H–1B workers.28 The industry
data, using the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS), is selfreported on USCIS Form I–129, Petition
for Nonimmigrant Worker, which
petitioning employers use to petition for
H–1B workers. Table 6 shows a list of
the top 10 NAICS industries that
25 See
84 FR at 948–49.
84 FR at 948, explaining that, for the FY
2016 cohort, 20,046 unique entities filed the 95,839
H–1B cap-subject petitions that were selected.
Calculation: 95,839/20,046 = 4.78.
27 Calculation: $10 (registration fee) × 5
registrations (one for each H–1B worker being
entered into the registration) = $50 total fee impact
for employers.
28 See 84 FR at 950.
26 See
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
60315
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
submitted H–1B cap-subject petitions in
the sample study, and the
corresponding size standard according
to the SBA.
TABLE 6—TOP 10 NAICS INDUSTRIES SUBMITTING FORM I–129, SMALL ENTITY ANALYSIS RESULTS
Rank
1 .............
2 .............
3 .............
4 .............
5 .............
6 .............
7 .............
8 .............
9 .............
10 ...........
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards
in millions
of dollars
Size standards
in number
of employees
Custom Computer Programming Services .............................................................
Computer Systems Design Services ......................................................................
All Other Business Support Services .....................................................................
Engineering Services ..............................................................................................
Software Publishers ................................................................................................
Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services .......
Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing ...............................................
Other Management Consulting Services ................................................................
Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services ..............................................
Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing ...........................................................
$27.5
27.5
15.0
15.0
38.5
15.0
........................
15.0
15.0
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
1,250
........................
........................
1,250
NAICS code
541511
541512
561499
541330
511210
541611
334413
541618
541690
325412
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
...........
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Source: USCIS analysis based on small business size standards.
Note: The Small Business Administration (SBA) has developed size standards to carry out the purposes of the Small Business Act and those
size standards can be found in 13 CFR, section 121.201.
SBA’s monetary size standard is based
on the average annual receipts of the
business entity. As discussed
previously, DHS has determined that
the majority of H–1B petitioning
employers would be classified as
‘‘small’’ for purposes of the RFA.
However, comparing the expected total
fee impact of $55.63 on the low-end for
every small entity (assuming each entity
submits approximately five
registrations) results in a negligible cost
impact relative to average annual
receipts. In fact, for a cost of $55.63, a
company would need to have annual
receipts of only $5,563 for the cost of
the registration fee for five registrations
to equal 1 percent of the annual
receipts. If a company used an
outsourced lawyer to petition for a visa
at a cost of $70.80 (assuming each entity
uses an outsourced attorney to submit
five registrations) the company would
need to have annual receipts of only
$7,080 for the cost of the fee to equal 1
percent of the annual receipts.
SBA guidance on additional measures
to determine whether a rule would have
a significant impact suggest comparing
the compliance cost to the labor costs.29
In that guidance, SBA states that an
impact could be significant if the
compliance cost ‘‘exceeds 5 percent of
the labor costs of the entities in that
sector.’’ 30 In the annual report to
Congress on the characteristics of H–1B
workers for fiscal year 2017, USCIS
determined the median annual
compensation for initial employment
across all occupations was $75,000.31
Furthermore, the median annual
compensation for initial employment
across known occupations ranged from
a low of $42,000 to a high of $160,000.32
This final rule is estimated to result in
compliance costs that represent much
less than 5 percent of the H–1B labor
costs.
Based on these findings, DHS certifies
that while this final rule could impact
a substantial number of small entities,
the impact that would arise from the
$10 registration fee would not result in
a significant impact. Therefore, the
Secretary certifies that this final rule
will not cause a significant impact to a
substantial number of small entities.
29 See U.S. Small Business Administration, A
Guide for Government Agencies: How to Comply
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, The RFA
threshold analysis: Can we certify? at Pg. 19,
https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/advocacy/
How-to-Comply-with-the-RFA-WEB.pdf. Visited
Apr. 16, 2019.
30 Id.
31 See U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Characteristics of H–1B Specialty Occupation
Workers, Fiscal Year 2017 Annual Report to
Congress, at Table 11, https://www.uscis.gov/sites/
default/files/reports-studies/Characteristics-ofSpecialty-Occupation-Workers-H-1B-Fiscal-Year2017.pdf. Visited Apr. 16, 2019.
32 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
C. Other Regulatory Requirements
This final rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by the Congressional Review
Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2), and thus is not
subject to a 60-day delay in the rule
becoming effective. This action is not
subject to the written statement
requirements of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). Nor does it require prior
consultation with State, local, and tribal
government officials as specified by
Executive Order 13132 or 13175. This
final rule also does not require an
Environmental Assessment (EA) or
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
40 CFR 1507.3(b)(2)(ii) and 1508.4. This
action would not affect the quality of
the human environment and fits within
Categorical Exclusion number A3(d) in
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dir. 023–01 Rev. 01, Appendix A, Table
1, for rules that interpret or amend an
existing regulation without changing its
environmental effect.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
DHS is submitting the information
collection requirements in this rule to
OMB for review and approval in
accordance with requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501–3512. DHS and USCIS are
revising this information collection to
report a change in the estimated annual
cost to the Federal government as a
result of this final rule. Additionally,
the information collection instrument
has been revised to include language
about the new registration fee. The
notice of proposed rulemaking stated
that DHS proposed a revision to the
USCIS Electronic Fee Payment
Processing information collection,
former OMB Control Number 1651–
0131. DHS and USCIS have determined
that the collection of information related
to fee payment processing is exempt
from the Paperwork Reduction Act and
that collection of information is not
required to be included in this
rulemaking.33 DHS is revising the
following USCIS information collection:
H–1B Registration Tool
DHS and USCIS are revising this
information collection to report a
change in the estimated annual cost to
the Federal government as a result of
this rule. Additionally, the information
collection instrument has been revised
to include language about the new
registration fee.
33 See https://pra.digital.gov/do-I-need-clearance/
Stating, ‘‘Doesn’t need PRA Clearance: Information
for voluntary commercial transactions, like
payment and delivery details.’’)
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
60316
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Overview of information collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a Currently Approved
Collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: H–1B
Registration Tool.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the DHS
sponsoring the collection: No Agency
Form Number; USCIS.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit. USCIS uses the data collected on
this form to determine which employers
will be informed that they are eligible to
submit a USCIS Form I–129, Petition for
a Nonimmigrant Worker, to petition for
a cap-subject beneficiary in the H–1B
classification.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The estimated total number of
respondents for the information
collection H–1B Registration Tool is
192,918 and the estimated hour burden
per response is 0.5 hours. Any
additional time burden for fee payment
processing is captured in the
information collection USCIS Electronic
Fee Payment Processing (OMB 1615–
0131).
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total estimated annual
hour burden associated with this
collection is 96,459 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public
burden (in cost) associated with the
collection: The estimated total cost
burden for purchases of equipment or
services to achieve compliance with the
information collection requirements of
this rule (not including providing
information to or keeping records for the
government, or kept as part of
customary and usual business or private
practices), are $0.34 There are no capital,
start-up, operational or maintenance
costs to respondents associated with
this collection of information.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and
procedure, Authority delegations
(Government agencies), Freedom of
information, Immigration, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, DHS is amending
chapter I of title 8 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
34 As stated elsewhere in this rule, the annual
transfer for registrants associated with the proposed
$10 fee is $1,929,180.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Nov 07, 2019
Jkt 250001
PART 103—IMMIGRATION BENEFITS;
BIOMETRIC REQUIREMENTS;
AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS
1. The authority citation for part 103
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C.
