Caribou-Targhee National Forest; Idaho; Caribou-Targhee National Forest and Curlew National Grassland Integrated Weed Management Analysis, 59765-59767 [2019-24222]
Download as PDF
59765
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2019 / Notices
respondent. Of the 238,644 households
requesting four replacement EBT cards,
about 26,424 are estimated to be in the
six States where the agencies have opted
to follow our regulations at 274.6(b)(5)
to withhold replacement cards. FNS
estimates that half of all recipients who
receive a notice upon issuance of their
fourth card will request a fifth card.
Estimated Time per Response: FNS
estimates that it will take State
personnel approximately 2 minutes to
generate and mail each required notice
to the client, to comply with 7 CFR
274.6; and that it will take SNAP
recipients approximately 2 minutes to
read each notice they receive and 28
minutes to make contact with the State
agency when required. There is an
average estimated time of 0.04557373
hours for each response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 22,956 hours (14,560.85
burden hours for individuals/
households and 8,396.20 for State
agencies). The currently approved
annual burden is 21,941 hours. The
revision reflects two adjustments,
neither of which is related to an FNS
program change:
(1) Because the number of households
participating in SNAP has decreased,
Estimated
number
respondents
Respondent
Activity
Individuals or Household (I/H) ..................
Read Withhold Replacement Card Warning Notice (274.6(b)(5)).
Read Replacement Card Withheld Notice
& Contact State Agency (274.6(b)(5)).
Read Excessive Replacement Card Notice (274.6(b)(6)).
we have fewer excessive replacement
EBT card requests and therefore fewer
notices, and
(2) more States opt to follow our
regulations at 274.6(b)(5) to withhold
replacement cards, which requires some
households to make contact with the
State agency if they request excessive
replacement cards
See the table below for estimated total
reporting annual burden for each type of
respondent.
There is no recordkeeping or thirdparty disclosure burden contained in
this information collection request.
Responses
annually per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Estimated
average
number of
hours per
response
Estimated
total hours
26,424
1.00
26,424
0.03
880.81
* 13,212
1.00
13,212
0.50
6,606.05
212,220
1.00
212,220
0.03
7,073.99
Individuals/Households Subtotal .......
...................................................................
238,644
......................
251,856
......................
14,560.85
State Agency ............................................
Send Withhold Replacement Card Warning Notice (274.6(b)(5)).
Send Replacement Card Withheld Notice
(274.6(b)(5)).
Send Excessive Replacement Card Notice (274.6(b)(6)).
6
4,404.03
26,424
0.03
880.81
6
2,202.02
13,212
0.03
440.40
47
4,515.31
212,220
0.03
7,073.99
State Agencies Subtotal ....................
...................................................................
53
......................
251,856
......................
8,395.20
Overall Grand Total Burden .......
...................................................................
238,697
2.11
503,712
0.0455737
22,956.05
* Note: The 13,212 Individuals/Households SNAP participants are the same I/H accounted for in the 26,424 and therefore not double counted.
Dated: October 18, 2019.
Pamilyn Miller,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–24097 Filed 11–5–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Caribou-Targhee National Forest;
Idaho; Caribou-Targhee National
Forest and Curlew National Grassland
Integrated Weed Management Analysis
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Caribou-Targhee National
Forest will prepare an environmental
impact statement (EIS) for invasive
plant management. Invasive plants are a
major threat to the biological diversity
and ecological integrity within and
outside the Caribou-Targhee National
Forest and the Curlew National
Grassland (Forests). The Forests propose
to implement adaptive and integrated
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Nov 05, 2019
Jkt 250001
invasive plan management on current
and potential infested areas forest-wide.
A clear and comprehensive integrated
invasive plant management strategy
would allow for the implementation of
timely and effective invasive plant
management and prevention projects
and programs on the Forests. In the
absence of an aggressive invasive plant
management program, the number,
density, and distribution of invasive
plants on both Forests is expected to
increase.
