Transportation Infrastructure Management, 59568-59570 [2019-24156]
Download as PDF
59568
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 614
[Docket No. FTA–2019–000X]
RIN 2132–AB37
Transportation Infrastructure
Management
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rulemaking rescinds an
FTA regulation that cross-references the
Management and Monitoring Systems
regulation for the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA). The statutory
basis for FHWA’s regulation was
rescinded by legislation in 2012.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
November 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Montgomery, Office of Chief
Counsel, (202) 366–1017 or
mark.montgomery@dot.gov. Office
hours are from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document is viewable online
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval
help and guidelines are available on the
website. It is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days a year. An electronic copy
of this document is available for
download from the Office of the Federal
Register home page at: https://
www.ofr.gov and the Government
Publishing Office web page at: https://
www.gpo.gov.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Background
Part 614 of title 49, Code of Federal
Regulations, cross-references the
Management and Monitoring Systems
regulation for the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) at 23 CFR part
500. That part implements section 1034
of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (Pub. L.
102–240) (ISTEA), which amended title
23, United States Code, by adding
section 303 (Section 303). Section 303
required the Secretary of Transportation
to promulgate regulations for State
development, establishment, and
implementation of systems for
managing: Highway pavement of
Federal-aid highways (PMS); bridges on
and off Federal-aid highways (BMS);
highway safety (SMS); traffic congestion
(CMS); public transportation facilities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Nov 04, 2019
Jkt 250001
and equipment (PTMS); intermodal
transportation facilities and systems
(IMS); and a system for monitoring
highway and public transportation
facilities and equipment (TMS).
However, the National Highway System
Designation Act of 1995 (NHS Act)
amended section 303 to allow a State to
elect not to implement, in whole or in
part, any one or more of the
management systems required under the
section, except for CMS in
transportation management areas
(TMA), and removed the management
system certification and sanction
requirements. As a result, FTA and
FHWA issued a final rule on December
19, 1996, 16 FR 67166–175, which
reflected this State option and contained
only minimum requirements for those
systems that a State could choose to
implement under the provisions of
section 303.
Since the 1996 update to 23 CFR part
500, section 1519(b) of the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
(MAP–21) Act (Pub. L. 112–141)
repealed section 303, which is the
statutory basis for the regulation.
Accordingly, FTA is issuing this final
rule to rescind 49 CFR part 614, which
cross-references 23 CFR part 500. This
deregulatory action will not negatively
impact safety, because congestion
management, the only management
system required under part 500, is still
mandated by 23 CFR part 450.
Discussion of the Changes
This action rescinds 49 CFR part 614,
which cross-references FHWA’s
Management and Monitoring Systems
regulation at 23 CFR part 500, because
the statutory basis for FHWA’s
regulation, 23 U.S.C. 303, was repealed
by MAP–21. While 49 CFR part 614
cites 49 U.S.C. 5303–5305 as additional
statutory authority, the requirements set
forth in those statutes that overlap with
the now-repealed 23 U.S.C. 303 are
implemented through other FTA
regulations. Of the four provisions of
section 303 and 23 CFR part 500 that
apply to FTA—IMS, CMS, PTMS, and
TMS—only CMS is required explicitly
by FTA statute, at 49 U.S.C. 5303(k)(3).
Whereas 49 CFR 500.105 requires the
metropolitan transportation planning
process to include a CMS, the
regulations at 23 CFR 450.322 (crossreferenced by 49 CFR part 613) also
effectively implement the CMS
requirement, which will continue to be
imposed after this rule becomes
effective.
Moreover, although not explicitly
required by any FTA statute, current
regulations cover management systems
like IMS and PTMS. For example, the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
metropolitan and statewide planning
processes require the integrated
management and operation of the
intermodal transportation system,
similar to IMS, at 49 U.S.C. 5303(c)(2)
and 5304(a)(2), and 49 CFR part 613
(cross-referencing 23 CFR part 450).
Further, transit asset management
incorporates much of the PTMS
requirement at 49 U.S.C. 5326, and 49
CFR part 625. As a result, the
requirements set forth in 49 CFR part
614 are either superfluous or
duplicative.
Good Cause for Dispensing With Notice
and Comment and Delayed Effective
Date
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency
may waive the normal notice and
comment procedure if it finds, for good
cause, that it is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. Additionally, 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
provides that an agency may waive the
30-day delayed effective date upon
finding of good cause.