1101, 1103, 1304, 1356, 1356b, 1372; 31
U.S.C. 9701; Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135
(6 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); E.O. 12356, 47 FR 14874,
15557, 3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 166; 8 CFR part
2; Pub. L. 112–54, 125 Stat 550.
2. Section 103.7 is amended by adding
paragraph (b)(1)(i)(NNN) to read as
follows:
■
§ 103.7
Fees.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(NNN) Registration requirement for
petitioners seeking to file H–1B petitions
on behalf of cap-subject aliens. For each
registration submitted to register for the
H–1B cap or advanced degree
exemption selection process: $10. This
fee will not be refunded if the
registration is not selected or is
withdrawn.
*
*
*
*
*
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–24292 Filed 11–7–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
8 CFR Part 217
RIN 1601–AA94
Designation of Poland for the Visa
Waiver Program
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
Eligible citizens, nationals,
and passport holders from designated
Visa Waiver Program countries may
apply for admission to the United States
at U.S. ports of entry as nonimmigrant
aliens for a period of ninety days or less
for business or pleasure without first
obtaining a nonimmigrant visa,
provided that they are otherwise eligible
for admission under applicable statutory
and regulatory requirements. On
October 31, 2019, the Secretary of
Homeland Security, in consultation
with the Secretary of State, designated
Poland as a country that is eligible to
participate in the Visa Waiver Program.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Accordingly, this rule updates the list of
countries designated for participation in
the Visa Waiver Program by adding
Poland.
This final rule is effective on
November 11, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erik
Rye, Department of Homeland Security,
Visa Waiver Program Office, (202) 282–
9907.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Background
A. The Visa Waiver Program
Pursuant to section 217 of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA),
8 U.S.C. 1187, the Secretary of
Homeland Security (the Secretary), in
consultation with the Secretary of State,
may designate certain countries as Visa
Waiver Program (VWP) countries 1 if
certain requirements are met. Those
requirements include, without
limitation: (1) A U.S. Government
determination that the country meets
the applicable statutory requirement
with respect to nonimmigrant visitor
visa refusals for nationals of the
country; (2) an official certification that
it issues machine-readable, electronic
passports that comply with
internationally accepted standards; (3) a
U.S. Government determination that the
country’s designation would not
negatively affect U.S. law enforcement
and security interests; (4) an agreement
with the United States to report, or
make available through other designated
means, to the U.S. Government
information about the theft or loss of
passports; (5) a U.S. Government
determination that the government
accepts for repatriation any citizen,
former citizen, or national not later than
three weeks after the issuance of a final
executable order of removal; and (6) an
agreement with the United States to
share information regarding whether
citizens or nationals of the country
represent a threat to the security or
welfare of the United States or its
citizens.
The INA also sets forth requirements
for continued eligibility and, where
appropriate, probation and/or
termination of program countries.
1 All references to ‘‘country’’ or ‘‘countries’’ in the
laws authorizing the Visa Waiver Program are read
to include Taiwan. See Taiwan Relations Act of
1979, Public Law 96–8, section 4(b)(1) (codified at
22 U.S.C. 3303(b)(1)) (providing that ‘‘[w]henever
the laws of the United States refer or relate to
foreign countries, nations, states, governments, or
similar entities, such terms shall include and such
laws shall apply with respect to Taiwan’’). This is
consistent with the United States’ one-China policy,
under which the United States has maintained
unofficial relations with Taiwan since 1979.
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60307-60316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24292]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2019 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 60307]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
8 CFR Part 103
[CIS No. 2652-19; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2019-0006]
RIN 1615-AC36
Registration Fee Requirement for Petitioners Seeking To File H-1B
Petitions on Behalf of Cap Subject Aliens
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
regulations to require petitioners seeking to file H-1B cap-subject
petitions to pay a $10 fee for each registration they submit to U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for the H-1B cap selection
process.
DATES: This final rule is effective December 9, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Nimick, Chief, Business &
Foreign Workers Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security,
20 Massachusetts Avenue NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20529-2140;
Telephone (202) 272-8377.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
A. The H-1B Registration System
B. Legal Authority
C. Registration Fee
II. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
A. Summary of Public Comments
B. General Support for the Proposed Rule
C. General Opposition to the Proposed Rule
D. Establishment of Registration Fee
1. Fee Payment System
2. Fee Amount ($10 per registration)
3. Fraud Deterrent
4. Equity of Registration Fee
E. Impact on Small Entities
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
G. Implementation Timeframe
H. Out of Scope
III. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Other Regulatory Requirements
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
I. Background
A. The H-1B Registration System
On January 31, 2019, DHS published a final rule requiring
petitioners seeking to file H-1B cap-subject petitions, including those
eligible for the advanced degree exemption, to first electronically
register with USCIS during a designated registration period, unless the
requirement is suspended (``H-1B registration final rule'').\1\ USCIS
stated in the H-1B registration final rule that it was suspending the
registration requirement for the fiscal year 2020 cap season to
complete required user testing of the new H-1B registration system and
otherwise ensure the system and process work correctly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 84 FR 888 (Jan. 31, 2019); 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(iii)(A)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once USCIS implements the system and requires registration, USCIS
will not consider an H-1B cap-subject petition to be properly filed
unless it is based on a valid registration selection for the applicable
fiscal year. See 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(iii)(A)(1) and (h)(8)(iii)(D). USCIS
will reject or deny H-1B cap-subject petitions that are not properly
filed. 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(iii)(D).
B. Legal Authority
The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) authorizes DHS to
establish and collect fees for adjudication and naturalization services
to ``ensure recovery of the full costs of providing all such services,
including the costs of similar services provided without charge to
asylum applicants or other immigrants.'' INA section 286(m), 8 U.S.C.
1356(m). Through the collection of fees established under that
authority, USCIS is primarily funded by immigration and naturalization
fees charged to applicants, petitioners, and other requestors. See INA
sections 286(m) and (n), 8 U.S.C. 1356(m) and (n); 8 CFR
103.7(b)(1)(i)(USCIS fees). Fees collected from individuals and
entities filing immigration benefit requests are deposited into the
Immigration Examinations Fee Account (IEFA) and used to fund the cost
of processing immigration benefit requests.\2\ Consistent with that
authority and USCIS' reliance on fees for its funding, DHS is amending
its regulations to require a fee for submitting H-1B registrations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 81 FR 26904, 26905 (May 4, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Registration Fee
On September 4, 2019, DHS published a notice of proposed rulemaking
seeking public comments on its proposal to require a $10 fee per H-1B
registration. See 84 FR 46460. DHS is amending its regulations to
require a $10 fee for each registration submitted to register for the
H-1B cap selection process. See 8 CFR 103.7(b)(1)(i)(NNN). As stated in
the proposed rule, USCIS operations are funded by fees collected for
adjudication and naturalization services, and USCIS must expend
resources to implement and maintain the registration system. Therefore,
DHS is requiring a fee for submitting H-1B registrations to recover
those costs.
II. Public Comments on the Proposed Rule
A. Summary of Public Comments
In response to the proposed rule, DHS received 22 comments during
the 30-day public comment period. There were no duplicate submissions
or letters submitted through mass mailing campaigns. DHS considered all
of these comment submissions. Commenters consisted of individuals
(including U.S. workers), law firms, professional organizations, and
advocacy groups. Some commenters expressed support for the rule and/or
offered suggestions for improvement. Two commenters expressed general
opposition to the rule, suggesting that DHS should not impose a fee for
registration. For many of the public comments, DHS could not ascertain
whether the commenter supported or opposed the proposed rule. A number
of comments received addressed subjects beyond those covered by the
proposed rule, and were deemed out of scope.
