Hours of Service of Drivers: Application for Exemption; Small Business in Transportation Coalition, 57932-57934 [2019-23561]
Download as PDF
57932
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2019 / Notices
the parameters that Arca and BZX use
to derive and expand their respective
MWCB auction collars? Are there any
specific data, statistics, or studies to
support the Exchange’s belief that (1)
the wider parameters proposed for
MWCB Auction Collars are set at
appropriate levels that would allow the
Exchange to re-open trading in
securities more quickly while still
reducing the potential to re-open at a
price that is significantly away from the
last traded price of the security and (2)
the wider parameters are appropriate
because the Exchange has traditionally
been a listing venue for equity stocks as
contrasted with Arca and BZX which
have traditionally listed more ETFs,
which can mute the effect of price
volatility? 18
3. Is it appropriate for the Exchange
to not adjust the MWCB Auction Collar
prices past 50% of the Auction
Reference Price for any security during
any Extended Display Only Period? Are
there any specific data, statistics, or
studies to support the Exchange’s belief
that (1) without this limitation, there is
potential for extreme volatility resulting
in trades at prices far away from a
security’s fundamental value, ultimately
harming investors that are party to the
trade and (2) it may be more appropriate
to continue adjusting price collars in the
context of LULD where trading is halted
due to a period of extraordinary
volatility in a single security because
there may be instances of a discrete
event that ultimately impacts the value
of the individual security and that an
MWCB Halt will be triggered during a
period of significant volatility across
markets that may not correlate to the
fundamental value of a single
security? 19
Comments may be submitted by any
of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2019–057 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2019–057. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
18 See
19 See
Notice, supra note 3, at 35902.
id. at 35903.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Oct 28, 2019
Jkt 250001
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2019–057 and
should be submitted on or before
November 19, 2019. Rebuttal comments
should be submitted by December 3,
2019.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019–23548 Filed 10–28–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2019–0239]
Hours of Service of Drivers:
Application for Exemption; Small
Business in Transportation Coalition
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for
exemption; request for comments.
AGENCY:
FMCSA announces that the
Small Business in Transportation
Coalition (SBTC) seeks reconsideration
of its application for exemption from the
SUMMARY:
20 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
electronic logging device (ELD) rule that
was denied by the Agency on July 17,
2019. SBTC has resubmitted its
application for exemption from the ELD
requirements for all motor carriers with
fewer than 50 employees, including, but
not limited to, one-person private and
for-hire owner-operators of commercial
motor vehicles used in interstate
commerce. SBTC believes that the
exemption would not have any adverse
impacts on operational safety as motor
carriers and drivers would remain
subject to the hours-of-service (HOS)
regulations as well as the requirements
to maintain paper records of duty status
(RODs). FMCSA requests public
comment on SBTC’s application for
reconsideration.
Comments must be received on
or before November 29, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Number
FMCSA–2019–0239 by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. See the Public
Participation and Request for Comments
section below for further information.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Each submission must include the
Agency name and the docket number for
this notice. Note that DOT posts all
comments received without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information included in a
comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at
any time or visit Room W12–140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The on-line FDMS is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any
personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as
described in the system of records
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2019 / Notices
notice (DOT/ALL–14 FDMS), which can
be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Pearlie Robinson, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
Standards; Telephone: (202) 366–4325;
Email: MCPSD@dot.gov. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate
by submitting comments and related
materials.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA–2019–0239), indicate
the specific section of this document to
which the comment applies, and
provide a reason for suggestions or
recommendations. You may submit
your comments and material online or
by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means.
FMCSA recommends that you include
your name and a mailing address, an
email address, or a phone number in the
body of your document so the Agency
can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comments online, go
to www.regulations.gov and put the
docket number, ‘‘FMCSA–2019–0239’’
in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and click
‘‘Search.’’ When the new screen
appears, click on ‘‘Comment Now!’’
button and type your comment into the
text box in the following screen. Choose
whether you are submitting your
comment as an individual or on behalf
of a third party and then submit. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. FMCSA will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may grant or
not grant this application based on your
comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from certain parts of the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs).
FMCSA must publish a notice of each
exemption request in the Federal
Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Oct 28, 2019
Jkt 250001
Agency must provide the public an
opportunity to inspect the information
relevant to the application, including
any safety analyses that have been
conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted, and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for
denying or granting the application and,
if granted, the name of the person or
class of persons receiving the
exemption, and the regulatory provision
from which the exemption is granted.
The notice must also specify the
effective period and explain the terms
and conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
381.300(b)).
III. Background
On December 16, 2015, FMCSA
published the Electronic Logging
Devices and Hours of Service
Supporting Documents final rule (80 FR
78292). The ELD rule applies to most
motor carriers and drivers who are
required to keep RODS. The compliance
date for the ELD requirement was
December 18, 2017.
