Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of DFARS Provision Related to Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support (DFARS Case 2019-D021), 58331-58332 [2019-23802]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 211 / Thursday, October 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
Information by Litigation Support
Contractors, in a solicitation.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 204, 209, 212, and 252
[Docket DARS–2019–0065]
RIN 0750–AK58
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Repeal of
DFARS Provision Related to
Disclosure of Information for Litigation
Support (DFARS Case 2019–D021)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to remove a provision that is
no longer necessary, pursuant to action
taken by the Regulatory Reform Task
Force.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Effective October 31, 2019.
Ms.
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to
remove DFARS provision 252.204–7013,
Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of
Information by Litigation Support
Contractors, its associated prescription
at 204.7403 and related text at 209.505–
4(b)(ii) and 212.301. This provision is
included in solicitations for the
acquisition of litigation support
services. The provision includes a
representation that, by submission of its
offer, the offeror agrees to handle and
protect all litigation information and
documentation as described in the
provision, indemnify the Government
from any liability or claim that arises
from the offeror’s misuse of the
litigation information, and ensure its
employees are subject to the same use
and nondisclosure obligations stated in
the provision prior to accessing any
litigation information. The provision
also notifies offerors that third parties
holding proprietary rights or any other
legally protectable interest in the
provided litigation information have the
right of direct action against the offeror
for any unauthorized use or disclosure
by the offeror.
DFARS provision 252.204–7013 is
unnecessary. The same information is
provided to offerors by including
DFARS clause 252.204–7014,
Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Oct 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
II. Discussion and Analysis
DFARS clause 252.204–7014
implements the authority and
requirements of 10 U.S.C. 129d, which
permits DoD to disclose information to
a litigation support contractor if the
disclosure is for the sole purpose of
providing administrative, technical, or
professional services to DoD in
anticipation of or during litigation. The
statute also requires that, under a
contract, the contractor agree to and
acknowledge specific terms and
conditions on the use and disclosure of
the information, and that any violation
of these terms and conditions is a basis
for termination of the litigation support
contract. DFARS clause 252.204–7014 is
included in all solicitations and
contracts that involve litigation support
services. The clause contains all of the
information in DFARS provision
252.204–7013, as well as a statement
that violation of the terms and
conditions of the clause is a basis for
termination of the contract. As such, the
DFARS provision is redundant and can
be removed from the DFARS.
The repeal of the DFARS provision
implements a recommendation from the
DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On
February 24, 2017, the President signed
Executive Order (E.O.) 13777,
‘‘Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda,’’ which established a Federal
policy ‘‘to alleviate unnecessary
regulatory burdens’’ on the American
people. In accordance with E.O. 13777,
DoD established a Regulatory Reform
Task Force to review and validate DoD
regulations, including the DFARS. A
public notice of the establishment of the
DFARS Subgroup to the DoD Regulatory
Reform Task Force, for the purpose of
reviewing DFARS provisions and
clauses, was published in the Federal
Register at 82 FR 35741 on August 1,
2017, and requested public input. No
public comments were received on the
provision. Subsequently, the DoD Task
Force reviewed the requirements of
DFARS provision 252.204–7013 and
determined that it could be repealed.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
This rule only removes obsolete
DFARS provision 252.204–7013,
Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of
Information by Litigation Support
Contractors. This rule does not create
any new provisions or clauses or impose
any new requirements on contracts at or
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58331
below the simplified acquisition
threshold and for commercial items,
including commercially available offthe-shelf items.
IV. Publication of This Final Rule for
Public Comment Is Not Required by
Statute
The statute that applies to the
publication of the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) is Office of Federal
Procurement Policy statute (codified at
title 41 of the United States Code).
Specifically, 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1)
requires that a procurement policy,
regulation, procedure or form (including
an amendment or modification thereof)
must be published for public comment
if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a
significant effect beyond the internal
operating procedures of the agency
issuing the policy, regulation,
procedure, or form, or has a significant
cost or administrative impact on
contractors or offerors. This final rule is
not required to be published for public
comment, because DoD is not issuing a
new regulation; rather, this rule is
merely removing an unnecessary
provision from the DFARS.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
VI. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13771,
because this rule is not a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be
given for this rule under 41 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
58332
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 211 / Thursday, October 31, 2019 / Rules and Regulations
1707(a)(1) (see section IV. of this
preamble), the analytical requirements
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not applicable.
Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required, and none has been
prepared.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204,
209, 212, and 252
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PART 212—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
212.301
[Amended]
4. Amend section 212.301 by—
a. Removing paragraph (f)(ii)(E);
b. Redesignating paragraphs (f)(ii)(F)
and (G) as paragraphs (f)(ii)(E) and (F),
respectively;
■ c. In the newly redesignated (f)(ii)(E)
removing ‘‘204.7403(b)’’ and adding
‘‘204.7403(a)’’ in its place; and
■ d. In the newly redesignated (f)(ii)(F)
removing ‘‘204.7403(c)’’ and adding
‘‘204.7403(b)’’ in its place.