DHS has reviewed all of the public comments received in response to
the proposed rule and is addressing relevant comments in this final
rule. DHS's responses are grouped by subject area,
[[Page 60308]]
with a focus on the most common issues and suggestions raised by
commenters. DHS is not addressing comments seeking changes in U.S.
laws, regulations, or agency policies that are out of scope and
unrelated to the changes proposed on September 4, 2019, or to the H-1B
registration system generally.
B. General Support for the Proposed Rule
Comment: Two commenters stated that they agreed with the proposed
fee without providing any additional or substantive rationale. While
DHS appreciates the input, a response to these general support comments
is not necessary.
C. General Opposition to the Proposed Rule
Comment: Two commenters said the rule would cause an unnecessary
financial obstacle to an already tedious and burdensome process for
prospective immigrants. One commenter said that the additional fee
would oppress minorities and put unnecessary financial barriers on
families and extend the time it takes for them to receive clearance.
The commenter explained that the process to become a legalized citizen
is already an extensive process and extending it further could turn
away families from receiving legalization.
Response: The H-1B classification is an employment-based
nonimmigrant classification that allows U.S. employers to temporarily
employ foreign workers in specialty occupations. DHS notes that this
rule is not addressing the process of obtaining an immigrant visa or
lawful permanent resident status. Rather, this rule addresses the fee
for filing an H-1B registration which is a prerequisite to being able
to file a nonimmigrant petition for a foreign worker in the H-1B
nonimmigrant classification. The fee paid for the registration is a
responsibility of the petitioning employer, not the foreign worker. DHS
believes that a $10 fee for each registration a U.S. employer chooses
to submit would not be overly burdensome for employers, especially when
considering the benefits of not having to submit a full, paper-based
petition as required for possible selection under the current cap
selection process. Moreover, the nominal fee would assist DHS in
recovering the cost of administering the electronic registration
process. Requiring such a fee would not have any impact on the time to
adjudicate an immigration benefit request.
D. Establishment of Registration Fee
1. Fee Payment System
Pay.gov
Comments: A few commenters asked DHS to explain with specificity in
the final rule how the payment system and payment mechanics will work.
The comments related to pay.gov are as follows:
Will DHS utilize pay.gov for the payment portal? If an
employer is already registered in pay.gov, will that registration
control for the H-1B registration fee payment?
Is submission of the registration fee payment via pay.gov
limited to employers, or may attorneys also submit payments via pay.gov
on behalf of their U.S. employer clients? The commenter stated that
attorneys should be able to submit registration fee payments via the
pay.gov portal for their U.S. employer clients.
A professional association stated that, given the limited
familiarity of stakeholders with the pay.gov portal, USCIS should
conduct stakeholder outreach and provide guidance and trainings on how
to utilize the pay.gov portal well in advance of the initial
registration period.
Response: DHS will use pay.gov for the payment portal. DHS is using
the pay.gov architecture to process the payment on the back end,
however, petitioners do not need to create a pay.gov account to pay the
fee. Registrants only have to enter in checking/savings account
information to do an ACH (Automated Clearing House) or credit/debit
card information to pay via card.\3\ G-28 Representatives will be able
to pay on pay.gov as well, given that there is no need for an account,
just basic payment details. USCIS is planning to conduct stakeholder
outreach and provide training on how to use the pay.gov portal and will
announce these trainings on the USCIS website.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Per 8 CFR 103.7(a)(2), remittances must be drawn on a bank
or other institution located in the United States and be payable in
United States currency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Payment Sources
Comments: The comments on payment sources include the following:
An advocacy group asked if pay.gov would allow access to
payment via computerized access to bank account and ACH payment
systems. This commenter also asked if there would be a one-time
registration per user of banking and pay.gov information.
A professional association stated that it appears that the
registration fee payment can be paid with either a debit or credit
card, or with a withdrawal from a checking or savings account, but
USCIS only provides a screen shot in the workflow document for the
credit card payment transaction. The commenter urged USCIS to allow for
the registration fee to be paid with a withdrawal from a checking or
savings account (ACH), as this is a common method of payment and will
better accommodate U.S. employers and immigration practitioners
submitting registrations on behalf of a high volume registrants.
A business association asked if there would be an ACH
processing fee associated with using this method of payment. If so, the
commenter asked if USCIS incorporated those costs into how it factored
the $10/registration fee such that it would be covered by the $10 fee
or in addition to the $10 fee. If the processing fee is separate from
the $10 registration fee, the commenter asked how much these processing
fees would add onto the $10 fee.
Response: The registration system will permit payments to be made
from a bank account (checking or savings), a credit card, or debit
card. No ACH fee will be charged. The registration fee cannot be made
using cash, a certified (bank) check, or money order.
Batch Payments
Comments: The comments on batch payments include the following:
A couple of commenters asked if employers would be able to
batch payments for multiple registrations.
A business association supported the ability of the
employer or representative to file registrations for more than one
beneficiary under one account, but said the NPRM does not indicate how
many registrations a petitioner can file at the same time or exactly
how the payment system will operate. Similarly, another commenter asked
whether the payment system would limit the amount of beneficiaries that
can be batched for simultaneous payment at any given time.
Another commenter also stated that they support the
ability to bundle the H-1B registration fees for multiple registrations
into one payment, but said it is unclear whether the pay.gov portal
would permit a registrant to make several bundled registration fee
payments on multiple occasions over a period of several days, or if
only one bundled registration fee could be submitted during the
registration period. Because large U.S. employers will likely submit
registrations throughout the registration period, the commenter
recommended that the
[[Page 60309]]
system should allow registrants to make several bundled registration
fee payments through the pay.gov portal.
A business association said the final H-1B Registration
Rule stated that employers would not be required to enter their
corporate information for each potential beneficiary. The commenter
asked if employers would be able to file information regarding the
corporation, the authorized employee of the corporation, and the
payment method/information used to pay the fees one time throughout
this process, and if so, how that would be done.
Response: The registration system will allow for batch payments to
pay the fee for multiple registrations submitted simultaneously. For
example, one registrant may submit five registrations at one time and
make one payment of $50 for the cost of the five registrations. There
is no limit to the number of registrations that can be submitted at one
time. Registrants would be able to submit as many registrations in as
many batches as they see fit during the registration period. For
example, a registrant could submit five registrations and pay a $50 fee
on March 2, a batch of five registrations on March 5 and pay another
$50 fee, and a batch of eight registrations with an $80 fee on March
15.
Registrants will not be required to enter their corporate
information for each potential beneficiary. Corporate and payment
information will only need to be entered one time for each batch of
registrations and associated payments. However, the corporate and
payment information will not carry over between subsequent batches of
registrations and fees.
Other Comments/Questions on Fee Payment Processing
Comments: Additional comments on fee payment processing are as
follows:
A business association stated that they were concerned
about the lack of specificity regarding how the $10 fee will be
collected. The commenter wrote that, as USCIS moves to finalize this
proposal, the agency should clearly lay out how employers will have to
use the H-1B registration's system payment mechanism.
An advocacy group asked how far in advance of the
registration period would registration be permitted for the payment
portal.
Response: DHS will use pay.gov for the payment portal, however,
there is no need to register with pay.gov in order to pay for an H-1B
registration. The pay.gov architecture is used only to process the
payments. USCIS will advise registrants of the location of the H-1B
registration portal, and any deadlines or other restrictions that will
apply. The H-1B registration system will contain clear instructions for
completing and submitting registrations and fees.