On June 5, 2018, FMCSA published
SBTC’s application for exemption and
requested public comment (83 FR
26140). SBTC reports it is a non-profit
trade organization with more than 8,000
members. SBTC states that it
‘‘represents, promotes, and protects the
interest of small businesses in the
transportation industry. Through the
exemption application, SBTC sought
relief from the ELD requirements for
small private, common and contract
motor carriers with fewer than 50
employees.’’ SBTC argued:
‘‘[T]he ELD rule is not a ‘‘safety regulation’’
per se as the FMCSA has concluded. Rather
it is a mechanism intended to enforce a safety
regulation by regulating the manner in which
a driver records and communicates his
compliance. That is, it is merely a tool to
determine compliance with an existing rule
that regulates over-the-road drivers’ driving
and on duty time, namely the actual safety
regulation: the [hours-of- service] regulations
codified at 49 CFR 395.3 and 395.5. However,
the ELD rule is not a safety regulation itself.
Therefore, it is our position that this rule
does not itself impact safety, and that the
level of safety will not change based on
whether or not our exemption application is
approved. That would require a change to the
[hours-of-service rules].’’
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57933
On July 9, 2018, FMCSA extended the
public comment period at the request of
the SBTC (83 FR 31836). The Agency
received more than 1,900 comments to
the docket [Docket No. FMCSA–2018–
0180]. Most of the comments favored
granting the exemption. On July 17,
2019, the Agency published notice of its
decision to deny SBTC’s application for
exemption (84 FR 34250) and listed the
following reasons for the denial:
• Failing to provide the name of the
individual or motor carrier that would
be responsible for the use or operation
of CMVs under the exemption [49 CFR
381.310(b)(2)];
• Failing to provide an estimate of the
total number of drivers and CMVs that
would be operated under the terms and
conditions of the exemption
[§ 381.310(c)(3)]; and
• Failing to explain how an
equivalent level of safety would be
achieved [§ 381.310(c)(5)].
IV. Request for Reconsideration of
Agency Decision
Through this application SBTC is
requesting FMCSA to reconsider its
denial of the exemption from the ELD
rule. SBTC provided responses to each
of FMCSA’s reasons for denying its
application. According to SBTC the
reason for not providing an estimate of
the number of drivers and CMVs that
would be operating under the
exemption is that SBTC is a trade group,
not a single carrier. SBTC argues that a
trade group would not know the number
of employees eligible for the exemption.
SBTC deferred that question to the
Agency because FMCSA is the
custodian of MCS–150 industry data.
SBTC believes that it has identified the
percentage of carriers that would be
affected by the exemption but does not
know a way to extrapolate the number
of drivers from the estimated 3.5 million
truck drivers in the U.S. without
deferring to FMCSA for that
information.
A copy of SBTC’s application for
reconsideration of the Agency’s denial
is available for review in the docket for
this notice.
V. Equivalent Level of Safety
To ensure an equivalent level of
safety, SBTC suggests a return to paper
logs. According to SBTC, ‘‘Paper logs
were deemed sufficient to ensure
adequate levels of safety for generations,
more than 80 years. And the FMCSA
has already issued numerous
exemptions that require carriers to
revert to tracking their hours of service
using paper logs in lieu of ELDs . . .’’
SBTC supports its argument with the
belief that ELDs have caused reckless
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
57934
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2019 / Notices
speeding and pose national security
threats. SBTC urges FMCSA to look
carefully at the unintended
consequences of the ELD rule when
deciding whether or not to grant the
exemption. SBTC also suggests that
FMCSA temporarily grant the
exemption ‘‘if for no other reason than
to press the pause button while
[FMCSA] studies these unintended
consequences and their adverse effects
on safety. We contend this would
indeed achieve a greater level of overall
safety than the current status quo.’’
Issued on: October 23, 2019.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019–23561 Filed 10–28–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2019–0102]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Renewal of a CurrentlyApproved Collection: Driver
Qualification Files
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
AGENCY:
Notice and request for
comments.
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), FMCSA announces its plan to
submit the Information Collection
Request (ICR) described below to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for its review and approval and
invites public comment. FMCSA
requests approval to revise and renew
an ICR titled ‘‘Driver Qualification
Files,’’ OMB Control Number 2126–
0004. The ICR estimates the burden
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers and motor carriers incur to
comply with the reporting and
recordkeeping tasks required for motor
carriers to maintain driver qualification
(DQ) files. The Agency’s regulations
pertaining to maintaining DQ files are
unchanged and impose no increased
information collection (IC) burden on
individual drivers and motor carriers.