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
December 23, 2019. The draft EIS is
expected in May 2020 and the final EIS
is expected in November 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 1405
Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83401.
Comments may also be sent via email to
FS-comments-intermtn-cariboutarghee@usda.gov or via facsimile to
(208) 557–5827.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi Heyrend at (208) 557–5791 or
heidi.heyrend@usda.gov. Individuals
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Invasive
plants create many adverse
environmental effects, including, but
not limited to: Displacement of native
plants; reduction in functionality of
habitat for wildlife; loss of threatened,
endangered, and sensitive species;
increased soil erosion and reduced
water quality; alteration of physical and
biological properties of soil, including
reduced soil productivity; changes to
the intensity and frequency of fires, and
loss of recreational opportunities.
Within the 2.9 million acres of the
Caribou-Targhee National Forest and
Curlew National Grassland, less than
two percent are identified as being
infested with invasive, non-native, and/
or state-listed noxious weeds.
These invasive plant infestations have
a high potential to expand on lands
within and adjacent to the Forests,
degrading desired plant communities
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
59766
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2019 / Notices
and the values provided by those
communities. Forest lands are also
threatened by invasive plants that have
not been found on the Forests but are
known to occur on adjacent lands.
Infestations can be prevented,
eliminated, or controlled through the
use of specific management practices.
Purpose and Need for Action
The overall purpose of the proposed
action is to reduce the negative effects
of invasive plants on the structure and
function of native plant communities
and on other natural resource values.
The proposal is in response to an
underlying need to implement policy
and direction provided at the national,
regional, state, and forest levels
(Executive Order 13112—Invasive
Species, 2004 National Invasive Species
Strategy and Implementation Plan,
2008–2012 National Invasive Species
Management Plan, 2009 Intermountain
Region Invasive Species Management
Strategy, 2005 Idaho Strategic Plan for
Managing Noxious and Invasive Weeds,
and the amended Land and Resource
Management Plans for the CaribouTarghee National Forest and Curlew
National Grassland).
The need for the proposed action is
multifaceted. Forest resources are
negatively impacted by existing and
expanding invasive plant species
populations. These species are known to
out-compete native plants, which can
result in reduced productivity and
biodiversity, habitat loss, and associated
economic impacts. A timely response to
new infestations, new invasive plant
species, and landscape scale
disturbances is needed. On the Forests,
landscape-level tree mortality and
disturbance from insects and wildfires
have increased and are likely to
continue to increase the potential for
invasive plant infestations.
Existing decisions for invasive plant
management on the Forests do not
address new species or provide
priorities for managing new infestations.
Updating these decisions would allow
the Forests to satisfy the need to
incorporate early detection and rapid
response into the invasive plant
management program. Invasive plant
infestations already exist throughout the
Forests and without management will
likely increase in density and
distribution. Active and adaptive
integrated management is necessary to
contain invasive plants within existing
boundaries, reduce infestation densities,
and retard the establishment of new
infestations. Control efforts would be
focused on infestations that can realize
the greatest resource benefits—those
with the highest risk of spread, those
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Nov 05, 2019
Jkt 250001
that have not become established, and
those that have the best likelihood of
success of control. New analysis and
planning is needed to make available
the most current tools and guide their
best use.
Rehabilitation of degraded landscapes
can inhibit the spread and
establishment of invasive plants.
Appropriate rehabilitation efforts are a
critical component of a fully functional
invasive plant management program.
The goals of rehabilitating degraded
areas may include preventing new
infestations, preventing the
reoccurrence of eradicated infestations,
and/or reducing the density and spread
of existing infestations. Post-fire
rehabilitation efforts may incorporate
one or more of the established control
techniques outlined in the proposed
action.
size of known infestations, proximity to
vectors or susceptible habitat, and
ability to outcompete desirable plant
species. The priority of species to be
treated would vary based on these
factors and could change over time.
These priorities would be used to guide
selection of specific management
activities for particular infestations.