2. Fee Amount ($10 per Registration)
Comment: Two commenters wrote that the proposed fee was too low
without providing an alternative amount. One commenter noted that they
were in favor of requiring a fee for H-1B petitions, but that it should
be a larger fee. This commenter wrote that a fee free H-1B application
and the lower wages paid to those granted H-1B status provides
incentive to hire non-U.S. citizens for U.S. based careers. One
commenter suggested a $500 fee, while another suggested a $1,000 fee.
One commenter said that based upon the assertion that the registration
would be a 7-minute additional time burden, the $10 registration fee is
appropriate and can be considered a nominal expense for most
petitioners.
Response: First, DHS notes that the $10 registration fee is
separate from and in addition to the H-1B petition filing fee.\4\ The
registration fee will be charged regardless of whether the potential
petitioner's registration is selected; i.e. even if the petitioner may
not ultimately file an H-1B petition. As stated in the NPRM, USCIS
lacks sufficient data to precisely estimate the costs of the
registration process. DHS proposed a $10 fee to provide an initial
stream of revenue to mitigate potential fiscal effects on USCIS.
Following implementation of the registration fee provided for in this
rule, USCIS will gather data on the costs and burdens of administering
the registration process in its next biennial fee review to determine
whether a fee adjustment is necessary to ensure full cost recovery.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ As stated in the proposed rule, H-1B petitioners currently
pay a $460 filing fee per petition. In addition to the filing fee,
certain H-1B petitions may have to pay up to $6,000 in statutory
fees. DHS does not have the authority to adjust the amount of these
statutory fees. USCIS does not retain most of the revenue. CBP
receives 50 percent of the $4,000 9-11 Response and Biometric Entry-
Exit fee and the remaining 50 percent is deposited into the General
Fund of the Treasury. USCIS retains 5 percent of the $1,500 or $750
American Competitiveness and Workforce Improvement Act (ACWIA) fee.
The remainder goes to the Department of Labor and the National
Science Foundation. USCIS retains one third of the $500 Fraud
Detection and Prevention fee, while the remainder is split between
the Department of State and the Department of Labor. See 84 FR
46462-46463.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Fraud Deterrent
Comment: One commenter asked how the nominal fee will prevent large
outsourcing companies from gaming the H-1B system, when their revenue
is in the billions. A professional association stated that the addition
of a $10 registration fee will not sufficiently deter speculative and/
or fraudulent filings. Another commenter noted that requiring employers
to pay a more substantial fee may protect employees from predatory
employers and that we should include a provision barring employers from
passing the fee on to their employees or garnishing it from their
wages.
Response: As stated in the proposed rule, the purpose of the
registration fee is to recover the costs of the registration system and
process; however, the fee may have an added benefit of deterring
frivolous registrations. USCIS will monitor the system for potential
fraud and abuse (e.g. monitoring the system to determine if employers
are submitting many registrations but filing petitions based on
selected registrations at a significantly lower rate, which could
reflect gaming of the system to unfairly improve their odds of being
selected). Further, DHS will require registrants to attest that they
intend to file an H-1B petition for the beneficiary in the position for
which the registration is filed. This attestation is intended to ensure
that each registration is connected with a bona fide job offer and, if
selected, will result in the filing of an H-1B petition.
In response to a commenter's proposal to bar employers from passing
the fee on to the beneficiary (foreign worker), DHS is not adopting
this suggestion because it is unnecessary and already prohibited by DOL
regulations as an unauthorized deduction. See 20 CFR 655.731(b)(9)(ii)
(`` . . . except that the deduction may not recoup a business
expense(s) of the employer (including attorney fees and other costs
connected to the performance of H-1B program functions which are
required to be performed by the employer, e.g., preparation and filing
of LCA and H-1B petition); . . .''). DHS notes that this prohibition
encompasses the costs of an H-1B registration.
Comment: A professional association recommended that, in its
calculations for how many registrations will be selected in the
registration lottery, USCIS take into consideration that there may be a
significantly higher rate of selected registrations resulting in
unfiled, denied, or revoked petitions. This commenter also recommended
that USCIS reserve enough unselected registrations that could be
invited to file in the situation where the H-1B petition approval rate
will not result in meeting the H-1B numerical limitations for FY 2021.
[[Page 60310]]
Response: When registration is not required, USCIS randomly selects
a certain number of H-1B cap-subject petitions projected as needed to
meet the numerical allocations. USCIS makes projections on the number
of H-1B cap-subject petitions necessary to meet the numerical limits,
taking into account historical data related to approvals, denials,
revocations, and other relevant factors.\5\ USCIS uses these
projections to determine the number of petitions to select to meet, but
not exceed, the 65,000 regular cap and 20,000 advanced degree
exemption, although the exact percentage and number of petitions may
vary depending on the applicable projections for a particular fiscal
year. Similarly, in years when USCIS will use the registration system,
it will project how many registrations need to be selected in order to
meet, but not exceed the numerical limitations. Unselected
registrations will remain on reserve for the applicable fiscal year. If
USCIS determines that it needs to increase the number of registrations
projected to meet the regular cap or advanced degree exemption, and
select additional registrations, USCIS would select from among the
registrations that are on reserve a sufficient number to meet the cap
or advanced degree exemption, or re-open the registration period if
additional registrations are needed to meet the new projected amount.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(ii)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Equity of Registration Fee
Comment: A commenter stated that H-1B petitioners have established
willingness and ability to pay the nominal H-1B registration fee. The
commenter stated a $10 fee is justifiable because the employers are the
ones who pay existing H-1B related filing fees rather than investing
this money to cultivate the knowledge of existing employees to better
their business.
Response: DHS agrees that a $10 fee for each registration will not
be overly burdensome for employers and will assist DHS in recovering
the cost of administering the registration process.
E. Impact on Small Entities
Comment: Two commenters addressed the proposal's impact on small
entities. A business association said USCIS stated that the $10
registration fee might minimize the possibility that larger employers
could flood the system crowding out smaller, compliant firms. The
commenter said it remains concerned about how the overall H-1B
registration system will impact small businesses and urged USCIS to
monitor and report on the filings. One commenter said that they were
concerned there were not enough safeguards in place to prevent
unscrupulous petitioners from flooding the H-1B system. This commenter
wrote that DHS should conduct additional outreach consistent with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), especially to small business
entities, so that concerns about potential flooding of the registration
system can be addressed prior to implementation.
Response: DHS has already put several safeguards in place to
prevent employers from flooding the H-1B registration system, and will
monitor the system throughout the registration process. As noted in the
H-1B registration final rule, DHS believes it is too speculative to
conclude that the H-1B registration system would result in large
entities crowding out smaller entities for H-1B prospective employees.
With the registration system, and the lower nominal fee, the barrier to
entry associated with the registration system could result in increased
participation by small entities in the competition for H-1B cap-subject
nonimmigrant visas. As noted in the proposed rule, the new fee will
impose a nominal compliance cost for any entity, including small
entities, that choose to compete for an H-1B cap-subject visa. DHS
maintains that the proposed fee will not impose a significant impact on
small entities.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
Comment: A professional association stated that USCIS' estimate of
a 7-minute additional time burden for reading the instructions and
completing the electronic fee payment was ``extremely low'' and appears
to assume that stakeholders are familiar with the pay.gov portal,
rather than first time users. However, the commenter stated that many
U.S. employers and attorneys have little or no experience using the
pay.gov portal. The commenter wrote that USCIS should recalculate the
total public burden (in time) to take into consideration that in many,
if not most cases, registrants will be accessing and navigating the
pay.gov portal for the very first time when submitting initial H-1B
registrations.