Section 1519(b) of MAP–21 repealed
section 23 U.S.C. 303 to remove the
requirement that states implement the
management systems enumerated in 23
CFR part 500. Because 49 CFR part 614
cross-references this regulation, FTA
finds good cause that notice and
comment for this rule is unnecessary
due to the nature of the revisions (i.e.,
the rule simply carries out the
nondiscretionary statutory language
found in MAP–21). The statutory
language does not require regulatory
interpretation to carry out its intent, and
comments cannot alter the regulation
given that the statute abrogated its
purpose. Further, the delayed effective
date is unnecessary because the removal
of the management systems requirement
was already made effective by MAP–21.
Accordingly, FTA finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) to
waive notice and opportunity for
comment and the delayed effective date.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), and Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
FTA has determined that this
rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of
Executive Order 12866, and within the
meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures. This action complies with
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and
13771 to improve regulation.
E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM
05NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs)
This final rule is considered an E.O.
13771 deregulatory action.
discharge traditional State governmental
functions.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because FTA finds good cause under
5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice
and opportunity for comment for this
rule, the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354, 5 U.S.C.
601–612) do not apply. FTA evaluated
the effects of this action on small
entities and determined the action
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. FTA hereby certifies that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this program. This E.O. applies because
State and local governments would be
directly affected by the regulation. Local
entities should refer to the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance Program
Number 20.505, Metropolitan
Transportation Planning and State and
Non-Metropolitan Planning and
Research, for further information.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
FTA has determined that this rule
does not impose unfunded mandates, as
defined by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4,
March 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48). This rule
does not include a Federal mandate that
may result in expenditures of $155.1
million or more in any 1 year (when
adjusted for inflation) in 2012 dollars
for either State, local, and tribal
governments in the aggregate, or by the
private sector. Additionally, the
definition of ‘‘Federal mandate’’ in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
excludes financial assistance of the type
in which State, local, or tribal
governments have authority to adjust
their participation in the program in
accordance with changes made in the
program by the Federal Government.
The Federal Transit Act permits this
type of flexibility.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that may have a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This action has
been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132 dated August 4,
1999, and FTA determined this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
or sufficient federalism implications on
the States. FTA also determined this
action will not preempt any State law or
regulation or affect the States’ ability to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Nov 04, 2019
Jkt 250001
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
Paperwork Reduction Act
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. FTA has
analyzed this rule under the Paperwork
Reduction Act and believes that it does
not impose additional information
collection requirements for the purposes
of the Act above and beyond existing
information collection clearances from
OMB.
National Environmental Policy Act
Federal agencies are required to adopt
implementing procedures for the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) that establish specific criteria
for, and identification of, three classes
of actions: (1) Those that normally
require preparation of an Environmental
Impact Statement, (2) those that
normally require preparation of an
Environmental Assessment, and (3)
those that are categorically excluded
from further NEPA review (40 CFR
1507.3(b)). This rule qualifies for
categorical exclusions under 23 CFR
771.118(c)(4) (planning and
administrative activities that do not
involve or lead directly to construction).
FTA has evaluated whether the rule will
involve unusual or extraordinary
circumstances and has determined that
it will not.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
FTA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights. FTA does not believe this rule
effects a taking of private property or
otherwise has taking implications under
Executive Order 12630.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
59569
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
FTA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. FTA certifies
that this action will not cause an
environmental risk to health or safety
that might disproportionately affect
children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
FTA has analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13175, dated November
6, 2000, and believes that it will not
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes; will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments; and will not
preempt tribal laws. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FTA has analyzed this action under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. FTA has
determined that this action is not a
significant energy action under that
order and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental
Justice)
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations) and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (77 FR 27534, May 10,
2012) (available online at https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201205-10/pdf/2012-11309.pdf) require DOT
agencies to achieve Environmental
Justice (EJ) as part of their mission by
identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects, including
interrelated social and economic effects,
of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority and low-income
populations. All DOT agencies must
address compliance with Executive
Order 12898 and the DOT Order in all
rulemaking activities. On August 15,
E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM
05NOR1
59570
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 5, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
2012, FTA’s Circular 4703.1 became
effective, which contains guidance for
recipients of FTA financial assistance to
incorporate EJ principles into plans,
projects, and activities (available online
at https://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/
FTA_EJ_Circular_7.14-12_FINAL.pdf).
FTA has evaluated this action under
the Executive Order, the DOT Order,
and the FTA Circular. FTA has
determined that this action will not
cause disproportionately high and
adverse human health and
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 614
Grant programs—transportation, Mass
transportation.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.90:
K. Jane Williams,
Acting Administrator.