Rehabilitation activities would be
designed and implemented based on the
conditions found in and around infested
areas. Both active revegetation and
passive revegetation (allowing plants on
site to fill in a treated area) would be
considered. Rehabilitation techniques
would be assessed and implemented in
order to promote native plant
communities that are resistant to
infestation by invasive plants.
Proposed Action
The Forests propose to implement
adaptive and integrated invasive plant
management on current and potential
infested areas forest-wide, including the
Jedidiah Smith Wilderness Area and the
Winegar Hole Wilderness Area.
Management activities would include
inventory and assessment designed to
support early detection and rapid
response, control methods,
implementation and effectiveness
monitoring, and rehabilitation.
Activities would be implemented
with federal, state, and local partners
where opportunities exist. Infestations
outside of currently identified areas may
include new sites that arise in the
future, or sites that currently exist, but
have not been identified in Forest
inventories to date.
The proposed action includes the use
of ground-based and aerial herbicide
applications, manual and mechanical
treatments, aquatic treatments,
biological treatments, and combinations
of these treatments. Proposed control
methods would be based on integrated
pest management principles and
methods known to be effective for each
target species. They include, but are not
limited to, mechanical techniques, such
as mowing and pulling; cultural
practices, such as the use of certified
noxious weed-free hay; biological
control agents, such as pathogens,
insects, and controlled grazing; and
herbicides that target specific invasive
plant species. Control methods could be
employed alone or in combination.
Treatment methods would be based on
the extent, location, type, and character
of an infestation and would be
implemented using project design
features. Management priority would be
based on factors such as number and
The No Action/Current Management
Alternative would continue current
weed management programs,
treatments, and levels of effort for
controlling weeds on both Forests.
Because of limited ability to respond
rapidly to new treatment areas and
updated methods, it is anticipated that
continuation of the current weed
treatment program would not keep pace
with the spread of weeds on both
Forests. New weed invaders would
continue to establish populations that
would likely increase in size. Under this
Alternative, it would likely not be
possible to be consistent with
management direction in all of the
management areas on both Forests or to
implement effectiveness monitoring and
adaptive management as prescribed in
the amended Land and Resource
Management Plans.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Possible Alternatives
Responsible Official
The responsible official will be the
Forest Supervisor for the CaribouTarghee National Forest and the Curlew
National Grassland.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide
whether or not to treat invasive plants
on the Caribou-Targhee National Forest
and the Curlew National Grassland,
including the Jedidiah Smith
Wilderness Area (123,451 acres) and the
Winegar Hole Wilderness Area (10,721
acres), and if so, what methods and
treatments will be used.
Permits or Licenses Required
Applicators must be licensed Idaho
professional herbicide applicators per
Idaho Department of Agriculture Rules
Governing Pesticide Use and
Application (Idaho Code § 22–3404).
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2019 / Notices
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the EIS. Comments that
would be most useful are those
concerning developing or refining the
proposed action, and in particular, are
site-specific concerns and those that can
help us develop treatments that would
be responsive to our goal to control,
contain, or eradicate invasive plants. It
is important that reviewers provide their
comments at such times and in such
manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be part of the public
record for this proposed action.
The decision for this project will be
subject to the objection process at 36
CFR 218 subparts A and B. Only
individuals or entities who submit
timely and specific written comments
concerning the project during this or
another designated public comment
period established by the responsible
official will be eligible to file on
objection.
Dated: October 16, 2019.
Allen Rowley,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest
System.
[FR Doc. 2019–24222 Filed 11–5–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Information Collection: Cooperative
Wildland Fire Management and
Stafford Act Response Agreements
Forest Service, USDA, Bureau
of Land Management DOI, Fish and
Wildlife Service DOI, National Park
Service DOI, and Bureau of Indian
Affairs DOI.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Forest Service is seeking comments
from all interested individuals and
organizations on the extension with no
changes to the information collection,
Cooperative Wildland Fire Management
and Stafford Act Response Agreements.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing on or before January 6, 2020 to
be assured of consideration. Comments
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:43 Nov 05, 2019
Jkt 250001
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments concerning this
notice should be addressed to Tim
Melchert, Cooperative Fire Specialist,
USDA Forest Service, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250.