Response: The pay.gov screen will be seamlessly linked to the
registration platform and will not require a separate log in, password,
or navigation to a separate website. Paying the $10 fee will be very
similar to paying for events or airline tickets, merchandise, and other
orders placed online, and USCIS anticipates it will be a
straightforward process for the public. In addition and as noted above,
USCIS intends to conduct outreach and training on how to use the
registration system, including making payments on the pay.gov portal,
and will announce these trainings on the USCIS website. USCIS has
received approval from OMB-OIRA to discontinue the approval of this
collection of information as guidance found at the website
pra.digital.gov stated that such payment transactions are not subject
to the PRA.
G. Implementation Timeframe
Comment: Two commenters addressed the implementation timeframe for
the proposed fee or the H-1B registration process more generally and
expressed concern about the lack of a definitive decision from USCIS to
implement the new H-1B registration requirement to which the $10
registration fee will be attached. These commenters asked that USCIS
notify the public as soon as possible with a final decision on whether
usability testing supports proceeding with the registration tool. One
commenter stated that, without a final decision and proper notice being
provided to stakeholders at this point in time, many business have
already begun expending resources in the preparation of various
supporting documents for the cap-subject H-1B petitions as they
normally would, thus negating the cost savings intended by the rule.
One commenter noted that if USCIS does not announce that it will
proceed with registration until shortly before the FY2021 cap season
begins in April 2020, it will likely be most harmful to the interests
of smaller employers who have less overall resources to deal with new
regulatory requirements in a short period of time. A few commenters
stated that, no later than November 1, 2019, USCIS should publicly
announce its decision to implement the registration system in the
Spring of 2020 for FY 2021 cap-subject H-1B cases. An advocacy group
stated that this notice could be posted on the agency's website or
could come with the publication of the H-1B registration fee final
rule, so it can be announced in the Federal Register months before any
registration period would be opened. This commenter also said USCIS
should indicate as early as possible the dates when the specific
registration period will occur and should consider a registration
period longer than the 2-week minimum registration period identified in
the final rule.
Response: USCIS intends to implement the registration process for
FY 2021, subject to continued testing of the system. DHS will publish a
notice in the Federal Register to announce the initial implementation
of the H-1B
[[Page 60311]]
registration process in advance of the cap season in which it will
first implement the requirement. USCIS will notify the public about the
implementation timeframe of the registration system and the initial
registration period as soon as possible, and will provide stakeholders
with plenty of notice prior to implementing the registration
requirement.
Comment: One commenter asked that as DHS moves to finalize and
implement the H-1B registration fee, it continue public outreach on
usability testing as a means to further assess the technical details of
the registration mechanics. A business association said USCIS should
(1) engage stakeholders and fully vet the new platform before
instituting the electronic registration system and (2) extend the
registration period to at least 30 days to account for any system
outages, difficulties in entering data, or other unforeseen problems.
Response: USCIS intends to continue stakeholder outreach and
training prior to the initial implementation of the registration system
to allow stakeholders the opportunity to familiarize themselves with
the electronic registration process. USCIS will provide guidance on how
to use the registration system and edit registrations prior to opening
the registration system for the initial registration period. DHS will
announce the duration of the initial registration period in the Federal
Register notice.
H. Out of Scope
DHS received many comments that were unrelated to the proposed
revisions regarding the registration fee. Many of these comments would
require Congressional action or additional regulatory action by DHS
unrelated to the H-1B registration fee requirement. Although DHS has
summarized the comments it received below, DHS is not providing
substantive responses to those comments as they are beyond the scope of
this rulemaking. To the extent that comments are seeking further
revisions to the H-1B program, DHS recognizes that additional
regulatory changes could improve the H-1B program and intends to
propose a separate rule to strengthen the H-1B visa classification. As
stated in the Unified Agenda of Proposed Regulatory Actions, 83 FR
57803, DHS plans to propose to revise the definition of specialty
occupation to increase focus on obtaining the best and the brightest
foreign nationals via the H-1B program, and revise the definition of
employment and employer-employee relationship to better protect U.S.
workers and wages. In addition, DHS will propose additional
requirements designed to ensure employers pay appropriate wages to H-1B
nonimmigrant workers.
Comments from the public outside the scope of this rulemaking
concerned the following issues:
Some commenters provided suggestions for improvement of
the H-1B program in general, including to raise the H-1B salary
minimum.
Some commenters said DHS should review the B-1, [Optional
Practical Training] OPT, EB-1, H-4, [Employment Authorization Document]
EAD, and L-1/L-2 visa programs to address unfairness, reduce fraud and
abuse within the programs, address specific companies known for abuses,
and protect wages of American workers.
One commenter expressed safety concerns that H-1B workers
are managing critical infrastructure at state government facilities due
to an influx of H-1B workers in the fields of IT, human resources, and
contracting.
Another commenter said H-1B is a ``legalized scam.''
Response: DHS appreciates these suggestions, however, DHS did not
propose to address these issues in the proposed rule, therefore these
suggestions fall outside of the scope of this rulemaking.
As discussed previously, DHS is finalizing this rule as proposed.
IV. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs, benefits, and transfers of available alternatives, and if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has not
designated this rule a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OIRA has not reviewed this
rule. As this rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is
exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's
Memorandum ``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled
`Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5,
2017).
1. Summary
DHS will amend its regulations to require a fee for each
registration submitted to register for the H-1B cap selection process.
DHS will require a fee of $10 per registration to recover some of the
costs that are associated with implementing and maintaining the H-1B
cap registration system. USCIS suspended the registration requirement
for the FY 2020 H-1B cap selection process. DHS recognizes that the
registration requirement was established to provide efficiency savings
to both USCIS and H-1B cap-subject petitioners associated with the
current paper-based cap selection process. In the H-1B registration
final rule, DHS estimated significant cost savings for both USCIS and
those H-1B petitioners. DHS stands by that analysis and believes that
USCIS will still reap significant efficiency and cost savings when
comparing an electronic registration process relative to the current
paper filing and cap selection process. DHS acknowledges that the $10
registration fee will reduce some of the estimated cost savings for
unselected H-1B cap-subject petitioners as described in the H-1B
registration final rule. As discussed in the Regulatory Review section,
DHS does not believe that the proposed registration fee will
significantly factor into the decision-making of potential H-1B
petitioners, nor does DHS believe that the fee will be perceived as
being cost-prohibitive by these potential H-1B petitioners. After the
registration requirement is implemented and reviewed over the coming
years, DHS will consider the costs associated with the system as
required during biennial fee reviews and adjust the registration fee
accordingly via notice-and-comment rulemaking.