However, the Agency increases its
estimate of the total IC burden of these
regulations primarily because both the
number of CMV drivers and the
frequency of their hiring have increased
since the Agency’s 2016 estimate of this
burden.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:05 Oct 28, 2019
Jkt 250001
Please send your comments by
November 29, 2019. OMB must receive
your comments by this date in order to
act on the ICR.
All comments should reference
Federal Docket Management System
Docket Number FMCSA–2019–0102.
Interested persons are invited to submit
written comments on the proposed
information collection to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget.
Comments should be addressed to the
attention of the Desk Officer,
Department of Transportation/Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
and sent via electronic mail to oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov, faxed to (202)
395–6974, or mailed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th
Street NW, Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Pearlie Robinson, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division Department
of Transportation, FMCSA, West
Building 6th Floor, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: 202–366–4325. Email:
MCPSD@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Driver Qualification Files.
OMB Control Number: 2126–0004.
Type of Request: Renewal and
revision of a currently-approved
information collection.
Respondents: CMV motor carriers and
drivers.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
6.89 million (6.35 million drivers + 0.54
million motor carriers).
Expiration Date: January 31, 2020.
Frequency of Response: The
information on some DQ documents is
only provided one time, such as that
furnished at the time the individual
applies for employment as a driver.
Other information must be obtained by
the motor carrier within 30 days of the
date the driver begins to drive a CMV
for the employer. Other information,
such as the driver’s motor vehicle
record, is only updated once a year.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
12.26 million hours.
DATES:
Background
The Motor Carrier Safety Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–554, Title II, 98 Stat. 2834
(October 30, 1984)) requires the
Secretary of Transportation to issue
regulations pertaining to commercial
motor vehicle (CMV) safety. Part 391 of
volume 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) contains the
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
minimum qualifications of drivers of
CMVs in interstate commerce.
Motor carriers may not require or
permit an unqualified driver to operate
a CMV. The foremost proof of driver
qualification is the information that part
391 requires be collected and
maintained in the driver qualification
file (DQ file) (49 CFR 391.51). Motor
carriers must obtain this information
from sources specified in the
regulations, such as the driver, previous
employers of the driver, and officials of
the State of driver licensure. Motor
carriers are not required to forward DQ
information to FMCSA, but must
maintain the information in a DQ file
and make it available to State and
Federal safety investigators on demand.
Through this ICR, FMCSA is asking
OMB’s approval to renew and revise its
estimate of the paperwork burden
imposed by its DQ file regulations. The
regulations have not been amended; the
IC burden imposed on individual
drivers and motor carriers by the
regulations is unchanged. The current
IC burden estimate approved by OMB is
10.21 million hours. The Agency has
increased its estimate of the total IC
burden from 10.21 million hours to
12.26 million hours. The increase in
burden hours is primarily the result of
a larger driver population and a higher
driver turnover rate, both of which
affect the volume of documents
produced and filed in DQ files. This
revised ICR removes the medical
examiner’s certificate recordkeeping
requirement from the estimate of burden
hours and cost to eliminate double
counting. Although the currently
approved ICR did not monetize driver
and motor carrier burden hours, the
revised ICR monetizes such burden.
On June 10, 2019, FMCSA published
a Federal Register notice allowing for a
60-day comment period on this ICR.
There were no comments submitted to
the docket in response to that notice.
Public Comments Invited
FMCSA requests that you comment
on any aspect of this information
collection, including: (1) Whether the
proposed collection is necessary for
FMCSA to perform its functions; (2) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (3)
ways for FMCSA to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the collected
information; and (4) ways that the
burden could be minimized without
reducing the quality of the collected
information. The Agency will
summarize or include your comments in
the request for OMB’s clearance of this
information collection.
E:\FR\FM\29OCN1.SGM
29OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57932-57934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23561]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2019-0239]
Hours of Service of Drivers: Application for Exemption; Small
Business in Transportation Coalition
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that the Small Business in Transportation
Coalition (SBTC) seeks reconsideration of its application for exemption
from the electronic logging device (ELD) rule that was denied by the
Agency on July 17, 2019. SBTC has resubmitted its application for
exemption from the ELD requirements for all motor carriers with fewer
than 50 employees, including, but not limited to, one-person private
and for-hire owner-operators of commercial motor vehicles used in
interstate commerce. SBTC believes that the exemption would not have
any adverse impacts on operational safety as motor carriers and drivers
would remain subject to the hours-of-service (HOS) regulations as well
as the requirements to maintain paper records of duty status (RODs).
FMCSA requests public comment on SBTC's application for
reconsideration.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 29, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Number FMCSA-2019-0239 by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. See the
Public Participation and Request for Comments section below for further
information.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments
received without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year.
Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records
[[Page 57933]]
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Pearlie Robinson, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle
Safety Standards; Telephone: (202) 366-4325; Email: [email protected]. If
you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
FMCSA encourages you to participate by submitting comments and
related materials.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA-2019-0239), indicate the specific section of this
document to which the comment applies, and provide a reason for
suggestions or recommendations. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so the Agency can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comments online, go to www.regulations.gov and put
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2019-0239'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and
click ``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Comment
Now!'' button and type your comment into the text box in the following
screen. Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual
or on behalf of a third party and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. FMCSA will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period and may grant or not grant this application
based on your comments.
II. Legal Basis
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must
provide the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant
to the application, including any safety analyses that have been
conducted. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period and explain
the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed
(49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Background
On December 16, 2015, FMCSA published the Electronic Logging
Devices and Hours of Service Supporting Documents final rule (80 FR
78292). The ELD rule applies to most motor carriers and drivers who are
required to keep RODS. The compliance date for the ELD requirement was
December 18, 2017.
On June 5, 2018, FMCSA published SBTC's application for exemption
and requested public comment (83 FR 26140). SBTC reports it is a non-
profit trade organization with more than 8,000 members. SBTC states
that it ``represents, promotes, and protects the interest of small
businesses in the transportation industry. Through the exemption
application, SBTC sought relief from the ELD requirements for small
private, common and contract motor carriers with fewer than 50
employees.'' SBTC argued:
``[T]he ELD rule is not a ``safety regulation'' per se as the
FMCSA has concluded. Rather it is a mechanism intended to enforce a
safety regulation by regulating the manner in which a driver records
and communicates his compliance. That is, it is merely a tool to
determine compliance with an existing rule that regulates over-the-
road drivers' driving and on duty time, namely the actual safety
regulation: the [hours-of- service] regulations codified at 49 CFR
395.3 and 395.5. However, the ELD rule is not a safety regulation
itself. Therefore, it is our position that this rule does not itself
impact safety, and that the level of safety will not change based on
whether or not our exemption application is approved. That would
require a change to the [hours-of-service rules].''
On July 9, 2018, FMCSA extended the public comment period at the
request of the SBTC (83 FR 31836). The Agency received more than 1,900
comments to the docket [Docket No. FMCSA-2018-0180]. Most of the
comments favored granting the exemption. On July 17, 2019, the Agency
published notice of its decision to deny SBTC's application for
exemption (84 FR 34250) and listed the following reasons for the
denial:
Failing to provide the name of the individual or motor
carrier that would be responsible for the use or operation of CMVs
under the exemption [49 CFR 381.310(b)(2)];
Failing to provide an estimate of the total number of
drivers and CMVs that would be operated under the terms and conditions
of the exemption [Sec. 381.310(c)(3)]; and
Failing to explain how an equivalent level of safety would
be achieved [Sec. 381.310(c)(5)].
IV. Request for Reconsideration of Agency Decision
Through this application SBTC is requesting FMCSA to reconsider its
denial of the exemption from the ELD rule. SBTC provided responses to
each of FMCSA's reasons for denying its application. According to SBTC
the reason for not providing an estimate of the number of drivers and
CMVs that would be operating under the exemption is that SBTC is a
trade group, not a single carrier. SBTC argues that a trade group would
not know the number of employees eligible for the exemption. SBTC
deferred that question to the Agency because FMCSA is the custodian of
MCS-150 industry data. SBTC believes that it has identified the
percentage of carriers that would be affected by the exemption but does
not know a way to extrapolate the number of drivers from the estimated
3.5 million truck drivers in the U.S. without deferring to FMCSA for
that information.
A copy of SBTC's application for reconsideration of the Agency's
denial is available for review in the docket for this notice.
V. Equivalent Level of Safety
To ensure an equivalent level of safety, SBTC suggests a return to
paper logs. According to SBTC, ``Paper logs were deemed sufficient to
ensure adequate levels of safety for generations, more than 80 years.
And the FMCSA has already issued numerous exemptions that require
carriers to revert to tracking their hours of service using paper logs
in lieu of ELDs . . .'' SBTC supports its argument with the belief that
ELDs have caused reckless
[[Page 57934]]
speeding and pose national security threats. SBTC urges FMCSA to look
carefully at the unintended consequences of the ELD rule when deciding
whether or not to grant the exemption. SBTC also suggests that FMCSA
temporarily grant the exemption ``if for no other reason than to press
the pause button while [FMCSA] studies these unintended consequences
and their adverse effects on safety. We contend this would indeed
achieve a greater level of overall safety than the current status
quo.''
Issued on: October 23, 2019.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-23561 Filed 10-28-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P