Comments also may be submitted via
facsimile to 208–387–5398 or by email
to: SM.FS.Fire-Agrmts@usda.gov.
The public may inspect comments
received at Forest Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250 during normal business
hours. Visitors are encouraged to call
ahead to 202–205–1637 to facilitate
entry to the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Melchert, Cooperative Fire Specialist, at
USDA Forest Service, 208–387–5887.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–
877–8339 twenty-four hours a day,
every day of the year, including
holidays.
In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Forest Service
will submit a request for a new
information collection to Office of
Management and Budget.
Title: Cooperative Wildland Fire
Management and Stafford Act Response
Agreements.
OMB Number: 0596–0242.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: To allow the performance of
specific activities in cooperation with
Federal, State, local, and Tribal
governments, Congress enacted
authorities allowing the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) and
United States Department of the Interior
(DOI) to enter into cooperative
agreements with fire organizations to
improve efficiency.
These include:
1. Facilitating the coordination and
exchange of personnel, equipment,
supplies, services, and funds among the
parties.
2. Sustaining Wildland Fire
Management activities, such as
prevention, preparedness,
communication and education, fuels
treatment and hazard mitigation, fire
planning.
3. Response strategies, tactics and
alternatives, suppression and post-fire
rehabilitation and restoration.
4. Allow for the parties to respond to
presidentially declared emergencies or
disasters.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59767
The primary authorities allowing for
the agreements are the Reciprocal Fire
Protection Act, 42 U.S.C 1856, and the
Stafford Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121. The
proposed Cooperative Wildland Fire
Management and Stafford Act Response
Agreement template will allow
authorized agencies to streamline
coordination with other Federal, State,
local, and Tribal governments in
wildland fire protection activities, and
to document in an agreement the roles
and responsibilities among the parties,
ensuring maximum protection of
resources.
To negotiate, develop, and administer
Cooperative Wildland Fire Management
and Stafford Act Response Agreements,
the USDA Forest Service, DOI Bureau of
Land Management, DOI Fish and
Wildlife Service, DOI National Park
Service, and DOI Bureau of Indian
Affairs must collect information from
willing State, local, and Tribal
governments from the pre-agreement to
the closeout stage via telephone calls,
emails, postal mail, and person-toperson meetings. There are multiple
means to communicate responses,
which include forms, optional forms,
templates, electronic documents, in
person, telephone, and email. The scope
of information collected includes the
project type, project scope, financial
plan, statement of work, and
cooperator’s business information.
Without the collected information,
authorized Federal agencies would not
be able to negotiate, create, develop, and
administer cooperative agreements with
stakeholders for wildland fire
protection, approved fire severity
activities, and presidentially declared
emergencies or disasters. Authorized
Federal agencies would be unable to
develop or monitor projects, make
payments, or identify financial and
accounting errors.
The regulations governing Federal
financial assistance relationships are not
applicable to agreement templates under
this information collection request. The
regulations in 2 CFR 200 set forth the
general rules that are applicable to all
grants and cooperative agreements made
by the Department of Agriculture and
Department of the Interior. Because the
Federal government’s use of Cooperative
Wildland Fire Management and Stafford
Act Response Agreements entered into
under cited Federal statutes are not
financial assistance for the benefit of the
recipient, but instead are entered into
for the mutual benefit of the Federal
government and the non-Federal
cooperators, the assistance regulations
in 2 CFR 200, as adopted and
supplemented by the Department of
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59765-59767]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24222]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Caribou-Targhee National Forest; Idaho; Caribou-Targhee National
Forest and Curlew National Grassland Integrated Weed Management
Analysis
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Caribou-Targhee National Forest will prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS) for invasive plant management.