2. Analysis of Costs and Benefits
When registration is required, all petitioners seeking to file an
H-1B cap-subject petition, including those eligible for the advanced
degree exemption, must first electronically register with USCIS during
a designated registration period. A separate registration must be
submitted for each worker on whose behalf a petitioner seeks to file an
H-1B cap-subject petition. Only those petitioners whose registrations
are selected will be eligible to file an H-1B cap-subject petition
during an associated filing period for the applicable fiscal year. By
means of this rule, DHS will require payment of a $10 registration fee
for each registration, which will be due and payable at the time of
registration submission. A registration will not be considered as
[[Page 60312]]
properly submitted until the fee is paid.\6\ In the analysis
accompanying the H-1B registration final rule, DHS estimated that
192,918 H-1B cap-subject registrations will be submitted annually based
on 5-year historical average Form I-129 petition filings.\7\ That
estimate will form the baseline for the analysis of costs associated
with the $10 registration fee. As DHS acknowledged in the H-1B
registration final rule, the use of this historical average to form the
baseline estimate does not factor in the possibility that the
registration's lower barrier to entry could result in increasing the
number of registrations that USCIS receives.\8\ To account for this
possibility, this analysis will present a range analysis of annual
costs up through an escalator of 30 percent increase over the baseline
estimate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 8 CFR 103.2(a)(1) and 8 CFR 214.2(h)(8)(iii)(A)(1).
\7\ See 84 FR at 925.
\8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1 presents the annual, undiscounted, aggregate costs
associated with the $10 registration fee using a range of escalations
over the baseline estimate of registrations.
Table 1--Undiscounted Aggregate Cost Estimates by Projected
Registrations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Annual cost--
registrations undiscounted
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline................................ 192,918 $1,929,180
Baseline Plus 10%....................... 212,210 2,122,100
Baseline Plus 20%....................... 231,502 2,315,020
Baseline Plus 30%....................... 250,793 2,507,930
------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCIS is required to review the cost of its operations on a
biennial basis and recommend fee adjustments as necessary. USCIS may
adjust the filing fees for immigration benefits and services through
notice-and-comment rulemaking. DHS used a 5-year period of analysis to
account for a potential time lag of the fee review and the actual
adjustment that occurs during the rulemaking cycle. Therefore, it is
reasonable to conclude that a 5-year period is a sufficient period for
DHS to base the analysis of the estimated impact of the registration
fee.
In addition to the $10 registration fee, USCIS projects there will
be an additional 7-minute time burden associated with reading the
instructions and completing the electronic fee payment. In the H-1B
registration final rule, DHS monetized time burdens based on who is
expected to submit the registration: A human resources (HR) specialist;
an in-house lawyer; or an outsourced lawyer.\9\ The relevant wage is
currently $32.11 \10\ per hour for an HR specialist and $69.34 \11\ per
hour for an in-house lawyer. DHS accounts for worker benefits when
estimating the opportunity cost of time by calculating a benefits-to-
wage multiplier using the Department of Labor, BLS report detailing the
average employer costs for employee compensation for all civilian
workers in major occupational groups and industries. DHS estimates that
the benefits-to-wage multiplier is 1.46 and, therefore, is able to
estimate the full opportunity cost per applicant, including employee
wages and salaries and the full cost of benefits such as paid leave,
insurance, and retirement.\12\ DHS multiplied the average hourly U.S.
wage rate for HR specialists and lawyers by 1.46 to account for the
full cost of employee benefits and overhead, for a total of $46.88 \13\
per hour for an HR specialist and $101.24 \14\ per hour for an in-house
lawyer. DHS recognizes that a firm may choose, but is not required, to
outsource the preparation of these registrations and, therefore, has
presented two wage rates for lawyers. To determine the full opportunity
costs if a firm hired an outsourced lawyer, DHS multiplied the average
hourly U.S. wage rate for lawyers by 2.5 for a total of $173.35 \15\ to
approximate an hourly billing rate for an outsourced lawyer.\16\ The
monetized equivalent time burden for 7 minutes (0.12 hours) is
$5.63,\17\ $12.15,\18\ and $20.80 \19\ for an HR specialist, in-house
lawyer, and outsourced lawyer, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 84 FR at 929.
\10\ Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor,
``Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2018, Human Resources
Specialist'': https://www.bls.gov/oes/2018/may/oes131071.htm.
Visited October 2, 2019.
\11\ Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor,
``Occupational Employment Statistics, May 2017, Lawyers'': https://www.bls.gov/oes/2018/may/oes231011.htm. Visited October 2, 2019.
\12\ The benefits-to-wage multiplier is calculated as follows:
(Total Employee Compensation per hour)/(Wages and Salaries per
hour). See Economic News Release, U.S. Dep't of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, Table 1. Employer costs per hour worked for
employee compensation and costs as a percent of total compensation:
Civilian workers, by major occupational and industry group (June
2019), available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_09172019.pdf (viewed October 2, 2019). The ECEC measures the
average cost to employers for wages and salaries and benefits per
employee hour worked.
\13\ Calculation: $32.11 * 1.46 = $46.88 total wage rate for HR
specialist.
\14\ Calculation: $69.34 * 1.46 = $101.24 total wage rate for
in-house lawyer.
\15\ Calculation: $69.34 * 2.5 = $173.35 total wage rate for an
outsourced lawyer.
\16\ See 83 FR at 24914 (May 31, 2018). The DHS analysis in,
``Exercise of Time-Limited Authority To Increase the Fiscal Year
2018 Numerical Limitation for the H-2B Temporary Nonagricultural
Worker Program'' used a multiplier of 2.5 to convert in-house
attorney wages to the cost of outsourced attorney wages. DHS
believes the methodology used in the Final Small Entity Impact
Analysis remains sound for using 2.5 as a multiplier for outsourced
labor wages in this rule.
\17\ Calculation: $46.88 hourly wage rate for HR specialist *
0.12 hours = $5.63.
\18\ Calculation: $101.24 hourly wage rate for in-house lawyer *
0.12 hours = $12.15.
\19\ Calculation: $173.35 hourly wage rate for outsourced lawyer
* 0.12 hours = $20.80.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on a review of historical filings, USCIS determined that
approximately 75 percent of H-1B cap-subject petitions are filed by an
attorney or accredited representative.\20\ This analysis will carry
that finding forward to estimate the time burden costs for complying
with the registration fee requirement. In other words, the analysis of
time burden costs presented assumes that 25 percent of the
registrations will be completed by an HR specialist or representative,
and 75 percent of the registrations will be completed by an attorney,
either in-house or outsourced. Table 2 presents the annual,
undiscounted, time burden or opportunity costs associated with paying
the registration fee electronically, assuming 7 minutes of time burden,
over a range of estimated numbers of registrations and according to who
submits the H-1B registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ See 84 FR at 925.
[[Page 60313]]
Table 2--Annual Time Burden Cost (Undiscounted) by Projected Registrations & Type of Submitter, Rounded
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of HR specialist In-house Outsourced
registrations \21\ lawyer \22\ lawyer \23\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline........................................ 192,918 $271,532 $1,757,965 $3,009,521
Baseline Plus 10%............................... 212,210 298,686 1,933,764 3,310,476
Baseline Plus 20%............................... 231,502 325,839 2,109,562 3,611,431
Baseline Plus 30%............................... 250,793 352,991 2,285,351 3,912,371
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that the cost estimates in Table 2 are overstated because they
do not account for the scenario of fewer unique entities submitting
registrations for multiple workers. DHS assumes that in those cases,
the registration submissions would be done at the same time so the fee
payment could be bundled, thus reducing the overall time burden
associated with submitting separate payments. The DHS analysis in the
H-1B registration final rule found that, on average, each employer
submitted five petitions.\24\ Thus, the estimate of undiscounted costs
in Table 2, which is based on the assumption of one petitioning
employer filing one petition, is likely overstated by approximately 80
percent. Estimates that are more likely to reflect the current business
behavior of five petitions per employer, are presented in Table 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Calculation: Number of Registrations * 25 percent * $5.63
(figures presented in the table are rounded to the nearest dollar).
\22\ Calculation: Number of Registrations * 75 percent * $12.15
(figures presented in the table are rounded to the nearest dollar).