PART 614—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
In consideration of the foregoing, and
under the authority of Public Law 112–
141, amend 49 CFR chapter VI by
removing part 614.
■
[FR Doc. 2019–24156 Filed 11–4–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2018–0008;
FXES11130900000C6–189–FF09E30000]
RIN 1018–BC02
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
Previous Federal Actions
On June 8, 2018, we published a
proposed rule to remove Colorado
butterfly plant from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants (i.e.,
to ‘‘delist’’ the species) (83 FR 26623).
Please refer to that proposed rule for a
detailed description of the Federal
actions concerning this species that
occurred prior to June 8, 2018.
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), remove the
Colorado butterfly plant (Oenothera
coloradensis, currently listed as Gaura
neomexicana ssp. coloradensis) from
the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Plants (List) due to recovery.
This determination is based on a
thorough review of the best available
scientific and commercial data, which
indicate that the threats to the Colorado
butterfly plant have been eliminated or
reduced to the point that it has
recovered, and that this plant is no
Species Description and Life History
Detailed information regarding the
Colorado butterfly plant’s biology and
life history can be found in the
biological report for Colorado butterfly
plant (USFWS 2017a, pp. 6¥7). The
biological report is an in-depth but not
exhaustive review of the species’
biology and threats, an evaluation of its
biological status, and an assessment of
the resources and conditions needed to
maintain long-term viability. The report
includes analyses of the species’
viability in terms of its resiliency,
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Removing Oenothera
coloradensis (Colorado Butterfly Plant)
From the Federal List of Endangered
and Threatened Plants
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
longer likely to become endangered in
the foreseeable future and, therefore, no
longer meets the definition of a
threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). This final rule also
removes the currently designated
critical habitat for the Colorado butterfly
plant.
DATES: This rule is effective December 5,
2019.
ADDRESSES: This final rule is available
on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2018–0008. Comments
and materials we received, as well as
supporting documentation we used in
preparing this rule, are available for
public inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–R6–ES–2018–0008. All of the
comments, materials, and
documentation that we considered in
this rulemaking are available by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at our Wyoming Ecological
Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, below).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyler A. Abbott, Field Supervisor,
telephone: 307–772–2374. Direct all
questions or requests for additional
information to: COLORADO
BUTTERFLY PLANT QUESTIONS, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Wyoming
Ecological Services Field Office, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Suite 308A,
Cheyenne, WY 82009. Individuals who
are hearing-impaired or speechimpaired may call the Federal Relay
Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Nov 04, 2019
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
redundancy, and representation
(USFWS 2017a, entire). Resiliency is the
ability of the species to maintain
healthy populations that can withstand
annual environmental variation and
stochastic events. Redundancy is the
ability of the species to maintain an
adequate number and distribution of
populations that can withstand
catastrophic events. Representation is
the ability of the species to adapt to
changing environmental conditions
through genetic, ecological,
demographic, and behavioral diversity
across its range. We summarize relevant
information from the biological report
below.
The Colorado butterfly plant is a
short-lived perennial herb that is
monocarpic or semelparous, meaning
that it flowers once, sets seed, and then
dies. Flowering plants may, on rare
occasions, flower a second year or
become vegetative the year after
flowering (Floyd 1995, pp. 10–15, 32).
Pollinators for related species of Gaura
and Colylophus (Onagraceae, tribe
Onagreae) consist of noctuid moths
(Noctuidae) and halictid bees
(Lasioglossum; Clinebell et al. 2004, p.
378); both moths and bees have been
identified visiting Colorado butterfly
plant flowers during annual censusing
(USFWS 2016b, entire). Additionally,
one study found that the Colorado
butterfly plant does not exhibit a
bimodal (day and night) pollination
system that is seen in other Gaura
species, since the majority of pollination
occurs at night by noctuid moths
(Krakos et al. 2013, entire).
The Colorado butterfly plant is selfcompatible (Floyd 1995, p. 4), meaning
that plants produce flowers that are
capable of forming viable seed from
pollen from the same plant. There are
no apparent adaptations for dispersal;
many seeds fall to the ground around
parent plants (Floyd and Ranker 1998,
p. 854), and, because the seed floats,
others may be dispersed downstream.
Livestock and native ungulates could
provide an important dispersal
mechanism as well, through ingestion of
the seeds (USFWS 2012, p. 27).
Populations of this species show
evidence of a seedbank, an adaptation
that enables the species to take
advantage of favorable growing seasons,
particularly in flood-prone areas (Holzel
and Otte 2004, p. 279).