Invasive plants are a major threat to the biological diversity and
ecological integrity within and outside the Caribou-Targhee National
Forest and the Curlew National Grassland (Forests). The Forests propose
to implement adaptive and integrated invasive plan management on
current and potential infested areas forest-wide. A clear and
comprehensive integrated invasive plant management strategy would allow
for the implementation of timely and effective invasive plant
management and prevention projects and programs on the Forests. In the
absence of an aggressive invasive plant management program, the number,
density, and distribution of invasive plants on both Forests is
expected to increase.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by December 23, 2019. The draft EIS is expected in May 2020 and the
final EIS is expected in November 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Caribou-Targhee National Forest,
1405 Hollipark Drive, Idaho Falls, ID 83401. Comments may also be sent
via email to [email protected] or via
facsimile to (208) 557-5827.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heidi Heyrend at (208) 557-5791 or
[email protected]. Individuals who use telecommunication devices
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Invasive plants create many adverse
environmental effects, including, but not limited to: Displacement of
native plants; reduction in functionality of habitat for wildlife; loss
of threatened, endangered, and sensitive species; increased soil
erosion and reduced water quality; alteration of physical and
biological properties of soil, including reduced soil productivity;
changes to the intensity and frequency of fires, and loss of
recreational opportunities. Within the 2.9 million acres of the
Caribou-Targhee National Forest and Curlew National Grassland, less
than two percent are identified as being infested with invasive, non-
native, and/or state-listed noxious weeds.
These invasive plant infestations have a high potential to expand
on lands within and adjacent to the Forests, degrading desired plant
communities
[[Page 59766]]
and the values provided by those communities. Forest lands are also
threatened by invasive plants that have not been found on the Forests
but are known to occur on adjacent lands. Infestations can be
prevented, eliminated, or controlled through the use of specific
management practices.
Purpose and Need for Action
The overall purpose of the proposed action is to reduce the
negative effects of invasive plants on the structure and function of
native plant communities and on other natural resource values. The
proposal is in response to an underlying need to implement policy and
direction provided at the national, regional, state, and forest levels
(Executive Order 13112--Invasive Species, 2004 National Invasive
Species Strategy and Implementation Plan, 2008-2012 National Invasive
Species Management Plan, 2009 Intermountain Region Invasive Species
Management Strategy, 2005 Idaho Strategic Plan for Managing Noxious and
Invasive Weeds, and the amended Land and Resource Management Plans for
the Caribou-Targhee National Forest and Curlew National Grassland).
The need for the proposed action is multifaceted. Forest resources
are negatively impacted by existing and expanding invasive plant
species populations. These species are known to out-compete native
plants, which can result in reduced productivity and biodiversity,
habitat loss, and associated economic impacts. A timely response to new
infestations, new invasive plant species, and landscape scale
disturbances is needed. On the Forests, landscape-level tree mortality
and disturbance from insects and wildfires have increased and are
likely to continue to increase the potential for invasive plant
infestations.
Existing decisions for invasive plant management on the Forests do
not address new species or provide priorities for managing new
infestations. Updating these decisions would allow the Forests to
satisfy the need to incorporate early detection and rapid response into
the invasive plant management program. Invasive plant infestations
already exist throughout the Forests and without management will likely
increase in density and distribution. Active and adaptive integrated
management is necessary to contain invasive plants within existing
boundaries, reduce infestation densities, and retard the establishment
of new infestations. Control efforts would be focused on infestations
that can realize the greatest resource benefits--those with the highest
risk of spread, those that have not become established, and those that
have the best likelihood of success of control. New analysis and
planning is needed to make available the most current tools and guide
their best use.
Rehabilitation of degraded landscapes can inhibit the spread and
establishment of invasive plants. Appropriate rehabilitation efforts
are a critical component of a fully functional invasive plant
management program. The goals of rehabilitating degraded areas may
include preventing new infestations, preventing the reoccurrence of
eradicated infestations, and/or reducing the density and spread of
existing infestations. Post-fire rehabilitation efforts may incorporate
one or more of the established control techniques outlined in the
proposed action.