\23\ Calculation: Number of Registrations * 75 percent * $20.80
(figures presented in the table are rounded to the nearest dollar).
\24\ See 84 FR at 948 (January 31, 2019) for the FY 2016 cohort
of H-1B cap-subject petitions selected. Of the 95,839 petitions
selected, there were only 20,046 unique entities that filed those
petitions. Calculation: 95,839/20,046 = 4.78.
Table 3--Annual Time Burden Cost (Undiscounted) by Projected Registrations & Type of Submitter, Less 80%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of In-house Outsourced
registrations HR specialist lawyer lawyer
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline........................................ 192,918 $54,306 $351,593 $601,904
Baseline Plus 10%............................... 212,210 59,737 386,753 662,095
Baseline Plus 20%............................... 231,502 65,168 421,912 722,286
Baseline Plus 30%............................... 250,793 70,598 457,070 782,474
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the total, undiscounted, aggregate annual costs of both
the registration fee and time burden costs are presented in Table 4.
The figures in Table 4 are found by adding the proportional costs
presented in Table 1 (in other words, assume 25 percent of
registrations are completed by HR specialist and 75 percent of
registrations are completed by lawyers either in-house or outsourced)
with the estimated costs for entities submitting registrations in Table
3.
Table 4--Aggregate Cost (Undiscounted) by Projected Registrations & Type of Submitter
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In-house Outsourced
Number of HR specialist lawyer (table lawyer (table
registrations (table 3 + 25% 3 + 75% of 3 + 75% of
of table 1) table 1) table 1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline........................................ 192,918 $536,601 $1,798,478 $2,048,789
Baseline Plus 10%............................... 212,210 590,262 1,978,328 2,253,670
Baseline Plus 20%............................... 231,502 643,923 2,158,177 2,458,551
Baseline Plus 30%............................... 250,793 697,581 2,338,018 2,663,422
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The lower bound aggregate cost estimate of complying with the
registration fee requirement is found by summing the estimated cost of
using an HR specialist with the cost estimate of using in-house lawyers
to complete the registration. The upper bound aggregate cost estimate
is found by summing the estimated cost of using an HR specialist with
the cost estimate of using outsourced lawyers to complete the
registration. Table 5 presents the lower bound and upper bound
aggregate cost estimates over the projected number of registrations for
a 5-year period, discounted at 3 and 7 percent.
[[Page 60314]]
Table 5--Aggregate Cost Estimates by Projected Registrations Over 5-Year Period, Discounted at 3% and 7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-Year discounted costs, 3%, 5-Year discounted costs, 7%,
Number of ($ millions) ($ millions)
registrations ---------------------------------------------------------------
Lower bound Upper bound Lower bound Upper bound
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Baseline........................ 192,918 $10.7 $11.8 $9.6 $10.6
Baseline Plus 10%............... 212,210 11.8 13.0 105.0 11.7
Baseline Plus 20%............... 231,502 12.8 14.2 11.5 12.7
Baseline Plus 30%............... 250,793 13.9 15.4 12.4 13.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed previously, while this initial registration fee of $10
per registration may not recover the full costs associated with
implementing and maintaining the H-1B registration system, it would
allow for USCIS to recover some of the costs, thus lessening the fiscal
impact to USCIS. DHS does not anticipate the required registration fee
to represent a significant business expense for those employers that
seek to employ cap-subject H-1B workers. The total costs for each
registration would range from $15.63 to $30.80 for a registration,
depending on who the petitioner uses to submit the registration. Even
with the addition of the registration fee requirement, as discussed
previously in the preamble, the registration process is still
anticipated to result in a net benefit relative to the paper-based cap
selection process.
The registration fee may also provide some unquantified benefits to
the extent that the fee may help to deter frivolous registrations. DHS
makes no conclusions on the impact that a $10 fee would have on the
number of registrations and has no way to estimate such an impact. As
stated in the H-1B registration final rule, however, commenters on the
H-1B registration proposed rule expressed various concerns about
potential ``flooding'' of the registration system. While there is no
way to estimate if a small fee would further deter such acts, beyond
the measures identified in the H-1B registration final rule (e.g., the
attestation requirement), DHS believes that it is reasonable to
conclude that the existence of a $10 fee could reduce the likelihood
that frivolous registrations would be submitted to flood or otherwise
game the registration system. In any event, such a benefit would only
be tangential to the fee's primary purpose of recovering USCIS costs.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, Public Law 104-121 (March 29, 1996), requires Federal agencies to
consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during
the development of their rules. The term ``small entities'' comprises
of small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are not dominant
in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of
less than 50,000. An ``individual'' is not defined by the RFA as a
small entity and costs to an individual from a rule are not considered
for RFA purposes. In addition, the courts have held that the RFA
requires an agency to perform a regulatory flexibility analysis of
small entity impacts only when a rule directly regulates small
entities. Consequently, any indirect impacts from a rule to a small
entity are not considered as costs for RFA purposes.
In the proposed rule, DHS provided a factual basis in certifying
the registration fee requirement would not pose a significant impact on
small entities for public comment. DHS received no challenges to the
certification statement under the RFA, nor to the factual basis
presented in support of said certification. DHS is reproducing the
factual basis, with updates to correct costs estimates due to
calculation errors, in certifying this final rule will not pose a
significant impact on small entities.
This final rule will directly impact those entities that petition
on behalf of H-1B cap-subject workers. Generally, H-1B petitions are
filed by a sponsoring employer; by proxy, once the online registration
requirement is implemented, registrations would likewise be submitted
by a sponsoring employer or their authorized representative. The
employer intending to petition for an H-1B cap-subject worker will
incur the registration fee costs of $10 per registration. Therefore,
DHS examines the direct impact of this final rule on small entities in
the analysis that follows.
In the H-1B registration final rule, DHS estimated that
approximately 78 percent of selected H-1B petitioners were small
entities after conducting an analysis of a statistically significant
sample.\25\ DHS believes it is reasonable to carry this finding through
and assume that approximately 78 percent, a majority, of H-1B
registrations would be submitted by small entities. Thus, for purposes
of the RFA, this final rule is expected to impact a ``substantial''
number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See 84 FR at 948-49.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To determine whether the impact of the required registration filing
fee would be ``significant,'' DHS must consider the estimated fee
impacts of individual petitioning small entities. In the H-1B
registration final rule, DHS found that the majority of petitioning
employers tended to submit petitions for multiple employees. Based on a
review of filings received in 2016, DHS determined that for every one
unique petitioning employer, there were an average of 4.78 petitions
submitted.\26\ For purposes of this analysis, DHS is rounding that
figure up to form a baseline assumption that for every one petitioning
employer, a total of five H-1B cap-subject workers are requested.
Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that on average each
petitioning employer that is a small entity will face a total fee
impact of $50, plus a one-time monetized time burden impact ranging
from $5.63 to $20.80, as a result of the required H-1B registration
fee.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See 84 FR at 948, explaining that, for the FY 2016 cohort,
20,046 unique entities filed the 95,839 H-1B cap-subject petitions
that were selected. Calculation: 95,839/20,046 = 4.78.
\27\ Calculation: $10 (registration fee) x 5 registrations (one
for each H-1B worker being entered into the registration) = $50
total fee impact for employers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In that same statistically valid sample study, DHS was able to
determine the top 10 industries that petitioned for cap-subject H-1B
workers.\28\ The industry data, using the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS), is self-reported on USCIS Form I-129,
Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker, which petitioning employers use to
petition for H-1B workers. Table 6 shows a list of the top 10 NAICS
industries that
[[Page 60315]]
submitted H-1B cap-subject petitions in the sample study, and the
corresponding size standard according to the SBA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ See 84 FR at 950.