■
■
■
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
Government procurement.
252.204–7013
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense
Acquisition Regulations System.
[Removed and Reserved]
5. Remove and reserve section
252.204–7013.
■
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204, 209, 212,
and 252 are amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 204, 209, 212, and 252 continues
to read as follows:
■
252.204–7014
[Amended]
6. Amend section 252.204–7014, in
the introductory text, by removing
‘‘204.7403(b)’’ and adding ‘‘204.7403(a)’’
in its place.
■
252.204–7015
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
[Amended]
PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE AND
INFORMATION MATTERS
7. Amend section 252.204–7015, in
the introductory text, by removing
‘‘204.7403(c)’’ and adding ‘‘204.7403(b)’’
in its place.
204.7403
[FR Doc. 2019–23802 Filed 10–30–19; 8:45 am]
■
[Amended]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
2. Amend section 204.7403 by—
■ a. In the section heading, removing
‘‘Solicitation provision and contract’’
and adding ‘‘Contract’’ in its place;
■ b. Removing paragraph (a); and
■ c. Redesignating paragraphs (b) and
(c) as paragraphs (a) and (b),
respectively.
■
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 207, 215, 216, and 234
[Docket DARS–2019–0026]
RIN 0750–AK38
PART 209—CONTRACTOR
QUALIFICATIONS
■
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Reliability and
Maintainability in Weapon System
Design (DFARS Case 2019–D003)
209.505–4 Obtaining access to proprietary
information.
AGENCY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
3. Revise section 209.505–4(b)(ii) to
read as follows:
(b) * * *
(ii) For litigation support contractors
accessing litigation information,
including that originating from third
parties, use and non-disclosure
requirements are addressed through the
use of the clause at 252.204–7014, as
prescribed at 204.7403(a). Pursuant to
the clause, litigation support contractors
are not required to enter into nondisclosure agreements directly with any
third party asserting restrictions on any
litigation information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 Oct 30, 2019
Jkt 250001
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
DOD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to implement a section of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2018 that requires the use of
reliability and maintainability
sustainment factors in weapon system
design.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
PO 00000
Effective October 31, 2019.
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Ms.
Kimberly Bass, telephone 571–372–
6174.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 84 FR 125 on June
28, 2019, to implement section 834 of
the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018.
Section 834 of the NDAA for FY 2018
amends 10 U.S.C. to add section 2443,
sustainment factors in weapon system
design which requires program
managers or comparable requiring
activity officials exercising program
management responsibilities to ensure
that reliability and maintainability are
included in the performance attributes
of the key performance parameters on
sustainment during the development of
capabilities requirements for major
weapon systems design and contracts
for the—
• Engineering and manufacturing
development of a weapon system,
including embedded software; or
• Production of a weapon system,
including embedded software.
As a matter of policy, the Under
Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment directed the application of
the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 2443 to
the technical maturation and risk
reduction phase. No public comments
were received on the proposed rule, and
no changes are made in the final rule.
II. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items,
Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items
This rule does not propose to create
any new provisions or clauses or impact
any existing provisions or clauses.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
E:\FR\FM\31OCR1.SGM
31OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 211 (Thursday, October 31, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58331-58332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23802]
[[Page 58331]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 204, 209, 212, and 252
[Docket DARS-2019-0065]
RIN 0750-AK58
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of
DFARS Provision Related to Disclosure of Information for Litigation
Support (DFARS Case 2019-D021)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to remove a provision that is
no longer necessary, pursuant to action taken by the Regulatory Reform
Task Force.
DATES: Effective October 31, 2019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Carrie Moore, telephone 571-372-
6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is amending the DFARS to remove DFARS provision 252.204-7013,
Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Information by Litigation
Support Contractors, its associated prescription at 204.7403 and
related text at 209.505-4(b)(ii) and 212.301. This provision is
included in solicitations for the acquisition of litigation support
services. The provision includes a representation that, by submission
of its offer, the offeror agrees to handle and protect all litigation
information and documentation as described in the provision, indemnify
the Government from any liability or claim that arises from the
offeror's misuse of the litigation information, and ensure its
employees are subject to the same use and nondisclosure obligations
stated in the provision prior to accessing any litigation information.
The provision also notifies offerors that third parties holding
proprietary rights or any other legally protectable interest in the
provided litigation information have the right of direct action against
the offeror for any unauthorized use or disclosure by the offeror.