The number of individuals in a
population of Colorado butterfly plants
appears to be influenced by rates of
seedling establishment and survival of
vegetative rosettes to reproductive
maturity. These factors may be
influenced by summer precipitation
(Floyd and Ranker 1998, p. 858; Fertig
E:\FR\FM\05NOR1.SGM
05NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 5, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59568-59570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24156]
[[Page 59568]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 614
[Docket No. FTA-2019-000X]
RIN 2132-AB37
Transportation Infrastructure Management
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rulemaking rescinds an FTA regulation that cross-
references the Management and Monitoring Systems regulation for the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The statutory basis for FHWA's
regulation was rescinded by legislation in 2012.
DATES: This final rule is effective on November 5, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Montgomery, Office of Chief
Counsel, (202) 366-1017 or [email protected]. Office hours are
from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document is viewable online through the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the website. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days a
year. An electronic copy of this document is available for download
from the Office of the Federal Register home page at: https://www.ofr.gov and the Government Publishing Office web page at: https://www.gpo.gov.
Background
Part 614 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, cross-references
the Management and Monitoring Systems regulation for the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) at 23 CFR part 500. That part implements
section 1034 of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
(Pub. L. 102-240) (ISTEA), which amended title 23, United States Code,
by adding section 303 (Section 303). Section 303 required the Secretary
of Transportation to promulgate regulations for State development,
establishment, and implementation of systems for managing: Highway
pavement of Federal-aid highways (PMS); bridges on and off Federal-aid
highways (BMS); highway safety (SMS); traffic congestion (CMS); public
transportation facilities and equipment (PTMS); intermodal
transportation facilities and systems (IMS); and a system for
monitoring highway and public transportation facilities and equipment
(TMS). However, the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995
(NHS Act) amended section 303 to allow a State to elect not to
implement, in whole or in part, any one or more of the management
systems required under the section, except for CMS in transportation
management areas (TMA), and removed the management system certification
and sanction requirements. As a result, FTA and FHWA issued a final
rule on December 19, 1996, 16 FR 67166-175, which reflected this State
option and contained only minimum requirements for those systems that a
State could choose to implement under the provisions of section 303.
Since the 1996 update to 23 CFR part 500, section 1519(b) of the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) Act (Pub. L.
112-141) repealed section 303, which is the statutory basis for the
regulation. Accordingly, FTA is issuing this final rule to rescind 49
CFR part 614, which cross-references 23 CFR part 500. This deregulatory
action will not negatively impact safety, because congestion
management, the only management system required under part 500, is
still mandated by 23 CFR part 450.
Discussion of the Changes
This action rescinds 49 CFR part 614, which cross-references FHWA's
Management and Monitoring Systems regulation at 23 CFR part 500,
because the statutory basis for FHWA's regulation, 23 U.S.C. 303, was
repealed by MAP-21. While 49 CFR part 614 cites 49 U.S.C. 5303-5305 as
additional statutory authority, the requirements set forth in those
statutes that overlap with the now-repealed 23 U.S.C. 303 are
implemented through other FTA regulations. Of the four provisions of
section 303 and 23 CFR part 500 that apply to FTA--IMS, CMS, PTMS, and
TMS--only CMS is required explicitly by FTA statute, at 49 U.S.C.
5303(k)(3). Whereas 49 CFR 500.105 requires the metropolitan
transportation planning process to include a CMS, the regulations at 23
CFR 450.322 (cross-referenced by 49 CFR part 613) also effectively
implement the CMS requirement, which will continue to be imposed after
this rule becomes effective.
Moreover, although not explicitly required by any FTA statute,
current regulations cover management systems like IMS and PTMS. For
example, the metropolitan and statewide planning processes require the
integrated management and operation of the intermodal transportation
system, similar to IMS, at 49 U.S.C. 5303(c)(2) and 5304(a)(2), and 49
CFR part 613 (cross-referencing 23 CFR part 450). Further, transit
asset management incorporates much of the PTMS requirement at 49 U.S.C.
5326, and 49 CFR part 625. As a result, the requirements set forth in
49 CFR part 614 are either superfluous or duplicative.
Good Cause for Dispensing With Notice and Comment and Delayed Effective
Date
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an
agency may waive the normal notice and comment procedure if it finds,
for good cause, that it is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest. Additionally, 5 U.S.C. 553(d) provides that an
agency may waive the 30-day delayed effective date upon finding of good
cause.