Table 6--Top 10 NAICS Industries Submitting Form I-129, Small Entity Analysis Results
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size standards Size standards
Rank NAICS code NAICS U.S. industry title in millions of in number of
dollars employees
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................... 541511..................... Custom Computer Programming $27.5 ..............
Services.
2.................... 541512..................... Computer Systems Design 27.5 ..............
Services.
3.................... 561499..................... All Other Business Support 15.0 ..............
Services.
4.................... 541330..................... Engineering Services........ 15.0 ..............
5.................... 511210..................... Software Publishers......... 38.5 ..............
6.................... 541611..................... Administrative Management 15.0 ..............
and General Management
Consulting Services.
7.................... 334413..................... Semiconductor and Related .............. 1,250
Device Manufacturing.
8.................... 541618..................... Other Management Consulting 15.0 ..............
Services.
9.................... 541690..................... Other Scientific and 15.0 ..............
Technical Consulting
Services.
10................... 325412..................... Pharmaceutical Preparation .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: USCIS analysis based on small business size standards.
Note: The Small Business Administration (SBA) has developed size standards to carry out the purposes of the
Small Business Act and those size standards can be found in 13 CFR, section 121.201.
SBA's monetary size standard is based on the average annual
receipts of the business entity. As discussed previously, DHS has
determined that the majority of H-1B petitioning employers would be
classified as ``small'' for purposes of the RFA. However, comparing the
expected total fee impact of $55.63 on the low-end for every small
entity (assuming each entity submits approximately five registrations)
results in a negligible cost impact relative to average annual
receipts. In fact, for a cost of $55.63, a company would need to have
annual receipts of only $5,563 for the cost of the registration fee for
five registrations to equal 1 percent of the annual receipts. If a
company used an outsourced lawyer to petition for a visa at a cost of
$70.80 (assuming each entity uses an outsourced attorney to submit five
registrations) the company would need to have annual receipts of only
$7,080 for the cost of the fee to equal 1 percent of the annual
receipts.
SBA guidance on additional measures to determine whether a rule
would have a significant impact suggest comparing the compliance cost
to the labor costs.\29\ In that guidance, SBA states that an impact
could be significant if the compliance cost ``exceeds 5 percent of the
labor costs of the entities in that sector.'' \30\ In the annual report
to Congress on the characteristics of H-1B workers for fiscal year
2017, USCIS determined the median annual compensation for initial
employment across all occupations was $75,000.\31\ Furthermore, the
median annual compensation for initial employment across known
occupations ranged from a low of $42,000 to a high of $160,000.\32\
This final rule is estimated to result in compliance costs that
represent much less than 5 percent of the H-1B labor costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See U.S. Small Business Administration, A Guide for
Government Agencies: How to Comply with the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, The RFA threshold analysis: Can we certify? at Pg. 19, https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/advocacy/How-to-Comply-with-the-RFA-WEB.pdf. Visited Apr. 16, 2019.
\30\ Id.
\31\ See U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Characteristics of H-1B Specialty Occupation Workers, Fiscal Year
2017 Annual Report to Congress, at Table 11, https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/reports-studies/Characteristics-of-Specialty-Occupation-Workers-H-1B-Fiscal-Year-2017.pdf. Visited Apr. 16, 2019.
\32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on these findings, DHS certifies that while this final rule
could impact a substantial number of small entities, the impact that
would arise from the $10 registration fee would not result in a
significant impact. Therefore, the Secretary certifies that this final
rule will not cause a significant impact to a substantial number of
small entities.
C. Other Regulatory Requirements
This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by the
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 804(2), and thus is not subject to a
60-day delay in the rule becoming effective. This action is not subject
to the written statement requirements of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). Nor does it require prior
consultation with State, local, and tribal government officials as
specified by Executive Order 13132 or 13175. This final rule also does
not require an Environmental Assessment (EA) or Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). 40 CFR 1507.3(b)(2)(ii) and 1508.4. This action would
not affect the quality of the human environment and fits within
Categorical Exclusion number A3(d) in Dir. 023-01 Rev. 01, Appendix A,
Table 1, for rules that interpret or amend an existing regulation
without changing its environmental effect.
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
DHS is submitting the information collection requirements in this
rule to OMB for review and approval in accordance with requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3512. DHS and USCIS
are revising this information collection to report a change in the
estimated annual cost to the Federal government as a result of this
final rule. Additionally, the information collection instrument has
been revised to include language about the new registration fee. The
notice of proposed rulemaking stated that DHS proposed a revision to
the USCIS Electronic Fee Payment Processing information collection,
former OMB Control Number 1651-0131. DHS and USCIS have determined that
the collection of information related to fee payment processing is
exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act and that collection of
information is not required to be included in this rulemaking.\33\ DHS
is revising the following USCIS information collection:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See https://pra.digital.gov/do-I-need-clearance/ Stating,
``Doesn't need PRA Clearance: Information for voluntary commercial
transactions, like payment and delivery details.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
H-1B Registration Tool
DHS and USCIS are revising this information collection to report a
change in the estimated annual cost to the Federal government as a
result of this rule. Additionally, the information collection
instrument has been revised to include language about the new
registration fee.
[[Page 60316]]
Overview of information collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection: Revision of a Currently
Approved Collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: H-1B Registration Tool.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
DHS sponsoring the collection: No Agency Form Number; USCIS.
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Primary: Business or other for-profit. USCIS
uses the data collected on this form to determine which employers will
be informed that they are eligible to submit a USCIS Form I-129,
Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker, to petition for a cap-subject
beneficiary in the H-1B classification.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: The estimated
total number of respondents for the information collection H-1B
Registration Tool is 192,918 and the estimated hour burden per response
is 0.5 hours. Any additional time burden for fee payment processing is
captured in the information collection USCIS Electronic Fee Payment
Processing (OMB 1615-0131).
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: The total estimated annual hour burden associated
with this collection is 96,459 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public burden (in cost) associated
with the collection: The estimated total cost burden for purchases of
equipment or services to achieve compliance with the information
collection requirements of this rule (not including providing
information to or keeping records for the government, or kept as part
of customary and usual business or private practices), are $0.\34\
There are no capital, start-up, operational or maintenance costs to
respondents associated with this collection of information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ As stated elsewhere in this rule, the annual transfer for
registrants associated with the proposed $10 fee is $1,929,180.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and procedure, Authority delegations
(Government agencies), Freedom of information, Immigration, Privacy,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, DHS is amending chapter I of title 8 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 103--IMMIGRATION BENEFITS; BIOMETRIC REQUIREMENTS;
AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 103 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1304,
1356, 1356b, 1372; 31 U.S.C. 9701; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135
(6 U.S.C. 1 et seq.); E.O. 12356, 47 FR 14874, 15557, 3 CFR, 1982
Comp., p. 166; 8 CFR part 2; Pub. L. 112-54, 125 Stat 550.
0
2. Section 103.7 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(1)(i)(NNN) to read
as follows:
Sec. 103.7 Fees.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(NNN) Registration requirement for petitioners seeking to file H-1B
petitions on behalf of cap-subject aliens. For each registration
submitted to register for the H-1B cap or advanced degree exemption
selection process: $10. This fee will not be refunded if the
registration is not selected or is withdrawn.
* * * * *
Kevin K. McAleenan,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-24292 Filed 11-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P