DFARS provision 252.204-7013 is unnecessary. The same information
is provided to offerors by including DFARS clause 252.204-7014,
Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Information by Litigation
Support Contractors, in a solicitation.
II. Discussion and Analysis
DFARS clause 252.204-7014 implements the authority and requirements
of 10 U.S.C. 129d, which permits DoD to disclose information to a
litigation support contractor if the disclosure is for the sole purpose
of providing administrative, technical, or professional services to DoD
in anticipation of or during litigation. The statute also requires
that, under a contract, the contractor agree to and acknowledge
specific terms and conditions on the use and disclosure of the
information, and that any violation of these terms and conditions is a
basis for termination of the litigation support contract. DFARS clause
252.204-7014 is included in all solicitations and contracts that
involve litigation support services. The clause contains all of the
information in DFARS provision 252.204-7013, as well as a statement
that violation of the terms and conditions of the clause is a basis for
termination of the contract. As such, the DFARS provision is redundant
and can be removed from the DFARS.
The repeal of the DFARS provision implements a recommendation from
the DoD Regulatory Reform Task Force. On February 24, 2017, the
President signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13777, ``Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda,'' which established a Federal policy ``to
alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens'' on the American people. In
accordance with E.O. 13777, DoD established a Regulatory Reform Task
Force to review and validate DoD regulations, including the DFARS. A
public notice of the establishment of the DFARS Subgroup to the DoD
Regulatory Reform Task Force, for the purpose of reviewing DFARS
provisions and clauses, was published in the Federal Register at 82 FR
35741 on August 1, 2017, and requested public input. No public comments
were received on the provision. Subsequently, the DoD Task Force
reviewed the requirements of DFARS provision 252.204-7013 and
determined that it could be repealed.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available
Off-the-Shelf Items
This rule only removes obsolete DFARS provision 252.204-7013,
Limitations on the Use or Disclosure of Information by Litigation
Support Contractors. This rule does not create any new provisions or
clauses or impose any new requirements on contracts at or below the
simplified acquisition threshold and for commercial items, including
commercially available off-the-shelf items.
IV. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required
by Statute
The statute that applies to the publication of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is Office of Federal Procurement Policy
statute (codified at title 41 of the United States Code). Specifically,
41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) requires that a procurement policy, regulation,
procedure or form (including an amendment or modification thereof) must
be published for public comment if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a significant effect beyond the
internal operating procedures of the agency issuing the policy,
regulation, procedure, or form, or has a significant cost or
administrative impact on contractors or offerors. This final rule is
not required to be published for public comment, because DoD is not
issuing a new regulation; rather, this rule is merely removing an
unnecessary provision from the DFARS.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
VI. Executive Order 13771
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13771, because this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be given for this rule under 41
U.S.C.
[[Page 58332]]
1707(a)(1) (see section IV. of this preamble), the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required, and none has been prepared.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204, 209, 212, and 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer Lee Hawes,
Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204, 209, 212, and 252 are amended as
follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 204, 209, 212, and 252
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 204--ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS
204.7403 [Amended]
0
2. Amend section 204.7403 by--
0
a. In the section heading, removing ``Solicitation provision and
contract'' and adding ``Contract'' in its place;
0
b. Removing paragraph (a); and
0
c. Redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as paragraphs (a) and (b),
respectively.
PART 209--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS
0
3. Revise section 209.505-4(b)(ii) to read as follows:
209.505-4 Obtaining access to proprietary information.
(b) * * *
(ii) For litigation support contractors accessing litigation
information, including that originating from third parties, use and
non-disclosure requirements are addressed through the use of the clause
at 252.204-7014, as prescribed at 204.7403(a). Pursuant to the clause,
litigation support contractors are not required to enter into non-
disclosure agreements directly with any third party asserting
restrictions on any litigation information.
PART 212--ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS
212.301 [Amended]
0
4. Amend section 212.301 by--
0
a. Removing paragraph (f)(ii)(E);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (f)(ii)(F) and (G) as paragraphs (f)(ii)(E)
and (F), respectively;
0
c. In the newly redesignated (f)(ii)(E) removing ``204.7403(b)'' and
adding ``204.7403(a)'' in its place; and
0
d. In the newly redesignated (f)(ii)(F) removing ``204.7403(c)'' and
adding ``204.7403(b)'' in its place.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
252.204-7013 [Removed and Reserved]
0
5. Remove and reserve section 252.204-7013.
252.204-7014 [Amended]
0
6. Amend section 252.204-7014, in the introductory text, by removing
``204.7403(b)'' and adding ``204.7403(a)'' in its place.
252.204-7015 [Amended]
0
7. Amend section 252.204-7015, in the introductory text, by removing
``204.7403(c)'' and adding ``204.7403(b)'' in its place.
[FR Doc. 2019-23802 Filed 10-30-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P