Proposed Action
The Forests propose to implement adaptive and integrated invasive
plant management on current and potential infested areas forest-wide,
including the Jedidiah Smith Wilderness Area and the Winegar Hole
Wilderness Area. Management activities would include inventory and
assessment designed to support early detection and rapid response,
control methods, implementation and effectiveness monitoring, and
rehabilitation.
Activities would be implemented with federal, state, and local
partners where opportunities exist. Infestations outside of currently
identified areas may include new sites that arise in the future, or
sites that currently exist, but have not been identified in Forest
inventories to date.
The proposed action includes the use of ground-based and aerial
herbicide applications, manual and mechanical treatments, aquatic
treatments, biological treatments, and combinations of these
treatments. Proposed control methods would be based on integrated pest
management principles and methods known to be effective for each target
species. They include, but are not limited to, mechanical techniques,
such as mowing and pulling; cultural practices, such as the use of
certified noxious weed-free hay; biological control agents, such as
pathogens, insects, and controlled grazing; and herbicides that target
specific invasive plant species. Control methods could be employed
alone or in combination. Treatment methods would be based on the
extent, location, type, and character of an infestation and would be
implemented using project design features. Management priority would be
based on factors such as number and size of known infestations,
proximity to vectors or susceptible habitat, and ability to outcompete
desirable plant species. The priority of species to be treated would
vary based on these factors and could change over time. These
priorities would be used to guide selection of specific management
activities for particular infestations.
Rehabilitation activities would be designed and implemented based
on the conditions found in and around infested areas. Both active
revegetation and passive revegetation (allowing plants on site to fill
in a treated area) would be considered. Rehabilitation techniques would
be assessed and implemented in order to promote native plant
communities that are resistant to infestation by invasive plants.
Possible Alternatives
The No Action/Current Management Alternative would continue current
weed management programs, treatments, and levels of effort for
controlling weeds on both Forests. Because of limited ability to
respond rapidly to new treatment areas and updated methods, it is
anticipated that continuation of the current weed treatment program
would not keep pace with the spread of weeds on both Forests. New weed
invaders would continue to establish populations that would likely
increase in size. Under this Alternative, it would likely not be
possible to be consistent with management direction in all of the
management areas on both Forests or to implement effectiveness
monitoring and adaptive management as prescribed in the amended Land
and Resource Management Plans.
Responsible Official
The responsible official will be the Forest Supervisor for the
Caribou-Targhee National Forest and the Curlew National Grassland.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The responsible official will decide whether or not to treat
invasive plants on the Caribou-Targhee National Forest and the Curlew
National Grassland, including the Jedidiah Smith Wilderness Area
(123,451 acres) and the Winegar Hole Wilderness Area (10,721 acres),
and if so, what methods and treatments will be used.
Permits or Licenses Required
Applicators must be licensed Idaho professional herbicide
applicators per Idaho Department of Agriculture Rules Governing
Pesticide Use and Application (Idaho Code Sec. 22-3404).
[[Page 59767]]
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the EIS. Comments that would be most useful are
those concerning developing or refining the proposed action, and in
particular, are site-specific concerns and those that can help us
develop treatments that would be responsive to our goal to control,
contain, or eradicate invasive plants. It is important that reviewers
provide their comments at such times and in such manner that they are
useful to the agency's preparation of the EIS. Therefore, comments
should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should
clearly articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. Comments
received in response to this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for
this proposed action.
The decision for this project will be subject to the objection
process at 36 CFR 218 subparts A and B. Only individuals or entities
who submit timely and specific written comments concerning the project
during this or another designated public comment period established by
the responsible official will be eligible to file on objection.
Dated: October 16, 2019.
Allen Rowley,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2019-24222 Filed 11-5-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P