Section 1519(b) of MAP-21 repealed section 23 U.S.C. 303 to remove
the requirement that states implement the management systems enumerated
in 23 CFR part 500. Because 49 CFR part 614 cross-references this
regulation, FTA finds good cause that notice and comment for this rule
is unnecessary due to the nature of the revisions (i.e., the rule
simply carries out the nondiscretionary statutory language found in
MAP-21). The statutory language does not require regulatory
interpretation to carry out its intent, and comments cannot alter the
regulation given that the statute abrogated its purpose. Further, the
delayed effective date is unnecessary because the removal of the
management systems requirement was already made effective by MAP-21.
Accordingly, FTA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and
(d)(3) to waive notice and opportunity for comment and the delayed
effective date.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
FTA has determined that this rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, and
within the meaning of DOT regulatory policies and procedures. This
action complies with Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 13771 to improve
regulation.
[[Page 59569]]
Executive Order 13771 (Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs)
This final rule is considered an E.O. 13771 deregulatory action.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because FTA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive
notice and opportunity for comment for this rule, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 5 U.S.C. 601-612) do not
apply. FTA evaluated the effects of this action on small entities and
determined the action would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. FTA hereby certifies that this
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
FTA has determined that this rule does not impose unfunded
mandates, as defined by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104-4, March 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 48). This rule does not include a
Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $155.1 million or
more in any 1 year (when adjusted for inflation) in 2012 dollars for
either State, local, and tribal governments in the aggregate, or by the
private sector. Additionally, the definition of ``Federal mandate'' in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act excludes financial assistance of the
type in which State, local, or tribal governments have authority to
adjust their participation in the program in accordance with changes
made in the program by the Federal Government. The Federal Transit Act
permits this type of flexibility.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that may have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive
Order 13132 dated August 4, 1999, and FTA determined this action will
not have a substantial direct effect or sufficient federalism
implications on the States. FTA also determined this action will not
preempt any State law or regulation or affect the States' ability to
discharge traditional State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply
to this program. This E.O. applies because State and local governments
would be directly affected by the regulation. Local entities should
refer to the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number
20.505, Metropolitan Transportation Planning and State and Non-
Metropolitan Planning and Research, for further information.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct,
sponsor, or require through regulations. FTA has analyzed this rule
under the Paperwork Reduction Act and believes that it does not impose
additional information collection requirements for the purposes of the
Act above and beyond existing information collection clearances from
OMB.
National Environmental Policy Act
Federal agencies are required to adopt implementing procedures for
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that establish specific
criteria for, and identification of, three classes of actions: (1)
Those that normally require preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement, (2) those that normally require preparation of an
Environmental Assessment, and (3) those that are categorically excluded
from further NEPA review (40 CFR 1507.3(b)). This rule qualifies for
categorical exclusions under 23 CFR 771.118(c)(4) (planning and
administrative activities that do not involve or lead directly to
construction). FTA has evaluated whether the rule will involve unusual
or extraordinary circumstances and has determined that it will not.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
FTA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights. FTA does not believe this rule effects a taking of
private property or otherwise has taking implications under Executive
Order 12630.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
FTA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. FTA
certifies that this action will not cause an environmental risk to
health or safety that might disproportionately affect children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
FTA has analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13175, dated
November 6, 2000, and believes that it will not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes; will not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments; and will not
preempt tribal laws. Therefore, a tribal summary impact statement is
not required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
FTA has analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. FTA has determined that this action is not a
significant energy action under that order and is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations) and DOT
Order 5610.2(a) (77 FR 27534, May 10, 2012) (available online at
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2012-05-10/pdf/2012-11309.pdf)
require DOT agencies to achieve Environmental Justice (EJ) as part of
their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects, including interrelated social and economic effects, of their
programs, policies, and activities on minority and low-income
populations. All DOT agencies must address compliance with Executive
Order 12898 and the DOT Order in all rulemaking activities. On August
15,
[[Page 59570]]
2012, FTA's Circular 4703.1 became effective, which contains guidance
for recipients of FTA financial assistance to incorporate EJ principles
into plans, projects, and activities (available online at https://www.fta.dot.gov/documents/FTA_EJ_Circular_7.14-12_FINAL.pdf).
FTA has evaluated this action under the Executive Order, the DOT
Order, and the FTA Circular. FTA has determined that this action will
not cause disproportionately high and adverse human health and
environmental effects on minority or low-income populations.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 614
Grant programs--transportation, Mass transportation.
Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.90:
K. Jane Williams,
Acting Administrator.
PART 614--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
0
In consideration of the foregoing, and under the authority of Public
Law 112-141, amend 49 CFR chapter VI by removing part 614.
[FR Doc. 2019-24156 Filed 11-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P